The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTrevor Lynch Archive
Age of Cringe
"Alt-Right: Age of Rage"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Based on a few clips, I was certain that Alt-Right: Age of Rage (2018) would lead to permanent physical damage from sheer cringiness. But I was delighted to have been proven wrong. This is a remarkably fair-minded documentary. On balance, though, I think it will be good for white identity politics. Age of Rage was directed by Adam Bhala Lough, an American of partial South Asian descent.

The film starts quite tendentiously, with footage of a German American Bund meeting in New York City in the 1930s. A line of young women walking into the meeting is accompanied by a stock sound effect of marching feet. The speaker, Fritz Kuhn, has a German accent that sounds comical and sinister. He speaks of taking America back from Jewish power. At one point, a certain Isadore Greenbaum rushes the stage and is tackled by Storm Troopers. New York’s finest then hustle in to break up the fight.

Then we read the words:

We learn from history
that we do not learn from history.

—Friedrich Hegel.

At this point, I knew that Lough would cut either to Hailgate or Unite the Right in Charlottesville. It was the latter.

From that point on, however, the tone became generally more balanced and the tide began to turn in the direction of the Alt Right. Basically, Lough made a practice of balancing pro-white speakers with anti-white speakers. The main pro-white voices are Richard Spencer of the National Policy Institute and Jared Taylor of American Renaissance. The main anti-white voices are Daryl Lamont Jenkins of One People’s Project and Mark Potok formerly of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

We also hear from Gavin McInnes of the Alt Lite, an Alt-Right video blogger known as TV KWA, Sikh activist Simran Jeet Singh, and Lacy MacAuley and John Carico of antifa. There are also brief clips of Milo Yiannopoulos and David Duke.

In Lough’s hands, all of his interviewees come off as articulate and sincere. Since it is child’s play to make even experienced speakers look exactly the opposite, we have the filmmaker’s integrity and honesty to thank for that.

There are some cringey moments.

For instance, we are treated to a debauched-looking Richard Spencer obviously posing with a cigarette and Gavin McInnes preening before a mirror, then loudly blowing his nose (clearly for show), before beginning the interview. But these were not candid moments included to be embarrassing. Both men were obviously posturing before the camera. No doubt they thought they were being “alpha” and “badass.” So the inclusion of these gaffes is on them, not Lough. In spite of his bizarre introduction, McInnes gives a compelling performance.

And, of course, there is Hailgate.

But the cringiest moments came in the last 45 minutes of the film, where we are treated to extensive footage of the 2017 American Renaissance conference and Unite the Right in Charlottesville a couple weeks later.

The Amren footage decidedly favors the pro-white side. The antifa are mostly fat, unattractive, self-righteous, and shrill misfits, with really lame chants, whereas the conference-goers are well-dressed and well-behaved, with conspicuously more fit people. At 63 minutes there is a welcome cameo of the Counter-Currents table.

The Charlottesville footage has cringe on both sides.

The torchlight march to the statue of Thomas Jefferson the night before the rally was, in terms of optics and messaging, extremely impressive.

But on the day of the rally, there are numerous shots of goofy and gross-looking people—from both Unite the Right and antifa—wearing home-made uniforms, including armor, and carrying improvised weapons. When the two sides started fighting, it was sometimes hard to tell which side people were on. So the net effect on the normie viewer should be a wash.

There is also ample footage of the police doing nothing while the antifa attack Unite the Right. Reporters and bystanders repeatedly ask them why they are doing nothing. Then, after countless fights and injuries, we hear the state’s declaration of an unlawful assembly. Riot cops move in (again to a cue of marching feet), and in the ensuing chaos and violence, Unite the Right attendee James Fields crashes into a crowd (to a stock cue of a race car engine), killing Heather Heyer and injuring a many more.

The worst moments on the pro-white side included Richard Spencer donning his bullet-proof vest, his security detail scrambling through a drill, and his big entrance saying “hail victory.” According to Jason Kessler, who is suing the city of Charlottesville over Unite the Right, Spencer had declined a police escort to the park so he and his guys could “look strong” in their entrance. If this is true, it undermines the narrative that the authorities are completely responsible for the obvious decision not to protect the rally from the antifa mob. We can only hope that a fuller picture of events emerges as Kessler’s suit continues.

As for the interview footage of Taylor and Spencer, I thought both men did admirable jobs. They made telling points with eloquence and sincerity. I was particularly impressed at the end, when both Spencer and Taylor answer the question of whether or not white demographic decline depresses them and makes them want to give up. Spencer offers an excellent rebuttal that I use as well: white demographic decline is precisely what is driving the rise of white identity politics. Taylor responds by arguing that he does not act based on calculations of outcomes but out of duty to his ancestors and his descendants. Still, he believes he can win.

ORDER IT NOW

The final question of the film is posed to Spencer and Jenkins: Is America now too divided to come together? Spencer’s response is excellent in both content and delivery. This gist of his answer is: maybe America can’t come back together. Maybe race and religion and ethnicity really do matter. Maybe this country has become too diverse to survive. Jenkins’ response is wholly unconvincing. He simply denies that America is divided, merely “frustrated” and in need of answers. It is patent nonsense in light of everything we have seen before it, but Jenkins is so adamant that unthinking people might actually find him convincing.

Although I disagree with them profoundly, I have to admit that Jenkins and MacAuley acquitted themselves well. Both have killer shill instincts, immediately trying to frame events in their favor even as they unfold before them. But both of them state their core views in a creditable way.

Jenkins is a black man with a large chocolate chip on his shoulder. He speaks ebonic English (“dat,” “dere,” “gone” as a verb) with great dignity and conviction but little by way of argument. Still, his judgment on Unite the Right while the rally was still winding down was prescient, namely, that this was the beginning of the end for the Alt Right.

MacAuley is a strong, independent womyn who has come a long way, baby, and will never be feminine, agreeable, barefoot, pregnant, or make sandwiches for anyone but her fellow protesters.

Potok is the slickest anti-white voice, but the most problematic, since everything he says is a cliché. These clichés are necessary, he says, because the old technique of Jewish organizations—namely to work with the media to quarantine pro-white ideas—no longer works because of the proliferation of alternative media. Thus people have to be inoculated from pro-white ideas with such talking points as the following.

  • The idea of an ethnostate is a prescription for genocide. This is followed by information about the botched India-Pakistan partition rather than the peaceful Czech-Slovak one. We are told that one to two million people died in the India-Pakistan partition, but given the hatreds between Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs, it might have saved lives in the long run.
  • We can’t differentiate between white and black people because of people who are mixed race.
  • Genetic determinism is a pseudo-science, like phrenology.
  • Eugenics leads to Nazi genocide, of course.
  • People become haters because of envy for their betters, guilt which they externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty lives.

Potok justifies the Taliban-style destruction of Confederate monuments, which he says are explicit expressions of white supremacism. As an example, he gives a monument in Colfax, Louisiana to three white men who died in a battle with black unionists. “That can come right down,” he says. Here he tips his hand.

If one really wanted to create a peaceful multiracial society, wouldn’t one seek a position beyond the racial conflicts of the past? Why not pursue reconciliation between both sides of the conflict? Why not, for instance, create a monument to the blacks who died, rather than remove a monument to the whites? Or better yet, why not let sleeping dogs lie, since most blacks and whites in Louisiana have long forgotten such historical events anyway?

But Potok does not want racial peace and reconciliation. He wants to refight the race wars of the past. And he sides with non-whites against whites. But this time, he wants the whites to lose.

Many people believe that the Southern Poverty Law Center and other such organizations wish to create a world of multiracial harmony. White Nationalists believe that diversity is just a euphemism for white dispossession. Diversity just means fewer white people. Today, it is our monuments that are being erased. Tomorrow it is our racial consciousness that will be erased. But if sub-replacement white fertility, miscegenation, and non-white immigration are not stopped, eventually our race itself will disappear.

A yellow post-it note by Potok’s desk is captured by Lough’s camera. On it, Potok keeps track of the decline of America’s white population decade by decade. But if diversity simply adds richness to America, why specifically keep tabs on white decline? I would love to hear Potok’s explanation for this. Perhaps, someday, he can be asked under oath.

Lough asks his interviewees about violence. McInnes wholeheartedly endorses it. Jared Taylor and Mark Potok reject it as counter-productive. Simran Singh says it is only justified in self-defense. Jenkins and MacAuley would cry out as they strike you. Spencer is not included.

Taylor, McInnes, and Yiannopoulos all defend freedom of speech. Potok, Singh, and Jenkins at least acknowledge that it is protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. But they prefer to emphasize the terrible consequences of respecting free speech for white people by trotting out Wade Michael Page and Dylann Roof. Again, Spencer is not included, which is just as well, because he doesn’t believe in free speech.

Age of Rage ends on an apocalyptic but rather sour note with Matt Christman, some sort of Marxist podcaster, ranting about how neoliberalism will create ecological and economic disasters that will displace millions of people. This will force a choice: to appropriate and redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the First World to guarantee the existence of all—or to embrace genocide. The Alt Right, he says, is paving the way for the latter solution.

This analysis comes out of nowhere, and frankly it seems nutty. Is it meant as an illustration of the views that guide Jenkins, Potok, etc.? Does it represent the filmmaker’s own views? The film seems too well-balanced for that to be the case.

Whatever the filmmaker’s motive—to say nothing of the foolishness of the Marxist analysis of fascism, or anything else, for that matter—the truth is that, politically speaking, the center will not hold. Instead, it will be increasingly abandoned for white and anti-white identity politics, then what remains will be pulverized when these two blocs clash for dominance.

Although it is certainly not the director’s intention, I think Alt-Right: Age of Rage will tip the outcome in our direction. Thus I highly recommend it, and I especially urge you to show it to select normies and share the results in the comments below.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Alt Right, American Media, Antifa 
Hide 121 CommentsLeave a Comment
121 Comments to "Age of Cringe"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. “People become haters because of envy for their betters, guilt which they externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty lives.”

    This is a fine example of logical reversal.

    You don’t start with an empty life and then desire to fill it up with meaning.

    Rather you start with a meaningful life and fear losing it which would lead to an empty life. So the empty life is not the cause of your fear. The prospect of losing your meaningful life is the cause of your fear. The empty life is the unavoidable consequence of losing everything you hold dear.

    Desiring not to lose everything one holds dear is behavior, according to Obama, characteristic of “bitter clingers”. Having no cultural achievements with which he can identify, (remember his remark about Europe’s not being his cultural home?) Obama and crew can afford to be cavalier about someone else’s prospective loss.

    Rather, Obama and crew have dedicated themselves to and derive meaning from destroying everything white people hold dear. And the delight they take in watching them squirm demonstrates that Obama is as vicious a sadist as any of the primitive tribal Africans who derived ecstatic pleasure from the pain and suffering they inflicted on their human and animal captives.

    • Disagree: atlantis_dweller
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  2. Tyrion 2 says:

    People become haters because of envy for their betters, guilt which they externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty lives.

    Contrary to what you write, this is very often true.

    Your naysaying here also contradicts your previous point that eugenics do not necessarily lead to genocide, through your implication that “haters” are actually well-adjusted and decent individuals.

    Because, if decent people are “haters” and eugenics is generally held to be true, then genocide would naturally follow. In other words, “happy to hate” or “eugenics”, pick at most one…or get genocide.

    I have personally found that “haters” tend to be extremely unbalanced individuals, so I won’t be picking that!

    Potok justifies the Taliban-style destruction of Confederate monuments, which he says are explicit expressions of white supremacism. As an example, he gives a monument in Colfax, Louisiana to three white men who died in a battle with black unionists. “That can come right down,” he says. Here he tips his hand.

    If one really wanted to create a peaceful multiracial society, wouldn’t one seek a position beyond the racial conflicts of the past? Why not pursue reconciliation between both sides of the conflict? Why not, for instance, create a monument to the blacks who died, rather than remove a monument to the whites? Or better yet, why not let sleeping dogs lie, since most blacks and whites in Louisiana have long forgotten such historical events anyway?

    Your argument here is a bit slippery, to be honest. It makes the American Civil War to be primarily a racial conflict – as if blacks were on one side and whites on the other. Obviously such a typification is ludicrous. Blacks played a very minor role in the war.

    This means that the taking down of the monument really is about exorcising a heretical object based on ideology.* I suppose you needed to typify it as you did to lend substance to your following argument, which cannot stand on its own.

    But Potok does not want racial peace and reconciliation. He wants to refight the race wars of the past.

    What race wars? I can’t actually think of any. This lack annuls your attempt at mind-reading in the first part of your statement.

    A yellow post-it note by Potok’s desk is captured by Lough’s camera. On it, Potok keeps track of the decline of America’s white population decade by decade. But if diversity simply adds richness to America, why specifically keep tabs on white decline? I would love to hear Potok’s explanation for this. Perhaps, someday, he can be asked under oath.

    No need to ask him. He has written about it loads. Back in 2012 he said that “[non-Hispanic whites losing majority status] in this country is the single most important driver in the growth of hate groups and extremist groups over the last few years.”

    In other words, he agrees with what you commended elsewhere in this very article! You can’t attribute something sinister and hidden to him for simply doing his job competently as per your own analysis!

    Age of Rage ends on an apocalyptic but rather sour note with Matt Christman, some sort of Marxist podcaster, ranting about how neoliberalism will create ecological and economic disasters that will displace millions of people. This will force a choice: to appropriate and redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the First World to guarantee the existence of all—or to embrace genocide. The Alt Right, he says, is paving the way for the latter solution.

    One of the final layers of argument that you must peel away when you talk to these types really is the above. Basically, passive, innocent, pure third-worlders are not living well. This is our fault because of (imperialism/neo-colonialism/arms industry/wars/neo-liberalism/capitalism/global warming/ju ju/magic earth/resource extraction/whatever is fashionable) After all, only we have agency and everything is bad but that which is nothing, and therefore pure.

    So now we have to save them all by giving up everything/to them.

    The roots of this type of thinking are deep. I’ll generalise by saying that it afflicts any society with an inbalance between yin and yang in favour of yin. Other explanations exist, but such thinking is common throughout human history at every level from the personal to the national to the global.

    *Do I need to state that I can’t stand people taking down old monuments and dread the day when someone realises that German soldiers from WWII lie in memorialised graves in Britain. May they rest in peace. Also, the recent vandalisation of Karl Marx’s grave in London was stupid.

  3. Tyrion 2 says:
    @ThreeCranes

    You don’t start with an empty life and then desire to fill it up with meaning.

    Actually, you do. Babies are stupid, irrational tyrants with no sense of meaning at all. That is why parents invest time in raising them. I mean…duh!

  4. @Tyrion 2

    Good point. Obama was not just waging war on adult white civilization, he was pitchforking white babies too.

  5. Franz says:
    @Tyrion 2

    What race wars? I can’t actually think of any.

    The Colonial Wars (“French & Indian”) were explicitly racial conflicts. An excellent film with Spencer Tracy called Northwest Passage makes this crystal clear.

    The conquest of the Old Northwest by Anthony Wayne’s Legion of the United States was also a race war and took place when George Washington was president. The Shawnee in this case had some Brits and Canuks along to shoot Americans, but it was the Shawnee that Wayne drove from the area, pretty much for good. A small remnant remains in Ohio.

    Also in Ohio there is a monument to this war that was put there some time ago at the site of the final battle at Fallen Timbers. Might be gone now. The wife and I saw it in the early 90s. One face of the monument honors the white settlers and Wayne’s troops, the other side honors the Shawnee and their allies. Very simple and sadly imposing.

    I fully agree with your main point. But the wars against the natives in that era (pre + post independence) were race wars and they were pretty gruesome. Much of the detail you’ll find in old books and diaries, not online. No need to wonder why.

  6. I won’t bother with this flick.

    anyone who cannot specify Jews

    as prime engine of both the White birthrate-killing

    kosher Culture of Death (abortion/porn/faggotry/miscegnation/feminism)

    and open-borders globalization, i.e. shitskin-insourcing,

    is a waste of time.

    • Agree: Svigor
  7. The reason while The Partition of India lead to the slaughter of millions was because Partition was INTENTIONALLY DELAYED IN THE HOPES OF STOPPING IT.

    The same will happen here unless we get ahead of this and rationally divide the country now.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  8. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Franz

    That’s fair. Even then though, weren’t there Indians on both sides?

    (If I keep talking about this, it might become obvious that my primary source of “knowledge” is The Last of the Mohicans…)

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Svigor
  9. This documentary was less one-sided than I thought it would be. SPLC’s Potok is the worst of the worst. But, with an ugly mug like that staring at him in the mirror, perhaps it’s no wonder he hates white men. The reviewer didn’t mention Lamont Jenkins’ cancer. But, along with his morbid obesity, he may not be with us much longer anyway. Spencer joked that he thought he was dead.

    Two points I question. It seemed to me that the filmmaker deliberately sped up the speed of sad sack James Fields plowing into the crowd. In other recordings, I thought he was going much slower until he hit reverse attempting to save his life. And did he mention the unbelievably outrageous sentence that this very scared young man received? I don’t think so.

    Finally, I didn’t know that Spencer was against free speech. Does that make sense? If so, then surely he knows his mic could be the first one shut off.

  10. Hail says: • Website

    First ten minutes, Youtube authorized preview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFSJr27iwkI

    Filmmaker (b.1979), does not address his ethnocultural origin on his extensive website bio page, but has given an interview referencing “family members from India.”

    • Replies: @Reuben Kaspate
  11. Franz says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Even then though, weren’t there Indians on both sides?

    True, sometimes.

    Rule of thumb when I was in the field (late 80s/early 90s) – The French Empire wanted to convert the heathen savage to Christianity, the British Empire wanted to kill them, and the Spanish Empire was sort of 50-50. Starting with Cortez they did have local help because the Natives had lots of grudges to settle. Bad bargain for them.

    Anthony Wayne remains the Patron Saint of ethnic cleansing. The Shawnee he did not kill he ejected north westward, in the autumn of the year, burning their lodges and forcing them to flee. Most probably didn’t survive the winter. “Mad Anthony Wayne” was one of my heroes as a kid, along with one of his opposite numbers, Simon Girty. “Dirty Girty” is not as well known as Wayne because he married a Shawnee gal in Ohio and fought for her people. He was a race traitor for sure, but loyal to his adapted kin. Those were interesting times.

    Actually Last of the Mohicans started the trend of mythicize/eulogize the Noble Redman which is both bonkers and very European. FWIW, the Romans did the same. After they genocided the Carthaginians they turned them into the stuff of legend. The difference is there were no Carthaginians surviving to disagree with any of Rome’s fictions.

  12. eah says:

    From that point on, however, the tone became generally more balanced and the tide began to turn in the direction of the Alt Right.

  13. AC says:

    “Genetic determinism is a pseudo-science, like phrenology.” Really?

    The science says otherwise.
    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/social-engineering-doesnt-work-blame-the-genes/

    We may to need to take another look at phrenology, too, I guess.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  14. Wally says:
    @Franz

    said;
    “The Colonial Wars (“French & Indian”) were explicitly racial conflicts. An excellent film with Spencer Tracy called Northwest Passage makes this crystal clear.”

    A Hollywood movie is your proof. LOL

    • Replies: @Svigor
  15. Wally says:
    @Franz

    Except that in all of Peru there were never more than 190 Spaniards and they defeated the slave taking, human sacrificing Incas with ease.
    Because the other tribes all hated the genocidal Incas and gladly fought against them.

    You have no proof that the “British Empire wanted to kill them”, your reciting your received indoctrination.

    • Replies: @Franz
  16. Wally says:

    concerning Charlottesville:

    “We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally.”

    – Zionist Jew Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.

    must read: http://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-won-the-battle-of-charlottesville/

  17. I have no idea where this author is coming from, nor why he thinks he’s qualified to comment for the alt-right. Whoever the film may portray, they have little or nothing to do with the alt-right. As for my comments here, to be put into this defensive posture is bad enough (“no true Scotsman”) but nonetheless necessary, because each and every single time the execrably stupid commentariat gets it wrong. If they are not controlled opposition by the left, they certainly act like it.

    This is a topic that requires volumes, but nonetheless:
    Although there are still elements of left versus right, the major issue of our time has now coalesced into nationalism versus globalism, which the true alt-right addresses.

    The alt-right does not in any way believe in exclusive white nationalism. That is in error because of three major reasons: (1) respect for all national boundaries where the nation is essentially an extended family based on hereditary and culture; (2) whites have many different cultures as per European history, and each one is to be respected as a nation (as well as non-white nations); (3) pan-racial solidarity ignores nations each based on one culture; it cannot scale up, it is not an optimal solution to anything in the real world, and historically has failed every time it’s been tried.

    Other errors abound. Let’s get this straight once and for all: Hitler was a miserable globalist. He is not some object of adoration by anyone other than Nazi larpers, certainly not the alt-right. He and the Nazis tried to take over Europe, Russia, and North Africa, and therefore did not respect national boundaries in any way, shape, or form.

    Meanwhile, Richard Spencer is an idiot who does not represent the alt-right, regardless of what he may fantasize about. His position amongst the real alt-right is absolutely non-existent. As just one of his ridiculous positions, he supports the damned EU.

    America is not some special case in that it can extricate itself from its ethnic and demographic problems. It made too many errors over its history, which has been seized upon and exacerbated by too many internal enemies. As but one example, the Confederate South should have been left to its own devices, to rise or fall without being externally forced by a Lincoln/Caesar who destroyed the Republic anyway and set the stage for the current Top-Down Almighty State in DC. And now, too many of the country’s erstwhile white citizens (including Trump) have been brainwashed into believing in civic nationalism, otherwise known as Magic Dirt. That’s just another fantasy, a type of globalism-lite. America is a failed experiment that will probably be unable to hang together for longer than 20 more years. Whatever may be done now is too little, too late. However, white European nations still have a good chance of saving themselves. With any luck, the EU will be dissolved, and every non-European invader will be expelled.

    If you really want a platform for the alt-right, if you really want to listen and learn something, then read the following 16 points:
    Vox Popoli: What the Alternative Right Is
    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/08/what-alt-right-is.html

    Otherwise you will continue to be a fish swimming in the leftist globohomo ocean, never realizing you are all wet.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @anonymous
  18. @Tyrion 2

    The roots of this type of thinking are deep. I’ll generalise by saying that it afflicts any society with an inbalance between yin and yang in favour of yin. Other explanations exist, but such thinking is common throughout human history at every level from the personal to the national to the global

    .

    Good point, and one I hadn’t thought of in those terms.
    In Shakespeare’s plays, the female characters are strong, but actively uninterested in being men. “All’s well that ends well” shows a woman who’s so strong it’s embarrassing (but different primarily in intensity from what many real women get to do in real life).
    At times, at least in Shakespre’s plays,the men just completely fail at some critical aspect of life that the women in the play care about, and the women actually dress up as men, impersonate men, fix the problem, _and then return to being women again_. They could clearly function as men if they wanted to [1].

    Women’s minds just aren’t like men’s minds; this is evident at an early age. Girls are much more interested in establishing and maintaining social relations, men in things and completing tasks. Both are interested in social standing, but within different hierarchies.

    In the present situation, women are replacing men for reasons that are not clear [2]. This appears to be a common phase of societies that are in severe trouble. I’d suspect that this has to do with the men being (for whatever reason) unable to run society, perhaps because of excessive infighting that has put the male hierarchy into stasis (in the sense of a stalemated civil war).

    Counterinsurgency

    1] It’s worth remembering that the sufferagists were upper class women. Suffrage was apparently opposed by the majority of women, who apparently didn’t want to have to act like men.

    2] I’ve seen several apparent motivations
    * Deep social conformity (women is expected to excel at man tasks by all around her during her entire life).
    * Severe distrust of men coupled with need to have a family, resulting in an attempt to dominate.
    * Surface social conformity (woman is expected to do man’s tasks and not do women’s tasks, and consequently does nothing)
    * Attempt to participate in a bureaucratic organization that relate to social and family cohesion (which run into trouble because women do not control the organization, or even strongly influence it).
    * Simply treat an outside job as the equivalent of the very old practice making money on the side by weaving on a hand loom.
    I’d say that none of these succeed because the social and personal organization that used to be done by the woman’s hierarchy has been usurped by a male hierarchy — the permanent bureaucracy, our old acquaintance socialism.
    *

    • Replies: @El Dato
  19. Zumbuddi says:

    The civil suit brought against 24 Unite the Right ptotesters by Jewish lawyers from New York city infuriated me.

    I wanted to do something; wake up the people of Charlottesville.

    But nothing in this article and nobody who purports to lead this “movement” has anything compelling to say.

    None of them has articulated a coherent message or vision.

    To the mattresses for Richard Spencer?
    Nah.
    Not worth my time and energy.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  20. @Franz

    What Roman fiction, and elogiative fiction at that, on Carthaginians do you know of?

    • Replies: @nsa
  21. @Franz

    . But the wars against the natives in that era (pre + post independence) were race wars and they were pretty gruesome. Much of the detail you’ll find in old books and diaries, not online. No need to wonder why.

    Not exactly race wars, although one could make a case for that. Much of the trouble in the US came from the rather gruesome ways that American Indians treated what the British European settlers regarded as noncombatants. This was the way that the American Indian tribes treated each other. Apparently they were short of entertainment (serious motive there), and perhaps they didn’t have any friends who were occupying their land and wanted do discourage recidivism. In any case, treatment of noncombatants stirred up considerable resentment among the British European settlers. The French and Indian Wars had the highest casualty rate per capita off any war since fought by what became the United States, and a goodly fraction of those were what the British European settlers thought of as noncombatants.

    But this didn’t stop Christian missionaries. There were, from AD 1492 onward, serious attempts to preserve American Indians, even (perhaps especially by) the Spaniards. The French made very serious attempts at conversion, and had a much more extensive relations with American Indian tribes than did the British American settlers. These attempts, all of them, were hindered greatly by the susceptibility of the American Indians to Eurasian/African diseases [1]. A missionary could easily kill the entire tribe he was witnessing to simply by being physically present and (remember, this is pre-germ theory) have no real idea of why or how. The French traders, for example, tended to be specialists who spent almost all their time in the woods with American Indians, which would have minimized disease transport from European to American Indian areas.

    Both sides in the French and Indian Wars allied with and armed their American Indian allies. While there was considerable animus by British European settlers against American Indians, and both sides took American Indian tendency to simply kill their enemies for granted, the idea of a “race war”, meaning a war fought on a governmental level and motivated by hatred of another race, is a bit far fetched.

    There are examples, quite few, really, of “Indian Removal” by the US Federal government. These appear to be conventional wars against nations that were in the US but not part of the US Federal Government. I’m drawing an analogy with the US Civil War here. The US Federal Government was (until perhaps AD 2008) quite intolerant of non federated governmental entities in the continental United States. Remember that there were also serious attempts to annex Candada, and of course the Mexican War to gain what is now the US Southwest.

    Of course, one can cite HBD as a reason for the conflicts between British European settlers and American Indian tribes, and perhaps there is something to that. Much of our current trouble appears to be from HBD. However, there were attempts to end conflicts with American Indians by simply ignoring race. That’s what led to missionary work and the schools on reservations, both of which are roundly criticized today (and neither of which worked out very well).

    So the criticism of British European settlers (and Spanish European settlers) appears to be not for fighting racial wars, but rather for winning wars of whatever description. Winning causes suffering by the losers, and is therefore a bad thing. This shows up today in commands not to use “white privilege”, in other words, “whites” are not to win but are rather to lose. Every damned time.

    Looked at that way, such criticism is simply part of a larger attempt at genocide of the British European setters: an attempt to ensure that their descendants will never attempt to win, and will lose.

    Nice trick, and one that has been very effective.

    Counterinsurgency

  22. El Dato says:

    This will force a choice: to appropriate and redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the First World to guarantee the existence of all—or to embrace genocide. The Alt Right, he says, is paving the way for the latter solution.

    I’m ok with that if the genocide is embraced in faraway places and no neocon, concern-liberal or other hand is moving it on.

    Oh, and this logic assumes that redistribution is possible or of benefit to the receiver, goods are a constant quantity over time unrelated to manpower, capital infrastructure, resource availability or skill levels and that the people of the world are in some kind of demographic stasis instead of being a foaming multicolored mass trying to occupy and outgrow itself.

  23. geokat62 says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You can’t attribute something sinister and hidden to him for simply doing his job competently as per your own analysis!

    Care to elaborate on what you think “his job” was that he was doing so competently?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  24. anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    ‘I have no idea where this author is coming from, nor why he thinks he’s qualified to comment for the alt-right.’

    Counter currents publishing, a webzine and publishing house. His name is Dr Gregory Johnson he is the proprietor.It has been in business since 2010. Trevor Lynch is one of his pen names. I suggest you take a look at it:

    http://www.counter-currents.com

    As for his ideas his white nationalist manifesto is here:

    Approach it with an open mind it will answer your questions

  25. anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    ‘Meanwhile, Richard Spencer is an idiot who does not represent the alt-right, regardless of what he may fantasize about’

    He literally invented the term. You are what people would call alt-light or a civic nationalist. I personally cannot countenance anything but absoloute self determination for White people.

  26. Benjy says:
    @Zumbuddi

    All of those alt-right jokers like Spencer or Thompson in the UK cannot name the jew. There is only one political figure who is 100% consistent on this:

    Patrick Little shows up at White House

    Patrick Little for President 2020

  27. Sean says:

    Age of Rage ends on an apocalyptic but rather sour note with Matt Christman, some sort of Marxist podcaster, ranting about how neoliberalism will create ecological and economic disasters that will displace millions of people. This will force a choice: to appropriate and redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the First World to guarantee the existence of all—or to embrace genocide. The Alt Right, he says, is paving the way for the latter solution.

    This analysis comes out of nowhere, and frankly it seems nutty.

    It is standard geopolitics much more than it is Marxism. As I understand it, Marxism is about socio-economic classes in conflict within counties, and war between countries is secondary. What has happened to McInnes in his upscale neighborhood shows that the battle lines are basically class lines. Those with their hands on the levels of power are never going to come over to Spencer no matter now much white decline in numbers. The mainly white ruling class are happy with the white decline

    • Replies: @unpc downunder
  28. Jake says:

    “According to Jason Kessler, who is suing the city of Charlottesville over Unite the Right, Spencer had declined a police escort to the park so he and his guys could “look strong” in their entrance. If this is true, it undermines the narrative that the authorities are completely responsible for the obvious decision not to protect the rally from the antifa mob.”

    A number of people think Richard Spencer is, or very well could be, a plant, paid by the Government and/or professional Leftist groups. If you know the history of the US government using such people not merely to inform but to lead groups to make stupid moves, you will agree that Spencer’s actions before and after the Charlottesville event would be in line with that history.

    If you know anything about the history of the British paying people to lead Irish nationalist groups into things that are expected the harm them, and how those plants invariably would reveal their contempt for anything in Ireland that suggested Ireland could be part of reviving Christendom, and you know that Spencer is playing the role of part pagan and part Modernist agnostic, then you will double or triple your confidence that Spencer is serving the Devil.

    • Replies: @anastasia
    , @Svigor
  29. Jake says:
    @Franz

    “The difference is there were no Carthaginians surviving to disagree with any of Rome’s fictions.”

    Yes there were. The Romans killed or enslaved most of the rich and powerful, including the child sacrificing and homosexual prostituting priestly class. And the Romans did ruin the site of Carthage so that no city could be rebuilt on it – new Carthage was built several miles away. But Rome did not exterminate all the genetic and cultural Semites who had made and ruled Carthage, much less the Berbers who had been conquered by the Semitic child sacrificers.

    What Rome did was REQUIRE that all cultural activities – government, law, education, official public entertainment, business that was not at the lowest end, etc. – be Roman/Latinate/European (as elsewhere in the Hellenistic Empire, Greek was the. language of ‘higher education and art). Rome refused to allow any expression of Semitic language, culture, or identity. It was not just about making the conquered give up any hope to rebel. The most wise Romans realized that Semitism is inherently antithetical to Hellenism, that Semitism will morally pollute even the most militarily strong nation that culturally is Latinate/Greek/European.

  30. @Hail

    I checked:Bhala is a last name used by Hindoo and Sick Poonjabs from India… mother is most likely a Hindoo since he doesn’t wear a turban or steel bamgle worn by the Sicks!

    • Replies: @Hail
  31. Potok wants statues of his own people to replace the ones of whites and any of blacks… after all, don’t they control the country?

  32. Tyrion 2 says:
    @geokat62

    Obviously a key part of his job is understanding the reasons for racial conflict. That he grasped a big one, despite its politically incorrect implications, shows competence. It is only a single incidence but then it was the denoument of the article, so it was fair for me to point out.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  33. anastasia says:

    Spencer is CIA agent, minion, patsy, stupid ass, no doubt about it.

  34. anastasia says:
    @Jake

    You’re right. It is so obvious that anyone who follows Spencer has to have his head examined.

  35. republic says:

    Spencer and his movement was created to to discredit the
    White Nationalist movement. In other words, controlled opposition.
    Indeed alt-right was Jewish controlled from the very beginning.
    The tribe likes to control both sides.
    The rise of White nationalism is a great threat to Jewish interests,
    So they seek to infiltrate and control White nationalist groups.

  36. Svigor says:

    The idea of an ethnostate is a prescription for genocide. This is followed by information about the botched India-Pakistan partition rather than the peaceful Czech-Slovak one. We are told that one to two million people died in the India-Pakistan partition, but given the hatreds between Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs, it might have saved lives in the long run.

    Counterargument: Israel.

    We can’t differentiate between white and black people because of people who are mixed race.

    Counterargument: I literally can’t tell the difference between Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Arabs, just by looking at them.

    Genetic determinism is a pseudo-science, like phrenology.

    Counterargument: this is a straw man fallacy; nobody but disingenuous Jews and their lackeys even mentions “genetic determinism,” because nobody in the discussion is actually a genetic determinist.

    Counterargument: phrenology did nothing wrong.

    Counterargument: this from the people who hate Darwin, reject the only real science to emerge from the social sciences, and his theories and have made a cult out of the pseudo-science of climate change.

    Eugenics leads to Nazi genocide, of course.

    Counterargument: that’s slippery slope fallacy; anti-racism* leads to Soviet genocide. *Substitute any value shared by leftists and communists for a rather extensive list of variations on this theme. P.S., abortion is eugenics; has it led to Nazi genocide? (Okay, it kinda has, but that fact isn’t helping Potok any.

    People become haters because of envy for their betters, guilt which they externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty lives.

    Counterargument: that’s argumentum ad hominem fallacy.

    Counterargument: it’s true that Jews generally think of themselves as our betters, and are generally spiritually empty, attitudes they then project onto the goyim.

    This is why Jews fight so hard to control the narrative; because their arguments are shit, and without air supremacy they’re going to lose, badly.

  37. Svigor says:

    People become haters because of envy for their betters, guilt which they externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty lives.

    Counterargument: who wrote this scheisse? Guilt is just summoned into existence out of thin air via the transitive property because hate or envy, or something.

    Counterargument: meaning, Jews hate Palestinians because Palestinians are Jews’ betters, and Jews envy the Palestinians, guilt which Jews externalize by blaming others, and out of a desire to give meaning to their otherwise empty Zionistic lives.

    Correction:

    Counterargument: this from the people who hate Darwin and his theories, reject the only real science to emerge from the social sciences, and have made a cult out of the pseudo-science of climate change.

  38. Svigor says:
    @Jake

    On the other hand, pretending for the purposes of argument that Spencer is legit, the chances that Jew/leftist shills will come onto social media to call him a shill are 100%.

    Actually, that is the case, regardless of whether Spencer is legit.

    Which is why legit, competent ethnopatriots usually avoid this topic, unless they have hard evidence to present, which none of you has.

  39. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Either way, in my experience, there is certainly deep spiritual meaning to be found in ethnopatriotism.

  40. Svigor says:
    @Franz

    Only in the sense that there was more than one race participating. In many, if not most cases, it was white man + red man vs. white man + red man. It was more a tribal/national conflict than a racial one, throughout. Of course, at the very end it took on starker racial overtones.

    P.S., Lol @ “A Hollywood film ‘makes this clear.’”

  41. Svigor says:
    @Wally

    Yeah, that was pretty explicitly caved-in-head.

  42. Svigor says:
    @Franz

    Probably for the best, given the mountains of baby skulls the Carthaginians left behind.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    , @peterAUS
  43. @Afterthought

    As Mountbatten, as Viceroy , was criticised for the breakneck speed with which he effected Partition, I would be interested to know how you might elaborate and justify your charge that Partition was deliberately delayed. By whom? Who are you thinking of as wanting to stop it who might have thought they had the power to influence the outcome? Gandhi of course was anti Partition.

    • Replies: @Sean
  44. Hail says: • Website
    @Reuben Kaspate

    From an interview circa Jan. 2017:

    Motherboard: Do you think electing Trump is moving toward the direction you want?

    Wilson: Maybe. No. The sad thing about Trump is that everybody is secretly really relieved he got elected, of the people I know—the professional left and academic left.

    Motherboard: Adam, are you relieved?

    Bhala Lough: Am I relieved Trump got elected? Oh, hell no.

    Wilson: Dude, it puts the left back into its proper orientation.

    Bhala Lough: I can’t. My mom is an immigrant, my whole half of my family is from India. A lot of them are here.

    Wilson is Cody Wilson, the subject of one of Bhala Lough’s documentaries.

    In a 2013 blog post, Bhala Lough describes an extended visit to India in college days; his writing makes it sound like it was a relatively regular thing for him to go on extended visits to India.

    I didn’t hear from him until that Christmas [from context, either Xmas 1998 or 1999], when I was traveling in India, along with Ben [Rekhi, NYU classmate] and Jesse [Nicely]. Ben and I both had family in Bombay: Ben was staying in the ridiculously lavish Oberoi hotel on the waterfront, while I stayed with my aunt and uncle and two cousins in an apartment complex fifteen minutes away by foot. Every afternoon, I would walk over, passing the outdoor marketplaces steaming with Mumbai street food and a never-ending sea of beggars to check my email in the Oberoi’s upscale corporate lounge

    Here is a Dec. 2011 blog post describing his mother’s family:

    This is why India is taking over: I ask my mom to translate something in Hindi for a screenplay I’m writing and within the hour her, my aunt, my uncle and my college student cousin have it done & prepared an email with lengthy footnotes and alternative suggestions.

  45. @Tyrion 2

    To accept premises literally is a sign of autism.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  46. republic says:

    Which is why legit, competent ethnopatriots usually avoid this topic, unless they have hard evidence to present, which none of you has.

    lots of evidence if one does a bit of research

  47. Sean says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Hindus opposed partition. Lord Curzon’s 1905 partition of Bengal caused an almost nation wide protest movement of Hindus.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  48. nsa says:
    @atlantis_dweller

    Carthago delenda est meant exactly that……it ceased to exist in fact and in the human mind. Proof: The Twelve Caesars by Suetonius, possibly the finest history ever written, mentions Carthage not even once.

  49. Asagirian says: • Website

    If Trump is literally Hitler, then Israel(the nation he loves) must be literally Fascist Italy and Iran(the nation he hates) must be literally Poland.

  50. Liza says:

    In the present situation, women are replacing men for reasons that are not clear

    Though men are weakening terribly, I still don’t see a lot of women designing and building just about everything that assholish feminists (and women in general) want and need, but have no gratitude for, and never ask themselves how these goodies came into existence; and doing all heavy labor in virtually all categories. The only physical labor unique to women is pushing a baby out – and lots of them can’t even do that anymore, a growing number of women who bother having children seem to like scheduling caesarean sections as it takes no work on their part. Yet birthing a child normally in accordance with nature’s laws is the only true rite of passage for females. That, along with nursing the child and caring for it.

    Without the standard-issue comforts and needs (roof over head/food/clothing) nothing else happens or matters. And like it or not, we need men for those basics.

    I’m not sucking up to men here; they have their flaws, the main one being they are the ones who encourage women to think they are “strong” – yes, strong as in sitting in cubicles in front of a screen for Big Corporation, thinking they can rule the world (while other women take care of their children). Boys, you let this happen, you made it happen. Pray for a collapse; that is the only thing that will set things right.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  51. peterAUS says:
    @anonymous

    You are what people would call alt-light or a civic nationalist.

    Yep.
    Dead end.

  52. peterAUS says:
    @Svigor

    Good comments so far.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  53. peterAUS says:
    @Svigor

    There IS one thing re “ethnostate” which is, still, not well defined.
    Europe vs “colonies”.

    I guess that the problem of “white self-determination” can’t be addressed the same way in both places.

    That’s the major issue, IMHO, re the idea.

    For Europeans, I feel that “nationalism” vs “globalism” is the key. Or, the Nation.

    For “colonies” , simply Israeli approach.
    Hehe….should the “migrant” thing continue, that can work even in Europe.

    That’s for an idea.

    Implementation is The Problem. The whites in “colonies” simply aren’t ready for it.
    Will they be ready in time is the Question.

    Hope it makes sense to you and a couple of guys around. Simply not keen to …ahm…debate that with, I’d say…..90 % of people here.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  54. Asagirian says: • Website

    Jewish Power will say, blah blah blah, we have most to fear from White Supremacism, but what the world should really fear is White Cuckremacism. The main problem is not that proud whites resist Jewish globo-homo supremacism but that they cuck to it. If whites could emancipate/liberate themselves from Jewish-Zionist globo-homo supremacist hegemonism, they would NOT be participating in these Wars for Israel, belligerence toward Russia & Iran, and Zionist tyranny over Palestinians in West Bank. The world would be nicer and safer.

    Look at the Iraq War. It was the result of White Cuckremacism to Jewish Supremacism. Cuckremacists don’t just bow down to another group BUT support and further its supremacist ambitions. Because Jewish Power is now in supremacist mode and because white folks submissively serve it, what the world fears most is White Cuckremacism.
    Indeed, even white supremacism would be less dangerous than white cuckremacism because it would at least push against Jewish supremacism. If white supremacism and Jewish supremacism duke it out, he rest of the world has less to worry about. There would be more balance in the world. The real problem for the world is that White Cuckremacists play obedient dogs to Jewish Supremacists. The combined power of Jewish supremacism and White cuckremacism have done so much harm to the world.

    By the way, if SPLC and ADL are such civil rights groups committed to equality, why don’t they EVER admonish white people for favoring Zionist imperialists over Palestinian victims? Why don’t they EVER pressure whites to be equally fair to both Jews/Israel and Palestinians/West Bank? So much for commitment to equality and justice.

  55. J1234 says:

    Age of Rage ends on an apocalyptic but rather sour note with Matt Christman, some sort of Marxist podcaster, ranting about how neoliberalism will create ecological and economic disasters that will displace millions of people. This will force a choice: to appropriate and redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the First World to guarantee the existence of all—or to embrace genocide. The Alt Right, he says, is paving the way for the latter solution.

    This analysis comes out of nowhere, and frankly it seems nutty.

    I’ll wait to see the movie (free, so as not to financially support cultural marxism) before judging this reviewer’s assessment, but I’m guessing the the analysis didn’t exactly “come out of nowhere.” The title of the movie, Alt Right, Age of Rage might provide some clues as to where the film comes from. Many people are willing to be a part of these leftist film projects that are intended to destroy them because a) they are promised by the film maker/broadcaster that the portrayal will be even handed…and b) they have an overly high opinion of the verbal and argumentative presentation and skills.

    Sorry, Richard Spencer just isn’t as bright as he would like people to believe. Some people would call me a white advocate. Nevertheless, he’s the last person I would follow in order to better the prospects of people of European descent. I have nothing against him personally – I’ve never met him, but I’ve listened to his presentations a fair bit. I agree with many /most of his criticisms of modern society, but few of his proposed solutions.

    He’s afflicted with “small thinking” syndrome. Specifically, he’s unable unable to deal with the possibility that the white utopia he would engineer might have some fatal flaws. (Engineered societies fail…no exceptions.) I wouldn’t be that impressed with what he might say at an Amren conference, so how could he fair any better in a leftist propaganda film?

    Maybe the film maker allowed him to give his entire liturgy without editing, and the reviewer is so enthralled with that liturgy that he isn’t properly scrutinizing it. Or maybe Richard’s black “ebonics” opponent was to dumb to provide any real opposition. I don’t know. Like I said, I’ll watch the movie to find out. It could be that Richard is speaking more rationally now and the reviewer is correct in his assessment. There are just some red flags for me at this point.

  56. @nsa

    Carthago delenda est meant exactly that……it ceased to exist in fact and in the human mind. Proof: The Twelve Caesars by Suetonius, possibly the finest history ever written, mentions Carthage not even once.

    The original Carthage was destroyed by the Romans to prevent any more Punic Wars. But they then rebuilt Carthage on a nearby, but different, site and it became one of the leading Roman cities in North Africa.

    Suetonius was concerned with the history of corrupt and tyrannical emperors, not an overview of the empire.

    • Replies: @nsa
  57. peterAUS says:

    Oh, B.T.W. the movie is, obviusly, agenda driven.

    Look at the cover. The message there for “chattering classes” (the movie is made for).

    And, the best, if only.

    The current “alt-right” is anything but that picture. With a good reason, of course.
    90 % of people who aren’t happy with the “globo-homo” agenda are those who wouldn’t break a sweat, let alone risk own bloody nose for what they, ahm, “believe” in. Not important, though.

    What is important is that 10 % who wouldn’t mind to get into action as in the picture know so well that the full force of state response will crash on them. More importantly, those 90 % from the paragraph above would support that.
    At least for now.

    • Replies: @Hail
  58. Maybe I don’t know enough about him. Based on a few glimpses, I think Matt Heimbach has the capacity to evolve into an articulate spokesman for Ethnic rights.

    I think the scrapes he’s gotten into can be marked to immaturity, and the (obvious) set-up between him and his mother-in-law, with the connivance of father in law, suggests that SPLC knew he had some charisma and had to take him down.

    I’d like to see him grow up and grow into a position of leadership.

  59. Jenkins is a black man with a large chocolate chip on his shoulder. He speaks ebonic English (“dat,” “dere,” “gone” as a verb) with great dignity and conviction but little by way of argument.

    Someones never been to southern Appalachia. Cajuns have been known for talking like this also. Not ebonics. Just typical southern drawl. What moron writes this stuff?

    Anyone that still hasn’t figured out this divide and rule game by now is just a useful idiot and will probably never learn, or they are part of it themselves.
    The whole alt-right and alt-left thing is just “deep state” orchestrated shenanigans.
    Another Hollywood/CIA production.

    R Reagan was a greater enemy to the white race than any average black or muslim will ever be. Same with Bill Clinton, Bush. obama was no different, but he was just as bad for the black race as whites, perhaps worse. The same things destroying white communities is destroying black communities. Wake up folks. The enemy is in DC and on Wall St, not your neighbors….

    White greed/capitalism brought the blacks here, brought all the other races here, capitalism is causing your misery today, white people aren’t having more children because they can’t afford to. Rich capitalists need to import cheap labor. Capitalist wars helped created the refugee influx into Europe. Same thing in Latin America, read Smedley Butler. Same as it ever was. Capitalism is a system motivated only by PROFITS, whatever it takes, it doesn’t care about your race, culture, country, or family, only MORE PROFIT. If it takes wars, so be it, if it takes mass immigration, so be it.

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/migrant-crisis-syria-war-fueled-by-competing-gas-pipelines/209294/

    This alt right phenomenon is clearly being pushed by the Israelis/Zionists as well, They’re an apartheid state, so they want to have counterparts in the US so they don’t feel so lonely in the world, it lets them point the finger and say, “look white Americans are just like us, we’re not so bad” same with Trumps wall, just another Israeli psyop.

    Yall keep fighting with the other slaves though, Trump, Kushner, Pelosi, Adelson and Soros all get a good laugh watching you idiots bash each other skulls in. They win without lifting a finger.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  60. @Sean

    Also, Marxism is a modernist/production orientated ideology which clashes with post-modern ideas like putting the environment first. Classic Marxists (like the Russian communists) wouldn’t be too happy about forcing the provincial working class to pay green taxes to support the “low carbon” lifestyles of non-productive urban yuppies.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Sean
  61. Does anyone feel that we are offered all these red herrings, identity politics, BLM, alt-right, alt-left, LGBT, etc., to distract us from what is really happening? The US is going, as our Mexican friends say, abajo in every way, while we debate here totally irrelevant things. Just an example: roads. They used to be fairly good even five years ago. Now there are potholes everywhere, on regular roads, on ramps, on highways, and nobody is fixing them. Apparently all resources went to endless senseless wars to enrich MIC. The same is true of healthcare, science, and the rest of it. Just this year’s increase in already humongous Pentagon budget was greater than the funding for NIH and NSF put together. Meanwhile all most people do is read MSM “news” about aliens or Hollywood sluts, while all “intellectuals” do is blah-blah-blah on alternative media. We are being robbed blind, and that’s important, the rest isn’t.

    • Agree: densa
  62. @Sean

    I was aware of Curzon as Viceroy but not of that partition. In another life I shall follow up and write a thesis on “Curzon and Famine in Bengal”.

  63. Agent76 says:

    Jan 20, 2017 Obama: A Legacy of Ashes

    Obama’s legacy is measured in ashes. From wars of aggression to a police state on steroids, banking bailouts and Obamacare, Obama has been the perfect captain to carry the New World Order football further down the field.

    2/18/2011 Progressive Chaos: Top-Down Bottom-Up, Inside-Out!

    After the chaos and unrest in Europe, then in the Middle East, just as Glenn Beck predicted, the TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM UP and INSIDE OUT strategy talked about by Van Jones is coming to pass.

  64. Agent76 says:

    Feb 23, 2019 UCLA Students Support Concentration Camps for Trump Supporters

    Kaitlin Bennett went undercover at UCLA to ask students to sign a petition to throw conservatives into involuntary re-education camps.

  65. Hail says: • Website
    @peterAUS

    Look at the cover

    Good point. This is the picture of a left-wing radical, not a mid-2010s Alt Right’er.

    Speaking of which, is there an Antifa documentary?

  66. @redmudhooch

    White greed…

    We’d be without electricity, factories, automobiles, medicine, heat without it.

    Ford was greedy, Edison was greedy, every inventor on earth wanted money.

    As for Spencer, he needed a DNA test to find out his ancestry. He stands around in public spouting about a white homeland, which will never ever happen. When whites abandon the cities they built entirely, they will collapse and Mestizos and blacks will then follow them into the rural hinterlands.

    Eventually in America, there will be nowhere further for anyone to move to. The 1% will move to Sydney or NZ legally. They will feel no more interest in America, having skimmed off the cream of productivity. They will simply by a nice house in NZ and uncork a bottle of wine. Middle-class and blue-collar American whites trapped in the US with huge populations of Mestizos and blacks will be like Boer bus drivers in South Africa in refugee camps.

    • Replies: @republic
  67. Organon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Your straw man about so called haters is meaningless. It’s a good indicator whenever someone uses the gambit of “your criticism is a function of envy for those superior x y z” that the person is probably trying to undermine rational discussion, or has been afflicted by the catch-all psychoanalysis themselves. You can work that gambit into almost any angle or critique. Therefore, it’s irrelevant to the discussion.

    Second, the notion that “eugenics” is a function of “hate” is also false. Your implicit assumptions are fraught with errors.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  68. @Franz

    Apropos of “Colonial Wars”, you forgot to include what is still considered per capita the bloodiest war in the history of North America (north of the Rio Grande at least), namely King Phillip’s War of 1675-78 New England which decimated almost half of the native population in that area.

  69. Organon says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Questionable, if not outright false, as traits are quite heritable, which has been proven. Some children act more rationally than others.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  70. nsa says:
    @Missing Persons Bodyguard

    As you know, following the annihilation of the Roman army at the Battle of Cannae, Hannibal thought he could just offer generous terms, settle up, and retreat as the victor. He knew little of the Roman character. Romans never quit and never conceded defeat, but they also refused to confront Hannibal and his army head on. Instead the Romans followed Hannibal around the Roman countryside for ten years as he pillaged, looted, and raped (still lots of frizzie hair in southern Italy). Hannibal even approached the Gates of Rome and challenged his enemy to come out and fight. The Romans sensibly declined, but also never quit and never settled up. Eventually, Hannibal and his army went home and that is when the Romans plotted out the final act of the Punic Wars.
    Compare the spirit of the Romans as they ruled their splendid empire to the American Zios and their pathetic globohomo operation. Can anyone imagine the Romans cucking out and allowing a small but wealthy devious cock cutting cult rule over them? The jooies tried it and got plastered….including the destruction of Jerusalem and its crappy jooie temple. By comparison, the servile Americans actually welcome and embrace jooie domination…..it’s as cowardly as it is inexplicable.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  71. Crimson2 says:

    No, the white supremacists do not come across well at all. No one likes you. Even Trump–a pompous, racist fool–won’t defend you. You’ve already lost. The only question is whether the alt right will fade away or whether they will commit suicide by cop. I’d bet most just fade away angrily, but some will try to martyr themselves in various stupid acts of futility.

  72. Anonymous[846] • Disclaimer says:

    The alt-right isn’t “over.”
    The dissident-right is just getting started.
    So many great voices;
    KMAC, Enoch, Spencer, Parrot, Ramzpaul, Vince James, James Edwards, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Josh Neal, David Duke, Don Black, Patrick Slattery, Mark Dankoff, Owen Benjamin, E. Micheal Jones, TDS/TRS, Heel Turn, No White Guilt, No Apologies, Stefan Molyneux, Brittany Pettibone, Lana and Heinrich at Red Ice, Styx, Jim Goad, etc.etc.etc.
    It seems like there are new voices popping up everyday, and they are all dedicated and bright.
    All of the brightest people are on the far right.
    The left has AOC…..we have Erik Striker and Greg Johnson.

    And the other thing we have is TRUTH.

    White people are being screwed over worse than any other group in history. The nations that we founded and built are being stolen from us by a hostile tribe that is motivated by nothing more than SPITE.

    Our numbers grow daily…..eventually it will be like someone turned on the lights…..

  73. In what parallel universe is the India Pakistan partition an ethnic one? The riots were almost entirely confined to one province – Punjab – which was divided between India and Pakistan. (There were only two provinces that were divided. The other was Bengal, which had already been divided in 1905-1911 and was simply redivided along those lines, with comparatively little bloodshed.) The people in Punjab doing the killing were ethnic Punjabis on both sides. How was that partition an “ethnic” affair? As for the Czech-Slovak “velvet divorce”, when did that occur? Only after both had been consumed by the EU. They were no longer independent states. Compare that with the fragmentation of Yugoslavia.

    • Replies: @fnn
  74. @Anonymous

    “The nations that we stole by genocide from the natives/enriched by attacking, colonising, and looting other countries are under threat from the inevitable passage of history. ”

    Fixed that for you.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  75. Svigor says:
    @peterAUS

    Thx dad (the “so far” was classic dad. I approve, btw 🙂 ).

  76. Svigor says:
    @peterAUS

    No, it doesn’t make sense, but I do acknowledge that 1 you have an inherent point in that all ID politics are local and 2 I dunno, but intuition tells me you may back into a point if you reformulate.

    And, of course, debating this stuff with at least 90% of the people here is pointless.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  77. peterAUS says:
    @Anonymous

    The alt-right isn’t “over.”
    The dissident-right is just getting started.
    So many great voices;
    KMAC, Enoch, Spencer, Parrot, Ramzpaul, Vince James, James Edwards, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Josh Neal, David Duke, Don Black, Patrick Slattery, Mark Dankoff, Owen Benjamin, E. Micheal Jones, TDS/TRS, Heel Turn, No White Guilt, No Apologies, Stefan Molyneux, Brittany Pettibone, Lana and Heinrich at Red Ice, Styx, Jim Goad, etc.etc.etc.
    It seems like there are new voices popping up everyday, and they are all dedicated and bright.

    Yep.

    Our numbers grow daily…..eventually it will be like someone turned on the lights…..

    Hopefully.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  78. Svigor says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    I too ignore Jews

    Life is too short for that shit

    The Jews can’t be trusted

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  79. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Franz failed to mention
    “Mohicans” were invention.
    ‘Cause whites knew what real Injuns were.

  80. Svigor says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    You can only admit YOUR guilt. Which you have. To receiving stolen goods.

    Leave America now, thief.

  81. Svigor says:
    @nsa

    Based Titus!!!

    Hail )))Titus((( !!!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_of_Titus

    All Hail the Next Coming of )))Titus(((!!!

  82. Svigor says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    On a more serious note, this is an obvious lie.

    The Amerinds lived by the right of conquest. For thousands of years, whoever conquered it, owned it, fair and square.

    Ergo, when the huwhite man took it, it thereafter belonged to the white man, fair and square, according to the law of the red man.

    Suck it, leftist scum (P.S., the foregoing excludes leftists, who have expressly excluded themselves from this, the posterity of the huwhite man. Vacate the premises now, leftists; you have no claim. Pray that Venezuela takes you in.).

  83. Franz says:
    @Wally

    You have no proof that the “British Empire wanted to kill them”

    History is sorta like proof.

    When some “native Canadians” got uppity in the 70s, the original Trudeau, Pierre Elliot, made the then-famous crack “We cannot repeal history” about the white conquests.

    Which is true.

    From Jefferson to Lincoln and from Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan, plenty of people of all types have noted two subspecies cannot inhabit the same territory and survive peacefully. The territorial exclusion principle is hard science.

    The British Empire had no official policy, but happened on the ground cannot, as Pierre noted, be repealed. The French pissed around too much and lost their New World empire. Not the other guys. At least not at first.

    One great story from Anthony Wayne’s conquest always stuck with me. After a massacre of American soldiers prior to Wayne’s involvement, the Shawnee shoved a mouthful of Ohio soil into each dead American mouth. “They wanted the ground,” the Shawnee said, “They got some.”

    Modern men miss simple points like that. Those were interesting times. Men knew the point.

  84. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Organon

    Second, the notion that “eugenics” is a function of “hate” is also false. Your implicit assumptions are fraught with errors.

    That’s a pretentious way of simply telling me that I’m wrong. Perhaps next time you’ll not vomit out your thesaurus and instead reply to what I actually wrote! Here’s a hint: the opposite of what you said I did…

    Your straw man

    Lol.

    Your entire post is a series of strawmen. Not that you seem to have an understanding of what that means.

    I am replying to specific points in the article, not written by you! You cannot just take up a conversation that you have in your head, imagine that instead I am replying to your internal monologue, and then say that I am mischaracterising your argument!

    That is crazy. Think about it.

    about so called haters is meaningless. It’s a good indicator whenever someone uses the gambit of “your criticism is a function of envy for those superior x y z” that the person is probably trying to undermine rational discussion, or has been afflicted by the catch-all psychoanalysis themselves. You can work that gambit into almost any angle or critique. Therefore, it’s irrelevant to the discussion.

    I was replying to a point brought up in the article.

    It implied a rejection of the observation that a lot of radical politics are the result of personal turmoil.

    By saying that they actually often are, I was not disputing the value of those politics – of course, one can arrive at truth through less than intellectually virtuous means (a broken clock…) I was instead making an observation that I believe to be factual. Indeed, I don’t really see how anyone can be so blind as to deny it.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  85. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Organon

    Have you ever looked after a baby?

  86. Tyrion 2 says:
    @ploni almoni

    Yes, I did myself a disservice when I took his histrionic gobbledegook seriously…

  87. fnn says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    The Velvet Divorce took place in 1993. Czechia and Slovakia became EU members in 2004.

  88. republic says:
    @jeff stryker

    Actually the demographics of Australia and New Zealand are rapidly changing against the white population.

  89. Zumbuddi says:
    @Anonymous

    Useful list.
    Thanks.
    Now — to get them together in a well-designed, broadly broadcast conference, and ensure that ADL does not sabotage it.

  90. @peterAUS

    But may it not be too late when enough whites wake up? I’m not sure I believe the statistics on racial makeup in many countries, and it’s rapidly changing anyway. Whites may become a minority in some countries before anyone tells them so, and then it’ll just be a done deal.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  91. peterAUS says:
    @Svigor

    …it doesn’t make sense…

    You appear to be an American. Your problem are the “other” there. They are people of color, first and foremost.
    For you, as White American, the main problem are the Blacks.
    You want to live in a place of your own. White ethnostate is the thing.
    Israeli approach.

    For a European it does not work that way. His problem are the “other” there too. They are NOT people of color, first and foremost. They are other Whites, defined by their nationality.
    For a, say…..Serb, the main problem are the Croats. And vice versa, of course, perhaps even more so.Let’s not get there, although I am sure some people around would just love to.
    Irish/English. French/German. Polish, Estonian, Letonian etc/Russian. LONG list.
    He wants to live in a place of his own. Nation state is the thing.
    Serb/Croat approach in wars in 90’s. Ukrainian/Russian approach as we speak.

    Bottom line, you’ll NEVER get an European to go for a White ethnostate there. Eastern European in particular.Yes, it would be nice, etc, but I don’t even want to talk about it.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Commentator Mike
  92. peterAUS says:
    @Commentator Mike

    But may it not be too late when enough whites wake up?

    Quite possible.
    Or, too late for a, say, more comfortable, for Whites that is, solution.

    Whites may become a minority in some countries before anyone tells them so, and then it’ll just be a done deal.

    Possible, of course.
    Not sure for “done deal” though. It could “just” make a fight (much) harder.

    Simple principle of combat. The Enemy. If we battle tomorow we”ll have advantage in men and material. Day after it will be equal. Two days after they’ll have advantage in men and material. Three days…and their advantage will be overwhelming.
    So, tomorrow we’ll win with ease and minimal casualties. We could even win in three days too, but it will be bloody costly.

    Hehe….history is full of examples when a huge mistake was made in that regard.
    Whites appear to be making the same.
    We’ll see……

  93. Wally says:
    @peterAUS

    said:
    “Bottom line, you’ll NEVER get an European to go for a White ethnostate there. Eastern European in particular.Yes, it would be nice, etc, but I don’t even want to talk about it.”

    Hungary’s & Poland’s strong resistance to dumb immigrants rather refute that.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  94. peterAUS says:
    @Wally

    Hungary’s & Poland’s strong resistance to dumb immigrants rather refute that.

    Man, you are really thick. If you were/are a librarian that is a good thing, but……..

    Here is a thought for you (please, take your time, don’t overheat the brain): imagine a White European ethnostate made of Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia and Austria. All white, all Catholic.
    Oh my……..

    Now, take a short break.Please.

    Back? Ready?
    Good.

    Now, imagine an American White ethnostate made of, say: Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.
    Not so hard now I guess.

    All good?
    No headaches, heart palpitations, cold sweat?
    Nice. I guess.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  95. @peterAUS

    What you mention about Europe is correct but things are changing rapidly with the everincreasing influx of the immigrants. Sure everyone, among white nationalists I mean, wants their ethnostate and the whites in Eastern Europe still have them. For now at least.

    The problem is that the weak economies in Eastern Europe and Balkans, and also in Southern Europe too, are pushing people to emigrate west and north, and combined with the decreasing reproduction rates, these countries are depopulating rapidly. Some politicians see bringing in Asian and Africans as a solution, and obviously the EU is pushing to replace whites thoughout Europe.

    And all this bickering and petty hates between Europeans of different nationalities may make them lose sight of the real danger they face of being swamped by coloureds. It’s all really a very nasty business, and it is part of a bigger plan. Eastern Europeans, Balkaners and South Europeans emigrating and leaving empty space in their own countries for non-Europeans to invade. Orban seems to be resisting and hopefully he gets support from others. Everyone needs their Orban right now if they’re to survive as nations.

    It’s hard to be optimistic when you see how very few countries refused to sign this latest UN Marrakesh agreement. And all those that did telling their people that it’s not really that important as it’s non-binding. Then why bother even have that meeting or sign anything?

    And the globalist propaganda of race replacement is so strong that even many whites who are not too happy about it still go along as they see no other solution to their demographic decline and depopulation.

    And the European Union is the greatest anti-European force there is. If it was true to its name and by and for Europeans and their interests then nobody would have a problem with the EU.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  96. @peterAUS

    The EU is actually supposed to be what you mention, one giant ethno state for Europeans, a sort of US of Europe. Most European people are quite content to be in it, but as it stands it’s not quite to the liking of politicians. They want it to be even more like USA, a meltng pot for even non-European races, and in everincreasing numbers too. And it is this that is now making some people, such as the British, unhappy with the EU.

    But it really makes no difference, as long as the same kind of politicians remain in power, whether a country leaves or remains in the EU. Those ruling the UK espouse the globalist ideology anyway. Of course reforming the EU to truly represent the interests of Europeans only would be ideal but as I don’t see any major steps being taken in that direction it’s best to beak it into pieces.

  97. peterAUS says:
    @Commentator Mike

    …things are changing rapidly with the ever increasing influx of the immigrants

    Yep.

    The problem is that the weak economies in Eastern Europe and Balkans, and also in Southern Europe too, are pushing people to emigrate west and north, and combined with the decreasing reproduction rates, these countries are depopulating rapidly. Some politicians see bringing in Asian and Africans as a solution….

    Correct.

    And all this bickering and petty hates between Europeans of different nationalities may make them lose sight of the real danger they face of being swamped by coloureds.

    Something like that.

    Eastern Europeans, Balkaners and South Europeans emigrating and leaving empty space in their own countries for non-Europeans to invade.

    Yep.
    They fought nasty and bloody wars in 90’s to get their nation states. A lot of death and destruction; their own and of the “other”.
    You American? Here is a secret for you: A Croat will gladly accept a Nigerian “migrant” over a Serbian refugee from “Republic of Krajina”/whatever. Make of that what you will.

    And the globalist propaganda of race replacement is so strong that even many whites who are not too happy about it still go along as they see no other solution to their demographic decline and depopulation.

    Hahaha…yeah.That’s funny. “See no solution”………..
    Tell you what. You promise whites in Balkans that no outside help would come, as the last time, and in less than 2 months there won’t be any “migrant” there.
    YOU are the problem. I mean, not you personally, but you know….your air power, standoff weaponry, special forces, full mechanized task forces ready to “jump”, the works. As the last time.
    You think Serbs would’ve caved over Kosovo if “your” air power had stopped? More importantly, MUCH more, some other “white” nations were quite ready and willing to assist, even join, Western ground forces had they decided to escalate. Meaning, instead of Albanian cannon fodder they got into the fray.
    So, Serbs would’ve had not only Albanian moving targets. It would’ve been full Western task force (the same which smoothly replaced Serb forces in Kosovo…), PLUS, Serb “white brother” nations.From all over the place.

    Hehe…something like ’41. Or ’15.

    History. Nobody reads it anymore.

    Well, in West and USA in particular, that is.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  98. anonymous[209] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    ‘It implied a rejection of the observation that a lot of radical politics are the result of personal turmoil.’

    The only personal turmoil here is yours. Stop pathologising the White desire not to be parasitised by Jews. The fact that you have to insult people and insinuate they have mental/emotional issues rather than debating thier ideas shows you are arguing in bad faith.

    You are a Jewish ethnic chauvanist/apologist and not a very good one.

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  99. @anonymous

    Your reading comprehension is stunted. I specifically excoriated civic nationalism in my comment. And your history is flawed: Spencer didn’t invent the term, he simply took the already-in-extent ‘alternative Right’ and shortened it. Furthermore, playing such word games in no way qualifies anyone as an expert.

    Pan-whiteness is an incredibly stupid idea. Pan-racial solidarity ignores nations; it cannot scale up, it’s not an optimal solution to anything in the real world, and historically it has failed every time it’s been tried. It is just another form of globalism. Each culture in Europe should stand and be supported as its own viable nation. If separate European cultures devise temporary alliance, then more power to them.

    You are obviously a Spencer fanboy, which means that you and your fuhrer are headed nowhere.
    Good luck with all that.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  100. peterAUS says:

    My 2 cents:

    Pan-whiteness is an incredibly stupid idea.

    Depends how one defines it.

    Pan-racial solidarity ignores nations; it cannot scale up, it’s not an optimal solution to anything in the real world, and historically it has failed every time it’s been tried. It is just another form of globalism.

    Something like that, if applied globally.

    In “colonies” it is a must. Especially in USA. All whites together, no matter what “country of origin” he/she came from. Italian, English, German, Portuguese, Russian….all together. Because that’s how the “other” see them.
    We don’t see Blacks being divided what tribe (not even a country/nation) they came from. All together against the “honkey”.
    Hehe…this is funny.
    I mean, Aryan Übermensch apparently can’t get what a Negro can, with ease. Oh my………

    In Europe, of course not.

    Each culture in Europe should stand and be supported as its own viable nation. If separate European cultures devise temporary alliance, then more power to them.

    Pretty much.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  101. peterAUS says:
    @peterAUS

    To expand on the concept of

    Aryan Übermensch apparently can’t get what a Negro can, with ease

    Whites in USA operate as “English”, “Scott”……”German”, “Italian”, “French”……”Pollack”, “Estonian”….you get the drift.
    The last time those fought among themselves was, what, around 70 years ago?
    That’s for Aryans.

    Now, for the Negroes, the tribes/African states have been fighting all the time. Doing it as we speak.
    And yet, when against the “honkey”, together, hands down.

    One could start to wonder……..about that Übermensch thing. I mean, simple common sense appears to be be lacking there.

    Jokes aside, we do know the reason.
    Won’t be easy to fix that.

  102. Sean says:
    @unpc downunder

    It’s a Humanist (for want of a better term) take on geopolitics. Elections are won by espousing Humanism and promising to transcend the calculus of geopolitical realism in which extermination is supposedly logical. Once in power, the B52s get used, but only a bit.

    Exterminating the Third World populations is most unlikely to be be the logical outcome of the West ignoring the worst climate change expectations, and those fears coming true as a result. It’s probably just not true that human beings would ignore something like that and no technological progress will be made for long enough for it to become unstoppable. Anything like the current rate of progress is going to supply a means to know if climate change needed to be reversed and to geo-engineer it in timely fashion. I think human beings will most likely be 100% extinct a century hence, though due to a intentional AIpocalypse.

  103. Sean says:
    @unpc downunder

    It’s a Humanist (for want of a better term) take on geopolitics. Elections are won by espousing Humanism and promising to transcend the calculus of geopolitical realism in which extermination is supposedly logical. Once in power, the B52s do get used, but only a bit because there are always more elections.

    Exterminating the Third World populations is most unlikely to be be the logical outcome of the West ignoring the worst climate change expectations, and those fears coming true as a result. It’s probably just not true that human beings would ignore something like that and no technological progress will be made for long enough for it to become unstoppable. Anything like the current rate of progress is going to supply a means to know if climate change needed to be reversed and to geo-engineer it in timely fashion. I do, however, think human beings will most likely be 100% extinct a century hence, having been long exterminated in an intentional AIpocalypse by something smart enough to fail the Turing test. It could only work if it came as a complete surprise, so we will not even know it is there.

  104. Gyre07 says:

    “No longer available on Amazon.” Bezos the Magnificent moonlighting as a SJ censor? You be the judge.

  105. @peterAUS

    I’m European but have done a lot of travelling. The problem with the narrow nationalisms is that they have contributed, or been used, to fight the various wars of the past century, including the world wars, and that has also contributed majorly to white demographic decline. Perhaps a more general white nationalism is necessay in the face of the existential threat facing the whites. It’s good to see that there are at least political forces expressing concerns about such matters, like the nationalist parties in Europe, but to what extent they’ll implement nation and race saving policies if and when they get elected, or if they’re just a vehicle for narcissitic, egotistic politicians to get into power, remains to be seen.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  106. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You should click on his website. It couldn’t be more like a serial killer’s basement wall if he tried…

  107. @Liza

    Boys, you let this happen, you made it happen.

    Not me Miss! It was them other boys. I was just a kid at the time.
    The ones who, having only daughters due to their families being “sustainably” small, decided to encourage those girls to be 3rd-rate men as a susbstitute for having actual sons.
    All I’ve got is dealing with the (bone-idle, spoiled, entitled, noisy, swollen-headed) consequences of that.

    • Replies: @Liza
  108. Anon[559] • Disclaimer says:

    Here we go again.

    http://skandinaviskfrihet.se/after-the-scandal-it-is-time-to-end-the-gay-network/

    Johnson may be deviant in private life, but he has mostly kept it to himself. I don’t know to what extent he is lying or passing rumors he heard from others. One thing for sure, it wasn’t smart for Alt Right to hit Johnson & crew before Charlottesville. Bad time to divide.

    The fact is radical movements tend to attract eccentrics and weirdos. Most normies don’t have the guts or spine. It takes a special kind of obsession, and radical personalities tend to be odd. Mishima on the Right, Pasolini on the Left. Lots of weirdos in Fascism and N. Socialism.

    Homos are strange in this way. In some ways, they are deviant & decadent. In other ways, they are fastidious, elitist, & obsessed with order/cleanliness. They are both anal(in sodomy way) and ‘anal'(in germ-freak way). Aristocratic style owes much to ‘gay’ sensibility.

    Cuz homos are naturally aristo in style & order-oriented, they’ve been very useful to Power, even on the Right. It’s like the ‘gay’ guy in NO WAY OUT. Totally devoted & ruthless in service to Power. DC is 10% homo. Very hard workers in Deep State.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXsbWJC8VM4&feature=youtu.be

    In a way, Greg Johnson was useful to Taylor precisely because he is homo. Taylor has no idea about what is going on in the nether regions of the Alt Right. Homos are into gossip & weird behavior, so they know who’s into drugs or wild behavior.

    Everyone in Alt Right and I mean everyone, would do better if he went on a sabbatical & confronted his own demons in a deep & meaningful way & made a confession(if only to oneself) before embarking again. We hear so much of “I know you are, but what am I”.

    Before seekers set out on their journeys, they did heavy soul-searching & confronted their own demons. We dont see any of this in Alt Right, with everyone just paving over his fault while MAGNIFYING the faults of others. First Alt Righter who purges his own demons win earn the right the lead. It’s like the scene in EXCALIBUR where Arthur admits his wrong in his misuse of the sword of power to beat Lancelot.

    Too much of Alt Right is like an ego-and-power trip. But real power has to be founded on an understanding, awareness, & confession of one’s own failures, betrayals, shortcomings, and mistakes. Alt Right needs to go into Augustinian Confession mode for awhile. Nietzsche later.

  109. peterAUS says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Again, the first step re “white survival” is to split the issue in two.
    1. “Colonies”, meaning USA (the top world player).
    2. Europe.
    The fundamental mistake is, IMHO, using the same approach to both.

    As for Europe, correct, nationalism has caused a LOT of death and destruction there. EU WAS meant, at least for idealists (before it was hijacked…) , to prevent the next ’39-’45 death and destruction.

    But, as some guys already stated here, the issue at the moment is between globalism (as it is ….not as it could’ve been…) and nationalism.
    Historically, YES, we are choosing between lesser evil. Hehe….which opens another, rather uncomfortable question: how come “we” haven’t come up with anything new? Anyway.

    It is quite possible that, should EU really collapse, we’ll see massive armed conflicts in Europe. Perhaps even escalating into nuclear exchanges. Etc.

    Either way you cut the current state of affairs, for lower 60 % of native European population things are looking…….interesting.

  110. Liza says:
    @Expletive Deleted

    as a susbstitute for having actual sons.

    It’s hard not to notice that there’s a lot fewer boys than girls being born. Some kind of pollution-related biological reason that affects men. Saw this on a documentary.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  111. geokat62 says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Obviously a key part of his job is understanding the reasons for racial conflict.

    Yes, of course. The ADL and SPLC understood quite well what the repercussions of open borders would be. Although they obviously would vehemently deny the role The Lobby played in pushing for the passsge of Hart-Celler, the post-it note on Mark Potok’s wall belies their misrepresentations. That post-it note, in my mind, represents the smoking gun that demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt The Lobby was keenly interested in the replacement of white America.

    According to The Lobby, it’s mission accomplished!

  112. Daryl Lamont Jenkins, or DLJ as he is more commonly known, is a violent Antifa leader who is connected to dozens of violent incidents over the years. He also had his first stroke at a young age, probably from being so fat. I think 2017 is the year he came to Amren and ended up in the hospital because he forgot his medication.

    DLJ was part of a completely debunked fake documentary jointly made by SPLC and MSNBC. They have a violent ex-con make wild unsubstantiated about engaging in mob violence against blacks. The SPLC then showed a computer animation of what a white on black mob attack might look like because they couldn’t find any real video. Even though scores of videos of violent racially motivated black on white attacks come out every year.

    The SPLC was forced to admit that they compensated the guy $30k to make his wild claims for the documentary, none of which are backed up by any police reports or evidence. Nor does the SPLC even have a single alleged victim.

    Then DLJ was part of a reality tv show about the KKK that was so fake and staged that it was canceled in disgrace before it even aired.

    I wonder if the people who took the 2017 Amren footage for the documentary are the same guys I had lunch with Friday morning before the conference. They were the only people in the cafeteria and said they were there for the conference so I sat down next to them. One was friendly, the other looked very annoyed. They had a bunch of video equipment but were very evasive about who they were going to make the video for.

  113. anonymous[531] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Whats with the aggressive tone pal?

    It seemed to me you didnt know what White nationalism/ethno nationalism was so I clarified. I see now that you do know what it is you just dismiss it out of hand.

    I am for White nationalism in America and ethnonationalism elsewhere.

    ‘Pan-racial solidarity ignores nations; it cannot scale up, it’s not an optimal solution to anything in the real world’

    Pan racial solidarity happens to be something that is coming to be absoloutely normal for the nonwhite members of what used to be White majoirty nations. All other groups have tribalism if Whites do not they will automatically lose. This is not a radical or particularly divisive conclusion just ask Jared Taylor.

    Colin Liddel originally had the website alternative right but it was Spencer who shortened the term, relaunched the website (he used to be editor of Takimag) and popularised the term and concept.

    ‘You are obviously a Spencer fanboy, which means that you and your fuhrer are headed nowhere.
    Good luck with all that.’

    I am not a ‘Spencer fanboy’ if anythibg I actually favour Greg Johnson who is at least capable of articulating alternative viewpoints in mainstrean ways without making a fool of himself. Spencer and Johnson famously do not get on.

    I notice that while you were quick to tar me with the accusation of facism (‘fuhrer’) you completely disregard my point about White people having self determination where thier societies should not suffer from the results of infiltration and manipulation by hostile alien groups.

    If I had to judge from your sophistry-the way you dismiss the most practical solutions only to not offer anything in thier place, your histrionics- slandering me as an unthinking follower of someone you think has a cult of personality and the way you dodge the most salient aspects of my comment I would have to say that you are not entirely White. In my experience it is people who are part White (who therefore are at least a tiny bit sympathetic to Whites) but who would supposedly not be accepted in a White ethnostate who are the most hysterical and dismissive of White self determination. From the way you strawman me I can guess your ethnicity but I wont bother as this is old hat to me now.

    P.S
    If my level of reading comprehension is sub par then yours must be lower than whale shit. You took a freindly comment aimed at helping you clarify your thinking and responded in a hysterical and hositle way.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  114. peterAUS says:
    @anonymous

    Good comment.

    Especially:

    I am for White nationalism in America and ethnonationalism elsewhere.

    All other groups have tribalism if Whites do not they will automatically lose.

    And…hehe….always….

    …you were quick to tar me with the accusation of facism (‘fuhrer’)…..

    Interesting observation:

    In my experience it is people who are part White (who therefore are at least a tiny bit sympathetic to Whites) but who would supposedly not be accepted in a White ethnostate who are the most hysterical and dismissive of White self determination.

    Well, in my experience it’s “cuckservatives”. And “they”, of course.

  115. Anonymous[846] • Disclaimer says:

    The IDF trolls don’t get it. They think they can stir trouble by calling people “homos’ or “Feds”
    or “unstable.”
    Nobody cares about this nonsense. Nobody cares that Greg Johnson is gay. I don’t care of Mike Enoch is jewish. I don’t even believe that he IS jewish, but it doesn’t matter. All that matters is whether a given individual is speaking truth and trying to help our cause.
    I try not to criticize anybody on the alt-right.
    I ignore anything to do with gossip and infighting. It’s tedious and boring. I don’t care what Matt Heimbach did or didn’t do. I don’t care if Owen Benjamin is a “shill.”
    Anybody can see right through the IDF/SPLC trolls.
    They are always transparently obvious.
    They provide comic relief TBH.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  116. peterAUS says:
    @Anonymous

    All that matters is whether a given individual is speaking truth and trying to help our cause.

    Yep.

    It’s tedious and boring.

    Worse. It’s counterproductive. Almost self-defeating, actually.
    At this stage, anyway.

  117. @Tyrion 2

    Yea no but, those small families, post WWI and continuing, had a theoretically equal chance of “daughtering-out”. So proud daddies made their daughters into princesses. Presumably because the notorious cretins (a.k.a. cavalry officers) Haig and Kitchener had slyly disposed of their sons while nobody was looking.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Trevor Lynch Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.