The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Nick Turse: One Down, Who Knows How Many to Go?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As TomDispatch’s Nick Turse reminds us today, the United States remains an imperial military presence unlike any other — not just in this moment but in the history of empire. Never has a single country had so many military bases on so many parts of Planet Earth. Consider that a striking fact of 2019, as it was, say, of the 1950s or the post-Cold-War 1990s. How many such bases? As Turse makes clear, no one really knows, possibly not even the Pentagon. And more curious yet, that vast global infrastructure, that “empire of bases” (in Chalmers Johnson’s eloquent phrase), is hardly noticed in what, since 9/11, has been known as “the homeland.” Few here think much about those global garrisons (although hundreds of thousands of Americans have in recent years been deployed to them); the media that cover every presidential tweet as if it were a missive from the emperor almost never mention them, much less report on them; and no one — Turse and a few scholars aside — seems to have the slightest interest in counting them up, much less considering their cost or even the global role they’ve been playing all these years. In domestic terms, they are essentially missing in action, which means a vision of how the United States has positioned itself on this planet is missing in action as well.

With that in mind, let’s acknowledge something else in this strange moment of ours: while that massive (and massively expensive) base structure remains firmly in place, American imperial power is increasingly another matter. It should be clear enough by now that, despite The Donald’s recent dark-of-night selfie drop-in on American troops at al-Assad Air Base in Iraq — as CNN put it, “the dicey security situation still restrict[ed] Trump to a clandestine visit more than 15 years after the American invasion” — he seems to be almost singlehandedly launching the process by which the American imperial system, built up over the last three-quarters of a century, could be dismantled. The Syrian withdrawal and possible Afghan drawdown of troops may just be straws in the wind — but one day, what a wind that could turn out to be!

It’s obvious that the man who ran as the first declinist candidate for president, the only one willing to acknowledge in 2016 that America was no longer quite so “great,” seems intent, however blindly, on beginning that dismantling process. He clearly has an urge to tear down international institutions and dismiss the network of subservient allies Washington had carefully built up for decades to bolster its global power.


Still, don’t label him the dismantler-in-chief quite yet. In the end, Donald Trump may indeed prove to be the American equivalent of one of the mad emperors that helped take down the Roman empire — a Queens-born Caligula. For the time being, however, think of him instead as an envoy for and a message from the unknown gods of the twenty-first century, a symptom of a process that has been going on just out of sight for years. After all, he bears no responsibility for the fact that the self-proclaimed greatest military power ever, in fighting post-9/11 wars without end, has found itself, despite that empire of bases, ever less able to impose its will militarily or otherwise on increasingly large parts of the planet.

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, Donald Trump 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    What a pleasant surprise from Mr. Engelhardt.

    Sir, if you read this comment: please stay focused on Ending the Empire. Your frequent spells of TDS and Climapocalypsomania are divide & conquer distractions that serve the Establishment.

    • Agree: TomSchmidt, Kratoklastes
  2. Never has a single country had so many military bases on so many parts of Planet Earth.

    I’m far more anti-Empire than Turse or Englehardt, but I stopped reading at that sentence because it’s the first super-obvious evidence of a dilettante (i.e., journalistic) grasp of history and/or extraordinarily lazy (i.e., journalistic) research. Hire a (better) minion, for fuck’s sake.

    During Victoria’s reign, the British had more ‘bases’ in India alone than the US has globally in CurrentYear. At least one garrison in every single town with a population of more than a few thousand (which is quite a few towns in 19th century India) – and other ‘bases’ in every other colonial possession (of which there were quite a few).

    During the same period as the height of the British Raj, there were at least 8 ‘bases’ in little old New Zealand (pop: 15,000 whites, 30,000 chocolates… several of the latter were my direct antecedents).

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  3. No need to worry about a Syrian withdrawal or Afghan drawdown. Trump has been overruled by advisors Pompeo and Bolton; and by the ever strange Senator Graham, who has picked up the war everywhere mantra left by that “Great American Hero” John McCain. How dare the President think that he was “the Decider” of American war policy!

  4. @Kratoklastes

    super-obvious evidence of a dilettante (i.e., journalistic) grasp of history and/or extraordinarily lazy

    For someone who’s so quick to call names, you can’t even be bothered to understand the sentence you quoted. Nice job.

  5. Anonymous [AKA "factnazi"] says:

    ‘… the mad emperors that helped take down the Roman empire — a Queens-born Caligula…’

    ‘Caligula (/kəˈlɪɡjʊlə/;[1] Latin: Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus; 31 August 12 – 24 January 41 AD) was Roman emperor from AD 37 to AD 41.’ (wikipedia)

    ‘ Most chronologies place the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476, when Romulus Augustulus was forced to abdicate to the Germanic warlord Odoacer.[‘ (wikipedia)

    Some take-down…

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower