The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTrevor Lynch Archive
Look Who's Back
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Whenever there is a decline of righteousness, and the rise of unrighteousness, then I come back to teach dharma.”

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter IV, Verse 7

“Nobody can stay mad at Hitler forever.”

Look Who’s Back

David Wnendt’s 2015 film Look Who’s Back (Er ist wieder da) is based on Timur Vermes’ 2012 novel of the same name about Adolf Hitler being mysteriously transported to modern Berlin and becoming a viral media sensation. Look Who’s Back is a fascinating and funny film, but its intended message is hard to fathom. Is the movie a satire of modern society, a satire of the modern media, a warning against recrudescent fascism? If it is entirely satire, it is too broad and all-encompassing so that one does not know where the filmmaker stands, and for what. As I read it, however, the net effect of this film is to make Hitler seem like a much more rational and compelling figure than the carpet-chewing madman to which we are accustomed. This, in turn, undermines the film’s attempt to smear National Populists like Marine Le Pen and Geet Wilders by linking them to Hitler. But surely this was no part of the Wnendt’s or Vermes’ intentions.

Look Who’s Back strikes me as a strange mashup of Jerzy Kosinski’s only good story, Being There—in which a mysterious cipher rides other people’s projections into a position of power—and Network, Paddy Chayevsky’s brilliant satire of television, in which an ambitious and unscrupulous female producer exploits Howard Beale, a TV-anchor turned mad prophet and tribune of populist rage. Only in this case, the cipher is invisible not because he is unknown but because he is overexposed, supposedly dead, and people refuse to believe their lying eyes.


The basic story of Look Who’s Back is quite simple. Through some miracle, Adolf Hitler (Oliver Masucci) has been transported from April 1945 to 2014. He wakes up in a Berlin apartment complex near the site of the old Chancellery. He then has the sort of comic misadventures one would expect of a guy dressed as Hitler wandering around present-day Berlin. Naturally, nobody thinks he has come back. Instead, they take him to be Hitler impersonator, i.e., a madman or a clown. People want to take selfies with him and do the Hitler salute. Parts of the film are presented as unscripted interactions with real people. If this is true, it seems remarkable how few negative reactions he receives. Frankly, I think it is all fake.

Hitler befriends a newsstand owner and begins to catch up on the last 70 years. He is horrified to learn that Poland still exists, and on German territory no less. Hitler regards Angela Merkel with contempt and regards her party as a pale imitation of National Socialism. But he puts a great deal of stock in the Greens.

Hitler then teams up with Fabian Sawatski (Fabian Busch) who is a bit of a loser, living with his mom and dreaming of being a director while relegated to delivering mail and making coffee at the offices of the MyTV network. Fabian is convinced that this Hitler impersonator will be a huge success and wants to come along for the ride. Criss-crossing Germany, Hitler talks to ordinary Germans about the evils of immigration and race-mixing and the sham of liberal democracy. He finds many receptive listeners. Again: Is this for real or just a morality play? Is it a warning that even the slightest deviation from the liberal democratic consensus will lead straight to You Know Who?

If this is the intended message, then why does the filmmaker portray Hitler as level-headed, reasonable, and even humorous? Why not just use the ranting TV Hitler we have seen a thousand times before? Vermes and Wnendt know that this image of Hitler was constructed by extracting the impassioned climaxes from what were often long lectures filled with facts and arguments. Vermes, by the way, is quite masterful at capturing Hitler’s voice and style, as ably discussed by Counter-Currents’ own James O’Meara, and this is carried over into the film with hilarious effect even when Hitler encounters such minor modern oddities as a granola bar.

Hitler hits the big time when Katja Bellini (Katja Riemann) takes over MyTV. She thinks Hitler will be sensational, but her resentful underling, Christoph Sensenbrink (Christoph Maria Herbst) thinks he can oust her by engineering a public backlash against putting Hitler on a TV satire show. Sensenbrink urges the writers to come up with the most offensive jokes possible. (Example: Q: What did the Jewish pedophile say? A: Want to buy some candy?)

But Hitler’s monologues are not the rantings of a genocidal madman. Nor are they comedy routines, although they have a biting wit. Instead, they are candid and heartfelt meditations on the banality of modern culture, the failure of liberal democracy, and the need for meaning in life. Hitler becomes a viral media sensation.

But then footage of Hitler shooting a small dog that attacked him comes to light. The whole thing strikes me as deeply fake, as Hitler was a dog lover. But it is used to great effect. The audience turns on him. Hitler is kaput. Bellini and Sawatski are aus. Sensenbrink takes Bellini’s job.

But then . . . Hitler comes back. Hitler is, after all, a best-selling author. So Hitler holes up at Sawatski’s mom’s apartment and writes his second bestseller, Look Who’s Back. In a hilarious satire of the modern image makeover, Hitler donates money to animal charities, appears on talk shows, and even manages to get beaten up by skinheads.

Meanwhile, the network’s profits plummet without Hitler, which sets up a scene in which Sensenbrink does a parody of Hitler’s famous Downfall tirade. (It is notable that the only ranting in the movie is not Hitler’s but Sensenbrink’s.) One of the idiots at the network suggests hiring Hitler back, because “Nobody can stay mad at Hitler forever.” Surely Jews would disagree.

Which brings us to another aspect of this film that strikes me as deeply fake: Jews are mentioned from time to time, but always in ways that make them seem like they are essentially powerless, in need of protection, and readily dismissed when they start going on about the dangers of resurgent Hitlerism. Bellini wants Hitler’s assurance that Jews will not be mocked, but Hitler takes her to mean that Jews are “no laughing matter.” A protest from Jewish organization is laughed off. When an elderly Jewish woman recognizes Hitler really is Hitler, it is dismissed as dementia.

This strikes me as deeply dishonest. A huge amount of modern politics in the West consists of placating “deeply concerned” Jews, even when they are transparently neurotic and manipulative. For instance, steps had to be taken lest space aliens be triggered into anti-Semitic pogroms when it was discovered that trees in Germany and buildings in America look like swastikas from above.

The film ends with Hitler, Sawatski, and Bellini making a movie of Look Who’s Back. The worst-case scenario of someone realizing that Hitler is actually, you know, Hitler, is acted out in the movie and disposed of with a diagnosis of mental illness. The movie completed, Hitler and Bellini ride through the streets of Berlin in an open limousine while Hitler monologues on the rise of nationalism, populism, and xenophobia around Europe to a montage of images of demonstrations and politicians like Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders. This, he claims, is an ideal environment for him to come back.

We are supposed to feel chills, but I felt rather angry at the attempt to stigmatize sensible European nationalism and populism by equating it with Hitler. Want borders? You’re no better than Hitler! Want standards? What is this, Nazi Germany? Of course, America was not Nazi Germany before 1965, when we opened our borders; or before the cultural revolutions of the 1960s which declared war against all reigning norms and values.

Look Who’s Back is a highly entertaining film, but it is deeply fake. The premise that Adolf Hitler could return to modern Germany, become a TV star, and then perhaps return to politics is meant as an insult to the German people. But surely there is no shortage of people in Germany who would scramble to engage in sadism and self-righteousness cloaked in the banner of anti-fascism if Hitler returned.

I suspect the truth would be closer to what we have been going through in America over the last few years when a real-life TV star became President. Donald Trump is no Hitler, but a large portion of the US population has gaslighted themselves into thinking Trump is Hitler’s second coming and reacted accordingly. And Trump Derangement Syndrome is the merest shadow of the oy veying that would rend the very fabric of the universe if Hitler actually did come back.

Nevertheless, I highly recommend Look Who’s Back. Oliver Masucci is a compelling Hitler, although they should have given him blue contact lenses. Katja Riemann is simply regal. Indeed, the entire cast is good.

Again, it is hard to determine the film’s actual message. But liberals find it deeply disturbing, and Right-leaning individuals who are supposed to be scared away from National Populism by an association with Hitler might have exactly the opposite reaction. I have never believed that the triumph of National Populism—which is based upon universal, objective reality, not mere historical contingencies—requires the rehabilitation of Hitler, but taking some of the sting out of the reductio ad Hitlerum can’t hurt either. Try showing this film to normies and see how they react.

• Category: Arts/Letters • Tags: Germany, Hitler, Movies 
Hide 19 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. iffen says:

    Have you written a review of The Death of Stalin?

  2. mh505 says:

    This film cannot even remotely compare to the book, which is great.

  3. anon[171] • Disclaimer says:

    The Reichsbürger movement in Germany (which already has hundreds of thousands of members and is steadily growing) actually believes that Hitler will return one day. According to them Hitler is merely sleeping under a mountain, but will return at some point in the future (maybe in January 2033), lead the Reichsbürger to victory over their enemies in a cleansing orgy of violence, restore the Reich as a perfect National Socialist community and rule it for a thousand years.
    It sounds pretty crazy, but so do many religions.

    • Replies: @SaneClownPosse
  4. Another “Springtime for Hitler.”

    Someone needs, and works hard, to keep the Hitler meme alive to justify their own crimes against humanity.

  5. @anon

    BS. Another fake group created by spooks. As are some established religions.

  6. Smith says:

    I actually highly enjoy this film due to it’s portrayal of Hitler. Powerful, brave but also with a sense of humor.

    If the portrayal of this Hitler can be described as accurate, then he’s indeed the smart leader that the West has lost.

    It seems Germany still has a lot to fight for.

    • Replies: @Old Prude
  7. MEH 0910 says:

    HITLER TEA KETTLE : The Time JCPENNEY Got in Trouble for Selling a TEAPOT that looks like HITLER

    • LOL: Old Prude
  8. Q: What did the Jewish pedophile say? A: Want to buy some candy?)


  9. American newsman William L. Shirer made the claim that Hitler was a “carpet chewer”. He reported that Hitler literally chewed the carpets in huge temper tantrums during the Czech crisis. He made this claim in “Berlin Diary”, “Rise and Fall of the Third Reich”, and even in his last book, “The Nightmare Years”, published in 1984. He learned nothing in all that time. The German term “Teppichfresser” means somebody who is climbing the walls or going around the bend, or is wearing out the carpets by pacing up and down while dictating. It’s slang, and anybody else would take it as slang. But Shirer repeated it literally for 44 years.

    Shirer also virtually single-handedly invented and popularized the idea that the Nazis claimed that the Germans or Teutons were a ‘Master Race’, a lie which is universally believed, although nobody can even tell you what it is supposed to mean, what the term is or means in German, or where it is to be found in National Socialist literature. “Master Race” was Shirer’s deliberate mistranslation of “Herrenvolk”, an extremely rare word used by German leaders a total of perhaps 8 or 9 times. As a stand-alone term, it means “Nation of Men”, a brave, independent people. Even at Nuremberg, they never claimed there was any “Master Race Principle” (except for Chapter 2 of Mein Kampf, which does not use the word Herrenvolk at all). It was used as a blanket accusation alleging racism, military aggressiveness, and so on, things that are not unique to Nazis or Germans at all but are the universal history of humanity.

  10. Even if the spontaneous public interactions are fake and are meant to shame Germans for acting like Hitler (Looks Who’s Back…in Spirit…), the reaction to the book and the movie have turned out to be Archie Bunkeresque. That’s the best part of all this.

  11. Dumbo says:

    I thought of making a sequel, called “Look who’s black”. This would be about Hitler returning as a black man, and everybody including liberals fawning about him and supporting his plans for world domination, sending Jews to camps, invading Poland and getting blonde pussy.

    • LOL: Old Prude
    • Replies: @Milesglorious
    , @Old Prude
  12. @Dumbo

    A good role for Morgan Freeman.

  13. The last of the Old Guard passes away.

    John Simon RIP

    • Replies: @Presocratic
  14. Old Prude says:

    Agree. I enjoyed the thing. Well-produced and well-acted with a lot of dry wit. The anti-nationalist montage at the end was a sour note: A blatant and clumsy piece of propaganda out of joint with the rest of the work.

  15. @Priss Factor

    Simon’s death really does mark the end of an era in film criticism. The Cavett interview (starts at 1:22 of the video) is enjoyable; I had not seen it before. Simon is in his mid-40’s here and pulls no punches with fellow guest Erich Segal about the movie Love Story, which had just been released. You have to admire Simon’s absolute unwillingness to ever temporize his views. Cavett alludes to Simon having appeared on his program a couple of times before, and I will have to look for those videos.

    • Replies: @Presocratic
  16. @Presocratic

    I just noticed that there is a second Cavett interview of Simon on that link you provided (starting at 13:00). Includes some exchanges with Mort Stahl. Also worth watching. Simon speaks in a rather deliberate way (he’s not glib), but one gets the sense of a real mind at work in these two appearances on the Cavett program.

  17. Old Prude says:

    Brilliant. Simply brilliant.

  18. conatus says:

    I liked this movie a lot mainly because it is a Hitler you have never seen before.
    This is a very funny movie. The guy who portrays Hitler is great, he certainly lived up to my scant imaginings of Dolph Returns.
    The movie manages to give Dolph some human aspects, he is not this screeching end-of-Bolero guy we have seen ON TV EVERY NIGHT OF OUR LIVES.
    In the movie Dolph has a sense of humor(the n-word) and he can be taken aback by the audiences reaction to him. He cared, unlike Stalin and Stalin’s henchmen like (((Genrik Yagoda))) who just forced everyone by constant terror to be good Commies.
    Robert Gallately makes this point in his book ‘Backing Hitler’
    But anyway the movie is funny and it is a Hitler you have never seen before.
    And really….. could you expect anyone to make you take what a movie approving of Hitler’s return in this day and age?

  19. Trump is worse than Hitler! If he is not stopped, the dead will rise and eat our souls!

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Trevor Lynch Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV