The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTrevor Lynch Archive
Film Review: "Richard Jewell"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

2019 was the year of the “frustrated-white-loser-living-at- home-with-his-mom” movie. First there was Todd Phillips’ Joker, an origin story of Batman’s most memorable nemesis, starring Joaquin Phoenix as the clown himself. Then came Clint Eastwood’s Richard Jewell, the true story of a Georgia security guard who discovered the Centennial Olympic Park bomb in 1996.

Jewell alerted the police, insisted they follow protocol when they were initially dismissive, and evacuated people from the area before the explosion, which killed two and injured more than 100. Jewell’s vigilance and conscientiousness saved many lives. He was hailed as a hero. Then he was framed as a suspect by the FBI and the media and hounded mercilessly. Why? Because he fit “the profile” of a mad bomber: a “frustrated white male” who lived at home with his mother.

Both Leftists and the Alt Right tried to meme Phoenix’s Joker into a symbol of white male rage and alienation. They did this long before the movie came out, based largely on hearsay, and many on the Right kept flogging this meme even after the movie belied it. For Phoenix’s Joker is not a charismatic criminal mastermind. He’s just a pathetic, vacant, mentally ill loser. Nobody would want to identify with him, not even pathetic, vacant, mentally ill losers.

Beyond that, there’s nothing especially insightful about Joker’s diagnosis of the modern malaise. Heartless rich people are cutting government programs, and Patrick Batemans are terrorizing people on the subway. It is true that during the Reagan years, thousands of mental patients ended up homeless, but most of Joker’s vision of dystopia is just unimaginative Bolshevik boilerplate. Nor does Joker offer any positive lessons for white men to overcome their alienation and rage. Joker isn’t the worst movie I saw in 2019—that prize goes to Star Wars—but it is certainly the most disappointing.

Richard Jewell is one of the best movies of 2019, with a brilliant script, excellent performances, and an important message. It is infinitely superior to Joker because it shows the true cause of white male rage and alienation. Richard Jewell is not a nutcase dumped into the gutter by Reaganism. He’s simply an ordinary white man who fit “the profile.” No, not the FBI profile, the hostile elite profile. Richard Jewell is the kind of white man that the American system increasingly blames for everything that is wrong with our society—while depending upon these men to keep the society going. It’s a profile authored by people who regard white Americans as contemptible aliens. It is propagated through a thousand movies, TV shows, books, songs, and bits of journalism.

Richard Jewell is a fat, white, Christian, heterosexual, Georgia redneck with a heavy Southern accent. He likes guns and hunting, drives a pickup truck, believes in the American system, looks up to authority—especially men in uniforms—and wants a career in law enforcement, because he wants to protect people. He’s kind-hearted, observant, attentive to the needs of others, and obviously desires to be liked. These are pro-social virtues, but he’s also somewhat pathetic. Assholes and bullies regard him as an easy target. Yet he doesn’t seem to be especially bitter, although he has good cause to be.

I vividly remember the Richard Jewell case. When he was being hailed as a hero in the media, they were obviously pained by the fact that he looked like a redneck from central casting. And when they turned on him, it was with an obvious relief and relish, because he looked like the kind of guy they spend all their time sniggering at and vilifying anyway.

You know very well that if even one or two of Jewell’s traits had been altered—if he were thin, or female, or black, or gay, or a Yankee—the whole thing would have played out very differently. But Richard Jewell was everything the hostile elite loved to hate. And they almost lynched him for it.

In the opening scenes of the movie, Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser in his breakout role) is an office supply clerk in law firm who strikes up an unlikely friendship with a young lawyer named Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell). Bryant is presented as a cocky Chad. Jewell is presented as observant to the point of nosiness and obsequious to the point of cringe.

Viewers with modern Leftist prejudices immediately dislike both men. Bryant is “toxically masculine,” and Jewell has “low self-esteem.” But the film then brilliantly shows that Jewell’s sharp eyes and punctilious desire to please others are what allows him to save lives, and Bryant’s cockiness is what allows him to save Jewell.

Richard Jewell offers a scathing portrait of two of the hostile elite’s enforcement arms: the mainstream media and the FBI, personified by Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Kathy Scruggs (played by Olivia Wilde) and FBI agent Tom Shaw (a fictional character played by Jon Hamm). Both are arrogant, ambitious, manipulative, and dishonest—and the system rewards them for this behavior. They team up to frame Richard Jewell as a terrorist and ruin his life, because they are utterly indifferent to truth and see him as a perfect patsy, for he “fits the profile” of the system’s number one enemy. He personifies the America they want to destroy. They really are “enemies of the people,” and it really is them or us.

It was perfectly reasonable for the FBI to look into Jewell. The bomber, Eric Rudolph, really was a frustrated white male. People really do plant bombs for attention. They also fake hate crimes for attention and even make their own children sick. And Jewell’s record could be taken to show signs of this sort of malignant narcissism. He was fired as a sheriff’s deputy and a campus security officer for overstepping his authority, which could be taken for self-importance although it is probably just the same over-zealousness that made him a hero in the Olympic Park bombing, and once Jewell was in the media spotlight, he was humble and gracious, not self-aggrandizing.

But the FBI did not just look into Jewell. They tried to frame him. What’s more, they tried to use his patriotism, respect for authority, and desire to do good to destroy him. Eastwood is brilliant to hone in on this point again and again. It is a lesson that all white people need to learn.

This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies. All the authoritative institutions of our society have been hollowed out, taken over, and repurposed to our dispossession and destruction. And one of the chief tools this system uses to destroy us is our own patriotism and naïve trust in the people who despise us. Richard Jewell repeatedly hammers home this moral obscenity.

This is one of the most important lessons we can teach, for when people cease to trust the media and the government—when they see them as a hostile elite, as enemies of the people—that is the beginning of populism. We have come a long way since 1996.

Many decent white people cringe when they look at Richard Jewell. Part of that reaction is healthy, because fat people are gross and unhealthy. Poor Richard Jewell died at the age of 44 from diabetes and heart disease. The stress of being framed as Public Enemy Number One surely did not help. I wish that Jewell had a longer, healthier life, and I hope that Paul Walter Hauser pulls a Chris Pratt body transformation.

But most of these negative reactions simply spring from anti-white hate internalized from the media, as well as the shameful American mania for exalting oneself by denigrating other whites. The truth is, we are all Richard Jewell. We are all targeted for destruction, and a smaller waistline and a better haircut won’t save you in the end.

What saved Richard Jewell? He knew his rights and asserted them. When he suspected that he was being framed, he called a lawyer with genuine character, Watson Bryant. Jewell slipped up a few times because of his trust in the government, his unassertiveness, and his desire to help. Bryant was there for support, but in the end, Richard Jewell was sufficiently smart, suspicious, and self-assertive to walk away a free man. He is an example to us all.

It would also be helpful if our people learn to see every reporter as a Kathy Scruggs and every cop as a Tom Shaw. There would be a lot fewer hit pieces and frameups.

Richard Jewell is a populist classic, which is why the enemies of the people have tried to bury it with silence or screeching. Every white person needs to see this superb film.

 
Hide 159 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. People forget that in 1996 terrorism was not associated with Muslims in the US. It was associated with Timothy McViegh type white men or David Koresh cultists. Oklahoma Bombing and Waco were the public preoccupation, not 9-11.

    One thing about revisionism is that the past is seen through the prism of current times. There was no such thing as “toxic masculinity” in 1996. The economy was better and wages were higher, so far fewer white men lived at home with their parents when they were 30 years old. This was very rare. Economically, the country was in far better shape in the nineties.

    Also, the nineties was a cynical era of the X-Files and general mistrust of the US government.

  2. This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies. All the authoritative institutions of our society have been hollowed out, taken over, and repurposed to our dispossession and destruction.

    Yes, it is run by a coalition of Jews and Whites, as has always been the case. Elites of both groups have been unified in their games for a long time, since the days of slavery and colonialism from which they benefited the most. You are only beginning to see this now because this Jew-WASP coalition has now turned on the average White, before you were quite content in them doing the looting, as long as it was somewhere else.

    Richard Jewell is a populist classic, which is why the enemies of the people have tried to bury it with silence or screeching. Every white person needs to see this superb film.

    Hmmm, I wonder why I am seeing posters for it at Edinburgh train station? These all-powerful elites sure are doing a bad job of trying to ‘bury it’.

  3. Anon[378] • Disclaimer says:

    Great review, look forward to seeing. Did you cap the Ad Astra comments?

  4. Bernie says:

    “This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies. All the authoritative institutions of our society have been hollowed out, taken over, and repurposed to our dispossession and destruction.”

    An absolutely perfect description of the current United States.

    • Agree: eah, donut
  5. Bernie says:
    @Just passing through

    “Days of slavery and colonialism?”

    These things are universal. Why do you only blame and hector whites?

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
  6. Franz says:
    @Just passing through

    Hmmm, I wonder why I am seeing posters for it at Edinburgh train station? These all-powerful elites sure are doing a bad job of trying to ‘bury it’.

    I can only assume Eastwood has more fans, or his distribution company there is spending more money. in Edinburgh.

    Came and went in the States before I even heard of it. There was an article whining about how it misrepresented a poor, overpaid reporter, but that was it. Very quiet release here.

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @Moi
  7. anarchyst says:

    The Richard Jewell movie exposed the “mainstream media” of being populated by nothing more than “media whores” who will sleep with anyone in order to “get the story”, no matter how false or untruthful.
    This is why those in the “mainstream media” hate this film.

  8. anarchyst says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    McVeigh didn’t do it…

    He was a “patsy” who was peripherally involved, being contracted to drive a truck and park it. The whole OKC investigation is full of holes and was tainted from the start.

    The intent was for McVeigh to be stopped and arrested. His missing license plate was removed by those involved and was part of the “plan” to pin the whold affair on him. Notice how quickly McVeigh was tried and executed, “witnesses” being the families who lost loved ones in that “operation”, being paraded through the trial, normally emotional anecdotal “evidence” is not admissable or permitted the be introduced as “evidence” but was allowed and was rampant throughout the McVeigh trial.

    There were critical ATF, FBI, and Justice Department records that needed to disappear in order to keep the “shadow government” from being discovered. In a normal investigation, evidence is preserved for weeks, months, and even years. Not so with OKC, as the debris from the Murrah buildng was carted off almost immediately under armed guard.

    There were explosives planted within the building. “Utility and maintenance workers” were observed going in and out of the building, wiring up the building for charges, being observed dealing with “blue barrels” that (presumably) held explosive charges. There is NO WAY a truck bomb could do so much damage as the building across the street was unscathed.

    FBI and ATF agents were also advised to “stay home” that day. It is clear that the destruction of the Murrah building was a government “operation”.

    The OKC “bombing” was implemented for a multitude of reasons, one being the destruction of critical government records as well an attempt to defuse the growing “militia movement” which was gaining strength in “flyover country”.

    The OKC bombing rates right up there with WTC 9-11 as being a successful government “operation”.

  9. Lurker says:

    people who regard white Americans as contemptible aliens. It is propagated through a thousand movies, TV shows, books, songs, and bits of journalism.

    The Agenda™!

    (Not forgetting advertising and music videos)

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    People forget that in 1996 terrorism was not associated with Muslims in the US.

    For those who can “see,” terrorism will always be associated with the whitevil man.

  11. Lurker says:
    @Just passing through

    this Jew-WASP coalition has now turned on the average White, before you were quite content in them doing the looting, as long as it was somewhere else

    As it works its way up the socio-economic ladder each new group of targeted whites are surprised they are now being victimised, perhaps more surprised than the last. The final group will perhaps be the most surprised of all – the WASP half of the coalition.

    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @Just passing through
  12. @Lurker

    One of the co-authors of the now well-known social science book ‘The Bell Curve’, Charles Murray, also wrote a book called ‘Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960-2010’ in which he shows the White segment of America has bifurcated into two very distinct economic and cognitive classes. The upper class have just become richer (by upper class I don’t mean billionaires, but those White Democrat voting types) while the White underclass has grown. Interestingly, he also showed that this White overclass preaches 1960s morals but practices 1950s morals themselves, they still have remained morally intact.

    Many of the Whites are now marrying off their children to Jews, think Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner. Reminds me of when two kingdoms used to marry off their children with eachother as a form of blood alliance (King of England offering his daughter to marriage with the King of France for example). So I don’t think they will be victimised, merely co-opted. This segment of Whites are in thrall with Jews and their achievements, these Whites probably identify more with Jews than with the White underclass as Jews are the epitome of elite, as such many are choosing to be co-opted by Jewry, they have become ‘honorary Jews’ of sorts.

    • Agree: Lurker, Pheasant
  13. Muggles says:

    I saw this film earlier this year. Was excellent and unusual in its methodical telling of this important story.

    I urge readers to catch this on cable or streaming, or get the DVD. Eastwood is a huge talent still making excellent and important films into his 90s. We should all be grateful to him. And we should all be as talented and creative in our later years. I hope he can keep doing it.

  14. @anarchyst

    Are you talking about McVeigh and the OKC building — or 9/11 and the twin towers? So much is the same … the explosives, the number of folks who somehow — mysteriously, on a work day — stayed away from work, the way the wreckage was all hauled away almost immediately — and on and on.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  15. anarchyst says:
    @Anthony Aaron

    I was describing OKC, but the WTC was treated the same way…destruction of “evidence”…

  16. “He’s kind-hearted, observant, attentive to the needs of others, and obviously desires to be liked. These are pro-social virtues, but he’s also somewhat pathetic. Assholes and bullies regard him as an easy target. Yet he doesn’t seem to be especially bitter, although he has good cause to be.”

    He is all of those things. However, minus the myopia he is also over the top. He is excessive and apparently even for the “good ol boys” he is over the top enough to lose his job. Unfortunately for him, and too his stead, he apparently is over the top regardless of who you are. And in that sense there is a sense of endearment. But too ignore his abusive tendencies is t0 paint a pie in sky — nice guy, likeable guy, admirable guy — sure, but he abuses that authority. Now I have little doubt that had he been over the top with just blacks — he would not have lost his position.

    And he would not have been in place that summer evening to save lives.

    _________________________

    I can only speak for myself. I like Mr. Jewel very shortly after he appears on the scene. But the argument about the media picking on the poor white guy, ignores that the media has spent most its history picking on non-whites. that this motif is a central point is odd. I can certainly make a case that it is an argument about white identity — and its innocence — an innocence that rests soley in one’s imagination. what’s important for me to remember is that even his supposed friends save one in the film, turned on him in very short order — including the police, the white police.

    It is frustrating to watch and one easily sympathizes and empathizes with Mr. Jewel, all the way through. And there is something else that I appreciated that Mr. Eastwood teased out and the actor Mr. Paul Hauser did beautifully — giving Mr Jewel not only as naive in presentation but intelligent and not as naive as he appears at all. Juxtaposed against the delightful performance of Mr. Sam Rockwell and other supporting cast — that added a very pleasant subtle surprise to the films texture. Laughing. No doubt I am reading more into it than was ever intended.

    It’s a great movie about how we got from their to presidents being bullied by staff on foreign policy.

  17. @Just passing through

    If it weren’t for my becoming an Unz reader, I’d never have heard of this movie.

  18. Great Review! By far and away one of the best movies of the year. The movie was immediately attacked by the women’s movement who didn’t like the fact of the reporter who supposedly slept with the FBI agent for info. What the movie portrayed was the beginning of this social justice movement as all the media became the judge and jury on Jewel. They gang banged him just like they do on everything they don’t like.

    Richard Jewel shows them what they really are. They don’t want to look in the mirror because they don’t want to see what they have become….they are the persecutors of Richard Jewel. They are never interested in the truth …just their own ideology.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  19. That “hostile elite” is actually a Jewish hostile elite.

  20. Eastwood’s masterful “Gran Torino” (2008) would be a great movie for Trevor to review, if he hasn’t done so already.

    BTW, I really liked “Richard Jewell,” but totally loved “Joker,” which can be interpreted any number of ways.

  21. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Once again, EliteCommInc. injects his typical jewish anti-gentile-anti-white biases with his statement: “the media has spent most its history picking on non-whites” which is demonstrably false.

    Minorities have been treated with kid gloves by the mainstream predominantly left-wing media for generations, now.

    It IS gentile white males who are at the lowest status of any racial group in today’s society, ripe for abuse and downright derision, being blamed for all of the world’s ills.

    Even sitcoms (entertainment?) of the past and even present generations always portray gentile white males as boobs and dummies, being uneducated and crude, while portraying minorities and women as “smart”, and “all-knowing”.

    Once again, Clint Eastwood hits it out of the park with the movie “Jewell”.

  22. “Once again, . . . injects his typical jewish anti-gentile-anti-white biases with his statement: “the media has spent most its history picking on non-whites” which is demonstrably false.”

    Your chrystal ball still needs work. Maybe a chat with a gypsy will help, since your tend to stereotype is in constant high gear.

    Before getting into a long legnthy deconstruction of your rather shallow complaint, let’s make a single observation, — it is possible that both have some salience. But up until perhaps the 1970’s, late 1970’s the white male role model was well in place before any real serious reconsideration of that motif was challenged. Since we are talking about the US let’s stay inbound as opposed top engaging nonrevelance. Of what men represented throughout the globe.

    Here’s my response: a Hollywood response no less

    https://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/the-best-80_s-movies

    https://www.ranker.com/list/the-best-80s-action-movies/ranker-film

    https://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/best-movies-of-1990

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-1990-action-movies/reference

    https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/586669/1990s-best-movies

    ————————–

    TV

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-70s-tv-shows/ranker-tv

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-80s-tv-shows/ranker-tv

    Finally some shift in programming that does not exclsuively favor the white males

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-80s-tv-shows/ranker-tv

    But by the 2000’s white males make a comeback . . .

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-shows-of-the-2000s/ranker-tv

    step back in time

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-60s-tv-shows/ranker-tv

    https://www.ranker.com/list/best-60s-tv-shows/ranker-tv

    I hate to break it to you but when it comes to white males in a positive and generally strong presentation as leaders — white maleness has a long and sustained run — even from Hollywood and NY studios.

    Sure there have been some negative critiques – that get bolder as times goes on. But anyone who thinks that male whiteness is out by entertainment standards is whistling Dixie. And they are not whistling it very well. By an large the strong white male remains a staple for US society as role positive model.

    Again as before your agenda is skewing your reality.

  23. @EliteCommInc.

    And I don’t think I say a single negative comment about the film itself. I have been repeatedly positive — very positive, more than positive. I am not sure if i would call it a “knock out of the park” . . . but it is a powerful and in my view important film. Director, Actor, producer and writer, Mr. Clint Eastwood’s films have been historically a critique of the established order. In that I think his best film might be “Flags of Our Fathers” or “Sniper” or “Unforgiven” or “In the Line of Fire” or some of my personal favorites:

    “Sudden Impact” with Sondra Locke — God rest her – still have a quite a thing for her

    “Hang’em High”, “Pale Rider” and

    “The Outlaw Josey Wales”

    However, if it will help you feel better, I really, really, really, really and really liked “Richard Jewell” (though it would have great to slap back at that same sex choice accusation by letting us meet, even for a second his wife. But I really liked that film – really and thought it was really really good.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
  24. The elite’s animus against the ordinary man has been gestating for a long time. I remember as a high-school music student in the early 70s helping some fellow musicians move a piano. There wasn’t enough room in the cab of the pickup, so two of us sat in back.

    This was about 10:00PM, and we were driving through a quiet residential neighborhood. The other guy, in his twenties, started pounding on the piano as we drove. I told him, “You’ll wake people up.”

    He replied “Who cares, all these ordinary middle-class people, living their ordinary middle-class lives! They deserve it.”

    A few years later I was talking to a former high-school classmate who’d become a feminist. She expressed hatred of ordinary housewives living at home and raising kids. I, naively, said, “Why should you care about what other people do with their own lives. They’re not hurting you.

    She hissed, “Yes, they are. Just by existing they are.”

    I’ve run into many more examples throughout my life. This has been a long time coming. The difference now is they feel safe enough to show their bigotry publicly.

  25. @anonymous1963

    You need to expand your field of vision. Elite gentiles have adopted the same contempt toward lower- and lower-middle class whites. They hate them, and now they’re not afraid to show it.

  26. ssohara says:

    Richard Jewell was an excellent movie. I saw it with my boyfriend.

    I am not white. My boyfriend is, he’s German. We both really loved the movie and we thought the acting was seamless. We think Clint Eastwood is an amazing director – everything he does is “real”. Much more so than most of the crap that comes out of Hollywood.

    But that’s what made Richard Jewell so frightening. It was based on a true story, and the movie felt real. We knew it happened and is still happening. The lack of morality of people today is so pervasive and sickening.

    Like I said, I’m not white. I’m against discrimination and prejudice against non-whites… and also against whites. I want people of all colors, shapes and sizes to be treated fairly.

    It is not OK to me that people bullied someone like Richard Jewell because he was fat. He was still someone’s son, a man who tried to do the right thing, a child of God. The movie poignantly captures his humanity.

    It made me sick to my stomach that a news reporter could pray to God for a lead while sleeping with a source of information – the lack of moral compass shown is just part of the society we live in though. It’s only gotten worse since the Atlanta Olympics. Same thing with the fictional FBI agent.

    I don’t care that Richard Jewell was fat, white, a redneck who lived with his mother. He was an earnest and well meaning human being who should have been treated with more respect and decency. That is what bothers me.

    I want blacks and women to be treated with decency, but I also want that for straight white men who graduate from community college, drive pick-ups and eat catfish. We are all human beings. Why is there all this tribalism these days instead of just teaching people the golden rule?

    • Agree: Muggles
    • Thanks: Alfred, Thulean Friend
    • Replies: @Stebbing Heuer
    , @tomo
  27. @anarchyst

    It’s quite possible Timothy McVeigh was groomed to be a far-right Oswald by DOJ/FBI assets within the militia movement of the 1990s. The militia movement itself was probably 80% organic, 20% Deep State.

  28. @EliteCommInc.

    I hate to break it to you but when it comes to white males in a positive and generally strong presentation as leaders — white maleness has a long and sustained run — even from Hollywood and NY studios.

    True, but they are hardly on the side of white interests. They are strong white men for Diversity, Jews, or PC. Take Mel Gibson in LETHAL WEAPON II. Tough white guy but at war with White South Africans.

    So much today is beyond cuckery. White guys are more like FAWBs or ‘fa**oty ass white boys’.

  29. @EliteCommInc.

    Director, Actor, producer and writer, Mr. Clint Eastwood’s films have been historically a critique of the established order.

    Clint Eastwood is not a writer. He never wrote a script. Surely he has suggested or even imposed rewrites on the scripts he directed during his long career, but he never claimed or received credit, and I do not think those interactions are enough to qualify him as a writer.

  30. AceDeuce says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    OKC probably was a Muslim act. Jayna Davis wrote all about it.

    And what “terrorism” did Koresh and his people engage in?

  31. AceDeuce says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I think Jewell had only recently moved in with his mother, in part because she was going to have an operation, and he could help take care of her.

  32. getaclue says:

    “This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies.”– This puts it all very succinctly and deadly accurately — exactly what is up for anyone not blind, in on it or terminally ignorant. The Racist NYSlimes and Mainslime Media try to incite violence and hatred against “whitey” daily and don’t get called on it– the Dem Party is certifiably insane as are the RINOS who are actually part of them — “Pierre Dilecto” Romney etc. — you read what they say and start to think at some point we started living in some parallel reality where the sane people diverged off somewhere and are based elsewhere now and some of us got “left behind”….

  33. “Surely he has suggested or even imposed rewrites on the scripts he directed during his long career, but he never claimed or received credit, and I do not think those interactions are enough to qualify him as a writer.”

    —– Excuse the obvious.
    For nearly every director who has been working as long and worn as many hats as Mr. Clint Eastwood: director, actor, producer, writer and composer/lyricist – should be a given.

    “His wide range works is a testament to his versatility and passion for storytelling.

    Below is a complete list of scripts and screenplays to Clint Eastwood’s directorial works.

    [MORE]

    1. Invictus Script (PDF Download) (2009)
    2. Gran Torino Script (2008)
    3. Changeling Script (2008)
    4. Letters from Iwo Jima Script (2006)
    5. Flags of Our Fathers Script (2006)
    6. Million Dollar Baby Script (2004)
    7. Mystic River Script (PDF Download) (2003)
    8. Blood Work Script (2002)
    9. Space Cowboys Script (2000)
    10. True Crime Script (1999)
    11. Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1997)
    12. Absolute Power Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1997)
    13. The Bridges of Madison County Script (1995)
    14. A Perfect World Script (1993)
    15. Unforgiven Script (1992)
    16. The Rookie Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1990)
    17. White Hunter Black Heart Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1990)
    18. Bird Script (1988)
    19. Heartbreak Ridge Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1986)
    20. Pale Rider Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1985)
    21. Sudden Impact Script (1983)
    22. Honkytonk Man Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1982)
    23. Firefox Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1982)
    24. Bronco Billy Script ($) for Purchase (1980)
    25. The Gauntlet Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1977)
    26. The Outlaw Josey Wales Script (PDF Download) (1976)
    27. The Eiger Sanction Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1975)
    28. Breezy Script (1973)
    29. High Plains Drifter Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1973)
    30. Play Misty for Me Script (Dialogue Transcript) (1971)
    . . .”

    https://scripts-onscreen.com/clint-eastwood-scripts-director/

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
  34. getaclue says:

    Whence all this “hate whitey” agenda? Here are some lads who from their own mouths can tell you EXACTLY what is going on!: Enjoy!:

    Subject: “Islam is the broom of Israel” rejoice some Jewish rabbis!

    Res ipsa loquitur?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/us3BImSU2vnN/

  35. getaclue says:
    @anarchyst

    You forgot to mention USAF General Partin– the USAF premier bomb expert who studied the damage of the building and concluded: “The attached report contains conclusive proof that the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was not caused solely by the truck bomb. Evidence shows that the massive destruction was primarily the result of four demolition charges placed at critical structural points at the third floor level.”– His credentials are the very best! This should have reopened the case and brought the true perpetrators–Feds? Obviously had, at the very least, to be in on it….– to Justice. Didn’t happen. Read his letter at the below link and weep. The USA is long gone and now some kind of old Stalinist USSR knock off is surfacing–the round ups and Mass Murder can’t be too far off at this point, listen to Bernie’s “Field Campaigners”– they aren’t kidding….– anyone not cluing in that things are not “normal” in the USA anymore is brain dead or in on it – – and that the dreaded “YT” is the target for frame job and elimination is obvious — The Racist NYSlimes and Mainslime Media lead the charge daily….All need to read this!!!!: http://physics911.net/generalpartinreport/

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  36. anarchyst says:
    @getaclue

    Thank you for reminding me about General Partin. Yes, I was aware that his expertise was ignored…
    Let’s not forget that federal agents were told to “stay home” on that day, as well.
    Regards,

  37. @EliteCommInc.

    It may come as a surprise to you, but all those scripts that you took the trouble to list have authors, and none of those authors is Clint Eastwood.

    You probably have heard of the Internet Movie Database (imdb.com). It lists the credits to most films made. You may check the authors of those scripts. Search for ‘Clint Eastwood’, then, for each resulting film he directed, click on ‘Full cast and crew’, and look at the names after the word ‘writers’.

    I very much doubt that Clint Eastwood could write a script, even if he wanted to. He just does not have that ability.

  38. I haven’t seen the film. Not much is discussed about Jewell’s interview process with police? Was he articulate and forceful in making his own case for not being considered a suspect? I have to assume –perhaps wrongly– that he was not. It can’t just be that he was fat (was he that heavy) or was single.

    • Replies: @Trevor Lynch
  39. getaclue says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You’re clearly wrong as to McVeigh– bombs were definitely INSIDE the building and blew outward– zero doubt of this– thus his trial and all else was a farce. (Given this the “Feds” had to be in on it….)

    How do we know? The top bomb expert in the USAF– a General and the best in the Nation as to analyzing this type of thing told us the truth (few have heard it unfortunately) — he examined the evidence and stated the irrefutable/obvious facts. “Bombs were inside” facts.

    Take a gander at the link below and get a clue? Also, what exactly did Koresh and the others, including children, do to justify being invaded and burned alive by the ATF? (Contrary to your statement — The 90’s were actually the time the Feds took off the gloves and starting framing people and murdering selected people/groups based on the NWO agenda they were then rolling out on us — like at Ruby Ridge — the murder of a woman and child by an FBI sharp shooter….). Waco also doesn’t stand up as to having any legitimacy as to what the Feds did under any type of fair/impartial investigation — but you can actually research that one on your own there is lots on it and the facts actually don’t fit your narrative/agenda of “hate whitey” any better than the McVeigh case does!: http://physics911.net/generalpartinreport/

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  40. dimples says:
    @anarchyst

    Look up ‘FMR – Bill Bean Interview’ on Youtube

    Cinematographer Bill Bean, while scouting for locations at Camp Grafton North Dakota, filmed McVeigh in an armoured vehicle after he had been discharged from the army. Apparently he was undergoing demolition training prior to being infiltrated into various extremist groups.

    If McVeigh was part of the plot, which he appears to have been, why didn’t he blab? One theory is that he was led to believe that his execution would be faked and he would be given a new identity.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  41. @ssohara

    For some reason, every society needs a sub-group or out-group to hate.

    At the moment, in the western world, it is white people’s turn, in particular the turn of white males. It’s other people in different societies and countries.

    There could be any number of reasons for it – many are posited here at Unz – but the outcome may simply be the result of random forces which began operating long ago and which are only now making themselves felt.

    Anyway, we’re here, with this situation. And I agree with you completely, this sort of irrational prejudice and hatred is vile and completely lacking in justification. It resides and emerges from deep in our psyches as human beings and social creatures.

    I wish there were more people like you and your boyfriend in the world.

    • Replies: @getaclue
  42. Miro23 says:

    No, not the FBI profile, the hostile elite profile. Richard Jewell is the kind of white man that the American system increasingly blames for everything that is wrong with our society—while depending upon these men to keep the society going. It’s a profile authored by people who regard white Americans as contemptible aliens. It is propagated through a thousand movies, TV shows, books, songs, and bits of journalism.

    Media which are Jewish owned and follow the line of Jewish activism.

    It’s the mirror image of Hitler’s Germany where the media demeaned and insulted Jews for their race, and excluded them from society wherever possible ( the outcome of the Weimar derived Jewish/Bolshevik vs. German National Socialist civil war).

    Now that US Jews have won their own US civil war (and have the power), they’re doing the same with white European American gentiles.

    The Jews vs. Anglos have been in this civil war since the campus protests of the late 1960’s with the Jews having won. Now, of course, no protest is allowed. The US is Institutionally Progressive (Institutionally Jewish) clamping down on any evidence of Anglo nationalism and squeezing Anglos out of society.

  43. Laughing . . .

    If it makes you feel better . . .

    I agree that the films are not credited to Director, actor, producer, (uncredited writer), lyricist and I think even some time music composer) Mr. Clint Eastwood.

    Hope that helps.

    “I very much doubt that Clint Eastwood could write a script, even if he wanted to. He just does not have that ability.”

    Laugh. Whether Director, actor, producer, (uncredited writer), lyricist and I think even some time music composer) Mr. Clint Eastwood.has the skills to write a script or screen play from top to bottom . . . maybe maybe not —

    Oy.

    laugh

  44. Excellent movie, excellent review – as always. Joker was tripe; Richard Jewell is reality, and only Eastwood tries to capture it.

  45. Sam J. says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    “…People forget that in 1996 terrorism was not associated with Muslims in the US. It was associated with Timothy McViegh type white men or David Koresh cultists..”

    For all you Timothy McVeigh fans here’s a clip of a documentary video a guy shot at Camp Grafton, North Dakota 03 August 1993. A guy was doing a documentary on the base and was going around taping random stuff. He happened to capture this guy on tape. Who do you see at 0:45 in this video? At this time the Federal Government says Timothy McVeigh was out of the service working gun shows. McVeigh’s sister always maintained that he was not a terrorist and was a patriot. She said he was on a special mission. Could McVeigh and her have believed that anything was acceptable to suppress those evil “White Supremacist”? Many people in the North actually think like this. We see confirmation of this in the new tapes of Bernie supporters calling for Gulags. Not all Whites believe the same things that many here do. I think some of this is hubris. They think they will run things no matter what and that even if they don’t their “precious constitution” will save them.

    Longer versions for more info and context.

    anarchyst says,”McVeigh didn’t do it…”

    Oh bullshit he did it alright. No he wasn’t alone, yes 100% there were other planted explosives, (Had to be to get the damage done) and I doubt he ever knew the whole story but I bet he was in that truck loaded with explosives and that he knew they were in the the truck.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @Steve Naidamast
  46. @Jeff Stryker

    One thing about revisionism is that the past is seen through the prism of current times.

    A quotable quotation from Jeff Stryker. Well worth remembering.

  47. Truth3 says:

    The Jew wakes up on a Tuesday morning…

    … in a mansion designed by and built by WMs (White Males)

    He says good morning with a kiss to his Shiksa wife…

    … that was raised by a WM.

    He steps into his Mercedes Benz S550 to drive to his office…

    … in an automobile designed by and built by WMs.

    He pinches the bottom of his cheery blonde secretary when he gets to his office…

    … and she was raised by a WM.

    He turns on his computer…

    … that was invented and designed by… yes, WMs.

    And reads about how US Military took 6 casualties fighting a War for Israel…

    … and 5 of the 6 were… yes, WMs.

    And he thinks…

    … how can I steal even more from those G-Damn WMs today?

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  48. KenH says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    People forget that in 1996 terrorism was not associated with Muslims in the US.

    Except the 1993 WTC bombing which was perpetrated by Muslims and pre-dates the OKC bombing. Also, right wing inspired terrorism is always really bad and inexcusable but the media considers the terrorism and rioting by the political left and black radicals of the 60’s and 70’s as romantic and in response to societal injustices.

  49. eah says:

    2019 was the year of the “frustrated-white-loser-living-at- home-with-his-mom” movie. First there was Todd Phillips’ Joker, an origin story of Batman’s most memorable nemesis, …

    I saw Joker (but not yet Richard Jewell), and never got that feeling about the movie or the character — after all, despite the Inszenierung, it’s based on a comic book character — not to mention the mental illness aspect — I also wasn’t bothered by the fact the yuppie louts on the subway were white, something I’ve seen complaints about (these same people generally don’t mention the kids who stole his sign and beat him up earlier in the movie were non-white).

    However current advertising does gezielt denigrate white men — the Twitter account @StupidWhiteAds tracks/highlights this phenomenon (“White Men Are Stupid In Commercials”).

  50. eah says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    People forget that in 1996 terrorism was not associated with Muslims in the US. It was associated with Timothy McViegh type white men or David Koresh cultists.

    It’s not really much different today, is it? — I mean, Trump has a lot of trouble pushing thru travel bans, but Congress holds hearings on ‘white supremacy’, and legislation like this will pass without much trouble:

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  51. @Bizarro World Observer

    Charles Murray, one of the authors of The Bell Curve, wrote a good book on the widening chasm between the upper and lower Whites. The book is called Coming Apart: The State of White America.

    The upper crust Whites preach 1960s Mora’s but themselves practice 1950s morals, the lower class Whites have now basically become ‘whiggers’ while the ostensibly progressive upper class Whites have become even more prosperous, their divorce rates and substance addiction rates are still very low.

  52. @Truth3

    Jews were very influential in the development of the computer to be fair, think of John Von Neumann. They also developed the RSA encryptiom system independently, Google was founded and designed by Jews and is owned by Jews.

    You seem to be falling for the meme of ‘parasite Jew’, whole this may be true for those banker types, make no mistake in that Jews are quite intelligent and have their fingers in a lot of pies. Most of America’s nuclear arsenal is in their hands as they were instrumental in inventing the nuke.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  53. Bill R says:

    “You know very well that if even one or two of Jewell’s traits had been altered—if he were thin, or female, or black, or gay, or a Yankee—the whole thing would have played out very differently…

    “The truth is, we are all Richard Jewell. We are all targeted for destruction, and a smaller waistline and a better haircut won’t save you in the end.”

    Unless, of course, you’re one of those damn Yankees!

  54. The problem with this movie is that it features the archetypal Eastwood hero; a stoic White man who knows the system is bad but works to defend it anyway because “it’s the right thing to do”. The police and military are no doubt filled with these types.

    And these types are just as much to blame for the mess that we’re in as Jews and Christians. They are the defenders of the system.

    More Anders Breiviks and fewer Richard Jewells is the way forward White man.

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
  55. Richard Jewell (may his memory be blessed) was the lower class white equivalent — a “poor man’s” version, if you will–of the upper class, elite, preppy, good-looking white men of the Duke Lacrosse team. Both were out of central casting for the purposes of the Left/elite media. What happened to both was not dissimilar except that the young men involved in the Duke rape hoax, had upper class parents, money and access to better attorneys. The takeaway from both situations should be the same-white men will always be a target, regardless of innocence.

    (Note: White women are increasingly being vilified the same way, which is what many of us early red pillers claimed would happen back when they still thought they’d be exempt).

    • Replies: @Jake
    , @Miro23
    , @ben tillman
  56. @Commentator Mike

    Not really. It applies to any kind of historical analysis, mainstream or revisionist.

  57. @Just passing through

    Fair points, but I’m not sure designing nuclear weapons is something to be particularly proud of.

    • Agree: Truth3
    • Replies: @Just passing through
  58. Moi says:
    @Franz

    I am an Eastwood fan, but unfortunately the man is a redneck.

    • Replies: @Joseph Doaks
  59. @Johnny Smoggins

    The problem with this movie is that it features the archetypal Eastwood hero; a stoic White man who knows the system is bad but works to defend it anyway because “it’s the right thing to do”. The police and military are no doubt filled with these types.

    Indeed.

    That was the central conceit between Harry Callahan and Lt. Briggs in Magnum Force.

  60. Jake says:

    “But the FBI did not just look into Jewell. They tried to frame him. What’s more, they tried to use his patriotism, respect for authority, and desire to do good to destroy him. Eastwood is brilliant to hone in on this point again and again. It is a lesson that all white people need to learn.

    This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies.”

    Unless you are a Yankee WASP, it ihas not been your country with your people having a real say since at least 1865. The Yankee WASP looking at white Protestant Southerners, and Irish and Italian and Polish Catholics, is exactly like Brit WASPs looking at Irish Catholics and Scottish Highlanders and Welsh speakers and ‘Celtic fringe’ English citizens who dare refuse to bow to the London super rich.

  61. @Moi

    What does “redneck” mean?

    • Replies: @Biff
  62. getaclue says:
    @Stebbing Heuer

    You really don’t have a clue?–Actually you are wrong — There is a very specific reason for the “hate whitey” agenda– there is big money behind it and it is very organized — and it isn’t because “For some reason, every society needs a sub-group or out-group to hate.”

    Do some research in good faith. Here you go for a start–right from their own mouths:


    This has all been planned for a very long time and we are seeing the execution of that plan– the Bankster money behind it is monstrous and Soros is one of the front men but by no means the only one: https://sovereignwales.com/2016/09/20/the-genocidal-kalergi-plan-to-destroy-the-indigenous-nations-and-peoples-of-europe/

    The Frankfurt School Communists who brought “Cultural Marxism” poison to the USA in the 1940s and totally corrupted Academia and Universities with thousands they planted in it were Jewish Supremacists– every single one of them– what they accomplished is horrific for Western Civilization and the USA– just look around: https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/satans-secret-agents-the-frankfurt-school-and-their-evil-agenda/

    And here is Soros, Front Man for the Rothschilds, financing of course the entire agenda: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/george-soros-the-money-behind-the-transgender-move/

    Seems the TRUTH is “antisemitic”? “Former Israeli Education Minister Shulamit Aloni confessed to Amy Goodman about this name-calling Hasbara tactic: “Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country [the US] people are criticizing Israel, then they are antisemitic.”

  63. Miro23 says:
    @OscarWildeLoveChild

    The takeaway from both situations should be the same-white men will always be a target, regardless of innocence.

    It’s not too complicated: Whites Bad, Blacks Good and Jews Holocaust Survivors.

  64. @Just passing through

    Yes, it is run by a coalition of Jews and Whites, as has always been the case.

    No. There is no “coalition” of Jews and Whites. There is no coalition at all. There is but one actor: the Jewish community as a collective. The elimination of Whites does not serve the interests of “elite” whites” and is not being driven by them in whole or in part.

  65. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    What really mattered about the Centennial bombing was that it got the July 17, 1996 US Navy shoot-down of TWA flight 800 off the news cycle and kept it off until Slick Willie was re-elected.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/us-navy-missile-hit-twa-800-ex-kennedy-aide-1.103900

  66. @Bizarro World Observer

    You need to expand your field of vision. Elite gentiles have adopted the same contempt toward lower- and lower-middle class whites. They hate them, and now they’re not afraid to show it.

    They do not hate them. That is utterly preposterous. They simply don’t care about them one way or the other, for the most part.

  67. @OscarWildeLoveChild

    Richard Jewell (may his memory be blessed) was the lower class white equivalent — a “poor man’s” version, if you will–of the upper class, elite, preppy, good-looking white men of the Duke Lacrosse team. Both were out of central casting for the purposes of the Left/elite media. What happened to both was not dissimilar except that the young men involved in the Duke rape hoax, had upper class parents, money and access to better attorneys. The takeaway from both situations should be the same-white men will always be a target, regardless of innocence.

    “Regardless of social class, wealth, and status” is more apt.

  68. Pheasant says:
    @Sam J.

    He was a useul idiot for the CIA. The journalist Pual Craig Roberts and the former CIA officer Cody Snogres are good on this. He was one of these people pleaser types who wanted to be in the special forces but was injured in training. The CIA used him as muscle to protect drug dealers and eventually used him as a patsy.

    Check out Cody Snodgress he has good information on Mena airport and the Clintons too:

  69. “But the FBI did not just look into Jewell. They tried to frame him. What’s more, they tried to use his patriotism, respect for authority, and desire to do good to destroy him. Eastwood is brilliant to hone in on this point again and again. It is a lesson that all white people need to learn.”

    Just a couple of reality checks. Officer Richard Jewell’s respect for authority apparently did not include respect for the authority of the law regarding excessive force. I definitively liked Mr. Jewell and he definitely was abused. And clearly the powers that be were themselves excessive. But before we get into motifs about faux white supremacists tropes, it might do well to remember that those who were close to him, and all of them in this film were white and themselves in position of authority were his worst enemies and aside from one according to the film and his mother — engaged in aiding the case by the FBI —

    ———————–

    As far as Mr. Timothy McVeigh and Mr. Terry Nichols they never had a successful explosive device until after Mr. Nichols returns from hi trip to the Phillipines, where and this is murky — he learned how to effectively engage a car bomb. However, why so many of you are compelled to drag those into this as some manner of defense is strange. Mr Jewell has none of that history – none. And trying to leap frog a case for Mr. Mcveigh, who had an accomplice who readily provided details of events — is a peculiar choice. That the FBI was hyper focused on “the white supremacist” faction or white nationalists made sense given what occurred the year before.

    The problems with the case were that Mr. Jewell, is light years from that profile and unless that aspect was deliberately cut from the profile in the film, the links were less than tenuous — they dd not exist, and pragmatically the timeline —

    Again, those spaces were filled by his former colleagues in the police department and if the film is true on the matter, previous employers — uhhh, no shortage of white authority.

    It might be a good idea to remember that Mr. McVeigh and Mr. Nichols were accused of attacking the feds, and in that building most of them were white — you bet they had their back-up. But their case against Mr. Jewell had little or no support.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  70. @Beefcake the Mighty

    I would tend to disagree, inventing a contraption that can exterminate 100s of thousands in a blink of an eye is something to be very proud of, orders of magnitude prouder than if one was to invent a firearm which enabled one person to take on 100s of natives with spears in foreign lands.

    Jews have complete control over this planet, they have control of the A-bomb and have in place the insane Samson option that will launch nukes at all Arab and even European countries, not to mention that Israelis are involved in making a lot of the electronics for US arsenal by way of ‘joint-ventures’ which treasonous Congressmen and women allow to happen.

  71. He was hailed as a hero. Then he was framed as a suspect by the FBI and the media and hounded mercilessly. Why? Because he fit “the profile” of a mad bomber: a “frustrated white male” who lived at home with his mother.
    No, he was framed because he virtually stopped the first “Boston Bombing”.

    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
  72. Ohhhhh and just for the record . . .

    I think Mr Clint Eastwood Director, producer, actor, (uncredited writer), composer, lyricist is more than capable of writing a screen play from start to finish.

  73. Z-man says:
    @Just passing through

    Yes, it is run by a coalition of Jews and Whites, as has always been the case. Elites of both groups have been unified in their games for a long time, since the days of slavery and colonialism from which they benefited the most. You are only beginning to see this now because this Jew-WASP coalition has now turned on the average White, before you were quite content in them doing the looting, as long as it was somewhere else.

    Yes. Agreed.

  74. “True, but they are hardly on the side of white interests. They are strong white men for Diversity, Jews, or PC. Take Mel Gibson in LETHAL WEAPON II. Tough white guy but at war with White South Africans.”

    Out more than thirty white tough guy role models,

    you select one that has dual cast — and one in which color is at issue — that’s myopia there are some lethal weapons films . . that run the gamit of issues.

    ————————————————
    “You really are a psychopath.”

    That may be. However, it’s relevance to this discussion’s content escapes me. Feel free to expand psychiatric diagnostics so that it relevant here.

  75. Assumingly the reporter and the G-man are both White Christians which makes the framing of the poor, trusting Richard Jewell even more heinous … perhaps, it isn’t a white country anymore and that’s a huge travesty.

  76. Agent76 says:

    FEBRUARY 1997 AMERICAN NIGHTMARE: THE BALLAD OF RICHARD JEWELL

    On July 30, 1996, the media identified Richard Jewell as the F.B.I.’s prime suspect in the Olympic Park bombing. For the first time, the 34-year-old security guard tells his extraordinary story, to MARIE BRENNER: his brief moment as a national hero, his hounding by the Feds and the press, and his eccentric friendship with the unknown southern lawyer who helped him through his public torment.

    https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/share/1fd2d7ae-10d8-474b-9bf1-d1558af697be

    The FBI’s Secret Rules

    President Trump has inherited a vast domestic intelligence agency with extraordinary secret powers. A cache of documents offers a rare window into the FBI’s quiet expansion since 9/11.

    https://theintercept.com/series/the-fbis-secret-rules/

  77. @dimples

    “why didn’t he blab?”

    Good question. I too suspect that he was “being infiltrated into various extremist groups”. This is standard FBI method of operation. But if he was a witting DOJ operative why would he except his sentence and walk into the federal death chamber without resistance? After capture he was housed at ADX Florence where he could have pacified by psycho-chemical cocktails. American Terrorist, a book about McVeigh’s journey to the OKC bombing published in 2001, brought out a few anomalies in McVeigh’s life but offered no definitive answers. McVeigh remains a puzzle; but the evidence at the site in OKC indicates something more than a truck bomb was used.

  78. @ben tillman

    The elimination of Whites does not serve the interests of “elite” whites”

    The thing about White Genocide theory adherents is that they fail to realise the use of the word ‘genocide’ is merely a shock factor designed to draw people in to the fact that the White majorities of various countries are being destroyed. Whites are not actually being exterminated despite the hyperbolae, the non-elite Whites are simply having their living standards reduced to Third World levels.

    And yes, it does serve the interests of elite Whites to see a nation fractures and divide so they can rule over it with ease and pull off more daring heists in the midst of the confusion and inter-ethnic fighting.

    And no it is not the ‘Jewish community’, most Jews are nobodies and don’t have any power, the real power brokers are Jews and their WASP comrades. Trump is in full control of his actions and has married his daughter off to a Jew as sign of goodwill and cooperation. Jews have traditionally worked hand in hand with WASP freemasons and the Founding Fathers were very philosemitic, with Franklin even donating money to set up the first synagogue in Philadelphia.

    You betray your very simple mode of thinking, that of unified racial blocks. You cannot fathom that a White would ever screw over other Whites for personal gain.

    So yes, it is a coalition of Whites and Jews, Jews were always regarded as foreign when they first came to any country but they managed to rise up to the top because they worked hand in hand with elite Whites to help them administer the country and do things like collect taxes and loan money. Use your common sense and think about how a foreign group could infiltrate a monolithic racial society like you claim the Jews allegedly did? Could the Jews infiltrate Nazi Germany? No because the leaders cared about their people, could the Jews infiltrate America, France and Britain? Yes, and they did because all three countries had an abundance of Whites willing to work with Jews to screw over other Whites.

  79. FvS says:
    @Just passing through

    You are only beginning to see this now because this Jew-WASP coalition has now turned on the average White, before you were quite content in them doing the looting, as long as it was somewhere else.

    So? This country belongs to the average white and now they are trying to destroy us. And I don’t remember owning any slaves or investing in any colonial ventures. You said it yourself that elites benefited the most from the looting of other peoples. The common man has little influence over these things, and most are lemmings brainwashed to believe whatever the elites tell them to believe. However, because of the internet and the increasingly obvious fact that our very existence is at stake, more whites than ever before are discovering who is behind the curtain and what their agenda is.

    Hmmm, I wonder why I am seeing posters for it at Edinburgh train station? These all-powerful elites sure are doing a bad job of trying to ‘bury it’.

    I hadn’t heard of it until this review.

  80. tomo says:
    @ssohara

    because divided people are much easier to manipulate, fear-monger and steal from by the people with strong cultural-nepotism within their own group.

    Create unity within your psychopath-support club , while introducing fear and division in your victims – has always been an effective psychopathic, parasitic kind of strategy, not too different from HIV

  81. tomo says:
    @Just passing through

    Does anyone know how many white people are there actually in the world today?
    In millions and in percentage?
    I find it hard to find such information online

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  82. @EliteCommInc.

    “they never had a successful explosive device until after Mr. Nichols returns from his trip to the Philippines, where and this is murky”

    Murky indeed. This is where the Islamic terror thread can be established. As you know, the Philippine archipelago is home to an Islamic terror presence. The mysterious John Doe #3 believed to have assisted McVeigh and Nichols is probably the link, if there is one, between Islamic terror and Nichols and McVeigh. This speculation also brings to mind the October 1 2o17 Las Vegas massacre. Stephen Paddock, the proverbial lone gunman, also had a link to the Philippines through a Filipino girlfriend who was eventually disappeared by the FBI. Both the OKC bombing and the Las Vegas massacre carry the whiff of FBI skullduggery. The FBI is more than a law enforcement/counterintelligence organization. It is a domestic CIA.

  83. Z-man says:
    @Just passing through

    Good post but this is contradictory and incorrect.

    The thing about White Genocide theory adherents is that they fail to realise the use of the word ‘genocide’ is merely a shock factor designed to draw people in to the fact that the White majorities of various countries are being destroyed. Whites are not actually being exterminated despite the hyperbolae, the non-elite Whites are simply having their living standards reduced to Third World levels.

    Whites are being exterminated or if you want to call it a nicer term (in decline) and by shady, evil, seemingly innocuous/peaceful means. If the word esterminatedwakes‘ up whites, so much the better.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  84. @tomo

    I think it is around 11-12%, Whites are one of the largest racial groups on the planet as the world is majority-minority i.e. comprised of many different racial groups.

    • Replies: @tomo
  85. @Z-man

    I find this strategy to be questionable, the term ‘great replacement’ seems much more accurate to reality. White Genocide might raise a lot of eyebrows but it will be dismissed out of hand by the huge majority of White people who think of genocide as mass killings. People often argue about whether it is a ‘technical genocide’ as argued by the UN definition but these discussions are long winded and never come to an adequate conclusion.

    For example, I can’t find any policy that specifically targets White people for reduction on birth rates, there is absolutely nothing stopping White people from popping out kids in welfare, in fact many don’t even choose to have kids when they are fairly well off as they find it too much of a burden and a hindrance to their career.

    In regards to race-mixing, although the media does shill for it, it still does not mean they are forcing genocide upon White people as Whites still have a choice ok whtehr they want to race-mix or not. Dating site stats show that Whites overwhelmingly prefer Whites for dating.

    What seems to be happening is that the majority are being dispossessed. White Genocide just seems like an extremely hysterical hyperbolae that makes people laugh, so once again, the term ‘Great Replacement’ should be used by anyone wishing to convince people.

    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @Commentator Mike
  86. @FvS

    That article goes to extreme lengths to try and classify it as a genocide, but even it admits that secular Jews (you know the ones behind the entire plot) have really low birth rates and suffer from feminism. The whole gist of the article is that Whites are somehow being psychologically manipulated to such a degree that they are sealing their own fate. It fails to show that all technologically advanced nations have low birth rates and that this trend is being repeated across the world, as a nation gets more developed its birth rate plummets.

    I ask you why the low birth rates of Japanese is not considered ‘Yellow Genocide’? You might answer that Japan isn’t being flooded by racial foreigners, right?

    So what is being said is that low birth rates because of technological advancement in Japan != Yellow Genocide but low-birth rates because of technological advancement and presence of large number of racial foreigners in the west == White Genocide. This mean it is not the low birth rate but the presence of racial foreigners that is the cause of the genocide in the minds of the adherents of the theory.

    So now I ask you why the presence of racial foreigners will cause the Whites to become extinct? It is allahed that a group of White Aryans invaded India but gradually disappeared due to race-mixing, but this isn’t genocide, their physical characteristics disappeared by their own volition.

    So no, it is not a ‘genocide’ as it is not preventing Whites from having children against their will, many Whites simply prefer to work and buy things instead of have children, there is nothing stopping Whites from going on welfare and having children.

    What will likely happen with Whites is that there will be an internal great replacement, Whites from low-fertility strata will eventually decrease in numbers while high fertility Whites like Amish will grow in numbers, as the TFR is the average across the group, as the Whites from low-fertility subcultures die out, they will not contribute to the TFR calculation and White TFR will go up.

    For example, 10 million urban Whites with a TFR of 1.5 and 100,000 Amish with a TFR of 5 will mean an overall White TFR of 1.53.

    Fast forward into the future and there are now only 2 million Whites with a TFR of 1.5 and 1 million Amish whites with a TFR of 4, the overall fertility of Whites will be 2.33.

    • Replies: @FvS
  87. @Just passing through

    The thing about White Genocide theory adherents is that they fail to realise the use of the word ‘genocide’ is merely a shock factor designed to draw people in to the fact that the White majorities of various countries are being destroyed. Whites are not actually being exterminated despite the hyperbolae, the non-elite Whites are simply having their living standards reduced to Third World levels.

    Of course, they’re being exterminated. That is the mathematically certain outcome of the policies presently in place.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  88. @Just passing through

    And yes, it does serve the interests of elite Whites to see a nation fractures and divide so they can rule over it with ease and pull off more daring heists in the midst of the confusion and inter-ethnic fighting.

    And no it is not the ‘Jewish community’, most Jews are nobodies and don’t have any power, the real power brokers are Jews and their WASP comrades.

    Being wiped out does not serve the interests of the white “elites” whatever the hell they are.

    And you obviously don’t know what a community is. A community is ONE-TOGETHER. The Jewish community is ONE actor, ONE organism. It makes the rules that your WASPs follow.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  89. Z-man says:
    @Just passing through

    White Genocide just seems like an extremely hysterical hyperbolae that makes people laugh, so once again, the term ‘Great Replacement’ should be used by anyone wishing to convince people.

    I don’t think it’s a hysterical hyperbolae. The ‘Great Replacement’ is ok but doesn’t express the urgency of the situation.

    In regards to race-mixing, although the media does shill for it, it still does not mean they are forcing genocide upon White people as Whites still have a choice…to want to race-mix or not. Dating site stats show that Whites overwhelmingly prefer Whites for dating.

    Forcing? No, but putting those images out here is mind influencing at the least. Subliminal messages

  90. “This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies.”

    This is a true statement. But it does not name our enemy, that is, the wicked ideology known, as (post-Christ) Judaism, and which is really a form of Pelagian-like anarchy.

    What is not true is that “our” identity is “white”. Because our Jewish-occupied media declare that being white is a vice, does not mean, therefore, that being white is a virtue:

    It means the enemy is weaponizing an innocent, if insignificant, trait.

    It means that if you take their bait you are embracing racism because your enemy told you that’s your identity.

    It means that you are glorying in a lie told about you and not bravely withstanding your enemy to the face.

    It means that you are, instead, internalizing the enemy’s command to play the role he assigns you.

    It means that you are not overcoming your enemy’s evil but being overcome by it.

    It means that you are imitating Richard Jewell in being fat and framed but not “sufficiently smart, suspicious, and self-assertive to walk away a free man.”

    Reflexive reaction to the enemy (of mankind’s) attack is no answer to our problem; a response born of reflection is. White Identity is to Race what Feminism is to the Female Sex and what Homosexuality is to civil rights: the weaponization of a natural good.

  91. @Just passing through

    For example, I can’t find any policy that specifically targets White people for reduction on birth rates, there is absolutely nothing stopping White people from popping out kids in welfare, in fact many don’t even choose to have kids when they are fairly well off as they find it too much of a burden and a hindrance to their career.

    That could easily be solved. White women engaging in prostitution, instead of being taxed (where legal) or fined and imprisoned (where illegal), could be sent to do community service by working in fuck factories in rotation so that they’re given time off during pregnancies before returning to shift-work in said establishments. Of course only white males would be allowed the use of such facilities, and that would be a problem in today’s society, such as it is. And all those Gulf princes. rich Jews, and millionaires would protest for being deprived of their instagram whores but so what? What is your priority? Saving the race or pleasing rich Arabs and oligarchs?

  92. @ben tillman

    Again, ‘extermination’ means complete destruction. You are extrapolating trends an are unable to see that the White fertility rate will one day in the future go up due to an ‘internal Great Replacment.’ Whites from low fertility subcultures will decline while Whites from high fertility subcultures will ascend demographically.

    As an example, if you have 1 million urban dwelling Whites, with a fertility rate of 1.5, and 50,000 Amish Whites with a fertility rate of 5, then the overall White fertility rate is:

    (1.5*1,000,000 + 5*50,000)/(1,000,000 + 50,000) = 1.67

    So every urban White generation has 75% of the people of the previous generation (1.5 kids per 2 people) while every Amish generation has 2.5 times the people of the previous generation (5 kids per 2 people). In 5 generations, assuming constant fertility rates (in fact they will decline slightly for the urban Whites and stay the same for Amish Whites) we have the following situation.

    urban Whites = 1,000,000 * (0.75^5) = 237,300
    Amish Whites = 50,000 * (2.5^5) = 4,888,800

    Now the White fertility rate is

    (1.5*237,300 + 5*4,888,800)/(237,300 + 4,888,800) = 4.84

    i.e. the White fertility rate has gone up, of course in reality the number of urban White greatly outnumbers that of Amish but the principle remains true, however it will just take a longer amount of time for White feritlity rates to go up as the equilibrium is passed.

    Also not mentioned is the fact that China’s population will start to decline around 2035, India’s population will start to decline around 2065,and Africa’s population will start to decline some time after 2100, so their share of the world population will be declining as White percentage is growing due to Amish and other high-fertility subcultures, as far as I know other races do not have Amish type cultures where they purposefully live a very simply existence, so this ‘internal Great Replacement’ will not happen in other races.

  93. @Mark James

    The “interview” consisted of an attempt to frame him by having him sign a confession under the pretense that he was helping the FBI make a training video.

  94. “This speculation also brings to mind the October 1 2o17 Las Vegas massacre. Stephen Paddock, the proverbial lone gunman, also had a link to the Philippines through a Filipino girlfriend who was eventually disappeared by the FBI. Both the OKC bombing and the Las Vegas massacre carry the whiff of FBI skullduggery. The FBI is more than a law enforcement/counterintelligence organization. It is a domestic CIA.”

    Here I mush back a step or more away. I think the FBI and other law enforcement agencies can be abusive, engage ion making cases they know are tenuous at least if not less, can be careless, misinformed, mistaken, will cover=up perjury and murder of the innocent, engage in entrapment – no doubt.

    I am a little whether they are engaged in plots against the US even as mechanisms of political agendas supposed to benefit country. There certainly have been COINTEL operations against US citizens beyond the pale much more the law.

    But, I am unpersuaded that they have engaged in acts to damage the US as an entity.

    ——————————–

    And to my original point, I don’t much appreciate inaccuracy and in this law enforcement honed its behavior by targeting the black population by several magnitudes of time space and force far more than whites male or female. And despite some shift, that remains the case, even if the shifts encourage feelings of the opposite.

    • Replies: @Beau Nydle
  95. @ben tillman

    Being wiped out does not serve the interests of the white “elites” whatever the hell they are.

    Which is why Whites are not being wiped out, merely abused on a grand scale. If Jews really wanted to wipe out Whites they could have done it quite quickly with bioweapons, it wouldn’t be difficult for the many Jewish institutions that are very influentual in the Western European countries to get some Mossad agents to release the spores.

    And you obviously don’t know what a community is. A community is ONE-TOGETHER. The Jewish community is ONE actor, ONE organism. It makes the rules that your WASPs follow.

    Incorrect, there is nothing in common between the chicken-swinging Jews who live in shitholes and the bankers at Goldman Sachs. Israel is currently the gay capital of Middle East and extremely degenerate, the stupid Orthodox Jews have 7 kids a couple and are outbreeding the secular Jews (you know the smart ones that are eligible to participate in big conspiracies)

    WASPs have been in bed with the Jews since the days freemasons and Jewry found a common purpose, world hegemony. That is the only reason Jews were allowed to attain the level of power they have attained in the West. Why didn’t all the WASPs do anything when Jewry was small and inconsequential? How did Jewry suddenly become big? You will find that the only logical answer is that upper-caste WASPs and Jews have worked together for a long time. I realise you are a simple minded White Nationalist who thinks all Whites are just poor misguided souls deceived by the Jews and that they all in form one solid bloc, but in reality there are many Whites completely willing to screw over other Whites for personal gain, it doesn’t matter if they are ‘Jew puppets’, the fact is that these Whites in positions of power sell out their people for money. Therefore it is indeed a coalition of Whites and Jews working together.

    • Replies: @FvS
    , @ben tillman
  96. “The “interview” consisted of an attempt to frame him by having him sign a confession under the pretense that he was helping the FBI make a training video.”

    And to his credit and wisdom, he did not bite.

  97. Shaman911 says:

    He just happened to stumble onto an FBI bomb. And the Establishment went nuts when he disrupted their False FLAG OP. The FBI had just gotten caught in 1993 trying to Bomb the Twin towers the first time. WACO, RUBY RIDGE, and this list will never end.
    It’s a Jewish/Masonic World Order.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  98. @ben tillman

    It may seem preposterous to you, but the ones I know do indeed hate their fellow whites less fortunate than they. They identify with their class, including Jewish elites, not their ethnicity.

    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @JohnnyWalker123
  99. @Johnny Walker Read

    So who was behind the bombing? I vaguely recall it being blamed on anti abortion people but knowing what we now know about the media and the people who control it, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was either Moslems or Israelis and the media covered for them.

  100. Anon[195] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    But you haven’t actually supported your main contention: that the media has been crapping on non-whites until just recently.

    If you believe that a positive portrayal of a white person is a negative portrayal of people who are not white, then you might be anti-white.

    Black people have been portrayed positively 99% of the time in television media for as long as it has existed. Sitcoms and movies had positive black male figures for the black community, comics tried many black heroes from their beginnings (who didn’t sell as well bc nerd culture wasn’t too successful among African Americans). If you rewind 100 years, sure, there were some local tabloids and so on that were very anti-black.

    Native Americans were portrayed well in most Westerns, as the Noble Savage. To be honest, no one would have wanted anything different. Native Americans were already in favor in the 1920’s if not before.

    Black gangster culture is portrayed spectacularly in music media and is absent from movies, except in some black-directed films. you also will notice that almost all villains are white.

    I notice that the Deep-voiced, proud, manly white men (think He-man) seem to have disappeared in the 1990’s, replaced by shameful guys like Shia Lebouf, Chip Gaines, and proud, stand-offish white females.

    Asian villains in Iron Man and Batman were made white. There are literally no black villains.

  101. @Sam J.

    Based on the notes I read written by Gore Vidal who developed a very personal relationship with McVeigh while he was in prison, McVeigh was in fact a true patriot in that he did truly believe in doing the right thing for people, god, and country.

    He was also quite well versed in constitutional knowledge and had hoped to become a Green Beret in the US Army but had been rejected for what I can’t quite remember.

    Gore Vidal paints a picture of a young American that hardly points to someone who would have blown up a building while children were still inside.

    It is awfully convenient to have had Timothy McVeigh driving a van to the front of the Murrah Building, parking it and then leaving it to only have the building blow up from the inside out…

  102. tomo says:
    @ben tillman

    the ‘elite’ whites are just useful psychopaths to be used by a nastier bunch of psychopaths

    • Replies: @Miro23
  103. “But you haven’t actually supported your main contention: that the media has been crapping on non-whites until just recently.
    If you believe that a positive portrayal of a white person is a negative portrayal of people who are not white, then you might be anti-white.
    Black people have been portrayed positively 99% of the time in television media for as long as it has existed.”

    Oy veh!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Black males have largely been absent from the media accept as either negative stereotypes as: criminals, comic foils or benign down trodden victims.

    i am unclear how to address anyone who thinks that black gangsters have been portrayed as positive models. Even current such portrayals are largely negative. Are there some medoa portrayals of gangster tropes becoming a success – that is nothing compared to the actual history. However, that wasn’t my initial advance.

    But rather that blacks are far more targeted as criminals and the media has been all too happy to play along.

    https://www.opportunityagenda.org/explore/resources-publications/media-representations-impact-black-men/media-portrayals

    https://colorofchange.org/dangerousdistortion/

    https://www.thoughtco.com/common-black-stereotypes-in-tv-film-2834653

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/black-men-media_b_2844990

    The real proof in the pudding is how the country responded to the Bill Cosby Show, as though black middle class was some kind new phenomenon. Black professionals raising intact families isn’t n ew and it didn’t start in the 1990’s. I hate these discussions because in in so many ways the basic case is just to easy to make.

    https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/news-media/racial-bias-reporting-research-trends/

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/when-the-media-treats-white-suspects-and-killers-better-than-black-victims_n_59c14adbe4b0f22c4a8cf212

    https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472068319-ch4.pdf

    Clearly we are not back in the 1950’s or prior. Sure blacks there are black criminals. But the how we have rhetorically engaged the matter has been overwrought. No one has to like black people in order to discuss the matter with some sense of fairness and rationality. And absolutely, there are choices some blacks can make to change their lives – no doubt. But I would be a rather silly not to motive the margin of error based on skin color is artificially smaller isn’t real or deliberate. And I absolutely appreciated the article recently about the TSA, a stop and frisk by any other name. All of the mechanisms used to applaude police treatment of the black population are coming full circle and it is not pretty.

    No one has to be anti-white to get the picture and the irony.

    • Replies: @Anon
  104. Miro23 says:
    @tomo

    The ‘elite’ whites are just useful psychopaths to be used by a nastier bunch of psychopaths.

    A few of them are maybe psychopaths but most of them aren’t. They’ve been co-opted or born into the elite or blackmailed or it’s part of their work. They’re well looked after as long as they do what they’re told and don’t step out of line. I would guess that most of Congress fall into this category. Part of the deal is that Bibi gets endless standing ovations but so what?

    The whole thing changes when the shooting starts (which it will). That calls for polarization (solidarity) across the whole of US society, and being pro-deplorable or anti-deplorable becomes a life or death issue.

  105. KenH says:

    This is not our country anymore. It is not our government. It is not our FBI. It is not our media. All of these are in the hands of our enemies. All the authoritative institutions of our society have been hollowed out, taken over, and repurposed to our dispossession and destruction. And one of the chief tools this system uses to destroy us is our own patriotism and naïve trust in the people who despise us. Richard Jewell repeatedly hammers home this moral obscenity.

    That’s the money paragraph right there. Outstanding. Richard Jewell found out that the people and institutions he was told he could trust tried their best to destroy him.

    Sure, Richard Jewell may have fit “the profile” but there was ZERO evidence tying him to the bombing. Moreover, as I recall, there was a video showing a man (who turned out to be Eric Rudolph) dropping a package under the bench and walking away. This man in no way resembled Jim Jewell (Rudolph was much thinner).

    Regarding Eric Rudolph, he wasn’t some “frustrated” loser. He penned several well thought out and well written anti-government manifestos and decided to take matters into his own hands regarding the moral rot and decadence he saw engulfing America. He was somewhat of a right wing Ted Kaczynski.

    As bad and as sad as the story of Jim Jewell was compared to today 1996 was actually the good ole days. We still had civil liberties (although they were under attack) and the judenpresse wasn’t anywhere near as overtly anti-white as they are today.

    If this had happened in the post 9-11 environment with all the unconstitutional police powers granted to the FBI and satanic media hatred of working class white males Jim Jewell would have stood no chance and would have been arrested, convicted by a kangaroo court and thrown in prison to rot and die a lonely and despised man all because he fit one of the FBI’s pseudo scientific criminal profiles.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  106. Anonymous[519] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lurker

    watch “walker, texas ranger” , for some real demonizing of white guys. An otherwise excellent show.

  107. ricpic says:

    “….fat people are gross….”

    I don’t react to them that way, not at all. If they are morbidly obese, yes. But there are many somewhat overweight people who are attractive. Delicate features on many such women.

  108. Anon[112] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    I’ll try to respond to as much of the stuff as is reasonable. The first link you gave provides much “research” of how black people are portrayed negatively in media.

    Before we proceed, let me ask you: if the media is making black people look so terrible, how in the Hell is it that whites from the Boomer generation onward acknowledge black people as the de facto determiners of what is cool? Let it sink in.

    African Americans are disproportionately represented in news stories about poverty, and these stories tend to paint a picture that is particularly likely to reinforce stereotypes and make it hard to identify with black males.

    I don’t know about “hard to identify with black males,” that seems subjective. But spotlighting black poverty and sweeping white poverty under the rug could be interpreted by someone such as me as increased sympathy towards black people, and decreased sympathy for white poverty and suffering.

    …outside of sports games, the representation of African Americans [in popular video games] drops precipitously, with many of the remaining featured as gangsters and street people …

    Yes, black people are gangsters in video games often, and it is considered peak cool. Grand Theft Auto is perhaps the coolest games in existence for teenagers.

    They also do not mention that TONS of video games are from Japan, and create games with characters with Japanese skin tones for a Japanese audience, which makes this entire topic irrelevant to the portrayals of AA in American media.

    The nerdy games, which are very popular, always seem to center around the Middle Ages, and there are a lot of them. These games don’t have black people; do you know why? There were no black people in Europe in the Middle Ages. Is this a problem? Of course not.

    This has been over-corrected since the time of these studies. New games in the Middle Ages hilariously have diverse characters.

    “The idle black male on the street corner is not the “true face” of poverty in America, but he is the dominant one in media portrayal. “

    I’m sorry, but in American cities, the idle black man on the street corner was a very real fixture of city life for a while (except the very recent phenomenon of cities in the Pacific NW). It also isn’t that big a deal, and isn’t much positive or negative.

    For example, low-income blacks in news stories are more likely to live in slums or urban areas, as opposed to rural areas, than real-world averages would suggest

    This isn’t negative nor positive. Media is centered in cities and they like to talk about city issues.

    It might be worse to display the “black rednecks” to the country than the cool lively urban black people.

    Black males also tend to be underrepresented as experts called in to offer commentary and analysis in the news. News programs frequently include “talking heads” invited to help clarify a given topic, but these tend not to be black males. In a 1997 sample of network news clips, black speakers accounted for less than 3 percent of the statements made by experts commenting on various issues.

    The particular sample (3%) might be cherry-picked, but I remember those years, and how few talking heads were black (and how many were Jewish). The thing is, this must compared to the percentage of black males (and Jewish males) who actually are “experts” – university professors, etc. – on the topic at hand. There’s a good chance that the news channels just couldn’t find many black males, and that they just couldn’t avoid the Jewish people.

    Perhaps the media should intentionally present a false reality. But can you really say that the media is anti-black just for presenting society as it is?

    I expect this has been greatly over-corrected since the time of these studies. It’s been 20 years.

    Black males are underrepresented in the roles of computer users or technical experts in television commercials, instead tending to appear in roles that put less emphasis on intellectuality (see below). (Kinnick & White, 2001) African Americans are also underrepresented as users of luxury items in commercials, instead being featured using more pedestrian consumer products. (Henderson & Baldasty, 2003)

    This is the same issue with the “expert” thing. At the time of these studies, these stereotypes were probably true; it probably was the case that there were tiny percentages of AA in tech. Even now, there is under-representation there. Tech only got “cool” after the facebook movie, which was after these studies, and now black people are angry that they didn’t get to be nerds on TV in the year 2000.

    And black people are certainly lovers of bargain goods; they are definitely a target demographic for such.

    I’d bet this has been over-corrected since the time of these studies. It’s been 20 years.

    As discussed, even when black males are presented sympathetically, they tend to be absent from some important types of roles, e.g., as fathers in parenting situations that audiences can relate to. On the other hand, black males are highly visible in other types of roles that can be considered positive. In the world as depicted by the media, blacks frequently excel in sports, and more generally, are associated with physicality and physical achievement — as well as the aggressiveness that usually goes along with this type of success.

    I’m a broken record, but once again, the media is showing us our society, and black people don’t like it. Fatherhood is evidently something black men aren’t very interested in these days (“it takes a village”). I’m not sure they are really wrong about that.

    Black men themselves absolutely love being assertive and aggressive. They get lots of p**** by doing this. It is who they are, and it is not shameful to portray them as they want to be.

    Blacks are overrepresented as perpetrators of violent crime when news coverage is compared with arrest rates [but are underrepresented in the more sympathetic roles of victim, law enforcer]. (Entman & Gross, 2008, p. 98, citing Travis L. Dixon & Daniel Linz, 2000)

    This one actually might have legs. The thing is, local news is heavily staffed by black people, so this is the least intuitive.

    Black people must be at least a little underrepresented as unfortunate victims of homicide due to the fact that such a large number of victims of black homicides are combatants themselves (gang-related violence).

    The law enforcer thing is contradicted in the article referenced.

    Black people are probably over-represented in television coverage because the category of “violent crime” includes anything from homicide to harassment, and black people are far more highly represented at the more extreme ends of that range (e.g. homicide), which is the stuff that will make it to the news.

    …[in a small sample of local Chicago TV news from 1993-1994] stories about Blacks were four times more likely to include mug shots [than stories about Whites accused of crimes]. (Entman & Rojecki, 2000, p. 82)

    Sample too small to make anything of it.

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Black people have been the Kings of Cool in the USA for 30 years (see recent Kobe Bryant death), and cannot be criticized except on the craziest corners of the internet, and yet they still think that the super-liberal Jewish-run media has had it out for them. What a joke.

  109. Biff says:
    @Joseph Doaks

    What does “redneck” mean?

    Hard worker. Nose to the grind stone. Blue collar(right below the red neck).

  110. Biff says:

    Have no illusions the injustices will ever end. Intent crimes are the new set of tools in the war against the plebes.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/01/31/former-coast-guard-lieutenant-given-13-year-sentence/4628170002/

    Hasson was arrested in February for stockpiling weapons in his Silver Spring, Maryland apartment with the intent to carry out attacks a

    • Replies: @Half Back
  111. FvS says:
    @Just passing through

    even it admits that secular Jews (you know the ones behind the entire plot) have really low birth rates and suffer from feminism.

    And he goes into it in more detail. Interestingly, Israeli secular Jews are at replacement level.

    It fails to show that all technologically advanced nations have low birth rates and that this trend is being repeated across the world, as a nation gets more developed its birth rate plummets.

    If technological advancement is what causes low birth rates, why do Christians have different TFRs from atheists when they all have access to the same technology? Clearly, there are other factors involved. And why would technological advancement matter in the first place? What specific piece(s) of technology is causing people to not have kids? You might say the internet and video games or something, but birth rates started dropping long before they were invented. Usually, the decline in most countries can be traced back to the 60s. I wonder why.

    This mean it is not the low birth rate but the presence of racial foreigners that is the cause of the genocide in the minds of the adherents of the theory.

    It’s both. In Japan’s case, I don’t know if their elites are malicious or just incompetent. Or maybe they think it would actually be a good thing for the population to decline a little since they’re on an island with limited space. At least so far, they have resisted the international pressure to increase their “diversity” and loosen immigration restrictions. There are pro-natalist policies that the Japanese government could implement if they wanted to, and if the native population ever got dangerously low, I guarantee they would.

    It is allahed that a group of White Aryans invaded India but gradually disappeared due to race-mixing, but this isn’t genocide, their physical characteristics disappeared by their own volition.

    If the Aryan elite were
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group

    Then you might call it a genocide. Or it might have been that these proto-Indo-European (Aryan) conquerors were mostly male and so just ended up breeding with the native populations once nature took over. But that’s not the kind of situation we find ourselves in today.

    So no, it is not a ‘genocide’ as it is not preventing Whites from having children against their will, many Whites simply prefer to work and buy things instead of have children, there is nothing stopping Whites from going on welfare and having children.

    You’re looking at things too superficially. Dr. Johnson states, in his opinion, the five principle causes of white extinction.

    1.) An ethic of hedonism, individualism, and selfishness that denigrates reproduction and family life;
    2.) Feminism, which encourages women to pursue careers instead of making family life their primary occupation;
    3.) The widespread use of birth control and abortion to decouple sex from pregnancy and pregnancy from child-rearing;
    4.) The rising costs of family formation, chiefly caused by racial integration—which is the driving force behind suburbanization and ex-urbanization in order to find safe spaces for whites to raise families—and by non-white immigration and offshoring industry, which lower wages for whites;
    5.) Miscegenation, in which individuals reproduce their own genes but not their race by mixing with another race.

    These factors are not blind forces of nature, like an asteroid colliding with earth. They were all created by human beings. Some of them, like feminism, birth control pills, legalized abortion, and overturning racial segregation, immigration restrictions, and bans on miscegenation are quite recent. They were hatched in the minds of intellectuals, artists, scientists, politicians, educators, and advertisers. They were made real by changing people’s beliefs and values, and by altering the laws and institutions that govern us.

    The Amish example actually serves to further Dr. Johnson’s argument because they have largely insulated themselves from mainstream ideologies. It is their strict belief system that protects them from globohomo liberalism and cultural Marxism. We see the same thing with Orthodox Jews (who still have access to modern technology and live in developed economies).
    https://listverse.com/2015/05/24/10-modern-luxuries-the-amish-actually-use/

    Dr. Johnson’s companion article.
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2014/02/white-extinction/

  112. “Black people have been the Kings of Cool in the USA for 30 years (see recent Kobe Bryant death) . . .”

    I have but one response . . . let me know when you think they are cool.

  113. FvS says:
    @Just passing through

    If Jews really wanted to wipe out Whites they could have done it quite quickly with bioweapons, it wouldn’t be difficult for the many Jewish institutions that are very influentual in the Western European countries to get some Mossad agents to release the spores.

    And invite possible reprisals against Israel? No, not worth the risk. Besides, with what they’re doing now, they can make a lot of money in the process. And they probably think this way is funnier too, getting whites to sink into self-hatred, worship black culture, and prostrate themselves before the Jew.

  114. @EliteCommInc.

    “law enforcement honed its behavior by targeting the black population by several magnitudes of time space and force far more than whites male or female”

    I know when I go fishing, I generally go where the fish are plentiful, because then you’re not just fishing, you’re catching, which is the ultimate goal of fishing. When it comes to black vs white crime, one need not go as far incarceration rates to find evidence of relatively much higher criminal tendencies among blacks, as apparently victims statements (victims statements are like the screens on a fish finder, but for law enforcement) tend to portray that blacks are in fact under represented in the “Big Houses” relative to the mentions they receive in said statements. I think a Counter Currents article had some sources for that but, I do not have any saved on this computer, so feel free to “Nah-Ahh” it to your hearts content.

  115. @Bizarro World Observer

    Elite White Gentiles do not “HATE” their fellow Whites. They’re simply indifferent towards them.

    It is true that they much more strongly identify with their economic class than their race, but it doesn’t mean they hate their race. Elite White Gentiles may feel a certain disgust towards working-class Whites, but they feel the same disgust towards less affluent Blacks and Hispanics. Elite Gentiles aren’t interested in watching Mexican Telenovelas or eating “Soul Food.” They aren’t interested in raising the minimum wage or giving low-income workers more time off (which would disproportionately help Non-Whites).

    There is indeed a lot of anti-white animus from the elites, but nearly all of it comes from Jews.

    Say what you want about George W. Bush, but he feels zero guilt over the 1+ million Iraqis who he butchered. He feels remarkably comfortable about his decision to invade Iraq, as do the overwhelming majority of White Gentile politicians.

    Elite White Gentiles passively go along with anti-white policies because Jews are so fanatically in favor of them. Since these anti-white policies aren’t applied to elites (whether they be Gentile or Jewish), there’s no problem. If there were ever an attempt to seize their wealth and redistribute it to the Non-White masses, you can bet Elite White Gentiles would fight back.

    • Agree: Miro23
  116. “I know when I go fishing, I generally go where the fish are plentiful, because then you’re not just fishing, you’re catching, which is the ultimate goal of fishing. When it comes to black vs white crime, one need not go as far incarceration rates to find evidence of relatively much higher.”

    Sure the crime rates for certain black populations are higher. Urban communities, especially those that in which there exists certain social debilitative dysfunctions or hurdles have always had more incidence of crime. That has historically been the case before there was a US>

    And regardless of what color populations that exist in said environments have incidence of croiminal activity. Now we know that as members of said population actually transition from such communities they experiences lower crime incidences. In the case of blacks, that process of working up and out was exacerbated by the use of skin color to maintain their position as an outgroup.

    No one needs a degree in social history to get the data of the deliberate prevention of the black population to integrate — and assimilate into the streams that move people into more sustainable environments. Since it was based on color, the normal paths that outgroups might use to integrate or assimilate were tougher to by-pass, hurdle, etc.

    The US had several major opportunities to not engage in the such discrimination, she chose not to do so.

    Poverty and the accompanying dysfunctions are not excuses or direct causes of crime — however, it’s clear that conditions are more conducive to fostering dysfunction.

    It would be an error to conclude my grasp of that reality makes me soft on black, white, yellow green, blue or chartruess colored people who engage in crime.

    And it has been a statistical mistake to use crime stats that apply to certain populations say perhaps 2% as descriptor for the whole. That has served as excuse to cut law enforcement loose as more than hall monitors against black populations on the while. Sure if I am a police officer and I want to boost my arrest record, getting stationed in an urban area is helpful. All the better if all blacks are rated as being criminal prone then my arrest is held to less accountability as is my conduct against said population — with the added boost of keeping the “gorilla’s ” in line.

    A practice and policy that will eventually lead to frustration and rioting. To that understanding, blacks never rioted because white betty was dating black frank or vice versa. The riots and their issues were nuts and bolts. The real history of rioting based on skin color thus far is that whites would riot and in doing so head out to attack black populations for anything from walking on the wrong beach to a black person getting a promotion. Sadly, I too had to get off the “black bandwagon” of low IQ and DNA to skin color cause for crime merry-go-round.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Beau Nydle
  117. @getaclue

    Eminent domain does not have as much relativity to urban (Erstwhile) middle class ethnic whites like myself. We’re not hicks and the concrete under a feet has nothing to offer the Feds. No precious minerals, fuel, nothing.

    McVeigh sure took the rap. He actually seemed to WANT to take the rap. He intentionally left clues. Maybe he wanted to be a martyr and struck a deal with Feds to take the rap.

    As for Koresh’s automatic rifles, well, only Mexicans can have those in sting operations.

  118. @eah

    Banning Saudi millionaires from buying NYC property or well-to-do Emirates from visiting Disney World makes little difference.

  119. @Commentator Mike

    Mike, before Brit posters get too dewy-eyed I think you should remember that the IRA supplied McVeigh with the detonator for that bomb and that McVeigh’s Sinn Fein relatives in Ireland were devout IRA who arranged this.

    You’ve probably also forgotten that McVeigh coordinated the training of IRA operatives in his survivalist camps in the US.

    Gerry Adams distanced himself from McVeigh publicly. But McVeigh was up to his eyeballs involved with the IRA. Somehow, to some extent, the IRA was aware of McVeigh’s activities.

    Post-911, you Brits have forgotten just how many Irish-American insurgents like McVeigh were involved with the IRA.

    I was 21 in 1995 and I do remember.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  120. Movie Reccommend

    Dark Water

  121. @Jeff Stryker

    Jeff,

    Thanks for the info. I was more aware of the link to the Philippines and I think that McVeigh was seen around the bar scene in Angeles where many Fist Gulf War vets, including some military demolition experts, used to congregate. I’m not saying that there was anything more than casual about these visits, as he could have learned all he needed to know while still in the military from associating with such demolition specialist friends, or from any similar expert veterans in the militia movement.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  122. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Once again, you take the typical liberal jewish communist position that black violence is caused by (gasp!) “white racism”. Ha ha…

    Blacks have had more opportunities than just about any other race and have had much additional “help” as well. People like you making excuses for their genetically-inherent dysfunctional behavior do blacks no favor.

    From one-sided “civil-rights (for some)” laws, (formulated and imposed on us whites by left-wing communist jews such as yourself) to “affirmative action” and other such “help”, blacks still have not been able to “make it” and be truly successful.

    The sad part is, that blacks are too stupid to see that they are being used by the jews to destabilize civil society, not altruism, as the jews are wont to claim, alhough there are a few who DO recognize jewish meddling in black affairs-the NOI, for one….

    Those of us who lived through the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement of the 1950s and 1960s had a saying that still rings true today: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”.

    You remind me of the college professor who has his own mindset, refusing to acknowledge that dysfunctional black behavior might be caused by other than the standard reasons spouted out by the typical liberal “academic crowd”. These “pointy headed intellectuals” make excuses for black behavior, carefully skirting around the “real” reasons for black dysfunction.

    I would like to drop you off in the middle of any major city’s “vibrant community” and see how long you last. You could use your notions of the reasons for black dysfunction to protect yourself.

  123. “You remind me of the college professor who has his own mindset, refusing to acknowledge that dysfunctional black behavior might be caused by other than the standard reasons spouted out by the typical liberal “academic crowd”

    Well, at least you understand that poverty urban communities pose a higher risk of victimhood, that would be correct. Now in talking about such communities, it’s important to note that not all low income communities experience the same level of criminal incidence. Overall even these communities, criminal elements are not completely overwhelming.

    I would rather avoid living in Cabreeny Green or “Hell’s Kitchen”, if possible.

    —————————————-

    Tell us how many blacks are dysfunctional. As for liberals, well we eat on opposite sides of the table, if at the same table at all.

  124. camus10 says:

    Lynch. thanx amusing movie review. the state vultures are indeed capable of sabotage

    but the best heal from damaged legacies by following original scripts.

    John 13:34 A new command I give you: love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another

    the choice is, will you be the sheep who bite anthropologic divisive teasers or will you feast on metaphysical triumphs

    caitlin johnstone link today :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAXcolWbh60

  125. @EliteCommInc.

    “Sure the crime rates for certain black populations are higher. Urban communities, especially those that in which there exists certain social debilitative dysfunctions or hurdles have always had more incidence of crime. That has historically been the case before there was a US”

    Urban communities full of poor whites, Asians & Indians do not commit crime anywhere near the amount poor blacks do. Crime is a more powerful generator of poverty, than poverty is a creator of crime and the behaviour of different groups experiencing similar financial impacts, highlights what a liberal fantasy it is that financially barren areas are generators of equal amounts of criminal behaviour between demographics.

    “And regardless of what color populations that exist in said environments have incidence of croiminal activity. Now we know that as members of said population actually transition from such communities they experiences lower crime incidences. In the case of blacks, that process of working up and out was exacerbated by the use of skin color to maintain their position as an outgroup”

    See my previous paragraph and investigate for yourself to register what an utter load of tosh your initial claim is. You will be unable to find a single community in the first world that has been improved by the arrival of blacks in to it as the “Regression to the mean” events take hold and the pre-existing social wealth of the afflicted community will be consumed until it is another area of mysteriously poverty stricken people. Only those that invested much of themselves in fantasy rather than observable reality will attempt to try to continue this outlandish tale, especially in front of those that have been witnesses to the cold hard reality.

    “No one needs a degree in social history to get the data of the deliberate prevention of the black population to integrate — and assimilate into the streams that move people into more sustainable environments. Since it was based on color, the normal paths that outgroups might use to integrate or assimilate were tougher to by-pass, hurdle, etc”

    No one has more doors installed in education & career institutions for their benefit than blacks. More money is spent per capita on black schools and institutions to try to drag blacks up, than any other demographic in the first world. Alternative Hypothesis on YouTube has done breathtakingly autistic breakdowns of the vast amount of wealth squandered on endlessly underperforming, ceaselessly ungrateful and distastefully entitled black Americans, merely to assuage the guilt mired wants of weak willed whites and it has all come to naught. The reason is genetic, not institutional and there’s no accounts department in the world that will be changing that.

    “The US had several major opportunities to not engage in the such discrimination, she chose not to do so”

    Why would anyone of sound rational thought processes give up the option of discrimination? I employ discrimination every time I buy a car, select tools, eat out, purchase attire etc etc. Discrimination is an all day, every day affair, that blacks are hugely put out by when it turns out that astute users of discriminatory practices, accurately deduced they were a net loss to any nation that wasn’t African in nature. When discrimination is in their favour it’s super marvy, when it’s used to halt their nation & community eviscerating behaviours, it’s super sadness time. Discrimination is the choice of a strong generation.

    “Poverty and the accompanying dysfunctions are not excuses or direct causes of crime — however, it’s clear that conditions are more conducive to fostering dysfunction”

    That’s right, it’s crime & dysfunction that is the major obstacle to high functioning communities and criminal & dysfunctional types create the environment necessary to replicate themselves. Communities that are able to overcome the blight of these people, demonstrate to the rest of us who they really are. Communities that are unable to overcome the blight of these people, also demonstrate to us who they really are. Once the demonstration has occurred, the informed discrimination can then comfortably take place.

    “It would be an error to conclude my grasp of that reality makes me soft on black, white, yellow green, blue or chartruess colored people who engage in crime”

    It’s the reality of demographically related traits and the quantity of them that you’re soft on. Every group will always reveal what primarily inhabits their group soul and only those who are invested in fantasy choose to try and deflect others thoughts away from those easily observed realities.

    “And it has been a statistical mistake to use crime stats that apply to certain populations say perhaps 2% as descriptor for the whole. That has served as excuse to cut law enforcement loose as more than hall monitors against black populations on the while. Sure if I am a police officer and I want to boost my arrest record, getting stationed in an urban area is helpful. All the better if all blacks are rated as being criminal prone then my arrest is held to less accountability as is my conduct against said population — with the added boost of keeping the “gorilla’s ” in line”

    The old sad faced lefty adage of NAXALT (Not All “X” Are Like That) is always wheeled out in response to any action that sees more of any particular (non white) group seeing extra effort to curtail their shittery, when the real way any group is regarded is actually with EXALT (Enough “X” Are Like That) This is correctly used to warrant the extra resources to deal with the elevated levels of shittery said group brings to the community they’re assailing. Policemen’s job is to catch criminals. If there’s more black criminal behaviour (which by all metrics and all datasets, no matter where in the world they exist, prove this to be the case) then the fact limited police resources are sent to areas that have elevated crime stats is the only rational response. If white people really hated blacks as much as blacks think white people hate them, we’d take all the police officers out of black communities, wall them in and push pizzas & loaded pistols through designated slots incorporated in said wall.

    “A practice and policy that will eventually lead to frustration and rioting. To that understanding, blacks never rioted because white betty was dating black frank or vice versa. The riots and their issues were nuts and bolts. The real history of rioting based on skin color thus far is that whites would riot and in doing so head out to attack black populations for anything from walking on the wrong beach to a black person getting a promotion. Sadly, I too had to get off the “black bandwagon” of low IQ and DNA to skin color cause for crime merry-go-round”

    I don’t even think you’re on the same planet as the rest of us, let alone some imagined merry go round. Whites looked after their own, against a notoriously sexually predatory (avail yourself of rape stats and try to maintain your fantasy) out group, that has also proven itself to be suicidally shortsighted, voracious consumers of any and all available resources. Thus they thereby show themselves to be in direct conflict with communities whose entire cultures are built around farsighted practices. Blacks eat the heart out of communities and then cry foul when confronted over their destructive practices, by those tasked with defending the communities they’re gorging themselves on. Whites didn’t riot, they policed their territory. Blacks do the rioting , because when you’ve built nothing to defend, it’s just the destructive, emotion fuelled expression of an insatiable mindset being told forcefully NO!! Leave white built and maintained areas and move permanently to an African nation where you can feed your fantasy, without disfiguring a world you neither understand or value here. Good luck trying to keep it alive with reality breathing hard down your neck.

    One last thing…. You seem to either not understand that pushing the “Reply” button below a post makes it a linked series of comments that others can then see what you’re replying to, or have replies made to you…. or you’re doing it out of some ingrained contrariness that’s revealing of why your expressed views on the real world run so counter to it’s incredibly well documented and outrageously easily accessed data sets, let alone it’s easily observed, every day existence in front of you. Either way, you’re doing it wrong.

  126. @Shaman911

    “He just happened to stumble onto an FBI bomb. And the Establishment went nuts when he disrupted their False FLAG OP. ”

    That makes much more sense than the FBI’s claim that Jewell planted the bomb himself.

  127. @Commentator Mike

    Terry Nichols was the one who visited the Philippines.

    Experts cast doubt that the IRA would have anything to do with an Irish-American nutter who had spotty service record.

    The fact that McVeigh’s grandparents were born in Ireland was about the only link.

  128. @anarchyst

    Well summarized.

    Although I might add that there is a real possibility that McVeigh did not actually die – his “execution” instead was an expertly staged show for witnesses.
    This disturbing theory has some evidence for it: one of the most credible witnesses to McVeigh’s execution described “shallow breathing” AFTER McVeigh had officially been pronounced dead.

    So, as Dimples pointed out, could the insider/plotters have secured McVeigh’s cooperation and silence with a promise to smuggle him out later, and then to start a new life (under a new identity)?

    Maybe.

    • Replies: @lysias
  129. What really pissed off the MSM about this movie was how Olivia Wilde’s journalist character perfectly embodies the “presstitute” meme popularized by PC Roberts and inserted into the title of the English translation of Uffkote’s anti-MSM masterpiece: https://www.patreon.com/posts/31430406

    Wilde trades sexual favors for FBI inside information that Jewell is a suspect. Then she perpetrates a journalistic lynching. Typical MSM journalist behavior. Read Uffkote’s exposé for details.

    The movie also offers a hidden polemic against feminism (among other shibboleths of elite liberalism). Wilde’s character is ambitious, narcissistic, sociopathic, and promiscuous. These characteristics, the film suggests, may not be entirely unrelated to her status as a woman who abandons the traditional faithful wife/devoted mother role in favor of a high-pressure career. Jewell’s mother, by contrast, is devoted and faithful, and her son repays her by taking care of her when she’s in need.

    Western culture devalues women’s commitment to being wives and mothers, and pushes them to compete in the workplace, where they are up against people with 30x their average testosterone level. (That would be men, for those of you who have forgotten there are two sexes with major biological differences.)

    This is the real cause of “white genocide” which is almost entirely due to declining birthrates.

    Note that Sam Rockwell’s character, he of the “toxic masculinity,” has a devoted and somewhat subservient, foreign-born, foreign-accented, traditionally feminine female partner who becomes his wife. They have a wonderful, complementary relationship—like traditional heterosexual relationships in bygone days of Western culture, relationships that still exist in other cultures (notably Islamic and Eastern Christian ones).

    So this movie is at least as politically incorrect on sexuality and family values as it is on race & ethnicity.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  130. I haven’t seen this yet, but did Eastwood really think people would flock to a movie without star power? They should but fact is they don’t.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  131. @Priss Factor

    Priss Factor,

    Then he should have cast himself in some role as there’s no bigger star than Clint Eastwood.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  132. @Just passing through

    Incorrect, there is nothing in common between the chicken-swinging Jews who live in shitholes and the bankers at Goldman Sachs.

    If the two sets of “Jews” have nothing in common, then it’s wrong to refer to both sets as Jews. Being a Jew means participating in the group evolutionary strategy, i.e., being part of the group.

    WASP’s have been in bed with the Jews since the days freemasons and Jewry found a common purpose, world hegemony.

    Only a small percentage of WASP’s were ever in bed with the Jews. And world hegemony. of course, was the Jews’ idea.

    [I]n reality there are many Whites completely willing to screw over other Whites for personal gain, it doesn’t matter if they are ‘Jew puppets’, the fact is that these Whites in positions of power sell out their people for money.

    Puppets have no agency.

    The notion that there is a coalition is preposterous. WASPs have absolutely no power vis-a-vis the Jews, and the project will ultimately destroy them (the WASP’s). This is not their idea, and they are not part of any coalition. Some of them sell out for short term economic gain. But the same is equally true for non-WASP whites. No group has suffered more from the rise of the Jews than WASP’s.

    • Agree: Twodees Partain
  133. @Bizarro World Observer

    Contempt and hatred are vastly different concepts. And for many if not most “elite” white gentiles even “contempt” would overstate their feelings.

  134. “Note that Sam Rockwell’s character, he of the “toxic masculinity,” has a devoted and somewhat subservient . . .”

    Complimentary sure —

    laugh.

    but I am not subservient is the most accurate term – maybe we saw different movies.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  135. @Commentator Mike

    Then he should have cast himself in some role as there’s no bigger star than Clint Eastwood.

    There are plenty of famous fatso actors.

  136. @EliteCommInc.

    Well, she at least lets him pretend to be in the driver’s seat. (Which is what smart women have been doing with their husbands since time immemorial.)

  137. “(Which is what smart women have been doing with their husbands since time immemorial.)”

    Laugh

    and agree.

  138. There is another aspect of the FBI’s purported efforts to frame Richard Jewell that the reader should be aware of, something that might put Clint Eastwood’s movie into the proper context: the Federal Bureau of Investigation might have been out to redeem themselves for having previously provided an erroneous criminal profile of a white male suspect in the high-profile Atlanta Child Murders case.

    The case in question involved the serial murders of over two dozen black children in Georgia. Racial tensions were running high at the time, and the FBI was brought in to “assist” the local police investigation (I’m sure the FBI didn’t trust local white Southerners to investigate fairly). Conventional wisdom has it that FBI eggheads came down to redneck Georgia and caught the killer with sophisticated profiling and investigatory methods. Indeed, the FBI’s profilers in the case were later amalgamated by author Thomas Harris to form the basis of the fictional character Jack Crawford of The Silence of the Lambs fame.

    Some claim this is a popular misconception.

    The reality is that the FBI may have impeded the investigation into the Atlanta Child Murders by offering an initially incorrect criminal profile – that of a white male. This despite the fact that the children were abducted from black neighborhoods, and a white male would have easily stood out; the suspect obviously had to be a black male. Indeed, one the FBI’s criminal profilers, Roy Hazelwood, claimed as much: “I knew there was no way a white serial killer could have moved through those neighborhoods without being noticed.” [Vronsky, pp 343. See below.]

    But that’s not how other investigators recalled it.

    “Looking over Wayne Williams’s description, it appears that the FBI profile that Hazelwood and Douglass submitted is incredibly accurate-right down to the ownership of a vehicle fitted with police lights and the dog.”

    “… there is a radically different account of the FBI’s participation in the Atlanta child murders investigation. Robert D Keppel, a professional investigator in more than fifty serial homicide cases and a consultant to the Atlanta child murder task force, remembers things differently upon his arrival in Atlanta in March 1980:

    SOURCE: Vronsky, Peter. Serial Killers: The Method and Madness of Monsters, pp. 345

    “We couldn’t wait to hear what gems of wisdom would come from the BSU’s (Behavioral Sciences Unit, FBI) agents, most of whom were only self-proclaimed experts in murder investigations and had never investigated one lead in an actual murder case. The FBI were the kings of follow-up but couldn’t solve a crime in progress. Most homicide detectives knew this … the profile of the probable killer provided by the BSU mirrored the wishes of the community, that is, the killer was white.”

    SOURCE: Keppel, The Riverman, pp. 114-115

    “Moreover, the FBI surveillance of river bridges did not start until April 24, after four bodies had already been found in Atlanta-area rivers between March 30 and April 20. Perhaps bureaucratic intransigence can explain why the bridge surveillance was not initiated immediately after Douglas “clicked” but only after four bodies in a row had been pulled out from the rivers. One wonders, though, why neither Hazelwood nor Douglas mentioned in their autobiographies the earlier BSU profile suggesting that the killer was a white individual. Or did Robert Keppel get the story all wrong? Go figure it out.”

    SOURCE: Vronsky, Peter. Serial Killers: The Method and Madness of Monsters, pp. 345

    The killer in question was indeed black man. It is speculated that the FBI felt pressured by racial considerations to blame a white man for the deaths of black children; the contentious Civil Rights era wasn’t long over and this was Georgia, after all – black murders, white establishment vilified as racist by the Yankee media.

    Instead of being a point of celebration for criminal profiling, the FBI’s involvement in the Atlanta Child Murders is a point of contention, perhaps an embarrassment if the canonical story is wrong. A false profile might very well have thrown off investigators while several more black children were needlessly killed.

    With that in mind, the FBI’s antipathy towards Richard Jewell may not be surprising. It is possible they were humiliated when it turned out the Child Murders perpetrator was a black male, and the Richard Jewell case might have been viewed as their chance to make it right by providing a correct assessment along the same lines – white male Southerner. Although, obviously, they failed in this regard once again.

    It could be alleged that the FBI only stopped with these hoaxes once they “got their man” in Eric Robert Rudolph, the hick white male Alabama abortion clinic bomber from the late 90s. Notably, the FBI talked Rudolph up the media to be this – entirely unlikely – larger than life survival expert capable of eluding the most seasoned military trackers. They generated this fictional character they could redeem themselves with by finding and then apprehending. But even then, not really. IIRC, a local North Carolina police officer caught Rudolph digging through a dumpster for scraps of discarded food. Some survival expert he turned out to be. Some behavioral profile.

    This is a potentially shocking event largely scrubbed from history, if the conventional narrative is false that is. The subject matter itself is fit for a Clint Eastwood movie, or a Ron Unz article.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  139. @Divine Right

    The killer was black, obviously, but we don’t know that it was Wayne Williams. FBI now believe it may been a black convict who died of AIDS in prison in 1987.

    One scenario is that Williams killed some victims and this seems likely.

    Because Williams was so small and a homosexual (He denied this even after his prison relationships were publicly known) the idea that he overpowered 6’2 black rent boys and threw them off bridges who were twice his size seems suspect.

    The FBI pursued the KKK endlessly in Georgia over the crime and even black detectives claimed it was not KKK. There was no attempt to pin the crimes on a white man.

    They even used Sinatra to pressure the Sharkey’s Machine-era Italian mafia capos as if Henry Silva would be out committing those crimes-there was a theory that it was a gangland retaliation against heroin distributors for the mafia in the ghetto which is really half-assed.

    All the theories were half-assed except that possibly Williams committed a few of them but the other culprit was not caught.

    • Replies: @Divine Right
  140. @EliteCommInc.

    Was Jewell really as dumb as the portrayal in the movie? I though Sam Rockwell was excellent as the attorney, but the Jewell charter was portrayed as an Asperger simpleton almost as bad as Sheldon in Big Bang Theory. The movie bombed, don’t know if it was just the subject matter, or the media running a campaign that it is “right wing” and violates “mee too” sensibilities ensuring a lot of women and their dates would stay away? If there was no evidence that the opportunist reporter really was sleeping with the agent in real life I don’t really know why the screenwriters would choose to slander her. She’s dead after all just like the real Jewell and isn’t that supposed to be exactly what the media did to him?

    This is a good lesson of why you need a lawyer if the police start interviewing you because of a crime. The same thing happened to the black kids in Central Park, Amanda Knox, and the high school boys in West Memphis. Huge lying media campaign demonizing people whom a more rational look should have shown as innocent. All of them also did not have the kind of competent legal representation Mr. Jewel had.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  141. @Sebastian Hawks

    The Knox case happened in Italy. To some degree she was a scapegoat of rampant anti-American sentiment, which was at a zenith during Bush’s idiocy.

    Of course, there are some unanswered questions. She may or may not have been involved.

    But that was not on US soil.

  142. “Was Jewell really as dumb as the portrayal in the movie?”

    I did not come out of the movie thinking that Mr. Jewell was “dumb”. In fact, from the start it was clear in my view that he was intelligent. An intelligence hid underneath large body and for the most part a gentle demeanor – not weak as is made clear with those scenes on campus — laughing — boundary issues, but issues based on what might be called a preventative hands on approach.

    And based on the film’s rendering, Mr. Jewell was well informed and upon getting “woke” he was able to defend himself quite well. He did not buy into that pretend making a training film, down right evil, in my view. I actually found an actual situation to use that term “woke”.

    I think Mr. Rockwell is a compilation of lawyers that dealt with Mr. Jewell. And I agree, it was a great performance. You just knew while watching the “Green Mile”, he was a force to be reckoned with in film. He even helped make “JoJo Rabbit” Tolerable.

    Ohhh excuse me

    Laugh. No I don’t think Mr. Jewel was dumb — idealistic, hopeful . . . but not dumb.

  143. @Jeff Stryker

    The judge in the case also made a controversial ruling that allowed police to pin all the murders on Williams — hair and fiber analysis. Williams was convicted of only two murders, neither of which closely fit the profile of the previous murders. Forensic evidence linking him to those victims was additionally discredited by the defense.

    However, it should be noted that the child murders stopped once Williams was arrested*, or so it is alleged. It’s also not inconceivable that a smart guy like Williams might not have had a gimmick that allowed him to overpower stronger — or at least troublesome — victims. John Wayne Gacy would trick his young male victims into handcuffing themselves. After, he had his way with them, even if they were younger and stronger. Ted Bundy pretended to be physically disabled or injured. I’m unaware of anything Williams might have used (or not) because the case has been swept under the rug by popular society; I’ll have to refresh my knowledge. Some of the best books on the subject are old, rare, or can only be purchased at high cost. I’d assume newer books are more along the lines of conventional wisdom. Probably no one wants to write about the case along contrarian lines for obvious reasons.

    Food for thought:

    Something like this incident occurred in the Stephen King novel IT, a book about serial child murders: all the killings are pinned on a single guy (innocent) and the case is quickly shushed; the murders then stop. The book itself was inspired by the child kidnapping hysteria of the 1980s. I can’t help but wonder if King partly based his book on this case**. It’d make for a good Hollywood thriller considering the recent release of the movie adaptations, but I don’t expect that kind of movie to get made in this environment — again, for obvious reasons.

    *Possible coincidence if another person was arrested and convicted around the same time. Police were on a heightened state of alert for wrongdoers.

    **There is a young black protagonist in the novel with a vague resemblance to Williams. During the Child Murders case, Williams would taunt police by offering his services as a crime scene photographer. IIRC, in the King novel, the black character has a camera and a picture book depicting the town’s history; the novel also introduces the character at a crime scene where a photograph of a child victim is found (he’s told off by police when he offers his help). Williams also taunted police by calling them. In the novel, the black character places a phone call to his old friends telling them to come back. Williams was the son of two retired school teachers. In the King novel, the black character becomes the local librarian. He was also young and taunted by a gang of racist bullies. The Child Murders involved an alleged (but probably nonexistent) racist group; a racist group resembling the KKK is mentioned repeatedly in the book. Williams was a homosexual, I believe, who dumped his victims in a river. The King novel opens with a gay man in a police station reporting the murder of someone found in a local river. Etc.

  144. I’m not usually a believer in railroaded blacks in a racist judicial system, but Williams should not have been convicted.

    Wayne Williams was a BS artist and chronic liar. He put himself in prison. He was also an attention-addict who may have intentionally framed himself simply as a publicity stunt to further his career and was then unable to prove his innocence.

    In terms of strength Williams really could not have heaved a body over the rails of the river.

    Williams was seen with the kids because he ran that half-baked recording studio but other adults were seen with the kids on the street.

    Williams criticized the police prior to his becoming a suspect and this did not exactly endear him to them. Well they did not intentionally frame Williams, they were in an awful hurry to believe he was guilty.

    Several victims were girls and Williams was flaming homosexual.

    One victim who claimed to see Williams saw him in the dark.

    The killings did not stop when Williams was locked up. They subsided and there were four more victims. But in 1987 the other black suspect died of AIDS in jail.

    There was some theory that Williams did it because he hated his race.

    It just all seems fairly suspect.

  145. If the point of this movie is truth-over-falsehood, was it a good idea to add fictional characters and bend the narrative here and there(contrary to what really happened) to push the message? Sort of self-defeating.

  146. @Kevin Barrett

    Wilde trades sexual favors for FBI inside information that Jewell is a suspect. Then she perpetrates a journalistic lynching. Typical MSM journalist behavior. Read Uffkote’s exposé for details.

    But did this really happen in this case? If not, it’s a case of lying to expose a lie, which is self-defeating.

  147. “If the point of this movie is truth-over-falsehood, was it a good idea to add fictional characters and bend the narrative here and there(contrary to what really happened) to push the message?”

    I have a hard time with this as well. But hiring five (if that) different actors to play however lawyers that Mr jewel went through would might cause more conflict for the viewer than the complex matters in play. If it impacts the central issues, it matters.

    For example, the film the Great Debaters switched the schools in which the ultimate debate took place. That was unnecessary and was misleading in my view.

    In this case, the only misleading factor might have been the suggestion that the reporter was using her womanly wiles to get information, but again, did not detract from the central point or even the theme of the story.
    ———————————————-

    As for the nonsense of interjecting the vase of child murder as the case for the FBI focus on Mr. jewel — nothing supports it. Nothing. It is so tangential as to be bizarre. The relevant issue – the Oklahoma City bombing. The FBI follow up on rumors as they do. In fact part of the focus on Mr Jewel was due to comments by people close to him. Aside from a single friend in the film, his friends were his best enemies. The FBI used those rumors . . . oh there’s a surprise. Law enforcement using rumors to make a case or to justify a case

    uhhh shock of shock. With this kind of pressure its even possible to get family members to chime in with their own doubts, suspicions, and agendas. No would be goose chases of child murderers need apply. According to the film, the agenda was in play by the players relevant and the background of Oklahoma federal building would be enough. What was shocking to the feds is how many actual white supremacists existed in the military after Oklahoma . . . who knew.

  148. anarchyst says:

    “In this case, the only misleading factor might have been the suggestion that the reporter was using her womanly wiles to get information, but again, did not detract from the central point or even the theme of the story.”

    The “reporter” DID use her “womanly guile” to gain information…not unusual in the sordid “journalism” field…

    Journalism has never been about “truth”…

    Police departments, federal “letter agencies, and even the FBI use the “Reid method” of interrogations to extract “confessions”, quite often from innocent suspects. Young people and those with no previous police contact are especially vulnerable to this “technique”.

    There is no punishment for “law enforcement” for prosecuting the innocent, even if they use this dishonest “technique” which has been proven to be flawed.

  149. “The “reporter” DID use her “womanly guile” to gain information…not unusual in the sordid “journalism” field…”

    In response:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/12/richard-jewell-movie-kathy-scruggs

    https://www.independentmail.com/story/news/local/south-carolina/2019/12/13/richard-jewell-movie-sc-kathy-scruggs-sc-reporter-atlanta-centennial-olympic-park-bombing/4383757002/

    Now granted the one scene in which some manner of flirtation suggested a sexual quid pro quo is not definitive. But it is controversial. Neither the film nor the research surrounding miss Skruggs makes supports that she slept around for information. But the innuendo is clearly in play. Now it may have been more a play to highlight her own “her independent streak” but it is a controversy nonetheless.

    I can only state that based on the record, there’s no evidence to support that Miss Skruggs did any such thing. She was as played by the efforts as other reporters. Reporters who want access to the law enforcement are not routinely doing stories to hold them accountable, that’s history.

    Laughing as for law enforcement . . . some have an easier road than others. Whites the easiest and the most complicit in supporting wrong doing — should have bit my tongue.

  150. lysias says:
    @Paul Jolliffe

    And there may also have been staged deaths in the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Maxwell.

  151. This is a very weird time to be a conservative.

    Mr. Richard Jewell, Waco, Ruby ridge . . . the current executive, Attry Roger Stone . . . Miss Ann Coulter, Mr Hannity . . . all in a reasonable twit about the justice system..

    Yet they have mocked blacks and across the country who have spent years describing in detail, with volumes of data sets that the system was leveraged unfairly against poor whites and even targeted blacks.

    It’s a very strange juxtaposition listening to whites bemoan problems republicans laughed at and about when made by others.

  152. correction:

    Yet they have mocked blacks and researchers, across the country who have spent years describing in detail, with volumes of data sets that the system was leveraged unfairly against poor whites and even targeted blacks.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Trevor Lynch Comments via RSS