The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
Brown Betrays Her Ignorance of Economics
Her ill-conceived plan to boost business is grounded in politics and geared to 'correctness'
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Sometimes a single phrase can summarize an entire political philosophy. Early in her campaign for governor, Kathleen Brown announced her support for re-imposing California’s asset-forfeiture laws, which involve confiscating the property of individuals who have not been convicted of any crime. Her position paper defended such laws as a “badly needed source of revenue . . . for state and local law enforcement agencies.” In plain English, government needs the money.

Does it? Since the early 1960s, our state budget has grown from under $3 billion to more than $55 billion, an increase of nearly 150% even after accounting for inflation and population growth. Few Californians today would believe that this huge spending increase has made our state a better place to live. Instead, much of the increased cost of government has gone to pay for the sort of half-baked spending programs that Brown now proposes as tools for revitalizing our economy and society. Consider a few choice examples.

Brown proposes an employer tax credit equal to 25% of the salary of each new job created in California that pays between $17,600 and $60,000 (presumably jobs paying more than $60,000 might create Republican voters and therefore should be discouraged). Brown seems not to realize that this provides an enormous incentive for an employer to eliminate existing jobs and replace them with “new” jobs having different titles, perhaps with the same employees doing the same work.

Even worse, Brown would “allocate” these tax credits according to a whole range of subjective evaluation standards, such as whether a company is part of an “emerging” industry (as decided by bureaucrats), whether it joins a business cluster (whatever that means) and how many minority workers it agrees to hire. Thus, even firms that actually created new jobs would get the tax credits only if they filled out endless new paperwork–or paid off the right politicians and bureaucrats. The only jobs that Brown’s proposal would create are for government bureaucrats, private sector paper-pushers and the lobbyists who act as their go-betweens.

Brown also proposes creating a fund to provide venture capital to start-up companies. The fund would be administered by a volunteer board of private venture capitalists and would provide funding to companies that had failed to attract funding from private venture capitalists. This authorizes political appointees to risk public money on companies for which they, as private investors, had already refused to risk their own private money. Such language almost guarantees massive losses to taxpayers. Brown seems unconcerned about the business logic of her economic proposals, but she is very concerned about their “political correctness.” The firms that are to receive government largess are not just those that government bureaucrats in their infinite wisdom divine will create the jobs of the future, but should be minority- or women-owned as well. Presumably, the ideal Brown entrepreneur is a politically connected and physically challenged minority woman in a government-selected industry. The question of whether such individuals will actually create new wealth for California appears entirely secondary.

ORDER IT NOW

None of these obvious business flaws would be apparent to someone like Kathleen Brown. As a member of the Los Angeles school board, she learned to bend to the prevailing political wind and presided over the decay of one of America’s finest public school systems. As a “rainmaker” at a prestigious law firm, she learned that names and personal connections mattered more than the quality of legal briefs. And as state treasurer, she has learned that product differentiation among the major Wall Street public-finance bond houses is almost nonexistent, with highly lucrative contracts being based primarily on political connections, campaign contributions and minority set-asides. How can Brown even understand the concept of meritocracy if she has never had any contact with it?

Brown’s California would retain enormously high tax rates on the successful many in order to subsidize the well-connected few. We would regularly read stories about the latest government-sponsored success, but never learn of the 10 companies silently driven into collapse to pay for that one public-relations triumph.

Anyone who has followed the international news over the past decade knows that state-managed economies are always far better at publicity than at productivity. But, as a prominent Brown supporter explained to me in a private conversation a few months ago, “Kathleen Brown is an economic illiterate.”

Ron K. Unz, a Silicon Valley computer software entrepreneur, was a Republican candidate for governor in the June primary.

(Republished from The Los Angeles Times by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?