The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: Secrets of Military Intelligence
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Some may remember that in 2005 a major media controversy engulfed Harvard President Larry Summers over his remarks at an academic conference. Casually speaking off-the-record at the private gathering, Summers had gingerly raised the hypothetical possibility that on average men might be a bit better at mathematics than women, perhaps partially explaining the far larger number of males holding faculty positions in the math, science, and engineering departments.

These controversial speculations were soon leaked to the press, and an enormous firestorm of protest erupted, with MIT professor Nancy Hopkins claiming that merely hearing Summers’ words at the event had left her physically ill, forcing her to quickly exit the room lest she suffer a blackout and collapse.

Harvard students and faculty members soon launched an organized campaign to have Summers removed from the summit of our academic world, with noted evolutionary-psychologist Steven Pinker being one of the very few professors willing to publicly defend him. Eventually, an unprecedented “no confidence” vote by the entire faculty and growing loss of confidence by the Board of Trustees forced Summers to resign, becoming the first Harvard President to suffer that fate in the university’s 350 year history, thus apparently demonstrating the astonishing power of feminist “political correctness” on college campuses.

The true story for those who followed it was actually quite a bit more complex. Summers, a former Clinton Administration Treasury Secretary, had a long record of very doubtful behavior, which had outraged many faculty members for entirely different reasons. As I wrote a few years ago:

Now I am hardly someone willing to defend Summers from a whole host of very serious and legitimate charges. He seems to have played a major role in transmuting Harvard from a renowned university to an aggressive hedge fund, policies that subsequently brought my beloved alma mater to the very brink of bankruptcy during the 2008 financial crisis. Under his presidency, Harvard paid out $26 million dollars to help settle international insider-trading charges against Andrei Shleifer, one of his closest personal friends, who avoided prison as a consequence. And after such stellar financial and ethical achievements, he was naturally appointed as one of President Obama’s top economic advisors, a position from which he strongly supported the massive bailout of Wall Street and the rest of our elite financial services sector, while ignoring Main Street suffering. Perhaps coincidentally, wealthy hedge funds had paid him many millions of dollars for providing a few hours a week of part-time consulting advice during the twelve months prior to his appointment.

Moreover, Summers had previously denounced anti-Israel activism by Harvard students and faculty members as “anti-Semitic,” an accusation that provoked fierce opposition. A few years later, it also came out that Summers may have played a crucial role in favoring Mark Zuckerberg over the Winkelvoss brothers in their early battle for ownership of Facebook, while Summers’ former assistant Sheryl Sandberg later became Facebook president, making her a multi-billionaire.

Although Summers’ impolitic remarks regarding female math ability had certainly sparked his ouster, the underlying cause was probably his many years of extremely unbecoming behavior. Indeed, I think a reasonable case can be made that Summers was the worst and most disreputable president in all of Harvard’s long history.

Still, even a broken or crooked clock is right twice a day, and I doubt that Larry Summers is the only person in the world who suspects that men might be a bit better at math than women. But some strongly disagree with this assessment, and in the wake of the Summers controversy one of his fiercest academic opponents was a certain Janet Mertz, who specializes in cancer research at the University of Wisconsin.

In order to effectively refute Summers’ odious speculations, she and her co-authors decided to carefully examine the total roster of participants in the International Math Olympiads for the years 1988-2007. These 3200-odd individuals represent the world’s highest-performing math students drawn from the secondary schools of dozens of countries, and the gender distribution across so many different cultures and years would surely constitute powerful quantitative evidence of whether males and females significantly differed in their average aptitudes. Since most of these thousands of Math Olympians are drawn from non-Western countries, determining the genders of each and every one is hardly a trivial undertaking, and we should greatly commend the diligent research that Mertz and her colleagues undertook to accomplish this task.

They published their important results in a 10,000 word academic journal article, whose “first and foremost” conclusion, provided in bold-italics, was that “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest.” And in her subsequent press interviews, she proclaimed that her research had demonstrated that men and women had equal innate ability in mathematics, and that any current differences in performance were due to culture or bias, a result which our media gleefully promoted far and wide.

But strangely enough, when I actually bothered to read the text and tables of her eye-glazingly long and dull academic study, I noticed something quite intriguing, especially in the quantitative results conveniently summarized in Tables 6 and 7 (pp. 1252-53), and mentioned it in a column of my own:

The first of these shows the gender-distribution of the 3200-odd Math Olympians of the leading 34 countries for the years 1988-2007, and a few minutes with a spreadsheet reveals that the skew is 95% male and 5% female. Furthermore, almost every single country, whether in Europe, Asia, or elsewhere, seems to follow this same pattern, with the female share ranging between 0% and 12% but mostly close to 5%; Serbia/Montenegro is the only major outlier at 20% female. Similarly, Table 7 provides a gender distribution of results for just the United States, and we find that just 5 of our 126 Math Olympians—or 4%—have been female. Various other prestigious math competitions seem to follow a roughly similar gender skew.

These remarkable findings are even more easily grasped when we summarize the male percentages of top math students aggregated across 1988-2008 for each individual country:

ASIA:
China, 96% male
India, 97% male
Iran, 98% male
Israel, 98% male
Japan, 98% male
Kazakhstan, 99% male
South Korea, 93% male
Taiwan, 95% male
Turkey, 96% male
Vietnam, 97% male

EUROPE:
Belarus, 94% male
Bulgaria, 91% male
Czech Republic, 96% male
Slovakia, 88% male
France 97% male
Germany, 94% male
Hungary, 94% male
Poland, 99% male
Romania, 94% male
Russia/USSR, 88% male
Serbia and Montenegro, 80% male
Ukraine, 93% male
United Kingdom, 93% male

OTHER:
Australia, 94% male
Brazil, 96% male
Canada, 90% male
USA, 96% male

INTERNATIONAL AVERAGE, 94.4% male

These are the empirical results that Mertz and her co-authors touted as conclusively demonstrating that males and females have equal mathematical ability. As near as I can tell, no previous journalist or researcher had noticed the considerable difference between Mertz’s empirical data and her stated conclusions, or perhaps any such individuals were just too intimidated to focus public attention on the discrepancy.

 

This striking disconnect between a study’s purported findings and its actual results should alert us to similar possibilities elsewhere. Perhaps it is not so totally rare that diligent researchers whose ideological zeal sufficiently exceeds their mental ability may spend enormous time and effort gathering information but then interpreting it in a manner exactly contrary to its obvious meaning.

These thoughts recently came to my mind when I decided to read a remarkable analysis of the American military by Joseph W. Bendersky of Virginia Commonwealth University, a Jewish historian specializing in Holocaust Studies and the history of Nazi Germany. Last year, I had glanced at a few pages of his text for my long article on Holocaust Denial, but I now decided to carefully read the entire work, published in 2000.

ORDER IT NOW

Bendersky devoted ten full years of research to his book, exhaustively mining the archives of American Military Intelligence as well as the personal papers and correspondence of more than 100 senior military figures and intelligence officers. The “Jewish Threat” runs over 500 pages, including some 1350 footnotes, with the listed archival sources alone occupying seven full pages. His subtitle is “Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army” and he makes an extremely compelling case that during the first half of the twentieth century and even afterward, the top ranks of the U.S. military and especially Military Intelligence heavily subscribed to notions that today would be universally dismissed as “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.”

Put simply, U.S. military leaders in those decades widely believed that the world faced a direct threat from organized Jewry, which had seized control of Russia and similarly sought to subvert and gain mastery over America and the rest of Western civilization.

In these military circles, there was an overwhelming belief that powerful Jewish elements had financed and led Russia’s Bolshevik Revolution, and were organizing similar Communist movements elsewhere aimed at destroying all existing Gentile elites and imposing Jewish supremacy throughout America and the rest of the Western world. While some of these Communist leaders were “idealists,” many of the Jewish participants were cynical opportunists, seeking to use their gullible followers to destroy their ethnic rivals and thereby gain wealth and supreme power. Although intelligence officers gradually came to doubt that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was an authentic document, most believed that the notorious work provided a reasonably accurate description of the strategic plans of the Jewish leadership for subverting America and the rest of the world and establishing Jewish rule.

Although Bendersky’s claims are certainly extraordinary ones, he provides an enormous wealth of compelling evidence to support them, quoting or summarizing thousands of declassified Intelligence files, and further supporting his case by drawing from the personal correspondence of many of the officers involved. He conclusively demonstrates that during the very same years that Henry Ford was publishing his controversial series The International Jew, similar ideas, but with a much sharper edge, were ubiquitous within our own Intelligence community. Indeed, whereas Ford mostly focused upon Jewish dishonesty, malfeasance, and corruption, our Military Intelligence professionals viewed organized Jewry as a deadly threat to American society and Western civilization in general. Hence the title of Bendersky’s book.

These widespread beliefs had important political consequences. In recent decades, our leading immigration restrictionists have regularly argued that anti-Semitism played absolutely no role in the 1924 Immigration Act drastically curtailing European immigration; and the debates and speeches found in the Congressional Record have tended to support their claims. However, last year, I speculated that the widespread awareness of the Jewish leadership of the Bolshevik Revolution may have been a large factor behind the legislation, but one that was kept away from the public record. Bendersky’s research fully confirms my suspicions, and he reveals that one of the former military officers most fearful of Jewish immigrant subversion actually played a crucial role in orchestrating the legislation, whose central unstated goal was eliminating any further influx of Eastern European Jews.

 

The bulk of the fascinating material that Bendersky cites comes from intelligence reports and official letters contained in permanent military archives. Therefore, we must keep in mind that the officers producing such documents would surely have chosen their words carefully and avoided putting all their controversial thoughts down on paper, raising the possibility that their actual beliefs may have been far more extreme. A particular late 1930s case involving one top general provides insight into the likely opinions and private conversations of at least some of those individuals.

Although his name would mean nothing today, Deputy Chief of Staff George Van Horn Moseley spent most of the 1930s as one of America’s most highly-regarded generals, having been considered for the top command of our armed forces and also serving as a personal mentor to Dwight D. Eisenhower, future Secretary of State George C. Marshall, and numerous other leading military figures. He seems to have been well-liked within our military establishment, and had an excellent personal reputation.

Moseley also had very strong opinions on the major public issues of the day, and after his retirement in 1938 freed him from military discipline, he began to aggressively promote these, going on a nationwide speaking tour. He repeatedly denounced Roosevelt’s military buildup and in an early 1939 speech, he declared that “The war now being proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” He stated that only Jews would profit from the war, claimed that leading Wall Street Jews had financed the Russian Revolution, and warned Americans not to let history repeat itself. Although Moseley’s outspokenness soon earned him a reprimand from the Roosevelt Administration, he also received private letters of support from other top generals and former president Herbert Hoover.

In his Congressional testimony just before the outbreak of World War II, Moseley became even more outspoken. He declared that the “murder squads” of Jewish Communists had killed “millions of Christians,” but that “fortunately, the character of the German people was aroused” against these traitors within their midst and that therefore “We should not blame the Germans for settling the problem of the Jew within their borders for all time.” He even urged our national leaders to “benefit” from the German example in addressing America’s own festering domestic Jewish problem.

As might be expected, Moseley’s 1939 praise of Germany’s Jewish policy in front of Congress provoked a powerful media backlash, with a lead story in The New Republic denouncing him as a Nazi “fifth columnist” and The Nation attacking him in similar fashion; and after war broke out, most public figures gradually distanced themselves. But both Eisenhower and Marshall continued to privately regard him with great admiration and remained in friendly correspondence for many years, strongly suggesting that his harsh appraisal of Jews had hardly been a deep secret within his personal circle.

Bendersky claims that Moseley’s fifty boxes of memoirs, private papers, and correspondence “embody every kind of anti-Semitic argument ever manifested in the history of Western civilization,” and based on the various extreme examples he provides, few would dispute that verdict. But he also notes that Moseley’s statements differed little from the depictions of Jews expressed by General George S. Patton immediately after World War II, and even from some retired generals well into the 1970s.

 

Although I would not question the accuracy of Bendersky’s exhaustive archival research, he seems considerably less sure-footed regarding American intellectual history and sometimes allows his personal sentiments to lead him into severe error. For example, his first chapter devotes a couple of pages to E.A. Ross, citing some of his unflattering descriptions of Jews and Jewish behavior, and suggesting he was a fanatic anti-Semite, who dreaded “the coming catastrophe of an America overrun by racially inferior people.”

But Ross was actually one of our greatest early sociologists, and his 26 page discussion of Jewish immigrants published in 1913 was scrupulously fair-minded and even-handed, describing both positive and negative characteristics, following similar chapters on Irish, German, Scandinavian, Italian, and Slavic newcomers. And although Bendersky routinely denounces his own ideological villains as “Social Darwinists,” the source he actually cites regarding Ross correctly identified the scholar as one of America’s leading critics of Social Darwinism. Indeed, Ross’s stature in left-wing circles was so great that he was selected as a member of the Dewey Commission, organized to independently adjudicate the angry conflicting accusations of Stalinists and Trotskyites. And in 1936, a Jewish leftist fulsomely praised Ross’s long and distinguished scholarly career in the pages of The New Masses, the weekly periodical of the American Communist Party, only regretting that Ross had never been willing to embrace Marxism.

Similarly, Bendersky is completely out of his depth in discussing scientific issues, especially those involving anthropology and human behavior. He ridicules the “scientific racism” that he noted was widely found among the military officers he studied, claiming that such theories had already been conclusively debunked by Franz Boas and his fellow cultural anthropologists. But modern science has firmly established that the notions he so cavalierly dismisses were substantially if not entirely correct while those of Boas and his disciples were largely fallacious, and the Boasian conquest of the academic world actually imposed a half-century Dark Age upon the anthropological sciences, much like Lysenko had done in Soviet biology. Indeed, the views of Boas, an immigrant Jew, may have been primarily motivated by ideological considerations, and his most famous early work seemed to involve outright fraud: he claimed to have proven that the shape of human heads was determined by diet, and rapidly changed among immigrant groups in America.

But far more serious than Bendersky’s lapses in areas outside of his professional expertise are the massive, glaring omissions found at the very heart of his thesis. His hundreds of pages of text certainly demonstrate that for decades our top military professionals were extremely concerned about the subversive activities of Jewish Communists, but he seems to casually dismiss those fears as nonsensical, almost delusional. Yet the actual facts are quite different. As I briefly noted last year after my cursory examination of his book:

The book runs well over 500 pages, but when I consulted the index I found no mention of the Rosenbergs nor Harry Dexter White nor any of the other very numerous Jewish spies revealed by the Venona Decrypts, and the term “Venona” itself is also missing from the index. Reports of the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership of the Russian Bolsheviks are mostly treated as bigotry and paranoia, as are descriptions of the similar ethnic skew of America’s own Communist Party, let alone the heavy financial support of the Bolsheviks by Jewish international bankers. At one point, he dismisses the link between Jews and Communism in Germany by noting that “less than half” of the Communist Party leadership was Jewish; but since fewer than one in a hundred Germans came from that ethnic background, Jews were obviously over-represented among Communist leaders by as much as 5,000%. This seems to typify the sort of dishonesty and innumeracy I have regularly encountered among Jewish Holocaust experts.

ORDER IT NOW

Admittedly, Bendersky’s book was published just 18 months after the seminal first Venona volume of John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr appeared in early 1999. But the Venona Decrypts themselves had been declassified in 1995 and soon begun circulating within the academic community. For Bendersky to stubbornly ignore the undeniable reality that a large and overwhelmingly Jewish network of Stalinist agents was situated near the top of the Roosevelt Administration, while ridiculing the military officers who made such claims at the time, raises severe doubts about his credibility as an objective historian.

As I pointed out earlier this year:

From 1941 to 1944 FDR’s Vice President was Henry Wallace, who would have succeeded to the presidency if Roosevelt had renominated him in that latter year or had died prior to early 1945. And although Wallace himself was not disloyal, his top advisors were mostly Communist agents. Indeed, he later stated that a Wallace Administration would have included Laurence Duggan as Secretary of State and Harry Dexter White as Secretary of the Treasury, thereby installing Stalinist henchmen at the top of the Cabinet, presumably supported by numerous lower-level officials of a similar political ilk. One might jokingly speculate whether the Rosenbergs—later executed for treason—would have been placed in charge of our nuclear weapons development program.

That America’s national government of the early 1940s actually came within a hair’s breadth—or rather a heart-beat—of falling under Communist control is a very uncomfortable truth. And our history books and popular media have maintained such total silence about this remarkable episode that even among today’s well-educated Americans I suspect that fewer than five in one hundred are aware of this grim reality.

The Venona Project constituted the definitive proof of the massive extent of Soviet espionage activities in America, which for many decades had been routinely denied by many mainstream journalists and historians, and it also played a crucial secret role in dismantling that hostile spy network during the late 1940s and 1950s. But Venona was nearly snuffed out just a year after its birth. In 1944 Soviet agents became aware of the crucial code-breaking effort, and soon afterwards arranged for the Roosevelt White House to issue a directive ordering the project shut down and all efforts to uncover Soviet spying abandoned. The only reason that Venona survived, allowing us to later reconstruct the fateful politics of that era, was that the determined Military Intelligence officer in charge of the project risked a court-martial by directly disobeying the explicit Presidential order and continuing his work.

That officer was Col. Carter W. Clarke, but his place in Bendersky’s book is a much less favorable one, being described as a prominent member of the anti-Semitic “clique” who constitute the villains of the narrative. Indeed, Bendersky particularly condemns Clarke for still seeming to believe in the essential reality of the Protocols as late as the 1970s, quoting from a letter he wrote to a brother officer in 1977:

If, and a big—damned big IF, as the Jews claim the Protocols of the Elders of Zion were f—- cooked up by Russian Secret Police, why is it that so much they contain has already come to pass, and the rest so strongly advocated by the Washington Post and the New York Times.

Our historians must surely have a difficult time digesting the remarkable fact that the officer in charge of the vital Venona Project, whose selfless determination saved it from destruction by the Roosevelt Administration, actually remained a lifelong believer in the importance of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

Let us take a step back and place Bendersky’s findings in their proper context. We must recognize that during much of the era covered by his research, U.S. Military Intelligence constituted nearly the entirety of America’s national security apparatus—being the equivalent of a combined CIA, NSA, and FBI—and was responsible for both international and domestic security, although the latter portfolio had gradually been assumed by J. Edgar Hoover’s own expanding organization by the end of the 1920s.

Bendersky’s years of diligent research demonstrate that for decades these experienced professionals—and many of their top commanding generals—were firmly convinced that major elements of the organized Jewish community were ruthlessly plotting to seize power in America, destroy all our traditional Constitutional liberties, and ultimately gain mastery over the entire world.

I have never believed in the existence of UFOs as alien spacecraft, always dismissing such notions as ridiculous nonsense. But suppose declassified government documents revealed that for decades nearly all of our top Air Force officers had been absolutely convinced of the reality of UFOs. Could I continue my insouciant refusal to even consider such possibilities? At the very least, those revelations would force me to sharply reassess the likely credibility of other individuals who had made similar claims during that same period.

As I wrote in 2018:

Some years ago, I came across a totally obscure 1951 book entitled The Iron Curtain Over America by John Beaty, a well-regarded university professor. Beaty had spent his wartime years in Military Intelligence, being tasked with preparing the daily briefing reports distributed to all top American officials summarizing available intelligence information acquired during the previous 24 hours, which was obviously a position of considerable responsibility.

As a zealous anti-Communist, he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive activity, therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms. In particular, the growing Jewish stranglehold over publishing and the media was making it increasingly difficult for discordant views to reach the American people, with this regime of censorship constituting the “Iron Curtain” described in his title. He blamed Jewish interests for the totally unnecessary war with Hitler’s Germany, which had long sought good relations with America, but instead had suffered total destruction for its strong opposition to Europe’s Jewish-backed Communist menace.

Beaty also sharply denounced American support for the new state of Israel, which was potentially costing us the goodwill of so many millions of Muslims and Arabs. And as a very minor aside, he also criticized the Israelis for continuing to claim that Hitler had killed six million Jews, a highly implausible accusation that had no apparent basis in reality and seemed to be just a fraud concocted by Jews and Communists, aimed at poisoning our relations with postwar Germany and extracting money for the Jewish State from the long-suffering German people.

He was scathing toward the Nuremberg Trials, which he described as a “major indelible blot” upon America and “a travesty of justice.” According to him, the proceedings were dominated by vengeful German Jews, many of whom engaged in falsification of testimony or even had criminal backgrounds. As a result, this “foul fiasco” merely taught Germans that “our government had no sense of justice.” Sen. Robert Taft, the Republican leader of the immediate postwar era took a very similar position, which later won him the praise of John F. Kennedy in Profiles in Courage. The fact that the chief Soviet prosecutor at Nuremberg had played the same role during the notorious Stalinist show trials of the late 1930s, during which numerous Old Bolsheviks confessed to all sorts of absurd and ridiculous things, hardly enhanced the credibility of the proceedings to many outside observers.

Then as now, a book taking such controversial positions stood little chance of finding a mainstream New York publisher, but it was soon released by a small Dallas firm, and then became enormously successful, going through some seventeen printings over the next few years. According to Scott McConnell, founding editor of The American Conservative, Beaty’s book became the second most popular conservative text of the 1950s, ranking only behind Russell Kirk’s iconic classic, The Conservative Mind.

Bendersky devotes several pages to a discussion of Beaty’s book, which he claims “ranks among the most vicious anti-Semitic diatribes of the postwar era.” He also describes the story of its tremendous national success, which followed an unusual trajectory.

ORDER IT NOW

Books by unknown authors that are released by tiny publishers rarely sell many copies, but the work came to the attention of George E. Stratemeyer, a retired general who had been one of Douglas MacArthur’s commanders, and he wrote Beaty a letter of endorsement. Beaty began including that letter in his promotional materials, drawing the ire of the ADL, whose national chairman contacted Stratemeyer, demanding that he repudiate the book, which was described as a “primer for lunatic fringe groups” all across America. Instead, Stratemeyer delivered a blistering reply to the ADL, denouncing it for making “veiled threats” against “free expression and thoughts” and trying to establish Soviet-style repression in the United States. He declared that every “loyal citizen” should read The Iron Curtain Over America, whose pages finally revealed the truth about our national predicament, and he began actively promoting the book around the country while attacking the Jewish attempt to silence him. Numerous other top American generals and admirals soon joined Statemeyer in publicly endorsing the work, as did a couple of influential members of the U.S. Senate, leading to its enormous national sales.

Having now discovered that Beaty’s views were so totally consistent with those of nearly all our Military Intelligence professionals, I decided to reread his short book, and found myself deeply impressed. His erudition and level-headedness were exactly what one would expect from an accomplished academic with a Columbia Ph.D. who had risen to the rank of colonel during his five years of service in Military Intelligence and on the General Staff. Although strongly anti-Communist, by all indications Beaty was very much a moderate conservative, quite judicious in his claims and proposals. Bendersky’s hysterical denunciation reflects rather badly upon the issuer of that fatwa.

Beaty’s book was written nearly 70 years ago, at the very beginning of our long Cold War, and is hardly free from various widely-held errors of that time, nor from deep concerns about various calamities that did not come to pass, such as a Third World War. Moreover, since it was published just a couple of years after Mao’s victory in China and in the midst of our own involvement in the Korean War, its discussion of those large contemporary events is far more lengthy and detailed than would probably be of interest to present-day readers. But leaving aside those minor blemishes, I think the account he provides of the true circumstances behind America’s involvement in both the First and Second World Wars and their immediate aftermath is greatly superior to the heavily slanted and expurgated versions we find in our standard history books. And Beaty’s daily wartime responsibility for collating and summarizing all incoming intelligence information and then producing a digest for distribution to the White House and our other top officials surely provided him a far more accurate picture of the reality than that of the typical third-hand scribe.

At the very least, we should acknowledge that Beaty’s volume provides an excellent summary of the beliefs of American Military Intelligence officers and many of our top generals during the first half of the twentieth century. With copyright having long lapsed, I’m pleased to make it available in convenient HTML format, allowing those so interested to read it and judge for themselves:

 

Despite Bendersky’s fulminations, Beaty seems to have been someone of quite moderate sentiments, who viewed extremism of any type with great disfavor. After describing the ongoing seizure of power in American society by Jewish immigrants, mostly aligned with international Zionism or international Communism, his suggested responses were strikingly inoffensive. He urged American citizens to demonstrate their disapproval by writing letters to their newspapers and elected officials, signing petitions, and providing their political support to the patriotic elements of both the Democratic and Republican parties. He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.

Others of similar background and views sometimes moved in far more extreme directions. About a dozen years ago I began noticing scattered references on fringe websites to a certain Revilo P. Oliver, an oddly-named political activist of the mid-twentieth century, apparently of enormous stature in Far Right circles. According to these accounts, after important World War II service at the War Department, he began a long and distinguished career as a Classics professor at the University of Illinois. Then, beginning in the mid-1950s, he became active in politics, establishing himself as a leading figure in the early days of both National Review and the John Birch Society, though he eventually broke with both those organizations when he came to regard them as too politically-compromised and ineffective. Thereafter, he gradually became more angry and extreme in his views, and by 1974 had become friendly with William Pierce of the National Alliance, suggesting the theme for his novel The Turner Diaries which sold hundreds of thousands of copies as a huge underground bestseller and according to federal prosecutors later served as the inspiration for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombings.

ORDER IT NOW

Although I had never heard of Oliver nor his unusual career, most of the facts I could verify seemed correct. The early years of National Review had carried more than 100 of his articles and reviews and a major feature in The Saturday Evening Post discussed his rancorous break with The John Birch Society. A few years later, I became sufficiently curious that I ordered his 1981 book America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, containing his personal memoir and many of his writings. So few were available, that by chance the one I received was the author’s own personal copy, with his address label glued to the cover and including a few pages of his personal correspondence and errata notes sent to his publisher. These days, the numerous copies available for sale on Amazon start at an outrageous price of almost $150, but fortunately the book is also freely available for reading or downloading at Archive.org.

When I first read Oliver’s book seven or eight years ago, it constituted one of my earliest exposures to the literature of the Far Right, and I was not at all sure what to make of it. His enormous classical erudition was quite apparent, but his political rhetoric seemed totally outrageous, with the word “conspiracy” used with wild abandon, seemingly on almost every other page. Given his bitter political feuds with so many other right-wingers and the total lack of any mainstream endorsements, I viewed his claims with a great deal of skepticism, though a number of them stuck in my mind. However, after having very recently absorbed the remarkable material presented by Bendersky and reread Beaty, I decided to revisit Oliver’s volume, and see what I thought of it the second time round.

 

Revilo P. Oliver, 1963.  Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Revilo P. Oliver, 1963. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Bendersky makes no mention of Oliver, which is unfortunate since all the spurious accusations he had leveled against Ross and Beaty would have been entirely correct if made against Oliver. Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him exactly the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding. A good indication of the explicit harshness of Oliver’s sentiments appears on the very first page of his preface, when he ridicules the total ineffectiveness of conservatives in combating “the existing situation, which has resulted from the invasion of their country by hordes of aliens who are, by a biological necessity, their racial enemies.” This sort of statement would have been unimaginable in Beaty, who emphasized Christian charity and goodwill.

More than half of the fairly long text consists of pieces that appeared during 1955-1966 in National Review, American Opinion (the Birch magazine), and Modern Age, generally book reviews. Most of the topics are hardly of great current interest, and discuss the internal conflicts of Ancient Rome, or perhaps provide Oliver’s views on Spengler, Toynbee, John Dewey, or Haitian history; but the material certainly establishes the impressive intellectual breadth of the author. According to the book’s introduction, Oliver was conversant in eleven languages, including Sanskrit, and I can well credit that claim.

As mentioned, Oliver particularly despised Christianity and Christian preachers, and he devoted a substantial portion of the remainder of the book to ridiculing them and their doctrines, often deploying his great scholarship laced with crude invective, and generally writing in an arch, rather droll style. Although not of much interest to me, I’d think that those who share Oliver’s religious disinclinations might find his remarks rather amusing.

However, the remaining one-third or so of the volume is focused on factual and political matters, much of the material being quite significant. According to the back cover, Oliver had spent World War II as director of a secret research group at the War Department, leading a staff that eventually grew to 175, and afterward being cited for his outstanding government service. His statements certainly present himself as extremely knowledgeable about the “hidden history” of that war, and he minced absolutely no words about his views. The combination of his strong academic background, his personal vantage point, and his extreme outspokenness would make him a uniquely valuable source on all those matters.

But that value is tempered by his credibility, cast into serious doubt by his often wild rhetoric. Whereas I would consider Beaty’s book quite reliable, at least relative to the best information available at the time, and might place Henry Ford’s The International Jew in much the same category, I would tend to be far more cautious in accepting Oliver’s claims, especially given the strong emotions he expressed. Aside from his many reprinted articles, the rest of the book was written when he was in his seventies, and he repeatedly expressed his political despair concerning his many years of total failure in various right-wing projects. He declared that he had lost any hope of ever restoring the Aryan-controlled America of 1939, and instead foresaw our country’s inevitable decline, alongside that of the rest of Western civilization. Moreover, many of the events he recounts had occurred three or four decades earlier, and even under the best of circumstances his recollections might have become a little garbled.

That being said, in rereading Oliver I was struck by how much of his description of America’s involvement in the two world wars seemed so entirely consistent with Beaty’s account, or that of numerous other highly-regarded journalists and historians of that era, such as the contributors to Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace. I had encountered this material some years after reading Oliver’s book, and it greatly buttressed his credibility.

But unlike those other writers, Oliver often framed the same basic facts in extremely dramatic fashion. For example, he denounced Churchill’s 1940 aerial bombing strategy as the most monstrous sort of war crime:

Great Britain, in violation of all the ethics of civilized warfare that had theretofore been respected by our race, and in treacherous violation of solemnly assumed diplomatic covenants about “open cities”, had secretly carried out intensive bombing of such open cities in Germany for the express purpose of killing enough unarmed and defenceless men and women to force the German government reluctantly to retaliate and bomb British cities and thus kill enough helpless British men, women, and children to generate among Englishmen enthusiasm for the insane war to which their government had committed them.

It is impossible to imagine a governmental act more vile and more depraved than contriving death and suffering for its own people — for the very citizens whom it was exhorting to “loyalty” — and I suspect that an act of such infamous and savage treason would have nauseated even Genghis Khan or Hulagu or Tamerlane, Oriental barbarians universally reprobated for their insane blood-lust. History, so far as I recall, does not record that they ever butchered their own women and children to facilitate lying propaganda….In 1944 members of British Military Intelligence took it for granted that after the war Marshal Sir Arthur Harris would be hanged or shot for high treason against the British people…

At the time I originally read those words, my knowledge of World War II was mostly limited to half-remembered portions of my old History 101 textbooks, and I was naturally quite skeptical at Oliver’s astonishing charges. But during subsequent years, I discovered that the circumstances were exactly as Oliver claimed, with so notable a historian as David Irving having fully documented the evidence. So although we may question Oliver’s exceptionally harsh characterization or his heated rhetoric, the factual case he makes seems not to be under serious dispute.

His discussion of America’s own entrance in the war is equally strident. He emphasizes that his colleagues in the War Department had completely broken the most secure Japanese codes, giving our government complete knowledge of all Japanese plans:

Perhaps the most exhilarating message ever read by American Military Intelligence was one sent by the Japanese government to their Ambassador in Berlin (as I recall), urging him not to hesitate to communicate certain information by telegrams and assuring him that “no human mind” could decipher messages that had been enciphered on the Purple Machine. That assurance justified the merriment it provoked…

However, just as many others have alleged, Oliver claims that Roosevelt then deliberately allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to proceed and failed to warn the local military commanders, whom he then ordered court-martialed for their negligence:

Everyone now knows, of course, that the message to the Japanese Ambassador in Washington, warning him that Japan was about to attack the United States, was read by Military Intelligence not long after the Ambassador himself received it, and that the frantic cover-up, involving some successful lying about details, was intended, not to preserve that secret, but to protect the traitors in Washington who made certain that the Japanese attack, which they had labored so long to provoke, would be successful and produce the maximum loss of American lives and destruction of American ships.

Numerous historians seem to have thoroughly established that Roosevelt did everything he could to provoke a war with Japan. But Oliver adds a fascinating detail that I have never seen mentioned elsewhere:

In January 1941, almost eleven months before Pearl Harbor, preparation for it began in Washington when Franklin D Roosevelt summoned the Portuguese Ambassador to the United States and, enjoining him to the utmost secrecy, asked him to inform Premier Salazar that Portugal need have no concern for the safety of Timor and her other possessions in Southeast Asia; the United States, he said, had decided to crush Japan forever by waiting until her military forces and lines of communication were stretched to the utmost and then suddenly launching an all-out war with massive attacks that Japan was not, and could not be, prepared to resist. As expected, the Portuguese Ambassador communicated the glad tidings to the head of his government, using his most secure method of communication, an enciphered code which the Portuguese doubtless imagined to be “unbreakable,” but which Roosevelt well knew had been compromised by the Japanese, who were currently reading all messages sent in it by wireless. The statement, ostensibly entrusted in “strict secrecy” to the Portuguese Ambassador, was, of course, intended for the Japanese government, and, as a matter of fact, it became certain that the trick had succeeded when the contents of the Portuguese Ambassador’s message to Salazar promptly appeared in a Japanese message enciphered by the Purple Machine. Roosevelt had only to wait for Japan to act on the “secret” information about American plans thus given her, and to order naval movements and diplomatic negotiations that would appear to the Japanese to confirm American intentions.

The fact that I have just mentioned is really the ultimate secret of Pearl Harbor, and seems to have been unknown to Admiral Theobald when he wrote his well-known book on the subject.

Oliver notes that Roosevelt had long sought to have America participate in the great European war whose outbreak he had previously orchestrated, but had been blocked by overwhelming domestic anti-war sentiment. His decision to provoke a Japanese attack as a “back door” to war only came after all his military provocations against Germany had failed to accomplish a similar result:

His first plan was defeated by the prudence of the German government. While he yammered about the evils of aggression to the white Americans whom he despised and hated, Roosevelt used the United States Navy to commit innumerable acts of stealthy and treacherous aggression against Germany in a secret and undeclared war, hidden from the American people, hoping that such massive piracy would eventually so exasperate the Germans that they would declare war on the United States, whose men and resources could then be squandered to punish the Germans for trying to have a country of their own. These foul acts of the War Criminal were known, of course, to the officers and men of the Navy that carried out the orders of their Commander-in-Chief, and were commonly discussed in informed circles, but, so far as I know, were first and much belatedly chronicled by Patrick Abbazia in Mr. Roosevelt’s Navy: the Private War of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet, 1939-1942, published by the Naval Institute Press in Annapolis in 1975.

…Although the U.S. Navy’s acts of outrageous piracy on the high seas were successfully concealed from the majority of the American people before Pearl Harbor, they were, of course, well known to the Japanese, and partly account for Roosevelt’s success in deceiving them with his “confidences” to the Portuguese Ambassador…they assumed that when Roosevelt was ready to attack them, his power over the American press and communications would enable him to simulate an attack they had not in fact made. That the deception was successful was, of course, shown in December 1941, when they made a desperate effort to avert the treacherous blow they feared.

Once America thus entered the war, Oliver then focuses on the horrific way the Allies waged it, using aerial bombardment to deliberately slaughter the civilian population of Germany:

Both British and Americans have always claimed to be humane and have loudly condemned unnecessary bloodshed, mass massacres, and sadistic delight in the infliction of pain…in 1945 their professions could still be credited without doubt, and that meant they would be stricken with remorse for a ferocious act of unmitigated savagery unparalleled in the history of our race and unsurpassed in the record of any race. The bombing of the unfortified city of Dresden, nicely timed to insure an agonizing death to the maximum number of white women and children, has been accurately described by David Irving in The Destruction of Dresden (London, 1963), but the essentials of that sickening atrocity were known soon after it was perpetrated. To be sure, it is true that such an act might have been ordered by Hulagu, the celebrated Mongol who found pleasure in ordering the extermination of the population of all cities that did not open their gates to him — and of some that did — so that the severed heads of the inhabitants could be piled up into pyramids as perishable but impressive monuments to his glory. The Americans and British, however, deem themselves more civilized than Hulagu and less sadistic.

He also harshly condemns the very brutal nature of the American occupation of Germany that followed the end of the war:

…with the American invasion of German territory began the innumerable atrocities against her civilian population — the atrocities against prisoners began even earlier — that have brought on our people the reputation of Attila’s hordes. The outrages were innumerable and no one, so far as I know, has even tried to compile a list of typical incidents of rape and torture and mayhem and murder. Most of the unspeakable atrocities, it is true, were committed by savages and Jews in American uniforms, but many, it must be confessed, were perpetrated by Americans, louts from the dregs of our own society or normal men crazed with hatred. All victorious armies, it is true, contain elements that want to outrage the vanquished, and few commanders in “democratic” wars can maintain the tight discipline that made Wellington’s armies the marvels of Europe or the discipline that generally characterized the German armies in both World Wars; what so brands us with shame is that the atrocities were encouraged by our supreme commander in Europe, whose orders, presumably issued when he was not drunk or occupied with his doxies, made it difficult or hazardous for responsible American generals to observe what had been the rules of civilized warfare. Almost every American soldier in Germany had witnessed the barbarous treatment of the vanquished, the citizens of one of the greatest nations of Western civilization and our own kinsmen, and — despite the efforts to incite them to inhuman hate with Jewish propaganda — many of our soldiers witnessed such outrages with pity and shame. The cumulative effect of their reports when they returned to their own country should have been great. It is needless to multiply examples, some of which may be found in F.J.P. Veale’s Advance to Barbarism (London, 1953).

And he suggests that the Nuremberg Tribunals brought everlasting shame upon his own country:

I was, of course, profoundly shocked by the foul murders at Nuremberg that brought on the American people an indelible shame. Savages and Oriental barbarians normally kill, with or without torture, the enemies whom they have overcome, but even they do not sink so low in the scale of humanity as to perform the obscene farce of holding quasi-judicial trials before they kill, and had the Americans — for, given their absolute power, the responsibility must fall on them, and their guilt cannot be shifted to their supposed allies — had the Americans, I say, merely slaughtered the German generals, they could claim to be morally no worse than Apaches, Balubas, and other primitives. Civilized peoples spare the lives of the vanquished, showing to their leaders a respectful consideration, and the deepest instincts of our race demand a chivalrous courtesy to brave opponents whom the fortunes of war have put in our power.

To punish warriors who, against overwhelming odds, fought for their country with a courage and determination that excited the wonder of the world, and deliberately to kill them because they were not cowards and traitors, because they did not betray their nation — that was an act of vileness of which we long believed our race incapable. And to augment the infamy of our act, we stigmatized them as “War Criminals” which they most certainly were not, for if that phrase has meaning, it applies to traitors who knowingly involve their nations in a war contrived to inflict loss, suffering, and death on their own people, who are thus made to fight for their own effective defeat — traitors such as Churchill, Roosevelt, and their white accomplices. And to add an ultimate obscenity to the sadistic crime, “trials” were held to convict the vanquished according to “laws” invented for the purpose, and on the basis of perjured testimony extorted from prisoners of war by torture…

…The moral responsibility for those fiendish crimes, therefore, falls on our own War Criminals, and, as a practical matter, nations always bear the responsibility for the acts of the individuals whom they, however mistakenly, placed in power. We cannot reasonably blame Dzhugashvili, alias Stalin: he was not a War Criminal, for he acted, logically and ruthlessly, to augment the power and the territory of the Soviet Empire, and he (whatever his personal motives may have been) was the architect of the regime that transformed a degraded and barbarous rabble into what is now the greatest military power on earth.

Oliver’s memoirs were published by a tiny London press in a cheap paper binding, lacked even an index, and were hardly likely to ever reach a substantial audience. That, together with the internal evidence of his text, leads me to believe that he was quite sincere in his statements, at least with regard to all these sorts of historical and political matters. And given those beliefs, we should hardly be surprised at the heated rhetoric he directs against the targets of his wrath, especially Roosevelt, whom he repeatedly references as “the great War Criminal.”

Sincerity is obviously no guarantee of accuracy. But Bendersky’s extensive review of private letters and personal memoirs reveals that a large portion of our Military Intelligence officers and top generals seemed to closely share Oliver’s appraisal of Roosevelt, whose eventual death provoked widespread “exultation” and “fierce delight” in their social circle. Finally, one of them wrote, “The evil man was dead!”

Moreover, although Oliver’s words are as heated as those of Beaty are measured, the factual claims of the two authors are quite similar with regard to World War II, so that all the high-ranking generals who enthusiastically endorsed Beaty’s bestselling 1951 book may be regarded as providing some implicit backing for Oliver.

Consider also the personal diaries and reported conversations of Gen. George S. Patton, one of our most renowned field commanders. These reveal that shortly after the end of fighting he became outraged over how he had been totally deceived regarding the circumstances of the conflict, and he planned to return to the U.S., resign his military commission, and begin a national speaking-tour to provide the American people with the true facts about the war. Instead, he died in a highly-suspicious car accident the day before his scheduled departure, and there is very considerable evidence that he was actually assassinated by the American OSS.

 

Oliver’s discussion of the Second World War provides remarkably vivid rhetorical flourishes and some intriguing details, but his basic analysis is not so different from that of Beaty or numerous other writers. Moreover, Beaty had a far superior vantage point during the conflict, while his book was published just a few years after the end of fighting and was also far more widely endorsed and distributed. So although Oliver’s extreme candor may add much color to our historical picture, I think his memoirs are probably more useful for their other elements, such as his unique insights into the origins of both National Review and the John Birch Society, two of the leading right-wing organizations established during the 1950s.

Oliver opens his book by describing his departure from DC and wartime government service in the fall of 1945, fully confident that the horrific national treachery he had witnessed at the top of the American government would soon inspire “a reaction of national indignation that would become sheer fury.” As he puts it:

That reaction, I thought, would occur automatically, and my only concern was for the welfare of a few friends who had innocently and ignorantly agitated for war before the unspeakable monster in the White House successfully tricked the Japanese into destroying the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. I wondered whether a plea of ignorance would save them from the reprisals I foresaw!

He spent the next decade entirely engaged in his Classical scholarship and establishing an academic career, while noting some of the hopeful early signs of the political uprising that he fully expected to see:

In 1949 Congressman Rankin introduced a bill that would recognize as subversive and outlaw the “Anti-“Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the formidable organization of Jewish cowboys who ride herd on their American cattle…In both the Houses of Representatives and the Senate committees were beginning investigations of covert treason and alien subversion…Then Senator McCarthy undertook a somewhat more thorough investigation, which seemed to open a visible leak in the vast dike of deceit erected by our enemies, and it was easy to assume that the little jet of water that spurted through that leak would grow hydraulically until the dam broke and released an irresistible flood.

However, by 1954 he recognized that McCarthy’s political destruction was at hand, and the opposing forces he so despised had gained the upper hand. He faced the crucial decision of whether to involve himself in politics, and if so, what form that might take.

One of his friends, a right-wing Yale professor named Wilmoore Kendall, argued that a crucial factor in the Jewish domination of American public life was their control over influential opinion journals such as The Nation and The New Republic, and that launching a competing publication might be the most effective remedy. For this purpose, he had recruited a prize student of his named William F. Buckley, Jr., who could draw upon the financial resources of his wealthy father, long known in certain circles for his discreet sponsorship of various anti-Jewish publications and “his drastic private opinion about the aliens’ perversion of our national life.”

A few years earlier, H.L. Mencken’s famous literary monthly The American Mercury had fallen on hard times and been purchased by one of America’s wealthiest men, Russell Maguire, who hoped to use it partly as a vehicle for his extremely strong anti-Jewish sentiments. Indeed, one of Maguire’s senior staffers for a couple of years was George Lincoln Rockwell, best known for later founding the American Nazi Party. But according to Oliver, enormous concerted pressure by Jewish interests upon both newstands and printers had caused great difficulties for that magazine, which were to eventually force Maguire to abandon the effort and sell the magazine.

Kendall and Oliver hoped that Buckley’s new effort might succeed where Maguire’s was failing, perhaps by avoiding any direct mention of Jewish issues and instead focusing upon threats from Communists, socialists, and liberals, who were far less risky targets to attack. Buckley had previously gained some journalistic experience by working at the Mercury for a couple of years, so he was probably well aware of the challenging political environment he might face.

Although L. Brent Bozell, another one of his young Yale proteges, would also be working with Buckley on the new venture, Kendall told Oliver that he had failed to locate a single university professor willing to risk his name as a contributor. This prompted Oliver to take up the challenge with such determination that more of his pieces appeared in National Review during the 1950s than almost any other writer, even ahead of Kendall himself. Apparently Oliver had already been friendly with Buckley, having been a member of the latter’s 1950 wedding party.

But from Oliver’s perspective, the project proved a dismal failure. Against all advice, Buckley founded his magazine as a profit-making enterprise, circulating a prospectus, selling stock and debentures, and promising his financial backers an excellent financial return. Instead, like every other political magazine, it always lost money and was soon forced to plead for donations, greatly irritating his initial investors.

Another concern was that just before launch, a couple of Jewish former Communists then running an existing conservative magazine caught wind of the new publication and offered to betray their employer and bring over all their existing subscribers if they were given senior roles. Although they were duly brought on board, their planned coup at The Freeman failed, and no promised bounty of subscribers appeared. In later hindsight, Oliver became deeply suspicious of these developments and how the publication had been so quickly diverted from its intended mission, writing:

…it was only long after Professor Kendall had been shouldered out of the organization and I had severed my connections with it that I perceived that whenever a potentially influential journal is founded, it receives the assistance of talented “conservative” Jews, who are charged with the duty of supervising the Aryan children and making certain that they play only approved games.

Oliver also emphasized the severe dilemma faced by the magazine and all other organizations intended to combat the influence of Jews and Communists. For obvious reasons, these almost invariably centered themselves around strong support for Christianity. But Oliver was a militant atheist who detested religious faith and therefore believed that such an approach inevitably alienated “the very large number of educated men who…were repelled by the hypocrisy, obscurantism, and rabid ambitions of the clergy.” Thus, Christian anti-Communist movements often tended to produce a large backlash of sympathy for Communism in elite circles.

Small ideological publications are notorious for their bitter intrigues and angry disputes, and I have made no effort to compare Oliver’s brief sketch of the creation of National Review with other accounts, which would surely provide very different perspectives. But I think his basic facts ring true to me.

 

By 1958 Oliver had established himself as one of National Review‘s leading contributors, and he was contacted by a wealthy Massachusetts businessman named Robert Welch, who had been an early investor in the magazine but was greatly disappointed by its political ineffectiveness, so the two men corresponded and gradually became quite friendly. Welch said he was concerned that the publication focused largely on frivolity and pseudo-literary endeavors, while it increasingly minimized or ignored the conspiratorial role of the Jewish aliens who had gained such a degree of control over the country. The two men eventually met, and according to Oliver seemed to be entirely in agreement about America’s plight, which they discussed in complete candor.

Late that same year, Welch described his plans for regaining control of the country by the creation of a semi-secret national organization of patriotic individuals, primarily drawn from the upper middle classes and prosperous businessmen, which eventually became known as the John Birch Society. With its structure and strategy inspired by the Communist Party, it was to be tightly organized into individual local cells, whose members would then establish a network of front organizations for particular political projects, all seemingly unconnected but actually under their dominant influence. Secret directives would be passed along to each local chapter by the word of mouth via coordinators dispatched from Welch’s central headquarters, a system also modeled after the strict hierarchical discipline of Communist movements.

Welch privately unveiled his proposal to a small group of prospective co-founders, all of whom with the exception of Oliver were wealthy businessmen. He candidly admitted his own atheism and explained that Christianity would have no role in the project, which cost him a couple of potential supporters; but about a dozen committed themselves, notably including Fred Koch, founding father of Koch Industries. Minimal emphasis was to be placed upon Jewish matters, partly to avoid drawing media fire and partly in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East.

As the project moved forward, a monthly magazine called American Opinion was launched and Oliver took responsibility for a large portion of each issue. Given his academic and political prominence, he also became one of the leading speakers for the organization in public venues and also an influential visitor to many of its local chapters.

Although Oliver remained a top figure in the organization until 1966, in later years he concluded that Welch’s serious mistakes had doomed the project to failure within just a couple of years after its establishment. Very early on, a Jewish journalist had obtained a copy of some of Welch’s secret, controversial writings and their public disclosure had panicked one of the most prominent Birch leaders, soon producing a major media scandal. Welch repeatedly vacillated between defending and denying his secret manuscript, forcing his associates to take contradictory positions, and making the entire leadership seem both dishonest and ridiculous, a pattern that was to be repeated in future years.

According to Oliver, nearly eighty thousand men and women enlisted in the organization during the first decade, but he feared that their energetic efforts and commitment were entirely wasted, producing nothing of any value. As the years went by, the organization’s ineffectiveness became more apparent, while Welch’s autocratic control blocked any necessary changes from within since his executive council functioned merely as a powerless fig-leaf. Although Oliver remained convinced that Welch had been sincere when he began the effort, the accumulation of so many unnecessary missteps eventually led him to suspect deliberate sabotage. He claimed that his careful investigation revealed that the organization’s financial problems had forced Welch to turn in desperation to outside Jewish donors, who then became his secret overlords, leading Oliver to rancorously break with the organization in 1966 and denounce it as a fraud. Although I have no easy means of verifying most of Oliver’s claims, his story hardly seems implausible.

Oliver also makes an important point about the severe dilemma produced by Welch’s strategy. One of the central goals of the organization had been to combat organized Jewish influence in America, but any mention of Jews was forbidden, so the officially designed term for their subversive foes was the “International Communist Conspiracy.” Oliver admitted that the usage of that ubiquitous phrase became “forced” and “monotonous,” and indeed it or its variants appear with remarkable regularity in his articles reprinted from the Birch magazine.

According to Oliver, the intent was to allow members to draw their own logical conclusions about who was really behind the “conspiracy” they opposed while allowing the organization itself to maintain plausible deniability. But the result was total failure, with Jewish organizations fully understanding the game being played, while intelligent individuals quickly concluded that the Birch organization was either dishonest or delusional, hardly an unreasonable inference. As an example of this situation, the late investigative journalist Michael Collins Piper in 2005 told the story of how at the age of sixteen he had embraced a ‘One-Minute’ Membership in the John Birch Society. Indeed, by the late 1960s, any public expressions of anti-Semitism by Birch members became grounds for immediate expulsion, a rather ironic situation for an organization originally founded just a decade earlier with avowedly anti-Semitic goals.

 

Following his 1966 rupture with Welch, Oliver greatly reduced his political writing, which henceforth only appeared in much smaller and more extreme venues than the Birch magazine. His book contains just a couple of such later pieces, but the second of these, published in a right-wing British magazine during 1980, is of some interest.

Just as we might expect, Oliver had always been particularly scathing towards the supposed Jewish Holocaust, and near the very beginning of his book, he states his own views in typically forceful fashion:

The Americans…were howling with indignation over the supposed extermination by the Germans of some millions of Jews, many of whom had taken the opportunity to crawl into the United States, and…one could have supposed in 1945 that when the hoax, devised to pep up the cattle that were being stampeded into Europe, was exposed, even Americans would feel some indignation at having been so completely bamboozled.

The prompt exposure of the bloody swindle seemed inevitable, particularly since the agents of the O.S.S., commonly known in military circles as the Office of Soviet Stooges, who had been dispatched to conquered Germany to set up gas chambers to lend some verisimilitude to the hoax, had been so lazy and feckless that they merely sent back pictures of shower baths, which were so absurd that they had to be suppressed to avoid ridicule. No one could have believed in 1945 that the lie would be used to extort thirty billion dollars from the helpless Germans and would be rammed into the minds of German children by uncouth American “educators” — or that civilized men would have to wait until 1950 for Paul Rassinier, who had been himself a prisoner in a German concentration camp, to challenge the infamous lie, or until 1976 for Professor Arthur Butz’s detailed and exhaustive refutation of the venomous imposture on Aryan credulity.

In his republished article, Oliver discussed this same topic at far greater length and in the context of its broader theoretical implications. After recounting various examples of historical frauds and cover-ups, starting with the possibly forged letter of the younger Pliny, he expressed his amazement at the continuing widespread acceptance of the Holocaust story, despite the existence of hundreds of thousands of direct eyewitnesses to the contrary. He suggested that such an astonishing scholarly situation must force us to reassess our assumptions about the nature of evidentiary methods in historiography.

Oliver’s peremptory dismissal of the standard Holocaust narrative led me to take a closer look at the treatment of the same topic in Bendersky’s book, and I noticed something quite odd. As discussed above, his exhaustive research in official files and personal archives conclusively established that during World War II a very considerable fraction of all our Military Intelligence officers and top generals were vehemently hostile to Jewish organizations and also held beliefs that today would be regarded as utterly delusional. The author’s academic specialty is Holocaust studies, so it is hardly surprising that his longest chapter focused on that particular subject, bearing the title “Officers and the Holocaust, 1940-1945.” But a close examination of the contents raises some troubling questions.

Across more than sixty pages, Bendersky provides hundreds of direct quotes, mostly from the same officers who are the subject of the rest of his book. But after carefully reading the chapter twice, I was unable to find a single one of those statements referring to the massive slaughter of Jews that constitutes what we commonly call the Holocaust, nor to any of its central elements, such as the existence of death camps or gas chambers.

The forty page chapter that follows focuses on the plight of the Jewish “survivors” in post-war Europe, and the same utter silence applies. Bendersky is disgusted by the cruel sentiments expressed by these American military men towards the Jewish former camp inmates, and he frequently quotes them characterizing the latter as thieves, liars, and criminals; but the officers seem strangely unaware that those unfortunate souls had only just barely escaped an organized mass extermination campaign that had so recently claimed the lives of the vast majority of their fellows. Numerous statements and quotes regarding Jewish extermination are provided, but all of these come from various Jewish activists and organizations, while there is nothing but silence from all of the military officers themselves.

Bendersky’s ten years of archival research brought to light personal letters and memoirs of military officers written decades after the end of the war, and in both those chapters he freely quotes from these invaluable materials, sometimes including private remarks from the late 1970s, long after the Holocaust had become a major topic in American public life. Yet not a single statement of sadness, regret, or horror is provided. Thus, a prominent Holocaust historian spends a decade researching a book about the private views of our military officers towards Jews and Jewish topics, but the one hundred pages he devotes to the Holocaust and its immediate aftermath contains not a single directly-relevant quote from those individuals, which is simply astonishing. A yawning chasm seems to exist at the center of his lengthy historical volume, or put another way, a particular barking dog is quite deafening in its silence.

I am not an archival researcher and have no interest in reviewing the many tens of thousands of pages of source material located at dozens of repositories across the country that Bendersky so diligently examined while producing his important book. Perhaps during their entire wartime activity and also the decades of their later lives, not a single one of the hundred-odd important military officers who were the focus of his investigation ever once broached the subject of the Holocaust or the slaughter of Jews during World War II. But I think there is another distinct possibly.

As mentioned earlier, Beaty spent his war years carefully reviewing the sum-total of all incoming intelligence information each day and then producing an official digest for distribution to the White House and our other top leaders. And in his 1951 book, published just a few years after the end of fighting, he dismissed the supposed Holocaust as a ridiculous wartime concoction by dishonest Jewish and Communist propagandists that had no basis in reality. Soon afterward, Beaty’s book was fully endorsed and promoted by many of our leading World War II generals, including those who were subjects of Bendersky’s archival research. And although the ADL and various other Jewish organizations fiercely denounced Beaty, there is no sign that they ever challenged his absolutely explicit “Holocaust denial.”

I suspect that Bendersky gradually discovered that such “Holocaust denial” was remarkably common in the private papers of many of his Military Intelligence officers and top generals, which presented him with a serious dilemma. If only one or two of those individuals had expressed such sentiments, their shocking statements could be cited as further evidence of their delusional anti-Semitism. But what if a substantial majority of those officers—who certainly had possessed the best knowledge of the reality of World War II—held private beliefs that were very similar to those publicly expressed by their former colleagues Beaty and Oliver? In such a situation, Bendersky may have decided that certain closed doors should remain in that state, and entirely skirted the topic.

 

At the age of 89, Richard Lynn surely ranks as the “grand old man” of IQ research, and in 2002 he and his co-author Tatu Vanhanen published their seminal work IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Their volume strongly argued that mental ability as measured by standardized tests was overwhelmingly determined by hereditary, genetic factors, and for nearly two decades their research findings have constituted a central pillar of the IQ movement that they have long inspired. But as I argued in a major article several years ago, the massive quantity of evidence they presented actually demonstrates the exact opposite conclusion:

We are now faced with a mystery arguably greater than that of IQ itself. Given the powerful ammunition that Lynn and Vanhanen have provided to those opposing their own “Strong IQ Hypothesis,” we must wonder why this has never attracted the attention of either of the warring camps in the endless, bitter IQ dispute, despite their alleged familiarity with the work of these two prominent scholars. In effect, I would suggest that the heralded 300-page work by Lynn and Vanhanen constituted a game-ending own-goal against their IQ-determinist side, but that neither of the competing ideological teams ever noticed.

For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect. Janet Mertz and her zealously feminist co-authors expended enormous time and effort to conclusively establish that across nearly all nations of the world, regardless of culture, region, language, the group of highest-performing math students has almost always been roughly 95% male and just 5% female, a result that would seem to deeply undercut their hypothesis that men and women have equal mathematical ability.

Similarly, ten years of exhaustive archival research by Joseph Bendersky produced a volume that seems to utterly demolish our conventional narrative of Jewish political activism in both Europe and America between the two world wars. Moreover, when carefully considered I think his text constitutes a dagger aimed with deadly accuracy straight at the heart of our conventional Holocaust narrative, his own lifelong area of study and a central pillar of the West’s current ideological framework.

Over the last year or two, pressure from the ADL and other Jewish activist organizations has induced Amazon to ban all books that challenge the Holocaust or other beliefs deeply held by organized Jewry. Most of these purged works are quite obscure, and many are of indifferent quality. In general, their public impact has been severely diminished by the real or perceived ideological associations of their authors.

Meanwhile, for nearly twenty years a book of absolutely devastating historical importance has sat on the Amazon shelves, freely available for sale and bearing glowing cover-blurbs by mainstream, reputable scholars, but by its Amazon sales-rank, selling almost no copies, a massive, unexploded shell whom nearly no one seems to have properly recognized. I suggest that interested readers purchase their copies of Bendersky’s outstanding opus before steps are taken to permanently flush it down the memory hole.

Related Reading:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 1620 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anonymous[469] • Disclaimer says:

    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it’s trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    , @kikz
    often wondered same.........................to include taking the 'pulse of the street'....
    , @peterAUS

    Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve?
     
    Both.
    , @Earth Ling
    I wonder what in the hell do we do now?

    Ron, thank you so much for the uncompromising, incredibly brave, exhaustive and meticulous research and writing you do and share.

    Now what? How do we break through the insane power the Jewish controlled media, govt, etc to reach our fellow Gentiles and Jews who do not want this murderous, conniving, Talmudic Bolshevism to rule the world?

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed. Thank God for the brave Jews who are uncovering the horrific misdeeds of the Jewish tribal elites. If I didn't at least have these Jews as my primary sources (Unz, Atzmon, Finkelstein, ... ) I would have no chance whatsoever.
    , @Titus
    They still get some mileage out of this site with Unz's occasional disinfo injections as well as that of others. Shamir's recent denial of the Bolshevik Revolution as a Jewish operation, Fred Reed's back door globalism idiocy and appeals to the shady historiography of David Irving are but a few examples.

    Even so, as you say, it does function as a social safety valve.
  2. FB says: • Website

    A very insightful article…only not in the way Mr Unz intended…

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military…the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…

    Now I understand the ‘intellectual’ nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on…I’m sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States…which is actually still ongoing…but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site…fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers…

    As for Mr Unz’s conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center…the Holocaust…well it’s because ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?

    Mr Unz’s conclusion about the ‘fatal flaw’ of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence…none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews…ergo it didn’t happen…LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide…or if not, what percentage…this important question remains a mystery…so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity…or a tiny minority…?

    Hmm…

    • Disagree: freedom-cat
    • Replies: @Blake
    Honestly get a life.
    , @Anonymous
    ADL checking in on you, Ronald. Lol.
    , @Parfois1

    ...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…
     
    The "obscure crackpot" was an eye-witness to the momentous events of his time and had access to the inner secrets of the war machine. He may have been an ultra-nationalist right-winger but that is not a good reason to dismiss his account of the historical facts unfolding before his eyes. Besides, his perception and interpretation of those events conform with the recent perspectives of other investigators who have demolished same sacrosanct dogmas about WWII and its aftermath.

    From this taste of his writing style and choice of words one can almost feel the outpouring of a man who had been deceived and outraged by the hypocritical official narrative and deceptions of the men in power. It is men like Revilo Oliver who open to us the windows into the workings of our masters and they should be honoured for their honesty and courage independently of one's political views.

    Full marks to Ron Unz for this article. By the way, his first name is not that odd: read it back to front. A little parental puzzle it seems.
    , @skrik

    are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...
     
    Err, ... Petitio Principii, much?
    , @Rabbitnexus
    I bet you had to squirm a bit whilst you did so if you actually did read that through. Sucks to be you because it is self evidently true.
    , @Wally
    said:
    "As for Mr Unz’s conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center…the Holocaust…well it’s because ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?
    Mr Unz’s conclusion about the ‘fatal flaw’ of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence…none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews…ergo it didn’t happen"

    - Your problem, and those like you, is that you have no proof for the magical German 'gas chambers', which were scientifically impossible. Sure would like to see you try though.

    - Your problem, and those like you, is that you claim that the remains of ca: 11,000,000 people ("6M Jews & 5M others", equal to the population of London), exist in immense mass grave whose locations are allegedly known. Sure would like for you to show us those.

    www.codoh.com
    , @Twodees Partain
    Please post your word count that would validate the statement that 90% of the article is devoted to some obscure crackpot. You didn't read the article, obviously. If you had, you might have offered a believable statement on the percentage of the text that refers to the "crackpot".

    Your absurd 90% claim shows that you can't even tell a convincing lie.
    , @Hail

    the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…
     
    Major names mentioned in article:
    - 'Oliver' (Revilo P.; 1908-1994): 59 hits in article
    - 'Bendersky' (b.1946; Jewish; author of a book on U.S. military intelligence's views on the "Jewish Threat"): 33 hits in article (incl. 31 for "Bendersky" and 2 for "Bendarsky")
    - 'Beaty' (author of "Iron Curtain Over America" [1951]; 1890-1961): 27 hits in article
    - 'Roosevelt': 19 hits in article (+1 for 'FDR' = 20).
    - 'Summers' (b.1954; Jewish; President of Harvard, July 2001 to June 2006): 15 hits in article
    - 'Welch' (of the John Birch Society; 1899-1985): 13 hits
    - 'Ross' (American sociologist of early 20th-century; 1866-1951): 8 hits
    - 'Mertz' (b.1949; Jewish; academic who proclaimed “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest” despite own evidence suggesting otherwise): 5 hits
    - 'Ford' (Henry): 4 hits
    SUM of the above nine people: 181 hits; of which 'Oliver' represents <33%.

    Total word count: 12,500
    - 1,160 words: Intro on the Larry Summers case of 2005;
    - 2,450 words: Section on the Joseph Bendersky book, "Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army" (2000);
    - 1,400 words: Section on WWII-era military intelligence officer Col. John Beaty's book, "Iron Curtain Over America" (1951);
    - 6,900 words: Section on Dr. Revilo P. Oliver's life and times, including John Birch Society origins (or which 2,280 words are passages from Dr. Oliver's writings);
    - 500 words: Conclusion which brings together the various strands of the article; the key sentence of the 500-word conclusion is "For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect," as demonstrated by the less-controversial Mertz case introduced in the Introduction. Ron Unz argues that Bendersky's own book on anti-Semitism in U.S. military intelligence in the first three-quarters of the 20th century contains, within it, and inadvertently, an anti-Holocaust-narrative "own goal."

    SUM: Of the 12,500 words in the article, 4,620 words (37%) are by Ron Unz within the Revilo P. Oliver section, and 2,280 words (18%) are excerpts from Oliver's writings in the same section. The passages from Oliver are probably justifiable because he is so little known in the 2010s to anything like a general audience, and he forms a core part of the point being made.
    , @RouterAl
    Not so much a comment "Straight Outta Compton" as "Straight Outta Tel Aviv".
    , @jbwilson24
    " ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?"

    The probability of that happening is exceedingly low. Even an outright anti-Semite might mention the gas chambers, in the same way that an anti-black resident of the American South might refer to lynchings. I simply cannot believe that a few of them wouldn't say "well, the gas chambers at Auschwitz were horrible, but with Jewish behaviour it is understandable that the Germans would over-react".

    What would be interesting is to comb through the Soviet sources to see if any of the Soviet military commanders mentioned this stuff.
    , @voicum
    The (probably) only who has zero clues is you , sir. Try to go back to school and finish your elementary four classes . Do not bother to go for mid or high school. You are not " equipped " for that.
    , @Pandour
    An excersise in obfuscation.It looks like you didnt read the same article I did-if indeed you read it at all.
    , @anon
    Is that you, FB...I?
  3. Fantastic resources as always. Much appreciated

    • Agree: Hail
    • Replies: @Alden
    I didn't spend much time in class or doing course work in college. Instead, I spent a lot of time in the Lucius Greene library reading books that directly contradicted everything I was told by the marxist professors, the newspapers of the time and the liberals.

    I read many of the books mentioned by Ron. I grew up listening to my parents standard oil multi millionaire commie jewish friends. And it's all true. 1900 on, the wealthy jews of the world were planning a communist takeover. I read every bit of Ford's newspaper about jewish communists. The reason Ford was alerted was because in the late 19teens and 20's his company was the subject of a crooked takeover by the jewish wolves of wall street. They operated the same way Ivan Boesky operated 60 years later. Ford managed to defeat them and started his newspaper hoping to expose them.

    If a ditzy sorority girl whose only interest in going to college was avoiding the horrors of going to work for another 4 years and hopefully snagging a rich husband who could spare me from the horrors of the working world could discover all that information about communist jews despite being raised in a commie household;
  4. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    Honestly get a life.

    • Replies: @Earth Ling
    I think FB wants to do far more than get a life. I'd say he wants to get the life of all goyim and crush it completely.
  5. j2 says:

    Nice article. But I comment your article of the IQ. There you state about twin studies:

    “These individual results, usually based on relatively small statistical samples of adopted twins or siblings, seemingly demonstrate the extreme rigidity of IQ—the “Strong IQ Hypothesis”—while we have also seen the numerous examples above of large populations whose IQs have drastically shifted over relatively short periods of time. How can these contradictory findings be squared? I do not have the solution, but it would seem a very worthwhile subject for further research, on both theoretical and practical grounds.”

    [MORE]

    The solution is very simple. If you divide
    National average IQ = average genetic IQ + average environmental IQ
    and an individual IQ is
    Individual IQ = genetic IQ + environmental IQ
    then you can write
    Individual IQ = national average IQ + (genetic IQ – average genetic IQ) + (environmental IQ – average environmental IQ) = national average IQ + A + B

    Twin studies show that of variation 80% comes from A and 20% comes from B. This does not in any way contradict that average environmental IQ is as large or a larger part than average genetic IQ, only it has a smaller variance. You can have e.g., average genetic IQ=50, average environmental IQ=50, yet you easily find variances that gives any number you wish for the twin study, like SD=13.4 and SD=6.7.

    But I think the weak IQ hypothesis can be supported by evidence.

    • Replies: @Anon
    I submit it to you that you'd better have made your comment to that article on that article's page.
  6. Btw, i was even more I nterested by the example than buy the main point, the olympiad in math is the best example of IQ power but it seems to be hard to grasp (selecting with math predicts math scores. So what ?).

    Field medal is harder to get than Nobel prize in physics or Bank of Sweden prize in economy : you have 10 000 PhD every year and a bit less than 1 fields medal (4, sometimes 3 or 2 every 4 year)

    The test is very low on math knowledge (high school level) but very high on complexity. It’s not noble math. It’s only about being astute and quick. That’s why many good mathematician despize it like they despize scholastic MCQ.

    But it’s prediction of research stellar power is incredible.

    Consider this : Field Medals are given in a 1:2:3:6 model so that there is 40/50 gold medalists for around 500/600 participants (1 in 12). 5 to 6 participants are selected by each country.

    There are 6 problems scored 7 points each. Bronze score starts at 16/42 wich is the median score. Silver is 19. Golden is 24. USA math University tenured professor average 15.

    [MORE]

    The gold medal have 1% chance of getting the medal field. 100 times more than math PhD holder. 1 in 100 among 18yo high school pupils versus 1 in 10 000 26yo PhD holder

    But every year, there is 2 to 4 participants with perfect scores (42). There chances of getting the medal fields is 10% ! 1000 times more than PhD !

    The only woman with a medal field for example was a perfect score on second try and a golden medal on first try. (The fact that there was no woman is not a mystery if 98% of prize holders are men, there were less than 50 recipients when she got the prize).

    The most elite academy in the world for math is French Ecole Normale Sup Ulm who select 60 math students and 40 of them choose to get a PhD in Math. Their success rate is 1 in 200 (despite an extraordinary selection in vast amount of knowledge). So it’s 50 times more than the average. But half the golden math results and 20 times less than the perfect score result.

    That means that selecting agile mind on a very small set of knowledge can help identify who can be the star researcher in the future, or more precisely its probability of doing it. And that could be done for al sciences probably greatly improving recruitment techniques and money spent on research !

    On the other hand, Harvard has the most selective math program math55 in the world. Only 20 students finish it. Bill Gates didn’t excel in this and that is why he had a comp’etelt different 2nd year at Harvard than first year, because he was sure he would be the best student (he was the best at the IT class). Despite this elitism, the program has produced kn’t 1 Field medal and only 2 math university professors, wich is a disaster compared to his potential reach.

    Conclusions

    —-> the best researcher are born and can be identified at an early age by scholastic tests, measuring g coupled with a small amount of crystallized intelligence.

    The quickness and astuce required is a good predictor of the deepness and thoroughness required to be a geniuous researcher because both are based on IQ (it’s not a necessary condition, but a enhancing (sufficiency side) one.

    —> Fancy most elitist programs made on mastering a huge amount of knowledge fail to produce the same results because you attract mainly people who want to show off their intelligence (by getting the grade) , people who had already learned the material and want to put this knowledge to use, and a small group (2/3) who happens to be geniuses and then are interested by the challenge without being really obsessed by the subject. Those 2/3 people will discourage all the other one so it’s very nefarious for the group to have them sail through the program. Bezos describe how he abandoned the idea of becoming a physicist at Princeton because of a similar program where he could compare himself to geniuses. And Scleifer himself despite finishing math55 decided he wasn’t good enough to be a mathematician. He became the most cited economist (number 1 on repec). His «  crookness » – as for the 3 other Jewish persons you name – may also be an innate psy trait, besides intelligence and creativity, btw ….

    Don’t group the geniuses, they wil cancel out, and disgust others, just identify them !

  7. j2 says:
    @anonymous
    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it's trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    “One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue.”

    “in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East.”

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    • Replies: @Wally
    One of the prime reasons for contriving the so called "holocaust" was to justify "that shitty little country's" creation and all he horrors that it has caused and is still causing.
    , @kikz
    seems to play. import hostiles, foment feelings of 'unsafety', whining occurring in France now......generating aliyah by diapsora; added bonus fouling of others' nest, bugger off to your OTHER country. 2/price of one.
    , @TheJester
    WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system ... with both having the power to create "gold" out of paper ... "gold" out of "nothing", a somewhat less torturous process than alchemy.

    Jews won both WWI and WWII. As an outcome of these Great Wars, surviving nations in the West have been described as Zionist/Jewish banking cartels masquerading as nation states.

    In light of the above, the creation of the Jewish state of Israel was a given. It was the next logical step in the quest for world hegemony as a safe haven for Jewish swindlers on the lam (from Russian oligarchs to American economists) seeking protection from goyim justice.

    , @Cowboy

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel.
     
    The reason for inciting 7 wars after 9/11 was to get moslem hordes to leave their homes for Europe. It is the same pattern we saw when the Zionists helped to create Hitler in order to force "the best" jews to flee to Palestine, or how various pogroms have been artificially incited to force jews to migrate or flee from one country to another, like from Iraq and Egypt to Israel. Allowing the goy peoples, races, or nations to prosper does not serve the purpose of Gods Chosen People.

    In Nato speak, Operation Gladio was part of a strategy of continual tension. Jews have been herding the goyim for centuries. Through war, usury, revolution, enslavement, famine, pestilence, depression, depravity and addiction the jew is always herding the goyim, usually to slaughter. That inferior jews get weeded out along the way is not a bug, it is a feature.

    , @Miggle

    “in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East.”
     
    DON'T ensure removal of all Jews to the Middle East. Genocide!

    Just ban genital mutilation of children below the age of consent. And get rid of the rabbis. It's they who are the real monsters. Rabbinical Talmudic rule destroyed ancient Judaism, and wiped out Hellenistic Judaism. Shahak writes that their totalitarianism is what preserved Judaism: no escape. I think Shlomo Sand or Ilan Pappe or some Jewish historian writes of an era of Jewish freedom before the rabbinate took over. And they took over by killing all dissenters after persuading European rulers to give them total power over all Jews. So encourage Karaitism without circumcision. DON'T send them to wipe out the original Hebrews, now called Palestinian Arabs.

  8. Mrs Mertz visibly doesn’t excel at math herself. “Men being on average better at math” doesn’t logically imply that “females cannot excel at mathematics”.
    But then, ideology and science just don’t go and never will go together. If reality contradicts the theory, ideologues adapt reality to suit the theory, while scientists adapt the theory to suit reality. Somehow, the ideologues’ approach always has either failed miserably, in the better cases, or created catastrophes, in the worse cases.
    The problem with scientific research today is that it has to be ideology and / or plutocracy compatible to attract funds, so little room is left for true science.

    • Replies: @Mike P

    Mrs Mertz visibly doesn’t excel at math herself. “Men being on average better at math” doesn’t logically imply that “females cannot excel at mathematics”.
     
    She most likely understands that very well; she just had to spin her tale that way in to avoid sharing Summers' fate.

    The problem with scientific research today is that it has to be ideology and / or plutocracy compatible to attract funds, so little room is left for true science.
     
    Exactly. She simply understands that you either play by the rules, or you are out.
  9. So International math Olympiad competition test is the best and clearest available example I know – Genome wide association stat maybe a thing in the future – that measurable individual ability differences is a real world fact.

  10. When I was doing a course at MIT the teaching assistant had been at Harvard with the twins and Zuckerberg. Despite being a very nerdy guy he said the Winklevoss twins were great people and Zuckerberg was a weasel.

    • Replies: @joeshittheragman
    "weasel"
    ----------------
    In the beginning of the movie about facebook, the girl zuckerberg was dating said she thought he was an a**hole and that's why she was breaking up with him.
    , @Anonymous
    https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a19490586/mark-zuckerberg-called-people-who-handed-over-their-data-dumb-f/

    Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

    Zuck: Just ask.

    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

    [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

    Zuck: People just submitted it.

    Zuck: I don't know why.

    Zuck: They "trust me"

    Zuck: Dumb fucks.
     
    , @Tired of Not Winning
    The movie Social Network pretty much portrayed them as such, Zuckerberg being a total weasel and douchebag while the Winklevoss, played by Armand Hammer, were WASPy and cool.

    The twins didn't turn out too badly either. They got $65m from Zuckerberg, invested $11m in bitcoin and are now billionaires:

    https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/4/16732952/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-billionaires-surge
    , @Prez2020
    I didn’t scour the comments section, but apparently I was not only person who found R. Unz’s comment interesting on the Winklevoss twins. I often wondered if their creation was wrestled out of their hands by the cabal that makes winners and losers. Losing out on tens of billions of dollars is a big deal and surely there is interest in making more Jewish billionaires and NFL owners. I don’t know if the WV brothers have given a candid interview or not.

    One personal point I would make here - that is another oddity - was that the WV bros had an older sister (whom I crossed time in college with) who died in a freak accident while sneaking on a movie set in Manhattan in 2002. She apparently was an aspiring movie actress, which I didn’t remember. She was an attractive young woman and had a Kennedy-esque aura about her, though still in a way was shy. I didn’t believe the story about her death, but it would be impossible to know the truth.
  11. Revilo P. Oliver is mostly known for his suicide (he and his wife) and his hectoring and totally unreadable prose, with his anti-Christian book so badly executed it’s been seen as an advertisement for the faith.

    Oliver’s error was thinking WWII is over. An error shared by many. Wm F. Buckley, Jr, started American Conservative, Inc, as a witches coven of anti-Midwest isolationism which Buckley pretty well acknowledged in the first few issues. Buckley was inducted into Skull & Bones (AKA brotherhood of death) in 1950, at midcentury, which is a Red Flag. As WFB was an ostentatious Roman Catholic, it was forbidden in that era for a Catholic to join any secret society much less a masonic subdivision at Yale. This ban was not lifted by the Church till the mid-1980s. Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any. Either way he lied to somebody for a whole generation.

    The real conspiracy isn’t the Birch, or Revilo Oliver, or even commies or the Jewish whatever. It’s the ball-less American Right and the misfits and tossers who guide it, use it, rise to the top of it and all the while accomplish nothing whatsoever.

    And it’s a string of total failure stretching now back nearly a century. Time to call bullshit on the right and note the commies were right from the start: It was and is phony, and not an especially edifying one at that.

    • Replies: @gsjackson
    Buckley's deep background would make for an interesting study. We all see how he ended up -- truckling to neocons and their money, handing them Joe Sobran's scalp and handing over his magazine to a little boy, Richard Lowry, who could be counted on to do their bidding. Was he nothing but a ZCIA operative from the start, notwithstanding any anti-semitic inclinations his father may have had?
    , @Anonymous
    'Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any'

    I personally think Buckley was a crypto jew.
    , @Hamlet's Ghost
    George Lincoln Rockwell, before he founded the American Nazi Party, wrote in This Time The World about his involvement with Buckley and the Jewish question when he was an up-and-coming conservative.:


    "One of the conservative leaders I contacted was William F. Buckley, Jr, the publisher of National Review. My friend in Washington, D.C., Sam Jones, was his correspondent and we got together at a meeting in New York. It was an, intellectual thrill, just talking with Buckley and his staff. There is more pulsating brain-power and genius surrounding Buckley than in any place else on earth, where I have ever been. Bill, himself, is personable in the extreme and brighter than all the rest, but his staff includes three or four Jews, one of them particularly Jewish-looking, and the atmosphere there is different than with other 'conservative' groups.

    Buckley is extremely cagey on the Jewish Question and even when you get him alone, it is difficult to elicit information as to his awareness. The best you can get are guarded implications from which you are at liberty to infer what you want. I have since learned the reason for this: Buckley's millionaire father had a major interest with the Jews in Israeli oil, and the result, even today, is that Buckley's anti-liberalism and anti-Communism stop at the borders of Israel and the doors of Zionist meeting halls.

    At the time I, too, was playing this silly 'I've-got-my-eyes-closed' game, so I felt that much could be accomplished by helping Buckley. I agreed to promote the National Review for him and he deposited a thousand dollars in a Washington bank to my account. So I started on a project designed to get mass circulation for National Review in colleges and universities.

    At the time, however, I was heavily involved in my own effort to launch the A.F.C.O. and the newspaper, and I am ashamed to have to admit that I did a rotten job for Bill. I made some efforts, but they were without the drive and full enthusiasm necessary in such a promotion and nothing happened. I returned the money to Bill, less expenses, with a guilty conscience. Outside of being too cagey on the Jewish Question, which is, of course, his privilege, Bill Buckley was 100% square as a man and unlike the situation with other right-wingers with whom I have worked or tried to work, my failure to accomplish anything with Buckley was entirely my fault. "


    chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://www.americannaziparty.com/thistimetheworld.pdf

    Ron Unz has been fearless in his coverage of books and subjects that have been rendered taboo by our self-chosen overlords. I would heartily recommend Rockwell's book to him and others who want to chart the sad and steady decline of American post-war conservatism. A full-length unzian (?) book review would be very much worth reading.

    , @Leon Haller
    You are correct re the uselessness of the American "Right", but this statement:

    "Revilo P. Oliver is mostly known for his suicide (he and his wife) and his hectoring and totally unreadable prose, with his anti-Christian book so badly executed it’s been seen as an advertisement for the faith."

    reveals you to be a complete phony (either a small-minded Christian, or a Jew). Oliver was possibly the most talented prose stylist the American Right ever produced (only possible exception was Sam Francis). And his wife did not commit suicide.
  12. “This striking disconnect between a study’s purported findings and its actual results should alert us to similar possibilities elsewhere”…but not in the same article. There is much food for thought here but it would probably have been easier to digest if it were split into two separate essays: one on the follies of feminism(s) & the other on the Jewish-Bolshevik nudge (shove!) of America into WW2 & beyond. There’s too great a “disconnect” between the two; although, they’re both enticing subjects in their own right. (ha! three different there-eir-y’re’s & two too’s in one sentence). But just so as not to disconnect from the oblique opening of this regaling romp , back to the slimy Summers, who “Moreover… had previously denounced anti-Israel activism by Harvard students and faculty members as ‘anti-semitic’”: i.e.”Profoundly anti-Israel views are increasingly finding support in progressive intellectual communities. Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-semitic in their effect if not their intent.”(Lawrence Summers, 17 September 2002)
    And just a couple of months ago on Twitter, Summers again:
    “The US Department of State’s definition of anti-Semitism explicitly identifies singling out Israel policy for criticism in a way different from other countries and drawing comparisons between it and the Nazis as anti-Semitic.
    https://www.state.gov/s/rga/resources/267538.htm#.XKYyGfZfyyE.twitter … (from tateDept)
    Lawrence H. Summers
    Verified account
    @LHSummers
    By this standard, BDS and Israel Apartheid week @Harvard are anti-Semitic in both effect and intent.
    9:36 AM – 4 Apr 2019”
    The guy’s a lost cause!

    • Replies: @Cowboy
    "Lawrence Summers" was a key player, his statement about Women's lower interest for Math being one of the few self-evident truths that ever came out of his mouth.

    Like a Macron, Obama, or even a Churchill, Summers was groomed for success from an early age, never working a real job his entire life:

    Born in New Haven, Connecticut, Summers became a professor of economics at Harvard University in 1983. He left Harvard in 1991, working as the Chief Economist at the World Bank from 1991 to 1993. In 1993, Summers was appointed Undersecretary for International Affairs of the United States Department of the Treasury under the Clinton Administration. In 1995, he was promoted to Deputy Secretary of the Treasury under his long-time political mentor Robert Rubin. In 1999, he succeeded Rubin as Secretary of the Treasury. While working for the Clinton administration Summers played a leading role in the American response to the 1994 economic crisis in Mexico, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, and the Russian financial crisis.
    ...
    In 1983, at age 28, Summers became one of the youngest tenured professors in Harvard's history.
     
    Summers is a very critical lifetime actor. He was Chief Economist at World Bank when the USSR collapsed and all the ashkenazi carpet baggers moved to Moscow. The story from Fitts and many others is that these carpet baggers had counterfeited a couple of hundred billion in TBills that they used to buy up anything of value remaining in the USSR. These faked TBills were coming due in 2001, and were located at the Solomon's Temple, now famous as Building number 7, on Sept 11, 2001. The US treasury and its tax donkeys simply paid out all the claims, and the Rothschild's and their associates walked away with all of Russia's resources, including Yukos oil.

    But Summers hands are even dirtier than than. He was involved in the BCCI bust and the Asian bubbles at the end of the 20th century, making fortunes for people the likes of Georgi Schwarz (Soros).

    But perhaps his greatest accomplishment for his Ashkenazi masters, with his co author Barsky, with support of Rabbi's across the planet, was perfecting the manipulation of gold prices.

    Not long before joining the new Clinton administration as undersecretary of the treasury for international affairs, Harvard president and former treasury secretary Lawrence H. Summers, then Nathaniel Ropes professor of political economy at Harvard, co-authored with Robert B. Barsky an article entitled "Gibson's Paradox and the Gold Standard" published in the Journal of Political Economy (vol. 96, June 1988, pp. 528-550). The article, which appears to draw heavily on a 1985 working paper of the same title by the same authors, is an excellent technical piece, revealing a high level of expertise regarding gold, gold mining, and the interconnections among gold prices, interest rates, and inflation.
     
    The entire post gold-standard bubble of the last half of a century would not have been possible without the "work" of people like Larry Summers, who have suppressed the price of gold and manipulated markets, to the advantage of their sponsors

    Gibson's paradox continued to operate for another decade after the period covered by Barsky and Summers. But sometime around 1995, real long-term interest rates and inverted gold prices began a period of sharp and increasing divergence that has continued to the present time.
    ...
    this same evidence also demonstrates that absent this governmental interference in the free market for gold, falling real rates would have led to rising gold prices which, in today's world of unlimited fiat money, would have been taken as a warning of future inflation and likely triggered an early reversal of the decline in real long-term rates.
     
  13. Anonymous[104] • Disclaimer says:

    We should return all intelligence operations back to the military. Less likelihood of politicization. And let the FBI once again focus on interstate crime.

    • Agree: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Whitewolf

    We should return all intelligence operations back to the military. Less likelihood of politicization. And let the FBI once again focus on interstate crime.
     
    It might mean less politicization but from what Ron has written it seems it wouldn't make much difference in the end. With military intelligence among others being well aware of an organized Jewish plot to take over America the organized Jewish plot proceeded as planned. Much like the attack on Pearl Harbor went ahead despite it being known that is what the Japanese had planned.

    I would question whether the military is less politicized than other areas of society. Everyone is conditioned through the same school system and media outlets with religious institutions of course playing a significant part as well.
  14. Anonymous [AKA "Pascal Bosquet"] says:
    @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    ADL checking in on you, Ronald. Lol.

  15. During WWII, there wasn’t any anti-Semitism in the German Army, as over 150,000 Jews served in their Armed Forces, with some Jews obtaining ranks as high as General.

    World Jewry better step lightly with all these claims of anti-Semitism, as polls are showing holocaust burn-out, with the American millennials and Generation Z exhibiting Shoah exhaustion, with many not knowing or caring about Zionist fairy tales. If Jews lose their anti-Semitism club and shield, Israel will slowly disappear.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    Which Jewish German generals were those?
  16. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    …the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…

    The “obscure crackpot” was an eye-witness to the momentous events of his time and had access to the inner secrets of the war machine. He may have been an ultra-nationalist right-winger but that is not a good reason to dismiss his account of the historical facts unfolding before his eyes. Besides, his perception and interpretation of those events conform with the recent perspectives of other investigators who have demolished same sacrosanct dogmas about WWII and its aftermath.

    From this taste of his writing style and choice of words one can almost feel the outpouring of a man who had been deceived and outraged by the hypocritical official narrative and deceptions of the men in power. It is men like Revilo Oliver who open to us the windows into the workings of our masters and they should be honoured for their honesty and courage independently of one’s political views.

    Full marks to Ron Unz for this article. By the way, his first name is not that odd: read it back to front. A little parental puzzle it seems.

    • Agree: Wally, Haxo Angmark, Iris
    • LOL: FB
    • Replies: @Egami Rorrim
    In tribute to Revilo, I have christened my self as Egami Rorrim. Peace, may the goyim prosper.
  17. “These are the empirical results that Mertz and her co-authors touted as conclusively demonstrating that males and females have equal mathematical ability. As near as I can tell, no previous journalist or researcher had noticed the considerable difference between Mertz’s empirical data and her stated conclusions, or perhaps any such individuals were just too intimidated to focus public attention on the discrepancy.”

    Seems like her research demonstrated the tautology of the thesis her research was attempting to disprove.

    • LOL: Digital Samizdat
  18. Here is an article that clearly explains the pro-Israel bias in America’s mainstream media:

    https://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-pro-israel-skew-in-american.html

    This study shows us that the pro-Israel narrative has become so firmly entrenched in the American mainstream media that it is almost impossible for news consumers to discern the truth about the situation in Israel and Palestine. This has greatly benefitted Washington which has made it abundantly clear that it sides with Israel in this fifty year-old conflict.

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
    My security would not allow that site as it is "a high security risk".
    says it has malware
  19. Anonymous [AKA "Mari Jackson"] says:

    Summers said that the variance in intelligence was larger for men than for women, not the mean. Thus there are more male geniuses and more male idiots. The second point was lost.

  20. Anonymous [AKA "Gerald47"] says:

    Excellent article. Thanks for the PDF links!

  21. ” He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.”

    Now being continued by Joogle, Jewtube and Jewbook?

  22. I believe it’s Wilmoore Kendall, spelled with an a.

    Great article, as usual. Unearthing these old books is a great service to the truth. It’s a happy day when I see an Unz and Guuyenot piece both arrive.

  23. @Greg Bacon
    During WWII, there wasn't any anti-Semitism in the German Army, as over 150,000 Jews served in their Armed Forces, with some Jews obtaining ranks as high as General.

    World Jewry better step lightly with all these claims of anti-Semitism, as polls are showing holocaust burn-out, with the American millennials and Generation Z exhibiting Shoah exhaustion, with many not knowing or caring about Zionist fairy tales. If Jews lose their anti-Semitism club and shield, Israel will slowly disappear.

    Which Jewish German generals were those?

    • Replies: @awry
    See

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazis_of_non-Germanic_descent

    and search for "jew" (of course we are speaking of people having partial Jewish descent here).

    , @Hamlet's Ghost
    Milch was half-Jewish. Both Hitler and Goering knew about it, but didn't care.
    , @Mefobills
    https://rafzen.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/jewish-senior-officers-in-hitlers-army-erhard-milch-wilhelm-keitel-walther-von-brauchitsch-erich-raeder-and-maximilian-von-weichs/

    It only took a few ergs of finger energy on my part to come up with a link.

    Before asking for proof about things, make a little effort on your own.

    Which Jewish generals?

    Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant generals, five major generals), « men commanding up to 100,000 troops. »
     
    If one is intellectually honest, they can pull on the thread and do more research on their own, and that takes initiative and energy.
  24. @Vojkan
    Mrs Mertz visibly doesn’t excel at math herself. “Men being on average better at math” doesn’t logically imply that “females cannot excel at mathematics”.
    But then, ideology and science just don’t go and never will go together. If reality contradicts the theory, ideologues adapt reality to suit the theory, while scientists adapt the theory to suit reality. Somehow, the ideologues’ approach always has either failed miserably, in the better cases, or created catastrophes, in the worse cases.
    The problem with scientific research today is that it has to be ideology and / or plutocracy compatible to attract funds, so little room is left for true science.

    Mrs Mertz visibly doesn’t excel at math herself. “Men being on average better at math” doesn’t logically imply that “females cannot excel at mathematics”.

    She most likely understands that very well; she just had to spin her tale that way in to avoid sharing Summers’ fate.

    The problem with scientific research today is that it has to be ideology and / or plutocracy compatible to attract funds, so little room is left for true science.

    Exactly. She simply understands that you either play by the rules, or you are out.

  25. All the proof that zionists control every facet of the zio/US gov is provided by the fact that Israel and the zionist controlled deep state and various traitors did 911 and got away with it, when every thinking American knows that zionists in the US gov and Israel did 911 and thus had the excuse to have the zio/US destroy the mideast for zionist Israel!

  26. @Franz
    Revilo P. Oliver is mostly known for his suicide (he and his wife) and his hectoring and totally unreadable prose, with his anti-Christian book so badly executed it's been seen as an advertisement for the faith.

    Oliver's error was thinking WWII is over. An error shared by many. Wm F. Buckley, Jr, started American Conservative, Inc, as a witches coven of anti-Midwest isolationism which Buckley pretty well acknowledged in the first few issues. Buckley was inducted into Skull & Bones (AKA brotherhood of death) in 1950, at midcentury, which is a Red Flag. As WFB was an ostentatious Roman Catholic, it was forbidden in that era for a Catholic to join any secret society much less a masonic subdivision at Yale. This ban was not lifted by the Church till the mid-1980s. Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any. Either way he lied to somebody for a whole generation.

    The real conspiracy isn't the Birch, or Revilo Oliver, or even commies or the Jewish whatever. It's the ball-less American Right and the misfits and tossers who guide it, use it, rise to the top of it and all the while accomplish nothing whatsoever.

    And it's a string of total failure stretching now back nearly a century. Time to call bullshit on the right and note the commies were right from the start: It was and is phony, and not an especially edifying one at that.

    Buckley’s deep background would make for an interesting study. We all see how he ended up — truckling to neocons and their money, handing them Joe Sobran’s scalp and handing over his magazine to a little boy, Richard Lowry, who could be counted on to do their bidding. Was he nothing but a ZCIA operative from the start, notwithstanding any anti-semitic inclinations his father may have had?

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    Buckley always came across as a liar when he appeared on TV. He had a habit of casting his eyes upward and licking his lips, both of which are tells, as anyone who plays poker knows. I always viewed him as an insufferably arrogant prick who was almost as conservative as Scoop Jackson.
  27. Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman’s union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    • Replies: @Emblematic
    What if the first half of your assessment ("I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists...") is largely correct but that, in the case of Jewish communists, conscious and/or unconscious motivations deriving from their Jewish identity were *also* at play?

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement (rather than simply malice toward non-Jews) that would still mean their Jewish identity was part of the explanation.
    , @Jack
    Himmler was annoyed that every German leader had a "pet" Jewish friend that they arranged to keep safe. The problem isn't Jewish people individually (most of them in the West are nice folks) the problem is that half their leaders hate Christians and the other half are willing to do literally whatever it takes (organ trafficking, sexual slavery, actual slavery, running phone banks to defraud Grandma of her life savings, etc) to amass obscene amounts of wealth. Eli Rosenbaum at the local law firm is fine. George Soros is not, and our society is run by the George Soros Jews
    , @Digital Samizdat

    His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man.
     
    Your father had a good point: the rich often do exploit the working man. But there's another fact to consider as well: sometimes the Big Jews exploit the Little Jews to get them to do their dirty work. Even bigshot-leftists like Trotsky were taking money from Wall Street, no doubt believing that the end justified the means. Moral of the story: be careful with idealism. Once it becomes detached from reality, it can be used to justify anything.
    , @Whitewolf

    According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else.
     
    Call it nature, religion or culture but Jews as a group have a history of extreme hostility to outside groups. Since even your holy texts command you to destroy or enslave other groups mainly through usury and subversion as in the old testament/torah you shouldn't be surprised that other people consider Jews as enemies or at least view them with extreme suspicion. Especially since you can't let your guard down against an enemy who attacks by subversion. If you mostly attack people in open combat then people see either aggression or non aggression. If you attack by subversion they assume you are always doing it just to be safe. Unless they are Christian Zionists they won't trust you at all.

    The promotion of diversity/White genocide going on right now isn't making you any friends either. It hasn't escaped notice that a huge percentage of it's promoters and funders are Jewish. If Whites can be considered by their nature racist, supremacist, privileged oppressors of everyone else then Jews can be considered by their nature enemies of everyone else.
    , @Anonymous
    'Were they crypto-Jews? '

    Philby looked remarkably Jewish. The Cambridge five were driven by resentments of low status: they did not quite fit in with the aristocrats.
    , @Anonymous
    'Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one'

    Of course people cannot have ethnic blinders and engage in self deception.
    , @Craig Nelsen

    That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.
     
    Your claim is plausible, but, I have to say, with what familiarity I have with the founding documents of various enduring civilizations, none approaches in terms of lethal intent to everyone else the genocidal xenophobia of the Hebrews. While there is violence and war in Homer, for example, there is a stated reason for it--a response to some action that made enemies. Deuteronomy, on the other hand, simply assumes up front everyone else is an enemy with a a choice between subservience and extermination. (Egyptians are the exception, and the children of Israel are admonished only not to abhor them). Deuteronomy even explicitly includes "cities not of these nations" and tells the Jews that, through usury, they will rule over many nations, and no nation will rule over them.

    I believe the authors of the Mosaic law and the Homeric epics were roughly contemporaries. Thousands of years later, the Jews and the Greeks are still around. Which is more successful? Which is more hated? Which is more rational?
    , @foolisholdman
    Communism is powerful ideologically, because of the inequalities manifest in society. It goes back much further than Marx. There were medieval communes in Europe that had very communistic ideas and were bitterly resented and eventually outlawed by the ruling classes of their time. The leaders of the Peasants' Revolt had many ideas in common with modern communists. In the British Civil war there were the Diggers and the Levellers.

    What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation. That was never the overt program. There may well have been (there probably was) such an esoteric program but it was not shared with the Goy members.

    , @peterAUS

    I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews.
     
    Yep.
    , @Saggy

    That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.
     
    This video by Rabbi ben Porat explains the reasons why Hitler hated communism and the Jews and saw them as an enemy to western society ....
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/uKbrffKEyE3m/
    , @James Forrestal
    Try to control your toxic, hate-filled semitism, please.

    Why do you hate White people so much, anyway?

    You need to be more tolerant.
    , @ababush

    Jews are just like everybody else only more so.
     
    Yitzhak Attia, director of the Yad vashem Institute International School, Israel magazine (April 2003):

    "The universal world will reign in a postmodern global village where all humanity lives ... even if our mind shouts to us by all its means the absurdity of this face-to-face between a small people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity ... as absurd as it is incoherent, as monstrous as it may seem, we are deeply involved in the intimate struggle between Israel and the Nations, which can only be genocidal and complete, because it is about our identities. »
    , @Emslander
    I think you've said it very well. Hatred of Jews grows during times of economic uncertainty, probably because many identifiable Jews are in visible roles at successful enterprises. We don't take note of all the people who are doing better than us who are from backgrounds similar to ours. In our everyday experiences, we have friends, coworkers and maybe even adversaries. Some of them are Jews and, in my experience, Jewish attitudes raise no issues that would recommend they be treated or seen any differently from non-Jews.

    I don't see any point to advancing anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist thought. I've spent time in Islamic countries and their nationalistic and theocratic tendencies are just as powerful. The antidote to self-destructive behavior is to know those fundamental principles that are best for our country and oppose those that are contrary. That's what national maturity fosters and we're a long way from maturity. Spend time in the UK and you see what healthy national loyalty looks like.

    Having said that, I enjoy this webzine. It allows us to read and debate matters that the politically sanguine and antiseptic world of eighth-grade journalism actively stifles, just as any socially insecure 12-year old would. There appears to be a whole range of thinking about American Jews that probably needed to be aired for good mental balance. None of them make a lot of sense as the basis of policy.
    , @Ace
    Yes, it was just idealism.

    Ronit Lentin was born in Haifa to Jews from Romania, she lived in Israel and studied at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Following this she decided to invade and colonise Ireland in 1969 to wage a war of race-replacement against the people. As founder of the Trinity Immigration Initiative, she is best known as advocating the demographic genocide of Irish people through third-world immigration, particularly Black Africans. (More at Metapedia)
     
    Link omitted.

    http://balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-Ireland.php

    Pure benevolence:


    The jew is racial strife, Israel Cohen 1912 “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause. .” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912,. On June 17, 1957, Vol. 103 p. 8559, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy
     
    https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archive.org%2Fstream%2Fcongressionalrec103dunit%23page%2Fn25%2Fmode%2F2up%3A0IhE0A_7flZQeEq04YHOTKCpGNE&cuid=3167535

    Concern for the working man:


    The Jewish attack on the family and the accelerating disintegration of society is seen in the promotion of aggressive, militant feminism and homosexuality, 57 varieties of transgender perversion, paedophilia, bestiality and incest.
    If there is a future for white people, it will be in countries like Hungary, Poland and Russia. Western Europe is a lost cause.
     
    https://russia-insider.com/en/serious-academic-antisemitism-enjoying-revival-responding-new-realities/ri24755
  28. Has anyone here read Bendersky’s book, ‘A Concise History of Nazi Germany’?

  29. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide…

    Err, … Petitio Principii, much?

  30. @Johnny Rico
    Which Jewish German generals were those?

    See

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazis_of_non-Germanic_descent

    and search for “jew” (of course we are speaking of people having partial Jewish descent here).

    • Replies: @Wally
    Hmm, we see Erhard Milch on that list, who definitely as not a Jew.

    His gentile mother & father had Erhard, they then divorced, the mother later remarried a Jew. Hence the myth that the Luftwaffe's Erhard Milch was a Jew.

    That is not to say that weren't large numbers of Jews who served in the Wehrmacht.

    Thanks.

  31. Anonymous[548] • Disclaimer says:

    …he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive activity, therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms.

    Bingo! How prophetic.

  32. In regard to the book, The Iron Curtain over America

    He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.

    The great purge of all materials against the interests of a certain group in the US has begun

    Under the HTML version of this book there was notice that it had been acquire from
    archive.org

    clicking on that link got this response:

    The item is not available due to issues with the item’s content

    So an Iron curtain of Jewish censorship has indeed descended upon America

    • Replies: @Montefrío
    I was able to download it less than an hour ago: it is now 11:50 a.m. EDT. I went directly to archive.org
    , @Anonymous
    Very true. I couldn't even archive this article without jumping through hoops. "archive.is" and archive.fo" are offline ATM. It's no secret that the Internet "archiive" sites are getting purged of wrongthink now. The term: "full spectrum dominance" was always cherished by our globalist overlords.
    , @skrik
    thnx; I just tried archive.org, got this:

    This item is no longer available.
    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.
     
    So I went to the html version, and read the 1st few paras of "Chapter II • Russia and the Khazars"

    Now, IF so-called 'modern' European Js are actually descended from Khazars, THEN they are not really Js at all [=fake joos], they’re not Semites as well; i.e. they have no traceable connection to Palestine AND they can't believably claim "God promised it to us!" - And IF the holohoax is exactly that, THEN isn't it "Three strikes and you're OUT!?"

    Test: Does this man look at all 'Semitic?'
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/4285292-3x2-340x227.jpg
  33. Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    • Replies: @Emblematic
    Now do the same analysis for the word "Nazi".

    If ever there was a candidate for a modern myth of the West it is the WWII Myth with the Nazis playing the role of demons.

    , @Digital Samizdat

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.
     
    Jews are one of their own symbolic myths. But they're sure convinced that they're real. Why do you think they get so upset when anybody else criticizes the Jews? Would they be quite as upset if those same people criticized, say, werewolves? I doubt it.
    , @anonymous
    No, Aaron, this is not an issue of 'myths' and 'symbols'. This is a real issue that is having real consequences in the real world. It is doing grave damage to real people and cultures.

    It can't be waved away with psychobabble, unfortunately.
    , @Anonymous
    This kind of airy psychological bullshit puts your usual nonsense to shame! You have outdone yourself.

    Now see if you can take a leaf out of George Orwell and argue your thoughts in plain english. If you have a point this should be easy to do.
    , @Anonymous

    "Jews don't exist. They're a social construct."
     
    L O L
    , @peterAUS

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.
     
    You could be onto something, quite uncomfortable, here.
    , @James Forrestal

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.
     
    Exactly. The jewish people are a myth; a social construct -- and an inherently oppressive one.

    People who believe themselves to be jewish need to check their privilege; to educate themselves; to interrogate their supremacism; to let go of their reflexive, unreasoning hatred, and learn to be more tolerant. It's the only way to deconstruct toxic semitism -- which must be done if we are to move forward together in the current year.

    Enough with the pilpul -- you need to be the archetypal ally.

    http://i65.tinypic.com/2hwt54.jpg
    , @Emslander
    Jung also pointed out the danger of people identifying with any archetype or with an archetype existing as a reality. Both of these problems belie your theory.
  34. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    I bet you had to squirm a bit whilst you did so if you actually did read that through. Sucks to be you because it is self evidently true.

    • Replies: @FB

    I bet you had to squirm a bit whilst you did so if you actually did read that through. Sucks to be you because it is self evidently true.
     
    'Sucks to be you'...?...what are you about 11...?

    As for 'squirming'...I haven't done that since I was, oh, about 11...

    I did read the article through...which was surprisingly brisk for one of Mr Unz's tomes...the lengthy excerpts from Oliver move along briskly also...although it is quite telling that a man of such lack of self control could rise to the level he did...says a lot about the US...
  35. It is interesting how crackpot and unintelligible the attempts to refute you have become Ron. Almost seems like they’ve reached count down to ther heads exploding. I love the logic and have seen articles and comments by writers on various subjects which do kick own goals. There are commenters on this page doing so as they demonstrate aspects at least of the Jewish power projection.

  36. RW says:

    Ron, as I recall your article of several years ago analyzing Lynn’s research demonstrated that European populations’ IQs tended to all settle around 100 after a couple generations living in a developed country, which is what a hereditarian would expect. In other words, if I recall correctly, your article did not compare Africans and Hispanics and Asians with Europeans, it was only intra-European comparisons.

  37. @Anonymous
    We should return all intelligence operations back to the military. Less likelihood of politicization. And let the FBI once again focus on interstate crime.

    We should return all intelligence operations back to the military. Less likelihood of politicization. And let the FBI once again focus on interstate crime.

    It might mean less politicization but from what Ron has written it seems it wouldn’t make much difference in the end. With military intelligence among others being well aware of an organized Jewish plot to take over America the organized Jewish plot proceeded as planned. Much like the attack on Pearl Harbor went ahead despite it being known that is what the Japanese had planned.

    I would question whether the military is less politicized than other areas of society. Everyone is conditioned through the same school system and media outlets with religious institutions of course playing a significant part as well.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  38. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    What if the first half of your assessment (“I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists…”) is largely correct but that, in the case of Jewish communists, conscious and/or unconscious motivations deriving from their Jewish identity were *also* at play?

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement (rather than simply malice toward non-Jews) that would still mean their Jewish identity was part of the explanation.

    • Replies: @FB

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement...
     
    Typical indoctrination...subvert what...?...the great system of American plutocracy and unrestrained exploitation of ordinary folks...for the benefit of a tiny class of parasites at the top...?
  39. @LondonBob
    When I was doing a course at MIT the teaching assistant had been at Harvard with the twins and Zuckerberg. Despite being a very nerdy guy he said the Winklevoss twins were great people and Zuckerberg was a weasel.

    “weasel”
    —————-
    In the beginning of the movie about facebook, the girl zuckerberg was dating said she thought he was an a**hole and that’s why she was breaking up with him.

  40. @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    Now do the same analysis for the word “Nazi”.

    If ever there was a candidate for a modern myth of the West it is the WWII Myth with the Nazis playing the role of demons.

    • Agree: AaronB
  41. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:

    Another amazing article. Thank you.

    Something to think about:

    1) Intelligent boldness is the key to charisma. People are attracted to fearless, knowledgeable truth-tellers who are intelligent enough to adjust the size of the red pill to their audience. Being too careful and defensive on the subject of Jewish power and influence is inefficient and often worse than useless.

    2) Knowledgeable people across the world know what’s going on. Many independent individuals, secret or semi-secret society members, intelligence agents, enforcement agents, academics, journalists (shabbos goyim and select Jews included) etc. know where this is heading. It’s extremely unlikely that they’ll choose suicide for 30 pieces of silver.

    • Agree: mark green, ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Miro23

    2) Knowledgeable people across the world know what’s going on. Many independent individuals, secret or semi-secret society members, intelligence agents, enforcement agents, academics, journalists (shabbos goyim and select Jews included) etc. know where this is heading. It’s extremely unlikely that they’ll choose suicide for 30 pieces of silver.
     
    There are plenty of opportunists among them. It's no different from the Soviet Union. If being a Communist gets you the 30 pieces of silver then they'd be vocal Communists, and if it switches to Neoliberalism, then they'll be vocal Neoliberals.

    Opportunists are a very reliable catalyst for change.
  42. FB says: • Website
    @Rabbitnexus
    I bet you had to squirm a bit whilst you did so if you actually did read that through. Sucks to be you because it is self evidently true.

    I bet you had to squirm a bit whilst you did so if you actually did read that through. Sucks to be you because it is self evidently true.

    ‘Sucks to be you’…?…what are you about 11…?

    As for ‘squirming’…I haven’t done that since I was, oh, about 11…

    I did read the article through…which was surprisingly brisk for one of Mr Unz’s tomes…the lengthy excerpts from Oliver move along briskly also…although it is quite telling that a man of such lack of self control could rise to the level he did…says a lot about the US…

  43. Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the “Alt Right.” There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and “RINOs”, but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on “race realism,” we are left with something very much like Oliver’s social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    • Replies: @fnn
    Oliver only wrote/spoke openly of his atheism after he left both National Review and the John Birch Society. At that point he knew he was addressing nothing beyond a "small fringe." Note that Oliver died in 1994 (at age 86) and stopped writing in the 1980s.
    , @Wally
    Take it easy, I wouldn't personalize it.

    IMO, the general thinking is:

    1. Christians are naive to the ways of those dedicated to destroying them

    2. the Christian sense of goodwill & forgiveness has allowed the enemy to get inside gate

    3. Christians are conditioned to not believe there are actually those who want to harm them, Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie and engage in the very actions that are obvious and now being recognized and called to account
    , @Republic
    The late Dr Pierce,the white nationalist had very negative views on Christianity. His statement in The National Vanguard is worth reading. He did however state that Christianity played an important role in civilization.

    Today, after decades of Jewification of both the Roman Catholic Church and all Protestant branches,the role of Christianity is extremely detrimental to the interests of White nationalism.

    The head of the RC church, the Pope,essentially promotes open borders.

    The only church with compatible interest to nationalists is the Orthodox church.

    My statement is in regard to the US, the RC church in Poland and Hungary, for example, are great supporters of nationalism in those countries.

    , @Digital Samizdat
    "Hostility" would be putting it strongly, jack. More like disappointment and wariness on account of all the SJWism and Zio-cucking modern Christianity is given to. If Christianity were ever to shape up its act, it might become a powerful vehicle of resistance against the régime. But most of these Christian types are too busy currying favor with it to consider such a thing.
    , @Johnny Rottenborough
    jack daniels—The Alt Right is hostile to Christianity because Christianity has given its blessing to the mass immigration which is wrecking the West; the churches could have stood foursquare with Western peoples but they sided with the enemy. As if that were not bad enough, by welcoming Islam, Western churches are betraying their faithful and committing demographic suicide.
    , @Whitewolf

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the “Alt Right.”
     
    Organized Christianity is almost as hostile to Whites as organized Jewry. Many Christian outfits fully support massive third world immigration and forced integration. It's a universalist faith which sees no difference between Europeans, Asians or Africans. Such a worldview helps spread the gospel but it doesn't help Whites wanting their countries and communities to stay White. On top of that you have evangelicals and born agains who pretty much worship Jews and Israel because their holy book tells them they are holy.
    , @Bork
    Christianity is a prototype form of communism with supernatural elements. Being a christian means that you are marinated in insane jewish thinking and unable to mentally defend anything or anyone against cultural marxism. This means that you arent welcome because you will instantly start subverting any form of pro white movement with your christian-jewish morals and ideas, and you will do this without being aware that you are an useful idiot for those that wish to see us gone forever. Remember that the germans sought to eradicate german christianity 1933-1945 and they did that for good reasons that are just as valid today as they were back then. You are simply not welcome because you dont belong any more than a random street negro.
  44. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    said:
    “As for Mr Unz’s conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center…the Holocaust…well it’s because ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?
    Mr Unz’s conclusion about the ‘fatal flaw’ of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence…none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews…ergo it didn’t happen”

    – Your problem, and those like you, is that you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible. Sure would like to see you try though.

    – Your problem, and those like you, is that you claim that the remains of ca: 11,000,000 people (“6M Jews & 5M others”, equal to the population of London), exist in immense mass grave whose locations are allegedly known. Sure would like for you to show us those.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...
  45. @Emblematic
    What if the first half of your assessment ("I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists...") is largely correct but that, in the case of Jewish communists, conscious and/or unconscious motivations deriving from their Jewish identity were *also* at play?

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement (rather than simply malice toward non-Jews) that would still mean their Jewish identity was part of the explanation.

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement…

    Typical indoctrination…subvert what…?…the great system of American plutocracy and unrestrained exploitation of ordinary folks…for the benefit of a tiny class of parasites at the top…?

    • Agree: Cyrano
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    subvert what…?
     
    Subvert their hosts, naturally. The Tribe does it every time because they don't know any better. Their hatred of the host is an integral principle which leads to success... and ultimate destruction. Like any other parasite.
  46. fnn says:

    Probably a study of the German Auschwitz and Treblinka trials of the mid-1960s would be the most useful for discovering the reality of the extent of the Holocaust. These trials took place well after the hysteria of the immediate post war period had subsided and before the current long age of hysteria had begun. It was that brief window of time when the Federal Republic looked like a normal country aside from its status as a “frontline” state in the Cold War. You’ll notice that some of the defendants were given rather short sentences and a few were actually acquitted, which seems to indicate that the legal processes were not entirely unfair. Also, keep in the mind there were millions of Wehrmacht and SS veterans living in Germany at that time. They and their families were a powerful voting/social bloc.

    • Replies: @Bukowski
    People still have a right to be sceptical of such matters. Article on the Treblinka trials.
    https://codoh.com/library/chapter/1789/
  47. @Republic
    In regard to the book, The Iron Curtain over America

    He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.
     
    The great purge of all materials against the interests of a certain group in the US has begun

    Under the HTML version of this book there was notice that it had been acquire from
    archive.org

    clicking on that link got this response:

    The item is not available due to issues with the item's content

     

    So an Iron curtain of Jewish censorship has indeed descended upon America

    I was able to download it less than an hour ago: it is now 11:50 a.m. EDT. I went directly to archive.org

    • Replies: @Republic
    strange,clicking on the link directly below the HTML got this response:

    This item is no longer available.

    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.
     
    1223 EDT
    , @Mike P
    It's gone. Probably some busybody from the ADL or some such outfit read this piece and had the book removed.

    I had hoped archive.org was better than that. Somebody better archive archive.org before the great purge strips them clean of all non-PC content also.

  48. @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    One of the prime reasons for contriving the so called “holocaust” was to justify “that shitty little country’s” creation and all he horrors that it has caused and is still causing.

  49. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    Oliver only wrote/spoke openly of his atheism after he left both National Review and the John Birch Society. At that point he knew he was addressing nothing beyond a “small fringe.” Note that Oliver died in 1994 (at age 86) and stopped writing in the 1980s.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    'stopped writing in the 1980s'

    There are srticles online where Oliver discusses president Clinton. He was incredibly prolific.
  50. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @LondonBob
    When I was doing a course at MIT the teaching assistant had been at Harvard with the twins and Zuckerberg. Despite being a very nerdy guy he said the Winklevoss twins were great people and Zuckerberg was a weasel.

    https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a19490586/mark-zuckerberg-called-people-who-handed-over-their-data-dumb-f/

    Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

    Zuck: Just ask.

    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

    [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

    Zuck: People just submitted it.

    Zuck: I don’t know why.

    Zuck: They “trust me”

    Zuck: Dumb fucks.

  51. @awry
    See

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazis_of_non-Germanic_descent

    and search for "jew" (of course we are speaking of people having partial Jewish descent here).

    Hmm, we see Erhard Milch on that list, who definitely as not a Jew.

    His gentile mother & father had Erhard, they then divorced, the mother later remarried a Jew. Hence the myth that the Luftwaffe’s Erhard Milch was a Jew.

    That is not to say that weren’t large numbers of Jews who served in the Wehrmacht.

    Thanks.

  52. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    Take it easy, I wouldn’t personalize it.

    IMO, the general thinking is:

    1. Christians are naive to the ways of those dedicated to destroying them

    2. the Christian sense of goodwill & forgiveness has allowed the enemy to get inside gate

    3. Christians are conditioned to not believe there are actually those who want to harm them, Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie and engage in the very actions that are obvious and now being recognized and called to account

    • Replies: @sarz

    ...Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie...
     
    Christians don't read the gospels much. Jesus' various harsh words on the Pharisees would help their imaginations along.
  53. @Montefrío
    I was able to download it less than an hour ago: it is now 11:50 a.m. EDT. I went directly to archive.org

    strange,clicking on the link directly below the HTML got this response:

    This item is no longer available.

    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.

    1223 EDT

  54. @Montefrío
    I was able to download it less than an hour ago: it is now 11:50 a.m. EDT. I went directly to archive.org

    It’s gone. Probably some busybody from the ADL or some such outfit read this piece and had the book removed.

    I had hoped archive.org was better than that. Somebody better archive archive.org before the great purge strips them clean of all non-PC content also.

    • Replies: @fnn
    It's still available at Amazon (!), Barnes and Noble and lulu.com.
    , @Montefrío
    I'm talking about the Oliver book, as I assume you are. I neglected to mention that I don't live in the USA, which may have something to do with why I was able to do so.I just downloaded it again. Hmmm.
    , @Twodees Partain
    I can picture a particular Fart Blossom ADL shill dashing off an email to his bosses reporting the site.
  55. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @Republic
    In regard to the book, The Iron Curtain over America

    He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.
     
    The great purge of all materials against the interests of a certain group in the US has begun

    Under the HTML version of this book there was notice that it had been acquire from
    archive.org

    clicking on that link got this response:

    The item is not available due to issues with the item's content

     

    So an Iron curtain of Jewish censorship has indeed descended upon America

    Very true. I couldn’t even archive this article without jumping through hoops. “archive.is” and archive.fo” are offline ATM. It’s no secret that the Internet “archiive” sites are getting purged of wrongthink now. The term: “full spectrum dominance” was always cherished by our globalist overlords.

  56. As near as I can tell, no previous journalist or researcher had noticed the considerable difference between Mertz’s empirical data and her stated conclusions

    Maybe she’s just not good at math?

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
    @ c matt,

    Quote: "Maybe she’s just not good at math?"

    Reply: Maybe she’s really good at meth?

    Makes you see things that ain't there...
  57. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    Himmler was annoyed that every German leader had a “pet” Jewish friend that they arranged to keep safe. The problem isn’t Jewish people individually (most of them in the West are nice folks) the problem is that half their leaders hate Christians and the other half are willing to do literally whatever it takes (organ trafficking, sexual slavery, actual slavery, running phone banks to defraud Grandma of her life savings, etc) to amass obscene amounts of wealth. Eli Rosenbaum at the local law firm is fine. George Soros is not, and our society is run by the George Soros Jews

  58. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man.

    Your father had a good point: the rich often do exploit the working man. But there’s another fact to consider as well: sometimes the Big Jews exploit the Little Jews to get them to do their dirty work. Even bigshot-leftists like Trotsky were taking money from Wall Street, no doubt believing that the end justified the means. Moral of the story: be careful with idealism. Once it becomes detached from reality, it can be used to justify anything.

  59. Jan 19, 2011 Eisenhower’s “Military-Industrial Complex” Speech Origins and Significance US National Archives

    President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address, known for its warnings about the growing power of the “military-industrial complex,” was nearly two years in the making. This Inside the Vaults video short follows newly discovered papers revealing that Eisenhower was deeply involved in crafting the speech, which was to become one of the most famous in American history.

    Feb 11, 2014 Corporatocracy: How the Corporate Welfare State Divides and Conquers

    A small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy. You couldn’t ask for a more perfect system of control.

    http://youtu.be/Ez8I8VGLNUw

  60. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @FB

    Even if it was because Jews were outsiders that saw them attracted to a subversive movement...
     
    Typical indoctrination...subvert what...?...the great system of American plutocracy and unrestrained exploitation of ordinary folks...for the benefit of a tiny class of parasites at the top...?

    subvert what…?

    Subvert their hosts, naturally. The Tribe does it every time because they don’t know any better. Their hatred of the host is an integral principle which leads to success… and ultimate destruction. Like any other parasite.

  61. FB says: • Website
    @Wally
    said:
    "As for Mr Unz’s conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center…the Holocaust…well it’s because ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?
    Mr Unz’s conclusion about the ‘fatal flaw’ of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence…none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews…ergo it didn’t happen"

    - Your problem, and those like you, is that you have no proof for the magical German 'gas chambers', which were scientifically impossible. Sure would like to see you try though.

    - Your problem, and those like you, is that you claim that the remains of ca: 11,000,000 people ("6M Jews & 5M others", equal to the population of London), exist in immense mass grave whose locations are allegedly known. Sure would like for you to show us those.

    www.codoh.com

    …you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.

    And you know what about ‘science’…?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present…but none of chose to take me up on it…

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1′ From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11

    —Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That’s from a peer reviewed journal…Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS…but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history’s ugliest band of organized psychopaths…

    You’re simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else…

    • Replies: @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.
    , @Wally
    Yawn.
    _ I can cite quotations to "witnesses" to witchcraft & sorcery too.
    An of course the alleged information in the link you cited conflicts with the official & fraudulently marketed Big Lie. You and those like you can't even keep your lies straight.

    - You addressed it in another thread? Please show us.

    - Indeed, I do most definitely know plenty about science. You obviously do not.

    "Red Cross nurses.1′ From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10). "

    - The entire matter was supposedly top secret, but curiously the SS supposedly allowed people to watch top secret SS operations. Oops! Hilarious.

    - We also note that FB cannot tell us how the alleged & impossible gas chambers supposedly worked. He simply dodges that challenge.

    - The alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewed and demolished here.
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11143&p=83723&hilit=model+asmarques#p83723

    - FB also cannot show us the millions upon millions of human remains that are said by his beloved "holocaust" Indu$try to exist in known locations.

    - Science talks and absurdly impossible Zionist propaganda walks:

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
    http://vho.org/GB/ooks/trr/index.html

    'Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz and Birkenau'
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf
    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

    , @Whitewolf

    That’s from a peer reviewed journal…Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS…but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history’s ugliest band of organized psychopaths…

    You’re simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else…
     
    That prize for histories ugliest band of psychopaths would have to go to the Bolsheviks whose reign of terror killed millions even in peacetime. Their genocidal ideology also ravaged much of Asia killing millions more.

    Tell me why countries have to enact holocaust denial laws to protect a narrative that can be proven true by your precious peer review journals. Why is questioning history forbidden in this one particular case? Surely the truth can stand alone against claims that it didn't happen.
    , @Iris

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present…but none of chose to take me up on it…
     
    Come on, FB, where is your engineering mind?

    The gas chambers are a secondary detail of WW2, not even worth discussing, but these idiotic fallacies have to stop.

    How were the alleged "gas chambers" constructed? Where are the layout drawings and plans? The supply and extract ductwork? The ventilation fans? The safety compartmentation? The gaskets and seals to protect the guards outside? The storage facilities for the Zyklon B? The gas detection and protective respiratory devices to avoid killing people outside the gas chambers when retrieving the "bodies"? The massive electrical power required, in war time, to run the nowhere-to-be-found fans, extracts, air handling units? All this exists only in Zionist propaganda.
    , @Patricus
    The problem with the gas chambers story is that the only evidence of these is hearsay like the example you just gave.
    , @Alden
    Peer reviewed journal? LOL. The story may very well be completely true.

    But academic peer reviews are just more academic BS. And academic journals are lies upon lies.
    , @davidgmillsatty
    Words are cheap. Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable, especially biased ones.


    How about showing us a picture of something similar to this:

    https://llwproductions.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/old-main-prison-santa-fe-nm-gas-chamber.jpg


    Here is Auschwitz Krema 1 for comparion:


    http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/2005Photos/GasChamber2005.jpg
  62. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    The late Dr Pierce,the white nationalist had very negative views on Christianity. His statement in The National Vanguard is worth reading. He did however state that Christianity played an important role in civilization.

    Today, after decades of Jewification of both the Roman Catholic Church and all Protestant branches,the role of Christianity is extremely detrimental to the interests of White nationalism.

    The head of the RC church, the Pope,essentially promotes open borders.

    The only church with compatible interest to nationalists is the Orthodox church.

    My statement is in regard to the US, the RC church in Poland and Hungary, for example, are great supporters of nationalism in those countries.

    • Replies: @Alden
    The Catholic Church has never been a national church. The word catholic means universal global in Greek. They always wanted Catholics in every nation in the world. There were Roman Catholic in China as early as 400ad.

    Catholic universalism is nothing new. What is new is the present Pope’s agreeing with the communists leftists anti White racists and global cheap labor capitalists.

    Latin America was the Catholic ideal. Conquer a continent, convert the locals but keep them in Latin America, don’t import them to Spain.

    Religion has nothing to do with the survival of Whites in a hostile world and the triumph of cheap non White labor cut throat capitalism.

    Other than the crusades I don’t see where any Christian church has ever helped Whites. The reformation churches hoped the Turks would conquer the Catholic countries of Europe.
    “ Better Turks than Papists” was the cry of the reformation churches.

    Expect for Jews, I don’t think any religion in the world has ever helped it’s own people. Temples ask for Jews to donate to Israel. Churches ask Christians to donate to Africans Asians blacks everyone but the Whites in their congregations.

    Whoever thought a church could do anything practical to help its people anyway? Kind of naive, like thinking God will help you if you pray enough.

    Only thing I can think of any church does that helps some Whites who have money is the huge system of Catholic schools that at least protect our children from the horrors of black thugs and don’t give lessons about how to use condoms in 5th grade.

    The private schools are about all the Christian churches are useful for. The northern Christian churches were very active in the civil rights school integregation destruction of the cities movement. Today’s southern churches are busy adopting Haitian kids and sending their members to Haiti and Puerto Rico to rebuild.

    If you want a religion that will help you because you are one of the members, become a Jew. It’s the only way.
  63. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else.

    Call it nature, religion or culture but Jews as a group have a history of extreme hostility to outside groups. Since even your holy texts command you to destroy or enslave other groups mainly through usury and subversion as in the old testament/torah you shouldn’t be surprised that other people consider Jews as enemies or at least view them with extreme suspicion. Especially since you can’t let your guard down against an enemy who attacks by subversion. If you mostly attack people in open combat then people see either aggression or non aggression. If you attack by subversion they assume you are always doing it just to be safe. Unless they are Christian Zionists they won’t trust you at all.

    The promotion of diversity/White genocide going on right now isn’t making you any friends either. It hasn’t escaped notice that a huge percentage of it’s promoters and funders are Jewish. If Whites can be considered by their nature racist, supremacist, privileged oppressors of everyone else then Jews can be considered by their nature enemies of everyone else.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  64. @Mike P
    It's gone. Probably some busybody from the ADL or some such outfit read this piece and had the book removed.

    I had hoped archive.org was better than that. Somebody better archive archive.org before the great purge strips them clean of all non-PC content also.

    It’s still available at Amazon (!), Barnes and Noble and lulu.com.

  65. Anonymous[217] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franz
    Revilo P. Oliver is mostly known for his suicide (he and his wife) and his hectoring and totally unreadable prose, with his anti-Christian book so badly executed it's been seen as an advertisement for the faith.

    Oliver's error was thinking WWII is over. An error shared by many. Wm F. Buckley, Jr, started American Conservative, Inc, as a witches coven of anti-Midwest isolationism which Buckley pretty well acknowledged in the first few issues. Buckley was inducted into Skull & Bones (AKA brotherhood of death) in 1950, at midcentury, which is a Red Flag. As WFB was an ostentatious Roman Catholic, it was forbidden in that era for a Catholic to join any secret society much less a masonic subdivision at Yale. This ban was not lifted by the Church till the mid-1980s. Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any. Either way he lied to somebody for a whole generation.

    The real conspiracy isn't the Birch, or Revilo Oliver, or even commies or the Jewish whatever. It's the ball-less American Right and the misfits and tossers who guide it, use it, rise to the top of it and all the while accomplish nothing whatsoever.

    And it's a string of total failure stretching now back nearly a century. Time to call bullshit on the right and note the commies were right from the start: It was and is phony, and not an especially edifying one at that.

    ‘Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any’

    I personally think Buckley was a crypto jew.

  66. @Republic
    In regard to the book, The Iron Curtain over America

    He also argued that the most dangerous aspect of the current situation was the enfolding “Iron Curtain” of Jewish censorship that was preventing ordinary Americans from recognizing the great looming threat to their freedoms, and claimed that combating such media censorship was a task of the highest importance.
     
    The great purge of all materials against the interests of a certain group in the US has begun

    Under the HTML version of this book there was notice that it had been acquire from
    archive.org

    clicking on that link got this response:

    The item is not available due to issues with the item's content

     

    So an Iron curtain of Jewish censorship has indeed descended upon America

    thnx; I just tried archive.org, got this:

    This item is no longer available.
    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.

    So I went to the html version, and read the 1st few paras of “Chapter II • Russia and the Khazars”

    Now, IF so-called ‘modern’ European Js are actually descended from Khazars, THEN they are not really Js at all [=fake joos], they’re not Semites as well; i.e. they have no traceable connection to Palestine AND they can’t believably claim “God promised it to us!” – And IF the holohoax is exactly that, THEN isn’t it “Three strikes and you’re OUT!?”

    Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?’

    • Replies: @Anonymouser
    'Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?"'

    This man is actually mostly sephardic who are ostensibly real semitic hebrews. His father has a fascination on medieval spanish jewish life and wrote a book about it.
    , @Republic

    Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?’
     
    looks like a crook
    , @Anonymouse
    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me (I'm a jew so I know the type). You can see it in the lips and around the nose. Jews are very inbred genetically so Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews often manifest the same business around the lips and the nose. I have it a bit myself but not to the point of caricature.
    , @Hippopotamusdrome

    Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?’

     

    head of the Kurultai of the Crimean Tatar People:

    https://i0.wp.com/euromaidanpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/4_Zair.jpg
  67. Runzie Baby should finance an indie documentary for his ‘American Pravda’ series. A lot more people will watch that vs. read these long articles.

    • Replies: @james bacque
    Thomm: I have already made the documentary. It is entitled Other Losses and I would love Ron Unz to feature it in the Unz Review.

    James Bacque Penetanguishene ON Canada
  68. @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.

    Jews are one of their own symbolic myths. But they’re sure convinced that they’re real. Why do you think they get so upset when anybody else criticizes the Jews? Would they be quite as upset if those same people criticized, say, werewolves? I doubt it.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    "Would they be quite as upset if those same people criticized, say, werewolves? "

    Now that was witty. It's such an accurate observation that no refutation is possible.
  69. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    ‘Were they crypto-Jews? ‘

    Philby looked remarkably Jewish. The Cambridge five were driven by resentments of low status: they did not quite fit in with the aristocrats.

  70. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    ‘Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one’

    Of course people cannot have ethnic blinders and engage in self deception.

  71. anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    No, Aaron, this is not an issue of ‘myths’ and ‘symbols’. This is a real issue that is having real consequences in the real world. It is doing grave damage to real people and cultures.

    It can’t be waved away with psychobabble, unfortunately.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Please don't hold Jung, who can in no way be connected with the concept of "psychobabble", responsible for whatever others say while they quote his name.
  72. @Johnny Rico
    Which Jewish German generals were those?

    Milch was half-Jewish. Both Hitler and Goering knew about it, but didn’t care.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    Interesting. Goring helped Milch when he was being investigated by the Gestapo and then Milch turned on him.

    "In 1944 Milch sided with Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister and Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsführer-SS, in attempting to convince Adolf Hitler to remove Göring from command of the Luftwaffe. When Hitler refused, Göring retaliated by forcing Milch out of his position. For the rest of the war, he worked under Albert Speer."
  73. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    This kind of airy psychological bullshit puts your usual nonsense to shame! You have outdone yourself.

    Now see if you can take a leaf out of George Orwell and argue your thoughts in plain english. If you have a point this should be easy to do.

  74. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    “Hostility” would be putting it strongly, jack. More like disappointment and wariness on account of all the SJWism and Zio-cucking modern Christianity is given to. If Christianity were ever to shape up its act, it might become a powerful vehicle of resistance against the régime. But most of these Christian types are too busy currying favor with it to consider such a thing.

  75. @Mike P
    It's gone. Probably some busybody from the ADL or some such outfit read this piece and had the book removed.

    I had hoped archive.org was better than that. Somebody better archive archive.org before the great purge strips them clean of all non-PC content also.

    I’m talking about the Oliver book, as I assume you are. I neglected to mention that I don’t live in the USA, which may have something to do with why I was able to do so.I just downloaded it again. Hmmm.

  76. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @fnn
    Oliver only wrote/spoke openly of his atheism after he left both National Review and the John Birch Society. At that point he knew he was addressing nothing beyond a "small fringe." Note that Oliver died in 1994 (at age 86) and stopped writing in the 1980s.

    ‘stopped writing in the 1980s’

    There are srticles online where Oliver discusses president Clinton. He was incredibly prolific.

  77. Until the Man on the Street finally wakes up to the enormous theft by the Jooz through all manner of financial trickery, the situation will only get worse.

    The US Military should have been our hope in dealing with these monsters… unfortunately, they were bought off with our tax dollars.

  78. @skrik
    thnx; I just tried archive.org, got this:

    This item is no longer available.
    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.
     
    So I went to the html version, and read the 1st few paras of "Chapter II • Russia and the Khazars"

    Now, IF so-called 'modern' European Js are actually descended from Khazars, THEN they are not really Js at all [=fake joos], they’re not Semites as well; i.e. they have no traceable connection to Palestine AND they can't believably claim "God promised it to us!" - And IF the holohoax is exactly that, THEN isn't it "Three strikes and you're OUT!?"

    Test: Does this man look at all 'Semitic?'
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/4285292-3x2-340x227.jpg

    ‘Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?”‘

    This man is actually mostly sephardic who are ostensibly real semitic hebrews. His father has a fascination on medieval spanish jewish life and wrote a book about it.

    • Replies: @skrik
    Kindly see #85.
    , @Twodees Partain
    That's odd. He looks Middle European to me. Sephardim have a certain look, which Benny lacks entirely.
  79. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    “Jews don’t exist. They’re a social construct.”

    L O L

  80. @anonymous
    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it's trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    often wondered same…………………….to include taking the ‘pulse of the street’….

  81. @skrik
    thnx; I just tried archive.org, got this:

    This item is no longer available.
    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.
     
    So I went to the html version, and read the 1st few paras of "Chapter II • Russia and the Khazars"

    Now, IF so-called 'modern' European Js are actually descended from Khazars, THEN they are not really Js at all [=fake joos], they’re not Semites as well; i.e. they have no traceable connection to Palestine AND they can't believably claim "God promised it to us!" - And IF the holohoax is exactly that, THEN isn't it "Three strikes and you're OUT!?"

    Test: Does this man look at all 'Semitic?'
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/4285292-3x2-340x227.jpg

    Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?’

    looks like a crook

  82. @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    seems to play. import hostiles, foment feelings of ‘unsafety’, whining occurring in France now……generating aliyah by diapsora; added bonus fouling of others’ nest, bugger off to your OTHER country. 2/price of one.

  83. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    jack daniels—The Alt Right is hostile to Christianity because Christianity has given its blessing to the mass immigration which is wrecking the West; the churches could have stood foursquare with Western peoples but they sided with the enemy. As if that were not bad enough, by welcoming Islam, Western churches are betraying their faithful and committing demographic suicide.

  84. Long on lore, short on ‘sure?’

    Kratoklastes: “The internet exists to destroy bad information. Posting bullshít does not work anymore, …”

    Q: Got any proof? I mean checkable, reputable citations. Studying a subject doesn’t usually ‘make you one’ of them.

    {Sephardi
    n noun (plural Sephardim ) a Jew of Spanish or Portuguese descent. Compare with Ashkenazi. Øany Jew of the Middle East or North Africa.}

    Q: Wouldn’t “Spanish or Portuguese” also look a bit mediteranean, like a ‘true’ Semitic? [Check the Pals, say.]

  85. Anonymous [AKA "JohnnyCrockett"] says:

    The fact that men are better at math than women is a dead issue. It has always been a known fact. If you take a bell-shaped curve of a large group of males’ math ability and shift it to the left somewhat, you get female math ability. It’s that simple.

  86. @Anonymouser
    'Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?"'

    This man is actually mostly sephardic who are ostensibly real semitic hebrews. His father has a fascination on medieval spanish jewish life and wrote a book about it.

    Kindly see #85.

  87. For those of you being blocked at archive.org, here is another link for the download of Oliver’s book

    https://tinyurl.com/y5my5gqu

  88. Oh God! How can we hope to contend with the Jew problem when we cannot even get rid of the unnecessary adjectives, with a superfluous “very” occurring in three consecutive sentences, not to mention the “actually quite a bit,” “actually bothered” and “quite” in fast succession.

    As for the concern of the American military with Jewish disloyalty, that is hardly to be surprised at, given that Judaism is a racist, supremacist religion, and that Jews have played a prominent role in the rise of Communism and the ongoing genocide of the dominant nations of Europe through mass immigration and multiculturalism.

    Rather than focus on opinions of largely unknown writers of a different time, it would be more useful to consider why recent and current members of the Anglo-American elite, including the intel agencies (William F. Buckley, Founder of the supposed conservative National Review worked for the CIA — under the direction of Howard Hunt of Watergate and Kennedy Assassination fame) are, with the apparent exception of Jeremy Corbyn of the UK Labour Party, trusty members of either the Cuck-servative or the Cuck-socialist party.

    • Replies: @anonymous

    ongoing genocide of the dominant nations of Europe through mass immigration and multiculturalism.
     
    Given the colonialist and imperialist past (overt) and present (covert) genocidal histories of your eurapean (read whitey) nations, suffice to say... what goes around, comes around.

    The Jooevil have their purpose, I suppose.
  89. A very long Unz’s article with too many topics to address (and most comments are, as usual, silly).

    What I find fascinating is that Mertz claimed, with 95% boys in math, that females were just like males in that discipline. And no one said: no girl, you yourself proved otherwise.

    Fascinating.

    As for Summers, I didn’t know he was such a sleazebag & actually a thief. That’s new.

    It does not have anything to do with the article, but just a free association: I’ve read a few times that there are more US Jews serving in Israeli IDF than in the US armed forces

    If true, it raises old questions about double loyalty….

    • Replies: @AaronB
    This kind of thing is actually extremely common.

    You find this a lot while arguing with IQ believers andcHBD types - their data completely contradicts their conclusions.

    Don't really know what to make of it, but it seems to be a rather common feature of the human mind.
    , @anon82822
    Some comments complain about the length of R.U.’s essay ...

    That researchers can produce a mountain of evidence pointing to an obvious conclusion yet draw the opposite one is like a stream running through the essay. This structure better persuades readers than if he had presented disconnected parts. As readers gradually see “one in the many” it seduces them to agree on all the topics, especially the most important one. I liked it.
  90. Anon[368] • Disclaimer says:

    “One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it’s trajectory. Thank you Ron”

    Shutting down the site would prove its contents correct. Not a smart move considering 1) declining support for Israel among both republicans and democrats 2) it was recently revealed that Gallup has been manipulating polling data to show inflated support for Israel among the American population since at least the late 1980s.

  91. TGD says:

    Since the subjects are mathematics aptitude, communist/Jewish conspiracies, academic infiltration and antisemitism, I’d like to mention the name of Anatole Katok, a name most people have never heard of, who died last year. Katok was a pioneer in dynamical systems and “chaos theory” and other arcane areas of mathematics.

    Katok was a leading mathematician in Russia but increasing antisemitism amongst mathematical elites prompted him to leave the Soviet Union in 1978. He obtained positions at Cal Tech, University of Maryland and finally Penn State.

    An interesting sidebar about Katok is that one of his PhD students was Michael Brin, the father of Sergei Brin, the multi-billionaire co-founder of Google. The Brins have endowed numerous chairs at universities in honor of Katok.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Both the Brins and Katok where males — probably cis males. Your comment feeds the bottom variety of sexism. Plus, it's likely Katok stole all his ideas about arcane mathematics from his wife/sister/daughter/aunt/niece.

    J/k
  92. A small correction. The Rosenbergs were executed for ESPIONAGE not treason (a wartime crime which didn’t apply). There was one person executed for treason in the Civil War over a flag, but no one executed and very few convicted of TREASON since then. There have been a few people and their children later droned in Pakistan and Yemen (supposedly for treason), but they were not charged, sentenced and executed in accordance with the Law. Charges of TREASON! (as in Russiagate) have become hyperbole in partisan politics, “full of sound and fury signifying nothing!” as Shakspeare noted.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    Hanoi Jane is still kicking.
  93. @micheal8
    A small correction. The Rosenbergs were executed for ESPIONAGE not treason (a wartime crime which didn't apply). There was one person executed for treason in the Civil War over a flag, but no one executed and very few convicted of TREASON since then. There have been a few people and their children later droned in Pakistan and Yemen (supposedly for treason), but they were not charged, sentenced and executed in accordance with the Law. Charges of TREASON! (as in Russiagate) have become hyperbole in partisan politics, "full of sound and fury signifying nothing!" as Shakspeare noted.

    Hanoi Jane is still kicking.

  94. @Bardon Kaldian
    A very long Unz's article with too many topics to address (and most comments are, as usual, silly).

    What I find fascinating is that Mertz claimed, with 95% boys in math, that females were just like males in that discipline. And no one said: no girl, you yourself proved otherwise.

    Fascinating.

    As for Summers, I didn't know he was such a sleazebag & actually a thief. That's new.

    It does not have anything to do with the article, but just a free association: I've read a few times that there are more US Jews serving in Israeli IDF than in the US armed forces

    If true, it raises old questions about double loyalty....

    This kind of thing is actually extremely common.

    You find this a lot while arguing with IQ believers andcHBD types – their data completely contradicts their conclusions.

    Don’t really know what to make of it, but it seems to be a rather common feature of the human mind.

  95. @skrik
    thnx; I just tried archive.org, got this:

    This item is no longer available.
    Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use.
     
    So I went to the html version, and read the 1st few paras of "Chapter II • Russia and the Khazars"

    Now, IF so-called 'modern' European Js are actually descended from Khazars, THEN they are not really Js at all [=fake joos], they’re not Semites as well; i.e. they have no traceable connection to Palestine AND they can't believably claim "God promised it to us!" - And IF the holohoax is exactly that, THEN isn't it "Three strikes and you're OUT!?"

    Test: Does this man look at all 'Semitic?'
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/4285292-3x2-340x227.jpg

    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me (I’m a jew so I know the type). You can see it in the lips and around the nose. Jews are very inbred genetically so Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews often manifest the same business around the lips and the nose. I have it a bit myself but not to the point of caricature.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    There is a "Jewish look" (nose, lips, perhaps eyes,..). For instance, people who look Jewish are, say, Einstein, Golda Meir, Zuckerberg, Ben Gurion, Kissinger,...

    On the other hand, many people who are not Jews "look Jewish" to me: actors Joe Mantegna, Al Pacino, assassinated Italian politician Aldo Moro..., while many "ethnic Jews" don't look Jewish (Netanyahu is among them, but I'd add many Israeli faces one can see on Youtube, for instance fat gay freelancer Corey Gil Shuster).

    Perhaps my Jewdar is not too functional....
    , @lloyd
    He just looks a thoroughly horrible man. A morph between the old American wasp club and an Israeli Mossad agent. Which is what he is. He does not look in any way Middle Eastern despite being born in Tel Aviv. He went to live in America before the Middle Eastern appearance rubbed into him.
    , @skrik

    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me
     
    Missing the point, much?

    Then

    Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews
     
    Misleading, much?

    My Q was does this man [Netanyahu] look at all ‘Semitic?’ To which the obvious answer is ‘bloody-hell no!’ Then, if they are not at all Semitic, they can't keep moaning over even the mildest criticism whilst shrieking ‘anti-Semitic!’
  96. Female Janet Mertz sez that women are equal to men in math by proclaiming 95% is equal to 5%.

    The word I’m looking for is irony.

  97. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:

    Bravo, Ron Unz. That was a wonderful and important article. I take back every bad thing I said about the shadow banning of comments about Freemasons here at UR. However it is a pity that Ron didn’t deem it important to describe what these authors said about the craft, or their relationship with it. Even if they had never mentioned the brotherhood it would have been worthy of note.

    For your long time struggle on behalf of free speech, honesty and historical truth, I award you, Ron Unz, the Clown Pepe Medal of Valor, with Rainbow Afro Hair and Dual Honkers:

    [MORE]

  98. @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system … with both having the power to create “gold” out of paper … “gold” out of “nothing”, a somewhat less torturous process than alchemy.

    Jews won both WWI and WWII. As an outcome of these Great Wars, surviving nations in the West have been described as Zionist/Jewish banking cartels masquerading as nation states.

    In light of the above, the creation of the Jewish state of Israel was a given. It was the next logical step in the quest for world hegemony as a safe haven for Jewish swindlers on the lam (from Russian oligarchs to American economists) seeking protection from goyim justice.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    "Creation of the Jewish state was the **next logical step.**"

    Methinks you've got the chronology wrong.

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it's own bank, & other institutions.

    Zionism came well before the World Wars and REQUIRED those wars -- ergo incited those wars, for the purposes and benefit of the Jewish people and the Zionist project.

    Once the timeline is assessed logically, the Hollywood / History channel version of holocaust falls apart.
    , @j2
    "WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system"

    I agree with much of what you write, but the banker, who enabled Germany to have a long war in the WWI was Jewish. The issue is that according to theoreticians of the time before the WWI, it was impossible for economic reasons for European powers to have a long war. Therefore the next war, that, for some specific reason was presented as sure to come, would be a short one. Germany would lose it, naturally, but no great harm would come from the war either to Germany or to anybody else, as it would be very short. What happened is quite different, and exactly as Freemasons wanted it (a senseless war to finish all wars, destruction of monarchies) and as Zionists wanted it (Palestine that Turkey refused to give). Bankers on both sides, from the same ethnic group, made a long extermination war possible and depending on the outcome, they decided who to ask for Palestine. The WWII is largely similar, yet in some ways different. Here in Unz there are some Hitler funs and some supporters of the official history. Both are false, and they are exactly the same: one view and the controlled opposition to it. In reality Hitler and Nazis were lifted to power to do the exact thing needed in the plan: to move the Jews to Palestine in order to create Israel. The origin of the Thule Society is Masonic in the wide sense. That explains everything. They certainly were not any real opposition to bankers. In the WWII both hands were played by the same side. In the WWI only the finance of the war was played by the same hand on both sides. But, as money rules, the outcome was decided, not in details, but decided,

  99. If you are interested in gender differences in intelligence and the likely cause, you might try reading “Smart and Sexy” by Roderick Kaine from Arktos. Basically, the premise is that the differences largely results from X chromosome linkage of intelligence.

    Hell, if you would be interested, I could probably have Arktos send you a review copy.

    https://mattforney.com/smart-sexy/

  100. C’mon…
    Revilo P. Oliver ???
    I implicitly trust a man whose name is a palindrome and looks like Vincent Price with muscle and an attitude.

    And I am completely serious.

  101. Anonymous [AKA "Trump/Pence 2020"] says:

    Anti-Semitism is a mental illness. Jews are God’s chosen people. God created them as superior to the gentiles. They were designed to rule over us. They are benevolent rulers. Look at America for example. Look at all our bountiful freedoms. Look at our booming economy. For those who praise and worship Israel, God will bless their lives immensely. If you’re not winning in life then maybe you need to pray to Jesus and bless Israel daily.

    There is a reason the Donald Trump is President. He serves God’s chosen people and God put him in the White House to serve Israel.

    KAG!

    • LOL: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @Robjil
    Remember USS Liberty June 8 1967. Who did that?

    Remember 911. Who did that? Laurent Guyenot and Christopher Bollyn - have lots of evidence that Israel with the US did it.

    It is not anti-Semitism to call out crimes committed by Jews or Israeli Jews. It is anti- crime. Every culture has people who commits crimes. No culture should be given a pass to protect their criminals. This pass to not prosecute Jewish or Israeli criminals is a crime against humanity and this planet itself.

    If you call yourself a Christian, look in the New Testament. Jesus was not afraid to call out Jews who did criminal or cruel things.

    You are supporting criminal behavior by giving a Total Protection Pass to Jews. No people should be given a Total Protection Pass. This Pass is destroying our planet.

    , @Olorin
    How did I know this troll would have No Recent Commenting History?

    Just a good guesser it seems.
  102. Fascinating article.

    This site is a national treasure for truth seekers.

  103. Well, it looks like it’s time to play my favorite game again: “Let’s blame the Jews for everything”. If it’s true that Jews have the tendency to stray to the left – in order to corrupt and destroy the pure and innocent capitalism – which it never was, that can only mean that the Jews are good people.

    How so? It’s easy. Human designed socio-economic systems ALWAYS evolve to the left. Thus, feudalism was more left wing than slavery, and capitalism is more left wing than feudalism. And whatever comes to replace capitalism – as it should one day – it will be more to the left than capitalism.

    But the capitalists know this, they are not stupid, that’s why they are faking liberalism in order to delay the expiry date for capitalism. Therefore, if it’s true that Jews always lean left, that means that they have the correctly charted evolutionary tendency.

    Human societies evolve to the left, only Hitler tried to discontinue that trend and we know how that ended. There are others who think that capitalism is the pinnacle of human achievement. Fine, then let’s make it the epitaph for humanity. Jews are right, if anything comes after capitalism – it would have to be something that involves taking a left turn.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    Not all Jews are leaning left anymore. Israel supports and props up all the right wing coups in Latin America since the 1950s.

    This author calls for BDS against Israel for what it has been doing and is doing to Latin America.

    https://savageminds.org/2016/03/18/israels-foreign-policy-in-latin-america-another-reason-to-take-the-call-to-boycott-seriously/

    Israel's support for Nicaragua Contras in the 198os and 1990s.

    "Israel’s support for the Nicaraguan Contras was mirrored in the Israeli support for right-wing Phalangist militias in Lebanon in the 1980s and ‘90s; by the same token, the Contras attacks on the institutions of Nicaraguan civil society prefigure the manner in which Israeli settler para-militaries “price tag” attacks seek to undermine the agricultural and social foundations of Palestinian life."

    Israel's support for Argentine's right wing government in 1970s- 1980s.

    "Israel sustained an intimate relationship with the military junta that ruled Argentina from 1976–1983, and provided logistical and hardware support for Argentina during the Falklands War of 1982. The Argentine junta was ideologically anti-Semitic, and routinely brandished Nazi and other fascist symbols . During la Guerra Sucia (the Dirty War), the military imprisoned, tortured and persecuted a higher percentage of leftist, progressive or non-political Jewish Argentine citizens han they did non-Jewish Argentines. In their dealings with the Argentine military, Israel’s leaders showed very clearly that they distinguished between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism and were fully capable of supporting a government that was radically anti-Semitic within its own borders and pro-Israel in its foreign policy. "

    Israel's support for Colombia's right wing rulers

    "In Colombia armed right paramilitaries have also been important players on their own, in collusion with the army’s battle with the leftist guerrillas of the FARC and other groups, and as shock troops for corporate interests. In the late 1970s the paramilitares organized into an umbrella organization, Auto-Defensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), co-founded by Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso, among others. In his 2001 biography, Mi confesión, Castaño describes his year of training in Israel in 1983–84, both in military schools and at the Hebrew University, and details Israel’s influence on his own ideological formation and that of his movement. The Israeli security firm Spearhead, led by retired IDF colonel Yair Klein, started training paramilitaries from the AUC in the mid–1980s, the same era in which Castaño received his education."

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-honduras-enter-new-blood-soaked-military-alliance-support-state-sponsored-terrorism/219887/

    "Israel and Honduras announced a new security agreement this month in which Israel will supply weapons and training to the Honduran military.

    Honduras is ruled by an oppressive and murderous regime that took power after a 2009 coup, and the agreement marks just the latest chapter in Israel’s long, bloody history of arming Central American despots."

    What foreign nation was involved in this 2009 coup?

    https://www.opdeepstate.com/2018/10/21/honduras-and-the-israeli-coup-a-new-special-relationship-immigration/

    "In the aftermath of the 2009 coup in Honduras, I had the opportunity to interview deposed President Manuel Zelaya, who, having been kindly escorted in his pajamas to Costa Rica by the Honduran military, had then resurfaced in Tegucigalpa and taken refuge in the embassy of Brazil. The interview took place via an intermediary inside the embassy, who conveyed my questions to Zelaya.

    One topic we touched on was a comment the left-leaning Zelaya had made concerning “Israeli mercenaries” operating in Honduras. This had unleashed a predictable hullabaloo in international media, with commentators tripping over each other to portray the besieged leader as an anti-Semite extraordinaire on some sort of permanent acid trip.

    In my write-up of the interview, which was published in an insignificant publication, I happened to point out that Israeli mercenaries weren’t exactly foreign to the Central American landscape. When the piece came out, the publisher of another insignificant publication—to which I had contributed some anti-coup articles—threw a fit. How dare I bring the Israelis into it; I would alienate all of Washington!"

    , @Parfois1
    I'm afraid your thesis that Jews are active in left-wing movements to, grosso modo, "be on the right side of history" in evolutionary social dynamics is incorrect, and has reached the proportions of a myth in right-wing/nationalist circles as revealed by the large number of comments here contending that Jews are/were the founders and flag-bearers of Communism/Bolshevism. That is a fundamental lie and it does serve the interests of conservatism because they miss the real enemy.

    It's trite to state once again that Jews were heavily involved in the political movements leading to the Russian Revolution and in the formative years of the USSR. But they were not involved only within the Bolsheviks, they were very active in all opposition parties against the Bolsheviks, which suggests that there was a calculating policy to place Jews in positions of leadership regardless of the final outcome. Jews fought against the Bolsheviks and many ended up in Gulags or facing execution squads, the most notorious one at the end of a sharp icepick in Mexico. See the pattern: there were many Jew horses in the race for power, their ultimate objective, not to bring about social justice or Communism.

    But the Russian Revolution was not the only revolution in human history. There were many rebellions and uprisings throughout Europe in the Middle Ages and since up to the French of 1789 and subsequent years up to 1948 Paris Commune. Yet, one never hears of Jews being on the barricades of the side of revolutionaries, although a late-comer (Marx) made some pronouncements from a safe distance. Perhaps they were too busy making money...

    And since the Russian Revolution were the Jews behind all subsequent uprisings in most of Europe in the aftermath of WWII? No. Were they with the Cuban and Iranian revolutionaries? No. But I know for certain that someone will come with the decrepit canard that the Jewish bankers financed them. History has many examples of peoples' rebellions against injustices perpetrated by the ruling classes regardless of Communism, Marxism, Bolshevism or Jewish activism.

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism. Look what they are doing in most countries where they grabbed the levers of power (USA, Europe). If that is not enough, look at the showpiece of Jewish power: Israel, a foretaste of things to come because of our willful blindness.
  104. @Anonymouse
    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me (I'm a jew so I know the type). You can see it in the lips and around the nose. Jews are very inbred genetically so Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews often manifest the same business around the lips and the nose. I have it a bit myself but not to the point of caricature.

    There is a “Jewish look” (nose, lips, perhaps eyes,..). For instance, people who look Jewish are, say, Einstein, Golda Meir, Zuckerberg, Ben Gurion, Kissinger,…

    On the other hand, many people who are not Jews “look Jewish” to me: actors Joe Mantegna, Al Pacino, assassinated Italian politician Aldo Moro…, while many “ethnic Jews” don’t look Jewish (Netanyahu is among them, but I’d add many Israeli faces one can see on Youtube, for instance fat gay freelancer Corey Gil Shuster).

    Perhaps my Jewdar is not too functional….

  105. Great Unz

  106. @Hamlet's Ghost
    Milch was half-Jewish. Both Hitler and Goering knew about it, but didn't care.

    Interesting. Goring helped Milch when he was being investigated by the Gestapo and then Milch turned on him.

    “In 1944 Milch sided with Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister and Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsführer-SS, in attempting to convince Adolf Hitler to remove Göring from command of the Luftwaffe. When Hitler refused, Göring retaliated by forcing Milch out of his position. For the rest of the war, he worked under Albert Speer.”

    • Replies: @Mike P
    There was a general coup attempt by the Luftwaffe top brass against Goering - Steinhoff, Galland, they were all in on it. When it failed, they were expecting to be executed, but Hitler merely demoted them.
  107. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    Your claim is plausible, but, I have to say, with what familiarity I have with the founding documents of various enduring civilizations, none approaches in terms of lethal intent to everyone else the genocidal xenophobia of the Hebrews. While there is violence and war in Homer, for example, there is a stated reason for it–a response to some action that made enemies. Deuteronomy, on the other hand, simply assumes up front everyone else is an enemy with a a choice between subservience and extermination. (Egyptians are the exception, and the children of Israel are admonished only not to abhor them). Deuteronomy even explicitly includes “cities not of these nations” and tells the Jews that, through usury, they will rule over many nations, and no nation will rule over them.

    I believe the authors of the Mosaic law and the Homeric epics were roughly contemporaries. Thousands of years later, the Jews and the Greeks are still around. Which is more successful? Which is more hated? Which is more rational?

  108. @Anonymous
    Anti-Semitism is a mental illness. Jews are God's chosen people. God created them as superior to the gentiles. They were designed to rule over us. They are benevolent rulers. Look at America for example. Look at all our bountiful freedoms. Look at our booming economy. For those who praise and worship Israel, God will bless their lives immensely. If you're not winning in life then maybe you need to pray to Jesus and bless Israel daily.

    There is a reason the Donald Trump is President. He serves God's chosen people and God put him in the White House to serve Israel.

    KAG!

    Remember USS Liberty June 8 1967. Who did that?

    Remember 911. Who did that? Laurent Guyenot and Christopher Bollyn – have lots of evidence that Israel with the US did it.

    It is not anti-Semitism to call out crimes committed by Jews or Israeli Jews. It is anti- crime. Every culture has people who commits crimes. No culture should be given a pass to protect their criminals. This pass to not prosecute Jewish or Israeli criminals is a crime against humanity and this planet itself.

    If you call yourself a Christian, look in the New Testament. Jesus was not afraid to call out Jews who did criminal or cruel things.

    You are supporting criminal behavior by giving a Total Protection Pass to Jews. No people should be given a Total Protection Pass. This Pass is destroying our planet.

  109. What a lesson in revisionist (i.e., real) history! I’ve read a fair amount of such history, but here are names I’ve never heard of. Thank you, Ron Unz.

  110. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel.

    The reason for inciting 7 wars after 9/11 was to get moslem hordes to leave their homes for Europe. It is the same pattern we saw when the Zionists helped to create Hitler in order to force “the best” jews to flee to Palestine, or how various pogroms have been artificially incited to force jews to migrate or flee from one country to another, like from Iraq and Egypt to Israel. Allowing the goy peoples, races, or nations to prosper does not serve the purpose of Gods Chosen People.

    In Nato speak, Operation Gladio was part of a strategy of continual tension. Jews have been herding the goyim for centuries. Through war, usury, revolution, enslavement, famine, pestilence, depression, depravity and addiction the jew is always herding the goyim, usually to slaughter. That inferior jews get weeded out along the way is not a bug, it is a feature.

    • Replies: @anonymous

    The reason for inciting 7 wars after 9/11 was to get moslem hordes to leave their homes for Europe.
     
    One group of evil (jooscum), incites, and the other group of evil (whitey), executes. It is difficult to see who the greater Evil is here.

    The whitey barbarians are getting the comeuppance they deserve (self-genocide). But, it is little solace for those suffering due to jooscum and whitey evil.

  111. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    Communism is powerful ideologically, because of the inequalities manifest in society. It goes back much further than Marx. There were medieval communes in Europe that had very communistic ideas and were bitterly resented and eventually outlawed by the ruling classes of their time. The leaders of the Peasants’ Revolt had many ideas in common with modern communists. In the British Civil war there were the Diggers and the Levellers.

    What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation. That was never the overt program. There may well have been (there probably was) such an esoteric program but it was not shared with the Goy members.

    • Replies: @j2
    "What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation."

    The "secret"history of Communism can fortunately be tracked reasonably well. Leftist thought started from Christian ideas, but it become Masonic already in the 18th century. Freemasons of Memphis and Mizraim type and Carbonaries were the revolutionary leftists in the 19th century. They were direct descendants of the Jacobins of the French Revolution. Jewish influence on this movement started from converted Frankists joining Freemasonry just before the French Revolution and up to early 19th century. Around this same time certain Jewish bankers (like Rothschild) started financing these revolutionaries, as they were financing wars as their main business. At Napoleon III's time revolutionary Freemasonry (Mizraim, Memphis and the Masonic-type Carbonaries) was already mainly financed by Jewish bankers. There were all of the elements, like controlled press and fully infiltrated system. When Freemasons were given amnesty after the Paris Commune fell, they stopped direct (but not indirect) subversive activities of Mizraim and Memphis. The revolutionary movement continued as Communism. It was financed by Jewish bankers and lead by Jewish revolutionaries from not later than 1890s, probably from 1860s. Freemasons were used for creating controlled opposition to Communism for Zionistic purposes, so Theosophy, Martinists and the Freemason Henry Ford warned of the Communistic threat. (Richard Wagner, with his antisemitic circle, either was a Mason or at least wanted to be, so was close to them.) All this was to force Jews to Palestine: the persecution had to be as the generation did not deserve a redemption (i.e., did not move voluntarily).

    The fact that many Communists did not realize these facts and believed in the Communistic ideas means only that they were fooled. The same way, many Freemasons or intellectuals, who did not realize this, were also fooled. The goal of the financiers was always to take the world power, not to build a better world, and successful revolutions are very seldom spontaneous (in Haiti there was one such case). Somebody is usually funding the revolutionaries.

    , @Parfois1
    What you are saying is also the gist of my comment further down, written before I read yours. It is important to stress the distinction between Zionism and Communism - they are at the opposite ends of the political spectrum. Only dimwits can't see it!

    Some allege they are similar because both are collectivist ideologies; but that is a crass mistake. The collectivism of Jews is only a tool for their own ethnocentrism, an exclusionary/racist mode for self preservation purposes and which they use to promote and support their own kind only.
    , @dfordoom

    Communism is powerful ideologically, because of the inequalities manifest in society. It goes back much further than Marx.
     
    The early Christians for example.
  112. @Cyrano
    Well, it looks like it’s time to play my favorite game again: “Let’s blame the Jews for everything”. If it’s true that Jews have the tendency to stray to the left – in order to corrupt and destroy the pure and innocent capitalism – which it never was, that can only mean that the Jews are good people.

    How so? It’s easy. Human designed socio-economic systems ALWAYS evolve to the left. Thus, feudalism was more left wing than slavery, and capitalism is more left wing than feudalism. And whatever comes to replace capitalism – as it should one day – it will be more to the left than capitalism.

    But the capitalists know this, they are not stupid, that’s why they are faking liberalism in order to delay the expiry date for capitalism. Therefore, if it’s true that Jews always lean left, that means that they have the correctly charted evolutionary tendency.

    Human societies evolve to the left, only Hitler tried to discontinue that trend and we know how that ended. There are others who think that capitalism is the pinnacle of human achievement. Fine, then let’s make it the epitaph for humanity. Jews are right, if anything comes after capitalism – it would have to be something that involves taking a left turn.

    Not all Jews are leaning left anymore. Israel supports and props up all the right wing coups in Latin America since the 1950s.

    This author calls for BDS against Israel for what it has been doing and is doing to Latin America.

    https://savageminds.org/2016/03/18/israels-foreign-policy-in-latin-america-another-reason-to-take-the-call-to-boycott-seriously/

    Israel’s support for Nicaragua Contras in the 198os and 1990s.

    “Israel’s support for the Nicaraguan Contras was mirrored in the Israeli support for right-wing Phalangist militias in Lebanon in the 1980s and ‘90s; by the same token, the Contras attacks on the institutions of Nicaraguan civil society prefigure the manner in which Israeli settler para-militaries “price tag” attacks seek to undermine the agricultural and social foundations of Palestinian life.”

    Israel’s support for Argentine’s right wing government in 1970s- 1980s.

    “Israel sustained an intimate relationship with the military junta that ruled Argentina from 1976–1983, and provided logistical and hardware support for Argentina during the Falklands War of 1982. The Argentine junta was ideologically anti-Semitic, and routinely brandished Nazi and other fascist symbols . During la Guerra Sucia (the Dirty War), the military imprisoned, tortured and persecuted a higher percentage of leftist, progressive or non-political Jewish Argentine citizens han they did non-Jewish Argentines. In their dealings with the Argentine military, Israel’s leaders showed very clearly that they distinguished between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism and were fully capable of supporting a government that was radically anti-Semitic within its own borders and pro-Israel in its foreign policy. ”

    Israel’s support for Colombia’s right wing rulers

    “In Colombia armed right paramilitaries have also been important players on their own, in collusion with the army’s battle with the leftist guerrillas of the FARC and other groups, and as shock troops for corporate interests. In the late 1970s the paramilitares organized into an umbrella organization, Auto-Defensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), co-founded by Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso, among others. In his 2001 biography, Mi confesión, Castaño describes his year of training in Israel in 1983–84, both in military schools and at the Hebrew University, and details Israel’s influence on his own ideological formation and that of his movement. The Israeli security firm Spearhead, led by retired IDF colonel Yair Klein, started training paramilitaries from the AUC in the mid–1980s, the same era in which Castaño received his education.”

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-honduras-enter-new-blood-soaked-military-alliance-support-state-sponsored-terrorism/219887/

    “Israel and Honduras announced a new security agreement this month in which Israel will supply weapons and training to the Honduran military.

    Honduras is ruled by an oppressive and murderous regime that took power after a 2009 coup, and the agreement marks just the latest chapter in Israel’s long, bloody history of arming Central American despots.”

    What foreign nation was involved in this 2009 coup?

    https://www.opdeepstate.com/2018/10/21/honduras-and-the-israeli-coup-a-new-special-relationship-immigration/

    “In the aftermath of the 2009 coup in Honduras, I had the opportunity to interview deposed President Manuel Zelaya, who, having been kindly escorted in his pajamas to Costa Rica by the Honduran military, had then resurfaced in Tegucigalpa and taken refuge in the embassy of Brazil. The interview took place via an intermediary inside the embassy, who conveyed my questions to Zelaya.

    One topic we touched on was a comment the left-leaning Zelaya had made concerning “Israeli mercenaries” operating in Honduras. This had unleashed a predictable hullabaloo in international media, with commentators tripping over each other to portray the besieged leader as an anti-Semite extraordinaire on some sort of permanent acid trip.

    In my write-up of the interview, which was published in an insignificant publication, I happened to point out that Israeli mercenaries weren’t exactly foreign to the Central American landscape. When the piece came out, the publisher of another insignificant publication—to which I had contributed some anti-coup articles—threw a fit. How dare I bring the Israelis into it; I would alienate all of Washington!”

    • Replies: @Parfois1
    Your ample supply of supporting material reinforces a rational analysis about the selectivity of Jewish policies and movements for their own self-interest, not supporting socialist policies or out of concern for the wellbeing of mankind. This faux Judeo-leftism nexus needs to be broken to enable us to see and show how and why Jewry hitched a ride on the Leftist-bandwagon on their way to influence and power.
    , @Lot
    Unzers: We hate Jews when they are communists, but we hate them too when they are anti-communists!

    Jews: Building Zion as God commands.

    https://orig00.deviantart.net/bde0/f/2012/273/d/a/friendliness__by_damainnero-d5gd02l.jpg
  113. @Johnny Rico
    Interesting. Goring helped Milch when he was being investigated by the Gestapo and then Milch turned on him.

    "In 1944 Milch sided with Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister and Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsführer-SS, in attempting to convince Adolf Hitler to remove Göring from command of the Luftwaffe. When Hitler refused, Göring retaliated by forcing Milch out of his position. For the rest of the war, he worked under Albert Speer."

    There was a general coup attempt by the Luftwaffe top brass against Goering – Steinhoff, Galland, they were all in on it. When it failed, they were expecting to be executed, but Hitler merely demoted them.

  114. Ron Unz is a true American patriot. May he continue, for a long time, to shine the light of truth on the numerous lies that Americans have believed. His articles are like a breath of fresh air.

    • Replies: @Olorin
    Agree heartily.

    Additionally he introduces these forbidden, complex, emotion-laden (by design) topics with such measured and thoughtful framing that it pulls the wiring off the underside of all the buttons installed in the reader to administer 20th century FearShocks when reading Heresy.

    He's like a one-man Stockholm-Syndrome cure brigade. Or the Willy Wonka of redpills--so tasty, they can be administered even to normies. (Well, normies who like to read. I usually send just a section or two to whet their appetites, then a bit more if they show interest, with the link at bottom.)

    Many thanks, Mr. Unz, for this Augean labor.

  115. @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...

    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    [MORE]

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland’ (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    • Replies: @Mefobills

    Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme?
     
    I'm an economic historian, and I actually look for Jewish good behavior. Unfortunately, whenever usury or unequal swaps occur, it is inevitable that there are Jewish hands in the pot. I wish it weren't so, but it is. When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    The line of good and evil runs down the middle of every man, and they have to decide which side they are on.
    , @Wally
    LOL: 'When beat, change the subject', says Incitatus.

    - Incitatus simply dodges the demolition of his fake "Operation Hummingbird" by me here:
    https://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/?highlight=hummingbird#comment-2359367

    - In fact I have demolished Incitatus so frequently that I doubt if he can sit down, see:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=incitatus&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    - Incitatus mentions the humane T4 euthansia program for the incurably ill which Germany had. It was no big deal, no secret, and Hitler later stopped it due to religious complaints. Of course, just about all nations now have euthanasia programs.
    See his T4 nonsense slapped silly here:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=T4&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    And also for Incitatus:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau: https://codoh.com/library/document/4730/

    That was easy.
    www.codoh.com

    , @Incitatus
    400 words edited by a fold that masks (286 words = 71.5%) text, including:

    'Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?"

    Etc.

    Interesting.
    , @Mike P

    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense.
     
    You can easily find the questions to your answers by perusing this site. Ron has written his own substantial piece on the holocaust, and the e-books in his collection on this site further make it clear where he stands on the question.

    There is also a convenient link that explains UR's purpose and guiding principles, which also addresses the comment policy.

    Never has it been so easy to find out about the truth about the so-called holocaust. If you and FB still can't do it, then this simply illustrates the power of brainwashing, not any ambiguity of the evidence.

    , @FB

    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website.
     
    I think the question is what Mr Unz hopes to accomplish with this website slash antfarm...in general...perhaps you haven't read much of this website...but the neo-nazis and Holocaust revisionism is just one small aspect of the UNZ 'ouvre'...

    The website includes 'authors' that spew unabashed race hate [not just Jews, but blacks, Latinos etc]...nonstop bullshit about 'racialist' IQ [SMFH]...and other such 'important' subjects...

    This attracts a truly grotesque commentariat of hard-baked bigots...who spew their bile here with such abandon that one wonders about how the human character can possibly descend to such worthlessness...

    But here's the thing...these people are truly losers...it's no surprise to anyone that the most vehement race hate occurs in the deeply disadvantaged socio-economic underclass...but this is NOT a reflection of ordinary folks...even folks we might wrongly label as 'white trash'...most ordinary folks [even the desperately poor] are actually decent folks...they suffer mostly due to our out of control elites and do not blame bogeymen of different color or religion...is the UNZ lunatics are a tiny irrelevant fringe...

    Here's a guy I really like...just a good old boy who's got a lot of heart and soul...these are the real 'people of the land'...not the bitter losers UNZ attracts like flies to shit...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x9cflMxahQ

    As to why this ant farm experiment...?

    That's the puzzler for me...no kind of 'movement' [other than the bowel type] can possibly result from this 'project'...

    For me the value in seeing these losers vent their spleen is to remind myself just how far down the wrong road some humans are capable of going...without ever realizing...'hey man...where the fuck is this road taking me...?'

    The human condition in its most weakened state [genetically, morally, humanistically...and every other way]...on display...it's like going to the museum and seeing the goofy creatures that never made it...it is instructive...

  116. @Anonymouse
    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me (I'm a jew so I know the type). You can see it in the lips and around the nose. Jews are very inbred genetically so Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews often manifest the same business around the lips and the nose. I have it a bit myself but not to the point of caricature.

    He just looks a thoroughly horrible man. A morph between the old American wasp club and an Israeli Mossad agent. Which is what he is. He does not look in any way Middle Eastern despite being born in Tel Aviv. He went to live in America before the Middle Eastern appearance rubbed into him.

  117. @Anonymous
    Anti-Semitism is a mental illness. Jews are God's chosen people. God created them as superior to the gentiles. They were designed to rule over us. They are benevolent rulers. Look at America for example. Look at all our bountiful freedoms. Look at our booming economy. For those who praise and worship Israel, God will bless their lives immensely. If you're not winning in life then maybe you need to pray to Jesus and bless Israel daily.

    There is a reason the Donald Trump is President. He serves God's chosen people and God put him in the White House to serve Israel.

    KAG!

    How did I know this troll would have No Recent Commenting History?

    Just a good guesser it seems.

  118. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    Please post your word count that would validate the statement that 90% of the article is devoted to some obscure crackpot. You didn’t read the article, obviously. If you had, you might have offered a believable statement on the percentage of the text that refers to the “crackpot”.

    Your absurd 90% claim shows that you can’t even tell a convincing lie.

  119. The question is how this all came to pass if the military-industrialist-capitalist institution was aware of the “threat.” The answer would seem to be simple if you think about it in Sherlockian terms; the control entities knew and allowed it if not urged it to happen. This must be why the reviled Revealo broke with the Pastoral Cult. Judeo-Christian-Islam seeks the end of the world, and no doubt the shadowy organizations behind Marxism-Capitalism benefit from it. This is why we are constantly hearing about the NWO and whatnot. Everyone wants to hurry things along so they can see what becomes of it.

  120. @gsjackson
    Buckley's deep background would make for an interesting study. We all see how he ended up -- truckling to neocons and their money, handing them Joe Sobran's scalp and handing over his magazine to a little boy, Richard Lowry, who could be counted on to do their bidding. Was he nothing but a ZCIA operative from the start, notwithstanding any anti-semitic inclinations his father may have had?

    Buckley always came across as a liar when he appeared on TV. He had a habit of casting his eyes upward and licking his lips, both of which are tells, as anyone who plays poker knows. I always viewed him as an insufferably arrogant prick who was almost as conservative as Scoop Jackson.

  121. @Mike P
    It's gone. Probably some busybody from the ADL or some such outfit read this piece and had the book removed.

    I had hoped archive.org was better than that. Somebody better archive archive.org before the great purge strips them clean of all non-PC content also.

    I can picture a particular Fart Blossom ADL shill dashing off an email to his bosses reporting the site.

  122. @Digital Samizdat

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.
     
    Jews are one of their own symbolic myths. But they're sure convinced that they're real. Why do you think they get so upset when anybody else criticizes the Jews? Would they be quite as upset if those same people criticized, say, werewolves? I doubt it.

    “Would they be quite as upset if those same people criticized, say, werewolves? ”

    Now that was witty. It’s such an accurate observation that no refutation is possible.

  123. @Anonymouser
    'Test: Does this man look at all ‘Semitic?"'

    This man is actually mostly sephardic who are ostensibly real semitic hebrews. His father has a fascination on medieval spanish jewish life and wrote a book about it.

    That’s odd. He looks Middle European to me. Sephardim have a certain look, which Benny lacks entirely.

  124. Philip Roth’s list of Jewish negative traits would include: contentiousness, dissension, hyper-criticalness, hyper-touchiness, alienation, awkwardness, and cringing. Assuming the accuracy of Roth, an alternative hypothesis emerges as to why Jews would not be well-suited for the military, and accordingly would be viewed negatively by military superiors. Jews following orders is like women sitting for the Putnam math competition, or men dealing with a kindergarten class.

    • Replies: @Anon

    Philip Roth’s list of Jewish negative traits would include: contentiousness, dissension, hyper-criticalness, hyper-touchiness, alienation, awkwardness, and cringing.
     
    That's fascism. It has the eerie power of making the likes of Roth look good, and one willing to support them.
  125. @John
    Ron Unz is a true American patriot. May he continue, for a long time, to shine the light of truth on the numerous lies that Americans have believed. His articles are like a breath of fresh air.

    Agree heartily.

    Additionally he introduces these forbidden, complex, emotion-laden (by design) topics with such measured and thoughtful framing that it pulls the wiring off the underside of all the buttons installed in the reader to administer 20th century FearShocks when reading Heresy.

    He’s like a one-man Stockholm-Syndrome cure brigade. Or the Willy Wonka of redpills–so tasty, they can be administered even to normies. (Well, normies who like to read. I usually send just a section or two to whet their appetites, then a bit more if they show interest, with the link at bottom.)

    Many thanks, Mr. Unz, for this Augean labor.

  126. Anon[363] • Disclaimer says:

    These are the empirical results that Mertz and her co-authors touted as conclusively demonstrating that males and females have equal mathematical ability. As near as I can tell, no previous journalist or researcher had noticed the considerable difference between Mertz’s empirical data and her stated conclusions

    That’s an average difference you have there… nothing out of the ordinary — and yes, universities, even MIT, have been progressively crowded with such people.

  127. @TheJester
    WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system ... with both having the power to create "gold" out of paper ... "gold" out of "nothing", a somewhat less torturous process than alchemy.

    Jews won both WWI and WWII. As an outcome of these Great Wars, surviving nations in the West have been described as Zionist/Jewish banking cartels masquerading as nation states.

    In light of the above, the creation of the Jewish state of Israel was a given. It was the next logical step in the quest for world hegemony as a safe haven for Jewish swindlers on the lam (from Russian oligarchs to American economists) seeking protection from goyim justice.

    “Creation of the Jewish state was the **next logical step.**

    Methinks you’ve got the chronology wrong.

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it’s own bank, & other institutions.

    Zionism came well before the World Wars and REQUIRED those wars — ergo incited those wars, for the purposes and benefit of the Jewish people and the Zionist project.

    Once the timeline is assessed logically, the Hollywood / History channel version of holocaust falls apart.

    • Replies: @Mefobills

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it’s own bank, & other institutions.

     

    Keep an eye on Patagonia. The early Zionists cast about for a country of their own. Palestine was the dream, while Uganda was offered up by the British. Ugandan people were willing.

    Other areas under serious consideration included Madagascar.

    Patagonia was considered the "practical" country. To wrest Palestine from the Ottoman empire required war. Zion didn't want "practical" they wanted Messianic prophecy to be self fulfilled.

    Israeli soldiers on "vacation" walk Patagonia today, and Zion is constantly interfering in Argentine politics.
  128. Those attempting to shut down Holocaust denial may be revealing their own insecurity about truth and consequently may be doing their cause a disservice. If the Holocaust were true, there would be no reason to shut down examination of the historical facts because truth can stand up to rigorous examination. When the evidence for all ideas is placed on the table, discussed, debated and discarded, in the end truth will be left standing. Refusal to even allow the discussion to take place might be construed as indirect evidence that those shutting down the discussion know the Holocaust didn’t happen, or at least, not as presented. But why resort to logic, truth and respectful debate when you can push people around, manipulate them with lies, ram propaganda down their throats, and then deride and deplatform them if they won’t play along, making an example of them to the rest of the herd? I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @S

    I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.
     
    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but 'conveniently forgotten'.

    For instance, few have ever heard that at the conclusion of the US Civil War that the United States intended to have a series of trials centered upon the South's POW camp system, with particular emphasis on one of the largest, Andersonville and its associated rail depot.

    The stated intent was to first put on trial, and then to have executed by hanging, the entirety of the upper echelons of the defeated Southern Confederacy's political and military leadership for 'crimes against humanity' regarding the 'camps', ie Jeff Davis and his cabinet, and General Robert E Lee and his lieutenants at his high command.

    The accusations were many and varied, ie that the South had used 'cattle cars' to transport prisoners, manufactured leather wallets from the human skin of murdered Union prisoners, murdered many hundreds of the men with 'poisonous injections' deceptively designed to look like preventive health measures, ie vaccination against disease, and had deliberately planned to 'systematically' murder many thousands of Union POW's by starving them to death.

    The plans largely fell through and the accusations are now generally, albeit quietly, acknowledged by historians to have been fraudulent. The North's own POW camp system holding the Southerners is now known to have had closely paralleling death rates to the South's camps.

    The one trial for Henry Wirz, the commanding officer at Andersonville, which went ahead, is now also acknowledged to have been a farce, and violated all basic norms of justice, the solitary and hapless Wirz being a 'scapegoat' for Northern picque regarding its huge wartime losses.

    All far too late for Wirz though, who was hung for amongst other things being accused of shooting down prisoners for sport with his personal pistol, and unleashing large and ferocious dogs upon prisoners, etc, etc. The last thing Wirz heard while on this earth and in the process of being hung were the chants of 'Andersonville!', 'Andersonville!', by the mob of Union soldiers who witnessed the execution and surrounded the gallows.

    Immediately after the Civil War's conclusion a song was published in the North with the phrase 'never forget' figuring prominently in the lyrics in regards to Andersonville and the other Southern camps.

    For decades after the war (through about 1900) Southerners had the accusations about 'the camps' routinely thrown in their face in the corporate media of the day.

    Though very rare, once in a great while during that same time period, a US establishment journal would acknowledge that more than anything the high death rate of Northern POW's in the Southern camps was due to the North's own policy of a complete blockade of food and medicine entering the South.

    The below 1870 article is from the then hugely influential Boston based Atlantic Monthly and was entitled 'Our Israelitish Brethren'. The magazine today remains quite influential, is now known simply as The Atlantic, and is based in Washington DC.

    In more modern English the article's title would translate as 'Our Jewish Brothers'.

    'Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.'


    The Atlantic Monthly (October, 1870) - Our Israelitish Brethren

    Who can estimate the reparation which Christendom owes this interesting and unoffending people? How abundant, how untiring, should be our charity in judging the faults of character which our own superstition has created or developed!

    Of the giant wrongs to which they have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded. In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea...

    ..Those who remained in the Peninsula suffered baptism, and were obliged to conform to the outward observances of the reigning church. Far more enviable was the lot of those who had accepted banishment. The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to "question" the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.

     

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/
    , @Olorin
    The holocaust narrative is a foundational myth imposed upon the goyim but also used as tribal glue.

    I'm not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes...that involve Jews imagining and rubbing hands over the most bizarre tortures being done TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE. Sometimes even involving their own families.

    On top of that, Jews have as a population strategy the retconning of the narratives of their host societies. "People of the Book" you know. They put themselves and each other in charge of the mechanisms of cultural production in their host societies. Then put themselves at the center of the important stories. A good example is the whole "we were slaves in Egypt" thing. As though all of that host society's vast history and deeds boil down to having been mean to Jews, who fortunately had the Plague n Clever Getaway god on their side.

    The charge of "antisemitism" has been a whip for forcing others to adopt this narrative. Well, that and saturating the culture with these themes and invented episodes. Inserting them into everything, tirelessly and persistently. Punishing any questioning of orthodoxy. Quickly this foundational myth, and the supporting quasi-religious textual/critical strategy that bolsters it, has risen to supplant all others in the US and Europe, in terms of sanctity and urgency...though in the former it is coupled with the Huddled Masses shtik of that sugar-slavery-and-swill-milk-origins-trust-fund gal and Zionist activist Emma Lazarus and her maudlin poem added late to that enormous French statue.

    Remember also that Jews played an outsized role in establishing the Victimization By Whites narratives of "civil rights," "feminism," "affirmative action," "gay rights," etc., doled out to all populations considered weaponizeable in the war on whites. Someone observed recently on 4chan that someone in some online magazine had referred to some cost of climate change as equivalent to X number of holocausts. So now apparently it's a quantitative unit too.

  129. It’s a popular prejudice, also, that focus on excellence in humanities (arts, philosophy) would yield percentages significantly divergent from those in the article re scientific areas.

  130. @Johnny Rico
    Which Jewish German generals were those?

    https://rafzen.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/jewish-senior-officers-in-hitlers-army-erhard-milch-wilhelm-keitel-walther-von-brauchitsch-erich-raeder-and-maximilian-von-weichs/

    It only took a few ergs of finger energy on my part to come up with a link.

    Before asking for proof about things, make a little effort on your own.

    Which Jewish generals?

    Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant generals, five major generals), « men commanding up to 100,000 troops. »

    If one is intellectually honest, they can pull on the thread and do more research on their own, and that takes initiative and energy.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    It took even less energy on my part to get you to do that. Thanks.
  131. @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme?

    I’m an economic historian, and I actually look for Jewish good behavior. Unfortunately, whenever usury or unequal swaps occur, it is inevitable that there are Jewish hands in the pot. I wish it weren’t so, but it is. When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    The line of good and evil runs down the middle of every man, and they have to decide which side they are on.

    • Replies: @anon

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.
     
    supposedly there was an Israeli pilot that refused to fire on the USS Liberty and was court-martialed and served 7 years in prison

    i was shocked when i heard this, also demonstrates how despicable the attack was
    , @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.
     
    All goyim posting here are in awe of those traits in Mr. Unz, and certainly hopeful, maybe even trustingly so, that he will remain an admirable exception among the group who has so disappointed and harmed us.

    Chapter 16, The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon

    https://www.ccel.org/g/gibbon/decline/volume1/chap16.htm


    Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which (((they))) committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.
     
  132. @anonymous
    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it's trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve?

    Both.

  133. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews.

    Yep.

  134. @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    You could be onto something, quite uncomfortable, here.

  135. @Mefobills
    https://rafzen.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/jewish-senior-officers-in-hitlers-army-erhard-milch-wilhelm-keitel-walther-von-brauchitsch-erich-raeder-and-maximilian-von-weichs/

    It only took a few ergs of finger energy on my part to come up with a link.

    Before asking for proof about things, make a little effort on your own.

    Which Jewish generals?

    Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant generals, five major generals), « men commanding up to 100,000 troops. »
     
    If one is intellectually honest, they can pull on the thread and do more research on their own, and that takes initiative and energy.

    It took even less energy on my part to get you to do that. Thanks.

    • LOL: sarz
    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    True, but who comes out of the exchange appearing genuine and who was exposed as a wanker? Hint: It's not you who appears genuine. Stop it, before you go blind.
  136. His subtitle is “Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army” and he makes an extremely compelling case that during the first half of the twentieth century and even afterward, the top ranks of the U.S. military and especially Military Intelligence heavily subscribed to notions that today would be universally dismissed as “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.”

    Hmm — looks like those old guys were 100% correct. How prophetic.

    Today, all US generals and admirals are publicly pro-Israel. Not one set of balls among them.

    That is how sick America is.

    Do No Harm — Art

  137. @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...

    Yawn.
    _ I can cite quotations to “witnesses” to witchcraft & sorcery too.
    An of course the alleged information in the link you cited conflicts with the official & fraudulently marketed Big Lie. You and those like you can’t even keep your lies straight.

    – You addressed it in another thread? Please show us.

    – Indeed, I do most definitely know plenty about science. You obviously do not.

    “Red Cross nurses.1′ From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10). ”

    – The entire matter was supposedly top secret, but curiously the SS supposedly allowed people to watch top secret SS operations. Oops! Hilarious.

    [MORE]

    – We also note that FB cannot tell us how the alleged & impossible gas chambers supposedly worked. He simply dodges that challenge.

    The alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewed and demolished here.
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11143&p=83723&hilit=model+asmarques#p83723

    – FB also cannot show us the millions upon millions of human remains that are said by his beloved “holocaust” Indu$try to exist in known locations.

    – Science talks and absurdly impossible Zionist propaganda walks:

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
    http://vho.org/GB/ooks/trr/index.html

    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf
    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

  138. @SafeNow
    Philip Roth’s list of Jewish negative traits would include: contentiousness, dissension, hyper-criticalness, hyper-touchiness, alienation, awkwardness, and cringing. Assuming the accuracy of Roth, an alternative hypothesis emerges as to why Jews would not be well-suited for the military, and accordingly would be viewed negatively by military superiors. Jews following orders is like women sitting for the Putnam math competition, or men dealing with a kindergarten class.

    Philip Roth’s list of Jewish negative traits would include: contentiousness, dissension, hyper-criticalness, hyper-touchiness, alienation, awkwardness, and cringing.

    That’s fascism. It has the eerie power of making the likes of Roth look good, and one willing to support them.

  139. Unz.com must be having an impact judging by the increasing number of wreckers showing up to do that thing they do.

    • Agree: Mefobills
  140. @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    LOL: ‘When beat, change the subject’, says Incitatus.

    – Incitatus simply dodges the demolition of his fake “Operation Hummingbird” by me here:
    https://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/?highlight=hummingbird#comment-2359367

    – In fact I have demolished Incitatus so frequently that I doubt if he can sit down, see:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=incitatus&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    – Incitatus mentions the humane T4 euthansia program for the incurably ill which Germany had. It was no big deal, no secret, and Hitler later stopped it due to religious complaints. Of course, just about all nations now have euthanasia programs.
    See his T4 nonsense slapped silly here:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=T4&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    And also for Incitatus:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau: https://codoh.com/library/document/4730/

    That was easy.
    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Incitatus

    “LOL: ‘When beat, change the subject’, says Incitatus”
     
    Really? You’re that desperate? Where did I say that? Links please.

    Little codoh Tar-Baby.
  141. @c matt

    As near as I can tell, no previous journalist or researcher had noticed the considerable difference between Mertz’s empirical data and her stated conclusions
     
    Maybe she's just not good at math?

    @ c matt,

    Quote: “Maybe she’s just not good at math?”

    Reply: Maybe she’s really good at meth?

    Makes you see things that ain’t there…

  142. @Zumbuddi
    "Creation of the Jewish state was the **next logical step.**"

    Methinks you've got the chronology wrong.

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it's own bank, & other institutions.

    Zionism came well before the World Wars and REQUIRED those wars -- ergo incited those wars, for the purposes and benefit of the Jewish people and the Zionist project.

    Once the timeline is assessed logically, the Hollywood / History channel version of holocaust falls apart.

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it’s own bank, & other institutions.

    Keep an eye on Patagonia. The early Zionists cast about for a country of their own. Palestine was the dream, while Uganda was offered up by the British. Ugandan people were willing.

    Other areas under serious consideration included Madagascar.

    Patagonia was considered the “practical” country. To wrest Palestine from the Ottoman empire required war. Zion didn’t want “practical” they wanted Messianic prophecy to be self fulfilled.

    Israeli soldiers on “vacation” walk Patagonia today, and Zion is constantly interfering in Argentine politics.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    Good point, thanks.
    Thierry Meyssan has reported on the Jewish billionaire who bought vast acreage in Patagonia.

    Also -- didn't Israel just send 1000 IDF troops to Honduras?

    iirc it was recently reported that 88 000 Hondurans migrated to USA in the last 3 or 4 months.
    Are Israelis facilitating the ethnic cleansing of Honduras for their own purposes, which might include a foot-hold for an Israeli military garrisoning of USA?
  143. Sorry for this quite boring question, but:

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.

    Grateful for any help.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.
     
    Sure, it's available on Archive.org in a variety of different formats:

    https://archive.org/details/BeatyJohnTheIronCurtainOverAmerica1.o/page/n1

    In glancing over this comment-thread, I noticed that people have discovered that the previous Archive.org version has been "disappeared" so I suggest you quickly grab what you want from this one while it still exists. Apparently, the Kindle and ePub versions have already been eliminated.

    The same situation probably applies to the Revilo Oliver book:

    https://archive.org/details/AmericasDecline1983V2
  144. @Wally
    LOL: 'When beat, change the subject', says Incitatus.

    - Incitatus simply dodges the demolition of his fake "Operation Hummingbird" by me here:
    https://www.unz.com/article/introduction-to-hitlers-war/?highlight=hummingbird#comment-2359367

    - In fact I have demolished Incitatus so frequently that I doubt if he can sit down, see:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=incitatus&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    - Incitatus mentions the humane T4 euthansia program for the incurably ill which Germany had. It was no big deal, no secret, and Hitler later stopped it due to religious complaints. Of course, just about all nations now have euthanasia programs.
    See his T4 nonsense slapped silly here:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=T4&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    And also for Incitatus:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau: https://codoh.com/library/document/4730/

    That was easy.
    www.codoh.com

    “LOL: ‘When beat, change the subject’, says Incitatus”

    Really? You’re that desperate? Where did I say that? Links please.

    Little codoh Tar-Baby.

    • Replies: @Wally
    Desperately you switched from the fake "holocaust" claims, which you cannot prove, to some laughably absurd pre-war claim which I have already shredded.

    Yep, that's you changing the subject.

    I gave the links, everyone can read them, you've been crushed again.

    And yes, www.codoh.com ... which contains a veritable library of material that you cannot refute.
    Ouch!

    Cheers.

    , @NoseytheDuke
    The inference was that you didn't respond to anything of substance but rather you chose to home in on an inconsequential matter of punctuation in a weak attempt to score a cheap point. It was disingenuous, unconvincing and more than a little pathetic, a bit like an old queen dressing up like a cheap tart and thinking that the fellas are fooled, but you'd know all about disingenuous old queens. Try again, old queen.
  145. @j2
    "One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue."

    "in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East."

    The reason for fomenting anti-Semitism (e.g. with the Protocols) in the end of the 19th century up to 1948 was to get people to Israel. A bit later the reason for fomenting anti-Semitism in Iraq was to have Iraqi Jews to move to Israel to get more people there.

    “in hopes that a growing schism between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews might weaken their powerful adversary, or if the former gained the upper hand, perhaps help ensure the removal of all Jews to the Middle East.”

    DON’T ensure removal of all Jews to the Middle East. Genocide!

    Just ban genital mutilation of children below the age of consent. And get rid of the rabbis. It’s they who are the real monsters. Rabbinical Talmudic rule destroyed ancient Judaism, and wiped out Hellenistic Judaism. Shahak writes that their totalitarianism is what preserved Judaism: no escape. I think Shlomo Sand or Ilan Pappe or some Jewish historian writes of an era of Jewish freedom before the rabbinate took over. And they took over by killing all dissenters after persuading European rulers to give them total power over all Jews. So encourage Karaitism without circumcision. DON’T send them to wipe out the original Hebrews, now called Palestinian Arabs.

  146. @Jim Given
    Sorry for this quite boring question, but:

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty's book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.

    Grateful for any help.

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.

    Sure, it’s available on Archive.org in a variety of different formats:

    https://archive.org/details/BeatyJohnTheIronCurtainOverAmerica1.o/page/n1

    In glancing over this comment-thread, I noticed that people have discovered that the previous Archive.org version has been “disappeared” so I suggest you quickly grab what you want from this one while it still exists. Apparently, the Kindle and ePub versions have already been eliminated.

    The same situation probably applies to the Revilo Oliver book:

    https://archive.org/details/AmericasDecline1983V2

    • Replies: @aandrews
    https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Decline-Conservative-Revilo-Oliver-ebook/dp/B07N2TMZKX/

    $2.99 for the Kindle version (as we speak).

    , @Mefobills
    Some Revilo excerpts can be found here:

    http://heretical.com/


    See Oliver: Jewish Strategy

    , @sarz
    Ron, please put all these works on your own server.

    And please have a donation mechanism at the bottom of the page if you would like financial help.
    , @Anonymous
    You can find the book here, in pdf format


    https://tinyurl.com/y5my5gqu
  147. @Ron Unz

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.
     
    Sure, it's available on Archive.org in a variety of different formats:

    https://archive.org/details/BeatyJohnTheIronCurtainOverAmerica1.o/page/n1

    In glancing over this comment-thread, I noticed that people have discovered that the previous Archive.org version has been "disappeared" so I suggest you quickly grab what you want from this one while it still exists. Apparently, the Kindle and ePub versions have already been eliminated.

    The same situation probably applies to the Revilo Oliver book:

    https://archive.org/details/AmericasDecline1983V2

    $2.99 for the Kindle version (as we speak).

  148. Ron, enormous thanks for a very important article. Now, I hope this doesn’t rub you up the wrong way, but I wonder if this next is totally off-topic.

    Look at the astoundingly powerful homosexual lobby which has taken the world by storm, pretending to be social progress when it is really social subversion.

    Comes out with nonsense like that an absurd contradiction between the physical body and erotic desires is not pathological, is normal, and it’s forbidden to suggest otherwise.

    One does not have to moralize, to say it’s wrong. It’s not wrong morally to be, oneself, diseased: not wrong to have a mental illness, even to be in denial that it’s an illness.

    But if social subversion is what it’s all about, who is behind that immensely powerful lobby now in control of little childrens’ schools and indoctrination? Where did it spring from?

    • Replies: @Parfois1
    I'm not sure whether the link below will work. Is a comment by "Iris" giving an example of Jewish hypocrisy: French minister Peillon's law for sexual education to pre-schoolers. Hope it works.

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Iris

    , @Parfois1
    My attempt to post a link regarding your question does not work,so it appears. Here's another try:
    Read last paragraph.

    Iris says:
    May 30, 2019 at 12:02 pm GMT • 200 Words
    @Jacques Sheete
    Dear Jacques;
    “Sayan”, plural “Sayanim” is a term initially used by author and former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky in his books. It describes Jewish people who are citizens/natives to the country they live in, but act as sleeper agents for Israel.

    This term has become commonly used within the (real) French alternative right, after anti-Zionist, Jewish author Jacob Cohen popularised it as title for one of his books: “Le printemps des Sayanim/ Bloom of the Sayanim”.

    Play Video

    The term Sayanim was spot on, because it described a phenomenon that was confusing and not well understood: the unconditional and totally unsuspected allegiance to Israel of members of the native Jewish diaspora.

    The Sayanim are far more than a network of informant. They are people “naturally” embedded in all areas of public life, who promote and push Israel’s grand agenda while the public remains unaware.

    For instance, Vincent Peillon, the French minister who introduced teaching LGBTQ “facts of life” to 4-year old kindergarten kids, has ancestral presence in France. He is a Strasbourg Jew, who despite the public policies he imposed on the goyim, brought up all of his 3 children in the Jewish religious educational system. You see the picture.

  149. S says:
    @Giuseppe
    Those attempting to shut down Holocaust denial may be revealing their own insecurity about truth and consequently may be doing their cause a disservice. If the Holocaust were true, there would be no reason to shut down examination of the historical facts because truth can stand up to rigorous examination. When the evidence for all ideas is placed on the table, discussed, debated and discarded, in the end truth will be left standing. Refusal to even allow the discussion to take place might be construed as indirect evidence that those shutting down the discussion know the Holocaust didn't happen, or at least, not as presented. But why resort to logic, truth and respectful debate when you can push people around, manipulate them with lies, ram propaganda down their throats, and then deride and deplatform them if they won't play along, making an example of them to the rest of the herd? I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.

    I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.

    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but ‘conveniently forgotten’.

    For instance, few have ever heard that at the conclusion of the US Civil War that the United States intended to have a series of trials centered upon the South’s POW camp system, with particular emphasis on one of the largest, Andersonville and its associated rail depot.

    The stated intent was to first put on trial, and then to have executed by hanging, the entirety of the upper echelons of the defeated Southern Confederacy’s political and military leadership for ‘crimes against humanity’ regarding the ‘camps’, ie Jeff Davis and his cabinet, and General Robert E Lee and his lieutenants at his high command.

    The accusations were many and varied, ie that the South had used ‘cattle cars’ to transport prisoners, manufactured leather wallets from the human skin of murdered Union prisoners, murdered many hundreds of the men with ‘poisonous injections’ deceptively designed to look like preventive health measures, ie vaccination against disease, and had deliberately planned to ‘systematically’ murder many thousands of Union POW’s by starving them to death.

    [MORE]

    The plans largely fell through and the accusations are now generally, albeit quietly, acknowledged by historians to have been fraudulent. The North’s own POW camp system holding the Southerners is now known to have had closely paralleling death rates to the South’s camps.

    The one trial for Henry Wirz, the commanding officer at Andersonville, which went ahead, is now also acknowledged to have been a farce, and violated all basic norms of justice, the solitary and hapless Wirz being a ‘scapegoat’ for Northern picque regarding its huge wartime losses.

    All far too late for Wirz though, who was hung for amongst other things being accused of shooting down prisoners for sport with his personal pistol, and unleashing large and ferocious dogs upon prisoners, etc, etc. The last thing Wirz heard while on this earth and in the process of being hung were the chants of ‘Andersonville!’, ‘Andersonville!’, by the mob of Union soldiers who witnessed the execution and surrounded the gallows.

    Immediately after the Civil War’s conclusion a song was published in the North with the phrase ‘never forget’ figuring prominently in the lyrics in regards to Andersonville and the other Southern camps.

    For decades after the war (through about 1900) Southerners had the accusations about ‘the camps’ routinely thrown in their face in the corporate media of the day.

    Though very rare, once in a great while during that same time period, a US establishment journal would acknowledge that more than anything the high death rate of Northern POW’s in the Southern camps was due to the North’s own policy of a complete blockade of food and medicine entering the South.

    The below 1870 article is from the then hugely influential Boston based Atlantic Monthly and was entitled ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’. The magazine today remains quite influential, is now known simply as The Atlantic, and is based in Washington DC.

    In more modern English the article’s title would translate as ‘Our Jewish Brothers’.

    ‘Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.’

    The Atlantic Monthly (October, 1870) – Our Israelitish Brethren

    Who can estimate the reparation which Christendom owes this interesting and unoffending people? How abundant, how untiring, should be our charity in judging the faults of character which our own superstition has created or developed!

    Of the giant wrongs to which they have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded. In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea…

    ..Those who remained in the Peninsula suffered baptism, and were obliged to conform to the outward observances of the reigning church. Far more enviable was the lot of those who had accepted banishment. The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to “question” the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

    • Replies: @Giuseppe

    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but ‘conveniently forgotten’.
     
    Discourse about Andersonville might be conveniently forgotten, but the oblique connection you draw from it to the Holocaust is an interesting idea.
  150. @LondonBob
    When I was doing a course at MIT the teaching assistant had been at Harvard with the twins and Zuckerberg. Despite being a very nerdy guy he said the Winklevoss twins were great people and Zuckerberg was a weasel.

    The movie Social Network pretty much portrayed them as such, Zuckerberg being a total weasel and douchebag while the Winklevoss, played by Armand Hammer, were WASPy and cool.

    The twins didn’t turn out too badly either. They got $65m from Zuckerberg, invested $11m in bitcoin and are now billionaires:

    https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/4/16732952/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-billionaires-surge

  151. @Mefobills

    The inception, or conception, of the Jewish state in Palestine was at least 1896.

    By approx. 1910 it had built specifically Jewish cities, it’s own bank, & other institutions.

     

    Keep an eye on Patagonia. The early Zionists cast about for a country of their own. Palestine was the dream, while Uganda was offered up by the British. Ugandan people were willing.

    Other areas under serious consideration included Madagascar.

    Patagonia was considered the "practical" country. To wrest Palestine from the Ottoman empire required war. Zion didn't want "practical" they wanted Messianic prophecy to be self fulfilled.

    Israeli soldiers on "vacation" walk Patagonia today, and Zion is constantly interfering in Argentine politics.

    Good point, thanks.
    Thierry Meyssan has reported on the Jewish billionaire who bought vast acreage in Patagonia.

    Also — didn’t Israel just send 1000 IDF troops to Honduras?

    iirc it was recently reported that 88 000 Hondurans migrated to USA in the last 3 or 4 months.
    Are Israelis facilitating the ethnic cleansing of Honduras for their own purposes, which might include a foot-hold for an Israeli military garrisoning of USA?

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    Zumbuddi,

    I usually rely on Adrian Salbuchi for Argentina info.

    With regards to Jewish buying up of land for Patagonian occupation, that is fully in accord with Zionist methods, especially after Rothschild came on board after first Zionist conference. Herzyl himself advocated the policy.

    With regards to Honduras, (((finance capitalism))) method is discussed in Perkin's book, Confessions of an economic hit-man.

    Honduras was "hit" long ago, and the land has been appropriated by a comprador elite. These elites are given guidance instructions from our friends and their shabbos goy accomplices out of Wall Street and London. Essentially, the economic method is a sophisticated form of usury, which allows the country to fall into elite hands over time. Once the peasants are displaced from their land, then they have no means of making wealth.

    This economic hit method is now feasting on the American body, as finance oligarchy has off-shored jobs while importing slave labor (to drive down labor costs).

    There will always be hierarchy and elites, and if said elites are hostile to their population, then that is a recipe for disaster.

    Globo Homo is closely related to Zion, which in turn is related to fiance capitalism, and this construct wants no borders and free movement of their private bank credit as money capital they control. If you follow their money, it is no surprise that Israeli soldiers are in Honduras.

    (Industrial Capitalism with nationalism is an arch enemy of Zion, and its name shall not be spoken.)
  152. @Ron Unz

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.
     
    Sure, it's available on Archive.org in a variety of different formats:

    https://archive.org/details/BeatyJohnTheIronCurtainOverAmerica1.o/page/n1

    In glancing over this comment-thread, I noticed that people have discovered that the previous Archive.org version has been "disappeared" so I suggest you quickly grab what you want from this one while it still exists. Apparently, the Kindle and ePub versions have already been eliminated.

    The same situation probably applies to the Revilo Oliver book:

    https://archive.org/details/AmericasDecline1983V2

    Some Revilo excerpts can be found here:

    http://heretical.com/

    See Oliver: Jewish Strategy

    • Replies: @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree
    From Conspiracy or Instinct? by Revilo P. Oliver

    http://heretical.com/oliver/js08.html

    It is entirely possible, therefore, that a species could have been formed by biological selection that automatically preys on our species as instinctively as wolves prey on caribou, although, of course, with much greater cunning and versatility.
     
    Thus the inclusion of the phrase "in instinctive concert" in the previously published official definition of "Anti-Termite" to void typical Jew mockery as "conspiracy theory" anytime truth is spoken of concerted Jew evildoing:

    “Anti-Semite”?

    Anti-Termite!!!

    I oppose proactively hateful ethno-supremecist Jews behaving as termites gnawing often latently but ever unceasingly in instinctive concert at the cultural structure of white Christian society as they have been doing since arriving en masse in the United States circa 1880 pursuing their apparent goal to eradicate all people of European descent.

     

    , @Hail
    A brief autobiographical text by Oliver, posted there and written in the early 1980s, reinforces Ron Unz' narrative:

    I married Grace Needham in 1930. Whatever I may have achieved, I owe entirely to the sustaining power through all subsequent years of an unfailing devotion for which I cannot rationally account.

    [....]

    I received the degree of Philosophiae Doctor in 1940. I may add that, given the great fear of “inbreeding,” I am the only person to receive the degree in Classics at the University of Illinois whom the Department determined to retain permanently. I began teaching graduate classes immediately after receiving the degree. For a considerable number of years I also gave graduate courses in the Renaissance, which put me also in the Department of Spanish and Italian, of which my good friend, Professor John Van Horne, was the head.

    At the suggestion of a military friend, I agreed, sometime in 1941, to join a secret subsidiary of the War Department, and did so as soon as my academic responsibilities would permit, in 1942, remaining there until the autumn of 1945. By good luck, I found myself in charge of a rapidly expanding department, and soon advanced from Analyst to Director of Research, finding myself responsible for the work of c. 175 persons. The work was harrowing, for various reasons, but extremely instructive. I learned, for example, the ultimate secret of Pearl Harbor, which was evidently unknown to Admiral Theobald and which was not disclosed in print until 1981 (in my America’s Decline, page 7).

    I returned to the University in 1945 as an Assistant Professor, became an Associate Professor in 1947, and Professor in 1953. [...] (Continues)
     
  153. Saggy says: • Website
    @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    This video by Rabbi ben Porat explains the reasons why Hitler hated communism and the Jews and saw them as an enemy to western society ….
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/uKbrffKEyE3m/

  154. From Henry Ford’s The International Jew:

    In England [the jew] is charged with being the real world ruler, who rules as a super-nation over the nations, rules by the power of gold, and who plays nation against nation for his own purposes, remaining himself discreetly in the background.

    In 1920 when Ford published his book, England was the world’s foremost empire. Fast forward 100 years and today and the same story is playing out in America. History continues to repeat itself.

  155. @Anonymous
    Another amazing article. Thank you.

    Something to think about:

    1) Intelligent boldness is the key to charisma. People are attracted to fearless, knowledgeable truth-tellers who are intelligent enough to adjust the size of the red pill to their audience. Being too careful and defensive on the subject of Jewish power and influence is inefficient and often worse than useless.

    2) Knowledgeable people across the world know what's going on. Many independent individuals, secret or semi-secret society members, intelligence agents, enforcement agents, academics, journalists (shabbos goyim and select Jews included) etc. know where this is heading. It's extremely unlikely that they'll choose suicide for 30 pieces of silver.

    2) Knowledgeable people across the world know what’s going on. Many independent individuals, secret or semi-secret society members, intelligence agents, enforcement agents, academics, journalists (shabbos goyim and select Jews included) etc. know where this is heading. It’s extremely unlikely that they’ll choose suicide for 30 pieces of silver.

    There are plenty of opportunists among them. It’s no different from the Soviet Union. If being a Communist gets you the 30 pieces of silver then they’d be vocal Communists, and if it switches to Neoliberalism, then they’ll be vocal Neoliberals.

    Opportunists are a very reliable catalyst for change.

  156. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    Try to control your toxic, hate-filled semitism, please.

    Why do you hate White people so much, anyway?

    You need to be more tolerant.

  157. @Franz
    Revilo P. Oliver is mostly known for his suicide (he and his wife) and his hectoring and totally unreadable prose, with his anti-Christian book so badly executed it's been seen as an advertisement for the faith.

    Oliver's error was thinking WWII is over. An error shared by many. Wm F. Buckley, Jr, started American Conservative, Inc, as a witches coven of anti-Midwest isolationism which Buckley pretty well acknowledged in the first few issues. Buckley was inducted into Skull & Bones (AKA brotherhood of death) in 1950, at midcentury, which is a Red Flag. As WFB was an ostentatious Roman Catholic, it was forbidden in that era for a Catholic to join any secret society much less a masonic subdivision at Yale. This ban was not lifted by the Church till the mid-1980s. Buckley either lied about his faith or is real masters, your bet is as good as any. Either way he lied to somebody for a whole generation.

    The real conspiracy isn't the Birch, or Revilo Oliver, or even commies or the Jewish whatever. It's the ball-less American Right and the misfits and tossers who guide it, use it, rise to the top of it and all the while accomplish nothing whatsoever.

    And it's a string of total failure stretching now back nearly a century. Time to call bullshit on the right and note the commies were right from the start: It was and is phony, and not an especially edifying one at that.

    George Lincoln Rockwell, before he founded the American Nazi Party, wrote in This Time The World about his involvement with Buckley and the Jewish question when he was an up-and-coming conservative.:

    “One of the conservative leaders I contacted was William F. Buckley, Jr, the publisher of National Review. My friend in Washington, D.C., Sam Jones, was his correspondent and we got together at a meeting in New York. It was an, intellectual thrill, just talking with Buckley and his staff. There is more pulsating brain-power and genius surrounding Buckley than in any place else on earth, where I have ever been. Bill, himself, is personable in the extreme and brighter than all the rest, but his staff includes three or four Jews, one of them particularly Jewish-looking, and the atmosphere there is different than with other ‘conservative’ groups.

    Buckley is extremely cagey on the Jewish Question and even when you get him alone, it is difficult to elicit information as to his awareness. The best you can get are guarded implications from which you are at liberty to infer what you want. I have since learned the reason for this: Buckley’s millionaire father had a major interest with the Jews in Israeli oil, and the result, even today, is that Buckley’s anti-liberalism and anti-Communism stop at the borders of Israel and the doors of Zionist meeting halls.

    At the time I, too, was playing this silly ‘I’ve-got-my-eyes-closed’ game, so I felt that much could be accomplished by helping Buckley. I agreed to promote the National Review for him and he deposited a thousand dollars in a Washington bank to my account. So I started on a project designed to get mass circulation for National Review in colleges and universities.

    At the time, however, I was heavily involved in my own effort to launch the A.F.C.O. and the newspaper, and I am ashamed to have to admit that I did a rotten job for Bill. I made some efforts, but they were without the drive and full enthusiasm necessary in such a promotion and nothing happened. I returned the money to Bill, less expenses, with a guilty conscience. Outside of being too cagey on the Jewish Question, which is, of course, his privilege, Bill Buckley was 100% square as a man and unlike the situation with other right-wingers with whom I have worked or tried to work, my failure to accomplish anything with Buckley was entirely my fault. ”

    chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://www.americannaziparty.com/thistimetheworld.pdf

    Ron Unz has been fearless in his coverage of books and subjects that have been rendered taboo by our self-chosen overlords. I would heartily recommend Rockwell’s book to him and others who want to chart the sad and steady decline of American post-war conservatism. A full-length unzian (?) book review would be very much worth reading.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    William F. Buckley, Jr. was a good example of Operation Mockingbird--CIA infiltration of all types of media outlets.

    He kept the mainstream "conservative movement" as a deep state pet poodle, which it remains today.

    A clue was that he was horrified at any mention of any "conspiracy"--the thought of folks meeting covertly to achieve their aims appeared to be incomprehensible to this "resident genius" of the right.
  158. @Zumbuddi
    Good point, thanks.
    Thierry Meyssan has reported on the Jewish billionaire who bought vast acreage in Patagonia.

    Also -- didn't Israel just send 1000 IDF troops to Honduras?

    iirc it was recently reported that 88 000 Hondurans migrated to USA in the last 3 or 4 months.
    Are Israelis facilitating the ethnic cleansing of Honduras for their own purposes, which might include a foot-hold for an Israeli military garrisoning of USA?

    Zumbuddi,

    I usually rely on Adrian Salbuchi for Argentina info.

    With regards to Jewish buying up of land for Patagonian occupation, that is fully in accord with Zionist methods, especially after Rothschild came on board after first Zionist conference. Herzyl himself advocated the policy.

    With regards to Honduras, (((finance capitalism))) method is discussed in Perkin’s book, Confessions of an economic hit-man.

    Honduras was “hit” long ago, and the land has been appropriated by a comprador elite. These elites are given guidance instructions from our friends and their shabbos goy accomplices out of Wall Street and London. Essentially, the economic method is a sophisticated form of usury, which allows the country to fall into elite hands over time. Once the peasants are displaced from their land, then they have no means of making wealth.

    This economic hit method is now feasting on the American body, as finance oligarchy has off-shored jobs while importing slave labor (to drive down labor costs).

    There will always be hierarchy and elites, and if said elites are hostile to their population, then that is a recipe for disaster.

    Globo Homo is closely related to Zion, which in turn is related to fiance capitalism, and this construct wants no borders and free movement of their private bank credit as money capital they control. If you follow their money, it is no surprise that Israeli soldiers are in Honduras.

    (Industrial Capitalism with nationalism is an arch enemy of Zion, and its name shall not be spoken.)

    • Replies: @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    ...(((finance capitalism))) method is discussed in Perkin’s book... the economic method is a sophisticated form of usury, which allows the country to fall into elite hands over time. ...

    This economic hit method is now feasting on the American body, as finance oligarchy has off-shored jobs while importing slave labor (to drive down labor costs). ...

    (Industrial Capitalism with nationalism is an arch enemy of Zion, and its name shall not be spoken.)
     
    Countries free of a Jew central bank (Iran, North Korea, etc.) are targeted for attack by the golem USA's military.

    These elites are given guidance instructions from our friends and their shabbos goy accomplices out of Wall Street and London.
     
    The parasite is harmless without the aid of its shabby goyim.

    The shabby goy is a treasonous betrayer to his own kind. What has been the traditional American penalty for treason?

    #DestroyShabbosGoy
  159. Whole lot of cold war propaganda in one article, what was the point of this article again? That Jews bad, communists bad, capitalists good, right wing dindu nuffin?None of it makes much sense at all.

    Its pretty clear that if there is indeed an International Jewish Conspiracy to take over the world they’re definitely not doing it with communism. Is Trump a communist? He’s given them more power and control over the government than any prez. in history. Is Kushner a communist? Is Henry Kissinger a communist? He has sure killed lots of his fellow communists. Milton Friedman a communist? He sure hates communists. Ayn Rand? The list is endless. Where the hell are all these communists that wield such power over our govt?

    We have a Jewish owned media right, so why did they throw that communist Jew Bernie Sanders under the bus in 2016 favoring the gentile Clinton? Why are they doing the same now to the communist Jew Sanders, favoring Biden? Again, doesn’t make a bit of sense.

    He stated that only Jews would profit from the war, claimed that leading Wall Street Jews had financed the Russian Revolution, and warned Americans not to let history repeat itself.

    Wall St Jews? So capitalists right? They got filthy rich and super powerful by way of the capitalist system. So where are the communist Jews with such great powers? Why weren’t they funding the Bolsheviks? Our govt. which is still controlled by Wall St capitalists, are funding and arming Wahabbi headchopping radical Islamists today, does that make our govt. Wahabbi Muslims? Does that make the Wall St capitalists Wahabbi Muslims? No, and to suggest that would make you sound pretty dumb.

    One might jokingly speculate whether the Rosenbergs—later executed for treason—would have been placed in charge of our nuclear weapons development program.

    Maybe its a good thing they gave the Soviets the bomb? What would the world be like today if only America had nukes? America would have probably already have destroyed most if not all of the planet nuking everyone that isn’t willing to be Americas slave. And if the Soviet communists were so evil why didn’t they nuke us when they got the bomb? Quite honestly I think its good more people have nukes so long as America has nukes, else they be destroyed. Think about it a bit.

    Oliver’s sentiments appears on the very first page of his preface, when he ridicules the total ineffectiveness of conservatives in combating “the existing situation, which has resulted from the invasion of their country by hordes of aliens who are, by a biological necessity, their racial enemies.”

    I think all those white guys in congress are a bigger enemy and much bigger threat to me and my family than any of the black latino or muslim refugees that have come here. Most of them wouldn’t even be coming here if not for the white dudes in congress, and the likes of Bush, Cheney, Reagan as well as obama and Biden bombing and sanctioning the shit out of their home countries for the capitalists down on Wall St. Ilhan Omar 2020!

    Oliver often framed the same basic facts in extremely dramatic fashion. For example, he denounced Churchill’s 1940 aerial bombing strategy as the most monstrous sort of war crime

    Churchill as well as FDR were capitalists not communists. Churchill even wrote a famous article in which he named the Zionist Jews “the good Jews” and the communist Jews the “bad Jews”
    Hows that working out? Wheres all these communist Jews raising hell in the Middle East, wheres the communist Jews terrorizing the Palestinians? The Zionists are clearly not good Jews, so I will assume Churchill is full of shit and the opposite of what he says is true.

    Everyone now knows, of course, that the message to the Japanese Ambassador in Washington, warning him that Japan was about to attack the United States, was read by Military Intelligence not long after the Ambassador himself received it, and that the frantic cover-up, involving some successful lying about details

    Its pretty clear Unz has a thing for bashing FDR which I don’t yet understand. From everything I was told by my great grandmother who lived through the depression everyone here in the south loved FDR. He basically saved their lives.Did he plan Pearl Harbor? I don’t know, haven’t studied it much, US has a good history of false flags. Maybe the intelligence guys knew it was coming but didn’t inform him? I don’t know much about this one. But people here in Georgia and the South definitely loved FDR for what he did to help them.

    Fred Koch, founding father of Koch Industries.

    Another capitalist slimeball, his sons are now pushing the coup/war in Venezuela, that would lead to huge refugee problems at the border, which you right wingers will probably somehow blame on communists. I’ve also read a little that Koch and Prescott Bush were funding and suppling Hitler with oil during the war.

    I wish I had more time to bash some more of the article or the cold war propaganda. I know Mr. Unz gets an uber boner for bashing communists and socialists at every opportunity. I only want the truth, whether it exonerates Hitler or the communists doesn’t matter to me, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle of both sides propaganda.

    I wish Mr. Unz were less biased with his writers and articles. Don’t get me wrong, I love reading alternative views about Hitler, Jews and the war and all. Some of it just doesn’t even make sense though, it obviously just propaganda from the cold war or WW2 or whatever. I’m fairly certain that most of the anti-communist stuff is CIA nonsense. I don’t consider myself a communist, I lean more towards socialist, its pretty clear capitalism is a Jewish conspiracy if one ever existed. Its should be clear that capitalism is a repeated failure that is rotting out our country. Same thing that happened to Wiemar Germany, free market capitalism, foreigners buying up everything, monopolies, massive inflation, etc… We need something different, there won’t be anything left if this madness keeps up.

    I read a lot of articles at Fort Russ and lefty sites, they offer different perspectives.

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/10/41-years-ago-israel-helped-the-cia-murder-revolutionary-icon-che-guevara-a-shahid-of-the-highest-ranking/

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/05/op-ed-anti-communist-cliches-are-cold-war-anti-history/

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/11/dispelling-12-myths-about-the-bolshevik-revolution/

    https://www.leftvoice.org/Five-Myths-About-the-Russian-Revolution-Debunked-1807

    I like John Pilger, David Sheen, Jimmy Dore and Abby Martins documentaries, they’re very good for alternative views.

    John Pilger The War On Democracy
    http://johnpilger.com/videos/the-war-on-democracy

    Giants: Who Really Rules The World?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    Its pretty clear Unz has a thing for bashing FDR which I don’t yet understand. From everything I was told by my great grandmother who lived through the depression everyone here in the south loved FDR.
     
    Here's an article of my from almost exactly a year ago that you really might want to read:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-great-purge-of-the-1940s/
    , @J. Gutierrez
    I see you're hammering away...go for it brother!

    I'll give you a heads up on why the Koch Brothers want to get their hands on Venezuelan oil. They own 2 refineries in Corpus Christi, one is the largest in the world, Valero. The Koch refineries are setup to process Heavy Crude Oil, the type that Venezuela has. Cutting Venezuelan oil imports would mean they have to find that type of oil somewhere else. When the US stopped the pipeline coming down from Canada it effected them, because the Tar Sands oil is heavy oil. They spent a lot of money on those refineries in betting that the pipeline would deliver the oil. Venezuela save them because they had an alternate source to keep those refineries working. I would not be surprised if they had input on the Venezuelan situation, because I remember hearing that they raised the price on Heavy Crude.

    On another note, I don't see too many people writing about the British Empire and the connection to Zionists Bankers when discussing WWI and WWII. I see the Evil Empire as being British Anglo Saxon with Zionist input. The Jews didn't start either war, it was Britain both times. If I remember correctly the British, the German and the Russian Royal families were related. Talk about betraying your blood for power! If they had no problem doing what they did to fellow "White Blue Eyed Germans" I can only imagine the brutality, Africa, India and their other Colonies went through. In my book ChristianZionistBritishIsrael and the Anglo Saxons sold their German brothers out for a few shackles. Churchill was an evil man brother no matter what he was...


    Take care brother!

    , @dfordoom

    Its pretty clear that if there is indeed an International Jewish Conspiracy to take over the world they’re definitely not doing it with communism.
     
    It is interesting that Jews have had immense influence on the Left, particularly in the US. Then in the 70s with the rise of the New Left the Left abandoned socialism and embraced identity politics. What happened to all the communist Jews? Were they OK with the Left turning against communism?

    And did Jews think identity politics was going to be good for them? I'd have thought that identity politics was a very very dangerous game for Jews to play. Was identity politics really a Jewish conspiracy?

    So maybe the Jewish domination of the Left hasn't been so monolithic after all.
    , @dfordoom

    Maybe its a good thing they gave the Soviets the bomb?
     
    It was obviously a very good thing for the world.

    It would also be a very good thing for Iran to have nukes. It would certainly promote peace in the Middle East.
  160. @AaronB
    Carl Jung warned that people can have their minds taken over by myths and symbols, if they repress the unconscious too much, as the modern world does. I think you have a very, very, severe form of this condition, Ron.

    Jews are not a real people - they are one of the modern West's symbolic myths.

    I think if we understand the use of the word Jew on unz.com in Jungian terms, as not referring to flesh and blood people but as being a modern Western myth, an emanation from the unconscious, then these weird essays on Jews make total sense and can actually be read with profit.

    Jews are not a real people – they are one of the modern West’s symbolic myths.

    Exactly. The jewish people are a myth; a social construct — and an inherently oppressive one.

    People who believe themselves to be jewish need to check their privilege; to educate themselves; to interrogate their supremacism; to let go of their reflexive, unreasoning hatred, and learn to be more tolerant. It’s the only way to deconstruct toxic semitism — which must be done if we are to move forward together in the current year.

    Enough with the pilpul — you need to be the archetypal ally.

  161. @LondonBob
    When I was doing a course at MIT the teaching assistant had been at Harvard with the twins and Zuckerberg. Despite being a very nerdy guy he said the Winklevoss twins were great people and Zuckerberg was a weasel.

    I didn’t scour the comments section, but apparently I was not only person who found R. Unz’s comment interesting on the Winklevoss twins. I often wondered if their creation was wrestled out of their hands by the cabal that makes winners and losers. Losing out on tens of billions of dollars is a big deal and surely there is interest in making more Jewish billionaires and NFL owners. I don’t know if the WV brothers have given a candid interview or not.

    One personal point I would make here – that is another oddity – was that the WV bros had an older sister (whom I crossed time in college with) who died in a freak accident while sneaking on a movie set in Manhattan in 2002. She apparently was an aspiring movie actress, which I didn’t remember. She was an attractive young woman and had a Kennedy-esque aura about her, though still in a way was shy. I didn’t believe the story about her death, but it would be impossible to know the truth.

  162. @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    400 words edited by a fold that masks (286 words = 71.5%) text, including:

    ‘Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?”

    Etc.

    Interesting.

    • Replies: @Wally
    Ah yes, obsessing over me again.

    I love getting under thin Zionist skin
  163. I think all those white guys in congress are a bigger enemy and much bigger threat to me and my family than any of the black latino or muslim refugees that have come here.

    Muh “Any form of group identity/ in-group preference for peoples of European descent is evil and wrong. But for Negroes, jews, mestizoes, Asians… it’s not only acceptable, but laudable, to work together to advance the perceived interests of your people.

    Not that long-discredited semitic canard again.

    Yawn.

  164. @redmudhooch
    Whole lot of cold war propaganda in one article, what was the point of this article again? That Jews bad, communists bad, capitalists good, right wing dindu nuffin?None of it makes much sense at all.

    Its pretty clear that if there is indeed an International Jewish Conspiracy to take over the world they're definitely not doing it with communism. Is Trump a communist? He's given them more power and control over the government than any prez. in history. Is Kushner a communist? Is Henry Kissinger a communist? He has sure killed lots of his fellow communists. Milton Friedman a communist? He sure hates communists. Ayn Rand? The list is endless. Where the hell are all these communists that wield such power over our govt?

    We have a Jewish owned media right, so why did they throw that communist Jew Bernie Sanders under the bus in 2016 favoring the gentile Clinton? Why are they doing the same now to the communist Jew Sanders, favoring Biden? Again, doesn't make a bit of sense.

    He stated that only Jews would profit from the war, claimed that leading Wall Street Jews had financed the Russian Revolution, and warned Americans not to let history repeat itself.
     
    Wall St Jews? So capitalists right? They got filthy rich and super powerful by way of the capitalist system. So where are the communist Jews with such great powers? Why weren't they funding the Bolsheviks? Our govt. which is still controlled by Wall St capitalists, are funding and arming Wahabbi headchopping radical Islamists today, does that make our govt. Wahabbi Muslims? Does that make the Wall St capitalists Wahabbi Muslims? No, and to suggest that would make you sound pretty dumb.

    One might jokingly speculate whether the Rosenbergs—later executed for treason—would have been placed in charge of our nuclear weapons development program.
     
    Maybe its a good thing they gave the Soviets the bomb? What would the world be like today if only America had nukes? America would have probably already have destroyed most if not all of the planet nuking everyone that isn't willing to be Americas slave. And if the Soviet communists were so evil why didn't they nuke us when they got the bomb? Quite honestly I think its good more people have nukes so long as America has nukes, else they be destroyed. Think about it a bit.

    Oliver’s sentiments appears on the very first page of his preface, when he ridicules the total ineffectiveness of conservatives in combating “the existing situation, which has resulted from the invasion of their country by hordes of aliens who are, by a biological necessity, their racial enemies.”

     

    I think all those white guys in congress are a bigger enemy and much bigger threat to me and my family than any of the black latino or muslim refugees that have come here. Most of them wouldn't even be coming here if not for the white dudes in congress, and the likes of Bush, Cheney, Reagan as well as obama and Biden bombing and sanctioning the shit out of their home countries for the capitalists down on Wall St. Ilhan Omar 2020!

    Oliver often framed the same basic facts in extremely dramatic fashion. For example, he denounced Churchill’s 1940 aerial bombing strategy as the most monstrous sort of war crime
     
    Churchill as well as FDR were capitalists not communists. Churchill even wrote a famous article in which he named the Zionist Jews "the good Jews" and the communist Jews the "bad Jews"
    Hows that working out? Wheres all these communist Jews raising hell in the Middle East, wheres the communist Jews terrorizing the Palestinians? The Zionists are clearly not good Jews, so I will assume Churchill is full of shit and the opposite of what he says is true.

    Everyone now knows, of course, that the message to the Japanese Ambassador in Washington, warning him that Japan was about to attack the United States, was read by Military Intelligence not long after the Ambassador himself received it, and that the frantic cover-up, involving some successful lying about details
     
    Its pretty clear Unz has a thing for bashing FDR which I don't yet understand. From everything I was told by my great grandmother who lived through the depression everyone here in the south loved FDR. He basically saved their lives.Did he plan Pearl Harbor? I don't know, haven't studied it much, US has a good history of false flags. Maybe the intelligence guys knew it was coming but didn't inform him? I don't know much about this one. But people here in Georgia and the South definitely loved FDR for what he did to help them.

    Fred Koch, founding father of Koch Industries.
     
    Another capitalist slimeball, his sons are now pushing the coup/war in Venezuela, that would lead to huge refugee problems at the border, which you right wingers will probably somehow blame on communists. I've also read a little that Koch and Prescott Bush were funding and suppling Hitler with oil during the war.

    I wish I had more time to bash some more of the article or the cold war propaganda. I know Mr. Unz gets an uber boner for bashing communists and socialists at every opportunity. I only want the truth, whether it exonerates Hitler or the communists doesn't matter to me, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle of both sides propaganda.

    I wish Mr. Unz were less biased with his writers and articles. Don't get me wrong, I love reading alternative views about Hitler, Jews and the war and all. Some of it just doesn't even make sense though, it obviously just propaganda from the cold war or WW2 or whatever. I'm fairly certain that most of the anti-communist stuff is CIA nonsense. I don't consider myself a communist, I lean more towards socialist, its pretty clear capitalism is a Jewish conspiracy if one ever existed. Its should be clear that capitalism is a repeated failure that is rotting out our country. Same thing that happened to Wiemar Germany, free market capitalism, foreigners buying up everything, monopolies, massive inflation, etc... We need something different, there won't be anything left if this madness keeps up.

    I read a lot of articles at Fort Russ and lefty sites, they offer different perspectives.

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/10/41-years-ago-israel-helped-the-cia-murder-revolutionary-icon-che-guevara-a-shahid-of-the-highest-ranking/

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/05/op-ed-anti-communist-cliches-are-cold-war-anti-history/

    https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/11/dispelling-12-myths-about-the-bolshevik-revolution/

    https://www.leftvoice.org/Five-Myths-About-the-Russian-Revolution-Debunked-1807

    I like John Pilger, David Sheen, Jimmy Dore and Abby Martins documentaries, they're very good for alternative views.

    John Pilger The War On Democracy
    http://johnpilger.com/videos/the-war-on-democracy

    Giants: Who Really Rules The World?
    https://youtu.be/ZUGh1Su7-ok

    Its pretty clear Unz has a thing for bashing FDR which I don’t yet understand. From everything I was told by my great grandmother who lived through the depression everyone here in the south loved FDR.

    Here’s an article of my from almost exactly a year ago that you really might want to read:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-great-purge-of-the-1940s/

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    At the risk of reproof for missing something obvious may I ask for you clarification of a passage that puzzled me:

    Similarly, ten years of exhaustive archival research by Joseph Bendersky produced a volume that seems to utterly demolish our conventional narrative of Jewish political activism in both Europe and America between the two world wars.

    *** *** ***
    What were you referring to as that "conventional narrative" which was demolished?
  165. @jack daniels
    Ron Unz writes:
    Unlike most right-wingers, then or now, Oliver was a militant atheist, holding scathing views towards Christianity, and he instead placed racial conflict at the absolute center of his world-view, making him very much the sort of outspoken Social Darwinist not uncommon in the early years of the twentieth century, but long since driven into hiding.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the "Alt Right." There is certainly an opening for a right-wing movement unencumbered by the trait of groveling before neocons and "RINOs", but if the Christian heritage is mocked and jettisoned and everything turns on "race realism," we are left with something very much like Oliver's social Darwinism, something very un-marketable beyond a small fringe, and of questionable coherence.

    As a Christian, I am surprised and disappointed by the hostility to Christianity I find among the “Alt Right.”

    Organized Christianity is almost as hostile to Whites as organized Jewry. Many Christian outfits fully support massive third world immigration and forced integration. It’s a universalist faith which sees no difference between Europeans, Asians or Africans. Such a worldview helps spread the gospel but it doesn’t help Whites wanting their countries and communities to stay White. On top of that you have evangelicals and born agains who pretty much worship Jews and Israel because their holy book tells them they are holy.

    • Replies: @Republic
    You are correct regarding Christians. However the Orthodox Church is an exception to that rule
  166. @S

    I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.
     
    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but 'conveniently forgotten'.

    For instance, few have ever heard that at the conclusion of the US Civil War that the United States intended to have a series of trials centered upon the South's POW camp system, with particular emphasis on one of the largest, Andersonville and its associated rail depot.

    The stated intent was to first put on trial, and then to have executed by hanging, the entirety of the upper echelons of the defeated Southern Confederacy's political and military leadership for 'crimes against humanity' regarding the 'camps', ie Jeff Davis and his cabinet, and General Robert E Lee and his lieutenants at his high command.

    The accusations were many and varied, ie that the South had used 'cattle cars' to transport prisoners, manufactured leather wallets from the human skin of murdered Union prisoners, murdered many hundreds of the men with 'poisonous injections' deceptively designed to look like preventive health measures, ie vaccination against disease, and had deliberately planned to 'systematically' murder many thousands of Union POW's by starving them to death.

    The plans largely fell through and the accusations are now generally, albeit quietly, acknowledged by historians to have been fraudulent. The North's own POW camp system holding the Southerners is now known to have had closely paralleling death rates to the South's camps.

    The one trial for Henry Wirz, the commanding officer at Andersonville, which went ahead, is now also acknowledged to have been a farce, and violated all basic norms of justice, the solitary and hapless Wirz being a 'scapegoat' for Northern picque regarding its huge wartime losses.

    All far too late for Wirz though, who was hung for amongst other things being accused of shooting down prisoners for sport with his personal pistol, and unleashing large and ferocious dogs upon prisoners, etc, etc. The last thing Wirz heard while on this earth and in the process of being hung were the chants of 'Andersonville!', 'Andersonville!', by the mob of Union soldiers who witnessed the execution and surrounded the gallows.

    Immediately after the Civil War's conclusion a song was published in the North with the phrase 'never forget' figuring prominently in the lyrics in regards to Andersonville and the other Southern camps.

    For decades after the war (through about 1900) Southerners had the accusations about 'the camps' routinely thrown in their face in the corporate media of the day.

    Though very rare, once in a great while during that same time period, a US establishment journal would acknowledge that more than anything the high death rate of Northern POW's in the Southern camps was due to the North's own policy of a complete blockade of food and medicine entering the South.

    The below 1870 article is from the then hugely influential Boston based Atlantic Monthly and was entitled 'Our Israelitish Brethren'. The magazine today remains quite influential, is now known simply as The Atlantic, and is based in Washington DC.

    In more modern English the article's title would translate as 'Our Jewish Brothers'.

    'Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.'


    The Atlantic Monthly (October, 1870) - Our Israelitish Brethren

    Who can estimate the reparation which Christendom owes this interesting and unoffending people? How abundant, how untiring, should be our charity in judging the faults of character which our own superstition has created or developed!

    Of the giant wrongs to which they have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded. In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea...

    ..Those who remained in the Peninsula suffered baptism, and were obliged to conform to the outward observances of the reigning church. Far more enviable was the lot of those who had accepted banishment. The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to "question" the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.

     

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but ‘conveniently forgotten’.

    Discourse about Andersonville might be conveniently forgotten, but the oblique connection you draw from it to the Holocaust is an interesting idea.

    • Replies: @S
    There are numerous close parallels between the US Civil War and WWII...ie both wars were perceived existential threats by quazi 'nationalist' enemies to the respective existance of the flagship states of first Capitalism, ie the United States, with the Civil War (1861-1865), and Communism, ie the Soviet Union, in regards to WWII, and the German war with it (1941-1945)

    Both the Confederacy and Germany mid war experienced dual catastrophic defeats while at the heighth of their power and invading their enemy, ie Gettysburg and Vicksburg for the South, and the paralleling Stalingrad and El Alemein for the Germans.

    Both the South and Germany had a hoped for 'redoubt' to continue the struggle into the Spring and Summer, the 'Alpine' for the Germans in '45, and the 'Trans-Mississippi' for the South in '65.

    The primary surrender dates in the Spring of '65 and '45 are within literal days of each other.

    And of course there were the mentioned accusations regarding 'the camps' and 'crimes against humanity' against both tbe South and the Germans at the end.

    I say 'perceived existential threat' as in reality neither the South nor Germany ever had any real chance of defeating their respective Capitalist or Communist foe. Clark Gable's little speech in Gone With the Wind about overwhelming Northern industrial might and resources was largely true.

    Similarly, WT Stead, a close associate of Cecil Rhodes, in a 1902 book calculated that the US/UK bloc had three times the wealth and economic resources of the combined French, Russian, and German empires.

    Those figures for the US/UK were still probably largely true in June, 1941, and it was the US/UK Capitalist bloc which was fully behind the Communist Soviet Union once the German invasion of it commenced.

    I've heard it said had the Soviet lines solidly broke that the US was prepared to send large numbers of its own troops to fill the gaps, and I think it's likely true. Similarly, had somehow the Southerners looked poised to defeat the North, I have little doubt the British Empire would have directly intervened to save the North.

    Both the United States and Soviet Union were too important at that stage of things in the manufactured and contrived dialectic of Capitalist vs Communist (in place since 1776 and 1789) to let them fall by the wayside.

    Now that the 'anti-thesis' of Communism has been brought down with 'the Fall of Communism', ie the economic and financial collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc, a very top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting, the worker being worthy of his wages those behind these things tell themselves; similarly we should expect to see the 'thesis' of Capitalism brought down, the 'Fall of Capitalism', in the form of the financial and economic collapse of the US/UK bloc, also to be a top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting.

    This will all make way for the 'synthesis', ie the 'convergance' of Capitalism and Communism to form global Multi-culturalism, and a global super-state to be called the 'United States of the World'/'World Union' or some such, aka the 'New Rome', in theory a democratic republic, though probably in reality like the post republic Rome of old, a dictatorship having a rubber stamp 'senate', and with its economic basis being slavery, ie wage slavery, aka so called 'cheap labor', with the global capital most likely located in Jerusalem.

    The long planned for WWIII will almost certainly be a major catalyst in bringing this final vision about.

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853
    , @Wally
    Andersonville & fake "holocaust", indeed similarities galore.

    See my previous comments with photos:

    https://www.unz.com/?s=andersonville&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    Regards.
  167. @Incitatus

    “LOL: ‘When beat, change the subject’, says Incitatus”
     
    Really? You’re that desperate? Where did I say that? Links please.

    Little codoh Tar-Baby.

    Desperately you switched from the fake “holocaust” claims, which you cannot prove, to some laughably absurd pre-war claim which I have already shredded.

    Yep, that’s you changing the subject.

    I gave the links, everyone can read them, you’ve been crushed again.

    And yes, http://www.codoh.com … which contains a veritable library of material that you cannot refute.
    Ouch!

    Cheers.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
  168. @Incitatus
    400 words edited by a fold that masks (286 words = 71.5%) text, including:

    'Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?"

    Etc.

    Interesting.

    Ah yes, obsessing over me again.

    I love getting under thin Zionist skin

    • Replies: @Shafar Nullifidian
    Zionists do not have skin... They have scales!
  169. j2 says:
    @foolisholdman
    Communism is powerful ideologically, because of the inequalities manifest in society. It goes back much further than Marx. There were medieval communes in Europe that had very communistic ideas and were bitterly resented and eventually outlawed by the ruling classes of their time. The leaders of the Peasants' Revolt had many ideas in common with modern communists. In the British Civil war there were the Diggers and the Levellers.

    What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation. That was never the overt program. There may well have been (there probably was) such an esoteric program but it was not shared with the Goy members.

    “What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation.”

    The “secret”history of Communism can fortunately be tracked reasonably well. Leftist thought started from Christian ideas, but it become Masonic already in the 18th century. Freemasons of Memphis and Mizraim type and Carbonaries were the revolutionary leftists in the 19th century. They were direct descendants of the Jacobins of the French Revolution. Jewish influence on this movement started from converted Frankists joining Freemasonry just before the French Revolution and up to early 19th century. Around this same time certain Jewish bankers (like Rothschild) started financing these revolutionaries, as they were financing wars as their main business. At Napoleon III’s time revolutionary Freemasonry (Mizraim, Memphis and the Masonic-type Carbonaries) was already mainly financed by Jewish bankers. There were all of the elements, like controlled press and fully infiltrated system. When Freemasons were given amnesty after the Paris Commune fell, they stopped direct (but not indirect) subversive activities of Mizraim and Memphis. The revolutionary movement continued as Communism. It was financed by Jewish bankers and lead by Jewish revolutionaries from not later than 1890s, probably from 1860s. Freemasons were used for creating controlled opposition to Communism for Zionistic purposes, so Theosophy, Martinists and the Freemason Henry Ford warned of the Communistic threat. (Richard Wagner, with his antisemitic circle, either was a Mason or at least wanted to be, so was close to them.) All this was to force Jews to Palestine: the persecution had to be as the generation did not deserve a redemption (i.e., did not move voluntarily).

    The fact that many Communists did not realize these facts and believed in the Communistic ideas means only that they were fooled. The same way, many Freemasons or intellectuals, who did not realize this, were also fooled. The goal of the financiers was always to take the world power, not to build a better world, and successful revolutions are very seldom spontaneous (in Haiti there was one such case). Somebody is usually funding the revolutionaries.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Sources please.
    , @Peter Grafström
    Partly true what you say. But Britains oligarchy masterminded it. It was in their interest that it would look like an independent jewish operation for those who scrutinised what went on.
    Before those Frankists you mention were recruited , the british elites at home arranged riots, pogroms of sorts, for to try ought the techniques to be employed in the ' french' revolution. But of course there was no sign it was directed from the top. It would look like a spontaneous evil.
    And probably made it easier to motivate support for jewish revolutionaries.
    Push-pull. People still avoid believing in that kind of double play unless it confirms their views.
    Most of those who know and mention that jews were involved in that revolution dont mention Britains leading figures Lord Shelburne and Jeremy Bentham who organised it from London.
    The fact that the first draft of the 'Protocols' turned up when Bismarck sought advice from the Rothschilds, before embarking on the unification of the 2nd Reich, does not necessarily support that the Rothschilds would benefit from alienating the germans toward the jews.
    It rather indicates that somebody feared a rising Germany, attracting more of the financiers to join in partnership with a competitive rival.
    To attract jews to go to the middle east and help develop the region in the spirit of Leibniz was already in Napoleons mind. But Britain wanted instead an aggressive bridgehead, not development. So the Israel project was an imperial design and jews were not to be anybody's partner but Britain's.
    And Wagner was recruited at an early age by the British youth networks, by which Britain infiltrated all their rivals worldwide. Similar to the NGOs and scholarships the Us/Uk employs today to foster young traitors against their countries everywhere.
    I am not calling Wagner a traitor but the revolutions were against Britain's rivals.
    Like I think you imply, none of it was spontaneous anymore than todays Cia colour revolutions.
    Wagner was also substantially influenced by a british intelligentia to see the jews in a way conducive to Britains aims to prevent jewish assimilation. To create a fertile ground for nazism by encouraging a cultic background. But Wagner himself kept a relatively low profile so it was Houston Chamberlain who brought him to a wider german audience. And did so in clear writing so there could be no mistake about what needed to be done.
  170. Hail says: • Website
    @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…

    Major names mentioned in article:
    – ‘Oliver’ (Revilo P.; 1908-1994): 59 hits in article
    – ‘Bendersky’ (b.1946; Jewish; author of a book on U.S. military intelligence’s views on the “Jewish Threat”): 33 hits in article (incl. 31 for “Bendersky” and 2 for “Bendarsky”)
    – ‘Beaty’ (author of “Iron Curtain Over America” [1951]; 1890-1961): 27 hits in article
    – ‘Roosevelt’: 19 hits in article (+1 for ‘FDR’ = 20).
    – ‘Summers’ (b.1954; Jewish; President of Harvard, July 2001 to June 2006): 15 hits in article
    – ‘Welch’ (of the John Birch Society; 1899-1985): 13 hits
    – ‘Ross’ (American sociologist of early 20th-century; 1866-1951): 8 hits
    – ‘Mertz’ (b.1949; Jewish; academic who proclaimed “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest” despite own evidence suggesting otherwise): 5 hits
    – ‘Ford’ (Henry): 4 hits
    SUM of the above nine people: 181 hits; of which ‘Oliver’ represents <33%.

    Total word count: 12,500
    – 1,160 words: Intro on the Larry Summers case of 2005;
    – 2,450 words: Section on the Joseph Bendersky book, “Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army” (2000);
    – 1,400 words: Section on WWII-era military intelligence officer Col. John Beaty’s book, “Iron Curtain Over America” (1951);
    – 6,900 words: Section on Dr. Revilo P. Oliver’s life and times, including John Birch Society origins (or which 2,280 words are passages from Dr. Oliver’s writings);
    – 500 words: Conclusion which brings together the various strands of the article; the key sentence of the 500-word conclusion is “For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect,” as demonstrated by the less-controversial Mertz case introduced in the Introduction. Ron Unz argues that Bendersky’s own book on anti-Semitism in U.S. military intelligence in the first three-quarters of the 20th century contains, within it, and inadvertently, an anti-Holocaust-narrative “own goal.”

    SUM: Of the 12,500 words in the article, 4,620 words (37%) are by Ron Unz within the Revilo P. Oliver section, and 2,280 words (18%) are excerpts from Oliver’s writings in the same section. The passages from Oliver are probably justifiable because he is so little known in the 2010s to anything like a general audience, and he forms a core part of the point being made.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    Excellent summary analysis!
    , @Hail
    I would note further here that three of the nine individuals whose names most frequently appear in this article are Jewish (Bendersky, Summers, Mertz). The other six appear to be of NW-European ancestral origin, likely Protestants, or, whatever their own faith, of strongly Protestant ancestry (e.g., despite Dr. Oliver's late-life anti-Christianism, he qualifies).

    A subtext to this Ron Unz article (and others), then, is that there was a domestic, geopolitical-cultural struggle for control of the United States that spans the first three quarters of the 20th century.

    That there was such a major struggle at all remains largely an untold story. While it was going on, the struggle was not often, if ever, on television screens or featured in magazines or the like. Yet on it went. This article fills some of the void.

    In blunt terms, the Jews won. Was the turning point the 1940-1945 period and the changes associated with the war mobilization? Could the turning point have been earlier? Later?

    I would also propose that the takedown of Richard Nixon in 1974 may have been one of the key, late-game acts in this generations-long affair. (Sidenote of ethnocultural origins of players involved: It so happens that all of Richard Nixon's ancestors were in the USA by the 1770s, and all were likely one kind of Protestant or another. He himself was famously raised Quaker, but crucially for his role in this saga, was of entirely colonial stock.) By the 1980s, it would have been impossible for a figure with such clear nationalist sympathies as Nixon to ever reach such a height of power in the USA, unless those "clear nationalist sympathies" were on behalf of the nation of Israel.
    , @Dube
    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece - would he look to trim Ron's 12,500?

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?

    Johannes Gutenberg would like to know. Not that it would stop him from pressing on.
  171. @Giuseppe
    Those attempting to shut down Holocaust denial may be revealing their own insecurity about truth and consequently may be doing their cause a disservice. If the Holocaust were true, there would be no reason to shut down examination of the historical facts because truth can stand up to rigorous examination. When the evidence for all ideas is placed on the table, discussed, debated and discarded, in the end truth will be left standing. Refusal to even allow the discussion to take place might be construed as indirect evidence that those shutting down the discussion know the Holocaust didn't happen, or at least, not as presented. But why resort to logic, truth and respectful debate when you can push people around, manipulate them with lies, ram propaganda down their throats, and then deride and deplatform them if they won't play along, making an example of them to the rest of the herd? I suspect those skeptical of the official Holocaust narrative are largely in the right for no other reason than simply because the entire discussion has been absolutely forbidden.

    The holocaust narrative is a foundational myth imposed upon the goyim but also used as tribal glue.

    I’m not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes…that involve Jews imagining and rubbing hands over the most bizarre tortures being done TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE. Sometimes even involving their own families.

    On top of that, Jews have as a population strategy the retconning of the narratives of their host societies. “People of the Book” you know. They put themselves and each other in charge of the mechanisms of cultural production in their host societies. Then put themselves at the center of the important stories. A good example is the whole “we were slaves in Egypt” thing. As though all of that host society’s vast history and deeds boil down to having been mean to Jews, who fortunately had the Plague n Clever Getaway god on their side.

    The charge of “antisemitism” has been a whip for forcing others to adopt this narrative. Well, that and saturating the culture with these themes and invented episodes. Inserting them into everything, tirelessly and persistently. Punishing any questioning of orthodoxy. Quickly this foundational myth, and the supporting quasi-religious textual/critical strategy that bolsters it, has risen to supplant all others in the US and Europe, in terms of sanctity and urgency…though in the former it is coupled with the Huddled Masses shtik of that sugar-slavery-and-swill-milk-origins-trust-fund gal and Zionist activist Emma Lazarus and her maudlin poem added late to that enormous French statue.

    Remember also that Jews played an outsized role in establishing the Victimization By Whites narratives of “civil rights,” “feminism,” “affirmative action,” “gay rights,” etc., doled out to all populations considered weaponizeable in the war on whites. Someone observed recently on 4chan that someone in some online magazine had referred to some cost of climate change as equivalent to X number of holocausts. So now apparently it’s a quantitative unit too.

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    "I’m not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes"

    some of that here:
    Most important part of being Jewish: Remembering the "Holocaust"
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12425
    ex.:
    "according to a 2013 survey of American Jews, the most essential part of what it means to be Jewish is remembering the so-called Holocaust"

    https://archive.is/6bA9C/927059a8b99d7cbaeefcd63192916598f2591b5c.png

  172. @Anonymouse
    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me (I'm a jew so I know the type). You can see it in the lips and around the nose. Jews are very inbred genetically so Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews often manifest the same business around the lips and the nose. I have it a bit myself but not to the point of caricature.

    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me

    Missing the point, much?

    Then

    Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews

    Misleading, much?

    My Q was does this man [Netanyahu] look at all ‘Semitic?’ To which the obvious answer is ‘bloody-hell no!’ Then, if they are not at all Semitic, they can’t keep moaning over even the mildest criticism whilst shrieking ‘anti-Semitic!’

    • Replies: @Whitewolf

    Then, if they are not at all Semitic, they can’t keep moaning over even the mildest criticism whilst shrieking ‘anti-Semitic!’
     
    They say things which will be effective. Truth doesn't ever come into the equation. Logic doesn't come into the equation either. Only what is effective. Most of the globohomo crowd are like that now. It helps if big money and the government is backing you as well. Just shrieking nonsense isn't quite as effective.

    Top tier subversives like Tim Wise put a more intellectual slant to their propaganda and their arguments are at least somewhat based in reality and logic. The rest just rely on repetition more than anything else.
  173. j2 says:
    @TheJester
    WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system ... with both having the power to create "gold" out of paper ... "gold" out of "nothing", a somewhat less torturous process than alchemy.

    Jews won both WWI and WWII. As an outcome of these Great Wars, surviving nations in the West have been described as Zionist/Jewish banking cartels masquerading as nation states.

    In light of the above, the creation of the Jewish state of Israel was a given. It was the next logical step in the quest for world hegemony as a safe haven for Jewish swindlers on the lam (from Russian oligarchs to American economists) seeking protection from goyim justice.

    “WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system”

    I agree with much of what you write, but the banker, who enabled Germany to have a long war in the WWI was Jewish. The issue is that according to theoreticians of the time before the WWI, it was impossible for economic reasons for European powers to have a long war. Therefore the next war, that, for some specific reason was presented as sure to come, would be a short one. Germany would lose it, naturally, but no great harm would come from the war either to Germany or to anybody else, as it would be very short. What happened is quite different, and exactly as Freemasons wanted it (a senseless war to finish all wars, destruction of monarchies) and as Zionists wanted it (Palestine that Turkey refused to give). Bankers on both sides, from the same ethnic group, made a long extermination war possible and depending on the outcome, they decided who to ask for Palestine. The WWII is largely similar, yet in some ways different. Here in Unz there are some Hitler funs and some supporters of the official history. Both are false, and they are exactly the same: one view and the controlled opposition to it. In reality Hitler and Nazis were lifted to power to do the exact thing needed in the plan: to move the Jews to Palestine in order to create Israel. The origin of the Thule Society is Masonic in the wide sense. That explains everything. They certainly were not any real opposition to bankers. In the WWII both hands were played by the same side. In the WWI only the finance of the war was played by the same hand on both sides. But, as money rules, the outcome was decided, not in details, but decided,

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Again, sources please.
    , @Mefobills
    WW1 was largely because England could not compete with Germany's Industrial Capitalism.

    This form of economy was mixed, with social safety nets. State Credit channeled into industry, thus building up industry to compete and then surpass England.

    England's system was Finance Capitalism, which came into being in 1694 with advent of Bank of England. BOE in turn was Jewish in conception... a state sponsored usury system, with bank stock issued to stock holders (many of who were our Sephardic friends out of Amsterdam.) This is a private stock owned bank issuing bank credit, where said credit goes into " markets" and owns companies. Companies in turn are owned by tied finance, and the country becomes subordinate to this finance method.

    Germany had inverted this scheme, where the polity was "over" finance, and controlled finance. Jealous men in western democracies, who fancied themselves god, or "god's chosen people" were violently opposed to the Industrial Capitalism of Germany. Frederich List learned this Industrial Capitalism method from Henry Carey and the American System, which was resurrected by Peshine Smith in the U.S.

    Germany popped into being on the world stage, and was kicking everybody's ass, except America's - and America was also using Industrial Capitalism up until the progressive era of 1913, when the banksters ran their game to takeover the country.

    GERMANY WAS IN OPPOSITION TO THE BANKSTERS OF THE WEST. This is why Germany was repeatedly attacked.

    With regards to international finance funding Germany, that is NOT factual if you follow the money.

    On May 1, 1933 Hitler outlined the first Reinhardt program, a four year plan to end unemployment by attack on several fronts:
    1) Spend 1 billion marks of employment credit bills
    2) Tax benefits for industry, agriculture, and the employment of domestic help
    3) Marriage bonus loans of 1000 marks
    4) Government control of money and capital markets

    May 31'st
    5) 1 Billion marks of short term public works bills

    Many of these bills never made it to Reichsbank for rediscount as they paid interest and were an incentive for private banks to hold.

    Various authors estimate new purchasing power in bill form introduced into German economy of around 15 billion marks.

    This was definitely NOT international bankster money, but instead Germany's own credit.
    Germany was gold deficient, and at that time in history, the world issued bank credit on top of gold.

    In other words, this whole Hitler was an agent of the Rothschilds or part of the New World Order, does not fly. People that make these sort of statements (like Henry Makow) are not monetarily literate.

    Germany separated from (((international capital))) which was their great sin; that and running an industrial capitalism economy which kicked England's butt.

  174. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    Not so much a comment “Straight Outta Compton” as “Straight Outta Tel Aviv”.

  175. @Ron Unz

    Its pretty clear Unz has a thing for bashing FDR which I don’t yet understand. From everything I was told by my great grandmother who lived through the depression everyone here in the south loved FDR.
     
    Here's an article of my from almost exactly a year ago that you really might want to read:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-great-purge-of-the-1940s/

    At the risk of reproof for missing something obvious may I ask for you clarification of a passage that puzzled me:

    Similarly, ten years of exhaustive archival research by Joseph Bendersky produced a volume that seems to utterly demolish our conventional narrative of Jewish political activism in both Europe and America between the two world wars.

    *** *** ***
    What were you referring to as that “conventional narrative” which was demolished?

  176. @Cyrano
    Well, it looks like it’s time to play my favorite game again: “Let’s blame the Jews for everything”. If it’s true that Jews have the tendency to stray to the left – in order to corrupt and destroy the pure and innocent capitalism – which it never was, that can only mean that the Jews are good people.

    How so? It’s easy. Human designed socio-economic systems ALWAYS evolve to the left. Thus, feudalism was more left wing than slavery, and capitalism is more left wing than feudalism. And whatever comes to replace capitalism – as it should one day – it will be more to the left than capitalism.

    But the capitalists know this, they are not stupid, that’s why they are faking liberalism in order to delay the expiry date for capitalism. Therefore, if it’s true that Jews always lean left, that means that they have the correctly charted evolutionary tendency.

    Human societies evolve to the left, only Hitler tried to discontinue that trend and we know how that ended. There are others who think that capitalism is the pinnacle of human achievement. Fine, then let’s make it the epitaph for humanity. Jews are right, if anything comes after capitalism – it would have to be something that involves taking a left turn.

    I’m afraid your thesis that Jews are active in left-wing movements to, grosso modo, “be on the right side of history” in evolutionary social dynamics is incorrect, and has reached the proportions of a myth in right-wing/nationalist circles as revealed by the large number of comments here contending that Jews are/were the founders and flag-bearers of Communism/Bolshevism. That is a fundamental lie and it does serve the interests of conservatism because they miss the real enemy.

    It’s trite to state once again that Jews were heavily involved in the political movements leading to the Russian Revolution and in the formative years of the USSR. But they were not involved only within the Bolsheviks, they were very active in all opposition parties against the Bolsheviks, which suggests that there was a calculating policy to place Jews in positions of leadership regardless of the final outcome. Jews fought against the Bolsheviks and many ended up in Gulags or facing execution squads, the most notorious one at the end of a sharp icepick in Mexico. See the pattern: there were many Jew horses in the race for power, their ultimate objective, not to bring about social justice or Communism.

    But the Russian Revolution was not the only revolution in human history. There were many rebellions and uprisings throughout Europe in the Middle Ages and since up to the French of 1789 and subsequent years up to 1948 Paris Commune. Yet, one never hears of Jews being on the barricades of the side of revolutionaries, although a late-comer (Marx) made some pronouncements from a safe distance. Perhaps they were too busy making money…

    And since the Russian Revolution were the Jews behind all subsequent uprisings in most of Europe in the aftermath of WWII? No. Were they with the Cuban and Iranian revolutionaries? No. But I know for certain that someone will come with the decrepit canard that the Jewish bankers financed them. History has many examples of peoples’ rebellions against injustices perpetrated by the ruling classes regardless of Communism, Marxism, Bolshevism or Jewish activism.

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism. Look what they are doing in most countries where they grabbed the levers of power (USA, Europe). If that is not enough, look at the showpiece of Jewish power: Israel, a foretaste of things to come because of our willful blindness.

    • Replies: @Cyrano
    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.

    First of all, the “socialism” that everybody now experiences and hates so much in the west was brought in by the ruling elites.

    And it’s not even “socialism” and it’s not even “left wing” policy. How can anybody buy that garbage. One of the most reactionary country, whose entire spectrum of politics is right wing, all of a sudden brings a “left wing” policy. Just to camouflage that there is nothing else left wing in their spectrum of politics –domestic, or even less foreign.

    Just that one single one: immigration. Only on that issue they are “left wing”. To cover up their predominantly reactionary policy about everything else. They still don’t have universal health care, for Christ-sake , all of other developed countries got it more than 50 years ago. How are they “progressive” and “liberal”?

    They could have chosen from the whole plethora of issues to go left wing on: Increase minimum wage, paid maternity leave, tuition free education, paid vacation, and many more. But they decided to go “left wing” only on immigration – because it doesn’t cost them a cent.

    Real left wing policies require taxing the rich and improving the plight of the DOMESTIC working class. Not the plight of 3rd world imports. They have no obligations to them. If you check in the dictionary, left wing policy means bringing more equality between the poor and the rich. How does uncontrolled immigration accomplishes that?

    The whole thing is scam to make them appear “progressive” and “liberal”. Which they are not. It is one of the most backward, reactionary regimes on the planet clinging to their wealth and privileges, trying to fool everybody about them being “progressive”. If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.
    , @Iris

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism.
     
    Jewish supremacists become interested in communist and socialist revolutions only when such political upheavals take place in rich, strategic countries worth controlling plundering.

    There never was any support from organised Jewry to fiercely communist but resource-deprived Cuba or North Korea.
  177. Ron I am at one with you when you write

    “I am not an archival researcher and have no interest in reviewing the many tens of thousands of pages of source material located at dozens of repositories across the country that Bendersky so diligently examined while producing his important book.”

    but

    Why leave your subsequent speculations unsupported by a little more evidence?

    A Stanford junior majoring in history and recommended by her professor would surely cost you practically nothing as a researcher for say a day in each of a couple of archives – maybe the cost would just be a return fare to the east coast. Having read Bendersky’s book you are well placed to make a shrewd choice of archives and individuals to focus on first and what to look for. “Jews” and “camps” would be a good start, though “Holocaust” might begin to pick up mentions as the old soldiers aged.

  178. @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...

    That’s from a peer reviewed journal…Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS…but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history’s ugliest band of organized psychopaths…

    You’re simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else…

    That prize for histories ugliest band of psychopaths would have to go to the Bolsheviks whose reign of terror killed millions even in peacetime. Their genocidal ideology also ravaged much of Asia killing millions more.

    Tell me why countries have to enact holocaust denial laws to protect a narrative that can be proven true by your precious peer review journals. Why is questioning history forbidden in this one particular case? Surely the truth can stand alone against claims that it didn’t happen.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    You refer to the Bolsheviks' "genocidal ideology". Can you please enlarge on that so as to explain how attributing a "genocidal" [sic] ideology to them stacks up with the facts. Stalin the Georgian didn't preside over the Holomodor because he was a racist who wanted to get rid of Ukrainians.
  179. @foolisholdman
    Communism is powerful ideologically, because of the inequalities manifest in society. It goes back much further than Marx. There were medieval communes in Europe that had very communistic ideas and were bitterly resented and eventually outlawed by the ruling classes of their time. The leaders of the Peasants' Revolt had many ideas in common with modern communists. In the British Civil war there were the Diggers and the Levellers.

    What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation. That was never the overt program. There may well have been (there probably was) such an esoteric program but it was not shared with the Goy members.

    What you are saying is also the gist of my comment further down, written before I read yours. It is important to stress the distinction between Zionism and Communism – they are at the opposite ends of the political spectrum. Only dimwits can’t see it!

    Some allege they are similar because both are collectivist ideologies; but that is a crass mistake. The collectivism of Jews is only a tool for their own ethnocentrism, an exclusionary/racist mode for self preservation purposes and which they use to promote and support their own kind only.

    • Replies: @Iris

    The collectivism of Jews is only a tool for their own ethnocentrism, an exclusionary/racist mode for self preservation purposes and which they use to promote and support their own kind only.
     
    ...While all real communists, misguided or not, are viscerally anti-racist, culturally anti-greed and hold the profound belief that the only fair social structures are those establishing the highest possible economic equality between all.

    Real communists are almost the exact opposite of Zionist supremacists; they are the closest to idealist Christians.

  180. eah says:

    A very interesting and thought-provoking article which references individuals and works largely unknown to me (I had heard of Revilo Oliver) — thanks.

    But as I argued in a major article several years ago,…

    It’s slightly marred by a gratuitous jibe at the hereditarian view of intelligence — ? — perhaps a future edit will include something about Hispanic crime.

  181. @Robjil
    Not all Jews are leaning left anymore. Israel supports and props up all the right wing coups in Latin America since the 1950s.

    This author calls for BDS against Israel for what it has been doing and is doing to Latin America.

    https://savageminds.org/2016/03/18/israels-foreign-policy-in-latin-america-another-reason-to-take-the-call-to-boycott-seriously/

    Israel's support for Nicaragua Contras in the 198os and 1990s.

    "Israel’s support for the Nicaraguan Contras was mirrored in the Israeli support for right-wing Phalangist militias in Lebanon in the 1980s and ‘90s; by the same token, the Contras attacks on the institutions of Nicaraguan civil society prefigure the manner in which Israeli settler para-militaries “price tag” attacks seek to undermine the agricultural and social foundations of Palestinian life."

    Israel's support for Argentine's right wing government in 1970s- 1980s.

    "Israel sustained an intimate relationship with the military junta that ruled Argentina from 1976–1983, and provided logistical and hardware support for Argentina during the Falklands War of 1982. The Argentine junta was ideologically anti-Semitic, and routinely brandished Nazi and other fascist symbols . During la Guerra Sucia (the Dirty War), the military imprisoned, tortured and persecuted a higher percentage of leftist, progressive or non-political Jewish Argentine citizens han they did non-Jewish Argentines. In their dealings with the Argentine military, Israel’s leaders showed very clearly that they distinguished between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism and were fully capable of supporting a government that was radically anti-Semitic within its own borders and pro-Israel in its foreign policy. "

    Israel's support for Colombia's right wing rulers

    "In Colombia armed right paramilitaries have also been important players on their own, in collusion with the army’s battle with the leftist guerrillas of the FARC and other groups, and as shock troops for corporate interests. In the late 1970s the paramilitares organized into an umbrella organization, Auto-Defensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), co-founded by Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso, among others. In his 2001 biography, Mi confesión, Castaño describes his year of training in Israel in 1983–84, both in military schools and at the Hebrew University, and details Israel’s influence on his own ideological formation and that of his movement. The Israeli security firm Spearhead, led by retired IDF colonel Yair Klein, started training paramilitaries from the AUC in the mid–1980s, the same era in which Castaño received his education."

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-honduras-enter-new-blood-soaked-military-alliance-support-state-sponsored-terrorism/219887/

    "Israel and Honduras announced a new security agreement this month in which Israel will supply weapons and training to the Honduran military.

    Honduras is ruled by an oppressive and murderous regime that took power after a 2009 coup, and the agreement marks just the latest chapter in Israel’s long, bloody history of arming Central American despots."

    What foreign nation was involved in this 2009 coup?

    https://www.opdeepstate.com/2018/10/21/honduras-and-the-israeli-coup-a-new-special-relationship-immigration/

    "In the aftermath of the 2009 coup in Honduras, I had the opportunity to interview deposed President Manuel Zelaya, who, having been kindly escorted in his pajamas to Costa Rica by the Honduran military, had then resurfaced in Tegucigalpa and taken refuge in the embassy of Brazil. The interview took place via an intermediary inside the embassy, who conveyed my questions to Zelaya.

    One topic we touched on was a comment the left-leaning Zelaya had made concerning “Israeli mercenaries” operating in Honduras. This had unleashed a predictable hullabaloo in international media, with commentators tripping over each other to portray the besieged leader as an anti-Semite extraordinaire on some sort of permanent acid trip.

    In my write-up of the interview, which was published in an insignificant publication, I happened to point out that Israeli mercenaries weren’t exactly foreign to the Central American landscape. When the piece came out, the publisher of another insignificant publication—to which I had contributed some anti-coup articles—threw a fit. How dare I bring the Israelis into it; I would alienate all of Washington!"

    Your ample supply of supporting material reinforces a rational analysis about the selectivity of Jewish policies and movements for their own self-interest, not supporting socialist policies or out of concern for the wellbeing of mankind. This faux Judeo-leftism nexus needs to be broken to enable us to see and show how and why Jewry hitched a ride on the Leftist-bandwagon on their way to influence and power.

    • Agree: Robjil
  182. @Hamlet's Ghost
    George Lincoln Rockwell, before he founded the American Nazi Party, wrote in This Time The World about his involvement with Buckley and the Jewish question when he was an up-and-coming conservative.:


    "One of the conservative leaders I contacted was William F. Buckley, Jr, the publisher of National Review. My friend in Washington, D.C., Sam Jones, was his correspondent and we got together at a meeting in New York. It was an, intellectual thrill, just talking with Buckley and his staff. There is more pulsating brain-power and genius surrounding Buckley than in any place else on earth, where I have ever been. Bill, himself, is personable in the extreme and brighter than all the rest, but his staff includes three or four Jews, one of them particularly Jewish-looking, and the atmosphere there is different than with other 'conservative' groups.

    Buckley is extremely cagey on the Jewish Question and even when you get him alone, it is difficult to elicit information as to his awareness. The best you can get are guarded implications from which you are at liberty to infer what you want. I have since learned the reason for this: Buckley's millionaire father had a major interest with the Jews in Israeli oil, and the result, even today, is that Buckley's anti-liberalism and anti-Communism stop at the borders of Israel and the doors of Zionist meeting halls.

    At the time I, too, was playing this silly 'I've-got-my-eyes-closed' game, so I felt that much could be accomplished by helping Buckley. I agreed to promote the National Review for him and he deposited a thousand dollars in a Washington bank to my account. So I started on a project designed to get mass circulation for National Review in colleges and universities.

    At the time, however, I was heavily involved in my own effort to launch the A.F.C.O. and the newspaper, and I am ashamed to have to admit that I did a rotten job for Bill. I made some efforts, but they were without the drive and full enthusiasm necessary in such a promotion and nothing happened. I returned the money to Bill, less expenses, with a guilty conscience. Outside of being too cagey on the Jewish Question, which is, of course, his privilege, Bill Buckley was 100% square as a man and unlike the situation with other right-wingers with whom I have worked or tried to work, my failure to accomplish anything with Buckley was entirely my fault. "


    chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://www.americannaziparty.com/thistimetheworld.pdf

    Ron Unz has been fearless in his coverage of books and subjects that have been rendered taboo by our self-chosen overlords. I would heartily recommend Rockwell's book to him and others who want to chart the sad and steady decline of American post-war conservatism. A full-length unzian (?) book review would be very much worth reading.

    William F. Buckley, Jr. was a good example of Operation Mockingbird–CIA infiltration of all types of media outlets.

    He kept the mainstream “conservative movement” as a deep state pet poodle, which it remains today.

    A clue was that he was horrified at any mention of any “conspiracy”–the thought of folks meeting covertly to achieve their aims appeared to be incomprehensible to this “resident genius” of the right.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  183. @Miggle
    Ron, enormous thanks for a very important article. Now, I hope this doesn't rub you up the wrong way, but I wonder if this next is totally off-topic.

    Look at the astoundingly powerful homosexual lobby which has taken the world by storm, pretending to be social progress when it is really social subversion.

    Comes out with nonsense like that an absurd contradiction between the physical body and erotic desires is not pathological, is normal, and it's forbidden to suggest otherwise.

    One does not have to moralize, to say it's wrong. It's not wrong morally to be, oneself, diseased: not wrong to have a mental illness, even to be in denial that it's an illness.

    But if social subversion is what it's all about, who is behind that immensely powerful lobby now in control of little childrens' schools and indoctrination? Where did it spring from?

    I’m not sure whether the link below will work. Is a comment by “Iris” giving an example of Jewish hypocrisy: French minister Peillon’s law for sexual education to pre-schoolers. Hope it works.

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Iris

  184. @Miggle
    Ron, enormous thanks for a very important article. Now, I hope this doesn't rub you up the wrong way, but I wonder if this next is totally off-topic.

    Look at the astoundingly powerful homosexual lobby which has taken the world by storm, pretending to be social progress when it is really social subversion.

    Comes out with nonsense like that an absurd contradiction between the physical body and erotic desires is not pathological, is normal, and it's forbidden to suggest otherwise.

    One does not have to moralize, to say it's wrong. It's not wrong morally to be, oneself, diseased: not wrong to have a mental illness, even to be in denial that it's an illness.

    But if social subversion is what it's all about, who is behind that immensely powerful lobby now in control of little childrens' schools and indoctrination? Where did it spring from?

    My attempt to post a link regarding your question does not work,so it appears. Here’s another try:
    Read last paragraph.

    Iris says:
    May 30, 2019 at 12:02 pm GMT • 200 Words

    Dear Jacques;
    “Sayan”, plural “Sayanim” is a term initially used by author and former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky in his books. It describes Jewish people who are citizens/natives to the country they live in, but act as sleeper agents for Israel.

    This term has become commonly used within the (real) French alternative right, after anti-Zionist, Jewish author Jacob Cohen popularised it as title for one of his books: “Le printemps des Sayanim/ Bloom of the Sayanim”.

    Play Video

    The term Sayanim was spot on, because it described a phenomenon that was confusing and not well understood: the unconditional and totally unsuspected allegiance to Israel of members of the native Jewish diaspora.

    The Sayanim are far more than a network of informant. They are people “naturally” embedded in all areas of public life, who promote and push Israel’s grand agenda while the public remains unaware.

    For instance, Vincent Peillon, the French minister who introduced teaching LGBTQ “facts of life” to 4-year old kindergarten kids, has ancestral presence in France. He is a Strasbourg Jew, who despite the public policies he imposed on the goyim, brought up all of his 3 children in the Jewish religious educational system. You see the picture.

  185. @Johnny Rico
    It took even less energy on my part to get you to do that. Thanks.

    True, but who comes out of the exchange appearing genuine and who was exposed as a wanker? Hint: It’s not you who appears genuine. Stop it, before you go blind.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    I didn't even realize there was an exchange.
  186. @Incitatus

    “LOL: ‘When beat, change the subject’, says Incitatus”
     
    Really? You’re that desperate? Where did I say that? Links please.

    Little codoh Tar-Baby.

    The inference was that you didn’t respond to anything of substance but rather you chose to home in on an inconsequential matter of punctuation in a weak attempt to score a cheap point. It was disingenuous, unconvincing and more than a little pathetic, a bit like an old queen dressing up like a cheap tart and thinking that the fellas are fooled, but you’d know all about disingenuous old queens. Try again, old queen.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    It takes one to know one. But do accept acknowledgment of the fact that you sound sober today. On a trip to the Sahara?
    , @Incitatus
    LOL! You’ve really mastered the art of irrelevance. Pat yourself on the back!
  187. @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense.

    You can easily find the questions to your answers by perusing this site. Ron has written his own substantial piece on the holocaust, and the e-books in his collection on this site further make it clear where he stands on the question.

    There is also a convenient link that explains UR’s purpose and guiding principles, which also addresses the comment policy.

    Never has it been so easy to find out about the truth about the so-called holocaust. If you and FB still can’t do it, then this simply illustrates the power of brainwashing, not any ambiguity of the evidence.

  188. Across more than sixty pages, Bendersky provides hundreds of direct quotes, mostly from the same officers who are the subject of the rest of his book. But after carefully reading the chapter twice, I was unable to find a single one of those statements referring to the massive slaughter of Jews that constitutes what we commonly call the Holocaust, nor to any of its central elements, such as the existence of death camps or gas chambers.

    This silence may nevertheless be consistent with conventional narratives of the Holocaust. The extermination camps (including Chelmno, Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor) were in the East, and those still in existence in 1944-5 were “liberated” by the Soviet Union, not the United States. If American officers never mentioned the slaughter, it may be because they had not seen it at first hand. It is also possible that some of them did refer to it, but for his own reasons – attempting to paint the US Army as anti-semitic – Bendersky chose not to mention this.

    If the scale of the Holocaust has been exaggerated, anyone who wishes to prove this point must analyse “The Destruction of the European Jews” by Raul Hilberg, line-by-line, and point out where he made his mistakes. Norman Finkelstein reports that, before writing anything on the Holocaust, he would re-read each volume of the book:

    They provided the psychological security I needed before daring to render a judgment of my own. Wanting to stand on the firmest possible intellectual foundations I reflexively reached for Hilberg.

    It is possible, following Finkelstein, to agree with the accepted history of the Holocaust, and also to deplore some of the purposes for which this history has been used.

    It is also remarkable (see link above) that Hilberg had difficulty finding a publisher in 1961 because the subject of the Nazi genocide was then taboo. Taboos may seem pervasive and unbreakable, but they will crumble in the face of evidence.

    • Replies: @utu

    that Hilberg had difficulty finding a publisher in 1961 because the subject of the Nazi genocide was then taboo
     
    The taboo was and still is Jewish collaboration with Nazis. Hanna Arendt had access to Hilberg's manuscript of Destruction of the European Jews and w/o attribution and w/o his permission used large parts of it about Judenrats and how they contributed to the destruction of Jews in her Eichmann in Jerusalem which first appeared as series of articles in New Yorker. Hilberg never forgave her.

    https://www.thenation.com/article/conscious-pariah/
    Raul Hilberg, the first historian to document the banality of Nazi evil, nursed a lifelong grudge against the woman who borrowed from and popularized his work, Hannah Arendt.
     
    Neither Arendt's Eichman in Jerusalem nor Hilberg's Destruction of the European Jerusalem were translated into Hebrew. The chapter of Jewish collaboration and misdeeds during WWII was closed for Israelis with Kastner trial and his murder.
  189. Revilo P Oliver was an absolute prophet. All you have to do is open your eyes and have a look at the country formerly known as the United States to become a “believer” in Revilo’s visions of a new America if the (((tribe))) who ruled it was not reigned in.

    As far as his anti-Christian rhetoric goes, he was absolutely correct. It amazes me how anyone who is against this “Judaism for Goys” is automatically considered a Satanist and a man of no morals. I have come to find Christianity and morality, more times than not are on opposite ends of the spectrum.

    • Replies: @Republic
    Just as White nationalists have to discuss and understand the Jewish Question, they also have to understand the Christian Question

    Here is what Dr William Luther Pierce, the late White Nationalist leader had to say about Christianity and White Nationalism:

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2010/10/on-christianity/


    The most important single fact concerning Christianity with which the Alliance must deal is that all the major Christian churches, Catholic and Protestant, liberal and fundamentalist, have openly aligned themselves with the enemies of the White race. The Catholics and the liberal Protestants are vigorously supporting racial mixing, while the fundamentalist Protestants are strong boosters of Zionism. These alignments will become increasingly important factors in our struggle in the years ahead, as the churches become more and more involved in social and political issues. The Jews have already announced their intention to mobilize fundamentalist Christians in their effort to maintain control of the U.S. government. The Alliance cannot remain silent in the face of such developments, for the sake of White unity or anything else.

     

  190. Whenever Vox Day chimes in that “just about everything you think you know about 20th century history is wrong”, you can be certain that he is engaging in a campaign of deception. That is what “sigmas” do.

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”. But destroying the Nazi machinery of death was not on its radar. Behind-the-scenes requests by Jewish leaders and the U.S. War Refugee Board for intervention were not heeded. Perhaps the government was concerned that the Nazi Regime would exploit such intervention for propaganda gains. Right or wrong, the military also insisted it could not divert resources from what it deemed as more vital objectives–the destruction of German military and industrial targets (Dresden, anyone)–and that they lacked the sophistication to liquidate the death camps with lethal
    precision.

    It is other than surprising that the American reluctance to intervene directly to stop the Holocaust remains a deeply contested issue.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.
     
    The so-called "direct evidence" was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that. The War Refugee Board was not created until later, but also from less than dependable sources. It's all explained in brief here: http://jan27.org/the-hoax-that-wont-die/

    The Jews ultimately prevailed with their hoax in 1944 when the Roosevelt Administration saw the value of the "Nazi death camp" narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law. But it was an uncertain road and no way was it believed in 1942.

    This is a good companion read: https://carolynyeager.net/how-british-psychological-warfare-resulted-short-term-victory-long-term-loss-europe
    , @Parfois1

    It is other than surprising that the American reluctance to intervene directly to stop the Holocaust remains a deeply contested issue.
     
    That is a crappy and discredit narrative - as if there was an Hollowcaust stated as fact and then discuss what follows from it - a fallacy. Not only that, there appears an accusation that the US Government had an obligation to declare war on Germany because of an alleged (and perhaps false) accusation. Why such obligation? Because the alleged victims were Jews, therefore there is that obligation to protect them - but to hell with everyone else.
  191. @j2
    "What Marx did was to give communists better tools for understanding society, he did not invent them. It looks to me as though organised Jewery recognised the power of this movement and used it to gain power in Russia. Certainly a lot of communists were not Jews and had no desire to further a take-over of World Power by the Jews or any other nation."

    The "secret"history of Communism can fortunately be tracked reasonably well. Leftist thought started from Christian ideas, but it become Masonic already in the 18th century. Freemasons of Memphis and Mizraim type and Carbonaries were the revolutionary leftists in the 19th century. They were direct descendants of the Jacobins of the French Revolution. Jewish influence on this movement started from converted Frankists joining Freemasonry just before the French Revolution and up to early 19th century. Around this same time certain Jewish bankers (like Rothschild) started financing these revolutionaries, as they were financing wars as their main business. At Napoleon III's time revolutionary Freemasonry (Mizraim, Memphis and the Masonic-type Carbonaries) was already mainly financed by Jewish bankers. There were all of the elements, like controlled press and fully infiltrated system. When Freemasons were given amnesty after the Paris Commune fell, they stopped direct (but not indirect) subversive activities of Mizraim and Memphis. The revolutionary movement continued as Communism. It was financed by Jewish bankers and lead by Jewish revolutionaries from not later than 1890s, probably from 1860s. Freemasons were used for creating controlled opposition to Communism for Zionistic purposes, so Theosophy, Martinists and the Freemason Henry Ford warned of the Communistic threat. (Richard Wagner, with his antisemitic circle, either was a Mason or at least wanted to be, so was close to them.) All this was to force Jews to Palestine: the persecution had to be as the generation did not deserve a redemption (i.e., did not move voluntarily).

    The fact that many Communists did not realize these facts and believed in the Communistic ideas means only that they were fooled. The same way, many Freemasons or intellectuals, who did not realize this, were also fooled. The goal of the financiers was always to take the world power, not to build a better world, and successful revolutions are very seldom spontaneous (in Haiti there was one such case). Somebody is usually funding the revolutionaries.

    Sources please.

    • Replies: @j2
    "Sources please."

    Wiz, if you feel that every comment in a discussion board needs to have a source, so please give the source of your expression 'Sources please". Who said it first? Where was it published? Have you made source analysis of what the person actually meant? Was he sincere, or under some pressure? What is the motive of you quoting this person here? I have noticed that the vast majority of your comments do not have a correctly formulated list of sources, and if they do, they seen not to be primary sources.

  192. @j2
    "WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system"

    I agree with much of what you write, but the banker, who enabled Germany to have a long war in the WWI was Jewish. The issue is that according to theoreticians of the time before the WWI, it was impossible for economic reasons for European powers to have a long war. Therefore the next war, that, for some specific reason was presented as sure to come, would be a short one. Germany would lose it, naturally, but no great harm would come from the war either to Germany or to anybody else, as it would be very short. What happened is quite different, and exactly as Freemasons wanted it (a senseless war to finish all wars, destruction of monarchies) and as Zionists wanted it (Palestine that Turkey refused to give). Bankers on both sides, from the same ethnic group, made a long extermination war possible and depending on the outcome, they decided who to ask for Palestine. The WWII is largely similar, yet in some ways different. Here in Unz there are some Hitler funs and some supporters of the official history. Both are false, and they are exactly the same: one view and the controlled opposition to it. In reality Hitler and Nazis were lifted to power to do the exact thing needed in the plan: to move the Jews to Palestine in order to create Israel. The origin of the Thule Society is Masonic in the wide sense. That explains everything. They certainly were not any real opposition to bankers. In the WWII both hands were played by the same side. In the WWI only the finance of the war was played by the same hand on both sides. But, as money rules, the outcome was decided, not in details, but decided,

    Again, sources please.

  193. anon[261] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mefobills

    Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme?
     
    I'm an economic historian, and I actually look for Jewish good behavior. Unfortunately, whenever usury or unequal swaps occur, it is inevitable that there are Jewish hands in the pot. I wish it weren't so, but it is. When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    The line of good and evil runs down the middle of every man, and they have to decide which side they are on.

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    supposedly there was an Israeli pilot that refused to fire on the USS Liberty and was court-martialed and served 7 years in prison

    i was shocked when i heard this, also demonstrates how despicable the attack was

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
    There is a recent book about the deliberate 2 hour attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 and wounded 174 out of a crew of 294 and the attack was only stopped when a Russia destroyer came upon the scene, the book is Blood In the Water, can be had at Barnes and Noble or Amazon.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Source please.
  194. @anon

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.
     
    supposedly there was an Israeli pilot that refused to fire on the USS Liberty and was court-martialed and served 7 years in prison

    i was shocked when i heard this, also demonstrates how despicable the attack was

    There is a recent book about the deliberate 2 hour attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 and wounded 174 out of a crew of 294 and the attack was only stopped when a Russia destroyer came upon the scene, the book is Blood In the Water, can be had at Barnes and Noble or Amazon.

    • Replies: @Parfois1
    Thanks DFox. Didn't know about the Russian destroyer. Did the Soviets denounce the event publicly?
    , @anarchyst
    Who controls the media?
    June 8, 2017 was the fiftieth anniversary of the deliberate attack upon the USS Liberty (GTR-5). Normally, on the fiftieth anniversary of any notable event in history, there is at least a mention of it in the mainstream media. Not so for the USS Liberty (GTR-5).
    This, in itself is telling.
    The USS Liberty was in international waters, clearly marked and identified by the Israelis as an American ship.
    Lyndon Johnson initially refused help for the stricken ship as he did not want to embarrass an ally (Israel). The plan, all along was for Israel to attack the ship, leaving no survivors, and then to blame it on Egypt, thereby pulling America into a middle east war on the side of the Israelis. A brave sailor was able to reconnect an antenna, under fire, to get the message out that they were being attacked. Initially Lyndon Johnson refused to send help, but was forced to when the fleet got the distress call. All one has to do is look at the Lavon affair, among others, in which Israel always gets others to do its dirty work for them.
    The subsequent investigation was whitewashed by none other than Admiral John S McCain (yes, John McCain’s daddy) with the captain of the ship being awarded the Medal of Honor not at the White House (which is protocol), but at an obscure Naval base.
    The USS Liberty (GTR-5) sailors were scattered throughout the Navy and warned not to discuss the “incident” (actually an act of war) under pain of courts-martial.
    The way the crew of the USS Liberty (GTR-5) was treated still stinks to this day.
    The USS Liberty (GTR-5) is the most decorated ship in Naval history.
    If I had my way, Israel would have been turned into a glass parking lot on June 9, 1967.
  195. @Whitewolf

    That’s from a peer reviewed journal…Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS…but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history’s ugliest band of organized psychopaths…

    You’re simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else…
     
    That prize for histories ugliest band of psychopaths would have to go to the Bolsheviks whose reign of terror killed millions even in peacetime. Their genocidal ideology also ravaged much of Asia killing millions more.

    Tell me why countries have to enact holocaust denial laws to protect a narrative that can be proven true by your precious peer review journals. Why is questioning history forbidden in this one particular case? Surely the truth can stand alone against claims that it didn't happen.

    You refer to the Bolsheviks’ “genocidal ideology”. Can you please enlarge on that so as to explain how attributing a “genocidal” [sic] ideology to them stacks up with the facts. Stalin the Georgian didn’t preside over the Holomodor because he was a racist who wanted to get rid of Ukrainians.

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
    Hows the weather in Tel Aviv?
    , @Johnny Walker Read
    Sources please.
  196. @anon

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.
     
    supposedly there was an Israeli pilot that refused to fire on the USS Liberty and was court-martialed and served 7 years in prison

    i was shocked when i heard this, also demonstrates how despicable the attack was

    Source please.

  197. @Blake
    Honestly get a life.

    I think FB wants to do far more than get a life. I’d say he wants to get the life of all goyim and crush it completely.

  198. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    The inference was that you didn't respond to anything of substance but rather you chose to home in on an inconsequential matter of punctuation in a weak attempt to score a cheap point. It was disingenuous, unconvincing and more than a little pathetic, a bit like an old queen dressing up like a cheap tart and thinking that the fellas are fooled, but you'd know all about disingenuous old queens. Try again, old queen.

    It takes one to know one. But do accept acknowledgment of the fact that you sound sober today. On a trip to the Sahara?

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    So you say, but it is Incitatus the disingenuous old queen who is the one referring to Putin's man boobs in his comments not me. Comments such as yours would suggest a hasbara still with training wheels on providing backup or just maybe you're an old queen yourself and are sensitive to the term.
  199. @Mefobills
    Some Revilo excerpts can be found here:

    http://heretical.com/


    See Oliver: Jewish Strategy

    From Conspiracy or Instinct? by Revilo P. Oliver

    http://heretical.com/oliver/js08.html

    It is entirely possible, therefore, that a species could have been formed by biological selection that automatically preys on our species as instinctively as wolves prey on caribou, although, of course, with much greater cunning and versatility.

    Thus the inclusion of the phrase “in instinctive concert” in the previously published official definition of “Anti-Termite” to void typical Jew mockery as “conspiracy theory” anytime truth is spoken of concerted Jew evildoing:

    “Anti-Semite”?

    Anti-Termite!!!

    I oppose proactively hateful ethno-supremecist Jews behaving as termites gnawing often latently but ever unceasingly in instinctive concert at the cultural structure of white Christian society as they have been doing since arriving en masse in the United States circa 1880 pursuing their apparent goal to eradicate all people of European descent.

  200. @Wizard of Oz
    You refer to the Bolsheviks' "genocidal ideology". Can you please enlarge on that so as to explain how attributing a "genocidal" [sic] ideology to them stacks up with the facts. Stalin the Georgian didn't preside over the Holomodor because he was a racist who wanted to get rid of Ukrainians.

    Hows the weather in Tel Aviv?

  201. @Hail

    the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…
     
    Major names mentioned in article:
    - 'Oliver' (Revilo P.; 1908-1994): 59 hits in article
    - 'Bendersky' (b.1946; Jewish; author of a book on U.S. military intelligence's views on the "Jewish Threat"): 33 hits in article (incl. 31 for "Bendersky" and 2 for "Bendarsky")
    - 'Beaty' (author of "Iron Curtain Over America" [1951]; 1890-1961): 27 hits in article
    - 'Roosevelt': 19 hits in article (+1 for 'FDR' = 20).
    - 'Summers' (b.1954; Jewish; President of Harvard, July 2001 to June 2006): 15 hits in article
    - 'Welch' (of the John Birch Society; 1899-1985): 13 hits
    - 'Ross' (American sociologist of early 20th-century; 1866-1951): 8 hits
    - 'Mertz' (b.1949; Jewish; academic who proclaimed “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest” despite own evidence suggesting otherwise): 5 hits
    - 'Ford' (Henry): 4 hits
    SUM of the above nine people: 181 hits; of which 'Oliver' represents <33%.

    Total word count: 12,500
    - 1,160 words: Intro on the Larry Summers case of 2005;
    - 2,450 words: Section on the Joseph Bendersky book, "Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army" (2000);
    - 1,400 words: Section on WWII-era military intelligence officer Col. John Beaty's book, "Iron Curtain Over America" (1951);
    - 6,900 words: Section on Dr. Revilo P. Oliver's life and times, including John Birch Society origins (or which 2,280 words are passages from Dr. Oliver's writings);
    - 500 words: Conclusion which brings together the various strands of the article; the key sentence of the 500-word conclusion is "For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect," as demonstrated by the less-controversial Mertz case introduced in the Introduction. Ron Unz argues that Bendersky's own book on anti-Semitism in U.S. military intelligence in the first three-quarters of the 20th century contains, within it, and inadvertently, an anti-Holocaust-narrative "own goal."

    SUM: Of the 12,500 words in the article, 4,620 words (37%) are by Ron Unz within the Revilo P. Oliver section, and 2,280 words (18%) are excerpts from Oliver's writings in the same section. The passages from Oliver are probably justifiable because he is so little known in the 2010s to anything like a general audience, and he forms a core part of the point being made.

    Excellent summary analysis!

  202. @Mefobills

    Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme?
     
    I'm an economic historian, and I actually look for Jewish good behavior. Unfortunately, whenever usury or unequal swaps occur, it is inevitable that there are Jewish hands in the pot. I wish it weren't so, but it is. When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    The line of good and evil runs down the middle of every man, and they have to decide which side they are on.

    When I find good Jewish behavior, I am in awe of the effort and moral integrity it took to swim against the tribe tide.

    All goyim posting here are in awe of those traits in Mr. Unz, and certainly hopeful, maybe even trustingly so, that he will remain an admirable exception among the group who has so disappointed and harmed us.

    Chapter 16, The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon

    https://www.ccel.org/g/gibbon/decline/volume1/chap16.htm

    Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which (((they))) committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.

    • Agree: Saggy
  203. j2 says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Sources please.

    “Sources please.”

    Wiz, if you feel that every comment in a discussion board needs to have a source, so please give the source of your expression ‘Sources please”. Who said it first? Where was it published? Have you made source analysis of what the person actually meant? Was he sincere, or under some pressure? What is the motive of you quoting this person here? I have noticed that the vast majority of your comments do not have a correctly formulated list of sources, and if they do, they seen not to be primary sources.

    • Replies: @Anon
    You sometimes seem to know what you are talking about and even have some technical expertise. What a pity then to undermine your credibility with such silliness. Surely you can recognise the "Sources please" as equivalent to someone in a conversation over a coffee listening to something interesting but novel to him and saying "That's an interesting view. Never heard it before. Where do you get it from?".
  204. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    Jews are just like everybody else only more so.

    Yitzhak Attia, director of the Yad vashem Institute International School, Israel magazine (April 2003):

    “The universal world will reign in a postmodern global village where all humanity lives … even if our mind shouts to us by all its means the absurdity of this face-to-face between a small people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity … as absurd as it is incoherent, as monstrous as it may seem, we are deeply involved in the intimate struggle between Israel and the Nations, which can only be genocidal and complete, because it is about our identities. »

  205. @Mefobills
    Zumbuddi,

    I usually rely on Adrian Salbuchi for Argentina info.

    With regards to Jewish buying up of land for Patagonian occupation, that is fully in accord with Zionist methods, especially after Rothschild came on board after first Zionist conference. Herzyl himself advocated the policy.

    With regards to Honduras, (((finance capitalism))) method is discussed in Perkin's book, Confessions of an economic hit-man.

    Honduras was "hit" long ago, and the land has been appropriated by a comprador elite. These elites are given guidance instructions from our friends and their shabbos goy accomplices out of Wall Street and London. Essentially, the economic method is a sophisticated form of usury, which allows the country to fall into elite hands over time. Once the peasants are displaced from their land, then they have no means of making wealth.

    This economic hit method is now feasting on the American body, as finance oligarchy has off-shored jobs while importing slave labor (to drive down labor costs).

    There will always be hierarchy and elites, and if said elites are hostile to their population, then that is a recipe for disaster.

    Globo Homo is closely related to Zion, which in turn is related to fiance capitalism, and this construct wants no borders and free movement of their private bank credit as money capital they control. If you follow their money, it is no surprise that Israeli soldiers are in Honduras.

    (Industrial Capitalism with nationalism is an arch enemy of Zion, and its name shall not be spoken.)

    …(((finance capitalism))) method is discussed in Perkin’s book… the economic method is a sophisticated form of usury, which allows the country to fall into elite hands over time. …

    This economic hit method is now feasting on the American body, as finance oligarchy has off-shored jobs while importing slave labor (to drive down labor costs). …

    (Industrial Capitalism with nationalism is an arch enemy of Zion, and its name shall not be spoken.)

    Countries free of a Jew central bank (Iran, North Korea, etc.) are targeted for attack by the golem USA’s military.

    These elites are given guidance instructions from our friends and their shabbos goy accomplices out of Wall Street and London.

    The parasite is harmless without the aid of its shabby goyim.

    The shabby goy is a treasonous betrayer to his own kind. What has been the traditional American penalty for treason?

    #DestroyShabbosGoy

  206. @Johnny Walker Read
    Revilo P Oliver was an absolute prophet. All you have to do is open your eyes and have a look at the country formerly known as the United States to become a "believer" in Revilo's visions of a new America if the (((tribe))) who ruled it was not reigned in.

    As far as his anti-Christian rhetoric goes, he was absolutely correct. It amazes me how anyone who is against this "Judaism for Goys" is automatically considered a Satanist and a man of no morals. I have come to find Christianity and morality, more times than not are on opposite ends of the spectrum.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HikmgEOI8O0

    Just as White nationalists have to discuss and understand the Jewish Question, they also have to understand the Christian Question

    Here is what Dr William Luther Pierce, the late White Nationalist leader had to say about Christianity and White Nationalism:

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2010/10/on-christianity/

    The most important single fact concerning Christianity with which the Alliance must deal is that all the major Christian churches, Catholic and Protestant, liberal and fundamentalist, have openly aligned themselves with the enemies of the White race. The Catholics and the liberal Protestants are vigorously supporting racial mixing, while the fundamentalist Protestants are strong boosters of Zionism. These alignments will become increasingly important factors in our struggle in the years ahead, as the churches become more and more involved in social and political issues. The Jews have already announced their intention to mobilize fundamentalist Christians in their effort to maintain control of the U.S. government. The Alliance cannot remain silent in the face of such developments, for the sake of White unity or anything else.

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
    • Replies: @Parfois1
    I'll answer the "Christian Question" in a sentence: Christianity is a moral code, not a theocracy.
    , @David Baker
    "The "Jewish Question" was answered after the hundredth expulsion of the tribe from yet another fed up population, who saw their kids disappearing, their economies trashed, pornography/vice flourishing and social tribulations. The answer was reasonable: Give Jews a place of refuge. (That was THEIR "Final Solution"...) Selecting Palestine for their refuge was a regrettable decision.
  207. @anonymous
    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it's trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    I wonder what in the hell do we do now?

    Ron, thank you so much for the uncompromising, incredibly brave, exhaustive and meticulous research and writing you do and share.

    Now what? How do we break through the insane power the Jewish controlled media, govt, etc to reach our fellow Gentiles and Jews who do not want this murderous, conniving, Talmudic Bolshevism to rule the world?

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed. Thank God for the brave Jews who are uncovering the horrific misdeeds of the Jewish tribal elites. If I didn’t at least have these Jews as my primary sources (Unz, Atzmon, Finkelstein, … ) I would have no chance whatsoever.

    • Replies: @Mefobills

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed
     
    Here is the solution:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

    This funding is by way of usury out of private banking. Religion is subordinate to money power, and usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).

    Money's true nature is law. Money is not a division of metal, or a division of debt instruments.

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.

    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.

    www.sovereignmoney.eu
  208. @skrik

    Netanyahu looks very jewish to me
     
    Missing the point, much?

    Then

    Sephardic jews from Turkey and Ukranian jews
     
    Misleading, much?

    My Q was does this man [Netanyahu] look at all ‘Semitic?’ To which the obvious answer is ‘bloody-hell no!’ Then, if they are not at all Semitic, they can't keep moaning over even the mildest criticism whilst shrieking ‘anti-Semitic!’

    Then, if they are not at all Semitic, they can’t keep moaning over even the mildest criticism whilst shrieking ‘anti-Semitic!’

    They say things which will be effective. Truth doesn’t ever come into the equation. Logic doesn’t come into the equation either. Only what is effective. Most of the globohomo crowd are like that now. It helps if big money and the government is backing you as well. Just shrieking nonsense isn’t quite as effective.

    Top tier subversives like Tim Wise put a more intellectual slant to their propaganda and their arguments are at least somewhat based in reality and logic. The rest just rely on repetition more than anything else.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  209. utu says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Across more than sixty pages, Bendersky provides hundreds of direct quotes, mostly from the same officers who are the subject of the rest of his book. But after carefully reading the chapter twice, I was unable to find a single one of those statements referring to the massive slaughter of Jews that constitutes what we commonly call the Holocaust, nor to any of its central elements, such as the existence of death camps or gas chambers.
     
    This silence may nevertheless be consistent with conventional narratives of the Holocaust. The extermination camps (including Chelmno, Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor) were in the East, and those still in existence in 1944-5 were "liberated" by the Soviet Union, not the United States. If American officers never mentioned the slaughter, it may be because they had not seen it at first hand. It is also possible that some of them did refer to it, but for his own reasons - attempting to paint the US Army as anti-semitic - Bendersky chose not to mention this.

    If the scale of the Holocaust has been exaggerated, anyone who wishes to prove this point must analyse "The Destruction of the European Jews" by Raul Hilberg, line-by-line, and point out where he made his mistakes. Norman Finkelstein reports that, before writing anything on the Holocaust, he would re-read each volume of the book:

    They provided the psychological security I needed before daring to render a judgment of my own. Wanting to stand on the firmest possible intellectual foundations I reflexively reached for Hilberg.
     
    It is possible, following Finkelstein, to agree with the accepted history of the Holocaust, and also to deplore some of the purposes for which this history has been used.

    It is also remarkable (see link above) that Hilberg had difficulty finding a publisher in 1961 because the subject of the Nazi genocide was then taboo. Taboos may seem pervasive and unbreakable, but they will crumble in the face of evidence.

    that Hilberg had difficulty finding a publisher in 1961 because the subject of the Nazi genocide was then taboo

    The taboo was and still is Jewish collaboration with Nazis. Hanna Arendt had access to Hilberg’s manuscript of Destruction of the European Jews and w/o attribution and w/o his permission used large parts of it about Judenrats and how they contributed to the destruction of Jews in her Eichmann in Jerusalem which first appeared as series of articles in New Yorker. Hilberg never forgave her.

    https://www.thenation.com/article/conscious-pariah/
    Raul Hilberg, the first historian to document the banality of Nazi evil, nursed a lifelong grudge against the woman who borrowed from and popularized his work, Hannah Arendt.

    Neither Arendt’s Eichman in Jerusalem nor Hilberg’s Destruction of the European Jerusalem were translated into Hebrew. The chapter of Jewish collaboration and misdeeds during WWII was closed for Israelis with Kastner trial and his murder.

  210. @Anonymouse
    Jews are just like everybody else only more so. I know this for a fact since I am one and my father was actually a member of the CPUSA in the late thirties. He was a working man who ran away to sea at 17 and helped to organize the East coast seaman's union at that time. His communist viewpoint was purely that of an idealist who believed that the rich exploited the working man. A working stiff all his life he was killed in an accident on a Chesapeake & Ohio tugboat. According to the jew haters on this list, a jew is in his nature an enemy to everyone else. Many American and English communist traitors were not jewish, including such worthies as Philby, Burgess, Anthony Blount, Hiss, Harry Hopkins, and others named in the above article. Were they crypto-Jews? I submit that idealism and ignorance of how societies function combined with resentment of the rich were the driving forces behind convinced communists, not the fact that a great number of them were jews. That theory seems more logical than the alternative theory that the jew is an enemy to everyone else because it explains the phenomenon in terms of rational motivations rather than on unquestioned folk hatred theories.

    I think you’ve said it very well. Hatred of Jews grows during times of economic uncertainty, probably because many identifiable Jews are in visible roles at successful enterprises. We don’t take note of all the people who are doing better than us who are from backgrounds similar to ours. In our everyday experiences, we have friends, coworkers and maybe even adversaries. Some of them are Jews and, in my experience, Jewish attitudes raise no issues that would recommend they be treated or seen any differently from non-Jews.

    I don’t see any point to advancing anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist thought. I’ve spent time in Islamic countries and their nationalistic and theocratic tendencies are just as powerful. The antidote to self-destructive behavior is to know those fundamental principles that are best for our country and oppose those that are contrary. That’s what national maturity fosters and we’re a long way from maturity. Spend time in the UK and you see what healthy national loyalty looks like.

    Having said that, I enjoy this webzine. It allows us to read and debate matters that the politically sanguine and antiseptic world of eighth-grade journalism actively stifles, just as any socially insecure 12-year old would. There appears to be a whole range of thinking about American Jews that probably needed to be aired for good mental balance. None of them make a lot of sense as the basis of policy.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    How about a baby step then--ban all dual-citizens (any two countries) from holding public office of significant responsibility (elected or appointed). That would be a public policy far outside the current Overton window that would actually help protect Jews from criticism of "rigging the deck".

    If you add that to anti-trust breakup of all major media and Internet empires and you would address the concerns of many folks here.

    Both will _never_ happen imho....
  211. S says:
    @Giuseppe

    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but ‘conveniently forgotten’.
     
    Discourse about Andersonville might be conveniently forgotten, but the oblique connection you draw from it to the Holocaust is an interesting idea.

    There are numerous close parallels between the US Civil War and WWII…ie both wars were perceived existential threats by quazi ‘nationalist’ enemies to the respective existance of the flagship states of first Capitalism, ie the United States, with the Civil War (1861-1865), and Communism, ie the Soviet Union, in regards to WWII, and the German war with it (1941-1945)

    Both the Confederacy and Germany mid war experienced dual catastrophic defeats while at the heighth of their power and invading their enemy, ie Gettysburg and Vicksburg for the South, and the paralleling Stalingrad and El Alemein for the Germans.

    Both the South and Germany had a hoped for ‘redoubt’ to continue the struggle into the Spring and Summer, the ‘Alpine’ for the Germans in ’45, and the ‘Trans-Mississippi’ for the South in ’65.

    The primary surrender dates in the Spring of ’65 and ’45 are within literal days of each other.

    And of course there were the mentioned accusations regarding ‘the camps’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ against both tbe South and the Germans at the end.

    I say ‘perceived existential threat’ as in reality neither the South nor Germany ever had any real chance of defeating their respective Capitalist or Communist foe. Clark Gable’s little speech in Gone With the Wind about overwhelming Northern industrial might and resources was largely true.

    Similarly, WT Stead, a close associate of Cecil Rhodes, in a 1902 book calculated that the US/UK bloc had three times the wealth and economic resources of the combined French, Russian, and German empires.

    Those figures for the US/UK were still probably largely true in June, 1941, and it was the US/UK Capitalist bloc which was fully behind the Communist Soviet Union once the German invasion of it commenced.

    I’ve heard it said had the Soviet lines solidly broke that the US was prepared to send large numbers of its own troops to fill the gaps, and I think it’s likely true. Similarly, had somehow the Southerners looked poised to defeat the North, I have little doubt the British Empire would have directly intervened to save the North.

    Both the United States and Soviet Union were too important at that stage of things in the manufactured and contrived dialectic of Capitalist vs Communist (in place since 1776 and 1789) to let them fall by the wayside.

    Now that the ‘anti-thesis’ of Communism has been brought down with ‘the Fall of Communism’, ie the economic and financial collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc, a very top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting, the worker being worthy of his wages those behind these things tell themselves; similarly we should expect to see the ‘thesis’ of Capitalism brought down, the ‘Fall of Capitalism’, in the form of the financial and economic collapse of the US/UK bloc, also to be a top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting.

    This will all make way for the ‘synthesis’, ie the ‘convergance’ of Capitalism and Communism to form global Multi-culturalism, and a global super-state to be called the ‘United States of the World’/’World Union’ or some such, aka the ‘New Rome’, in theory a democratic republic, though probably in reality like the post republic Rome of old, a dictatorship having a rubber stamp ‘senate’, and with its economic basis being slavery, ie wage slavery, aka so called ‘cheap labor’, with the global capital most likely located in Jerusalem.

    The long planned for WWIII will almost certainly be a major catalyst in bringing this final vision about.

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    • Replies: @Parfois1

    This will all make way for the ‘synthesis’, ie the ‘convergance’ of Capitalism and Communism to form global Multi-culturalism, and a global super-state to be called the ‘United States of the World’/’World Union’
     
    You take Hegel too seriously, the metaphysical equivalente to the action-reaction of the physical world. I'm not an expert in this field but my view is that Communism and Capitalism are not the opposites of a Hegelian dialectic since each one contains its own contradiction, eg. Capitalism creates a proletariat, its nemesis to bring about Communism. Hence Capitalism's efforts to eliminate the proletariat, its negation, partly successful so far through its conversion to financial/imperial Capitalism. Lenin had already noted the transformation of Capitalism to its new model.

    Anyway, I don't see a fundamental difference between the two modes of economic development except for the ownership of the means of production and the ultimate goal of the national economy. Under Capitalism the economy is geared to produce profits for the financial/investor class; in Communism the economy works to satisfy the material and spiritual needs of the people as a whole. But the process (the nuts and bolts) in both productive systems is the same, the minor difference being the employees/workers participation in the management of the enterprises.

    No contradictions there to apply Hegel or his upside-down version, Marx.
  212. Wally says: • Website
    @Olorin
    The holocaust narrative is a foundational myth imposed upon the goyim but also used as tribal glue.

    I'm not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes...that involve Jews imagining and rubbing hands over the most bizarre tortures being done TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE. Sometimes even involving their own families.

    On top of that, Jews have as a population strategy the retconning of the narratives of their host societies. "People of the Book" you know. They put themselves and each other in charge of the mechanisms of cultural production in their host societies. Then put themselves at the center of the important stories. A good example is the whole "we were slaves in Egypt" thing. As though all of that host society's vast history and deeds boil down to having been mean to Jews, who fortunately had the Plague n Clever Getaway god on their side.

    The charge of "antisemitism" has been a whip for forcing others to adopt this narrative. Well, that and saturating the culture with these themes and invented episodes. Inserting them into everything, tirelessly and persistently. Punishing any questioning of orthodoxy. Quickly this foundational myth, and the supporting quasi-religious textual/critical strategy that bolsters it, has risen to supplant all others in the US and Europe, in terms of sanctity and urgency...though in the former it is coupled with the Huddled Masses shtik of that sugar-slavery-and-swill-milk-origins-trust-fund gal and Zionist activist Emma Lazarus and her maudlin poem added late to that enormous French statue.

    Remember also that Jews played an outsized role in establishing the Victimization By Whites narratives of "civil rights," "feminism," "affirmative action," "gay rights," etc., doled out to all populations considered weaponizeable in the war on whites. Someone observed recently on 4chan that someone in some online magazine had referred to some cost of climate change as equivalent to X number of holocausts. So now apparently it's a quantitative unit too.

    said:
    “I’m not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes”

    some of that here:
    Most important part of being Jewish: Remembering the “Holocaust”
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12425
    ex.:
    “according to a 2013 survey of American Jews, the most essential part of what it means to be Jewish is remembering the so-called Holocaust”

    • Replies: @David Baker
    They're still dabbling in child snuff pornography. Read about "Operation Blue Orchid", an international, multi-agency project which uncovered a ring of child pornography producers. Russian Jewish Mafia figures were luring Russian children as young as 2 years old from orphanages, then videotaping those kids being sexually tortured to death--this feature of those films were specified by their Jewish customers. One Jewish customer was located in Walnut Creek, CA, and when he was arrested in his apartment, hundreds of these films were found. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
  213. @anonymous
    One wonders how it serves them that they allow unz.com to continue. Giant Honey Pot? Social safety valve? In any case, I look forward to more as Weimerica continues it's trajectory. Thank you Ron.

    They still get some mileage out of this site with Unz’s occasional disinfo injections as well as that of others. Shamir’s recent denial of the Bolshevik Revolution as a Jewish operation, Fred Reed’s back door globalism idiocy and appeals to the shady historiography of David Irving are but a few examples.

    Even so, as you say, it does function as a social safety valve.

  214. @Giuseppe

    Some historical events are not so much forbidden, but ‘conveniently forgotten’.
     
    Discourse about Andersonville might be conveniently forgotten, but the oblique connection you draw from it to the Holocaust is an interesting idea.

    Andersonville & fake “holocaust”, indeed similarities galore.

    See my previous comments with photos:

    https://www.unz.com/?s=andersonville&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    Regards.

  215. @Wally
    Take it easy, I wouldn't personalize it.

    IMO, the general thinking is:

    1. Christians are naive to the ways of those dedicated to destroying them

    2. the Christian sense of goodwill & forgiveness has allowed the enemy to get inside gate

    3. Christians are conditioned to not believe there are actually those who want to harm them, Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie and engage in the very actions that are obvious and now being recognized and called to account

    …Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie…

    Christians don’t read the gospels much. Jesus’ various harsh words on the Pharisees would help their imaginations along.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    I'm Christian, and I'll assert that people of any religious persuasion can be corrupted. We're all sinners in one form or another, and in Christian fashion (Catholic, specifically) we confess our sins and seek redemption. Jews just haul out their Holocaust as the Go To resource to engender empathy for their miscreants.
  216. @Wally
    said:
    "I’m not able to search at the moment but you can look up the various surveys of American Jews post WWII and younger that reveal they perceive their tribally binding commitment being not to God or even Israel but to this grotesque concatenation of snuff porn episodes"

    some of that here:
    Most important part of being Jewish: Remembering the "Holocaust"
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12425
    ex.:
    "according to a 2013 survey of American Jews, the most essential part of what it means to be Jewish is remembering the so-called Holocaust"

    https://archive.is/6bA9C/927059a8b99d7cbaeefcd63192916598f2591b5c.png

    They’re still dabbling in child snuff pornography. Read about “Operation Blue Orchid”, an international, multi-agency project which uncovered a ring of child pornography producers. Russian Jewish Mafia figures were luring Russian children as young as 2 years old from orphanages, then videotaping those kids being sexually tortured to death–this feature of those films were specified by their Jewish customers. One Jewish customer was located in Walnut Creek, CA, and when he was arrested in his apartment, hundreds of these films were found. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @sarz

    ...Russian Jewish Mafia...
     
    That makes about as much sense as Russian Jewish Bantu. The biggest and most sinister body of organized crime on the planet hides behind the name of a much more benign though vastly overhyped crime body.

    Call them by their own name. Russian Mishpucha. German Mishpucha. American Mishpucha. Or just plain Mishpucha.
  217. From the Amazon reviews of Bendersky’s book:

    It’s hard to review this book simply because it is the only one that I know ever written on the subject of anti-Semitism and its influence on US Army poicy from the end of WWI through the end of WWII and into the 50’s. It certainly is exhaustive – the research is incredible, and it is very well written. The author has dug up dozens of Army officers, mostly mid level careerists, who held anti-Jewish views. What Bendersky has failed to do was explain how a handful of anti-Semetic officers influenced American policy or changed the course of WWII.

    That is precisely it! What was the then contemporary military failed at altering the course of Jewish influence. As Ron hypothesizes, the only thing Bendersky did not do was to show that the anti-semetic trends of the military carried through the Holocaust, and therefore only dissipated after a failed war with what a curious observer would easily determine was Jewish influence. Beaty, Oliver, et al. wrote books but ultimately the propaganda campaign that rages to this day won out. Every day we live further buries our access to truth. The symbolic trend from Beaty, to Oliver, to modern day radicals illustrates how this same propaganda works double to block content while radicalizing proponents into becoming at least visibly (if not internally compromised) unapproachable sources. This is a dangerous level of understanding and control of human behavior.

    Relating this to Guyénot’s recent (and good) article, as I have been diving through Ron’s American Pravda’s and the related readings (or more), and even before this with various observations and academic courses, I had set up in my mind an understanding that the U.S. not having an established religion (being predominantly secular) was a tremendous weakness to our ability to fight or even comprehend these types of outside forces. In place of religion we have secular civic values, but these values have not been upheld (in various ways, some of them I am sure planned by outside interests) in order to make the reliable to citizens. I agree that Christianity’s weakness was its promotion of individualism but, and like the benefits of a cohesive unity found Judaism, I do not dismiss individualism as a weakness. On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back.

    We’ve seen Hitler emulate Judaism and fail, we’ve seen Oliver and Welch do the same on a smaller scale and fail. Emulating the deeply flawed opponent will not work, you’ll just at best become them. When you no longer regard the means by which you continue existence, and for no other reason than simply persisting, you have utterly and miserably failed. It won’t be until everyone individually realizes the importance of our collective existence (and I mean that absolutely, no ideological zealots here or there espousing how grand their love is; every single nobody simultaneously) that we truly advance. For now we must be determined and open to finding and understanding the truth.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    "On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back."

    Good luck with that.

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.

    I think the tooth fairy exists as well.
    , @Anon


    I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need […]
     
    First you say it's important to understand people's minds, then you talk of something that's absolutely beyond what is possible to them as what is needed.
    , @anonymous

    determined inquisition for truth
     
    Since you mention this somewhere in the context of Christianity... well, you sure are in for a wild goose chase, as so many others have engaged in, and finally chosen to get off. :)
  218. @Blake
    Fantastic resources as always. Much appreciated

    I didn’t spend much time in class or doing course work in college. Instead, I spent a lot of time in the Lucius Greene library reading books that directly contradicted everything I was told by the marxist professors, the newspapers of the time and the liberals.

    I read many of the books mentioned by Ron. I grew up listening to my parents standard oil multi millionaire commie jewish friends. And it’s all true. 1900 on, the wealthy jews of the world were planning a communist takeover. I read every bit of Ford’s newspaper about jewish communists. The reason Ford was alerted was because in the late 19teens and 20’s his company was the subject of a crooked takeover by the jewish wolves of wall street. They operated the same way Ivan Boesky operated 60 years later. Ford managed to defeat them and started his newspaper hoping to expose them.

    If a ditzy sorority girl whose only interest in going to college was avoiding the horrors of going to work for another 4 years and hopefully snagging a rich husband who could spare me from the horrors of the working world could discover all that information about communist jews despite being raised in a commie household;

  219. @Parfois1
    I'm afraid your thesis that Jews are active in left-wing movements to, grosso modo, "be on the right side of history" in evolutionary social dynamics is incorrect, and has reached the proportions of a myth in right-wing/nationalist circles as revealed by the large number of comments here contending that Jews are/were the founders and flag-bearers of Communism/Bolshevism. That is a fundamental lie and it does serve the interests of conservatism because they miss the real enemy.

    It's trite to state once again that Jews were heavily involved in the political movements leading to the Russian Revolution and in the formative years of the USSR. But they were not involved only within the Bolsheviks, they were very active in all opposition parties against the Bolsheviks, which suggests that there was a calculating policy to place Jews in positions of leadership regardless of the final outcome. Jews fought against the Bolsheviks and many ended up in Gulags or facing execution squads, the most notorious one at the end of a sharp icepick in Mexico. See the pattern: there were many Jew horses in the race for power, their ultimate objective, not to bring about social justice or Communism.

    But the Russian Revolution was not the only revolution in human history. There were many rebellions and uprisings throughout Europe in the Middle Ages and since up to the French of 1789 and subsequent years up to 1948 Paris Commune. Yet, one never hears of Jews being on the barricades of the side of revolutionaries, although a late-comer (Marx) made some pronouncements from a safe distance. Perhaps they were too busy making money...

    And since the Russian Revolution were the Jews behind all subsequent uprisings in most of Europe in the aftermath of WWII? No. Were they with the Cuban and Iranian revolutionaries? No. But I know for certain that someone will come with the decrepit canard that the Jewish bankers financed them. History has many examples of peoples' rebellions against injustices perpetrated by the ruling classes regardless of Communism, Marxism, Bolshevism or Jewish activism.

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism. Look what they are doing in most countries where they grabbed the levers of power (USA, Europe). If that is not enough, look at the showpiece of Jewish power: Israel, a foretaste of things to come because of our willful blindness.

    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.

    First of all, the “socialism” that everybody now experiences and hates so much in the west was brought in by the ruling elites.

    And it’s not even “socialism” and it’s not even “left wing” policy. How can anybody buy that garbage. One of the most reactionary country, whose entire spectrum of politics is right wing, all of a sudden brings a “left wing” policy. Just to camouflage that there is nothing else left wing in their spectrum of politics –domestic, or even less foreign.

    Just that one single one: immigration. Only on that issue they are “left wing”. To cover up their predominantly reactionary policy about everything else. They still don’t have universal health care, for Christ-sake , all of other developed countries got it more than 50 years ago. How are they “progressive” and “liberal”?

    They could have chosen from the whole plethora of issues to go left wing on: Increase minimum wage, paid maternity leave, tuition free education, paid vacation, and many more. But they decided to go “left wing” only on immigration – because it doesn’t cost them a cent.

    Real left wing policies require taxing the rich and improving the plight of the DOMESTIC working class. Not the plight of 3rd world imports. They have no obligations to them. If you check in the dictionary, left wing policy means bringing more equality between the poor and the rich. How does uncontrolled immigration accomplishes that?

    The whole thing is scam to make them appear “progressive” and “liberal”. Which they are not. It is one of the most backward, reactionary regimes on the planet clinging to their wealth and privileges, trying to fool everybody about them being “progressive”. If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.

    • Agree: dfordoom
    • Replies: @peterike

    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.... If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.
     
    Your conception of contemporary "socialism" is at least forty years behind the times. The "socialism" of old has morphed entirely into Cultural Marxism -- a very useful term even if not literally accurate -- and the full weight of Cultural Marxism is pointed at destroying whites. Your little speech about "universal health care" and so on is a laughable political antiquity.
    , @David Baker
    Jews have hundreds of nuclear warheads poised in Israel, and if they don't get their way, they'll unleash them on Europe, Russia and other locales. (See the Israeli "Samson Option".) This would be the thermonuclear equivalent of a hissy fit, but it's just more of their bluster. The world has been on the brink of destruction for many years. You can place Jews on the roster of those who ponder that notion.
  220. Fascinating, I have to read this. Thanks for bringing it up.

    As an aside, Japanese leaders were likewise frank about the role of Jews in communism. Example:

    “There was a special report prepared by a Mr. Murakawa, a Vice Consul in the Shanghai Consulate General on the Russian Jewish community of Shanghai. This report was sent to the Minister of Foreign Affairs. It is a lengthy report and deals with the communal activities of the Russian Jewish community and their leaders.

    The main spirit of the report is indicated by these quotations from it: “However, no matter what kind of passports they may have or no matter what camps they may belong to, they all work for the Soviet Union. The Jews in Russia were masters of the Soviet people up to the time of the German-Soviet war, and they still are masters at the present time…”

    Wanderers and settlers in the Far East : a century of Jewish life in China and Japan, Dicker

  221. @FB
    A very insightful article...only not in the way Mr Unz intended...

    Ostensibly an article about the Bendersky book, which treats the longstanding issue of anti-Semitism in the US military...the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot...a creature of the long past days of open race hate...one Revilo P Oliver...

    Now I understand the 'intellectual' nourishment that the troglodytes writing and commenting on this site have been nourished on...I'm sure there are many more Olivers and his ilk in the dark past of the United States...which is actually still ongoing...but only among the truly developmentally challenged that flock to this site...fortunately for all good and decent people a mere numerical irrelevance of harmless outliers...

    As for Mr Unz's conclusion that the Bendersky book is somehow devoid of its center...the Holocaust...well it's because 'none' of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust...gee go figure...anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers...?

    Mr Unz's conclusion about the 'fatal flaw' of Bendersky rests on that one single sentence...none of these Jew haters mentioned the slaughter of Jews...ergo it didn't happen...LOL

    And of course one might ask Mr Unz if these people mentioned in the Bendersky book are representative of the entire cadre of military men familiar with the genocide...or if not, what percentage...this important question remains a mystery...so the reader has zero clue as to whether these downplayers of the Holocaust constitute near unanimity...or a tiny minority...?

    Hmm...

    ” ‘none’ of the anti Semites in the US military mentioned in the book, actually talk about the Holocaust…gee go figure…anti-Semites not talking about gas chambers…?”

    The probability of that happening is exceedingly low. Even an outright anti-Semite might mention the gas chambers, in the same way that an anti-black resident of the American South might refer to lynchings. I simply cannot believe that a few of them wouldn’t say “well, the gas chambers at Auschwitz were horrible, but with Jewish behaviour it is understandable that the Germans would over-react”.

    What would be interesting is to comb through the Soviet sources to see if any of the Soviet military commanders mentioned this stuff.

  222. @Roger Smith
    From the Amazon reviews of Bendersky's book:

    It's hard to review this book simply because it is the only one that I know ever written on the subject of anti-Semitism and its influence on US Army poicy from the end of WWI through the end of WWII and into the 50's. It certainly is exhaustive - the research is incredible, and it is very well written. The author has dug up dozens of Army officers, mostly mid level careerists, who held anti-Jewish views. What Bendersky has failed to do was explain how a handful of anti-Semetic officers influenced American policy or changed the course of WWII.
     
    That is precisely it! What was the then contemporary military failed at altering the course of Jewish influence. As Ron hypothesizes, the only thing Bendersky did not do was to show that the anti-semetic trends of the military carried through the Holocaust, and therefore only dissipated after a failed war with what a curious observer would easily determine was Jewish influence. Beaty, Oliver, et al. wrote books but ultimately the propaganda campaign that rages to this day won out. Every day we live further buries our access to truth. The symbolic trend from Beaty, to Oliver, to modern day radicals illustrates how this same propaganda works double to block content while radicalizing proponents into becoming at least visibly (if not internally compromised) unapproachable sources. This is a dangerous level of understanding and control of human behavior.

    Relating this to Guyénot's recent (and good) article, as I have been diving through Ron's American Pravda's and the related readings (or more), and even before this with various observations and academic courses, I had set up in my mind an understanding that the U.S. not having an established religion (being predominantly secular) was a tremendous weakness to our ability to fight or even comprehend these types of outside forces. In place of religion we have secular civic values, but these values have not been upheld (in various ways, some of them I am sure planned by outside interests) in order to make the reliable to citizens. I agree that Christianity's weakness was its promotion of individualism but, and like the benefits of a cohesive unity found Judaism, I do not dismiss individualism as a weakness. On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back.

    We've seen Hitler emulate Judaism and fail, we've seen Oliver and Welch do the same on a smaller scale and fail. Emulating the deeply flawed opponent will not work, you'll just at best become them. When you no longer regard the means by which you continue existence, and for no other reason than simply persisting, you have utterly and miserably failed. It won't be until everyone individually realizes the importance of our collective existence (and I mean that absolutely, no ideological zealots here or there espousing how grand their love is; every single nobody simultaneously) that we truly advance. For now we must be determined and open to finding and understanding the truth.

    “On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back.”

    Good luck with that.

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.

    I think the tooth fairy exists as well.

    • Replies: @Parfois1

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.
     
    Thank you for that reference. It's a field of personal interest (major in Sociology of Organizations). Appreciate if you might give more details/links. I'll try on the web but I'm presently in a remote region with poor access.
    , @Parfois1
    Got it! Here's the summary. The full study is easy to access through your reference for any one interested.

    "Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation. By tracking evolution across time, we find individual differences between evolving worlds in terms of early humanitarian competition with ethnocentrism, including early stages of humanitarian dominance. Our evidence indicates that such variation, in terms of differences between humanitarian and ethnocentric agents, is normally distributed and due to early, rather than later, stochastic differences in immigrant strategies."

    I highlighted the findings which, no surprise, explains why Jewry - the epitome of ethnocentrism - is/becoming the dominant ethny/race. The humanitarians are not far behind and, given favourable cultural inputs (eg. a little dose of nationalism) could be the best choice. Sounds like "Socialism in One Country" to me.

  223. @sarz

    ...Christians cannot imagine that some people woulds stoop so low as to contrive The Big Lie...
     
    Christians don't read the gospels much. Jesus' various harsh words on the Pharisees would help their imaginations along.

    I’m Christian, and I’ll assert that people of any religious persuasion can be corrupted. We’re all sinners in one form or another, and in Christian fashion (Catholic, specifically) we confess our sins and seek redemption. Jews just haul out their Holocaust as the Go To resource to engender empathy for their miscreants.

  224. @Ron Unz

    Is there a simple way to download the entire of John Beaty’s book as a single PDF file, free of the ten separate Chapter boxes it is now confined in? I can save Chapters 1-3, but then things get challenging.
     
    Sure, it's available on Archive.org in a variety of different formats:

    https://archive.org/details/BeatyJohnTheIronCurtainOverAmerica1.o/page/n1

    In glancing over this comment-thread, I noticed that people have discovered that the previous Archive.org version has been "disappeared" so I suggest you quickly grab what you want from this one while it still exists. Apparently, the Kindle and ePub versions have already been eliminated.

    The same situation probably applies to the Revilo Oliver book:

    https://archive.org/details/AmericasDecline1983V2

    Ron, please put all these works on your own server.

    And please have a donation mechanism at the bottom of the page if you would like financial help.

  225. @Corvinus
    Whenever Vox Day chimes in that "just about everything you think you know about 20th century history is wrong", you can be certain that he is engaging in a campaign of deception. That is what "sigmas" do.

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the "Final Solution". But destroying the Nazi machinery of death was not on its radar. Behind-the-scenes requests by Jewish leaders and the U.S. War Refugee Board for intervention were not heeded. Perhaps the government was concerned that the Nazi Regime would exploit such intervention for propaganda gains. Right or wrong, the military also insisted it could not divert resources from what it deemed as more vital objectives--the destruction of German military and industrial targets (Dresden, anyone)--and that they lacked the sophistication to liquidate the death camps with lethal
    precision.

    It is other than surprising that the American reluctance to intervene directly to stop the Holocaust remains a deeply contested issue.

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.

    The so-called “direct evidence” was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that. The War Refugee Board was not created until later, but also from less than dependable sources. It’s all explained in brief here: http://jan27.org/the-hoax-that-wont-die/

    The Jews ultimately prevailed with their hoax in 1944 when the Roosevelt Administration saw the value of the “Nazi death camp” narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law. But it was an uncertain road and no way was it believed in 1942.

    This is a good companion read: https://carolynyeager.net/how-british-psychological-warfare-resulted-short-term-victory-long-term-loss-europe

    • Agree: Zumbuddi
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The so-called “direct evidence” was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that."

    It was not hearsay; rather, it was several eyewitness accounts by soldiers from the Russian Army. Military intelligence confirmed what they saw. We also know that the Red Cross in 1996 released their archives, which documented first-hand accounts and reports on the persecution of Jews and political prisoners from 1939 to 1945 in concentration camps, with that information being given. American and British intelligence was privy to general, but not detailed, activities of German concentration camps from that organization.

    "saw the value of the “Nazi death camp” narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law."

    Without a doubt, in a war, there are atrocities committed. But to the victor goes the spoils. No distraction, just retaliation for German aggression.

    Besides, your reputation proceeds you.

    http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2016/07/dumb-neo-nazi-carolyn-yeager-attacks.html
  226. @David Baker
    They're still dabbling in child snuff pornography. Read about "Operation Blue Orchid", an international, multi-agency project which uncovered a ring of child pornography producers. Russian Jewish Mafia figures were luring Russian children as young as 2 years old from orphanages, then videotaping those kids being sexually tortured to death--this feature of those films were specified by their Jewish customers. One Jewish customer was located in Walnut Creek, CA, and when he was arrested in his apartment, hundreds of these films were found. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

    …Russian Jewish Mafia…

    That makes about as much sense as Russian Jewish Bantu. The biggest and most sinister body of organized crime on the planet hides behind the name of a much more benign though vastly overhyped crime body.

    Call them by their own name. Russian Mishpucha. German Mishpucha. American Mishpucha. Or just plain Mishpucha.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    One of the most dangerous and wanted criminals in the world is a Russian Jew. Someone blurted that Jews don't plan to destroy the world with Socialism. That scheme destroys nations by espousing government dependency. Jews who took over Russia demonstrated the Socialist doctrine to a tee. Socialism is a complete fraud, and Jews have perfected the art of introducing this scheme to unwary populations.

    There's one common trait Jews display: An innate ability to deny--emphatically--doing that which they do.
    , @Twodees Partain
    For what it's worth:

    https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/the-russian-israeli-mafia-off-limits-to-fbi-us-intelligence/
  227. @Parfois1
    I'm afraid your thesis that Jews are active in left-wing movements to, grosso modo, "be on the right side of history" in evolutionary social dynamics is incorrect, and has reached the proportions of a myth in right-wing/nationalist circles as revealed by the large number of comments here contending that Jews are/were the founders and flag-bearers of Communism/Bolshevism. That is a fundamental lie and it does serve the interests of conservatism because they miss the real enemy.

    It's trite to state once again that Jews were heavily involved in the political movements leading to the Russian Revolution and in the formative years of the USSR. But they were not involved only within the Bolsheviks, they were very active in all opposition parties against the Bolsheviks, which suggests that there was a calculating policy to place Jews in positions of leadership regardless of the final outcome. Jews fought against the Bolsheviks and many ended up in Gulags or facing execution squads, the most notorious one at the end of a sharp icepick in Mexico. See the pattern: there were many Jew horses in the race for power, their ultimate objective, not to bring about social justice or Communism.

    But the Russian Revolution was not the only revolution in human history. There were many rebellions and uprisings throughout Europe in the Middle Ages and since up to the French of 1789 and subsequent years up to 1948 Paris Commune. Yet, one never hears of Jews being on the barricades of the side of revolutionaries, although a late-comer (Marx) made some pronouncements from a safe distance. Perhaps they were too busy making money...

    And since the Russian Revolution were the Jews behind all subsequent uprisings in most of Europe in the aftermath of WWII? No. Were they with the Cuban and Iranian revolutionaries? No. But I know for certain that someone will come with the decrepit canard that the Jewish bankers financed them. History has many examples of peoples' rebellions against injustices perpetrated by the ruling classes regardless of Communism, Marxism, Bolshevism or Jewish activism.

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism. Look what they are doing in most countries where they grabbed the levers of power (USA, Europe). If that is not enough, look at the showpiece of Jewish power: Israel, a foretaste of things to come because of our willful blindness.

    This brief digression should conclude with the remark that Jewish power is not concerned with notions of democracy, liberty, fraternity, peace, equality or any other loft ideals of humanism.

    Jewish supremacists become interested in communist and socialist revolutions only when such political upheavals take place in rich, strategic countries worth controlling plundering.

    There never was any support from organised Jewry to fiercely communist but resource-deprived Cuba or North Korea.

  228. @Parfois1
    What you are saying is also the gist of my comment further down, written before I read yours. It is important to stress the distinction between Zionism and Communism - they are at the opposite ends of the political spectrum. Only dimwits can't see it!

    Some allege they are similar because both are collectivist ideologies; but that is a crass mistake. The collectivism of Jews is only a tool for their own ethnocentrism, an exclusionary/racist mode for self preservation purposes and which they use to promote and support their own kind only.

    The collectivism of Jews is only a tool for their own ethnocentrism, an exclusionary/racist mode for self preservation purposes and which they use to promote and support their own kind only.

    …While all real communists, misguided or not, are viscerally anti-racist, culturally anti-greed and hold the profound belief that the only fair social structures are those establishing the highest possible economic equality between all.

    Real communists are almost the exact opposite of Zionist supremacists; they are the closest to idealist Christians.

  229. @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present…but none of chose to take me up on it…

    Come on, FB, where is your engineering mind?

    The gas chambers are a secondary detail of WW2, not even worth discussing, but these idiotic fallacies have to stop.

    How were the alleged “gas chambers” constructed? Where are the layout drawings and plans? The supply and extract ductwork? The ventilation fans? The safety compartmentation? The gaskets and seals to protect the guards outside? The storage facilities for the Zyklon B? The gas detection and protective respiratory devices to avoid killing people outside the gas chambers when retrieving the “bodies”? The massive electrical power required, in war time, to run the nowhere-to-be-found fans, extracts, air handling units? All this exists only in Zionist propaganda.

    • Replies: @j2
    I read the interrogation of Maria Stromberger. It is not an especially convincing evidence of gas chambers in Auschwitz 1. It says what the judges demand, but does not actually say what FB's article claims she saw:
    https://zapisyterroru.pl/Content/3766/Stomberger_Maria_en.pdf
  230. @NoseytheDuke
    The inference was that you didn't respond to anything of substance but rather you chose to home in on an inconsequential matter of punctuation in a weak attempt to score a cheap point. It was disingenuous, unconvincing and more than a little pathetic, a bit like an old queen dressing up like a cheap tart and thinking that the fellas are fooled, but you'd know all about disingenuous old queens. Try again, old queen.

    LOL! You’ve really mastered the art of irrelevance. Pat yourself on the back!

  231. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:

    Ron Unz wrote about Oliver:

    As mentioned, Oliver particularly despised Christianity and Christian preachers, and he devoted a substantial portion of the remainder of the book to ridiculing them and their doctrines, often deploying his great scholarship laced with crude invective, and generally writing in an arch, rather droll style.

    You write:

    As far as his anti-Christian rhetoric goes, he was absolutely correct.

    Yet in the YT clip Oliver goes on about the great achievements of Christianity and Christian civilization. He clearly states that Christianity, for all its warts and faults, is the only religion that could have produced western thought and civilization.

    The problem here is that Jews, Ron Unz included, like to make equivalences between atheist Jews hating Christianity, and atheist Christians hating Christian Priests and various corrupt Churches. There is a massive difference, as is evidenced by Atheist Zionists using the ruse of “Gods Chosen People” as justification for their land theft and genocide of Palestinians.

    Atheist Christians like Revilo Oliver cherish the civilizations that Christianity built. So do many atheist jews, like Ron Unz, who prove it by their presence despite being automatic citizens of Israel who are granted innumeranble rights including participation in looting Christians for Holocaust Booty and US tax dollar booty. Then there are the millions of Muslims refugees from the dysfunction that Islam creates, who instead of seeking their “peace” in the warm bosom of the umma, instead find fulfillment for their entire families by invading Christian countries that they hate.

    So one must be clear that a Christian loving atheist like Revilo Oliver simply cannot be compared to a Christian hating Moslem, Jew, Hindu, Sub-Saharan black, or especially a Christian hating Communist.

    • Replies: @anonymous

    that Christianity, for all its warts and faults, is the only religion that could have produced western thought and civilization.
     
    What proof do you have for such a claim? You give credit to something, where none is due.

    It is clear that the western civilisation has achieved much worldly success. It is also clear that the religion you credit that success with, is riddled with inconsistencies, irredeemable weaknesses in fact, not least being that its central theological basis rests on such an oxymoron as, Monotheistic Trinitarianism… or in other words, pagan polytheist mangods-worship, quite like a sub-sect of hinduism (they have their equivalent monotheistic-trimurthism).

    When you godless pagans can’t even logically explain your own faith, except with nonsensical metaphors (ice/water/vapour, multi-dimensional geometry…), which too many of your own kind find hard to digest, then how can you credit it with anything? It is actually quite pathetic.

    Perhaps the real truth behind your success is that of a profound sense of self-worship… a sense that your perceived "high IQ," perceived "better looking skin/features," etc., that God has chosen your kind to rule this world… which enabled the satanic levels of Greed and Psychopathy we all witness… the greed and psychopathy which enabled the vast rape and plunder of wealth from faraway lands, which would ultimately be the fuel required for the success you exult in now.

    Your cursed godless kind best exemplifies the adage... the higher you are, the harder you fall. You think you are demigods on earth, but you will find yourselves utterly humiliated in the Hereafter. Also, given your faith in the blessed monotheist prophet Jesus(pbuh), and many others before him, another comes to mind... so near, yet so infinitely far.


    Then there are the millions of Muslims refugees from the dysfunction that Islam creates, who instead of seeking their “peace” in the warm bosom of the umma, instead find fulfillment for their entire families by invading Christian countries that they hate.
     
    Have you given thought to the possibility that if not for your satanic genocidal kind, setting their domiciles on fire, maybe they could have been content in their own modest homelands, with intact families? Yeah, whitey?
  232. @Wizard of Oz
    You refer to the Bolsheviks' "genocidal ideology". Can you please enlarge on that so as to explain how attributing a "genocidal" [sic] ideology to them stacks up with the facts. Stalin the Georgian didn't preside over the Holomodor because he was a racist who wanted to get rid of Ukrainians.

    Sources please.

  233. @Cyrano
    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.

    First of all, the “socialism” that everybody now experiences and hates so much in the west was brought in by the ruling elites.

    And it’s not even “socialism” and it’s not even “left wing” policy. How can anybody buy that garbage. One of the most reactionary country, whose entire spectrum of politics is right wing, all of a sudden brings a “left wing” policy. Just to camouflage that there is nothing else left wing in their spectrum of politics –domestic, or even less foreign.

    Just that one single one: immigration. Only on that issue they are “left wing”. To cover up their predominantly reactionary policy about everything else. They still don’t have universal health care, for Christ-sake , all of other developed countries got it more than 50 years ago. How are they “progressive” and “liberal”?

    They could have chosen from the whole plethora of issues to go left wing on: Increase minimum wage, paid maternity leave, tuition free education, paid vacation, and many more. But they decided to go “left wing” only on immigration – because it doesn’t cost them a cent.

    Real left wing policies require taxing the rich and improving the plight of the DOMESTIC working class. Not the plight of 3rd world imports. They have no obligations to them. If you check in the dictionary, left wing policy means bringing more equality between the poor and the rich. How does uncontrolled immigration accomplishes that?

    The whole thing is scam to make them appear “progressive” and “liberal”. Which they are not. It is one of the most backward, reactionary regimes on the planet clinging to their wealth and privileges, trying to fool everybody about them being “progressive”. If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.

    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic…. If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.

    Your conception of contemporary “socialism” is at least forty years behind the times. The “socialism” of old has morphed entirely into Cultural Marxism — a very useful term even if not literally accurate — and the full weight of Cultural Marxism is pointed at destroying whites. Your little speech about “universal health care” and so on is a laughable political antiquity.

    • Replies: @Cyrano
    You are right about only one thing in YOUR little speech there – that Cultural Marxism is out to destroy the white people.

    You are wrong that is a higher form of socialism or any kind of socialism or Marxism. Come on, man, there is no country in this world that hates socialism more than US.

    They wouldn’t allow socialism under any disguise or reincarnation to enter their country even if it was slipped to them by the “treacherous Jews”. That whole thing about “Cultural Marxism” is phony.

    Marxism is supposed to deal with only one issue: - wealth inequality. You’re saying that US solved that problem and now they moved to higher, more advanced forms of inequality? They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism, that’s why they are pretending that they are dealing with other, higher issues of inequality. “Cultural Marxism” is a right wing deception.
  234. @Cyrano
    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.

    First of all, the “socialism” that everybody now experiences and hates so much in the west was brought in by the ruling elites.

    And it’s not even “socialism” and it’s not even “left wing” policy. How can anybody buy that garbage. One of the most reactionary country, whose entire spectrum of politics is right wing, all of a sudden brings a “left wing” policy. Just to camouflage that there is nothing else left wing in their spectrum of politics –domestic, or even less foreign.

    Just that one single one: immigration. Only on that issue they are “left wing”. To cover up their predominantly reactionary policy about everything else. They still don’t have universal health care, for Christ-sake , all of other developed countries got it more than 50 years ago. How are they “progressive” and “liberal”?

    They could have chosen from the whole plethora of issues to go left wing on: Increase minimum wage, paid maternity leave, tuition free education, paid vacation, and many more. But they decided to go “left wing” only on immigration – because it doesn’t cost them a cent.

    Real left wing policies require taxing the rich and improving the plight of the DOMESTIC working class. Not the plight of 3rd world imports. They have no obligations to them. If you check in the dictionary, left wing policy means bringing more equality between the poor and the rich. How does uncontrolled immigration accomplishes that?

    The whole thing is scam to make them appear “progressive” and “liberal”. Which they are not. It is one of the most backward, reactionary regimes on the planet clinging to their wealth and privileges, trying to fool everybody about them being “progressive”. If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.

    Jews have hundreds of nuclear warheads poised in Israel, and if they don’t get their way, they’ll unleash them on Europe, Russia and other locales. (See the Israeli “Samson Option”.) This would be the thermonuclear equivalent of a hissy fit, but it’s just more of their bluster. The world has been on the brink of destruction for many years. You can place Jews on the roster of those who ponder that notion.

  235. @Iris

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present…but none of chose to take me up on it…
     
    Come on, FB, where is your engineering mind?

    The gas chambers are a secondary detail of WW2, not even worth discussing, but these idiotic fallacies have to stop.

    How were the alleged "gas chambers" constructed? Where are the layout drawings and plans? The supply and extract ductwork? The ventilation fans? The safety compartmentation? The gaskets and seals to protect the guards outside? The storage facilities for the Zyklon B? The gas detection and protective respiratory devices to avoid killing people outside the gas chambers when retrieving the "bodies"? The massive electrical power required, in war time, to run the nowhere-to-be-found fans, extracts, air handling units? All this exists only in Zionist propaganda.

    I read the interrogation of Maria Stromberger. It is not an especially convincing evidence of gas chambers in Auschwitz 1. It says what the judges demand, but does not actually say what FB’s article claims she saw:
    https://zapisyterroru.pl/Content/3766/Stomberger_Maria_en.pdf

    • Replies: @Erebus
    From your link...

    Chairperson: What are the motions of the parties as to the mode of questioning the witness?
    Prosecutor Cyprian: We discharge the witness from the oath.
    Defender Ostaszewski: We discharge the witness from the oath.
    Chairperson: By mutual agreement of the parties, the Tribunal has decided to question the witness without an oath.
     
    To my knowledge, no "witness" for the Holohoax managed to hold their story intact when questioned under oath. Not even Hilberg.
  236. @sarz

    ...Russian Jewish Mafia...
     
    That makes about as much sense as Russian Jewish Bantu. The biggest and most sinister body of organized crime on the planet hides behind the name of a much more benign though vastly overhyped crime body.

    Call them by their own name. Russian Mishpucha. German Mishpucha. American Mishpucha. Or just plain Mishpucha.

    One of the most dangerous and wanted criminals in the world is a Russian Jew. Someone blurted that Jews don’t plan to destroy the world with Socialism. That scheme destroys nations by espousing government dependency. Jews who took over Russia demonstrated the Socialist doctrine to a tee. Socialism is a complete fraud, and Jews have perfected the art of introducing this scheme to unwary populations.

    There’s one common trait Jews display: An innate ability to deny–emphatically–doing that which they do.

    • Replies: @Bukowski
    I am currently reading The Jewish Mafia by Herve Ryssen - the English language edition that is. I highly recommend it as it contains a wealth of information usually left out by the MSM or Hollywood. https://barnesreview.org/product/the-jewish-mafia/
  237. @j2
    "WWI and WWII have been described as wars between the Prussian national banking system and the Jewish private banking system"

    I agree with much of what you write, but the banker, who enabled Germany to have a long war in the WWI was Jewish. The issue is that according to theoreticians of the time before the WWI, it was impossible for economic reasons for European powers to have a long war. Therefore the next war, that, for some specific reason was presented as sure to come, would be a short one. Germany would lose it, naturally, but no great harm would come from the war either to Germany or to anybody else, as it would be very short. What happened is quite different, and exactly as Freemasons wanted it (a senseless war to finish all wars, destruction of monarchies) and as Zionists wanted it (Palestine that Turkey refused to give). Bankers on both sides, from the same ethnic group, made a long extermination war possible and depending on the outcome, they decided who to ask for Palestine. The WWII is largely similar, yet in some ways different. Here in Unz there are some Hitler funs and some supporters of the official history. Both are false, and they are exactly the same: one view and the controlled opposition to it. In reality Hitler and Nazis were lifted to power to do the exact thing needed in the plan: to move the Jews to Palestine in order to create Israel. The origin of the Thule Society is Masonic in the wide sense. That explains everything. They certainly were not any real opposition to bankers. In the WWII both hands were played by the same side. In the WWI only the finance of the war was played by the same hand on both sides. But, as money rules, the outcome was decided, not in details, but decided,

    WW1 was largely because England could not compete with Germany’s Industrial Capitalism.

    This form of economy was mixed, with social safety nets. State Credit channeled into industry, thus building up industry to compete and then surpass England.

    England’s system was Finance Capitalism, which came into being in 1694 with advent of Bank of England. BOE in turn was Jewish in conception… a state sponsored usury system, with bank stock issued to stock holders (many of who were our Sephardic friends out of Amsterdam.) This is a private stock owned bank issuing bank credit, where said credit goes into ” markets” and owns companies. Companies in turn are owned by tied finance, and the country becomes subordinate to this finance method.

    Germany had inverted this scheme, where the polity was “over” finance, and controlled finance. Jealous men in western democracies, who fancied themselves god, or “god’s chosen people” were violently opposed to the Industrial Capitalism of Germany. Frederich List learned this Industrial Capitalism method from Henry Carey and the American System, which was resurrected by Peshine Smith in the U.S.

    Germany popped into being on the world stage, and was kicking everybody’s ass, except America’s – and America was also using Industrial Capitalism up until the progressive era of 1913, when the banksters ran their game to takeover the country.

    GERMANY WAS IN OPPOSITION TO THE BANKSTERS OF THE WEST. This is why Germany was repeatedly attacked.

    With regards to international finance funding Germany, that is NOT factual if you follow the money.

    On May 1, 1933 Hitler outlined the first Reinhardt program, a four year plan to end unemployment by attack on several fronts:
    1) Spend 1 billion marks of employment credit bills
    2) Tax benefits for industry, agriculture, and the employment of domestic help
    3) Marriage bonus loans of 1000 marks
    4) Government control of money and capital markets

    May 31’st
    5) 1 Billion marks of short term public works bills

    Many of these bills never made it to Reichsbank for rediscount as they paid interest and were an incentive for private banks to hold.

    Various authors estimate new purchasing power in bill form introduced into German economy of around 15 billion marks.

    This was definitely NOT international bankster money, but instead Germany’s own credit.
    Germany was gold deficient, and at that time in history, the world issued bank credit on top of gold.

    In other words, this whole Hitler was an agent of the Rothschilds or part of the New World Order, does not fly. People that make these sort of statements (like Henry Makow) are not monetarily literate.

    Germany separated from (((international capital))) which was their great sin; that and running an industrial capitalism economy which kicked England’s butt.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager, utu
    • Replies: @j2
    "In other words, this whole Hitler was an agent of the Rothschilds or part of the New World Order, does not fly."

    I understand your argument and it is a good one. However, there is a different argument that does not follow the money and leads to a different result. These arguments should be both considered and they probably are not in actual contradiction but in apparent contradiction only. This is not the correct thread to look at this problem deeply, so I let it be. I only outline the other argument:

    In 1942 Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Kalischer said that Jews would return to Palestine in 100 years from 1940 and that Rothschild and Cremieux would make it, and if the Jews would not go volontarily, they would be pushed there with lots of suffering. 100 years from 1940 is 1939/40. Both Rothschild and Cremieux were Freemasons and from Mordecai Noah and others we know that Masons did want Jews to be restored to Palestine. Wagner's circle started spreading antisemitism at the same time when Zionists started looking for a homeland. Several Masons, like Henry Ford, were spreading antisemitism and Protocols apparently comes from Theosophists, an esoteric society with strong Masonic connections. Theosophist and Mizraim Freemason Sebottendorf joins the German order and splits from it Thule Society, which founds the party (DAP) to become the Nazi party. From these I conclude that pre-Zionists made a plan for restoring Jews to Palestine around 1840. They worked on this plan since that time. They got a promise of Palestine in the First World War.We know that in the WWI a Jewish minister was responsible for finding finance for Germany's war effort. That is why WWI become a long war.

    So, this was all before Hitler and before the finance of Hitler's Germany. From these events before Hitler we already can say that pre-Zionists (Rothschild, Freemasons, some kabbalists, some Communists) created with the help of Masonic forces an antisemitic society Thule for the purpose of pushing Jews to Palestine starting around 1939/40.

    Then to Hitler.

    German army send Hitler to spy on DAP. Does a spy sent to spy a group ever become converted to the group's goals. No, an infiltrator stays as an infiltrator. But Hitler was not an infiltrator, he believed in Nazi ideas. We can conclude that German army on purpose sent Hitler to DAP to be a leader in that party and to create from DAP a strong party for political purposes. These purposes included driving Jews out of Europe, else Hitler would not have been sent to DAP, which had the antisemitism for the Thule Society. Hitler has a book outlined in his library: Jews must be restored to Palestine.
    I conclude from this that the Nazi party was created for the purpose of pushing Jews to Palestine and Hitler was selected by some important people to be the leader of this party.

    Your counterarguments are answered in 1) and 2):
    1) In the WWI time England opposed Germany's economic power. That England's economy was in Jewish control, while Germany's was not in Jewish control. To this we may say, in Germany there were many rich Jews at the time of the WWI. If the goal was an economic war fought as real war, then if would have been British+British Jews against Germans + German Jews. This was not the case. A long war was decided on. The result of this long war was that three kings fell, Communists got to power in Russia, Europe had a war to finish all wars, and the USA become a power. These were Masonic goals. And Jews got the Belfour declaration and bankers on both sides made money.
    Therefore I cannot see WWI as a war between British+Jewish bankers and German bankers. These German bankers included many Jews at that time.

    2) Your second argument is that the finance of Hitler's Germany did not come from Jews. This is correct. Also Hitler's funding when he rose to power came largely from the sales of his book. I do not accept the argument that Hitler was funded to power by American Jews. But Hitler was put to power with the help of the German army, and he joined a party founded by a Freemason Sebottendorf of the revolutionary rite of Mizraim. The very clear plan of pushing Jews to Palestine by antisemitism was in force long before Hitler become an antisemite. If Hitler did not consciously cooperate in this plan, then at least Rudolf Hess did. Thule was created by Masonic forces (though opposing the normal Freemasons, but Theosophy is Masonic, at this time subversive Masonry did not work through Freemason lodges an more) for the explicit goal of pushing Jews to Palestine. Nothing in the finance of Hitler's Germany changes this fact.

    You say that Rothschild did not finance Hitler or Hitler's Germany. I fully agree with this, but Rothschild did finance Zionism. As the Thule Society was an enemy created by Freemasons and needed by Zionists, we cannot remove Rothschild from this equation. He did not finance Hitler, but Hitler was to do a task for Zionists, and that was largely to Rothschild.

    So, this is the other argument. We can discuss it in some other time. You can think about it.
  238. Hail says: • Website
    @Hail

    the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…
     
    Major names mentioned in article:
    - 'Oliver' (Revilo P.; 1908-1994): 59 hits in article
    - 'Bendersky' (b.1946; Jewish; author of a book on U.S. military intelligence's views on the "Jewish Threat"): 33 hits in article (incl. 31 for "Bendersky" and 2 for "Bendarsky")
    - 'Beaty' (author of "Iron Curtain Over America" [1951]; 1890-1961): 27 hits in article
    - 'Roosevelt': 19 hits in article (+1 for 'FDR' = 20).
    - 'Summers' (b.1954; Jewish; President of Harvard, July 2001 to June 2006): 15 hits in article
    - 'Welch' (of the John Birch Society; 1899-1985): 13 hits
    - 'Ross' (American sociologist of early 20th-century; 1866-1951): 8 hits
    - 'Mertz' (b.1949; Jewish; academic who proclaimed “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest” despite own evidence suggesting otherwise): 5 hits
    - 'Ford' (Henry): 4 hits
    SUM of the above nine people: 181 hits; of which 'Oliver' represents <33%.

    Total word count: 12,500
    - 1,160 words: Intro on the Larry Summers case of 2005;
    - 2,450 words: Section on the Joseph Bendersky book, "Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army" (2000);
    - 1,400 words: Section on WWII-era military intelligence officer Col. John Beaty's book, "Iron Curtain Over America" (1951);
    - 6,900 words: Section on Dr. Revilo P. Oliver's life and times, including John Birch Society origins (or which 2,280 words are passages from Dr. Oliver's writings);
    - 500 words: Conclusion which brings together the various strands of the article; the key sentence of the 500-word conclusion is "For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect," as demonstrated by the less-controversial Mertz case introduced in the Introduction. Ron Unz argues that Bendersky's own book on anti-Semitism in U.S. military intelligence in the first three-quarters of the 20th century contains, within it, and inadvertently, an anti-Holocaust-narrative "own goal."

    SUM: Of the 12,500 words in the article, 4,620 words (37%) are by Ron Unz within the Revilo P. Oliver section, and 2,280 words (18%) are excerpts from Oliver's writings in the same section. The passages from Oliver are probably justifiable because he is so little known in the 2010s to anything like a general audience, and he forms a core part of the point being made.

    I would note further here that three of the nine individuals whose names most frequently appear in this article are Jewish (Bendersky, Summers, Mertz). The other six appear to be of NW-European ancestral origin, likely Protestants, or, whatever their own faith, of strongly Protestant ancestry (e.g., despite Dr. Oliver’s late-life anti-Christianism, he qualifies).

    A subtext to this Ron Unz article (and others), then, is that there was a domestic, geopolitical-cultural struggle for control of the United States that spans the first three quarters of the 20th century.

    That there was such a major struggle at all remains largely an untold story. While it was going on, the struggle was not often, if ever, on television screens or featured in magazines or the like. Yet on it went. This article fills some of the void.

    In blunt terms, the Jews won. Was the turning point the 1940-1945 period and the changes associated with the war mobilization? Could the turning point have been earlier? Later?

    I would also propose that the takedown of Richard Nixon in 1974 may have been one of the key, late-game acts in this generations-long affair. (Sidenote of ethnocultural origins of players involved: It so happens that all of Richard Nixon’s ancestors were in the USA by the 1770s, and all were likely one kind of Protestant or another. He himself was famously raised Quaker, but crucially for his role in this saga, was of entirely colonial stock.) By the 1980s, it would have been impossible for a figure with such clear nationalist sympathies as Nixon to ever reach such a height of power in the USA, unless those “clear nationalist sympathies” were on behalf of the nation of Israel.

  239. @Earth Ling
    I wonder what in the hell do we do now?

    Ron, thank you so much for the uncompromising, incredibly brave, exhaustive and meticulous research and writing you do and share.

    Now what? How do we break through the insane power the Jewish controlled media, govt, etc to reach our fellow Gentiles and Jews who do not want this murderous, conniving, Talmudic Bolshevism to rule the world?

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed. Thank God for the brave Jews who are uncovering the horrific misdeeds of the Jewish tribal elites. If I didn't at least have these Jews as my primary sources (Unz, Atzmon, Finkelstein, ... ) I would have no chance whatsoever.

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed

    Here is the solution:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

    This funding is by way of usury out of private banking. Religion is subordinate to money power, and usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).

    Money’s true nature is law. Money is not a division of metal, or a division of debt instruments.

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.

    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.

    http://www.sovereignmoney.eu

    • Replies: @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree
    MEFOBILLS has specified the mental self-discipline we the goyim must self impose to escape Jew tyranny and the #Jew$4whiteGENOCIDE initiative (and that means all goyim 'cause "Whitey's the Golden Goose" who's brought unprecedented prosperity and living standards to the entire world, and if Jews eradicate whitey all the remaining goyim will be hopelessly exploited as slaves of the Jews):

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.
     
    He expresses the action we must then take:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

     

    He explains why that action is necessary:


    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.
     
    He also expesses two powerfully insightful subtleties, the later of which would be appreciatively edifying to have him explain further:

    ...usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).
     
  240. @peterike

    Jews are not out to destroy the world via socialism because they “hate the goyim”. The whole idea is idiotic.... If that’s the “socialism” that everyone in the west is pissed off about – relax – it’s not socialism, it’s a right wing scam.
     
    Your conception of contemporary "socialism" is at least forty years behind the times. The "socialism" of old has morphed entirely into Cultural Marxism -- a very useful term even if not literally accurate -- and the full weight of Cultural Marxism is pointed at destroying whites. Your little speech about "universal health care" and so on is a laughable political antiquity.

    You are right about only one thing in YOUR little speech there – that Cultural Marxism is out to destroy the white people.

    You are wrong that is a higher form of socialism or any kind of socialism or Marxism. Come on, man, there is no country in this world that hates socialism more than US.

    They wouldn’t allow socialism under any disguise or reincarnation to enter their country even if it was slipped to them by the “treacherous Jews”. That whole thing about “Cultural Marxism” is phony.

    Marxism is supposed to deal with only one issue: – wealth inequality. You’re saying that US solved that problem and now they moved to higher, more advanced forms of inequality? They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism, that’s why they are pretending that they are dealing with other, higher issues of inequality. “Cultural Marxism” is a right wing deception.

    • Agree: byrresheim
    • Replies: @atlantis_dweller

    They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism, that’s why they are pretending that they are dealing with other, higher issues of inequality.
     
    😌 That's what makes the most the happiest.
    , @peterike

    Marxism is supposed to deal with only one issue: – wealth inequality. You’re saying that US solved that problem and now they moved to higher, more advanced forms of inequality? They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism,
     
    That's the point. NOBODY cares are wealth inequality, other than populists and nationalists, who are routinely shouted down in the Public Arena. Trump has done more to restore working class wage growth than any President since... I dunno, Coolidge? Yet the Left despises him.

    There's no "true Marxism" anywhere, which is why I said you're dealing in historical antiquities and outdated nonsense. Not that there ever WAS any "true Marxism" and not that Marxism as practiced was EVER anything more than cover for a power grab, usually an ethnic or tribal power grab.

    And where do you get your fantasy that I said the US "solved" wealth inequality? You're one of those people that scans words on a page and then just plops them into pre-conceived barrels whether or not it makes any sense. Open your mind, son, and stop riding your absurd hobby-horse. You remind me of that 80 year old Jewish guy that used to rant about Communism and hand out The Daily Worker outside Bloomingdale's. An idiot of one idea.
    , @dfordoom

    Cultural Marxism” is a right wing deception.
     
    As a commenter on some other thread pointed out it would be more accurate to call it Cultural Capitalism.
  241. @TGD
    Since the subjects are mathematics aptitude, communist/Jewish conspiracies, academic infiltration and antisemitism, I'd like to mention the name of Anatole Katok, a name most people have never heard of, who died last year. Katok was a pioneer in dynamical systems and “chaos theory” and other arcane areas of mathematics.

    Katok was a leading mathematician in Russia but increasing antisemitism amongst mathematical elites prompted him to leave the Soviet Union in 1978. He obtained positions at Cal Tech, University of Maryland and finally Penn State.

    An interesting sidebar about Katok is that one of his PhD students was Michael Brin, the father of Sergei Brin, the multi-billionaire co-founder of Google. The Brins have endowed numerous chairs at universities in honor of Katok.

    Both the Brins and Katok where males — probably cis males. Your comment feeds the bottom variety of sexism. Plus, it’s likely Katok stole all his ideas about arcane mathematics from his wife/sister/daughter/aunt/niece.

    J/k

  242. @Cyrano
    You are right about only one thing in YOUR little speech there – that Cultural Marxism is out to destroy the white people.

    You are wrong that is a higher form of socialism or any kind of socialism or Marxism. Come on, man, there is no country in this world that hates socialism more than US.

    They wouldn’t allow socialism under any disguise or reincarnation to enter their country even if it was slipped to them by the “treacherous Jews”. That whole thing about “Cultural Marxism” is phony.

    Marxism is supposed to deal with only one issue: - wealth inequality. You’re saying that US solved that problem and now they moved to higher, more advanced forms of inequality? They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism, that’s why they are pretending that they are dealing with other, higher issues of inequality. “Cultural Marxism” is a right wing deception.

    They are never gonna touch the only issue that matters in a true Marxism, that’s why they are pretending that they are dealing with other, higher issues of inequality.

    😌 That’s what makes the most the happiest.

  243. @Roger Smith
    From the Amazon reviews of Bendersky's book:

    It's hard to review this book simply because it is the only one that I know ever written on the subject of anti-Semitism and its influence on US Army poicy from the end of WWI through the end of WWII and into the 50's. It certainly is exhaustive - the research is incredible, and it is very well written. The author has dug up dozens of Army officers, mostly mid level careerists, who held anti-Jewish views. What Bendersky has failed to do was explain how a handful of anti-Semetic officers influenced American policy or changed the course of WWII.
     
    That is precisely it! What was the then contemporary military failed at altering the course of Jewish influence. As Ron hypothesizes, the only thing Bendersky did not do was to show that the anti-semetic trends of the military carried through the Holocaust, and therefore only dissipated after a failed war with what a curious observer would easily determine was Jewish influence. Beaty, Oliver, et al. wrote books but ultimately the propaganda campaign that rages to this day won out. Every day we live further buries our access to truth. The symbolic trend from Beaty, to Oliver, to modern day radicals illustrates how this same propaganda works double to block content while radicalizing proponents into becoming at least visibly (if not internally compromised) unapproachable sources. This is a dangerous level of understanding and control of human behavior.

    Relating this to Guyénot's recent (and good) article, as I have been diving through Ron's American Pravda's and the related readings (or more), and even before this with various observations and academic courses, I had set up in my mind an understanding that the U.S. not having an established religion (being predominantly secular) was a tremendous weakness to our ability to fight or even comprehend these types of outside forces. In place of religion we have secular civic values, but these values have not been upheld (in various ways, some of them I am sure planned by outside interests) in order to make the reliable to citizens. I agree that Christianity's weakness was its promotion of individualism but, and like the benefits of a cohesive unity found Judaism, I do not dismiss individualism as a weakness. On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back.

    We've seen Hitler emulate Judaism and fail, we've seen Oliver and Welch do the same on a smaller scale and fail. Emulating the deeply flawed opponent will not work, you'll just at best become them. When you no longer regard the means by which you continue existence, and for no other reason than simply persisting, you have utterly and miserably failed. It won't be until everyone individually realizes the importance of our collective existence (and I mean that absolutely, no ideological zealots here or there espousing how grand their love is; every single nobody simultaneously) that we truly advance. For now we must be determined and open to finding and understanding the truth.

    I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need […]

    First you say it’s important to understand people’s minds, then you talk of something that’s absolutely beyond what is possible to them as what is needed.

  244. Hail says: • Website
    @Mefobills
    Some Revilo excerpts can be found here:

    http://heretical.com/


    See Oliver: Jewish Strategy

    A brief autobiographical text by Oliver, posted there and written in the early 1980s, reinforces Ron Unz’ narrative:

    [MORE]

    I married Grace Needham in 1930. Whatever I may have achieved, I owe entirely to the sustaining power through all subsequent years of an unfailing devotion for which I cannot rationally account.

    [….]

    I received the degree of Philosophiae Doctor in 1940. I may add that, given the great fear of “inbreeding,” I am the only person to receive the degree in Classics at the University of Illinois whom the Department determined to retain permanently. I began teaching graduate classes immediately after receiving the degree. For a considerable number of years I also gave graduate courses in the Renaissance, which put me also in the Department of Spanish and Italian, of which my good friend, Professor John Van Horne, was the head.

    At the suggestion of a military friend, I agreed, sometime in 1941, to join a secret subsidiary of the War Department, and did so as soon as my academic responsibilities would permit, in 1942, remaining there until the autumn of 1945. By good luck, I found myself in charge of a rapidly expanding department, and soon advanced from Analyst to Director of Research, finding myself responsible for the work of c. 175 persons. The work was harrowing, for various reasons, but extremely instructive. I learned, for example, the ultimate secret of Pearl Harbor, which was evidently unknown to Admiral Theobald and which was not disclosed in print until 1981 (in my America’s Decline, page 7).

    I returned to the University in 1945 as an Assistant Professor, became an Associate Professor in 1947, and Professor in 1953. […] (Continues)

  245. @anonymous
    No, Aaron, this is not an issue of 'myths' and 'symbols'. This is a real issue that is having real consequences in the real world. It is doing grave damage to real people and cultures.

    It can't be waved away with psychobabble, unfortunately.

    Please don’t hold Jung, who can in no way be connected with the concept of “psychobabble”, responsible for whatever others say while they quote his name.

  246. @Anonymous
    It takes one to know one. But do accept acknowledgment of the fact that you sound sober today. On a trip to the Sahara?

    So you say, but it is Incitatus the disingenuous old queen who is the one referring to Putin’s man boobs in his comments not me. Comments such as yours would suggest a hasbara still with training wheels on providing backup or just maybe you’re an old queen yourself and are sensitive to the term.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
    Careful. Your gender ambivalence is showing.

    Take comfort.

    God loves [even] you just the way you are.
  247. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @j2
    "Sources please."

    Wiz, if you feel that every comment in a discussion board needs to have a source, so please give the source of your expression 'Sources please". Who said it first? Where was it published? Have you made source analysis of what the person actually meant? Was he sincere, or under some pressure? What is the motive of you quoting this person here? I have noticed that the vast majority of your comments do not have a correctly formulated list of sources, and if they do, they seen not to be primary sources.

    You sometimes seem to know what you are talking about and even have some technical expertise. What a pity then to undermine your credibility with such silliness. Surely you can recognise the “Sources please” as equivalent to someone in a conversation over a coffee listening to something interesting but novel to him and saying “That’s an interesting view. Never heard it before. Where do you get it from?”.

    • Replies: @j2
    "Surely you can recognise the “Sources please” as equivalent to someone in a conversation over a coffee listening to something interesting but novel to him and saying “That’s an interesting view. Never heard it before. Where do you get it from?”."

    Of course I do. It is absurd to ask for sources to each argument. What I mean is that Wiz asking for sources is making a similar absurd thing.

    Asking for sources for any disputed topic is just a fake argumentation trick, i.e., you try to imply that the argument is not sound as it has no sources. But the nature of any disputed topic is that it cannot be solved by using sources: there are sources for and against and the truth of the topic is not clarified by looking at which source is in a more esteemed publication and which in less. I think Ron Unz's present article makes it perfectly clear: he mentions that Bendersky uses primary sources but gets a false result, and he discusses a less respectable source, Oliver, who Unz thinks has some correct points, yet the source is not a good one.

    No disputed topic can be solved from sources. An argument must be based on logical reasoning. Any argument of the real world must use as some facts or claims as the starting point, but each of the facts or claims used needs to be checked. Therefore, a strong argument, should use as few external facts as possible. It follows that there should be as few sources as possible, and preferably these sources are not named as the facts that are used should preferably be commonly accepted. Ideally you should not need any sources, only commonly known facts and what logically follows.

    Let us take the Holocaust death toll as an example. Do we know it by a reference to Raoul Hilberg, who calculated it as 5.1-5.2 million? Or from the Jewish World Almanac giving 4.4 million, or from Reitlinger 4.1-4.5 million, or from any of the authors who calculate it to 5.7-6 million? Clearly, if there are many different numbers, at most one of these authors is correct, and it is not by voting how many hits some number gets. Thus, it is absurd to e.g. say that Hilberg is the monumental classic and you should go line by line through the work and show where he goes wrong. As the death tolls are different, all but one must go wrong and very possibly all do. (Actually Reitlinger and Almanac get the correct number, if Jewish population figures in the Soviet Union are accepted, but the Soviet figures are almost certainly wrong, so all of these estimates are false).

    So, we cannot solve the Holocaust death toll by giving sources. Can we then solve the problem of the effect of secret societies in the time spell from 1750 to 1914 in Europe by using sources? I say absolutely not. When the question is of secret societies, which at that time were really secret, we have very meager information that has leaked from different sources. This question can only be solved by studying it for a long time and putting small bits together, judging each small bit of information carefully. The result is an argument. An argument has justification, which often is very long but can certainly be given to someone interested in this topic. (Ideally this somebody would finally come to the same conclusion after judging these small information bits, but if he has an agenda not to agree, he will not agree and there is nothing you can do. So, an argument is a good one if another honest and clever researcher can be convinced by it, but how do you know who is honest and clever? And this is so even in mathematics. How do you force someone to admit that the argument is correct if he insists it is not and does not explain why?)

    What bits of information to use in an argument is your choice: in a strong argument there should be as few external facts as possible because the argument depends on their correctness. It is possible indeed to track Freemason subversive activity during 1750-1872 (Paris Commune) and even up to 1914. The Wikipedia, Masonic own sources and similar common sources are reasonably good on Masons. These are common knowledge and therefore you should not give a source to a particular text. That particular text cannot prove that the claim is correct, you have to check all texts to prove a claim from sources. This is why facts used in an argument should mainly be commonly accepted facts: everybody who knows something of the topic accepts that Memphis and Mizraim lodges were revolutionary. The rest of my argument is similar. It gets to claims that Wiz does not accept as he has not studied the topic, but Wiz does not accept that WTC7 fell by explosives, so that does not mean anything.

    It is fully absurd for Wiz to ask for sources in this case. If he wants to know how a specific claim is argued, then he should ask how do you get this claim, and then I probably would explain it, unless it is too long to explain here. But such a claim should be specified. It can, for instance, be, how do you know that Frankists were the first Jews to join Freemasonry. Then I would explain that they were not the first Jews, but the first important Jews for the revolutionary Masonry and go to quotes from Jacob Frank's work. But that will be long. It is even longer to show the banker involvement.

    I did not want to write a long explanation like this to garble the thread, but I thought that Wiz needs an answer to his request of sources. Thus, I wrote what every intelligent person should understand, but as you wrote what you wrote, I am forced to explain this in the long way.

  248. @Hail

    the article actually devotes 90 percent of its 12,000 words to an obscure crackpot…a creature of the long past days of open race hate…one Revilo P Oliver…
     
    Major names mentioned in article:
    - 'Oliver' (Revilo P.; 1908-1994): 59 hits in article
    - 'Bendersky' (b.1946; Jewish; author of a book on U.S. military intelligence's views on the "Jewish Threat"): 33 hits in article (incl. 31 for "Bendersky" and 2 for "Bendarsky")
    - 'Beaty' (author of "Iron Curtain Over America" [1951]; 1890-1961): 27 hits in article
    - 'Roosevelt': 19 hits in article (+1 for 'FDR' = 20).
    - 'Summers' (b.1954; Jewish; President of Harvard, July 2001 to June 2006): 15 hits in article
    - 'Welch' (of the John Birch Society; 1899-1985): 13 hits
    - 'Ross' (American sociologist of early 20th-century; 1866-1951): 8 hits
    - 'Mertz' (b.1949; Jewish; academic who proclaimed “the myth that females cannot excel in mathematics must be put to rest” despite own evidence suggesting otherwise): 5 hits
    - 'Ford' (Henry): 4 hits
    SUM of the above nine people: 181 hits; of which 'Oliver' represents <33%.

    Total word count: 12,500
    - 1,160 words: Intro on the Larry Summers case of 2005;
    - 2,450 words: Section on the Joseph Bendersky book, "Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army" (2000);
    - 1,400 words: Section on WWII-era military intelligence officer Col. John Beaty's book, "Iron Curtain Over America" (1951);
    - 6,900 words: Section on Dr. Revilo P. Oliver's life and times, including John Birch Society origins (or which 2,280 words are passages from Dr. Oliver's writings);
    - 500 words: Conclusion which brings together the various strands of the article; the key sentence of the 500-word conclusion is "For ideologically-blinkered scholars to sometimes produce research that constitutes “a game-ending own-goal” may be much more common than most of us would expect," as demonstrated by the less-controversial Mertz case introduced in the Introduction. Ron Unz argues that Bendersky's own book on anti-Semitism in U.S. military intelligence in the first three-quarters of the 20th century contains, within it, and inadvertently, an anti-Holocaust-narrative "own goal."

    SUM: Of the 12,500 words in the article, 4,620 words (37%) are by Ron Unz within the Revilo P. Oliver section, and 2,280 words (18%) are excerpts from Oliver's writings in the same section. The passages from Oliver are probably justifiable because he is so little known in the 2010s to anything like a general audience, and he forms a core part of the point being made.

    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece – would he look to trim Ron’s 12,500?

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?

    Johannes Gutenberg would like to know. Not that it would stop him from pressing on.

    • Replies: @Hail

    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece – would he look to trim Ron’s 12,500?
     
    Ron Unz's articles are not meant to be bite-sized "takes." He does not blog or tweet. The beauty of this 12,500-word article is that those with the discipline to follow it through to the end will be rewarded, almost as a well-made movie does, weaving together several narratives into a coherent whole, and what may well be called a surprise ending.

    As for length, it is true that 12,500 words is long. If a good reading speed is 300+ wpm, a 12,500-word piece takes 40 minutes to consume fully (that is, for content; reading for comprehension/absorption and excl. any use skimming). At a more leisurely <250wpm, it would be 50 to 55 minutes.

    Those with the discipline to sit and read an well-researched, thoughtful article like this for (say) 45 minutes, can really learn a lot. Imagine instead looking a random Youtube video using one or more of the keywords from this article, and watching that for 45 minutes, something a lot of people do.

    (Here, e.g., is an appearance of Joseph Bendersky, the central figure of this article, somewhere on Youtube, on a panel on a 2015 panel called "The Future of History;" he sits beside somebody named Jonathan Israel ["Main Interests: ...European Jews"]. I don't have the discipline to watch their entire panel, which probably runs an hour, but I guarantee there is substantially less 'there' than in this Ron Unz article.)

    So I would ask again, Which yields a better result: 45 minutes of reading a carefully prepared Ron Unz article, or 45 minutes flailing around Youtube trying to find some kind of comparable material? (This on my mind given a recent Anatoly Karlin article on the subject.)
    , @skrik

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?
     
    OT but haw; perhaps more people should use 'oldie but goldie' proper PCs, fiddling around with a 1ffs pasd [= one-finger flat-screen personal anti-social device] could send you blind.
  249. @Carolyn Yeager

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.
     
    The so-called "direct evidence" was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that. The War Refugee Board was not created until later, but also from less than dependable sources. It's all explained in brief here: http://jan27.org/the-hoax-that-wont-die/

    The Jews ultimately prevailed with their hoax in 1944 when the Roosevelt Administration saw the value of the "Nazi death camp" narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law. But it was an uncertain road and no way was it believed in 1942.

    This is a good companion read: https://carolynyeager.net/how-british-psychological-warfare-resulted-short-term-victory-long-term-loss-europe

    “The so-called “direct evidence” was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that.”

    It was not hearsay; rather, it was several eyewitness accounts by soldiers from the Russian Army. Military intelligence confirmed what they saw. We also know that the Red Cross in 1996 released their archives, which documented first-hand accounts and reports on the persecution of Jews and political prisoners from 1939 to 1945 in concentration camps, with that information being given. American and British intelligence was privy to general, but not detailed, activities of German concentration camps from that organization.

    “saw the value of the “Nazi death camp” narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law.”

    Without a doubt, in a war, there are atrocities committed. But to the victor goes the spoils. No distraction, just retaliation for German aggression.

    Besides, your reputation proceeds you.

    http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2016/07/dumb-neo-nazi-carolyn-yeager-attacks.html

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    Not a thing you said here (pure nonsense) supports your statement that:

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.
     
    But now I see that you are from the Holocaust Controversies group, and that explains why no one engages you. I shan't either from now on.
  250. @Robjil
    Not all Jews are leaning left anymore. Israel supports and props up all the right wing coups in Latin America since the 1950s.

    This author calls for BDS against Israel for what it has been doing and is doing to Latin America.

    https://savageminds.org/2016/03/18/israels-foreign-policy-in-latin-america-another-reason-to-take-the-call-to-boycott-seriously/

    Israel's support for Nicaragua Contras in the 198os and 1990s.

    "Israel’s support for the Nicaraguan Contras was mirrored in the Israeli support for right-wing Phalangist militias in Lebanon in the 1980s and ‘90s; by the same token, the Contras attacks on the institutions of Nicaraguan civil society prefigure the manner in which Israeli settler para-militaries “price tag” attacks seek to undermine the agricultural and social foundations of Palestinian life."

    Israel's support for Argentine's right wing government in 1970s- 1980s.

    "Israel sustained an intimate relationship with the military junta that ruled Argentina from 1976–1983, and provided logistical and hardware support for Argentina during the Falklands War of 1982. The Argentine junta was ideologically anti-Semitic, and routinely brandished Nazi and other fascist symbols . During la Guerra Sucia (the Dirty War), the military imprisoned, tortured and persecuted a higher percentage of leftist, progressive or non-political Jewish Argentine citizens han they did non-Jewish Argentines. In their dealings with the Argentine military, Israel’s leaders showed very clearly that they distinguished between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism and were fully capable of supporting a government that was radically anti-Semitic within its own borders and pro-Israel in its foreign policy. "

    Israel's support for Colombia's right wing rulers

    "In Colombia armed right paramilitaries have also been important players on their own, in collusion with the army’s battle with the leftist guerrillas of the FARC and other groups, and as shock troops for corporate interests. In the late 1970s the paramilitares organized into an umbrella organization, Auto-Defensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), co-founded by Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso, among others. In his 2001 biography, Mi confesión, Castaño describes his year of training in Israel in 1983–84, both in military schools and at the Hebrew University, and details Israel’s influence on his own ideological formation and that of his movement. The Israeli security firm Spearhead, led by retired IDF colonel Yair Klein, started training paramilitaries from the AUC in the mid–1980s, the same era in which Castaño received his education."

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-honduras-enter-new-blood-soaked-military-alliance-support-state-sponsored-terrorism/219887/

    "Israel and Honduras announced a new security agreement this month in which Israel will supply weapons and training to the Honduran military.

    Honduras is ruled by an oppressive and murderous regime that took power after a 2009 coup, and the agreement marks just the latest chapter in Israel’s long, bloody history of arming Central American despots."

    What foreign nation was involved in this 2009 coup?

    https://www.opdeepstate.com/2018/10/21/honduras-and-the-israeli-coup-a-new-special-relationship-immigration/

    "In the aftermath of the 2009 coup in Honduras, I had the opportunity to interview deposed President Manuel Zelaya, who, having been kindly escorted in his pajamas to Costa Rica by the Honduran military, had then resurfaced in Tegucigalpa and taken refuge in the embassy of Brazil. The interview took place via an intermediary inside the embassy, who conveyed my questions to Zelaya.

    One topic we touched on was a comment the left-leaning Zelaya had made concerning “Israeli mercenaries” operating in Honduras. This had unleashed a predictable hullabaloo in international media, with commentators tripping over each other to portray the besieged leader as an anti-Semite extraordinaire on some sort of permanent acid trip.

    In my write-up of the interview, which was published in an insignificant publication, I happened to point out that Israeli mercenaries weren’t exactly foreign to the Central American landscape. When the piece came out, the publisher of another insignificant publication—to which I had contributed some anti-coup articles—threw a fit. How dare I bring the Israelis into it; I would alienate all of Washington!"

    Unzers: We hate Jews when they are communists, but we hate them too when they are anti-communists!

    Jews: Building Zion as God commands.

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
    Did God command Israelis to shoot and kill Palestian men , women and children and to conduct genocide on the Palestian people.
    , @Robjil
    Protection for bad behavior is what the world hates. No one hates any people for doing good things. The protection racket for Jews and Israel is what the world hates. This protection racket is destroying our planet.

    Why is there no real research about who did nine eleven? The fingerprints of Israel are all over it, so the Jewish/ Israeli protection racket is pulled over it.

    The holocaust can't be investigated. It must be "believed", since it helps keep the protection racket in place. Thus, Mad Albright can say 500000 Iraqi children dying from US sanctions is OK, since it wasn't the Big 6.

    This Big 6 pass gives total protection for massive criminal behavior by big Jews, Israel and even the US as a colony of Israel.

  251. @FB

    ...you have no proof for the magical German ‘gas chambers’, which were scientifically impossible.
     
    And you know what about 'science'...?

    I already addressed this in another thread where you and a number of your nazi numbskulls were present...but none of chose to take me up on it...

    The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10).

    The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside.11
     
    ---Maria Stromberger: A Nurse in the Resistance in Auschwitz

    That's from a peer reviewed journal...Ms Stromberger the nurse was a member of the SS...but even some members were disgusted by the beastly wholesale extermination carried out by history's ugliest band of organized psychopaths...

    You're simply a dumb loser who knows zilch about science, or anything else...

    The problem with the gas chambers story is that the only evidence of these is hearsay like the example you just gave.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?
  252. @Mefobills

    I will read the comments carefully to look for solutions. I can tell you that the efforts I make with friends and family to awake them to reality are perilous indeed
     
    Here is the solution:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

    This funding is by way of usury out of private banking. Religion is subordinate to money power, and usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).

    Money's true nature is law. Money is not a division of metal, or a division of debt instruments.

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.

    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.

    www.sovereignmoney.eu

    MEFOBILLS has specified the mental self-discipline we the goyim must self impose to escape Jew tyranny and the #Jew$4whiteGENOCIDE initiative (and that means all goyim ’cause “Whitey’s the Golden Goose” who’s brought unprecedented prosperity and living standards to the entire world, and if Jews eradicate whitey all the remaining goyim will be hopelessly exploited as slaves of the Jews):

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.

    He expresses the action we must then take:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

    He explains why that action is necessary:

    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.

    He also expesses two powerfully insightful subtleties, the later of which would be appreciatively edifying to have him explain further:

    usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).

    • Replies: @David Baker
    Churchill defined Jewish Tyranny in his article about the Bolsheviks.
    , @Mefobills
    It will take a legal body to scrub a money system of usury. Listen up goy, money's true nature is law. Don't listen to our friends who insist it is a division of debt or whatever, as long as they control it. This is the vice your testicles are in and you think it is normal because you have been hypnotized from birth.

    Legal bodies to control money has been done in the past, but usually Mammon is aroused and tears it down.

    For example, ancient Venice had a legal body that would examine the debtor/creditor contract at inception, to then apportion risk.

    If you wanted to go on a fishing expedition, and said expedition did not catch many fish, then the creditor would lose as well as debtor as specified legally in advance. Today, if a banker loans new bank credit to outfit a fishing vessel, then new debtor is on the hook to perform. If debtor cannot pay, then bank takes the boat as collateral.

    Taking the boat in a swap, where risk was attached to debtor is a heads I win tails you lose proposition for banker.

    Usury is a power relation with a heads I win tails you lose proposition, and is the "taking of something for nothing." Remember TARP? Risk was put onto the taxpayers shoulders in a power relation. Taxpayers lost.

    In a gold money system, the holders of gold coins will retreat and "wait out" the sellers of perishable goods and wares. The sellers of milk, eggs, or any perishable goods will desperately lower prices to acquire the gold. Since gold doesn't rust or degrade, then the holder of said gold has a power relation OVER those who are desperately selling their rusting goods. Gold is thus a usury system, which is why the protocols like gold.

    Germany's bill system, where they injected purchasing power into the economy, improved the commons in a win win situation, where all were better off - that would be non usurious. Also, the bills were paid interest which fluxed outward from Reichsbank. In other words, Reichsbank paid the bill holder interest, rather than bill holder paying the bank. Big enormous difference, as Germany's bill system (Mefobills or Oeffabills) put purchasing power into the hands of their people. This is non usurious. The state gave their people money power rather than harvesting their people of life energy. The state was a giver of life, rather than taker.

    Metal by weight as money got its start in the Temples of Middle East. Metal by weight substituted for barley weights. Our (((friends))) soon learned metal tricks, and usury became part of their control matrix. Even the biblical story of controlling Egyptian grain is one of codifying usury as power for the tribe. Get control of the grain while it is plentiful, and charge high prices later when it is scarce.

    In reality, scholars have found that Egypt's money system was gold hoops sold outside of the economy for trade, but internal to the economy was clay shards. Said shards had numbers written on them indicating how much grain you had stored. As mice and rats ate the grain, your shards reduced in purchasing power. This is a demur-rage system, where the money loses power in alignment with perishable goods it purchases, and is thus non usurious. So, either the biblical story is a lie, our our friends engaged in their typical subterfuge to control Egyptian society.

    It's not a simple subject, and our friends teach their methods to acolytes in their temples. It is the tribe secret, and Nazi Germany stepped on the tribe's electrified third rail by using industrial capitalism and issuing their own non usurious purchasing power. Before the first world war, Germany wanted to link up ultimately to Russia with Baghdad Berlin railroad, and this was another big no no to the international finance tribe. Our friends have been taking rents and usury on shipping since Levantine times. Our friends couldn't hypothecate new credit on goods in transit shipped by German rail, nor could they interdict rail with piracy. Many books could be written about all the different usurious schemes prevalent in our world today.

    Solon's reforms in Greece were a direct result of our (((friends)) making clay ledgers grow with usury while demanding scarce silver in payment. Clay ledgers make demands that grow, while the real world cannot pay. This scheme by our friends ended up putting Greek farmers into slavery death, causing starvation in city states like Athens. In other words, maritime shipping is only a part of the Jewish usury system, which jumped from Levant (Mediterranean) to London. Why do you think London became a gold center despite having no gold in the ground?

    There are many forms of usury, but it is not just excess interest. I already explained how interest fluxed outward from Reichsbank and this increased German money supply. Similarly, Benjamin Franklin's Philadelphia Colony fluxed interest outward. Franklin spent debt free money into the commons so debtors to Franklin's bank had money available in supply to pay their loan interest. Franklin also limited loans to 8 years to prevent bank interest claims from going exponential.

    A sovereign money system is only a law change, and it would disenfranchise our friends from their money power. Their crooked hands have to be ripped off of the levers of money creation and control. Unfortunately, the bad guys would rather have WW3 (to distract you while they get rich) than let go.

    www.sovereignmoney.eu

  253. @Corvinus
    "The so-called “direct evidence” was hearsay concocted by the World Jewish Congress, and the British and US military intelligence knew that."

    It was not hearsay; rather, it was several eyewitness accounts by soldiers from the Russian Army. Military intelligence confirmed what they saw. We also know that the Red Cross in 1996 released their archives, which documented first-hand accounts and reports on the persecution of Jews and political prisoners from 1939 to 1945 in concentration camps, with that information being given. American and British intelligence was privy to general, but not detailed, activities of German concentration camps from that organization.

    "saw the value of the “Nazi death camp” narrative for distracting from their own war crimes of which they were guilty under international law."

    Without a doubt, in a war, there are atrocities committed. But to the victor goes the spoils. No distraction, just retaliation for German aggression.

    Besides, your reputation proceeds you.

    http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2016/07/dumb-neo-nazi-carolyn-yeager-attacks.html

    Not a thing you said here (pure nonsense) supports your statement that:

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.

    But now I see that you are from the Holocaust Controversies group, and that explains why no one engages you. I shan’t either from now on.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    The "Final Solution" was a term coined by Herzl to describe his Zionist scheme. It would be just like Jews to attribute that phrase to the German campaign to rid their country of the tribe.
    , @FB

    ...that explains why no one engages you. I shan’t either from now on.

     

    Well it's good to see the old 'gal' still has amore on her mind...it is springtime after all...LOL

    [Does that mean it's over with 'Renfro'...?]

    https://i.postimg.cc/sfYwGtNS/pawn-shop-engagement.jpg

    She's a very 'practical' gal our Caroline...

    My model for the role of women in a healthy society is the Third Reich.
     
    , @Corvinus
    Sweetie, "Final Solution" references the planned extermination of Jews by Germany. There is considerable documentation on that subject. I purposely used that term to determine if you would get triggered. You passed with flying colors. Note that you chose not to challenge what I stated about the American military being privy to Nazi machinations, but deciding not to intervene.

    "But now I see that you are from the Holocaust Controversies group, and that explains why no one engages you. I shan’t either from now on."

    Typical response. I am NOT from that group. I simply found a source that demonstrated your apparent incompetence.

    So, rather than engage in substantive discourse, you choose to run away. There is a plethora of proof, from German historical archives to film footage to eyewitness testimony about the Holocaust and its adverse impact. You can't run away all of your life from those facts.
  254. FB says: • Website
    @Incitatus
    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website. The latter is a thinly veneered Tar-Baby who [uninvited] spams denialism and accusatory rhetoric, inviting response ever-mired in codoh nonsense

    Wally has no convincing excuse for Operation Hummingbird murders. Former Chancellor/General Schleicher and wife were each shot in the face on 30 Jun 1934. Wally’s justification? Schleicher was a “traitor”, no details given. No explanation for the murder of Frau Schleicher and many others [e.g. Gustav Ritter von Kahr, former Bavarian commissioner who suppressed the Nov ’23 Putsch, found hacked to death with pickaxes in a wood outside of Munich].

    One is, of course, supposed to debate on codoh, neo-Nazis [Tar-Baby] central.

    Why would Ron Unz sponsor/associate with this rubbish? That’s the question. Is Wally a condiment that enhances the ‘all things lead to Jews’ theme? A force-multiplier for galvanizing fascination/revulsion/power?

    Stromberger’s testimony won’t convince Wally’s confederates, but you know that. They live in denial [e.g. Barbarossa was ‘preemptory defense’].

    Consider the tale of German settler Erna Petri, who arrived with her 3-yr old son in Lwów, ‘Wartheland' (Poland) June 1942 to join husband Horst, an SS officer. Both, participants in Himmler’s agricultural colony program, took possession of a Polish noble’s manor outside the town. Within two days of arrival, Erna witnessed her husband whipping farm laborers and soon followed his example. In summer 1943, returning from a Lwów shopping trip, she encountered six nearly-naked, starving children (age 6-12, escaped from a rail car bound for Sobibor) beside the road. She stopped the carriage, calmed them, took them home, fed them while waiting for her husband to arrive. Failing his appearance, she led the children to a pit in the woods previously used for executions, lined them up on the edge of the ditch, proceeds down the line shooting each child in the back of the neck with a revolver given her by her father. She later remembers after the first two were shot, the others “began to cry” but “not loudly, they whimpered”.

    Erna and Horst were tried 1962 in East Germany, both found guilty. Erna got life, Horst got the noose. [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.291-2].

    Doubtless Wally has a band-aid that obscures history with “revisionism” that invites a swim in the codoh septic tank.

    Wally and allies justify Aktion T4 – state murder of good Aryans [200,000] normal Germans protested – as “involuntary assisted suicide”. More gibberish nonsense.

    Point?

    They think they know better than Germans about the latter’s fate, and would love to clone Adolf, Eva and the whole menagerie for another go at wholesale killing.

    It’s well worth questioning why Ron Unz welcomes Wally on his ant-farm/website.

    I think the question is what Mr Unz hopes to accomplish with this website slash antfarm…in general…perhaps you haven’t read much of this website…but the neo-nazis and Holocaust revisionism is just one small aspect of the UNZ ‘ouvre’…

    The website includes ‘authors’ that spew unabashed race hate [not just Jews, but blacks, Latinos etc]…nonstop bullshit about ‘racialist’ IQ [SMFH]…and other such ‘important’ subjects…

    This attracts a truly grotesque commentariat of hard-baked bigots…who spew their bile here with such abandon that one wonders about how the human character can possibly descend to such worthlessness…

    But here’s the thing…these people are truly losers…it’s no surprise to anyone that the most vehement race hate occurs in the deeply disadvantaged socio-economic underclass…but this is NOT a reflection of ordinary folks…even folks we might wrongly label as ‘white trash’…most ordinary folks [even the desperately poor] are actually decent folks…they suffer mostly due to our out of control elites and do not blame bogeymen of different color or religion…is the UNZ lunatics are a tiny irrelevant fringe…

    Here’s a guy I really like…just a good old boy who’s got a lot of heart and soul…these are the real ‘people of the land’…not the bitter losers UNZ attracts like flies to shit…

    As to why this ant farm experiment…?

    That’s the puzzler for me…no kind of ‘movement’ [other than the bowel type] can possibly result from this ‘project’…

    For me the value in seeing these losers vent their spleen is to remind myself just how far down the wrong road some humans are capable of going…without ever realizing…’hey man…where the fuck is this road taking me…?’

    The human condition in its most weakened state [genetically, morally, humanistically…and every other way]…on display…it’s like going to the museum and seeing the goofy creatures that never made it…it is instructive…

    • LOL: Wally
    • Replies: @Incitatus

    “perhaps you haven’t read much of this website”
     
    Avoid most race and IQ articles, not my subjects. Afraid of sleeping at the keyboard.

    “most ordinary folks [even the desperately poor] are actually decent folks…and do not blame bogeymen of different color or religion”
     
    Agree. Here and abroad.

    “they suffer mostly due to our out of control elites”
     
    Agree. When the powerful smother communitarianism and sustainability by appetite/action/inaction/sadism, descent seems inevitable.

    Minority targeting and scapegoating have utility. As old as Hellas (pharmakos). Perhaps that’s why Giraldi blames everybody but his ‘slam dunk’ former employer for 9/11 and Iraq 2003?

    “The human condition in its most weakened state [genetically, morally, humanistically…and every other way]…on display…it’s like going to the museum and seeing the goofy creatures that never made it…it is instructive…”
     
    Valid point. Come to think of it, UR is rather like a small carnival freak show. Most just the usual bearded lady, two-headed snake, Siamese-twin, dwarf, 600-lb child. Once in a while a genuine ‘Jo-Jo the Dog-Faced Boy’, ‘Elephant Man’ or ‘Man with Half a Body’. Suppose that’s what makes it worth visiting.

    Same fascination as safely passing a really good car wreck.
    , @Druid
    Holohoax! Get the word right
    , @Jacques Sheete

    This attracts a truly grotesque commentariat of hard-baked bigots…who spew their bile here with such abandon that one wonders about how the human character can possibly descend to such worthlessness…
     
    No need to come here to find that. One doesn't have to look any further than Congress or the Knesset or the Talmud to find hard-baked bigots…who spew their bile here with such abandon that one wonders about how the human character can possibly descend to such worthlessness…

    BTW, that pretty well describes the usual trolls here. In fact, they seem to get a huge kick out of stating positions that are as hideous as they are outrageous. So, thank you for that, I intend to use it from time to time when the behavior manifests itself which it will.

    PS: Speaking of grotesque... hard-baked bigots who spew, etc., your comment is a classic example of the same. Nice work! Go back and read then try to deny it. LOL.

    , @Jacques Sheete

    For me the value in seeing these losers vent their spleen is to remind myself just how far down the wrong road some humans are capable of going…without ever realizing…’hey man…where the fuck is this road taking me…?’
     
    Exceuse me but I think you may have just vented your spleen as well as your bowels and you'll be happy to note, I'm sure, that you're not alone.


    "Goyim [non-Jews] were born only to serve us." Explaining why God allowed non-Jews long lives, he added: "Imagine that your donkey would die, you’d lose your income. [The donkey] is your servant. … That’s why he [the gentile] gets a long life, to work well for the Jew."
    This summer, Yosef Elitzur and Yitzhak Shapira, who head an influential seminary in the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar, published The King’s Torah, a 230-page guide to how Jews should treat non-Jews.

    The two rabbis concluded that Jews were obligated to kill anyone who posed a danger, immediate or potential, to the Jewish people, and implied that all Palestinians were to be considered a threat. On these grounds, the pair justified killing Palestinian civilians and even their babies.

    Israel’s Racist Rabbis, By Jonathan Cook
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/12/10/israel-s-racist-rabbis/print


     

  255. When we look back at historical events that have impacted western society as a whole, one only needs to look at One Country and One Race! No other country on earth has caused so much harm and destruction to people and populations than the British Empire! After the Jews were thrown out of most European countries for their treasonous acts, England allowed them to return. The King used them as a tool to collect tax revenue. As the Jews prospered, they slowly married into the Anglo Saxon society, which opened new opportunities in the Trading, Shipping and Banking sectors of Britain.

    British-Israel is Born
    British Israelism (also called Anglo-Israelism) is the belief that people of Western European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. The concept often includes the belief that the British Royal Family is directly descended from the line of King David. There has never been a single head or an organisational structure to the movement. However, various British Israelite organisations were set up across the British Commonwealth and America from the 1870s, and many still continue to exist. British Israelites believe that Jews only descend from Judah (and the tribe of Benjamin), while the House of Israel they believe are the White British or Anglo-Saxon-Celtic kindred peoples of North-Western Europe today.

    It is generally considered that British Israelism as an ‘ideology’ was first founded in England, from where it spread to the United States.

    British Israelism as an established movement traces itself back to the 17th century. Adriaan van der Schrieck (1560–1621) a Flemish language researcher in 1614 wrote:

    “…the Netherlanders with the Gauls and Germans together in the earliest times were called: Celts, who are come out of the Hebrews.”

    I wouldn’t discount the possibility of Jewish influence in bringing this new belief system to the Anglo Saxon people.

    Davidic Origin of British Monarchy
    King James of England (1567–1625) believed he was a king of Israel.

    One of the core beliefs of British Israelism is that the British monarchy are lineal descendants from King David (Davidic line). British Israelites cite I Kings 9: 5; I Chron. 17: 12, II Chron, 17: 18 and II Sam. 7: 13 which state that the throne of King David over Israel will be established forever.

    America
    There are also a minority of British Israelites who believe America is not in prophecy. These British Isrealites hold the position that the Israelites must always have the throne of King David ruling over them (I Chron. 17: 12; II Sam. 7: 13). Since the Thirteen Colonies in 1776 declared their independence and formed the United States of America, they lost their loyalty to the British monarch and no longer had a monarchy to rule over them. Some British Israelites therefore strongly reject the idea that America are Israel (Ephraim or Manessah).

    [MORE]

    Canada, Australia and New Zealand
    An example of a British Israelite who held this minority view was William H. Poole who only believed the nations of the ‘British crown’ were Israelites, including Canada where he served as a Methodist minister.

    Since Canada, Australia and New Zealand remain apart of the British Commonwealth, modern British Israelites who hold this minority view within British Israelism have no problem with accepting these countries as Israel, alongside Britain.

    Anglo Saxon Christian Jewish Zionist Two Peas in one Pod!

    America, Canada, New Zealand and Australia were all colonized by the British Empire. The Colonization had the Trademark Jewish invasion methods as described in the Bible. Just as the Israelites attacked the Canaanites, and killed every man, woman and child, the British in bloody Jewish fashion used the same methods when conquering the new lands. It took more than 200 years to finally end the slaughter of American Indians, Canadian Indians, The New Zealand Natives and The Australian Aborigine. The same propaganda used by the Jews today, “God gave us these lands”, the American’s “Manifest Destiny” was used to steal land.

    WWI, Russian Revolution and WWII

    The British Empire instigated both wars against the German Empire. The Anglo Saxon British were not forced into those wars by the Jews. The Jews did use their influence decisions to its advantage, but Britain wanted that war. The same goes for America and the rest of the British Empire. How can anyone in their right mind blame the Jews for those wars…

    It was the British who used Poland as bait in the second world war, not the Jews.

    The Russian Revolution could not have happened without American and British financing. The Anglo Saxon Banking Cartel that was headquartered in New York and London supplied the money.

    The Jewish Bolsheviks were not Russian at least the leaders weren’t, they were American and British Communist Jews. The murder of all those Christian Russians at the hands of these people is a travesty of justice the same as the murder of Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian men, women and children by the same people. Not one person has faced justice for their participation in those crimes. I have seen the written accounts of how much pleasure they got out of killing people using all sorts of horrendous acts of violence.

    Remember the British India Trading Company, they used slave labor and sold drugs to China. They called it “Free Trade” the same as they do to this day. It wasn’t the Israel India Trading Company… That company was a criminal Pirate organization that raided, raped and pillaged weaker civilizations at will. The Dutch India Trading Company was another Anglo Saxon fleet of Pirates.

    The Banks and Shell Corporations that hide money and are exempt from paying taxes are a product of the criminal British Banking System out of the City of London and located on British territory. Not Jewish Bankers in Israel! The Christian Zionist British American Israel Empire is an Anglo Saxon Criminal Cabal that the Zionist Jews are just a member of, not at the head of it.

    The Jews own the banks, media and pretty much everything of any value. But the Anglo Saxon’s are the yes men that work for them and call the shots. When Venezuela and Mexico called the Bank of England and requested their Gold be sent to them, they were told “no” by a representative of that bank. They didn’t call Israel or an Israeli Bank, they called an Anglo Saxon run bank.

    What is so funny about this whole thing is how Britain right now plays the roll of being not so powerful, when in reality it’s just laying low waiting to make its next move. The US might be part of that move… they might want payback for breaking away in 1776 and because of that are not considered part of British Israel. I am willing to bet that the Bank of England holds all of the US Gold Reserves, and will not release them. If you can’t see that happening, right now, I have an oil well in Venezuela to sell you.

    • Replies: @Peter Grafström
    Statements from sir Francis Drake from the 1500s seem to indicate that British israelism was in their minds back then already.
    It makes sense to pretend to be cosy with the jews so they may be played against rival countries. As the British currency attained a dominating status, the jews would have the same interests as the rest of Britains oligarchic class.
    But when the jews seem to be tempted to move closer to the rivals, it makes sense(in a powerpolitical sense) to undermine the jews among the rivals.
    Evidence that this was the true reason for both the emergence of modern zionism and nazism is available but treated with complete silence by official history, including David Irving who otherwise gives the impression of wanting more justice for Germany.
    Apparently those grassroots among anglosaxons who are struggling to defend Hitler and the nazis are helping those who want to evoke revanchism and to use it against whom?
    Russia it seems! And Us/Uk/Israel are all involved in what happened in Ukraine.
    Official articles in Israel confirm that Israeli troops were under command by the 'nazis' in the 'revolution' in 2014.
    Thus j2 for example now realises that the (official British) Israel project goes back to the 1840s but only mentions the jews and freemasonry and only as if it was under total control by jews. But he doesnt mention the British elites. Shaftesbury and Palmerston and many more.
    Britains 19th century influence was allencompassing. They were behind every upheaval.
    Playing all sides. And topping it off by controlling the way history has been presented in their favour.
  256. @Carolyn Yeager
    Not a thing you said here (pure nonsense) supports your statement that:

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.
     
    But now I see that you are from the Holocaust Controversies group, and that explains why no one engages you. I shan't either from now on.

    The “Final Solution” was a term coined by Herzl to describe his Zionist scheme. It would be just like Jews to attribute that phrase to the German campaign to rid their country of the tribe.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Actually, the term was used at the Wannsee Conference (Berlin; January 20,1942) where German officials discussed its implementation.
  257. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree
    MEFOBILLS has specified the mental self-discipline we the goyim must self impose to escape Jew tyranny and the #Jew$4whiteGENOCIDE initiative (and that means all goyim 'cause "Whitey's the Golden Goose" who's brought unprecedented prosperity and living standards to the entire world, and if Jews eradicate whitey all the remaining goyim will be hopelessly exploited as slaves of the Jews):

    Humans need to reject their brainwashing and fix their eyes on the money, and only then can Jewish power (which is really money power) be thwarted.
     
    He expresses the action we must then take:

    Strip the money power away from our (((friends))). Any sort of revolution has to be funded. Any sort of hypnosis on a host society has to be funded.

     

    He explains why that action is necessary:


    A sovereign money system is lawful and under control of the polity; not controlled by hidden masonic/jewish power brokers.

    Any sort of hidden hostile elite intent on taking rents to aggrandize their power, spells doom for the host country.
     
    He also expesses two powerfully insightful subtleties, the later of which would be appreciatively edifying to have him explain further:

    ...usury has been normed out of the language. It used to be a mortal sin and is now wrongly considered as excess interest (more brainwashing).
     

    Churchill defined Jewish Tyranny in his article about the Bolsheviks.

  258. FB says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager
    Not a thing you said here (pure nonsense) supports your statement that:

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the “Final Solution”.
     
    But now I see that you are from the Holocaust Controversies group, and that explains why no one engages you. I shan't either from now on.

    …that explains why no one engages you. I shan’t either from now on.

    Well it’s good to see the old ‘gal’ still has amore on her mind…it is springtime after all…LOL

    [Does that mean it’s over with ‘Renfro’…?]

    She’s a very ‘practical’ gal our Caroline…

    My model for the role of women in a healthy society is the Third Reich.

  259. @Patricus
    The problem with the gas chambers story is that the only evidence of these is hearsay like the example you just gave.

    Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?

    • Replies: @Patricus
    "Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?"

    Don't have the answer for that but could speculate. They dismantled their chemical works and scavenged whatever they could from camps so the Soviets couldn't make use of it.

    I doubt the Germans used the camps for mass executions. They did operate slave labor factories and population holding camps. Why would they ship people hundreds or thousands of miles to execute them? Why not just execute people where they were found and save all the expense? They did execute people, including Jews, in their operations against partisans. Almost certainly the Germans committed war crimes but these were wildly exagerated and lavishly embellished by the victors.
    , @Wally
    - 'Auschwitz destroyed' my ass.
    It certainly was not as that profitable Fantasy Theme Park that rakes in the cash will attest.

    - There were no homicidal gas chambers to destroy none, and you have no proof they existed and of course you cannot tell us how they supposedly worked.

    - Of course a fake "gas chamber" was built AFTER the war by the Soviets. Oops!

    - And then, if you think the SS destroyed 'gas chambers' at Auschwitz then why did the SS supposedly leave behind fully intact alleged 'gas chambers' at the Majdanek camp? The SS had plenty of time to do so if they wished before the Communists arrived.

    - The absurdly impossible "holocaust" narrative now says, after many damning story changes, that ca. 1,250,000 Jews and hundreds of thousands of others at Auschwitz were gassed, cremated, and the remains buried in allegedly known places at Auschwitz. Yet we see no such human remains there. Please show then to us.

    - The alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewed and demolished here.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11143&p=83723&hilit=model+asmarques#p83723


    www.codoh.com
    , @Saggy
    The story is that when the Russians captured Majdanek there was massive propaganda about the gas chambers and crematoriums. The famous Himmler quote is ..

    In order to stop the epidemic, we were forced to cremate the bodies of the many people that died of the disease. That was the reason we had to build the crematoria, and now, because of this everybody wants to tighten the noose around our neck.
     
    And for that reason they dynamited the crematoriums at Birkenau (although I don't how the possibility that the Russians dynamited them is excluded).

    The Birkenau crematoriums consisted of a central furnace room and two large partially underground wings for the storage of bodies. The hoax 'gas chambers' were supposedly in the wings. The Nazis (or whoever) dynamited the furnace rooms, not the crematorium wings, so the hoax 'gas chambers' were not dynamited. The roofs of the wings collapsed in most place. Not everywhere however, and here is a pic of G. Rudolf inspecting the inside of one of the wings ..
    https://i.imgur.com/vnKkBCA.jpg
    There is no reason whatever to think that that the crematorium morgue room was a 'gas chamber' besides the lies of the Jews. We could get into that, Pressac's book is the starting point, but this is not the place.

    Here is the fact, we have an unimpeachable eyewitness at Auschwitz, E. Wiesel, who spent a year at Auschwitz when the Nazis were supposedly killing 10,000 Jews per day in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. The book 'Night' recounts his experience, he doesn't mention gas chambers. He says the Nazis killed the Jews by tossing them alive into burning pits, one for children, one for adults. He saw it with his own eyes. Believe it or not !

  260. @j2
    I read the interrogation of Maria Stromberger. It is not an especially convincing evidence of gas chambers in Auschwitz 1. It says what the judges demand, but does not actually say what FB's article claims she saw:
    https://zapisyterroru.pl/Content/3766/Stomberger_Maria_en.pdf

    From your link…

    Chairperson: What are the motions of the parties as to the mode of questioning the witness?
    Prosecutor Cyprian: We discharge the witness from the oath.
    Defender Ostaszewski: We discharge the witness from the oath.
    Chairperson: By mutual agreement of the parties, the Tribunal has decided to question the witness without an oath.

    To my knowledge, no “witness” for the Holohoax managed to hold their story intact when questioned under oath. Not even Hilberg.

    • Replies: @j2
    Yes, without oath, but under legal obligations. The removal of the oath serves only to calm the conscience of the witness in case she has to tell something that the court requires but her conscience does not allow. If you read the interrogation further, there are a few points, I will include some here. It is the same as with all witness statements I have so far checked. They do not make the case of gas chambers at all believable to the reader. Every statement from Germans/Nazis has some impossible parts, like the idea of the witness would be to inform the reader that it is not possible what he tells, and most statements from a Jew has impossible parts, like outright miracles and obvious inconsistencies.

    We find such also from Stromberg, but what may be interesting form FB is that the article he linked to presents Stromberg's witness statement quite incorrectly.

    This is from the article posted by FB. It explains what Maria Stromberg should have been able to see if there were gassings in Auschwitz I, the main camp:
    https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-1155902751/maria-stromberger-a-nurse-in-the-resistance-in-auschwitz
    "Eventually there were several hospital blocks for prisoners in Auschwitz I and Birkenau, and the Revier (infirmary) for SS personnel located directly across from Crematorium I in Auschwitz I. The SS Revier was a well-equipped field hospital, staffed by SS physicians, orderlies, and, beginning in 1942, Red Cross nurses.1' From the SS Revier, one was able to look through the windows and see the gas chamber and Crematorium I (three furnaces capable of burning 340 bodies per day10). The nursing personnel of the Revier were able to see the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B (hydrogen cyanide) that was released into the gas chamber to kill all those inside."

    And this is what Mari Stromberg told in the interrogation
    https://zapisyterroru.pl/Content/3766/Stomberger_Maria_en.pdf
    "I had the opportunity to watch what was going on in the courtyard from the SS sick room windows. Later, the gas chambers and crematorium there were stopped, and the work was taken up in Birkenau.
    From the windows of that building, I saw the original gas chambers and the original crematorium, which were later moved to Birkenau. Only one street was between us: here was the sick room, and there was the crematorium and the gas chambers.I will describe one incident I saw from the window.
    There was a boy there, maybe 7 years old, who had on a sailor suit and blond hair – he looked so nice. He took the clothes off and folded them nicely, and in the meantime, his mother, with a baby in her arms who might have been around one and a half years and who had already been stripped naked, put the baby in his arms, so that she could also take her clothes off. And then they went inside."

    Question: Did the boy and mothere undress and found the clothes nicely outside? It was supposed to be done in an undressing room. Then the naked people waited outside. Stromberg's version is in contradiction with other versions. She could not see inside the dressing room.

    Maria Stromberg continues:
    "Now another incident. Once, this was in January 1943, the day was exceptionally cold even though I was dressed warmly – this was before noon in the so-called staff building – I hear some terrible wailing, not even human. I stopped dead in my tracks and at that moment three trucks passed by me, loaded full with naked men who were shivering with fevers and stretching their gaunt hands towards me – after all, I was standing by the road in a sister’s uniform – but I couldn’t help them. They were going to the crematorium in Birkenau. They were already free."

    So, three trucks full of naked men were taken somewhere. How could Stromberg know if they were taken to the crematorium in Birkenau and what was to happen to them there? Very clearly she does not tell of these men being gassed in Auschwitz I gas chamber. She does not tell anything like that she saw the trucks bringing the prisoners to the gas chamber and the SS men climbing on the roof to drop the Zyclon B. Very obviously the article does not do justice to the interrogation notes.

    Stromberg tells of Aryan prisoners in Auschwitz:
    "Apart from that, the mortality rate among the Aryan prisoners is, on average, 7-8 thousand a month."
    "800 Aryan women, French, came from Paris. For the whole week, they were under the charge of guard Mandl, whom I’ve already mentioned. They were without any food, in an ice-cold block." Then Stromberg tells of an absurd way of checking if a prisoner is fit to work by kicking her from the back. This must be a parody of a cartoon made by one Jewish prisoner of how the women prisoners were forced to go on fours and the female guard would kick on bottom those who were to be gassed. In Stromberg's story it is Aryan women from Paris treated like this, not likely in Nazi Germany.

    There were prisoners from many groups: Polish, Jewish from many countries, Gypsies, Russian POWs, but I have not heard that Aryan prisoners from Paris were ever transported to Auschwitz. The death rate of these non-Jewish prisoners is also too high. I would consider Stromberg's testimony highly suspect and without value to the question of the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz.

    So, FB, your link is now checked and it did not fly.
  261. @Wizard of Oz
    Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?

    “Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?”

    Don’t have the answer for that but could speculate. They dismantled their chemical works and scavenged whatever they could from camps so the Soviets couldn’t make use of it.

    I doubt the Germans used the camps for mass executions. They did operate slave labor factories and population holding camps. Why would they ship people hundreds or thousands of miles to execute them? Why not just execute people where they were found and save all the expense? They did execute people, including Jews, in their operations against partisans. Almost certainly the Germans committed war crimes but these were wildly exagerated and lavishly embellished by the victors.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Why did the Germans deport children and old people, not just workers is the question you should be asking. Your suggested take on the deportations is easy to answer. Murdering Jews in Belgium, Holland, France, Hungary and Rome would not only inflame resistance in the occupied countries it would be known round the world and abhorred. Remember that murdering the disabled was covered up in euphemism.
  262. j2 says:
    @Anon
    You sometimes seem to know what you are talking about and even have some technical expertise. What a pity then to undermine your credibility with such silliness. Surely you can recognise the "Sources please" as equivalent to someone in a conversation over a coffee listening to something interesting but novel to him and saying "That's an interesting view. Never heard it before. Where do you get it from?".

    “Surely you can recognise the “Sources please” as equivalent to someone in a conversation over a coffee listening to something interesting but novel to him and saying “That’s an interesting view. Never heard it before. Where do you get it from?”.”

    Of course I do. It is absurd to ask for sources to each argument. What I mean is that Wiz asking for sources is making a similar absurd thing.

    Asking for sources for any disputed topic is just a fake argumentation trick, i.e., you try to imply that the argument is not sound as it has no sources. But the nature of any disputed topic is that it cannot be solved by using sources: there are sources for and against and the truth of the topic is not clarified by looking at which source is in a more esteemed publication and which in less. I think Ron Unz’s present article makes it perfectly clear: he mentions that Bendersky uses primary sources but gets a false result, and he discusses a less respectable source, Oliver, who Unz thinks has some correct points, yet the source is not a good one.

    No disputed topic can be solved from sources. An argument must be based on logical reasoning. Any argument of the real world must use as some facts or claims as the starting point, but each of the facts or claims used needs to be checked. Therefore, a strong argument, should use as few external facts as possible. It follows that there should be as few sources as possible, and preferably these sources are not named as the facts that are used should preferably be commonly accepted. Ideally you should not need any sources, only commonly known facts and what logically follows.

    Let us take the Holocaust death toll as an example. Do we know it by a reference to Raoul Hilberg, who calculated it as 5.1-5.2 million? Or from the Jewish World Almanac giving 4.4 million, or from Reitlinger 4.1-4.5 million, or from any of the authors who calculate it to 5.7-6 million? Clearly, if there are many different numbers, at most one of these authors is correct, and it is not by voting how many hits some number gets. Thus, it is absurd to e.g. say that Hilberg is the monumental classic and you should go line by line through the work and show where he goes wrong. As the death tolls are different, all but one must go wrong and very possibly all do. (Actually Reitlinger and Almanac get the correct number, if Jewish population figures in the Soviet Union are accepted, but the Soviet figures are almost certainly wrong, so all of these estimates are false).

    So, we cannot solve the Holocaust death toll by giving sources. Can we then solve the problem of the effect of secret societies in the time spell from 1750 to 1914 in Europe by using sources? I say absolutely not. When the question is of secret societies, which at that time were really secret, we have very meager information that has leaked from different sources. This question can only be solved by studying it for a long time and putting small bits together, judging each small bit of information carefully. The result is an argument. An argument has justification, which often is very long but can certainly be given to someone interested in this topic. (Ideally this somebody would finally come to the same conclusion after judging these small information bits, but if he has an agenda not to agree, he will not agree and there is nothing you can do. So, an argument is a good one if another honest and clever researcher can be convinced by it, but how do you know who is honest and clever? And this is so even in mathematics. How do you force someone to admit that the argument is correct if he insists it is not and does not explain why?)

    What bits of information to use in an argument is your choice: in a strong argument there should be as few external facts as possible because the argument depends on their correctness. It is possible indeed to track Freemason subversive activity during 1750-1872 (Paris Commune) and even up to 1914. The Wikipedia, Masonic own sources and similar common sources are reasonably good on Masons. These are common knowledge and therefore you should not give a source to a particular text. That particular text cannot prove that the claim is correct, you have to check all texts to prove a claim from sources. This is why facts used in an argument should mainly be commonly accepted facts: everybody who knows something of the topic accepts that Memphis and Mizraim lodges were revolutionary. The rest of my argument is similar. It gets to claims that Wiz does not accept as he has not studied the topic, but Wiz does not accept that WTC7 fell by explosives, so that does not mean anything.

    It is fully absurd for Wiz to ask for sources in this case. If he wants to know how a specific claim is argued, then he should ask how do you get this claim, and then I probably would explain it, unless it is too long to explain here. But such a claim should be specified. It can, for instance, be, how do you know that Frankists were the first Jews to join Freemasonry. Then I would explain that they were not the first Jews, but the first important Jews for the revolutionary Masonry and go to quotes from Jacob Frank’s work. But that will be long. It is even longer to show the banker involvement.

    I did not want to write a long explanation like this to garble the thread, but I thought that Wiz needs an answer to his request of sources. Thus, I wrote what every intelligent person should understand, but as you wrote what you wrote, I am forced to explain this in the long way.

    • Replies: @Anon
    You really do have a talent for prolix missing the point. Does it not occur to you to test a person's credit by finding out what he thinks is credible and persuasive? Suppose he mentions a source which is notorious for having been proved fraudulent. Is it of no interest to you,?
  263. Anonymous [AKA "Derek1925"] says:

    Dear Ron Unz, Have just read your article on “Outrage by U.S.Military” as well as your previous virulent anti-Jewish articles on the Jewish religion and I notice an inconsistency.

    Whereas other mildly critical posts, authors, books are censored, deplatformed and shut down by Jewish controlled media and utilities or targeted for court action by AIPAC and the ADL among many other Jewish organizations that seek to eradicate any “anti-semitic” opinions, your Unz Review sails on untouched. I think this is strange.

    Are you and your journal what used to be known as a “Stalking Horse”, set up to entice closet anti-jewish writers and thinkers to reveal themselves so that lists can be made for future use?

    I have no use for religions of any sort let alone the granddaddy that spawned the Christian and Moslem subsects. I think it hillarious that Jews should believe they are the only ones with souls and the goyim are no better than cattle. Now that is CHUTZPAH.

    Yours truly, Derek1925

    • Replies: @Wally
    LOL

    I remind you that www.codoh.com is still up & running.

    Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust is not exactly friends of the Usual Enemies of Free Speech.

    According your logic anyone inviting comments and discussion on subjects that profit Zionists are doing nothing more than gathering data for Big Brother.

    So let's all just surrender and get it over with.

    , @peterAUS

    Are you and your journal what used to be known as a “Stalking Horse”, set up to entice closet anti-jewish writers and thinkers to reveal themselves so that lists can be made for future use?
     
    Yes.
    Not the most important reason, though.
  264. j2 says:
    @Mefobills
    WW1 was largely because England could not compete with Germany's Industrial Capitalism.

    This form of economy was mixed, with social safety nets. State Credit channeled into industry, thus building up industry to compete and then surpass England.

    England's system was Finance Capitalism, which came into being in 1694 with advent of Bank of England. BOE in turn was Jewish in conception... a state sponsored usury system, with bank stock issued to stock holders (many of who were our Sephardic friends out of Amsterdam.) This is a private stock owned bank issuing bank credit, where said credit goes into " markets" and owns companies. Companies in turn are owned by tied finance, and the country becomes subordinate to this finance method.

    Germany had inverted this scheme, where the polity was "over" finance, and controlled finance. Jealous men in western democracies, who fancied themselves god, or "god's chosen people" were violently opposed to the Industrial Capitalism of Germany. Frederich List learned this Industrial Capitalism method from Henry Carey and the American System, which was resurrected by Peshine Smith in the U.S.

    Germany popped into being on the world stage, and was kicking everybody's ass, except America's - and America was also using Industrial Capitalism up until the progressive era of 1913, when the banksters ran their game to takeover the country.

    GERMANY WAS IN OPPOSITION TO THE BANKSTERS OF THE WEST. This is why Germany was repeatedly attacked.

    With regards to international finance funding Germany, that is NOT factual if you follow the money.

    On May 1, 1933 Hitler outlined the first Reinhardt program, a four year plan to end unemployment by attack on several fronts:
    1) Spend 1 billion marks of employment credit bills
    2) Tax benefits for industry, agriculture, and the employment of domestic help
    3) Marriage bonus loans of 1000 marks
    4) Government control of money and capital markets

    May 31'st
    5) 1 Billion marks of short term public works bills

    Many of these bills never made it to Reichsbank for rediscount as they paid interest and were an incentive for private banks to hold.

    Various authors estimate new purchasing power in bill form introduced into German economy of around 15 billion marks.

    This was definitely NOT international bankster money, but instead Germany's own credit.
    Germany was gold deficient, and at that time in history, the world issued bank credit on top of gold.

    In other words, this whole Hitler was an agent of the Rothschilds or part of the New World Order, does not fly. People that make these sort of statements (like Henry Makow) are not monetarily literate.

    Germany separated from (((international capital))) which was their great sin; that and running an industrial capitalism economy which kicked England's butt.

    “In other words, this whole Hitler was an agent of the Rothschilds or part of the New World Order, does not fly.”

    I understand your argument and it is a good one. However, there is a different argument that does not follow the money and leads to a different result. These arguments should be both considered and they probably are not in actual contradiction but in apparent contradiction only. This is not the correct thread to look at this problem deeply, so I let it be. I only outline the other argument:

    In 1942 Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Kalischer said that Jews would return to Palestine in 100 years from 1940 and that Rothschild and Cremieux would make it, and if the Jews would not go volontarily, they would be pushed there with lots of suffering. 100 years from 1940 is 1939/40. Both Rothschild and Cremieux were Freemasons and from Mordecai Noah and others we know that Masons did want Jews to be restored to Palestine. Wagner’s circle started spreading antisemitism at the same time when Zionists started looking for a homeland. Several Masons, like Henry Ford, were spreading antisemitism and Protocols apparently comes from Theosophists, an esoteric society with strong Masonic connections. Theosophist and Mizraim Freemason Sebottendorf joins the German order and splits from it Thule Society, which founds the party (DAP) to become the Nazi party. From these I conclude that pre-Zionists made a plan for restoring Jews to Palestine around 1840. They worked on this plan since that time. They got a promise of Palestine in the First World War.We know that in the WWI a Jewish minister was responsible for finding finance for Germany’s war effort. That is why WWI become a long war.

    So, this was all before Hitler and before the finance of Hitler’s Germany. From these events before Hitler we already can say that pre-Zionists (Rothschild, Freemasons, some kabbalists, some Communists) created with the help of Masonic forces an antisemitic society Thule for the purpose of pushing Jews to Palestine starting around 1939/40.

    Then to Hitler.

    [MORE]

    German army send Hitler to spy on DAP. Does a spy sent to spy a group ever become converted to the group’s goals. No, an infiltrator stays as an infiltrator. But Hitler was not an infiltrator, he believed in Nazi ideas. We can conclude that German army on purpose sent Hitler to DAP to be a leader in that party and to create from DAP a strong party for political purposes. These purposes included driving Jews out of Europe, else Hitler would not have been sent to DAP, which had the antisemitism for the Thule Society. Hitler has a book outlined in his library: Jews must be restored to Palestine.
    I conclude from this that the Nazi party was created for the purpose of pushing Jews to Palestine and Hitler was selected by some important people to be the leader of this party.

    Your counterarguments are answered in 1) and 2):
    1) In the WWI time England opposed Germany’s economic power. That England’s economy was in Jewish control, while Germany’s was not in Jewish control. To this we may say, in Germany there were many rich Jews at the time of the WWI. If the goal was an economic war fought as real war, then if would have been British+British Jews against Germans + German Jews. This was not the case. A long war was decided on. The result of this long war was that three kings fell, Communists got to power in Russia, Europe had a war to finish all wars, and the USA become a power. These were Masonic goals. And Jews got the Belfour declaration and bankers on both sides made money.
    Therefore I cannot see WWI as a war between British+Jewish bankers and German bankers. These German bankers included many Jews at that time.

    2) Your second argument is that the finance of Hitler’s Germany did not come from Jews. This is correct. Also Hitler’s funding when he rose to power came largely from the sales of his book. I do not accept the argument that Hitler was funded to power by American Jews. But Hitler was put to power with the help of the German army, and he joined a party founded by a Freemason Sebottendorf of the revolutionary rite of Mizraim. The very clear plan of pushing Jews to Palestine by antisemitism was in force long before Hitler become an antisemite. If Hitler did not consciously cooperate in this plan, then at least Rudolf Hess did. Thule was created by Masonic forces (though opposing the normal Freemasons, but Theosophy is Masonic, at this time subversive Masonry did not work through Freemason lodges an more) for the explicit goal of pushing Jews to Palestine. Nothing in the finance of Hitler’s Germany changes this fact.

    You say that Rothschild did not finance Hitler or Hitler’s Germany. I fully agree with this, but Rothschild did finance Zionism. As the Thule Society was an enemy created by Freemasons and needed by Zionists, we cannot remove Rothschild from this equation. He did not finance Hitler, but Hitler was to do a task for Zionists, and that was largely to Rothschild.

    So, this is the other argument. We can discuss it in some other time. You can think about it.

    • Replies: @Anon
    "You can think about it". Or stop thinking about it and preserve your sanity.
  265. @Corvinus
    Whenever Vox Day chimes in that "just about everything you think you know about 20th century history is wrong", you can be certain that he is engaging in a campaign of deception. That is what "sigmas" do.

    The U.S. military had direct evidence after 1942 that the Germans had embarked on the "Final Solution". But destroying the Nazi machinery of death was not on its radar. Behind-the-scenes requests by Jewish leaders and the U.S. War Refugee Board for intervention were not heeded. Perhaps the government was concerned that the Nazi Regime would exploit such intervention for propaganda gains. Right or wrong, the military also insisted it could not divert resources from what it deemed as more vital objectives--the destruction of German military and industrial targets (Dresden, anyone)--and that they lacked the sophistication to liquidate the death camps with lethal
    precision.

    It is other than surprising that the American reluctance to intervene directly to stop the Holocaust remains a deeply contested issue.

    It is other than surprising that the American reluctance to intervene directly to stop the Holocaust remains a deeply contested issue.

    That is a crappy and discredit narrative – as if there was an Hollowcaust stated as fact and then discuss what follows from it – a fallacy. Not only that, there appears an accusation that the US Government had an obligation to declare war on Germany because of an alleged (and perhaps false) accusation. Why such obligation? Because the alleged victims were Jews, therefore there is that obligation to protect them – but to hell with everyone else.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Of course there was a Holocaust, as there are reams of documentary evidence, from eyewitness accounts to footage to correspondence.

    Do you relish being ignorant?
  266. @Desert Fox
    There is a recent book about the deliberate 2 hour attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 and wounded 174 out of a crew of 294 and the attack was only stopped when a Russia destroyer came upon the scene, the book is Blood In the Water, can be had at Barnes and Noble or Amazon.

    Thanks DFox. Didn’t know about the Russian destroyer. Did the Soviets denounce the event publicly?

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
    I am not sure, but there is another book that came out some years ago by USS Liberty survivor Philip Tourney called What I Saw That Day, can be had on Amazon, however now is fairly expensive, but I read it years ago and it is a great book, maybe it can read on line somewhere.
  267. @Republic
    Just as White nationalists have to discuss and understand the Jewish Question, they also have to understand the Christian Question

    Here is what Dr William Luther Pierce, the late White Nationalist leader had to say about Christianity and White Nationalism:

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2010/10/on-christianity/


    The most important single fact concerning Christianity with which the Alliance must deal is that all the major Christian churches, Catholic and Protestant, liberal and fundamentalist, have openly aligned themselves with the enemies of the White race. The Catholics and the liberal Protestants are vigorously supporting racial mixing, while the fundamentalist Protestants are strong boosters of Zionism. These alignments will become increasingly important factors in our struggle in the years ahead, as the churches become more and more involved in social and political issues. The Jews have already announced their intention to mobilize fundamentalist Christians in their effort to maintain control of the U.S. government. The Alliance cannot remain silent in the face of such developments, for the sake of White unity or anything else.

     

    I’ll answer the “Christian Question” in a sentence: Christianity is a moral code, not a theocracy.

  268. @Wizard of Oz
    Why did the SS cause so much destruction at Auschwicz? What was it covering up?

    – ‘Auschwitz destroyed’ my ass.
    It certainly was not as that profitable Fantasy Theme Park that rakes in the cash will attest.

    – There were no homicidal gas chambers to destroy none, and you have no proof they existed and of course you cannot tell us how they supposedly worked.

    Of course a fake “gas chamber” was built AFTER the war by the Soviets. Oops!

    And then, if you think the SS destroyed ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz then why did the SS supposedly leave behind fully intact alleged ‘gas chambers’ at the Majdanek camp? The SS had plenty of time to do so if they wished before the Communists arrived.

    – The absurdly impossible “holocaust” narrative now says, after many damning story changes, that ca. 1,250,000 Jews and hundreds of thousands of others at Auschwitz were gassed, cremated, and the remains buried in allegedly known places at Auschwitz. Yet we see no such human remains there. Please show then to us.

    The alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewed and demolished here.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11143&p=83723&hilit=model+asmarques#p83723

    http://www.codoh.com

  269. @S
    There are numerous close parallels between the US Civil War and WWII...ie both wars were perceived existential threats by quazi 'nationalist' enemies to the respective existance of the flagship states of first Capitalism, ie the United States, with the Civil War (1861-1865), and Communism, ie the Soviet Union, in regards to WWII, and the German war with it (1941-1945)

    Both the Confederacy and Germany mid war experienced dual catastrophic defeats while at the heighth of their power and invading their enemy, ie Gettysburg and Vicksburg for the South, and the paralleling Stalingrad and El Alemein for the Germans.

    Both the South and Germany had a hoped for 'redoubt' to continue the struggle into the Spring and Summer, the 'Alpine' for the Germans in '45, and the 'Trans-Mississippi' for the South in '65.

    The primary surrender dates in the Spring of '65 and '45 are within literal days of each other.

    And of course there were the mentioned accusations regarding 'the camps' and 'crimes against humanity' against both tbe South and the Germans at the end.

    I say 'perceived existential threat' as in reality neither the South nor Germany ever had any real chance of defeating their respective Capitalist or Communist foe. Clark Gable's little speech in Gone With the Wind about overwhelming Northern industrial might and resources was largely true.

    Similarly, WT Stead, a close associate of Cecil Rhodes, in a 1902 book calculated that the US/UK bloc had three times the wealth and economic resources of the combined French, Russian, and German empires.

    Those figures for the US/UK were still probably largely true in June, 1941, and it was the US/UK Capitalist bloc which was fully behind the Communist Soviet Union once the German invasion of it commenced.

    I've heard it said had the Soviet lines solidly broke that the US was prepared to send large numbers of its own troops to fill the gaps, and I think it's likely true. Similarly, had somehow the Southerners looked poised to defeat the North, I have little doubt the British Empire would have directly intervened to save the North.

    Both the United States and Soviet Union were too important at that stage of things in the manufactured and contrived dialectic of Capitalist vs Communist (in place since 1776 and 1789) to let them fall by the wayside.

    Now that the 'anti-thesis' of Communism has been brought down with 'the Fall of Communism', ie the economic and financial collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc, a very top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting, the worker being worthy of his wages those behind these things tell themselves; similarly we should expect to see the 'thesis' of Capitalism brought down, the 'Fall of Capitalism', in the form of the financial and economic collapse of the US/UK bloc, also to be a top-down affair accompanied with much economic looting.

    This will all make way for the 'synthesis', ie the 'convergance' of Capitalism and Communism to form global Multi-culturalism, and a global super-state to be called the 'United States of the World'/'World Union' or some such, aka the 'New Rome', in theory a democratic republic, though probably in reality like the post republic Rome of old, a dictatorship having a rubber stamp 'senate', and with its economic basis being slavery, ie wage slavery, aka so called 'cheap labor', with the global capital most likely located in Jerusalem.

    The long planned for WWIII will almost certainly be a major catalyst in bringing this final vision about.

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    This will all make way for the ‘synthesis’, ie the ‘convergance’ of Capitalism and Communism to form global Multi-culturalism, and a global super-state to be called the ‘United States of the World’/’World Union’

    You take Hegel too seriously, the metaphysical equivalente to the action-reaction of the physical world. I’m not an expert in this field but my view is that Communism and Capitalism are not the opposites of a Hegelian dialectic since each one contains its own contradiction, eg. Capitalism creates a proletariat, its nemesis to bring about Communism. Hence Capitalism’s efforts to eliminate the proletariat, its negation, partly successful so far through its conversion to financial/imperial Capitalism. Lenin had already noted the transformation of Capitalism to its new model.

    Anyway, I don’t see a fundamental difference between the two modes of economic development except for the ownership of the means of production and the ultimate goal of the national economy. Under Capitalism the economy is geared to produce profits for the financial/investor class; in Communism the economy works to satisfy the material and spiritual needs of the people as a whole. But the process (the nuts and bolts) in both productive systems is the same, the minor difference being the employees/workers participation in the management of the enterprises.

    No contradictions there to apply Hegel or his upside-down version, Marx.

    • Replies: @S
    Regarding the Hegelian Dialectic (ie thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis, aka problem, reaction, solution, etc) I don't particularly subscribe to it myself as a 'science' of how things move along historically, however, there are those who certainly do at present, and have thought so in the past, or something similar, so I find it useful, even necessary, to mention.

    Like yourself I'm not an expert in this field either.

    'Anyway, I don’t see a fundamental difference between the two modes of economic development except for the ownership of the means of production...But the process (the nuts and bolts) in both productive systems is the same, the minor difference being the employees/workers participation in the management of the enterprises.'
     
    I entirely concur.

    Broadly speaking, Capitalism and Communism, are not the 'polar opposites' that they might seem to be in a certain shallow sense, but rather are closely paralleling, even more broadly still one could say, 'complimentary', the one with its emphasis on an artificial hyper-individualism, the other with its emphasis on an artificial hyper-collectivism.

    It might shock 'true believers' of either Capitalism or Communism (not suggesting you're either) just how closely these systems do parallel each other were they to closely examine the matter.

    [I explore this subject in depth at a post from another site linked below.]

    But should these parallels be that surprising in light of the fact that 'Founding Fathers', of the Capitalist 1776 American Revolution, ie its heaviest hitters, such as Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, apparently Benjamin Franklin as well, amongst likely others, were also 'Founding Fathers' of the nascent Communist 1789 French Revolution?

    Seems a bit incongruous, and odd, finding the creators of the 1776 Capitalist American Revolution, with its first flag that same year being the multi-national corporation British East India Company flag (aka 'Grand Union' flag) to symbolize it [and with it also that same year the 'Capitalist bible' being published in Britain, ie Adam Smith's book The Wealth of Nations] being also heavily involved in the creation and construction of the 1789 Communist French Revolution.

    [It's also seemingly incongruous how the British Empire's capital city London since 1776 and 1789 has historically operated as something of a central clearing house for both Capitalist and Communist revolutions across the globe, whether it be British Whig party members openly supporting the Capitalist 1776 American Revolution there without receiving official censure, or Karl Marx freely and without molestation advocating the Communist overthrow of various nations from that same capital city. As long as England itself was more or less left out of the picture, these would be Capitalist and Communist revolutionaries seemed to have historically been given a 'green light' to act freely there.]

    It was the latter 1789 French Revolution of course which introduced to the world 'the Commune', the 'political commissar', 'counter-revolution', the 'Whites', in time 'Red republicanism', and the mass arrests and executions of the 'Great Terror'...the same revolution which in time that Soviet Communism would evolve from.

    Not surprisingly, the seat of the nascent Communist revolution, Paris, has an entire city square named 'Stalingrad' to honor that city's Soviet defenders.

    A person might say since 1776 and 1789 that this is all just 'good will towards man' at work, 'progressivism' as expressed in its establishment 'right' and 'left' modes. However, in my life I've found people in general just aren't that altruistic, and that very often, even with 'enlightened self-interest', a concept I myself very much believe in, there are ulterior motives.

    I also very much believe that in politics things just don't happen by chance and that there are no coincidences.

    Regarding the more purely Anglo-Saxon aspect of these things, a major aspect indeed, amongst others, one finds on the eve of this what I submit has been a manufactured and contrived dialectic since 1776 and 1789, a victorious British Empire that at the conclusion of the Seven Years War in 1763 was already entering into the realm of global hegemony.

    It will be recalled at the conclusion of that global war that French power in North America had been smashed, Spain was already entering into a period of steep decline with only nominal control of its territory north of the Rio Grande, and the stone age Indian tribes present there had little hope of succesfully resisting encroachment.

    More or less the whole of North America was therefore open for the taking by the British Empire and with its conquest, the ultimate dream of most empires, ie the obtainment of total world power, would be within reach.

    [The conquest of North America would be the key. The question then for the power elites and hangers on involved would be just exactly how to go about this grab for total power all whilst simultanously encountering as little opposition from the rest of the world as possible. The conquest of North America accompanied with strategic deception, ie a false split between the US and UK under cover of the 1776 Revolution, would fulfil this need nicely. See the New Rome and the remarkable Belcher Foundation series of articles linked below for insight into this subject.]

    Enter in 'coincidentally' at about that same time what (I submit) from the beginning has been a manufactured, contrived, and controlled dialectic, the 1776 American Capitalist Revolution, and the 1789 French nascent Communist Revolution.

    And now, after almost some two hundred and fifty years of global Capitalist and Communist Revolution and strife, and two world wars, we now find ourselves on the cusp of a third world war where billions of people may very well likely die.

    How did things come to this?

    'The defection of Marseilles soon produced that of Lyons. This important city became the central point of the counter revolution in the South…'

    http://images.rarenewspapers.com/ebayimgs/8.24.2007/image071.jpg

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/revolution_and_counter_revolution

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    http://www.belcherfoundation.org/camerica.htm

    http://www.belcherfoundation.org/trilateral_governor.htm

    http://www.belcherfoundation.org/trilateral_center.htm
  270. @jbwilson24
    "On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back."

    Good luck with that.

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.

    I think the tooth fairy exists as well.

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.

    Thank you for that reference. It’s a field of personal interest (major in Sociology of Organizations). Appreciate if you might give more details/links. I’ll try on the web but I’m presently in a remote region with poor access.

  271. It is not a terribly well-guarded secret that US military intelligence coopted the Organisation Gehlen (erstwhile German intelligence) in 1945 not because they were so good (though they were) or well liked (heh) but because every last one of their own (((agents))) in Europe had become worse than useless in one swoop. Draw your own conclusions.

    IOW Saint Joseph of Wisconsin was onto something, but he couldn´t very well
    say “Hitler was right after all”.

    – As for the abovementioned jews in the Wehrmacht: Two field marshals, fifteen generals and at least 22 bearers of the Oak Leaves; and not no-names, but the likes of Adm. Rogge (OC of Kiel at war´s end) and Gen. Heinrici (OC of Berlin at war´s end). Again, go figure.
    Did I mention that Adolf Eichmann was the SS liaison to Feivel Polkes of the Haganah who received guns and training in agriculture and small-unit action ? 😛

  272. Hail says: • Website
    @Dube
    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece - would he look to trim Ron's 12,500?

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?

    Johannes Gutenberg would like to know. Not that it would stop him from pressing on.

    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece – would he look to trim Ron’s 12,500?

    Ron Unz’s articles are not meant to be bite-sized “takes.” He does not blog or tweet. The beauty of this 12,500-word article is that those with the discipline to follow it through to the end will be rewarded, almost as a well-made movie does, weaving together several narratives into a coherent whole, and what may well be called a surprise ending.

    As for length, it is true that 12,500 words is long. If a good reading speed is 300+ wpm, a 12,500-word piece takes 40 minutes to consume fully (that is, for content; reading for comprehension/absorption and excl. any use skimming). At a more leisurely <250wpm, it would be 50 to 55 minutes.

    Those with the discipline to sit and read an well-researched, thoughtful article like this for (say) 45 minutes, can really learn a lot. Imagine instead looking a random Youtube video using one or more of the keywords from this article, and watching that for 45 minutes, something a lot of people do.

    (Here, e.g., is an appearance of Joseph Bendersky, the central figure of this article, somewhere on Youtube, on a panel on a 2015 panel called “The Future of History;” he sits beside somebody named Jonathan Israel [“Main Interests: …European Jews”]. I don’t have the discipline to watch their entire panel, which probably runs an hour, but I guarantee there is substantially less ‘there’ than in this Ron Unz article.)

    So I would ask again, Which yields a better result: 45 minutes of reading a carefully prepared Ron Unz article, or 45 minutes flailing around Youtube trying to find some kind of comparable material? (This on my mind given a recent Anatoly Karlin article on the subject.)

    • Replies: @Dube
    Hail, thanks for your reply. I dismiss neither the article nor your appreciation. I expect that Mr. Unz himself might wonder what a good and fierce editor might trim to get 10k. Such insistence does occur. Ron mentioned that figure himself in reference to a particular editor. My conceit of having J. Gutenberg ask the question assumes that he would not have trimmed, say, the Bible.
  273. @Dube
    The editor who regretted that few US writers can do a 10,000 word piece - would he look to trim Ron's 12,500?

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?

    Johannes Gutenberg would like to know. Not that it would stop him from pressing on.

    On what sort of screen is such work being read? Does that sort out to age groups?

    OT but haw; perhaps more people should use ‘oldie but goldie’ proper PCs, fiddling around with a 1ffs pasd [= one-finger flat-screen personal anti-social device] could send you blind.

    • Replies: @Dube

    haw; perhaps more people should use ‘oldie but goldie’ proper PCs, fiddling around with a 1ffs pasd [= one-finger flat-screen personal anti-social device] could send you blind.
     
    Skrik, as a long-ago circulation manager I do wonder how oldie/goldie we are here at UR. But that's more a quantitative query than qualitative. It becomes a question of how the qualities can be distributed to the quantities. Now there's a Haw for you I hope. (Uh, no, I'm not looking for work.)
  274. @NoseytheDuke
    True, but who comes out of the exchange appearing genuine and who was exposed as a wanker? Hint: It's not you who appears genuine. Stop it, before you go blind.

    I didn’t even realize there was an exchange.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    You are correct. MEFOBILLS contributed information while you contributed nothing.
  275. @jbwilson24
    "On the contrary, I think individualism and strong willed, determined inquisition for truth in the advancement of human consciousness is what we need to beat this beast back."

    Good luck with that.

    Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Schultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SImulation, 16(2013), 1–16.

    I think the tooth fairy exists as well.

    Got it! Here’s the summary. The full study is easy to access through your reference for any one interested.

    “Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation. By tracking evolution across time, we find individual differences between evolving worlds in terms of early humanitarian competition with ethnocentrism, including early stages of humanitarian dominance. Our evidence indicates that such variation, in terms of differences between humanitarian and ethnocentric agents, is normally distributed and due to early, rather than later, stochastic differences in immigrant strategies.”

    I highlighted the findings which, no surprise, explains why Jewry – the epitome of ethnocentrism – is/becoming the dominant ethny/race. The humanitarians are not far behind and, given favourable cultural inputs (eg. a little dose of nationalism) could be the best choice. Sounds like “Socialism in One Country” to me.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    The humanitarians are not far behind and, given favourable cultural inputs (eg. a little dose of nationalism) could be the best choice.
     
    The best choice is obviously international white ethnocentrism. A little dose of nationalism is fine as long as the whole race realises the gravity of the situation and embraces in-group cooperation.

    Your own quoted study suggests that humanitarianism towards out-groups can be exploited. Still, it can work if the goyim across the world figure out which particular global (((out-group))) stands in opposition to all of them.