The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersSBPDL Blog
The Great Replacement in New York City: from 98% White in 1910 to 32% White in 2020...
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
The previously unpublished version of the iconic photograph.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

PK Note: Your Coronavirus Social Distancing book list now includes Sam Francis Essential Writings on Race, and Race and the American Prospect.

 

Why take just a macro-look at The Great Replacement in the United States of America, when you can easily take a micro-look? Let’s start with New York City. For those wondering, here’s the racial breakdown of New York City from 1910 – 2020:

1910 98% White
1920 97% White
1930 95% White
1940 94% White
1950 90% White
1960 85% White
1970 63% White
1980 52% White
1990 44% White
2000 35% White
2010 33% White
2020 32% White

Here’s more:

It’s hard to believe that until 1980, New York City was overwhelmingly white — and it was traditionally conservative. Even during the Ellis Island period, it was a white city except for black Harlem. After the 1965 Immigration Act, the city turned multiracial and declined. Though it recovered in the 1990s and early 21st century, the white population is still declining, and the city is now a bastion of the far left.

New York started as New Amsterdam, a Dutch settlement seized by the English and renamed in 1664. The British controlled it for the entire period of the Revolutionary War; it was a loyalist stronghold. New York abstained in the critical independence vote on July 2, 1776. After the war, it was the headquarters for Andrew Hamilton and High Federalism. During the Civil War, many New Yorkers, especially working-class whites, sympathized with the Confederacy. Many blacks fled the city after the 1863 Draft Riots, and by 1865, there were fewer than 10,000 blacks left.

More than 12 million immigrants came through Ellis Island from 1892 to 1954. Almost all were white, though many were Italian, Eastern European, Jewish, or otherwise different from the Northern Europeans who founded the United States. This stopped after the 1924 Immigration Act, championed by Representative Albert Johnson. “It has become necessary that the United States cease to become an asylum,” he said. Today, the official House of Representatives website calls the bill a “legislative expression of the xenophobia, particularly towards eastern and southern European immigrants, that swept America in the decade of the 1920s.”

Of course, it wasn’t just migration from white nations that worried Americans. In 1910, central Harlem was about 10 percent black. By 1930, it was 70 percent black. By 1950, it was about 98 percent black, and Harlem was the center of American black cultural and intellectual life. It was also heavily leftist, with figures such as poet Langston Hughes and singer Paul Robeson supporting the Soviet Union and JosephStalin. In 1964, the Harlem race riot, which began after an off-duty police officer shot a black teenager, was the first major race riot of the decade. [The Great Replacement: New York City, b y Greg Hood and Paul Kersey, April 13, 2020]

The Great Replacement is no myth. It’s happened in New York City, where the white population dropped from 98% in 1910 to 32% white today.

Odds are, it’s coming to a city near you.

 
Of Related Interest
Hide 158 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Perhaps the great replacement has already happened! We are in damage control now. The only way we can make it is to fight back, but it seems like many of our people have lost the will to fight. Much of what we see on television is our surrender to the nonwhites. White men are shown as buffoons, while black men are shown as men. When they take down our monuments, then we have surrendered.

    Is there a way to win? Yes, or course, but do you think whites will unite to fight for their own people? If we were a boxer, we would be in the corner covering our face to hopefully stop a few of the blows. If we strike back, it will only make the oppoent hit us harder. However, if we don’t fight, we will find ourselves on the floor looking up to the enemy.

    There come a point when one needs to completely surrender and throw in the towel, or fight back. In Virginia a tyrant is taking away our rights to bear arms because the negroes don’t want us to have them. Never mind it is the negroes killing other negroes. There are no whites Nazis or white supremacists hurting anyone, but the media tells them those lies.

    Unless we joing together as a people, we are done!

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @HT
    True, but our problem is at least half the white people hate us more than they hate the non-whites who want to take everything they have.
    , @Joseph Doaks
    "Unless we join together as a people, we are done!"

    This!
    , @Craig Nelsen
    Call out every anti-white depiction like this AP photo by Charlie Riedel on the KCTV website today. (KCTV Channel 5 is the CBS affiliate in Kansas City. It always seems especially eager to denigrate white people. Can you imagine them running a photo of a homeless black man with some white businessmen standing around?)

    https://craignelsen.com/img/misc/2020-04-15-kc_white_homeless_AP.jpg

    https://www.ap.org/en-us/formats/photos

    , @Josephus Cato
    Still haven't heard any cases yet of neo-Nazis or white supremacists coughing on police or Jews.
  2. Anonymous[307] • Disclaimer says:

    Odds are it already came for a city near you! Came to Detroit with a vengeance. Destroying everything in its path for 144 square miles. Ruined workplaces, neighborhoods, shopping areas, schools, safety, even churches were decimated. Financially destroyed and left in shambles. Now moving to all the ring suburbs. Racist for noticing.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
    So very true. Racist for noticing, but now they are doing forage/scavenger parties down here. Except the police are on it and arrests are made.
  3. New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away ‘White” Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White. Personally, I’d rather be castrated with a rusty chainsaw than be forced to live in New York City!

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    "New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away ‘White” Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White"

    Yes, but that also means that NY was not 98% white in 1910, since a lot of those 'white' people were Jews.

    Jews do not identify as white, as they repeatedly tell us with op-eds in Haaretz, the Times of Israel, etc.
    , @Informed Citizen
    Its called cultural marxism.
  4. Only White people would cheer their own replacement. White men built the modern world. When and why did we change? I blame the 19th amendment giving women the vote,the birth control pill,and soy.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Yoga, too.
  5. And when the tranformation is complete even basic modern civilization ceases.

    • Replies: @Glock45
    And when the transformation is complete even basic modern civilization ceases.

    Nothing makes me laugh more nowadays than to see your typical white sh!tl!b still virtue-signalling for "diversity"...from the safety, security, and comfort from their 99% white neighborhood.

    Why?

    Because they have no idea that, once their little non-white pets become the majority, they can kiss their safety, security, and comfort goodbye. They think America will still be a First World country when that happens?

    Not a chance.

    America (or what will be left of it) will be lucky to have running water and electricity.
  6. thanks for building it i guess

  7. In an interview Sunday with CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Minnesota Fed prez Neel Kashkari said the U.S. economy is facing a “long, hard road” as it attempts to rebound from the coronavirus pandemic, warning Americans to brace themselves for 18 months of shutdowns.

    18 months of shutdowns would be a disparate experience, depending on where you live.

    Anyway, in the long run – perhaps even in the medium run – the determining issue of racial proportions across the country won’t be replacement rates, or even birth rates. Rather, the big demographic determinant will be survival rates. That is the issue that forward thinkers should be cogitating upon.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    If this country (world) is shut down for another 18 months, it’s not the Chinese virus. It’s something much more sinister. Who? What? Where? Most importantly, Why?
  8. anonymous[267] • Disclaimer says:

    Another pointless repetitive article on racial demographics. We get it. But now what? The only way to save traditional America is to boot out the Northeast and West Coast into separate nations. What remains is Legacy America which can be salvaged. A return to the America of 1990 by shutting down immigration and changing the education system. I find anything else but practical solutions to be useless. The author is wasting his life writing about black crime #1037.

    • Disagree: bruce county
    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    Maybe you feel you’re wasting your time reading them.

    Don’t try to speak for everyone.

    We all realize the facts are redundant but new visitors don’t.
    , @MalePaleStale
    The problem of White replacement is so insidious because it is other Whites that are promoting and engineering it. Condemning Blacks or Hispanics is tantamount to me yelling at flies in my house instead of my son who intentionally left the door open. The promoters of White replacement are like a malignant cancer that has spread so deeply into a body that you can't remove it without killing the body as a whole. These people are our family members, friends, and neighbors. Paul Kersey is a small part of the solution if only to counter the main stream anti-white propaganda in a small way.

    I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action.
    , @GodHelpUs
    The America of 1990 was already in terminal decline, sustained only by the greatest exercise in money printing in history by the Federal Reserve. How many dollar billionaires were minted by Greenspan and Bernanke and Yellen? Now a Gentile has been put into the hot seat and the system will be allowed to reset and soon we will all be billionaires. Welcome to Weimar America. Reap what you've sown.
    , @Alden
    Doesn’t legacy America include the south east?

    Most of those states are 20-40% black. The big cities seem to be run by blacks. The black cities of Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Detroit Chicago, Milwaukee. St Louis, Milwaukee and their metro areas are just black crime ridden ghettos run by black politicians and civil service. Atlanta, Mobile, New Orleans, Baton Rouge all the southern cities are black ghettos run by blacks

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.

    It’s so nice to deal with competent polite Hispanic Asian pacific island affirmative action government workers here in California instead of the snarling hateful sows when affirmative action began. Even the hateful snarling sows have shaped up but now they have Hispanic Asian supervisors.

    If I have to be a minority I prefer to be a minority in a 5-7 percent black state like California instead of a 30 percent black state or a state run by a city like Chicago or St Louis.
  9. 32% is likely low because America has bizarre ways of counting whites because they like to include various types of middle easterners, hispanics, iranians, etc. White gentiles – meaning whites that the average person that you would agree are white – are probably much less than 32%.

    • Replies: @Just Passing Through
    True, I would guess that out of all places, New York has the greatest concentration of people from the Middle East & North Africa region and as per the US Census Bureau, this ethnic group is categorised as White. And then we also have the Jewish people who have been very abundant in the Big Apple (or should it be the Big Bagel?).

    I would say the Gentile White population of New York could be as low as 15-20%
    , @dindunuffins
    Same way they skew the crime numbers for Whites. Bunching in "White Hispanics. " Of course that phrase is only mentioned when something bad happens.Anything good goes to being "Hispanic" and celebrating their "Hispanic" heritage.
    , @Jim in Jersey
    Typically, whenever I venture over to the city (and it’s not often) I am the only white face I see, start to finish.

    Black and brown is the color of the city.

    For however long it lasts.
  10. The Great Replacement in New York City: from 98% White in 1910 to 32% White in 2020…

    And those numbers reflect what a shithole NYC has become.

  11. And here you have it…Of his mixed background, Slash later remarked, “As a musician, I’ve always been amused that I’m both British and black; particularly because so many American musicians seem to aspire to be British while so many British musicians, in the ‘Sixties in particular, went to such great pains to be black.” Weak White Cuck Idiots.

    • Replies: @bruce county
    Mom was a golliwog...

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=golliwog&FORM=HDRSC2

    , @bruce county
    Mom was definitely a golliwog…
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=golliwog&FORM=HDRSC2
    , @Loren
    musicians = drug addicts.
  12. At what percentage of black population does modern civilization cease to exist?? Haiti is a perfect axample.
    Do taxpayers keep funneling money into the failing state?
    Do we prop up the power grid and the water supply when blacks refuse to pay the bills?
    When are we finally going so enough is enough and the experiment has been a failure?
    These primitive creatures cannot maintain civilization without us.
    At what point do we stop coddling these feral beasts?
    How many more cities are we willing to cede to them?
    I’m cheering for Covid 19…

    So many questions. One answer. Separation!!! Separation now and separation for ever.
    Be alert. Be safe. Avoid the groid.

    • Replies: @Just Passing Through
    Cities will inevitably be a magnet for such people as cities breed dependence in people. If you live in some rural or semi-rural place there is not real chance of them coming to settle there as there isn't a ecosystem of gibs set up yet.
    , @Glock45
    Speaking of Covid-19, the latest wave of negro fatigue is coming in fast and hard with all the whining stories the lugenpresse is running about how covid is racist, since it is having a "disparate impact" on blacks. Story after story about this in the past week, and, reading in between the lines, somehow this "disparate impact" of the corona virus on blacks is....of course!!!....whitey's fault!

    Which makes me ask the question, for those pushing this non-sense, or their black pets, will ever answer:

    If living among whites is such a horribly, repressive experience (and, apparently now, even poses an existential threat) for black people...

    ...why don't they just separate?

    Why don't they return to their motherland?

    I mean, the same people who run the lugenpresse also tell us (through ads, TV shows, and movies) that blacks are super smart, super intelligent and filled with sage wisdom! Heck, we wouldn't have ever even gone to the Moon if it weren't for black people (see Hidden Colors!). So surely they can make it on their own!! Surely they can build the Wakanda of their wildest dreams back on their mother continent! They certainly don't even need whitey, right???
    , @dindunuffins
    And as @Just Passing Through just stated ,his scenario is South Africa and Zimbabwe,formally Rhodesia,and what comes with that is even more murders and rapes and robbery as Blacks from the cities will go out into the country where the Whites are trying to hunker down and survive on their farms and homesteads. Just like what happened in Zimbabwe/formally Rhodesia and what is happening in South Africa. And just like South Africa,most of the Police are "diversified" and will look the other way as Whites are slaughtered across the American Midwest. Whites in the former United States are already under 65% of the population. We used to be over 95%. I would venture to say we are even less than 65% seeing all the miscegenation that has happened and is happening. Most of these half-breeds do NOT consider their White half and for all intents and purposes they are NOT White.
  13. @dindunuffins
    And here you have it...Of his mixed background, Slash later remarked, "As a musician, I've always been amused that I'm both British and black; particularly because so many American musicians seem to aspire to be British while so many British musicians, in the 'Sixties in particular, went to such great pains to be black." Weak White Cuck Idiots.
    • Replies: @dindunuffins
    LMFAO!!!!!!
  14. @suicidal_canadian
    32% is likely low because America has bizarre ways of counting whites because they like to include various types of middle easterners, hispanics, iranians, etc. White gentiles - meaning whites that the average person that you would agree are white - are probably much less than 32%.

    True, I would guess that out of all places, New York has the greatest concentration of people from the Middle East & North Africa region and as per the US Census Bureau, this ethnic group is categorised as White. And then we also have the Jewish people who have been very abundant in the Big Apple (or should it be the Big Bagel?).

    I would say the Gentile White population of New York could be as low as 15-20%

  15. @bruce county
    At what percentage of black population does modern civilization cease to exist?? Haiti is a perfect axample.
    Do taxpayers keep funneling money into the failing state?
    Do we prop up the power grid and the water supply when blacks refuse to pay the bills?
    When are we finally going so enough is enough and the experiment has been a failure?
    These primitive creatures cannot maintain civilization without us.
    At what point do we stop coddling these feral beasts?
    How many more cities are we willing to cede to them?
    I'm cheering for Covid 19...

    So many questions. One answer. Separation!!! Separation now and separation for ever.
    Be alert. Be safe. Avoid the groid.

    Cities will inevitably be a magnet for such people as cities breed dependence in people. If you live in some rural or semi-rural place there is not real chance of them coming to settle there as there isn’t a ecosystem of gibs set up yet.

  16. @bruce county
    And when the tranformation is complete even basic modern civilization ceases.

    And when the transformation is complete even basic modern civilization ceases.

    Nothing makes me laugh more nowadays than to see your typical white sh!tl!b still virtue-signalling for “diversity”…from the safety, security, and comfort from their 99% white neighborhood.

    Why?

    Because they have no idea that, once their little non-white pets become the majority, they can kiss their safety, security, and comfort goodbye. They think America will still be a First World country when that happens?

    Not a chance.

    America (or what will be left of it) will be lucky to have running water and electricity.

    • Replies: @dindunuffins
    The best "white sh!tl!b" example is Timmy " I cuck for Black buck" Wise. Surrounded by a sea of Whiteness.
    Tim Wise, whom scholar and philosopher Cornel West calls, "A vanilla brother in the tradition of (abolitionist) John Brown," is among the nation's most prominent antiracist essayists and educators.
    For years, acclaimed author and speaker Tim Wise has been electrifying audiences on the college lecture circuit with his deeply personal take on whiteness and white privilege.
    "ELECTRIFYING" lol
  17. @bruce county
    At what percentage of black population does modern civilization cease to exist?? Haiti is a perfect axample.
    Do taxpayers keep funneling money into the failing state?
    Do we prop up the power grid and the water supply when blacks refuse to pay the bills?
    When are we finally going so enough is enough and the experiment has been a failure?
    These primitive creatures cannot maintain civilization without us.
    At what point do we stop coddling these feral beasts?
    How many more cities are we willing to cede to them?
    I'm cheering for Covid 19...

    So many questions. One answer. Separation!!! Separation now and separation for ever.
    Be alert. Be safe. Avoid the groid.

    Speaking of Covid-19, the latest wave of negro fatigue is coming in fast and hard with all the whining stories the lugenpresse is running about how covid is racist, since it is having a “disparate impact” on blacks. Story after story about this in the past week, and, reading in between the lines, somehow this “disparate impact” of the corona virus on blacks is….of course!!!….whitey’s fault!

    Which makes me ask the question, for those pushing this non-sense, or their black pets, will ever answer:

    If living among whites is such a horribly, repressive experience (and, apparently now, even poses an existential threat) for black people…

    …why don’t they just separate?

    Why don’t they return to their motherland?

    I mean, the same people who run the lugenpresse also tell us (through ads, TV shows, and movies) that blacks are super smart, super intelligent and filled with sage wisdom! Heck, we wouldn’t have ever even gone to the Moon if it weren’t for black people (see Hidden Colors!). So surely they can make it on their own!! Surely they can build the Wakanda of their wildest dreams back on their mother continent! They certainly don’t even need whitey, right???

    • Replies: @Loren
    hidden figures, [or was colors intended in yr post?
    , @Sick 'n Tired
    Brawl breaks out at Covid-19 party in Philly. This is why they are catching the virus at higher rates.

    https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9znzQ_1586833594
    , @Jim in Jersey
    I heard they had all this planned already and we’re all packed and ready for the voyage back to the motherland but the bicycle sank.
  18. @dindunuffins
    And here you have it...Of his mixed background, Slash later remarked, "As a musician, I've always been amused that I'm both British and black; particularly because so many American musicians seem to aspire to be British while so many British musicians, in the 'Sixties in particular, went to such great pains to be black." Weak White Cuck Idiots.
  19. Lyndon Johnson and Ted Kennedy should go down in history as the greatest enemies of White Americans. Their actions are the root cause of our decline, current pitiful state and eventual demise.

    • Agree: Female in FL
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Special attention should also be paid to the string puller. The man behind the mask.
  20. @anonymous
    Another pointless repetitive article on racial demographics. We get it. But now what? The only way to save traditional America is to boot out the Northeast and West Coast into separate nations. What remains is Legacy America which can be salvaged. A return to the America of 1990 by shutting down immigration and changing the education system. I find anything else but practical solutions to be useless. The author is wasting his life writing about black crime #1037.

    Maybe you feel you’re wasting your time reading them.

    Don’t try to speak for everyone.

    We all realize the facts are redundant but new visitors don’t.

    • Replies: @bruce county
    I look at in one way.
    Some time in the near future this will be looked at as THE DEFINITIVE RECORD of the chain of events that HAS lead us to our destruction.

    The UNZ Review and other stories that have been collected will be the story that survivors can teach their children that when warnings aren't heeded this is the end result.
    , @Anon
    He didn´t SAY...he was ¨speaking for everyone¨...Jim. Mind if he has an opinion on the article? Sort of like YOU?
  21. @suicidal_canadian
    32% is likely low because America has bizarre ways of counting whites because they like to include various types of middle easterners, hispanics, iranians, etc. White gentiles - meaning whites that the average person that you would agree are white - are probably much less than 32%.

    Same way they skew the crime numbers for Whites. Bunching in “White Hispanics. ” Of course that phrase is only mentioned when something bad happens.Anything good goes to being “Hispanic” and celebrating their “Hispanic” heritage.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
    Yes, let us not forget David Berkowitz, Dylan Klebold, Nikolas Cruz, George Zimmerman and other infamous (((White Men))).
  22. @bruce county
    At what percentage of black population does modern civilization cease to exist?? Haiti is a perfect axample.
    Do taxpayers keep funneling money into the failing state?
    Do we prop up the power grid and the water supply when blacks refuse to pay the bills?
    When are we finally going so enough is enough and the experiment has been a failure?
    These primitive creatures cannot maintain civilization without us.
    At what point do we stop coddling these feral beasts?
    How many more cities are we willing to cede to them?
    I'm cheering for Covid 19...

    So many questions. One answer. Separation!!! Separation now and separation for ever.
    Be alert. Be safe. Avoid the groid.

    And as just stated ,his scenario is South Africa and Zimbabwe,formally Rhodesia,and what comes with that is even more murders and rapes and robbery as Blacks from the cities will go out into the country where the Whites are trying to hunker down and survive on their farms and homesteads. Just like what happened in Zimbabwe/formally Rhodesia and what is happening in South Africa. And just like South Africa,most of the Police are “diversified” and will look the other way as Whites are slaughtered across the American Midwest. Whites in the former United States are already under 65% of the population. We used to be over 95%. I would venture to say we are even less than 65% seeing all the miscegenation that has happened and is happening. Most of these half-breeds do NOT consider their White half and for all intents and purposes they are NOT White.

    • Replies: @Cowtown Rebel
    The last Five Star General was Omar Bradley. None, not even Schwarzkopf (Negrohead?) or Powell (Headnegro?), has held that rank since he died in 1981.

    Yet, I've seen several of the highly decorated H.N's.I.C. in law enforcement boasting five stars. If not, they at least have to have the highest military rank currently attainable, with a minimum of four stars gleaming on their collars. Long Gone are the days of Reed and Malloy. Today, you're just as likely to encounter a trigger happy Somalian or a nervous-Nellie Woman who doesn't look away from her cellphone long enough to realize she's in the wrong apartment before discharging her weapon.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/minneapolis-police-sentencing-mohamed-noor.html

    https://abc13.com/amber-guyger-botham-jean-guyers-geiger-police-officer-trial/5581929/
  23. @Glock45
    And when the transformation is complete even basic modern civilization ceases.

    Nothing makes me laugh more nowadays than to see your typical white sh!tl!b still virtue-signalling for "diversity"...from the safety, security, and comfort from their 99% white neighborhood.

    Why?

    Because they have no idea that, once their little non-white pets become the majority, they can kiss their safety, security, and comfort goodbye. They think America will still be a First World country when that happens?

    Not a chance.

    America (or what will be left of it) will be lucky to have running water and electricity.

    The best “white sh!tl!b” example is Timmy ” I cuck for Black buck” Wise. Surrounded by a sea of Whiteness.
    Tim Wise, whom scholar and philosopher Cornel West calls, “A vanilla brother in the tradition of (abolitionist) John Brown,” is among the nation’s most prominent antiracist essayists and educators.
    For years, acclaimed author and speaker Tim Wise has been electrifying audiences on the college lecture circuit with his deeply personal take on whiteness and white privilege.
    “ELECTRIFYING” lol

    • Replies: @Piglet

    The best “white sh!tl!b” example is Timmy ” I cuck for Black buck” Wise. Surrounded by a sea of Whiteness.

     

    I think you meant to type (((Wise))). From Wikipedia: "Wise was born in Nashville, Tennessee, to Michael Julius Wise and LuCinda Anne (née McLean) Wise. His paternal grandfather was Jewish (of Russian origin)..."

    I'm not sure why it is, but many Jews have the names of colors in German. For example:

    Schwarz (black)
    Gelb (yellow)
    Rot (or Roth) (red)
    Gruen (green)
    Weiss (white)

    In the case of the latter, you may come across it being spelled Wise.
  24. “…will be lucky to have running water and electricity…”

    This is the stage – actually the lead-up to this stage – at which survival rates will become vastly more important than birth rates.

    White Americans must defend 2A. And continue to leave the cities. Retreat. Buy time. (((They))) think that time is on their side, but it is not. The economy of excess wealth is almost done and the end of The Days Of The Gibs is fast approaching. Many whites will then rediscover their racial solidarity. Be optimistic, for truly terrible times are coming.

  25. @anonymous
    Another pointless repetitive article on racial demographics. We get it. But now what? The only way to save traditional America is to boot out the Northeast and West Coast into separate nations. What remains is Legacy America which can be salvaged. A return to the America of 1990 by shutting down immigration and changing the education system. I find anything else but practical solutions to be useless. The author is wasting his life writing about black crime #1037.

    The problem of White replacement is so insidious because it is other Whites that are promoting and engineering it. Condemning Blacks or Hispanics is tantamount to me yelling at flies in my house instead of my son who intentionally left the door open. The promoters of White replacement are like a malignant cancer that has spread so deeply into a body that you can’t remove it without killing the body as a whole. These people are our family members, friends, and neighbors. Paul Kersey is a small part of the solution if only to counter the main stream anti-white propaganda in a small way.

    I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action.

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    "I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action."

    Traditional America is not coming back, period. Just the transition from rural to urban populations has left major marks that are almost impossible to erase. The rise of obesity, diabetes, etc. The dysgenic effect of the welfare state being another.

    The truth is that America's white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones' book 'the slaughter of cities') and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can't compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    What we CAN do is exactly as you suggest: have kids, teach them of their culture, expose them to the realities of power and the struggle that they are going to have as members of a despised minority. Most of the world is tribal, and they had better get used to competing with tribal peoples.

  26. @anonymous
    Another pointless repetitive article on racial demographics. We get it. But now what? The only way to save traditional America is to boot out the Northeast and West Coast into separate nations. What remains is Legacy America which can be salvaged. A return to the America of 1990 by shutting down immigration and changing the education system. I find anything else but practical solutions to be useless. The author is wasting his life writing about black crime #1037.

    The America of 1990 was already in terminal decline, sustained only by the greatest exercise in money printing in history by the Federal Reserve. How many dollar billionaires were minted by Greenspan and Bernanke and Yellen? Now a Gentile has been put into the hot seat and the system will be allowed to reset and soon we will all be billionaires. Welcome to Weimar America. Reap what you’ve sown.

    • Agree: Augustus
  27. I grew up in upstate NY which was basically a place where NYC got its water and electricity from while imposing its economically devastating far left political ideology on us through demographic dominance. (((Saul Steinberg’s))) New Yorker magazine cover that showed NYC in the foreground with Washington DC and Los Angeles as mere villages with Tokyo in the distant background visually summarizes the typical attitude of NYC residents toward the rest of the world.

    One of my favorite newspaper headlines was “Ford to NYC: Drop Dead!”

    • LOL: Female in FL
  28. @Jim in Jersey
    Maybe you feel you’re wasting your time reading them.

    Don’t try to speak for everyone.

    We all realize the facts are redundant but new visitors don’t.

    I look at in one way.
    Some time in the near future this will be looked at as THE DEFINITIVE RECORD of the chain of events that HAS lead us to our destruction.

    The UNZ Review and other stories that have been collected will be the story that survivors can teach their children that when warnings aren’t heeded this is the end result.

  29. @dindunuffins
    And here you have it...Of his mixed background, Slash later remarked, "As a musician, I've always been amused that I'm both British and black; particularly because so many American musicians seem to aspire to be British while so many British musicians, in the 'Sixties in particular, went to such great pains to be black." Weak White Cuck Idiots.

    musicians = drug addicts.

  30. @suicidal_canadian
    32% is likely low because America has bizarre ways of counting whites because they like to include various types of middle easterners, hispanics, iranians, etc. White gentiles - meaning whites that the average person that you would agree are white - are probably much less than 32%.

    Typically, whenever I venture over to the city (and it’s not often) I am the only white face I see, start to finish.

    Black and brown is the color of the city.

    For however long it lasts.

  31. @dindunuffins
    The best "white sh!tl!b" example is Timmy " I cuck for Black buck" Wise. Surrounded by a sea of Whiteness.
    Tim Wise, whom scholar and philosopher Cornel West calls, "A vanilla brother in the tradition of (abolitionist) John Brown," is among the nation's most prominent antiracist essayists and educators.
    For years, acclaimed author and speaker Tim Wise has been electrifying audiences on the college lecture circuit with his deeply personal take on whiteness and white privilege.
    "ELECTRIFYING" lol

    The best “white sh!tl!b” example is Timmy ” I cuck for Black buck” Wise. Surrounded by a sea of Whiteness.

    I think you meant to type (((Wise))). From Wikipedia: “Wise was born in Nashville, Tennessee, to Michael Julius Wise and LuCinda Anne (née McLean) Wise. His paternal grandfather was Jewish (of Russian origin)…”

    I’m not sure why it is, but many Jews have the names of colors in German. For example:

    Schwarz (black)
    Gelb (yellow)
    Rot (or Roth) (red)
    Gruen (green)
    Weiss (white)

    In the case of the latter, you may come across it being spelled Wise.

  32. @Dr. Pepper
    Perhaps the great replacement has already happened! We are in damage control now. The only way we can make it is to fight back, but it seems like many of our people have lost the will to fight. Much of what we see on television is our surrender to the nonwhites. White men are shown as buffoons, while black men are shown as men. When they take down our monuments, then we have surrendered.

    Is there a way to win? Yes, or course, but do you think whites will unite to fight for their own people? If we were a boxer, we would be in the corner covering our face to hopefully stop a few of the blows. If we strike back, it will only make the oppoent hit us harder. However, if we don't fight, we will find ourselves on the floor looking up to the enemy.

    There come a point when one needs to completely surrender and throw in the towel, or fight back. In Virginia a tyrant is taking away our rights to bear arms because the negroes don't want us to have them. Never mind it is the negroes killing other negroes. There are no whites Nazis or white supremacists hurting anyone, but the media tells them those lies.

    Unless we joing together as a people, we are done!

    True, but our problem is at least half the white people hate us more than they hate the non-whites who want to take everything they have.

  33. @anon
    New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away 'White" Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White. Personally, I'd rather be castrated with a rusty chainsaw than be forced to live in New York City!

    “New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away ‘White” Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White”

    Yes, but that also means that NY was not 98% white in 1910, since a lot of those ‘white’ people were Jews.

    Jews do not identify as white, as they repeatedly tell us with op-eds in Haaretz, the Times of Israel, etc.

    • Replies: @Loren
    a lot fo Jews infiltrated, oops, moved here after WW1 and WW2.
    Im not sure how many were here in 1900, but statistically, they were the criminals, not Blacks.
  34. @MalePaleStale
    The problem of White replacement is so insidious because it is other Whites that are promoting and engineering it. Condemning Blacks or Hispanics is tantamount to me yelling at flies in my house instead of my son who intentionally left the door open. The promoters of White replacement are like a malignant cancer that has spread so deeply into a body that you can't remove it without killing the body as a whole. These people are our family members, friends, and neighbors. Paul Kersey is a small part of the solution if only to counter the main stream anti-white propaganda in a small way.

    I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action.

    “I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action.”

    Traditional America is not coming back, period. Just the transition from rural to urban populations has left major marks that are almost impossible to erase. The rise of obesity, diabetes, etc. The dysgenic effect of the welfare state being another.

    The truth is that America’s white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones’ book ‘the slaughter of cities’) and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can’t compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    What we CAN do is exactly as you suggest: have kids, teach them of their culture, expose them to the realities of power and the struggle that they are going to have as members of a despised minority. Most of the world is tribal, and they had better get used to competing with tribal peoples.

    • Replies: @eah
    I agree with what you say re how dysgenic civilization is, and that in some ways Whites exemplify this to a sad degree -- re "Traditional America is not coming back": yes, it is hard to visualize, especially when 35% of the white population is obese and/or suffering from other chronic 'diseases of modern civilization' -- but I won't be throwing in the towel; the issue is too important -- a 'majority minority' America will be a literal disaster for Whites, and they have to be made to see that -- we need to get a "critical mass" of Whites to realize this.

    However I disagree with this part:

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can’t compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    Having worked in high tech for a long time, I do not see (dot) Indians as particularly intelligent, ambitious, or hyper-competitive; nor devious, to be fair -- but they are conformist suck-ups, and definitely clannish/nepotistic -- once they reach "critical mass" in a company, Whites are far less likely to be hired there, and it is only a matter of time before the stupid Whites in lower level management who started hiring them dwindle too (good riddance), since otherwise you have a plantation/overseer kind of optic that most companies consciously want to avoid.
    , @Alden
    We’re now starting the third generation of affirmative action. Before marriage and children comes a decently paid job with some security that you’ll be able to pay rent or mortgage and feed the kids 5, 10, 15 years hence.

    Affirmative action must end before Whites can talk about marriage, homes and having lots of White children. So let’s be realistic instead of loser conservatism.

    Or maybe we can all go on welfare and live off our kids. But welfare, like everything in America discriminates against Whites.
    , @Just another serf


    The truth is that America’s white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones’ book ‘the slaughter of cities’) and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.
     
    We all must admit the truth here. White men of the present time are a shadow of white men alive in 1912. Far less independent. Far less tough. And despite all the world’s knowledge at the touch of a keyboard, less intelligent.
  35. not sure i believe the drop from 2000 to 2020 was only 3%.

    if you were in NYC in 2000 and then didn’t go there again until 2020, you would swear you were in a foreign country. i used to go there every couple months between 1995 and 2000, then went back in 2015 and the city was unrecognizable. all of the old New Yorkers were long gone.

    it’s possible gentrification in the boroughs has balanced out the total demographics versus what you see in Manhattan, but i’m not convinced about that. the previous character of the city is history. NYC is very clearly now some foreign city, not related or connected to America in any way. very few historic Americans walking around, it almost seems like a colony of Latin America and China. only the orthodox Jews remain as a visible sign of times in the past.

    the mayor is a literal communist. most citizens of NYC hate the President, dislike America and Americans. the television media is trying to make you care about NYC being hit hard by the virus. don’t go for it. those people wouldn’t care for one second if it was happening to you, and they say so, over and over.

    • Thanks: Hail
    • Replies: @bruce county
    The Stones nailed New York perfectly with "Shattered"

    Go ahead... Bite The Big Apple....Don't mind the maggots....

    , @Alden
    Lots of NYC metro boomers moved to California in the 60s 70s. Every time they go back they say it’s less and less White.
    , @Love Street
    Yep, Houston is well on its way to being that way too.
    They brag about it being an international city 💩.
    Mayor Sylvester Turner , what a joke.
  36. @Glock45
    Speaking of Covid-19, the latest wave of negro fatigue is coming in fast and hard with all the whining stories the lugenpresse is running about how covid is racist, since it is having a "disparate impact" on blacks. Story after story about this in the past week, and, reading in between the lines, somehow this "disparate impact" of the corona virus on blacks is....of course!!!....whitey's fault!

    Which makes me ask the question, for those pushing this non-sense, or their black pets, will ever answer:

    If living among whites is such a horribly, repressive experience (and, apparently now, even poses an existential threat) for black people...

    ...why don't they just separate?

    Why don't they return to their motherland?

    I mean, the same people who run the lugenpresse also tell us (through ads, TV shows, and movies) that blacks are super smart, super intelligent and filled with sage wisdom! Heck, we wouldn't have ever even gone to the Moon if it weren't for black people (see Hidden Colors!). So surely they can make it on their own!! Surely they can build the Wakanda of their wildest dreams back on their mother continent! They certainly don't even need whitey, right???

    hidden figures, [or was colors intended in yr post?

  37. Anonymous[141] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kim

    In an interview Sunday with CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Minnesota Fed prez Neel Kashkari said the U.S. economy is facing a “long, hard road” as it attempts to rebound from the coronavirus pandemic, warning Americans to brace themselves for 18 months of shutdowns.
     
    18 months of shutdowns would be a disparate experience, depending on where you live.

    Anyway, in the long run - perhaps even in the medium run - the determining issue of racial proportions across the country won't be replacement rates, or even birth rates. Rather, the big demographic determinant will be survival rates. That is the issue that forward thinkers should be cogitating upon.

    If this country (world) is shut down for another 18 months, it’s not the Chinese virus. It’s something much more sinister. Who? What? Where? Most importantly, Why?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the "population boom" has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can't support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term "totalitarian", an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he's a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it's crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today's geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ's Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It's too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It's what systems people call an "emergent property".

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they've brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can't work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco's inability to house its working population and California's inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities' Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won't work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask "Why is it all so cruel?". Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try "world as illusion", although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won't change the end of the cities.
  38. @Glock45
    Speaking of Covid-19, the latest wave of negro fatigue is coming in fast and hard with all the whining stories the lugenpresse is running about how covid is racist, since it is having a "disparate impact" on blacks. Story after story about this in the past week, and, reading in between the lines, somehow this "disparate impact" of the corona virus on blacks is....of course!!!....whitey's fault!

    Which makes me ask the question, for those pushing this non-sense, or their black pets, will ever answer:

    If living among whites is such a horribly, repressive experience (and, apparently now, even poses an existential threat) for black people...

    ...why don't they just separate?

    Why don't they return to their motherland?

    I mean, the same people who run the lugenpresse also tell us (through ads, TV shows, and movies) that blacks are super smart, super intelligent and filled with sage wisdom! Heck, we wouldn't have ever even gone to the Moon if it weren't for black people (see Hidden Colors!). So surely they can make it on their own!! Surely they can build the Wakanda of their wildest dreams back on their mother continent! They certainly don't even need whitey, right???

    Brawl breaks out at Covid-19 party in Philly. This is why they are catching the virus at higher rates.

    https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9znzQ_1586833594

  39. @Anonymous
    Odds are it already came for a city near you! Came to Detroit with a vengeance. Destroying everything in its path for 144 square miles. Ruined workplaces, neighborhoods, shopping areas, schools, safety, even churches were decimated. Financially destroyed and left in shambles. Now moving to all the ring suburbs. Racist for noticing.

    So very true. Racist for noticing, but now they are doing forage/scavenger parties down here. Except the police are on it and arrests are made.

  40. @ Dr Pepper I am one of the ones who has given up. I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late. I have zero friends left and very few family to socialize with. I don’t know if its because I am in a particularly foul mood today but I don’t think so. I grew up in GA and it is my home and I will die here. I started school in 1969 in one of the blackest (still is) schools in GA. There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal. Everyday was like a war zone trying to get home. We had to walk aabout 10 blocks. I will never forget it. And that’s when race relations were supposedly so much better. Everyone always says IKAGO. I do too. I had a few black friends, they were alright. But I would sacrifice everyone of them for a White nation. As I am sure they would sacrifice me too. It seems every family here has the mulatto grandbaby or niece or whatever. I had made a friend and we have been friends for about a year and a half but she just got a new boyfriend and he is no race realist. I thought he may be because he is from Michigan but alas, he is not. And he doesn’t like me because I am. As for the other poster who said Whites may awaken soon because of hard times, they may. I can’t throw my lot in with folks who have rejected me. Trust is a hard thing to establish, its alot harder to rekindle trust when it has been broken. I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority. I do. I wish I could communicate as eloquently as some of these people. I will be ok til my time comes but I cringe when I see little White toddlers as I know the hell that awaits them through no fault of their own. I see White women all over the nation go into schools and waste their talents trying to teach Black children. Can’t they see their delusion? It appears not. I see my young Whites getting ghettoized with the black culture. black culture is everywhere. Its quite horrible. I pray alot but He doesn’t seem to be listening to me? I will keep praying. I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly. You are the ones I pray for. Good luck my nation for you will certainly need it. Rant off now. I don’t even know what I was trying to say. But thank you God for PK and the posters on here. You really are a lifeline, even if you don’t know it.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I think you are right about the future. I want to believe that there will always be places to escape to. Small cities and towns that will remain civilized and safe. Places where our white children and grandchildren can live and thrive in peace. Enlightening to hear your experiences. The guy from Michigan must be from the Upper Peninsula. Or he’s lying.
    , @LoutishAngloQuebecker
    God Bless you.

    One thing I enjoy about PK's blog is the viewpoints we see here from lower-class Southerners. Poor grammar, not the best flow, but overall I love it. I can hear it in your guys' comments.

    You are the forgotten ones, the ones who can't afford to move away. The government has turned its back. Wealthier whites have turned their backs. You live in the integrated hell every day and see what's going on. Must be real sad to see.

    Anyways, God Bless and let's pray one day whites will regain their dignity and self respect.
    , @Corvinus
    "I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late."

    We have awaken. It's just that you don't personally agree what we have discovered for ourselves.

    "There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal."

    It wasn't as bad as you make it out to be.

    "I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority."

    Don't worry about us, we will be fine.

    "I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly."

    You're right, we do.
  41. The problem, of course, goes far beyond New York City itself, because the 68% nonwhite population of the city also controls the State, including rural areas that are literally 98% white:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper_Lake_(village),_New_York

    You can be a white person living in 1.7% black Saratoga Springs, and descended from ancestors who have lived there since colonial times, and these are the people who control your state government:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letitia_James

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Heastie

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Stewart-Cousins

    White politicians like Cuomo have seen the proverbial writing on the wall and completely betrayed their own race for electoral benefit. Cuomo is a ceaseless anti-white demagogue who knows that the Black and Puerto Rican votes in the 85% minority Bronx are far more important than the white votes in all of Upstate New York, and he acts and governs accordingly.

    This should be a very important lesson for white people in the Dakotas, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Vermont, and other white areas who think that big-city racial demographics will never affect them, because the Democratic Party is in the process of saturating urban areas with nonwhites and forming a voting bloc that will eventually outnumber the rural white areas and then treat them like colonies. And they will find enough white politicians who will sell their fellow whites down the river to succeed.

    • Replies: @D-FENS
    Many of those towns in the Adirondack Park are 99% white. I grew up just outside the Park and still go back every year. Not as spectacular as say, Mt. Rainier or Yosemite but then you don’t need a permit to hike in 5 miles to a remote lake.

    Very hard winters, though.
    , @ThreeCranes
    Good comment. And given how sparsely populated rural areas are, Democrats won’t have to import too many third-world immigrants to gain those electoral majorities.
    , @Alden
    Great comment. Look what’s happened in majority White Minnesota and Wisconsin. Seattle is majority White. The city, county and state civil service is heavily affirmative action black and BLM and Socialist Alternative runs the town. Portland is run by blacks and lunatic fringe Whites.

    At least California isn’t run by black Oakland, Pittsburgh and Richmond and the blacks of Los Angeles are dispersed all over S California where Hispanic police, elected officials and ordinary civilians keep them under control.
  42. @jbwilson24
    "I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action."

    Traditional America is not coming back, period. Just the transition from rural to urban populations has left major marks that are almost impossible to erase. The rise of obesity, diabetes, etc. The dysgenic effect of the welfare state being another.

    The truth is that America's white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones' book 'the slaughter of cities') and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can't compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    What we CAN do is exactly as you suggest: have kids, teach them of their culture, expose them to the realities of power and the struggle that they are going to have as members of a despised minority. Most of the world is tribal, and they had better get used to competing with tribal peoples.

    I agree with what you say re how dysgenic civilization is, and that in some ways Whites exemplify this to a sad degree — re “Traditional America is not coming back”: yes, it is hard to visualize, especially when 35% of the white population is obese and/or suffering from other chronic ‘diseases of modern civilization’ — but I won’t be throwing in the towel; the issue is too important — a ‘majority minority’ America will be a literal disaster for Whites, and they have to be made to see that — we need to get a “critical mass” of Whites to realize this.

    However I disagree with this part:

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can’t compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    Having worked in high tech for a long time, I do not see (dot) Indians as particularly intelligent, ambitious, or hyper-competitive; nor devious, to be fair — but they are conformist suck-ups, and definitely clannish/nepotistic — once they reach “critical mass” in a company, Whites are far less likely to be hired there, and it is only a matter of time before the stupid Whites in lower level management who started hiring them dwindle too (good riddance), since otherwise you have a plantation/overseer kind of optic that most companies consciously want to avoid.

  43. @Glock45
    Speaking of Covid-19, the latest wave of negro fatigue is coming in fast and hard with all the whining stories the lugenpresse is running about how covid is racist, since it is having a "disparate impact" on blacks. Story after story about this in the past week, and, reading in between the lines, somehow this "disparate impact" of the corona virus on blacks is....of course!!!....whitey's fault!

    Which makes me ask the question, for those pushing this non-sense, or their black pets, will ever answer:

    If living among whites is such a horribly, repressive experience (and, apparently now, even poses an existential threat) for black people...

    ...why don't they just separate?

    Why don't they return to their motherland?

    I mean, the same people who run the lugenpresse also tell us (through ads, TV shows, and movies) that blacks are super smart, super intelligent and filled with sage wisdom! Heck, we wouldn't have ever even gone to the Moon if it weren't for black people (see Hidden Colors!). So surely they can make it on their own!! Surely they can build the Wakanda of their wildest dreams back on their mother continent! They certainly don't even need whitey, right???

    I heard they had all this planned already and we’re all packed and ready for the voyage back to the motherland but the bicycle sank.

  44. @prime noticer
    not sure i believe the drop from 2000 to 2020 was only 3%.

    if you were in NYC in 2000 and then didn't go there again until 2020, you would swear you were in a foreign country. i used to go there every couple months between 1995 and 2000, then went back in 2015 and the city was unrecognizable. all of the old New Yorkers were long gone.

    it's possible gentrification in the boroughs has balanced out the total demographics versus what you see in Manhattan, but i'm not convinced about that. the previous character of the city is history. NYC is very clearly now some foreign city, not related or connected to America in any way. very few historic Americans walking around, it almost seems like a colony of Latin America and China. only the orthodox Jews remain as a visible sign of times in the past.

    the mayor is a literal communist. most citizens of NYC hate the President, dislike America and Americans. the television media is trying to make you care about NYC being hit hard by the virus. don't go for it. those people wouldn't care for one second if it was happening to you, and they say so, over and over.

    The Stones nailed New York perfectly with “Shattered”

    Go ahead… Bite The Big Apple….Don’t mind the maggots….

    • Replies: @Raz
    "Shattered" was a few years after the really bad NY depicted in movies like Taxi Driver. Mid 70's were the nadir. It was starting to get better a little after that with Koch as Mayor. And got better with effective government under Guiliani and Bloomberg. My sense it is going bad again under DeBlasio. Even my left wing daughter and her husband didn't like him when they lived in NY. But he has a Black wife (who was handed billions of dollars to do who knows what with a city agency devoted to mental health and can't account for the money) and is more popular with the Black electorate you would expect a White guy to be.
  45. Anonymous[407] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gunga Din
    Lyndon Johnson and Ted Kennedy should go down in history as the greatest enemies of White Americans. Their actions are the root cause of our decline, current pitiful state and eventual demise.

    Special attention should also be paid to the string puller. The man behind the mask.

  46. @prime noticer
    not sure i believe the drop from 2000 to 2020 was only 3%.

    if you were in NYC in 2000 and then didn't go there again until 2020, you would swear you were in a foreign country. i used to go there every couple months between 1995 and 2000, then went back in 2015 and the city was unrecognizable. all of the old New Yorkers were long gone.

    it's possible gentrification in the boroughs has balanced out the total demographics versus what you see in Manhattan, but i'm not convinced about that. the previous character of the city is history. NYC is very clearly now some foreign city, not related or connected to America in any way. very few historic Americans walking around, it almost seems like a colony of Latin America and China. only the orthodox Jews remain as a visible sign of times in the past.

    the mayor is a literal communist. most citizens of NYC hate the President, dislike America and Americans. the television media is trying to make you care about NYC being hit hard by the virus. don't go for it. those people wouldn't care for one second if it was happening to you, and they say so, over and over.

    Lots of NYC metro boomers moved to California in the 60s 70s. Every time they go back they say it’s less and less White.

  47. @jbwilson24
    "I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action."

    Traditional America is not coming back, period. Just the transition from rural to urban populations has left major marks that are almost impossible to erase. The rise of obesity, diabetes, etc. The dysgenic effect of the welfare state being another.

    The truth is that America's white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones' book 'the slaughter of cities') and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can't compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    What we CAN do is exactly as you suggest: have kids, teach them of their culture, expose them to the realities of power and the struggle that they are going to have as members of a despised minority. Most of the world is tribal, and they had better get used to competing with tribal peoples.

    We’re now starting the third generation of affirmative action. Before marriage and children comes a decently paid job with some security that you’ll be able to pay rent or mortgage and feed the kids 5, 10, 15 years hence.

    Affirmative action must end before Whites can talk about marriage, homes and having lots of White children. So let’s be realistic instead of loser conservatism.

    Or maybe we can all go on welfare and live off our kids. But welfare, like everything in America discriminates against Whites.

    • Agree: Augustus
    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine. If any group requires, as a white man on Wall Street once told me, "2000 sf for the parents and 500sf per child", then it's going to need a lot more soul crushing work and to send both parents to do it. And it frankly cannot afford more than 3 children.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/91feb/9102house2.htm
  48. NYC was a relatively comfy place up until the mid-1960’s. One could still see its greatness in the pre-war architecture. And you could see the vision of the city’s energetic founders. Until the early 1960’s one could go anywhere in the boroughs and find no trouble, unless you were looking for it.

    The little candy store/soda fountain places were really wonderful for a kid. The German, Italian and yes, even Jewish delis were awesome. There were great parks and playgrounds. It was a very comfy big city.

    Now, aside from the cataclysmic racial changes, Manhattan is virtually owned by the guy who helped kill thousands of innocent people in what was, for him anyway, a giant insurance scam.

    It’s horribly sad. I consulted the thesaurus for a better description. The English language lacks anything strong enough to describe it for me.

  49. This is not great news for NY whites, but look at the fine print: the 20 years from 1980 to 2000 saw it drop from 52 to 35, but in the next 20 years it went to 32. Obviously slowing down a lot.

    I listened to a Charles Murray interview where he said that there were still plenty of places where white people can live among similarly-minded whites, but I’m not entirely sure where he means. Perhaps very small towns. There’s a few that are 98% plus white:
    http://zipatlas.com/us/city-comparison/percentage-white-population.1.htm

    Here’s a few:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Stein,_Ohio (piece of rural Germany in Ohio)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnesville,_Pennsylvania (used to host a Bavarian festival)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutopolis,_Illinois (“City of the Teutons”)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria,_Minnesota (has ‘Runestone Community Centre’)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Ulm,_Minnesota (settled by The German Land Company, hosts Oktoberfest and the Bavarian Blast festival)

    Looks like there’s a vague pattern

    Amusingly, the most ‘white’ place is recorded by Wikipedia as Kiryas Joel, New York: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Places_in_the_United_States_with_notable_demographic_characteristics#Race_2

  50. @bruce county
    Mom was a golliwog...

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=golliwog&FORM=HDRSC2

    LMFAO!!!!!!

  51. @Dr. Pepper
    Perhaps the great replacement has already happened! We are in damage control now. The only way we can make it is to fight back, but it seems like many of our people have lost the will to fight. Much of what we see on television is our surrender to the nonwhites. White men are shown as buffoons, while black men are shown as men. When they take down our monuments, then we have surrendered.

    Is there a way to win? Yes, or course, but do you think whites will unite to fight for their own people? If we were a boxer, we would be in the corner covering our face to hopefully stop a few of the blows. If we strike back, it will only make the oppoent hit us harder. However, if we don't fight, we will find ourselves on the floor looking up to the enemy.

    There come a point when one needs to completely surrender and throw in the towel, or fight back. In Virginia a tyrant is taking away our rights to bear arms because the negroes don't want us to have them. Never mind it is the negroes killing other negroes. There are no whites Nazis or white supremacists hurting anyone, but the media tells them those lies.

    Unless we joing together as a people, we are done!

    “Unless we join together as a people, we are done!”

    This!

    • Agree: bruce county
  52. O.T. – but relevant. I saw some Nascar driver was reprimanded for using the dreaded N. You know, that word that is so freely tossed around by the pyramid builder descendants? This will be a career crusher for the guy, and all those other talented black drivers can take his place. I’m just wondering what sponsors they’ll have on their car decals. “And in the lead position, Jaquarius Levonte, driving the Chrysler 300” (with Old English 800 decals, Black & Mild stickers all over). “Whoa!!!Tom? Did you see that “Black Ice ” air freshener fly out of his window!!? Levonte is sure to be in the top 3 this time. ….”Yes Fred, he is a very diverse driver as you can see…”

    • LOL: Love Street
    • Replies: @Mark in MI
    I, personally, started using the word "Kaffir". Love the sound of it. Same meaning but most people still have no idea what it means.
  53. @prime noticer
    not sure i believe the drop from 2000 to 2020 was only 3%.

    if you were in NYC in 2000 and then didn't go there again until 2020, you would swear you were in a foreign country. i used to go there every couple months between 1995 and 2000, then went back in 2015 and the city was unrecognizable. all of the old New Yorkers were long gone.

    it's possible gentrification in the boroughs has balanced out the total demographics versus what you see in Manhattan, but i'm not convinced about that. the previous character of the city is history. NYC is very clearly now some foreign city, not related or connected to America in any way. very few historic Americans walking around, it almost seems like a colony of Latin America and China. only the orthodox Jews remain as a visible sign of times in the past.

    the mayor is a literal communist. most citizens of NYC hate the President, dislike America and Americans. the television media is trying to make you care about NYC being hit hard by the virus. don't go for it. those people wouldn't care for one second if it was happening to you, and they say so, over and over.

    Yep, Houston is well on its way to being that way too.
    They brag about it being an international city 💩.
    Mayor Sylvester Turner , what a joke.

  54. OT: Teenage girl murdered, her boyfriend shot, over 3 pairs of sneakers. Guess the suspects.

    https://news.yahoo.com/two-men-arrested-murder-miami-154317448.html

    • Thanks: eah
  55. The plummet began when The Jew, The Cuck and The Drunk pushed through the 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration Act, which fundamentally altered our demographics, sold with the lie it wouldn’t.

    Today we can’t even get the Orange Weakling to end birthright citizenship which isn’t law.

    “The Union” won’t last without a parting of ways.

    • Replies: @Mark in MI
    I am a Trump supporter but you are 100% correct on this one.
  56. the jewish population is, at least, 15%. with a very low estimate of 90% of them being non-mixed with hispanics, blacks or asians.

    so this means that it’s around 18% or so of the non-hispanic “goyim white” population in nyc! many of them in staten island, which is barely the city as we know it

  57. @Dr. X
    The problem, of course, goes far beyond New York City itself, because the 68% nonwhite population of the city also controls the State, including rural areas that are literally 98% white:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper_Lake_(village),_New_York

    You can be a white person living in 1.7% black Saratoga Springs, and descended from ancestors who have lived there since colonial times, and these are the people who control your state government:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letitia_James

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Heastie

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Stewart-Cousins

    White politicians like Cuomo have seen the proverbial writing on the wall and completely betrayed their own race for electoral benefit. Cuomo is a ceaseless anti-white demagogue who knows that the Black and Puerto Rican votes in the 85% minority Bronx are far more important than the white votes in all of Upstate New York, and he acts and governs accordingly.

    This should be a very important lesson for white people in the Dakotas, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Vermont, and other white areas who think that big-city racial demographics will never affect them, because the Democratic Party is in the process of saturating urban areas with nonwhites and forming a voting bloc that will eventually outnumber the rural white areas and then treat them like colonies. And they will find enough white politicians who will sell their fellow whites down the river to succeed.

    Many of those towns in the Adirondack Park are 99% white. I grew up just outside the Park and still go back every year. Not as spectacular as say, Mt. Rainier or Yosemite but then you don’t need a permit to hike in 5 miles to a remote lake.

    Very hard winters, though.

  58. @jbwilson24
    "New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away ‘White” Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White"

    Yes, but that also means that NY was not 98% white in 1910, since a lot of those 'white' people were Jews.

    Jews do not identify as white, as they repeatedly tell us with op-eds in Haaretz, the Times of Israel, etc.

    a lot fo Jews infiltrated, oops, moved here after WW1 and WW2.
    Im not sure how many were here in 1900, but statistically, they were the criminals, not Blacks.

    • Replies: @D-FENS
    I thought most of the Jews moved here between 1890 and 1917. Partly because so many Jews were radicals, the 1924 immigration act put the brakes on immigration. I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here. Plus sick of the rest of the world after the futile experience of WW1. Wall street was bombed at least once that I know of.

    I suspect that if the 1924 Immigration Act had been enacted in 1904, FDR would not have been elected. While American zionists did work to push US into WW1 (rewarded with Balfour Declaration), our anglophile elite would have gotten us in anyway as they did in WW2. They were making too much money selling arms to the allies and without US entry, the allies would have defaulted on loans made by the Morgan and Rockefeller interests.
  59. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @GA Pretty Pony
    @ Dr Pepper I am one of the ones who has given up. I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late. I have zero friends left and very few family to socialize with. I don't know if its because I am in a particularly foul mood today but I don't think so. I grew up in GA and it is my home and I will die here. I started school in 1969 in one of the blackest (still is) schools in GA. There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal. Everyday was like a war zone trying to get home. We had to walk aabout 10 blocks. I will never forget it. And that's when race relations were supposedly so much better. Everyone always says IKAGO. I do too. I had a few black friends, they were alright. But I would sacrifice everyone of them for a White nation. As I am sure they would sacrifice me too. It seems every family here has the mulatto grandbaby or niece or whatever. I had made a friend and we have been friends for about a year and a half but she just got a new boyfriend and he is no race realist. I thought he may be because he is from Michigan but alas, he is not. And he doesn't like me because I am. As for the other poster who said Whites may awaken soon because of hard times, they may. I can't throw my lot in with folks who have rejected me. Trust is a hard thing to establish, its alot harder to rekindle trust when it has been broken. I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority. I do. I wish I could communicate as eloquently as some of these people. I will be ok til my time comes but I cringe when I see little White toddlers as I know the hell that awaits them through no fault of their own. I see White women all over the nation go into schools and waste their talents trying to teach Black children. Can't they see their delusion? It appears not. I see my young Whites getting ghettoized with the black culture. black culture is everywhere. Its quite horrible. I pray alot but He doesn't seem to be listening to me? I will keep praying. I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly. You are the ones I pray for. Good luck my nation for you will certainly need it. Rant off now. I don't even know what I was trying to say. But thank you God for PK and the posters on here. You really are a lifeline, even if you don't know it.

    I think you are right about the future. I want to believe that there will always be places to escape to. Small cities and towns that will remain civilized and safe. Places where our white children and grandchildren can live and thrive in peace. Enlightening to hear your experiences. The guy from Michigan must be from the Upper Peninsula. Or he’s lying.

    • Replies: @Not Woke--Not Broke
    Anonymous(210)------------The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.
  60. @Dr. X
    The problem, of course, goes far beyond New York City itself, because the 68% nonwhite population of the city also controls the State, including rural areas that are literally 98% white:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper_Lake_(village),_New_York

    You can be a white person living in 1.7% black Saratoga Springs, and descended from ancestors who have lived there since colonial times, and these are the people who control your state government:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letitia_James

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Heastie

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Stewart-Cousins

    White politicians like Cuomo have seen the proverbial writing on the wall and completely betrayed their own race for electoral benefit. Cuomo is a ceaseless anti-white demagogue who knows that the Black and Puerto Rican votes in the 85% minority Bronx are far more important than the white votes in all of Upstate New York, and he acts and governs accordingly.

    This should be a very important lesson for white people in the Dakotas, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Vermont, and other white areas who think that big-city racial demographics will never affect them, because the Democratic Party is in the process of saturating urban areas with nonwhites and forming a voting bloc that will eventually outnumber the rural white areas and then treat them like colonies. And they will find enough white politicians who will sell their fellow whites down the river to succeed.

    Good comment. And given how sparsely populated rural areas are, Democrats won’t have to import too many third-world immigrants to gain those electoral majorities.

  61. COVID-19 is having a deadly impact on the African-American community. I’ll be talking with leaders, doctors, journalists, & REAL people suffering in this pandemic. Hope y’all can join me for this discussion tomorrow 4/14 at 11 PM EST on @OWNTV & streaming for free on @AppleTV. pic.twitter.com/L2nSJQ782x

    — Oprah Winfrey (@Oprah) April 13, 2020

    Indeed, blacks Americans run the risk of suffering from an array of the comorbidities that cause complications for coronavirus positive people. “African Americans and Native Americans develop high blood pressure at much younger ages, and it’s less likely to be under control, and does greater harm to their organs,” said Surgeon General Jerome Adams. “Puerto Ricans have higher rates of asthma and black boys are three times as likely to die of asthma as their white counterparts. As a matter of fact, I’ve been carrying around an inhaler in my pocket for 40 years out of fear of having a fatal asthma attack. And I hope that showing you this inhaler shows little kids with asthma all across the country that they can grow up to be Surgeon General one day.”

    • Replies: @bruce county
    Jesus Christ.... Some one get me a tissue.
    , @nymom
    It is actually not the Black community that is suffering disportionately from the virus in NYC, but the Asian and Hispanic community which probably includes Dominicans many of who could be classified as Black (although don't tell them that they are black).

    Asian although a very low 7% of the victims are only 14% of NYC's population...which means their numbers are quite high all things considered.

    This is just the usual suspects painting Black people as the biggest victims of everything again...More attention-whoring by the usual suspects...
  62. @Alden
    We’re now starting the third generation of affirmative action. Before marriage and children comes a decently paid job with some security that you’ll be able to pay rent or mortgage and feed the kids 5, 10, 15 years hence.

    Affirmative action must end before Whites can talk about marriage, homes and having lots of White children. So let’s be realistic instead of loser conservatism.

    Or maybe we can all go on welfare and live off our kids. But welfare, like everything in America discriminates against Whites.

    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine. If any group requires, as a white man on Wall Street once told me, “2000 sf for the parents and 500sf per child”, then it’s going to need a lot more soul crushing work and to send both parents to do it. And it frankly cannot afford more than 3 children.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/91feb/9102house2.htm

    • Replies: @Alden
    My point was affirmative action, not size of houses. My point was not modest poverty level living standards. If neither parent can get a job due to affirmative action, any type of housing other than section 8 or the projects is out of the question. But government subsidized housing is reserved for non Whites, even illegals and last week’s arrivals.

    Whites are even affirmative actioned out of welfare and disability as well as jobs.

    And the White elites are as enthusiastic about affirmative action as Justice Brennan who wrote the doctrine of disparate representation.
    , @Mr. Rational

    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine.
     
    The problem is that such down-scale housing is now thoroughly infested with diversity and has lousy schools.  You'd have to home-school to avoid putting the kids through hell 180 days a year, and not everyone is willing or even able to do that.
  63. I’d wager 95% of Covid cases are in Blue cities and States. Meanwhile, the rest of the country is supposed to kow-tow to THOSE assholes and their needs.

    A Tough Shit for them kinda deal. Let em stretch out in the beds they made for themselves.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
  64. @Loren
    a lot fo Jews infiltrated, oops, moved here after WW1 and WW2.
    Im not sure how many were here in 1900, but statistically, they were the criminals, not Blacks.

    I thought most of the Jews moved here between 1890 and 1917. Partly because so many Jews were radicals, the 1924 immigration act put the brakes on immigration. I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here. Plus sick of the rest of the world after the futile experience of WW1. Wall street was bombed at least once that I know of.

    I suspect that if the 1924 Immigration Act had been enacted in 1904, FDR would not have been elected. While American zionists did work to push US into WW1 (rewarded with Balfour Declaration), our anglophile elite would have gotten us in anyway as they did in WW2. They were making too much money selling arms to the allies and without US entry, the allies would have defaulted on loans made by the Morgan and Rockefeller interests.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs

    I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here.
     
    Early 20th century immigration was a success. No one was being imported by globalist swine for government coin. There was no welfare state and everyone learned English.

    By comparison the 21st century gimmiegrant is a losing bet. Being so dissimilar they never assimilate. The (IQ-level) retarded arrive as sick, useless burdens and "educated" legals vote 90% democrap. We need a 30-year moratorium on immigration while we clean house.

    , @Hibernian
    Irish and German grievances, and Scandinavian neutralism, aligned with the heritage of independence passed down from the WASPS who rebelled in 1776. Unfortunately, somewhere along the way, an elite super wealthy Anglophilic WASP upper class had developed, and they, exemplified by Teddy Roosevelt, wanted to go to war for Britain.
  65. @Anonymous
    I think you are right about the future. I want to believe that there will always be places to escape to. Small cities and towns that will remain civilized and safe. Places where our white children and grandchildren can live and thrive in peace. Enlightening to hear your experiences. The guy from Michigan must be from the Upper Peninsula. Or he’s lying.

    Anonymous(210)————The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.

    • Agree: Augustus
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.
     
    It's been tried. The Somalis then go, on their own, to a large city with Federally paid welfare and other Somalis. Its the only place they can survive economically and culturally.
    The present lockdowns might be used as precedent to force Somalis to stay in small cities and towns, but even the PRC has not been able to stop its own internal migrations.
  66. NYC was actually 99% white in 1900–and the relative handful of blacks were a crime problem even then. They were about 4% of Philadelphia back then, and a major crime problem.

    When groids talk about how they “built” American cities, it’s not only unlikely, it’s impossible. They weren’t even infesting those cities when YT was actually doing the building and development.

  67. @Loren
    COVID-19 is having a deadly impact on the African-American community. I’ll be talking with leaders, doctors, journalists, & REAL people suffering in this pandemic. Hope y’all can join me for this discussion tomorrow 4/14 at 11 PM EST on @OWNTV & streaming for free on @AppleTV. pic.twitter.com/L2nSJQ782x

    — Oprah Winfrey (@Oprah) April 13, 2020

    Indeed, blacks Americans run the risk of suffering from an array of the comorbidities that cause complications for coronavirus positive people. “African Americans and Native Americans develop high blood pressure at much younger ages, and it’s less likely to be under control, and does greater harm to their organs,” said Surgeon General Jerome Adams. “Puerto Ricans have higher rates of asthma and black boys are three times as likely to die of asthma as their white counterparts. As a matter of fact, I’ve been carrying around an inhaler in my pocket for 40 years out of fear of having a fatal asthma attack. And I hope that showing you this inhaler shows little kids with asthma all across the country that they can grow up to be Surgeon General one day.”

    Jesus Christ…. Some one get me a tissue.

    • LOL: Augustus
  68. YT says:

    I blame this on the white baby boomers who today, still , in April 2020 are so bent on living in their suburbs and my greedy baby boomer father just told me today “cities are done” with a proud look on his face, like he’s proud of all the American cities being destroyed I could almost weep or become bitter with hatred for him . It comes down to the racial reality and the reality of cities. Cities were and always will be the economic and cultural center of a civilization, even with the internet. If the city goes so does everything else and you baby boomers were so against that concept because of Thomas Jefferson and the yeoman, because of your love of cars and because you wanted a lawn. I really think most problems we have, obesity and loneliness and violence , all came down to two things: urban planning/ design and race. And now look what I, a white , born in the 90’s, inherited. When you go to your grave think of this and think of the whites born after 1980. You probably won’t though since you were and are so greedy. And I hope it haunts your souls for eternity.

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    Sure.

    Blame your old man.

    Like he destroyed the cities. Like he didn’t warn you what was going on.

    What makes you think he had any more power over government shenanigans than you do now?

    Cities were not designed to become a haven for the homeless populations of the country. They didn’t migrate there like buffalo. They were lured there with promise of protection and free shit.

    Try understanding the old man’s smile.

    I’m wearing the same one as I sit here reading your pitiful blame-game, chronic complaint.
    , @anarchyst
    You are blaming the wrong people. It is the "greatest generation" that fomented the destruction of the major cities. The "greatest generation" eviscerated true "freedom of association" and "restrictive (real estate) covenants", NOT us "boomers". Had forced integration and the abolition of "freedom of association" not been the case, the cities would be far better places today.

    Many of us "boomers" protested against the misguided "civil-rights (for some) laws and statutes that were forced on us by those of the "greatest generation" under the auspices of jewish groups. Let's not forget the jewish destruction of civil society with "bussing" schemes of the 1970s in which jewish judges ruled that "blacks had to sit next to whites in order to be able to learn". That was another aspect of the so-called "civil-rights (for some)" movement that pushed whites out of cities.

    Us white "boomers" who protested were "pushed back" into obscurity by the jewish-run pro-civil-rights (for some) mainstream media as well as by federal troops.

    Judicial tyranny exposed itself with the demand by judges that property taxes be increased so that "a new school" could be built for blacks in Kansas City. The school that was built was state-of-the-art, having the best amenities that (taxpayer) dollars could buy. It didn't take but a few years for the state-of-the-art school to be trashed by the very blacks attending it.

    The "greatest generation" made the world safe for today's world jewry domination of western societies. In my humble opinion, we fought on the "wrong side".

    There is an currently running HBO series, a "what if" situation in which Charles Lindbergh wins the presidency instead of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It is a sappy jew-produced program that is designed to elicit pity for the "poor jews", reinforcing their status as "victims". If Lindbergh had not been marginalized by the power structure, and had achieved the presidency, we would be living in a much better world today. World War 2 would have been "Europe's war" for Europeans to figure out. The sad part of the whole situation is that our "best and brightest" were sacrificed on the battlefield...for what??

    Your assessment of "boomers" being blamed for the suburbs is off-base. The suburbs is what made the American dream possible.

    As to cities, you can have them. Although being born in a (once) great city, your idea of stacking people up on top of each other in apartments and condos, with the resultant disease and urban "vibrancy" is not my cup of tea.

    All one has to do is look at New (jew) York City. Most of the people who live there don't own and will never own anything of real value, instead paying inflated, exorbitant "rent" to some fat jew shylock landlord. Most of the people cannot afford to own anything, despite wages being relatively high. Ownership of real estate is definitely out of the question for most New York City residents.

    What is wrong with people choosing how and where they want to live? YOU might not like suburbs, preferring the "vibrancy" and urban decay of cities, but in the "good ol' USA, people STILL have choices.

    , @Not Woke--Not Broke
    YT--------Boomer Whites abandoned the cities because of Negroes,not because they wanted lawns.Sure a few of us did the Mother Earth farmletts thing,but most of us just wanted Whitopia.
  69. @anonymous
    Another pointless repetitive article on racial demographics. We get it. But now what? The only way to save traditional America is to boot out the Northeast and West Coast into separate nations. What remains is Legacy America which can be salvaged. A return to the America of 1990 by shutting down immigration and changing the education system. I find anything else but practical solutions to be useless. The author is wasting his life writing about black crime #1037.

    Doesn’t legacy America include the south east?

    Most of those states are 20-40% black. The big cities seem to be run by blacks. The black cities of Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Detroit Chicago, Milwaukee. St Louis, Milwaukee and their metro areas are just black crime ridden ghettos run by black politicians and civil service. Atlanta, Mobile, New Orleans, Baton Rouge all the southern cities are black ghettos run by blacks

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.

    It’s so nice to deal with competent polite Hispanic Asian pacific island affirmative action government workers here in California instead of the snarling hateful sows when affirmative action began. Even the hateful snarling sows have shaped up but now they have Hispanic Asian supervisors.

    If I have to be a minority I prefer to be a minority in a 5-7 percent black state like California instead of a 30 percent black state or a state run by a city like Chicago or St Louis.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Alden,
    You are exactly right. Honestly, these days I feel more comfortable in California then I do in Georgia or Michigan. California is run by Latinos, who actually want a civilization to live in. People on this blog complain about Hispanics/Asians/Muslims, and there are good reasons to complain about those groups, but at least you can have civilization with those people.

    People who complain about California these days are just idiots, you won't get gangbanged in many parts of the state now, and you can actually have a family, and realize your kids won't get beat up in school by thugs.

    Those "Conservative" politicians who decry mass immigration but let Blacks outbreed Whites are just the worst people in America. These days, Gavin Newsom is more pro White than the governor of Alabama.
    , @eah

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.
     
    Anyone who visits a government office, especially in/near a major city, has seen the same -- Blacks are now over-represented in many branches of the federal government, oftentimes dramatically so; e.g. in the Dept of Education, nearly 40% of the employees are black (select "Department of Education" --> link) -- I once emailed my congressional representative to suggest the EEOC investigate the obviously discriminatory hiring practices of the federal government, especially the Dept of Education -- I got no reply.

    I think that without affirmative action in government employment (where the jobs pay pretty well and have very good benefits, including pensions), the black middle class would shrink dramatically.
  70. @TomSchmidt
    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine. If any group requires, as a white man on Wall Street once told me, "2000 sf for the parents and 500sf per child", then it's going to need a lot more soul crushing work and to send both parents to do it. And it frankly cannot afford more than 3 children.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/91feb/9102house2.htm

    My point was affirmative action, not size of houses. My point was not modest poverty level living standards. If neither parent can get a job due to affirmative action, any type of housing other than section 8 or the projects is out of the question. But government subsidized housing is reserved for non Whites, even illegals and last week’s arrivals.

    Whites are even affirmative actioned out of welfare and disability as well as jobs.

    And the White elites are as enthusiastic about affirmative action as Justice Brennan who wrote the doctrine of disparate representation.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Presumably you see AA giving unwarranted advantages to non-whites. Happens, I guess. Such that the people not advantaged have less income coming in than they might otherwise have had.

    I don't agree with the idea that AA prevents either parent from getting a job. I've never seen that level of discrimination and I dont think it exists. Hell, until Corona, there were plenty of jobs: they just paid crap wages. But crap wages, even in NYC, could buy housing; not great housing.

    The challenge is: can people disadvantaged still raise a family with the lower level wages in a smaller place? Post-war whites could. Dump the cable TV, the over-750sf home, and a few other things, and maybe they can again. The EITC doesn't take any account of race and it is available to all. Just sayin'.
  71. @Dr. X
    The problem, of course, goes far beyond New York City itself, because the 68% nonwhite population of the city also controls the State, including rural areas that are literally 98% white:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper_Lake_(village),_New_York

    You can be a white person living in 1.7% black Saratoga Springs, and descended from ancestors who have lived there since colonial times, and these are the people who control your state government:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letitia_James

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Heastie

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Stewart-Cousins

    White politicians like Cuomo have seen the proverbial writing on the wall and completely betrayed their own race for electoral benefit. Cuomo is a ceaseless anti-white demagogue who knows that the Black and Puerto Rican votes in the 85% minority Bronx are far more important than the white votes in all of Upstate New York, and he acts and governs accordingly.

    This should be a very important lesson for white people in the Dakotas, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Vermont, and other white areas who think that big-city racial demographics will never affect them, because the Democratic Party is in the process of saturating urban areas with nonwhites and forming a voting bloc that will eventually outnumber the rural white areas and then treat them like colonies. And they will find enough white politicians who will sell their fellow whites down the river to succeed.

    Great comment. Look what’s happened in majority White Minnesota and Wisconsin. Seattle is majority White. The city, county and state civil service is heavily affirmative action black and BLM and Socialist Alternative runs the town. Portland is run by blacks and lunatic fringe Whites.

    At least California isn’t run by black Oakland, Pittsburgh and Richmond and the blacks of Los Angeles are dispersed all over S California where Hispanic police, elected officials and ordinary civilians keep them under control.

  72. Anonymous[134] • Disclaimer says:
    @Not Woke--Not Broke
    Only White people would cheer their own replacement. White men built the modern world. When and why did we change? I blame the 19th amendment giving women the vote,the birth control pill,and soy.

    Yoga, too.

    • LOL: bruce county
  73. Anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    If this country (world) is shut down for another 18 months, it’s not the Chinese virus. It’s something much more sinister. Who? What? Where? Most importantly, Why?

    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the “population boom” has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can’t support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term “totalitarian”, an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he’s a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it’s crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today’s geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ’s Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It’s too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It’s what systems people call an “emergent property”.

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they’ve brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can’t work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco’s inability to house its working population and California’s inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities’ Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won’t work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask “Why is it all so cruel?”. Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try “world as illusion”, although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won’t change the end of the cities.

    • Agree: Augustus, Sick 'n Tired
    • Replies: @nymom
    The only problem with your analysis is that most modern people wish to live in urban areas. They don't want to live on farms or these suburban utopias you are talking about which existed in our past. People make choices and unfortunately most of them chose the cities to reside within and have their children...Many of the Whites remaining in NYC are top tier earners and use private schools for their children. So they don't care as yet about the deterioration around them. They are insulated from it.

    This is true worldwide by the way; which is why many of the larger countries such as China and maybe India and some other Asian countries have begun to restrict people from moving into cities. It is only here in the US that you can move willy nilly where ever you feel like it.

    Urban demographics or unrest, squalor, etc., could change that in the future; but for now it's just the way it is...
    , @Augustus
    Thank you so much. Between you, Copley, a dose of race realism from this site, and a bit of understanding of how poverty actually pays big for cities, plus my economic view of hyper inflation, you have REALLY opened my eyes! Thank you for helping to supply so much cohesion to the thoughts of an old, aging economist. It has been educating reading your comments.
    , @AnalogMan
    That's the kind of intelligent commentary I come here for. Please get yourself a handle, or otherwise identify yourself in your comment, so that I (and others) can look out for your work.
    , @TomSchmidt
    I'll have to pick up Uncivilization.

    I'd urge you to read Scale, by Geoffrey West. It offers a counter to your arguments based on the science of fractals.
  74. Anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Not Woke--Not Broke
    Anonymous(210)------------The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.

    The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.

    It’s been tried. The Somalis then go, on their own, to a large city with Federally paid welfare and other Somalis. Its the only place they can survive economically and culturally.
    The present lockdowns might be used as precedent to force Somalis to stay in small cities and towns, but even the PRC has not been able to stop its own internal migrations.

    • Replies: @Augustus
    Somalis, the Obama race bomb against whites. He could drop them anywhere as a surprise attack. The bomb explodes like a nuclear device and rids an area of whites as surely as radiation, and permanently.
  75. @Jim in Jersey
    Maybe you feel you’re wasting your time reading them.

    Don’t try to speak for everyone.

    We all realize the facts are redundant but new visitors don’t.

    He didn´t SAY…he was ¨speaking for everyone¨…Jim. Mind if he has an opinion on the article? Sort of like YOU?

  76. @D-FENS
    I thought most of the Jews moved here between 1890 and 1917. Partly because so many Jews were radicals, the 1924 immigration act put the brakes on immigration. I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here. Plus sick of the rest of the world after the futile experience of WW1. Wall street was bombed at least once that I know of.

    I suspect that if the 1924 Immigration Act had been enacted in 1904, FDR would not have been elected. While American zionists did work to push US into WW1 (rewarded with Balfour Declaration), our anglophile elite would have gotten us in anyway as they did in WW2. They were making too much money selling arms to the allies and without US entry, the allies would have defaulted on loans made by the Morgan and Rockefeller interests.

    I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here.

    Early 20th century immigration was a success. No one was being imported by globalist swine for government coin. There was no welfare state and everyone learned English.

    By comparison the 21st century gimmiegrant is a losing bet. Being so dissimilar they never assimilate. The (IQ-level) retarded arrive as sick, useless burdens and “educated” legals vote 90% democrap. We need a 30-year moratorium on immigration while we clean house.

    • Agree: AR in Illinois
    • Replies: @Loren
    No, Jews took over.
  77. Here’s a video of New York City in 1911
    These are those who built the city.

    • Thanks: Hibernian
    • Replies: @bruce county
    It would be great to see this in color.

    Thanks Kenn
    , @Augustus
    Thanks Kenn,

    Whenever I see examples of the early 20th century, I am amazed by the lack of obese individuals, and the number of white people safe to ride public transportation. Says a lot about our present direction.

  78. @Lunarcricket
    O.T. - but relevant. I saw some Nascar driver was reprimanded for using the dreaded N. You know, that word that is so freely tossed around by the pyramid builder descendants? This will be a career crusher for the guy, and all those other talented black drivers can take his place. I'm just wondering what sponsors they'll have on their car decals. "And in the lead position, Jaquarius Levonte, driving the Chrysler 300" (with Old English 800 decals, Black & Mild stickers all over). "Whoa!!!Tom? Did you see that "Black Ice " air freshener fly out of his window!!? Levonte is sure to be in the top 3 this time. ...."Yes Fred, he is a very diverse driver as you can see..."

    I, personally, started using the word “Kaffir”. Love the sound of it. Same meaning but most people still have no idea what it means.

    • Replies: @Love Street
    S A
    , @AnalogMan
    In present-day South Africa, you'd get jailed for saying that. You don't want to be jailed in South Africa.

    Having left South Africa a few years ago, I stubbornly continue to use the word. My grandson objects. I no longer speak to my grandson. Cheeky pup, where does he think he gets off?

    The word actually goes back earlier than the settlement of SA. When the earliest Portuguese explorers (Bartolomeu Dias, 1488) rounded the Cape into the Indian Ocean and sailed up the east coast of Africa, they encountered Arab seamen. They saw these black, almost human-like creatures on the shore, and asked the Arabs what they could be. The Arabs replied that they were "kaffirs", or heathens. Unbelievers. The Portuguese took that to be their name, and so for nearly 500 years it was used, without any derogatory connotations. But of course, as with your "N-word", it could not but become a deadly insult just by virtue of the reality it references.

    Trust me, "People of Colour" will eventually be just as racist.
  79. @dindunuffins
    Same way they skew the crime numbers for Whites. Bunching in "White Hispanics. " Of course that phrase is only mentioned when something bad happens.Anything good goes to being "Hispanic" and celebrating their "Hispanic" heritage.

    Yes, let us not forget David Berkowitz, Dylan Klebold, Nikolas Cruz, George Zimmerman and other infamous (((White Men))).

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    You'r peddling the notion that Zimmerman was Jewish. This has been gone over here before. Zimmerman is a surname of both Jewish and Christian German and German descended people.
  80. @Loren
    COVID-19 is having a deadly impact on the African-American community. I’ll be talking with leaders, doctors, journalists, & REAL people suffering in this pandemic. Hope y’all can join me for this discussion tomorrow 4/14 at 11 PM EST on @OWNTV & streaming for free on @AppleTV. pic.twitter.com/L2nSJQ782x

    — Oprah Winfrey (@Oprah) April 13, 2020

    Indeed, blacks Americans run the risk of suffering from an array of the comorbidities that cause complications for coronavirus positive people. “African Americans and Native Americans develop high blood pressure at much younger ages, and it’s less likely to be under control, and does greater harm to their organs,” said Surgeon General Jerome Adams. “Puerto Ricans have higher rates of asthma and black boys are three times as likely to die of asthma as their white counterparts. As a matter of fact, I’ve been carrying around an inhaler in my pocket for 40 years out of fear of having a fatal asthma attack. And I hope that showing you this inhaler shows little kids with asthma all across the country that they can grow up to be Surgeon General one day.”

    It is actually not the Black community that is suffering disportionately from the virus in NYC, but the Asian and Hispanic community which probably includes Dominicans many of who could be classified as Black (although don’t tell them that they are black).

    Asian although a very low 7% of the victims are only 14% of NYC’s population…which means their numbers are quite high all things considered.

    This is just the usual suspects painting Black people as the biggest victims of everything again…More attention-whoring by the usual suspects…

  81. @dindunuffins
    And as @Just Passing Through just stated ,his scenario is South Africa and Zimbabwe,formally Rhodesia,and what comes with that is even more murders and rapes and robbery as Blacks from the cities will go out into the country where the Whites are trying to hunker down and survive on their farms and homesteads. Just like what happened in Zimbabwe/formally Rhodesia and what is happening in South Africa. And just like South Africa,most of the Police are "diversified" and will look the other way as Whites are slaughtered across the American Midwest. Whites in the former United States are already under 65% of the population. We used to be over 95%. I would venture to say we are even less than 65% seeing all the miscegenation that has happened and is happening. Most of these half-breeds do NOT consider their White half and for all intents and purposes they are NOT White.

    The last Five Star General was Omar Bradley. None, not even Schwarzkopf (Negrohead?) or Powell (Headnegro?), has held that rank since he died in 1981.

    Yet, I’ve seen several of the highly decorated H.N’s.I.C. in law enforcement boasting five stars. If not, they at least have to have the highest military rank currently attainable, with a minimum of four stars gleaming on their collars. Long Gone are the days of Reed and Malloy. Today, you’re just as likely to encounter a trigger happy Somalian or a nervous-Nellie Woman who doesn’t look away from her cellphone long enough to realize she’s in the wrong apartment before discharging her weapon.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/minneapolis-police-sentencing-mohamed-noor.html

    https://abc13.com/amber-guyger-botham-jean-guyers-geiger-police-officer-trial/5581929/

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    By my knowledge, 5-star generals only exist at that rank during times of declared war.

    Since we don’t ‘do that’ anymore, you will not see a 5-star General in the near future.
    , @anarchyst
    Ever notice that police unions are "fraternal"? This should tell you something. The "thin-blue-line" is a gang, little different than street gangs--at least when it comes to "covering-up" their questionable and quite often, illegal and criminal behavior.
    In today's day and age, "officer safety" trumps de-escalation of force. This, in part, is due to the militarization of the police along with training in Israeli police tactics. This becomes a problem, with the "us vs. them" attitude that is fosters, along with the fact that Israel is a very different place, being on a constant "war footing", and by necessity, its police tactics are very different.
    There are too many instances of police being "given a pass", even when incontrovertible video and audio evidence is presented. Grand juries, guided by police-friendly prosecutors, quite often refuse to charge those police officers who abuse their authority.
    Police officers, who want to do the right thing, are quite often marginalized and put into harms way, by their own brethren...When a police officer is beating on someone that is already restrained while yelling, "stop resisting" THAT is but one reason police have a "bad name" in many instances...this makes the "good cops" who are standing around, witnessing their "brethren in blue" beating on a restrained suspect, culpable as well...
  82. NYC can’t be 32% white. I think Jews are at least 5-6% of that number and Middle Easterners are maybe 3-5%, so the real figure is probably somewhere around 20%. People need to take a good look at NYC, Chicago, LA, Miami and other cities because this is what ethnic cleansing looks like and it’s now spreading into other parts of the country.

    Contrary to what all the cuckservative fatheads tell people the non-whites will never morph into flag waving, race doesn’t matter Republicans.

  83. Even though NYC has suffered from “The Great Replacement”, isn’t it still safer, in general, than it was back in the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s? At least, using homicides as a metric?

    I’d imagine getting tough on crime with that “broken windows” policing is what turned a lot of it around, and helped counteract the encroaching “die-versity”. However, if they start getting too lax on law enforcement, it will all just regress to the mean.

  84. @Sick of Orcs
    The plummet began when The Jew, The Cuck and The Drunk pushed through the 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration Act, which fundamentally altered our demographics, sold with the lie it wouldn't.

    Today we can't even get the Orange Weakling to end birthright citizenship which isn't law.

    "The Union" won't last without a parting of ways.

    I am a Trump supporter but you are 100% correct on this one.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    Thanks, Fren. I support Trump, and hope he returns the favor before he's done.
  85. Don’t let Zionist Israel-lover Kersey boy confuse you. Billionaire Hungarian Jew Soros

    (self-adopted pseudonym) and his fellow tribesmen have financed and otherwise promoted

    unlimited immigration to dilute the European-American Gentile population in the USS

    Titanic. Kersey gets all us peons riled up at minority crime but hides the 800-pound

    gorilla that is masterminding our genocide. When the crap hits the fan, Kersey will move

    to his adopted Israel with a fat paycheck from Soros. NO BORDERS, NO COUNTRY!

    • Replies: @Love Street
    PK knows about the J Q.
  86. @YT
    I blame this on the white baby boomers who today, still , in April 2020 are so bent on living in their suburbs and my greedy baby boomer father just told me today "cities are done" with a proud look on his face, like he's proud of all the American cities being destroyed I could almost weep or become bitter with hatred for him . It comes down to the racial reality and the reality of cities. Cities were and always will be the economic and cultural center of a civilization, even with the internet. If the city goes so does everything else and you baby boomers were so against that concept because of Thomas Jefferson and the yeoman, because of your love of cars and because you wanted a lawn. I really think most problems we have, obesity and loneliness and violence , all came down to two things: urban planning/ design and race. And now look what I, a white , born in the 90's, inherited. When you go to your grave think of this and think of the whites born after 1980. You probably won't though since you were and are so greedy. And I hope it haunts your souls for eternity.

    Sure.

    Blame your old man.

    Like he destroyed the cities. Like he didn’t warn you what was going on.

    What makes you think he had any more power over government shenanigans than you do now?

    Cities were not designed to become a haven for the homeless populations of the country. They didn’t migrate there like buffalo. They were lured there with promise of protection and free shit.

    Try understanding the old man’s smile.

    I’m wearing the same one as I sit here reading your pitiful blame-game, chronic complaint.

    • Replies: @YT
    Actually my boomer dad is utterly appalled at my views and conclusions about race , he raised me to be “ color blind”, whatever that means. I’ll admit I’ve always enjoyed having edgy and controversial ideas and that’s partly why I feel this way. To this day though he is a racial egalitarian and would never say anything negative about blacks, he believes race means nothing , but I’ve seen and read too much for me to be “blind” about what I notice . One thought experiment is if the American continent had millions of blacks inhabiting it and no whites , it doesn’t take a philosopher to imagine what it would be like . Even if an all black America had lots of money I predict it still would be utter chaos and mayhem. Maybe someday when people will get money for exposing racists ( funded by woke capital ) since this capitalist system is so messed up they’ll find this comment and come looking for me like a Stasi - esque thing to put on the racist database . And then like communist society I would go to trial and be sent to Alaskan work camps for reprogramming or “ special treatment” . Scary times we live in
  87. @Cowtown Rebel
    The last Five Star General was Omar Bradley. None, not even Schwarzkopf (Negrohead?) or Powell (Headnegro?), has held that rank since he died in 1981.

    Yet, I've seen several of the highly decorated H.N's.I.C. in law enforcement boasting five stars. If not, they at least have to have the highest military rank currently attainable, with a minimum of four stars gleaming on their collars. Long Gone are the days of Reed and Malloy. Today, you're just as likely to encounter a trigger happy Somalian or a nervous-Nellie Woman who doesn't look away from her cellphone long enough to realize she's in the wrong apartment before discharging her weapon.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/minneapolis-police-sentencing-mohamed-noor.html

    https://abc13.com/amber-guyger-botham-jean-guyers-geiger-police-officer-trial/5581929/

    By my knowledge, 5-star generals only exist at that rank during times of declared war.

    Since we don’t ‘do that’ anymore, you will not see a 5-star General in the near future.

    • Replies: @Piglet
    Rather than being dependent upon there being a declared war taking place, I think the real reason you won't see five-star rank again is because we'll never again field a military as large as the one that fought WW II.
  88. DRUDGE is so pro panic over corona.
    one of todays links is over a poker game and the players died or are suff er in.

    the death–93 or 94 year old jewess in Florida.

  89. Anon[223] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alden
    Doesn’t legacy America include the south east?

    Most of those states are 20-40% black. The big cities seem to be run by blacks. The black cities of Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Detroit Chicago, Milwaukee. St Louis, Milwaukee and their metro areas are just black crime ridden ghettos run by black politicians and civil service. Atlanta, Mobile, New Orleans, Baton Rouge all the southern cities are black ghettos run by blacks

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.

    It’s so nice to deal with competent polite Hispanic Asian pacific island affirmative action government workers here in California instead of the snarling hateful sows when affirmative action began. Even the hateful snarling sows have shaped up but now they have Hispanic Asian supervisors.

    If I have to be a minority I prefer to be a minority in a 5-7 percent black state like California instead of a 30 percent black state or a state run by a city like Chicago or St Louis.

    Alden,
    You are exactly right. Honestly, these days I feel more comfortable in California then I do in Georgia or Michigan. California is run by Latinos, who actually want a civilization to live in. People on this blog complain about Hispanics/Asians/Muslims, and there are good reasons to complain about those groups, but at least you can have civilization with those people.

    People who complain about California these days are just idiots, you won’t get gangbanged in many parts of the state now, and you can actually have a family, and realize your kids won’t get beat up in school by thugs.

    Those “Conservative” politicians who decry mass immigration but let Blacks outbreed Whites are just the worst people in America. These days, Gavin Newsom is more pro White than the governor of Alabama.

    • Replies: @Alden
    It’s funny, the MS 13 gang started in Los Angeles but was run out of the state by some very restrictive associating with fellow gangster laws. Now they are flourishing in N Virginia and Long Island NY.

    The Rodney King riots and OJ acquittal were the last hurrah of Jewish led black power in California. Los Angeles was the power center of America Jew liberals and their black storm troopers. But due to the unlimited immigration so loved by American Jews, they’re being replaced by Persian Israeli Russian other immigrant Jews who loathe blacks. Ha ha ha.
  90. @anon
    New York is supposedly 32% white today, take away 'White" Hispanics, Jews, Middle Easterners and you are probably left with 10-15 percent traditional White. Personally, I'd rather be castrated with a rusty chainsaw than be forced to live in New York City!

    Its called cultural marxism.

  91. @Alden
    My point was affirmative action, not size of houses. My point was not modest poverty level living standards. If neither parent can get a job due to affirmative action, any type of housing other than section 8 or the projects is out of the question. But government subsidized housing is reserved for non Whites, even illegals and last week’s arrivals.

    Whites are even affirmative actioned out of welfare and disability as well as jobs.

    And the White elites are as enthusiastic about affirmative action as Justice Brennan who wrote the doctrine of disparate representation.

    Presumably you see AA giving unwarranted advantages to non-whites. Happens, I guess. Such that the people not advantaged have less income coming in than they might otherwise have had.

    I don’t agree with the idea that AA prevents either parent from getting a job. I’ve never seen that level of discrimination and I dont think it exists. Hell, until Corona, there were plenty of jobs: they just paid crap wages. But crap wages, even in NYC, could buy housing; not great housing.

    The challenge is: can people disadvantaged still raise a family with the lower level wages in a smaller place? Post-war whites could. Dump the cable TV, the over-750sf home, and a few other things, and maybe they can again. The EITC doesn’t take any account of race and it is available to all. Just sayin’.

    • Replies: @Alden
    Are you familiar with your county’s residential building codes? It may be illegal under your county’s building code to build a free standing single family 750sq ft house.

    In rural areas it’s possible to build anything under the state basic or universal building code, but not in urban areas.

    Then there’s property taxes. The exact same houses just yards away often have thousands of dollars difference in the amount of property taxes levied if those houses are in different towns or school districts.

    It’s not elastic items such as toys, new cars, clothes furniture eating out entertainment electronics that are the killer. It’s basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work.

    But go ahead and pretend it’s 1947 in a no money down for veterans. $50 a month mortgage payment AND property tax, $40 a month food bill for 2 parents and 2 babies, $1.50 a month phone bill and $5.00 a month winter heat bill, $1.50 a month gas and electric in summer out of $240 a month take home.

    A White male Rip Van Winkle who’s unaware of the effect of 53 years of affirmative action against White men.
  92. @Anonymous
    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the "population boom" has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can't support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term "totalitarian", an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he's a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it's crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today's geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ's Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It's too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It's what systems people call an "emergent property".

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they've brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can't work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco's inability to house its working population and California's inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities' Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won't work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask "Why is it all so cruel?". Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try "world as illusion", although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won't change the end of the cities.

    The only problem with your analysis is that most modern people wish to live in urban areas. They don’t want to live on farms or these suburban utopias you are talking about which existed in our past. People make choices and unfortunately most of them chose the cities to reside within and have their children…Many of the Whites remaining in NYC are top tier earners and use private schools for their children. So they don’t care as yet about the deterioration around them. They are insulated from it.

    This is true worldwide by the way; which is why many of the larger countries such as China and maybe India and some other Asian countries have begun to restrict people from moving into cities. It is only here in the US that you can move willy nilly where ever you feel like it.

    Urban demographics or unrest, squalor, etc., could change that in the future; but for now it’s just the way it is…

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The question of whether people want to live in mega-cities is, I think, of less importance than the question of whether mega-cities can maintain their basic infrastructure. Maintaining (and refurbishing / upgrading) basic infrastructure would require far more resources than are currently being extracted from the hinterlands of the cities now. These resources are not available, the cities are finding their political legitimacy to be diminishing (which brings their tax income and legal preferences into question), and successful imposition of a pure command economy would, in any case, result in a _reduction_ of resources actually delivered.
    Should this happen, should the monetary streams that currently support the finance and welfare sectors be reduced, the many who now prefer to live in the cities would find it economically impossible to continue doing so. A mild version of that is happening now, due to COVID-19 dislocation, and city populations gave been declining for some time, so the phenomenon is clearly possible.
    Speaking personally, there are quite a few things I'd like that I can't have. Nobody seems to care. Perhaps that will be the fate of the former city dwellers as well.
  93. @YT
    I blame this on the white baby boomers who today, still , in April 2020 are so bent on living in their suburbs and my greedy baby boomer father just told me today "cities are done" with a proud look on his face, like he's proud of all the American cities being destroyed I could almost weep or become bitter with hatred for him . It comes down to the racial reality and the reality of cities. Cities were and always will be the economic and cultural center of a civilization, even with the internet. If the city goes so does everything else and you baby boomers were so against that concept because of Thomas Jefferson and the yeoman, because of your love of cars and because you wanted a lawn. I really think most problems we have, obesity and loneliness and violence , all came down to two things: urban planning/ design and race. And now look what I, a white , born in the 90's, inherited. When you go to your grave think of this and think of the whites born after 1980. You probably won't though since you were and are so greedy. And I hope it haunts your souls for eternity.

    You are blaming the wrong people. It is the “greatest generation” that fomented the destruction of the major cities. The “greatest generation” eviscerated true “freedom of association” and “restrictive (real estate) covenants”, NOT us “boomers”. Had forced integration and the abolition of “freedom of association” not been the case, the cities would be far better places today.

    Many of us “boomers” protested against the misguided “civil-rights (for some) laws and statutes that were forced on us by those of the “greatest generation” under the auspices of jewish groups. Let’s not forget the jewish destruction of civil society with “bussing” schemes of the 1970s in which jewish judges ruled that “blacks had to sit next to whites in order to be able to learn”. That was another aspect of the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement that pushed whites out of cities.

    Us white “boomers” who protested were “pushed back” into obscurity by the jewish-run pro-civil-rights (for some) mainstream media as well as by federal troops.

    Judicial tyranny exposed itself with the demand by judges that property taxes be increased so that “a new school” could be built for blacks in Kansas City. The school that was built was state-of-the-art, having the best amenities that (taxpayer) dollars could buy. It didn’t take but a few years for the state-of-the-art school to be trashed by the very blacks attending it.

    The “greatest generation” made the world safe for today’s world jewry domination of western societies. In my humble opinion, we fought on the “wrong side”.

    There is an currently running HBO series, a “what if” situation in which Charles Lindbergh wins the presidency instead of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It is a sappy jew-produced program that is designed to elicit pity for the “poor jews”, reinforcing their status as “victims”. If Lindbergh had not been marginalized by the power structure, and had achieved the presidency, we would be living in a much better world today. World War 2 would have been “Europe’s war” for Europeans to figure out. The sad part of the whole situation is that our “best and brightest” were sacrificed on the battlefield…for what??

    Your assessment of “boomers” being blamed for the suburbs is off-base. The suburbs is what made the American dream possible.

    As to cities, you can have them. Although being born in a (once) great city, your idea of stacking people up on top of each other in apartments and condos, with the resultant disease and urban “vibrancy” is not my cup of tea.

    All one has to do is look at New (jew) York City. Most of the people who live there don’t own and will never own anything of real value, instead paying inflated, exorbitant “rent” to some fat jew shylock landlord. Most of the people cannot afford to own anything, despite wages being relatively high. Ownership of real estate is definitely out of the question for most New York City residents.

    What is wrong with people choosing how and where they want to live? YOU might not like suburbs, preferring the “vibrancy” and urban decay of cities, but in the “good ol’ USA, people STILL have choices.

    • Replies: @Love Street
    They should have let Patton finish the war .
    He knew .
    , @Anonymous
    Well I remember it. The US "silent generation" had believed wartime propaganda and cooperated with government in every way. The result had been an end to the Depression, worldwide US influence coupled with a threat of sudden death in nuclear war from which only government could protect, a great increase in standard of living, apparent secure possession of that standard of living, and a host of technical marvels developed during WW II, together with a "Glided Age sunset" wave of technical innovations that included the basis of microelectronics, and a media that constantly told the "silent generation" how wonderful they were.
    In short, the "Silent generation" believed that and acted as though it lived in a Paradise given to them by the leadership of the Federal government during WW II. The only thing it had to do was to not think and to follow orders --- a successful strategy, in their experience, that had transformed 1930 America into 1950 America.
    Who, I was often asked, would want to change that?
    This general attitude persisted until perhaps the 1990s. "Silent generation" and "Boomers" never noticed that their children were being destroyed, and only noticed in passing that "the good jobs have gone".
    This was the rather generous and gullible attitude of government worship that justified the civil rights acts ("Government gave, why not give the same to everybody?") you describe. It is the ancestor of the Magic Dirt theory of Open Borders (Government gives everything, we have a good government here in Magic Dirt land, let everybody come here and be given to.). "Social inertia", I believe it is called, and a few less complimentary names as well.

    The shedding of any obligation to the Silent Generation and its progeny came in the 1960s, which in retrospect were pretty clearly political theater (I was in NYC at the time and had some Jewish political activist acquaintances). The Vietnam War established that government couldn't militarily draft its population anymore, had to rely on professionals, and so needn't pay attention to keeping the population happy enough to be drafted. So it hasn't since. It has kept its obsolete cities and jettisoned its hinterland population, or at least tried to do so.

    And the new generations of Americans have realized that the government really doesn't love them; even some of the Boomers have figured that out.

    I saw their starv'd lips in the gloom
    With horrid warning gaped wide,
    And I awoke, and found me here
    On the cold hill side.

    So, it's time to wake up on the cold, wet hillside and try to make the world into something you can live in. Not a new problem. You can look back into the 1930s and hear the same complaints from Americans in old movies/recordings. The complaints were justified in the 1930s and are justified now, but that doesn't change the need of the current generation to transform the world. Do it or die, as they say.

    And please, try not to screw it up the way the 1930s generation did. The success of the 1930s generation in WW II led directly to the betrayal of the Silent generation by the monolithic and independent government that the 1930s generation put in place, and that was (of course, it always happens) turned against the American population during the 1960s. Try to do better -- don't make something you can't unmake.
  94. @Kenn Daily
    Here's a video of New York City in 1911
    These are those who built the city.
    https://youtu.be/aohXOpKtns0

    It would be great to see this in color.

    Thanks Kenn

    • Replies: @Love Street
    I think there are colorized versions on j tube. Other cities too.
    , @AnalogMan
    I didn't expect colour. Nor did I expect sound. In 1911?
  95. @gary
    Don't let Zionist Israel-lover Kersey boy confuse you. Billionaire Hungarian Jew Soros

    (self-adopted pseudonym) and his fellow tribesmen have financed and otherwise promoted

    unlimited immigration to dilute the European-American Gentile population in the USS

    Titanic. Kersey gets all us peons riled up at minority crime but hides the 800-pound

    gorilla that is masterminding our genocide. When the crap hits the fan, Kersey will move

    to his adopted Israel with a fat paycheck from Soros. NO BORDERS, NO COUNTRY!

    PK knows about the J Q.

  96. @Jim in Jersey
    By my knowledge, 5-star generals only exist at that rank during times of declared war.

    Since we don’t ‘do that’ anymore, you will not see a 5-star General in the near future.

    Rather than being dependent upon there being a declared war taking place, I think the real reason you won’t see five-star rank again is because we’ll never again field a military as large as the one that fought WW II.

  97. @anarchyst
    You are blaming the wrong people. It is the "greatest generation" that fomented the destruction of the major cities. The "greatest generation" eviscerated true "freedom of association" and "restrictive (real estate) covenants", NOT us "boomers". Had forced integration and the abolition of "freedom of association" not been the case, the cities would be far better places today.

    Many of us "boomers" protested against the misguided "civil-rights (for some) laws and statutes that were forced on us by those of the "greatest generation" under the auspices of jewish groups. Let's not forget the jewish destruction of civil society with "bussing" schemes of the 1970s in which jewish judges ruled that "blacks had to sit next to whites in order to be able to learn". That was another aspect of the so-called "civil-rights (for some)" movement that pushed whites out of cities.

    Us white "boomers" who protested were "pushed back" into obscurity by the jewish-run pro-civil-rights (for some) mainstream media as well as by federal troops.

    Judicial tyranny exposed itself with the demand by judges that property taxes be increased so that "a new school" could be built for blacks in Kansas City. The school that was built was state-of-the-art, having the best amenities that (taxpayer) dollars could buy. It didn't take but a few years for the state-of-the-art school to be trashed by the very blacks attending it.

    The "greatest generation" made the world safe for today's world jewry domination of western societies. In my humble opinion, we fought on the "wrong side".

    There is an currently running HBO series, a "what if" situation in which Charles Lindbergh wins the presidency instead of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It is a sappy jew-produced program that is designed to elicit pity for the "poor jews", reinforcing their status as "victims". If Lindbergh had not been marginalized by the power structure, and had achieved the presidency, we would be living in a much better world today. World War 2 would have been "Europe's war" for Europeans to figure out. The sad part of the whole situation is that our "best and brightest" were sacrificed on the battlefield...for what??

    Your assessment of "boomers" being blamed for the suburbs is off-base. The suburbs is what made the American dream possible.

    As to cities, you can have them. Although being born in a (once) great city, your idea of stacking people up on top of each other in apartments and condos, with the resultant disease and urban "vibrancy" is not my cup of tea.

    All one has to do is look at New (jew) York City. Most of the people who live there don't own and will never own anything of real value, instead paying inflated, exorbitant "rent" to some fat jew shylock landlord. Most of the people cannot afford to own anything, despite wages being relatively high. Ownership of real estate is definitely out of the question for most New York City residents.

    What is wrong with people choosing how and where they want to live? YOU might not like suburbs, preferring the "vibrancy" and urban decay of cities, but in the "good ol' USA, people STILL have choices.

    They should have let Patton finish the war .
    He knew .

    • Agree: Augustus
    • Thanks: anarchyst
  98. @Dr. Pepper
    Perhaps the great replacement has already happened! We are in damage control now. The only way we can make it is to fight back, but it seems like many of our people have lost the will to fight. Much of what we see on television is our surrender to the nonwhites. White men are shown as buffoons, while black men are shown as men. When they take down our monuments, then we have surrendered.

    Is there a way to win? Yes, or course, but do you think whites will unite to fight for their own people? If we were a boxer, we would be in the corner covering our face to hopefully stop a few of the blows. If we strike back, it will only make the oppoent hit us harder. However, if we don't fight, we will find ourselves on the floor looking up to the enemy.

    There come a point when one needs to completely surrender and throw in the towel, or fight back. In Virginia a tyrant is taking away our rights to bear arms because the negroes don't want us to have them. Never mind it is the negroes killing other negroes. There are no whites Nazis or white supremacists hurting anyone, but the media tells them those lies.

    Unless we joing together as a people, we are done!

    Call out every anti-white depiction like this AP photo by Charlie Riedel on the KCTV website today. (KCTV Channel 5 is the CBS affiliate in Kansas City. It always seems especially eager to denigrate white people. Can you imagine them running a photo of a homeless black man with some white businessmen standing around?)

    https://www.ap.org/en-us/formats/photos

  99. @Anonymous

    The next Democrat president will import Somalis into your nice,small,White city.
     
    It's been tried. The Somalis then go, on their own, to a large city with Federally paid welfare and other Somalis. Its the only place they can survive economically and culturally.
    The present lockdowns might be used as precedent to force Somalis to stay in small cities and towns, but even the PRC has not been able to stop its own internal migrations.

    Somalis, the Obama race bomb against whites. He could drop them anywhere as a surprise attack. The bomb explodes like a nuclear device and rids an area of whites as surely as radiation, and permanently.

  100. @Anonymous
    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the "population boom" has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can't support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term "totalitarian", an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he's a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it's crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today's geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ's Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It's too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It's what systems people call an "emergent property".

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they've brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can't work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco's inability to house its working population and California's inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities' Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won't work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask "Why is it all so cruel?". Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try "world as illusion", although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won't change the end of the cities.

    Thank you so much. Between you, Copley, a dose of race realism from this site, and a bit of understanding of how poverty actually pays big for cities, plus my economic view of hyper inflation, you have REALLY opened my eyes! Thank you for helping to supply so much cohesion to the thoughts of an old, aging economist. It has been educating reading your comments.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Glad to hear it! Much of political discussion is gossip about politicians or discussing issues that were long ago decided. I'd like to see more discussions about the _consequences_ of issues that have been decided but are not generally realized.

    Additional reference:
    _The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger _ , by Marc Levinson, mentions the economic influence of container shipment on urban areas world wide, but only in passing, not emphasizing the importance of the phenomenon.

    Implications of theory:
    The schema I've outlined should be fairly useful, in the same way as knowing that it's time to plant the crops is useful, or that Taleb's low cost option purchases that bet on a "black swan" event occurring was betting on a discontinuous urban decline.

    But that's about all it can do. I see no way of changing the basic current of events. The national decentralization foreseen in the 1950s is finally at hand, and might be discontinuous. What will replace cities?
  101. @Alden
    Doesn’t legacy America include the south east?

    Most of those states are 20-40% black. The big cities seem to be run by blacks. The black cities of Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Detroit Chicago, Milwaukee. St Louis, Milwaukee and their metro areas are just black crime ridden ghettos run by black politicians and civil service. Atlanta, Mobile, New Orleans, Baton Rouge all the southern cities are black ghettos run by blacks

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.

    It’s so nice to deal with competent polite Hispanic Asian pacific island affirmative action government workers here in California instead of the snarling hateful sows when affirmative action began. Even the hateful snarling sows have shaped up but now they have Hispanic Asian supervisors.

    If I have to be a minority I prefer to be a minority in a 5-7 percent black state like California instead of a 30 percent black state or a state run by a city like Chicago or St Louis.

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.

    Anyone who visits a government office, especially in/near a major city, has seen the same — Blacks are now over-represented in many branches of the federal government, oftentimes dramatically so; e.g. in the Dept of Education, nearly 40% of the employees are black (select “Department of Education” –> link) — I once emailed my congressional representative to suggest the EEOC investigate the obviously discriminatory hiring practices of the federal government, especially the Dept of Education — I got no reply.

    I think that without affirmative action in government employment (where the jobs pay pretty well and have very good benefits, including pensions), the black middle class would shrink dramatically.

    • Replies: @Augustus
    Affirmative action has handed millions of good government jobs to blacks, who have repaid the taxpayers with attitude from fat, black, female, petty bureaucrats, who can expand 2 hours of work into 8 hours daily.
  102. @YT
    I blame this on the white baby boomers who today, still , in April 2020 are so bent on living in their suburbs and my greedy baby boomer father just told me today "cities are done" with a proud look on his face, like he's proud of all the American cities being destroyed I could almost weep or become bitter with hatred for him . It comes down to the racial reality and the reality of cities. Cities were and always will be the economic and cultural center of a civilization, even with the internet. If the city goes so does everything else and you baby boomers were so against that concept because of Thomas Jefferson and the yeoman, because of your love of cars and because you wanted a lawn. I really think most problems we have, obesity and loneliness and violence , all came down to two things: urban planning/ design and race. And now look what I, a white , born in the 90's, inherited. When you go to your grave think of this and think of the whites born after 1980. You probably won't though since you were and are so greedy. And I hope it haunts your souls for eternity.

    YT——–Boomer Whites abandoned the cities because of Negroes,not because they wanted lawns.Sure a few of us did the Mother Earth farmletts thing,but most of us just wanted Whitopia.

  103. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @nymom
    The only problem with your analysis is that most modern people wish to live in urban areas. They don't want to live on farms or these suburban utopias you are talking about which existed in our past. People make choices and unfortunately most of them chose the cities to reside within and have their children...Many of the Whites remaining in NYC are top tier earners and use private schools for their children. So they don't care as yet about the deterioration around them. They are insulated from it.

    This is true worldwide by the way; which is why many of the larger countries such as China and maybe India and some other Asian countries have begun to restrict people from moving into cities. It is only here in the US that you can move willy nilly where ever you feel like it.

    Urban demographics or unrest, squalor, etc., could change that in the future; but for now it's just the way it is...

    The question of whether people want to live in mega-cities is, I think, of less importance than the question of whether mega-cities can maintain their basic infrastructure. Maintaining (and refurbishing / upgrading) basic infrastructure would require far more resources than are currently being extracted from the hinterlands of the cities now. These resources are not available, the cities are finding their political legitimacy to be diminishing (which brings their tax income and legal preferences into question), and successful imposition of a pure command economy would, in any case, result in a _reduction_ of resources actually delivered.
    Should this happen, should the monetary streams that currently support the finance and welfare sectors be reduced, the many who now prefer to live in the cities would find it economically impossible to continue doing so. A mild version of that is happening now, due to COVID-19 dislocation, and city populations gave been declining for some time, so the phenomenon is clearly possible.
    Speaking personally, there are quite a few things I’d like that I can’t have. Nobody seems to care. Perhaps that will be the fate of the former city dwellers as well.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Geoffrey West's book Scale discusses why cities grow. In point of fact, when a city grows by 100% (doubles), it's infrastructural needs only grow by 85%. So cities are less intensive in use of infrastructure.

    When city size goes up by 100%, income in the city grows by about 115%. Of course, so does crime, disease, etc. the challenge of running a city is to get the positive network effects while not suffering the negative ones.

    By contrast, suburbs appear to be cheaper from an infra standpoint because the first set of infra is put in by developers at no cost to the governments that can then tax homeowners. Once the sewers and water and roads wear out, however, there isn't enough yield of tax revenue to replace the worn out infrastructure. But that problem is years after the developers have collected their dollars. It's known as the growth ponzi scheme.

    https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme
  104. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @Augustus
    Thank you so much. Between you, Copley, a dose of race realism from this site, and a bit of understanding of how poverty actually pays big for cities, plus my economic view of hyper inflation, you have REALLY opened my eyes! Thank you for helping to supply so much cohesion to the thoughts of an old, aging economist. It has been educating reading your comments.

    Glad to hear it! Much of political discussion is gossip about politicians or discussing issues that were long ago decided. I’d like to see more discussions about the _consequences_ of issues that have been decided but are not generally realized.

    Additional reference:
    _The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger _ , by Marc Levinson, mentions the economic influence of container shipment on urban areas world wide, but only in passing, not emphasizing the importance of the phenomenon.

    Implications of theory:
    The schema I’ve outlined should be fairly useful, in the same way as knowing that it’s time to plant the crops is useful, or that Taleb’s low cost option purchases that bet on a “black swan” event occurring was betting on a discontinuous urban decline.

    But that’s about all it can do. I see no way of changing the basic current of events. The national decentralization foreseen in the 1950s is finally at hand, and might be discontinuous. What will replace cities?

  105. @Kenn Daily
    Here's a video of New York City in 1911
    These are those who built the city.
    https://youtu.be/aohXOpKtns0

    Thanks Kenn,

    Whenever I see examples of the early 20th century, I am amazed by the lack of obese individuals, and the number of white people safe to ride public transportation. Says a lot about our present direction.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    As a high school student in the NY area in 1964 I could and did take the subway from its northmost terminus into NYC to shop on Christmas Eave. No trouble, no sign of trouble. Safe as houses. Same thing in the East Village during the Summer of Love -- go out during the day, no trouble. That had started to change by 1968 -- saw a gang of "Teens", on had a hunting knife strapped to his lower right leg. By 1972 NYC had delusional psychotics in Central Park and "Teens" literally tearing branches off of trees -- during the day, and after a brief visit I decided to avoid the city.
    In other words, there was a fairly brief transition interval from fully safe (most places in NYC) to fully unsafe (most places in NYC). This now seems, looking back, to have been a deliberate choice by NYC city government.
    , @Flubber
    Obesity is a product of cheap crappy processed food.

    Back then IOU didn't get High Fructose Corn Syrup in everything (Thanks to a subsidy driven glut)
    and the supermarkets didn't have 4 or 5 aisles full of sugary/salty shit.
  106. @Dr. Pepper
    Perhaps the great replacement has already happened! We are in damage control now. The only way we can make it is to fight back, but it seems like many of our people have lost the will to fight. Much of what we see on television is our surrender to the nonwhites. White men are shown as buffoons, while black men are shown as men. When they take down our monuments, then we have surrendered.

    Is there a way to win? Yes, or course, but do you think whites will unite to fight for their own people? If we were a boxer, we would be in the corner covering our face to hopefully stop a few of the blows. If we strike back, it will only make the oppoent hit us harder. However, if we don't fight, we will find ourselves on the floor looking up to the enemy.

    There come a point when one needs to completely surrender and throw in the towel, or fight back. In Virginia a tyrant is taking away our rights to bear arms because the negroes don't want us to have them. Never mind it is the negroes killing other negroes. There are no whites Nazis or white supremacists hurting anyone, but the media tells them those lies.

    Unless we joing together as a people, we are done!

    Still haven’t heard any cases yet of neo-Nazis or white supremacists coughing on police or Jews.

  107. @Mark in MI
    I, personally, started using the word "Kaffir". Love the sound of it. Same meaning but most people still have no idea what it means.

    S A

  108. @bruce county
    It would be great to see this in color.

    Thanks Kenn

    I think there are colorized versions on j tube. Other cities too.

  109. @TomSchmidt
    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine. If any group requires, as a white man on Wall Street once told me, "2000 sf for the parents and 500sf per child", then it's going to need a lot more soul crushing work and to send both parents to do it. And it frankly cannot afford more than 3 children.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/91feb/9102house2.htm

    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine.

    The problem is that such down-scale housing is now thoroughly infested with diversity and has lousy schools.  You’d have to home-school to avoid putting the kids through hell 180 days a year, and not everyone is willing or even able to do that.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Interesting that the public school system in NYC has basically been revealed as a free babysitting service, with politicians delaying closing schools becvause of the need for parents to find child-minders. In some sense you'd be rolling back the suburban project: one anecdote I recall was that suburban houses could be bought for a lower monthly payment than rent in NYC. Look at pictures of the Bronx in the 1950s before the Cross Bronx rolled through.

    So: a model with mothers living and maybe working close by the home was transported out to the suburbs. Out there, distances required driving. Out there, society built a LOT of schools and parks for the oncoming boom generation. Because the schools were staffed by women whose work opportunities elsewhere were less, the teachers were generally of higher quality, so it was OK to entrust children to them. Now women started to agitate to go to work as the major functions of childcare and education had been outsourced from them to generally trustworthy sources. That then drove the cycle of increasing house size and pricing; the first man to send his wife to work got a real advantage, like the first person to stand at a baseball game gets a great view... but then everyone behind him has to stand, also, with the result of no one getting a better view but everyone standing.

    Living jammed in with less space so that only one salary is required reverses this logic. Yes, the schools aren't fit to educate as well as 1955's. But there's a non-working spouse who can do that job and also apply his or her intelligence to playing "defense" with the family capital, while someone else plays "offense." (We've had a long time of both people playing offense with the result that millions don't have $400 for a contingency.)

    It's not easy, but it could be done individually. If a group of like-minded people took over a small, collapsed city like Camden or Highland Park, they might be able to do more. Unlikely unless strongly linked to a religious denomination whose policies are immune from intrusion under the 1st amendment.
  110. @D-FENS
    I thought most of the Jews moved here between 1890 and 1917. Partly because so many Jews were radicals, the 1924 immigration act put the brakes on immigration. I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here. Plus sick of the rest of the world after the futile experience of WW1. Wall street was bombed at least once that I know of.

    I suspect that if the 1924 Immigration Act had been enacted in 1904, FDR would not have been elected. While American zionists did work to push US into WW1 (rewarded with Balfour Declaration), our anglophile elite would have gotten us in anyway as they did in WW2. They were making too much money selling arms to the allies and without US entry, the allies would have defaulted on loans made by the Morgan and Rockefeller interests.

    Irish and German grievances, and Scandinavian neutralism, aligned with the heritage of independence passed down from the WASPS who rebelled in 1776. Unfortunately, somewhere along the way, an elite super wealthy Anglophilic WASP upper class had developed, and they, exemplified by Teddy Roosevelt, wanted to go to war for Britain.

    • Agree: TomSchmidt
  111. @eah

    Someone I know who works in downtown Chicago says the federal, state, county and city buildings are just full of blacks. It’s the same in Atlanta, Memphis Louisville, Frankfort, all the important southern and midwestern cities.
     
    Anyone who visits a government office, especially in/near a major city, has seen the same -- Blacks are now over-represented in many branches of the federal government, oftentimes dramatically so; e.g. in the Dept of Education, nearly 40% of the employees are black (select "Department of Education" --> link) -- I once emailed my congressional representative to suggest the EEOC investigate the obviously discriminatory hiring practices of the federal government, especially the Dept of Education -- I got no reply.

    I think that without affirmative action in government employment (where the jobs pay pretty well and have very good benefits, including pensions), the black middle class would shrink dramatically.

    Affirmative action has handed millions of good government jobs to blacks, who have repaid the taxpayers with attitude from fat, black, female, petty bureaucrats, who can expand 2 hours of work into 8 hours daily.

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    AKA "Adult Day Care"
  112. @Cowtown Rebel
    Yes, let us not forget David Berkowitz, Dylan Klebold, Nikolas Cruz, George Zimmerman and other infamous (((White Men))).

    You’r peddling the notion that Zimmerman was Jewish. This has been gone over here before. Zimmerman is a surname of both Jewish and Christian German and German descended people.

    • Replies: @Swamp Fox
    Berkowitz was adopted. He was born to an Italian-American woman.
  113. @Mark in MI
    I, personally, started using the word "Kaffir". Love the sound of it. Same meaning but most people still have no idea what it means.

    In present-day South Africa, you’d get jailed for saying that. You don’t want to be jailed in South Africa.

    Having left South Africa a few years ago, I stubbornly continue to use the word. My grandson objects. I no longer speak to my grandson. Cheeky pup, where does he think he gets off?

    The word actually goes back earlier than the settlement of SA. When the earliest Portuguese explorers (Bartolomeu Dias, 1488) rounded the Cape into the Indian Ocean and sailed up the east coast of Africa, they encountered Arab seamen. They saw these black, almost human-like creatures on the shore, and asked the Arabs what they could be. The Arabs replied that they were “kaffirs”, or heathens. Unbelievers. The Portuguese took that to be their name, and so for nearly 500 years it was used, without any derogatory connotations. But of course, as with your “N-word”, it could not but become a deadly insult just by virtue of the reality it references.

    Trust me, “People of Colour” will eventually be just as racist.

  114. @bruce county
    It would be great to see this in color.

    Thanks Kenn

    I didn’t expect colour. Nor did I expect sound. In 1911?

  115. @Anonymous
    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the "population boom" has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can't support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term "totalitarian", an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he's a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it's crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today's geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ's Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It's too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It's what systems people call an "emergent property".

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they've brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can't work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco's inability to house its working population and California's inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities' Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won't work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask "Why is it all so cruel?". Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try "world as illusion", although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won't change the end of the cities.

    That’s the kind of intelligent commentary I come here for. Please get yourself a handle, or otherwise identify yourself in your comment, so that I (and others) can look out for your work.

  116. Anonymous[964] • Disclaimer says:
    @Augustus
    Thanks Kenn,

    Whenever I see examples of the early 20th century, I am amazed by the lack of obese individuals, and the number of white people safe to ride public transportation. Says a lot about our present direction.

    As a high school student in the NY area in 1964 I could and did take the subway from its northmost terminus into NYC to shop on Christmas Eave. No trouble, no sign of trouble. Safe as houses. Same thing in the East Village during the Summer of Love — go out during the day, no trouble. That had started to change by 1968 — saw a gang of “Teens”, on had a hunting knife strapped to his lower right leg. By 1972 NYC had delusional psychotics in Central Park and “Teens” literally tearing branches off of trees — during the day, and after a brief visit I decided to avoid the city.
    In other words, there was a fairly brief transition interval from fully safe (most places in NYC) to fully unsafe (most places in NYC). This now seems, looking back, to have been a deliberate choice by NYC city government.

  117. @Augustus
    Affirmative action has handed millions of good government jobs to blacks, who have repaid the taxpayers with attitude from fat, black, female, petty bureaucrats, who can expand 2 hours of work into 8 hours daily.

    AKA “Adult Day Care”

    • Agree: Augustus
  118. @bruce county
    The Stones nailed New York perfectly with "Shattered"

    Go ahead... Bite The Big Apple....Don't mind the maggots....

    “Shattered” was a few years after the really bad NY depicted in movies like Taxi Driver. Mid 70’s were the nadir. It was starting to get better a little after that with Koch as Mayor. And got better with effective government under Guiliani and Bloomberg. My sense it is going bad again under DeBlasio. Even my left wing daughter and her husband didn’t like him when they lived in NY. But he has a Black wife (who was handed billions of dollars to do who knows what with a city agency devoted to mental health and can’t account for the money) and is more popular with the Black electorate you would expect a White guy to be.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Yeah it's collapsing. DeBlasio is a disaster.
    , @Loren
    I was in NYC in the 1970s.
    jobs were scarce and home prices very high, in White areas,

    and I dont mean Manhattan.
  119. Anonymous[964] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst
    You are blaming the wrong people. It is the "greatest generation" that fomented the destruction of the major cities. The "greatest generation" eviscerated true "freedom of association" and "restrictive (real estate) covenants", NOT us "boomers". Had forced integration and the abolition of "freedom of association" not been the case, the cities would be far better places today.

    Many of us "boomers" protested against the misguided "civil-rights (for some) laws and statutes that were forced on us by those of the "greatest generation" under the auspices of jewish groups. Let's not forget the jewish destruction of civil society with "bussing" schemes of the 1970s in which jewish judges ruled that "blacks had to sit next to whites in order to be able to learn". That was another aspect of the so-called "civil-rights (for some)" movement that pushed whites out of cities.

    Us white "boomers" who protested were "pushed back" into obscurity by the jewish-run pro-civil-rights (for some) mainstream media as well as by federal troops.

    Judicial tyranny exposed itself with the demand by judges that property taxes be increased so that "a new school" could be built for blacks in Kansas City. The school that was built was state-of-the-art, having the best amenities that (taxpayer) dollars could buy. It didn't take but a few years for the state-of-the-art school to be trashed by the very blacks attending it.

    The "greatest generation" made the world safe for today's world jewry domination of western societies. In my humble opinion, we fought on the "wrong side".

    There is an currently running HBO series, a "what if" situation in which Charles Lindbergh wins the presidency instead of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It is a sappy jew-produced program that is designed to elicit pity for the "poor jews", reinforcing their status as "victims". If Lindbergh had not been marginalized by the power structure, and had achieved the presidency, we would be living in a much better world today. World War 2 would have been "Europe's war" for Europeans to figure out. The sad part of the whole situation is that our "best and brightest" were sacrificed on the battlefield...for what??

    Your assessment of "boomers" being blamed for the suburbs is off-base. The suburbs is what made the American dream possible.

    As to cities, you can have them. Although being born in a (once) great city, your idea of stacking people up on top of each other in apartments and condos, with the resultant disease and urban "vibrancy" is not my cup of tea.

    All one has to do is look at New (jew) York City. Most of the people who live there don't own and will never own anything of real value, instead paying inflated, exorbitant "rent" to some fat jew shylock landlord. Most of the people cannot afford to own anything, despite wages being relatively high. Ownership of real estate is definitely out of the question for most New York City residents.

    What is wrong with people choosing how and where they want to live? YOU might not like suburbs, preferring the "vibrancy" and urban decay of cities, but in the "good ol' USA, people STILL have choices.

    Well I remember it. The US “silent generation” had believed wartime propaganda and cooperated with government in every way. The result had been an end to the Depression, worldwide US influence coupled with a threat of sudden death in nuclear war from which only government could protect, a great increase in standard of living, apparent secure possession of that standard of living, and a host of technical marvels developed during WW II, together with a “Glided Age sunset” wave of technical innovations that included the basis of microelectronics, and a media that constantly told the “silent generation” how wonderful they were.
    In short, the “Silent generation” believed that and acted as though it lived in a Paradise given to them by the leadership of the Federal government during WW II. The only thing it had to do was to not think and to follow orders — a successful strategy, in their experience, that had transformed 1930 America into 1950 America.
    Who, I was often asked, would want to change that?
    This general attitude persisted until perhaps the 1990s. “Silent generation” and “Boomers” never noticed that their children were being destroyed, and only noticed in passing that “the good jobs have gone”.
    This was the rather generous and gullible attitude of government worship that justified the civil rights acts (“Government gave, why not give the same to everybody?”) you describe. It is the ancestor of the Magic Dirt theory of Open Borders (Government gives everything, we have a good government here in Magic Dirt land, let everybody come here and be given to.). “Social inertia”, I believe it is called, and a few less complimentary names as well.

    The shedding of any obligation to the Silent Generation and its progeny came in the 1960s, which in retrospect were pretty clearly political theater (I was in NYC at the time and had some Jewish political activist acquaintances). The Vietnam War established that government couldn’t militarily draft its population anymore, had to rely on professionals, and so needn’t pay attention to keeping the population happy enough to be drafted. So it hasn’t since. It has kept its obsolete cities and jettisoned its hinterland population, or at least tried to do so.

    And the new generations of Americans have realized that the government really doesn’t love them; even some of the Boomers have figured that out.

    I saw their starv’d lips in the gloom
    With horrid warning gaped wide,
    And I awoke, and found me here
    On the cold hill side.

    So, it’s time to wake up on the cold, wet hillside and try to make the world into something you can live in. Not a new problem. You can look back into the 1930s and hear the same complaints from Americans in old movies/recordings. The complaints were justified in the 1930s and are justified now, but that doesn’t change the need of the current generation to transform the world. Do it or die, as they say.

    And please, try not to screw it up the way the 1930s generation did. The success of the 1930s generation in WW II led directly to the betrayal of the Silent generation by the monolithic and independent government that the 1930s generation put in place, and that was (of course, it always happens) turned against the American population during the 1960s. Try to do better — don’t make something you can’t unmake.

    • Replies: @Augustus
    I don't think the present citizens are capable of improving the country. Too many coming out of college, hanging diplomas and immediately going into early retirement near the coffee machine, or water cooler, depending on the weather.
    As long as they get "free" college (no matter how dumbed down the "education," and "free" healthcare they seem happy to watch government grow at an all consuming pace. Next up, promises of free food, clothing, and shelter, only 50% more government growth needed. Then on to the secondary needs of humanity.
    Meanwhile, government growth squeezes personal freedom, and few young people seem to care, or to even notice.
  120. @Mr. Rational

    Levittown houses, segregated by law or contract for whites, built in the post-War boom, were 750 square feet. My guess is that any group willing to jam 2 parents and 3 kids in that amount of space will be able to make out just fine.
     
    The problem is that such down-scale housing is now thoroughly infested with diversity and has lousy schools.  You'd have to home-school to avoid putting the kids through hell 180 days a year, and not everyone is willing or even able to do that.

    Interesting that the public school system in NYC has basically been revealed as a free babysitting service, with politicians delaying closing schools becvause of the need for parents to find child-minders. In some sense you’d be rolling back the suburban project: one anecdote I recall was that suburban houses could be bought for a lower monthly payment than rent in NYC. Look at pictures of the Bronx in the 1950s before the Cross Bronx rolled through.

    So: a model with mothers living and maybe working close by the home was transported out to the suburbs. Out there, distances required driving. Out there, society built a LOT of schools and parks for the oncoming boom generation. Because the schools were staffed by women whose work opportunities elsewhere were less, the teachers were generally of higher quality, so it was OK to entrust children to them. Now women started to agitate to go to work as the major functions of childcare and education had been outsourced from them to generally trustworthy sources. That then drove the cycle of increasing house size and pricing; the first man to send his wife to work got a real advantage, like the first person to stand at a baseball game gets a great view… but then everyone behind him has to stand, also, with the result of no one getting a better view but everyone standing.

    Living jammed in with less space so that only one salary is required reverses this logic. Yes, the schools aren’t fit to educate as well as 1955’s. But there’s a non-working spouse who can do that job and also apply his or her intelligence to playing “defense” with the family capital, while someone else plays “offense.” (We’ve had a long time of both people playing offense with the result that millions don’t have $400 for a contingency.)

    It’s not easy, but it could be done individually. If a group of like-minded people took over a small, collapsed city like Camden or Highland Park, they might be able to do more. Unlikely unless strongly linked to a religious denomination whose policies are immune from intrusion under the 1st amendment.

  121. @Anonymous
    Well I remember it. The US "silent generation" had believed wartime propaganda and cooperated with government in every way. The result had been an end to the Depression, worldwide US influence coupled with a threat of sudden death in nuclear war from which only government could protect, a great increase in standard of living, apparent secure possession of that standard of living, and a host of technical marvels developed during WW II, together with a "Glided Age sunset" wave of technical innovations that included the basis of microelectronics, and a media that constantly told the "silent generation" how wonderful they were.
    In short, the "Silent generation" believed that and acted as though it lived in a Paradise given to them by the leadership of the Federal government during WW II. The only thing it had to do was to not think and to follow orders --- a successful strategy, in their experience, that had transformed 1930 America into 1950 America.
    Who, I was often asked, would want to change that?
    This general attitude persisted until perhaps the 1990s. "Silent generation" and "Boomers" never noticed that their children were being destroyed, and only noticed in passing that "the good jobs have gone".
    This was the rather generous and gullible attitude of government worship that justified the civil rights acts ("Government gave, why not give the same to everybody?") you describe. It is the ancestor of the Magic Dirt theory of Open Borders (Government gives everything, we have a good government here in Magic Dirt land, let everybody come here and be given to.). "Social inertia", I believe it is called, and a few less complimentary names as well.

    The shedding of any obligation to the Silent Generation and its progeny came in the 1960s, which in retrospect were pretty clearly political theater (I was in NYC at the time and had some Jewish political activist acquaintances). The Vietnam War established that government couldn't militarily draft its population anymore, had to rely on professionals, and so needn't pay attention to keeping the population happy enough to be drafted. So it hasn't since. It has kept its obsolete cities and jettisoned its hinterland population, or at least tried to do so.

    And the new generations of Americans have realized that the government really doesn't love them; even some of the Boomers have figured that out.

    I saw their starv'd lips in the gloom
    With horrid warning gaped wide,
    And I awoke, and found me here
    On the cold hill side.

    So, it's time to wake up on the cold, wet hillside and try to make the world into something you can live in. Not a new problem. You can look back into the 1930s and hear the same complaints from Americans in old movies/recordings. The complaints were justified in the 1930s and are justified now, but that doesn't change the need of the current generation to transform the world. Do it or die, as they say.

    And please, try not to screw it up the way the 1930s generation did. The success of the 1930s generation in WW II led directly to the betrayal of the Silent generation by the monolithic and independent government that the 1930s generation put in place, and that was (of course, it always happens) turned against the American population during the 1960s. Try to do better -- don't make something you can't unmake.

    I don’t think the present citizens are capable of improving the country. Too many coming out of college, hanging diplomas and immediately going into early retirement near the coffee machine, or water cooler, depending on the weather.
    As long as they get “free” college (no matter how dumbed down the “education,” and “free” healthcare they seem happy to watch government grow at an all consuming pace. Next up, promises of free food, clothing, and shelter, only 50% more government growth needed. Then on to the secondary needs of humanity.
    Meanwhile, government growth squeezes personal freedom, and few young people seem to care, or to even notice.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Your observations match mine. This is where the deterioration of the cities becomes important. The expansion of services promised by modern monetary theory (MMT) and to be financed by simply issuing money is unlikely, to say the least; inter-bank transactions are showing intense distrust by banks concerning other banks' credit worthiness, even at the current level of Federal indebtedness.

    The "do nothing" generations are not particularly lazy. A student once told me that he was reluctant to learn anything (such as simple grammar and vocabulary) because the corporation he would work for might want him to do something different. Another student said that he wanted an A without learning the material because he would be a manager and just wanted the course for show.
    Later on, I went into large organizations and found that the students were correct: being a member of corporate culture was very important, and corporate culture invariably include things that were flat wrong in the larger culture (or subculture, whichever). It usually does not require managers to have domain knowledge. The person who does nothing can do nothing wrong _if_ the organization is political, as most are now (even the "tech" companies).
    If the organization is economic, however, doing nothing is bad, objective knowledge and productive activities are good.
    So, _if a large majority of organizations become economic_, the not particularly lazy generations will act differently, many will try to do something rather than nothing. Conformity is powerful.

    Just what that different something could be is an interesting question. They might turn into hardnoses, disillusioned and determined not to be hurt by fraud again. They might try more intensive politics, hoping it would work this time. They might just lay down and die - that's a common response when an entire culture is destroyed. They might turn to and rebuild a distributed, non-urban economy with considerable autarky -- rather like the Russian Federation -- and that would have the best prospects of surviving over several generations.
  122. @Hibernian
    You'r peddling the notion that Zimmerman was Jewish. This has been gone over here before. Zimmerman is a surname of both Jewish and Christian German and German descended people.

    Berkowitz was adopted. He was born to an Italian-American woman.

    • Replies: @Balckbeards ghost
    Very wrong-

    David Berkowitz was born Richard David Falco in Brooklyn, New York, on June 1, 1953.[1]:73 His mother, Elizabeth "Betty" Broder, grew up as part of an impoverished Jewish family. She married Tony Falco, an Italian-American, in 1936.[1]:76-79 After a marriage of less than four years, Tony Falco left her for another woman.[1]:76 In 1950, Broder started a relationship with a married man named Joseph Klineman.[1]:76,81 Three years later, she became pregnant with a child to whom she chose to give the surname Falco and, within a few days of Richard's birth, Broder gave the child away.[1]:80 Although her reasons for doing so are unknown,[1]:81 later writers have surmised that Klineman threatened to abandon her if she kept the baby and used his name.[2]

    The infant boy was adopted by Pearl and Nathan Berkowitz of the Bronx.[1]:16 The Jewish-American couple were hardware store retailers of modest means, and childless in middle age. They reversed the order of the boy's first and middle names and gave him their own surname, raising young David Richard Berkowitz as their only child.[3][4][5]
  123. @Anonymous
    The question of whether people want to live in mega-cities is, I think, of less importance than the question of whether mega-cities can maintain their basic infrastructure. Maintaining (and refurbishing / upgrading) basic infrastructure would require far more resources than are currently being extracted from the hinterlands of the cities now. These resources are not available, the cities are finding their political legitimacy to be diminishing (which brings their tax income and legal preferences into question), and successful imposition of a pure command economy would, in any case, result in a _reduction_ of resources actually delivered.
    Should this happen, should the monetary streams that currently support the finance and welfare sectors be reduced, the many who now prefer to live in the cities would find it economically impossible to continue doing so. A mild version of that is happening now, due to COVID-19 dislocation, and city populations gave been declining for some time, so the phenomenon is clearly possible.
    Speaking personally, there are quite a few things I'd like that I can't have. Nobody seems to care. Perhaps that will be the fate of the former city dwellers as well.

    Geoffrey West’s book Scale discusses why cities grow. In point of fact, when a city grows by 100% (doubles), it’s infrastructural needs only grow by 85%. So cities are less intensive in use of infrastructure.

    When city size goes up by 100%, income in the city grows by about 115%. Of course, so does crime, disease, etc. the challenge of running a city is to get the positive network effects while not suffering the negative ones.

    By contrast, suburbs appear to be cheaper from an infra standpoint because the first set of infra is put in by developers at no cost to the governments that can then tax homeowners. Once the sewers and water and roads wear out, however, there isn’t enough yield of tax revenue to replace the worn out infrastructure. But that problem is years after the developers have collected their dollars. It’s known as the growth ponzi scheme.

    https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme

    • Replies: @Alden
    I’m sitting in a suburb of San Francisco that was founded in 1769. Water, roads and sewers work just fine.
    , @nymom
    Where my daughter just moved in NJ there are no sewer systems or public transportation. People use septic tanks and pay about 500. annually for snow removal. She gets water from a well and handles her own garbage disposal. Everybody has a home with a nice piece of land on it (hers is about 7 acres)...the schools are good and no public housing in sight...

    So it is possible to have suburban development without these huge infrastructure costs if you have each homeowner responsible for their own water, sewer, garbage disposal etc., She is also looking into solar panels for the house and to heat water before sending it into the hot water system...

    It is when people expect government to pick up all of these costs that the problems ensue.
  124. @Anonymous
    Why?

    Basic mechanism is described in a book by G. Copley, _Uncivilization_.
    Very briefly, Copley points out that the increase in population of the "population boom" has ended up in cities, worldwide, because the rural areas can't support the increase. This has made some cities (usually political capitals except in the USA) not just politically dominant, but politically totalitarian (in the sense of the political term "totalitarian", an example of which is political correctness). This totalitarianism appears independently of governmental form. That is, a tyranny such as Venezuela is just as interested in preventing urban riots as is a democracy such as the UK. The city populations have escalation dominance, which they have used to act solely in their own interest while disregarding their hinterlands.
    Copley does not consider economics (he's a strategist of the geopolitical kind). I do consider economics, and it's crucial: not one of the mega-cities is economically viable. Every last one of them is supported by their totalitarianism.
    Example: cities were once transportation hubs, with a subsidiary manufacturing base and a dependent political base (dependent in that the three branches had to be next to the most intense commercial activities for simple convenience of all parties). Containerization ended this. Containers take up too much room for a container transportation node to be urban, and the consequence was today's geographically dispersed manufacturing.
    So: even Western cities have been living on politics since the 1960s (e.g. LBJ's Federal funding of city welfare payments, which made welfare dependents an income source for US cities). To rephrase that, the entire _planet_ is a command economy for the support of its megacities.

    The Jews did not do this. It's too big a result even for them even if they were as superhuman as they and their critics say they are. Jews exploited it, but are like the rooster that crows every morning and thinks it causes the sun to rise. It's what systems people call an "emergent property".

    So: you ask why the curent reaction to the COVID-19 infection.

    Simple: The Western cities have retained their political totalitarianism by _having a large population_. Since Western populations are not increasing, when internal migrations failed they've brought in foreigners. To keep from having their imported foreigners leave, they have taken foreigners who can't work productively in an industrial economy. Thus, cities have a non-productive population, selected precisely for being non-productive.
    Problem: the funds raised by political totalitarianism have been inadequate. Western cities are deteriorating and are becoming unlivable as their basic engineering systems fail (e.g. NY subways, Baltimore housing, San Francisco's inability to house its working population and California's inability to maintain its electrical energy distribution system).
    Cities' Solution: Become more totalitarian (e.g. the current lockdowns) as part of instituting a total command economy (e.g. shutting down what we had in 2019 and replacing it with a more controlled system in 2021). Why? A total command economy is the only way that cities (worldwide) can survive. Won't work. Command economies are even _less_ efficient than the Western 2019 economies. Cities will get _less_ income, not more, and will deteriorate even more quickly. This will be worldwide as deterioration of global trade will make the worldwide economy less productive.

    We are looking at the last sigh of the Moor, the Fall of the Cities, a last gasp attempt to maintain the unmaintainable.

    Copley things that the situation will resolve by a more equitable distribution of influence between cities and their hinterlands. I think that the cities will ride their current model until it hits the ground, most likely symptom being hyperinflation, with pestilence now appearing as an alternative. Cities have been militarily obsolete since nuclear weapons were developed, economically obsolete since the 1960s, politically obsolete since 2016, and are now going to vanish in their present form.

    You may ask "Why is it all so cruel?". Try reading the Book of Job, best and only answer so far. Alternately, try "world as illusion", although this usually requires chemical augmentation of the Western believer, ethanol being the usual chemical. Or one can believe in a mystical Government that will act as no government has ever acted and will save everything, although that is becoming physically unsafe as actual governments fail. Whatever you choose, it won't change the end of the cities.

    I’ll have to pick up Uncivilization.

    I’d urge you to read Scale, by Geoffrey West. It offers a counter to your arguments based on the science of fractals.

  125. @Raz
    "Shattered" was a few years after the really bad NY depicted in movies like Taxi Driver. Mid 70's were the nadir. It was starting to get better a little after that with Koch as Mayor. And got better with effective government under Guiliani and Bloomberg. My sense it is going bad again under DeBlasio. Even my left wing daughter and her husband didn't like him when they lived in NY. But he has a Black wife (who was handed billions of dollars to do who knows what with a city agency devoted to mental health and can't account for the money) and is more popular with the Black electorate you would expect a White guy to be.

    Yeah it’s collapsing. DeBlasio is a disaster.

  126. @TomSchmidt
    Presumably you see AA giving unwarranted advantages to non-whites. Happens, I guess. Such that the people not advantaged have less income coming in than they might otherwise have had.

    I don't agree with the idea that AA prevents either parent from getting a job. I've never seen that level of discrimination and I dont think it exists. Hell, until Corona, there were plenty of jobs: they just paid crap wages. But crap wages, even in NYC, could buy housing; not great housing.

    The challenge is: can people disadvantaged still raise a family with the lower level wages in a smaller place? Post-war whites could. Dump the cable TV, the over-750sf home, and a few other things, and maybe they can again. The EITC doesn't take any account of race and it is available to all. Just sayin'.

    Are you familiar with your county’s residential building codes? It may be illegal under your county’s building code to build a free standing single family 750sq ft house.

    In rural areas it’s possible to build anything under the state basic or universal building code, but not in urban areas.

    Then there’s property taxes. The exact same houses just yards away often have thousands of dollars difference in the amount of property taxes levied if those houses are in different towns or school districts.

    It’s not elastic items such as toys, new cars, clothes furniture eating out entertainment electronics that are the killer. It’s basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work.

    But go ahead and pretend it’s 1947 in a no money down for veterans. $50 a month mortgage payment AND property tax, $40 a month food bill for 2 parents and 2 babies, $1.50 a month phone bill and $5.00 a month winter heat bill, $1.50 a month gas and electric in summer out of $240 a month take home.

    A White male Rip Van Winkle who’s unaware of the effect of 53 years of affirmative action against White men.

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
    • Replies: @Augustus
    Who made $60 per week in 1947?
    , @TomSchmidt
    I'm quite aware of changes in government policies that have negatively affected the population in the USA. In a very real sense, clear, simple, straightforward rules that anyone could understand and follow have been replaced by maddeningly complex systems that empower the smart and twisted types, to the benefit of the lawyer type. There's WAY too much "gotcha"; just think, for example, of "zero tolerance" policies in schools. I had my share of indiscretions in my youth, dealt with by cops applying their own discretion to the situation. Now a similar case would be arrested.

    On affirmative action, Thomas Sowell points out how much fairer it would be to do reparations instead. Affirmative action won't threaten the chances for the elite to attend the schools of their choice; instead, it transfers from the marginal white or Asian person to the marginal Black or Hispanic person. The person who is harmed will never know his opportunity has been transferred; meanwhile, the benefits are largely showered on the Black and Hispanic upper classes (with nothing for the black and Hispanic lumpenproletariat) and also the White (and now Asian) elites, who don't have to face competition from the white and Asian strivers. Sowell makes the point that if you want to confer a benefit for slavery, the benefits should be transferred to ALL the descendants of slaves, and the costs should be paid by ALL the whites (the time for this is running out), not just the ones that AA disadvantages, who are, again, not the elite: thus, reparations are more just/equitable than AA.

    I assume you're not going to change the structure of society. What can the person disadvantaged by AA do? Presumably he has been denied economic assets, but economic assets are egalitarian, and can be used equally by anyone. Presumably, he has a skill level higher than people who passed him for AA reasons. That suggests a capacity to think independently.

    You're absolutely correct: the crushing burden is "basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work" that need to be dealt with. I've pointed out how cheap places like Camden NJ are, along with Highland Park. They're also small. They're also crime-ridden. (Near SF, Richmond is another example) Presumably the person passed over for AA reasons has some talent at: shopping intelligently for used cars; building social capital with others overlooked so as to for self-defense groups; getting enough votes in a small city like Highland Park to take over the city and cut taxes for schools; intelligently adapting structures with insulation to cut down on the cost of utilities like gas [which is still cheap due to fracking, but may escalate in cost if fracking collapses, as looks likely].

    You can protest AA all you want; as a shrinking share of the population, you're unlikely to win the political argument. (And you have to remember: elite whites BENEFIT from it, and are not your allies.) Reclaiming spaces that are cheap because the asset inflation hasn't driven them through the roof would seem to be the only recourse, short of a system overthrow (which my be in process; who knows?)

    Got a more likely solution that the individual affected by AA can effect himself?
  127. @Mark in MI
    I am a Trump supporter but you are 100% correct on this one.

    Thanks, Fren. I support Trump, and hope he returns the favor before he’s done.

  128. @Sick of Orcs

    I think Americans were tired of the upheaval from Jews, Italians, Irish and Germans bringing their historical grievances here.
     
    Early 20th century immigration was a success. No one was being imported by globalist swine for government coin. There was no welfare state and everyone learned English.

    By comparison the 21st century gimmiegrant is a losing bet. Being so dissimilar they never assimilate. The (IQ-level) retarded arrive as sick, useless burdens and "educated" legals vote 90% democrap. We need a 30-year moratorium on immigration while we clean house.

    No, Jews took over.

  129. @Raz
    "Shattered" was a few years after the really bad NY depicted in movies like Taxi Driver. Mid 70's were the nadir. It was starting to get better a little after that with Koch as Mayor. And got better with effective government under Guiliani and Bloomberg. My sense it is going bad again under DeBlasio. Even my left wing daughter and her husband didn't like him when they lived in NY. But he has a Black wife (who was handed billions of dollars to do who knows what with a city agency devoted to mental health and can't account for the money) and is more popular with the Black electorate you would expect a White guy to be.

    I was in NYC in the 1970s.
    jobs were scarce and home prices very high, in White areas,

    and I dont mean Manhattan.

  130. @Anon
    Alden,
    You are exactly right. Honestly, these days I feel more comfortable in California then I do in Georgia or Michigan. California is run by Latinos, who actually want a civilization to live in. People on this blog complain about Hispanics/Asians/Muslims, and there are good reasons to complain about those groups, but at least you can have civilization with those people.

    People who complain about California these days are just idiots, you won't get gangbanged in many parts of the state now, and you can actually have a family, and realize your kids won't get beat up in school by thugs.

    Those "Conservative" politicians who decry mass immigration but let Blacks outbreed Whites are just the worst people in America. These days, Gavin Newsom is more pro White than the governor of Alabama.

    It’s funny, the MS 13 gang started in Los Angeles but was run out of the state by some very restrictive associating with fellow gangster laws. Now they are flourishing in N Virginia and Long Island NY.

    The Rodney King riots and OJ acquittal were the last hurrah of Jewish led black power in California. Los Angeles was the power center of America Jew liberals and their black storm troopers. But due to the unlimited immigration so loved by American Jews, they’re being replaced by Persian Israeli Russian other immigrant Jews who loathe blacks. Ha ha ha.

  131. @TomSchmidt
    Geoffrey West's book Scale discusses why cities grow. In point of fact, when a city grows by 100% (doubles), it's infrastructural needs only grow by 85%. So cities are less intensive in use of infrastructure.

    When city size goes up by 100%, income in the city grows by about 115%. Of course, so does crime, disease, etc. the challenge of running a city is to get the positive network effects while not suffering the negative ones.

    By contrast, suburbs appear to be cheaper from an infra standpoint because the first set of infra is put in by developers at no cost to the governments that can then tax homeowners. Once the sewers and water and roads wear out, however, there isn't enough yield of tax revenue to replace the worn out infrastructure. But that problem is years after the developers have collected their dollars. It's known as the growth ponzi scheme.

    https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme

    I’m sitting in a suburb of San Francisco that was founded in 1769. Water, roads and sewers work just fine.

  132. Anonymous[964] • Disclaimer says:
    @Augustus
    I don't think the present citizens are capable of improving the country. Too many coming out of college, hanging diplomas and immediately going into early retirement near the coffee machine, or water cooler, depending on the weather.
    As long as they get "free" college (no matter how dumbed down the "education," and "free" healthcare they seem happy to watch government grow at an all consuming pace. Next up, promises of free food, clothing, and shelter, only 50% more government growth needed. Then on to the secondary needs of humanity.
    Meanwhile, government growth squeezes personal freedom, and few young people seem to care, or to even notice.

    Your observations match mine. This is where the deterioration of the cities becomes important. The expansion of services promised by modern monetary theory (MMT) and to be financed by simply issuing money is unlikely, to say the least; inter-bank transactions are showing intense distrust by banks concerning other banks’ credit worthiness, even at the current level of Federal indebtedness.

    The “do nothing” generations are not particularly lazy. A student once told me that he was reluctant to learn anything (such as simple grammar and vocabulary) because the corporation he would work for might want him to do something different. Another student said that he wanted an A without learning the material because he would be a manager and just wanted the course for show.
    Later on, I went into large organizations and found that the students were correct: being a member of corporate culture was very important, and corporate culture invariably include things that were flat wrong in the larger culture (or subculture, whichever). It usually does not require managers to have domain knowledge. The person who does nothing can do nothing wrong _if_ the organization is political, as most are now (even the “tech” companies).
    If the organization is economic, however, doing nothing is bad, objective knowledge and productive activities are good.
    So, _if a large majority of organizations become economic_, the not particularly lazy generations will act differently, many will try to do something rather than nothing. Conformity is powerful.

    Just what that different something could be is an interesting question. They might turn into hardnoses, disillusioned and determined not to be hurt by fraud again. They might try more intensive politics, hoping it would work this time. They might just lay down and die – that’s a common response when an entire culture is destroyed. They might turn to and rebuild a distributed, non-urban economy with considerable autarky — rather like the Russian Federation — and that would have the best prospects of surviving over several generations.

  133. @Alden
    Are you familiar with your county’s residential building codes? It may be illegal under your county’s building code to build a free standing single family 750sq ft house.

    In rural areas it’s possible to build anything under the state basic or universal building code, but not in urban areas.

    Then there’s property taxes. The exact same houses just yards away often have thousands of dollars difference in the amount of property taxes levied if those houses are in different towns or school districts.

    It’s not elastic items such as toys, new cars, clothes furniture eating out entertainment electronics that are the killer. It’s basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work.

    But go ahead and pretend it’s 1947 in a no money down for veterans. $50 a month mortgage payment AND property tax, $40 a month food bill for 2 parents and 2 babies, $1.50 a month phone bill and $5.00 a month winter heat bill, $1.50 a month gas and electric in summer out of $240 a month take home.

    A White male Rip Van Winkle who’s unaware of the effect of 53 years of affirmative action against White men.

    Who made $60 per week in 1947?

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1949/demo/p60-005.html

    "Families in the United States had an average (median) income of $3,000 i n 1947, according to estimates issued today by J. C. Capt, Director, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce."

    So, about half the population, if median and mean were close.
  134. Anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    3842887

    My “Cold War” background is showing. Take a look at this:
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/isn-t-flattened-curve-were-220023017.html

    An ultra-thick urban tail to COVID-1 or equivalent could also empty out the cities in less than 30 years. Politics:
    a: “There is much suffering from the cities. They need more resources.”
    b: “You mean the people who brought this disease upon us and continue to be a threat want more money? When it’s all I can do to hold on? No.”

  135. @Alden
    Are you familiar with your county’s residential building codes? It may be illegal under your county’s building code to build a free standing single family 750sq ft house.

    In rural areas it’s possible to build anything under the state basic or universal building code, but not in urban areas.

    Then there’s property taxes. The exact same houses just yards away often have thousands of dollars difference in the amount of property taxes levied if those houses are in different towns or school districts.

    It’s not elastic items such as toys, new cars, clothes furniture eating out entertainment electronics that are the killer. It’s basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work.

    But go ahead and pretend it’s 1947 in a no money down for veterans. $50 a month mortgage payment AND property tax, $40 a month food bill for 2 parents and 2 babies, $1.50 a month phone bill and $5.00 a month winter heat bill, $1.50 a month gas and electric in summer out of $240 a month take home.

    A White male Rip Van Winkle who’s unaware of the effect of 53 years of affirmative action against White men.

    I’m quite aware of changes in government policies that have negatively affected the population in the USA. In a very real sense, clear, simple, straightforward rules that anyone could understand and follow have been replaced by maddeningly complex systems that empower the smart and twisted types, to the benefit of the lawyer type. There’s WAY too much “gotcha”; just think, for example, of “zero tolerance” policies in schools. I had my share of indiscretions in my youth, dealt with by cops applying their own discretion to the situation. Now a similar case would be arrested.

    On affirmative action, Thomas Sowell points out how much fairer it would be to do reparations instead. Affirmative action won’t threaten the chances for the elite to attend the schools of their choice; instead, it transfers from the marginal white or Asian person to the marginal Black or Hispanic person. The person who is harmed will never know his opportunity has been transferred; meanwhile, the benefits are largely showered on the Black and Hispanic upper classes (with nothing for the black and Hispanic lumpenproletariat) and also the White (and now Asian) elites, who don’t have to face competition from the white and Asian strivers. Sowell makes the point that if you want to confer a benefit for slavery, the benefits should be transferred to ALL the descendants of slaves, and the costs should be paid by ALL the whites (the time for this is running out), not just the ones that AA disadvantages, who are, again, not the elite: thus, reparations are more just/equitable than AA.

    I assume you’re not going to change the structure of society. What can the person disadvantaged by AA do? Presumably he has been denied economic assets, but economic assets are egalitarian, and can be used equally by anyone. Presumably, he has a skill level higher than people who passed him for AA reasons. That suggests a capacity to think independently.

    You’re absolutely correct: the crushing burden is “basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work” that need to be dealt with. I’ve pointed out how cheap places like Camden NJ are, along with Highland Park. They’re also small. They’re also crime-ridden. (Near SF, Richmond is another example) Presumably the person passed over for AA reasons has some talent at: shopping intelligently for used cars; building social capital with others overlooked so as to for self-defense groups; getting enough votes in a small city like Highland Park to take over the city and cut taxes for schools; intelligently adapting structures with insulation to cut down on the cost of utilities like gas [which is still cheap due to fracking, but may escalate in cost if fracking collapses, as looks likely].

    You can protest AA all you want; as a shrinking share of the population, you’re unlikely to win the political argument. (And you have to remember: elite whites BENEFIT from it, and are not your allies.) Reclaiming spaces that are cheap because the asset inflation hasn’t driven them through the roof would seem to be the only recourse, short of a system overthrow (which my be in process; who knows?)

    Got a more likely solution that the individual affected by AA can effect himself?

    • Replies: @WSG
    Thomas Sowell is your typical "super-duper-magical" orc, which is, of course, not saying much.
  136. @Augustus
    Who made $60 per week in 1947?

    https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1949/demo/p60-005.html

    “Families in the United States had an average (median) income of $3,000 i n 1947, according to estimates issued today by J. C. Capt, Director, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.”

    So, about half the population, if median and mean were close.

  137. @TomSchmidt
    I'm quite aware of changes in government policies that have negatively affected the population in the USA. In a very real sense, clear, simple, straightforward rules that anyone could understand and follow have been replaced by maddeningly complex systems that empower the smart and twisted types, to the benefit of the lawyer type. There's WAY too much "gotcha"; just think, for example, of "zero tolerance" policies in schools. I had my share of indiscretions in my youth, dealt with by cops applying their own discretion to the situation. Now a similar case would be arrested.

    On affirmative action, Thomas Sowell points out how much fairer it would be to do reparations instead. Affirmative action won't threaten the chances for the elite to attend the schools of their choice; instead, it transfers from the marginal white or Asian person to the marginal Black or Hispanic person. The person who is harmed will never know his opportunity has been transferred; meanwhile, the benefits are largely showered on the Black and Hispanic upper classes (with nothing for the black and Hispanic lumpenproletariat) and also the White (and now Asian) elites, who don't have to face competition from the white and Asian strivers. Sowell makes the point that if you want to confer a benefit for slavery, the benefits should be transferred to ALL the descendants of slaves, and the costs should be paid by ALL the whites (the time for this is running out), not just the ones that AA disadvantages, who are, again, not the elite: thus, reparations are more just/equitable than AA.

    I assume you're not going to change the structure of society. What can the person disadvantaged by AA do? Presumably he has been denied economic assets, but economic assets are egalitarian, and can be used equally by anyone. Presumably, he has a skill level higher than people who passed him for AA reasons. That suggests a capacity to think independently.

    You're absolutely correct: the crushing burden is "basic non elastic items such as housing, property taxes utilities gas and car repairs to get to work" that need to be dealt with. I've pointed out how cheap places like Camden NJ are, along with Highland Park. They're also small. They're also crime-ridden. (Near SF, Richmond is another example) Presumably the person passed over for AA reasons has some talent at: shopping intelligently for used cars; building social capital with others overlooked so as to for self-defense groups; getting enough votes in a small city like Highland Park to take over the city and cut taxes for schools; intelligently adapting structures with insulation to cut down on the cost of utilities like gas [which is still cheap due to fracking, but may escalate in cost if fracking collapses, as looks likely].

    You can protest AA all you want; as a shrinking share of the population, you're unlikely to win the political argument. (And you have to remember: elite whites BENEFIT from it, and are not your allies.) Reclaiming spaces that are cheap because the asset inflation hasn't driven them through the roof would seem to be the only recourse, short of a system overthrow (which my be in process; who knows?)

    Got a more likely solution that the individual affected by AA can effect himself?

    Thomas Sowell is your typical “super-duper-magical” orc, which is, of course, not saying much.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    i won't measure him against others. I do find his argument against AA a very useful tool. I hope you'll use it too when confronting the white elites that support it and benefit from it. You can debate whether AA should exist at all, but you CANNOT allow them to get away with not proclaiming that if it does exist it should fall upon all, not just the marginal middle-striving white and Asian kids. After all, they're "egalitarians."

    Frankly, if the white elite was forced to disgorge enough wealth to pay reparations, well, interesting things might happen.
  138. YT says:
    @Jim in Jersey
    Sure.

    Blame your old man.

    Like he destroyed the cities. Like he didn’t warn you what was going on.

    What makes you think he had any more power over government shenanigans than you do now?

    Cities were not designed to become a haven for the homeless populations of the country. They didn’t migrate there like buffalo. They were lured there with promise of protection and free shit.

    Try understanding the old man’s smile.

    I’m wearing the same one as I sit here reading your pitiful blame-game, chronic complaint.

    Actually my boomer dad is utterly appalled at my views and conclusions about race , he raised me to be “ color blind”, whatever that means. I’ll admit I’ve always enjoyed having edgy and controversial ideas and that’s partly why I feel this way. To this day though he is a racial egalitarian and would never say anything negative about blacks, he believes race means nothing , but I’ve seen and read too much for me to be “blind” about what I notice . One thought experiment is if the American continent had millions of blacks inhabiting it and no whites , it doesn’t take a philosopher to imagine what it would be like . Even if an all black America had lots of money I predict it still would be utter chaos and mayhem. Maybe someday when people will get money for exposing racists ( funded by woke capital ) since this capitalist system is so messed up they’ll find this comment and come looking for me like a Stasi – esque thing to put on the racist database . And then like communist society I would go to trial and be sent to Alaskan work camps for reprogramming or “ special treatment” . Scary times we live in

  139. @Swamp Fox
    Berkowitz was adopted. He was born to an Italian-American woman.

    Very wrong-

    David Berkowitz was born Richard David Falco in Brooklyn, New York, on June 1, 1953.[1]:73 His mother, Elizabeth “Betty” Broder, grew up as part of an impoverished Jewish family. She married Tony Falco, an Italian-American, in 1936.[1]:76-79 After a marriage of less than four years, Tony Falco left her for another woman.[1]:76 In 1950, Broder started a relationship with a married man named Joseph Klineman.[1]:76,81 Three years later, she became pregnant with a child to whom she chose to give the surname Falco and, within a few days of Richard’s birth, Broder gave the child away.[1]:80 Although her reasons for doing so are unknown,[1]:81 later writers have surmised that Klineman threatened to abandon her if she kept the baby and used his name.[2]

    The infant boy was adopted by Pearl and Nathan Berkowitz of the Bronx.[1]:16 The Jewish-American couple were hardware store retailers of modest means, and childless in middle age. They reversed the order of the boy’s first and middle names and gave him their own surname, raising young David Richard Berkowitz as their only child.[3][4][5]

    • Replies: @Swamp Fox
    Klineman isn't a Jewish surname?
    I stand corrected.
    , @Swamp Fox
    What's also wrong, I think, is your spelling of the name "Blackbeard."
    Unless there once existed a dread pirate Balckbeard.
  140. @Cowtown Rebel
    The last Five Star General was Omar Bradley. None, not even Schwarzkopf (Negrohead?) or Powell (Headnegro?), has held that rank since he died in 1981.

    Yet, I've seen several of the highly decorated H.N's.I.C. in law enforcement boasting five stars. If not, they at least have to have the highest military rank currently attainable, with a minimum of four stars gleaming on their collars. Long Gone are the days of Reed and Malloy. Today, you're just as likely to encounter a trigger happy Somalian or a nervous-Nellie Woman who doesn't look away from her cellphone long enough to realize she's in the wrong apartment before discharging her weapon.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/minneapolis-police-sentencing-mohamed-noor.html

    https://abc13.com/amber-guyger-botham-jean-guyers-geiger-police-officer-trial/5581929/

    Ever notice that police unions are “fraternal”? This should tell you something. The “thin-blue-line” is a gang, little different than street gangs–at least when it comes to “covering-up” their questionable and quite often, illegal and criminal behavior.
    In today’s day and age, “officer safety” trumps de-escalation of force. This, in part, is due to the militarization of the police along with training in Israeli police tactics. This becomes a problem, with the “us vs. them” attitude that is fosters, along with the fact that Israel is a very different place, being on a constant “war footing”, and by necessity, its police tactics are very different.
    There are too many instances of police being “given a pass”, even when incontrovertible video and audio evidence is presented. Grand juries, guided by police-friendly prosecutors, quite often refuse to charge those police officers who abuse their authority.
    Police officers, who want to do the right thing, are quite often marginalized and put into harms way, by their own brethren…When a police officer is beating on someone that is already restrained while yelling, “stop resisting” THAT is but one reason police have a “bad name” in many instances…this makes the “good cops” who are standing around, witnessing their “brethren in blue” beating on a restrained suspect, culpable as well…

  141. @Balckbeards ghost
    Very wrong-

    David Berkowitz was born Richard David Falco in Brooklyn, New York, on June 1, 1953.[1]:73 His mother, Elizabeth "Betty" Broder, grew up as part of an impoverished Jewish family. She married Tony Falco, an Italian-American, in 1936.[1]:76-79 After a marriage of less than four years, Tony Falco left her for another woman.[1]:76 In 1950, Broder started a relationship with a married man named Joseph Klineman.[1]:76,81 Three years later, she became pregnant with a child to whom she chose to give the surname Falco and, within a few days of Richard's birth, Broder gave the child away.[1]:80 Although her reasons for doing so are unknown,[1]:81 later writers have surmised that Klineman threatened to abandon her if she kept the baby and used his name.[2]

    The infant boy was adopted by Pearl and Nathan Berkowitz of the Bronx.[1]:16 The Jewish-American couple were hardware store retailers of modest means, and childless in middle age. They reversed the order of the boy's first and middle names and gave him their own surname, raising young David Richard Berkowitz as their only child.[3][4][5]

    Klineman isn’t a Jewish surname?
    I stand corrected.

  142. @GA Pretty Pony
    @ Dr Pepper I am one of the ones who has given up. I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late. I have zero friends left and very few family to socialize with. I don't know if its because I am in a particularly foul mood today but I don't think so. I grew up in GA and it is my home and I will die here. I started school in 1969 in one of the blackest (still is) schools in GA. There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal. Everyday was like a war zone trying to get home. We had to walk aabout 10 blocks. I will never forget it. And that's when race relations were supposedly so much better. Everyone always says IKAGO. I do too. I had a few black friends, they were alright. But I would sacrifice everyone of them for a White nation. As I am sure they would sacrifice me too. It seems every family here has the mulatto grandbaby or niece or whatever. I had made a friend and we have been friends for about a year and a half but she just got a new boyfriend and he is no race realist. I thought he may be because he is from Michigan but alas, he is not. And he doesn't like me because I am. As for the other poster who said Whites may awaken soon because of hard times, they may. I can't throw my lot in with folks who have rejected me. Trust is a hard thing to establish, its alot harder to rekindle trust when it has been broken. I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority. I do. I wish I could communicate as eloquently as some of these people. I will be ok til my time comes but I cringe when I see little White toddlers as I know the hell that awaits them through no fault of their own. I see White women all over the nation go into schools and waste their talents trying to teach Black children. Can't they see their delusion? It appears not. I see my young Whites getting ghettoized with the black culture. black culture is everywhere. Its quite horrible. I pray alot but He doesn't seem to be listening to me? I will keep praying. I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly. You are the ones I pray for. Good luck my nation for you will certainly need it. Rant off now. I don't even know what I was trying to say. But thank you God for PK and the posters on here. You really are a lifeline, even if you don't know it.

    God Bless you.

    One thing I enjoy about PK’s blog is the viewpoints we see here from lower-class Southerners. Poor grammar, not the best flow, but overall I love it. I can hear it in your guys’ comments.

    You are the forgotten ones, the ones who can’t afford to move away. The government has turned its back. Wealthier whites have turned their backs. You live in the integrated hell every day and see what’s going on. Must be real sad to see.

    Anyways, God Bless and let’s pray one day whites will regain their dignity and self respect.

  143. @WSG
    Thomas Sowell is your typical "super-duper-magical" orc, which is, of course, not saying much.

    i won’t measure him against others. I do find his argument against AA a very useful tool. I hope you’ll use it too when confronting the white elites that support it and benefit from it. You can debate whether AA should exist at all, but you CANNOT allow them to get away with not proclaiming that if it does exist it should fall upon all, not just the marginal middle-striving white and Asian kids. After all, they’re “egalitarians.”

    Frankly, if the white elite was forced to disgorge enough wealth to pay reparations, well, interesting things might happen.

  144. @TomSchmidt
    Geoffrey West's book Scale discusses why cities grow. In point of fact, when a city grows by 100% (doubles), it's infrastructural needs only grow by 85%. So cities are less intensive in use of infrastructure.

    When city size goes up by 100%, income in the city grows by about 115%. Of course, so does crime, disease, etc. the challenge of running a city is to get the positive network effects while not suffering the negative ones.

    By contrast, suburbs appear to be cheaper from an infra standpoint because the first set of infra is put in by developers at no cost to the governments that can then tax homeowners. Once the sewers and water and roads wear out, however, there isn't enough yield of tax revenue to replace the worn out infrastructure. But that problem is years after the developers have collected their dollars. It's known as the growth ponzi scheme.

    https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme

    Where my daughter just moved in NJ there are no sewer systems or public transportation. People use septic tanks and pay about 500. annually for snow removal. She gets water from a well and handles her own garbage disposal. Everybody has a home with a nice piece of land on it (hers is about 7 acres)…the schools are good and no public housing in sight…

    So it is possible to have suburban development without these huge infrastructure costs if you have each homeowner responsible for their own water, sewer, garbage disposal etc., She is also looking into solar panels for the house and to heat water before sending it into the hot water system…

    It is when people expect government to pick up all of these costs that the problems ensue.

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    Shhhhh.

    We only show people the oil refineries and filth-covered cities. That keeps them from looking to move here.

    We don’t show the nice, densely wooded sections where white people still live their lives.
    , @TomSchmidt
    Solar is an interesting case. Where I live north of NYC, the all-in cost of each marginal kilowatt hour is about $.24. Much of that cost goes to pay for "necessary" infrastructure, things like the tree-trimming around power lines to keep from having 90% of houses without power in the wake of a major storm like Sandy in 2012. With solar incentives from the state and federal governments, I can supply power to myself (but not a lot) using my own solar panels at a cost per kWh about 60% of that, and that's assuming grid-tied power. The problem is that I need to deal with night and winter, and those long gray stretches without sun. Cutting off from the utility to save money with my own power isn't worth it... yet.

    I'd guess it's the same out in sussex or Warren county. It's a hell of a lot more expensive to put in a septic tank and leach field on each individual house (and you need extra acres) so the model of development has been to build a lot of houses on expensive land and outsource the sewage-cleaning to the government. Of course, your daughter's tank will need to be replaced in 30 years from installation if steel; you REALLY don't want that fouling the well. You cannot escape the costs of infrastructure to provide health and safety.

    We could once work in common to supply public goods. NYC still does this particularly well with water supply, and the costs to city residents of using public transit and subsidizing it are FAR less than the depreciation of all the xtra cars that city residents would need to buy if there weren't public transit (imagine 1.1 million more cars, at $30,000 each, depreciated over 20 years, and you begin to see the economics of the situation: that's an economic benefit to urban dwellers that helps pay for all the featherbedding). NYC could easily afford Boss Tweed and his crew engaging in what Plunkitt called "honest graft," like buying land in advance of the city's purchasing it for a park, because the surplus of working together was large enough to allow a little skim.

    By contrast, when the goal becomes ONLY the skim, and not the general welfare, you get disasters like Flint's water supply, where they decided not to pay Detroit's charges and wound up causing a lead crisis whose costs FAR exceed the few dollars needed to supply the chemicals needed to keep lead from leaching from water pipes.
    , @TomSchmidt
    Essentially, your daughter is supplying her own infra needs at a higher cost than it would be to do it in common. Except that doing it in common anymore invites two many birds "wetting their beaks" in the common purse. Conventional developers can get away with adding housing at excess infrastructure burden because towns are happy to have hookup fees NOW to balance budgets NOW, and the problems of 30 years later are someone else's problem. Your daughter's builder did the same thing, except the person on the hook in 30 years isn't the public, but your daughter.

    I hope she's saving on property taxes enough to offset the depreciation. At 7 acres, if she grows $500 worth of food annually she qualifies for the farmstead property tax exemption. Be sure she secures that.
  145. @nymom
    Where my daughter just moved in NJ there are no sewer systems or public transportation. People use septic tanks and pay about 500. annually for snow removal. She gets water from a well and handles her own garbage disposal. Everybody has a home with a nice piece of land on it (hers is about 7 acres)...the schools are good and no public housing in sight...

    So it is possible to have suburban development without these huge infrastructure costs if you have each homeowner responsible for their own water, sewer, garbage disposal etc., She is also looking into solar panels for the house and to heat water before sending it into the hot water system...

    It is when people expect government to pick up all of these costs that the problems ensue.

    Shhhhh.

    We only show people the oil refineries and filth-covered cities. That keeps them from looking to move here.

    We don’t show the nice, densely wooded sections where white people still live their lives.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    Heck, even West Orange has some nice spots, like the neighborhood around Edison's house. Of course, there's nowhere else to go after Warren and Sussex are consumed...
  146. @nymom
    Where my daughter just moved in NJ there are no sewer systems or public transportation. People use septic tanks and pay about 500. annually for snow removal. She gets water from a well and handles her own garbage disposal. Everybody has a home with a nice piece of land on it (hers is about 7 acres)...the schools are good and no public housing in sight...

    So it is possible to have suburban development without these huge infrastructure costs if you have each homeowner responsible for their own water, sewer, garbage disposal etc., She is also looking into solar panels for the house and to heat water before sending it into the hot water system...

    It is when people expect government to pick up all of these costs that the problems ensue.

    Solar is an interesting case. Where I live north of NYC, the all-in cost of each marginal kilowatt hour is about $.24. Much of that cost goes to pay for “necessary” infrastructure, things like the tree-trimming around power lines to keep from having 90% of houses without power in the wake of a major storm like Sandy in 2012. With solar incentives from the state and federal governments, I can supply power to myself (but not a lot) using my own solar panels at a cost per kWh about 60% of that, and that’s assuming grid-tied power. The problem is that I need to deal with night and winter, and those long gray stretches without sun. Cutting off from the utility to save money with my own power isn’t worth it… yet.

    I’d guess it’s the same out in sussex or Warren county. It’s a hell of a lot more expensive to put in a septic tank and leach field on each individual house (and you need extra acres) so the model of development has been to build a lot of houses on expensive land and outsource the sewage-cleaning to the government. Of course, your daughter’s tank will need to be replaced in 30 years from installation if steel; you REALLY don’t want that fouling the well. You cannot escape the costs of infrastructure to provide health and safety.

    We could once work in common to supply public goods. NYC still does this particularly well with water supply, and the costs to city residents of using public transit and subsidizing it are FAR less than the depreciation of all the xtra cars that city residents would need to buy if there weren’t public transit (imagine 1.1 million more cars, at $30,000 each, depreciated over 20 years, and you begin to see the economics of the situation: that’s an economic benefit to urban dwellers that helps pay for all the featherbedding). NYC could easily afford Boss Tweed and his crew engaging in what Plunkitt called “honest graft,” like buying land in advance of the city’s purchasing it for a park, because the surplus of working together was large enough to allow a little skim.

    By contrast, when the goal becomes ONLY the skim, and not the general welfare, you get disasters like Flint’s water supply, where they decided not to pay Detroit’s charges and wound up causing a lead crisis whose costs FAR exceed the few dollars needed to supply the chemicals needed to keep lead from leaching from water pipes.

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational

    Of course, your daughter’s tank will need to be replaced in 30 years from installation if steel
     
    Who on earth would make a septic tank out of steel?  My last house's was concrete, and I see plastic advertised now.
  147. @nymom
    Where my daughter just moved in NJ there are no sewer systems or public transportation. People use septic tanks and pay about 500. annually for snow removal. She gets water from a well and handles her own garbage disposal. Everybody has a home with a nice piece of land on it (hers is about 7 acres)...the schools are good and no public housing in sight...

    So it is possible to have suburban development without these huge infrastructure costs if you have each homeowner responsible for their own water, sewer, garbage disposal etc., She is also looking into solar panels for the house and to heat water before sending it into the hot water system...

    It is when people expect government to pick up all of these costs that the problems ensue.

    Essentially, your daughter is supplying her own infra needs at a higher cost than it would be to do it in common. Except that doing it in common anymore invites two many birds “wetting their beaks” in the common purse. Conventional developers can get away with adding housing at excess infrastructure burden because towns are happy to have hookup fees NOW to balance budgets NOW, and the problems of 30 years later are someone else’s problem. Your daughter’s builder did the same thing, except the person on the hook in 30 years isn’t the public, but your daughter.

    I hope she’s saving on property taxes enough to offset the depreciation. At 7 acres, if she grows $500 worth of food annually she qualifies for the farmstead property tax exemption. Be sure she secures that.

  148. @Jim in Jersey
    Shhhhh.

    We only show people the oil refineries and filth-covered cities. That keeps them from looking to move here.

    We don’t show the nice, densely wooded sections where white people still live their lives.

    Heck, even West Orange has some nice spots, like the neighborhood around Edison’s house. Of course, there’s nowhere else to go after Warren and Sussex are consumed…

    • Replies: @Female in FL
    A friend of mine lived in Tuxedo Park, he owned a Sunoco gas station just down the road. It was amazing how you went from a gorgeous neighborhood to a ghetto.
    Lol, he was able to spend the entire month of February in Vail every year just on the quarters from the air compressor. Seems the little negroes always needed air in their bike tires.
    , @Jim in Jersey
    Like they say... nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there.
  149. @TomSchmidt
    Solar is an interesting case. Where I live north of NYC, the all-in cost of each marginal kilowatt hour is about $.24. Much of that cost goes to pay for "necessary" infrastructure, things like the tree-trimming around power lines to keep from having 90% of houses without power in the wake of a major storm like Sandy in 2012. With solar incentives from the state and federal governments, I can supply power to myself (but not a lot) using my own solar panels at a cost per kWh about 60% of that, and that's assuming grid-tied power. The problem is that I need to deal with night and winter, and those long gray stretches without sun. Cutting off from the utility to save money with my own power isn't worth it... yet.

    I'd guess it's the same out in sussex or Warren county. It's a hell of a lot more expensive to put in a septic tank and leach field on each individual house (and you need extra acres) so the model of development has been to build a lot of houses on expensive land and outsource the sewage-cleaning to the government. Of course, your daughter's tank will need to be replaced in 30 years from installation if steel; you REALLY don't want that fouling the well. You cannot escape the costs of infrastructure to provide health and safety.

    We could once work in common to supply public goods. NYC still does this particularly well with water supply, and the costs to city residents of using public transit and subsidizing it are FAR less than the depreciation of all the xtra cars that city residents would need to buy if there weren't public transit (imagine 1.1 million more cars, at $30,000 each, depreciated over 20 years, and you begin to see the economics of the situation: that's an economic benefit to urban dwellers that helps pay for all the featherbedding). NYC could easily afford Boss Tweed and his crew engaging in what Plunkitt called "honest graft," like buying land in advance of the city's purchasing it for a park, because the surplus of working together was large enough to allow a little skim.

    By contrast, when the goal becomes ONLY the skim, and not the general welfare, you get disasters like Flint's water supply, where they decided not to pay Detroit's charges and wound up causing a lead crisis whose costs FAR exceed the few dollars needed to supply the chemicals needed to keep lead from leaching from water pipes.

    Of course, your daughter’s tank will need to be replaced in 30 years from installation if steel

    Who on earth would make a septic tank out of steel?  My last house’s was concrete, and I see plastic advertised now.

  150. @TomSchmidt
    Heck, even West Orange has some nice spots, like the neighborhood around Edison's house. Of course, there's nowhere else to go after Warren and Sussex are consumed...

    A friend of mine lived in Tuxedo Park, he owned a Sunoco gas station just down the road. It was amazing how you went from a gorgeous neighborhood to a ghetto.
    Lol, he was able to spend the entire month of February in Vail every year just on the quarters from the air compressor. Seems the little negroes always needed air in their bike tires.

  151. It’s one of the top three types:
    https://www.homeadvisor.com/r/septic-tank-types/

    Probably the cheapest.

    Plastic is newer. Those might last 40 years.

    A recent check shows plastic costs less than concrete; you can be sure it doesn’t last as long. Except: if concrete cracks…

    I’d go with plastic for 30-40 years.

  152. @TomSchmidt
    Heck, even West Orange has some nice spots, like the neighborhood around Edison's house. Of course, there's nowhere else to go after Warren and Sussex are consumed...

    Like they say… nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there.

  153. @GA Pretty Pony
    @ Dr Pepper I am one of the ones who has given up. I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late. I have zero friends left and very few family to socialize with. I don't know if its because I am in a particularly foul mood today but I don't think so. I grew up in GA and it is my home and I will die here. I started school in 1969 in one of the blackest (still is) schools in GA. There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal. Everyday was like a war zone trying to get home. We had to walk aabout 10 blocks. I will never forget it. And that's when race relations were supposedly so much better. Everyone always says IKAGO. I do too. I had a few black friends, they were alright. But I would sacrifice everyone of them for a White nation. As I am sure they would sacrifice me too. It seems every family here has the mulatto grandbaby or niece or whatever. I had made a friend and we have been friends for about a year and a half but she just got a new boyfriend and he is no race realist. I thought he may be because he is from Michigan but alas, he is not. And he doesn't like me because I am. As for the other poster who said Whites may awaken soon because of hard times, they may. I can't throw my lot in with folks who have rejected me. Trust is a hard thing to establish, its alot harder to rekindle trust when it has been broken. I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority. I do. I wish I could communicate as eloquently as some of these people. I will be ok til my time comes but I cringe when I see little White toddlers as I know the hell that awaits them through no fault of their own. I see White women all over the nation go into schools and waste their talents trying to teach Black children. Can't they see their delusion? It appears not. I see my young Whites getting ghettoized with the black culture. black culture is everywhere. Its quite horrible. I pray alot but He doesn't seem to be listening to me? I will keep praying. I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly. You are the ones I pray for. Good luck my nation for you will certainly need it. Rant off now. I don't even know what I was trying to say. But thank you God for PK and the posters on here. You really are a lifeline, even if you don't know it.

    “I no longer have too much hope that my people (White people) will awaken before it is too late.”

    We have awaken. It’s just that you don’t personally agree what we have discovered for ourselves.

    “There were only 6 White kids in my school (grades 1-7) and that included myself and my 3 sisters. It was pure hell. It was brutal.”

    It wasn’t as bad as you make it out to be.

    “I feel so bad for Whites. They have no idea how bad it will be when they become the minority.”

    Don’t worry about us, we will be fine.

    “I know there are many strong Whites who are raising their children properly.”

    You’re right, we do.

  154. @jbwilson24
    "I share your frustration over a lack of concrete solutions. To change this country, we need a great upheaval. Perhaps, Covid 19 will bring about the change. Until then, small things like starting families and influencing the young are the best course of action."

    Traditional America is not coming back, period. Just the transition from rural to urban populations has left major marks that are almost impossible to erase. The rise of obesity, diabetes, etc. The dysgenic effect of the welfare state being another.

    The truth is that America's white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones' book 'the slaughter of cities') and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    Whites in North America are easy prey for hyper competitive and clannish groups like Indians. We simply can't compete with them in terms of reproductive rates, ambition, cunning, deviousness, etc.

    What we CAN do is exactly as you suggest: have kids, teach them of their culture, expose them to the realities of power and the struggle that they are going to have as members of a despised minority. Most of the world is tribal, and they had better get used to competing with tribal peoples.

    The truth is that America’s white population has changed, let alone the overall population. We are less healthy, less independent, less intelligent, less hardy (etc) than we used to be. Our best members have produced pitiful numbers of children, while white communities have been devastated through forced integration (read E Michael Jones’ book ‘the slaughter of cities’) and social engineering. The loss of communities is linked to a loss of identity.

    We all must admit the truth here. White men of the present time are a shadow of white men alive in 1912. Far less independent. Far less tough. And despite all the world’s knowledge at the touch of a keyboard, less intelligent.

  155. @Balckbeards ghost
    Very wrong-

    David Berkowitz was born Richard David Falco in Brooklyn, New York, on June 1, 1953.[1]:73 His mother, Elizabeth "Betty" Broder, grew up as part of an impoverished Jewish family. She married Tony Falco, an Italian-American, in 1936.[1]:76-79 After a marriage of less than four years, Tony Falco left her for another woman.[1]:76 In 1950, Broder started a relationship with a married man named Joseph Klineman.[1]:76,81 Three years later, she became pregnant with a child to whom she chose to give the surname Falco and, within a few days of Richard's birth, Broder gave the child away.[1]:80 Although her reasons for doing so are unknown,[1]:81 later writers have surmised that Klineman threatened to abandon her if she kept the baby and used his name.[2]

    The infant boy was adopted by Pearl and Nathan Berkowitz of the Bronx.[1]:16 The Jewish-American couple were hardware store retailers of modest means, and childless in middle age. They reversed the order of the boy's first and middle names and gave him their own surname, raising young David Richard Berkowitz as their only child.[3][4][5]

    What’s also wrong, I think, is your spelling of the name “Blackbeard.”
    Unless there once existed a dread pirate Balckbeard.

  156. @Augustus
    Thanks Kenn,

    Whenever I see examples of the early 20th century, I am amazed by the lack of obese individuals, and the number of white people safe to ride public transportation. Says a lot about our present direction.

    Obesity is a product of cheap crappy processed food.

    Back then IOU didn’t get High Fructose Corn Syrup in everything (Thanks to a subsidy driven glut)
    and the supermarkets didn’t have 4 or 5 aisles full of sugary/salty shit.

    • Replies: @Augustus
    I agree about nutrition, but I would add that people walked more.
  157. @Flubber
    Obesity is a product of cheap crappy processed food.

    Back then IOU didn't get High Fructose Corn Syrup in everything (Thanks to a subsidy driven glut)
    and the supermarkets didn't have 4 or 5 aisles full of sugary/salty shit.

    I agree about nutrition, but I would add that people walked more.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Kersey Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...
Becker update V1.3.2