The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewWhitney Webb Archive
As Moderna's Covid-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead, Its Chief Medical Officer's Recent Promotion of "Gene-Editing Vaccines" Comes to Light
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc.

Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.” Moderna’s response is odd given that the “study” in question is focused on safety and “is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine,” according to a report in TIME. Notably, none of the study’s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “generally safe.” It is also worth noting that this “safety-focused” study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine’s effects in the very short term.

Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna’s Covid-19 “shows promising early results” and has presented “encouraging early signs” because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “interim results.” In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a key figure in the U.S. government’s coronavirus response.

Though it is unclear if these “encouraging early signs” will be replicated in future tests of larger samples that are actually designed to test the vaccine’s effectiveness, the news is surely welcome to Moderna, given that their past mRNA vaccines failed to produce hardly any immune response at all, explaining why the company has never brought an mRNA vaccine to market in its entire history as a company.

However, since at least last fall, Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding “nanoparticles” to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a “strategic ally” of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA’s plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report.

Thanks to the “interim results” of this new study, Moderna is set to take the lead in the race to gain government approval for a Covid-19 vaccine. Moderna had already pulled ahead of other Covid-19 vaccine candidates in recent weeks, being the first vaccine in the U.S. to go the human trials (after it was allowed to skip animal trials) and also enjoying strong support from the U.S. government. For instance, Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine recently received fast-track approval from the Food and Drug administration (FDA) after receiving the “green light” to proceed to Phase 2 testing prior to the results of Phase 1 being published. Moderna’s president, Dr. Stephen Hoge, recently said the company now expects to begin the final third phase of testing sometime this summer.

In addition to support from the FDA, Moderna has also received considerable U.S. government funding (\$438 million) from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a division of HHS overseen by HHS’ Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Robert Kadlec. Moderna has also stated that it is directly collaborating with the U.S. government to bring its vaccine candidate to market.

Moderna’s considerable lead has also been the result of backing that it received in January from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which was founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine has also received additional millions from long-time Moderna backer Bill Gates. Gates recently authored an article where he described Moderna’s mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 as the “most exciting” and discussed it at length.

Gates’ affinity for Moderna may owe to the fact that Moderna’s co-founder, MIT’s Robert Langer, is a Gates associate whose lab developed the Gates-funded “quantum dot ‘tattoo’” vaccine identification marker that is “visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter” and was described by Science Alert as “a low-risk tracking system.” Another Langer-Gates partnership is a “birth control microchip” inserted to the body that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.


With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls, it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna’s current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. Zaks, an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline, oversees “preclinical development, clinical development and regulatory affairs” for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries.

In a 2017 TED Talk, two years after joining Moderna, Zaks spoke at length about how he views mRNA vaccines and their modality, including those he produces at Moderna. In a speech entitled “The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing,” Zaks’ description of Moderna’s mRNA products as, making permanent edits to human genes, clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines “degrade” over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines.

Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies “are actually hacking the software of life and that it’s changing the way we think of and treat disease.” He describes mRNA as “critical information that determines what a cell will actually do” and then states that, if one could “introduce a line of code or change a line of code” in a person’s genome, that has “profound implications for everything.” He then falsely claims that Moderna’s products at the time were proven to “work in people” as the company, prior to Covid-19, was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness.

Zaks further described his view of well-known diseases like cancer as being caused by “screwed-up DNA” that can be “fixed” with Moderna mRNA vaccines, which he also refers to in the talk as “information therapy” given that he says Moderna’s vaccines work by altering the “operating systems” of human cells, i.e. their genetic code.

The summary of Zaks’ talk encapsulates his view as the following simple question: “If our cells are the hardware and our genetic material the operating system, what if we could change a few lines of code?” — seemingly suggesting that the permanent introduction of changes into the human genome is as simple as troubleshooting or programming a computer or phone application. It also says that Zaks considers the future of “personalized medicine” to be “gene-editing vaccines tailored to each patient’s immune system.” The Ted Talk recommended after viewing Zaks’ speech on the Ted Talk website notably broaches a key point that Zaks overlooks, namely that gene-editing can “change an entire species – forever.”

Zaks’ statements are noteworthy and concerning for several reasons, including the fact that DARPA — Moderna’s “strategic ally” — is also openly funding research aimed at “reprogramming genes” and “manipulat[ing] genes or control[ling] gene expression to combat viruses and help human bodies withstand infection” caused by Covid-19. The DARPA-backed project would use a method that is known to cause severe genetic damage that has actually been shown to aggravate the conditions it was meant to cure.

With such permanent gene-altering technology on the fast-track to become the first Covid-19 vaccine widely available for use, it is deeply concerning that this experimental vaccine with potentially far-reaching consequences is being rammed through thanks to fervent support from both the U.S. government and controversial philanthropists that apparently have little interest in studies examining the mRNA vaccine’s long-term effects. Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be “distributed” throughout the U.S. by the military, now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine’s gravely under-reported ability to “hack the software of life” in ways that could harm public health.

(Republished from The Last American Vagabond by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Science • Tags: Coronavirus, Darpa, Genetic Engineering, Vaccines 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Al Moanee says:

    I am no “slam-dunk” consumer of any info put forth from any US mainstream source and super-especially so if emanating from its pharma or bio industries. That said, and legitimate gene-editing concerns aside, it looks to me that the data conveyance in this article (on what Moderna claims to have transpired to date regarding this vaccine trial) is materially inaccurate, enough to be brought to this article’s readers attention. Compare the below press release today from Moderna with what this article (esp at its beginning) conveys about what Moderna made public today. The info as presented in the article does not line up well. Perhaps better to have quoted the horse’s mouth than the horse’s ass (Time mag).

    • Thanks: Brás Cubas
    • Replies: @Herald
  2. KA says:

    The new vaccine, developed by the biotechnology company Moderna Therapeutics, does not contain the virus that triggers COVID-19, as a conventional vaccine might. Instead, Moderna researchers used a new technique to make messenger RNA  (mRNA), which is similar to mRNA found in  SARS-CoV-2. In theory, the artificial mRNA will act as instructions that prompt human cells to build a protein found on the surface of the virus. That protein would theoretically trigger a protective immune response. Standard vaccines work similarly but use a dead or weak virus as their base, forgoing the process of constructing viral proteins from scratch.

    Cels will produce the viral protein from m RNA and cell then will produce an antibody.

    Has any work been done on the function or safety of this mRNA -made protein?

    What if antibody develop against the mRNA itself? Antibody though usually develops against protein and certain sugar ,antibody can develop against any foreign substance .

  3. anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    Really rushing this thing through after creating panic and fear. Wonder who the initial guinea pigs will be? Might be ineffectual and worthless, might cause side effects that show up later. They’ll assure everyone that it’s safe; they always do. Politicians will try to force this down everyone’s throat. Millions upon millions of doses to be made and sold at how much per dose? Have to admit, all these people, with Gates at their head, are coming across as some really creepy types. This virus will have run its course in a few months but the damage done will last a lifetime. Authorities all over the world have gotten a taste of power as they high-handedly coerced millions of their deplorable subjects into compliance by diktat. They won’t want to give that up. This virus sure popped up in the nick of time, eh conspiracy theorists?

    • Agree: Nosquat Loquat
  4. If Covert-19 taught us nothing else, at least we are swotting up on genetics research. Enough to understand nonsense terms like …”cell producing proteins…” and so on, as nonsense, specificaliciously speaking. But it matters not, it’s a new language, and this time we have the resources to learn it, not like when they formulated our independent judiciary, or traded us our freedom for the eternal dream of liberty, or those damnable economics theories they cook up faster than we can pay the extra taxes on every new brainfart. No, this time we learn with them, and we can hear when they talk nonsense. Like:
    Can somebody explain why the Chief Medical Officer discusses genetics with the words of computer patches, including common misconceptions as understood by people who know nothing of genetics, or even basic science? Did Billy de Patch write his speech? I understand that chief officer actually means “in charge of legal issues”, but certainly this dweeb has SOME basic understanding of his chosen field? Is this how the blokes in white coats explain it to him?
    And just by the way, the so-called “scientists created….neutralised flu virus…..release in urban area….track spread with modern technology….blah blah blah” press releases 2018/2019 news cycle was all just halucinations in this paranoid Goy’s brain, and nowhere else?
    People, please, help me out here, why am I the only one remembering those ‘news’ reports? But yah, Billy de Patch has been working on this long enough for me to have made fun of it two years ago already. It gives me delusions of prophesy, when its really just reductio ad absurdum.

    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  5. @paranoid goy

    Nice way of putting things. As far as the outsiders, rectal extraction of what lingers in the public domain, worthless, junk, by definition. No insider would venture outside the magnetic field of profit. Even then, the public would not understand any nuances(hammer & nails). Stuck between bad jest and out of luck for any outsider.

    There will be a flat, further humiliating the surplus population, incentive, and the bottom ups will eagerly submit.

    Indeed the article drifts to bending what is in the public domain, itself garbage by definition. Michael Hudson does better on economics theory.

  6. Ano4 says:

    Compared to auther articles produced by Whitney Webb, this article is of a lower quality.

    It conflates gene-editing technology (such as CRISPR among others) and RNA vaccines.

    These two approaches to modulating/altering genetic information expression are completely different.

    Although an RNA vaccine might in theory be used to express the Cas9 nuclease, it is not the case here.

    And even if it did express Cas9, it would not lead to DNA cuts and subsequent gene-editing in the absence of the other CRISPR technology elements.

    Any mRNA is a temporary transcript of a relevant genetic information needed to code for a protein.

    RNA is very sensitive to nucleases, it is easily degraded in vitro if RNAse is present.

    mRNA is also naturally degraded in our cells by specific enzymatic complexes.

    Therefore, any modulating activity due to an mRNA is transient.

    RNA vaccines cannot alter the genome on a permanent basis.

    All they can do is expressing some antigenic protein.

    Then the antigenic protein might perhaps induce a immune response.

    Or it might not.

    Which is the real question when we talk about Moderna’s vaccine: does it induce a sufficient immune response?

    If not they are useless.

    That doesn’t mean they are harmful.

    • Replies: @meena
  7. meena says:

    We hope that this mRNA doesn’t do nay changes in DNA or rRNA or interfere with other mRNA or act as enzyme targeting other cellular machines. Problem in biology is that expected results often do not pan out as explained from pre existing g knowledge .

    This is why a through animal test was needed .

    we still don’t know about how this mRNA being delivered and what is the percentage that shows up in B Lymphocytes .

    • Agree: Ano4
  8. Herald says:
    @Al Moanee

    Perhaps you should study the comments of Robert Kennedy Jr. on the Moderna sales pitch. You’ll find Kennedy’s assessment of it at

    Big Pharma is all about money and just few days ago Moderna was valued at \$28 billion, amazing for a company, that has sold just what? Nevertheless Moderna has already pocketed around \$400 million tax dollars and involved in Moderna’s COVID-19 quest, are the “lockdown until your vaccinated” preachers, Fauci and Gates. Fauci is well Fauci and Gates is a eugenicist, what could go wrong?

    Moderna’s product is a highly experimental RNA vaccine and if licensed, it will be the first of its type. RNA vaccines have never been shown to be either safe or effective, but somehow we have to believe it’s going to be so different this time! However, Moderna won’t have to worry as its dubious offering will be bought up by the state, who will also fully indemnify the company from any harm that it causes, that’s how the vaccine laws work.

    • Replies: @Robert White
  9. @Herald

    I like the way you write, Herald.


Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Whitney Webb Comments via RSS
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
How America was neoconned into World War IV
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement