The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersSBPDL Blog
Mein Obama Calls Black People "Eggplants"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

You have to love Mein Obama. His ratings are failing dramatically, the voters who put him in the White House are fleeing with no sign of returning and yet Black people still love their man (though Gallup’s newest poll shows the lowest approval percentage of Obama by Black people since he took office – 85 percent approval). Well, to halt the catastrophic popularity decline Mein Obama appeared on The View where he made these comments:

When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: “We are sort of a mongrel people.”

“I mean we’re all kinds of mixed up,” Obama said. “That’s actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it.”

The president’s remarks were directed at the roots of all Americans. The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as “of mixed breed, nature, or origin,” according to dictionary.com. Obama did not appear to be making an inflammatory remark with his statement and the audience appeared to receive it in the light-hearted manner that often accompanies interviews on morning talk shows.

Mongrels? Who is that dude talking about? It is well-known that Mein Obama has been playing a lot of golf since he took office, so it is becoming glaringly obvious that he has bought into the idea of the Brown Paper Bag Test so that he can play 18-holes at lily-white courses. Black people are proud to be Black and the mere mention of a mongrelized past coupled with an amalgamated genetic present is unsettling, especially coming from Mein Obama. Is he calling Black people part eggplant, a la Dennis Hopper in True Romance ? A “mongrelized people” is an incredibly unpleasant and contemptuous manner in describing anyone, let alone an entire race. And Mein Obama has just decried the race he chooses to identify with as mongrelized and unauthentic, not exactly endearing terminology. One person dared preempt Mein Obama by asking how white are Black people, but his question went largely ignored:

How white are blacks? How black are whites? Because African-Americans and European-Americans have been in contact, sometimes intimate, since 1619, these questions are central to Americans’ collective self-understanding. In recent years, genetic techniques for accurately determining the answers have finally become available. Molecular anthropologist Mark D. Shriver heads a group of nine population researchers at Penn State University who are going beyond the arbitrary “one drop of blood” rule to answer these ancient questions about the family trees of the typical American “black” and “white.” They have examined DNA samples from 3,000 individuals in 25 locations around America, mostly self-identified African-Americans, looking for the gene markers that tend to differ between Europeans and Africans. Shriver pointed out that genetically tracking admixture is difficult because differences even between subraces, such as Scandinavian versus West African, account for only about ten percent of human genetic variation. “Thus, we are all more alike than we are different,” he noted. Besides illuminating American history, Shriver hopes to use his ability to determine racial admixture to locate genes associated with illnesses that affect one race more than the other — such as diabetes, prostate cancer, and hypertension, which are more prevalent among African-Americans, and dementia and osteoporosis among whites. The subject of black-white admixture is particularly complicated because, since the later 17th Century, Americans with virtually any visible sub-Saharan African ancestry (the so-called “one drop of blood”) have been socially categorized as simply African. Only recently has society begun to tolerate individuals like Tiger Woods (who is one-half East Asian, one-quarter sub-Saharan African, one-eighth European, and one-eighth Native American) defining themselves as anything other than as African. Indeed, Woods was criticized by some African-Americans in 1997, following the first of his three Masters’ victories, for not submitting to the “one drop” definition. Is mixed race ancestry fairly typical for an American? In two ways, it is. First, more than 50 million whites, according to his analyses, have at least one black ancestor. Another way to approach the question is to group together all the whites and blacks in America and calculate their mean degree of admixture. Shriver’s data shows that on average, they would be about 12 or 13 percent African. Yet, from another perspective, a sizable degree of racial mixing is highly unusual. There simply aren’t many African-Americans or European-Americans who are mostly white but also substantially black. Shriver pointed out, “There is a very small degree of overlap in the population distributions.” In America, most of the whites are extremely European and most of the blacks are quite African. Despite the notorious arbitrariness of the “one drop” rule, the actual American population conforms to its strictures surprisingly closely. Granted, the “one drop” rule would be laughed out of existence if anyone attempted to impose it on a land with a more genetically blended population, such as Puerto Rico (which Shriver has begun to study). Yet, it appears possible that the rule survives in the U.S. because it’s not too wildly inaccurate. Only a small fraction of the population is more than half, but less than 90 percent European. Among self-identified whites in Shriver’s sample, the average black admixture is only 0.7 percent. That’s the equivalent of having among your 128 great-great-great-great-great-grandparents (who lived around two centuries ago), 127 whites and one black. It appears that 70 percent of whites have no African ancestors. Among the 30 percent who do, the black admixture is around 2.3 percent, which would be like having about three black ancestors out of those 128. In contrast, African-Americans are much more racially mixed than European-Americans. Yet, Shriver’s study shows that they are less European that was previously believed. Earlier, cruder studies, done before direct genetic testing was feasible, suggested that African-Americans were 25 or even 30 percent white. Shriver’s project is not complete, but with data from 25 sites already in, he is coming up with 17-18 percent white ancestry among African-Americans. That’s the equivalent of 106 of those 128 of your ancestors from seven generations ago having been Africans and 22 Europeans. According to Shriver, only about 10 percent of African-Americans are over 50 percent white. This genetic database is restricted to adults. Black-white married couples quadrupled in number between the 1960 Census and 1990 Census, so the admixture rates among children are no doubt higher than among adults.

One can only laugh at the idea of the one-drop rule, until the reality of current pop star Rihanna being bullied for the sin of being white in Barbados is uncovered. For the authentic Black people in Barbados, Rihanna looked too white. When confronted with such distressing knowledge – since Rihanna is a symbol of “Black” sexuality in America – what is one to take from Mein Obama’s declaration of Black people being mongrelized? Recall that in the sordid history of Haiti, mongrelized (or partially white) Black people were slaughtered by pure, authentic Black people (of the darker variety). A scene from an insipid Kevin Costner film sums up this entire debate in the eyes of authentic Black people (unlike the half-white Barry Soetoro who dares call “his” people mongrelized), courtesy of General Bethlehem. Like it or not, America in 2010 is finally getting that discussion on race.

(Republished from SBPDL by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. For those who don't know, Moulinyan is a bastardization of "melanzana," which means eggplant in Italian. It's etymology probably goes back to around the 10th century AD, when Sicilians started getting their first looks at their very dark Muslim conquerors, who were eventually kicked out of Malta and Sicily around the turn of the next century. I'm not really sure if Obama was calling black people "moolies," but whatever.

    Even if the genetic differences between the races seem small, it should be remembered that the genetic sequencing difference between humans and chimps is less than 3%.

    Being a mongrel of any kind is probably genetically advantageous however, since for the most part nature favors hybrids. When people who look like each other breed with each other too often, bad things start happening, which explains why royal bloodlines run into such disastrous trouble. From the Czar's hemophiliac son to inbreeding among the English royals, it's clear that nature favors a hybrid. By virtue of his admixture Obama has the best traits of two gene pools while maladies common to either one of the races will probably be recessive. His kids seem healthy.

  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "Black people are proud to be Black and the mere mention of a mongrelized past coupled with an amalgamated genetic present is unsettling, especially coming from Mein Obama."

    I doubt most blacks would find that unsettling, (that is if they know this bit of information I'm about to share) seeing how during slavery the white master would give the slave away to some other white person to mate with or the master him or herself would mate and have sex. This leads to the offspring being part white and part black. So it shouldn't be surprising if you have white ancestors in your black family, same with whites vice versa.

  3. You know what you are? Click here to find out.

  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I'm still reeling that zippy's approval rating has sunk to 85% among blacks. That's great news! It had been stable at 95% for two solid years, so, apparently, some of the blacks who voted for "Change" actually thought that meant "positive change" and they are smart enough to know the difference.

    While his "mongrel" remark is clearly evidence of his self loathing, in November '08 0bummer referred to himself as a "mutt". MSNBC spun it as proof that he was incredibly comfortable "with race". Here's the link if anyone is interested:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27606637/

    XD .45

    In November '08 0bama described himself as a "mutt". Now he says "mongrel". Soon he'll be saying "Heinz 57".

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "Even if the genetic differences between the races seem small, it should be remembered that the genetic sequencing difference between humans and chimps is less than 3%."

    Well:

    "Full genome sequencing has resulted in the conclusion that "after 6.5 [million] years of separate evolution, the differences between chimpanzee and human are ten times greater than those between two unrelated people and ten times less than those between rats and mice". Suggested concurrence between human and chimpanzee DNA sequences range between 95% and 99%. It has been estimated that the human lineage diverged from that of chimpanzees about five million years ago, and from that of gorillas about eight million years ago. However, a hominid skull discovered in Chad in 2001, classified as Sahelanthropus tchadensis, is approximately seven million years old, which may indicate an earlier divergence."

    Oh yeah, and HYBRID POWER! Wait, no… it doesn't have the same defiant ring as black power nor the same inbred charm as white power, and it just makes me feel like an environmentally aware vehicle.

    Oh well, back to silently conspiring to overthrow the existing order.

  6. "Even if the genetic differences between the races seem small, it should be remembered that the genetic sequencing difference between humans and chimps is less than 3%."

    This is a myth.

    Last year, a study of gene copy numbers revealed a 6.4% difference

    In 2005, scientists discovered that the chimpanzee genome was 12% larger than the human genome.

    In 2003, scientists calculated a 13.3% difference in sections of our immune systems.

    One study has even revealed a 17.4% difference in gene expression in the cerebral cortex.

    Creation geneticist, Dr Rob Carter, recently stated on the USA-nationally syndicated Janet Parshall Show, that our genomes are at least 8–12% different.

  7. Being a mongrel of any kind is probably genetically advantageous however, since for the most part nature favors hybrids. When people who look like each other breed with each other too often, bad things start happening, which explains why royal bloodlines run into such disastrous trouble.

    Apples and oranges (I almost wrote orangutans). There's quite a bit of difference between a single extended family and, say, all the Northern Caucasian people on the planet. Whites on the whole are numerous and diverse enough that they could exclusively breed with each other for eternity and not run into the problems you describe. The "nature favors hybrids" argument, in the context of miscegenation, is most often used by those who would like the white race to go away.

  8. It sort of reminds we of Bill Murrays speech in Stripes.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCHTzumpk4Q&feature=related

  9. CWN says:

    "Full genome sequencing has resulted in the conclusion that "after 6.5 [million] years of separate evolution, the differences between chimpanzee and human are ten times greater than those between two unrelated people and ten times less than those between rats and mice". Suggested concurrence between human and chimpanzee DNA sequences range between 95% and 99%. It has been estimated that the human lineage diverged from that of chimpanzees about five million years ago, and from that of gorillas about eight million years ago. However, a hominid skull discovered in Chad in 2001, classified as Sahelanthropus tchadensis, is approximately seven million years old, which may indicate an earlier divergence."

    Sahelanthropus tchadensis(Toumaï) was just an ape. All of the hominid fossils below the level of Homo erectus (which is fully human) are nothing but extinct primates that have been arranged in a sequence to attempt to prove that humans have evolved.

  10. The one drop rule is retarded but most blacks seem to like it as it allows them to claim successful and beautiful mostly white people as their own.

  11. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "The one drop rule is retarded but most blacks seem to like it as it allows them to claim successful and beautiful mostly white people as their own."

    This is true. Blacks consider white-owned slavery to be the greatest holocaust in history, and they reject all slavery-associated beliefs, particularly the 3/5 Rule…

    However…

    Blacks EMBRACE the One-Drop Rule and still practice it to this day!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Kersey Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?