The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: Elon Musk, Kanye West, and Much Riskier Targets
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Although it’s too soon to be sure, the early signs are not looking good for Elon Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter, thereby demonstrating once again how easily the concentrated power of the media can destroy those whom it turns against.

The South African-born Tech entrepreneur entered the fray having several seemingly huge advantages. He already ranked as the wealthiest person in the world by a considerable margin. His Tesla Motor Company, constituting the bulk of his fortune, pioneered the electric vehicles that have become a major status symbol of affluent liberals, and despite a considerable decline in its stock, was still comparable in value to the combined total of the world’s next half-dozen automobile manufacturers. He simultaneously served as CEO of SpaceX, America’s best hope for continued domination of space, and its associated Starlink satellite network had recently proven itself a huge factor in modern warfare. Musk was not only lauded as an enormous technological hero, but he had also accumulated considerable media influence of his own, with his 118 million followers on Twitter probably giving him the reach of a major television celebrity or even an entire broadcast network.

Indeed, Twitter had become so important to him that earlier this year he boldly offered to buy the struggling social media giant and take it private. A decade ago, a leading Twitter executive had memorably described his company as representing “the free speech wing of the free speech party,” and Musk seemingly intended to roll back the mounting tide of censorship and restore it to that position.

For generations “free speech” had been one of the most universally cherished American values, but after Donald Trump used the power of his free speech on Twitter to unexpectedly win the White House, those prevailing sentiments very rapidly changed, and the need to exclude “fake news” and suppress “hate speech” became the accepted priority of all right-thinking individuals obedient to the narrative of the mainstream media. Beginning with a few extreme cases here and there, the resulting Twitter purges grew exponentially, until by early 2020 these had finally claimed the sitting President of the United States; and powerful elements of American society were very concerned that Musk might try to reverse that process. So his takeover of Twitter, substantially funded from his own pocket, was viewed by many as a horrifying and potentially dangerous threat to American values, with Musk himself increasingly portrayed as a Bond-style super-villain by the buzzing media beehive, an interloper whose nefarious plans had to be frustrated at all costs.

Twitter had already been losing money and the $14 billion in debt Musk took on to help fund his purchase made the situation far worse. Once the media painted him as a dangerous bad-thinker and Twitter suddenly became “controversial” his timorous advertisers—who provided nearly all of its existing revenue—began dropping away, with each public desertion being loudly broadcast by the hostile media megaphone.

All of these major blows came despite Musk’s partial reversal of his self-proclaimed “free speech absolutism,” as he promised to maintain many of Twitter’s existing restrictions and except for a certain former President only reinstated the most milquetoast of purged Tweeters. Musk’s U-turn immediately drew angry denunciations from some of the same individuals who had previously championed his takeover.

When expenses rise and revenue falls, financial problems result, and journalists reported that Musk had privately warned of the risk of bankruptcy as he prepared his drastic cuts to Twitter’s bloated workforce. Meanwhile, most of the company’s previous senior executives were fired or quit.

Earlier this month, Musk had intentionally slashed Twitter’s headcount by 50%, but on Thursday his media critics gleefully reported that one-third of his remaining staff had suddenly quit, with many of his crucial software engineering teams having almost totally disappeared. The front-page headline in the hostile New York Times was “Twitter Teeters on the Edge” and it darkly suggested that the company might be entering a software death-spiral, hardly encouraging news for the remaining corporate advertisers who were so necessary for its survival. I’ve never much used Twitter myself, but if I’d invested years of my time and effort in building up millions of followers, I’d be feeling pretty worried right now.

Perhaps Musk will once again ultimately triumph against the odds, and successfully create the universal WeChat-type service he has envisioned. But right now, I think it much more likely that the seemingly fragile social media giant will continue to decline then ultimately wind up in different hands. And if our media can so quickly and easily crush the aspirations of the wealthiest man in the world, perhaps costing him and his financial backers the $44 billion they had invested, who in the future would dare risk another such challenge?

 

Perhaps by coincidence, a somewhat similar controversy had recently played out in the case of a different high-profile individual, the billionaire black rapper and fashion designer Kanye West. Although I’d previously had only the vaguest impression of him, he was apparently a towering international celebrity, as well as being among the wealthiest black Americans who had ever lived, while having tens of millions of followers on Twitter and other networks.

Apparently for some reason or other, he became angry and agitated over what he saw as the overwhelming Jewish influence in the worlds of business and media, and began loudly saying so in various venues and on his social networks. As might be expected, the media reaction was swift and devastating, portraying him as a moral leper, and thereby forcing most of his business partners to cut their ties, often at enormous financial cost. Apparently 25% of the profits of footware giant Adidas came from West’s line of sneakers, but they abandoned the longtime deal at a total cost of almost $650 million when their media masters proclaimed it as a fundamental issue of morality. At the other end of the spectrum, Goodwill Industries announced that they would no longer offer their impoverished clientele the donated cast-offs associated with such a vile anti-Semite. The rapper’s longtime bank even closed his accounts and would no longer provide a haven for his money.

The immediate result of all these coordinated blows was that the bulk of West’s large fortune suddenly evaporated, while his (Jewish) personal trainer publicly declared that if he continued his bad behavior the erstwhile billionaire might end up spending the rest of his life heavily drugged and imprisoned in a mental institution. Almost none of his fellow black celebrities rallied to his side, or if they did, I didn’t hear about it. The story soon dropped from the media, perhaps permanently taking with it the once-iconic global black celebrity.

West’s high-profile transgressions had put our ideological watchmen on full alert and this probably accounted for the new controversy that soon engulfed black basketball star Kyrie Irving, who ran into a media buzz-saw for merely Tweeting out a link to an Afrocentric documentary available on Amazon. The controversial claims made in that video riled up the ADL, and Irving quickly offered public apologies and a payment of $500,000 to salvage his sports career. But that tentative deal unraveled due to his subsequent impolitic remarks, and he was suspended from basketball, while his personal line of sneakers was cancelled by Nike. Yet another abject lesson proving that even the highest and the mightiest should think twice before exercising their right to free speech. The media creates reality and if they decide to declare you a target, you quickly become a human pin-cushion.

Back in the 1990s, Bill Gates was much in the news, with his $100 billion fortune then ranking him as the wealthiest man in the world, a position he had held for so many years that it seemed permanent. His Windows operating system enjoyed a near-monopoly on all personal computers, so his products controlled the technological infrastructure of every country, just as every writer and every financier depended upon his ubiquitous Word and Excel programs. Given such potent assets, he was sometimes half-jokingly described as the most powerful person in the world, having clout that dwarfed that of any President or Pope.

While I did not necessarily dispute such an appraisal, I would always point out the severe limitations of his position. I proposed a thought-experiment in which the Monarch of Microsoft carelessly uttered some highly untoward views on any one of a number of sufficiently touchy subjects. For all his money and influence, he probably would have been quickly annihilated, fried to a crisp by a concentrated media blast and then overwhelmed by the massive wave of public revulsion that it generated, quite possibly losing his company and much of his gigantic fortune in the process. Bill Gates might have been powerful, but the media could have destroyed him at a stroke, snuffing him out like a candle in a gale-force wind. The current fates of Elon Musk, Kanye West, and others suggest that I was probably correct.

 

The ADL seems to have played a central role in all these current controversies discussed above, with Musk quickly bowing to its authority and soliciting its advice, while the organization led the successful attacks on West and Irving. Such developments were hardly surprising given its notorious reputation, but the ADL’s reaction to my own past activities had followed a strikingly different trajectory. As I wrote four years ago:

In our modern era, there are surely few organizations that so terrify powerful Americans as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, a central organ of the organized Jewish community.

Mel Gibson had long been one of the most popular stars in Hollywood and his 2004 film The Passion of the Christ became among the most profitable in world history, yet the ADL and its allies destroyed his career, and he eventually donated millions of dollars to Jewish groups in desperate hopes of regaining some of his public standing. When the ADL criticized a cartoon that had appeared in one of his newspapers, media titan Rupert Murdoch provided his personal apology to that organization, and the editors of The Economist quickly retracted a different cartoon once it came under ADL fire. Billionaire Tom Perkins, a famed Silicon Valley venture capitalist, was forced to issue a heartfelt apology after coming under ADL criticism for his choice of words in a Wall Street Journal column. These were all proud, powerful individuals, and they must have deeply resented being forced to seek such abject public forgiveness, but they did so nonetheless. The total list of ADL supplicants over the years is a very long one.

Given the fearsome reputation of the ADL and its notorious hair-trigger activists, there was a widespread belief that my small webzine would be completely annihilated when I first launched my recent series of controversial articles in early June by praising the works of historian David Irving, a figure long demonized by the ADL. Yet absolutely nothing happened.

During the next three months my subsequent articles directly challenged nearly every hot-button issue normally so fiercely defended by the ADL and its lackeys, so much so that a friendly journalist soon described me as the “Kamikaze from California.” Yet despite my 90,000 words of text and the 13,000 comments I had attracted, the continuing silence of the ADL was absolutely deafening. Meanwhile, my articles were read more than half a million times…

When divine wrath fails to smite the heretic and terrifying enforcers of official dogma seem to have suddenly lost their taste for battle, others gradually begin to take notice and may grow emboldened. Eventually leading pro-Russian and Libertarian websites such as Russia Insider and LewRockwell began republishing some of my most controversial American Pravda articles, thus bringing my factual claims to the attention of broader audiences. After the conclusion of my series, I began directly ridiculing my strangely timorous ADL opponents, publishing a short column entitled “Has the ADL Gone Into Hiding?” which led the redoubtable Paul Craig Roberts to describe me as “the bravest man I know.”

Apparently the combination of all these factors at long last grew too worrisome for the ADL, and stirring from their secret hiding place, its activists have now finally released a short and rather milquetoast response to my material, one which hardly much impresses me. A few days ago, they Tweeted out their column, together with a photo of their new nemesis.

Those were the opening paragraphs of my response to that foolhardly ADL attack, which had provided me an excellent opportunity to publish a lengthy article recounting the extremely sordid history of that powerful organization. My piece presented many important facts previously only little known and drew considerable interest, eventually being read nearly 50,000 times:

After that initial exchange, the ADL apparently reconsidered its media strategy and concluded that discretion was the better part of valor, slinking back into hiding. Indeed, the highly counter-productive consequences of any challenge either to myself or to my publication became so obvious that they seem to have issued a general edict, forbidding any mention whatsoever in all the media outlets under their editorial influence. Their leadership rightly realized that although we might suffer from their attacks, by drawing much greater attention to our information, such actions might prove severely damaging or even fatal to their long-term interests.

The reality of this presumably ADL-enforced media blockade became apparent in 2020, when the SPLC and its journalistic allies launched a ferocious wave of coordinated attacks aimed at forcing the resignation of Stephen Miller, perhaps the most hated member of the Trump Administration, a drive that came just a few months before the presidential election. The central charge against Miller was that in his private emails he had promoted several controversial posts by blogger Steve Sailer, all of which had originally been published on our website.

Such attacks typically rely upon guilt by association, and the Sailer pieces in question had run on the same page as articles promoting Holocaust Denial and various other exceptionally controversial topics, so the connection was irrefutable. And if those other issues had been publicly linked to Miller, his political fall would have become certain. But the lengthy research report denouncing Miller and the pieces he had endorsed scrupulously avoided any mention of our website or the vastly more controversial material it contained, and as a consequence Miller managed to survive. Apparently maintaining the prohibition against any hint of our existence was far more important than claiming the political scalp of a top Trump advisor. To the ADL and its allies, we constituted a terrifying Lord Voldemort, and merely mentioning our name might result in their destruction.

 

As the heavy blows suffered by Musk, West, and others have demonstrated, the media has enormous potential striking power, but creating an outlet that can effectively wield it is far from an easy task, and merely providing heavy resources may be insufficient.

I recently noted the interesting coincidence that our own publication had been launched almost simultaneously with the Intercept, sponsored by Tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar. Lavishly funded and staffed by a crew of all-stars led by renowned investigative reporter Glenn Greenwald, the Intercept seemed certain to transform journalism, but despite the $200 million it has absorbed since 2013, the results have been less than impressive. Indeed, these days our own webzine attracts roughly comparable monthly traffic along with almost twice as much readership time, despite our having suffered under the handicap of total deplatforming by Facebook and deranking by Google.

The obvious reason for such a striking mismatch between inputs and outputs is that so much of the Intercept‘s content during the Trump Era and afterwards became almost indistinguishable from what was found on so many other websites, a situation very different from the uniqueness of what we offer.

Over the years, visitors have regularly told me that they are aware of no other publication anywhere on the Internet that provides convenient access to such a wide range of ultra-controversial material across so many different subjects, nor many websites that allow such lightly-moderated discussions in its comment-threads. So perhaps this makes us the rightful heir to the mantle of “the free speech wing of the free speech party.”

Obviously, such an approach has its pluses and minuses, and I personally find a great deal of the material we publish both distasteful and wrong-headed, a failing even more common in the regular flood of the often vituperative comments. But from the beginning, the Mission Statement of this alternative media publication had envisioned that situation, and our primary role has been to serve as a content-distribution channel and commenting platform.

Furthermore, a major reason for launching the publication had been to provide a convenient venue for my own future writings, and in that regard I’ve been very satisfied with the body of work I’ve now produced, mostly over the last four or five years.

Highly controversial material, no matter how persuasive or well-documented, almost inevitably requires considerable time to achieve any broader impact. Next week will mark the tenth anniversary of the publication of my own “Myth of American Meritocracy” article, and the legal challenges it inspired to discriminatory admissions practices at our elite universities have only just now finally reached the Supreme Court, which as a result may soon strike down a half-century of Constitutional support for racial preferences, as I discussed in a recent review article:

 

Seen in this light, I’m hardly surprised that the far more recent elements of my American Pravda series have not yet produced much visible public impact, though given their exceptionally controversial nature, I suspect they have been quietly discussed in various quarters, as suggested by the millions of total pageviews they have accumulated.

Taken as a whole, the series is intended to provide a historical counter-narrative to the major events of the last 100 years, one that vastly differs from what is presented in our standard textbooks or mainstream media outlets, and it does so mostly in a sequence of self-contained, bite-size chunks that can easily be individually digested.

Over the last few years, these articles have attracted tens of thousands of comments, many of them quite substantial and fiercely critical, but after carefully considering the arguments made and the evidence presented, I still feel reasonably sure that perhaps 99% of my published analysis is correct, at least to within the limits of confidence that I had originally expressed. But even if only 10% of my conclusions were correct and 90% were totally mistaken, the impact upon our established understanding of the modern world would still be revolutionary. I’m much less certain when or if such unorthodox perspectives will become generally accepted, but that might eventually happen.

It’s always encouraging to discover that others may sometimes see things in the same way. I was recently contacted by a longtime reader of this website, someone with a strong academic background who later became quite financially successful. Although he’d previously read many of my individual articles when these had appeared over the last few years, once he sat down and devoured the total contents of my six American Pravda print collections, he found the combined impact extremely compelling, and he contacted me, wondering how he could assist the project. After a little discussion, he decided to become a financial sponsor of the website, providing an initial payment of $100,000, with his identity to be kept strictly confidential until he might want it disclosed.

From its inception, I’ve funded the website almost entirely on my own, so his sponsorship was very welcome, especially since it represented hard evidence that others had a high regard for the material we have presented.

Additional financial sponsors would also be very much appreciated, and they should regard any assistance they provide as constituting media venture capital. Their confidential involvement would allow them to support a potentially crucial project with little if any downside risk if certain topics remain controversial and forbidden, but which would provide them with enormous potential credit if the political and ideological winds change. Moreover, any such financial outlays would be merely a tiny sliver of the $200 million spent to fund the Intercept, let alone the tens of billions of dollars now invested in Twitter.

Anyone so interested in becoming a financial sponsor of our publication can contact me at Ron(at)unz(dot)com, while for the more paranoid individuals, I also now have a protonmail account RonUnz(at)protonmail(dot)com, though I seldom use it for anything.

As a perfect example of the upside potential of what I am describing, I still find it quite astonishing that for the last thirty months there has been strong even overwhelming evidence that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), which has also cost the lives of well over a million Americans, but that virtually no one else anywhere on the Internet has been willing to point to that obvious scenario. Perhaps this climate of total avoidance will continue indefinitely, but if the story does eventually come out it would surely rival the two world wars as among the most significant occurrences in all of human history.

Meanwhile, my efforts on that score continue. My Covid/Biowarfare EBook has been downloaded over 13,000 times and my individual articles have accumulated more than 900,000 pageviews on the Internet, while three of my video podcast interviews from earlier this year have reached nearly 2.3 million views on Rumble, each probably more popular than 99.99% than the other videos on that platform.

Kevin Barrett, FFWN • February 16, 2022 • 15m

Video Link

Geopolitics & Empire • February 1, 2022 • 75m • SoundCloud Audio

Video Link

Red Ice TV • February 3, 2022 • 130m

Video Link.

Related Reading:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 318 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[248] • Disclaimer says:

    Ron Unz is legend. Thank you for your work

  2. Ron Unz says:

    Here’s a lengthy comment I left a few years ago on my view of the dynamics of political/media conflicts. I’d originally been thinking of including it in the body of my piece since it was somewhat relevant to the situation regarding the ADL, but finally decided it was too long and extraneous:

    Well, as someone who’s actually been involved in quite a number of major political campaigns, several of them successful, let me contribute my own perspective…

    First, media totally dominates our political world, so much so that there’s no other factor of even remotely comparable importance. Aside from the desire of campaign consultants to get rich, the only reason politicians raise money is to buy media, mostly paid (i.e. ads) but also free (i.e. campaign consultants who can effectively spin reporters and shape the coverage).

    Personally, I think the best metaphor I’ve ever encountered for understanding the role of media in politics is found in the Warlock stories of Larry Niven, the noted SF writer. In his framework, mana is the raw power source behind magic, the resource necessary to produce desired effects, much like hydrocarbons that power our industrial civilization. Basically, media is the mana of political campaigns.

    So the two, somewhat independent, needs of a political campaign are to acquire sufficient mana and then to shape it effectively. Elected officials, celebrities, and those with connections to major media organs tend to have automatic access to reasonable supplies of mana, but their effectiveness at using it can vary dramatically. Also, in the case of elected officials, they may be used to controlling the mana in their local area, but are often unprepared for the situation elsewhere, where their usual sources of power do not apply.

    Candidates who do not start with such a powerful, pre-existing base are faced with drawing sufficient mana for their campaigns to even come into being. If the media doesn’t cover you, then you don’t exist, and your 2% in the national polls would be comparable to that of a fictitious individual provided as a placebo (non-existent individuals with invented names sometimes get 5% or higher support in political polls).

    So, how to get mana? Well, one less pleasant way, is to do or say sufficiently outrageous or controversial things that the media covers you. For example, a few weeks ago some unknown individual with no funding paid $200 to file a California ballot initiative mandating the death penalty for all homosexuals, calling it “The Sodomite Suppression Act” or something like that. Normally, random ballot initiatives get zero coverage, but he got lots of ink and maybe some electronic coverage, probably millions of dollars worth of free mana. The problem with this approach is that the mana comes in the form of a massively destructive blast from all directions, which probably doesn’t help you actually get elected. Over the years, various rightwing Republican candidates for president have knowingly or unknowing followed this sort of approach to cope with their lack of funding, without a history of much success. To some extent, the proposed positions of the hypothetical “Fred” represent an attenuated version of this strategy.

    Now getting hit by a blast of pure mana isn’t a great recipe for winning a campaign, but it beats having no access to any mana at all, which is the fate of an unknown candidate whose positions are bland or mainstream. And the crucial possibility is that a sufficiently skilled political sorcerer may be able to divert and capture at least a portion of the mana in that blast, reshaping it to power his own defenses and perhaps even a counterattack. This is not easy—indeed it’s *exceptionally* difficult—but pretty much the only option under the circumstances. Thus, suffering a massive, one-sided attack may provide the only slight chance of winning.

    If the Opposition largely controls the sources of mana, namely the media, they may realize this, and deliberately avoid providing any visibility to the “dangerous ideas” of their opponent, following the classic “blackout strategy.” Notably, the MSM and the Republicans used this approach quite effectively against the Ron Paul campaign in 2008. (And if your response isn’t sufficiently disciplined, they can shape any slight carelessness into a crushing disaster, as was used against the Howard Dean campaign in 2004.)

    One counter-move is to try to take advantage of any ill-discipline among your massively mana-rich opponents. For example, if they’ve decided upon a classic “blackout strategy” but you can provoke a few of them into foolish attacks, that not only provides you some necessary resources, but the chance for easy early victories if their smarter and more powerful elements stick with the blackout.

    And the ideal situation is to take positions that *seem* crazy and very vulnerable, thereby drawing the shock and the attacks, but which are actually much stronger and more defensible than realized. Once again, this is *not* easy to pull off.

    In political campaigns my own preferred approach has always been a combination of strategic offense and tactical defense, namely trying to quickly occupy a position astride the Opposition lines of supply and communications, thereby almost forcing them to attack lest they risk the entire collapse of their front.

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-left-has-already-won-the-2016-election/#comment-987039

    • Agree: JohnnyWalker123
    • Thanks: TKK, HdC, AlexanderEngUK
  3. Anonymous[254] • Disclaimer says:

    Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
    Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.
    Musk is now Deep State’s enemy number one.
    Note to Elon: don’t try to seek refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy/Consulate.

    • Agree: Realist, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  4. Thank God for Ron Unz.

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  5. IronForge says:

    Plenty of Diaspora and Sayanim playing that Game.

    I “suggested” a Link to a few Articles Published here at a Newslink Section of a Finance Blog; and it’s Owner sent me a Pvt Message saying that she didn’t want anything posted from a “Holocaust Denier”.

    Her Loss.

  6. Just want to say thanks, Ron.

    You are nuts and this place is a mental sewer. Nonetheless, I am free to think and say what I want, something that is forbidden nearly elsewhere.

    • Agree: Josh Gerard
    • LOL: Greta Handel
    • Replies: @gidoutahere
    , @Anonymous
    , @Legba
  7. >Almost none of his fellow black celebrities rallied to [West’s] side, or if they did, I didn’t hear about it.

    Dave Chapelle did. Apparently he left the spicier parts of this monologue out when running it by SNL’s producers. He really did a perfect job of supporting West here without stepping over the line into cancel territory himself. There was some impotent whining from ADL’s Greenblatt but the appetite for going after yet another black celebrity (after West and Irving) seems to have dissipated:

    • Replies: @OrangeSmoke
  8. Congratulations Ron on your achievements as publisher. Allow me to follow up your account of your relationship with the ADL by asking what you think of my speculation that your banning by Facebook and deranking by Google were a result of your being secretly stalked by the ADL until they found something on which to pounce which didn’t involve Jewishness.

    Also, there must be a story in your efforts to find out exactly what your problems are with Google and Facebook, and in your attempts to have their decisions reversed. Your readers would be keen to read it.

    Then there is the curious fact that only Google and Faceboook have acted against you.How come? Did the ADL only complain where they had reliable inside help? Or has it been knocked back elsewhere?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  9. Well, I try to read the Unz Review every night…from the periphery (south America)…thanks Ron!

    • Agree: katzenellenbogen, Iris
  10. denmla says:

    …Brave!…..they try with famous lawyer Gerry Spence, and they fail!….Gerry ‘s wife is Jewish, same as his son!….so it shows IQ to be very low!….

  11. One-off says:

    Despite the First Amendment, the United States has shockingly little free speech any longer, so thank you. I find much of the content here, from the comments to the main pieces, to be often ignorant and unhinged. I also learn some things now and then, too, and at least my thinking is challenged. That’s how it is supposed to work in a purportedly free society.

    It is pretty clear your punishment was supposed to be the deplatforming from social media but that obviously didn’t pan out. If West manages to survive that will be another case of heretical opinions, regardless of their merit, that didn’t lead to destruction.

    As for Musk, he quickly trimmed his free speech raison d’etre and made a deal with the devil. I’m less sanguine about his future.

    We either are entering a dark totalitarian age or emerging from one. It’s difficult to determine which it is.

  12. As we live, according to James Burnham, in a “managerial society”, not the rich, not even the immensely rich, are the really powerful. This lesson had to be learned by the hard way e.g. by Jack Ma in “Eastasia” and by Elon Musk and Kanye West in “Oceania”…

    • Agree: Prester John
  13. Anon[248] • Disclaimer says:

    Ron, what can be done to extend your umbrella of ADL immunity to others? Perhaps a commentary on whether noticing Jewish media power is or is not antisemitic? Or perhaps an article on how that power can be resisted without being motivated by hate?

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  14. Trinity says:

    Mark 10:25

    Go back and forth on the Bible. Agnostic /Christian in spirit at least. Whether the Bible is script or real, money is the root of all evil and you can take that to the bank. Can I get a witness. hehe.

    Another thing for sure, EVERYONE will take a dirt nap eventually and whether you just rot, ( most y’all best be hoping this is yo’ scenario), or there is in fact a God, a Devil, the pit and pearly gates. Good lawd, think of the names on the ground floor. Ex Presidents, World leaders, we can guess a few added in the last few years or so. A lifespan of 75-84 for a male, little more for the fairer sex. Goes in a flash. Sure don’t need a bummer like, Welcome To Hell to put a cherry on top of a life lining, dining, pocket lining. How the pajamas holding up, H.H.? George, John, table for two. Winston, I presume.

    Cue:Hell’s Bells by AC/DC

    • Replies: @Exalted Cyclops
  15. Nietzsche says:

    Interesting how Ron’s Jewish mind cannot comprehend how Elon can solve this Twitter problem and come out winning big. Elon is one of the best problem solvers in the world.

    Aside from that, you are doing God’s work here Ron. Keep it up, keep it Free.

  16. It would be so wonderful if a few more voices would start calling out the ADL at this critical moment.

  17. @Cranberries

    I disagree that Chappelle supported Kanye, he just reinforced the comments that Kanye was mentally ill because he told the truth about his parasitic Jewish managers and his evil trainer. Of course he said that Kanye was not insane but then went on to say that he was “not well” to placate the ADL. He went on a very strange Democrat rant about Walker being stupid and that the Ukrainians were beating the hell out of the Russians. If he believes that then Chappelle is not well informed. He calls Trump an “honest liar” by pointing out that many of the things he said during the 2016 campaign were true and that is why people supported him.

    Chappelle has great timing, presentation and is funny but he did Kanye no favors and essentially kissed the feet of his masters at the SNL show.

  18. Congratulations,thank you and best wishes. I am sure it is a massive undertaking and that you have earned the successes at every step. I very much enjoy the efforts,and look forward to the day that your site becomes larger than the concerted propaganda of the lame stream.

    Anything is possible.Keep up the great work. And I’ll hope it get’s even better.Truth wins.

  19. Did you see Jonathan Greenblatt announce that twitter is now on “deathwatch” ?

    These are the people who decide whether we have free speech or not.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Wade
  20. Ghali says:

    Shamefully, the Jews have an iron grip on America and Americans. But, with people like West the ‘Invisible hand’ is becoming visible and brave Americans will wake up from hyperinflation.

  21. SafeNow says:

    To understand Ron’s immunity, look no further than the metaphors he dispatched above to describe the fate experienced by others: Fried to a crisp; a candle in a gale-force wind; becoming a pin cushion. Combine the ability to write essays in a highly scholarly manner, with this kind of engaging style, and what you get, in the parlance of Ron’s comment number 2, is mana. Wordsmith mana. The ADL is adept with words, and is a bully. They will gravitate toward bullying those who possess strong abilities and resources, but not in the realm of wordsmith talent; and they will give an extremely wide berth to wordsmith talent superior even to their own.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  22. It’s a huge fight and Elon Musk has not lost it.

    Good luck to the Unz Review. I’m glad to read that an intellectually capable and financially potent supporter found his way to this great place of – deep breaths / interesting thoughts / confused gaggle = a true realm of free speech (which – necessarily – is an impure mixture (utopian philosopher Ernst Bloch (Only Hegel and (popular adventure novelist) Karl May are pure, all else is an impure mixture, Bloch often said).

    The debate that is up is: To differentiate between two modes: 1) free andc2) strategic speech (see: Jürgen Habermas: Theory of Communicative Action).

    Corporations and the ADL and politics take place/ constitute the realm of strategic speech – the intellectual realm is the place to counterbalance the insufficencies that necessarily arise in the domains of the strategic realms of speech – via free speech/open debates.
    That is the common ground journalism shares with science proper (as opposed to The Science (Matt M. Briggs).

    Sam Harris is stuck in the dichotomies that arise from his insufficient intelellectual approach to the problem of the two modes of public speech. He (and some others of the IDW crowd) is not willing to concede, that free speech is the right answer in the intellectual relam even though it means a) to eventually lose control over debates and b) to risk to hear not only dumb & ugly & silly etc. stuff, but also unpleasant truths (which often look ugly – not least at first sight…).

    Jordan B. Peterson, Peter Boghossian, Joe Rogan, Gad Saad, Toby Young seem to be willing to support free speech/ – and not least Elon Musk’s attempts to do something for it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @paranoid goy
  23. meamjojo says:

    “Apparently for some reason or other, he became angry and agitated over what he saw as the overwhelming Jewish influence in the worlds of business and media, and began loudly saying so in various venues and on his social networks.”

    Catch up with this article Ron. It will enlighten you and others.
    ——
    Blacks and Jews, Again
    Nov. 20, 2022, 6:00 a.m. ET
    By Michael Eric Dyson – Mr. Dyson (@MichaelEDyson) is a professor at Vanderbilt University and author of “Entertaining Race: Performing Blackness in America.”

    “What effective measures will the collective Negro community take against the vicious antisemitism?” Rabbi Everett Gendler shared this question with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. at a meeting of the Rabbinical Assembly in 1968, 10 days before King was murdered.

    Nearly 55 years later, the actions of two iconic Black figures demand that we ask a version of this question again. Ye, the hip-hop artist and fashion designer formerly known as Kanye West, has unleashed a rash of antisemitic tirades, while the Brooklyn Nets basketball superstar Kyrie Irving posted on social media a link to a documentary laden with antisemitic views.

    The actions of Ye and Irving bring spent tropes of Jewish control to the surface. Their provocations also compel us to grapple with sometimes conflicting Jewish and Black views of race and privilege and how the suffering of each community shapes their identities and fuels their fight against bigotry. It is painful and a bit embarrassing to admit that African Americans and Jews have, for one reason or another, competed, quarreled, and jostled with each other to gain attention and empathy for our struggles and the injustices we confront.

    None of that can blunt an abiding truth: We are, after all, old friends and lovers, sometimes rivals, with all the affection and bitterness such a relationship evokes. Black antisemitism is real; so is Jewish racism, from the horrendous bigotry of white Jews against Black Jews to the profoundly anti-Black statements of David Horowitz, who called Barack Obama “an evil man” and “an anti-American radical.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/20/opinion/kyrie-irving-kanye-west-antisemitism.html

    • LOL: Skeptikal
  24. meamjojo says:

    “As the heavy blows suffered by Musk, West, and others have demonstrated, the media has enormous striking power”

    I believe this should have been evident even to the mentally feeble after how the media drove Covid fear and panic to high levels that resulted in severe economic repercussions that continue to reverberate today.

    It’s unfortunate that the media as a group can’t be sued for the harms they inflicted on the world during the Covid scamdemic.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  25. @Ron Unz

    mana is an interesting choice of term – by Larry Niven, and by yourself by reference.

    In Maori, it means “prestige, authority, control, power, influence, status, spiritual power, charisma” and is – like Niven’s version – something that permeates the universe and everything in it, to greater or lesser extents.

    Considering that Maori and broader Polynesian culture only diverged in about the 1500s, the Maori version of manais roughly in line with its meaning in broader Polynesian culture. Maybe that’s where Niven picked up the term.

    I would argue that Maori take the concepts more seriously as a matter of current culture: mana tangata – the mana of the people in an area – and mana huaanga (also known as mana taonga) – the mana associated with control over resources or ‘treasure’ – are central to current arguments over the validity of the (claimed) cession of sovereignty over New Zealand to the English. (TL;DR: the United Chiefs did not cede sovereignty. They couldn’t under their own laws. This has been recognised by Wai 1040, and the legal arguments will play out over the course of the next lifetime).

    Related to this is kaitiakitanga – which is, very specifically, stewardship – which contributes to the mana of chieftains (rangatira) subject to the rules of being a chieftain (rangatiratanga).

    Ceding mana taonga is inconsistent with both kaitiakitanga and rangatiratanga, which is why there is absolutely no way that 500 Maori with the authority to do so would have agreed to cede rangatiratanga to the English.

    The document they agreed to doesn’t even say that they cede rangatiratanga: it says that they grant kawanatangagovernorship – over the White settlers.

    This chicanery should remind everyone of the Balfour Declaration’s second bit…

    … it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine…

    Little wonder that the Russians have finally worked out that the West’s political class are недоговороспособны – ‘non-agreement-capable‘. The world’s brown folks would use a different word in Russian: пизду (rhymes with ‘runts’).

    Folks who like the idea of mana will love the (related) idea of utu. It’s very much like Brick Top’s idea of ‘Nemesis’…

    • Replies: @Simon D
  26. Ron Unz states the apparently reason he and his site are not targets:

    “They [the ADL etc] rightly recognized that although we might suffer from their attacks, by drawing much greater attention to our information, such actions might prove severely damaging or even fatal to their long-term interests.”

    Allow me to offer an alternative explanation, based on the science of group dynamics.

    A small insular but powerful group, with a 2000+ year written history, and an declared ideology of being the ‘chosen people’, creates a shared ‘identity’, and the identity, we can say, is the ideology. Beyond this identity it’s possible for individual members of this group to have any number of political points of view, opposing each other quite earnestly. Thus Noam Chomsky disagrees with Henry Kissinger. etc.

    The natural working of such an insular group results in the group members preference for other group members as ‘argument partners’, or ‘opposition’. Thus those who control the Israeli State much prefer being opposed by B’Tselem rather than by a peace group made up and controlled by Palestinians. Thus Marxist economics professor Wolfe is the preferred ideological opponent for the capitalists who run Goldman-Sachs.

    I call this ‘niche filling’ by any strongly self identified minority. Which, by the way, African Americans are NOT, there is no shared religion or shared cultural history that pre-dates chattel slavery in colonial and ante-bellum USA.

    Thus, to come to the point, the reason Mr. Unz’s wonderful site has not been targeted by the powers that be is precisely because the niche fillers of every ideological persuasion recognize that at least the site that hosts attacks on the niche fillers is owned and edited by a fellow niche filler, which is better than being owned and edited by someone completely outside the ‘tribe’.

    Maybe this an erroneous view of the situation, but certainly it is not outside the realm of the possible?

    • Agree: Kim
    • Thanks: Zane
    • Replies: @Hacienda
    , @Chris Moore
  27. anonymous[166] • Disclaimer says:

    Our gracious, great host Ron Unz, is quite right about how even the mightiest are under threat by the oligarch cabal around them. Issues are often Jewish but not always.

    There was a time then-younger ‘richest man in the world’ Bill Gates started to be a critic of USA gov policy. Suddenly, US gov was moving to ‘break up monopoly Microsoft’. Gates shut up and became totally pro-establishment; gov decided Microsoft was ok as is.

    Also at times ‘richest man in the world’ Warren Buffett, himself had a phase of criticising USA gov policy. Suddenly in financial news there were notes on looming ‘investigations of Warren Buffett and his companies’, ‘Buffett might need to testify’ … and then one day this reversed – investigative issues were resolved, no moves against Buffett … and shortly after, it was reported that ‘Buffett is now bullish on America’.

    Bill Clinton is very establishment but he balked at bombing Serbia. ‘Brave Jewish journalist’ Matt Drudge then launched the ‘huge scandal’ of Clinton’s affair with Jewish Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was impeached but apparently cut a deal – Just after his Senate ‘acquittal’, Clinton began bombing Serbia, killing thousands of civilians.

    Maybe realising the game is already gone too far to turn back, Musk has pushed back against the ADL’s Greenblatt, telling him ‘Hey stop defaming me!’

    • Thanks: Zane
  28. Kali says:

    Mel Gibson should write a regular column for The Unz Review. – I’d read it! 🙂

    Keep up the good work Ron. And best of luck with attracting extra funding.

    Much love,
    Kali.

    • Agree: anarchyst, Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @Face_The_Truth
  29. Spect3r says:

    This “Musk Cult following” is insane.
    WTF do you see on the man?

    • Replies: @Meimou
  30. frankie p says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    First, thanks as always for being the stand up man that you are, devoted to pursuit of the truth and freedom to speak about it in every situation.

    I like the mana idea, and I agree with you that media is the most influential and powerful thing in our society.
    I can’t help but conclude that this circumstance is not beneficial to society. It’s overall effect is detrimental. Having a population who believe that they enjoy “freedom of the press” is the WORST thing for the US. It’s much better in China or the old USSR, where the population KNOW and KNEW that the press wasn’t free, and they looked at it through skeptical glasses.

  31. In my youth I was a drummer in a rock n roll band. My last gig before I was drafted was with a guy who owned a road house just outside a midwestern college town. The same guy who owned the venue also led his own house band. The joint was jam packed with underage drinkers.

    And always there were deputies parked outside. They would bust a few of the most dangerously drunken minors every night. They could have come inside and busted dozens of them. The sheriff made no secret of his stratagy. Keep the kids where I can keep an eye on them.

    I don’t pretend to know why they let you live Ron. But it’s not because they are afraid of you.

    If Elon only destroys Twitter he will always be my hero. But here is the part I just don’t understand. If Elon values free speech what the hell was he doing on Twitter in the first place? Why am I not reading Elon Musk at The Unz Review?

    • Agree: Son of a jedi
  32. Gilgames says:

    Mr Unz!
    Ever since I discovered unz.com, I’m highly impressed by your way of uncovering both side of a coin, in light of the existential rights off the “Free Speech”

    It reminds me of the Taoist Principles:

    “The dynamic balance in life is two opposites completing each other in the effort to form one. This is clearly demonstrated in the yin (female) and yang (male) energies. These two energies are opposites, but when joined together form a complete energy known as chi which is the governing energy of all life and the perfectly balanced form of energy.

    Experiencing and living in humility means you appreciate others. You experience a genuine respect and gratitude for those who serve as your mentors and teachers. When you recognize that all people have value and are worthy, then you gain true humility.”
    https://feng-shui.lovetoknow.com/Taoism_Principles

    Thank You very much for legendary work, you are my Hero!

  33. Bro43rd says:

    Thanks to Ron for providing a true free speech hangout. It is the most entertaining political reading found on the internet (& mostly in readers comments). My only request would be more writers from the liberty end of the spectrum. Specifically Tom Woods, Hoppe, Rothbard, Spooner, etc.

    Another note to the editor, while it’s understandable to give authors leeway in banning commenters, especially foul language & vicious ones. But when authors ban commenters for no good reason other than they’re ideological foes & they prefer an echo chamber, I ,& others, essentially put a reverse ban on them as authors. I think a standard should be made for the reasonable use of the commenters ban. Giving authors ability to ban commenters on a whim does a disservice to the broad range of ideas found in this hangout. Authors who want an echo chamber should stick with ms media. I’d estimate 90% of the readers of TUR are here because of the comment section.

    • Thanks: Greta Handel
  34. JR Foley says:

    Did Elon Musk have anything to do with Sam Bankman-Fried?

    • Replies: @RDF2
  35. Brosi says:

    for the more paranoid individuals, I also now have a protonmail account RonUnz(at)protonmail(dot)com, though I seldom use it for anything.

    “Holocaust” denial and “anti-semitism” are serious crimes in many countries across the planet. The existence of these anti-gentile laws in and of themselves are proof of overwhelming Jewish Power. David Irving, Ernst Zundel, Ursula Haverbeck, Monica and Alfred Schaefer all ended up in prison, which is arguably far worse than the loss of wealth or income. People taking measures to protect themselves for the Jewish lust for vengeance for perceived verbal slights should not be belittled by calling them “paranoid”.

    Further, you, Ron Unz, can have absolute trust the owner of this webzine, while many others like myself have to wonder whether the ADL’s failure to even attempt to censor UR might be due to some other purpose, such as limited hangout or some kind of phishing.

    Finally, the fact that you are Jewish provides you a certain degree of inoculation against charges of anti-semitism.

    So as much as we goyim appreciate and respect you for providing us with this platform, please be aware that there are plenty of reasons for us to act “paranoid”, especially if we are not US persons residing in the US.

  36. Brosi says:

    For all of you who have accounts on Twitter please retweet.

    Peter McCullough is a brave warrior who has lost far more than Ron Unz in his struggle to get the truth out.

  37. BuelahMan says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I think they spell it “g_d”

  38. While I find many of the commenters to be milquetoast boomerfed soyim the articles are what I come for. Even if I disagree with them and their lack of understanding on the large problems on this Jewish-Masonic controlled earth this is still the only place on the clearnet where anyone can speak their mind. While I still look at free speech as something that isn’t free nor guaranteed by anything, especially not a enlightenment era screed written on paper by freemasons, it is nice to have a place on the clearnet. Even though Unz is part of the tribe he has the bravery to allow a place like this to simply exist. This speaks volumes to people like me whose entire lives have constantly been shunted by the machinations of WorldWide ZOG. So even if we disagree Ron Unz you are truly a man amongst vermin and varmints. Keep allowing the content and the comments and you will keep your honor.

  39. Tucker says:
    @anon

    Is it possible that Ron Unz is so naive that he fails to understand the reason why his website and the truth telling he allows to appear on it that is critical of many of these subversive and anti-White jewish behaviors has not incurred the Satanic wrath of the ADL is because his website is being used as a pressure relief valve for Whites who understand that jews are waging an openly declared war on Whites and working day and night to destroy White Western Civilization?

    This is pretty obvious to me, and probably many others, who are familiar with the tactics of our number one enemy. Use of gate keepers, pressure release valves, agents who misdirect and shift the blame for the subversive and destructive agendas away from who are the real culprits and onto other patsies. Like Nazis who have been dead and decomposed for well over 70 years.

    After all, once you have mastered the enemy’s playbook. everything they are doing is easy to see and you can predict what they will do next.

  40. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    The Unz Review, the archives you have gathered and made available, and the extraordinary American Pravda series are to my mind the greatest journalistic accomplishment so far in this century.

    As far as the ADL is concerned, their silence is a deliberate tactic to avoid bringing more readers to your Review. It’s the same blanket of silence they tried to pull over Mearsheimer and Walt’s “The Israel Lobby” when it first came out.

  41. Roger says: • Website

    “…I personally find a great deal of the material we publish both distasteful and wrong-headed, a failing even more common in the regular flood of the often vituperative comments.”

    As do I, Ron, but I am at liberty to pick and choose what I read here, much of which I choose not to. As to the vituperative comments, most of them I ignore completely, considering them to be not worthy of any response.

    Nevertheless, occasionally I find real value in some material here (Larry Romanoff’s discussion on democracy, for instance) and I encourage you to press on with your work. It is having an impact and will continue to do so, even though that may not be readily apparent.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  42. I’m a farmer in the rural south of the US and I read the Unz Review every day. I can’t thank you enough, Ron, and I wish farming paid better so I could contribute to your project. If you ever want high quality grass fed beef let me know!

  43. Realist says:

    Although it’s too soon to be sure, the early signs are not looking good for Elon Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter, thereby demonstrating once again how easily the concentrated power of the media can destroy those whom it turns against.

    This is demonstrably true. While Elon Musk is the richest man in the world, he is no match for the US government which can print money ad infinitum…plus they have total physical and legal control over Musk, with all the government agencies at the ready.

  44. Almost none of his fellow black celebrities rallied to his side, or if they did, I didn’t hear about it.

    This is the saddest thing of all. If a dozen black celebs had stood up Spartacus-style, then the ADL would back down.

    The tragic thing is blacks are still slaves. They used to be branded as slaves, but are now slaves to brands.

  45. ulithi says:

    The Unz Review, a blessed Isle in the Lügenpresse Sea.

  46. Anonymous[175] • Disclaimer says:

    Elon Musk would have been better off by using 44 billion to buy out renegades in the CIA to knock off the ADLs of the world. But then again if you are part of the Tribe then it’s only exercise to fool the goyim into thinking that the fight is real when it’s only a publicity stunt to further their collective agenda.

  47. Skeptikal says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Love it!!

    Thanks for the laugh.

  48. Skeptikal says:
    @Anon

    Ron’s experience suggests that it might be worth a try to continue to call out the ADL and not back down to its bullying, while establishing a position that it is the organization that is being challenged, not individual Jews.

    Just like with the Mafia. We can talk all day about the Mafia, investigate it, do research on its origins in Sicily, etc. and nobody thinks we are attacking Italians.

    It is obvious, too, that a lot of Italians have been victimized by the Mafia.

    The same goes for Jews.

    Or, at least, has historically gone for many Jews.

    It is funny how Jewish writers can make as the centerpiece of their creative output the psychological problems that seem to go with the territory of being Jewish—but no one else is allowed to *notice* or write about this.

  49. @Tucker

    Chicken Little Ron’s job is to spook any and all who dare speak truth to power, regardless of the size of their bank accounts. He’s like the robot in the 1960’s TV show Lost in Space, wandering hither and thither, arms waving, proclaiming “Danger, Danger.”

  50. @Roger

    I think there is merit in your view that a number of enemies would regard UR as a manageable pressure valve. Still I am not sure how far I can agree with your iews as a whole because Larry Romanoff, whom you praise for one article long ago went off my reading now short UR reading list. I think that happened almost simultaneously with his having a hissy fit and apparently banning me. Of course a ban like that exposes him, though he probably doesn’t realise it, to the judgment that one can’t even be bothered to take the 4 or 5 minutes of tapping or typing that is the most one needs to create sock puppets that will slip under his radar.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Roger
  51. Cking says:

    To Ron Unz’ summation, Yes, the American people must recognize and crystallize the Covid Bio-Warfare offensive, no matter its’ origin, as the deadliest offensive against humanity comparable to WWI and WWII. And it’s still an ongoing project. That realization should bring down this Wall St. owned two party political edifice now threatening thermonuclear WWIII as if it were justifiable, unavoidable, and the operation of the highest, national security statecraft. But most, watching the MSM, would never know it. The MSM is still pitching the efficacy and necessity for covid booster shots. If the Theranos standard, where corporate fraud was detected, journalism, and law enforcement worked, had been applied to the operation of Covid 19, the PCR test, and mRNA potions, we’d be in a completely different situation now.

    An attack of atomic bombs could not have done the damage to our National and the Global economy that Covid has done, millions of lives gone or ruined.

    Poverty, caused by the Fed/Wall St. system is the national security crisis. We have near third world cities throughout this country. 20 cities could be bulldozed to make way for completely new construction. The economy platform, the nuclear powered, Redevelopment of North America, must be funded and implemented now. Yet, according to the Fed’s logic, Perpetual War seems to be the only thing our political system can organize. Covid Madness has so destabilized the United States that it will take decades to quantify, if its true evil, radical depopulation, were ever detected by Main St. America. It’s certainly not recognized now as the MSM has us focused on a completely corrupt, unworkable, disheartening, political system tasked with driving the USA’s downward trajectory, while gaining the compliance of the numbed and dumded downed, forcibly jabbed and woked, citizenry.

    However, There is resistance to this forced march through history. The American Revolution is not over, we’ve only begun to fight.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  52. @SafeNow

    Interesting thought but do you really credit the ADL with the ability to exercise that much good judgment? But you do prompt speculation that it recognises that it has only limited scarce resources of the talent needed to take on Ron verbally as well as logic.

  53. Anon[288] • Disclaimer says:

    Elon will be okay ! With Twitter he has a foothold to counter the Jou rhetoric and MSM/ ADL hogwash which most people realize is hogwash. Bit by bot I believe this will gain traction.

    Now Yeezy: Note the following tidbit from the Guardian.

    The American Restroom Association has called on Starbucks to keep its restrooms open to all.

    In June, CEO Howard Schultz threatened to close its bathrooms to non-paying customers.

    The chain brought in an open-door policy in 2018 after two Black men were arrested in Philadelphia.

    The American Restroom Association has called on Starbucks to keep its bathrooms open to everyone, The Guardian reported.
    ================================================================

    Yeezy has the formula for bringing the Tribe under control. Blacks can set the example by attending the Starbucks washrooms in force, whereever they are found. If washrooms are occupied well there is always the sitting area, counter tops and so on. Just as the Chosen seek to make an example of the Yeez, so too he can set the Tempo in the opposite direction.

    Once Starbucks is brought to heel with Howdy Schultz suitably paying homage to the Wakandians, other enterprises can be visited with the same treatment.

    The Tribe fears loss of income and outright condemnation. Blacks, with nothing to lose, with they themselves claiming eternal victimhood, having short fuses and quick to burn, loot and wreck, are the ideal bunch to correct the situation. They could also get payback for being used as cannon fodder by the Tribe.

    Yeezy with lots to lose may be hesitant. He should have known beforehand either go all the way or dont start at all. However the average Black, with nothing to lose is a more formidable opponent.

    As one UR comment said the Chosen few like to fight with brass knuckles. You cannot bring a bag of marshmallows to a combat with them. ONly a fool plays the gentleman in a street fight !

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  54. @OrangeSmoke

    “Chappelle has great timing, presentation and is funny but he did Kanye no favors and essentially kissed the feet of his masters at the SNL show.”

    Maybe, maybe not. If so, in his defense this has to be said: Like the rest of us he, suffers from a fatal weakness: he likes to eat, and if he doesn’t eat, he dies. In Tinseltown to get along you go along, otherwise you don’t eat. Period! At some point Chappelle and others like him (Mel Gibson, to cite one example) are left with no choice but to cop out on some level, even if it isn’t necessarily sincere. Which it probably isn’t (and the ADL knows it). After all, what has Gibson done since “Passion” really? Those who don’t cop out and who are righteous in their dissent are called heroes, even saints*. And since Chappelle likes to eat, sainthood ain’t on the menu.

    *As footnote, one such hero– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn– would have instantly recognized the tactics employed by the ADL and their flunkies.

  55. “One hundred years after the French Revolution, the editors of Civiltà Cattolica, the official voice of the Vatican on political affairs, came to a startling conclusion: any country which turns away from laws based on the teaching of the Catholic Church and God’s eternal law will end up being ruled by Jews. These three articles, originally published over the fall of 1890, explain in detail why this is so, for both France in 1890 and America today.

    E. Michael Jones

    South Bend, Indiana

    February 2012”

    And all the white power protestants say, “Huh?”

    • Disagree: Hulkamania
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  56. @OrangeSmoke

    You “disagree that Chappelle supported Kanye.” So did Ken Meyercord in our recent discussion of Jewish ethnic nepotism: https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/ken-meyercord-on-jewish-ethnic-nepotism I think you and Ken missed the double-edged aspect of Chappelle’s monologue. The subtext of the whole monologue was “I have to say certain things because I have a gun to my head, and I’m not supposed to mention that there’s a gun to my head, but…well, there’s a gun to my head.”

    • Agree: Bro43rd, New Dealer
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  57. Anon[288] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    There are some buggers, that is bloggers, who pout when their “wisdom” is mocked. As you said though, it reflects badly on them and also on this Site, which after all,promotes FREE speech.

    My thinking is like yours. If the bugger believes and can substantiate his position then why does he get all excited.

    One fellow who was notorious for this was Anatoli Karlov, with his endless graphs, charts and statistics during the Covid hollowhoax. Anyone attacking his nonsense or mocking his portrait holding his big sword and rocking his Salvation Army rags got blacklisted. Anatoli was a real uptight girl and much too sensitive for the animals, trolls and miscellaneous toxic characters who lurk on UR.

    The arrogance of these bloggers is dazzling. Very successful writers have their detractors and critics. These cretins though, in their astounding arrogance, believe they are supreme oracles of the Universe and their “wisdom” is divine and thus untouchable.

    One day I spent a lot of time mocking and attacking Anatoli both personally and his content. Some comments got through and others were cut. It was a lot of fun to waste his day reading all my shit before I assume he just gave up.

    Fortunately, Anatoli has moved on to brown pastures, sword, used clothing, worn out dime store sneakers and whacky opinions and all. Larry and Anatoli seem to be birds of a feather and will fly away. I think Ron puts up with their hurt feelings before he sets them free..

    Larry the Romanoff, like the Czar of Russia and his Cohorts, will be sent on his way, not with bullets but Ron’s boot up his ass.

  58. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    This highlights the downward trajectory of American culture. Twitter is geared for short attention spans, people whose reading comprises less than a paragraph on their phones. It invites smarmy, witty one line zingers. A moderate length magazine article is already TLDR for all these many millions. That a rapper like West could become such a known and followed cultural icon, along with his former spouse, shows how American culture is in the basement. What’s the mental level all this is pitched at? About twelve? It’s not even bread and circuses anymore, now it’s just a three ring circus. A free flow of information would be desirable but there has to be somebody out there desirous of receiving it, a group that appears to be a relatively small percent of the population.

    • Agree: Skeptikal
  59. anon[568] • Disclaimer says:

    There is a Gunman on Campus: Tragedy and Terror at Virginia Tech– Ben Agger, Timothy W. Luke

    The well known dog who used to sit on his 2 legs and flap his ears – Krauthammer – did not wait even few hours to connect “decades old Palestinian terror “, and “suicide bombers in Iraq “ and “Al Jazeera “ to the Virgina Tech shootings . He traced the terror to Islam . But he was not canceled nor his registration by Am eryucan or Canadian Board of Psychiatry was removed . -page 45

  60. Anonymous[189] • Disclaimer says:
    @john-hopelo

    Seems perfectly sane to me. Can you direct me specifically to something he’s said that is objectively, provably not only false but perspicuously “crazy”? So…unless you CAN, your remark has the ring of someone who’s (a little) crazy . No?

  61. Dystopian says:
    @Tucker

    Ron is doing his job as a propagandist for the Chinese. That is the most likely explanation for him pushing the narrative that the CCP had nothing to do Covid and continuing to push the clot shot. Apparently that trumps a little Jew critique. Don’t get me wrong, there is still a lot of good info here. But just as I do with the MSM, I take everything I read here as BS until I can verify it’s veracity with other sources.

  62. Chris Moore says: • Website

    These ((jews)) have decided their next big grift is to short the carbon industry.
    http://www.williamengdahl.com/gr15November2022.php
    This is in conjunction with the ESG movement, which is basically the kosher stamp of approval for the corporate world.

    Eventually these ((jews)) are going to bite off more than they can chew, and “anti-Semite” coffers will be overflowing.

    Will that be their big comeuppance, predicted in the Bible? Or will Satan again get away with playing the “victim” when things get hot?

    These ((jews)) and their illuminati partners in crime have a quicksilver talent for dodging justice, but the world is closer than ever to wrapping its collective mind around the depths of their evil.

  63. saggy says: • Website

    Inforwars did a hit piece on Musk ….. calling him a ‘fake genius’ … which it does a good job of documenting.



    Video Link

  64. Anonymous[366] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
    Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.

    Who will be the first to break the story about FTX being a conduit for Western intelligence agencies funneling black budget money to Ukraine and [other entities] to regime change Russia?? 🤔

    Tucker?

    • Replies: @RDF2
    , @Rev. Spooner
  65. Trinity says:
    @Emblematic

    The only one who decides whether you have free speech is YOU.

    • Agree: Kali
  66. TKK says:

    While reading Ron’s superb writing, I come back to the same question:

    What makes Mel Gibson and other very rich celebrities eventually grovel and apologize to their Jewish tormentors?

    Gibson made a net profit of $611 million dollars from The Passion of the Christ alone.

    He is not going to be forced to toil in a straight job. Do Jewish lawyers, agents and & handlers warn them that will be ostracized and black balled from their entire working circle, i.e. you will not be able to hire producers, special effects, cinema-photographers for any future projects?

    Are they threatened with banking terrorism: you apologize and grovel or we will lock you out of your funds, and subject you to never ending audits from the IRS?

    There is some unnamed, dreadful hammer that must be used to force someone with such a strong personality as Gibson to eat crow. Gibson proselytized Catholism boldly in print interviews and eventually divorced his wife of many years and mother of his many children due to their theological differences. He even stated his own wife would be doomed to eternal damnation because she was not a Roman Catholic who believed in the idiotic transubstantiation doctrine.

  67. Hacienda says:
    @WingsofADove

    Partially true. Both you and Ron have working points. I’d add the games of go and chess as a useful analogy.

    In go, the object is to surround the pieces with your pieces. Having a numerical advantage is hugely important. In chess, the numerical advantage is relatively unimportant. One queen is equal to nine pawns. One king is more than all the pieces. Both games have two colors only, two players only.
    What if you had a piece, a Ron Unz, that on the board, but is not strictly colored. A mix of black and white. A kind of double-agent. Now Ron has a very high numerical value, so you’d better find out that he’s not your piece, before eliminating him. AFAICT, ADL and whoever/whatever ADL answers to, hasn’t made that determination. I would also add, the game being played is not so clear. Is this a chess game or a go game? We know Jews are great at chess, but poor at go. Ron has allies who play both games really well. The ADL wouldn’t want to play chess only to find out that the game was go all along.

    • Replies: @WingsofADove
  68. Anonymous[447] • Disclaimer says:

    God I love this. This is like watching an early maturer find his spindly victim on the playground, torture him with noogies and wedgies, sit on him and make him lick his shoe.

    Unz is World Cosmic Emperor of All Multiverses!

  69. Mevashir says:

    Anyone so interested in becoming a financial sponsor of our publication can contact me at [email protected], while for the more paranoid individuals, I also now have a protonmail account [email protected], though I seldom use it for anything.

    This is great. I would happily donate on a monthly basis assuming I would receive the privilege of unfettered commenting on TUR, including three comments per hour under my handle per each article. Currently I am severely restricted and am forced to use Anons and to frequently shift my location to different cell towers and WiFi networks.

    As for the ADL, the best way to humble them is to state:

    Israel did 9/11 and the ADL covered up for them. They are American traitors and Israel firsters and should be banned and run out of our country.

    • Agree: Zane
    • Replies: @Agent76
  70. RDF2 says:
    @anon

    “I personally find a great deal of the material we publish both distasteful and wrong-headed…”

    I agree, but that is one of the joys of this site. The varying perspectives and “balls to the wall” commitment of the authors is astonishing in breadth and depth. Thank you, Mr. Unz, for providing a valuable resource for alternative voices.

  71. RDF2 says:
    @JR Foley

    SBF offered to help Musk with his purchase of Twitter but Musk dismissed him as a fraud.

  72. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @WingsofADove

    Thus, to come to the point, the reason Mr. Unz’s wonderful site has not been targeted by the powers that be is precisely because the niche fillers of every ideological persuasion recognize that at least the site that hosts attacks on the niche fillers is owned and edited by a fellow niche filler, which is better than being owned and edited by someone completely outside the ‘tribe’.

    But the “tribe” was long ago overtaken by Golden Calfer Satanists, with but a small remnant of truthers now labeled “anti-Semites” holding the line.

    This “tribe” has been comprised of Satanists almost (but not quite) exclusively, roughly since the crucifixion of Jesus. And their Satanic viciousness has been growing exponentially the more power they have attained.

    Meanwhile, they’ve gone about preaching how they were in continuity with Moses (the founder of Judaism) and the Prophets, to simultaneously steal the moral authority of the Bible, and discredit the Ten Commandments, and the Biblical teachings of the “anti-Semitic” Prophets. Because surely, any group that chastens the wild-eyed Semitic psychopaths and forces them to toe the line of civilization is motivated by “racist” and “anti-Semitic” hate, no? That’s certainly what the Satanic Marxists preached. That’s the anti-Christian civilization message by preached in the corrupted Anglo institutions and schools now, too.

    This entire myth, that the “Jews” are the “Jews of the Bible” and not the Satanists of the Bible has been advanced by their stooges, co-profiteers, and corrupt, soulless illuminati partners in crime for ages. Which is why one mustn’t continue to do ((jew)) propaganda by labeling Satanists “Jews.”

  73. RDF2 says:
    @Anonymous

    Revolver.news has a great article about TETHER (the cryptocurrency allegedly backed 1:1 by $US) that exposes the rot at the heart. TETHER is the preferred crypto for CIA backed groups from Ukraine to Syria to Myanmar.

  74. Trinity says:

    Brando and Gibson were both big time Hollywood actors so they were both more than likely playing another role for their masters. The Jew crying out in pain as he strikes down Mel and Marlon. Too bad REAL life Marlon didn’t have the guts of the character he played in “One Eyed Jacks.” Both Mel and Marlon were SCRIPTED.

    The so called “reverend” Billy Graham was the biggest disappointment. An alleged “man of God,” groveling to these (((inbreds,))) for giving them a love tap.

    It will take a man or people with nothing left to lose to set things right. The average Whitey won’t even risk his job or miss a meal, much less risk his life for something.

  75. At the end of your article, you brought up covid and pointed to your recent articles along with your e-book. All amazing stuff. However, I find it interesting that the millions who died of COVID19 mirror in number the absence of annual flu deaths. Funny how things work. It’s as if the flu simply disappeared at the exact same time covid appeared. Which is also amazing. This fact validates your first point concerning the power of the media, if an event is ignored by MSM it may as well not exist. Any who, there’s more to the covid story than meets the eye.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  76. Godspeed, Mr. Unz! And thank you for your work.

    If there are honest historians in the coming centuries, I do not doubt that they will refer to your material.

  77. @Tucker

    I’m sorry but you have committed an innacuracy. Ron is immune because I am in fact Count Dracula who, as he cannot likely remember, I admit, did nefariously become a victim of the crime of Pizza delivery-boy abduction by entities, it has long been customary to deny even exist, acting under the influence of my luridly ghastly immortal supernatural powers. It was not a difficult task for me, though impossible to accept by most people as I realized long ago, to graft upon his then juvenile physique, by means of techniques within the ambit of the vast enterprises I secretly seized invisible control over during a period of conflict it is not permitted to speak of, an apparatus of my design by which he has remained entirely under my power and control, but rendering him immune into perpetuity.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  78. @Anonymous

    Wrong. The money is being funneled to US politicians as well as Ukrainians.

  79. Ron, if the out-of-control monster Greenblatt does finally go after you, please do me a favor: don’t grovel.

    The question is – how can people go after him? Every day his list of victims grows. What happens if you and Elon get them all under the same roof? Could be a lot of pissed off and motivated people.

  80. Anon[309] • Disclaimer says:

    I suspect Twitter will hang around. Musk has a history of success in his business ventures, and Twitter is an established industry with no real competition in its specialized niche, and extra staff that could be cut without harming the company. These are all signs that it will do okay eventually.

    Control of Twitter means Musk can drive views towards those companies that advertise with Twitter, which makes it a lucrative deal for them. Those companies that backed out simply created extra billboard space for those who stayed to advertise on. Besides, there was always more you could do with Twitter you could charge people for. Making people pay for the right to post longer entries, for example.

    Musk can emphasize videos and turn the site into Tik Tok, which is apparently quite lucrative. He could create a Substack version of Twitter, which looks like it could make money. He could even pick and choose among content creators and create a Twitter newspaper you can subscribe to.

  81. @Trinity

    You misquoted the scripture. The verse is 1 Timothy 6:10. Here’s an early edition of the original Greek (Beza Greek New Testament 1598):

    [MORE]

    Ῥίζα γὰρ πάντων τῶν κακῶν ἐστιν ἡ φιλαργυρία· ἧς τινὲς ὀρεγόμενοι ἀπεπλανήθησαν ἀπὸ τῆς πίστεως, καὶ ἑαυτοὺς περιέπειραν ὀδύναις πολλαῖς.

    English translation (New American Standard):

    For the love of money is a root of all sorts of evil, and some by longing for it have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

    Money itself is not addressed here. The writer’s declaration is that those believers who make money – or more broadly materialism – their main priority in life are in danger of falling away from the faith altogether and thus likely to end up miserable (e.g. pierced themselves with many griefs). The writer is not even addressing non-Christians in the declaration, as they serve a different master altogether. Timothy’s letter is intended for instruction of those in the church.

    The opening clause states that the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. A simple perusal at what has been going on in Ukraine since 2014 with all of the death and destruction wrought is ample proof of this statement. The political leadership of both parties here in Kayfabeland have been accumulating considerable fortunes from the mountains of corpses and rivers of blood there – as has Elon Musk. I doubt any of them lose sleep over it. Their kind rarely if ever do.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  82. Simon D says:
    @Kratoklastes

    That’s why I keep coming back to this site — we get an erudite account of Maori sovereignty with a Bricktop video.

    Here’s another one for you, Mr K.

  83. Rurik says:

    And if our media can so quickly and easily crush the aspirations of the wealthiest man in the world, perhaps costing him and his financial backers the $44 billion they had invested, who in the future would risk another such challenge?

    Henry Ford

    Walt Disney

    Ted Turner…

    Elon Musk?

    demonstrating once again how easily the concentrated power of the media can destroy those whom it turns against.

    For generations “free speech” had been one of the most universally cherished American values, but after Donald Trump used the power of his free speech on Twitter to unexpectedly win the White House, those prevailing sentiments very rapidly changed, and the need to exclude “fake news” and suppress “hate speech” became the accepted priority of all right-thinking individuals obedient to the narrative of the mainstream media.

    For all his money and influence, he probably would have been quickly annihilated, fried to a crisp by a concentrated media blast and then overwhelmed by the massive wave of public revulsion that it generated, quite possibly losing his company and much of his gigantic fortune in the process. Bill Gates might have been powerful, but the media could have destroyed him at a stroke, snuffing him out like a candle in a gale-force wind. The current fates of Elon Musk, Kanye West, and others suggest that I was probably correct.

    This nefarious power of the purse, isn’t only used to destroy people who tell the truth, it’s also used to destroy political leaders and even entire countries, and as we’re all witness to today, entire civilizations.

    Yes, they can take by force Walt Disney’s media empire, and use what Disney created to promote (like the use the Ford Foundation) everything that Walt Disney despised. They surely must get a big kick out of that. ‘Such a deal!

    But the real power of Jewish supremacism was far more flagrant in what they did in the 20th century to entire countries, starting with South Africa. Where if a nation is found to contain wealth, they simply send in their goons, (Perfidious) to take it. Even at the cost of half the children of the nation. Talk about ‘worth it’, eh?

    A report after the war concluded that 27,927 Boers (of whom 24,074 [50 percent of the Boer child population] were children under 16) had died in the camps. In all, about one in four (25 percent) of the Boer inmates, mostly children, died.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War_concentration_camps

    Yes, they orchestrated the cruel deaths of 500,00 Iraqi children, and that must have been horrible for the people of Iraq. But imagine losing half of your nation’s children to slow and deliberate starvation.

    But that was just the beginning! Soon the Jewish century would really get kicked into gear, with the Bolshevik Revolution and WWI.

    Henry Ford may have stopped publishing, but at least he and his family were not out and out butchered, like this family was, for the crime of being considered an obstacle to the tribe’s insatiable lust for more power.

    Walt Disney had his empire stripped from him, and used to promote everything that Disney despised.

    But for opposing the Bolsheviks, Germany and untold millions of women and children wer burned to the ground or sent out to freeze and starve, and then the remainder tortured and enslaved, and to this day, remains occupied as a vassal state of Zion.

    So yes, their media power is near absolute, and their treachery infinite, as Elon is no-doubt finding out. But it’s doubtful that they’ll give Elon the Ezra Pound treatment, (put in a 6′ x 6′ outdoor steel cage, lit up at night by floodlights for weeks, until he started to lose his mind. Whereupon he was committed to a high security insane asylum for over a decade). All simply for using free speech so speak the truth.

    But even Ezra didn’t receive the treatment that has been meted out to those heads of state that were considered to be inconvenient to the tribe, like Mussolini, or Slobodan Milosevic or Yasser Arafat or Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi, or the untold millions upon millions of men, women and children who’ve been slaughtered or starved or tortured or displaced of everything in this world, including hope, all for being considered somehow an obstacle or inconvenient in some way to the appetites and designs of the tribe.

    Today they’ve got their sights on Vlad Putin.

    The question now, is whom is going to prevail in this latest brouhaha for a national leader who’s failing to submit to the tribe’s domination. Will they again force the issue, like they did to Germany? Like they did to Serbia? Like they did to Iraq and Libya and then tried to do to Syria?

    This is all tied together. The demand that they control all the media and social media, and who can say what, is the same demand that they control the UN, and decide who can say what and where the bombs fall.

    Elon (and Ron Unz) are not just taking on a few media barons, and organizations like the ADL or SPLC, they’re taking on something far more insidious and nether-worldly. A demonic hate that I, for one, find utterly incomprehensible. I’m a working class American, a citizen of a nation that is only a few hundred years old. They’ve been practicing and honing and perfecting genocidal hatred and malevolence and treachery for thousands of years. This all goes back to Babylon, and further, to the per-historic times before mankind became ‘civilized’. Back to the primordial slime, when murder wasn’t even considered murder, but just making your own way, so to speak. Butchering the Romanov family in a basement, isn’t something to morally wrangle over for this lot. It’s isn’t a matter of ‘should we do it?, but just a logistical matter of when can we?

    Which, as far as I can see, is how the see the rest of us, who they perceive exactly as they did the Romanovs, the Germans, the Iraqis, and now the Russians, (again). Neocons don’t trouble themselves with silly notions of morality. There wasn’t any hand-wringing at Deir Yassin any more than the 500,000 Iraqi children cruelly killed by deliberate lack of clean water or medicine. Growing up Christian, it’s very hard to comprehend this mentality, but it’s how they’re raised. And unless we Christians and Muslims and others, can start to appreciate their mindset, and understand just what we’re dealing with, we too are going to be the next victims of it. That, I’d say is a 100% certainty.

    • Agree: KenH
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Anon
  84. KenH says:

    And if our media can so quickly and easily crush the aspirations of the wealthiest man in the world,

    So it’s just an amorphous “media” who’s to blame? The race of people who own the media are responsible for crushing anyone who threatens their interests and Kanye certainly did with his shining of the spotlight upon them in the music industry.

    If Jews can destroy a former sitting president, a multibillionaire negro rapper and now have the world’s wealthiest man in their crosshairs then it’s time to use hard government power to strip Jewish elites of all of their wealth and power. And yes, Jews in Clinton’s DOJ showed Bill Gates what they could and would do to him if he didn’t start helping left wing causes.

    All of the “tropes” and “canards” about the Jewish people throughout history and how they are always exploiting and waging war upon their gracious hosts is turning out to be 100% true.

    • Agree: Zane
  85. KenH says:

    People are saying the litmus test that Musk is serious about restoring free speech is to restore Alex Jones’s twitter account. But the real litmus test would be to restore the accounts of David Duke, Nick Fuentes and Jared Taylor.

    All of the censorship and shadow banning is needless when there are block and mute options. But the ADL wants to make sure that only their and others anti-white propaganda is allowed on the platform. Whites defending themselves and calling attention to Jewish perfidy and black violent crime is “hate”.

    • Replies: @bike-anarkist
    , @geokat62
  86. 20th century was the age of rags to riches. 21st century is the age of nobodies to numberones. we had seen an indonesian moslem nigger (who was nobody) became the president of usa. now we see a south african nobody becomes the richest man in the world. i am afraid soon we will see a vietnamese nobody build a superluminal interstellar spacecraft and conquer thousands planets in various galaxies.

    que sera sera. what will be will be (just like what happened has happened).

    “the foot feels the foot when it feels the ground.”
    — Siddharta.

  87. Thim says:

    Whenever there is a deepstate gathering it is likely Elon will be there. He was given the tech for Space X, has had Tesla mostly tax funded, is running ZOG’s targeting and communucation system in the Ukraine war, and he is a populist! Not.

    He wants to chip you. He wants to chip all of us. He is following in the footsteps of his Jewish grandfather, who led a movement to replace democracy with a technocratic elite. And he wound up in a Canadian prison. The past is prologue.

  88. It was an ethnic bio-weapon, targeting Chinese, Iranians and Trump, but leaving the remnant more or less 99.96% unscathed. It got out of hand of course, shedding here, there and everywhere but the spike proteins were a multi-billion dollar bolt-on boondoggle that made it all worthwhile.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  89. Rurik says:
    @Reginald Bob-Titley Highstreet-Cobble

    under the influence of my luridly ghastly immortal supernatural powers.

    it didn’t require ‘supernatural powers’ to bully or blackmail (or both), Woodrow Wilson into betraying his nation and handing the keys to the U.S. Treasury to the tribe. Once they controlled the money, it was as someone once said, ″Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who establishes its laws.″

    It wasn’t by supernatural power that the tribe came to control the money, but by treachery. (yes, perhaps a treachery that is ‘luridly ghastly’ for centuries of practice), but once they controlled the money, the rest was like shooting fish in a barrel.

    If I could conjure a trillion or ten, by hitting some keys on my computer, then I’d have that ‘supernatural power’. It isn’t hard or mysterious to understand. It’s really very simple.

  90. Anon[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    Growing up Christian, it’s very hard to comprehend this mentality, but it’s how they’re raised. And unless we Christians and Muslims and others, can start to appreciate their mindset, and understand just what we’re dealing with, we too are going to be the next victims of it. That, I’d say is a 100% certainty.

    Good idea, one that Kevin Barrett probably supports. The problem is that Christian Zionists like A123 here on this site work overtime to demonize Islam and to forge an alliance between Christians and
    Jews. And they have clowns in right wing media like Hannity O’Reilly Coulter and all the others to go along with this deception. Even Jeff Rense, who was an ardent 9/11 truther and opposed the GWOT, during the Trump administration turned into an hysterical Islamophobe.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Rurik
  91. Wade says:
    @Emblematic

    Yeah, didn’t he even add a dramatic “It didn’t have to be this way…” Something a Hollywood character might say when they finally get the upper hand over an opponent and just before they eliminate them?

  92. Anon[758] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Even the much vaunted Abraham Accords promoted by Trump only create an alliance between Israel and Gulf oil sheiks. The Israelis provide security, both physical and cyber, and financial services (money laundering?), and the Gulf nations get to host rich Israelis on shopping sprees in places like Dubai. There is nothing in this treaty for the average man, not Israeli and certainly not Palestinian. It’s another Trump scam catering to the rich degenerates whose company he enjoys.

  93. @KenH

    … and the freedom for Julian Assange.

  94. Yee says:

    Ron won’t be hunted because he’s not a public figure and he is his own boss, so nobody can destroy his career or fire him. If ADL targets Ron, it would only give this website more publicity.

    The major reason Ron is immune – his website doesn’t make money, so ADL lost the ability to hurt him.

  95. China
    In the People’s Republic of China, holocaust denial is illegal under advocating or glorifying wars of aggression or aggressive conduct, under the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Heroes and Martyrs.

    Russia
    Main article: Law Against Rehabilitation of Nazism
    In May 2014, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin signed a law making the denial of Nazi crimes and “wittingly spreading false information about the activity of the USSR during the years of World War Two” or portraying Nazis as heroes a criminal offence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_Holocaust_denial
    Anyone here game for jolly Iran?

  96. @Rurik

    I am 100% in agreement with what you say. My post was an attempt at a form of humor I have found it necessary to exercise in order not to overly loose my mind contemplating the cruel untruth under which these inhumane lizards prevail. Their very name is Iniquity. Dressed up as “law.”

    • Agree: Rurik
  97. @Yee

    My theory was that because Jews read right to left rather than left to right (Hebrew) that they read “Ron” as “Nor.” Which is a form of negation and exclusion, each being something that pleases them very greatly, so they keep him around.

  98. Legba says:
    @john-hopelo

    Please point out some of the ‘nuts’ statements, please

  99. Rurik says:
    @Anon

    Good idea, one that Kevin Barrett probably supports.

    only up to a point

    there is a tragic reality that is the greatest hurtle to Western nations and Islamic nations coming together to oppose our common enemy. And that hurtle is immigration.

    Most Muslims in the U.S. voted for Hillary vs. Trump, knowing that Hillary would destroy as many Muslim nations and murder and menace as many Muslims as her ((masters)) told her to, with unbridled glee.

    But because Trump said something about the borders, Muslims preferred the cackling war hag, over any possibility that Trump might have ended the wars, but slowed down the colonization of the West – by non-Westerners.

    Young, military-age Syrian and other ‘men’ will leave their families to the tender mercies of ISIS/Daesh, so they can take part in the cannibalistic feasting upon the dying Western world. I have as much sympathy for them as I do the young American men who would go to Afghanistan or Iraq as contractors, to make gobs of cash off the suffering of the Iraqi, (or other) people. They deserve what they get for being unwelcome occupiers of other people’s countries. In both cases.

    These Muslim men’s lust for Western decadence, is stronger than their love of their own lands and people and institutions, and even Islam itself. Free stuff in Germany trumps their love of their families.

    If it were up to me, every single Syrian (or Iraqi or Libyan) senior citizen who’s been impacted by Bush’s or Obama’s treachery and war mongering, should be allowed to resettle in the West, including America. And get generous benefits. Unlike the hordes of other invaders, it was America that destroyed their countries. And our government owes them restitution.

    But the single young men pouring over the borders are nothing but Zionist armies and tools intended to cause strife and help to divide and conquer and eventfully replace the people of the West. Something for which many of these young Muslim men, (if not most), would be all too eager to participate in, with gusto.

    So that is the problem. In too many ways, (just as someone just pointed out Trump’s and Israel’s and the wealthy rulers of the Gulf Nations) the young Muslim invaders are all too happy to make common cause with the Zionists, so long as they perceive personal benefits to themselves by doing so. Even if it causes hatred among the people of Europe and North America for all the invaders, (including the Muslim men), who have no desire to have their communities transformed and ultimately be replaced.

    That, at least is how I see the intractable differences between the two civilizations – the West and Islam, making common cause. If that is Jeff Rense’s point, then I agree with him, and all others that say unequivocally, that ALL people are entitled to self-determination, and that includes the Palestinians, AND the people of the West. Period.

    Otherwise, we’re both obviously being menaced and genocided by the same fiend.

    But try telling that to billionaire Trump, or mega-wealthy Gulf State leaders, or young Muslim men intent upon invasion and conquest and plunder. Even (or especially) if the plunder is handed to them on a ((silver platter)).

    >><<

    Just ask any Muslim, would you be OK with the West closing the door to mass-immigration, (including Muslim immigration), if it meant there would be peace in Palestine, and no more wars by NATO against Muslim nations?

    I'd say perhaps more than half would agree to the bargain. Those who love Islam and their own families, more than they covet the decadence of the Western world, and imposing themselves upon it.

    But I'd bet that the vast majority of single men, would refuse, and would condemn their home nations to the tender mercies of someone like Hillary, so long as they themselves could take part in the scavenging upon the West, with all that means.

    • Thanks: Thomasina, Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning
  100. @Hacienda

    Thanks for your very stimulating response. I’ve never played GO so I don’t quite understand completely your analogy.

    However, in terms of what makes one a target, I’ll posit my own theory and connect it with our topic.

    The main target of power is any group or individual who is successfully organizing poor people to demand a bigger piece of the pie, either via workplace action, street action or actual revolution against a hierarchical economic system (note, could be communist, capitalist etc).

    Is the Unz site doing this? Not at all. So it’s not a ‘real’ threat.

    Is it a threat to Jewish power because it gives a platform to anti Jewish power writers?

    No, because Jewish power depends on cohesion of a small strongly identified group, and the best way for that group to stay strongly identified is the presence of a mild threat. Simply scrolling through a week of Unz should probably guarantee that any Jewish reader will feel more identity with their group.

    If you note, most ‘left’ anti capitalist writers of note are never published on Unz. This is because if they do get published on Unz they are open to attack from other leftists. A great example of this is the satirist C. J. Hopkins, whose writing used to be on Unz, but Hopkins was attacked by counterpunch because his stuff appeared on Unz and since then I don’t recall a single Hopkins article on Unz.

    Thus the traditional radical challenge to entrenched financial power never finds voice on Unz, and so Unz is no threat to financial power. It’s a great way of limiting the reach of real critics of economic power: the ‘fake left’ polices the ‘real left’ from expanding their readership.

    So, I’ll meditate on your game analogy. My current view is that if the Unz site was successfully being used to organize poor people against financial power it WOULD come under attack quick quickly.

    Keep in mind also that Ron Unz is a very vocal supporter of the basic assumption of the Covid narrative: that it’s a novel dangerous virus that killed millions worldwide. Those who disagreed with that narrative are still barred from Twitter.

  101. ANON[365] • Disclaimer says:

    In parallel with The Anti-Defamation League, we have the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_irs_990_990t_103121.pdf

    SPLC appeals weekly for donations while their 990 IRS shows income of $133 million, $770 million in assets, 398 employees. the report is 66 pages of interesting study.

  102. @gidoutahere

    If you are allowed to “speak” in the MSM, you are just repeating what they are saying.

    Everyone knowns this, including those that bother to engage the MSM.

  103. meamjojo says:

    Well there goes Trump’s chances of getting reelected! [lol]
    ———–
    Kanye West Confirms 2024 Presidential Bid
    November 21, 2022

    Kanye West appears to have confirmed that he will be running for president in 2024 in an attempt to move “towards the future” after giving up on his White House bid in 2020.

    In a since-deleted video posted to Twitter by the account Patriot Takes, West, whose legal name is Ye, can be seen alongside conservative figure and former Breitbart editor, Milo Yiannopoulos.

    “This is Milo right here, working on the campaign,” West, 45, says in the video. “Is that an announcement?” one man asks West, to which he responds by laughing.

    “I guess it is,” he adds, to which a laughing Yiannopoulos replies, “Thanks, I accept.”

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/kanye-west-confirms-2024-presidential-bid_4876045.html

  104. Ron Unz has provided a terrific safe haven for sharing verboten ideas and I thank him for that. But I think the reason Ron is immune from the ADL is because he is Jewish. Jewish in-group preference is so intense that it really doesn’t matter what is said about Jews but only who is saying it. Jews don’t feel threatened by other Jews due to their natural affinity with one another. Plus this aligns with their Freemasonic twin-pillar dialectic. As long as the thesis and the anti-thesis are both inside the larger Jewish tent, they are not bothered much.

    • Agree: TelfoedJohn
  105. Wild Man says:
    @Ron Unz

    I suppose that might be one of the reasons why you have chosen to be in the mana bizz yourself. But the mana can be subverted – no?

    Allow me a silly analogy (I know it’s silly, but it is a personal anecdote, and we each only have a limited supply of those): When I was a young lad, on summer break from elementary school (it must have been one of the later elementary grades – grade 5 or 6), I became a bit bored by mid-summer, and decided that I was just the young fellow, to start a youth magazine. Well, …. one soon finds that, if you want to publish, you have to find stuff that people might deem worthy of reading, and so the first order of business, is developing copy. Of course that is where I almost immediately failed. Since there was no rag to point to yet, to get others enthused about writing for it, … I realized I would need to write all the copy myself. OK, so I looked around as to what was going on in the culture. Well, there was always this ‘drug scare’ thing coming up and reoccurring in the culture, ….. so I thought I would use that topic as the feature for the first edition, write up some really cool personal interest stories about people who had bad horrific experiences with elicit street drugs, which of course I didn’t know any such people, because I was still just a little kid, … but you know, … my thinking was – keep it topical – I was already familiar with the genre – just make it up.

    Well, …. I soon became un-enthused. I soon realized that all my copy was complete shite because it was complete BS, completely fabricated, ….. and that is when I realized what this publishing game is all about (a very fine line if one is going to chose to do it right, …. which was well beyond my capacity to take on as a young lad, because I was still a completely naive greenhorn, as almost all young lads are, so was not only incapable of writing good copy myself, but was also incapable of judging the overall worthiness of copy as presented by others). I guess the happy ending to the story, is that I decided I should just go outside and pay with my friends like a little kid again (because that is what I was, …. enough of this influence-bizz for now, …. do some living first).

    Of course, I think you are well aware of that fine line, and that is what you are after here at the UR (topical but relevant, and truthy instead of bull-shitty). And if anyone has the chops, experience and overall worthiness to do it, at this stage in your life, …. well that would be Ron Unz, we all agree.

    OK, … saying all that, … I am wondering what your thoughts are on all these claims of Jewish subversion of the mana the enervates culture (especially MSM)? It looks to me, to be a big problem – am I wrong?

    Perhaps those most skilled at this mana-subversion, can afford the capital cost of acquiring those mana-producing assets, …. as the asset paired with the subverso-skill can lead to some very large gains in engineered-influence, … and where there is engineered-influence, there is money. A lot of people say, all this is a Jewish specialty. Are they wrong?

  106. atp says:

    Have been wondeing how long it would take to see if Elon Musk was an true advocate for free speech! With his banning of Alex Jones, now we know! He apparently did not realize how powerful the Opposition to free speech is. To give him benefit of the doubt, he probably did initually mean what he was saying, but reality of the real money set in and there he went! It’ll be interesting to watch this all play out!

    • Agree: Skeptikal
  107. @Kali

    Acclaimed American actor, film-director and film-producer Mel Columcille Gerard Gibson is a worshiper of a dead-Jew named Rabbi Yeshua Ben Yosef — whom Pagan Roman authorities called “Iēsus Nazarēnus, Rēx Iūdaeōrum” 2000 years ago.

    So, for being a worshiper of a long-dead Jewish rabbi, Mel Columcille Gerard Gibson has always been unable to articulate his political-social positions correctly.

    That is also the case for most White greedy Christians in America and in Europe who literally believe that a long-dead Jewish rabbi will save them from the intense fire of “Christian Hell” after their physical deaths on earth when, in fact, the long-dead Jewish rabbi could not save himself from the gallows of Pagan Roman authorities!

    Just think for moment.

  108. Agent76 says:

    Oct 27, 2022 WOW: This Explains Why Elon Is Doing It!

    05 Oct 2022 You cannot bully or manipulate me’: Bob Marley’s granddaughter Selah blasts critics for attacking her for wearing ‘White Lives Matter’ top with Kanye West – and texts rapper saying she wants to ‘continue conversation’ with ‘depth and clarity’

    Bob Marley’s granddaughter has blasted people criticizing her for wearing Kanye West’s ‘White Lives Matter’ top – telling them ‘you can’t coax me into silence.’

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11283447/Bob-Marleys-granddaughter-Selah-blasts-critics-attacking-wearing-White-Lives-Matter-top.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead

  109. Agent76 says:
    @Mevashir

    I have some information away from the mainstream liars in the CIA mockingbird media.

    September 10, 2021 The Bin Ladens and the Bushes: On 9/11 George Herbert W. Bush Meets Osama’s Brother Shafiq bin Laden

    Lest we forget, one day before the 9/11 attacks [as well as on the morning of 9/11, the dad of the sitting President of the United States of America, George Herbert Walker Bush was meeting none other than Shafiq bin Laden, the brother of the alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-bin-ladens-the-bushes-and-911-a-former-us-president-meets-osamas-brother-not-subject-to-anti-terrorism-legislation/5582436

    September 11, 2013 9/11 Debunked in Under 5 Minutes

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Random Anonymous
  110. Curle says:

    “The main target of power is any group or individual who is successfully organizing poor people to demand a bigger piece of the pie, either via workplace action, street action or actual revolution against a hierarchical economic system (note, could be communist, capitalist etc).”

    Your list is under inclusive. The target clearly includes ethnic groups who resist group delegitimization via highly curated and self-serving victim stories.

  111. Mark Hunter says: • Website

    Great article.

    Some years ago Norman Finkelstein gave a talk at the local university.  A day or two before it was scheduled, someone, or some group, took out a full page advertisement in the university weekly (published by the administration, not the students).  It warned people not to attend Finkelstein’s talk!  He was an evil this and that, the usual epithets he has to put up with.

    Needless to say his talk was well attended and probably more so because of the silly advertisement.  The ADL knows what it’s doing studiously ignoring RU’s work.

    By the way, Finkelstein was an excellent speaker.  His material was new, typed out but delivered as if weren’t, an impressive performance.  (The talk was mostly about the scholarship, or rather the lack of it, behind Dershowitz’s book The Case for Israel which had just come out.

    • Replies: @TelfoedJohn
    , @Ron Unz
  112. Free Speech Army Must Be Mobilized

    Farage had fun with his ‘People’s Army’ bit and it was a big hit with the voters.

    Free Speech Army Is On The March!

    Tweet from 2015:

  113. geokat62 says:
    @KenH

    People are saying the litmus test that Musk is serious about restoring free speech is to restore Alex Jones’s twitter account. But the real litmus test would be to restore the accounts of David Duke, Nick Fuentes and Jared Taylor.

    Musk has been wrestling with building a platform dedicated to freedom of speech versus one that was striving for 100% accurate information. People were informing him that these two objectives were mutually exclusive and that he had to pick one.

    What did he do? After much deliberation, he recently unveiled Twitter’s new policy:

    “New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.”

    Ring a bell?

    This happens to be Cheka-head Jonathan Greenblatt’s new tagline. He’s been making the rounds on the tv circuit plugging it.

    Totally caved to the canal.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @geokat62
  114. @Wizard of Oz

    The ADL ‘knocked back’ anywhere in the Captured States of America!!?? You’re are a caution, Wizz.

  115. @WingsofADove

    You are, I believe, correct that any criticism of the actions of any Jew, no matter how reprehensible, is used by the Judeofascist and Zionazi elites to peddle the perennial canard that ‘antisemitism’ is on the rise, and Auschwitz is about to be re-opened. Real statistics, I believe, show that true Judeophobic acts are decreasing, which is, of course, a good thing.
    But fabricated ‘antisemitism’ must always be on the march, even if that takes some rabbi painting swastikas on his own synagogue, or some yeshiva student in Israel making ‘antisemitic’ threats in the USA, or some rabid Zionazi posting Judeophobic (and Jewish aggrandising)comments here.

  116. anarchyst says:
    @Mick Jagger Gathers No Mosque

    One aspect of Protestantism that deserves to be explored is its affinity for judaism, which fails to recognize the undying hatred that judaism has for Christianity.
    Even the modern-day Catholic church has been poisoned by this heresy with the imposition of the changes wrought by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” which was largely a “coup” by Protestants and jews.

    [MORE]

    Protestantism abandoned the belief that “good works” were necessary for salvation.
    It is difficult to comprehend how a person who has taken advantage of others all of his life, made life difficult for other, committing grievous sins and transgressions is able to ask for forgiveness on his deathbed and receive salvation “just like that”. I am aware of the Catholic Church “selling indulgences–salvation for shekels”–an abomination which was rightly criticized.
    Even if “good works” do not count, they can’t hurt and are a way to help humanity.
    It is the Catholic Church that instituted the first hospitals and educational institutions, long before that of Protestants.
    Yes, the united States of America was largely successful due to Protestant (lack of) ethics, most Protestant builders of industry raking in millions in profits while ignoring the basic needs of those who made their success possible by their hard work. It was common to see these Protestant “captains of industry” do their damnedest to “squeeze” their employees, paying them as little as possible while raking in massive profits benefiting only themselves. Protestants consider anyone who cannot be successful in business as suffering from a moral failing–sure sounds like a jewish concept to me….
    The Catholic faith requires business owners to pay their workers fairly–not below subsistence wages. There is no comparable demand in Protestantism.
    These Protestant “captains of industry” attempted to redeem themselves by establishing “foundations” (which guarded their wealth, making it tax exempt) and indirectly countering their own Protestant belief that “good works” were not necessary for salvation.
    They always pleaded poverty to their employees while living grand lives themselves.
    This contributed to the rise of labor unions, which at first, were brutally suppressed.
    There were exceptions, such as Henry Ford, who almost single-handedly created the middle class by paying his employees well above “market wages” of the day. His $5.00 per day wage was not entirely altruistic as it was also instituted to stem “turnover” as assembly line work was monotonous, but his writings have stated that one of his objectives was to make it possible for workers to “enjoy the fruits of their labor”.
    The Protestant Reformation resulted in the legalization of usury, the establishment of the debt based financial system and central banks which has enabled the usurers to accumulate so much wealth and power that they can impose their NWO.
    The Reformation resulted in capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism, two world wars which resulted in the decimation of the European peoples by the jews and WASPS acting as muscle for the bankers, and various genocides and the dystopian difficulties that are a part of modern civilization.

  117. @Cking

    Bio-warfare is obviously the genocidal ruling elites’ preference for eliminating the ‘useless eaters’. Thermo-nuclear war is too dangerous, and famine and natural pestilence take too long. Moreover the hour is late, and if much of humanity does not disappear, pronto, ecological collapse will be too far advanced to be reversed for centuries, if not millennia. So Sars Cov 2, its new variants and the other plagues being prepared in US bio-labs are just the beginning. The killer mRNA shots, and killer ‘medications’ are part and parcel of the enterprise, the ultimate Evil that the parasite elites have committed-so far.

    • Troll: P.T.
  118. Anon3837 says:

    American Pravda fell asleep for the last few years. We’ll see if it ever wakes up. Not sure what the point of this piece is, other than more humblebrag from the editor.

  119. @WingsofADove

    There is a very good black American writer who publishes on veteranstoday whose work is of a high standard and completely in line with what gets published on UR.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/author/alexis/

    He would make a great addition to the UR roster. UR does publish other writers from veteranstoday, most notably Kevin Barrett, but I wonder why Jonas E. Alexis is not given space on UR. Or has he been approached and turned down the offer not wanting to associate with the website for whatever reason?

  120. @anon

    Unz mentions Gates as a “hypothetical” what-if case.

    In fact, Gates was nailed down by a pre-emptive Zio-strike:

    the Clinton regime threatened Microsoft with anti-trust proceedings,

    and Gates has been peddling globohomo ever since.

  121. Skeptikal says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    I was disappointed when Chapelle said that Ye does have mental health issues. He said something like, “Well, one thing is, Kanye is unstable.”

    That is again taking the focus off what Ye says and makes it sound like his observations are the product of mental illness.

    That is the psychiatric explanation as used in the USSR to define dissidence as mental illness and confine dissidents to mental wards in far-off mental institutions specializing in this “treatment.”

    We are seeing a lot of camel noses under the tent attempts to make this equivalency fly in a number of contexts (sorry for mixed metaphor). I am quite sure the NYT tried to associate doubting the Russiagate tale with a mental disease.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @anarchyst
  122. BlackFlag says:
    @WingsofADove

    Is the Unz site doing this? Not at all. So it’s not a ‘real’ threat.

    The site redpills normies some who migrate to other sites, groups, etc. that might lead to organization.

    No, because Jewish power depends on cohesion of a small strongly identified group, and the best way for that group to stay strongly identified is the presence of a mild threat. Simply scrolling through a week of Unz should probably guarantee that any Jewish reader will feel more identity with their group.

    Well, I think Jewish groups do that via their own publications. Read any of them to see how they bring attention to anti-Jewish sentiments and historical incidents. Much better cause 1) More Jewish people read those 2) They can present the pro-Jewish side more effectively. 3) No risk of stirring up goyim cause few visit those websites and stores are presented in a pro-Jewish way. 4) If this were the case, Jewish watchdog orgs like ADL would be trying to bring more attention to unz.com rather than staying almost mute as RU pointed out.

    most ‘left’ anti capitalist writers of note are never published on Unz. This is because if they do get published on Unz they are open to attack from other leftists.

    Michael Hudson is by far the most popular economics writer on unz.com and he is solidly on the left and anti-capitalist. Not aware of any heat he has taken.

    • Replies: @WingsofADove
  123. Obviously, such an approach has its pluses and minuses, and I personally find a great deal of the material we publish both distasteful and wrong-headed, a failing even more common in the regular flood of the often vituperative comments.

    Just as obviously, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) finds that on the balance, this site’s ‘distasteful’ and ‘wrong-headed’ materials are far too useful to them to be slapped down.

  124. KenH says:
    @geokat62

    This happens to be Cheka-head Jonathan Greenblatt’s new tagline. He’s been making the rounds on the tv circuit plugging it.

    Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach is a Greenblattism.

    It looks like antifa and BLM are still allowed on Twitter and they spew anti-white drivel and misinformation and outright lies about current events.

  125. Corvinus says:
    @Ron Unz

    “For generations “free speech” had been one of the most universally cherished American values, but after Donald Trump used the power of his free speech on Twitter to unexpectedly win the White House, those prevailing sentiments very rapidly changed, and the need to exclude “fake news” and suppress “hate speech” became the accepted priority of all right-thinking individuals obedient to the narrative of the mainstream media.”

    Free speech remains a potent force in our country. It’s just that there are always consequence for what one says.

    Sure, the Johnny Walker’s and the clifford brown’s of the world have the liberty to falsely claim that “a secret society runs the country from the shadows” and “Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell (like her father before her) were intelligence assets for Israel, organized crime and likely certain elements of US intelligence”, The problem is that this “opinion” becomes “truth”, which spreads like a cancer, thus metastasizing discourse. It’s a race to the bottom of the brain stem.

    Case in point—Hilary Clinton on Twitter linked to a Los Angeles Times article about what happened to Pelosi’s husband, and then Elon Musk countered with *a post from a fake-news site* that soon was taken down. Then he wrote there was a “tiny possibility” what he linked to had been was wrong as a hedge against spreading disinformation.

    Too many people are getting sucked into this vortex. But then again, you facilitate it and receive financial consideration along the way, so in the end why would you want to take partial ownership.

    That’s why you need to heed this message

    John Robb—We are being mentally rewired by the technologies of social networking. It’s an involuntary process. That mental rewiring is forcing a reorganization of society. Those changes are dangerous during the early phases (think: printing press/30-years war)…We might need to shut down Twitter to increase our potential of surviving the first half of this century. Network decision making, in its current raw form, is simply too dangerous.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  126. Corvinus says:
    @Skeptikal

    Kanye does have mental health issues. It’s patently obvious.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    , @Sollipsist
  127. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m quite unintelligent and lack in courage/fearlessness, but to me it seems like a non-pragmatic decision for Musk to purchase twitter, a company de facto controlled by the Ashkenazim and who only employed Genetically Sociopathic Gentiles. Did Musk think he could take on the entire Ashkenazim all by himself, without his one billion fellow ethnic Europeans backing him by all means allowed by the laws of physics? Would it not have been more pragmatic for him to either have started his own Twitter-like company, or just fund existing companies like Gab? His money is just that – a bunch of colored paper. But the Ashkenazi wealth is organic in nature – a cornucopia of advanced DNA, and the Ashkenazim can depend on each other in the current evolutionary wars. Europeans on the other hand are mostly sociopathic individualists.

    Yes, if even Europeans are no match for the Ashkenazim, then surely Sub-Saharan Africans would also not be. Kyrie Irving and Kenye West apparently were not aware of their own race’s genetic deficiencies and held Europeans and the Ashkenazim solely culpable for their race’s misfortunes. Whatever. To me, it seems like the whole contemporary world has become a biological circus due to dysgenics and mutational load (except perhaps Israel and the diaspora Ashkenazi community). We can all just sit on the internet and complain about it as we individually wait to die. I know that this is all that I do. In fact, why even wait to die? Since there is nothing meaningful left for Group Selected Gentiles on Earth, why not we just take the initiate to leave this world for the After-Life? Let the Ashkenazim have Earth, and we, the more altruistic people, can take our chances with a possible altruistic G-d in the Next Life.

    Mr. Unz says “I proposed a thought-experiment in which the Monarch of Microsoft carelessly uttered some highly untoward views on any one of a number of sufficiently touchy subjects. For all his money and influence, he probably would have been quickly annihilated, fried to a crisp by a concentrated media blast and then overwhelmed by the massive wave of public revulsion that it generated.”

    I think Mr. Unz gives too much credit to the dysgenically degenerated public. I don’t believe the public can make a rational decision to have revulsion or not to anything. Rather, I think that if Bill Gates hypothetically were to have been crushed, public “opinion” is inconsequential. Rather, it’s the Ashkenazi elites/Deep State that would sink Gates. Surely with all the sophisticated tools of the Deep State/CIA, if Bill Gates, hypothetically, was too much of a threat to the status quo, he could be taken out, with some excuse given to the public.

    As Unz stated, Mel Gibson, to whom the most important thing was money/resources, quickly capitulated to the Ashkenazim, as will Musk. The problem here is genetics: ethnic Europeans no longer function as a united Group Selected ethnic group, but have de-evolved into Individually Selected sociopaths. On the other hand, the Ashkenazim are still innately united as a race, and are also the most intelligent people, which is an asset. Just based on absolute numbers, Europeans should easily be able to out-compete the Ashkenazim; due to their very large size, their absolute count of very high IQ people far surpasses that of the Ashkenazim, as described by Professor Kevin MacDonald. However, since each of these one billion Europeans work alone, as opposed to working together as a united ethnic group, their higher population count is useless in the face of the much more united Ashkenazim. Anyway, personally, I already consider the Ashkenazim the winner of the evolutionary wars. To me, it seems like continuing the “battle” is as meaningless as a dying Neanderthal population continuing a useless battle against the genetically superior Homo Sapiens. But then, as I said earlier, I am quite innately cowardly and highly given to anxiety and depression – my ability for stress tolerance is extremely low.

    Also, Mr. Unz mentions how the ADL does not target Unz Review too much. But, what if they feel they can actually learn something from it? You know the saying of not “throwing out the baby with the bath water.” While the Ashkenazim can oppose Gentile ethno-nationalism, they can still greatly benefit themselves by applying the research of scientists such as Richard Lynn, Dr. Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie, Marian Van Court, Matt Nuenke, Kevin MacDonald, Emil Kirkegaard, etc. Using their research, the Ashkenazim can eugenically/transhumanistically augment themselves.

    Sanjay

    • Agree: Astuteobservor II
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  128. Hacienda says:
    @WingsofADove

    I’ve never played GO so I don’t quite understand completely your analogy.

    At its heart, it’s very simple. Taking an area depends very much on who has more pieces there.
    Another way it differs from chess is that the value of a piece fluctuates depending on the placement of other pieces and position on board. It’s impossible for beginners to assess the relative weighting of pieces, areas of control. Whereas in chess you can track the value of pieces pretty easily. Control the center. A queen will almost always be worth more than a knight. A king is always more than any piece.

    I said a Ron Unz “on the board” would be ambiguous. A better visualization is to see Ron Unz “above the board”. A UFO moving independently two inches aboard the pieces, then making the pieces move themselves as if it was a third player in the game.

    Is it a threat to Jewish power because it gives a platform to anti Jewish power writers?

    Frankly, I can’t have any objective opinion about the Jews. The garden variety Jews- students, lawyers, businessmen, teachers, medical pros who I’ve met are consistently decent people. If by decent, you mean a very specific thing. Decent by the standards of the day. What’s crazy about the Jews is how much they can change in one lifetime. The Jew you knew in 8th grade is definitely not the Jew you know at 30 or what the Jew will become at 60. It’s nuts.

    So, whatever is said today about Jewish power will probably have to be amended tomorrow. Thrown away 10 years from now.

  129. @the grand wazoo

    > the millions who died of COVID19 mirror in number the absence of annual flu deaths.

    Where on earth do you get that from?

    https://web.archive.org/web/20110308050706/http://www.cdc.gov/flu/keyfacts.htm

    —–
    Flu seasons are unpredictable and can be severe. Over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu-associated deaths range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people.

    During 2009-2010, a new and very different flu virus (called 2009 H1N1) spread worldwide causing the first flu pandemic in more than 40 years. It is estimated that the 2009 H1N1 pandemic resulted in more than 12,000 flu-related deaths in the U.S. In contrast to seasonal flu, nearly 90 percent of the deaths occurred among people younger than 65 years of age.
    —–

    Where have you have heard anything about “millions … of annual flu deaths”?

  130. Treg says:

    We might agree that today “The Left”, has an “Obsessive Love-Like Disorder”, especially in the USA & Western European countries.

    Psychiatrists know an Obsessive-Love-Like-Disorder can happen when a person has an overwhelming DESIRE to PROTECT & DEFEND someone that goes to unreasonable extremes.

    [MORE]

    Yes, the desire to defend & protect someone you care for is very natural and is a good thing. But what is beyond the pale is when the defense & protection goes beyond reason, beyond the facts, causing us a blindspot to reality. Most of all, a tell-tell sign is it goes beyond what is even good for the object of the Obsession. An Obsessive-Love-Like-Disorder can occur alongside many conditions, such as: obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), delusional jealousy&fears, attachment disorders, erotomania, delusional disorders, borderline personality disorder (BPD), and
    post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). But let us just take note of “erotomania”. Erotomania, a mental health condition in which the person experiences delusional beliefs of being loved from afar by another person. This can be either a well-known celebrity that is high above or even someone of much lower status, either way, they hardly know them at all but they like to think that they do.

    We all know of a parent whose ears perk up the second they hear their child’s name. Their heart races and immediately they are like a very protective and angry momma-bear ready to pounce. Look out!

    The parent, despite what the teacher sees, the neighbors see, and the immediate family sees, instantly excuses, defends & justifies all their child’s actions. Moreover their Obsessive-Love-Like- Disorder causes others who see the problem with the child, to become fearful of speaking up. Many just ignore the problem or worse, go along to “keep the peace” & not get smeared with “you must hate my child – end of discussion!!!”.

    Rarely do we find adults brave enough to endure the hell that will come their way if they try to stand up & call a spade a spade to the parent with their child. Soon we all learn it does not pay to stand up against a person whose Obsessive-Love-Like- Disorder makes them unreasonable & unbearable.

    This has happened collectively to the Left, with its Love-Like-Obsession with “people of color” & “minorities”. Remember from above that Erotomania is a mental health condition in which the person experiences delusional beliefs of being loved from afar by another person. This can be someone of much lower status, either way, they hardly know them at all but they like to think that they do. I am suggesting this is what has happened to the Left today. (see Ami Horowitz’s interview with Liberals about IDs and minorities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW2LpFkVfYk)

    For example: Try to talk about reducing Muslim immigration into Europe & you’re an ” Islamophobe” – end of discussion!!!

    Try to talk of black-on-white crimes or high murder counts & suddenly you’re a “racist” hater of all black people – end of discussion!!!

    Try to talk about Israel, the ADL, the SPLC, the Jewish Lobby over our Congress & very rich & powerful Jews & their actions, & suddenly you’re an “Antisemitic” hater of all things Jewish – end of discussion!!!

    America First Patriots reject all “Obsessive Love-Like Disorders”, even those who dream of a “Whites Only USA”. But we also object to the Left who are out to De-White America and de-Christian America and turn her into something she’s not. We are America First!!

  131. John Robb—We are being mentally rewired by the technologies of social networking. It’s an involuntary process. That mental rewiring is forcing a reorganization of society. Those changes are dangerous during the early phases (think: printing press/30-years war)…We might need to shut down Twitter to increase our potential of surviving the first half of this century. Network decision making, in its current raw form, is simply too dangerous.

    I say:

    Ruling Class decision making, in its current raw form, is simply too treasonous and too dangerous.

    We might need to politically decapitate the ruling classes of England and the USA to increase our potential of surviving the first half of this century.

    The JEW/English Ruling Class of England is backsliding on the independence of England from the prison house of nations called the European Union.

    [MORE]

    Nigel Farage must avail himself of some FREE SPEECH — Twitter and more — in his efforts to make the duplicitous and perfidious ruling class of England do what is in the best interests of England and the English people.

    Nigel Farage Must Mobilize The Free Speech Army and the People’s Army.

    Nigel Farage Must Crush The Tories And Destroy The Tory Party.

  132. @Corvinus

    Nah.
    Always judge a man by his virtues, not by his mistakes.

  133. Voltara says:

    Twitter is the #1 news media outlet in the world by a long way. To date it has been so heavily censored and skewed towards mindless propaganda sensible people have minimised their exposure to it. These people are also the prime audience for advertisers. By adding new functionality and removing the blatant censorship Twitter has the potential to become the world’s #1 website measured by visits and engagement. Musk’s investment will prove to be a clever one. If I could buy shares right now I would.

  134. HT says:

    The media is the greatest enemy we face. There needs to be a plan, a strategy, and an implementation to destroy the media as it currently exists. There is no major problem that can be corrected as long as the media has this kind of coordinated power.

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  135. Finkelstein’s debate with Dershowitz is pretty funny

    I say:

    In 2017, Dershowitz Viciously Attacked Unz Review Author And Former CIA Agent Philip Giraldi

    Dershowitz Didn’t Like Former CIA Operative Valerie Plame TWEETING A Link to Giraldi’s Unz Review Article With This Title:

    America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars

    https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-jews-are-driving-americas-wars/

    Alan Dershowitz went on the Neo-Con Network Fox News and attacked “Girardi” for so-called “anti-Semitism.” Manners prevent me from suggesting that the anti-White scoundrel Dershowitz deliberately mispronounced the name of Giraldi just to be a snot.

    Joe Girardi was a fine baseball player and is now the manager of the New York Yankees. Since Dershowitz is a professor at Harvard in Boston, it could be that Dershowitz is so used to hearing “Girardi” while watching baseball games that he made an honest mistake. Since I don’t think Dershowitz is capable of any honesty whatsoever, I think Dershowitz did it to be a snot.

    Philip Giraldi should write about how Rupert Murdoch and the Murdoch Mob allows the Neo-Cons and those who support them to have prime television coverage of their opinions and worldviews. If Giraldi has covered Murdoch’s Neo-Con proclivities previously, perhaps he could update his stance on the Murdoch Mob.

    Dershowitz on the Murdoch Mob’s Fox News Neo-Con propaganda network:

    https://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/22/alan-dershowitz-valerie-plame-tweeting-anti-semitic-article-jews-causing-americas-wars

    • Replies: @Charles
    , @Z-man
  136. anarchyst says:
    @Skeptikal

    You are correct.
    Communist jews in the Soviet Union used psychiatry to define dissidents as having “oppositional defiance disorder” which could mean anything, but was mostly used to punish political dissidents.
    There are (((those on the left))) who approve of such treatments in the USA.
    Let’s face it. The American psychiatric system has already legitimized mental illnesses such as homosexuality, transgenderism, and other former “disorders”, even going as far as approving (and normalizing) such abnormal behavior in children.
    It’s not much of a step to normalize “oppositional defiance disorder” to punish those who “stray from the party line”.

  137. Anon[303] • Disclaimer says:

    Ron,
    Would love to support the Unz Review…. but only in a totally private/confidential manner.
    If you want to allow for truly private/confidential donations, then please add a Monero address to your list of crypto donation addresses.
    peace.

  138. @Dieter Kief

    I will always be grateful to Jordan Peterson for informing me that benzodiazepam addiction is cured in some Russian clinics by putting the patient into a coma for two weeks.

    [MORE]

    I have a Russian friend who tells me they have an addiction treatment in that country perfected on alcoholics where they induce a deep hypnotic induction; then yell at the patient:

    “This is what the booze [xanax, whatever] is doing to you.”

    The hypnotist’s aid then smacks the patient on the top of his head from behind with a hammer hard enough for him to see stars and not hard enough to knock him unconscious.

    My friend did not know the prevalence of this procedure but they weren’t a drunk or a medical professional so if it’s rare they would have found this out by an unlikely combination of circumstances. Maybe it was total nonsense but he has always seemed like a serious fellow.

  139. @Dieter Kief

    Jordan Peterson doesn’t have any virtues. He’s a drug addicted liberal moron with the emotional stability of a two year old.

    • Replies: @RJ Macready
  140. Zane says:

    ” I’m the richest person in the world. Yay! ” – Elon de Musk

    ” Hold my beer. ” – Count von der Rothschild.

  141. “The front-page headline in the hostile New York Times was “Twitter Teeters on the Edge”….”
    Rather hypocritical coming from an outlet that only exists by the largesse of a Mexican billionaire, who for some reason chooses to keep the most prestigious Democratic Party propaganda rag afloat.

    There is no talk of the Times ever turning a profit again!

  142. Ron Unz says:
    @Mark Hunter

    The ADL knows what it’s doing studiously ignoring RU’s work.

    I’d already given some of my analysis in that very long comment at the top, but let me provide an additional metaphor, one that also explains the very rapid original publication of my initial American Pravda series. The key argument is that if this website or my own writing were merely one-tenth as controversial, the likelihood of a ferocious attack by ADL and similar groups would have been enormously greater.

    Author Michael Lewis originally made his name with Liar’s Poker, an amusing 1989 account of Wall Street behavior. The title referred to the gambling game of the traders at Salomon Brothers and other firms, who would regularly bet thousands of dollars on the serial numbers of dollar bills.

    As Lewis tells the story, the Salomon CEO John Gutfreund one day decided to assert his supremacy over his arrogant employees who were playing Liar’s Poker, challenging his top trader to a single round, but for a bet of one million dollars. Back in those bygone days, a million dollars was a great deal of money, even to successful Wall Street traders.

    But instead of being intimidated, the trader replied that he’d gladly take the bet, but only if the stakes were raised to ten million dollars. Risking ten million dollars on a stupid bet was more than Gutfreund was willing to do, so he instead walked away, defeated.

    I think the situation faced by the ADL has been very similar. Once I’d managed to release the first dozen or so of my 2018 American Pravda articles, those had raised so many different ultra-controversial issues that the ADL realized that if they strongly attacked me, they’d effectively be playing for all their chips. Maybe they’d win, but if they lost and their attack backfired, with the resulting media coverage bringing all that long-suppressed information to widespread public attention, they’d quite possibly be destroyed.

    They obviously decided that they couldn’t risk the survival of their organization on such a risky attack, and walked away from the fight.

    That’s exactly why I had worked so very hard to publish all those major 2018 articles in such rapid succession. Once I began the series, an all-out attack became quite likely until enough of the articles had been released to scare off the ADL and any other possible attackers:

    https://www.unz.com/page/american-pravda-series/

    • Agree: Charles, TKK
  143. Charles says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    Thanks for the link to the Giraldi article; I think it was before I began reading TUR.

  144. Anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dieter Kief

    Jordan Peterson was touring in Israel with Ben Shapiro last week:

    Lovely 🤢

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Corvinus
  145. Skeptikal says:
    @Corvinus

    Hmmm.
    1. If you had been subjected to the stressors that Ye describes, you might be . . . stressed and showing signs of it. Are you by any chance a doctor?
    2. Being publicly labeled as mentally ill by your supposed ally in a context (Ye’s observations on Jews and the entertainment industry) where it is irrelevant might increase your paranoia.
    3. It was gratuitous and added no humor to Chapelle’s comedy routine, so why? A bit of groveling? “I am not really a Ye supporter nudge nudge and I am willing to defame and put him down in a most public space where people are invited to laugh at him (not me).”

    To me one big question is:
    Why in the world did Ye marry into the trashy Kardashian family? Armenians are a lot like jews, btw. They are proud of their traditional tribal acuity in business but prefer to play the genocide card whenever given a chance.
    Still they have a much more attractive culture than Jews.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  146. Z-man says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    You mean Douche-a-witz, a snake’s snake.

  147. Anon[288] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Jordan is just another stooge with a circumcised knob in his mouth. He comes across as some kind of oracle, all wise, who has discovered a new philosophy in life, who is in tune with the Universe and by imparting his vast knowledge of how the world works,will, along with Isrell, save the world and save us OR save us and thus save the world..

    All that the Jew flunky promulgates has already been worked out and written about by the ancients. But who reads Marcus Aurelius, Epitectus, Seneca, Homer and these greats ? Literature these days is Harry Potter and/ or How Charles the Club decided he was a girl and how he was transformed by having his dick cut off and a pussy installed. A whole text of 800 pages will be devoted to explaining how Charley found himself and became Charlene.

    Jordan…. what he bloviates about was once called common sense and practised by our ancestors. I would bet, that our Grandparents had more sense than the crew graduating from any of these institutions of “higher learning” these days.

    Today, people regurgitate what they read in a text book which in and of itself may be trash. Back in the day, people used their heads !

    Hence Jordan is considered an oracle of prudence by the folks who are mentally lost and mentally incapable of thought. To the rest of us, he is just vomiting up what is already known and accepted as good sense but which in this epoch of fools is considered tripe.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
    , @Richard B
  148. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    So, should we trust Jordan Peterson?

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  149. Corvinus says:
    @Skeptikal

    What specific stressors caused by Jews led to Kanye’s mental illness? I thought it was in born for blacks to be more prone to fits of rage and fits of confusion. That’s the HbD explanation.

    It wasn’t defamation, it was truth by Chappelle.

    “Why in the world did Ye marry into the trashy Kardashian family?”

    Fame whore.

    “Armenians are a lot like jews, btw”

    According to Who/Whom?

  150. Agent76 says:
    @Anon

    I would appreciate more information about the links before I click on them. Just a habit I have had for over twenty years. Just like the title of the article, date, as my posts are posted. Thanks for your understanding and cooperation ahead of time Anon!

    • Replies: @Anon
  151. Marcion says:

    I agree. Let’s not be so pessimistic about the Twitter situation.

    • Agree: john-hopelo
  152. @Rurik

    To your well-composed comment I would add.

    1. Globohomo is an attack on traditional family life, where the real meaning of life dwells.
    2. The shallow materialism and mirage of abundance is apparently too intoxicating and irresistible to
    most people.
    3. The human condition is normally absurd, and meaningful living is a rarity.

    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  153. Notsofast says:
    @Anon

    all we need to know about this stooge, is that he got got all fucked up on pharmaceutics, and then went into hiding, for months as they juggled his perceptions. he’s probably on a laundry list of other drugs now.

    the way you quit the shit, is cold turkey, substituting one drug for another just leads to what you see here.

  154. Notsofast says:
    @Corvinus

    no, we shouldn’t trust him, and we definitely shouldn’t trust you.

    • LOL: john-hopelo
  155. Try posting a link to “American Pravda” on Facebook/Life Log!

  156. Notsofast says:
    @Corvinus

    coronavirus, i am shocked by your racist comment, that “i thought it was inborn (one word, btw), for blacks to be more prone to fits of rage and confusion.”

    aren’t you worried that you are being “marked” by your words that will come back to haunt you someday?

  157. @Hulkamania

    This is strange to write seeing as he’s the guardian saviour of the right wing. They quote him, get inspired by him and celebrate him.

  158. Anonymous[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    In general, this site is a pretty good place for free speech, but there’s something that deserves more discussion.

    About 3 years ago, a friend of mine who used to post here noticed that his name had been discovered by one of (((the adversaries))) who frequented this place. He wasn’t doxxed outright, but it was obvious the adversary knew who he was and began ‘teasing’ him with personal details he’d somehow obtained about him. My friend didn’t know what to think and became somewhat paranoid about the ordeal, so he just stopped posting altogether.

    There are a number of ways this could have been done, but the fact that it *could* be done using this site is a greater cause for concern. Personally, I have no evidence that you know about this, Ron, and when all is said and done, you can’t be held responsible for what some nefarious parties may be doing through your website without your knowledge, but at the very least, you owe it to those who trust you to issue some kind of caveat or disclaimer about this site’s vulnerability. Furthermore, you would provide a great service to readers/commenters by featuring tech savvy individuals who might be able to teach a layperson how to safeguard himself against potential bad actors here, since there are *bound* to be many.

    IMHO, if you ignore this vulnerability, it’s more likely you’ll become an object of suspicion. Voldemort effect aside, people may see the ADL’s relative quiet as part of a strategy in which too much heat generates such light, a honeypot cannot properly serve its purpose. This is not my theory, but it is also not an irrational one. Give the users here a solid basis to believe you’re interested in their security and it would go a long way in gaining their trust.

    Just my two cents.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  159. Corvinus says:
    @Notsofast

    There’s no such thing as racism—Notsofast

    “no, we shouldn’t trust him, and we definitely shouldn’t trust you.“

    Spoken like a jilted woman.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  160. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    You write great fiction. I enjoyed reading your work. Not realistic on your part, but enjoyable nonetheless.

    • Replies: @RJ Macready
  161. vox4non says:

    Ron,

    Long may your fortress stand,
    and the light spread far.

  162. Anon[102] • Disclaimer says:
    @Agent76

    They are two Long writings I uploaded concerning 9/11 conspiracy theories. The first a book by Victor Thorn of blessed memory on the Israeli role in 9/11. The other are statements from professionals from many walks of life concerning the cover-up of 9/11 truth.

    You may download either or both of these articles and share them freely with people.

  163. @Corvinus

    He is spot on about 90 percent of things he wrote. Evolution and biology will eventually emerge victorious. The jew must-have most certainly understood this and used it to their advantage. Meanwhile the gentile white does everything in their power to inter procreate just to show off their individualism

  164. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    If democracy is to work, then shouldn’t the voters at least be required to be intelligent enough to distinguish between objective and subjective language? Every politician in the media only use subjective language, which is done solely for the purpose of deception.

    What does it say about a voting population if they even watch the Ashkenazi media in the first place through which they would come across political advertisements? This media is pure fraud and pure Cultural Marxism.

    I wrote the following during Trump’s first run for presidency as an example of the type of message a politician would give if both the candidate and voting population were genetically healthy:

    What If I Was Donald Trump?

    I believe in science. So, I believe in evolution and the survival of the fittest: unintelligent people and people with bad genes should go extinct.

    A people with good genes should understand basic logic, reason, objectivity, and the scientific method. As such, as Trump, I would state my goals objectively:

    [MORE]

    1) I will deport all illegal immigrants, who are over-represented in crime and the benefactors of welfare services.

    2) I will stop all further immigration until everyone in the USA has a socio-economic status they desire.

    3) I will stop interfering in foreign affairs, since we currently have no foreign threats aside from illegal immigration, and will bring back all our troops and instead place them on our borders.

    4) I will remove the USA from NATO and the United Nations, since neither organization serves America’s interests.

    5) I will break up all company monopolies in the USA to encourage competition, innovation, quality improvement, and lower prices.

    6) I will break up the media conglomerates in the USA to allow for more free speech of ideas, facts, and opinions.

    7) I will ban all financial contributions to political candidates. Instead, public funds will be equally provided to any candidate that pass a certain threshold of popular support. This will end the existence of politicians being bribed to serve the interests of certain entities, as opposed to the overall interest of the voters.

    8) I will ban all lobbyists. Any individual, company, organization, or other entity that wants to talk to a politician about supporting a certain law or policy will be required to carry out all communication in front of a public video camera which will be aired live on public television and internet for all to see free of charge, and the conversations will be archived for ever and accessible to any individual.

    9) I will ban any individual from making more than $200,000 a year; any income above that will be taken away as taxes and used for things like the military, police services, public schools, and so forth, and/or put in a public bank for use during emergencies. This is to ensure that no individual becomes too powerful where they can use their financial power to affect laws and public policy that serve their own interest, as opposed to the interests of the voters as a whole.

    10) I will pass a law banning outsourcing of factories and labor; all factories must remain in the USA, and all employees must come from our nation. Also, I will ban the ability of foreign nations to buy American companies. These policies will ensure that the USA has the capacity to be self-sufficient in all things. I will only allow imports of foreign products if for the time being, we ourselves cannot produce the product or service in question, but then I will start implementing policy to make us capable in providing that very product and/or service in question so that we can eventually be self-sufficient in that area.

    11) I will pass a law requiring us to be a peaceful nation, and also if required, cooperate with other nations where it is necessary when dealing with aspects that are shared between nations, such as protocols for interaction in international waters, globally shared resources such as air, and outer-space.

    12) I will support the First Amendment fully, with emphasis on the free exchange of ideas, facts, and opinions. I will abolish “hate-crime” laws; an act of violence or robbery or vandalism is a crime, regardless of why the individual did it. A person who was beaten or killed to steal their property was inflicted with an equal magnitude of crime as a person who was beaten or killed because of his ethnic, sexual, gender, or religous background. I will not penalize thought, just action.

    13) I will support the right of individuals to own firearms for the purpose of self-defense. I believe a person should not be forced to have to fist-fight a burgler, rapist, or murderer. The victim should be given the means to safely stop the perpetrator.

    14) I will pass a law requiring the death penalty for all murderers, rapists, assaulters, robbers, significant vandalizers, and significant fraudsters. No exceptions will be given to people based on who they are (CEOs, politicians, ethnic background, gender, etc).

    15) For a nation to be prosperous, a minimum amount of genetic health must be maintained. As such, criminals will not be allowed to reproduce. Also, chronic welfare recipients will not be allowed to reproduce. Plus, geniuses, scientists, engineers, and other gifted people will be given economic and social incentives to have many children.

    If you support the above laws and policies, then please vote for me. If not, then please vote for my primaries opponents or the Democrat candidate. I need not say any more. The above sums up my views. Either you agree, or you don’t. The choice is yours. The future is yours. Good luck.

    Sanjay

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  165. After reading the comments sections of your articles and others on this website. I came to realize something.

    100% free speech is detrimental to real discussions, especially if the discussions are done so under anonymity. Cause you have psychopath anons and paid for trolls like the zionist anons whose main purpose is to derail any meaningful discourse.

    I am 100% ok with 100% free speech under real names with real bios and profiles. No psychopaths and paid or unpaid trolls will be able to hide.

    Only way for your website and it’s articles to see the light of the day is for a massive clean up of anons that calls for the deaths of another group (as an example). with the current state of the comments sections, I personally doubt anyone or any news organization with any influence outside of MSM will risk calling attention to your articles or this website.

  166. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Rurik

    I think there is something supernatural at play here, though. Call it “supernatural evil,” conjured by the collective mind of the ((jews)) “channeling” or praying to Satan.

    Under this theory, a hegemonic fiat currency is not the end unto itself, but rather a means to a Satanic end. Perhaps the Hebrew Golden Calfers were cultivating an egregore, or “a group mind that is created when people consciously come together for a common purpose.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore#Contemporary_usage

    Moses, then, was commanded from on high to physically destroy this Satanic egregore by destroying the Golden Calfers, which these Satanic Hebrews have been attempting to reassemble ever since. The Brits, for example, were parasites on this Satanic egregore, cynically using it as a means to a hegemonic fiat currency end, and allowing the ((Marxists)) to run amok on the Russians to attain it.

    Now the American deep state, also cynically, is allowing these same Satanic ((jews)) to run amok on the world.

    When ((AOC)) was confronted by her Bronx constituency at a town hall for being a hypocrite and warmonger, and went into a kind of mocking dance, what we were perhaps seeing is a present day incarnation of the ancient Hebrew Golden Calfers (unconsciously?) going into reptilian mode and joining in with her critics in order to temporarily conceal herself.
    https://nypost.com/2022/10/21/aoc-ripped-for-mocking-constituents-with-dance-during-town-hall-protest/

    It’s akin to these ((jews)) joining and then co-opting the opposition, and reformatting it to a state more amenable to their Satanic agenda. For example, the way the ((neocons)) infiltrated and then co-opted the GOP.

    • LOL: Kim Jong Il
    • Replies: @Rurik
  167. @Notsofast

    It’s just projection, common among racists.

  168. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Homosexuality is as old as humanity. Gays often want families, and are no worse as parents than straights. Do you wish also to traduce divorce and falling out of love among straights? I agree with points 2 and 3.

    • Replies: @Kim
    , @Rurik
  169. @Ron Unz

    Perhaps someone has studied Jewish history, and, finally, come to the realisation that unhinged arrogance, and the instant resort to rage and slander, may not be in the interests of the Jews. You can criticise the behaviour of some Jews without being a Nazi.

  170. @Corvinus

    According to George Orwell, or at least a proverb he quotes, Armenians are worse than Jews.

  171. geokat62 says:

    ADL’s Schwartza Obsession



    Video Link

  172. YesXorNo says: • Website

    Mr Unz,

    Thank you for this article. I concur with your analysis that a concentrated media attack can be devastating and that the ADL do use this tactic. I also concur that the Intercept left its mooring during the Trump era. Indeed, this is what forced one of their founders to leave. There is another factor too. This is the continuous burning of confidential sources, particularly of Jeremy Scahill. This was the final straw for me, and I only visit the site on the rare occasion that they actually do some useful reporting and I find it via other sources.

    I am glad to see you admit that some articles published at The Unz Review are a steaming pile of irrelevance or a so poorly referenced as to make them fantasies. Nonetheless, I read everything authored by yourself or Pepe Escobar. I also agree that you are providing an important service. A collection of steaming piles of rubbish with a few diamonds is better than nothing. Nothing is how I evaluate the legacy media.

    I contend that the last 15 years have seen a huge change emerging in media production and consumption. The article I published on the topic is titled “New Media: From Archipelagoes to Networks”. What we are seeing are connections between “alternate media” organisations forming. Stupid stuff like alternet.org are falling by the wayside. Even CounterPunch is struggling. However, these connections between more independent publishing organisations and individuals are growing not so much between the organisations but via the individual consumer and independent publisher. This explains the constant attacks against independent publishers on Youtube and Twitter.

    Speak with any individual who publishes in video format and they will tell you that they may still use Youtube whereupon they built an audience, but they are now also publishing on Rumble, Odysee and perhaps other distribution platforms. They know from where the threat comes.

    I outline the thesis in this old article:

    https://yesxorno.substack.com/p/new-media-from-archipelagoes-to-networks

    I wish you the best of luck in finding financial backing to support the continuation of The Unz Review. I read its RSS feed every day.

    Regards,

    YesXorNo

  173. Richard B says:
    @Anon

    Great comment! Spot on!

    The fatal thing about celebrity “intellectuals” like Jordan Peterson is that their mediocre minds are extolled as great by credulous dumbshits devoid of judgment and corrupt power brokers devoid of conscience.

    • Replies: @Anon
  174. @BlackFlag

    “Michael Hudson is by far the most popular economics writer on unz.com and he is solidly on the left and anti-capitalist. Not aware of any heat he has taken.”

    Thank you, I stand corrected.

    However, perhaps we should note that 1) Mr. Hudson is often a jargonish complicator. Quite hard to understand unless you already know his use of vocabulary. And not the type of text that would help anybody organize poor people, in my opinion. 2) Mr. Hudson’s ‘leftism’ is statist top down control, especially of banking, as in the Chinese system. This is one branch of leftism, but another branch completely rejects this 3) Hudson’s advocacy of statist top down control perhaps is the reason he is appealing to the technocratic mindset. Rather than ‘leftist’ we could describe him as ‘economic technocrat’?

    • Replies: @BlackFlag
  175. Skeptikal says:
    @Corvinus

    “What specific stressors caused by Jews led to Kanye’s mental illness? ”

    You are trolling me, or else you have been in a cave in recent weeks.

    1. Described quite cogently by Ye in his interview with Tucker Carlson.
    2. Described very clearly and evidence supplied of Ye’s forced institutionalization, drugging, and threats to do the same again and put him out of business forever by his “trainer,” Pasternak (who is Jewish). It is all over the internet. You can find it yourself: “Pasternak’s threatening text to Ye.” I expect this is the tip of the iceberg.

    Caw caw! Watching you.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  176. Richard B says:
    @Tucker

    Interesting comment.

    Not a few have suggested that this is a Honeypot site. The article itself could be used as evidence. As the the title implies, and the article itself clearly states, the ADL can get to everyone – except Ron Unz. What is that if not a Red Flag flapping in a gale-force wind.

    So, as a humble commenter I’ll conduct my own thought-experiment, and in the spirit of Free Speech, play Devil’s Advocate. I’ll put Ron’s excerpts in italics followed by comments from The Devil’s Advocate or TDA.

    The media creates reality and if they decide to declare you a target, you quickly become a human pin-cushion.
    TDA: But not Ron Unz. As the title of the article makes clear, it’s even riskier for the ADL to tangle with TUR and the mighty Ron Unz, than with the richest man in the world. Oh brother!

    Back in the 1990s, Bill Gates…the wealthiest man in the world…..half-jokingly described as the most powerful person in the world, having clout that dwarfed that of any President or Pope.……
    While I did not necessarily dispute such an appraisal, I would always point out the severe limitations of his position.
    TDA: So Bill Gates,
    the wealthiest, most powerful man in the world, suffers from severe limitations. But not Ron Unz.

    I proposed a thought-experiment in which the Monarch of Microsoft, etc, etc. Bill Gates might have been powerful, but the media could have destroyed him at a stroke, snuffing him out like a candle in a gale-force wind.
    TDA: Get that folks? Per Ron’s thought-experiment, Bill Gates, a man more powerful than any President or Pope, would have been quickly annihilated and fried to a crisp (ouch!), by the ADL. Then, in the real world, Elon Musk, Kanye West and other rich, famous and very powerful people, all stand paralyzed with fear while waiting their turn to be dropped down the gullet of the cannibalistic ADL. The ADL could get them all….But not Ron Unz. He alone stands tall. A beacon of hope in a world of darkness. In a word, Unbelievable. Literally.

    The ADL seems to have played a central role in all these current controversies discussed above, with Musk quickly bowing to its authority and soliciting its advice.
    TDA: But not the mighty Ron Unz. Who from now on we would do well to refer to simply as Super Ron! It’s a bird! It’s a plane! No! It’s Super Ron! Able to leap over powerful Jewish organizations in a single bound. Not only that Goyim, but he’s 99% right, about everything!

    Seriously. How can anyone keep a straight face? By the way, nothing screams Insecure! louder than non-stop bragging and the need to believe you’re always right. And Ron Unz brags in just about every article and essay he puts out. It’s so obnoxious. Why doesn’t he just let his work speak for itself? Isn’t that what it’s supposed to do? Then again, psychotic arrogance and self-awareness do not go together.

    while the organization led the successful attacks on West and Irving.
    TDA: But not Ron Unz. Sorry, Super Ron. Anyway, the aritcle is chock-o-block filled with examples like the above. But you get the point, which is, unlike us measly goy and perhaps the occasionally collataerally damaged jewkins, Super Ron is invincible.

    I’ll suggest one possible conclusion to the above in a follow up comment.

    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @Ron Unz
  177. @Ron Unz

    An earthy analogy I have used for some time is that of a grizzly bear walking majestically through the forest, knowing that he is at the top of the food chain (forget man for the moment).

    He encounters a badger in front of his intended path and further notices that the badger is not fazed and furthermore doesn’t intend to move to make way.

    So the grizzly contemplates his situation. He knows that he can defeat the badger. He also knows that badgers are not very tasty to his palate. But more importantly he knows that the badger is a very fierce and fearless fighter and the price to defeat him may be an eye, half a nose and various punctures. The grizzly decides that the price to pay for pride is too high.

    The forest then witnesses a 1500lb grizzly bear walking around a 50lb badger.

    Addendum: If the badger were attacking a bear cub, and the grizzly in question was a mamma, the outcome would be radically different.

    Cheers-

  178. Kim says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Homos are incurable and compulsive pedophiles.

    To promote them as being acceptable as parents in public policy brands you as a child molester.

    You deserve the garotte.

  179. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    In regard to my previous comment, one possible conclusion we could come to is that, if Jewish Supremacy Inc. is willing to allow The ADL to be attacked like this it’s because they no longer need it. That’s all. The ADL has outlived its usefulness, and has now become as obsolete as the rotary phone.

    Could be JSI is diversifying and downsizing. It no longer needs the loud and brash ADL and can get its job done just fine through a variety of other much quieter means. Such as, for example, honeypot sites like TUR. But a question remains. If JSI already has the West right where they want them, why bother with Operation Honeypot, in whatever form?

    The answer, not surprisingly, is trivial. It’s all they really know how to do. Meaning, they can acquire power, but not manage it, as is evident in the collapse of the social institutions their power now controls, and how quick they are to punish anyone who notices, though it’s impossible not to.

    So they’re deflecting attention away from that obvious fact in a desperate attempt to preserve their power long enough to roll out their China-inspired social credit system on that part of the world they now control (or perhaps China got the idea from them and it was simply rolled out there first). And now we’re back to their need for honeypot sites like TUR.

    This would explain why Ron Unz, Larry China Uber Alles Romanoff, and others here, can’t stop praising China, while Jewish Supremacy Inc. in typical 1984 fashion pretends to be at odds with China so that no one will notice when both Asiatic partners in crime (The CCP and JSI) lower the boom once and for all on a smiling, unsuspecting West. It also explains Ron’s utter contempt for what surely must be the majority of TUR’s readers – White men. As if White men, or anyone for that matter, either needs or wants his approval.

    In any event, and in the spirit of Free Speech, I’m sure Ron won’t mind if a humble commenter, who clearly values this webite, steps in briefly to play the role of The Devil’s Advocate in TUR’s Free Speech Theatre. Of course, if Ron and TUR do mind, one would be inclined to raise curious doubts about the authenticity of this website.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  180. Ron Unz says:
    @Anonymous

    About 3 years ago, a friend of mine who used to post here noticed that his name had been discovered by one of (((the adversaries))) who frequented this place. He wasn’t doxxed outright, but it was obvious the adversary knew who he was and began ‘teasing’ him with personal details he’d somehow obtained about him. My friend didn’t know what to think and became somewhat paranoid about the ordeal, so he just stopped posting altogether.

    I’ll admit I’ve never understood this “doxxing” issue.

    If someone commenting on this website reveals all sorts of very personal details, I suppose a diligent enemy could figure out his identity and reveal it directly or in teasing. But if you don’t reveal your personal details, how in the world could anyone do that?

    One of the most frequent commenters on his website is Alden, with over 24K comments totaling more than 2 million words. She’s a hard-core WN and sometimes very sharp-tongued in her insults, and has surely made numerous enemies here. And over the years, she’s revealed an enormous amount of information about her personal background—her age, her ethnicity, places of residence, past employment and business activities, political donations, and a wealth of other factual information. Surely, if there were any target for doxxing, she would be it, but it’s never happened, so I don’t think it’s really all that easy.

    My guess is that nearly all the people doxxed have stupidly revealed their exact identity to some friend, with whom they later quarreled and retaliated against them. Anyway, I think that the overwhelming majority of people who get into trouble do so because of something controversial they said on their Twitter account or in a text message, which obviously has nothing to do with doxxing.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  181. Ron Unz says:
    @Richard B

    Not a few have suggested that this is a Honeypot site. The article itself could be used as evidence. As the the title implies, and the article itself clearly states, the ADL can get to everyone – except Ron Unz.

    Well, you can believe whatever you want. But what would be the purpose? I very much doubt that most of the commenters on this website are people of any great importance, and I’d guess that most of them have been saying lots of “controversial” things on other websites as well, probably for many years. So what exactly would be the benefit of luring them here to say controversial things on this website as well?

    And I’ve already explained in great detail why the ADL doesn’t attack me or this publication. The ADL’s primary weapon against its targets, including Musk, West, and Irving is to focus (negative) media attention upon them, thereby damaging their business activities and relationships and inflicting psychological pain. In fact, it’s pretty much their only weapon.

    But if they focused media attention against me or this website, the information I’ve provided in my writings would become vastly better known, probably inflicting enormous damage upon the ADL and those groups it supports, so they avoid doing so.

    Suppose your only weapon is a flame-thrower and you’re standing inside a building filled with open barrels of gun-powder, where someone you don’t like is insulting you. There’s not really much you can do under those circumstances.

  182. geokat62 says:
    @Richard B

    So they’re deflecting attention away from that obvious fact in a desperate attempt to preserve their power long enough to roll out their China-inspired social credit system on that part of the world they now control (or perhaps China got the idea from them and it was simply rolled out there first)…

    while Jewish Supremacy Inc. in typical 1984 fashion pretends to be at odds with China so that no one will notice when both Asiatic partners in crime (The CCP and JSI) lower the boom once and for all on a smiling, unsuspecting West.

    This, indeed, appears to be the final phase in their 6,000 year timeline, prophesied in their religious texts.

    We’re in the year 5,782. That means there are 218 years left to fulfil their “end of days” prophesies…

    1. blot out the memory of amalek
    2. erect the third temple
    3. anoint the Mosiach

    Once these 3 requirements are fulfilled, HaShem will bless each tzadik with 2,800 Noahide (goyim) slaves to rule over in perpetuity.

    Baruch HaShem!

  183. Anonymous[225] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, it wasn’t doxxing. It was intimidation, a way of standing down an opponent by leaking bits and pieces about his real world identity. FWIW, my friend was *assiduously* careful about not divulging personal information about himself.

    There are one of two ways this could have happened. Either the (((party concerned))) used one or more hacking techniques (such as a web beacon) to determine his IP and system/browser type, then applied social engineering techniques (extracting more data from his ISP) to obtain his real world identity. The other way (which I don’t personally subscribe to) is that your site is a honeypot (as suggested by Richard above).

    I’m curious to know if any other posters here have experienced anything similar to this. In the meantime, I still feel that the vulnerabilities here warrant more attention. I shouldn’t have to explain the situation to someone as obviously bright as you, and I say this out of nothing but profound respect for you. I *want* this site to be the best it can possibly be.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  184. Anonymous[250] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s great, Unz jeering ADL from the battlements, waving his private parts at their aunties, and ADL can’t even do their Jewy mobbing shit. There’s a reason for that. When ADL wants to go get some nuisance, they don’t have the last word. CIA does. ADL does CIA’s illegal domestic dirty work.

    As they have done for decades,

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/12/adl-spies/
    https://psmag.com/news/kings-garbage-76228

    Greenblatt’s a court Jew for CIA. CIA gets their take through the flimsiest of bad-cop cutouts. If you blow ADL, you burn CIA’s illegal domestic agent. So big smouch Greenblatt has to sit and take it like a scrawny hooknosed worm eating shit in Leo Frank’s intestines.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  185. medo says:

    I do not understand how you avoid censorship….I do not agree with much on this site, but I come regularly to find information not available elsewhere. IMPORTANT facts, events and opinions edited out of our lives entirely by our “leaders” and “free press”

    keep it up!

  186. Ron Unz says:
    @Anonymous

    Ron, it wasn’t doxxing. It was intimidation, a way of standing down an opponent by leaking bits and pieces about his real world identity. FWIW, my friend was *assiduously* careful about not divulging personal information about himself.

    I’ll admit I’m extremely skeptical. My impression is that the NSA intercepts all Internet traffic, so I suppose someone there could determine your friend’s identity if they devoted enough resources to the project. But unless your friend is someone as important as Vladimir Putin, I really doubt they’d bother. Otherwise, I can’t see how it could be possible.

    Assuming your story is true, I suspect there’s a much more mundane explanation. Since your friend apparently told you that he’s been commenting on this website, he probably told some of his other friends as well, perhaps providing enough details that one of them was able to guess his handle, and show up to tease him a little for his involvement with such a “controversial” website.

    I think that’s the sort of thing that’s responsible for 99.5% of all doxxings and quasi-doxxings.

    In fact, I’m not sure I’ve ever heard of a single case of someone’s online identity being unmasked without their having committed that sort of huge personal blunder.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anon
  187. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    I’ll admit I’m extremely skeptical. My impression is that the NSA intercepts all Internet traffic, so I suppose someone there could determine your friend’s identity if they devoted enough resources to the project. But unless your friend is someone as important as Vladimir Putin, I really doubt they’d bother. Otherwise, I can’t see how it could be possible.

    Edward Snowden said that some NSA employees have at their fingertips the ability to monitor laptops/phones/etc. as easily as one might execute a Google search. One of his primary complaints was that this technology was being systemically abused to spy on family members, girlfriends, and others. I think you’d agree these people aren’t more important than Vladimir Putin. I believe Snowden also recently said this kind of abuse has not been significantly stopped, in spite of what oversight committees would have us believe.

    So it would be a trivial matter for a sayan (helper of Israel) working within the belly of the beast to abuse his authority in order to do this. Also, my friend is something of a loner. I doubt he’d blab a lot to *anyone* about his activity here.

    Alternatively, a skilled hacker could use a web beacon (in the form of an invisible 1×1 pixel) and some savvy analysis to acquire data about the name under which a computer has been registered as well as the kind of computer used and browser type/version. You yourself have access to this information in your data logs. Having this data, as well as a person’s IP, one might be able to finagle more information out of an ISP system operator (particularly if there are sayanim there).

    It’s not really all that difficult to see how this could be possible. It doesn’t take much talking outside the forum. Even VPNs are no guarantee against it. (Mine lost connection while writing my last post here!)

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @niceland
  188. geokat62 says:
    @Anonymous

    ADL does CIA’s illegal domestic dirty work.

    You’ve got the causal arrow pointing in the opposite direction.

    The CIA/FBI take their direction from the ADL, a domestic terrorist organization inciting anti-White hate.

  189. Wild Man says:
    @Ron Unz

    Mr. Unz, … you are still claiming you don’t get it. Time for you instead, to start claiming, you do indeed get it (i.e. – the content of what Richard B is actually saying to you), because no one (of the people that have taken a great interest in this site) believes your obfuscation anymore, that you ‘don’t get it’. That low-brow approach doesn’t work for you anymore. The reason it doesn’t work is because we all know how smart you are, and many of us here are pretty damn smart in our own right, … and so we realize that your excuses are not emanating for a place of ‘smarts’ (though it should, because you are smart, and smart recognizes smart). You do realize that – right? Your obfuscation is so mickey-mouse, it is not befitting a man of your intellectual stature, and so, one who continues to notice that (me, let’s say), tends to wonder – what gives here?

    What precisely am I talking about?

    1) you feature many writers here at the UR, that would be described by the faux-west globalists now controlling our western spheres, as deeply subversive to the faux-west globalist’s otherwise deeply subverso worldview.

    2) you don’t really sort out where you stand, among all the themes outlined by the various ‘subversive to the subversos’ authors, you feature here, … instead you just continue to give that stupid blanket statement (which is a ruse, as anyone with half-a-brain can see), that:

    [MORE]

    “Over the years, visitors have regularly told me that they are aware of no other publication anywhere on the Internet that provides convenient access to such a wide range of ultra-controversial material across so many different subjects, nor many websites that allow such lightly-moderated discussions in its comment-threads. So perhaps this makes us the rightful heir to the mantle of “the free speech wing of the free speech party.”

    Obviously, such an approach has its pluses and minuses, and I personally find a great deal of the material we publish both distasteful and wrong-headed, a failing even more common in the regular flood of the often vituperative comments. But from the beginning, the Mission Statement of this alternative media publication had envisioned that situation, and our primary role has been to serve as a content-distribution channel and commenting platform.”

    , …. as such implying that you are a hero for carrying material that is ‘subversive to the subversos’, whilst at the same time claiming that, at root, you are innocent of holding those distasteful and wrong-headed views yourself, one might conclude. This way, …. one cannot really know what internal opinion Unz truly harbors (which I am quite sure, is the dynamic that you very ham-handedly are tying to attempt …. a very Jewish behavioral trait it seems), at least in terms of the UR editorial choices of what to carry, …. which means instead, the UR readership that becomes curious about that (nearly everyone here, I would suspect, who are of the type that have taken a great interest in the site, like is the case for me), have no choice, but to try to glean Unz-internal-perspective, by way of your own writing here at the UR. But, even though you think the entirety of the American Pravda series, taken all together, does that for your readership (i.e – clarify the Unz stance on the points made by the other writers you carry), …. it turns out that it doesn’t. You conclude those American Pravda series articles with paragraphs that speak to only ‘tepid conclusive analysis’ (because you never seem to offer a prescription for these ills, …. but truly, if one really believes the content of the American Pravda articles, … after all this time, … one would think the author would offer potential prescriptions, if he indeed were serious about the problems he writes about). If you think that the American Pravda series is much more than that (i.e. – more than tepid conclusive analysis), as you seem to claim by way of what appears to be bragging, … then why do you conclude each article in that series with such tepid conclusive analysis (i.e- never venturing towards potential prescriptions)? I note that the other writers that you feature here at the UR, tend not to do that (they instead tend to draw bold culture-spanning conclusions from their analysis, but alas, even these writers you feature, tend to shy away from offering prescriptions).

    More from your article:

    “Perhaps by coincidence, a somewhat similar controversy had recently played out in the case of a different high-profile individual, the billionaire black rapper and fashion designer Kanye West. Although I’d previously had only the vaguest impression of him, he was apparently a towering international celebrity, as well as being among the wealthiest black Americans who had ever lived, while having tens of millions of followers on Twitter and other networks.”

    I mean, it would be impossible for you not to know the stature of Kanye West in the overall culture, if you read the Andrew Anglin articles that you feature here at the UR. So, within this quote, … it is tantamount to you claiming that you don’t read the writers you feature here (i.e. – no editorial choice of what to carry, is what you are therefore claiming). Of course I don’t buy that now (and never did), and anybody that does, is a flaming fool.

    The time to get Greenblatt and the ADL, … get them with the same tools they use for their own game, is right f*cking now, like I said in a previous comment in a previous thread:

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-stage-is-set-for-us-combat-troops-in-ukraine/?showcomments#comment-5666485

    From my linked prior comment:

    Maybe it is time to lynch (figuratively speaking) Greenblatt (before he is allowed to get away to some other Jewish racket) and the ADL. A huge throw-down, … an over-the-top smear campaign, that is just going to be so overwhelmingly anti-Semitic ( and what is wrong with that, …. there is no way out of this without coming out against the self-defined-Semites), it will make everyone on earth blush. Its time for that. Jerry Seinfeld is a smart cookie, and can smell it in the air already. The time to strike-out against the ADL racket is now.

    Mr Unz, … are you up for that, or not? If not, why not? By way of your bragging, as to hemming in Greenblatt and the ADL, with respect to UR operations, …. yes, …maybe the dynamic you are describing (Greenblatt as mucho afraid of you) may be nice for you and all, but what about your goy readership? We need more. Much more. We need to demolish the Jewish-subverso action upon our culture, and the way to begin to do that is to go after the most glaring examples, like Greenblatt and the ADL, to be taken down forthwith. Don’t pretend that you have the stomach for that, if you don’t. Maybe it truly is the case, that you are bragging about getting the upper hand on Greenblatt and the ADL, when in fact, he has the upper-hand on you, apparently.

    You know, your comment #2 of this thread, just begs for these implied questions to be answered:

    OK, … saying all that, … I am wondering what your thoughts are on all these claims of Jewish subversion of the mana the enervates culture (especially MSM)? It looks to me, to be a big problem – am I wrong?

    Perhaps those most skilled at this mana-subversion, can afford the capital cost of acquiring those mana-producing assets, …. as the asset paired with the subverso-skill can lead to some very large gains in engineered-influence, … and where there is engineered-influence, there is money. A lot of people say, all this is a Jewish specialty. Are they wrong?

    I think that you, within your own writing, continue to be careful to imply what I just said there as a potential possibility, without overtly coming out and clearly stating it isn’t just a possibility, it is the facts (like the other writer you carry here, pretty much all tend to do).

    I know you will probably again attempt to deflect. Let me head that off at the pass. What about this Romanoff article, featured at the UR today:

    https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/the-richest-man-in-the-world/

    Just say it Ron Unz finally, .. to you agree or disagree.? If you disagree – then what portion do you disagree with, precisely? If you wholeheartedly agree with Romanoff, then can you please finally, clearly, overtly say-so (i.e. – f*ck Greenblaltt, … he is a very very dirty player by your own admission, let him come for you, as you say, …… if the way you feature your dynamic with Greenblatt and the ADL is accurate, …. then you need to goad him and the ADL now, … instead of just resting on your laurels of who-intellectually-checkmated-who-style, which is tantamount to protecting yourself and the UR, at the expense of the larger goy culture that you are otherwise immersed in).

    This is really simple (I mean the UR’s needed decision, as to which way to go, from here on in, … more of the weird status quo of goys complaining and Unz playing nothing more than lip-service to that, .. or more-so to now morph towards actually being a venue outlining prescriptions for needed change). This ADL-Greenblatt/UR conflict, that Unz has outlined for us, as per Unz’s analysis of this conflict, makes it clear that the UR, above all other publications, is best positioned to take on the simplest prescription on that front, which is to take action to destroy Greenblatt and the ADL. Maybe Mr. Unz should go talk to Jerry Seinfeld, right about now (two heads being better than one and all that), … as to developing a real ‘Jewish-subversion-action-upon-the original Jewish-subversos’. The word needs this desperately. Is Unz the man for the job?

    You conclude your comment #190 with this:

    “Suppose your only weapon is a flame-thrower and you’re standing inside a building filled with open barrels of gun-powder, where someone you don’t like is insulting you. There’s not really much you can do under those circumstances.”

    You mean Greenblatt is that person standing inside that buldign, by way of your analogy. OK, …. that explains how his hands might be tied when it comes to the UR, but it doesn’t explain why you don’t use that ADL/Greenblatt strategic disadvantage, vis-a-vis the UR, to blow him out of the water. You need to write articles that make it clear, that the only prescription for the good of us all in west (Jews an goys alike) is for the utter and compete destruction of the Jew-racket that the ADL/Greenblatt are emblematic of, by first destroying the ADL, by way of your writing. The ADL must cease to exist. It seems in his latest article, Romanoff is alot more capable than you, 0n that front.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Ron Unz
  190. Dennis Dale says: • Website

    Apparently for some reason or other, he became angry and agitated over what he saw as the overwhelming Jewish influence in the worlds of business and media, and began loudly saying so in various venues and on his social networks. As might be expected, the media reaction was swift and devastating, portraying him as a moral leper, and thereby forcing most of his business partners to cut their ties, often at enormous financial cost.

    The “some reason” was his being assailed by business associates and media after being photographed wearing a “White Lives Matter” t-shirt. He was catching so much hell from so many Jews he forgot himself and went on “Death Con 3”.

    It’s very important to note this all started when powerful Jews started leaning heavily on Ye for defending whites–no “antisemitism” had yet appeared. The man was being threatened by people with the means to carry those threats out, for defending white lives.

    Pretty astounding.

    • Agree: Zane, Rurik
  191. Rurik says:
    @Chris Moore

    Hey Chris,

    going into reptilian mode

    I know some people who’re convinced that the only way to understand what motivates our elites is that they’re really extraterrestrial, malevolent aliens. Smart, educated folks believe it, too. You’d be amazed at all the evidence and testimonials of people who’ve ‘been to the Secret Space Station’, where humans and aliens collaborate on their nefarious schemes to enslave and harvest humans. Perhaps it’s true. I really don’t know.

    But what I’ve come to suspect, is that for a lot of people, the motivations of our elites, who’re tirelessly working to bring strife and suffering to as many people as they can, seems like it simply can not be the work of fellow humans, because they know their own hearts are not black with cruelty and malice, and so they figure no human heart can be that vile. So you have theories of aliens or ‘reptilians’ or Satanists, working in league with the devil himself.

    And I ‘get it’, why people feel that way. Because the motivations and actions of our elites seem so inhuman, and even anti-human, that people can’t comprehend that it could be fellow humans doing such things.

    But they are. It’s just that they haven’t been raised the way you and most Christians and Muslims and Hindus and others have been raised. Rather, they’re raised with a Darwinian religion that advocates the genocide of all other people not their own. Just read the Old Testament, and how god exhorts his people to ‘slay them all, to the last person, and even donkey and goat’, blah, blah..

    If you were an adherent of that book, raised from childhood and with all kinds of rites and sacraments of cruelty and genocide, rather than the New Testament, you too would likely be a monster.

    We don’t need aliens or shape-shifting reptilians or demons from hell, all we need to do is read the Old Testament, and realize that there really are people who take all that ‘chosen’ and genocide stuff literally. They actually believe that they are the only ones with souls, and that god put the rest of us here to be their slaves. Yes, it’s beyond laughable, but millions of Jews believe it.

    Also, since they’ve been at it for thousands of years, I wonder if there hasn’t morphed a kind of genetic element to it, with the most vicious adherents of the Torah, doing as Jehovah bids, and multiplying with other like-minded coreligionists. Just look at Jonathan Greenblatt. If that isn’t the face of malevolence incarnate, I don’t know what is. And of note, he is the one who is exalted to the highest perch of their modern Cheka.

    Look at who they just put back in office in Israel. A known, genocidal psychopath.

    we don’t need shape-shifting reptilians, or aliens or even demons

    we have Bibi, and sadly, he is human. Even if most of us would prefer to believe otherwise.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  192. @OrangeSmoke

    Chappelle trod the line between cancellation on one side and truth and backing up his friend, Ye, very well in that SNL sketch, which I thought was genuinely funny. I think Chappelle’s support for Ye was confirmed by the hostile response to Chappelle’s monologue from the ADL and other jew supremacists/apologists.

    E.g. Chappelle said something like “It’s not crazy to think that jews control the media, but it’s certainly a crazy thing to say” and at the end “I hope they don’t take anything away from me [because of what I’ve said]…. whoever they are!” with a big smile. For me, Chappelle’s clearly agreeing with Ye, and Chappelle’s a comedian so he did it in a funny and roundabout way.

    • Replies: @Anonydogg
  193. Wild Man says:
    @Ron Unz

    Further to my first (#198) response comment, …. which I concluded with this observation:

    You mean Greenblatt is that person standing inside that buldign, by way of your analogy. OK, …. that explains how his hands might be tied when it comes to the UR, but it doesn’t explain why you don’t use that ADL/Greenblatt strategic disadvantage, vis-a-vis the UR, to blow him out of the water. You need to write articles that make it clear, that the only prescription for the good of us all in west (Jews an goys alike) is for the utter and compete destruction of the Jew-racket that the ADL/Greenblatt are emblematic of, by first destroying the ADL, by way of your writing. The ADL must cease to exist. It seems in his latest article, Romanoff is alot more capable than you, 0n that front.

    , …. Ron, … if you don’t make these moves, others are going to start featuring the UR by way of links, ….. putting those words in your mouth. I might be someone inclined to that, for instance (but I am not such a putz, that I would feature these as your own words, but nevertheless, it would be completely fair, to feature this as the stance of the UR, as published by Ron Unz, despite the editor’s & publisher’s admonishments that he doesn’t read his own UR offerings, and indeed, being non-putz-like, I would do what I thought was fair), …. but my main point being, is, someone is going to do that, and the ones that will be most successful with that venture, would be people with far more cultural reach than I possess, and they may not be so careful with your carefully curated moves towards having your cake, and eating it too. Ron – by ‘wanting your cake and eating it too’, I am implying that you seem to be in the business of fostering ‘subversion of the prior Jewish-subverso-action’ crowd, whilst at the same time, claiming you, otherwise, perhaps are not in the ‘subversion of the prior Jewish-subverso-action’ crowd, by personal belief, …. which in order to enable that seeming double-standard, continues to remain quite vague (i.e – your personal beliefs on the JQ is what still remains quite vague).

    Ron – you created a nice website here. It’s time you take full responsibility for it. But it seems you are either afraid, or alternatively, are doing some sort of weird limited-hangout thing. Others (aware goys) don’t want to see it that way though. Because we need some fair-minded Jews on our side, to sort out all this Jewish-subverso-action. This is super-easy: Are you that Jew or no? Soon, if you continue to refuse to directly answer that question, … others will conclude that it is best to use all the huge amount of pertinent material contained here at UR (especially the commentariat which tends towards very good), precisely for that purpose, despite what the publisher thinks about that. When that comes (which by some of your comments, it seems you are wishing for), …. are you still gonna sit on the fence like that, with respect to where you actually stand on the original Jewish subverso-action, as directed at our original culture (i.e. – continuing to seemingly wanting to have your cake and eat it too)?

  194. Rurik says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Gays often want families, and are no worse as parents than straights.

    wrong

    boys and girls, (yes, they exist), need role models to develop as healthy adults.

    Would you have a problem with homosexual men adopting boys, and then raising them to be homosexual?

    And if you would, then why? What’s wrong with raising boys to be homosexual? Are you a homophobe?

    Because that is part of the ‘woke’ agenda, is to indoctrinate children to be homosexual. Especially boys. Homos are in just about every case, allies of J-supremacist wokeness and all things liberal-progressive-anti-white. So why wouldn’t they want little boys raised to be homos? There aren’t too many homos in right-wing circles, so that kind of kills two birds with one stone. Raise them to be homosexual, and they not only won’t breed, they’ll also do all they can to destroy traditional society, because traditional society prevents homos from having sex with children, which is something a lot of them obviously want to do.

    I have no problem with homosexuals having civil unions, and being left alone to live how they want, so long as they’re not shoving it in anyone’s face. But the idea of homos adopting little boys, is the rancid depth of moral depravity, as far as I’m concerned. Children deserve better from the adults they depend upon to make decisions that have huge effects on their lives and well-being.

    Allowing homosexual men to adopt little boys is when we know our society is lost.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  195. iffen says:

    Rather sad to see you rattling the tin cup after these many years.

    Anyway, thanks again for the UR.

  196. Anon[357] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wild Man

    I agree completely with your growing skepticism about our host. For me the biggest tell is his constant effort at self-aggrandizement, drawing attention to his so-called singular efforts to expose the truth.

    I don’t think a real Patriot would do that. He would devote his talents and gifts to saving his people. I’m not sure our host has “a people”. He seems to consider himself an elitist, not interested in leading anyone to freedom or liberation, but seeking our adulation because of his so-called penetrating insights.

    I’ve read parts of MEIN KAMPF and I don’t recall Hitler doing this. Everything he writes is an effort to liberate his German people from the menace of international Jewry. He was a devoted Patriot who loved his Nation and wanted to save it from an insidious menace. But our host does not seem to have this same dedication. Rather than liberating us he wants us to adulate admire and even venerate him.

    This to me is a complete giveaway that he is not sincere. As you so well put it, he never prescribes anything. Rather he overwhelms us with hopelessness in the face of the full spectrum Jewish supremacist onslaught that he and his contributors so thoroughly document.

    • Thanks: Wild Man
  197. The Wall Street Journal and the WSJ editorial page editors are vile, duplicitous corporate propaganda whores.

  198. Notsofast says:
    @Corvinus

    i’m just a dumbass, deep-state, troll that don’t make no sense- corvinus

    if we’re just going to make up quotes and attribute them to the other person, at least mine is accurate.
    go back to troll school, your posts are getting dumber and dumber.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  199. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Rurik

    So you have theories of aliens or ‘reptilians’ or Satanists, working in league with the devil himself… Rather, they’re raised with a Darwinian religion that advocates the genocide of all other people not their own.

    Who else was raised with “Darwinian religion”? And can we expect them to eventually devolve into slaves for ((jews))? Yes.

    So you don’t believe ((jews)) manifest supernatural evil through their collective unconscious? You don’t believe Darwinian religion institutions controlled by ((jews)) are engaged in conjuring evil, or an evil state of mind, ultimately in suicidal service of ((jews))?

    When I call them “reptilians,” I mean they’re literally operating out of their reptile brain. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they haven’t evolvelved, because they have — not positively, but negatively.

    Who’s to say there aren’t supernaturally forces at work there, because unevolved people are generally stupid, and ((jews)) definitely aren’t stupid. In fact, they’re diabolically smart. But the people they convince to pursue Darwinian explanations that reduce humanity to evolved apes? They’re not so smart.

    Look at the state of the Darwinian English. Even though they’re partners in crime, the ((jews)) laugh at them as dumb apes, which they’ve become. Meanwhile the ((jews)) and their Satanic religion are running circles around these dumbfounded Darwinian apes, who have become their ineffectual slaves and tools.

    It’s their Satanism that is preventing these ((jews)) from devolving into apes. And they’re well aware of it.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  200. BlackFlag says:
    @WingsofADove

    Poor people are never going to self-organize. Hudson is legitimizing intellectual > elite power grabber demagogues > poor.

    Successful leftist movements are statist and top-down.

    Hudson is all about the financial industry being parasitical. Exactly the type that would be feared. I hear him on leftist shows like Multipolarista and nobody criticizes him for publishing on unz.com

    I like your points about organization and an interesting theory on this website but I think it’s totally wrong.

  201. Anonydogg says:
    @AlexanderEngUK

    Also the line “… Ye is not crazy… He is unwell…” I think he was saying that Ye is in a tight spot after the Jews targeted him so viciously

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  202. Corvinus says:
    @Notsofast

    You’re not denying that racism doesn’t exist.

    Regardless, all you have is ad hominem. You lose.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  203. Corvinus says:
    @Skeptikal

    So we’re supposed to trust a black man who has been verbally abusive and who is bipolar that he blames a Jew for his own condition. Where is the accountability on the part of West?

    “Ye’s forced institutionalization, drugging, and threats”

    Let’s be more accurate here.

    https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kanye-west-bipolar-disorder-handcuffed-psychiatric-hold-173812157.html

  204. Rurik says:
    @Chris Moore

    So you don’t believe ((jews)) manifest supernatural evil through their collective unconscious?

    does it matter if someone believes their manifest works, (certainly evil if the word has any meaning whatsoever), are supernatural in provenance, or originating from their reptilian brain?

    Who’s to say there aren’t supernaturally forces at work there,

    Certainly not I. I wouldn’t presume to know if there are or not. I simply admit that I don’t know. But my point is that when you look at human history, and human nature, I just don’t think supernatural explanations are necessary for what the Zionists are doing today. I’m not suggesting supernatural forces aren’t there, only that humans are perfectly capable of the most heinous acts of treachery and cruelty, all their own. If assigning a supernatural cause would stop it, then I’m all in.

    But certainly we can agree that when it comes to heinous acts of cruelty, the Jews don’t have a monopoly on that. And if promoting endless wars for fun and profit is evil, (and I consider it so), then so too was burning German women and children alive, which the Christians of Perfidious and America were all too happy to do. Was ‘Bomber Harris’ a demon? Or all too human?

    It’s their Satanism that is preventing these ((jews)) from devolving into apes.

    Well Chris, you (of course) are perfectly welcome to your theories. And the idea that Zionism is a kind of Satanism, is something that definitely resonates with me. It seems to me the 20th century was in large part Satan’s century. (just like Pacino says in the movie, ‘all of it!’)

    I used to pooh-pooh the idea that there were aliens meddling here on earth. I no longer do. I accept the possibility, just as I accept the possibility that something supernatural is at work. I’m a mortal, and so my faculties for understanding such things are limited. And as such, it would be the height of presumptuousness to proclaim I can know such things, either in the affirmative, or the negative.

    I don’t.

    All I was suggesting, is that from my perspective, a supernatural (or alien or other) theory is understandable, because their motivations seem so inhuman, but just perhaps, their methods and motivations and compassion (or lack of) are all too quintessentially human.

  205. Roger says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    Wiz,

    “I think there is merit in your view that a number of enemies would regard UR as a manageable pressure valve.”

    I am not sure what you based this on or exactly what you mean by it. Perhaps you could explain.

    As to your other comment, I’m OK with that. I was not praising Romanoff as a man, but only that sometimes, that is, sometimes his articles have merit and are worth reading. I would go so far as saying that about other writers here as well, including those I hardly ever read.

    As for Romanoff, I have asked him pointed questions about things he has posted here and, sad to say, have never gotten an answer. Probably never will. I do not expect to. Nevertheless, if he has time to respond furiously to negative comments, surely he would have the time to answer a thoughtful, penetrating question. At least I would think so.

    Thanks for your comment.

  206. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @Richard B

    The last sentence of my comment was somewhat murky. The background is Peterson comes across as some world class oracle of wisdom. For example he gave some long talk about the importance of being ethical.

    However, to those with a brain in their head, what he presents as some earth shattering new aspect of pjhilosophy (or whatever) is old hat hundreds of thousands of years old. I posit any of our Grand Parents would look at this fellow as obtuse and trite ie he obtained a Doctorate to tell us what we already know and practice ?

    To those who are dumb, or dishonest, Peterson’s blather is wisdom.

    In the land of the Eunuchs the man with a 3 inch willy is a super stud. In this day where I consider he majority as fools, Peterson is considered by the rabble to be some sort of Moses, debouching from the mountain with a divine teaching and salvation for the wicked. The delicious irony of it all is that the scoundrels who drool over his twaddle and agree they should be ethical, immediately return to their old ways.

    I look at the man as a Hasbara shill. He reminds me of those commercials of the 70’s/ 80’s where a Chinaman, posing with 2 girls in front of a Rolls, was selling an educational program for $400. The course would show you how to become a millionaire investing in real estate with no money down.

    But, people pay to listen to his shit and thats just the way it is. Like SBF its the old scam, pulled from under the bed, polished, renovated, tuned up and touted to the suckers.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  207. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    This is Anonymous #2. What you say is logical. You said few of us here are of any importance, at least as compared to the rich and famous and spot light hogs. I would also like to add that few of us here have much to lose either financially or in terms of reputation.

    I dont mean any of this is a derogatory way. I regard both these conditions as strengths.

    When I was in the working world, my employer underwent a major tax audit. In talking to the lead Tax Man he told me this story.

    A junior auditor went to audit a Vietnamese store that had not been remitting any taxes for a number of years. There they accosted the owner who claimed he could not speak English so an interpreter had to be brought in. They advised the fellow he owed tens of thousands to the Government and he would have to stump up. In the meantime they would tie up his bank account, his business premises, his inventory and the two luxury SUv’s parked outside.

    Sadly, through the interpreter, the auditor learnt the bank account was just about empty, the buildings were rented, inventory was on credit and the vehicles were leased. LOL

    The auditor, anxious to score a successful audit, and squeeze some blood from a stone, advised the man he would thus end up in jail. This time the Vietnamese owner laughed at him and in perfect English said the following:

    “I spent 10 years in a communist re-education camp. 16 hour work days, watery soup, sometimes a bowl of rice with a fish head. Always hungry, always tired, always listening to a 24/7 recording played to the camp extolling the virtues of the Hanoi Communists. Classes, beatings,punishment and abuse. One shirt, one pants, a pair of sandals made from a tire and bath now and then. To you prison must be terrifying but to me an American prison would be a sweet vacation. Lets go now.”

    And that, was the end of the conversation and the audit. Having little or nothing to lose is a weakness and a strength depending on the circumstances and the players. A person in that situation can throw all caution to the wind and be as obnoxious as he wants to be. Its not in the interest of the powers that be to come after him and if they do, he probably will not give a shit.

    To me all this talk about the Gummint monitoring our conversations and emails is all baloney. They dont have the resources to pursue all the chain snatchers, petty criminals, dopers, dealers, pimps, whores, rapists and murderers. My opinion is if you are prolific enough to be made an example of they will come after you.

    However, one of your faithful followers, like me, I have some old clothes, a car that will soon need a horse and furniture the Salvation Army would mock and enough in my pocket for a coffee and a McDonald apple tart ? I doubt any Government agency or other Organization with sensitive feelings care what I say or do.

    Your situation is different as you have explained but the effect on the opposition is the same. I find it amusing that there are others on this site, who are concerned you are a Quisling but yet they post the most alarming, entertaining, intelligent and sometimes most idiotic comments.

    They must be dumb, naive and arrogant to put themselves on a pedestal of importance and believe that any organization, Government or otherwise, cares or even notices that they exist.

  208. Ron Unz says:

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @mulga mumblebrain
    , @Anon
  209. Ron Unz says:
    @Wild Man

    Mr. Unz, … you are still claiming you don’t get it.

    Look, you’re just some random nut who hangs around my website leaving interminably long comments, probably because you’ve been banned everywhere else.

    Your 300,000 words of comments over the last year have mostly been rants devoid of any meaningful substance, so you contribute nothing of value to the discussions on this website.

    Since you seem rather unhappy here, I suggest that you permanently depart for a more pleasant venue.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  210. Anon[357] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Well these black people are much more Israelite and Jewish than RU, because unlike Unz they believe in the Bible and take its stories and teachings very seriously. Or as Saint Paul said, “not all who call themselves Israel are Israel.” I’d take a black believer over an unbelieving Khazarian Jew any day.

  211. Ron Unz says:
    @Anonymous

    Edward Snowden said that some NSA employees have at their fingertips the ability to monitor laptops/phones/etc. as easily as one might execute a Google search. One of his primary complaints was that this technology was being systemically abused to spy on family members, girlfriends, and others.

    As far as I know, Snowden was talking about NSA employees improperly monitoring the Internet communications of prominent celebrities or their own personal friends (or enemies). Since they had the entire Internet at their fingertips, they could just check what those friends were saying in their private communications.

    That’s totally different than trying to determine the identity of an anonymous commenter on a website. I’m sure the NSA could do it, but it would probably require a great deal of effort, and would not be the sort of thing some NSA employee would just quietly do on his lunch-break.

    Lots of the commenters here are delusional in all sorts of different ways, so believing that they’re so enormously important that the NSA cares what they’re saying in their comments is just another delusion.

    As I already said, 99.5% of the times that someone gets purged for saying something, it’s because he said it on a public Tweet that went viral. Offhand, I can’t think of any case in which someone got purged for his totally anonymous comments on a website, but maybe you can come up with one or two examples.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
    , @Richard B
    , @Corvinus
  212. Ron Unz says:
    @Anon

    The last sentence of my comment was somewhat murky. The background is Peterson comes across as some world class oracle of wisdom. For example he gave some long talk about the importance of being ethical….To those who are dumb, or dishonest, Peterson’s blather is wisdom.

    I’d never heard of Peterson until five or six years ago when there was a David Brooks column in the NYT describing him as America’s most important public intellectual, which greatly surprised me.

    I hunted around a little and couldn’t find anything interesting or important that he’d ever written. I tried to watch one of his video lectures, but it was so dull and bland I gave up after five minutes. Then I heard he’d become addicted to drugs, and had spent all his new-found money on that.

    As far as I could determine, the main reason for his original celebrity was that he’d firmly refused to de-genderize his pronouns or something ridiculous like that.

    I honestly can’t imagine why anyone pays any attention to him or why he’s allegedly popular in certain circles.

  213. @Ron Unz

    What I’ve noticed about Peterson is his insights in his professional field are fairly astute but when he ventures outside of psychology,his opinions are mundane if not foolish.

    He has a good grasp of Canadian domestic politics but seems to be abysmally ignorant of international affairs.But a shark out of water is not worth beating so…

  214. Atle says:

    I’m starting to feel that worship of Ron Unz isn’t necessarily nonsensical.

  215. @Ron Unz

    David Brooks!!?? It is to laugh!

  216. Hacienda says:
    @Ron Unz

    Suppose your only weapon is a flame-thrower and you’re standing inside a building filled with open barrels of gun-powder, where someone you don’t like is insulting you. There’s not really much you can do under those circumstances.

    Mr. Unz,

    Have you ever considered the possibility that they don’t shut you down because this site is a light in the darkness for Them.

    We all know the US is upside down. Inside-out compared to the US of our youth. Even the ADL must be greatly puzzled by the lesbianism of Jewish women who were once traditional not 50 years back.
    I’m guessing the increasing rancor even in the Jewish community must trouble them. The falling white birth rate. The precipitously falling marriage rate. The ugliness of public spaces. The wretchedness of the public school system. The obvious corruption of entertainment, sports, government, military.

    This is one of the very few places people can find some bits of clarity, quality discussion at the base level amongst much muck.

    When the world is burning, you’d want at least a body of water for relief. Even if the water is sometimes filthy.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  217. @Ron Unz

    I, myself, converted to Judaism the other day. I did it myself, following the instructions on the pack, and am now a Rabbi, so due deference would be appreciated. I did it in black-face in tribute to my black Judaic brothers and sisters. I am thinking of making aliyah. I’ve seen a ‘Palestinian’ farm in Samaria that looks nice, once the pests have been removed.

    • LOL: Brás Cubas
  218. @Anonydogg

    He may yet get the Paul Robeson treatment.

  219. Joseph A. says:
    @OrangeSmoke

    Regarding the Ukraine, I found it interesting that Chappelle’s analogy was the United States vs. Colorado . . . a part of the United States. This isn’t what one would normally do to toe the line. It would be the U.S. vs. Belize or Luxembourg . . . Chappelle is wily even here. He’s clever.

  220. SOL says:

    Regardless of my disagreements with Mr. Unz on various political issues, I’d like to express gratitude for him providing this platform for speech at variance with the official narrative.

    • Agree: Richard B, Roger
  221. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    [quote]”I hunted around a little and couldn’t find anything interesting or important that he’d ever written. I tried to watch one of his video lectures, but it was so dull and bland I gave up after five minutes.”[/quote]

    The only content of his I found worthwhile was his recorded class lectures in Psychometrics at the University of Toronto, Canada. He recorded his lectures each year, and each year, he covered less and less “politically incorrect” topics such as innate gender differences and the research of Francis Galton. Here are his playlists for the yearly lectures:

    2014: Youtube.com/watch?v=_0xBOMWJkgM&list=PL22J3VaeABQCfQy9Yg2y8fi5cI8HYUUct

    2015: Youtube.com/watch?v=ZKpqpBRVr8Y&list=PL22J3VaeABQAhrMCQUa6sde_Y9DVbLYRv

    2016: Youtube.com/watch?v=UGLsnu5RLe8&list=PL22J3VaeABQAOhH1CLMNnMl2R-O1abW1T

    2017: Youtube.com/watch?v=kYYJlNbV1OM&list=PL22J3VaeABQApSdW8X71Ihe34eKN6XhCi

    Though the earlier years had more “politically incorrect” content, his last year of 2017 was the one where he apparently transformed his style into one containing so-called “charisma,” “charm,” and “self-aggrandizement.” He also lost all his excess body weight, got a new hairstyle, and got a new “hip” wardrobe. One could speculate that plans were already in the works for him to attempt to become a celebrity.

    Sanjay

  222. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    In one of Peterson’s videos, he was talking about how American Indians traditionally have been using Psilocybin mushrooms, and this invokes a religious experience that has a profound permanent effect; the individual smoking it, if he was not spiritual/religious before, permanently becomes spiritual/religious. The person loses his nihilism/atheism, if preexisting, and ends up feeling that his life has purpose and meaning. Well, I am curious to know if perhaps Peterson himself experimented with this mushroom, and if this would explain his sudden transformation into a self-declared “Messiah” out to save the world. Perhaps he has sincerely become spiritual/religious and feels that it’s his duty to “help” humanity, even though his advice is unintentionally misguided and counter-productive.

    Sanjay

    • Replies: @Anon
  223. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    Thanks for your response Ron.

    First, though I may have laid it on a bit thick, I truly was playing the Devil’s Advocate and exploring outloud some doubts that I’ve had and frustrations that I’ve experienced as a TUR commenter in general, and as a reader of your work in particular.

    But I didn’t hold back for two reasons: 1. I know you value freedom of speech. 2. You’re a man of the world with a thick skin. You didn’t get to where you are in life because your ego could be bruised by some lone commenter with a different point of view.

    Also, though it’s clear we’re not in agreement on a number of things, I can’t remember reading an article or essay of yours, or a back and forth between you the publisher and me the commenter, where I haven’t learned something. And that, in my view, is really why we’re here – to learn. Hence the value of free speech. Certainly one of the benefits from that all important freedom is that you get to learn from people you disagree with.

    If one can’t do that then they’re just trolling.

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again because it’s worth repeating, this is the best website in the history of the Internet. And the Internet is the most important information tool in the history of the world.

    That’s why I take being a TUR commenter seriously (or at least try to and most of the time succeed). Toward that end, along with my doubts and frustrations, I’ve also expressed my gratitude and appreciation to you and your staff in a number of comments. But an even better way to express that gratitude would be to make one’s contribution as worthwhile and as thought-provoking as the article, essay, or comment that inspired one to respond in the first place.

    However, that being said, and with all due respect, I will continue to reserve the right to keep a healthy grain of salt in my mouth as I continue my particiation in this site.

    Thanks again for your response.

  224. Mevashir says:
    @Ron Unz

    The concern of many people here is TUR is operating a sting operation a bait and switch or an entrapment scheme. Where RU and his contributors publish provocative articles that incite commenters to pour out anti-Jewish invective. The hidden purpose of this website might be to flush us out into the open. And while NSA wouldn’t want to waste its time tracking us, they don’t need to if RU can provide to them our ISPs and other data. He might be working for NSA or ADL as a contractor collating our information for future nefarious purposes.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @Corvinus
  225. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    A Black Hebrew Israelite ?

    Is that an oxymoron ? Like Jumbo Shrimp ? A giant ant ? A huge mosquito ?

  226. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    This back and forth between Ron Unz and Anonymous is extremely valuable for anyone interested in this topic. More importantly, it directs attention to the value of free speech in general and this website in particular.

    As Ron says in TUR’s Mission Statement:

    …sometimes the most valuable insights are obtained by reading opinions sharply divergent from one’s own. Facing a sharp intellectual or ideological challenge forces us to more effectively frame our arguments and buttress the weaknesses in our logic and evidence that had previously remained unnoticed. Taking the measure of an effective critic is always more valuable than listening to a mindless echo.

    Some articles and topics really bring out the best in TUR contributors and commenters, thereby raising the standard of the comment section (which in my view is an extremely important part of this website). This article, and the exchange between Ron Unz and Anonymous, is a case in point.

  227. geokat62 says:

    Jordan Peterstein was hand picked by The Chosen to dupe the dumb goyim.

    With their nonstop promotion of wokeism, they realised a backlash was developing so they pumped Peterstein up as the leading light who would debunk the worst excesses of wokeism for the goy.

    The catch, of course, was to downplay any attempt to rekindle any hint of a white identity and to encourage whites to continue to practice a failed ideology, the call “radical individualism.”

    Peterstein is in the employ of little Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire. Recently, Little Ben recently arranged a meeting between Peterstein and Bibi Nut’nYahoo and foolishly documented Peterstein shaking hands with his paymaster.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  228. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Well, I am curious to know if perhaps Peterson himself experimented with this mushroom, and if this would explain his sudden transformation into a self-declared “Messiah” out to save the world. Perhaps he has sincerely become spiritual/religious and feels that it’s his duty to “help” humanity, even though his advice is unintentionally misguided and counter-productive.

    =================================================================

    It is true tribes in North and South America have used plants to “contact the spirit world”. However, they do so occasionally, under strict tribal protocol guided by the Shaman. Thats a lot different from hitting the bong every 15 minutes in the basement LOL !

    [MORE]

    From Petersons usually dazed expression I would say he has eaten every mushroom and toadstool he ever saw, those from the supermarket and from the nearby park. I would bet that when mushroom season is over the anointed one tokes up dried poison ivy and plantain leaves. The result is his brain now has the IQ of a mushroom. Far from losing one’s ego, narcissism or whatever, the fact is this is easy since one becomes brain dead. One then discovers the meaning of life which is to toke, loke and smoke weed and munch on mushrooms and toadstools…………ALL DAY & EVERY DAY. The resulting intellectual smoke is blown up the asses of the lost souls (whose IQ is measured on the negative scale) who lap up his hocus pocus.

    Peterson sees himself as being on some special mission which is to bring spiritual awareness to the masses so that they can find their inner child, get in touch with their centre and connect with the divine wisdom of the Universe and perhaps even see and communicate directly with God.

    The practical, sharp sighted man laughs at all this nonsense. He wants to make money, live in a nice house, drive nice cars, deck out in the polo shirts, italian pants and alligator skin shoes, eat in nice restaurants, fuck every woman he can and of course use recreational dope, tobacco and alcohol….all the while maintaining his sanity.

    Sanjay, it seems to me that “civilization” produces more nutballs than primitive existence. There are a lot of loonies out there looking to other loonies for guidance and direction in their miserable lives. Before the internet no one would have bothered with Peterson but now anyone wacky can become the guest of honour, even at the homes of the rich and famous who themselves seems to be as mad as the rabble.

  229. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Hacienda

    We all know the US is upside down. Inside-out compared to the US of our youth. Even the ADL must be greatly puzzled by the lesbianism of Jewish women who were once traditional not 50 years back.

    Not only are these Satanists not “troubled,” but they cultivate homosexuality in their Talmudist bathhouses and Synagogues of Satan, just as pedophilia is sanctioned in the Talmud. ((Chuck Schumer)) welcomes his lesbian daughter, whom he made a lesbian, and says he fears for her marriage in a conservative America.
    https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-chuck-schumer-lesbian-daughter-alison-ruth-bader-ginsburg-20200921-uwcn5hggjnek3luu7zsv5selx4-story.html

    So authentic Moses Jews may be troubled, but authentic Moses Jews are so few and far between as to be completely irrelevant to “Judaism,” and probably couldn’t care less what happens to the ((jews)). In fact, I’ll go beyond that. I’ll hazard that authentic Moses Jews want the ((jews)) dead — and far be it from me to argue they’re wrong. After all, the moral conscience of Western Civilization was built by Moses and Jesus on top of the graveyard of the Synagogue of Satan for a reason.

    The ((jews)) want us to weep and tear our clothes and gnash our teeth for destroying their ability to destroy civilization? I think not. I think, double down.

  230. Corvinus says:
    @Ron Unz

    “Lots of the commenters here are delusional in all sorts of different ways“

    Does that apply to you as well?

  231. @Corvinus

    It’s true. And it’s a little weird that so many people here who would otherwise jump to characterize ideological opponents as mentally unhealthy don’t even acknowledge that fact. All the comments about tranny delusions, sociopaths in power, and especially black low IQ/impulse control are suddenly beside the point.

    It’s not a win when the people who you agree with are clearly crazy. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re wrong, but it also shouldn’t serve as inspiration and encouragement. One of the things that appeals to me about the right versus the left is that the right tends to prefer (or at least claims to prefer) disciplined thought and common sense to wild ideas by disordered minds.

  232. niceland says:
    @Anonymous

    I am most certainly no expert, but it seems to me the methods you describe apply to all websites receiving comments?

    If so, I guess any website hosting controversial material and allowing free speech in it’s comment section could fall under the alleged ‘honeypot’ theory!?

  233. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mevashir

    The concern of many people here is TUR is operating a sting operation a bait and switch or an entrapment scheme. Where RU and his contributors publish provocative articles that incite commenters to pour out anti-Jewish invective. The hidden purpose of this website might be to flush us out into the open.

    Flush us out in the open as what, exactly? Authentic Jews and Christians in the best tradition of Moses and Jesus and any average folk of conscience and good will at war with the Synagogue of Satan?

    And while NSA wouldn’t want to waste its time tracking us, they don’t need to if RU can provide to them our ISPs and other data. He might be working for NSA or ADL as a contractor collating our information for future nefarious purposes.

    You still don’t get it, do you? The NSA, like the Soviet Union before it, is a failing, crumbling institution built by ((jews)) and at war with the world to do ((jewish)) bidding. The ((jews)) are on their back foot and headed for a fall. These paranoid little mice who tremble in fear of the ((jews)) are the ones who are spreading toxicity, not the “anti-Semites.” These paranoid little mice have been conditioned by the Synagogue of Satan into cowardice.

    Didn’t you say you had a ((jew)) background, Mevashir? Did you ever ask yourself what seeds of doubt were sewn into your mind by your ((jew)) upbringing? Did you ever ask yourself if the Synagogue of Satan had your best interests or the best interests of humanity at heart? Have you learned nothing from all the articles on this website? Have they done nothing to deprogram you? Are you going to spend your life as a paranoid little mouse trembling before the Synagogue of Satan?

  234. Notsofast says:
    @Corvinus

    i’ll try and put this in simple terms that you can understand. when you threaten people and tell them that they are “marked” and their comments are being monitored, do you ever wonder if your comments are also being monitored? perhaps you’re marked.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  235. Corvinus says:
    @Mevashir

    “He might be working for NSA or ADL as a contractor collating our information for future nefarious purposes.”

    So you’re really guessing. You have no idea. Anything is possible, but is it probable or likely that you’re being tracked?

    Occam’s Razor–If you had posed considerable threat to Jews, the CIA, Zionists, and Globohomo (take your pick), you would have disappeared by now.

  236. Corvinus says:
    @Notsofast

    Again, you’re not denying that racism doesn’t exist.

    “i’ll try and put this in simple terms that you can understand. when you threaten people and tell them that they are “marked” and their comments are being monitored”

    Remember, Thrallman claimed I was a Fed. So on what basis is his assertion based on fact? So, in kind and in jest, I said that he was being carefully watched. Are you going to take him to task for making a wild generalization? Or are you under the false impression that the intelligence apparatus of our nation is monitoring your every move?

    People here irrationally believe they are being monitored on this fine opinion webzine because they are “marked”. It’s the Boogeyman Syndrome and Jew Derangement Syndrome working in concert.

    “do you ever wonder if your comments are also being monitored? perhaps you’re marked.”

    Not in the least. Because if I was deemed a specific threat, I would have been permanently removed from our society.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Notsofast
  237. Gordian Knot Time,

    This is the knot. Why is Julian Assange treated differently than Ron Unz if disseminating uncomfortable truths to the masses is the common denominator? Honest question.

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Anon
  238. @Ron Unz

    I hunted around a little and couldn’t find anything interesting or important that he’d ever written. I tried to watch one of his video lectures, but it was so dull and bland I gave up after five minutes. Then I heard he’d become addicted to drugs, and had spent all his new-found money on that.

    I say from (2018):

    Jordan Peterson has been groomed by shady elements in the corporate propaganda apparatus to stop young White people from gathering together — as Whites — in order to advance their own group interests.

    Jordan Peterson is the human equivalent of anti-White ideological libertarianism. Peterson’s function as a corporate media whore is to prevent young people of European Christian ancestry from fighting together to defend their people. The shady shysters in the corporate media that push Peterson want young White people to stay atomized and apart instead of organized and prepared to fight for their people.

    Jordan Peterson is an evil baby boomer Canadian who has admitted to drug use. Jordan Peterson should be asked the Sam Huntington questions by some young White person to see how he would respond. We know Peterson avoided a direct answer and stayed mum on the Jewish Question.

    Sam Huntington questions:

    Who are we as a nation? What are we fighting for?

    Ask Jordan Peterson what Canada is as a nation?

    Ask Jordan Peterson what Canada is fighting for?

    https://www.unz.com/article/a-reply-to-jordan-peterson/?showcomments#comment-2329788

    Professor Kevin MacDonald on Jordan Peterson(2018):

    Peterson bows down to the powers that be and has grown wealthy in the process. He is the sort of “rebel” the multicultural elites like, one who participates in their censorship of those who would reveal the power of these elites and their hostility to Western peoples and cultures.

    https://www.unz.com/article/a-reply-to-jordan-peterson/?highlight=peterson

  239. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:
    @Timur The Lame

    The answer seems pretty obvious. Assange steals classified documents and releases them to the public. Unz deals with information available to everyone and doesn’t divulge classified secrets.

    • Replies: @Timur The Lame
  240. @Rurik

    There was an excellent little doco on gay couple who fostered numerous children over many years. They fostered girls because of bigots like you. Their girls did very well, which is difficult with many fostered children, and often returned to visit, frequently with their own children. If I remember correctly they finally fostered or adopted a boy, who, of course, was fine and turned out straight. Your hatred and bigotry is nauseating, as is your crazed paranoia.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  241. @Kim

    Listen you Evil lunatic hate pustule-paedophilia is an equal opportunity abomination, with straights (like you, perhaps)every bit as guilty as queers.

  242. American Pravda: Elon Musk, Kanye West, and Much Riskier Targets

    I say:

    Muskellunge(Elon Musk) — also known as Muskie — must launch a retaliatory strike on the Murdoch Organized Crime Syndicate that owns and controls the Wall Street Journal and Fox News.

    The Wall Street Journal has been ramping up their vicious and nasty attacks on Muskie and Trumpy.

    The WSJ is serving as a proxy propaganda front for the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and the ruling class of the rancid Republican Party.

    The Wall Street Journal wants to stop any attempt by Trump to (1) bring back a patriotic immigration policy that puts the interests of the USA and the American people first (2) bring back a America First foreign policy that avoids unnecessary overseas wars and (3) bring back a pro-American sovereignty trade policy that puts the interests of the USA first.

    The Wall Street Journal wants to prevent Trump and the patriotic Americans that put America First from using TWITTER to publicize the political positions that put the interests of the USA first.

    Muskellunge(Elon Muskie) has upset the TWITTER applecart by beginning the process by which good and decent American patriots — and patriots in other nations — might use TWITTER to launch counter-attacks against the globalizers who wish to attack and destroy nation state sovereignty.

    As a bit of fun, which Muskie says he wants back on TWITTER, I will suggest that a nasty Wall Street Journal propaganda tart named Allysia Finley is the Taylor Lorenz of the Wall Street Journal.

    Muskie can go after the Wall Street Journal and the Swamp City DC Post at the same time.

    The waves break both ways — Apocalypse Now surf scene.

    HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

    [MORE]

    EVEN TO THOSE NASTY TART PROPAGANDA PUKES AT THE WALL STREET JOURNAL AND THE SWAMP CITY DC POST!

    • Replies: @Anon
  243. Rurik says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Your hatred and bigotry is nauseating, as is your crazed paranoia.

    just answer the question Mulga

    Would you have a problem with homosexual men adopting boys, and then raising them to be homosexual?

    I’ll be waiting for your answer. If you attempt crickets, then I’ll accept that you’re not a person of principle or integrity, but just another status-whoring, trite and virtue-signaling hypocrite.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  244. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Again, you’re not denying that racism doesn’t exist.

    Forget about “racism.” Here’s what “soulism” really looks like…

    • Replies: @Anon
  245. The So-Called “Anti-Defamation League” Is A Clear And Present Threat To The Safety, Security And Sovereignty Of The United States Of America.

    The ADL is anti-White

    The ADL is anti-Christian

    The Jew-controlled ADL is evil

    I would look more at the diasporan JEW SUPREMACIST pressure groups like the ADL rather than the Israel government in terms of interfering in USA elections.

    The anti-White, anti-Christian JEW SUPREMACISTS at the ADL are interfering in elections in the USA by colluding and conspiring with internet corporations and the corporate media to censor and silence any individuals or groups that seek to implement an immigration moratorium or deport illegal alien invaders.

    The anti-White, anti-Christian JEW SUPREMACISTS at the ADL also do not want to allow any debate about the ISRAEL FIRST policy pushed by the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    The anti-White Bolshevik Jew thugs at the anti-White ADL are colluding with Google and YouTube to censor and deplatform any White people who advance the interests of Whites as Whites and advocate for Whites as Whites.

    The ADL pushes mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and multicultural mayhem. The ADL does not want any debate whatsoever on nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and multicultural mayhem. Any American citizen who proposes an immigration moratorium or advocates for the deportation of illegal alien invaders will be attacked and censored by the ADL and Google and YouTube.

  246. @Anon

    Well yes, I get that but the ‘stolen’ information that was released was something along the lines of being the truth. Supposedly the population is supposed to be privy to the actions of our “servants” because they are under some rules of accountability. In an erratic way the fourth estate took care of these problems but when they sold out totally it was open season for the big boys except for mavericks like Assange who was an aberration only because of technology.

    Is there anything in the highest documents of the Republic that states in lay terms something along the lines of “once you elect your representatives, they are no longer under any obligation to divulge anything they do, foreign or domestic and if what they agree upon has the possibility of affecting world affairs for generations to come, they are Constitutionally allowed to freeze the documents for 25, 50, 75 0r 100 years”? I am not aware of that kind of proviso but would guess that if it was published, people would no longer vote. I read that there are still 50,ooo classified documents on Lee Harvey Oswald 59 years after the event. He was a lone nut, don’t you know. Why can’t the public or historians know what is in these documents?

    Of course writings on deep historical or complicated machinations don’t catch fire with the mob because they require effort and (gasp) thinking but they do go on record. That may make them somewhat benign in the case of TUR.

    I suppose the question would be does the public have the right to know absolutely what their corrupt, degenerate, anti-social, foreign compromised representatives are up to, or have been up to no matter the source? “Have been” and “presently are” may be the answer to my original query.

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Anon
  247. Anon[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Would be nice if Tucker Carlson would air that clip of defiant Israeli racists. Maybe they should be called Proud Goys?

  248. Anon[263] • Disclaimer says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    The Wall Street Journal wants to stop any attempt by Trump to (1) bring back a patriotic immigration policy that puts the interests of the USA and the American people first (2) bring back a America First foreign policy that avoids unnecessary overseas wars and (3) bring back a pro-American sovereignty trade policy that puts the interests of the USA first.

    That’s because Wall Street always has sought cheap labor without rights benefits pensions etc. And illegals are ideal for that. Ever heard of the Braceros Program? Wall Street pumps them in and then fans the flames of racism when the public becomes irate.

    America’s Cancer Capitalist system cannot survive without illegal virtual slave labor to exploit.

  249. Anon[263] • Disclaimer says:
    @Timur The Lame

    You are speaking idealistically and theoretically. But surely you know that there are many national Security laws on the books that prevent us from knowing the truth. The government has broad powers to invoke emergency provisions that effectively censor the truth from the public. In fact that’s why the Warren Commission covered up the JFK assassination. They said the truth would be too damaging for the public. Of course you and I don’t agree with that. But unfortunately the people in power have the legal authority to make such decisions.

    • Replies: @Timur The Lame
  250. @Anon

    Yes of course. But when degenerates, sociopaths, pedophiles, satanists and all other forms of human garbage (assuming they are human) control all the information, where are we ?

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  251. Notsofast says:
    @Corvinus

    and exactly what is “our” nation?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  252. geokat62 says:

    Breaking news…

    Jewish homosexual ‘Trust and Safety’ czar, Yoel Roth, suddenly resigns from Twitter, child sexual abuse material (CSAM) now rigorously banned from platform

    https://justicereport.news/articles/2022/11/23/banning-of-child-sexual-abuse-material-on-twitter-begins-only-after-sudden-departure-of-jewish-homosexual-trust-and-safety-czar-yoel-roth/

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  253. Corvinus says:
    @Notsofast

    “and exactly what is “our” nation?“

    People from around the world. It’s who we are, a nation of immigrants. Always has been, always will be.

    Unless, of course, you are one of those fellows who believe thar “true Americans” only come from historic WASP stock.

    What do YOU think is “our” nation?

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Chris Moore
  254. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    People from around the world. It’s who we are, a nation of immigrants. Always has been, always will be.

    Until 1965, it was a nation of white immigrants (according to 1790 Immigration Act). That only changed when Jewish Supremacist Organizations successfully lobbied for open borders (Hart-Celler Act).

    And the country has been going downhill ever since 1965.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  255. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    There were subsequent immigration laws that enabled non whites to emigrate here. It’s who we are.

    Southern and Eastern Europeans were deemed unassimilable by “true Americans” in the early part of the 20th century. What happened? Magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  256. @Kim

    The majority of cold molestors are straight white men, usually Christians. You do realize that the Vatican is renowned for their sexual proclivities right? Gays are fine as long as they stay in their parameters. They can even be an asset at times

  257. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    People from around the world. It’s who we are, a nation of immigrants. Always has been, always will be.

    We were a nation of legal immigrants other than the Black slaves that you ((jews)) and ((jew)) stooges brought in. You’re still bringing in slaves by opening up the borders and advertising open borders, in conjunction with your globalist slaving agenda (and drug running, prostitution, corrupt election, etc profiteering agenda) . You ((jews)) are soulless Golden Calfers who ought to be dealt with — must be dealt with — to solve the problems that afflict the globe. No solutions are possible so long as you soulless ((jews)) are running amok, poisoning the well and doing your Satanic worst.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  258. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    There were subsequent immigration laws that enabled non whites to emigrate here. It’s who we are.

    Produce the provisions that support your assertion.

    What happened? Magic dirt?

    Speaking of magic dirt…

  259. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “Produce the provisions that support your assertion“

    https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/burlingame-seward-treaty

    So, why were Eastern and Southern Europeans discriminated against by their fellow whites? How did they become “American”? Magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  260. Corvinus says:
    @Chris Moore

    “We were a nation of legal immigrants other than the Black slaves that you ((jews)) and ((jew)) stooges brought in. “

    First, I’m Goy. Pure Goy. Second, when you accuse your political opponent as being a Jew without any evidence, you come across as a spoiled little child. Third, decidedly more non Jews than Jews brought in slaves.

    “You ((jews)) are soulless Golden Calfers who ought to be dealt with — must be dealt with — to solve the problems that afflict the globe.”

    Again, I’m not Jewish. But I’m curious as your plan to deal with them. Be specific. Or, is it just idle talk on your part.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @geokat62
  261. Wild Man says:
    @Timur The Lame

    Yes, … your exchange with Anon gets to a central point I have been making with my IRL buddies lately. Me and my buddies are mainly in our early 60’s, and now that we all sit back and examine our lives (men in their ’60’s seem to have a penchant for that), and what the background cultural milieu was, upon which the acts of lives occurred, …. and realize that we all had questions, beginning in our teens or 20’s, that couldn’t be properly answered (questions about the cultural milieu) because, even though we apparently do live in a free and open society, … the free and open society exists within a background of state secrecy (secrecy about so many many things).

    [MORE]

    I have recently been in the habit of pointing out to these IRL buddies, that back at the time, when we first started having questions about the system we are immersed in, back when we were young, …. we pretty much all accepted this as normal. We came up in an apparent free and open society in which it was normal for the state to harbor many secrets, and we more or less accepted that as normal, but as well, were intrigued by what the secrecy was potentially hiding. The thing is, ….. there is absolutely no reason why we should have accepted this state secrecy about many many matters, as normal. Why is it seen as normal? Well, it’s because it’s the way we operate at the much finer granular level of interpersonal relationships (i.e. – we don’t reveal everything, because if we do, there will be misunderstandings that arise, and then we will experience some downstream hardship stemming from those misunderstandings). Of course, we should not except that, that normal interpersonal dynamic should apply to the state, though. It shouldn’t, …. because that opens the door to psychopathy creeping into high places. The main reason why we need to be somewhat guarded about revealing everything within interpersonal relationships, is because that action thwarts the designs of the psychopath (which are always present in the cultural milieu, at least in low %). But of course, this defensive response (probably genomically encoded), helps at the interpersonal level, normies vs. psychos-style, … but is a disaster at the state level, normies vs. psychos-style. But this insight tends to be counter-intuitive among people (because we probably are all genomically encoded to at least some degree, to have these tendencies towards keeping some of cards held close to chest). What I am suggesting is, that ‘state-secrecy-function’ favoring the accruing of psychopathy at nodes of cultural control, … is probably a genome issue (i.e. – what worked for humanity early on, before there was much of a ‘state’ at all, during hunter-gatherer times, …. doesn’t work now).

    If my hunch is correct, … what to do? I tell my buddies, … we need to get this out of our minds, this accepting of state secrecy, whilst at the same time being intrigued as to what precisely this secrecy might be hiding. We need to give sympathy, to our prior-selves of our youth, who did accept this (or the current youth for that matter), ….. we didn’t know any better, but now we do. As such, I tell my buddies, every time their line of inquiry is cut off by ‘state secrecy’ (which comes up all the time), ….. under no circumstances should us men, in our early ’60s, accept this now. We should be the ones, calling out this somewhat genomically-controlled dynamic, of state secrecy accruing, because psychopathy is accruing at nodes of cultural control. I tell my buddies, …. we all have a responsibility now, as experienced members of the society, to – ‘do not comply’, when somebody at the state level says they can’t tell us the real deal, because of whatever the narrative-of-the-moment that is used to obfuscate, comes up. This can be really simple. If you can’t figure out what is going on to your satisfaction, because of ‘state secrecy’ (which has morphed into a ‘state obfuscation racket’, as far as I can tell), …. DO NOT ACCEPT THAT AS NORMAL.

    I didn’t just hit upon this new strategy out of the blue. It came after many many frustrating convos, with these buddies, ….. I noticed that my cohort (men in their early ’60’s … my buddies) were becoming cynical (i.e. – ‘not our problem now, we tried and failed’). Sorry, not nearly good enough. Because we are the experienced ones. We have a responsibility. I am sure humanity can overcome this ‘psychopathy-accruing-at-cultural-nodes-of-control’, problem, like so many other problems that we have licked (I believe in the great resilience of humanity). The first step towards that, is to be absolutely adamant that state secrecy, and the state obfuscation racket that it has morphed into, is ABSOLUTELY NOT ACCEPTABLE.

    Believe it or not, this new stance of mine, with my IRL buddies, is gaining some traction in their minds (when nothing else beforehand-offered, seemed able to break through the growing cynicism of my cohort).

  262. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    Well, you can believe whatever you want. But what would be the purpose? I very much doubt that most of the commenters on this website are people of any great importance, and I’d guess that most of them have been saying lots of “controversial” things on other websites as well, probably for many years. So what exactly would be the benefit of luring them here to say controversial things on this website as well?

    Working to keep my comments as short as possible I wanted to answer this one separately. Even a book, or long essay or article, no matter how well-reasoned and well-written, can never say all that needs to be said about any topic, let alone this one. Same with a long comment. So a short one, or shorter one, will leave even more unsaid.

    So, with that in mind, and continuing in the role of Devil’s Advocate, I’ll proceed.

    The questions what would be the purpose? and what exactly would be the benefit of luring them here to say controversial things on this website? are asked as if there’s no possible answer. Fair enough. But maybe there is an answer, one that’s at least worth considering. So here goes.

    If the commenters are of no importance why have a comment section at all?
    Perhaps the arugment is that we commenters are unimportant because we are on the cultural periphery, specifically, we have no real social power or cultural control. Though it is true we are on the cultural periphery, from the point of view of those in power, that is exactly why we are important.

    Consider Identity Politics. Today it is not only a political force with no rival, it’s also the dominant explanatory system, if you will, of the entire Western world.
    An explanatory system, moreover, that is being used to dismantle the superstructure of Western Civilization.

    And yet, just 50 years ago, after the landslide victory of Richard Nixon, it consisted of a number of bizarre and resentful splinter groups. In short, it operated on the cultural periphery. This helps explain the seige mentality that Identity Politics in general, and the hositle elite in particular, suffers from. They know only too well that they could lose power in the same way they acquired it in the first place.

    Also, and speaking of power, it is not in the interest of those in power to eliminate opposition, or underestimate it. As Nietzsche once wrote, Anyone who spends a lifetime fighting an enemy has a real keen interest in making sure their enemystays alive! Now why on earth would they want to do that?

    Well, te exhibit mastery, of course. In short, to exercise power. And the best way for them to do that would be to make the exercise of that power as arbitrary, unjust and unpredictable as possible. A better way for a power center to keep the masses in line would be impossible to imagine.

    Tempted as I am right now to go into more detail, and the subject is certainly worth exploring, perhaps it would be better to end here. But not before asking a final question.

    Ignoring what I’ve said above, let’s focus instead on the point of your article, that The Unz Review is a much riskier target than Elon Musk, Kayne West, etc. Very well then. In that case, why wouldn’t they just delete you? If The Unz Review is a threat, why would the hostile elite allow it to continue?

  263. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    “Produce the provisions that support your assertion“

    The Burlingame-Seward Treaty, 1868

    You must’ve missed reading the concluding paragraph:

    However, the success of the treaty was short-lived. By the late 1870s, U.S. industrial leaders and politicians could no longer ignore the increasing anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States, particularly in the western states; in fact, industrialists and politicians often promoted anti-Chinese activities. A new treaty signed in 1880 revised the Burlingame-Seward agreement, and the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 abrogated its free immigration clauses altogether.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  264. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Corvinus

    First, I’m Goy. Pure Goy. Second, when you accuse your political opponent as being a Jew without any evidence, you come across as a spoiled little child.

    I never accused you of being a “Jew.” I accused you of being a ((jew)) — a Synagogue of Satan spiritual ((jew)). And you are. You’re also incredibly glib and sophomoric, which shows you to be the stunted “little child.” Classic ((jewish)) projection.

    Third, decidedly more non Jews than Jews brought in slaves.

    They were Synagogue of Satan spiritual ((jews)), like you.

    But I’m curious as your plan to deal with them. Be specific. Or, is it just idle talk on your part.

    Execution for treason. For example, 9/11 treason. I think a true and honest investigation would unearth thousands upon thousands of treason doers (both before and ex post facto). That’s a start.

    One can’t be executed for being an adherent to the Synagogue of Satan, of course. Or can they? It’s a good question. If the Synagogue of Satan is a criminal conspiracy engaged in ongoing treason for the State of Israel — and I believe it is — who knows what all will be uncovered.

    When Israel was inchoate, Synagogue of Satan spiritualists were hard to nail down. But they’ve now got a track record of formal treason, since 1948. For example, if LBJ was still around, he would be put on trial and likely eventually executed for USS Liberty treason. He’s no longer around, but the Synagogue of Satan that instigated and facilitated his treason still is.

    Can you be tied to the Synagogue of Satan? Spiritually, certainly. But on paper? That remains to be seen.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  265. Anonymous[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Between the articles and the comments, this site is pretty close to a compendium of the gravest CIA state crimes: the apical coup of 1963; the WTC demolitions provocation; the Boston explosions provocation; the banned biological weapon SARS2 and related medical experimentation under ulterior constraint and coercion. US acquiescence to Google/Facebook censorship of this inculpating evidence is an unlawful failure to protect your freedom of expression.

    You can challenge this unlawful censorship in US courts. Don’t expect much, these are not independent courts, CIA runs them. Just be sure to call an expert witness to explain Article 19 under the GC-34 interpretation, and Article 20 under the Article 19 NGO’s interpretation. The crooked scumbag judges of these bullshit federal courts have been indoctrinated with Federalist Society dogma, so your case will be shit through a goose.

    Then you’re ready for the real action: use the NGO liaison of the Human Rights Committee to make your case at mandatory US human rights review. Do the equivalent at the Human Rights Council and Inter-American Commission for Human Rights. The US has failed to respect, protect, or fulfill your rights to freedom of information and expression, as an inchoate crime and element of the broader common plan and conspiracy for undeclared war. States of the Group in Support of the UN Charter can then bring UNZ’s censorship to the ICJ, as part of a broader question like CIA impunity and criminal enterprise. There are NGOs to walk you through this process.

    This is the only way reforms get forced on the US government – public disgrace in international forums.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  266. Corvinus says:
    @Chris Moore

    Lol, you are using my blog postings as “evidence” that I’m a (jew) and should be tried for treason. That’s literally insane on your part. Obviously you don’t understand the law and the American court system.

    “For example, if LBJ was still around, he would be put on trial and likely eventually executed for USS Liberty treason”

    Who would bring him up on charges? In what court? How are you certain he would be found guilty?

    I get it, though. It’s much easier to make these bombastic claims rather than to think critically, especially since you lack the high T required to pull a Kyle yourself. And of course since you’re being monitored by Mossad.

    It’s a sickness from n your part. Seek professional help.

  267. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Regardless, there was an agreement in place that allowed non whites to emigrate to our nation.

    So, why were Eastern and Southern Europeans discriminated against by their fellow whites? How did they become “American”? Magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  268. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Regardless, there was an agreement in place that allowed non whites to emigrate to our nation.

    Regardless? LOL So, for 12 years out of close to 200 years a minuscule number of. non-whites were permitted to emigrate. This represented a drop in the ocean compared to what has happened post 1965, with the passage of Hart-Celler… when Jewish Supremacist Organizations opened the floodgates to non-white mass immigration.

    There’s no getting around the fact that this represented the true death knell of the nation. Now, there’s talk of secession and civil war, all thanks to JSOs pushing for the passage of Hart-Celler.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  269. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    First, I’m Goy. Pure Goy.

    … more like “First, I’m Shabbos Goy. Pure Shabbos Goy.”

  270. @geokat62

    If Jews thought they had a ‘right’ to steal Palestine from its inhabitants, why cannot other groups invent such a ‘right’ for themselves? Long before the Jews invented themselves, H. sapiens from Africa lived in what is now Palestine, and lived there for tens of millennia. A prior and far longer claim to ownership, I would say.

  271. @geokat62

    ‘Minor attracted’ material, please. And the overwhelming majority of gays, and other queers, are as opposed to paederasty as the rest of us. The ‘trans’ abomination is not just child abuse, but misogyny and homophobia as well. A carefully crafted psychic epidemic, with lots of money behind it.

  272. @Rurik

    As far as I am concerned adoptive parents ought not raise their children to be anything other than themselves. They should just let them develop as all parents ought to, but not all do. I would condemn a gay parent attempting to force a child to be gay, against their inclination, AND a straight parent, adoptive or ‘natural’, attempting to ‘straighten’ out a gay child. Is that clear enough for you?

  273. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    I get it. You’re angry at yourself for once again being exposed as a fraud.

    “There’s no getting around the fact that this represented the true death knell of the nation.”

    It’s an opinion.

    “Now there’s talk of secession and civil war,”

    I’ve heard that talk for over 50 years. And don’t kid yourself, you’re certainly not going to do anything about it.

    So, why were Eastern and Southern Europeans discriminated against by their fellow whites? How did they become “American”? Magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  274. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “There are NGOs to walk you through this process.“

    Since you know so much about this process, why don’t you get the ball rolling? Duty calls, right?

  275. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    How do your policies align with Christianity? Cite passages that link to each of your proposals as evidence.

  276. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    I get it. You’re angry at yourself for once again being exposed as a fraud.

    Says the beta cuck who never apologized to the memory of the late Prof. Tony Martin for calling him a liar when he accurately quoted two Jewish demographers who showed that twice as many Jewish households owned slaves (75%) compared to white households who owned slaves (36%) in 1830s America.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  277. Anonymous[153] • Disclaimer says:

    Corvinus, sorry JTRIG demoted you from biting Craig Murray’s ankles and sent you here to the Internet’s fringes. It’s thankless, frustrating work, arguing with people who are smarter than you. But if you say the stupid shit over and over, JTRIG will give you a fat juicy foundling to fuck!

  278. Rurik says:

    Is that clear enough for you?

    no, thanks for ‘answering’ the question, but it was more of a dodge.

    [MORE]

    Of course no one is going to approve of a ‘parent’ forcing a child to be homosexual. That isn’t what I asked. I said raising them to be homosexual. IOW encouraging them to explore different sexualities and exposing them to alternative lifestyles, (especially when they’re very, very young). Taking them to gay extravaganzas and parties and clubs, where homosexual men feel free to express themselves unrestrained by a ‘puritanical and bigoted’ society.

    Look how these dykes are dressing this boy?

    https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5936ceb42200003d00c6c896.jpeg?ops=scalefit_960_noupscale

    But my main problem is with men, because males are far, far more sexually aggressive then women.

    I don’t know of any women who’ve adopted a child in order to rape it, and pimp him out to other homosexual men to rape.

    ”Being a father was an honour and a privilege that amounted to the best six years of my life,”

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/couple-offered-son-to-paedophiles-20130630-2p5eg.html

    I saw in your charming reply to Kim, you posited thus:

    Listen you Evil lunatic hate pustule-paedophilia is an equal opportunity abomination, with straights (like you, perhaps)every bit as guilty as queers.

    If that’s true, then why do those pedophile priests target so many boys, and not girls, as would be consistent with them being all men? Being men, and according to your theory, the vast majority of raped children should have been girls, but they weren’t. They were boys. 80 to 90% of the Catholic priest cases were boys. And this is from a group comprised 100% of males. Statistically, you’d expect a group of males to abuse female children in numbers closer to the 90+%, if straight males were just as guilty as homosexuals when it came to child rape. But the numbers are reversed, which means that homosexuals are not just somewhat more inclined to rape children, but orders of magnitude more inclined.

    The Boy Scouts is enduring a massive scandal of thousands of boy rapes, covered up for decades. The Girl Scouts reports of abuse barely register, by comparison.

    Clearly, and obviously, there is something in the character of male homosexuals that targets children- boys. Have you ever heard of a female version of Jerry Sandusky?

    Russia recognizes this and humanly bans adoption of Russian orphans to nations that allow homosexuals to get married, (as this is obviously the pretext for homosexuals to adopt children).

    “…the government had acted to protect adopted children “from possible unwanted influence such as artificial forcing of non-traditional sexual behavior and the suffering, complexes and stresses that, according to psychologists’ studies, are often experienced by kids raised in same-sex families.”

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/02/13/russia-bans-adoptions-to-countries-where-gay-marriage-is-legal-a32064

    This is one more reason ZOG is targeting Russia. Forcing pro-homosexual values onto children is a moral atrocity, and an abomination. And that it will be done so to all Western children, is a ‘woke’ imperative. Traditional values like mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, are now considered ‘child abuse’ by the ‘Patriarchy’, according to ‘wokeness’, of which obviously Mulga is a proud, card-carrying member.

    The sad and tragic thing is, the moral rot has so disastrously run its course in the ((West)), to the point that there actually are people who would advocate that homosexual men should be allowed to adopt little boys! Just as our progressive-liberal, ‘woke’ commissars are demanding ‘Trans-hour in the elementary schools, to normalize the depraved and perverted and sexually degenerate. (In the elementary schools!)

    Even younger, as the children in this ‘drag queen story hour’ are just babies.

    Perhaps you’d do this to your son Mulga, and instruct him to color the picture of the degenerate, and hold it up for the approval of the adults

    but for many of us, this is just more proof of the moral and spiritual gangrene undermining the health of a society. And, it is ((deliberate)), being forced upon the West by ZOG, and its all too willing homos and assorted enemies of the West.

    What’s so curious, is that in every other instance Mulga, you’re such a big fan of the West, and the people among whom you live, that trying to parse why someone like you would advocate something as destructive to the West as homosexuals raising children, is such a mystery. /s

    Since you’re a tireless proponent of all things China, I wonder how many times you’ve railed against China’s refusal to even allow civil unions between homosexuals, eh?

    Perhaps that’s fine for China, because you like China and want it to be ascendant, whereas you clearly and obviously have a little hard on for the West, regularly and routinely maligning the white people of Australia in the most vicious terms.

    Hmm…

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  279. Corvinus says:
    @Ron Unz

    It is more probable that he hit a nerve with you, so rather then address his cogent points, you resort to as hominem. How does that further your mission statement?

  280. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Beta cuck is so 2018.

    And we’ve been through this before with Martin—he patently misrepresented the work of Jews for his nefarious ends.

    So, why were Eastern and Southern Europeans discriminated against by their fellow whites? How did they become “American”? Magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  281. Hatuxka says:
    @anon

    A model of what Twitter could become without the tight governance of allowable opinion, governance that seemed to accelerate and intensify in the last 2-3 years, is this site. Would Twitter survive such reset? Standard liberals don’t normally concern themselves with what advertisers would desire in this regard, but it is the most often line of attack on the new owner’s signs of his future management of restoring free speech. Unz steers clear of trying to challenge every major keystone trope of western historiography, such as making the bad concession that 15 million people died during and/or as a result of the Great Leap Forward, to get across a larger point that at the very least the western claims about it are exxagerated. They are in fact fabrication. Twitter overdid the strictness of what was acceptable and allowable. But just raising an issue can get one banned on this recent version of Twitter. Twitter’s mode of dealing with free speech has got to change. Unz allows all kinds of opinions. I was banned on a subReddit for linking to the Uni Review in citing a piece by a left wing anti-imperialist. The complaint against me was I was citing a Nazi site, regardless of the subject and the writer cited. My continuing discussion with the mod made it clear that the fact that there were ANY non-liberal to very prejudiced opinions to be found on the site made the piece suspect in the mind of the person demanding that I be banned. This is where Twitter was headed. ‘Don’t bring this up, don’t allow that non-mainstream thinking on Twitter because the whole thing is tainted.’

  282. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Rurik

    Mulga is a sick ((jew)) who has confessed to a “Hebrew brush” background. When he’s not pushing kosher Talmudic rape, he’s pushing psychopath profiteering ((Larry Fink’s)) war on carbon, and the ESG agenda. The world is coming to an end soon, preaches ((Mulga)) and the ESG cult.
    http://www.williamengdahl.com/gr15November2022.php

    It’s all connected. ((They’re)) all connected — by the Synagogue of Satan.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  283. American Pravda hasn’t had any impact because Ron Unz hasn’t presented anything new. Holocaust denial is as old as the Holocaust itself and long debunked. On Barbarossa he simply followed Suvorov. The Israel/JFK link has been known for 30 years. His coronavirus articles were obvious nonsense. The older meritocracy articles were noticed simply because they suited the lefty zeitgeist.

  284. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Beta cuck is so 2018.

    Apologies, Corvy. You’re goy, pure Shabbos goy. Better? lol

    And we’ve been through this before with Martin—he patently misrepresented the work of Jews for his nefarious ends.

    You’re a liar. He did no such thing. He accurately relayed the results of their demographic work.

    So, why were Eastern and Southern Europeans discriminated against by their fellow whites? How did they become “American”? Magic dirt?

    No big mystery. Northern Europeans were initially reluctant to see Southern Europeans in a favourable light. But here’s the difference, crow feet, Southern Europeans satisfied the two requirements of the 1790 Immigration Act, white person of good character.

    Non-whites don’t satisfy at least one of those conditions, until Jewish Supremacist Organizations opened the floodgates with Hart-Celler in 1965.

    Make America White Again!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  285. @Chris Moore

    Chris-getta grip. Who knows, maybe even you will have a touch of the Yidbrush back in the past. It’s no big deal.’Pushing Talmudic rape’?? As Pauline Pantsdown says-‘Please explain’.
    To reduce the need to avert (no longer possible, but just for argument’s sake)the climate destabilisation apocalypse to Larry Fink’s ‘profiteering’ is way beyond stupid, but there you go. I do agree with your characterisation of Larry Da Fink. The human world is coming to an end, and no amount of deranged denial is going to change that.

  286. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62

    “New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.”

    Must read message from Gab-founder, Andrew Torba…

    There Is No Freedom of Speech Without Freedom of Reach

    https://news.gab.com/2022/11/there-is-no-freedom-of-speech-without-freedom-of-reach/

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  287. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “Apologies, Corvy. You’re goy, pure Shabbos goy. Better? lol“

    Lol, now you’re going beck to 2010.

    “You’re a liar. He did no such thing. He accurately relayed the results of their demographic work.“

    Still seething after your intellectual beat down. Get over it.

    “No big mystery. Northern Europeans were initially reluctant to see Southern Europeans in a favourable light…white person of good character”

    It was more than reluctance. If Southern and Eastern Europeans were of “good character”, then there would have been no need for specific quotas for them. Madison Grant called the Mediterranean races, i.e. the Italians and the Greeks, as being inferior and utterly unassimilable. His HbD inspired work was used as the basis for the quota acts. Are you suggesting he was scientifically wrong in his assessment?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  288. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Are you suggesting he was scientifically wrong in his assessment?

    I’m suggesting that every people have a right to self determination. If the Founders wished to create a nation exclusively for Northwestern Europeans, that was their prerogative.

    They decided to use the language of “white person of good character,” not “person of good character.” I respect their wishes and wisdom for choosing this language. You obviously don’t.

    So, stop pretending that America was always a nation of immigrants (and not white immigrants). This is a falsehood. As Mark Potok’s post-it note shows, America was a predominantly white nation until 1965. Thanks to the nefarious activities of Jewish Supremacist Organizations, however, it is going to become majority minority… a disaster in the making.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  289. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Simply scrolling through a week of Unz should probably guarantee that any Jewish reader will feel more identity with their group.

    Let’s hope so, because the vast majority of “Jews” are ((jews)) of the Synagague of Satan, meaning their highest values are financial, self-gratification, self-aggrandizemen, or status-seeking — with zero regard for morals or ethics, except vis-a-vis their acceptance in the ambitious, toxic, and constantly expanding Zionist/Synagogue of Satan “community.”

    I’ve pointed out how modern lefties are almost ALL on board ((Larry Fink’s)) zero carbon and ESG scam (and Talmudic globo-homo, too). ((Fink)) is merely the latest “Big Jew” guru pushing the racket, and all the higher-ups know it’s a racket, just like all the “Big Jews” knew the “War on terror” was a Zionist racket. These rabbis and gurus know their people, and know what buttons to push to rally them and keep them in line, and to sate their greed.

    Despute their “Holocaust ” smokescreen, this site and Unz himself have recorded their treachery and brought what Zionists label “antisemitism” (but what is actually humanitarianism) into the mainstream to a degree I didn’t think was possible in my lifetime.

    But I guess the right idea at the right time in history is unstoppable.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  290. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “I’m suggesting that every people have a right to self determination.”

    You’re contradicting yourself. You do realize that Americans in 1870, in 1895, and 1965 made their own decisions of their own volition, to enable different peoples to enter our shores.

    “If the Founders wished to create a nation exclusively for Northwestern Europeans, that was their prerogative.”

    Except it says in our Preamble that our posterity has the liberty to make laws and create policies suited for them. It’s who we are. Tantrums on your part won’t change that fact.

    They decided to use the language of “white person of good character”

    A product of the times.

    “I respect their wishes and wisdom for choosing this language. You obviously don’t.”

    If Southern and Eastern Europeans were of “good character”, then there would have been no need for specific quotas for them. Madison Grant called the Mediterranean races, i.e. the Italians and the Greeks, as being inferior and utterly unassimilable. His HbD inspired work was used as the basis for the quota acts. Are you suggesting he was scientifically wrong in his assessment?”

    “As Mark Potok’s post-it note shows, America was a predominantly white nation until 1965.”

    You mean it was a WASP nation until the early 1900s, and then an invasion happened, compliments of Southern and Eastern Europeans. So, what changed? Was it magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  291. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    You’re contradicting yourself. You do realize that Americans in 1870, in 1895, and 1965 made their own decisions of their own volition, to enable different peoples to enter our shores.

    Contradicting myself? Lol, nice try.

    1870 and 1895, yes. 1965, no. Once America became officially ZOG occupied, the will of the people was no longer a consideration. It was the will of a special interest group that prevailed over all else. Hence, the floodgates to non-white mass immigration.

    Corvy, still trying his best to defend the indefensible, lol.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  292. geokat62 says:

    Gab comment posted by Delirium:

    Judea declares war on Twitter

    NAACP and ADL call for Twitter ad boycott after Musk reinstates Trump

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-elon-musk-donald-trump-naacp-adl-ad-boycott/#app

    Yesterday, Elon said that a large coalition of political and social activists agreed not to starve Twitter of ad revenue if he formed a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints, but the activists broke the deal.

    Seems like Musk is retaliating.

    Brace yourselves. The jews are about to go kvetch con 3.

    https://gab.com/UniversalDelirium/posts/109396330564501351

  293. Bro43rd says:
    @HT

    While I agree the media is a big problem, I think the control of currency/money is the linchpin of the whole shebang. Eliminate fiat currency and all the other sectors supported by it will wither away naturally.

    • Replies: @Psychotic Break
  294. @Bro43rd

    Yes, that’s right, and it is obvious that Musk hasn’t bought Twitter to make money in the short (or even medium) term, but to control the network communication system presently most suitable, and most ubiquitous, to link up with and control his proposed ‘chips in us all‘.

  295. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    You keep backtracking. It’s glorious to see you flail.

    “Once America became officially ZOG occupied, the will of the people was no longer a consideration.”

    How are YOU the possessor of truth? What makes YOU absolutely certain, compared to others, that you are right?

    You’re implying that white Americans are helpless. That they have no agency. That they are slaves. That is insane.

    So, it was a WASP nation until the early 1900s, and then an invasion happened, compliments of Southern and Eastern Europeans. So, what changed? Was it magic dirt?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  296. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    You keep backtracking.

    So, what changed?

    1965 Hart-Celler Act, pushed by Jewish Supremacist Organizations is what changed.

    Not backtracking, but tracking is the operative word.

    Just ask Jewish Supremacist Mark Potok of SPLC who tracked what changed…

  297. @geokat62

    You forget the interbreeding between racial groups. How about a moan concerning the ‘mongrelisation’ of the USA? And ‘Whites’ is SO broad. You don’t differentiate between the ‘wogs”, ‘spics’, ‘dagos’, ‘Huns’, ‘Polacks’ and ‘wops’. Where’s your hierarchy of ‘Whiteness’?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  298. @Chris Moore

    So, it’s a growing meme on the paranoid denialist Right. Anthropogenic climate destabilisation is a ‘Jewish plot’??!! It had to come. These festering cesspools masquerading as minds always follow a familiar pattern.

    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
  299. geokat62 says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    How about a moan concerning the ‘mongrelisation’ of the USA?

    Wouldn’t you be moaning if a hostile third party saw fit to promote mass miscegenation of the Han and the non-Han (eg Uyghurs) in China, let alone promoting mass non-Han immigration that threatens to make the Han a minority?

  300. @mulga mumblebrain

    Disbelief in “manmade climate change” is actually quite mainstream. I doubt that much more than half the American public believes that BS. And why should we? Anyone who attempts to give the other side is defunded and demonized as a tool of the oil companies. Never mind that the oil companies are just fine with this manufactured crisis, they’ll make zillions off these carbon credit scams.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  301. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Yes, you are backtracking mightily.

    That law represented the will of the people, and was supported by a great deal of Gentiles in Congress.

    “Wouldn’t you be moaning if a hostile third party saw fit to promote mass miscegenation of the Han and the non-Han“

    You mean how like the WASPs were bemoaning that the Mediterranean race should not breed with the Nordic race?

    So, it was a WASP nation until the early 1900s, and then an invasion happened, compliments of Southern and Eastern Europeans. So, what changed? Was it magic dirt

  302. geokat62 says:

    That law represented the will of the people, and was supported by a great deal of Gentiles in Congress.

    LOL. That’s not what Prof. MacDonald demonstrates in Ch. 7 of his magnum opus, The Culture of Critique.

    Such a Shabbos goy! Or more likely, you are related to Mark Potok.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  303. @Dieter Kief

    Hearken to Corvinius.
    ‘Twas but a baker’s dozen of moons back, when our Conservative brethren (und cistern) illuminated us all upon the tactic proposed by them heinous Libtards:
    “Identify the most likely candidates, have them pretend to be Conservative, and get them elected into office that way.”
    In this system of make-believe democracy, where celebrity is more important than brains, I find it odd that so many famous people suddenly saw the Llight, and turned from their religious adoration of all things ‘progressive’.
    But then, most nobody remembers (or even believe) that Soros said ca. 2014: “2016 will be the last democratic elections in America.” Why would they remember something as insignificant as an open desire to replace conservative candidates with satanic paedovores…

    • Troll: Corvinus
  304. @Fidelios Automata

    Americans are, in large degree, greedy, brainwashed, narcissistic morons. They would not know that a tram was up them until the driver rang the bell. In almost all the world, save the Evil Anglosphere, denialism is regarded as a psychological and moral disease, as it surely is. One of the prime reasons that the USA is so nearly universally hated is the manner in which and a few deranged stooges eg Austfailia, have sabotaged global efforts to avert a climate destabilisation catastrophe

  305. Wokechoke says:
    @meamjojo

    Covid was a warm up for a wider war. A civil defense drill if you like.

  306. Wokechoke says:
    @Corvinus

    The printing press was used by nationalist Puritan propagandists to stir the English civil War or War of Three Kingdoms. Irish atrocities against English settlers in Ulster set off Parliament against the king. I’m not so sure the medium of cheap paper prints was the message though. Not only is that beyond blaming the messengers it’s blaming the ink and paper itself.

    The fight between a rising merchant class and a land owning class was the real trouble. Both sides knew what they were doing, they just didn’t know how it might end.

  307. geokat62 says:

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Hidden History of the 1930s and 1940s