The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTrevor Lynch Archive
Review: American History X
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Director Tony Kaye’s anti-skinhead morality tale American History X (1998) is proof that propaganda is far from an exact science. Just as Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket caused a surge in Marine recruitment, American History X actually increases audience sympathies with neo-Nazi skinheads, despite its best efforts to present them as hateful hypocrites and losers.

American History X stars Edward Norton as Derek Vinyard, a young skinhead in Venice Beach, California. It is a riveting and compelling performance, Norton’s finest work. I saw American History X after I saw Fight Club, where Norton’s character is so unimposing and unassertive that he projects Brad Pitt’s Tyler Durden as an alter ego. Thus I was surprised that in American History X, Norton plays a character every bit as swaggering, self-confident, and violent as Tyler Durden. They don’t seem like two different characters so much as two different men.

Derek Vinyard is the eldest of the four children of a fireman who was murdered by blacks while putting out a fire in their neighborhood. Derek was outraged and becomes involved with a local neo-Nazi mastermind, Cameron Alexander (Stacy Keach) who is supposed to remind us of Tom Metzger. Derek is highly intelligent and articulate. He is also a natural leader. With Cameron’s help, he builds up a serious and well-organized skinhead gang.

Three incidents stand out. First, Derek challenges some Crips to a basketball contest for control of a local public court and wins. The game is one of the best-shot sequences in the film. Second, Derek makes a rousing, well-argued speech against race replacement immigration then leads his gang to trash a Korean-owned grocery store that employs illegal aliens. Third, when Derek’s widowed mother Doris (Beverly D’Angelo) begins dating Murray (Elliot Gould), a Jewish teacher at Derek’s high school, the dinner table conversation becomes explosive. Derek refers to Murray as a “Kabbala-reading motherfucker” and reveals a huge swastika tattoo which he says means “not welcome.”

One does not need to endorse Derek’s Nazi ideology, rhetorical excesses, and physical violence to admire his sincerity and conviction, or to see the merits of his arguments. As for his opponents, they have nothing to offer but hurt looks, breaths sharply drawn in disapproval, and mumbling about racism and social inequalities.

Since the purpose of this film is to warn us against Derek’s ideas, one wonders what director Kaye and screenwriter David McKenna were thinking. They could have presented Derek as a vulgar, hateful loser like his fat friend Seth, whom Murray could easily best in a battle of wits. Instead, they chose to make Derek highly intelligent and articulate. This was a gutsy move, which goes against all media stereotypes about skinheads. However, if they are going to present Derek as fearsomely intelligent, then they need to match him with a more capable opponent, and they don’t. This means that Derek Vinyard can win any fair debate, which matters to some movie watchers.

Derek’s opponent and ultimate salvation is supposed to be Bob Sweeney, played by Deep Space Nine’s Avery Brooks. Sweeney is said to be a brilliant guy. He has two Ph.D.s. (Why is he teaching in a high school then?) He claims to see “holes” in Derek’s racialist worldview, which he dismisses as “bullshit.” But it rings hollow from the start. Brooks has made a career reading lines in his resonant, well-modulated black man’s voice. But he doesn’t come off as particularly intelligent. Derek’s father Dennis dismisses Sweeney’s pontificating as “nigger bullshit,” impressive only to the witless and gullible. When Sweeney actually argues against Derek, it turns out that dad was right. Sweeney’s arguments are terrible. Again, one has to ask what the filmmakers were thinking.

The most well-realized black character in the movie is Lamont (Guy Torry), an amiable buffoon. The rest of the black characters are vacant, mindless thugs. This too proves problematic for the film’s anti-racist message, for it supports Kipling’s characterization of non-whites as “half-devil, half-child.”

American History X is primarily the story of how Derek Vinyard stops being a skinhead. He starts when his father is murdered, then he falls in with the wrong crowd. He stops when he gets thrown in prison. When three Crips try to steal Derek’s car, he ends up killing two of them and is sentenced to three-and-a-half years for manslaughter.

While in prison, Derek immediately allies with the Aryan Brotherhood gang. This makes sense for two reasons. First, Derek is a neo-Nazi too. Second, even if he weren’t, it would be smart to join them, because whites who go it alone in prison are picked off by non-whites, who form gangs.

But cracks begin to appear in Derek’s racial collectivism. While working in the prison laundry, Derek bonds with a goofy black guy, Lamont, over their common interests in basketball and pussy. Derek also falls out with the Aryan Brotherhood because for some reason he objects to them selling drugs to nonwhites.

One of the most memed moments in American History X is when Derek declares that “Pot is for niggers.” Derek regards non-whites as soulless subhumans. So why not sell drugs to them? Or, at the very least, why make trouble with your allies over it?

But Derek is a bit abrasive and autistic about “principles.” The Aryans tire of Derek’s preaching, so one day, their leader forcibly sodomizes him in the shower. This leads Derek to change his whole worldview.

But that is just dumb and out of character. Derek keeps getting himself into trouble because he is a stickler for principles. But nothing that has happened challenges his basic principles. Lamont proves only that every group has likable outliers, apparently even in prison. And yes, we aren’t so different after all when we focus on the least common denominators, like food, sex, and games. As for the Aryans: they are not supposed to sell drugs and rape one another. But is it realistic to expect sterling characters in prison? Besides, when people betray their principles, couldn’t that be because the people are bad, not the principles?

Derek is taken to the prison infirmary. He needs some stitches. There he is visited by Sweeney, who makes a little speech:

There was a moment when I used to blame everything and everyone for all the pain and suffering and vile things that happened to me, that I saw happen to my people. I used to blame everybody. Blame white people. Blame society. Blame God. I didn’t get no answers because I was asking the wrong questions. You have to ask the right questions.

When Derek asks Sweeney what the right questions are, the answer is: “Has anything you’ve done made your life better?” To which Derek tears up, because no, he has suffered quite a lot for his ideas. Derek then begs Sweeney to help get him out of prison. He has a parole hearing coming up soon.

Sweeney’s arguments are terrible.

First of all, it is merely a shaming tactic to liken complaints about white dispossession to blacks blaming the white man for their own failings. It might appeal to an older generation of “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” conservatives, but Derek would see through it. What matters is the question of truth. White dispossession is real. The solution is not to “try harder” in a rigged system but to change the system. Blacks who still fail in a system of objective black privilege can’t blame the system for that. They can only blame themselves.

Second, when Sweeney chooses to focus on his individual life rather than questions of social justice, this is not moving from the “wrong questions” to the “right questions.” It is just a subjective change of focus. But focusing on your own life doesn’t make social problems disappear. It simply distracts you from noticing them. Individualism is just escapism. It is a form of cowardice.

The system deals with white dissidents by piling on personal problems: doxing, defamation, deplatforming, censorship, legal persecution, etc. That’s on top of the wearisome drama endemic to the movement itself. When enough negative consequences accumulate, many people simply give up. They have not, however, achieved some sort of enlightenment. Their convictions have not been disproven. They have simply been broken by the system. Derek is a broken man.

Sweeney speaks for Derek, and he is paroled. Somehow, he manages to survive on his own for the final months of his sentence. The conditions that drive men into racial prison gangs have been suddenly been suspended. The movie explains this miracle with a ridiculous deus ex machina: the spindly black buffoon Lamont somehow has enough credibility with the various prison gangs to “protect” Derek. I guess they were afraid he would rumple their sheets. I’m pretty sure what Derek’s dad would call his plot conceit.

American History X is also the story of Derek’s younger brother Danny (Edward Furlong), who idolizes him. While Derek is in prison, Danny joins Cameron’s skinhead gang. Danny gets in trouble when he writes a paper on Mein Kampf for the civil rights portion of Murray’s class on American history. Sweeney, who is now the principal, tells Danny that he is now in a new class, called American History X. His assignment is to write a paper on Derek, who has just gotten out of jail. Danny’s paper, related as a voice-over, is the narrative framework of the movie.

Once Derek is paroled, he does not want to get back into the gang. Instead he wants to get Danny out of it. This is irrational. Derek killed two Crips. They will be seeking revenge. He has a better chance if he has the gang behind him. If he really wants to extract Danny and break with the gang, then he needs to be diplomatic about it. Otherwise, he will simply multiply his enemies. Derek bungles his exit rather badly. He ends up punching Cameron and having a gun drawn on him. Now both the skinheads and the Crips are gunning for him.

The next morning, Derek has a meeting with his parole officer, and Danny has to turn in his paper. But it turns out that the same system that broke Derek now has a use for him. The Crips have attacked Cameron and Seth. Sweeney—who is clearly acting outside the purview of a high school principal—and a cop approach Derek for help. Derek is now a police informant.

When Danny shows up at the High School, we hear a voice-over of the end of his paper: “my conclusion is hate is baggage. Life’s too short to be pissed off all the time. It’s just not worth it.” Then he quotes Abraham Lincoln’s pious folderol about overcoming enmity—this time between the North and the South—by the better angels of our nature tugging on the mystic chords of memory. The emptiness of these high-minded sentiments was, of course, soon demonstrated by America’s bloodiest war. As if to underscore this very point, the voiceover follows Danny’s bloody murder in a school bathroom by a Crip.

Again, I am not sure what the filmmakers were thinking, but this conclusion does not support their anti-“hate” agenda. Danny is right. Hate is arguably “baggage.” Being angry all the time is definitely no fun. If we were but atoms floating in a social-historical void, we would surely benefit from simply shrugging off hate and anger.

But that’s not the world we live in. You may decide one morning not to have any enemies. But your enemies may still have it in for you. In fact, they might think your change of heart is a weakness to be exploited. Danny and Derek did not choose to be in a race war. The race war was imposed on them. Derek decided to fight, which is necessary if one wants to have a chance of winning. The system broke Derek, but it didn’t stop the race war. Nor could it protect him or his brother once he broke with the gang.

Derek bears some responsibility for his brother’s death: not for exposing him to “hate” but for pulling him out of the gang. As a member of the gang, Danny enjoyed some protection, because the Crips knew that attacking him would lead to retaliation. But once Derek and Danny were out of the gang, they became targets of opportunity.

Lincoln’s hope that “memory” could overcome enmity presupposed that the North and the South had deep commonalities and old friendships that had simply been forgotten in the struggle over slavery. Memory will not heal the divisions between blacks and whites in America, because there was no common community before slavery. There is enmity all the way down. Memory only polarizes race relations in America, which in turn polarizes whites against each other.

After Danny’s murder, the film ends with a sunset at the beach to Lincoln’s high-flown rhetoric. In short, a typical liberal retreat from racial reality into sentiment. An anticlimax. Dare we wonder what happens next? The most logical ending for this story would be a repentant Derek shaving his head to rejoin the struggle. But that’s clearly not the intended message.

American History X is beautifully filmed—often by Kaye himself—with an excellent orchestral score by Anne Dudley. Some scenes drag, and the use of slow motion is about as annoying as teeth scraping against a concrete curb. But this might not be due to Kaye, who turned in a 95-minute final cut. Norton and the studio insisted on a longer edit, which added back in 24 minutes. Kaye’s reaction to this was highly neurotic, to say the least, and he was branded unemployable, even though the film went on to enjoy commercial and critical success.

Why does American History X fail so splendidly as propaganda?

ORDER IT NOW

We can discard the idea that Tony Kaye is secretly sympathetic to Nazi skinheads. He is what Derek would call a “Kabbala-reading motherfucker.” He would arrive on set in a chauffeured limo with the license plate “JEWISH” and had matzos delivered to the set at Passover.

The most likely hypothesis is that the filmmakers were just smug. They thought that Derek’s views are self-evidently evil and that their own views are self-evidently good. Thus they felt that their respective positions simply needed to be stated aloud, with no real argument, and the audience would agree with their viewpoint.

But people outside the Leftist bubbles of academia and the media don’t react that way. Intelligent normies see the logic of Derek’s positions. They can separate the truths Derek utters about white dispossession and liberal coddling of black criminals from the violent skinhead trappings. They also see the vacuousness of the film’s liberal message. Thus American History X qualifies as a classic of Right-wing cinema, despite the best efforts of the filmmakers.

 
Hide 292 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Norton likely had a lot to do with the direction the movie took.

    Norton’s a notorious prima donna intense actor who often rewrites portions of scripts he’s involved in. He likely saw the character as written two-dimensionally and pushed for more 3-D characterization, constantly asking how and why a man would end up a neo-Nazi besides “evil.” It also explains why the rest of the characters are so flat: the actors didn’t have the juice, ability, or interest to rewrite their own lines to make sense.

    I get the sense that without Norton’s involvement this movie and the character would have been the typical Afterschool Special On the Big Screen fare, a la Crash.

  2. Trinity says:

    From what I have and read about state prisons in California it is very political and very segregated unlike prisons in the South and East Coast. Also I highly doubt that the Aryan Brotherhood would rape another White inmate or any inmate for that matter, that is strictly Black behavior in prisons and isn’t as common as it was years ago Prison rape nearly always involves Blacks raping a White inmate. Mexicans and White gangs would more than likely stab one of their own if they found out he was a boot bandit. Even having sex with prison punks is frowned upon by White and Mexican gangs. Derek would be taken out by his own because of politics but he would more than likely be stabbed or bludgeoned to death by the White gang.

    I never liked American History X because of the ending. The White Aryan Brotherhood gang rapes another White which portrays Whites acting like Blacks. Sure, Whites have raped other Whites in prison. Carl Panzram, the notorious serial killer bragged about buggering countless males in the free world and in prison, Panzram himself was gang raped by White hobos while hopping a train as a wandering youth riding the rails. Male rape in prison in modern times is almost always committed by Blacks and the victims are almost always White. And the Aryan Brotherhood is not the same gang as Neo Nazis or Skinheads in prison, they are different factions, just like The Woods, but there is an alliance, in states like California, White gangs even have an alliance with certain Mexican gangs. It is the Mexican gangs who run things in California state prisons from what I have heard and read, not the Blacks.

    Also, Derek’s mom is dating the Jew who teaches at the school Derek and his younger brother attended. And Sweeney turns out to be the all wise hero who saves Derek from his racist beliefs. LMAO. Hitler and the book Mein Kampf are of course demonized and anyone slightly sympathetic to the German cause in WWII has to have mental or emotional problems. Anyone who might think that Germany was defending itself from suffering the same fate as the Soviet Union from the (((Bolsheviks))) must have went through some traumatic event like having their father killed by negro rioters. Which brings us to the most famous scene of the movie, the curb stomping incident where Derek and his sharpie drawn ridiculous looking Swastika put the thug’s mouth on the curb and stomps his head. While certain Whites, particularly the males might think this awesome, it shows Whites in a bad light. A kick to the ribs and or a shot to the leg where the negro thug couldn’t escape arrest would have saved Derek a trip to the joint and not made him out to be a savage.

    While this movie has its moments, Derek makes some valid points about illegals flooding our nation, Rodney King, etc., in the end, it spews the same old horseshit about a multiracial society being good for America. SORRY, BUT THIS MOVIE IS REALLY ANTI-WHITE IMO.

  3. Actually, the most important part of the movie (I’m amazed the author never picked up on this) is when Sweeney asks Derek where the racism began. We are taken back to Derek’s past and at the breakfast table, where Derek’s father is angry over two of his workmates losing their jobs, to blacks, unqualified for the job, through affirmative action. The father makes a great argument, not only for the clear racism of affirmative action but also having two unskilled fireman, incapable of doing the job will put his life, his colleagues and the public’s lives at risk. Here, we clearly see the indoctrination that affirmative action, which is clearly racist, isn’t and those who disagree with it are racists.

    It was this part of the movie that Derek said turned him towards national socialism and obviously becoming a racist. In other words, courtesy of Sweeney, he had to realise that blacks who don’t have skills and don’t work to attain them should be given carte blanche access to any career, even if it means firing white people who have the skills, while to oppose it, as a white person, makes one a racist even though what’s happened clearly is.

    American History X is yet another movie, that gives the jew freedom to dredge up the past, Hitler, WW2 and the promotion of jewish persecution, the holocaust, white supremacism, racism and hated of whites to non whites.

    Its an awful movie, one of complete propaganda, telling whites that if they fight back against jews and blacks, destroying their civilization, they’re racists. No wonder every white I know, pretty much, under the age of 50 hates their culture, civilization and nation, thanks to drivel like this.

    • Agree: Trinity, Wally, europeasant
    • Thanks: JimDandy, mark green
    • Replies: @Trinity
  4. Trinity says:
    @White Elephant

    Derek’s father is SPOT ON, most of what is taught in “skoo” is “nigger bullshit” or either Jewy lies and anti-White propaganda. But yet Derek’s father is made out to be a simple minded “racist” and Sweeney is the edjumucated PhD. lolol. Never read, “Native Son,” and I don’t have any plans to read it in the future. “To Kill A Mockingbird” was required reading back in my “skoo” and that is pure anti-White Southerner horseshit. Not about to read the “Invisible Man” either. Imagine public schools requiring nonwhites to read David Duke’s VERY INFORMATIVE AND TRUTH FILLED BOOK, “MY AWAKENING?” Whites should definitely put it on their reading lists.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @White Elephant
  5. I don’t agree that this is Norton’s best work. It’s not bad, but his best role, IMO, was in Primal Fear. The story line of Primal Fear wasn’t that great, but Norton turned in such a good performance that the film was better than it would have been otherwise.

    • Agree: SunBakedSuburb, botazefa
    • Replies: @JimDandy
    , @p4nc4k3s Pl34s3
  6. @R.G. Camara

    That’s true; great actors used to rewrite and add to the scripts that were given to them. That’s another reason why movies have gotten so bad recently—fewer great actors.

    I thought this was one of trev’s best reviews so far. There are a lot of really original ideas and notions incipient in this essay(I think). I liked the idea that a retreat into individualism is really a form of escapism and ultimately cowardice. Selfishness? This could be developed into a stand alone philosophical essay, perhaps by Greg Johnson.

    Other “skin head classics” this has grow into a respectable sub genre, would be Imperium, The Believer, Romper Stomper…any others? Maybe Class of 1984. They all are characterized by very charismatic leads.

  7. When I first saw the movie, I was firmly in the ‘anti-racist’ camp. I explained Derek’s turning away from his views to myself as resulting from his finally having learned that NABALT, and finally having seen what a pack of losers those neo-nazis were; that those views were wrong was something I just took for granted. Therefore, I felt more than a little uncomfortable that the neo-nazi was able to make any reasonable points at all. My thinking was that if a neo-nazi could make a reasonable point, then it should be the reasonable point that counted most, rather than the fact that he was a neo-nazi that counted most.

    I didn’t think much about this after the film, so I can’t really claim the movie changed my mind about anything. But maybe it softened me up a bit. When I became more interested in politics (I had near zero interest when I watched this film), I would sometimes come across views similar to those Derek expressed, and it gradually became apparent to me that these were never really successfully refuted, mostly only slandered as ‘racist.’ By the time I encountered more fully developed racialist views (such as at Amren or Vdare), it no longer bothered me whether the arguments were ‘racist’ or not, only whether they were true.

    Greg seems to think that because of examples like mine, the film failed in its task as anti-white propaganda. But I think people who can be swayed by reason and evidence on race are greatly outnumbered by people who are swayed solely by emotion, and by this standard, I think the film succeeded in linking white nationalism to loserdom all too successfully. (Hell, even after I conceded that WN’s were factually right, it still took me a long time to accept they were morally right – ie that what they planned to do, in light of what they knew, was moral.)

  8. JimDandy says:
    @R.G. Camara

    Norton blatantly stole from other source material when he hijacked the script rewrites. Those thefts account for the few strong moments of the film. Overall, the movie was absolutely drivel. It’s howlingly funny when you think about how they invert reality in this movie: Sensitive white suburban kid becomes raging Nazi skinhead overnight, but then he goes to prison and gets raped by the Aryan gang, gets protected by the black gang for the rest of his stint, and emerges from the joint a passionate anti-racist as his #1 black protector follows him along the fence pounding his chest and yowling “Remember the brothas! THE BROTHAS!”

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Negrolphin Pool
  9. JimDandy says:
    @Twodees Partain

    Norton is a pencil neck from one of the most influential families of limo-liberal elites in America who seeks out “gritty” roles that he is laughably unfit for. He is an entirely full of shit duplicitous little phony, which is why his first role was convincing. He has sucked in just about every role since. Think what you will about David Lee Roth, but he nailed it when he said, “You know why all the critics love Elvis Costello? Because they all look like him!” In Norton, the sniveling, beta, progressive masses of film critics found a kindred spirit they could live through vicariously.

  10. @Trinity

    Of course he was spot on and that’s precisely WHY they made the film and portrayed what he said to be racist. When you call something racist, it can therefore not be questioned and thus accepted, even though, ironically they’re calling the father racist to objecting to what was racist affirmative action. The dumb goyim have to accept affirmative action, which is there to completely destroy the very concept of meritocracy, simply because blacks, haven’t the IQ to do what whites do. And the very reason white civilization is the way it is and black civilization is the way it is, is precisely due to this.

    Blacks living in the west, fail to understand that as 1/5th of the white population, there are going to be far more intelligent white people than them and more importantly far more people, better suited to do the jobs they want. So we have a problem and that’s why blacks have the low paid jobs. So what do you do? The blacks are clearly NOT going to get better, not just because they have low IQ’s and mentally incapable, but also because those who are ‘brighter’ than the majority, have to compete against far brighter whites and other non blacks.
    The solution, to this problem is simple – you send blacks back to Africa, to live amongst their own people and therefore, there is no way to call ‘racism’ when blacks don’t get jobs, due to other blacks having them. But they didn’t do that. No, instead the jew used this to attack white civilization by saying there are too many white people with good jobs. Instead of saying they have those jobs because they’re better skilled, due to working harder to attain those skills, the jew calls out ‘institutional racism’. And voila, here we are in the nightmare reality of today.

    Take Scotland of late? It’s run by a woman, a communist at that, masquerading as a nationalist, who promotes mass immigration and her ‘justice secretary’ is a Pakistani, who said, in the Scottish Parliament that “there are too many white people in positions of power in Scotland”. Yes, had a white man said that in Pakistan, if he had been in the government (which would never have happened) about too many Pakistanis in positions of power, his head would have been removed from his shoulders, by the mob, the minute he left Parliament.
    We are somehow led to believe that non whites, predominantly with a lower IQ, living in Scotland, should be in positions of power and authority when 98% of Scotland is white? So not only are they competing against people far more suited to the job, in their own nation, these non whites, in this case Pakistanis, think that Scotland is breeding superhuman Pakistanis far more capable than other Scottish people, who outnumber them by 99-1?

    We got good books at school to read, but I will say that my education began when I left school. I had to learn about my people’s history and my culture when I left school, as I wasn’t taught it, in school. Absolute madness, but the cultural Marxist agenda, by the time I was in secondary school (early 80’s) was already some 50 years in the western school system. Why, for example, would I care about the history of what happened, outside of my own country, in history lessons, unless of course it involved my nation? The brainwashing and indoctrination machine was already in full flow by then.

    The reality is simple. The more immigrants come in, the more the white people are going to be forced to read non white literature, have their street names and buildings changed, have to put up with Black History Month, Jewish holohoax memorials, statues pulled down replaced with immigrants and the eradication of their culture. But quite simply Trinity, if white people accept this and don’t fight back at what is clearly the colonization of their land and destruction of their culture, civilization and nation, then the nightmare that inevitably befalls them is entirely of their own doing. I have no sympathy for those who have no desire to protect themselves and their culture. To me, they’re already dead.

    There is only one solution to saving the west – repatriation of ALL non whites back to their ancestral lands. Of course, you have to remove the jew first, but when you do, everything will follow as easily as putting together a 50 piece jigsaw. Immigration and multiculturalism is invasion under another name. And we’re seeing PRECISELY the outcome of 70 years of it, since the end of the war. The blacks were brought not only to the west as cotton pickers for the jewish textile industry, but also as a weapon, they’d use to beat whitey with in the future, once of course, they’d granted them citizenship and gone through the civil rights process.

  11. Truth says:

    One does not need to endorse Derek’s Nazi ideology, rhetorical excesses, and physical violence to admire his sincerity and conviction, or to see the merits of his arguments.

    Naw, but it damn sure don’t hurt! (wink)

  12. And yes, we aren’t so different after all when we focus on the least common denominators, like food, sex, and games.

    There’s a confusion here between least and lowest. Lowest common denominators emphasise what is held most in common.

  13. Elliott Gould’s character being utterly unlikeable didn’t do the film any favors. His smug face was so extremely puncheable. He comes off as your stereotypical whiny, effeminate Jewish man. Probably not a stretch for the Jewish Mr. Gould in real life. Earlier in Gould’s career, Robert Altman had the chutzpah to cast him as ladies’ man Trapper John in MASH. Jewish wishful thinking at its finest. Although if he were a little younger, he’d be an ideal actor to play Jeffrey Epstein.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
    , @Ray P
  14. “Derek also falls out with the Aryan Brotherhood because for some reason he objects to them selling drugs to nonwhites.”

    Great column, but your claim here is patently false. Derek is specifically upset that the AB is getting drugs from the Mexican Mafia and selling them to White people.

    Other than that, nice work.

    • Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy
  15. American History X was anti-racist in the same way that Goodfellas was anti-mob, or Rebel Without a Cause was anti-teenage rebellion. You can load up a film with messages and consequences and still end up striking a chord of inspiration that does the exact opposite. With the craze for revisionist editing, I’m surprised that they still allow powerful moments like that dinner scene to be shown.

    • Agree: White Elephant
    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @R.G. Camara
  16. Trinity says:
    @Sollipsist

    Nothing that comes out of (((Hollywood))) is ever meant to be “anti-racist.” They have been making movies that are racist towards Whites for at least 60 years and counting.

    • Replies: @padre
    , @WhiteWinger
    , @Truth
  17. @Trinity

    what I have and read about state prisons in California it is very political and very segregated unlike prisons in the South and East Coast.

    That used to be true, but is no longer true. The prisons used to have a policy of segregated prisoners by race to prevent gang wars, since gangs are based on race in prison, but a lawsuit in the courts caused this effective system to be discarded. The wonders of diversity!

    • Replies: @Trinity
  18. @Hapalong Cassidy

    The 70’s saw the flourishing of Gould’s career as a leading man. Unsurprisingly, most of his films are forgotten today and they didn’t make much money. The backlash in the 80’s of the ripped ubers-mensch action star is likely partially related to the Jewish push of neurotic ugly weak men like Gould and Woody Allen in their films of the 70s.

  19. @Sollipsist

    The problem with making a good movie denouncing anybody/ any lifestyle is you have to first make that person or lifestyle seem positive and attractive in some way, otherwise you’re just putting plastic Nazi bad guys on the screen for two minutes hate. And once you show some positive imagery associated with a “bad” thing people will lose the message you wanted to send.

    For example, I would bet many, many drug-abuse movies have encouraged people to use drugs, if only because the movies make drug use (at first) seem so awesome or escapist or cool.

  20. Trinity says:
    @R.G. Camara

    That was part of the film that was bullshit. It showed Derek in a cell by himself and everyone else on that tier was by themselves in their own cell in general population. Unless you are placed in a cell by yourself at first as some sort of orientation period. I don’t have the pleasure of knowing how it works. haha. Yeah, I thought in California they didn’t cell Blacks with Whites and vice versa and that politics made Whites clique up with Whites ONLY for survival. In states like Florida, they have wigger Crips and Bloods. smdh. I kid you not. These wiggers are so cowardly, they “keep it real” and sign up with these traditionally Black gangs only to be used as “crash dummies.” Prison has to be hell on earth in most states but it seems like politics in California at least keeps Whites from being thrown to the wolves. Don’t the California prisoners still self segregate in the cafeteria, the yard, etc.? Sharing a small cell with anyone regardless of race has to suck, but it definitely would be better to share it with someone of your own race unless the guy was allergic to hygiene.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  21. You know I saw this flick a long time ago. So long ago that I saw it on a DVD that included extra scenes that never made it into the movie that I watched.

    At the time I saw it, I was not “woke” to race realism and other concepts that I later came to embrace, but several things in it rang completely false to me.

    For one, the idea that the Aryans would rape a guy. No. They would kill the guy. Or they would just leave him alone. For another, Norton’s weird reaction to being raped. That’s just not what would have happened.

    For two , the extreme brutality of Norton’s killing of the guy. That was just beyond the pale. And I agree with many other commenters here that that would not have been forgiven by anyone ever.

    That Norton would have been then–after his rape–left alone to hang with black people in prison is completely absurd.

    The movie had no credibility.

    It was very interesting to read that the director’s cut was far more lean. The so-called “deleted” scenes on the DVD were really stupid–I remember one of a little black girl in a McDonald’s that Norton acted like he “cared” about her; and some nonsense scenes of Stacy Keith hamming it up–and I’d love to see the stripped down version. My feeling is the director was right in cutting it shorter and Norton was dead wrong in expanding it because–as it is–it makes no sense and has no grasp on reality.

    Initially I had wanted to see it because of Norton’s nomination for Best Actor.After seeing it, I was disillusioned and disgusted by the film’s dishonesty..

    And that was years ago.

    This review added to my understanding and many of the comments I am in total agreement with.

    • Replies: @Truth
  22. A P.S. to my post:

    Also, Norton’s character would never have spouted the ideas he did to the Aryans. Even a 12-year old would have understood the way of the world in that society.

    And even if he nonsensically thought that what they were doing was wrong?

    Even a child would have known better than to speak out. It made no sense. What was the point in it? You’re stuck in prison with these guys.. Why on Earth would you talk shit to them?

    Just had to add that. Peace.

    • Agree: Radicalcenter
  23. KenH says:

    American History X was a great movie for about the first half to 2/3 of the way through. During that segment it told the story of racial problems and changing neighborhood and community demographics through the eyes of working class whites and made the skins somewhat sympathetic figures. It depicted most blacks how they really are which is mean, hyper aggressive and hateful towards whites. Not the Hollywood fantasy of dignified and noble negroes who suffer in silence.

    But then the movie went off the rails and showed Derek doing some serious soul searching and realizing that white pride is icky, pointless and just plain wrong. Two blacks helps him see the light. While in prison blacks turned out to be sorta good while his fellow whites were actually bad. So you see, being pro-white is just plain silly.

    Then just when Derek was getting used to his new schtick as a negro lover the simian animal that we saw at the beginning of the movie shoots and murders Derek’s brother in cold blood.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @onebelowall
  24. @JimDandy

    “Watching The Detectives” has an edgy groove that is rather infectious and has a restrained, slowly rising intensity that is slightly unsettling, but other than that, it doesn’t seem that E. C. had much else to offer. If he had done more material in that vein and less like “Alison” then he may have been more commercially, rather than critically, successful. Perhaps, he exhausted his creative energy with that one, but I’m not that familiar with his entire catalog. So, I may not be giving him a fair critique.

    Next to Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine and Dr. Howard, D. L. R. is one my favorite Heebs! Van Hagar – Sammy Halen never did even come close. Although, Sam had some really good songs when he was a solo artist before joining with the brothers V. H.

  25. Whites love masochism.

    • Replies: @gar manar nar
  26. I didn’t see the movie when it came out, but years later. I was astounded at the first part of the movie, how compelling the protagonist was and how artfully the film was shot. The last part was, of course, stereotypical Hollywood propaganda – it was like two different movies. I do recall reading that the Jewish director in fact got cold feet and didn’t want to release the movie AT ALL, but the review here puts it down to a dispute over length.
    The phoniest part was the rape scene in prison. In dismissing the scene, I had to explain to the gal I was watching with that for a leader of a white gang to rape a man was far-fetched enough, but to do it while the rest of the gang watched on impassively was REALLY far-fetched.
    American History X was a movie I went into with low expectations, but turned out to be very memorable.

  27. I was just beginning to immerse myself in an ideology that I have come to embrace fully, when this movie first came out. My political-racial education actually commenced from the time that I entered the public education system. I was of the guinea pig generation, an acceptable sacrifice to the concept of forced integration. The questions surfaced in my mind from an early age, but it wasn’t until I was in my teens that racial awareness had finally been hammered into me. Still, a real awakening, or should I say, validation, came from the attack on Reginald Denny in the wake of the crowning of Rodney King.

    That incident, coupled with the increasing vocalization of barbarity in Rap music and anti-White rhetoric in media and education, alleviated me of any reservations I may have had and offered me terra firma to stand upon.

    As for the movie, American History X, I recognized it for what it was, and I took from it what I considered to be useful and disregarded what I deemed to be rubbish. In that respect, I likely concur with the majority of the assessments of the author and the other commenters. If I disagree with anything that has been asserted, it would be the character of White Prison Gangs. From what I’ve read in the papers, and from what I’ve witnessed personally from an outsider’s perspective, they are more interested in making money from dealing methamphetamine to other White People than they are in maintaining Racial Cohesion. They appear to be more prone to murder another White Person than to slay a rival Ethnic Gang Member. This may be because the majority of them are in prison for being criminals to begin with, not like the character of Derek Vinyard who is a violent dissident. They only join The Gang because it offers them protection and gives them an avenue to further their criminal aspirations. No self respecting Soldier of the Third Reich would have defaced their bodies in the manner of these so-called Neo-Nazis.

    But, I am not a National Socialist, I am a Confederate. And, it is a certainty that no Southern Gentleman would allow himself to become a doodling pad for some “artist” who would otherwise be painting bullfighters on black velvet.

    As for similar films in this realm, I have seen a great many of them, and taken them all in the same way; extracting what is useful and simply shrugging off the rest. Other features in this genre that I recommend seeing at least once would include: “Higher Learning,” “Falling Down,” and “Romper Stompers” Each has valid points articulated, but ultimately have to play those down by making the protagonist out to be villainous.

    For those of a Southern persuasion, I suggest:

    “Gods and Generals” – Except for the “Now, you know they won’t be bothering us colored folks” line, this is a fairly truthful movie. The Yankees wouldn’t have only cleaned the house out, that Negro woman would have probably been raped by them. There was a lot of abuse heaped upon “freed” Negroes by the Northern invaders and much of it is documented in the Official Records.

    “Virginia” – Stars Fred MacMurray as a bitter Southerner after the war who has had a string of indignities inflicted on him, but retains his sense of place, his respect for his heritage, and is bound by his commitment to honor over all other considerations. This is a true representation of the unrepentant Southerner whose pride had not been stripped away with his material possessions. The evidence of these sentiments and strong convictions are abundant in the archival letters, diaries and articles from that period. I have a photocopy of a letter from my Great, Great Grandfather to his Niece, assuring her that he, nor any other member of the family, ever took an Oath of Allegiance to “The Union” or expressed any regret for having fought for the Confederacy.

    “The Great Locomotive Chase” As a Walt Disney film, starring Fess Parker as the most contemptible person he ever portrayed, it is a little campy. But, it is historically accurate and it does do credit to the principal Confederate pursuer and the men who captured the dastardly spies and saboteurs collectively known as Andrew’s Raiders. These men were later awarded the first Medals of Honor, but Andrew’s was rescinded because he was never in the military. In fact, the men who were in the Army were dressed as civilians and should have been ineligible for the Medal as well. But, then, Yankees were never known for their honor… or hospitality, or courtesy, or generosity, or manners, or dignity, or anything other than their avarice, chicanery, gaudiness, pomposity and braggadocio.

    “The Birth of A Nation” – Over three hours long and silent, you have to be in the mood, and have the time set aside, to watch this. But, as Woodrow Wilson exclaimed, “It is like writing history with lightning,” and, “… it is all so true.” I’ve watched this a few times, and having read accounts of the behavior of the Freedmen and the Monkeyshines in the Government positions occupied by them, I’ve come to understand that the rise of Clansmen, Red Shirts and other Vigilance Committees in the South was not only necessary, but absolutely heroic; just as the picture dramatizes.

    • Agree: WhiteWinger
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  28. I forgot to cite one other film, corny but timely, that I think is worth watching:

    “The Second Civil War.” – I saw this when it debuted on H.B.O. back in the late 90’s, around the same time “American History X” was released. Although, the dialogue is a little childish and some of the scenarios are somewhat cheesy, it, nonetheless, effectively illustrates the deep and multitudinous Racial divides in what’s left of this Country. Going far beyond Black and White, it explores Black and Hispanic conflict, as well as the cacophonous, frequently irreconcilable, demands and expectations of the Rainbow of Diversity encompassed within our borders.

  29. Bruno says:

    Kaye was fully aware of that and asked his name to be removed from the credit and publicly disowned the movie :

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2002/oct/25/artsfeatures.advertising

    He says it comes from the main actor adding 40 minutes to the movie with his own best parts. The vanity of an actor made the movie kinder toward the anti-hero and provoked the irrationalities within the script. The producers wanted the main character to be more human to sell more entries.

    Capitalists will sell sell you the rope with wich you will hang them

  30. @Trinity

    Rape happens across the board in prisons. Though it may be more common among Blacks it happens among all the races. The story I heard was that it used to be Whites getting raped and beaten by Blacks when Whites started becoming the minority in California prisons, so the White gangs formed as a way for Whites to defend themselves, although they did form gangs for mutual defense against other races, they still engage in all the criminal activities that gangs do, wich include dealing drugs, rape, murder etc. wich is probably a good enough reason to stay out of prison.
    California is seen as the most liberal, left-wing, “hippie” state but all that goes out the window as soon as you get locked up, then reality sets in. Then it becomes pure law of the jungle segregation by race and you stick with your own or else.
    I am glad I know this by reading accounts and talking to people who have been there, and not by first hand experience. I don’t ever want to go!

  31. Recently re-watched AHX to root for Vineyard.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  32. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    What was the director thinking? He thought he was manipulating the audience by making Norton’s character so admirable and the blacks so, well, black in their behavior. The basketball scene is the height of this–white guys beating thuggish blacks at their own game. Even Norton’s crime is a result of blacks showing up at his house with guns.

    The idea was to sweep that away with the betrayal by the Aryan gang in prison. Because Norton has been built up so much in our estimation, his conversion is supposed to impress us.
    But the film doesn’t pull it off because they have nothing. So they have the rape-betrayal, which as you point out, has nothing to do with principals or the reality of black malice. The film thinks we’re stupid.
    Norton’s speech at the dinner table is a powerful argument. The film, to pull off its feat of converting us along with Norton, had to give us one substantive moment to counter that, and it can’t, so it settles on showing us Norton reading a book and shaking his head over something or other that is displacing his racist worldview.
    How the director did not see this is inexplicable.

    But the worst part is when Norton, now converted, says it all started at home, with his racist firefighter dad complaining about affirmative action at the dinner table–sometime before he’s murdered by blacks.
    What were they thinking? That we’re stupid as they are.

  33. Every time I risk it and decide to watch a Jewywood movie, no matter how good the recommendation, I end up feeling shit on. Jewish Anti-white propaganda is so pervasive in Hollywood, that I have completely written off movies and TV. Instead I read historical revisionism and listen to audio books and podcasts. I know I am not alone in this forum. So although I appreciate the review and the reviewer’s point that Jews are smug and their propaganda is failing, I am certain I would find nothing redeeming about the movie under consideration.

    • Thanks: anarchyst, profnasty
    • Replies: @White Elephant
  34. TKK says:

    I am in and out of Florida prisons about twice a month.

    The idea of being in a cell with one other roomie is a Hollywood troupe. This is mainly reserved for maximum security.

    Most people in prison now are in huge rooms with many, many bunk beds. It is called a dorm and it is not segregated except by age. The best “dorms” are with the elderly inmates who just want peace.

    Have you ever been to a play, or gone to your airplane seat, and a truculent jerk is in your assigned seat? That is what goes on on the dorms- every hour. All of your things will be stolen or thrown on the floor, and you have to argue and fight to get in your assigned bunk. IF you are not in your assigned bunk, you are written up by the guards, and lose the meager privileges that make life in a stinking hot cage bearable: commissary, the phone and going outside everyday.

    Which makes this conclusion:

    But focusing on your own life doesn’t make social problems disappear. It simply distracts you from noticing them. Individualism is just escapism. It is a form of cowardice.

    easy to write in a movie review but poor advice for a happy life. I am going to take on an entire oligarchy and end up trapped in a cage with the very critters you wish to escape?

    For people who don’t buy the bait and switch that all this suffering will be rewarded with a paradise, why would we waste our one precious life fighting these battles?

    For people out in the working world, we see how quickly it is fading to black.

    Where is Ashley Babbit’s killer? A black man can shoot a white woman, aim and premeditate, as she in unarmed and standing beside other cops-

    and the entire country conspires to protect him?

    I say get out of America. It’s just not worth it. Again- easy to be an ANONYMOUS keyboard warrior when you draw a government or retirement check. Everything is different now. People lost their jobs for saying: ALL LIVES MATTER.

    Whites are on the menu.

    • Agree: profnasty
    • Replies: @DCThrowback
  35. cohen says:

    American History:
    6 million Jews were killed in concentration camps in WWII

    Efforts are underway to equate Jews with Zionists in US congress. Same people are writing history and just listen on this Video

    Helen Keller was Nazi guy probably a TERRORIST or may be fake.
    D-Day is a RAPPTER
    Peal Harbor is a Bridge
    Who is Hitler?
    Ironically same kids are/will be forced to read Elie Wiesel (with missing TATTOOS, WHERE IS THE BEEF) IN high schools

    Funny Video

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9288923/History-teacher-discovers-Gen-Z-students-dont-know-HITLER-is.html

    • Replies: @profnasty
  36. anarchyst says:

    I would like to suggest another movie for review–“Law Abiding Citizen” starring Jamie Foxx as Nick Rice, the self-serving “win at any cost” prosecutor, true justice be damned and Gerard Butler as Clyde Alexander Shelton whose family was murdered in front of him.
    The prosecutor made a deal with one of the murderers to implicate the other murderer, allowing the principle murderer to escape true justice.
    Gerard Butler’s character, Clyde Alexander Shelton weaves a plot to “get back” at all of those who were involved in the case.
    Although the premise of the movie was casting the prosecutor as “the good guy” for many of us aware people the prosecutor was indeed “the bad guy”. All one has to do is to look at the ferocity and harshness that the prosecutor displayed going after Butler’s character for “doing what the justice system should have done, all along”.
    I was rooting for Clyde Alexander Shelton throughout the movie. I wish that he “had pulled the whole diseased temple in upon itself”…

  37. padre says:
    @Trinity

    Oh, shut up! Everybody is after whites, while they have done nothing wrong!

    • LOL: Truth
  38. American History X was a film that had a fairly good look at how whites have come to be dispossessed in a country they once thrived in. Whether or not this was a sub plot in the film I cannot say.

    Trevor did a great analysis of the film. All his points are well studied and well made. I could almost deal with the film until they trotted out the same old bullshit history of the tyrant Lincoln and the so called “Civil War”.

    Once more I’ll leave you with some of Lincoln’s own words to prove what a two faced liar he was. As Napoleon Bonaparte stated — ‘History is a set of lies agreed upon.’

    Everything You Know About the Civil War Is Wrong

    Lincoln argued that secession was legally and constitutionally impossible, a view that stood in stark contrast to his stated beliefs while a member of Congress just 12 years earlier. In an 1848 speech in the House of Representatives regarding the war with Mexico, Lincoln argued in favor of secession:

    Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right — a right which, we hope and believe, is to liberate the world. Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize, and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit.

    https://medium.com/@jonathanusa/everything-you-know-about-the-civil-war-is-wrong-9e94f0118269#id_token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6ImZkYjQwZTJmOTM1M2M1OGFkZDY0OGI2MzYzNGU1YmJmNjNlNGY1MDIiLCJ0eXAiOiJKV1QifQ.eyJpc3MiOiJodHRwczo

  39. @Trinity

    Oh. You’ve read a lot about the prisons in California. That’s good. Have you ever been in one?

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    , @Trinity
    , @redflame
  40. @Dennis Dale

    “What were they thinking? That we’re stupid as they are.”

    While I’m not a national socialist, the whole purpose of this movie was to denigrate white nationalism, through destroying the Cameron character, played by Stacy Keach of Mickey Spillane’s‘ Mike Hammer’ fame and white unity. The prison scene was important because what it tried to promote was the AB were just hypocrites, out for themselves, with no honour and integrity.
    As I said above, it was another way of the jew, bringing in Hitler and the third reich.

    All movies are propaganda, by the jew. If you look at almost every sitcom, soap opera, sci-fi series (especially Star Trek) you will always see WW2, third reich and ‘nazi’-eque episodes. You will never see anything remotely communist. And they do this because they have to continually hammer home to the audience that national socialism is bad and evil because the jew knows that when any nation adopts national socialism, it’s very, very bad for them. It’s like a vampire being in charge of movies, constantly making films that are anti garlic, anti crucifix and anti sunlight.

    So as you ask above of do they think we’re as stupid as they are, the answer, overwhelmingly is yes and more. 1% of the 1% of the 1% controlling the population, from the beginning of the 20th century? They’ve been responsible for every conflict in this world, pretty much from the mid 17th century onwards? The great plague in London in 1665, the great fire, the building of the city of London, the establishment of the bank of England, the British empire, the control of 25% of the world and its population. The two great wars, where millions of Europeans murdered one another, they were responsible for. They own all the major establishments – politics, judiciary, police, armed forces, msm, academia, arts and entertainment, think tanks, quangos, NGO’s, along with all minority organizations pushing for the end of whiteness? And only a very small percentage of white people see this? And you ask if they think we’re stupid? I think you know that answer.

    • Thanks: Johnny Walker Read
  41. @Chris in Cackalacky

    You’ll find that most people on this forum and all likewise truth seeking ones, stopped watching Jewwood, TV and the msm a long time ago. It’s there as a distraction, to stop you doing what you did. Essentially it’s the Wizard of Oz, keeping everyone bedazzled with the magic, while they ignore the man behind the curtain.
    If I ever do drag myself to peruse a film, within minutes I can already see the blatant propaganda and programming. That’s when I switch it off, asking myself why I torture myself so.

    And you are correct. There’s nothing redeeming about the movie whatsoever. Other than the fact I loathe actors, finding them all narcissists with hugely, inflated egos (especially Edward Norton, who no one wants to work with), the fact that they sell out their nation, making movies like this disgusts me. To sum up American History X, seeing as you don’t want to watch it, in two sentences I’d say: “a movie that teaches whites to accept that the reason jews are persecuted and blacks don’t succeed is down to white, institutional, racism. It also teaches us that national socialism is very much part of the natural racism, within white people and has to be destroyed.

    • Thanks: Ugetit
  42. @Simon Dresden

    “American Me” was a film that perfectly captured the alliances that formed in California prisons. On one side you had the Mexican Mafia and the Aryan Brotherhood, and on the other you had the Nortenos and the Black Guerrilla Family. Also, as depicted in the film, prison gangs did indeed rape their own, but only as punishment for transgressions. It was this depiction of rape that enraged the real life Mexican Mafia, and a couple of people who worked on the film were murdered by them as a result.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Simon Dresden
  43. “This too proves problematic for the film’s anti-racist message, for it supports Kipling’s characterization of non-whites as “half-devil, half-child.””

    Rudy was thinking about the brown-skinned of India not Blacks. But had he lived long enough to see those Hindoos sent up a probe to Mars, albelt a tiny one, all on their own, he might not have thought of those exotic people as “half-devil, half-child.”

    I wonder what the old boy would have thought of the Hindoos taking the first prize for the spelling bee contests in the last fifteen years or so (not to mention 2nd and 3rd prizes also in many of the same years) given that Kipling was a wordsmith of the English language… his alter ego Kim could explain it much better, perhaps!

  44. Mike Tre says:

    Not a bad review of a ridiculous movie. Lynch asks several times “what were the makers (of the movie) thinking?” They were trying to reconcile the realities of race that they ultimately known exist with their blank-slating PC fallacies. Further, every single scene in the movie is meant to dishonestly manipulate the viewer.

    There are many scenes in the movie that reveal this conflict, but the most obvious one is the pickup basketball game. Aside from the ridiculous premise of the scene, I’m not sure there’s anyone who really believes that 4 skinheads (is the blueprint of a modern skinhead a physically gifted, good looking, intelligent white guy? Or an awkward scrawny dork who feels ostracized by society?) would beat 5 teenage negroes in a game a of pickup basketball. But the purpose of the scene is to prove (prove!) that stereotypes are actually not based on reality, but instead just concocted in our collective minds out of thin, racist air. You see, in Blankslateland, if whites can be better at basketball, well then negroes can be smarter and more moral and honorable that whites! This last point is proven (proven!) in the prison sequence; the Aryans turn on one of their own and rape him, while the negro gangs end up ultimately protecting him from further attacks.

    Norton’s performance is very good, but everything else about this movie is trash. Even the title, American History X, is meant to suggest that American history is primarily and mostly about whites abusing and exploiting negroes. However, viewed with the proper frame of reference, the film is a very very good example of the way Hollywood attempts to subvert American whites and teach them to hate themselves.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Priss Factor
  45. Marckus says:

    We need to stop analyzing these films as if they were high works of literature written by one of the masters. They are not and American X is also NOT

    Full metal jacket stimulated Marine Corps recruitment ? That is, until the 18 year old dreamers who saw themselves as an Arnold/ Rambo super soldier come back from overseas minus their legs.

    Hollywood puts out shit and anyone who takes any of it seriously is an ass !

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  46. Boris II says:

    American History X was unrealistic. The white supremacists were WAY too intelligent in that movie. Nice try, Hollywood.

  47. Mike Tre says:
    @Johnny Rico

    Is a requisite for penology to do a 5-10 bit in the clink? Or are you just going to do your usual bit of baiting and trolling?

    As usual, you have nothing of substance to add, just 8th grade level rhetoric.

    • Replies: @Truth
  48. Crass says:

    American History X is a crass and highly overrated film.

    Edward Norton’s role as Derek Vinyard is neither convincing or rational. I should know, as i walked the walk in my 14 inch Dr. Martens Boots and white laces for many years, in the late 80s and early 90s. The character he portrayed, Derek Vinyard, would have went running home to his mammy, if he had witnessed some some of the gratuitous violence that was dished out by the gang of psychotic misfits, that i unfortunately socialised with in my late teens and early 20s. After a few lines of Speed and some loud Oi! Band music like Skrewdriver, i witnessed some real ultra violence.

    Looking back at our violence, i feel very little remorse. (Although i was one of the few who never served a Prison term for it). The Che Guevara T-Shirt wearing “Commies” as we called them, deserved everything they got, as did the few unfortunate Niggers we came across, who certainly deserved what they got, for been stupid useless lazy parasites.

    Anyway, a much more accurate Film of the life of Oi! Music Misfits, is the 1992 film Romper Stomper. Romper Stomper is a vastly superior Film than American History X, and the character Russell Crowe played, Hando, actually reminds me of one of my old colleagues.

  49. Ray P says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    At the time, in the nineteen nineties, Gould would have been best known to the movie-attending audience (teenagers and people in their twenties) for playing Monica (Courtney Cox) and Ross (David Schwimmer) Geller’s father, Jack Geller, on the Friends t.v. show. Given that was a comedic role, some good feeling for him may have been assumed to carry over.

  50. Ugetit says:
    @Marckus

    Excellent comment, and it applies not only to Hollywood, but everything else the Zio-Commie mafiosi touch.

  51. @White Elephant

    your facts on Scotland are eye opening to share to the many unaware. similar to FBI crime stats that can wake up “research science” types that know the MSM is subversive, but dont know how to research yet.

    showing the Barbara Spectre clip helps.

    as well as that Democracy Now interview about semetism. where the lady admits to it being a trick, in her own words, out of her own mouth, on a leftist program.

    i was formerly an all one, globalism is the way type of guy.
    reading more and aging brings wisdom when eyes are open.

  52. Ugetit says:
    @White Elephant

    We need an “Agree in Spades” button!

    You obviously get it.

    Also look what they did in India, China, Africa and Russia, to mention only a few of the most obvious, as well.

  53. Trinity says:

    The barbed wire tattoos around Derek’s arms certainly date this film and the oversized Swastika looks as if it was drawn on his chest with a black magic marker. hehe.

    If I am not mistaken, wasn’t the girl who played Derek’s dimwitted girlfriend in the movie, a Jewess in REAL life? A Jew or Jewess playing a Nazi or Klansman is/was usually reserved for “real” life (((talk shows))) back in the day like (((Jerry Springer))), (((Geraldo))), or the Doprah Show. I heard a story that Doprah once had two ADL Jews posing as skinheads. Amazingly these Jewish actors were the most vulgar spewing hatred that only an over the top poser would say, like killing Jews and saying “nigger” over and over. The two J-actors would appear on a later show and say they had changed their hate-filled ways. lolol.

    Anyone remember the Geraldo prison interview with Charles Manson? That was a classic.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  54. @JimDandy

    100% right! And dozens of similar such actors, before he arrived in the late ’90s, and after. I blame Dustin Hoffman in the late ’60s.

  55. Trinity says:
    @Johnny Rico

    No, but I read two excellent books about prison life that I highly recommend, Skippy. The first is “In The Belly Of The Beast” by Jack Henry Abbott. Abbott collaborated with (((Norman Mailer))) on this book and was even paroled in 1981 only to be arrested for manslaughter and sent back to prison where he was commit suicide IF I am not mistaken. I believe Abbott was half Irish and half Chinese IF I am not mistaken. It was long ago that I read this book. He was a devout commie and leftist and he goes over this in his book. Good writer though. The guy even dedicates his book to serial killer Carl Panzram and murderer Gary Gilmore. Abbott was serving time in a Utah prison so he was familiar with Gilmore having done time with Gary, why the admiration for Panzram, well Abbott was considered a psychopath by many with exception of the idiot (((Norman Mailer.))) Perhaps that hammer that Rip Torn hit Norman in the head with caused Norman to go batty. ” The Executioner’s Song” written by Mailer about Gary Gilmore is also a good read. I gotz to give credit where credit is due.

    Some other good books about prison life, “Taming The Beast” written by Edward George, this one was about Charles Manson’s life behind bars. Another one would be ” The Hot House: Life Inside Leavenworth Prison” by Pete Early. Check ’em out sometime, Skippy.

  56. @JimDandy

    You know Diamond Dave based his whole image off of the Jim Dandy. I thought that was cool.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  57. Trinity says:

    I thought the movie: “An Innocent Man” starring Tom Selleck was a better prison flick than the overrated “American History X.”

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
  58. profnasty says:
    @Trinity

    Florida here./ Young White men living in Black gangy culture. I’ll never understand it. They have virtually no self awareness or pride.
    Tampa mayor, a White lesbian. Miami a Cuban mini-state (fortunately conservative). Ft.Myers, me, a 20% White minority. / Only White retirees, and sunshine, make Florida liveable. Thank Heaven for Ron Desantis. Even if he is a little bit jewed up.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  59. @Trinity

    Now that’s 100% TRUTH TO POWER!!!!

    In my opinion, it all begins in 1947, with Gentleman’s Agreement

  60. profnasty says:
    @cohen

    Adolph Hitler was the greatest man of the 20th century. Any idiot knows that.
    In America, you can’t have a 15 minute conversation without invoking his name. Greatness.

    • Replies: @cohen
  61. @TKK

    Q: Where is Ashley Babbit’s killer?

    Q: Where was her funeral?

    Sometimes the movies happen IRL 😉

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @TKK
  62. anarchyst says:
    @White Elephant

    You are correct about jews being behind every war and conflict, being the inventors of communism, for which ((they)) are always being “given a pass”.

    However, the “Nazi sting” that jews have used so successfully in the past is starting to fade, along with their phony “holocaust ™ “.

    The same thing goes for the “racism sting” which more and more is being seen as a ‘badge of honor” than a slur.

    More and more people are seeing through the falsehoods and doing their own research into these things and observing that it is indeed the “jews” who are “pulling the strings behind the curtain”.

  63. Trinity says:
    @profnasty

    Lived in Brandon, Tampa and Lakeland back in the day and I truly LOVE Florida. I still consider Florida my adopted home state. Congrats to Tampa and their Bucs. Florida unfortunately does seem to have a great deal of wiggers and Salt and Pepper couples as well though.

  64. @JimDandy

    I don’t have enough recent comments to agree, but +1.

    That no one involved in the film was killed is a testament to the high civility of the Aryan Brotherhood, which Jim Goad has correctly identified as a self-defense organization.

    Contrast with the Mexican Mafia, which allegedly killed more than 10 people involved in “American Me”, a movie that included a similarly grotesque portrayal of the stated gang’s leadership engaging in outrages for which the gang itself executes transgressors.

    • Agree: George F. Held
  65. @Trinity

    She and Furlong both.

    Elliot Gould however, was painfully convincing, in my opinion. You cannot picture him as a macho detective (LONG GOODBYE) or for that matter as a surgeon (MASH) but he does seem convincing as the guidance counsellor.

    THINGS I LEARNED FROM AMERICAN HISTORY X

    …Black thugs who come to your house to steal your car in the middle of the night won’t be armed.

    …Being busted for cocaine at the Heathrow airport will ruin your career as Mike Hammer.

    …7 foot skinheads in prison are on the downlow.

    …Your sister will attack you with a baseball bat for suggesting that Rodney King might have been in the wrong.

    …Your mother will be ashamed you came out of her body.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @SunBakedSuburb
  66. @Trinity

    NB: Psychopathy is defined and diagnosed by the PCL-R, an objective framework when calibrated against a minimum background.

    A rank amateur should not use this or any diagnostic tool. But someone who has any real-life experience with psychopaths and has read “The Mask of Sanity” and perhaps any work by Dr. Robert Hare should have enough background to accurately assess whether a familiar individual scores the minimum 30 points.

  67. Good review.

    It’s too bad “Yggdrasil” isn’t doing his movie reviews anymore. It would be interesting to see what he has to say on “Yggdrasil’s movie list.”

  68. Speaking of Full Metal Jacket, can you imagine this scene in a modern movie with all the PC BS?

  69. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Yes you’re right U-T.

    Oh but wait, you still own TV’s right.

    Great! Then by all means, please STFU and study harder in my classes.

  70. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    At the time I saw it, I was not “woke” to race realism and other concepts that I later came to embrace, but several things in it rang completely false to me.

    For one, the idea that the Aryans would rape a guy. No. They would kill the guy. Or they would just leave him alone. For another, Norton’s weird reaction to being raped. That’s just not what would have happened.

    For two , the extreme brutality of Norton’s killing of the guy. That was just beyond the pale. And I agree with many other commenters here that that would not have been forgiven by anyone ever.

    That Norton would have been then–after his rape–left alone to hang with black people in prison is completely absurd.

    The movie had no credibility.

    Please enlighten us with your personal experiences in Tha Jaynt, Wes Watson…

    • Replies: @restless94110
  71. along with Romper Stomper, it was made in the 90s as a movie about what kind of person you shouldn’t become, and it wasn’t total 2 dimensional propaganda. the WN characters weren’t complete caricatures and made good arguments. but in the end, the movie’s message was as always, never resist jews and africans and mexicans as they take over the country and society your people forged out of raw wilderness.

    maybe that made a small amount of sense back in the 70s thru the 90s, as it could clearly be said, lots of the guys who spent decades in WN back at that time, really did waste their life and accomplish nothing, when the threat of total societal collapse was far in the future, and their time would have been better spent on a career and a marriage.

    but the funny part is that 23 years after AHX, every single thing the movie told you to not worry about or resist has come to be true. as is usually the case with jewish propaganda. the long game is what matters. they absolutely are taking over and destroying your country, and replacing you. it may take a century, but it happens. when you’re in the middle of it, it seems like a slow slog moving at a glacial pace, but time does keep moving, and the enemy continues to advance. look at the Biden Administration today. an America unrecognizable from the Bush and early Clinton administrations when AHX was made.

  72. Truth says:
    @KenH

    the Hollywood fantasy of dignified and noble negroes who suffer in silence.

    Then just when Derek was getting used to his new schtick as a negro lover the simian animal that we saw at the beginning of the movie shoots and murders Derek’s brother in cold blood.

    Yeah, that really made Knee-growz look good.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  73. GMC says:

    LOL Hollywood – Grew up in Chicago’s North side in th 50s 60s and 70s including a tour in Nam – look up how many gangs there were in Chicago during those times . Even my good friends from the Chicago Outlaws had respect – RIP Loren !

    • Replies: @Trinity
  74. @Trinity

    2017’s Shot Caller was a pretty decent prison movie.

  75. I watched this movie when it came out. This was long before I became a “racist”.

    But the odd thing was that I agreed with each and every thing Derek and his father said in the early parts of the movie. Any human of normal intelligence would.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  76. @Truth

    The Jaynt? What is a jaynt? Who is Wes Watson?

    Recommend: get off the crack pipe. Do it. Do it today.

    • Replies: @Truth
  77. Anastasia says:

    Hitler would have had all the American neo nazis arrested and jailed if they lived in Germany at the time. The depiction in the movie is incorrect as many apeople who challenge the propaganda do not resemble the actor depicted in the movie. If they didn’t not hold the opinions they do they would more resemble the quintessential intellectual. The most visible example is the guy from American Renaissance but he has no connection with the so called “nazi”. He is called a “white supremacist. Those who challenge that piece of history are even mor intellectually bent and they do not tattoo nazi crosses on their chest neither do they shave their heads. I do not know these so called “skinheads”. In my opinion it is more likely that they are independent contractors of the security agencies than they are lovers of Adolfo Hitler.

  78. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Hey Troof, your old cellie, Fleece Johnson aka The Booty Warrior said hi, breh.

  79. Truth says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    Also, as depicted in the film, prison gangs did indeed rape their own, but only as punishment for transgressions.

    “We want to apologize in advance here Pepe for what we’re about to do, but realize, we are only getting our dicks hard looking at your hairy azzhole for your own good…”

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  80. redflame says:
    @Johnny Rico

    Read rape stats years ago and more men are raped in the USA than women by far and it is in prison. A git-er-dun neighbor type, not boomer age but boomer minded, was talking big shit about what he was gun do if this that or the other. Told him if you do you better be prepared to run for the rest of your life or you’ll be in prison being raped by niggers everyday. He seemed confused that it could ever even happen. He’s too tough you see. These people live in la-la-land.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  81. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    There are many scenes in the movie that reveal this conflict, but the most obvious one is the pickup basketball game. Aside from the ridiculous premise of the scene, I’m not sure there’s anyone who really believes that 4 skinheads (is the blueprint of a modern skinhead a physically gifted, good looking, intelligent white guy? Or an awkward scrawny dork who feels ostracized by society?) would beat 5 teenage negroes in a game a of pickup basketball.

    Bro., the scene doesn’t quite achive justice without video. The best part is 5’7 140 lb. Derrick with an In yo’ face disgrace, funkedy-funk reverse JAM to win the game!

    • LOL: JimDandy
  82. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    I’m with you Mike;

    That optical nerve surgery I did last week didn’t turn out half bad. The operation was a success, unfortunately the patient died.

    My cousin’s first year medical book helped greatly.

  83. JimDandy says:
    @dindunuffins

    I actually didn’t know that. I knew of Black Oak Arkansas because they were supposedly into Satanism or something.

  84. Anastasia says:

    Most of those challenging the history of Germany before and during WWII, and those who challenge the age old truism of “birds of a feather flock together” are intellectual nerds who do not wear swastikas on their chest. Hitler would probably have had them all arrested.

  85. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    Stop being modest Wes, we know it’s you.

    Let me axe you somethin’, Wood, how many cigarettes did you used to get for those bottles of hooch you brewed up in your commode?

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @restless94110
  86. WHAT says:
    @Trinity

    >Germany was defending itself
    By brutally attacking first her immediate neighbors and then aiming to outright genocide russian people. And before you even begin your ridiculous apologia for genocidal german monsters, I`d like to remind you that where they got to lord over russians, they acted exactly like the worst of bolsheviks, prodrazverstka and mass executions included. Mr. Klimov made an excellent in its horrendousness movie about what was happening for illiterates even.

    There is general Hitler cuckery in altright circles prompted by widespread daddy issues, and then there is russophobes like you.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  87. Trinity says:
    @GMC

    The Outlaws had a chapter in Albany, Georgia back in the Seventies, I certainly don’t think they are there now because the town is about 75% Black. Anyhow, never forget that one of the members wrote a letter to the editorial section complaining about someone stealing his bike. Paraphrasing here because we are talking decades ago, the guy wrote, you could steal my dog or rape my woman but you don’t touch my bike. haha. I might have it backwards though, perhaps he said you could rape my dog or steal my woman but you don’t touch my bike. In JawJuh, you never know, we had a negro arrested in suburban Atlanta a few years back for attempted rape of two female pit bulls. I KID YOU NOT. Either that guy was the horniest man alive or the bravest/dumbest idiot out there. Imagine being locked up in a cell or dorm with a guy who tried to rape a couple of female pit bulls? You would be safer locked up with Truth’s pal, Fleece Johnson.

    • LOL: GMC
  88. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    How did Wes do all that hard time and not have any scars to show for it. I thought they took the weights out of prisons in California? How did Wes have such a buff physique with no weights and eating prison food. Not to mention living in a stress filled environment, yo. All these prison YouTubers are all about click$ not cliques, yo. Big Herc was the first and now there are these prison warriors all over YouTube. Big Herc is busting cheeks and splitting wigs, yo, and selling merchandise. LMAO. Big Herc is almost as white as you, Troof, but he is dark as hell, yo. Big Herc, the Rush Limbaugh of the prison YouTubers, just like Rush, he was the first, and like Rush, he was followed by copycats when they found there was money to be made. Troof, I think you might ride in the Asian car or the White car, you too White to be down with the brothas, cuz.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  89. @Truth

    “And remember, this hurts us more than it hurts you.”

  90. @redflame

    My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, Sidney, is that the 24/7 rapefest of American prisons is unique, at least in the supposed “First World”. A Brevik or Varg imprisoned in Norway has no such fears. It’s one of those “American exceptionalism” things, like having a stupid anthem and having a “World Series” of baseball or fearing “socialized medicine” more than dying in bankruptcy.

    I believe it’s a product of 1. overrepresentation of Negroes and 2. corrupt prison guards. Am I wrong?

  91. @Truth

    Still have no idea what a jaunt is and don’t watch videos sent by wankers. Get a job. Comb your hair. And start making sense. Then we’ll talk.

    • Replies: @Truth
  92. @Trinity

    Another failed screenwriter talking troof. I guess poseurs are a dime a dozen in the basements of the wankers all over the land who think they are talking like a convict, but sound utterly phony.

    Recommend: watch Danny Trejo movies. You’ll eventually get it. Go on, little locust. Patience. Perseverance.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  93. Trinity says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    Norway and Sweden needs to concern itself about third world Muslims raping Norwegian women from what I have read and heard. Is this true or is it horseshit? I have heard Norway’s big brother Sweden is now the rape capital of Europe. Again, is this true or horseshit? Rape was happening even when prisons were segregated, I already mentioned Carl Panzram, who one time raped several African males in the free world. Talk about role reversals. I also think I read somewhere that Clyde Barrow of Bonnie and Clyde fame might have either been raped by another inmate or he fought off an attack by a stronger inmate. Clyde Barrow was a physically small man.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  94. Director Tony Kaye’s anti-skinhead morality tale American History X (1998) is proof that propaganda is far from an exact science. Just as Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket caused a surge in Marine recruitment, American History X actually increases audience sympathies with neo-Nazi skinheads, despite its best efforts to present them as hateful hypocrites and losers.

    Art or entertainment takes on a life of its own. Especially in cinema, the visceral elements often override the cautionary tale. This is no less true of art as of propaganda. Martin Scorsese’s GOODFELLAS is a work of art, so revealing about the world of Italian-American hoodlums, but the riveting style and wall-to-wall music make it a thrilling experience. Tommy(Joe Pesci), though clearly a loathsome psychopath, is colorful and entertaining. Even as we reject Henry Hill’s worldview about ‘wiseguys’ who live it up and the suckers who work 9 to 5, we can’t help reveling in the sheer audacity of the criminal world. John Boorman critiqued this aspect of the film and made a corrective with b/w THE GENERAL that features relatively dour Irish goons. Art can make the ‘bad guys’ sympathetic or even ‘cool’. Entertainment even more so. Audiences LOVED to hate the Terminator(a ‘bad boy’ as a well as a bad guy), who was made into the ‘good guy’ in the sequel. Hannibal Lecter the sociopathic killer is admired for his taste & class(unlike the crude and gross ‘Buffalo Bill’) and superhuman brilliance(which makes him to humans what humans are to sheep).
    DOWNFALL is a work of art, and it features the Nazis facing doom as all-too-human characters not without qualities of honor and courage.

    The audience has a dual attitude toward the Bad Guys. On the one hand, the audience roots for the Good against the Bad. The Good represent the viewers’ superego. And yet, they are fascinated by the Bad because it represents their Id, their repressed darker nature. So, fiction narratives serve as a kind of psycho-therapy where the audience is allowed to indulge in their dark fantasies(via the bad guys) but have them snuffed out by the forces of light(the good guys). Have the cake and eat it too. Alfred Hitchcock understood this aspect of art/entertainment, especially in STRANGERS ON A TRAIN where the villain is detestable but also irresistible in his unrestrained egotism. He will stop at nothing to get what he wants.
    It poses a question as to the true nature of the Good. Is it an innate glow within every soul allowed to radiate or simply a matter of repressing the darkness in every heart? Some believe men are innately good but corrupted by society, whereas others believe men are innately bad(or beastly or animal) and, therefore, what we call ‘goodness’ is really a matter of repressing and regulating the worse devils of our nature — keeping the birds in the cage because, otherwise, the scenario in Hitchcock’s THE BIRDS. Judaism and Christianity say man is tainted with the Original Sin, and goodness is a constant struggle in devotion to the Torah(Judaism) or acceptance of Jesus as the final arbiter and savior.

    At any rate, it’s misguided to see AMERICAN HISTORY X as failed propaganda. It’s better to see it as failed art. If Tony Kaye simply wanted to make a piece of propaganda, he could have gone the route of Alan Parker with MISSISSIPPI BURNING or made something like FRIED GREEN TOMATOES where blacks are aglow with sanctity whereas Southern Whites are mostly semi-neanderthal rednecks. So easy to do. Or, consider all those anti-Muslim movies where Arabs are little more than screaming terrorists who blow things up along with themselves. Making a propaganda about the evils of skinheads would have been the easiest project, especially as even most members of the White Right consider skinheads to be demented morons. (Are skinheads even around any more?) Tony Kaye certainly fancied himself as something more than an entertainer or propagandist. He wanted to rise above the business of advertising(that made his name) and be renowned as an ARTIST, and art has to seek and reveal the truth. Art is simply more demanding than entertainment or propaganda.

    Entertainment is usually about sticking to the tried-and-true formula that pleases the audience. Propaganda is about pushing a certain dogma, agenda, or worldview regardless of truth. It’s more about faith or interests. Catholic Church pushes pro-Catholic propaganda, corporations push advertising(commercial propaganda) to make profits(though, of late, the PC ‘woke’ types use ads to push the idolatry of globo-homo and ideology of diversity regardless of their commercial value). In contrast, art calls for an inner struggle. It’s like there are two meanings to Jihad. One is a physical war against the infidel. It is Islam as war propaganda. But there is another meaning, a wrestling with one’s own soul and conscience to arrive at the higher/deeper truth. A writer or filmmaker working as propagandist merely needs to push his favored agenda/ideology or that of his employer. He’s either an activist or hired hand. His main objective is to win the game than to know the truth.

    So, if Tony Kaye merely wanted to make a piece of anti-white propaganda, it would have been easy. But Kaye most certainly wanted to work in the mode of an artist, and this pushed him to probe deeper and look further; he chose to consider angles he could easily have avoided as a mere propagandist. It’s like Oliver Stone’s egotism as an artist has fueled some remarkable works or, at least, remarkable moments. He was never an admirer of Richard Nixon, but he produced an empathetic portrait of the man that only an artist could have delivered. Stone has pro-black sympathies but was artist enough to show the ugly side of black behavior in PLATOON and especially in BORN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY where the VA hospital run by blacks is a hell hole. He came to sympathize with the communists in the Vietnam War, but he showed how the Viet Cong could also be brutal and atrocious in HEAVEN AND EARTH.
    Oliver Stone is perfectly capable of being a propagandist, as with the insane JFK, a work so over-the-top and contradictory — a paranoid fantasy made with Capraesque earnestness — that it amounted to little more than tabloid-cinema. Sometimes, Stone couldn’t make up his mind whether he was an entertainer/sensationalist or artist/investigator. This was especially true of WALL STREET, supposedly a condemnation of Greed but, to any honest observer, a celebration of unfettered egotism. Who cares about Martin Sheen’s wooden symbol of the Honest Working Man when Gordon Gekko steals the show from beginning to end? A work about financial fraud that comes closer to art is Scorsese’s THE WOLF OF WALL STREET, though its over-the-top comical tone results in something closer to Animal House + Stock Market. Unlike GOODFELLAS that perfectly set the knob between the alluring and the appalling, THE WOLF OF WALL STREET mostly works as an amusement park for vice. (Also, it is dishonest in de-emphasizing the Jewish aspect of the gang of thieves, indeed far more egregious than the pimp not being black in TAXI DRIVER. It just goes to show, even those committed to art must tiptoe around certain matters in any given order with its sacred cows and taboos. It’s been said many artistic-inclined Chinese film-makers chose to make works about the hinterland or non-Han ethnicities due to fewer taboos associated with such subjects. HORSE THIEF is a prime example.) A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is another film where the sheer visceral elements overwhelm the theme. For many viewers, Alex was more like a rock star than lowlife punk, and not surprisingly, Mick Jagger was considered for the role.

    Now, the cult of the artist spans from conviction to conceit. Because the artist gets more respect than there mere entertainer or propagandist, many in the business strive to be one, if only for vanity-sake. There’s more money in entertainment, but your average film-maker would rather be a Kubrick(or even a Tarantino) than a Michael Bay. Ambition says, it’s all about the ‘motherfuc*ing money’, but vanity says it’s about respect, and artists(or at least ‘auteurs’ like Hitchcock) own the veneration.

    No wonder Woody Allen and Steven Spielberg aspired to make ‘serious’ works as well. Allen wanted to be more than a clown or comic. And for all his movie-making magic as entertainer, Spielberg wanted to be the next David Lean(though some would question Lean’s credentials as an artist). But then, is the desire to be an artist a matter of virtue or a matter of vanity? Art comes naturally to some people. Ingmar Bergman and Michelangelo Antonioni were no fakers. Scorsese was born to be an artist. Even as a young man devoted to Catholicism, he wanted more than the official dogma. He had to find his own truth and meaning about God and goodness through through the Mean Streets of life. In contrast, Spielberg was a born entertainer. From a young age, he loved fantasy and escapism, and this accounts as to why even his serious works go only so far. Even when Spielberg dons adult glasses, his heart beats with the rhythms of a child. SCHINDLER’S LIST and SAVING PRIVATE RYAN are artful in their brutal depiction of history but almost childlike in their moralism and sentimentality. It’s like watching MR. SCHINDLER GOES TO WASHINGTON and SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS FIGHT THE NAZIS. The violence in SAVING PRIVATE RYAN is powerfully authentic and infinitely more brutal than anything featured in the works of John Ford or Sam Fuller, but the emotions are from Norman Rockwell and the Muppet Movie.

    There are some people with genuine artistic souls but have an allergy to honesty, or openness. David Mamet is such an artist. He is obsessed with Jewishness but worried about giving the game away with too candid an approach. David Cronenberg is in equal parts natural entertainer and natural artist, but his artistic side shares the same neurosis as Mamet’s. He too is obsessively Jewish-centrist but worried that goyim might get the ‘wrong idea’ if he shows too much. And yet, they turned this limitation into an advantage. They ply their art as games in which the audience must actively participate. Thus, their films are more engaging and provocative. Also, there is plausible deniability as the truth is pieced together by the audience. Mamet and Cronenberg can say the audience came to such-and-such conclusion on their own. In a way, Mamet and Cronenberg are less dishonest than cryptic. Instead of telling lies, they play hide-and-seek, also true to a lesser extent with Stanley Kubrick, especially with THE SHINING. Indeed, one might argue that it is this very hide-and-seek game of clues-about-Jews that make their works more rewarding.

    Then, there are fakers posing as artists, and Aaron Sorkin really takes the cake. He has talent, a knack for elevated hackwork. But Sorkin’s ‘art’ is all surface and no substance. His talent is for dressing up propaganda with the look of ‘truth’, rather like those people who turn plastic into items on the menu. It looks like food but is for the eyes, not the stomach. SOCIAL NETWORK has the look of a serious work about Mark Zuckerberg but is nothing but an apologia for Jewish Power. MARGIN CALL and THE BIG SHORT are similarly phony baloney, ‘serious’ works for unserious people. Upon closer inspection, they are essentially Jews blaming everyone else for the mess in which they played a prominent role.

    On the evidence of AMERICAN HISTORY X, Kaye doesn’t seem the out-and-out faker like the Sorkins of the world. Sorkin is actually worse than a honest propagandist who, at the very least, doesn’t hide what he’s doing. Sorkin, a tribal propagandist in artist’s clothing, is a real slimeball who doesn’t even have the conceit of an artist. Sorkin operates like Neil Simon in pretense of being another Mamet. He’s just a con-man. In contrast, Kaye, though clearly lacking the true conviction of an artist(like Scorsese, Shohei Imamura, Jan Troell, Emir Kusturica, etc.), at the minimum exhibited the conceit of an artist, and that conceit drags him to uncomfortable truths in AMERICAN HISTORY X. Glorifying himself as an artist than mere entertainer or propagandist, Kaye didn’t want to fall back on tired PC cliches about ‘racism’ and skinheads. (Also, it was clever as self-promotion because an overly simplistic movie would have been less controversial, thus less a topic of discussion.) Kaye wanted to show that he at least tried to understand, even empathize. As an artist, he felt an obligation to see the world through eyes of those he loathes. After all, there is good in everyone, and the world isn’t made up of angels and demons.

    Furthermore, he might have felt that the film would be more convincing and moving if it showed a character struggling to break out of his comfort zone. After all, it’s natural for a man in a desert to look for water. He wants to find an oasis. Derek(Edward Norton) feels at home with his skinhead neo-nazi crew. There is a sense of place, a sense of belonging. In a way, they are more his family than his mother is. And yet, Derek must rise above that to attain a higher grace. It’s like the final segment of THE LAST TEMPATION OF CHRIST. Jesus on the cross is in a hell of pain and suffering. An ‘angel’ arrives and offers him respite and relief. Jesus doesn’t have to suffer and sacrifice himself for mankind that taunts and jeers at him. He can be a normal Jew with wife and family with a sense of belonging. And yet, at the end, Jesus rejects all that and seeks pain on the cross.
    Likewise, for AMERICAN HISTORY X to make sense, one must consider its neo-spiritual element. It is a quasi-christian tale told by a Jew. Derek becomes like a christ-figure who must rise above family and race to stand for the higher truth. Now, why would a Jew do that? Was Kaye the Jew encouraging the deracinating aspect of Christianity on whites? Or, is there a hidden/repressed element within the Jew who dreams for the messiah that can bring an end to the tribal conflicts that have marked Jewish existence from the beginning.
    In a way, the white vs black tensions in the L.A. of the film could be a reflection of the Jewish vs Arab/Palestinian conflicts in the Middle East. Many Jews, like neo-nazi skinheads, are totally tribal and territorial. They are Jewzis, and they see the world in terms of us-versus-them and take pride in that. But there is also a side of Jewishness that is deeply troubled by this seemingly never-ending conflict stemming from Jewishness’s us-vs-them worldview. Despite all their wealth and power, Jews are outnumbered, and for how long can they carry on with these tribal wars and dirty tricks? On the one hand, Jews hate Jesus as the great traitor. But on the other hand, Jews can’t help feeling that they missed the one great opportunity where Jews and Gentiles could have become one people through salvation offered by Jesus. (The second opportunity was with communism that sought to erase distinctions between Jews and gentiles, as among the classes, but in the end, capitalism won out, and rich Jews chose Zionism uber alles.) In a way, the neo-nazi skinheads in the movie represent the worst nightmare of the Jews, but in another way, they could be metaphors for Jews, the much vilified and hated minority. Indeed, Derek sounds more like a white Zionist than a white nazi at times.

    Another thing. AMERICAN HISTORY X offered a convenient way for Jews to express their own angers and doubts about blacks. Because of the political/symbolic alliance between Jews and blacks, most Jews toned down their real feelings about black problems. But many Jews have known all along about the blacks. Howard Stern, the Id of the Jewish Community, spoke of how black thugs attacked Jews. From the 1960s to the early 90s, many Jews were victimized by black crime or just plain loutish behavior. Crown Heights mayhem was fresh in the memory of Jews when the movie was made. And the L.A. riots dampened the mood of the new decade. In the 90s, Al Sharpton was still strutting around and howling about ‘diamond merchants’, and Louis Farrakhan had his Million Man March. Also, many Jews felt blacks were ingrates, and of course, many blacks felt exploited by rich Jews.

    But because of the political alliance, Jews couldn’t express their anger about blacks as Jews. So, why not make a movie like AMERICAN HISTORY X that offers a no-holds-barred depiction of blacks as the thugs, louts, hoodlums, and punks that they be? But as the movie is about white skinheads vs blacks, these possibly ‘racist’ views would be white than Jewish even though Jews shared many of the same fears and loathing about blacks. It’s like how Jews used Archie Bunker on ALL IN THE FAMLILY. On the one hand, Bunker was a simple-minded bigot, but then, he also said what was on the minds of older Jews in regards to the boomer generation and the ‘shvartzes’. But since goy Bunker said it, Jewish prejudices were laundered as ‘white goy’ bigotry. This way, Jews could have the cake and eat it too. Air their very Jewish grievances but through goy figures who took the blame. Just like ‘privatize the profits, socialize the losses’, ‘spew Jewish rage, blame goy hate’.

    [MORE]

    Another black figure who pissed off Jews in the 90s was Spike Lee. While many Jewish critics highly praised DO THE RIGHT THING, others were troubled by such an incendiary film set in a city that seemed to be on the edge. Though DTRT doesn’t have Jews, it threatened New York(aka Jew York) with riots and mayhem in the name of black rage. (Black and Jewish relations reached a nadir with Mayor Ed Koch’s brazen remarks about black criminals as ‘animals’. And there was the matter of Bernie Goetz in the mid-80s and the Central Park assault-rape in 1989, the same year DTRT was released.) No wonder Hollywood went with DRIVING MISS DAISY than DTRT for the Oscars in 1989. Spike Lee didn’t improve matters with Jews when he praised Louis Farrakhan and featured Jews as swindlers in MO’ BETTER BLUES. In the early 90s, NY Jews had enough of blacks and went with Rudy Giuliani than David Dinkins, the first black mayor of NY.
    Indeed, there was a reason why Jewish Power favored globo-homo over black interests over the years. Even the presidency of Obama proved a bigger (ba)boon for the ‘gay’ community. If anything, Jews cleverly used Obama to mute the black community. With a Negro as president, many blacks thought they were winning when all Obama ever did was bend over to Jews and homos and pushed for more mass immigration. At any rate, as long as Obama was the candidate, black vote was overwhelmingly for the Democratic Party, and Jews need not worry. But many black voters stayed home in 2016, and furthermore, Donald Trump was gaining black vote with his anti-immigration-stance and his swagger as the ‘first ni**a president’. It was out of this desperation that Jews in 2020 favored BLM over globo-homo to keep blacks reliably on the Democratic side. Another reason why Jews revived black identity politics was out of fear of white populism triggered by Trump and the internet. For Jews, ‘America First’ and its railings against ‘globalism’ were code words for ‘white people need to break free of Jewish control’, and so, Jews decided to ramp up hysteria about ‘white supremacism’ to suppress white identity and interests. And what better way to attack White Pride than by using the Negro Card because the Narrative have long featured blacks as saintly victims of slavery & Jim Crow and as the Idolatry-Industry have celebrated blacks as top athletes & rappers? But this is now, and things were different then, when AMERICAN HISTORY X was made, a time when many Jews were worried far more about blacks than about whites, most of whom seemed rather restive and apathetic.

    Tony Kaye and Spike Lee have one thing in common. The vain desire to be acknowledged as artists(or at least personal ‘auteurs’), but when push came to shove, it was more conceit than conviction. DO THE RIGHT THING, for example, has the look and feel of reality but is full of BS on many levels. One scene has every group badmouthing every other group, but in reality, despite all the differences and distrusts among diverse groups, the overwhelming racial tension in NY or any big city is white vs black, brown vs black, yellow vs black, Jewish vs black, Arabs vs black, Hindus vs black, and etc. Even Jews and Arabs get along more peacefully in NY than do Jews with blacks or Arabs with blacks.
    As with AMERICAN HISTORY X’s empathetic treatment of Derek and skinheads, DTRT shows the human side of the Italian-American pizzeria owner and his sons(though it seems calculated than curious). They are not portrayed as simpleminded goombas or knee-jerk ‘racists’ and have their own rationales. So, their seemingly jaundiced views aren’t entirely without reason, and Lee does show just enough of stupid black behavior to justify the prejudice. But when push comes to shove, Lee is a black tribalist first-and-foremost and sides with Buggin’ Out and Radio Raheem when they are clearly the instigators of all that goes wrong. Buggin’ Out’s complaint that the walls of the pizzeria have pictures of Italian-Americans but no blacks makes about as much sense as a white guy complaining that a black man’s rib or chicken joint has pictures of famous black bluesmen and sports stars. And yet, Lee in his interview thinks Buggin’ Out has a point, which goes to show the kermitty-the-frog-lookalike-mofo is a real idiot. Lee is no Martin Scorsese. Though Italian-American with a deep feeling for his heritage and community, Scorsese cuts no slack for his kind, nor does he round up the narrative with some pat ‘message’. Tony Kaye and Spike Lee do understand what it means to an artist, but it never carries over from conceit to conviction. As such, even as so many gritty details in DTRH and AHX ring true, the over-arching narratives and messages are unconvincing.

    Derek is highly intelligent and articulate. He is also a natural leader. With Cameron’s help, he builds up a serious and well-organized skinhead gang.

    It’s possible that an intelligent man of some talent could be drawn to a movement of such idiocy. People naturally gravitate toward community, and if the only white-conscious one happens to be extreme, what choice is there? Also, it’s easy to tower over idiots, which makes Derek’s natural leadership qualities even more compelling.
    Still, more interesting would be a story about a white-conscious community that isn’t extreme or deranged. It’s like what Aldous Huxley said in BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED: The satire in BRAVE NEW WORLD offered only two extremes, savage authenticity and bogus artificiality with nothing in between. Likewise, movies about white identity tend to offer only two possibilities: ‘Anti-racism’ and radical racism, as if there’s nothing in between. But the example of David Duke shows how white people can overcome this. Duke joined the KKK and dabbled in Neo-Nazism as a young man because he found nothing white-and-proud out there, but he later formulated a new movement of white identity/interests that paved a course generally free of Neo-Nazis and the KKK. And the saner elements of the Alt Right also represented this path. There are also Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald. And yet, in the popular imagination, if you aren’t a self-loathing white ‘gulliberal’ who waves BLM and sucks up to Jews, you must be a ‘white supremacist’, a KKK, a neo-nazi! And AMERICAN HISTORY X, despite its somewhat humanizing portrait of skinheads, falls into the same trap. There is no in-between option, no rational course that balances white identity/interests with respect for other groups. Rather, white identity must be synonymous with racial extremism.
    It’s like serving a menu where the soup comes icy cold or boiling hot but never warm. Goldilocks option is denied to whites. Unless whites are total self-loathing maggots, aka ‘gulliberals’ or ‘cuckservatives’, they are total ‘white supremacists’. Sadly, many on the Dissident Right have internalized this dynamics and feel they must go 14/88 to be authentic as proud white folks when, if anything, they’ve fallen into the Jewish Trap of either/or for whites.

    Derek refers to Murray as a “Kabbala-reading motherfucker” and reveals a huge swastika tattoo which he says means “not welcome.”

    I wonder if the scene was alluding to the dinner in THE HEARTBREAK KID where the Jewish guy talks about honesty of the cauliflower. It’s a powerful scene, and the hurt in Elliott Gould’s character is convincing enough. He could be a nice guy, but Derek, so consumed with a race-war worldview, can only see him as The Jew, the enemy. Chances are the man never read the Kabbalah and happens to be a milquetoast secular Jew. And yet, there’s a certain truth to Derek’s attitude as well. Even though he, his mother, and the Jewish guy all share in the generic Americanism, there is a vast gulf at the deeper level, especially because Jews do have roots whereas most whites don’t. Derek seeks to reconnect with roots but sadly connects with poisoned ones. To his mother, the Jewish guy is just another date. And on some level, he is just that, an American who happens to be Jewish.
    And yet, even regular Jews are somehow different in their deeper sense of heritage and loyalty, in their stronger sense of grievance. So, in some ways, Derek knows the Jew better than the Jew knows himself. Derek knows that, when push comes to shove, even regular all-American Jews are Jews first and American second. And yet, Derek isn’t fully honest about his feelings because, apart from the real animus, there is a certain envy. After all, if whites had a similar sense of roots and heritage, they would not have lost to the Jews. When Jews came to America, they remained Jews first, Americans second; they kept with their deep loyalty. When white Europeans came to America, they became Americans first, Europeans second(or none at all). Jews didn’t abandon their Old World ties, white Americans did. But then, European betrayal goes back to the adoption of Christianity. For a Jew to be Jewish means to preserve heritage, memory, identity, and loyalty. For a European to be Christian meant thje rejection of indigenous cultures in favor of a cult of a Jew as Messiah. Furthermore, to be Christian means a white Christian must regard a black Christian, brown Christian, and yellow Christian as more his brother than a white pagan is. Thus, Christianity was the first Americanism that made Europeans reject their own for something Other.

    This is why E. Michael Jones and people like Nick Fuentes are foolish to cling to Christianity as the source of Western identity and pride. While a proud white person can be Christian, Christianity must be treated as one’s personal ideology than core identity. It’s a matter of creed, not breed. Jewishness in contrast is creed wedded to breed. E. Michael Jones faults the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, and Kevin MacDonald finds problems with the Jewish Culture of Critique, but the problem is less that Jews have them than that goyim lack them, or at least they lack them as their own. Without revolutionary spirit, there is stagnation. Without the culture of critique, there is only dogma and conformism. The problem for the white race isn’t the Revolutionary Spirit and Culture of Critique per se but that they’ve outsourced them to Jews.
    Furthermore, is it even true that Jews are somehow unique in this revolutionary spirit? Didn’t the Christian West try to revolutionize the whole world by spreading the Gospel to every corner of the planet? If Christianity is anti-revolutionary, why didn’t it leave other peoples and cultures alone? Why introduce the Faith into non-Christian lands and try to turn the culture and values upside down? Long before Jews became communists and other kinds of radicals, Christianity in the West and then across the Non-West spread spiritual and social revolutions of far-reaching consequence. Furthermore, perhaps the revolutionary spirit owes more to certain factors in Northern Europe that made both Christians and Jews more bold, restless, aggressive, and impatient. After all, most Christian orders in North Africa and Near East were ultra-conservative and stagnant. And most Jews in the Middle East were hardly like the firebrands Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky. The real revolutionary spirit took off in Western Europe, especially in Northern Italy, France, Germany, and southern Britain.

    Since the purpose of this film is to warn us against Derek’s ideas, one wonders what director Kaye and screenwriter David McKenna were thinking.

    Yes and no. The film isn’t merely an indictment of white ‘racist’ extremism but of the social conditions that make it fester and grow. To the film’s credit, it doesn’t shy away from the harsh realities that drive white kids into forming their own gangs. While the message is against white ‘racism’, it has the courage to admit that hatred doesn’t exist in a vacuum. In a world of black and brown tribalism, whites have no choice but to band together, though whites in the film do it in a self-destructive way, though not as much as the fellas in ROMPER STOMPER.
    Trevor Lynch is being disingenuous in pretending that Kaye set out to make a simpleminded anti-white and ‘anti-racist’ propaganda and only accidentally stumbled on some inconvenient truths. No, Kaye set out to make an ‘anti-racist’ work of art, but the truths dredged up by artistic commitment didn’t sit well with the favored narrative. This has long been a problem with scholars who are at once committed to truth and ideology. David Puttnam who wrote BOWLING ALONE set out to gather facts in support of Diversity but arrived at the opposite conclusion, which was painful for him. He was scholar enough to admit his thesis was disproven but ideologue enough to have written another book expressing the hope that Diversity could somehow work. But then, as reality never fully jibes with any single worldview or ideology, there is always bound to be some degree of conflict between what one believes and what one sees(if he has any interest in the truth).

    Thus, AMERICAN HISTORY X is partly right, partly wrong. It’s true that far-right neo-nazi types of movements in the West have been toxic, useless, and self-destructive. And yet, the film falters in posing only two possibilities: Far-right extremism and wishful hope in the Dream. But why should it be so? It’s like there is a middle course between militarism and pacifism, and one doesn’t have to be a total hawk or a total dove. In a way, this whole left-vs-right discourse has poisoned the blood politics. The great promise of fascism was the left and right could be fused together constructively, and the early successes of National Socialism were a testament to that. But Adolf Hitler’s radical racism destroyed the future.

    However, if they are going to present Derek as fearsomely intelligent, then they need to match him with a more capable opponent, and they don’t. This means that Derek Vinyard can win any fair debate, which matters to some movie watchers.

    Edward Norton seems to be very smart(though also overly eccentric), but is Derek really fearsomely intelligent? Or does he seem highly intelligent in contrast to the morons he hangs with? Even a hill seems pretty high in the plains. Derek is certainly far above average in IQ, but he doesn’t seem to be a genius. And if indeed he was truly smart, he would have seen through the problems of Neo-Nazism on his own. Derek is smart but not smart enough to avoid falling into his own traps of ideological fanaticism and dogmatism. In becoming so hardline based on his rage, he creates his own stupidity instead of advancing an alternative and superior ideology and worldview that rejects both naive Liberalism(& spineless ‘conservatism’) and far-right nuttery that attracts losers and ne’er-do-wells.
    In a way, he seems drawn to the skinhead world because he wants dominance, and it’s easy to be a lion among hyenas. If you want to serve, you seek out the superior. If you want to lead, you seek out the inferior. Being the all-too-rare smart ‘white nationalist’ has gotten to his ego. But worst of all, he doesn’t just adopt an extreme ideology but an extremely demented lifestyle of ugliness and degeneracy. In this, the skinheads weren’t much different from Antifa, a bunch of druggies and degenerates.

    Brooks(Sweeney_ has made a career reading lines in his resonant, well-modulated black man’s voice. But he doesn’t come off as particularly intelligent. Derek’s father Dennis dismisses Sweeney’s pontificating as “nigger bullshit,” impressive only to the witless and gullible. When Sweeney actually argues against Derek, it turns out that dad was right. Sweeney’s arguments are terrible.

    Negro Sweeney may be a silly-ass jiver, but what makes a teacher special isn’t necessarily his beliefs but his willingness to engage his students, encourage discussion, and provoke argument. So, the reason why Derek is impressed by Sweeney may have less to do with the Negro’s brilliance(real or not) but his willingness to at least have a conversation with the ‘enemy’ that calls him a ‘ni**er’ behind his back. Today, so many Negroes want the ‘conversation’ to be monologues. Sweeney, at the very least, is willing to listen to ‘racists’.

    But Derek is a bit abrasive and autistic about “principles.” The Aryans tire of Derek’s preaching, so one day, their leader forcibly sodomizes him in the shower. This leads Derek to change his whole worldview. But that is just dumb and out of character. Derek keeps getting himself into trouble because he is a stickler for principles.

    It’s not just about principles but about authority. Prior to his prison term, Derek was always the alpha, and others looked up to him. Being part of the skinhead gang wasn’t just about ‘principles’ but the pride of princehood. Derek spoke, others listened. He gave orders, others followed. They were his disciples. He felt he had the White Pride movement in the palm of his hand. No one among his peers dared to give him lip. He was the head wolf within the pack.
    In prison, he continues to see himself as the natural leader, and other whites should look up to him. But he realizes that guys in prison are harder, tougher, older. They are seasoned veterans of thuggery and criminality. If Derek went to prison for over-zealous behavior while foiling a crime, other ‘Aryans’ are probably there for brazen criminal acts. Derek was a leader of boys and girls on the outside, but he’s faced with real men inside the prison. And when he begins to look down on the ‘Aryans’ as unworthy of his attention, others feel offended and put him in his place. He is ironically made the ‘bitch’ by fellow whites.

    But nothing that has happened challenges his basic principles. Lamont proves only that every group has likable outliers… As for the Aryans: they are not supposed to sell drugs and rape one another. But is it realistic to expect sterling characters in prison? Besides, when people betray their principles, couldn’t that be because the people are bad, not the principles?

    All very true, but we have to remember that Derek is an extremist with hardcore view of the races. It all depends on one’s starting point. Reality allows for outliers and variances, but Derek developed a fanatical view of the world where whites are his brothers and non-whites are his enemies, pure and simple. Derek began to reject Political Correctness because he came to notice reality for what it was — lots of blacks are scum, and white people have grievances too — , but then he went far beyond noticing reality by creating his own fantastic worldview based on the iron laws of race. He didn’t go from social naivete to principled commitment to reality but to a rather delusional iron law of the Aryans vs everyone else, especially the Jews and blacks. And for that reason, it is plausible that he is disillusioned by the behavior of the ‘Aryans’ in prison and grateful for the Nice Negro. Derek got to hating blacks so much that he was unwilling to admit that not all Negroes are insane bunners.
    Also, Lamont, buffoonish as he is, shows that decency isn’t really about learning, intelligence, or highfalutin stuff; it’s about people connecting on the level of openness and friendship. So, it’s not really about ‘basketball and pussy’ but about being honest and forthright. It’s like Zorba the Greek isn’t a learned man but wise in instinct. Of course, contra Zorba’s argument, it’s much easier to see the good-or-bad in a man when peoples have their own nations. It’s true that Greeks shouldn’t hate all Turks, and vice versa, but it’s good for Greeks to have Greece and good for Turks to have Turkey. Nationalism(minus imperialism) is the best means by which people can judge others by their character than skin color or ethnicity. After all, a Greek in Greece feels secure and need not worry about extinction of his people, culture, and land. Greeks and Turks once butchered one another because of the insecurities and anxieties created by the Ottoman Empire.

    …it is merely a shaming tactic to liken complaints about white dispossession to blacks blaming the white man for their own failings. It might appeal to an older generation of “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” conservatives, but Derek would see through it. What matters is the question of truth. White dispossession is real. The solution is not to “try harder” in a rigged system but to change the system. Blacks who still fail in a system of objective black privilege can’t blame the system for that. They can only blame themselves.

    Not quite. Sweeney is different from most Negroes who only blame whitey(with encouragement from Jews). Sweeney is saying it’s not enough for blacks to blame everything on white because of ‘muh history’. Blacks as individuals must examine their own behavior and ask what they’ve done to make the world a better or worse place. And this rule should apply to whites as well. While Derek is right about the social problems caused by blacks and non-whites, his solutions have been lousy. Adopting extremist views, turning hate into a virtue, and reducing the world into a Manicheanism hasn’t done anything for him or his crew. Derek’s extremism made him blind to even the good things about other races while blinding him to the failures among his own kind.

    After all, Derek didn’t suffer merely for his ideas. He’s not a saintly martyr. He made his own life miserable by adopting a cartoonish view of the world where it all boils down to heroic skinheads vs everyone else. Blacks and Jews didn’t make him get a stupid Swastika tattoo on his chest. With his smarts and ability, he could have served his race in more constructive ways, but he chose the lifestyle of a skinhead lout, and this rubs off badly on his younger brother. For all his superior intelligence and leadership qualities, he didn’t try to elevate his racial comrades but descended to their level of crude thuggery. Ironically, skinheads are totally ‘whigger’ material.

    …when Sweeney chooses to focus on his individual life rather than questions of social justice, this is not moving from the “wrong questions” to the “right questions.” …focusing on your own life doesn’t make social problems disappear. It simply distracts you from noticing them. Individualism is just escapism. It is a form of cowardice.

    I don’t think Sweeney is arguing for individualism. He’s not saying focusing on one’s individual issues will make larger problems go away. Rather, a better world begins with yourself. So, even if one has a generally low opinion of blacks, it simply wouldn’t do to act like a lout and blame the world for it. There are too many things that Derek and his mates do that are self-destructive. And this was certainly true of the Alt Right. True, Jewish Power has done everything it could to destroy white identity and interests, BUT did Richard Spencer and Co. have to indulge in drugs and alcohol and act like louts? Did they have to get together and give Hitler salutes while screaming Sieg Heil? Did Spencer have to mess up his marriage in the most spectacular way? Did Matt Heimbach have to boff his mother-in-law and beat up his father-in-law? What was that? Jerry Springer hour? Does Chris Cantwell have to be a cantaloupe-head? Hating ‘ni**ers’ is one thing; must so many white-nats act like ‘whiggers’? Especially when Jews are out to get you and smear you as a ‘white supremacist neo-nazi’, how about not acting like cartoonish clowns? If Jews use the rain machine to make you wet, the last thing you want to do is break your own umbrella. But that’s just what Spencer, Heimbach, and Cantwell did.

    Jordan Peterson, goofy guy that he is, did have a good point about making-your-own-bed. The world has lots of problems, and they won’t go away however a good person you try to be on the individual level. That said, making the world a little better has to begin with you. If the world is full of lies, you-as-individual must stop telling lies. Derek was right about the rottenness of race relations in the US, but he made things worse by not only regarding others as crude stereotypes but becoming a crude stereotype, as if to confirm the propaganda of SPLC: “Look, they are nazis!” The best way to combat Jewish supremacism is not to embrace white supremacism but to reject all forms of supremacism and call for a limited nationalism for all peoples.

    The movie explains this miracle with a ridiculous deus ex machina: the spindly black buffoon Lamont somehow has enough credibility with the various prison gangs to “protect” Derek.

    This is actually far more plausible than people might think. Having been around plenty of Jews and blacks, I know how they think and operate. Blacks are not only about thuggery and apelike behavior, though there’s plenty of that. There’s a scene in DO THE RIGHT THING where the usually unpleasant Radio Raheem has a soft spot for Mookie(played by Lee). And Mike Tyson, the lout and thug that he is, could break down in tears thinking of Cus D’Amato. So, it’s possible that Lamont, a much-liked figure among the blacks, could have asked for favors among the brothas who, out of favor to him, left the white boy alone. Unlikely but far from implausible. It’s like the scene in THE KILLING FIELDS where the skilled pleading by Dith Pran leads to Sydney Schanberg being spared. Things like that do happen. Negroes are craaaazy, but if you know their psychology and treat them like children-who-are-bigger-and-stronger-than-you, you can get along. It’s like the meanest nastiest black biatch will melt in your hands if you tell her how she looks so lovely in that weave, shoo. They suddenly go from crazy gorilless to happy gorilless.

    Video at 56:22

    Danny gets in trouble when he writes a paper on Mein Kampf for the civil rights portion of Murray’s class on American history.

    That is the funniest thing in the movie.

    Once Derek is paroled, he does not want to get back into the gang. Instead he wants to get Danny out of it. This is irrational. Derek killed two Crips. They will be seeking revenge. He has a better chance if he has the gang behind him. If he really wants to extract Danny and break with the gang, then he needs to be diplomatic about it.

    He did try to be diplomatic and walk away on friendly terms, but things fell apart. The problem is it’s not easy to bid farewell to a lifestyle like that. It’s like the system keeps calling Deckard back to be blade runner. It’s hard to walk away from gang life. It’s like a family, a brotherhood. Also, the gang hero-worships him and has no clue as to his transformation in prison. As for the crips being out to get him, if they really were they would have gotten him in jail. Crips, lowlifes that they are, know that Derek didn’t kill the blacks in a gang war but in a foiled robbery. It’s like the mafia make a distinction between ‘business’ and ‘personal’. Negroes are like that too.
    Also, it’s not about being rational or irrational but being sensible. Derek has walked away from that life; he’s outgrown it, much like Mark Wahlberg folded his career as a rapper. His priority is to save his younger brother from the lifestyle, and he knows they must go Cold Turkey. It’s like when Lawrence of Arabia finally calls it quits, it’s total and absolute. He’s no longer a fellow Arab but a British soldier back on duty.

    Also, whatever one thinks of Sweeney, he didn’t have to do what he did. But he did it for someone who hates blacks because he believes that, on some level, there is something better inside Derek. So, on that personal level, he owes something to Sweeney who went the extra mile for an enemy.
    In a way, it’s like the reverse situation of RIDE WITH THE DEVIL. Why does the black guy ride and fight alongside the Confederates even though it’s the North that promises freedom for blacks? Because the Negro’s master, unlike typical white Southerners, has set him free and treats him as a dear friend. On the personal level, the Negro feel indebted to him even though he would rather be on the other side. Rationally, the Negro should use the first opportunity to run and join the Northern side, but his sense of personal indebtedness to his master/buddy keeps him fighting for the South. He is both grateful and bitter. Their bond of friendship is also like a bondage. And Derek feels similarly about Sweeney. Much of human nature is personal, not rational. Consider the sentimentalism that affects even the Dissident Right, especially among the boomer types. Why are they so incapable of naming the Jew?

    Also, Derek’s transformation is a testament to the power of pain. What finally breaks Cool Hand Luke in the end? The grueling agony. He simply couldn’t take it anymore. Likewise, Derek’s transformation owes as much to pain & fear as to better understanding. Thus, it is both noble and ignoble. Through prison experience, he did become wiser and more broadminded. But he also became more fearful and desperate. But then, so many choices we make are not pure but compromised, a blend of courage and cravenness. Take Puyi in THE LAST EMPEROR. He really did change but under considerable duress. The story of Jesus is an outlier because He didn’t cave to the pain.

    …Danny’s bloody murder in a school bathroom by a Crip. Again, I am not sure what the filmmakers were thinking, but this conclusion does not support their anti-“hate” agenda.

    The ending would indicate that AMERICAN HISTORY X is not a simple anti-hate message. It is disturbed by the radical politics of hate but is aware that hate is not a one-way street. There is plenty of black hostility and thuggery. Why not give the film its due in addressing this truth instead of being so incredulous that a propaganda movie subverts its own message? While the film isn’t entirely truthful and invokes certain PC shibboleths, it has just enough courage and daring to break free of ideological dogma.

    Tragedy of history is that sentiments are rarely in sync. Jean Renoir made THE GRAND ILLUSION as remembrance of the tragedy that was the Great War and as warning against another such conflagration, but Nazi Germany banned the film and embarked on war-footing. So many in UK and France didn’t want war, but Hitler regarded their decency or moderation as weakness. Likewise, so many whites wanted to bury the hatchet and be nice to Jews following WWII, but Jews decided to destroy the white race. Sentiments out of sync in history.

    AMERICAN HISTORY X ends on a note of tragedy. Derek really did change and tried to turn his brother around, but the immediate world remained as it is, with sun rising in the east and setting in the west. It was the hard lesson learned by the lord in Akira Kuroawa’s RAN. As an old man, he’d seen enough battles & bloodbath and wanted to retire peacefully in an orderly world, but war was still raging in the hearts of man. In EXCALIBUR, Uther wants to call it quits and settle down. He’s ‘weary of battle’, but his enemies are ready for more. The ending of AMERICAN HISTORY X is well aware of this ironic tragedy, and it was intentional. It’s like when the sun is in the east, the west is dark, and when the sun is in the west, the east is dark. Rarely are humanity and history in sync. The film ought to be lauded for the courage to end that way.

    Derek bears some responsibility for his brother’s death: not for exposing him to “hate” but for pulling him out of the gang. As a member of the gang, Danny enjoyed some protection, because the Crips knew that attacking him would lead to retaliation.

    Being a member of a gang is a double-edged sword. It can mean protection by your buddies, but it can also mean carrying a target on your back. Notice how blacks who joined the Bloods or Crips had a higher chance of getting killed than blacks who didn’t. Same with Mexican gangs. Some may join as a survival strategy, but chances are it will reduce their chances of survival as gang life is about guns and knives, like in WEST SIDE STORY.

    Memory will not heal the divisions between blacks and whites in America, because there was no common community before slavery. There is enmity all the way down. Memory only polarizes race relations in America, which in turn polarizes whites against each other.

    It all depends on who controls the memory. When proud whites controlled American Historical Memory, there was something for everyone. Anglos and Europeans deserved respect for having conquered and settled North America, creating a great new nation. But American Indians were ennobled in time as brave and worthy warriors who’d put up a courageous war against the white man. Cowboy and Indians were both honored. Black American experience was recognized as one of slavery, struggle, resilience, and color. And yet, White South was also admired for its loyalty, courage in battle, honor code, and its rich heritage. Every group got its due. But then, Jews came along and took control of the Memory and Narrative; the result has been total sacralization of the Negroes and total vilification of whitey, especially Southern whitey.

    True, even with white control of memory, blacks were bound to be problematic due to evolution. Having evolved for 100,000s of years in wild Africa teeming with gorillas, rhinos, elephants, hyenas, lions, hippos, cape buffalos, leopards, and wild hogs, blacks evolved to be tough, fast, strong, nasty, wild, and crazy. Black women emphasized butt-shaking, and black men emphasized dong-swinging, and that’s why black culture is mostly about the beat and beating up people. What were whites thinking when they imported so many of these black savages? But because blacks were so tough, they could be made to pick lots of cotton and carry big bales on their shoulders. Going was good for whites as long as it lasted.

    Even though whites and blacks came to co-exist only relatively recently, there is a strong bond between whites and blacks because whites are so into black-derived music, so admiring of black athleticism, and so into black-buns-and-dongs. White race is into serious jungle fever.
    Just consider: Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, and etc. are all Slavs, but are Poles into Russian culture, are Russians into Polish culture, are Czechs into Serbian culture, are Serbs into Slovak culture? Chances are NO. But I’ll bet they’re all into rap music and ‘twerking’. Or consider Japan, China, and S. Korea. They are all East Asian, but the chances are they don’t much care about one another’s cultures or histories BUT they are all into worshiping NBA Negroes and imitating rap music. What do UK, France, Holland, Poland, and Germany have in common? Jungle Fever. So, even though whites and blacks are racially different and even though many whites(including ‘liberals’) don’t want to live with lots of Negroes, so many whites, cons and libs, are enamored of the rambunctious Negro. UK cheers for black athletes, France cheers for black athletes, Holland cheers for black athletes, and etc. Because blacks are so good at sports & hollering and because they excite whites with buns & dongs, whites have come to idolize blacks as the magical race, and this idolatry is what most whites have in common across entire continents. An Armenian may know almost nothing about Belgium, and a Belgian may know nothing about Armenia, but the chances are both are into worshiping Negro athletes and shaking their butts to rap music. What does a white Parisian have in common with a white Texan? They are both into black sports and black music. And they both celebrate ACOWW or Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs.

    The most likely hypothesis is that the filmmakers were just smug. They thought that Derek’s views are self-evidently evil and that their own views are self-evidently good.

    Or maybe Trevor Lynch is being a bit smug in thinking the Jewish Tony Kaye simply had no art in him and only propaganda in mind. Rather than seeing AMERICAN HISTORY X as failed propaganda, it makes more sense to see it as failed art. Like some of John Sayles films, it is willing to go further and dig deeper than your average Hollywood movie, BUT it doesn’t go quite far enough and falls back on one too many time-worn formulas to fill in the gaps. Thus, it doesn’t quite make it as art(which would be something like MY BEAUTIFUL LAUNDRETTE), but the effort, even if half-hearted, is there.

    Now, a failed work of propaganda would be Sam Fuller’s ludicrous WHITE DOG that doesn’t make sense even on its own grounds.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @Father O'Hara
  95. I like how the moral of the movie is: “Never quit Nazi-ing or else you’ll be killed.”

    It’s like the moral of Looking for Mr. Goodbar: “Never quit sleeping around or you will be killed.”

  96. This movie is not made for you middle-class middle-aged people.

    It is expressly made for exploiting young working-class men.

  97. cohen says:
    @profnasty

    Not according to Hollywood or historians who have the tendency to copy each others.

    I was amused by the the knowledge of the students and the product American Educational system is producing.
    Your comments regarding Hitler will get you into trouble in Europe. Look what happened to that 93 years old German lady who is locked up in solitary confinement for speaking her mind about 6 million Jews counts.

  98. @JimDandy

    And your point is? Almost all actors are libtards. It’s probably what makes them actors in the first place. The subject was which was Norton’s best role. Apparently, you’ve mistakenly concluded that the subject is ” whether Edward Norton is a libtard”.

    Bullfight fans mostly know that their hero matadors are maricones, but that has nothing to do with their skill at bullfighting. Recognizing ability isn’t dependent upon sharing the performer’s mental illness.

    Have you noticed that David Lee Roth is an untalented, arrogant asshole who has no career anymore because he’s an untalented, arrogant asshole? I didn’t think so.

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @JimDandy
  99. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    Get a job?!?!

    Old Sport, our glorious pandemic has given me a way to combine two of my favorite hobbies to maximum efficiency; ridicule, and making money.

    It’s the online economy, new normal, my Wood Bruva.

    Now are you going to tell me how to make a knife out of a bar of soap, or what?

    • Replies: @restless94110
  100. Truth says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    …Black thugs who come to your house to steal your car in the middle of the night won’t be armed.

    …Being busted for cocaine at the Heathrow airport will ruin your career as Mike Hammer.

    …7 foot skinheads in prison are on the downlow.

    …Your sister will attack you with a baseball bat for suggesting that Rodney King might have been in the wrong.

    …Your mother will be ashamed you came out of her body.

    You know, you’re right, Stryke-Dogg.

    The first one is a little iffy.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  101. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    No, but I read two excellent books about prison life that I highly recommend,

    So, the Hollywood industry is anti-white, but the Manhattan book publishers aren’t?

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    , @Trinity
  102. Dr. Doom says:

    The enemy’s Anti-White propaganda is in your face now.
    Its palpable. Its obvious. Unsubtle and blatant.

    In the past, it was guilt trips about po’ blech folks and Jewish victims.
    Everybody that wasn’t Anti-White was a Nazi Bigot Hater Stereotype.

    Now its become so in your face, its backfiring.
    Its presenting good things as bad, and bad things as good.

    Its losing eyeballs and ears fast. The Lugenpresse has lost the narrative.
    The narrative cannot be debated so they impose more and more censorship.

    Creating an echo chamber for )))them((( and no one else.
    A self defeating tactic for an unabashed hostile alien…

  103. JimDandy says:
    @Twodees Partain

    My points are clear. There is no need to repeat, for instance, that Norton is a shitty actor and laughably miscast in the roles he seeks out, but I will–just for you, sport.

    PS Please note the part where I wrote “Say what you will about David Lee Roth, but”

  104. @Cowtown Rebel

    “I am a Confederate”

    I am not. But you are correct in your allusion to the situation in the Confederate states after the surrender: Africans unleashed: a rampage of rape and murder, mostly of poor southern whites. Nathan Bedford Forrest turned the early Klan into into a self-defense force.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  105. KenH says:

    Regarding prison stories I read an autobiography by a high ranking member of one of the major outlaw motorcycle clubs in California and he said there’s a joke that starts “what has two black eyes and no shoes”? The answer is a white boy in the LA county jail since whites are so few in the jail that they are routinely preyed upon by blacks and Latinos.

  106. @Truth

    The NYC publishing hive, apparently controlled by middle age Jewish women, is intermittingly anti-white. As you know, 2020 was the year of submission to the black goddess. It was a well-funded spectacle: so much guilty white cash flowing into all cultural sectors. Those Jewish women created a whole new category devoted to books by and about black ladies. We know a lot about black ladies now.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  107. @Jeff Stryker

    “Being busted for cocaine at the Heathrow airport will ruin your career as Mike Hammer”

    This is upper level anti-comedy. As are the rest of your ditties. But after having a laugh at his expense I must remind the audience that Stacy Keach is an excellent actor who’s had a long and solid career. His performance in Houston’s Fat City (1972) is incredibly thoughtful and tragic.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  108. Pheasant says:
    @Priss Factor

    Do you ever shut the fuck up?

  109. JimDandy says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    All true. It’s not uncommon for them to openly say now that they aren’t interested in white male authors.

  110. Anonymous[103] • Disclaimer says:

    Not sure what the point of the review is but I’m going with “Niggers bad.”

  111. Angharad says:
    @Trinity

    My favorite convict is the sublime Bobby Beausoleil. He did the Tate killings – which was a simple drug deal gone very, very bad. Bobby was a beautiful, charismatic devil – and is still insanely hot unto old age. He’s a musician, and has his own website.

    http://www.bobbybeausoleil.com/

    America is a very, very strange place.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Trevor Lynch
  112. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    There is no such thing as “white civilization”, just civilization. Moreover, you talk about repatriation of all non-whites and the removal of the Jew, but that’s a pipe dream. Why even mention something that cannot and will not be done? Of course, if you actually tried doing something about it, then you would be taken more seriously. But, you won’t, so you cuck and cower instead.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  113. Corvinus says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    “in the Confederate states after the surrender Africans unleashed: a rampage of rape and murder, mostly of poor southern whites.”

    Citations required here, or retract your statement.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  114. @White Elephant

    “If you look at almost every sitcom, soap opera, sci-fi series (especially Star Trek) you will always see WW2, third reich and ‘nazi’-eque episodes. You will never see anything remotely communist.”

    With three words I refute this statement: “E Pleb Neesta”.

    The original Star Trek series did indeed have an episode (#23, second season, 1968) where Yanks (Yangs) and the Commies (Kohms) were represented, with the Kohms being the nasty, totalitarian descendants of the present PRC and the Yangs being the freedom-loving, oppressed descendants of the bloodied but unbowed Yanks. The episode is entitled, “The Omega Glory”.

    Some folks call the episode corny. Me? I was a young man who saw it (along with my family) originally aired more than a half century ago. When the white guy Yang proudly comes out carrying the tattered American flag, I got patriotic goose bumps, I’ll admit. Same response when Kirk completes the “Pledge of Allegiance” for the stunned Yangs. My older brother and folks felt the same way about it, as I recall. The original Star Trek was a family fave we all enjoyed heartily.

    Never say ‘never’………. 😉

  115. I’m just going to park this here:

    https://armedwithknowledge.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-truth-about-propaganda-and.html

    I think the movie ended up being about the character Ed Norton wanted for his character to be what he was in the eyes of everybody he was allied with or close to. In turn the Film lost some of its edge as propaganda. Still, this was probably allowed to happen because the message is in the slippery slope, not the character flaw.

  116. Trinity says:
    @Angharad

    Bobby Beausoleil was in jail at the time of the Tate/LaBianca murders. Beausoleil was charged with the murder of Gary Hinman. There is some theory that the Tate/LaBianca murders were done as copycat murders to the Hinman murder to lay the blame on the Black Panthers. So many theories with this case. Why this case garnered so much attention for so many years is fascinating. As has been pointed out many times by reporters and interviewers, Manson became infinitely more famous/infamous than Tate who was a B-list actor at best and he even became more well known than The Beach Boys who apparently took liberties with a song Manson had written and changed the words and title. From what I have read all the Manson girls adored the young and admittedly handsome Beausoleil, but I just have no admiration for a stone cold killer no matter if he looks like Elvis Presley. People like Manson and female serial killer Eileen Wournos were defeated from the start, same with the guys I mentioned earlier, Carl Panzram and Jack Henry Abbott, particularly Manson and Wournos who really led nightmarish lives. But many of Manson’s followers could have went a different path, terrible waste of life. I saw a relatively recent interview of Beausoleil and he seems to have mellowed with age like we all do, I guess he has resigned himself to the fact that he will spend the rest of his life in prison and he should. I have no idea what his life was like prior to meeting up with Manson, but he made a bad choice. It happens. Hey, don’t roll the dice if you can’t pay the price. Don’t take your feet down no dead end street. Cue: Theme From Baretta by Sammy Davis Jr.

    Yes, America is a very, very strange place, but is it really any more strange than anywhere else. Are not people just people wherever you go? Have people really changed that much over the centuries? America is like a large California or Florida, none of us are originally from here, so to say America is strange is like saying Europe is strange and now we have to add every sort of Ahmad, Wang Lei, Shlomo, Kwame, and every kind of ethnicity or race to the mix. America is a muddied mess. Iceland looks better every day. Going to go catch an old episode of Baretta now. Good night from America, and tell them Trinity is still my name.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  117. @KenH

    …shoots and murders Derek’s brother in cold blood.

    I read somewhere years ago that one version of the script featured Derek becoming a Nazi again after his brother’s murder.

  118. @Truth

    MORE THINGS I LEARNED

    …The brothers who hustle for hoops all day on Venice courts will care so much about losing a low-ball bet on hoops that they will try to steal his car in the middle of the night.

    …It is not at all pitiful to be in your late 20’s & hustling 10th graders at a basketball court.

    …Homophobic Skinhead gangs will not think it is gay at all to have their junk out sodomizing some a hangaround in the shower because he declined to participate in their prison yard drug deals.

    …When making a movie about raving anti-Semitic skinheads it makes perfect casting sense to cast noticeably Jewish actors like Edward Furlong in lead roles.

    …A cunning black teen felon gangbanger won’t shoot you after school on the Venice beach where you stalk him everyday but in the boy’s toilet at school where he is bound to be caught & immediately jailed.

    …Mike Hammer did so much blow that it caused him to have a cleft palette when he shaved the stache.

    …If you are a handwringing Jewish 60’s liberal back number with a lust for the blonde MILFS the best choice is the mother of that raving anti-Semitic skinhead with the huge swastika on his chest.

    …Local authorities won’t suspect you in a racially motivated Supermarket robbery when you are the locally famous skinhead who commits the crime without a mask on camera.

    …Police will never deduce you committed a first degree murder against an unarmed teenager as you can easily explain that you curbed stomped him in self-defense.

    …California prisons have a staff 2 & an inmate population of perhaps 10.

    …Judging from the height/size of Ed’s 7 foot skinhead prison rapist it must have really hurt the first time.

    …A soul-dead heartless pitiless skinhead will act like Jodie Foster in THE ACCUSED.

    …The best path to redemption is to be sodomized in prison.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trevor Lynch
  119. @Hapalong Cassidy

    American Me is a great film.

    Blood in, Blood Out is another one.

    Recently, Shotcaller is a great prison movie that further explores the alliance between the Aryan Brotherhood and The Mexican Mafia

  120. @Truth

    So now we have a place called a Jaynt, a guy named Wes, and somebody called a Wood Bruva.

    And you are making money from this stuff?

    Well, good on ya. You go, girrrlll.

    Still have no idea what it is you are saying. You need a knife? Why not just go online and buy one?

    But here, I’ll oblige you: take a bar of soap. Get in a shower. Wash your mouth out. Then use a knife to carve the bar of soap into a knife. Then hide your new soap knife under your bunk. When the screws come to search your basement cell, pretend you never knew it was there.

    After that, go back to making money as an incel. Only a few more years and you will be able to buy a few more cats to keep you company. Good luck, Woody Bruva!

    • Replies: @Truth
  121. @Angharad

    My favorite convict is the sublime Bobby Beausoleil. He did the Tate killings – which was a simple drug deal gone very, very bad.

    No he didn’t. He was in jail when the Tate La Bianca murders happened.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  122. @Jeff Stryker

    …Police will never deduce you committed a first degree murder against an unarmed teenager as you can easily explain that you curbed stomped him in self-defense.

    Ha ha

  123. @Corvinus

    “There is no such thing as “white civilization”, just civilization.”

    That’s where I stopped reading.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Mike Tre
  124. TKK says:
    @DCThrowback

    Yes. It is all odd.

    Then, they trotted out the story that she had many lovers, etc.

    She was shot standing beside several armed cops.

    But- who benefits?

    No one cares she died. Her name is not mentioned anymore. Is it to further enrage whites and make us know we are powerless?

  125. @Trinity

    Norway and Sweden needs to concern itself about third world Muslims raping Norwegian women from what I have read and heard. Is this true or is it horseshit?

    The whole “Muslim rape epidemic in Europe” narrative is just horseshit. There is no legitimate question of that. What is particularly annoying about that one is that people here who see through 9/11 (and thus, presumably, the whole “Islamic terrorism” BS) will get infuriated whes is y ou tell them that the Muslim rape edidemic is BS. Surely, it stands to reason that if “Muslims as terrorists” is horseshit, then “Muslims as rapists” is as well. (Fool me once….

    The other thing is that it doesn’t take too much investigation to figure out who is behind both narratives. So, when the people who say that they are so “red-pilled” on the JQ are so emotionally attached to this particular Zionist propaganda narrative… but… well, if you’re really red-pilled, you shouldn’t be so easy to troll with these absurd propaganda narratives.

    I have heard Norway’s big brother Sweden is now the rape capital of Europe. Is this true or is it horseshit?

    Yeah, Sweden has become a Mad Max dystopia apparently. Well, no. I mean, the fact of the matter is that everybody really should be able to see through this kind of thing. The Zionist propaganda machine (things like Breitbart etcetera) put this stuff out there so that certain people can glom on to this stuff and effectively discredit themselves. It’s really infuriating because, when somebody like Paul Craig Roberts falls for this, and he’s also telling the truth about 9/11 and a host of other things, he’s basically discrediting all the 9/11 truth and the rest of it, by associating it with this stuff about non-existent rape epidemics in Europe. So, some of the agenda is a bit like the flat earth psy-op, just to discredit things that actually are true, by associating them with obvious nonsense.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Dumbo
  126. @Trevor Lynch

    Manson encouraged Bobby to do the drug deal with Gary Hinman which of course went wrong.

    The mainstream media has tried to downplay Hinman’s involvement in the drug business, but the fact of the matter is that he manufactured small amounts of mescaline & amphetamine in his basement.

    Manson did not like Bobby but was afraid Bobby would reveal Manson’s participation in Hinman’s killing (Cutting him with the sword) which was a violation of his parole that would have sent him directly back to prison.

    Dennis Wilson also “borrowed” a Manson song apparently without paying a royalty, which was really stupid.

    Manson himself has denied that he put much faith in Terry Melcher’s promises of a recording deal, the actual killings were an attempt to intimidate Dennis Wilson into paying up the royalty on the song he blatantly stole from Manson.

    Wilson himself was a ruffian who actually beat Charles Manson up once & convinced himself that Charlie owed him the song because he let Charlie & his girls stay for the summer.

    Manson wanted the public to believe that black panthers did it but in reality he knew that Wilson would know he was behind the Tate killings & it was simply an attempt to rattle Wilson into paying up.

    So it was not a drug deal. Manson was into hallucinogens as oppose to Hollywood drugs like cocaine.

    It was a combination of Dennis Wilson’s stupidity & Manson’s craziness…both worsened by drugs.

    Manson could have said all this at the trial but he himself was afraid the Hollywood machine would turn on him. Indeed, Bugliosi downplayed the involvement of Hollywood in Manson’s life.

    • Replies: @Truth
  127. @SunBakedSuburb

    I thought he was good as Frank James in “The Long Riders.” But, David Carradine literally rode away with that one. His portrayal of Cole Younger was inspirational and even reminiscent of Squintin’ Clint’s “The Outlaw Jose Wales.”

    Carradine may have been a strange person to put it mildly. Regardless, “The Long Riders” climactic coda accompanying the ambush by the Square Heads is eerily spine tingling. I have the out-of-print soundtrack on L. P., and I listen to it often. I recently saw an earlier, less gritty, but very similar version of the shootout in Northfield in a film starring Robert Wagner as Jesse. It had an ending that featured an old blind Negro singing about The Dirty Little Coward that Shot Mr. Howard.

    I understand how many feel about (((Hollywood))), and they are right. But, a dramatization is a useful means of telling a story. The main problem is in a film like “Pearl Harbor” you have a silly love triangle (so the Women won’t get bored), and a pilot who is not only flying P-40’s, but Spitfires as well, then back to a P-40 to be one of the airmen who actually did manage to get aloft during the attack, and finally, flying B-25’s off the deck of the U.S.S. Hornet. This was complete and totally unnecessary (((Cinematic))) embellishment that robs the credit for the unique character of their missions and individual achievement that was due to the Eagle Squadron, Doolittle’s Raiders, and the U. S. Army Air Corp pilots stationed at Pearl on December 7th, rather than honoring them. Contrast that with the earlier film, “Tora! Tora! Tora!,” which dealt with the planning of the attack and the efforts to decode Japanese transmissions, featured the primary military participants, and was devoid of fluff.

    I remember when Stacy Keach smoked so much Marijuana that he turned into a Lizard!!!

  128. Trinity says:

    I liked Stacy Keith in “Fat City” with Jeff Bridges. The movie isn’t for everyone but I though it was watchable.

  129. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Hmm, reading true crime is usually safe unless there is a racial element the Jew wishes to brainwash the public with. “In The Belly Of The Beast” the book was written by a self avowed albeit very articulate and self educated convict named Jack Henry Abbott. Abbott was the son of an Irish American soldier and a Chinese American prostitute and spent his life in foster homes and started committing crimes at a young age. Like Manson and others I mentioned like Gary Gilmore, Panzram, etc., Abbott spent most of his life in foster homes, reformatories, jails and prison. I read this book decades ago in the Eighties before I became wise to the JQ, but I found Abbott’s racial views to be total bullshit as I was probably racially aware before I hit puberty. Nonetheless, I found the book a great read on prison and prison brutality. I believe (((Norman Mailer))) and others helped with Abbott receiving parole only for Abbott to kill a waiter while during an altercation while in NYC. Thanks, (((Normy.)))

    (((Norman Mailer))) also did a good job on the Gary Gilmore story. Once again, no Jewy agenda being pushed just an interesting story and book. Anyone who grew up in the Seventies will remember Gary Gilmore. I read this book while underway and at sea. Borrowed it from a fellow sailor and I “forgot” to return it. hehe. This was in the mid 1980s, once again, not potty trained on the JQ yet and the book has nothing to do with pushing an agenda other than telling about Gary Gilmore and Nicole, his girlfriend.

    “The Hot House: Life Inside Leavenworth Prison” by Pete Early? Hmm, read this one in the mid 1990s when the kid was still breast feeding on the subject of J-power and influence, but this was a true crime book and all the lead characters were White convicts with the exception of a Black warden and some other White guy who had a position in running the prison. The Aryan Brotherhood is discussed in this book and has some interesting characters serving time in one of America’s most famous federal prisons. And the kid never buys books nowadays, only checks them out of the library, no publishing company is receiving my money you can believe that. Cue: Right Place Wrong Time by Dr. John fo’ da Troof.

  130. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    So now we have a place called a Jaynt, a guy named Wes, and somebody called a Wood Bruva.

    You almost had me fooled with the Opie Taylor routine, until you slipped up, Shot Caller…

    When the screws come to search your basement cell,

    Alright, you’re in the jaynt. Probably doing a long stretch, I was wrong. Heads up, my cousin is in the cell next to yours he says the screws are going to be doing a paraphernalia sweep tomorrow! Hide that cell phone you are typing on in your anus.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  131. Truth says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I’m glad Manson’s name came up, I never liked the little 5’3 half-Mexican guy back in the 60s, but when one of our greatest American actors started playing him the 80’s, he was kinda cool:

    • Replies: @Trinity
  132. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    You, dumb cluck, Manson was born in Cincy and raised in Kentucky, he was a Kentucky hillbilly. “Half-Mexican?” lolololol. Taint no Mexican going to sport a beard like that, believe that. Manson did time all over the place, Indiana, Omaha at Boys Town, Cook County jail, reformatories, jails and prisons all over the place. He was a petty thief, guilty of check forgery, pimping, etc. Manson was as White as yours truly.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @redflame
  133. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    “Half-Mexican?” lolololol. Manson was as White as yours truly.

    U-T, if Mom is still alive, have a serious conversation with her. If now, contact a psychic and have a seance.

    https://www.insidehook.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Charles_manson_11_20_2017-e1511221800937-1.jpg?fit=1440%2C886

  134. @Jonathan Revusky

    The whole “Muslim rape epidemic in Europe” narrative is just horseshit.

    It’s surely exaggerated, and most Muslims are not in ‘grooming’ gangs. Also, whites today don’t need Muslims to show the way of debauchery. Black influence and Jewish media are main destroyers of white souls and bodies.

    The real issue is demographic colonization. Even if every Muslim were the nicest guy around, too many of them will change the character of European nations.

    It’s like, if every Hindu were a saint but took over an African nation via endless immigration, it will go from African nation to Hindu nation.

    I’m sure most Jews in Israel are normal people, even decent people. But it sure ain’t Palestine anymore.

  135. @WHAT

    >Germany was defending itself

    By brutally attacking first her immediate neighbors and then aiming to outright genocide russian people.

    Trinity’s way of thinking is all too common among the far right, far left, Jews, blacks, and etc.

    It’s an either/or view of the world. Nazis were either totally evil or totally good. It’s like Stalinists only saw the good in Stalin, Maoists only saw the good in Mao. Hitlerites see only the good in Hitler. And of course, many Jews see Jewishness only as goodness and ANYTHING opposed to Jewish power is ‘evil’ and ‘antisemitic’. And plenty of blacks are into self-worship and BLM. Even though BLM has led to more murders of blacks(by other blacks), blacks just love the self-worship. It’s like, when push came to shove, Jesus chose death & apotheosis than life & obscurity. To become God, He had to die. Likewise, even though BLM is leading to more massacre of blacks, blacks figure it’s a worthy price to pay for black apotheosis as godly and divine.

    This kind of mentality, whether among white nats, blacks, or Jews, is a sign of weak individuality and strong ethnocentrism. There is the need for the individual to submit to the higher glory of the Great Leader or the Great Symbol but is based on exaggerated sense of ethnic pride(or wounded pride).

    One can note the good things done by National Socialists while bemoaning their great crimes, but neo-nazis types can only see the good. It’s like many blacks see only the good of the Black Panthers and BLM. Sure, the Panthers and BLM stand for some good things, but there’s also toxicity and mendacity, but they are overlooked. The same mentality operates among the Hitlerites.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  136. @Corvinus

    “Citations required here, or retract your statement”

    Are you the guy at my mom’s senior apartment complex who scolds his fellow tenants who don’t mask up whilst strolling about outside, taking in the fresh air?

    • LOL: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Cowtown Rebel
  137. @Mike Tre

    I’m not sure there’s anyone who really believes that 4 skinheads (is the blueprint of a modern skinhead a physically gifted, good looking, intelligent white guy? Or an awkward scrawny dork who feels ostracized by society?) would beat 5 teenage negroes in a game a of pickup basketball. But the purpose of the scene is to prove (prove!) that stereotypes are actually not based on reality, but instead just concocted in our collective minds out of thin, racist air.

    No, the scene isn’t pushing blank slate. Rather, it is showing how Derek is truly remarkable not only for his smarts but his bodily skills. While blacks will beat whites 10 out of 1, there is still the chance that whites could win. Boston Celtics had 4 white starters and won the championship twice. Duke Blue Devils were the whiter team in the days of Christian Laettner and won twice.

    The scene is not saying whites are just as good as blacks in B-ball. It is saying that Derek is so skilled(or trains so hard) that he can beat the odds and pull off what the boys did in the movie HOOSIERS.

    It’s not a scene about blank slates but about outliers.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  138. @White Elephant

    I think you are missing the fact that Western Civilization has essentially committed suicide. It’s not that brown people from the third world took over; Rather the west has been rotting from the inside out for decades if not centuries. A combination of (((international finance))), greed, foolishness, and laziness has been the death knell of what once was a great civilization.

    It’s true that Jews are behind much of this; however whites are collectively responsible for allowing, aiding and abetting them to destroy the West.

    Blaming the brown and black people who have been by and large invited in or brought in as slaves because they are useful to the wealthy is mostly a distraction. Even if all nonwhites disappeared tomorrow, atheistic nihilistic perverse child killing white land whales are not going to re-capture their humanity short of a total collapse or Divine Intervention.

    I wonder how many of the posters on this site have had less kids than the replacement rate, and have contributed to the Wests problems during their lifetime. Looking for someone to scapegoat will not help you.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  139. Dumbo says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Actually, it is true. It’s just that “rape” in Sweden and Germany can mean a lot of things. In Sweden in particular because of feminism. But if you change it to “sexual abuse” epidemic then it’s 100% true.

    I am familiar with the current situation Germany. Of all the women in Germany that have been sexually touched in some way against their will, in 100% of the cases it has been by foreigners, mostly Muslims and African refugees. Northern Europeans just don’t do that kind of thing.

    While the Jews play up the “Muslim menace” for their own benefit, they are also the ones behind the Muslim immigration.

    And, as Priss says, even if 90% Muslims are nice, family-oriented people, if they come in large enough numbers, the countries will change.

    France has already changed, it’s no longer what it was.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  140. @Priss Factor

    I like to refer to the mentality you are describing as “the idiot binary”. Most people are caught up in that mode of thinking.

  141. @stevennonemaker88

    I used to think like you “Blaming the brown and black people who have been by and large invited in or brought in as slaves because they are useful to the wealthy is mostly a distraction.”

    Then I woke up.

    I’ve said what I’ve said for one particular reason and that is, you have clearly NOT been to parts of England that are non white enclaves.
    I have.

    Do you know that London and Birmingham, England’s largest and second largest not only have a majority Muslim population, but both Mayors are not from the UK, but Pakistani?
    Do you know that there are many areas, formerly white, now Muslim (predominantly Pakistan)?
    Do you know that in London, the gang warfare is not indigenous but predominantly black, Afro Caribbean, mixed with Russian, Bangladeshi, Somalian and Turkish?
    Do you understand that if Pakistan can grow from 60 million to under 179 million in 40 years, with the UK from 55.5 to 63.5 in the same period with the majority of births coming from immigrants predominantly from 1997 onwards, courtesy of Tony Blair’s open door policy, what does that spell for the future of the indigenous population?

    I could go on, listing fact after fact. I could go on and list crime statistics. I could go on and list more hatred from the indigenous from each subsequent immigrant generation, proving, overwhelmingly that ‘diversity’ is not strength but national suicide.

    You cannot play a game of chess without chess pieces, subsequently you cannot have a war without armies, SUBSEQUENTLY you cannot have civil chaos, courtesy of indigenous vs immigrant, were there no immigrants in that land.

    I’m not saying that the indigenous haven’t contributed to their downfall, but people like you fail to see that there were two purposes for immigration:

    1. More people = more competition for jobs = lowering of wages = increase in the cost of living = lowering of living standards.

    2. Immigration = creation of immigration laws = promotion of immigrant culture and religion = immigrant political parties = immigrant holding of positions of power and authority = influence over indigenous to hate their history and culture = recent statue destruction and support of immigrant groups like BLM.

    If there were NO immigrants and thus none in power, the jew would have no hammer to hit whitey over the head and they would not be able to hide, promoting their anti white rhetoric on movies, TV & msm.
    Do you not see the coincidence in the fact that Britain, drastically started to change, the children of the Windrush West Indians, started coming of age along with the arrival of Indian sub continent peoples started arriving at the start of the 70’s? The TV in the UK DRASTICALLY started to change, in the 80’s, so as to not offend them.

    You do not see the wood for the trees.
    Without ANY immigrants in the west, the jew would not be able to hide and employ his agenda of indigenous culture generation through promotion of non indigenous.
    As I said above about the Pakistani culture secretary, saying there were too many whites in position of power; do you think he would even be in that position, in the 70’s and more so, what would have happened if he’d said it? There would have been an uproar and he’d have been removed immediately! Roll on 50 years to see the impact, upon the UK because of immigration and successive immigrant generations.

    No, the immigrants and the jew have to go, if any western nation is to survive AND THE JEW KNOWS THIS!
    I have absolutely nothing against immigrants, far from it, but the bottom line regarding them is simple. I don’t want Turkish kebab shops, or Chinese Takeaways. I don’t want Curry houses either. If I did I’d travel to their lands and buy it there. More so, I do NOT want people, not of my nation, telling me how to live my life and worse, trying to promote his culture over my own. If he/she wants to live by their culture, that’s fine by me. He/she can go back to their own lands and live with their own people to do so.

    I unlike you, see where this is going to end.
    We are NOT supposed to all be living together. That’s why we have different countries, each with their own cultures and traditions. “East is east and west is west and never the twain shall meet” – Rudyard Kipling said that and he was correct.
    All those people who are pro immigrant and immigration certainly wouldn’t consider selling up their house and living with immigrants in one big communal hall would they? They also wouldn’t give up their home and put up immigrants, they pay for would they? No, but they want everyone else to, especially those who have the common sense to see what immigration does to a nation.

  142. @White Elephant

    BLM is African-American. They’ve been in the US since it was a British colony.

    It would be more accurate to compare Mexicans to Pakistanis. The difference being that some Mexicans are white, or the Indian blood they possess is no more than that of Burt Reynolds.

    The drawback is that Mexico is a contiguous country, while immigrants have to somehow reach UK.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  143. @Peter D. Bredon

    It’s one of those “American exceptionalism” things, like having a stupid anthem

    How is the American National Anthem “stupid”?

  144. @Truth

    So your cousin is in a time warp in the 1930s when they called the guards ” screws?”

    well, bumkie, I am in 2021 so your cuz must be 130 years old by now.

    Unfortunately for you, no one ever heard of the jaynt and the only reason I continue to reply to you is to help you make money in your campaign of ignorant ridicule. I am solidly with you in making enough money for you to buy that self-driving car you crave, so I am doing my best to do my part. Ridicule away, boobie!

    As for cell phones up my anus, I believe that you are probably on a space ship to Uranus. When you arrive there in 2030, let us all know how many cell phones you find there.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
    , @Truth
  145. anarchyst says:
    @Priss Factor

    When it comes to brute strength and endurance, many blacks have the advantage. However, when it comes to critical thinking skills, tactics, and the ability to “look ahead” and plan one’s moves, whites have the advantage.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Priss Factor
    , @Mike Tre
  146. @White Elephant

    Blah blah blah Jews blah blah blah.

    Thank God for the fine upstanding Anglo billionaires like Gates that do everything they can for their own people and don’t promote globalism.

    Yawn.

  147. redflame says:
    @Trinity

    Was not aware of Manson being raised in Kentucky. So Edgar Casey, William Branham and Manson. All three weird and attained world wide negative influence. Did Manson supposedly experience visitations, revelations from “messengers” as well? Kentucky looks to have been used as a psyop breeding ground.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  148. @Jeff Stryker

    Yup,

    But correct me if I’m wrong but do US statistics not show incredible racism from blacks towards whites?
    Are we not just seeing blatant cultural appropriation by blacks (even though they constantly moan about it, but it never happens) but actual takeover of our culture by blacks?
    Do statistics in the US not show that, as a white, you’re 6 times more likely to be killed by a black man, whereas as a black man, six times less likely to be murdered by a white as you are a black?
    I don’t know what you’re getting at with BLM being African American as I already know that.

    Mexicans possibly can be compared to Pakistanis, but Mexicans are overwhelmingly Christian. Pakistanis are Muslim and happy to promote Sharia law of Christian law.

    But really, as I’ve stated, the west will not survive unless it starts removing non whites. It’s that simple. All other nations on this earth, live in their lands as the overwhelming majority Pakistan, China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, all African nations, while really the only non western nation that is mixed, but still predominantly Amerindian are the countries in South America. It’s the west that’s a mixing bowl, and the jew’s adding the ingredients and stirring it all up.

  149. redflame says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    Varg just experienced 16 yrs of alone time (which nords are completely capable of while maintaining sanity) not having to work/wage cuck nor worry about paying bills and had lots of leisure time to read, think and gain cred. He just had to stay in a very small apartment with a window. Though he did get his jaw broken once and got to learn first hand just how very differently those from the near-east think. All his videos are wiped but he went into this in a few where he told his story about living in Iraq and about when he had his jaw broken. He was punished for the jaw break brawl , not the attacker, iirc.

    Don’t know about Sidney.. you mean Sydney? Not familiar with Australia prisons.

  150. redflame says:

    Oh and I respect Varg by the way. Was not dissing on him. Hail Varg.

  151. Trinity says:
    @redflame

    It has been a long time since I read about Manson, but I just did a search and saw that he was placed with his aunt in West Virginia while his mother finished out her prison stint for robbery and then Manson and his mother moved to Indiana in 1943 before Manson was sent to a reformatory for boys at the age of 13 in 1947. His biological father is thought to be one Walker Scott of Cattlesburg, Kentucky. Looks like Manson was screwed from the start. Manson started out in the Blue Grass State but his stay there was not very long it seems. Looks like Manson was just a roaming gypsy but I had thought he spent more time in Kentucky. I remember one interview where he said his uncle in Kentucky told him to quit going to those “Yankee schools, boy” and Manson then claims the next day he set the school on fire. smdh. I believe that was one of his interviews with Dianne Sawyer. Been so long it is hard to remember. Crazy Charlie. Dude, could have been a helluva stand up comedian if he had chosen that route.

    Cue: Kentucky Rain by Elvis

  152. @White Elephant

    You said: “There is only one solution to saving the west – repatriation of ALL non whites back to their ancestral lands. ” Not only is this absurd and impossible, it would fail to solve the root problems and also be wrong.

    The problem with your way of thinking is that you are putting the cart before the horse. Certainly weaponized mass immigration is problematic; but it was not the main source of trouble in the west. White women went from having 4 children on average to less than 2 . The west fought two massive civil wars (world wars); Mass immigration is just one symptom of the overall cultural decline and GREED of the wealthy whites . The immigrants were brought in by our own corrupt governments and big businesses. You are acting as if the immigrants themselves are the PRIMARY problem in the west and caused the cultural decline. This is reversed; uncontrolled immigration is a symptom of the fact that the west is run by a hostile elite and the culture and moral fabric of the west was destroyed, and that Whites collectively have committed (jew assisted) suicide. My grandparents on both sides had the same number of grandchildren as they had children. (replacement rate means having twice the number of grandchildren as children, since each child forms only half of a couple). Middle class whites are destroying THEMSELVES.

    Of course mass weaponized migration drives down wages and leads to street crime and many other issues. But it is not THE problem, it is a symptom of THE problem. As I stated previously, young whites (especially women) are by and large already destroyed. IT will take a total collapse or a miracle to salvage what is left of the west. Your blaming of the immigrants pretty much amounts to scapegoating, as they are NOT the real cause of the problems and were themselves intentionally brought in by OUR OWN PEOPLE.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  153. @restless94110

    Isn’t screw an old British term for the prison guards?

    • Replies: @restless94110
  154. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    LOL, You’re a strange dude.

    But tangentially, already one of my favorite posters.

    Good show, Old Sport.

    • Thanks: restless94110
  155. Truth says:
    @anarchyst

    However, when it comes to critical thinking skills, tactics, and the ability to “look ahead” and plan one’s moves, whites have the advantage.

    Really?

    Then how come you have so few children?

  156. @anarchyst

    When it comes to brute strength and endurance, many blacks have the advantage. However, when it comes to critical thinking skills, tactics, and the ability to “look ahead” and plan one’s moves, whites have the advantage.

    Right. It means black power is more immediate. Blacks can summon it right on the spot in an instant. They can beat up the white there and then.

    In contrast, white power takes time. It requires organization, knowledge, unity, discipline, and people working together.

    A single black can destroy a single white, but united & well-prepared whites can destroy blacks.
    But white unity is not allowed. There is no proud white leadership. White elites cuck to Jews and worship the Magic Negro.

    Blacks have advantage in Instant Power. Whites have advantage in Institutional Power. But it takes time for people to create and manage institutions. In the past, whites did create and control their own institutions. The movie ZULU shows what a well-organized white army can do a whole bunch of blacks. But whites are no longer allowed to organize in such manner around the themes of white pride and power. So, whites without institutional power lose to instant black power.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  157. Corvinus says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    That’s GeneralRipper whom you referred to.

    You made an assertion. Now back it up or retract. I know I am asking much from you, but muster up the intellectual horsepower and provide a source. It will be taxing for you, and you will need a day to recuperate; nonetheless, put up or shut up.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  158. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    You stopped reading because my hate facts made you cower. But they do have pills to boost your T-levels. Again, talking and acting are two entirely separate things. LOL, the Orcs have inundated the Shire, and rather than lead a frontal attack to stop their rampage, you’re still sounding the alarm, hoping someone other than yourself will lead the charge.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  159. Mike Tre says:
    @White Elephant

    Next time stop reading at “Corvinus.”

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @White Elephant
  160. @Corvinus

    I always like when you mention me in dispatches, big girl.

    That means I’m in your head…lol

  161. @stevennonemaker88

    All that you have written, I’ve stated many times, in many replies on many forums. Yes, I completely agree that whites are instrumental to their own demise, through greed, overwhelmingly. Yes, feminism, has resulted in women having fewer children than the older generations, if any at all! But where did feminism come from? What is Fabian Socialism, if not communism on a slow heat? Where does that come from?

    I’m not scapegoating immigrants but simply making an obvious point. Africans were brought into the west for two main reasons. Firstly, to pick the cotton, which was the main trade of the jew. Every land the jew has moved into, before they got involved in jewelry and banking, it was textiles. Secondly, they knew, damn well, that by granting them citizenship and allowed to stay in the west, they were lighting the fuse to a nightmare scenario in the future, where through their civil rights movements and support of the blacks, they will wage a war, with them, against the whites. This was all planned.

    So I’m not solely blaming immigrants, no, but they are a big part of the problem, most notably because they completely fail to see, that simply by BEING in the western civilization, they’re guilty of racism and white genocide, as they push for their cultural rights, over those of the European.
    This is why there is the problem with immigrants.
    If, however, immigrants and their offspring, weren’t granted citizenship; if they were not allowed to buy/rent property nor have a work visa and had to renew their visa, proving they have income to support themselves, then that isn’t a problem. In fact, that’s precisely how it works in Thailand. It’s how it should work in the west also.
    Immigrants should realise that they are second class citizens, in the European civilization and governments should be made of the indigenous, for the indigenous. Guaranteed, once you implemented these laws upon society, you would instantly see a mass exodus of immigrants and their offspring, regardless of being born in that western country. And so it should be.

    And for those whites, who think there’s nothing wrong with immigration and that we should all live together and be one big melting pot, you should consider handing in your passport and renouncing your nationality (seeing as you care nothing for it) and going off to whatever foreign land, that the immigrants you want to live with come from. I’m sure after a year or so there, not being allowed to work, rent or buy property, you’d soon want to come home, but you’re stuck there, a second class citizen in a country of alien peoples.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  162. Mike Tre says:
    @anarchyst

    “When it comes to brute strength and endurance, many blacks have the advantage.”

    Actually, this is wrong. Northern Europeans have the most brute strength (look up the WSM and powerlifting names) and the most endurance (look up who makes up the Navy Seals).

    Negros can run fast and jump high. The real skinny ones can run far in a short amount of time, but give them something to carry and they are pretty much useless. They also cannot swim worth a damn.

  163. @Mike Tre

    I did.
    I don’t get into arguments with people, because I can spot trolls a mile off. You’re right, that’s precisely what I do. The minute I see their handle, I move onto the next comment. Absolutely no desire of reading anything Corvinus has to write.

  164. Mr. Blank says:

    There have been conflicting reports over the years that an alternate ending was filmed that showed Derek re-embracing the skinhead culture — it was supposed to illustrate *mumble-mumble-mumble-something* “neverending cycle of violence” *mumble-mumble-something-else*. It’s more likely they just liked the idea of a cool “dark” ending and went ahead and shot it without thinking about the message it would send in the context of the film’s story.

    If it exists, it’s never been released. I actually believe it’s plausible this alternate ending exists in a vault somewhere; it’s not unheard of for filmmakers to shoot multiple endings and then decide in the editing room which one works best.

  165. @Mike Tre

    Exactly.

    Big Jew has conditioned white people to accept that coons are Supermen.

    When I was in high school playing lacrosse, we drubbed all the nigger schools. Those monkeys could move, but they couldn’t shoot or communicate.

    When I was in Marine Corps boot camp, it became clear how inferior they were.

    Most couldn’t swim or shoot. In addition, they were petrified of heights and being outdoors at night

    I ran the fastest in the three mile and file mile runs and shot the Series high.

    Negroes are a race of stupid slaves…lol

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  166. Truth says:

    I ran the fastest in the three mile and file mile runs and shot the Series high.

    That’s very impressive, Chesty Puller.

    And now as a washed-up Old Fart you spend your time on the internet bitching, whining, cursing like a 7th grader and feeling sorry for yourself.

    You’ve come a long way.

    Semper Fi!

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  167. @Mike Tre

    Nowadays, white men and boys are being subjected to so much hate and indoctrination, they can’t even express those sentiments.

    They hate us.

    Hate them back x 10.

    • Agree: Mike Tre
  168. @White Elephant

    I live in Guatemala, married a local woman and have three kids all born here. I cannot vote, but otherwise I am not restricted from doing most things; I have a full time job, and I am allowed to own property. The people here are actually quite different from the latinos in the US; Of course there are problems; but most have a somewhat traditional culture and value family and other things which where once valued by the west.

    I am not against “immigration” however I am against weaponized mass migration. But immigration is not really the topic; we are talking about issues inside of the country between people of different races. The fact of the matter though is there are hundreds of millions of non-whites ALREADY in the west, ranging from first generation immigrants to people who have lived there as long as whites. There are many millions of mixed race people as well. Simply stating they all have to be forcibly expelled is neither possible nor moral. How do you even determine what country someone’s ancestors are from if they are not a recent immigrant?

    I understand that you are upset with the situation of formerly white, traditional places turned unrecognizable and filled with people from a foreign culture who bring crime and all kinds of problems. However, the root of the problem is our government, wealthy oligarchs, and general cultural degradation. If we fix those problems, we could actually have a chance at solving some of the other issues in a fair and reasonable manner. As long as those problems remain, The destruction of the west will continue from all directions.

  169. And now as a washed-up Old Fart you spend your time on the internet bitching, whining, cursing like a 7th grader and feeling sorry for yourself.

    U mad?

    Yeah nigga, I’m a 59 year old white working man.

    We keep this country going.

    White skilled labor keeps your lights on, homie.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    , @Truth
  170. Mike Tre says:
    @GeneralRipper

    I went to a private Catholic school in the valley (our biggest sports rival was Sailer’s high school alma mater) and played football. Our team was mostly white with some scrappy Koreans thrown in. We had two negroes on the team (one was Gladys Knight’s son, Shanga, and he was extremely obese and rarely played because he had no stamina). As you said, we destroyed the inner city Catholic schools that were majority negro, because we had discipline and technique. We did however, lose to one majority negro team, Baldwin Park, but their running back was a guy named Lawrence Philips, and it was only by 2 points.

    I also joined the Marines (1833, very few negroes in that MOS because again, they can’t swim) and observed all of the same things you did. All of them sported pizza boxes on their chest. All of them. that’s also when I discovered just how lazy they really are as a group.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  171. @stevennonemaker88

    Yes it is, Your Highness. It was also used though extensively in American fiction. Jack London wrote of it and even Patricia Highsmith in the early 50s.

    Screw away!

  172. @stevennonemaker88

    You have turned your back on your culture, mixed with another nation and had children. Of course you’re not going agree with me. You’re part of the problem for crying out loud!

    Did you read what I wrote in my reply about Pakistan? In the time it took their country to increase in population by nearly 300% the UK increased by 12%.
    Do the math and you agree on immigration? Do you not see that any migration is a problem, when that migrant’s nation breeds 24 times that of the host population?

    You will not see the bigger picture because you abandoned your people and chose one of another nation. Why do you think the bible specifically forbids miscegenation? Because it causes serous problems down the line.
    Your children are neither European nor Guatemalan. They belong to neither for one cancels or the other. I’m not saying this to attack you but look at the situation, in the west with mixed race? The overwhelming majority adopt the black over the white. Barak Obama is a classic example. He shit on white people and their culture, ironically when it was his white mother who raised him as his father was nowhere to be sceen.

    I really don’t want to harp on about mixed race, even though the overwhelming agenda is eradicating whites, through mixing, via the Kalergi plan, Kalergi, of course hated the fact that he was a ship, sailing through the sea, with no harbour to dock at and call home but its very much part of the agenda.

    You cannot have a united nation with immigration for reasons explained. And you cannot have Jewish rule without immigration. You talk about our problem being the oligarchs, government and cultural degradation but the problem of cultural degradation is directly as a result of multiculture (immigration) and the oligarchy and government are not the problem of those awake, but in fact those destroyed by cultural degradation – the masses.

    You do not see this and won’t accept it because given the choice of saving your nation would mean a choice between siding with your partner/offspring or your own nation and those fighting against immigration and miscegenation. It appears that you can’t get involved in this, because if you side with your family, you fight against your nation being a proponent of immigration, multiracial and multicultural countries (globalism) and if you side with your nation, you fight against your family and offspring.

    This is not meant as an attack, simply showing you that you’re stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea. It’s either your family or your nation. And you are clearly not going to abandon your family. You are the globalist’s wet dream. This is precisely what they want. If you advocate for race mixing then it means you can’t draw a line in the sand when you say “that’s enough immigration“. If you’ve done it, who are you to say others can’t? When all the whites start choosing non whites as partners and no white babies are being born, you can’t take any moral high ground opposing this.

    Believe it or not but the very thing that caused most of the problems that happened in the bible, with the Hebrews and Israelites, WAS nation mixing. A nation is bound by its culture. When you add other cultures, you create multicultural and your culture no longer is prominent. Look at the ridicule, for example, of John Cleese, when in a TV interview said that London was no longer English? And he’s right! A classic example of this is watch Monty Python’s ‘Meaning of Life’ when the waiter takes you outside the restaurant, through the streets of Central London, into the country and the sketch of the dinner with Death. There isn’t ONE immigrant in that clip and that film was made in 1983, 38 years ago! Now, you’d be lucky to see a white face!

    You see, immigration is the tool, the jew uses to dismantle the host nation. The jew then gives the immigrant power to change the culture. And that power leads to immigrants questioning our history and pulling down statues of slave owners and renaming universities and streets. It gives the immigrant power to start having white children learn about black culture, reading black books about black struggle. And they begin to hate who they are. They then demand that white culture be removed because its institutionally racist.

    Our culture would never be under threat if there were no immigrants here to put it under that threat! This is what you miss. Politicians, oligarchs, Jews and immigrants ALL have to go, if white civilization is to be saved and reverse programming to start, on our people, to right the wrongs of nearly 90 years of cultural Marxism.

    This is black and white, literally. For blacks to survive they can’t be near whites and vice versa for the jew is bringing them together, not in harmony, but to destroy one another through warfare and race mixing. Each new generation, black and white, hates white civilization more than the previous one. This is a serious problem. Unless stopped, we know what the outcome will be.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @stevennonemaker88
  173. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    White skilled labor keeps your lights on, homie.</blockquote

    Thanks Flipper

    I just put track lighting in the den, you think you can put in an extra hour of OT this week?

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  174. @SunBakedSuburb

    I’m pretty sure he’s the one. You’ll also get a severe tongue lashing if you don’t separate the recyclable material from the rest of your trash. Eating meat is liable to make The Corny Guy have a hissy. He is the living epitome, the textbook definition, of a Beta male. He wears lacy Manties and a Bro-ssiere. He took over the position as Masculine-Feminist in Chief from Jerry Springer. He also lactates and his menstrual cycle is in sync with A.O.C.’s. He is an amazingly effeminate contortionist who specializes in bending over. His Democratic Credentials are nearly impeccable.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  175. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    Why do you think the bible specifically forbids miscegenation?

    What bible did you read?

  176. @stevennonemaker88

    Eisenhower managed to round up one million undocumented Mexicans and deport them during Operation Wetback. Cesar Chavez used to beat up illegal aliens. In my old High School, the Chicanos hated “Wetbacks,” (their word, not mine) and would insult and attack them.

    The Chinese were designated as Aliens Ineligible for Residency for 60 years until the beginning of the Second World War. But, not as well known is that Pancho Villa massacred 300 Chinamen at Torreon in 1911. In 1930, the Government of Mexico rounded up 70% of the Chinese Men living in Mexico, along with their Mexican Wives and Children, stripped them of all but the clothes on their backs and sent them penniless across the border into the desert of the American Southwest. The U. S. Government placed them in detention facilities until they could be shipped to China, where they were never fully accepted. In the 1950’s, the Mexican Government allowed the Women and Children to return. It wasn’t until the 1980’s that Mexico permitted the Chinese Men to come back, by which time most had died.

    The American Colonization Society was founded in 1816 to, as Henry Clay stated in the keynote address at the Society’s formation, “rid our country of a useless, pernicious, if not dangerous portion of the population.” At the time, this sentiment was prevalent in both the North and the South, and other prominent members of the Society included James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, Daniel Webster, Francis Scott Key, and Winfield Scott. Liberia was founded for the purpose of returning Negroes to Africa, but funding for such a large scale endeavor was difficult to obtain. Abraham Lincoln, who mimicked Clay’s policies, appealed to Congress on numerous occasions to provide the necessary allotment for the purpose of colonizing Negroes outside of the United States. The Chiriqui Project looked to send freed slaves to Central America, but the neighboring Countries of Nicaragua and Honduras objected to having a colony of former slaves (Negroes) as neighbors.

    The Federal Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted U. S. Citizenship to Free White Males.

    Until the late 1960’s, the U. S. was approximately 88% European-American. The population is now hovering near 50% White, with Hispanics making up about 35%, and Negroes being around 12%, Jews being another 2% ,and the remainder is Asian and Aboriginal. Globally, people of European descent were a full 1/4 of the World’s population in the 1960’s, that is now down to 10% and rapidly decreasing. The alleged Holocaust, even if it were true, wouldn’t begin to compare to the displacement, disenfranchisement, and disappearance of the White Race that was orchestrated in the second half of the twentieth century. This is a crisis of an unprecedented scale and no half hearted measures tempered by sentimental considerations are going to solve it. History has shown us what is required.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  177. @Priss Factor

    “A single black can destroy a Single White”??? Perhaps… perhaps NOT! It depends upon who dat Nigga be and who the White Person that they are dealing with is. If that White Person just happens to be ME, they may very well be in for some serious trouble. I’ve been on both the receiving and the delivering end of a beat down. But, I have occupied the latter position far more often than the former, in spite of the self assured pronouncements, and much to the chagrin, of my overly confident adversaries. I’ve frequently found that strength advantages can be overcome by a definite and determined attack, preferably launched while they are in the middle of sticking their chests out and flapping their lips. Something like… “I’ll beat yo’ mutha fu… WHAM! SLAM! BAM! BAM! BAM! You’d be surprised what you can achieve when you set your mind to it and dispense with the formalities.

  178. @Truth

    Truth,

    The commandment – “Thou shalt not commit adultery” has nothing to do with having relations with another, while you’re married. However, this is what is promoted, for obvious reasons.
    We already have just this commandment with “Thou shalt not covet”. Why would there be two commandments that promote the same thing? It’s like saying “do not think about killing” or “Do not think about stealing”. There would be 20 commandments, were this the case.
    The act of desiring your neighbours wife and possessions also means that if you do so, you most certainly will act upon it.
    The word adultery has been deliberately changed in order to remove race mixing.
    Look at where adultery comes from? It comes from the latin adulterate: And the meaning:

    “to debase or make impure by adding inferior, alien, or less desirable materials or elements.”

    Adulterate means to mix.

    In the bible God does not want people to mix for cultural reasons. If they mix then their offspring will worship their Gods, most notably the Canaanite Gods.

    We, the European people ARE the descendants of the Tribes of Israel.

    And to show the nonsense of how much religion has been subverted read the following from the Catholic Exchange: https://catholicexchange.com/does-the-bible-forbid-miscegenation

    The idiot who wrote this, has no idea about the bible, but instead promotes the ‘universal’ Christianity, which is not what Christianity is about. Christ’s flock are the Israelites and no one else. But Christianity is spread in order that people understand goodness. Most Christians today are nothing more than hippies, promoting their whole liberal, love and peace culture.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @stevennonemaker88
  179. @Truth

    There is a lot wrong with the bible in the translations.
    Take Isiah 14:12 (KJV)-

    “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”

    Now take a literal translation from the Hebrew:

    Isiah 14:12 (YLT):

    “How hast thou fallen from the heavens, O shining one, son of the dawn! Thou hast been cut down to earth, O weakener of nations.”

    There is no Lucifer in the Hebrew bible. Lucifer doesn’t exist! Lucifer is from the Latin ‘Lucem Ferre‘ meaning ‘Shining one’. In this very instance, the Roman translators have created someone, who never existed in Lucifer and look at the BS that has been built around this make believe creation? Was this a mistake by the ‘freemason’ Roman translators or was it deliberate?

    There WAS a war with the angels against God, who were cast down to earth. The Book of Enoch speaks of this and their leader was Azazel. It was he who taught man warfare and gave him fire. Azazel is Lucifer, or should I say, Azazel is Azazel for Lucifer does not exist.
    So who is the shining one, described in Isiah 14:12? The shining one is none other than Adam. This passage is about the eviction from Eden with Eve.

    And the bible has much of this. More so today, the jew is COMPLETELY rewriting the bible. Take the new Danish bible for example? The jews have rewritten all references to Israel with ‘jews’ and ‘land of the jews’.
    The word Jew first appeared in the KJV bible. In the OT the words that Jew now replaces was of the tribe of Judah. In the NT the word jew replaces ‘an inhabitant of Judea’. Both are completely different to one another. At the time of Christ, Judea was filled with peoples from everywhere, worshiping many deities. A small percentage of those in Judea were of the tribe of Judah. But the Jew, through word manipulation has made it so that people believe everyone in Judea was Jewish, that is following the Jewish religion (talmudism) which was incidentally created in the 4th-5th century after Christ. Judaism is younger than Christianity and has nothing to do with the Old or New Testament and the Israelite religion.

    Remember Orwell – “Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.

    If the jew is not stopped they will completely rewrite history, making themselves out to be gods, while destroying all cultures and nations on this earth, in order they be their slaves and forever wallow in ignorance of who they all really are.

  180. profnasty says:
    @R.G. Camara

    Swastica is “Hate”. Why is that? First used to show German independence, then, in battle, as Anti-Communist. How is that “Hate”?
    Movie. You put that kid into the gladiator ring, where he must fight for his life. He fights. Now they call him names
    Evil, Hater, Nazi, White Supremacist, Cracker…….

    Better to simply give the Black gladiator your sister, then let him cut your throat. Better than being called names.

  181. Trinity says:

    Blacks are generally more skillful at street fights than Whites and that is indeed a fact, I say this as a kid who grew up going to school with Blacks. It has little to do with physical superiority like fast twitch muscle fibers or generally longer limbs, but simply that MOST Blacks, at least the poor and lower middle class grow up fighting while MOST Whites have little fighting experience in the streets. Back in the day unless someone was seriously injured you were not going to jail for a street fight, maybe an overnight stay at most, now these things are taken more seriously. Blacks are also less inhibited about going to jail and more likely will hit first and think about the consequences later. Only had two fist fights with Blacks in my life. Threatened numerous times though. One fight was in the dugout of a baseball game. The Black guy kicked me in the leg for no reason whatsoever and I jumped up and thumped him good. Admittedly, the Black guy was smaller than me but he should have thought about that before kicking me. The second encounter took place when I laid out a Black guy who thought his New Yawk skreet thug act and size had me cowed, admittedly it did until I decided I had enough of this asshole’s shit. He was my shipmate and he tried to bully me one time too many. I knocked the guy stiff as a board, laid him out. At the time I guess I only weighed in the 180s and this guy was a good 6’1″ and a sloppy 220-230lbs. Admittedly growing up I saw a few street fights involving Blacks vs. Whites and more often than not, the Black guy emerged the victor. Street fighting comes down to experience, motivation, landing the first hit is always important, and the element of surprise more so than any sort of physical advantages. We used to box in junior high school for the amusement of our Black P.E. instructor, imagine the snowflakes doing that today, and my brother “tow up” several Black boys, and dat is the God’s honest troof. I only boxed one fat Black kid and the guy was a big sissy. I honestly thought this supposed “bad ass” was going to cry. Floored him twice.

  182. @Truth

    Q: How would this country run without another grossly overpaid and under-qualified apefirmative ackshun nigger bureaucrat tucked away in a cubicle in some Gov’t building, surfing the net all day and taking 2 hour lunch breaks?

    A: Much more efficiently…lol

    • Replies: @Truth
  183. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    I read this but I am having trouble comprehending, so just to be sure here, you are interpreting Exodus 20:14; though shall not commit adultery, as anti miscegenation? And you are using a translation for a language the bible was translated into as your proof?

    I take it that means one is allowed to have sex with married women, in your unique understanding?

    My Friend, I have read many ridiculous things in my time, this has got to be up there. First of all, the bible was written for men, and men only, what this verse says is that adultery is committed when a man has sex with a woman who is married to another man. As a man, you are technically allowed to have sex with other women if you are married, (this is highly qualified, and the explanation would take too long here). Adultery is having sex with a married woman, fornication is having sex without commitment.

    As for though shalt not covet; we will turn to your favorite tool, the etymology of the word here:

    covet (v.)
    mid-13c., “to desire or wish for inordinately or without regard for the rights of others,” from Old French coveitier “covet, desire, lust after” (12c., Modern French convoiter, influenced by con- words), probably ultimately from Latin cupiditas “passionate desire, eagerness, ambition,” from cupidus “very desirous,” from cupere “long for, desire” (see cupidity). From mid-14c. in a good sense, “desire or wish for eagerly, desire to obtain or possess.” Related: Coveted; coveting.

    This obviously deals with desire not accomplishment of an act. Why would desire be a sin? Obviously because it shifts one’s mindset from a godly nature. One is supposed to desire a relationship with God, not money, sex without commitment, a car…. or someone else’s wife. That is what makes a godly world.

    No, Old Sport, I have yet to see one logical argument in which a biblical verse demonstrates God’s desire against interracial liaisons, and if God did not want it to happen, use your education here; why would he have simply not given us different chromosome counts?

    Moses, a patriarch of the chosen people was married to a Hamite, and God punished his relatives for objecting to this.

    My friend, you are allowed to like, or dislike anything you desire, but shoehorning scripture awkwardly, makes you look like a fool. Simply stand up, be a man and say “it shouldn’t happen because I don’t like it. And stand upon it. This is what men used to do.

    Of course the vast majority of your white male contemporaries will disagree with you because most white men seem to prefer Asian women, but perhaps you can grease the wheel a bit with them first and bring up the vision of big hulking KNEE-grows with 5’2 blonde waifs…

    We all have to gain a foothold somewhere.

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @White Elephant
  184. @White Elephant

    “We, the European people ARE the descendants of the Tribes of Israel.”

    I actually thought you where half way reasonable before. Now I know you are a diluted fool.

    You will say anything to try to fit your idiotic pre-conceptions.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  185. @Truth

    Yes Truth, you are having trouble comprehending. No need to explain myself. It’s there for you to see; to agree or disagree with. You disagree. Nothing more to state on the matter.

  186. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Q: How would this country run without another grossly overpaid and under-qualified apefirmative ackshun nigger bureaucrat tucked away in a cubicle in some Gov’t building, surfing the net all day and taking 2 hour lunch breaks?

    A: Like Russia.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  187. @Cowtown Rebel

    I’ll preface this comment by saying we are all individuals and control our own actions. There are exceptions to the below. But since we are speaking of the collective actions of nations and peoples:

    “wouldn’t begin to compare to the displacement, disenfranchisement, and disappearance of the White Race that was orchestrated in the second half of the twentieth century.”

    Do you know who carried out this great disappearance? twas whites themselves. My grandparents had 5 kids; their 5 kids only had 5 kids; that is HALF of replacement rate. Most middle class whites are similar.

    You should read my previous post because I already explained this quite thoroughly. Between Hedonism, Atheism, Feminism, and Abortion, The West has basically put a gun to it’s collective head and pulled the trigger.

    It is true that The wealthy Jews had a major hand in promoting this, but whites allowed, aided, and abetted it.

    So called white nationalists like to speak out of both sides of the mouth:

    On one hand they think they are superior to others and wise and great, yet at the same time they like to blame everything on jews and blacks and browns and never take responsibility, “oh it was the media, the immigrants, the school system, etc….”

    You cannot be a wise adult and a gullible child at the same time.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  188. @Truth

    …If that two hour lunch consisted of two bottles of vodka & Krokidil.

    • LOL: Truth
  189. @stevennonemaker88

    “I actually thought you where half way reasonable before. Now I know you are a diluted fool.”

    Deluded‘ is the word you’re looking for.
    And no, I’m far from.
    Read your bible.
    Understand it, I recommend the Young’s Literal Translation. Adam and Eve were the first white people on this earth. No, they did not look like those in the middle east.
    And quite the contrary, I have absolutely NO preconceptions (all one word by the way) about what I write about and who we, the Europeans are.
    You, are the one on here with your preconceptions, a European, who’s married to a Guatemalan woman, who’ve shown your hatred for your own race by conceiving children with and promote, precisely what TPTB want for people of this world. Had you lived in biblical times, you’d have worshiped Nimrod.

    If you actually read the bible you would understand quite a few things, most notably,

    1. Jesus was not a Jew, but a Judahite.
    2. His flock are the Israelites, who are not the Jews.
    3. The Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

    If you pulled your head out of your ass and did some research you would find that I am speaking 100% fact. However you won’t, because I’ve ripped you a new one, on your miscegenation and thinking you can fight for white nationalism. You’re angry, because you know that I’m 100% correct in precisely EVERYTHING I’ve said to you. It was your choice to go down to Central America and ride some local coochie. You crossed the Rubicon there and then and instantly dug yourself a hole to sit in.

    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @John Johnson
  190. @stevennonemaker88

    “Do you know who carried out this great disappearance? twas whites themselves. My grandparents had 5 kids; their 5 kids only had 5 kids; that is HALF of replacement rate. Most middle class whites are similar.”

    And what do you do? You have two mixed race children with a Guatemalan.
    Great going there Steve!

    “So called white nationalists like to speak out of both sides of the mouth:

    On one hand they think they are superior to others and wise and great, yet at the same time they like to blame everything on jews and blacks and browns and never take responsibility, “oh it was the media, the immigrants, the school system, etc….””

    I used to think just like that, that was before I actually educated myself on reality.
    Do you know that before WW2, there was no need for the usage of nationalist? Regardless whether you were Socialist, conservative or liberal (classic British), your nation came first.
    It was the jew who brought about identity politics.
    Why did Hitler use the term ‘Nationalist’? He used it because Germany WAS under the attack of alien peoples (Jews from Eastern Europe via Khazaria) who wanted to implement upon them, what Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin did to the Russians, post 1917 takeover.

    You have no dog in this fight Steve. You chose your side a long time ago, when you decided to ‘get jiggy’ with Miss Guatemala.
    Yes, whites are to blame for many things, but who was it that brought about the reality that made them change? Who was it that brought in cultural Marxism? Who was it that took control of the msm and academia, the two main sources of information for the masses? Who was it that infiltrated politics, law and order? Who was it that infiltrated the entertainment system to also control the masses?
    Yes, Steve, it was the jew, no one else. Sure, they had a little help from the shabbos goyim, but were they shabbos or crypto jews? Most people, in power today, are just so.

    Look, Steve, you’ve made your bed. You’re a promoter of ANY kind of immigration, miscegenation, multiculturalism and multiracial society. You are no friend of the white peoples saving their nation. And this, really is what bites deep down because you know you turned your back on your own nation and civilization.

    • Thanks: Trinity, Cowtown Rebel
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @stevennonemaker88
  191. @White Elephant

    Why do you think the bible specifically forbids miscegenation?

    This is false. you fit in with the zionists.

    Did you read what I wrote in my reply about Pakistan? In the time it took their country to increase in population by nearly 300% the UK increased by 12%.
    Do the math and you agree on immigration? Do you not see that any migration is a problem, when that migrant’s nation breeds 24 times that of the host population?

    You are actually supporting my point: whites have stopped having enough children. The fertility rate of Pakistan in 2016 was 3.0; in the UK it was 2.95 in 1964, it has now dropped to 1.65 (actually lower among whites). You think the brown people are reproducing like rabbits but in reality they are just reproducing at a normal rate, similar to whites before the cultural decline really hit.

    Your children are neither European nor Guatemalan. They belong to neither for one cancels or the other.

    Actually they are both Guatemalan and American.

    You are the globalist’s wet dream

    I expose the coronahoax, the holohoax, and oppose the entire evil globalist agenda. what are you talking about?

    The west has committed collective suicide of their own free will. They exchanged family values, morality, integrity, and truth for Hedonism, Atheism, Feminism, and all manner of perversion and evil. White women began killing their babies. The borders where opened to provide labor and useful servants for the wealthy whites and jews. THIS IS THE PROBLEM. non-whites from the third world are not the main problem. Most of them would not even be in the west if they where not BROUGHT IN by big businesses and government programs going back to the slave trade.

    For most young white men, finding a white woman who wants to have kids and actually be a woman is almost impossible. That is the reality. I am proud to have three children. They are valuable and beautiful. One is even a blonde. How many kids do you have?

    In your recent posts you have made clear that you are a fool and a liar. You are looking for a scapegoat to blame the death of the west on, when it was a self inflicted death.

  192. anarchyst says:

    It seems that all of the posters who decry the negative birth rate of whites are forgetting to mention one major point:

    Birth control

    It is birth control systems that have divorced intercourse from procreation and is partially responsible for the dearth of white births. I would like to see birth control used by whites to be considered to be destructive and to be recognized as a destroyer of (white) society.

    Let the browns and blacks avail themselves of birth control, and give it to them freely without cost on their part.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  193. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    3. The Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

    Come on Bro, just one more, I’m starting to enjoy this.

    If the Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes if Israel (not totally untrue, BTW, just more like 98%) Then who were the sons of Japheth, Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tira?

    I had always understood that these people went north to Europe, did they go south to Africa? Did they sail to Samoa? I’m confused now.

    http://ccg.org/english/s/p046a.html

    • Replies: @Dennis Dale
  194. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    While we’re at it Bro., would you mind explaining to me how the Swedes and the Germans fulfill the curses levied on Israel from Deuteronomy 28? I’m learning so much today (embolded = hint!).

    Deuteronomy 28-16 Cursed shalt thou be in the city, and cursed shalt thou be in the field.

    Deuteronomy 28- 37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee.

    Deuteronomy 28- 48 Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee.

    Deuteronomy 28- 49 The LORD shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    Deuteronomy 28-64 And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.

    Deuteronomy 28- 68 And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

  195. I could spend a lot of time, explaining to you, where everyone went, but really ‘Truth’ (really you chose that name? Sarcasm perhaps?), it would take up too much of my time.

    What I will do though is point you in the direction where all your answers can be answered. Pop over to Brother Charles website and there you’ll find the answer to all your questions. He’s a rather knowledgeable chap and written extensively on the bible. I have to go to bed. I was up very early, re-decorating my flat in lockdown and I’m very tired.

    Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah?

    If you do a search, on his website, it will bring up articles that may answer your questions, especially on the sons of Japheth, Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech and Tira.

    You could also go to these links:

    Europeans Are The “Lost” Tribes Of Israel – A Rare Documentary

    Heraldry & Symbols of the 12 Tribes of lsrael in Europe

    Now I’m off to bed. Up in 5 hours.

    • Replies: @Truth
  196. Dennis Dale says: • Website
    @Truth

    Troot, my boy, you’re the intellectual equivalent of a dung beetle, endlessly rolling little balls of shit for no apparent purpose.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Priss Factor
  197. Truth says:
    @Dennis Dale

    OK, your intellectual response fully answered all of my questions, Professor, thank you

  198. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    I am 15 minutes into the Europeans are the Lost Tribes documentary. It is patently, and I mean totally ridiculous.

    It makes no sense whatsoever, and dovetails with dovetails with nothing in the bible.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  199. @anarchyst

    White Births

    At the rate things are going, the oligarchy & the AOC-Left will make working poor impoverished whites ineligible for welfare or any sort of benefits.

    They already have.

    Most people believe blacks in Detroit or Flint are the poorest residents.

    They are not. The poorest residents are Polish-Americans who are ineligible for SNAP, for Fed Housing, for any sort of social program besides food stamps. They live in the worst poverty you can believe.

    Because most of the posters here are either rural rubes or Southern-fried necks & exurbanites or hicks from the sticks, they know little about the plight of the urban underclass white.

    And what is the point of acting like a ghetto or barrio minority and having 5 kids raised in squalor because you cannot afford anything?

    Your daughter goes to hellish public schools run by the most psychopathically ruthless teen felons who are 16 year old drug assassins in the 9th grade who push their sweet sweet candy on her…

    Your son becomes an Eminem whigger to integrate?

    That is a triumph for the white race?

    What did Mandela do for the working class Boers? Fourteen year old Dutch girls raised in shanties who run around turning tricks with HIV positive Zulus out of desperation because their parents were blue-collar?

    Meanwhile, the English upper class South Africans simply moved to London. Reopened the books. They had two kids & could afford it.

    Why do fantasists here believe that AOC’s government is going to be paying any benefits to white kids born to poor parents who cannot afford it?

    Look at how white men who refuse to pay child support are treated like FBI most wanted while blacks have 7 kids.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Truth
  200. @Truth

    Look, this is really easy. You either accept that Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes or you don’t. It doesn’t matter what you watch, it’s not going to change it. You’re fixed on accepting that they’re not. You do not see that Adam and Eve were the first white people on this earth and you do not accept that the tribes, after captivity, moved through the Caucasus mountains and into Europe. You do not accept the prophecy of Genesis 17:4-6, for the only place, on this earth which has had great kings has been Europe. You do not accept that advances in all aspects of life, have come from the white peoples, whom by this are God’s chosen and therefore blessed.

    Truth, you’re either being deliberately obstinate or you’re promoting an agenda, for if there was any truth in you, you certainly would not take the stance you have.

    Anyway, you have links and can do your own research. If you’re open minded, with the ability to think critically and therefore see the truth, then you WILL come to the conclusion I have promoted. If you don’t, or you are a troll you won’t.
    It’s up to you. I’m not going back and forth with you on this. I’m on a break from decorating. I don’t have time to waste. Sorry.

    • Replies: @Truth
  201. anarchyst says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You are correct. You make excellent points on how difficult it is for poor whites to have large families. The “system” itself makes it almost impossible for whites to have large white-sustaining families. Even the “tax system” sees to that.

    When it comes to the dearth of “public assistance” available to white families truly in need, I can personally relate to your post, having reluctantly applied for “public assistance” during a major year-long downturn when I was unemployed. I dutifully filled out the multiple-page “application for public assistance”, turned it in and waited.

    My appointment with the 300 lb. negro “social worker” was a waste of time. She told me that I should take “any job available” and that I would not qualify for any type of assistance–no food stamps, medicaid or any other assistance. I was “just another white boy” who paid taxes for decades…who did not deserve help.

    I know of blacks and foreigners presently who are getting thousands of dollars per month in “benefits”, along with free health and dental benefits. These welfare recipients are even able to “bank” their cash benefits, using them for weaves and nails.

    The local Catholic social service agency has a “food bank” which is open a number of times per month. On “food distribution day”, the number of new cars–Cadillacs, BMWs, Mercedes, Audis, and other high-end cars (that the average white person cannot afford) is telling. Almost every recipient is a 300 lb. negro woman.

    I have a relative who is permanently disabled who is receiving a minimal disability amount who received no SNAP or other non-cash benefits. He applied for a “Bridge Card”, the Michigan equivalent of the EBT program. The 300 lb. negro “social worker” awarded him $9.00 per month. He gave up and said “screw it”. He’s white and therefore does not qualify…

    If you are white, forget being able to receive “public assistance”.

    Another “quirk” in the Michigan welfare system is that of the way foreign muslim applicants are treated. Muslims can claim up to four “wives” for assistance…the “first wife” is classified as the “wife” and the other three are “cousins”. This is no joke and is a part of the Michigan “public assistance” system.

    I cannot understand how these blacks and foreigners can claim and receive benefits so easily while truly needy whites are shut out of the system.

    Regards,

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @stevennonemaker88
  202. Trinity says:
    @restless94110

    Danny Trejo served time. Wow, I am impressed. NOT. So did Edward Bunker who knew Trejo from prison or met him on the set, can’t remember which. Bunker might be best known for his small role in “Reservoir Dogs.” Bunker wrote a few books but I couldn’t get past a few pages in each of his books that I tried to read. I thought they were garbage. I believe Bunker wrote the screenplay or helped write the screenplay for “Runaway Train” where Trejo had a small role as a prison boxer boxing Eric Roberts. “Runaway Train” is a decent movie, but why an Alaskan convict played by Jon Voight sports a fake Brooklyn accent is a mystery to me, and Eric Roberts accent sounds weird regardless of any movie he played in. The guy is allegedly from Georgia originally but his accent doesn’t belong to any region of the country that I am familiar with. I take it the guy had some kind of speech impediment growing up or something. Trejo seems like a nice bloke, and claims to be some sort of welterweight champion in some prison he served time in but even if that is true, big deal. More than likely, Trejo was just your average convict trying his best to survive in a shithole prison with other convicts, that surely doesn’t make him special. Exactly what am I supposedly to eventually get? That you are a moron? LMAO.

    The dumbest fake accents ever are Jon Voight’s Brooklyn accent in “Runaway Train” and Robert DeNiro’s terrible southern accent in “Cape Fear.” Both are cringe worthy.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  203. Truth says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    They are not. The poorest residents are Polish-Americans who are ineligible for SNAP, for Fed Housing, for any sort of social program besides food stamps. They live in the worst poverty you can believe.

    Doesn’t work like that, Bro.

    Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.

    ://www.huffpost.com/entry/food-stamp-demographics_n_6771938

    “Whites make up the largest share of those receiving food stamps (36 percent) and Medicaid (43 percent),” he tweeted Oct. 11. “Hispanics comprise the largest ethnic group to receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (37 percent).”

    https://checkyourfact.com/2018/10/18/fact-check-whites-medicaid-food-stamps/

    What did Mandela do for the working class Boers?

    What did their upper-middle class English brothers do for them?

  204. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    Look, this is really easy. You either accept that Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes or you don’t.

    I’m guessing you won a lot of debate medals in high school.

    • LOL: John Johnson
    • Replies: @White Elephant
  205. Truth says:
    @anarchyst

    My appointment with the 300 lb. negro “social worker” was a waste of time.

    Almost every recipient is a 300 lb. negro woman.

    The 300 lb. negro “social worker” awarded him $9.00 per month. He gave up and said “screw it”. He’s white and therefore does not qualify…

    My friend, I am sorry you are having a hard time in life, but like they say, “when life give you lemons…”

    You have to be able to find some way to make a living with that scale you carry around.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  206. Trinity says:

    Damn it, Jim. I’m glad that poster brought up Danny Trejo. Jewywood made a movie with Trejo starring in it titled, “Bad Ass.” Man those Jews sure have high IQs and sheeit, yo. ROTFLMMFWAO.

    Never seen the movie but I heard there was a scene where some skinheads are messing with some old Black dude on a city bus and Trejo saves the day. Lest we forget people, Trejo, is a tiny man, it doesn’t matter how much time he did in the Big House or his claims of being “welterweight champ” of whatever prison don’t mean diddly in the REAL WORLD. And what is Trejo’s age? Dude is old, I think this movie was made in 2012, so he was still old only a tad younger.

    I heard the movie was a total inverse of real life and was loosely based on the viral YouTube video of back in the day when an old White guy pummeled an aggressive albeit smaller Black guy on an Oakland city bus. This was a REAL LIFE incident and Trejo and (((company))) did their REEL version later. The old White guy who pummeled the much smaller although much younger Black thug, was one Tom Brusso who became better known as “Epic Beard Man” aka “Vietnam Tom” aka “Tommy Slick.” Dude was an internet sensation for awhile and definitely had his 15 minutes of fame. “Epic Beard Man” should have demanded money for stealing his story and not portraying the REAL life incident the way it went down. Wonder if “Epic Beard Man” is still alive, been awhile ago.

    REAL VERSION: 67 or 68 year old grizzly White dude beats snot out of 30 something year old Black dude. REEL VERSION: Tiny Mexican beats up skinheads harassing old Black guy on bus. hahaha.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @stevennonemaker88
  207. Anonymous[103] • Disclaimer says:

    Edward Norton looked ripped 20 years ago! He made the swasti.ka look good. It made a nice template for Anglin’s tatty, what a provocateur and bravely bringing ‘awareness.’ A ’90s version of Michael Reinoehl and his blm neck message.

  208. anarchyst says:
    @Truth

    Ha Ha…good one. You must be a 300 lb. negress in a do nothing “social work” government affirmative action job.
    You just exposed yourself…

    • LOL: Trinity
  209. @White Elephant

    The Europeans are the descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

    This isn’t true.

    Europeans are descended from Arabs.

    Not really debatable because of DNA testing.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  210. You do not see that Adam and Eve were the first white people on this earth

    I really like how you guys are so c-ck sure of yourselves.

    Hey kids don’t read about Neanderthals or Israel God might send you to hell.

    Oh and where God says Jews he actually meant Whites. I don’t know why so many of the names are Jewish.

    This really isn’t working for Western society. If anything lying to children just preps them for liberalism. Protestants are teaching their children to reject natural history at an early age. So they are already prepped for liberal creationism (Christians are wrong but race doesn’t exist).

  211. @anarchyst

    I cannot understand how these blacks and foreigners can claim and receive benefits so easily while truly needy whites are shut out of the system.

    It is intentional. The system is set up to screw young working class people, especially whites.

  212. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    REAL VERSION: 67 or 68 year old grizzly White dude beats snot out of 30 something year old Black dude

    The guy was actually a 50 year old career government employee who thought it was a good idea to dress like he was 30 on the bus while drinking heavily during on his off day.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  213. @Trinity

    This is the video. That black dude deserved what he got.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  214. It is intentional. The system is set up to screw young working class people, especially whites.

    This is correct and Republicans are still following the deluded belief that “more free market” will somehow fix everything.

    We aren’t going to get anywhere until Western conservatives accept that the market itself can work against a country. Right now we have a worst of both worlds scenario where Fabian socialists and Randian libertarians can only agree on one thing which that is working class Whites deserve to be kicked in the teeth.

    Thanks to certain talk show hosts most conservatives deny race and walk around with the MUH FREEDUMB mentality. Liberals have anointed Blacks as deserving of public assistance while Whites are given bootstrap lectures. It’s all just really stupid and most importantly not working. Whites end up having small families or remain single and then conservatives whine about importing Mexicans. I sometimes wonder if Christian conservatives even care because in their minds the whole planet is going to get a reset anyways. Israel God will fix it all I guess.

  215. Trinity says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    I wonder if EBM is still kicking ass and taking names. haha. Shout out to the internet legend “Tommy Slick” for going “Vietnam” on that mofo. lolol. “Call the amberlamps.” Cue: Black Betty by Ram Jam.

  216. Trinity says:

    I like how the Black girls were calling EBM “pinky,” looks like a “hate crime” to me. I believe one said eff his white ass up as well. And then they are telling the Black guy who TRIED to assault “Vietnam Tom” to press charges against the victim. ROTFLMMFWAO. The “victim” was EBM and the Black guy was the perpetrator who carried out an unsuccessful assault and battery attempt to say the least. Blacks, man. You can’t make this shit up.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
    , @Truth
  217. @White Elephant

    And what do you do? You have two mixed race children with a Guatemalan.
    Great going there Steve!

    3 Kids, and yes, it is great going to have children. how many do you have? you grouchy, weak old bastard.

    Why did Hitler use the term ‘Nationalist’? He used it because Germany WAS under the attack of alien peoples (Jews from Eastern Europe via Khazaria) who wanted to implement upon them, what Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin did to the Russians, post 1917 takeover.

    Germany was under attack, but it was mostly by fellow whites. You have conveniently left out the BRITISH who firebombed the country and killed millions of civilians, and the RUSSIANS who also killed millions and gang raped even young girls; and the AMERICANS who starved some million German POWs to death after the war was over. the jews where involved, no doubt, but the whites willingly killed fellow white men, women, and children by the millions. your shit-don’t-stink mentality about whites is what makes you incapable of thought.

    Yes, Steve, it was the jew, no one else. Sure, they had a little help from the shabbos goyim, but were they shabbos or crypto jews? Most people, in power today, are just so.

    at 2% of the population, jews would not get far unless the wealthy whites allowed and even helped them along. The wealthy whites were too greedy and too cowardly to stand against them, and the working whites were too gullible and foolish. And THAT is the real reason jews have taken over the west. You cannot point a finger at the non-whites without having 3 fingers pointing back at fellow whites, who sold out their own people for the proverbial 30 pieces of silver.

    This is the last post i will make on this thread, as I have already shown you to be a fool who cannot answer my point. Your attempting to blame everything on non whites is nothing but cowardly scapegoating.

    • Replies: @Truth
  218. @Trinity

    yup i don’t think anyone was expecting Tom to pack such a punch.

    Blacks, man. You can’t make this shit up.

    Well, I’ve met some very awful blacks and some decent ones, and also some very perverse whites, so i don’t like to paint with too broad a brush. I work with a number of Jamaicans, and they are quite different from most american blacks. I think it has to do with the welfare and corrupted culture in the USA. In Jamaica, if you act a fool and get what you deserve, their is no NAACP to go crying to.

  219. Trinity says:

    Those Black girls instigated that shit. I think the Black dude would have let it go, but those Black girls egged that shit on. The bad thing is they were laughing about the Black guy “leaking.” Lesson: Don’t ever let a woman or women or anyone for that matter goad you into to taking an ass beating. Everyone wants to see a fight as long as they aren’t the ones fighting. To her credit, the older Black lady was trying to talk sense to the Black man but he listened to those giggling hos in the back of the bus who only laughed about him getting his ass handed to him afterwards. No doubt that they wanted to see EBM take the beating but as long as it wasn’t them they were fine and dandy with the Black dude being bloodied and filming it. Pathetic.

  220. @Trinity

    I could not disagree with you more on just about everything you just said. So, not in any particular order let’s go:

    I saw Runaway Train about 10 years after its release and rated it then as one of the best prison movies of all time, and one of the best Voight roles ever. I have no urge to see it again (I rarely watch movies more than once no matter how good, with notable exceptions). I could care less about Voight’s accent, but your criticism makes little sense (and also your criticism of DeNiro and Roberts). You seem to think that nobody in the US moves to Alaska from NYC (You are clearly from the UK where the accent places a person in a certain class and area. Not relevant in the States). It’s called the melting pot for a reason, boobie, so that part of your spew sounds arrogant and irrelevant.

    As is your deep dive into Trejo’s biography. Who gives a shit? Trejo is a fantastic screen actor because he possesses that rarest of all qualities: a screen presence and a strong screen persona. And he shows it in every role no matter how small. The persona is always genuine. Years ago I read the diaries of Charlton Heston, which were best sellers and of the many interesting bits in it was in the very early days he said that he immediately came to realize that his screen persona throughout the world–he said his effortless ability to project strenngth, loyalty, honesty, bravery, etc.–were recognized the world over and that was what was driving his popularity and his success. And this is true for all great film actors.

    It does not matter where Trejo came from though he did do time: he projects that convict thing and that is why I recommended you watch his movies after I read your embarrassing, infantile scrawl, an attempt to sound like something you have no idea about. Watch Trejo’s performances especially that film he did with his old friend and fellow convict, who wrote it and played a lead in it, and with a remarkable cameo by Mickey Rourke. I can’t remember the name, but I’ve given you enough info for you to find it.

    Who knows,? Maybe it was this Bunker guy you talk about but that nobody cares about.

    So as usual, you completely miss the gist of my comment (i.e., beef up your failing skills at writing in convict jargon by watching a real convict and skilled actor (Trejo) do it right) and go off on some nutty tangent.

    I am glad you mentioned Runaway Train though. I hadn’t thought of that wonderful film in many years.

    P.S., From Heston’s first diary: the genesis of the saying “who do I have to fuck to get off this picture?” was from a long-suffering female extra on The 10 Commandments, which suffered from endless retakes. Apparently it was torture.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Jeff Stryker
    , @Trinity
  221. @Dennis Dale

    What was the director thinking? He thought he was manipulating the audience by making Norton’s character so admirable and the blacks so, well, black in their behavior… The idea was to sweep that away with the betrayal by the Aryan gang in prison. Because Norton has been built up so much in our estimation, his conversion is supposed to impress us.

    There is some truth in that, but I think there’s more, and it’s about the manner of ‘conversion’. Derek wasn’t so much converted in thought as contorted by pain. Thus, his conversion wasn’t pure and principled. The main impetus for trying to change to was get away from the pain of being bung-donged, ironically by guys on his side. So, it was so much about redeeming-the-wrong than no more to reaming-the-bung.

    Unlike Jesus, he can’t rise above physical pain. He reaches a breaking point and caves to the demand offered by the Negro teacher.

    In a way, this echoes BORN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY. How much of Ron Kovic’s change of heart a matter of genuine transformation or of a personal rage about his paralysis & pain? If Kovic had returned from Vietnam in one piece, it’s very likely he would have remained very gung-ho about the war. But it’s being stuck in a wheelchair for the rest of his life that finally gets to him. With his manhood ruined, he comes to hate the military and all it stands for. He even comes to identify with the many Vietnamese who were killed or crippled by the US war machine. Could he have reached the same conclusion without the wound and paralysis? Maybe, but then, maybe not. The personal affects the political.

    Likewise, Derek may not have change but for the PAIN he could no longer endure getting bung-donged. It was to avoid the pain that he reached out to the Negro teacher, and he was grateful that the Negro did something for him EVEN THOUGH he didn’t have to. So, out of relief and gratitude, he tries to turn his life around, but his personal change isn’t in sync with the world which remains the same. That is the tragedy of the film. You can try to change but the world won’t change with you. No wonder Jesus preached that salvation is only possible through Kingdom of Heaven, not the Kingdom of Man.

    And so, Derek, following his brother’s death, has two options left. Return to a racial/tribal view of the world OR seek spiritual truth whereby one can lose in THIS world but win in the NEXT one.

    At any rate, the role of pain in Derek’s transformation gives the Jewish Game away. Of course, the pain is mostly to be administered by the Jews. Jews feel that the only way the white man can be kept down and obedient is to make him feel the pain. Jews don’t believe in white goodness or white change of heart. Jews believe whites can only be kept in their place by pain or threat of pain. Jews believe Germans changed their ways ONLY BECAUSE they lost and were raped into compliance. Jews feel the same way about all whites. Whites must be emotionally whipped, sexually cucked, and racially emasculated.

    It was the unbearable pain that finally broke Derek. It wasn’t principles. And it’s the pain administered through lawfare that has turned Richard Spencer into a ninny and Matt Heimbach into a fat pooter-boy.

    Pain works. Most are not like Jesus.
    Why did Kunta Kinte finally say, “Sheeeeeeeiiiiiit, my name be Toby”?
    He be afraid of being whipped some more.

  222. @John Johnson

    This is correct and Republicans are still following the deluded belief that “more free market” will somehow fix everything.

    Trust me. No Republican at this point honestly believes in any of that, especially as capitalism is not totally aligned with the Democratic Party. Biden got 3.5 billion in donations in 2020.

    Republicans stick to ‘muh free markets’ cuz they’re too chicken to touch on other issues like race and etc.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  223. @Dennis Dale

    Relatively speaking, Truth is actually a Righteous Negro. If most Negroes were like him, much of the race problems would diminish to a great deal.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @John Johnson
  224. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Settle down bro, let your erection subside. This did happen ten years ago…

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Trinity
  225. Truth says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    how many do you have? you grouchy, weak old bastard.

    I would set the over/under on this gentleman’s children at .5. And I would set the over/under on his age at 37.

  226. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    I read your embarrassing, infantile scrawl,

    I think screw is callin’ you out, U-T. You gon’ take that? I understand there are no cameras in the kitchen freezer.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @restless94110
  227. @restless94110

    Bunker’s STRAIGHT TIME was probably the best cinematic interpretation of Bunker’s work, in which Hoffman played his alter ego.

    Interestingly, Hoffman LOOKED like Trejo in that film. Seedy stache & long hair & shifty.

    We usually think of Hoffman in goofy roles, but in that film he is surprisingly convincing.

    That film was made way back in 1977.

    Bunker shows up as a bartender who tips Hoffman on scores.

    Voight in Runaway Train was in a Fed Max. He could have been from anywhere. Not necessarily Alaska.

    As for Roberts, his accent was also strange in STAR 80, where he was supposed to Canadian.

    • Replies: @restless94110
    , @Trinity
  228. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    He’s just triggered because he thinks a 5’4″ 70 something year old Mexican is a “bad ass” because he did time in prison, has tattoos, and isn’t exactly the most handsome feller out there. Leave the poor guy alone, he has enuff troubles, thinking actors and their mostly fake backgrounds are believable. Speaking of Mickey Rourke, some guy on here one time thought that Rourke was a legit tough guy. ROTFLMAO. Obviously that guy never watched any of Rourke’s ” professional boxing matches.” lololol.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  229. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    I don’t think da Troof is a negro. I don’t think da Troof is very trooful either. hehe.

  230. @John Johnson

    both parties are rotten to the core. The USA in general is a complex system that is in decline; it faces a host of issues and their is NO EASY answer or simple solution to all the problems. Western civilization took millennium to develop and has basically suicided itself in the last century.

    Liberals have anointed Blacks as deserving of public assistance while Whites are given bootstrap lectures.

    Exactly. There was a time when you could pull yourself up by your bootstraps in the postwar years. Since then, expenses have gone up by 20 times but wages only by 7 times. the bootstrap lecture is basically B.S. because even if you work 100 hours a week at a low wage job you don’t make enough to really move up.

    I’m sure we have plenty of common ground, and also plenty of different views. Remember not all Christians are zionists or premillennialists, and much of what passes for so called science or natural history is ridiculous extrapolation and guessing. You cannot test what was alleged to have happened thousands or millions of years ago, and without testing, you don’t have science. Most worldviews have some truth mixed in with lies and distortions.

  231. Trinity says:
    @restless94110

    I was once told I looked like a Cockney while visiting Glasgow, Scotland, no lie. I had no idea what a Cockney was nor did I care enough to bother at the time. I was getting stewed man. teehee. My buddy ended up in the pokey overnight in a Edinburgh jail while we were over there. My friend might be able to co-star in a remake of “Bad Ass” with Danny Trejo since he can now claim he spent time in the joint, yo.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  232. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor

    Well thanks a lot Priss.

    For a homosexual, I don’t think you’re half bad either…

  233. @Truth

    More scrawl. You really think you are the cat’s meow. Rock on, infant.

    • Replies: @Truth
  234. @Trinity

    he has enuff troubles

    Uh, Mr. Snark? enuff? ROTFLMAO. Wanker spellings by a wanker. Apparently I tapped into a hornet’s nest of wankers.

    Wank on, Enuff.

  235. @Jeff Stryker

    Straight Time was a terrible movie with no redeeming qualities that set Hoffman’s career back at least 20 years. Hoffman never allowed anyone but him to control the outcome of his films after that serious misstep.

  236. Trinity says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Thanks for the 411 on the prison being a federal prison. I just didn’t see why they had Voight speak with that ridiculous accent. It was too over the top and insulting to Brooklyn natives and their lovely Brooklynese. Same thing with DeNiro in Cape Fear, although DeNiro was supposed to be in a native of the South. No one in the South speaks like DeNiro, that was a bad attempt to sound Southern. I think in the original Cape Fear with Robert Mitchum, they mentioned that Cady raped his victim in Baltimore. As a native from Bawlmer, I can tell you that no one there speaks at all like Mitchum did in that movie, at least not someone born and raised there. Runaway Train wasn’t a bad movie but I couldn’t get past that ridiculous attempt to sound like a New Yawker by Voight. They should have had him just talk in his normal voice.

  237. @John Johnson

    No we are NOT descended from Arabs.
    Adam was white
    The Arabs are from the line of Japeth. The Europeans from the line of Shem. Adam was ruddy in complexion.
    And there’s this:

    Lamentations 4:7
    “Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:”

    This is a very good article, on Brother Charles’ website about the insane blacks and their black Israelite/Hebrew BS.

    BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 1

    I suggest you start opening your eyes, instead of reading the many lies that have been prevalent, about ‘white’ people throughout history. There was a time, when Europeans knew who they were. That time has gone due to years of indoctrination, predominantly from the Catholic church, which promoted jews as God’s chosen which couldn’t be farther from the truth.

    Btw, I used to be ignorant like you once. Then I started educating myself. I suggest you do the same.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  238. @Truth

    Never debated in school. I never saw the point. I still don’t see the point either.
    I search for the truth. I find it. I tell others. That’s me.
    In other words, I lead the horse to water and let it choose whether to drink or not on its own. I’m not going to try and force it to drink if it doesn’t want to.
    This is the same thing about debating. It’s a waste of time. You present the facts to one another, let them go off and read it. If one still doesn’t get it, they’re either stupid or a jew, deliberately trying to cause trouble.

    So when I come here, I’ll present my case. People can agree or disagree. I’m not going to get drawn into a slagging match. I come to inform and find like minded individuals, not fight and waste time. I do not suffer fools gladly.

    • Replies: @Truth
  239. @Trinity

    My friend might be able to co-star in a remake of Bad Ass with Danny Trejo since he can now claim he spent time in the joint, yo.

    Yo. You think that spending one night in the “pokey” is equivalent to time in prison? Yeah. Sure.

    So, watch Bad Ass 2. Danny Glover is fine and he didn’t have to spend time in a “pokey.”

    It’s called acting, mate.. Watch. Learn.

    Also , how does one “look like” a Cockney without being able to speak like a Cockney? In other words, how could one be mistaken for a Cockney? Isn’t the accent the thing? What does a Cockney look like? Flat head? Cross-eyed? Serious. I thought the whole Cockney thing was the manner of speaking, not the looks. And also, why did he end up in jail? For being a Cockney? Wow. And here I thought Cockneys had rights.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  240. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    Well great, start presenting facts, and we will be fine. Once again, the curses of Dueteronomy 28 outline, purposefully, and in perpetuity whom the 12 tribes became. So explain to me how this pertains to any European group:

    Deuteronomy 28-16 Cursed shalt thou be in the city, and cursed shalt thou be in the field.

    Deuteronomy 28- 37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee.

    Deuteronomy 28- 48 Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee.

    Deuteronomy 28- 49 The LORD shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    Deuteronomy 28-64 And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.

    Deuteronomy 28- 68 And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

    https://i1.wp.com/readthehedge.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/dollarbill.jpg?fit=1300%2C867&ssl=1

    Now, my friend, I could literally go on for another 2 hours on this subject without notes, the fact that Europeans are the semites is so foolish and ridiculous it is like electing a guy most famous for doing movies with a monkey as POTUS.

    As I said though, this gentlemen is 98% wrong, what did he get right? That the European royals are descendants of the Tribe of Dan. This is accurate: DANmark, SweDAN, DANube river, SarDANia, etc. but therein lies the problem, you aren’t. If you were you would be wealthy.

    You are a garden-variety Japhetite. That is why they hate you.

    And the Tribe of Dan by the way? The only tribe disenfranchised from the throne in God’s kingdom; oh, and the peoples from which The Anti-Christ comes.

    And how do we know that they are “semites”, well, they’re under a directive to tell you:

    https://madamenoire.com/1007389/meghan-markle-black-princesses/

    Have a good day.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  241. @Truth

    Like I said in my reply, you’re either stupid or you’re a jew.
    Then again you could be a black Israelite/Hebrew, which now seems more apparent,especially from the above.
    With that you are now completely ignored.

    I suggest you read the link I gave to John Johnson in the reply above pertaining to those who call themselves black Hebrews.

    Black’s and their Black Jesus part 1

    This 9 part explanation, utterly, totally and completely annihilates the laughably, stupid belief that blacks are somehow Hebrews. I do not believe that negros are cursed Hamites. There is far more probability that they are a people put on this earth before God created Adam. The Ethiopians may very well be Hamites, but the sub Saharan blacks? ROTFLMFAO!

    There is no Truth in you, only arrogance. It now makes perfect sense that you are a black Hebrew. And this is my last reply to you. As I said, I DO NOT SUFFER FOOLS GLADLY.

    • Replies: @Truth
  242. @Priss Factor

    Trust me. No Republican at this point honestly believes in any of that, especially as capitalism is not totally aligned with the Democratic Party. Biden got 3.5 billion in donations in 2020.

    I really wish I could believe that.

    Rushbots are not going to just walk on their belief in free markets. That would mean that Rush was wrong about everything related to economics but they spent decades listening to him.

    At best the Republican voters are split while the Randian swamp creatures of DC still think the free market can somehow magically fix anything including healthcare. Just look at how they almost got Trump to kill off the ACA without a replacement. Horrible political strategy even if you think the magic spirits of Rand would somehow protect people with pre-existing conditions from amoral insurance companies.

  243. I think most of the Japhetites who comment here know European monarchies have Babylonian blood and Rothschild money.

  244. @White Elephant

    No we are NOT descended from Arabs.
    Adam was white

    So Adam had sex with Eve and through inbreeding we somehow got Arabs?

    Where do Neanderthals fit into this storyline? We know that Europeans have a small amount of Neanderthal DNA which causes problems for both creationism and the liberal form (all people out of Africa with the same traits except for superficial features).

    This is a very good article, on Brother Charles’ website about the insane blacks and their black Israelite/Hebrew BS.

    They are the crazy ones trying to adopt a Jewish take on history, eh?

    That time has gone due to years of indoctrination, predominantly from the Catholic church, which promoted jews as God’s chosen which couldn’t be farther from the truth.

    I went to a protestant church actually.

    In my mainstream protestant church I was told that:

    1. Race doesn’t exist and anyone who says otherwise is evil. God just painted people different colors and then meanie Whites invented the idea of race.

    2. Africa is poor because of heathenistic beliefs and White colonialism. The ideal Whites go off at a young age to save the souls of third world countries. We can fix their countries by sending Whites there to save them from themselves.

    3. Jews are God’s chosen people. They have important prophets that we need to know about but they don’t accept Jesus. So God’s chosen people reject their own savior. Makes sense? Not at all and this is not to be discussed.

    4. Darwinism is wrong but some of it might be true but we don’t need to talk about that either.

    5. Everything we say is correct and if you question us you will probably end up in hell.

    Yea so I’ve been to church. No need for a refresher. I defend the Catholic church because they at least have children. Protestant churches around this country are closing due to declining attendance. Maybe lying about race and telling children that their ancestors ruined Africa isn’t such a good strategy.

    I can give the Catholic and Orthodox churches a pass. The protestant churches however have embraced the worst of liberalism where Whites are to blame for racial inequality and the third world.

  245. Truth says:
    @White Elephant

    As I said, I DO NOT SUFFER FOOLS GLADLY.

    If that is the case, Old Sport, your knuckles must be scarred from having bashed every mirror in your house, multiple times.

    Please say hello for me to Odin, Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, Ganesh, Chupacabras, Beowulf,Ba’al, or whatever other Gaulic, Celtic, et al, Japhethic god that you really worship.

    You’re going to need him.

  246. @Trinity

    “So many theories with this case”

    Chaos (2019) by Tom O’Neill connects Manson with CIA-funded psychologists from UC Berkeley who were flooding the ’67 SF hippie scene with speed for an experiment that began with testing aggression in rats. Manson’s parole officer placed Manson with the two psychologists who were operating out of the Haight-Ashbury Free Clinic. Manson’s job was to collect a harem of mostly female hippies for a more focused study. The well-documented book goes on to explore Manson’s connections with the LA County Sheriffs Dept. and a federal drug agent who penetrated Roman Polanski’s Hollywood circle. The now deceased federal drug agent’s widow and daughter told O’Neill that he was CIA.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  247. @Priss Factor

    Relatively speaking, Truth is actually a Righteous Negro. If most Negroes were like him, much of the race problems would diminish to a great deal.

    What is a Righteous Negro?

    I know his type.

    Troof would happily load us into cattle cars for a 1984 type state if they paid him decently. Heck he would probably do it for a burger.

    He knows full well that the establishment lies and that it is in the best interest of his race to suppress any questioning of mainstream propaganda.

    But he finds liberal dishonest thinking to be boring even if he supports it on a grander scale.

    Of course he trolls a lot but he has little choice. The establishment graduates millions of Blacks and yet their leading trufer uses trolling and distraction techniques. What does this tell us about the establishment?

    With that said I really don’t mind the guy. Sure he is full of it but once in a while delivers a really good one liner. There are also too many Hebrew obsessed here and he mixes it up a bit. I’d hate to see him banned for trolling. Like I said the establishment defenders don’t have much of a choice.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Priss Factor
  248. @restless94110

    The prison system, inherently unjust and inhumane
    Is the ultimate expression of injustice
    and inhumanity in the society at large.
    Those of us on the outside do not like
    to think of wardens and guards as our surrogates, yet they are.
    And they are intimately locked in a deadly embrace
    with their human captives behind prison walls.
    By extension, so are we.
    The terrible double meaning is thus imparted
    to the original question of human ethics
    “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

    “The Last Act of Defiance” – Exodus

    One does not have to visit Hell to know that it is an undesirable place to spend an eternity. Growing up where I did, I came to know a number of people who had been to the penitentiary. Usually, it wasn’t being a smooth criminal that got them incarcerated to begin with. Ex-Cons and the Construction Workers that I grew up around shared a few things in common. For one thing, they were often the same people. Among the traits they routinely displayed were border line illiteracy and limited vocabularies, a sophomoric sense of humor, boorish behavior, a lack of table manners, and a tendency to want to fight over small disagreements; or at least engage in loud, profanity laced shouting matches. There were numerous occasions that somebody had been to prison and was going to whip my ass. Only once did one of my formerly incarcerated opponents manage to best me, and he was someone that went around kicking everybody’s ass. And, even he wasn’t game for a rematch. At the time, I was 18 and he was 27.

    Prison is a miserable place, there is no doubt about it. But, only a Loser goes around boasting of being locked up like they earned an esteemed accolade befitting a Nobel Laureate. Spending time in The Joint is wretched, not heroic. It is sad and pitiful, not grand and admirable. The only time it can be considered a badge of honor is if it is a result of being a political prisoner, a martyr for a cause, or a P. O. W. And, those according to context.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  249. Truth says:
    @John Johnson

    He knows full well that the establishment lies and that it is in the best interest of his race to suppress any questioning of mainstream propaganda.

    My friend, I think you have been misreading my posts.

    9-11 was a hoax
    The Coronavirus is the flu
    Black people should stop complaining about slavery
    All presidential elections are fake, they are decided long in advance.
    There is a Satan-worshiping cabal that runs the earth
    White people are not inherently evil
    There are fundamental differences between the races
    Homosexuality is a choice, and a bad one
    The earth is fixed and does not move
    We have never been to the moon, and never will

    I could continue, but these are not what i would call “suppressing questioning of mainstream propaganda.”

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
  250. @John Johnson

    Troof would happily load us into cattle cars for a 1984 type state if they paid him decently. Heck he would probably do it for a burger.

    No, he has standards. He wouldn’t do it for anything less than a bucket of fried chicken; and as we’re being shipped away he’d probably give us a few pieces of chicken and some biscuits.

    That’s righteous behavior, relatively speaking.

    • LOL: Truth
  251. Siskel and Ebert best of 76

  252. Trinity says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    I went through a period where I consumed lots of books on Manson and some of the theories like yours, no offense, are laughable. The “Helter Skelter” theory promoted by Vincent Bugliosi is pretty hysterical as well. Bobby Beausioli who was a brief member of the Manson clan and who murdered Gary Hinman so much as said that Bugliosi’s “Helter Skelter” fantasy was bullshit, and coming from a man with life in prison, and nothing to lose, he seemed pretty credible. I’m going with this crime was nothing more than the Manson crew looking to commit a couple of copycat murders to shift the blame on the Hinman murder to the Black Panthers. I also go with the theory that Manson chose the Tate home because he mistakenly thought that Terry Melcher still resided at that residence. The LaBianca’s were just victims of circumstance and were unlucky enough to be chosen the next night.

    Perhaps the case was so big because it involved an aspiring actress and other noted rich people like Abigail Folger, the great granddaughter of the founder of Folger’s coffee and Jay Sebring, a hair stylist who catered to movie stars of the day. And of course, Manson was an off the wall, and even charismatic figure. These murders while horrific were certainly not unheard of in a city the size of Los Angeles. It was just media overkill with this case and as I stated earlier Manson achieved the fame he wanted so bad and in the end the name Manson is just as recognizable as Mick Jagger, The Beach Boys or Beatles. Granted Manson’s name is synonymous with evil and infamous, but he still achieved some sort of bizarre fame and massive cult following. How many interviews had this guy done over the years, how many books, etc.

    Manson was no MK ultra experiment or none of that other horseshit. All that crap is just some sap looking to sell a book or do a few talk show gigs. Manson has described himself as a petty thief, a tramp, a pimp, who did some time for forging checks, and that is more than likely what all Manson ever was in the end. The murders were simply done out of either revenge for Melcher snubbing Manson or had something to do with drug deals gone bad in the case of Gary Hinman. IF Sharon Tate and the other socialites had not been victimized and had their not been a racial element involved which was mainly promoted by Bugliosi, this case would have barely made it past the local news. Theories about Sixties rock star Jim Morrison being some sort of CIA plant and/or MK ultra experiment are just as laughable. Where do people come up with this shit and who is buying into it? People looking to sell bullshit for the almighty dollar.

    Did Manson have complete mind control over these kids? Hippie cults and Svengali or Cult Leaders back then were a dime a dozen. Manson was a worldly and well traveled ex-con who was 33-34 years old brainwashing mostly teenage or early twenty something year old girls and a few young naive men of the same age. Nothing magical here. Manson having been deprived of sex, at least with a female for so many years was more than willing to play hippie cult leader. Nothing special about a 34 year old ex-convict wise to the ways of the world manipulating naive people nearly half his age. The whole story is basically a media creation and the mystique of Manson is a media creation as well. Manson himself has told you as much in so many interviews. Knowing he would never receive parole, Manson played up the media creation to the hilt and probably enjoyed all the attention he always sought but never received as a number in prison or as a failed, marginally talented musician.

  253. @Cowtown Rebel

    Yeah, No one in this thread is boasting about prison life, but you. You are reverse boasting: shaming and dissing. This comment thread is about the lack of genuineness in American History X in the prison scenes (and secondarily in the murder scene that got Norton there in the first place)..

    Trejo appears a lot like ex-convicts I have known, who do have a sense of the survivor and the camaraderie of those finding themselves in harsh situations together. You have a judgmental streak that is ugly. Before you continue you would be well to employ the adage: walk a mile in another man’s shoes, before you judge him as harshly as you do.

    The Finns are far more humane and smart, because they are into correction, not retribution and punishment. And they know the simple fact that any restriction on a person’s freedom is a harsh punishment, no matter how good the conditions of that restriction. In other words, they aren’t vindictive. Because that is counterproductive to the safety of the society at large. In other words, they realize that, unless they are going to exterminate the malcreant, they better do their level best to make sure he is helped to correct his behavior and re-integrate into the society at large.

    English-speaking nations are just focused on harsh punishment and then back out with no real attempt at correction and re-integration. And then they wonder why they have the most per capita incarcerated (and/or on parole or probation) in the world.

    It is madness, but just one of the many madnesses coming to a head in these times.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  254. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Hmm, talk about the pot calling the kettle black ( pun intended.) Not that I am buying your whole Black Hebrew Jizzraelite ACT, mind you, the Heeb part, yes, the Black part, nah. Slavery ended in this part of the world in 1865, didn’t you catch the memo? Oh, but it still exists in the Motherland you call Africa where Blacks enslave, genocide, and torture each other around the clock like they have been doing for centuries. That is why Blacks stay here and “suffer” so much living with “White racism” cuz even they know that Africa is a literal shithole and violent place.

    Anywho, I’ll play along with your being a Black Hebrew Jizzy for the time being. That picture with the Black guy and the horrifically scarred back has been shown at least 6 gorillion times in books, television, and now you are showing us the same picture for yet another time. Wonder where are all the pictures of the Whites who have been disfigured, tortured, maimed, burned by Blacks over the years?

    Surely, the media isn’t about to show you pictures of that poor White child thrown off the balcony of a Minneapolis mall by a Black demon.

    Surely, the media isn’t about to show you pictures of that 12 year old White kid burned to death by a Black female in Texas.

    I could list hundreds if not thousands if I had the inclination. For every single picture you throw up that some Black was abused by Whites, I could show you probably 75-100 of cases where Blacks maimed or tortured Whites. To suggest that Blacks have suffered more in this nation at the hands of Whites than the reverse is more “nigger bullshit” to quote Derek’s father’s words in American History X.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Truth
    , @Cowtown Rebel
  255. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Hmm, talk about the pot calling the kettle black ( pun intended.) Not that I am buying your whole Black Hebrew Jizzraelite ACT,

    What act? I placed bible verses, (from the actual BIBLE) and then I placed pictures. If you can find pictures, on information in which the fate of another human group more closely approximates God’s curses from Deut. 28, I’d love to see them.

  256. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Oh, but it still exists in the Motherland you call Africa where Blacks enslave, genocide, and torture each other around the clock like they have been doing for centuries

    U-T, slavery still exists in your very hometown, and guess what; YOU’RE IN IT! Why do you think so many Honkees spend their winter in San Moritz, they’re summer in the Bahamas, and their spring camping in the Rockies while they live off interest from the tax YOU paid? Why do you think they have convinced so many of you who are collecting S.S to take the suicide shot (covid vaccine)? Why do constantly whine about the whitey who own TV, the radio, the newspapers, the book publishers, the magazine publishers, the social media pages, the websites, etc. being against you.

    Well I’ll give you one hint…Toby.

  257. @restless94110

    I don’t know where you get the idea that I am boasting of Prison life? I merely stated that there is a tendency in this society to give too much credit to so-called “street cred.” Street smarts is a good thing to have. In fact, I would have to say that possessing “street smarts” probably prevented me from following a route similar to those with whom I was well acquainted.

    Book smarts and just plain intelligence come in handy too. Especially when you want to have a job and function in civilization. Manners, courtesy, and the ability to converse also aid in cultural, as well as professional and personal advancement. Can I behave in a crude manner and speak using only four letter adjectives? I not only can, I have been to school to learn precisely those skills. However, I usually try to refrain from displaying those abilities, and, more importantly, I can control them. Having learned other modes of conduct and ways to communicate, why would I want to emulate or revere a common hoodlum who has no desire to better themselves or their surroundings? As for ugliness, Ex-Cons like Danny Trejo only want everything to be as ugly as they are both inside and out.

    However, if you read my comments, as well as the Commie inspired quote from the band Exodus, you should be able to decipher that I am against the prison system as it currently exists. Harsh punishments should be reserved for the most heinous offenses. No one should be less safe in jail than they are on the street, that is by design and could be remedied. Executions should be swift. In instances where guilt is abundantly evident, judgments should be made without the burden of a prolonged and pointless trial; the defense lawyer’s only job to be to argue for leniency. I don’t think criminals should be coddled, nor do I believe they should be exploited or victimized. They should be treated according to the nature of their crime. Some should be flayed alive. Others, made to work out their debts to society. Many, due to their only crime being some form of drug abuse, shouldn’t be in jail at all; though some may have to be institutionalized due to their inability to live independently.

    As far as the World’s largest prison population, that is true. And, alarmingly, the growing number of Corporate run facilities means that there is money in the business of jailing people. But, the laws are so strict and the punishments are so severe in other parts of the World, that there is no need to have so many prisons. The people don’t dare commit an offense for fear of death or interminable sentences. A dead person, or one that will never see the light of day again, has little need for rehabilitation and certainly won’t be reintegrated. The madness is far from being isolated in the West. Are you really that naive?

    As far as the topic of this thread is concerned, it, like practically every other, has deviated from the initial point of discussion long ago. We’ve got quotes from the Bible, a list of Greek Gods, a discussion about Black Hebrews, the life and times of Charles Manson, and you lecturing me about the humanity of the Finns, and you have the gall to accuse me of not focusing on the subject at hand? Remind me… What role did Danny Trejo play in American History X?

    • Replies: @restless94110
  258. @Cowtown Rebel

    I don’t know where you get the idea that I am boasting of Prison life?

    Apparently you can’t read. You were doing the opposite. What’s wrong with you,man? You are fighting ex-cons on the job site when you are 18? You sound like a criminal. But you are instead a knight in shining armor in your head?

    Dude, I can’t be arsed to read the rest of your foolish nonsense.

    Have fun, bud. And stop wasting my time.

    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Cowtown Rebel
  259. While whites brag of their prison experience the Asians, Jews, Indians clear all the cash in the USA.

    They live large & make bank while whites here brag of fisticuffs on the street with worthless black thugs who probably went on to spend their lives in a “traphouse”.

    Big Herc & Wig-Splitter Wes might have dominated the chow line in the prison but the former ended up in prison for an inept bank robbery & the latter beat a kid up over a marijuana deal.

    Meanwhile the Brahmins run IT, the Jews everything else, the Italians are the only successful criminals who manage to become millionaires & stay on the street, the Asians go to Harvard.

    Half the hicks here act like a state school college degree is a big deal. I’m ashamed of mine.

    They are not living in barracks trying to teach blacks how to swim.

    Italian-Americans at least live large on crime while the whites end up like Anglo-Celtic tweakers you see on FIRST 48 who stabbed their meth dealer.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  260. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    Screw, I’m thinking you should look for a nice, compliant thread. Could help with your anxiety.

    Could be white, Asian, or even one of those black ladies to whom you have denied satisfaction..

    • Replies: @restless94110
  261. @Truth

    Hey Troof,

    The only screws still around are in your fertile imagination.

    Apparently you are now a doctor and a match maker. A weirdo of your talents should be wasting them on little old me.

    Move on, little locust. Fly.

  262. Trinity says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Dude, how many Italian Americans do you know? I know a couple and one is my sister in law is a devout religious person who probably is the most truthful and law abiding person that I know of.

    You have to be a Jew. I would rather brag about being a man and fighting for your honor than being a little shrew bragging about how Jews get rich running Ponzi schemes or any other Jewy crimes. Eventually those effeminate Jews might wind up being brought to justice like Bernie Madoff and wind up being bitch slapped by some 145lb negro. LMAO. What about the Subway guy, (((Jared Fogle))) who was convicted of child pornography and paying for sex with minors. Hmm, think I would rather be a meth addict than a chomo, which is the lowest thing a person could ever be. Seems to me that it is rather common for Jews to be arrested for a lot of perverse sexual crimes like child molestation, rape, sexual assault, etc. We all saw how many Jews were named in the #MeToo movement. I think I heard that “the ugliest man in porn” Ron Jeremy, was facing rape charges a month or so ago. smdh. Seems to be a genetic problem here. Selling body organs? A rabbi caught by Chris Hanson trying to have sex with an underage boy on the show, “To Catch A Predator?” Seems like we have a pattern here, my friend.

    Add to this list, last but not least, the Jew serial killer, Albert Fish who preyed on children and ate the victims as well. What kind of demonic piece of shit this guy must have been. Makes those redneck meth heads look pretty damn good IMO.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  263. anarchyst says:
    @Trinity

    Let’s not forget serial rapist Leo Frank who tried to pin his murder of a child on a black man and pretty much single handedly started the jewish “Anti-Defamation League”. Thankfully his attempt to “purchase” a pardon from a corrupt governor was cut short by a well-deserved “necktie party”.
    Justice was served…

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  264. Trinity says:
    @anarchyst

    Yep, another Jewy trait of theirs which is blaming others or self projecting their bad behavior on others. They claim everyone else is “anti-Semitic” or “racist” while they seek to take away the rights of Whites in America and abroad and while they subject Palestinians to brutal treatment, steal their land, etc. And of course we all know the Jew had nothing to do with the African Slave Trade. SARC. Jews joke that rural Whites or particularly White Southerners practice inbreeding but the Jews along with Arabs, Blacks, and Hispanics are far more guilty of inbreeding than the most backwoods White Southern family you could think of. The Jew talks of “White Privilege” but it is the Jew who is the most privileged and wealthy tribe in America. When you think of the pornography “business” and how many Jews are involved there, you have to wonder how many lives have been taken in that filthy industry. Suicides, drug overdoses, how many of the girls have been raped, or subjected to degrading acts that leave them soulless, the walking dead, etc., it is sickening. Lest we forget Epstein/Maxwell & Company as well. How many White females lives were destroyed there? You have to wonder IF Maxwell is even in prison. My guess is Epstein is still alive, probably in Israel or Saudi.

    • Thanks: Cowtown Rebel
  265. @restless94110

    “Yeah, No one in this thread is boasting about prison life, but you.” – insomniac90210

    My reading comprehension skills are par excellence. Apparently, you can’t remember what you typed. The problem is, you can’t be bothered reading, Period. Fights on construction sites are common, that’s one of the reasons that I didn’t continue working with bricklayers, carpenters, drywallers, roofers, etc… Another reason is that, although hourly pay was often good, work was sporadic and I generally made more at the end of the year doing a nine to five gig than they did. A third reason, that didn’t apply to me as much as it did my contemporaries, is the trades have been taken over by Illegal Aliens who do shoddy work on cheap bids. However, if you know anything about Mexicans, then you know that too much cerveza y machismo equals pugilistica. Those people will fight at the drop of a sombrero. You sound like an imbecile. But you are instead a “Super Genius” (who doesn’t read) inside your head?

    Nobody’s wasting your time but you. If anything, I’m wasting my own time refuting your asinine assertions. But, I mainly do it in case anyone else is reading this exchange. Which is my reason for frequenting this site to begin with. To learn from others and to share what I know with those who can benefit from what I’ve managed to absorb.

    Dud, the only fool spouting nonsense from their arse is you.

    Have Funk! Crud. And, Stop pasting your slime!

    Stanks.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  266. @Cowtown Rebel

    So when I wrote:

    Yeah, No one in this thread is boasting about prison life, but you. You are reverse boasting: shaming and dissing.

    And then your replied:

    I don’t know where you get the idea that I am boasting of Prison life?

    That somehow means that:

    My reading comprehension skills are par excellence. Apparently, you can’t remember what you typed.

    No, bunkie. That means you can’t remember what you read. Or couldn’t comprehend it.

    I don’t know what part of Eastern Europe you are in where fist fights on construction sites are as frequent as those in old Clint Eastwood movies, but I’ve worked on construction sites for decades and never seen but one. Any foreman I’ve ever had would’ve canned any stupid fool like yourself for assaulting another on a site. Maybe even invited the cops to take both of you fighters away. I’m sure your “opponents” would have also been violated and hauled off to prison for fighting with a stupid young hater like yourself so why would they?

    You’re dramatizing, Chauncy.

    And yes, I still couldn’t be arsed to read more than a sentence or two of your fiction. Because shit is shit.And your shit is toxic shit.

    How about you and Truth talk with each other instead of with me? He has a taste for 1920s prison lingo. That should go well with your construction worker stories taken from old Clint Eastwood movies.

    Spanks.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Cowtown Rebel
  267. @Trinity

    Yes, as common as photography had become by the 1860’s, if that picture were anything other than the most inflammatory example of cruelty that they could find, then we would be inundated with images like that. Still, flaying was a common punishment in the World’s Navies at the time. A White Man with the Lewis and Clark expedition was left on guard duty and fell asleep. He received ONE HUNDRED LASHES! Yet, he lived (probably slept on his stomach) and apparently continued on with the expedition:

    On 12 July 1804 at Camp New Island, near today’s Rulo, Nebraska, a court martial consisting of the two commanding officers—one of them serving as judge advocate–convened at 1:00 p.m. for the trial of Alexander Willard, who was charged with “lying down and Sleeping on his post whilst a Sentinal.” It was a capital crime, “under the rules and articles of War punishable by death.” Although Willard pleaded guilty of lying down, but not guilty of sleeping, the court, “after Duly Considering the evidence aduced, are of oppinion that the Prisoner . . . is guilty of every part of the Charge exhibited against him. it being a breach of the rules and articles of War (as well as tending to the probable distruction . . . of the party) do Sentence him to receive One hundred lashes on his bear back, at four different times in equal propation.– and order that the punishment Commence this evening at Sunset, and Continue to be inflicted, (by the Guard) every evening untill Completed.” Dividing the flogging into four parts on four successive days was a common way of increasing the severity of the punishment. – http://www.lewis-clark.org/article/2640

    And, let’s not forget that only 6%, approximately 600,000, of the Negroes shipped to the Western Hemisphere from Africa were brought to the U.S. The vast majority, 94%, over 10,000,000, were transported to the Caribbean and South America. The Trans-Atlantic Slave trade would continue for 23 years after The War to Prevent Southern Independence had ended. Cuba and Brazil did not outlaw Slavery until 1888. Prior to that, their labor needs were being supplied by ships operating out of Northern ports in the United States, as they always had been.

    I remember reading about the little boy tortured to death by the Sheboon with an acetylene torch. If the races had been reversed… well, you know. The only reason The Mall of America atrocity got so much coverage is because it was such a blatant act committed in front of multiple witnesses. It couldn’t be as easily ignored. Who still remembers Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom?

    I recommend reading “Left Behind in Rosedale: Race Relations and the Collapse of Community Institutions” by Scott Cummings. This was a neighborhood just over a mile from where I grew up. It hit close to home and I became obsessed with it, visiting the area (which has since become El Barrio) and researching old newspaper articles in the library’s archives. The book describes the plight of the elderly White residents, whose homes were being burglarized, who were being harassed and robbed on the street, whose property was being vandalized, and who were being raped and murdered in the homes that they had spent their lives working for and raising their families in. There were 46 crimes against the old White residents within a 30 block area during a 3 month period between June and September of 1982. Three old White Women, ages 77, 80 and 94, were raped. This had been going on since the late 1970’s. One old White Woman was in her bathtub when a group of Negroes burst in on her. They dragged her out of the tub and began slapping her and demanding money. When she didn’t have enough to satisfy their demands, they began punching her until she fell down. Then, they kicked and stomped on her, spray painted her genitals and killed her by shoving a 14″ wooden dowel down her throat. Afterwards, they went and played video games with the pocket change that they stole from her.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  268. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    Hey Screw, I just wanted to give you a little history here.

    You know, things were all good in the Peckerwood Car until you showed us, us Knee-Grows and the Mess-Kins had problems in our own cars, but yours was running like a Tank.

    Anyway, first you shiv Steve-88 in the bathroom (and y0u won’t tell me what you used to make the knife), then you get some of your boys to jump Unholy-Trinity, now you are trying to take the car keys from Cowtown (Street name: Ol’Hickory).

    I mean, it was a week ago that your people owned the cell-phone trade and were making inroads on the drug trade from the Asians. But you had to come do what white men do and come mess it up for other white men with your weapons and invasions.

    As a member of a more peaceful race I am thoroughly disappointed in you.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  269. Trinity says:
    @Cowtown Rebel

    Thanks for the information and I will definitely see if I can grab a copy of the book you recommended. I can’t tell you how many times I have seen that picture of the negro with his back scarred. Like the holyco$t images, that one picture is shown over and over and over. And lest we forget the Wichita Massacre before the Knoxville Horror or Jessica Chambers burned alive in Mississippi a few years ago. That was a REAL Mississippi Burning and not FAKE like the REEL Mississippi Burning. I heard at one time (((they))) were thinking about making a movie based on the Wichita Massacre only the perpetrators would be White and Black instead of all Black. My guess is they would probably make the victims White and Black as well. LYING JEWS.

    You probably already know that the book and movie, “A Time To Kill” which was based on a true story actually REVERSED the races of the victim and the perpetrators. In REAL life, the perpetrators all Black gang raped a young White female and yet they write a book and produce a movie showing the complete opposite and fool the public by saying based on a true life story. DECEPTION & LYING. Maybe that is why Jews excel at criminal activity over their Gentile counterparts. Goodness knows, our friend (((Stryker))) is rather proud of Jewish criminal achievements like underage prostitution rings, money laundering, selling body organs, Ponzi schemes, child molestation and an assortment of things that disgust most people.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  270. @Truth

    (and y0u won’t tell me what you used to make the knife

    Hey, Troof. I did tell you what I used to make the knife: a knife I bought at WalMart. But you’re not listening, Troofie baby.

    You are so immersed in your 80-year old convict character that you don’t realize you were freed to the streets in 1973.

    Troof, smell the coffee. It’s not pruno. You are on the street, and the ghost of your kindly grandma, Lizzy Borden, is smiling down on you.

    Bask in her gaze. Go the library and learn how to use a computer. Go on a date with Danny Trejo.Or better yet, that other weirdo who thinks it’s cool to get into fist fights on construction sites.

    He’s rough trade, but I got a feeling you like that kind of thing.

    You have a talent, Troof. It’s just not for writing. Recommend: Open up a boutique on the Boardwalk selling old license plates. That should keep you from getting homesick for the life.

  271. Truth says:

    Open up a boutique on the Boardwalk selling old license plates. That should keep you from getting homesick for the life.

    LOL, Bro, you must be a Khazar.

    Even on, say, the Dennis Miller scale of references, yours are obscure.

  272. @restless94110

    Yeah, I read your first sentence, and the one following it. You contradicted yourself, and I chose to interpret your analysis of my mentality as you first described it. I’m neither boasting, or dissing” prisoners or construction workers as a whole, I’m simply stating facts as I observed them.

    It is also well established that construction workers and prisoners aren’t generally well read or very articulate. I don’t know what construction sites you’ve worked at where everyone has a law degree, never uses profanity, and display a refined etiquette befitting a foreign ambassador… but, I suspect it’s in your imagination. Most who are in the trades would not be well suited for the professions and vice versa. For whatever reason, it is often the case that people who are good with their hands aren’t usually as adept at reading and writing. Whereas, those who excel in communication related businesses are typically not as handy around the house. I’m kind of like Don Williams in the song “Good Ole Boys Like Me” – “I was smarter than most and I could choose. I learned to talk like the man on the six o’clock news.”

    Eastern Europe? Never been there. But, I know that the word Slave comes from the Slavic people who were dominated and enslaved through blood quotas by the Ottomans. I don’t know what Fantasyland you dwell in. But, I can tell that TEXAS is much too hot for you, so I suggest that you remain where you are. Snowflakes don’t last long here.

    It would seem, from your reaction to the idea of someone fighting that you must be considerably younger than me. It may be true that the first thing a foreman would do today would be to fire the combatants and summon the authorities. That is the modern Snowflake answer for everything. It’s that way in the schools now too. A couple of kindergartners get into a slap fight and the police are called, charges filed, and the parents are fined or jailed or both. Now, everyone, like you, is looking for a “safe space” and needs a puppy to deal with the fact that “Nanna” croaked.

    My “sh*t” is only toxic to you because you know that what I’m writing is true and you can’t handle the truth. It’s like rat poison to a rodent.

    Why don’t you go do the only thing you know how to do? If you’ve forgotten, I’ll remind you:

    Wanks.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  273. @Cowtown Rebel

    Yeah, I read your first sentence, and the one following it. You contradicted yourself, and I chose to interpret your analysis of my mentality as you first described it. I’m neither boasting, or dissing” prisoners or construction workers as a whole, I’m simply stating facts as I observed them.

    Thanks for reading without comprehending. You deserve a couple of points for that. By the way, don’t you have a couple fist fights to get into? Be careful, you wild cowboy you. One too many punches and you are looking at murder 1. But you don’t care do you? Obviously fist fights are your thing. Kicking ass,taking names. And then the director yells Cut, Print. And you can go back to make up.

    In the real world? Fighting on the job site? They call that felony assault, criminal. Doesn’t matter who started it. I’m shocked you are still walking around free talking smack.

    Choose whatever versions of my analysis you care to, bub. As usual, I could not be arsed to read anything else you said beyond this first paragraph, because it is obvious you are either a liar, a fool, or just a pure hater.

    Go boast and diss some little old lady crossing the street. She is easy for a guy like you.

    Or better yet, go to construction sites and start fist fights. Spend your time doing what you like to do (beat people up) instead of writing replies to me.

    Take my advice. Do yourself a favor. Beat someone down a little bit too far one time. Then you too can enjoy the prison life you richly deserve. On your first day there try out that arrogant and dissing attitude. See how far that gets you.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Cowtown Rebel
  274. @Trinity

    You’re welcome. No, I have to admit, I didn’t know about the movie “A Time To Kill.” I’m not sure if I’ve seen it, but I do vaguely remember some promos, or reviews, or at least the title. I will have to read about it and watch the movie so I can add it to the long list of (((Hollywood))) lies that I’ve already accumulated. Thank You.

    On another thread, I brought attention to Danny Glover assuming a role that rightfully belonged to a White Man in “Bat*21” and Morgan Freeman stealing the credit from a White Man and having it attributed to a Negro in “Dolphin Tale.” As well as the substitution of a multi-ethnic and bi-gendered ensemble in lieu of the White Male Firefighters who raised the flag at the site of the collapse of the World Trade Center.

    I’ve cited this book on multiple occasions, and though I’ve definitely READ more books than the New Millennium Z’ster that boasts of the number of titles he has on Audiobooks, I keep returning to this one as a reference:

    “The Vanishing American Jew” by Alan Dershowitz offers an insiders perspective into the mindset and motivations of the Jewish people. As a book that was written for the purpose of encouraging Jews to marry and have children with other Jews, it is extremely candid. Yet, it contains a number of disclaimers just in case the Goyim are reading it. Dershowitz explains the need to perpetuate victimhood to maintain cohesion. He readily acknowledges the Anti-Christian attitudes that are prevalent in the Jewish community, but excuses them as being due to a continual fear of the Inquisition and Holocaust. He also enumerates the disproportionate influence of Jewish people in politics, academia, and entertainment, but insists that there is no set agenda that they cooperate on. Yet, on the very first page, he laments that the era of enormous Jewish influence in America may soon be coming to an end due to intermarriage and assimilation. The book is very revealing, and I considered it to be all the more valuable because it was a Jew saying these things, rather than a so-called “Anti-Semite” pointing them out.

    Chambers, unfortunately chose to expose herself to the elements. Although, she certainly didn’t deserve to suffer the way she did. Her fate is akin to that of an individual who wanders into the wilderness without a compass or provisions and then gets lost and starves to death. In other words, she placed herself in jeopardy and wound up deceased as a result of her indiscretions. The victims of the Wichita Massacre were simply going about their business when they were intruded upon and subjected to among the most vile and malevolent fates imaginable. Both were horrific, but one was avoidable and the other wasn’t. Although, the latter makes a strong case for the 2nd amendment.

    (((Stryker)))? Isn’t he the guy who claims to live in Dubai? I started ignoring him months ago. His only shtick is to ridicule Americans for wanting to save their Country and to have a decent life. If he really is in Dubai, he will hopefully soon be Jihaded. I don’t know if he’s the same one, but I remember encountering him before. There are several of these alleged ex-Pats who claim to have pulled up roots and quasi-settled elsewhere. If they are truly where they say they are, then there’s a damn good chance that at some point they will wear out their welcomes (if history is any indication) and the first place they will be scrambling to reach will be the U. S. Embassy; provided it is still functioning.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  275. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    I have it Ol’ Hickory 5 – Screw 4, going into the top of the ninth. Screw has the #3-4-5 hitters coming up.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  276. @restless94110

    Go suck your thumb, or whatever it is that you wrap your lips around, Sissy Boy. If you think that people aren’t out there fighting with one another, then you haven’t been watching the news, or reading the newspapers, or ever even seen an episode of “Ridiculousness.”

    I am not forward for a fight, however, unlike a spineless Coward like you, I don’t scurry away from one ducking my head and clinching my arse. And, if you naively believe that everyone who gets into an altercation winds up in prison, then you are apparently unaware of the number of unsolved homicides in the city of Chicago. If the Cops can’t even be bothered to investigate a murder, why do you think they would be so prompt to arrest a couple of individuals involved in a street brawl? I’ve always stopped short of killing people, although it did require a little dissuasion from concerned bystanders on a couple of occasions. Really, I have sufficient self control to refrain from bludgeoning someone to death. But, being a lily-livered pacifist, you wouldn’t know anything about it. You deal with your problems by cuddling your therapy puppy and taking anti-anxiety meds. Take my advice: If someone does assault you, you may be able to curl up in a ball and withstand their attack until someone (the Police?) arrives to save you. It’s your only defense.

    As for Construction Sites, the ones that I worked on were mainly employing White Men. They may have been lacking a sense of decorum, but they were the type of guys that were doing those kind of jobs. I haven’t done any Construction work in quite a few years. From what I have seen, there are mostly Mexicans building the houses now. The exception being electricians and plumbers. The last construction work I did was rewiring houses for H.U.D. in South Dallas. And, funny enough, the guy I worked for ended up getting into a fight with one of his subordinates. They both went back to the job the next day. No police, no undue drama or hysterical overreaction, just a misunderstanding that they apparently felt they needed to settle. That’s how things were before the Snowflake Generation began to melt whenever they were exposed to any source of heat.

    This was a very different Country before cell phones and computer games turned everyone into a Sci-Fi Geek that can’t find their destinations without a Vehicular Navigation System, whose social interaction consists of Friends on Facebook and imbecilic Tweets, and whose only exposure to excitement and danger is what is manifested on a video screen.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  277. Truth says:

    You left one hanging off the outside corner Screw, Hickory just crushed it for a 3-run blast.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
  278. @Truth

    Thanks for tuning in. Wry wit noted, I like the play by play and score keeping. Especially, when you have me ahead!

  279. @Truth

    You’ll need to furnish me with a program of the players for me to understand your lingo, Troof.

  280. @Cowtown Rebel

    Confucius say: man who write too many words screaming about sissies and cowards and every other thing in the book is man who flap gums into the wind.

    I been around a long time, boyo, and no, fist fights among adults aren’t common, and those adults that engage in them, eventually end up doing time.

    Good luck, sonny. Like I said, go find a construction worker to beat up or whatever it is that floats your boat.

  281. @Cowtown Rebel

    Typical of the dumb proles to think in a global hub like Dubai the Emirates are swinging scimitars intent on Jihad. No, they are loaded & managing their properties in Marble Arch.

    Bush made the proles believe that & blew the US economy on wars in the ME that did not even get us any oil & yet the dumb proles still believe this line 20 years after 9-11.

    No wonder (THEY) run a con on them.

    …But not this German-American.

    [MORE]

    That last paragraph sounds familiar because after moving to Dubai my former off-campus landlord kept calling my relatives about some bill from my college years & I had to fly back to Michigan & some local yokel said “I heard you moved to Iraq”…I shuddered at his ignorant stupidity…to think that Dubai-a gorgeous mosaic of sprouting skyscrapers & pristine new public transport & roads was the same as Bagdad…

    By the time the rube asked me that, I had spent a summer in London & Christmas vacations traveling India & smoking marijuana in Amsterdam cafes…I jumped in my Hertz rental & left Michigan behind forever.

    But years later, I would talk to Stanley the Polish guy from Flint. I recall watching the sun set over the Gulf of Oman as he spun his sad Michigan prole tale. We had been roommates in college. He knocked up a Polish Catholic girl in Flint. He got stuck there. The house his parents left him was worth nothing, could not give it away. He was trapped. He lived on a street full of heroin addicts & crack dealers in a grimy rustbelt city.

    I shuddered. Thank goodness I got gone as a young man. Thank goodness I did not hit up a girl on the wrong night in Michigan & get stuck there.

    I had forgotten how dumb the hicks were until you said that. And now I remember. Only someone who did not possess a passport & had spent their entire life in some podunk town in the house they were born could fail to realize the secular earning power of Dubai.

    But that is why Dubai nearly bought the US Port Authority after the US plunged into recession at the tail end of Bush’s administration-which mercifully I was overseas & managed to miss…except for that one brief trip 20 years ago back to Michigan in the summer of 2001 when I was 27.

    Globalization has had another 20 years to work its magic, but the hicks & rubes are still as ignorant as ever.

    Dubai is long in my past. It was a stepping stone.

    In 1996 & 1997 I was a garden variety college slacker who was smoking too much weed & fighting with my college girlfriend, a bitchy blond sorority girl. The 90’s was a grim, bleak time. The last year, things truly went downhill into horror. The Cholos & tweakers in Phoenix.

    What saved me was an opportunity to move to an oasis of opportunity in the desert. It wasn’t great. I was one more lowly-paid young expat.

    But Dubai was an exciting place to be young in the late 90’s. And then there was that summer of 2000 in London.

    …And then my relatives started to fax me about some old landlord from my disastrous college years in some jerkwater Michigan town complaining about some security deposit.

    I flew back the summer of 2001, just before 9-11.

    And on the way out, I ran into a local yokel I had known. “They said you went to Iraq” he said. I shook my head at his ignorance…time to get back overseas.

    Dubai was long behind me now, but it had been a stepping stone. I had gone overseas before I could be locked into marriage, into child support, into divorce, into a mortgage on a house which would be worth nothing in a lousy economy.

    I escaped all of that an a young age.

    Sometimes I would watch old episodes of FIRST 48 in Asia where the sorry white lumpenproles went down for being part of some meth circle. Could have been me. Many acquaintance I knew in the US from the drab margins of working class white life might have gone that way. I would watch the white proles acting like Eminem in a grotesque imitation of black mannerisms. Overseas, I preserved my European identity because there was no external cultural forces.

    The cultural forces that oppressed working class whites never affected me. I was working in Dubai, meeting women in London, swimming in the Arabian Sea. The horror of keeping a clunker car running with rusted out rims to shop at Kroger’s in freezing cold weather was not my fate. Instead, I enjoyed the good taste of hummus & bubble tea abroad.

    I’m not a lumpen on Big Herc’s show who was sent down for selling Opoids & beat up a “Chomo” & had to visit a probation officer & subject urine samples.

    Instead, I spent my life overseas. A part of no system. Having to hear no BS about white privilege. No fears about BLM.

    I missed it all.

    Thank goodness for Dubai & the doors it opened to me as a young man.

    The expats on here will understand. You have to be one. You have to have zero stake in your land of birth. You have to be enjoying life in a warm climate where there are no whiggers, no hippie anarchists trying set dumpsters on fire outside gas stations, no worries that your daughter will be sexually bullied in lousy public high schools, no Opoid addicts…

    Expats are superior to that. We ask ourselves. We see it the way people see drunks in a streetfight from their apartment window. We are removed from this.

  282. @Twodees Partain

    I thought 25th Hour was his best, only because of the supporting roll of his ’70 Superbee.

  283. I was a member of the National Alliance when this film came out, and I recall enjoying it at the now-defunct Century Shoreline 16, in Mountain View.

    The unusually Diverse audience (it seemed like a lot of folks drove in from East Palo Alto that evening) got a little rowdy throughout, LOL.

  284. Franco says:

    It is interesting to note that there has long been a rumor going around about this film, not just about what was added, but what was subtracted. You said the most logical ending for the film would be Derek Vinyard shaving his head and gearing up for war, with or without the backing of the gang Derek was in, the peculiarly named Disciples of Christ. Tony Kaye evidently agreed and wrote that as the ending. I don’t know if it was ever filmed, but it seems like it makes sense in the context of the story and with the likely editorial intent of an ethnoreligious jew. The movie is a sly knock on Christianity and ultimately about how what appears to be potentially the best of them are in reality the worst and most dangerous. At least that’s what I got from it.

  285. How is it Friedkin and Donald Trump talk so much alike? Is it a New York thing?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Trevor Lynch Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement