The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: Anne Frank, Sirhan Sirhan, and AIDS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


As an heir to the most famous political family in modern American history, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is hardly an obscure individual, and recent events have greatly elevated his national prominence.

Although he had spent most of his career as a highly-successful environmental attorney, during the early 2000s he gradually became involved with the grassroots movement questioning the safety and efficacy of our proliferating vaccines, a cause widely ridiculed or ignored by our national elites but increasingly resonating with many worried families.

Then the sudden Covid epidemic moved public health issues to the absolute center of the political debate, including the highly controversial steps taken to control the disease. For the first time in history, most Americans were suddenly subjected to lockdowns, which imposed severe restrictions upon their freedom of movement and assembly, and although these were originally presented as temporary measures expected to last only a couple of weeks, across much of the country they actually remained in place for a year or longer. Moreover, the permanent solution proposed for the crisis was the largest mass-vaccination drive in world history, with the leading vaccines relying upon a new and relatively untested mRNA biotechnology developed by our profit-hungry pharmaceutical giants, a situation that raised deep suspicions among many citizens.

ORDER IT NOW

Given these developments, the once marginal anti-vaxxing movement suddenly exploded onto the national stage, cutting across many existing political, social, and ideological fault-lines and encompassing perhaps 20-30% of America’s population, with Kennedy and his Children’s Health Defense non-profit soon becoming leading champions of these fearful individuals. Despite lacking any media coverage or a promotional advertising campaign, his book The Real Anthony Fauci sold over 500,000 copies by early January, spending two months on the Amazon bestseller list, much of that time at the very top.

The media establishment regards our vaccination drive as an absolutely crucial national priority and is intensely hostile to those who challenge it, so Kennedy soon became one of its leading villains. In mid-December, a team of six journalists and researchers at the Associated Press unleashed a ferocious 4,000 word assault, followed a few weeks later by a similar critique in leftist Counterpunch. But both these pieces attacked Kennedy on rather mundane grounds, claiming that his anti-vaccination arguments were wrong, dangerous, and possibly financially motivated, and neither gained much attention, nor seemed to damage his popular momentum.

When the media targets an individual, it monitors his every utterance, seeking the slightest opening to vilify him, and last week an opportunity came as Kennedy spoke before a crowd of 30,000 anti-vaxxers at a rally in Washington, DC. Indulging in overly-heated rhetoric, he declared “We have witnessed over the last 20 months a coup d’état against democracy, and the controlled demolition of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.” He further suggested that that government requirements for vaccinations and mandates were imposing “fascism” on our society, with families having nowhere to escape: “Even in Hitler’s Germany, you could cross the Alps to Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”

In our deeply secular society, Nazi Germany has replaced Satan as the epitome of pure evil, while Anne Frank—a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war—has been elevated to the status of a sacred martyr. Although drawing such historical analogies is hardly uncommon in political rhetoric, it can sometimes produce angry reactions, especially if these are orchestrated by a hostile media, and Kennedy’s supposedly scandalous references immediately provoked a firestorm of critical coverage, soon leading him to apologize.

With Kennedy’s enemies fanning the flames, his brief reference to the sad fate of a girl who died three generations ago may have received a hundred times more media coverage than the large rally he had headlined or the huge sales of his national bestseller. When the media seeks to destroy someone’s reputation, it will react with hair-trigger reflexes to his slightest misstep.

 

Yet oddly enough, the same media organs that created a major national controversy out of a few ill-chosen words at a political rally had previously allowed certain of Kennedy’s other, seemingly far greater vulnerabilities to pass almost entirely unnoticed.

These days being labeled a “conspiracy theorist” is a particularly serious charge, with the slur suggesting dangerous mental illness, and surely stigmatizing Kennedy in such a manner would have been an ideal means of discrediting him. But although the author had publicly proclaimed himself a conspiracy theorist of the most explicit sort last month, almost all our hostile journalists carefully averted their eyes.

In the 1960s the conspiratorial term of abuse was first applied to those who challenged the official story that President Kennedy had died at the hands of a deranged lone gunman, and was later broadened to include the many other assassinations that soon followed, including that of the president’s own brother. And on December 8th, nearly the entire Forum page of the San Francisco Chronicle was filled by a Kennedy column arguing that his father Sen. Robert F. Kennedy had been slain by a group of secret conspirators, with the convicted gunman merely being an innocent patsy who should finally be released from prison.

ORDER IT NOW

Yet although Kennedy’s legion of media critics attacked him on almost all other grounds, fair or unfair, they carefully avoided that seemingly easy means of branding him as delusional. The long AP attack that ran a week later mentioned not a word, nor did the January Counterpunch piece. As a consequence, I doubt whether more than a tiny slice of the public is aware that Kennedy is a “conspiracy theorist.”

The obvious reason for this strange media reticence was that Kennedy’s position was very solidly grounded in hard factual evidence. In 2018 I drew upon some of the material in David Talbot’s widely-praised 2008 book Brothers to describe the strange aspects of the assassination.

If the first two dozen pages of the Talbot book completely overturned my understanding of the JFK assassination, I found the closing section almost equally shocking. With the Vietnam War as a political millstone about his neck, President Johnson decided not to seek reelection in 1968, opening the door to a last minute entry into the Democratic race by Robert Kennedy, who overcame considerable odds to win some important primaries. Then on June 4, 1968, he carried gigantic winner-take-all California, placing him on an easy path to the nomination and the presidency itself, at which point he would finally be in a position to fully investigate his brother’s assassination. But minutes after his victory speech, he was shot and fatally wounded, allegedly by another lone gunman, this time a disoriented Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan, supposedly outraged over Kennedy’s pro-Israel public positions, although these were no different than those expressed by most other political candidates in America.

All this was well known to me. However, I had not known that powder burns later proved that the fatal bullet had been fired directly behind Kennedy’s head from a distance of three inches or less although Sirhan was standing several feet in front of him. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony and acoustic evidence indicated that at least twelve bullets were fired although Sirhan’s revolver could hold only eight, and a combination of these factors led longtime LA Coroner Dr. Thomas Naguchi, who conducted the autopsy, to claim in his 1983 memoir that there was likely a second gunman. Meanwhile, eyewitnesses also reported seeing a security guard with his gun drawn standing immediately behind Kennedy during the attack, and that individual happened to have a deep political hatred of the Kennedys. The police investigators seemed uninterested in these highly suspicious elements, none of which came to light during the trial. With two Kennedy brothers now dead, neither any surviving members of the family nor most of their allies and retainers had any desire to investigate the details of this latest assassination, and in a number of cases they soon moved overseas, abandoning the country entirely. JFK’s widow Jackie confided in friends that she was terrified for the lives of her children, and quickly married Aristotle Onassis, a Greek billionaire, whom she felt would be able to protect them.

Over the years, the 1968 Robert Kennedy assassination has attracted merely a sliver of the books and research devoted to the earlier killing of his elder brother in Dallas, and Talbot’s text spent only a few pages sketching out the strong evidence that the convicted gunman was merely an innocent dupe, manipulated by the true conspirators. But in 2018, two additional books appeared that were entirely focused on the case.

ORDER IT NOW

A Lie Too Big To Fail by longtime journalist and conspiracy researcher Lisa Pease ran 500 pages and covered the events of that fatal California evening in exhaustive detail, winning the endorsements of filmmaker Oliver Stone and renowned JFK researcher James W. Douglass. When I read it a few months ago, I found the huge volume of material quite useful but felt that it relied too heavily upon the recollections of eyewitnesses, which can easily grow attenuated over the decades. I was also disturbed to note that the text sometimes seemed to gradually transform reasonable suspicions into apparent certainties, eventually arguing that 3-4 different gunmen were probably firing at the presidential candidate that evening while Sirhan’s own gun had held only blanks.

At the very end, the author also veered off into building castles in the air with regard to other assassinations, arguing that Oswald probably had multiple personalities and that Jack Ruby was operating under a post-hypnotic suggestion, thinly documented claims that seriously weakened her credibility, as did her earlier suggestion that John Lennon had been killed by a government-programmed assassin in 1980 for his past criticism of the Vietnam War. Sometimes less is better, and I think that Pease’s book would have been much stronger if it had been heavily edited and substantially cut. All those extraneous elements should have been left on the cutting-room floor rather than distracting from the central evidence she provided regarding the existence of an RFK assassination conspiracy and Sirhan’s likely innocence.

ORDER IT NOW

Meanwhile, The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy by Tim Tate and the Brad Johnson was released that same year and suffered from none of these flaws. The two conspiracy researchers had spent some 25 years heavily involved in the case, and although their volume was only around half the length of the Pease book, it seemed a far more effective treatment of the topic, including eyewitness accounts but focused primarily upon the undeniable physical and forensic evidence while avoiding any damaging bouts of unwarranted speculation.

While working at CNN, one of the authors had originally obtained the audiotape establishing the number of shots fired, which probably constitutes the single strongest piece of evidence in the case. The book analyzed and evaluated that crucial item in tremendous detail, and also focused upon the fatal shot, which was fired at point-blank range from behind the candidate while Sirhan, the supposed gunman, was standing several feet in front. But since both the publisher and the lead author were British, the work seems to have received much less attention in this country, and I only discovered and read it after Kennedy cited it in his SF Chronicle column.

Unlike many other controversial American killings or terrorist attacks, the powerful evidence of a conspiracy in the case of the RFK assassination was physical and seemingly undeniable. Wikipedia is notoriously reluctant to promote conspiratorial narratives, but in this case the striking facts are presented with only rather weak challenges.

The conclusive proof from the audio recording only came to light in 2004, but I was surprised to discover that all the other strong evidence, including the large number of unexplained bullet holes, had already been known and reported for decades.

Former Congressman Allard K. Lowenstein had been heavily involved in the 1968 election campaign, playing a major role in the effort to unseat incumbent President Lyndon Johnson. In 1977 he published a long cover-story in the influential Saturday Review, setting forth the overwhelming evidence that a second gunman had been involved in the shooting, and my content-archiving system provides a convenient PDF copy. So nearly all the crucial facts in the case have been known for 45 years, but were almost always ignored by our dishonest or cowardly American media.

Three years after publicly revealing that explosive information, Lowenstein himself was dead, supposedly shot at the age of 51 by a deranged lone gunman who had been a former student of his, but I have been informed that his personal friends never believed that story.

Given this massive preponderance of evidence, we can easily understand why the harsh media attacks upon Kennedy had so carefully avoided mentioning his conspiratorial beliefs regarding his father’s assassination. Such criticism would have merely brought the issue to wider public attention, and anyone who began looking into the matter would have quickly concluded that Kennedy was probably correct while our media had spent a half-century covering up the true facts of the 1968 assassination. And if Kennedy were telling the truth and the media lying, many people would begin to wonder if the same might also be true on the vaxxing issue.

 

Over the last couple of months, I have noted that this pattern of media reticence has been even more pronounced with regard to the actual contents of Kennedy’s landmark book. Perhaps one might argue that his statements about the death of his father were personal matters exempt from media scrutiny, or even that the details of a particular assassination so many decades ago had no relevance to his vaxxing arguments. But it seemed utterly bizarre that all of the harsh attacks on his book had carefully avoided mentioning its major theme.

I had opened Kennedy’s book assuming that it would focus almost entirely on the vaccination issues with which the author had long been identified. Yet I soon discovered that nearly half the text—some 200 pages—was instead devoted to the disease of AIDS, an entirely different topic, and that the claims he made were absolutely incendiary. As I wrote in December:

Yet according to the information provided in Kennedy’s #1 Amazon bestseller, this well-known and solidly-established picture, which I had never seriously questioned, is almost entirely false and fraudulent, essentially amounting to a medical media hoax. Instead of being responsible for AIDS, the HIV virus is probably harmless and had nothing to do with the disease. But when individuals were found to be infected with HIV, they were subjected to the early, extremely lucrative AIDS drugs, which were actually lethal and often killed them. The earliest AIDS cases had mostly been caused by very heavy use of particular illegal drugs, and the HIV virus had been misdiagnosed as being responsible. But since Fauci and the profit-hungry drug companies soon built enormous empires upon that misdiagnosis, for more than 35 years they have fought very hard to maintain and protect it, exerting all their influence to suppress the truth in the media while destroying the careers of any honest researchers who challenged that fraud. Meanwhile, AIDS in Africa was something entirely different, probably caused mostly by malnutrition or other local conditions.

I found Kennedy’s account as shocking as anything I have ever encountered.

In 1985 AZT, an existing drug, was found to kill the HIV virus in laboratory tests. Fauci then made tremendous efforts to speed it through clinical trials as an appropriate treatment for healthy, HIV-positive individuals, with FDA approval finally coming in 1987, producing Fauci’s first moment of triumph. Priced at \$10,000/year per patient, AZT was one of the most expensive drugs in history, and with the cost covered by health insurance and government subsidies, it produced an unprecedented financial windfall for its manufacturer.

Kennedy devotes an entire chapter to the story of AZT, and the tale he tells is something out of Kafka or perhaps Monty Python. Apparently, Fauci had been under enormous pressure to produce medical breakthroughs justifying his large budget, so he manipulated the AZT trials to conceal the extremely toxic nature of the drug, which rapidly killed many of the patients who received it, with their symptoms being ascribed to AIDS. So following FDA approval in 1987, hundreds of thousands of perfectly healthy individuals found to be infected with HIV were placed on a regimen of AZT, and the large number of resulting deaths was misattributed to the virus rather than to the anti-viral drug. According to the scientific experts cited in the book, the vast majority of post-1987 “AIDS deaths” were actually due to AZT.

Prior to the Covid outbreak, AIDS had spent almost four decades as the world’s highest-profile disease, absorbing perhaps a couple of trillion dollars of funding and becoming the central focus of an army of scientists and medical experts. It simply boggles the mind for someone to suggest that HIV/AIDS might have largely been a hoax, and that the vast majority of deaths were not from the illness but from the drugs taken to treat it.

My science textbooks sometimes mentioned that during the benighted 18th century, leading Western physicians treated all manner of ailments with bleeding, a quack practice that regularly caused the deaths of their patients, with our own George Washington often numbered among the victims. Indeed, some have argued that for several centuries prior to modern times, standard medical treatments inadvertently took far more lives than they saved, and those too poor or backward to consult a doctor probably benefited from that lack. But I had never dreamed that this same situation might have occurred during the most recent decades of our modern scientific age.

Since the 1980s AIDS has been an explosive topic in the public sphere, and anyone—whether scientist or layman—who questioned the orthodox narrative was viciously denounced as having blood on his hands. During the early 2000s South African President Thabo Mbeki had cautiously raised such possibilities and was massively vilified by the international media and the academic community. Yet when Kennedy’s #1 Amazon bestseller went much farther, devoting seven full chapters to making the case that HIV/AIDS was merely a medical hoax, his media antagonists carefully avoided that subject even while they attacked him on all other grounds.

Once again, the only plausible explanation is that the hostile journalists and their editors have recognized that Kennedy’s factual evidence was too strong and any such attacks might prove disastrously counter-productive. As far back as the 1990s, a former Harvard professor had publicly declared that the AIDS hoax was as great a scientific scandal as the notorious Lysenko fraud, and if a substantial portion of the American public concluded that AIDS was indeed a medical phantom that had been promoted for 35 years by our gullible and dishonest media, the credibility of the latter on current vaccination issues might be completely annihilated.

 

It would have been the easiest thing in the world for the media to accurately blast Kennedy as “a conspiracy theorist whose book claims that AIDS is a hoax,” and that simple, short phrase would have immediately dealt a massive body-blow to his public reputation. But many people would then have begun looking into the facts, and once they did so, the tables might have quickly turned, destroying the credibility of his critics. The total silence of the media suggests that they greatly feared that possibility.

The hostile media demanded that Kennedy immediately apologize for his heated words regarding fascism and Anne Frank, and to his credit he quickly did so. But I believe that he now has every right to demand that the same media publicly apologize for having spent the last fifty years concealing the true facts of his father’s assassination from his own family and from the American people. And he and others should also begin demanding that the media and medical establishments apologize for the catastrophic HIV/AIDS disaster they inflicted upon our society, a disaster that probably led to the horrible deaths of hundreds of thousands of perfectly healthy Americans. These two matters carry vastly greater weight than a glancing spoken reference to the events of World War II.

One reason that the remarkable silence surrounding Kennedy’s controversial disclosures was so easily apparent to me is that I have become familiar with that pattern. Over the last several years both media outlets and activist organizations have similarly shied away from the published contents of this website and my own writings, doing their best to avert their eyes from material that was many times more controversial than what they would have eagerly attacked and denounced elsewhere. I have discussed what I call this “Lord Voldemort Effect,” and have described some notable examples in the media.

Many of my own essays have dealt directly with the same controversial topics highlighted in Kennedy’s writings and public statements, and for those so interested in exploring them, they are conveniently grouped together in these categories:

Related Reading:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 529 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Only the goodest goyim still trust the system. The kikes and satanists have pushed too far. Most competent people want to be white collar criminals now, while the state get the lowest trashes to do their bidding.

    This is why GOD will win and all the kikes and golem are going to hell.

    • LOL: Realist
    • Troll: HammerJack
    • Replies: @Tomas Allen
  2. But there were people dying mysteriously of an unknown condition that came to be called GRID (Gay-Related Immune Deficiency) which came to be called AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). I have no trouble believing Fauci manipulated circumstances for his own purposes, or that big pharma killed more people than it helped, but a hoax?

  3. Nancy says:

    Thanks. (I am patient, and persuaded to trust.)

  4. There was a third probable assassination which has rarely received much media attention—that of the legendary “John-John” JFK Jr. As it happened to an airplane he was piloting, calling it a probable assassination is something nobody can fully prove.

    But airplanes have been used for that purpose quite frequently, as was the case with the crash of the aircraft in which Omar Torrijos, the leader of Panama, who was refusing to go along with programs “suggested” by well connected individuals generally associated with powerful entities from “El Norte”.

    Then there was the extremely coincidental crash of Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone, his wife and key staff members just days before his likely victory in a re-election campaign just a couple weeks into the future. At the time he was the major leader in the Senate of the group of solons who opposed Bu\$h the Lesser’s impending attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan. He also may have made a strong Democrat candidate against the Chimp in the Presidential election two years hence.

    Why take down JFK Jr.? He was publishing a magazine titled “George” and he had tipped his hand, perhaps fatally, that he might have dug up sone dirt on the man for whom the CIA headquarters was named and who was eyeballs deep in the Agency’s Bay of Pigs operation.

    Was the Bu\$h Crime Clan involved in the operation against Robert Kennedy? Doubtful. But it would seem pretty obvious to the likes of film-maker Oliver Stone, that there’s a lot of dirt surrounding the most bloodstained family in recent American history…and that family’s name did not begin with a “K”.

  5. > conspiratorial term of abuse

    Almost as much a term of abuse as “anti-vaxxer”!

    • Agree: Anon62, Alfred
  6. This is a trivial side note, but Robert Kennedy Jr.’s wife disgusted me when she attacked her husband for the Anne Frank thing. On Twitter she wrote…

    “My husband’s reference to Anne Frank at a mandate rally in Washington D.C. was reprehensible and insensitive. The atrocities that millions endured during the holocaust should never be compared to anyone or anything. His opinions are not a reflection of my own.”

    That female is physically ugly, and she clearly hates Kennedy.

    If she was my wife, I’d divorce her immediately.

  7. Good article. Bringing the fact that the “dog [media] did not bark” about RFK Jr.’s support of the RFK Sr. conspiracy theory nicely complements your point about their not doing so either about the HIV/AIDS issue, and the inference that they’re afraid of scrutiny on those areas.

    Yet it seems like it also equally complements the media’s lack of coverage of any details of Fauci’s role in in the suppression of alternative viewpoints on both AIDS and COVID-19, and the larger issues of possible overselling of vaccinations in general. (Correct me if I’m wrong; I haven’t followed that media coverage that closely.) So maybe there’s something to RFK Jr.’s viewpoints on the last two issues (COVID-19 and vaccinations) as well.

  8. Charles says:

    The late Wilson Bryan Key, a Canadian college professor of media and advertising, is probably little known now. He gained notoriety for writing a series of books in the ’70s and ’80s claiming that all manner of media (visual and auditory) is drenched in subliminal manipulations. Naturally the few mentions of his work in American media were – and are -uniformly hostile.

    The reason for the hostility, however, most certainly has nothing to do with the idea of artists painting breasts or penises into liquor-ad ice cubes. Dr. Key relentlessly attacked all manner of media, including print, TV, the film industry, and popular music. He (in my opinion) convincingly argued that the Beatles were exhaustingly marketed at least in part to provide acceptance for the burgeoning drug culture – including Rx drugs. I am mentioning all of this to say that American corporate media – ALL of it – is to a great degree a destructive force in American life. That’s why The Unz Review is the most important site on the internet.

    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  9. Kennedy didn’t say anything wrong. Yes… you could cross the alps like the Von Trapp family or you could hide in an attic. Two different events and not one and the same. Why is this even an issue?

    • Agree: Notsofast
  10. JWalters says:

    Thanks again Ron. The unanimous dishonest behavior by the corporate media tells us this is highly coordinated. The only way for this to happen is for a few people to own controlling shares in all these media corporations. This is currently done through a few hedge funds and large banks. Reporters and editors working in the corporate media who try to pull the curtain back are quickly fired. Examples are Dan Rather, anchor and managing editor at the CBS Evening News, Chris Hedges, Pulitzer Prize winning war correspondent at the New York Times, and Phil Donahue, host of the top-rated show at MSNBC.

    The basic history of the banking cartel that controls America’s media and politicians is sketched in
    “War Profiteers and Israel’s Bank”
    https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html

    The battles with this banking cartel through history, including the early days of the US, FDR’s fight, and recent developments in the news, are sketched by Matt Ehret in
    “NATO’s War Drive and the Great Reset: Historical Forces at Play”
    https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/natos-war-drive-and-the-great-reset

    It’s important that the public learn this banking cartel exists, and that it has monopoly control over our mainstream press, our major corporations in the areas of war, energy, and medicine, and our electoral process. Further, it exercises these same monopoly powers in all the Western democracies.

    It directs the drug dealing and plundering of South American economies, causing the floods of immigrants escaping their crime-ridden, impoverished countries. It instigates the Middle East wars, causing floods of refugees into an overwhelmed Europe. And it is instigating the current conflict between Russia and the West, possibly even wanting a new war in Europe, both for the profits and for the camouflaging chaos.

    A planned Covid pandemic, with billions in vaccine profits, achieved by devastating the lives of millions, would fit perfectly into its pattern of operations.

    The RFK assassination, with the simplicity of its conclusive evidence, the bullet to the back of the head from point-blank range, would shred the public’s worldview if it became widely known. Then all the other conspiracies would become immediately plausible.

  11. The bullet that killed Robert Kennedy may not have come from Sirhan Sirhan’s gun but what was the Palestinian doing there and then with a gun? Once he drew the gun so would have others to protect Kennedy and he was probably killed in the ensuing gunfight – accidentally or by ‘friendly fire’. This doesn’t make Sirhan Sirhan “innocent”.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Notsofast
    , @Iris
    , @babu
    , @Alden
    , @haha
  12. Alfred says:

    Once again, the only plausible explanation is that the hostile journalists and their editors have recognized that Kennedy’s factual evidence was too strong and any such attacks might prove disastrously counter-productive. As far back as the 1990s, a former Harvard professor had publicly declared that the AIDS hoax was as great a scientific scandal as the notorious Lysenko fraud, and if a substantial portion of the American public concluded that AIDS was indeed a medical phantom that had been promoted for 35 years by our gullible and dishonest media, the credibility of the latter on current vaccination issues might be completely annihilated.

    Thank you for reading this book with an open mind. I confess that although I bought the Kindle version, I prefer to read the parts that you highlight here. There is simply too much going on at present for my few remaining neurons to handle. I worked out for myself many years ago that vaccines were not at all what they were cracked up to be. The fact that their manufacturers have unlimited legal protection is all one needs to know. I have worked for big US companies so I understand their mentality quite well. I did receive gigantic bonuses at one time consequent to making sales.

    It will be interesting to see whether the laws of Australia will be upheld by their judges. I recently had a bad, but not unexpected, experience with an Australian court judgement. The judge decided that my daughter of 16 should be allowed to have hormone treatment against my wishes. The “paediatrician” deemed it to be in her interest to do so.



    Video Link

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  13. Ace says:

    Always lucid, Mr. Unz.

    What the courtier press chooses to ignore is a vast topic:

    1. Mochtar Riady’s rescue of Clinton’s primary campaign. Riady the banker with ties to Chinese intelligence.

    [MORE]

    2. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard’s account of his interview with the widow of the man who provided security for the Clinton campaign HQ in Little Rock. She said he would drive to Mena Airport at the behest of Vince Foster on occasion. One time she looked in the trunk of his car after a trip to Mena that he made and found it was full of \$100 bills. He was gunned down in the streets of L.R. although the killing was later ascribed to his stepson.

    3. The whereabouts of Craig Livingstone who acquired 700 FBI files on Republicans for Hillary and why they were not prosecuted.

    4. The present whereabouts of all the other Americans in Benghazi when.

    5. The non-natural born citizen status of Obama, Harris, Cruz and Rubio.

    6. The unconstitutional nature of our wars on Serbia and Syria and their being aggressive wars.

    7. The true extent of the activities of Craig Spence and his Washington call boy operation and the fact that his house — with audio and video devices in at least one bedroom — was apparently provided to him by the ruling party of Japan.

    8. Why Spence was able to conduct late-night tours of the White House.

    9. The absurdity of our responsibility to protect nonsense and our moronic “rules-based international order” locution.

    10. Where Libya’s gold went.

    11. Why, exactly, Assad, Putin, and Soleimani are considered brutal dictators.

    12. The physical impossibility of the chlorine cylinders being air-dropped in Douma per the engineering assessment and why the OPCW suppressed that assessment.

    13. The identity of the American officials who met with OPCW officials about the alleged chlorine attack on Douma.

    14. The Coast Guard radar tracks of high-speed ship movements at or around the time of the downing of TWA 800, as reported by Accuracy in Media.

    15. The USS Liberty attack.

    16. The identity of the three men who severely beat the man in the Quapaw Towers who unwisely publicly stated he had a video tape of Clinton arriving at Jennifer Flowers door. They wanted the tape.

    17. Who threatened Kathleen Willey and a Clinton-connected woman in St. Louis.

    18. What Trump, Clinton, Dershowitz, Gates and the others were doing on Epstein’s Jail Bait Island.

    19. Why Pelosi and her husband moved a factory they owned to Guam.

    20. Anything and everything related to Brandon and Hunter involving Ukraine and China.

    21. The theft of the 2020 presidential election.

    22. The non-prosecution of scum-of-the-earth AntiFa.

    23. Why, in the name of fighting “terror,” we arm, train, protect, and support scum-of-the-earth terrorists in Syria.

    24. Why AIPAC is not required to register as a foreign agent.

    25. The federal money that flows to the tech giants and the nature of the work they do for Fedzilla.

    26. The cowardice of every state bar association and state supreme courts in failing to challenge the monstrous betrayal by the Supreme Court in enabling Fedzilla.

    27. Why Jocelyn Elders got to be Surgeon General.

    28. The whereabouts of the Skripals.

    29. The role played by the Sphinx of Pennsylvania Avenue, Jared Kushner, in the Trump WH.

    An unrelated quibble — people questioning the “vaccine” are not fearful individuals. They are people who have every reason to be cautious. I don’t want to inject tobasco sauce into my body because I’m fearful but because I’m not a moron. Allegedly.

  14. dina says:

    Quid est veritas?
    There is only one Truth and we must always start from there to reach all the other truths

  15. Franz says:

    Many thanks, Ron, for including the Saturday Review article which I just started reading.

    There’s nothing to compare with the ultimate Wayback Machine of an archived magazine article. Especially one where the author was killed by a “deranged former student” over 40 years ago. What a rotten cover story.

    How low these people were. And still are.

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  16. @A little boy in the crowd

    The “holocaust” and the Anne Frank stories should be examined thoroughly and dispassionately. I don’t see evidence yet.

    • Agree: HdC
  17. The alternative hypotheses on AIDS are covered in RFK’s book. Basically, AIDS is a constellation of similar but different diseases in people whose immune systems have been compromised by haemophilia, drug addiction, and homosexual bacchanalia. The first wave of AIDS was probably caused by “poppers” (recreational amyl nitrite) destroying the immune systems of the aforesaid homosexuals. An aggressive herpes virus (HHV-6A) is probably the actual infectious disease that is killing those at-risk populations now.

    Fauci and Big Pharma needed an infectious disease to treat using expensive drugs and/or vaccines. A harmless retrovirus was plucked out of early research and AZT–a terribly toxic, discarded leukaemia drug–was selected. They manufactured the results they needed by fraud, brought it to market, and then killed a whole generation of AIDS patients with high-dose AZT. Anyone who spoke up was simply destroyed since Fauci and Big Pharma control all the research money via captured regulators.

    What is striking to me is how Fauci was able to reverse his early bad reputation with the AIDS community to make them his biggest supporters. Political correctness is simply the best way to forward plutocrat/crony capitalist interests in the US.

    • Agree: Alfred
  18. And yet you still use the smear term “anti-vaxxers” to refer to people who are for the most part only protesting the new “vaccines” for the “pandemic”.

    The stronger and longer the torrent of BS like this, the more people are eventually going to reject all medical treatment period, let alone injections, let alone vaccines and “vaccines”. The whole edifice emits a putrid stench.

    • Agree: Notsofast, Alfred
    • Replies: @Olivier1973
  19. utu says:

    The angel of death, Ron Unz strikes. Poor RFK, Jr., whole his life he did everything to avoid the curse of Kennedys by being marginal and irrelevant. He thought that giving support to the anti-vaxxer wackos would make him safe that he would be dismissed as a harmless eccentric. But then the covid struck and the anti-vaxxers with the help of Chinese and Russian bots and trolls and platforms like TUR became a political force that the establishment had to reckon with. Poor RFK, Jr. now he finds himself being pushed by the events to the center stage and egged on by Ron Unz to take the path leading to his demise.

  20. In our deeply secular society, Nazi Germany has replaced Satan as the epitome of pure evil, while Anne Frank—a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war—has been elevated to the status of a sacred martyr.

    Anne Frank was taken across Germany in wartime to be treated in a hospital for typhus. Most of the population, indoctrinated by the public school system and the MSM, probably think she was killed in a gas chamber in some Nazi Death Camp. The real story of Anne Frank undermines claims of Nazi Death Camps. Of course, the MSM would never let any person appear in their media to argue that point.

    Where the facts are completely incontrovertible, as in the case of the assassination of RFK, then non-reporting and silence is the preferred option. Where they have to deal with the matter, as in The Real Anthony Fauci, any criticism is carefully focussed to avoid dealing with matters that would expose the weakness of the MSM narrative, such as HIV/AIDS.

    It is pleasing that we have a forum like UR to discuss these matters ( Hat Tip, Mr Unz ). But the fundamental problem is caused by the lack of a free press. 40 years ago, 50 companies owned 90% of media outlets. Not good. Now it’s 5 companies. Democracy doesn’t die in the dark. A free society needs a free press. Unsurprisingly, the MSM don’t say that any more.

  21. Gay men receive HIV meds as a preventative.
    it’s called PREP.

    CosTS \$27,000 per year. Govt pays for free.

    • Replies: @PDXLibertarian
  22. Attorney Kennedy, first: „You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.“

    Attorney Kennedy, follow up:
    “I apologize for my reference to Anne Frank, especially to families that suffered the Holocaust horrors.”

    As a German I accept Kennedy’s apology under the assumption that with “Holocaust horrors” Kennedy refers to the Jewish & Allied hyenas instigated and executed slaughter of 20 mio Germans in the Second Jewish World War JWW2 as much as to 20 mio. raped and displaced Germans then and cont. to this day.

    Hence the Jewmedia could be taken right to jump on Kennedy for lying twice:

    1. Audrey Hepburn (aka Anne Frank) had a pretty good life etc. pp.
    2. Without real need reinforcing the greatest smear and extortion scheme in known history.

    Kennedy relativises and diminishes his own important works by sucking up to the Jewish evil; bottom line: this Kennedy is at the end of the day a coward and far from JFK’s courage or was it a JFK naivity and Att. Kennedy knwos the deadly powergame of the Jew and simply does not want to be murdered too?.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Thanks: Irish Savant
    • Replies: @turtle
    , @Irish Savant
  23. BuelahMan says:

    while Anne Frank—has been elevated to the status of a sacred martyr.

    I would point out that the media coverage Ron discusses about Anne Frank is primarily jewish lies. The entire Anne Frank mythos is a lie based upon faked writings by the girl’s Dad. Some say with pen technology yet to e invented when the girl was alive (if she was alive). At this point, who can truly separate any truth about the girl from the mass of lies?

    Every place this hoax was plastered to victimize the jew was done so by jews and the few gullible goy that live for the jews’ every lie.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @Alden
  24. I am about to follow up your leads to proof that too many bullets were fired and from the wrong direction and also to circulate your cogent piece amongst friends. But I am triggered as too often by what I see as a too frequent use of your rhetorical force ahead of your logical skills.

    You say, characteristically,

    the only plausible explanation is that the hostile journalists and their editors have recognized that Kennedy’s factual evidence was too strong and any such attacks might prove disastrously counter-productive

    It is far from the “only plausible explanation”. It doesn’t take more than your knowledge of the world, the media and human behaviour to imagine several plausible quite different conversations in which it was decided not yet to tackle Kennedy’s HIV/AIDS heresy.

    Let’s say a writer/researcher raises it as something that he/she, though young, is sure must be ridiculous and allowing Kennedy to be discredited. It takes little imagination, or logic, to hear ” sure, how many hundred books and papers are you going to read?” and “our message is to keep people getting vaccinated: that will completely distract them”. A good enough start?

    Do you really insist that they must have assessed Kennedy’s evidence and assessed its strength? Why not accept that there is 200 pages of detail on a different subject to the one they are primarily interested in and they put it aside as requiring too much irrelevant work. Discrediting the man was not the first objective.

  25. Tucker says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    What about Magic Johnson? He used to be in the news constantly, and we were told that he had AIDS, but I don’t recall hearing any news that he had died.

    I have read some speculation by some people that the AIDs industry needed to come up with a supposedly heterosexual face to use as a propaganda / marketing bludgeon and that was the role Johnson was assigned to play. The public perception at the time the so-called ‘AIDS’ scamdemic was unleashed was that it was a disease that was pretty much confined to homosexuals and drug users who used and shared dirty needles. So, in order to condition normal and straight White tax payers to be willing to support massive expenditures of their tax dollars on AIDs research and drugs – the scam artists had to convince the normies that AIDs was a threat to them, too. Magic Johnson, who is supposedly a straight guy who was married at the time, announced that he had AIDs. I do not remember how, or if, he explained how he thought he got infected with the virus – but for several years, he became the prime marketing salesman for the AIDS industry – appearing all over Television and showing up at AIDs fundraising events and giving speeches and engaging in glad-handing events.

    On a personal level, I can remember thinking at the time that the constant fear mongering over the grossly exaggerated, over hyped threat of AIDs seemed to fit in nicely with the desire on the part of that tribe of Middle Easterners who rejoice whenever they see statistics that show a decline in the birth rate of White Europeans. And, I wondered if the whole thing was some kind of devious psyop designed to make Whites terrified of having sex. Less sex would result in fewer White babies being born, right?

    And, if you look at the recent statistics – that document the rather depressing reduction in the birth rates of White Americans, and then remember how ecstatic the kosher left got when those statistics hit the newswires, it sure does seem as if my psyop theory could be true.

    Meanwhile, all of the fearmongering about AIDs didn’t seem to have much effect on the promiscuity of blacks and other minorities due to their greater propensity for letting the little head do all the thinking for the big head.

  26. The only mistake Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. made was to apologize. He should have attacked the media whores directly and gotten even more publicity for which the public would have thanked him and backed him.

    I hope some of the folks on this site finally get the message that it is the US government that can’t be trusted to tell you the time of day. It is always a gov’t operation that we later discover was a complete lie. Lies have been used to provide the reason to enter every US military adventure in the last 50 years at least. Those lies caused the murder of millions of innocent people and the responsible parties are still around and protected by the gov’t thugs.

    You voters should be totally ashamed of yourselves for constantly supporting a system that has been lying to you and deceiving you for decades. Don’t you people ever catch on? You simply believe in god, democracy and every other stupid thing that comes along without ever demanding any proof. You are the real problem.

  27. onebornfree says: • Website

    R.U.: “Indulging in overly-heated rhetoric, he declared “We have witnessed over the last 20 months a coup d’état against democracy, and the controlled demolition of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.” He further suggested that that government requirements for vaccinations and mandates were imposing “fascism” on our society,”

    I’m not really a big fan of the “government can solve our problems” statist Kennedy, however, there’s absolutely nothing “overheated” in Kennedy’s words here, nothing.

    He’s simply described _exactly_ what is going on, and has been going on for decades in the US and elsewhere.

    Fact: Many states in the US are presently under a medical fascist dictatorship.

    If you, Mr Unz, do not, or will not see that simple fact, when it’s staring right in your face, then I can only conclude that you are “a cup and saucer shy of a full set”, and that your “elevator doesn’t go all the way up to the top floor.

    Wakeup, fer chrissakes!

    “Regards” onebornfree

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @cassandra
  28. Ironically, a new investigation has concluded that Anne Frank was betrayed by a Jew, Arnold Van den Bergh, member of Amsterdam’s collaborationist Jewish Council:
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60024228

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  29. @utu

    ‘utu’ writes:

    Poor RFK, Jr. now he finds himself being pushed by the events to the centre stage and egged on by Ron Unz to take the path leading to his demise.

    Are you suggesting that RFK Jr’s ‘demise’ (as in death) is imminent ?

    ‘utu’, are you privy to the planning for RFK Jr’s death [because he’s revealing too much truth and therefore presenting as a threat to the Zio establishment], through your extensive network of Talmudic buddies ?

    Or is that just some gossip you heard at your local synagogue ?

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
  30. sally says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    Every federal agency exist to accommodate the needs of the monopoly powered members of industries the agencies are appointed to regulate. Industries usually do business as corporations and corporations usually promote the private investment objective of the wealthy oligarch owners.

    The choice of the word “hoax” to describe the “make Pharma rich” programs. suggest a deceptive intentional fabrication. but it does not make clear whether the fabrication intended was to advance a fraud, or to make an instructive point?

  31. anon[284] • Disclaimer says:

    Its called Operation Mockingbird. The fact that millions of people still believe anything they hear or see in the press is a sad commentary on our national IQ. The one saving grace that should comfort us is that when these liars and murderers pass someone with horns will be waiting for them.

  32. Anon[382] • Disclaimer says:

    Before our Normie friends can even start to fathom the Fauci evil and other assorted lies, it might be best to start red pilling our friends with accepting that our elite lies systematically. Start with the easy lies first then work up to the difficult ones later.

    Start red pilling first with
    Tonkin Gulf
    Kuwait Incubator Babies
    Saddam’s WMDs

    Then move onto
    2 planes 3 buildings
    Epstein – Maxwell

    Finally
    Leo Frank – ADL
    Jude’s Declares War on Germany
    Epstein – Maxwell – Samuel Pisar – Blinken!

    Red Pilling might take a year or maybe 2 years of step by step awakening….don’t rush it, otherwise our friends minds shut down. Most Normies suspect something doesn’t quite add up, but are terrified to explore too deeply.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  33. Gizmo880 says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    People were indeed dying from a mysterious condition as you have stated. In the U.S., the deaths started among the Gay male populations of New York city and San Francisco after those groups participated in Government sponsored Hepatitis B vaccines. The first cases of what became known as AIDS were diagnosed in the U.S. before a single case was ever diagnosed in Africa. So much for the ‘AIDS from a monkey out of Africa’ story shoved down the throats of the world. All subsequent countries that had heavy outbreaks of the illness called AIDS participated in Vaccine programs sponsored by the WHO and other health organizations.

    After much research on the issue of Governmental lying about health issues in this country after becoming disabled by Lyme Disease (another medical condition the CDC and every other government health organization is lying through their teeth about), it was completely obvious that the out of Africa story was the real hoax and the most likely culprit was something that came out of Ft. Detrick, Maryland. As with many other historical events, the web has been scrubbed of much of this information.

    I have not read Rober F. Kennedy Jr’s book, and don’t know much about him or his beliefs, but the idea that AIDS was nothing more than a hoax does not seem very plausible to me after years of research on this issue. There was indeed something killing a great many people, it just wasn’t what the Government told us it was.

    • Replies: @We are all dumb
    , @Nancy
  34. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:
    @Verymuchalive

    Excellent, incisive article by Ron Unz. Thank you.

    Best post here so far by Verymuchalive. “Where the facts are completely incontrovertible, as in the case of the assassination of RFK, then non-reporting and silence is the preferred option.” And we just saw another recent example of that with the Waukesha black-on-white-massacre.

    • Thanks: Verymuchalive
  35. big daddy says:

    The facts are out that we live in a Matrix and yet most folks still believe or just ignore the lies and evil deeds. Sad commentary on we humans.

    That’s why I am a cultural libertarian: God; family; everything is private property, including yourself.

    Then hopefully freedom is attainable. Government is evil because our nature cannot handle big institutions.

    • Thanks: Thor Walhovd
  36. geokat62 says:

    Yet oddly enough, the same media organs that created a major national controversy out of a few ill-chosen words at a political rally…

    Ill-chosen words? How can you say they were ill-chosen words, when you yourself have written an article calling into question the veracity of events surrounding wwii? In light of what you have written, I thought his words were well-chosen.

    So nearly all the crucial facts in the case have been known for 45 years, but were almost always ignored by our dishonest or cowardly American media.

    As I’ve repeatedly pointed out, there is nothing American about the media, Ron, when 96% of Jewish Supremacists own it.

    The hostile media demanded that Kennedy immediately apologize for his heated words regarding fascism and Anne Frank, and to his credit he quickly did so.

    To his credit? I’d say it was to his shame that he apologised for saying nothing wrong.

    Do you think it’s also to his wife’s credit when she threw her husband under the bus?

    • Agree: Mehen, mark green
    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @SunBakedSuburb
  37. @utu

    Maybe you are on to something here, but the real picture may be slightly different. What is the best defense against becoming a victim of a conspiracy? Surely attracting to oneself the attention of conspiracists before it takes place is a very promising strategy. They would act as a permanent legion of bodyguards, so to speak.

    Antivaxxing is notorious for being a powerful magnet for conspiracists. By building around him a faithful legion of admirers and followers as an anti-vaxxer, Kennedy is probably safer than if he were a run-of-the-mill liberal activist or politician. He had chosen environmental activism in the beginning, perhaps because he thought (correctly at that time) that environmentalism also attracted this type of mentality, but, as it became mainstream, that appeal was lost, and he moved to a more fringe topic.

    I think Covid-19 may have been a boon to him, contrary to what you say. I doubt it that he simply wants to stay safe and out of the spotlight. His ultimate goal, I think, may lie outside the realm of antivaxxing. The publication of the SF Chronicle piece about his father’s assassination is perhaps evidence of that. We may have to wait for further developments.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
  38. @Brás Cubas

    One wording error I would like to correct in the above comment. Where I wrote:

    Antivaxxing is notorious for being a powerful magnet for conspiracists.

    I actually meant:

    Antivaxxing is notorious for being a powerful magnet for conspiracy theorists.

    • Replies: @Towey
  39. JackOH says:

    BTW, I sort of recall Big Pharma used the FDA’s alleged dilatoriness in approving AIDS medications as a political battering ram to get that Prescription Drug User Fee Act passed in 1992, which turned the FDA into a rubber stamp for Big Pharma. That PDUFA set the stage for the Sacklers introducing their Oxycontin a few years later on the flimsiest of evidence.

    (I half-sleepily scanned the relevant Wikipedia page twenty minutes ago.)

    Does anyone know any more details about Big Pharma’s machinations during that period?

    If true, this reeks of a dystopian, criminalized medical establishment telling government: “Give us a free hand on politicized AIDS, and, in exchange, we’ll addict millions of Americans to opioids, allow more than a half-million OD deaths, create a vast wave of property crimes as junkies try to pay for illegal dope after they’ve been cut off, empower and enrich drug gangs, etc. How’s that for a deal?”

    Yes, I’m distorting of course, but how could anyone in authority not see the possible consequences of the PDUFA?

    • Agree: David from Alaska
    • Replies: @emerging majority
  40. These days being labeled a “conspiracy theorist” is a particularly serious charge,

    No, it is not even a “charge”, it is an insult from people who have no argument to oppose.

  41. @azureamaranthine

    And yet you still use the smear term “anti-vaxxers” to refer to people who are for the most part only protesting the new “vaccines” for the “pandemic”.

    True!

    The mRNA products are not vaccines. Please everyone, stop using the word vaccine for products which are toxic, do not prevent contagion, do not prevent becoming ill and do not prevent dying from the virus.

    Omicron is the real vaccine, now.

    ADE effect is seldom mentioned.

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @emerging majority
  42. PJ London says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    They were getting cancer from the use of “Poppers” which was an overwhelmingly Gay drug.
    The FDA had approved Amyl Nitrite as ‘safe’ and if it was proved to be cancer inducing some 2 million users could have claimed medical costs of treatment (\$4-5 million each) and would have bankrupted the government.
    The Thalidomide scandal was fresh in people’s minds, so they blamed (falsely) HIV and blamed an African Monkey for the disease.

  43. @Craig Nelsen

    I’m surprised Unz still fully believes in germ theory after not only reading Kennedy’s book but starting to question the HIV/AIDS hoax. While I still think there is a combination theory between germ and terrain theory. Virology seems to be a bunk if not outright fraudulent science. GRIDS could easily be chalked up to men shoving foreign objects, penises, semen, lubricants, even drugs up their anuses. The homosexuals are known for rampant drug use and I’m sure when the GRIDS shit started a lot were using and sharing needles. Its time for people to start questioning ZOG’s entirety and every narrative they have given including ones that fit your worldview. Faggots maybe degenerate animals but not necessarily diseased, mentally diseased for sure, animals.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  44. PJ London says:

    The reason that Mbeki was quiet was that he did not want to project the ‘truth’, what he wanted and got was multimillions of dollars to keep quiet.
    South Africa was / is divided into 13 regions or provinces. Since 1910 they have kept extensive and very accurate medical records of the provincial hospitals and health services.
    In 1986/87 it showed that one region (Northern Natal on the Mozambique border) had a rate of nearly 50% HIV positive people using the hospitals and services. The Northern Cape (Kimberly and desert area) had a prevalence of less than 5%. The expectation was that Natal would have a massive increase in the ‘AIDS” diseases (Cancer, TB, and all the other 18 listed as AIDS) whilst Cape would be much less impacted.
    By 2010 it was shown that there was no statistical increase in the diseases and that all regions of the country continued without any variation to match the incidence of HIV.
    He threatened to reveal the actual numbers and was paid an enormous bribe to STFU.
    It is almost impossible to access the statistics by province or city to make a current assessment.
    It is the same scam that they pulled with Covid. Call everything Covid and claim that all deaths regardless of actual cause, is a Covid related death.

    • Replies: @AnthonyBrink
    , @Curmudgeon
  45. And on the vaccine front, the medical ‘authorities’ in the UK are already warning the aged 55 and up to ‘expect’ as many as 300,000 deaths from a previously under-diagnosed cardiac condition known as “aortic stenosis” within the next five years, which, for some strange reason, they simply ‘missed’ previously. In hundreds of thousands of people. Despite heart disease being the greatest killer currently, and always the subject of intense research.

    It’s not egregious medical negligence which should shake any remaining faith the sheeples would have in their medical ‘leaders’. No, it’s just something the UK medical authorities simply figured out recently and are now making known. Nothing can be done about it, of course. It’s all just FYI, so that when Dad or Mum suddenly keel over, you’ll know why. And the kids who were vaxxed. And the superbly trained professional athletes, like soccer stars and other unbelievably cardiovascularly fit sports figures who were vaxxed. It’s the new normal. No problem. To be expected, actually.

    But what it certainly is NOT is an attempt to get ahead of the curve of vaccine-related injuries that were commonly predicted by nearly all physicians who opposed the jabs, and is entirely consistent with the openly noted side effects of the Covid jabs from day one:

    https://www.sott.net/article/463821-Aortic-Stenosis-The-latest-heart-attack-scapegoat

    Expect the push to vaccinate EVERYONE worldwide to continue, as the unvaccinated controls who would put the lie to this obvious murderous medical bullshit must be eliminated by any and all means necessary……

    • Agree: Marcion
    • Replies: @Frank McGar
  46. @Verymuchalive

    Curiously the Canadian national broadcaster CBC did a special on Anne Frank just literally 2 weeks ago about how researchers have finally found who had betrayed the Franks. It was a Jewish Notary!

    I didn’t watch it because I had become all “Franked’ out years ago when reading into all the shenanigans of her father Otto, but still I was curious why such a story would hit airplay.

    The only answer I could come up with is the old ‘there is no such thing as bad advertisement’ and even if the conclusion is not favourable the name is out there yet again.

    Maybe RFK jr. caught wind of the story and being fresh in his memory mentioned her because one would think that it is a safe example and pleasing to powerful elements in the media. But it is most curious why the connection became immediately so volatile. Now I get it, it was the allusion that Anne Frank could have been an anti-vaxxer!

    I guess that one can’t have this sacred child that every public school kid was force fed to learn about associated with the latest iteration of the evil Nazi, the anti vaxxing, MAGA goon!

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  47. HT says:

    Living in a country where Neo-Marxist Jews control every major institution, as we now do, liberty and freedom is impossible.

  48. I seem to remember reading that Kennedy actually said he believed that HIV caused AIDS. If so, that would have confronted the writers of the hit job with Kennedy really having g only added the charge against Fauci that
    his promotion of AZT was lethal. Indeed just that element of the Kennedy chapters on HIV/AIDS would have decided the matter as the last thing they wanted to do was to discredit Fauci as promoter of vaccination.

    *** *** ***

    Also, why did you say that Lowenstein’s friends (who? Edward Kennedy and William F. Buckley Jr?) are said not to have believed that Loewnstein was shot by a schizophrenic under a delusion? Clearly because you believe that is evidence in favour of your preferred inference about the conspiracy you regard as the best explanation for RFK’s murder. But it actually detracts from thre strength of your argument that you regard it as acceptable to proffer as evidence hearsay from people you don’t name or describe about people you don’t name or identify who are supposed to have found something, unspecified, fishy about the description of Lowenstein’s death. And your facts are incompletely stated. You say Lowenstein wrote up his theory in the Saturday Review in 1977, after which it took three years for some cabal to organise his death! But it had already been adequately written up in the New York Times by John Crewdson in 1974:

    6 Years Later, Evidence in Sirhan’s Case Is Questioned https://nyti.ms/1RDCC4F

    So you believe on that evidence that in 1980 some conspirators probably six got round to organising Lowenstein’s murder six years after he tried to get people interested in the Kennedy killing without success. You must be good at believing improbable stories.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Ron Unz
  49. I just read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s SF Chronicle piece pleading for Sirhan’s release. He writes that “Sirhan squeezed off six more shots, emptying his chamber as five of the six shots hit bystanders.” Even if there was another shooter whose shots were those that killed RFK, how can Jr. logically argue that Sirhan was innocent? At the least there was a conspiracy, no?

    • Replies: @Iris
  50. geokat62 says:

    Telegram comment posted by Windsor519:

    You won’t see this on the news:
    So this is all kinds of wrong! Not only is this is a peaceful protest (so not breaking any laws) but the police have blocked this portion of the convoy in (front and back) with snow plows. About 250 trucks from the prairies some with young children, some with dogs.

    They don’t have access to fuel to keep their trucks running for heat, and volunteers have to hike in to bring food but they can’t reach all of them. The police are not allowing them to leave their trucks or to turn around. They are holding them hostage.

    THIS IS NOT RIGHT!

    Video by MG, on the ground intel by Marianna -thank you ladies!

    https://t.me/adamsonbarbecue/156

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  51. @utu

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=478388390307626

    A bit of a long video with little sourcing (from a book by Brancois de Bonivard), but I have read this on another blog (yes, it’s not the actual historical documents, maybe have a look yourself). From about 12 minutes is the info.

    [MORE]

    In short: in 1530, Geneva had a plague outbreak.

    They went all out to stop the plague. There was a 40 day quarantine where people were not allowed to leave their homes.

    Business people and the Magistrates paid hospitals to keep running. (In this time, it was also decided that the?) hospitals would receive the property of any patient that died alone.

    The grants by the Magistrates depended on the number of patients.

    Now the plague started subsiding. And the grants started decreasing, and fewer loners were dying.

    Hospital gets less money. So what did the doctors do? Start killing people. First doctors started poisoning patients, to get more subsidies. The subsidies however depended on the number of plague deaths. So the doctors started cutting boils from the bodies of the dead, dry them, and then give that to patients as medicine, then spreading it on people’s clothes. it didn’t work very well, and so they started to go around town at night, putting the powder on doors of people from whom they could profit (rich, alone). One doctor decided to just throw it over crowds during the day. There, the scheme got busted (dried crushed powder from putrid boils).

    (that is what the guy goes over).

    Now can you see how the current subsidies for hospitals if they have a person die from covid, if they intubate, if they use Remedesvir (a drug that was suspended for use during an Ebola outbreak because it killed too many people!) – this is the same profit incentive.

    The vaccines, mind you – a UK GP gets (to memory) £12.73 for each vaccine administered, £2.73 for the cost of the vaccine, and £10.00 as profit for the doctor.

    Not discussing the validity of the vaccine here, but the profitisation of medical policy.

    Can you deny decisions on health have been laced with monetary considerations, and are these not detrimental to public health?

    This is the 21st century, that such motives don’t muddy medical decisions, is an unbelievable presumption on the part of the ruling class.

    I’m not on facebook, so can’t ask the man for references, but they are surely there (the first post I read was a translated quote from an older document.. Should have saved the page, I’m still looking for it anyways)

  52. I am beyond trusting any member of the establishment.
    In particular scions of powerful families who are trying to forge a “champion of the common people” image.
    And wives of scions who “criticize” them – it’s all just kayfabe.

  53. Ron Unz says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    But there were people dying mysteriously of an unknown condition that came to be called GRID (Gay-Related Immune Deficiency) which came to be called AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). I have no trouble believing Fauci manipulated circumstances for his own purposes, or that big pharma killed more people than it helped, but a hoax?

    I’ve already published several lengthy articles on the topic over the last couple of months, which include extensive references. Just read them:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-vaxxing-anthony-fauci-and-aids/#the-hiv-aids-crisis-as-a-medical-media-hoax

    https://www.unz.com/runz/aids-and-the-revival-of-the-duesberg-hypothesis/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-public-health-problems/#aids-and-the-duesberg-hypothesis

  54. J says:

    Unz is a maestro in lying while telling the truth, suggesting that the Nazis were humanitarians full of compassion trying to save the life of Anna Frank in a German hospital.

    • Replies: @Gidoutahere
    , @Ace
    , @Becky21k
  55. @Ron Unz

    Ron, this is a short piece by Karl Popper called “Science as Falsification”.

    https://staff.washington.edu/lynnhank/Popper-1.pdf

    In truth, I’m enjoying watching your glass floor crack slowly, with respect to medical science.

    That paper (Popper in my mind has an excellent take on the scientific method) is illuminating because: with respect to AIDS, Duesberg’s body blows are not openly falsified by the scientific community (never mind them trying to make their own hypotheses verified).

    “Acquiescence is agreement” within law, but within science, silence is deadly (imo).

    Your current article isn’t really about the current health policies, but there is still a silence here: ignore the vaccines – let’s take long-know-to-be-safe drugs like HCQ, Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Zinc.

    \$15.4bn budget for the CDC, yet Fauci when asked about the efficacy of Vitamin D, Zinc, says something along the lines of “we haven’t run the studies yet”. … ?! Yet they could read 500,000 pages of vaccine documents from Pfizer, over a period of 100ish days, to authorise obviously profitable, new techniques (I actually like them, I just think the potion needs to stew a bit longer to be safe and understandable)?

    Vaccine deaths are not falsifiable either because: VAERS is wank, Eudravigilance is wank, the Yellow card reporting system is wank. It is an approximate responce, but I am being short.

    The thing is, this is not Fauci’s first rodeo – the man played the same tune during the AIDS epidemic (if Duesberg’s (ghost written)) book is anything to go by.

    At the very least, should we not all be in agreement we need a head of the NIH that has fewer skeletons in his closet? (never mind his understanding, or lack there of, of the scientific method)

    • Replies: @Getaclue
  56. @Gizmo880

    I totally forgot about the NYC San Francisco experimental Hep B vaccine given to gays at the time. Thank you for the reminder.

  57. saggy says: • Website

    Anne Frank—a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war—

    There is no actual evidence of this, and the story has changed recently … https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/europe/anne-frank-date-of-death/index.html

    Researchers say Anne Frank perished earlier than thought

    And there is direct evidence that she survived the war. This photo is from the British documentary Memory of the Camps now on the PBS channel, and was taken by the British military photographers as they entered Belsen. The children in the picture are now known as the ‘diamond children’ as their parents were diamond merchants from Amsterdam. The nurse is Luba Tryzynska, the ‘angel of Belsen’, and she and the children were brought together to Amsterdam and greeted by the queen. The group has held reunions in the past. The girl in the front, second from the left, shows a striking resemblance to Anne Frank. I wrote to the Anne Frank center in Amsterdam and asked them to identify the girl, they claimed to have no knowledge of the picture or the girl.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  58. Notsofast says:
    @Commentator Mike

    sirhan sirhan was a patsy and most likely a victim of the mk ultra program. multiple witnesses saw a woman with a polkadot dress with him, that was likely his handler. one of bobbys campaign workers told police she saw her running out the back door exclaiming “we got him” shortly after the shooting. her statement was discounted as a hallucination of an overwrought campaign worker. as to your question of why was a palestinian there with a gun, who do you think would want a palestinian blamed for the assassination?

    • Agree: Alfred, JWalters
    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  59. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62

    … when 96% of Jewish Supremacists own it.

    Correction: s/b 96% of American media owned by Jewish Supremacists.

  60. @emerging majority

    Wasn’t he being recruited to run for senate in NY to replace the retiring Moynihan? JFK Jr’s demise led way for Senator Hillary Clinton. So there is a possibility the Kennedy was Arkancided.

    • Agree: SurfingUSA
  61. Kennedy is definitely being ignored for subject matter. I think it is interesting that his actress wife is now being used to marginalize him. Wonder if she remains by his side, will she “assassinate” him via committing him due to “mental illness ” and for his safety?

  62. Iris says:
    @Commentator Mike

    but what was the Palestinian doing there and then with a gun?

    Sirhan’d been hypnotised. Some people are naturally better subjects than others.

    http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/S%20Disk/Sirhan%20Sirhan%20Trial/Item%2001.pdf

    • Agree: JWalters
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  63. Tom Verso says:

    Ron Unz and the “Pathetic Fallacy”

    The most common and indeed pervasive fallacy in social commentary is the Pathetic Fallacy; as is perfectly illustrated in this article.

    “Fallacy” is defined as “a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument”.

    The “Pathetic Fallacy” is an ‘unsound argument’ resulting from “the attribution of human feelings and responses to inanimate things.”

    The most common example of the pervasive use of the pathetic fallacy in social discussions is the attribution of human characteristics to the inanimate institution of ‘the MEDIA’.

    An institution is defined as: “established organization or corporation.”

    Media in this article is just such of an example of predicating human characteristics to an ‘inanimate institution’.

    For example:
    > “The media establishment regards our vaccination drive…” (i.e. the inanimate institution ‘media’ is predicated to have human mental capacity to made a human judgement (regard) about a social phenomena)

    > “the Associated Press unleashed a ferocious..” (i.e. the inanimate institution ‘Associated Press” is predicated to have human capacity to act ‘ferociously)

    > “When the media targets an individual, it monitors his every utterance, seeking the slightest opening to vilify him …(i.e. the inanimate institution ‘Associated Press” is predicated to have human capacity to ‘target’, ‘monitor’ and ‘seek’;)

    There are many more examples of the Pathetic Fallacy in this article. Indeed in literary terms ‘the media’ may be characterized as the article’s protagonist .

    However, it is important to note that the media as the protagonist is pervasive in all social commentary.

    The reason of this obvious and pervasive use of the pathetic fallacy is the refusal (fear) of social commentors to identity the actual human beings resonsiible for the media, i.e. the owners of the respective media organizations.

    Thus, one comments on ‘The Washington Post” but never Jeff Bezos.

    Again, comments on.the New York Times but never Arthur Gregg Sulzberger

    The Fox News and The Wall Street Journal but not Rupert Murdoch.

    Ultimately it is the owners of media who determine what the media presents to the public. The owners hire the mangers who in turn hire and publish consistent with the owners wishes.

    Use of the Pathetic Fallacy is the means by which social commenters like Ron Unz protect the owners from public ire and thereby perpetuate the prevailing ideology dictated NOT by THE MEDIA by the owners of the media.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    , @Becky21k
  64. @A little boy in the crowd

    Cheryl Hines, Mr. Kennedy’s wife 3rd wife, clearly went over the top, showing disgusting disrespect for her husband. I’m sure she loved the publicity she created. Shows that you can never trust, nor marry, an actress.

    “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” in which she plays Larry David’s wife, is, IMO, a very funny show. Most of the main characters are Jews, and Larry David (also Jewish) loves to poke fun at them. I don’t know if the character Hines plays is also Jewish, but Wikipedia says she was raised Catholic, like her husband. Nonetheless, no spouse should publicly shame her husband without consequence.

    From what I’ve read, Hines doesn’t support Bobby’s mission. Where was she during his DC speech at the anti-mandate rally? A good wife would have been by his side. He should cut her loose. She’s just dragging him down.

  65. Unz- Anne Frank or Sirhan Sirhan: who is the real martyr?

    Also Unz: why is Sailer the only one with any sane readers?

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Ron Unz
  66. Anonymous[586] • Disclaimer says:

    Can commenters please stop insulting Ron Unz here, for the love of God? It’s childish and off-putting. Don’t poison the well for those of us who come here to learn and get closer to the truth. If you think Ron is wrong, make your case respectfully. We’ve all been wrong before, we all have blind spots. If you can’t convince him he’s wrong, why does that matter so much to you? Be grateful you have a forum in which to voice your views to a wider audience than you’d otherwise have; let others judge who’s right and who’s wrong on the merits of your arguments. Simple stuff. And if you think he has sinister motives for running this site, the place to make such an argument is not on his forum. That kind of illogical aggression betrays a muddled mind and weak character. It’s no different than the immigrants who say America is evil and unjust even as they take government handouts and refuse to leave.

  67. @Ron Unz

    I seem to have failed to get #48 linked as intended to #24 so, not to take a chance I am appending the third part here.

    I forgot to mention that the New York Times had about 10 times the circulation of the Saturday Review. This also gives me the opportunity to thank you Ron Unz for making that excellent article by Lowenstein available. He was a loss to his country.

  68. @InnerCynic

    you could cross the alps like the Von Trapp family

    Ever wonder why they didn’t get stopped by barbed wire like Steve McQueen in The Great Escape?

    They left Austria in September 1938, by taking a train to Italy.

  69. @saggy

    I have never seen a picture of Anne Frank that resembles the girl you refer to FWIW.

  70. @Timur The Lame

    Speaking of fake martyrs, how is the case of the “751 Indians ( feather variety ) massacred at Kamloops” going. The Dorchester Review has effectively debunked all this very recently.
    https://www.dorchesterreview.ca/blogs/news/in-kamloops-not-one-body-has-been-found

    I can’t find much more about this later than the January 11 publication date of the article. Is the Canadian MSM still repeating this garbage as if nothing has happened or has it just clammed up ? As a non-Canadian, I would be interested to know.

    • Replies: @Timur The Lame
  71. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    When the media targets an individual, it monitors his every utterance, seeking the slightest opening to vilify him,

    All the major media have been in seamless lockstep throughout the years to engineer the public’s perceptions. They were doing it back during the Maine explosion to sell the so-called Spanish-American war and they’ve been doing it up to the present moment. They’ve been a propaganda arm of the government besides selling consumer products and supposed other news and entertainment. Technology has expanded it’s reach and years of practice and study has refined its trickiness.

    several centuries prior to modern times, standard medical treatments inadvertently took far more lives than they saved,

    What’s seen as quackery now was the state of the art wisdom back then. Our job now is to figure out what in today’s accepted wisdom will be seen tomorrow as quack nonsense. George Washington ‘followed the science’.

  72. @Craig Nelsen

    Robert Gallo was the hero of the day. A virus was the cause of AIDS and not the gay communities reckless use of drugs and sexual over indulgence; thus saving the gays the embarrassment of admitting “they did it to themselves”. The rest of the story stems from profiteers never letting a good crises go to waste. Our current CDC director, the odious Jew Walensky, is an AIDS “expert”.

  73. geokat62 says:

    Looks like Spotify caved…

    Telegram comment posted by Robert W Malone, MD:

    Well, well. They got to Spotify now. Only a matter of time at this point.

    Spotify’s Platform Rules and Approach to COVID-19
    JANUARY 30, 2022

    https://newsroom.spotify.com/2022-01-30/spotifys-platform-rules-and-approach-to-covid-19/

    📌Follow and Share👇🏻
    🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

    https://t.me/RWMaloneMD/1502

  74. @Ron Unz

    The use of the description “hoax” rarely seems to me used with justification on UR where it is usually applied to something that the writer wants to characterise as a monstrous and damaging fraud which should make the reader angry.

    A quick online search produces

    a humorous or malicious deception

    To accommodate the splendid Skokal Hoax I would add something like “or one designed to draw attention to a truth regarded as more important”.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  75. @Franz

    Especially one where the author was killed by a “deranged former student” over 40 years ago.

    One lone nut (Lee Harvey Oswald) is a misfortune. Two (adding Jack Ruby) is carelessness. Three (adding Sirhan Sirhan) is a way of life.

    • Agree: JWalters, Franz
  76. Iris says:
    @utu

    He thought that giving support to the anti-vaxxer wackos would make him safe that he would be dismissed as a harmless eccentric.

    The anti-vaxxing sentiment has been growing forcefully and globally for at least two decades, born of of the terrible “pandemic” of autism in young children, that can only be attributed to the quality of vaccines, or to vaccine cocktails too large for children’s young immune systems.

    Covid ant-vaxxing movement was only the logical and final consequence of anger and distrust that have been brewing for far too long. You see yourself as supremely rational; most of the time, you are just ignorant.

    • Replies: @UR2
  77. @J

    Frank story likely a hoax to instill sympathy for the Jews while they pick our pockets. There is nothing sacred about Jewish “history”. Indeed, this Unz piece laments the largely Jewish controlled medias omissions, lies, and distortions. Who is lying to whom? Maybe little Anne is a lampshade – the horror.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  78. @A little boy in the crowd

    Nonetheless, no spouse should publicly shame her husband without consequence.

    She didn’t watch Godfather II?

    What would be an analog to this? Has any notable woman taken sides against her husband in this fashion ever? I cannot think of anything even close.

  79. Iris says:
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Unz- Anne Frank or Sirhan Sirhan: who is the real martyr?

    Both are martyrs, in a different way. Why put a hierarchy in the suffering of human beings?

  80. @geokat62

    Once again, Geo, we see the Police as attack dogs for the judeo-masonic death machine that goes under the name of democratic government, elected by popular ballot.
    Recently Polizei in Germany beat peaceful protesters, incl women, with batons.

    I occasionally access Gab and see Americans desperate to get Trump, the most blatant jew tool, back in power. Maybe he will assassinate more Iranian leaders for Israel. There seems NO, as in NIL and ZERO, suspicion that the entire Bidet “election” was just maybe a piece of theatre designed for that end.
    These people mostly cheer on their Police and their Military.
    They identify themselves as Patriots.

  81. anonymous[994] • Disclaimer says:

    Regarding the ‘Anne Frank’ etc type of comment, Israeli media itself is making similar comparisons

    Ziona Greenwald in the Times of Israel, compares discrimination against unvaccinated people, to the early stages of 1930s-40s Nazi crimes against Jews, saying that:

    Nazi crimes against Jews took place in stages, earlier stages being social shaming and de-humanisation

    Social shaming and de-humanisation of the unvaxed is also taking place in stages … so what later stages might follow?

    ‘This is how it happens’
    https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/this-is-how-it-happens/

  82. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I seem to remember reading that Kennedy actually said he believed that HIV caused AIDS.

    The 200 pages in Kennedy’s book attacking the orthodox HIV/AIDS narrative is probably the longest such exposition published anywhere since the 1990s, and the books that were released 25-30 years ago probably sold merely a sliver of his 500,000 copies. As I mentioned in my original review, he did include a couple of sentences as a personal disclaimer, but it’s unlikely that the rabidly hostile media would pay much attention to that.

    For the last several decades, individuals who made a case 99% less comprehensive than Kennedy’s have been ferociously vilified as “AIDS Deniers with blood on their hands.”

    And your facts are incompletely stated. You say Lowenstein wrote up his theory in the Saturday Review in 1977, after which it took three years for some cabal to organise his death! But it had already been adequately written up in the New York Times by John Crewdson in 1974

    Thanks, I hadn’t been aware of the earlier NYT article, which apparently was substantially based upon Lowenstein’s efforts to get the national media to cover the issue. I guess he eventually gave up and later published the lengthy cover-story in Saturday Review, which also included a great deal of additional evidence.

    Also, why did you say that Lowenstein’s friends (who? Edward Kennedy and William F. Buckley Jr?) are said not to have believed that Loewnstein was shot by a schizophrenic under a delusion?

    I’d only been very slightly familiar with Lowenstein, and discovered that he’d been shot after I read his Wikipedia page, which made me wonder a little. However, one of his friends then emphatically told me that he and the others had never accepted the official story. The incident happened over 40 years ago, and that’s the total limit of my knowledge. I was just passing along what I had been personally told.

  83. anon[729] • Disclaimer says:

    This is a frickin masterpiece of Unzian needling:

    “Hey, not only did he diss the fake holocaust Jews, he ratted out Gottlieb’s shop for brainwashing Sirhan Sirhan Sirhan to whack Bobby Kennedy so he couldn’t reopen the JFK coup records! The noive!”

    Any minute now Avril Haines is gonna rappel down his house and shoot him with a ANX-A2 blowdart.

  84. @emerging majority

    I remember the JFK jr incident and I remember reading in the non msm sites that I frequented at the time the possibility that it was no accident, the Hillary angle and that some fisherman heard a bang of some sorts and for all intents a purposes I believed that it was no accident.

    A very good friend of mine who is/was a commercial small plane pilot was visiting right at that time and he explained to me how dis-orienting night flying without instrument certification could be and he went through the motions but as I don’t know anything about flying, plus that he was more or less a ‘normie’ with respect to believing the news, I dismissed his opinion.

    Only many years later when I picked up a couple of books that dealt with second generation of the family not the incident as such did I start to change my mind on the subject. There were lots of minor contributing factors and delays that fateful evening as well as nasty strife with his wife that could have set his mind off. He also was a risk taker and wasn’t night certified.

    Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. I now believe that he did splash the plane due to disorientation. After changing my mind I came across a Youtube by a retired pilot that walked through just exactly what JFK Jr would have been looking at in the cockpit and it sort of confirmed my revised take on the incident. Of course that is only my opinion but I believe it to be correct.

    BTW, if you like to keep a small record of airplane ‘mishaps’, do you remember Majority Leader Hale Boggs Sr. and his Alaskan plane crash? Guess who dropped him off at the airport? None other than a 19 year old William Jefferson Clinton!

    The term “Wellstoned” is in minor use for suspicious accidents by politicians but it took place in 2002. Boggs Sr. went down in 1972. Maybe the accepted term should be “Bogged Down”-ha!

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @republic
  85. HT says:

    I am guessing every school child in America had to read Anne Frank in the 1960’s. All part of the jewing of America and propagandizing us as early as possible. Now no criticism of the sacred Jew is tolerated as they destroy our country by looting it and spreading degeneracy of every form.

  86. @Craig Nelsen

    30 years ago, I think the satirical magazine Private Eye best summed all this up.
    They assured us that AIDS stood for Anal Injection and Death Syndrome..

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  87. Ron Unz says:
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Also Unz: why is Sailer the only one with any sane readers?

    Well, if you go over to the National Review website, almost all the readers and commenters will be “sane”…

    • LOL: JimDandy
  88. geokat62 says:

    Danish government has recently decided that Covid “should no longer be critical to public health.”

    Denmark’s Chief Modeller: Why we’ve ended ALL Covid laws

    Description:

    Freddie Sayers meets Dr Camilla Holten-Møller, chair of the Expert Group for Mathematical Modelling at Denmark’s public health agency ‘Statens Serum Institut’.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  89. Re. Anne Frank (Audrey Hepburn)

    Daily Stormer: Fake Liberation Photos: Anne Frank’s stepsister admits it was all a giant con; Jan. 29, 2020

    [MORE]

    “Anne Frank may not have inked that famous diary” New York Post, 9 October 1980

    “Blue Paste, an expertise of the federal crime department proofs: In the diary of Anne Frank editings have been made afterwards. The authenticity of the diary is thus further cast into doubt.” Allied licensed msm “Der Spiegel” 41/1980 – 6 Oct 1980

    “Anne Frank Hoax: Finally, an Admission” National Vanguard, Rose Pennington, 28 Feb 2016

    “Anne Frank: Was her father co-author? Die Presse, 20.11.2015

    Polskaweb News: “Audrey Hepburn was Anne Frank”

    “Is the “Diary” of Anne Frank Genuine?”, Robert Faurisson, engl. rsp. ital edition

    “Anne Frank’s Diary – A Hoax” by Ditlieb Felderer, orig. published by bible researcher, Taby, Sweden

    Anne Frank Hoax Exposed: Clever Jew Made Millions from Dead Daughter; by Dr. William L. Pierce (1980)

    • Thanks: Emil Nikola Richard
    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  90. Dutch Boy says:

    The explanation for RFK’s assassination from some is that he never bought the Lee H. Oswald single gunman theory of his brother’s assassination but could do nothing about it when LBJ was prez. He was determined to re-investigate when he became prez and his victory in the California primary made that highly likely. That victory triggered the assassination by the folks who had done in JFK.

  91. Iris says:
    @Tono Bungay

    Even if there was another shooter whose shots were those that killed RFK, how can Jr. logically argue that Sirhan was innocent?

    Firstly, because Sirhan never shot Mr Robert Kennedy.
    Here is a photo of coroner Thomas Noguchi, who performed the autopsy, showing the trajectories of the bullets that killed RFK. They all came from behind, and were shot by Thane Eugene Cesar.

    Sirhan was standing about several meters in front of RFK, so could have never shot him behind the ear at point blank.

    Second, it is certain that Sirhan is the scapegoat of a political cover up.
    Paul Schrade, on the photo to the right, a friend and political ally of RFK, was also shot in the head on that tragic day. He said this about Sirhan:

    my first step was to acknowledge what we know about Sirhan, that he didn’t do it and couldn’t have done it and that was covered up completely by the investigation. That’s why I went down to visit him because I

    https://whowhatwhy.org/podcast/rfk-assassination-an-eyewitness-to-history/

    Sirhan has maintained having no recollection whatsoever of the tragedy, which cost him his parole.
    He was possibly hypnotised.

    Sirhan: A “Manchurian Candidate” in the RFK Assassination?

    https://whowhatwhy.org/podcast/sirhan-a-manchurian-candidate-in-the-rfk-assassination/

  92. @Wizard of Oz

    The “Skokal Hoax “? Do you mean The Sokal Affair, which wasn’t humorous or malicious ?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair

    Or do you mean The Skripal Affair, which wasn’t humorous, but was a malicious deception carried out by MI6 ?

  93. @Alfred

    I don’t know the dynamics of your family. I would flee and keep my daughter away from these lunatics until she is 18 years.

  94. @Ron Unz

    All National Review commenters must be certified sane, otherwise they won’t publish their comments. Same goes for the writers,too. Otherwise they sack them and they end up writing for UR, or worse.
    (PS I’m sure you got Derbyshire to take a medical first before letting him loose on the readership )

    • Troll: Iris
  95. Concerning RFK, Jr.’s revelations concerning AIDS and HIV, see the outrageous Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism. I was directed there by Wikipedia when I went looking for the subject of “psychological denial.” They don’t have a page for that non-political diagnosis common in the field of psychology. This is a pretty good reminder to be skeptical of what one finds on Wikipedia.

    • Replies: @Getaclue
  96. Wild Man says:

    “The hostile media demanded that Kennedy immediately apologize for his heated words regarding fascism and Anne Frank, and to his credit he quickly did so.”

    Mr. Unz: You continue to miss what should be the main takeaway, from your Kennedy expose. No, ….. apologizing, when there was nothing to apologize for, is not to Mr. Kennedy’s credit (though I understand why he did so, ….. he did so from a position of weakness that is not fully of his making).

    What in heaven’s name was there anything to apologize for? We are experiencing covid fascism. Our authorities are behaving like covid nazis. The holocaust industry has made so much hay over a certain strain of ethno-fascism, to the point that ‘fascism’s’ #1 example, by far, is Nazi Germany, within the popular western cultural milieu. But fascism comes in many many flavors and the ethno-variety is only one. Nevertheless, the holocaust industry has worked to make the Nazi example (of ethno-type-fascism) the #1 way, in which it interpret the term ‘fascism’ within the popular culture.

    Mr. Unz …. please, … just say the rest of it already (that one of the biggest cultural problems in the west is that the Jewish passive-aggressive-type ethno-fascism is left to operate as the sacrosanct fascism, that must always and forever be officially free of the ‘fascism’ moniker, so as to remain sacrosanct). Kennedy, to his credit, uses a phrase that borrows from these cultural facts, and look what happens. And then you say that, it his to his credit, that he apologized? What is wrong with you?

  97. @Badger Down

    Half of the diary written by Ball point pen which still had to be invented???
    Lot of fakery went on then and is still going on.

    • Replies: @Getaclue
  98. @Craig Nelsen

    Once late at night, before DVRs or on OnDemand, I happened to catch a peculiar documentary on Bravo about homosexuals who gave each other AIDS on purpose. It was morbidly fascinating. One of the homosexuals said he had been sodomized by over 50 other men on the occasion of his 23rd birthday, without the use of prophylactics. Of course such practices could transmit a virus, but it’s also possible that having the semen, which is to say the DNA, of scores of men injected into one’s bowels would disrupt intestinal flora to the point of causing a fatal condition.

  99. Anne Frank and Sirhan Sirhan would have made a cute couple.

  100. Ace says:
    @J

    So why did the Germans put her in a hospital?

  101. @geokat62

    Covid-19 is a pandemic which can be declared by government decree and it can also be abolished by government decree.

    • Agree: RestiveUs
  102. Alfred says:

    I don’t know the dynamics of your family. I would flee and keep my daughter away from these lunatics until she is 18 years.

    I wish I could have. I was divorced and outside Australia when the borders were shut. My ex-wife – a GP in Melbourne – supported our daughter’s wishes. The legal papers only came to me a few months ago. The court hearings in Canberra were held online.

    I have done plenty of mistakes in my life, but moving to Australia was the biggest one.

  103. saggy says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    Anne (IMO) and Anne …Incidentally, there was another Jewish kid in Belsen who wasn’t from Amsterdam, who went on to become a prof. at Berkeley … he wrote about his experiences …. ‘Memories of a Coal Child’ http://faculty.ce.berkeley.edu/coby/essays/coalchild.htm

  104. @Verymuchalive

    Hi!

    I can’t help you much there friend. I haven’t watched TV or bought newspapers going on for over two decades and even then I had an aversion for Canadian news. Even the history is gruelingly boring.

    It makes it easier for me to tell ‘normie’ friends and neighbours that I don’t know anything about the subject without lying hence avoiding irritating discussions.

    The rest of the world however does interest me. Through my own prism of course.

    Cheers-

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  105. Ace says:
    @emerging majority

    Nigel Farage survived a small plane crash.

  106. Getaclue says:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    Fauci is where he is exactly because of the “skeletons in his closet” — you do get that?

    Why do you think so many Pedos are in high places and types like Epstein have walk in access to Presidents (Clinton seeing Epstein at the White(Whore)House with 8 girls in tow etc.). Fauci literally funded the creation of the CVirus at WuHan with our Tax \$\$\$, anyone not an idiot, in on it, or in denial knows this now, Fauci created this “monster” — yet he’s still on TV endlessly instructing/pontificating to us on what freedoms we should and shouldn’t have, Biden has stated he will “NEVER” fire him —

    The fact Fauci is not at the very least fired now, if not in prison or worse, tells you all you need to know about how things are “run” using such scum/psychopaths to front the “Elite’s” vicious programs for depopulation and/or enslavement of the Peons (most of which are all for it of course and love “America’s Doctor” and injecting the “next” “Booster” as told….) — the fact even here at UNZ people, intelligent people, have not woken up to the fact the Vx is actually a poison massively distributed is a real head scratcher for me– at this point you have to be willfully ignorant not to have clued in on it….

    This is good on a Bible mistranslation that when corrected tells you what is up right now– we were all warned as to what is going on now by God Himself but to no avail for so many– “Booster up” now…morons:

    https://www.barnhardt.biz/2022/01/26/you-gotta-be-kidding-me-mailbag-revelation-1823-for-thy-merchants-were-the-great-men-of-the-earth-for-by-thy-pharmaceuticals-were-all-nations-deceived-edition/

    • Thanks: Emil Nikola Richard
    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  107. Getaclue says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    Been to the “house” — very weird vibe there of something that was created, very weird…all about selling tickets, \$ maker…not saying she didn’t exist but…the ball point pen thing is for real and it matches the house set up….

  108. Getaclue says:
    @David Martin

    A group of Loons edit Wikipedia–especially the political stuff — from what I gather — never use it for anything but some general thing that no one would bother lying about–it’s totally politicized by Leftists/Establishment creeps full of lies/slanders….

    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @Ace
  109. @Random Anonymous

    Bringing the fact that the “dog [media] did not bark” about RFK Jr.’s support of the RFK Sr. conspiracy theory nicely complements your point about their not doing so either about the HIV/AIDS issue, and the inference that they’re afraid of scrutiny on those areas.

    Media people instinctively know which issues to avoid and cover up. In fact, we all know which issues are forbidden by trauma programming. We see the way people that raise certain issues are treated by “society” (meaning the media, government and police), and a normally socialised person avoids the subject matter or becomes a volunteer enforcer for it (in the case of celebrating X) or against it (in the case of forbidden truths).

  110. MrE3001 says:

    Never noticed that Anne had such deep set eyes, a wide dental arch, and high cheekbones. Not surprising, though.

  111. Nancy says:
    @Gizmo880

    ‘Poppers’ (to soften the anus plus other detrimental side effects, including inhibiting the immune system) became very, very, very popular with gays at this time, and the amazing promiscuity of gays (bathhouses, etc) which exposed them to innumerable pathogens, added up to making them very, very vulnerable to many diseases. AID S patients die of a whole suite of illnesses. So a ‘virus’ was necessary so as to find a ‘silver bullet’ to enrich Pharma…. enter Fauci.

    Prof. Deusberg has laid this out completely…. for your answers, get RFK’s book from the library and check out the appropriate chapter. All this ‘theorizing’ is silly …. the answers are at your fingertips.

    • Replies: @Herald
    , @Ned Kelly
    , @Peg B
  112. TREG says:

    I am so grateful to Ron Unz and his growing American Pravda Series. I do what I can by sharing it at every opportunity. I owe him so much. I feel a deep gratitude to him personally and yet I’ve never met the man. A big high five, that’s for sure! Thank you.

    • Agree: dearieme, Nancy
  113. TomasRose says:

    “seeking the slightest opening to vilify him” Or any opening at all…

    https://nypost.com/2021/09/23/anti-vax-conspiracy-theorist-rfk-jr-is-the-dumbest-kennedy/

    • Replies: @Insouciant
  114. Taking away the microphone in this information age is burying you. It works. When search engines can’t find you, it really really works. I found this website through google, no one can do that now.

    • Agree: Realist
  115. @Verymuchalive

    Though they be mere minions, it continues to surprise me that some half-crazed PTSD vet exuded from “serving his country”, now suffering from a terminal diagnosis of one of those induced fatal conditions has not taken it upon himself to take out one of those pre\$\$titute talking-heads who “earns” perhaps a cool million per year smilingly lying to the public. He could take him out to a fancy-schmancy restaurant where only the elite hang out, assume a false I.D. of someone on the “A” list.

    Had I the skills of a novelist, it could make a blockbuster book/movie scenario. Perhaps someone posting or lurking here at UR, has those particular skills. If so, the idea is happily granted to you.

    • Replies: @Si1ver1ock
    , @Kratoklastes
  116. Pheasant says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Yeah but thats just made up cover for the real story which was that they were caught because they were running a rationing scam. They purchased black market food coupons at a time when the Dutch were starving. Makes Jews look bad. The Franks were criminals.

  117. Towey says:
    @Brás Cubas

    I disagree. All the antivaxxers I know were previously pro vaccines. It was their personal experience with a vaccine injured child that drove them to them to become antivaxxers.
    I personally was motivated to research vaccines by the increase in the number of autistic children being raised by young colleagues. In my previous 60 years of existence, I had never encountered one autistic child.
    My research into the damages caused by vaccines and the complete absence of liability on the part of the pharmaceutical companies has pushed me firmly into the antivaxxers camp. Antivaxxers are not conspiracy theorists. Our beliefs have a firm solid basis.

    • Agree: Dutch Boy, Agent76
    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
    , @Agent76
  118. @HeebHunter

    Does anyone else think commenters like HeebHnter are trolls? They are really making it hard to recommend UNZ, but then, I suppose that is their purpose.

    • Troll: Sepp
  119. Anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:

    A parasitic race will always find a way to milk the host and there will be no shame in their game.

  120. @Getaclue

    Tell us more about Frank house.

    A friend — gay, as it happens — boasted that he visited Frank house on his visit to Europe.
    My esteem for him dropped considerably.

    Neighborhood bookstore owner held an Anne Frank day.
    She said there are multiple versions of The Diary. “They’ve been amended as new material is discovered.”

    I wonder if the next New Version will report on the Jewish guy who turned in the black-marketing Franks?

  121. @Tom Verso

    Ultimately it is the owners of media who determine what the media presents to the public.

    Agreed–as one of the podcasters around here likes to say:

    “Politics is about who, not what.”

  122. @TomasRose

    “seeking the slightest opening to vilify him” Or any opening at all…

    Why in the world did RFKJr provide that “opening”?
    Surely he could have seen that coming. Or should have.

    @ #78:

    Has any notable woman taken sides against her husband in this fashion ever? I cannot think of anything even close.

    Anne Morrow Lindbergh lamented her husband Charles’s reference to Jews in his Iowa speech, but it was not in the same “fashion,” but only “close.”

    Charles’s reference to Jews was at least in context.

    Can’t for the life of me understand why RFKJr thought he had to “go there.”
    Not making any reference at all to the sacred Big H would have been the thing to do.

    Was RFK set up to undermine his own message and sabotage the Protest in DC?

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  123. Ace says:
    @Getaclue

    Try to make a non-PC, not-inflammatory edit and you’ll get an instant un-edit.

  124. @Ron Unz

    I wouldn’t know, I visit your site daily and I haven’t paid any attention to national review in years.

    Sirhan Sirhan can rot, and I don’t see the point of having a go at some poor kid who died of typhus during ww2, whatever you think of the mythology constructed around it.

  125. In our deeply secular society, Nazi Germany has replaced Satan as the epitome of pure evil, while Anne Frank—a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war—has been elevated to the status of a sacred martyr.

    So those WW2 Nazis weren’t such bad fellows after all. Their putting the teenaged Anne Frank into a German hospital was surely evidence of that.

    Mr. Unz could have put any words he wanted into that link – that’s how it works. The subtitle of the link used the words “dying from typhus in a concentration camp hospital”. But he didn’t use those words!

    It took only a few minutes to make a search for the Bergen Belsen Hospital.

    In the last days before liberation, up to 600 people were dying each day from hunger and sickness. The Germans alleged that Allied bombs destroyed a water pump and therefore many of the inmates were dying of thirst, having been without any water for six days. Facilities existed to bake 60,000 loaves of bread daily, but only 10,000 loaves a day were provided for inmates, the rest was sent to feed German soldiers. British forces discovered that inmates had been without any food for six days and that no medical supplies existed in the camp (Hardman, 1958).

    {and}

    When British forces entered the camp initially they saw nothing to cause alarm but deeper in the camp they were confronted with an estimated 10,000 unburied naked bodies. The stench was so horrendous that it could be smelled up to ten miles from the camp (Introduction to Bergen Belsen, 2002).

    https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.248048781193313

    The Evil Allies had destroyed the water pump! So now the Nice Nazis couldn’t help the “inmates dying of thirst”. Obviously there was no point of wasting bread on the poor thirsty inmates, so the most all the food went to German Soldiers. Likely these German Soldiers were trying very hard to prevent the Evil Allies from doing even more harm to the poor inmates. No telling what the Murderous British Troops might have done to the thirsty, starving, naked, hospital-without-medicine patients.

    Congratulations to Mr. Unz on producing some world-class Newspeak.

  126. turtle says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    I am profoundly disillusioned by Mr. Kennedy’s disgusting grovel.
    IMO, he said absolutely nothing which required an apology.

    • Agree: InnerCynic
  127. Corrupt says:

    “Anne Frank—a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war—has been elevated to the status of a sacred martyr

    Tell me about it. Apparently saying anything about her sluttish ways will get you kicked off facebook. Don’t ask how I know that.

  128. @Getaclue

    Replying here because Getaclue and Rev. Spooner raise two interesting issues:

    Gospels are fake = Jesus never existed
    Diary is fake = Anne Frank never existed

    Sherlock Holmes never existed, yet there are a dozen or more “replica” of 122b Baker St. constructed by LARPing fans, selling tickets and souvenirs.
    Anne Frank never existed, yet there’s a replica house, selling tickets and souvenirs.

    Interesting, eh?

  129. @JackOH

    The tentacles of the Octopus always work in concert. Your assessment of the medical monopoly schemes fostered by the world’s leading drug-dealers is correct and to the point.

    Those property crimes by junkies, as you note, are the ultimate result of CIA control over both the heroin and cocaine rackets. Their Black-Ops units receive their primary financing via those shenanigans, and thusly have no need to bring such budgetary matters up before Congress.

    [MORE]

    Now we arrive at the next of the spin-off rackets involved in this whole meta-conspiracy: The totally corrupt, but properly titled CRIMINAL “Justice” system. It begins in Congre\$\$, which enacts some 50 new elements of felony legislation per session. Over time, that has added up to more than 5,000 federal-level felonies. There’s a book out titled “Three Felonies per Day”. The author did his research and discovered that the average American, knowingly or innocently, commits no fewer than three such felonies every DAY.

    That metastasizing increase in felonies gives federally corrupted police departments, and particularly the crime-creating FBI bureaucracy; innumerable opportunities to “grease” up. Forfeiture laws are a case of Santa being real for corrupt cops. Say they knock down someone facing a felony or felonies. Particularly when this involves drugs, they are fully granted the power to ransack the victim’s residence and make off with all valuables as well as trashing the place. Great fun, eh?

    Those forfeitures also extend to the Feebees, who go after bank-accounts, real-estate and similar assets. The Bureau is generous enough with their junior confederates to give them a share in the loot.

    So we next segue into the court system, which of course is “overburdened” with their titanic caseloads. That means procedures proceed at a snail’s—or even glacial pace–so even if the accused has some resources and hires a pricey federal okayed trial lawyer, he’s out scores of thousands and may very well not be able to prove his innocence.

    You see, in federal district courts, the current conviction rate runs at 99%—not quite up to the perfected standards of Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s USSR–but essentially a slam-dunk for the pro\$ticutor.

    Now, we must consider the plight of those accused who are not gentlefolk of considerable means. Unable to post sufficient bail (which is generally kept at excessive levels) they languish for months and sometimes years in one of those fifty or more county jails in the particular federal district where the “offense” occurred. Those places receive over \$100 per day to house and feed the as yet untried defendants. From that C-Note + , they need to extract about \$2.00 per prisoner to feed him or her. It’s doubtful whether county commissioners or state governments go out of their ways to audit those favored institutions.

    So with that tremendous cash-flow, there is a lot of grease to share, not only from direct federal income, but also with contractors who supply food, medicines, clothing, fuel, bedding, vehicles, uniforms and other necessities. Depending on the part of the country, the grease may not take the form of cash, but rather such emoluments as time-shares, crates of high-grade whiskey, high-end golfing and additional goodies from those companies which receive the contracts with the institutions.

    Finally, when the hapless detainee, ultimately is blackmailed and bribed by the court to enter a guilty plea, he then is processed by the Bureau of Prisons and assigned to one of it’s facilities. The grease system in those institutions is roughly similar to those in the favored jails.

    Once upon a time, when liberals were liberal, there were numerous opportunities offered to prisoners to learn trades and other rehabilitative programs. No longer do those institutions offer anything much more than human warehousing cramped quarters and diets and medical care all the way up to equivalence with higher Third-World levels. All that dinero goes to the usual suspects.

    As you may have gathered from the above revelations, those tentacles of the Octopus work hand-in-glove with other governmental tentacles as well as with various favored corporations. It’s all about the money. Currently, the U\$ is dominated by predators and parasites, most of them being connected by navel-cords to the federal regime in the Di\$trict of Corruption.

    Of course, taxpayer dollars via the IR\$ and increasing Federal debt levels to the Bank\$ter Crime Clan owners of the “Federal” Reserve provide the gelt for this \$hitpile of corruption.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  130. turtle says:
    @RoatanBill

    US government that can’t be trusted to tell you the time of day.

    Actually, that is one of the few things US Gov can be trusted on.
    https://www.dullmensclub.com/demetrios-matsakis-the-nations-timekeeper/

  131. @PJ London

    Where’s your evidence that then-South African President Thabo Mbeki ‘threatened to reveal the actual numbers [of ‘AIDS’ cases relative to the so-called ‘HIV’ infection rate in about 2010] and was paid an enormous bribe to STFU’?

  132. @Olivier1973

    Maybe those jabs require a change in spelling as “Vaccines” still have a warm and fuzzy rep with a lot of people.

    Perhaps a simple spelling change as “VaXXXines”. Those tripled “X”es have a certain level of street-cred. At the least, the switch has the possible result of encouraging readers to think. Yes, it’s true, I favor “giving them ideas”. Never know what happens when folks are enabled to think for themselves. Gasp! They could begin to go “off Message”.

    • Replies: @Olivier1973
  133. @We are all dumb

    Your self-description is perfectly apt, except for the fact that you are employing third-person when you use the pronoun “We”. Please do speak for yourself.

  134. @Getaclue

    I mostly agree, but we should push softly on ol’ Unzie – he’s just waking up to it, so best try more careful arguments.

    I dunno if the are all paedos mind you, just that they are all amoral and happily support each other’s criminal and lustful inclinations.

  135. Took me six weeks over the holidays and into Advent to get through RFK Jr.’s Fauci book, a very difficult read and useful for the very reasons Ron suggests: the Empire can only go so far in criticizing Bobby’s boy before the Boomers and Gen Xers with the tiniest shreds left of historical memory and conscience start to ask themselves difficult questions. Messing with the Kennedy mythos is messing with a power that might undo years of hard work if they give him too much airtime.

    Dense and cramming too much on each over-filled page, the book was also a little tiresome with gratuitous digs against Trump, while operating with one foot still in a world that gives any credit whatsoever to the CIA trash being peddled by the New York Times and Wikipedia.
    Heck, after the last 6 years Bobby Jr. still calls himself a Democrat – you do the math on that one.

    And as far as the AIDS/AZT revelations go, decades too late to make a difference anyway, they pale in comparison to the global genocidal madness of the Covid death jabs whose fallout is just getting started. Yes it’s Fauci’s schtick, but will that matter to the DOJ or Congress even if the truth comes out on the sidelines? Yeah it’s nice that a few fringe free speech websites are now taking the Fauci/AZT scam seriously, but does anybody here or elsewhere really think this late stage awareness will stop the apocalyptic freight train heading our way on a scale that is a gazillion times worse?

  136. Trinity says:

    Wonder how many German girls the same age as Ann Frank were brutalized, beaten, raped or were burned alive by the Allies during and after the war? What, no books on that one? No movies? No memorials? No pastors denouncing mans inhumanity by preaching how “the good guys” raped millions of Germans, young and old, female and even male.

    • Agree: JM
    • Thanks: Arthur MacBride
  137. Olivier1973 says: • Website
    @emerging majority

    Sorry, but I disagree. Any word looking like “vaccine” is non starter, as it inevitably makes think to a vaccine.

    Camus said: “Malnommer les choses, c’est ajouter au malheur du monde.”

    “To misname things is to add to the misfortune of the world.”

    I prefer “mRNA toxic products”. It is longer, but it describes the thing exactly.

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
  138. Dutch Boy says:
    @Towey

    The utter indifference of the medical establishment about the ongoing autism disaster would be inexplicable if one were not aware that they are complicit in its (iatro)genesis. The fox does not investigate the chicken coop raid.

  139. @emerging majority

    “JFK Jr.”

    Both JFK Jr. and Hillary Clinton were eyeing the senate seat for New York up-for-grabs in the 2000 election. Guess who’s plane went down July 1999 in the waters off Martha’s Vineyard. Hillary is a long-time shadow state asset; probably beginning when she was a staff lawyer for the Watergate Committee where she moonlighted for the CIA stealing the pedo-files from the Committee’s massive intelligence intake on all the players involved in the investigation.

    “Bu\$h Crime Clan”

    You got that right. The Bushes are a tawdry American tributary of the Astor bloodline. Russ Baker, a left-leaning author/investigative reporter published Family of Secrets in 2008, a well-researched exploration into clandestine doings of the Bush milieu.

    Say what you will about the Kennedys, a political clan with long-time ties to organized crime. But it was their blood that was shed in the shadow state upheaval of the 1960s.

    • Agree: Agent76
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  140. @geokat62

    Maybe Cheryl was just trying to save her spot in next season’s Curb Your Enthusiasm.

  141. @republic

    Yes, thank you. It is well written and I will probably re-read it but I found things there that I did not agree with given my own reading. If my mind will be changed it will be due to the back and forth in the comments section.

    Unz.com is the only site that I am aware of where the comments improve the deeper you go and if you are truly interested in a topic where your own knowledge is limited and your basic take on it is somewhat neutral, going through the comments will greatly help you in forming a qualified opinion.

    My most recent experience in this was going through 1000+ comments on the LBJ/Moon Hoax article. I loved every minute of it without any desire or inclination to enter the fray.

    Cheers-

  142. Agent76 says:

    Aug 30, 2020 Legendary Speech Robert Kennedy Jr. in Berlin 2020

    Full speech of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Berlin. 29th august 2020.

    January 24, 2022 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “Defeat the Mandates” Rally

    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. spoke in front of more than 30,000 people at the “Defeat the Mandates” rally Sunday in Washington, DC, calling to end vaccine mandates, government overreach and censorship, and to fortify democracy against intrusive technologies.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-speech-defeat-the-mandates/

    • Thanks: PDXLibertarian, Iris
  143. Herald says:
    @Nancy

    Better still buy RFK’s book.

  144. Agent76 says:
    @Towey

    This is informative as well. Thanks for posting Towey.

    Dec 17 2021 WOW Dr. Charles Hoffe Delivers A Dose Of Reality You Can’t Afford To Miss!!!

    On Thursday December 16th in Pemberton BC Dr. Charles Hoffe gave a speech to about 100 people who braved the cold to hear his message and it certainly was loud and clear.

  145. Anon[419] • Disclaimer says:

    German press going apesh*t over Dutch book alleging Anne Frank was ratted out by the head of the local Judenrat ( use google translate )

    https://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/anne-frank-holocaust-verrat-1.5519054

    • Replies: @babu
  146. Anon[336] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m confused; is Ron waking-up, or is he angling for an invite to Martha’s Vineyard to mingle with our political royalty this summer?

    Anyone?

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  147. Very interesting and compelling thesis as to why the media whore dogs failed to bark.

  148. Anon[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @saggy

    Incidentally, there was another Jewish kid in Belsen who wasn’t from Amsterdam, who went on to become a prof. at Berkeley … he wrote about his experiences ….

    . . . one of which invented the ballpoint pen.

    With a tinkerer’s mind like hers, it’s a shame she didn’t survive, might have invented a new & improved twisty tie for sliced bread, or something.

  149. Ned Kelly says:
    @Nancy

    I read this entire book years ago. I learned about ‘poppers’ from the book. I was like: Oh my God! Who would take a drug labeled nail polish remover! But for queers it’s nothing… Poppers are labeled or packaged as room deodorizers, leather polish, nail polish remover, or videotape head cleaner to evade anti-drug laws.
    The Book was intriguing but I don’t have the enough science to judge. But it does highlight some glaring anomalies. Seemingly one disease for Africa and quite another for the rest of the world. AZT was probably worse than the disease…
    My beef was the medical establishments and the “Gay community” (Gay inc) lockstep propaganda.
    To insure that the Gays were not demonized, blamed or even questioned. Their “life style” wasn’t obstructed with with any public health rules, restrictions or penalties. Gays were blameless victims and condoms (Safe Sex) were the public health cure-all…
    But you have to acknowledge that they did a marvelous job educating the public to the fact that HIV/AIDS could not be spread by casual conduct… Not even conspiracy nuts believe that!

    https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/nitrite-poppers

  150. Wild Man says:
    @Insouciant

    On this passage of your comment:

    “Can’t for the life of me understand why RFKJr thought he had to “go there.”
    Not making any reference at all to the sacred Big H would have been the thing to do.

    Was RFK set up to undermine his own message and sabotage the Protest in DC?”

    You are just so wrong. Sorry, but not sorry – the Jewish holocaust industry has made it so, that ‘Nazi’ is synonymous with ‘fascism’. Kennedy didn’t do that. Jews did. The larger Jewish community-proper, in the very least, allowed those Jews in their midst to sponsor the popular concept of ‘fascism’ and ‘Nazi’ as synonymous terms.

    And we now have covid nazis (i.e. – covid fascists). And you and others (even inclusive of Mr. Unz perhaps … see comment #96 above) go clutching at ‘my precious Nazi pearls’ ….. terminology usable by thee, but not by me (or Kennedy) apparently. Go feck yourself, if that is what you think. Pathetic.

  151. @A little boy in the crowd

    RFK the Lesser’s comments were factually incorrect, and, I would say, an obvious attempt to worship in the Holocaust pseudo-religion. And truly foolish. Even merely mentioning a victim of the Judeocide invites deliberate distortion, attack and abuse from the ‘antisemitism’ industry, particularly when you are threatening Jewish elite interests, which he does by questioning the CoViD narrative, which, among other things, is 100% kosher. And his wife works in Hollywood, so MUST grovel, incessantly, although she may be so thoroughly brainwashed that she believes the garbage she is spouting.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  152. @Kurt Knispel

    It’s probably the lesser of two evils. RFK knows that should he speak truth about the Jews he instantly becomes a non-person. Which in turn means that he’s powerless to further his main objective, exposing the vaxx genocide.

  153. @Charles

    Advertising is a pure Evil, without ANY redeeming features. It is a very pure offspring of its parent-capitalism.

    • Replies: @RestiveUs
    , @Wizard of Oz
  154. Wild Man says:
    @Wild Man

    The media is trying for this antisemitic crap in Canada too over the ‘Canadian Convoy against Covid Nazis’. Should we just go with ‘Canadian Convoy against Covid C*nts’ so as not to offend?

  155. @Wizard of Oz

    The one in the photo looks younger than the 15-years old Anne Frank.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
  156. @JWalters

    You’re getting warm Ron; I give you credit.

    But it’s a lot worse than you think.

    In fact, at your current rate of catching on to conspiracy reality, I hope I live long enough for you to understand that, like most people, you have been victimized by propaganda, and that many things you believed were true because they appeared in the NYT, AP and Reuters were establishment lies—- and this is still the case.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  157. @James N. Kennett

    Yes. Crossing the Alps doesn’t have to be on foot or by motorcycle… hahahah. But “cross” they did by train.

  158. Wild Man says:
    @Wild Man

    I guess the take-away, in the whole scheme of things, the way this is going down, is that antisemitism (real or imagined) is of much higher priority, moralities-wise, to the overall culture, than the covid gas-lighting (subverso) disaster.

    No. Not. Not even close. Not even remotely close. What the hell? Extreme levels of narcissistic navel-gazing.

    Jews: Get on with the much needed ‘group identity meditation’ or the ‘group self-analysis’ project, within the larger Jewish community-proper, that is going to be needed, to undo all this BS, that has polluted every venue of western endeavor. YOU ARE PATHETIC IF YOU REFUSE NOW (too much water under the bridge now, the time to act is NOW).

  159. @RoatanBill

    ‘Fifty years’? ‘Remember the Maine!’.

  160. babu says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Palestinian Christian. Sirhan family immigration sponsored by a Christian Church organization in to US. Media has used Palestinian to imply he is Muslim.

    • Agree: JWalters
    • Replies: @SaneClownPosse
  161. babu says:
    @Anon

    The whole thing is a hoax.

    • Replies: @Anon
  162. @Timur The Lame

    Two decades ! You were obviously a pioneer. I threw out my TV seven years ago. Living in Britain, I was subject to the dreaded BBC Licence Fee. However, I hadn’t paid it for 20 years previously. If you live in heavily built up areas, it is easy to evade paying it, as they find it very difficult to detect you.

    I did find over the years that there were less and less programmes that I wanted to watch. Every year, it got worse. “News and current affairs” were invariably biased or even downright propaganda. This has now spread to most of the output – history, sport, even physical science.

    Seven years ago I moved to the country. I gave up the TV and have never regretted it. Like you, I may not get all the “news” as quickly as I did previously. But I get later anyway, and using the internet, I am much better informed than being reliant only on TV, radio and newspaper.

    PS I live next to a retirement housing complex. They have a lounge with a TV. It is hardly used and they permit me to use it in the evenings at will. So I still watch some TV. If The New York Post is now America’s Newspaper of Record, then Channel 5 is now Britain’s TV Channel of Record. This is somewhat surprising, as, when Channel 5 started out in the mid 1990s, the late night coverage was full of films featuring the likes of Shannon Tweed ( Strangely, she never wore any tweed ! ). You know where I’m coming from!

    Not only are Channel 5 documentaries informative and free of political correctness ( Ancient Egypt, excellent ! ), many are positively subversive ( of present day secular liberal and leftist values).
    This is evinced by their most popular programme Our Yorkshire Farm. Clive and Amanda Owen are a couple who run a large Yorkshire Sheep Farm. They have 9 children, all of them a credit to their parents. All of these children are the product of their marriage, and neither has been married before. They are Christian, but not fuddy duddy. Amanda is an attractive and outgoing lady in her late 40s { God, if only I were 20 years younger ! } I shouldn’t need to tell you that Clive and Amanda are white and that about half the kids have red or reddish hair.
    Life affirming. White Life affirming.

    So there is some hope for British television. I doubt that stuff like that would appear in the US MSM, and especially not in the heart of wokeness, Canada. Correct me, if I’m wrong.

  163. @onebornfree

    I think all modern day references to fascism are wrong, because what people think fascism is, wasn`t. Yes, they implemented the world`s first universal medical care system, but didn`t dictate what that care had to be. Fascism was not perfect, but there is not a political philosophy that is. Otherwise, I think you are on target.

  164. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    So you believe on that evidence that in 1980 some conspirators probably six got round to organising Lowenstein’s murder six years after he tried to get people interested in the Kennedy killing without success. You must be good at believing improbable stories.

    I probably should have clarified something. I have absolutely no idea whether Lowenstein was killed by a deranged individual as the official story claims or whether he fell victim to some plot. And if it were the latter, I have no idea whether the motive was his work on the RFK assassination or something else entirely. Until a few weeks ago, I barely even knew who Lowenstein was, let alone that he’d been murdered.

    However, when I came across that long article he’d written on the RFK assassination and then discovered that he’d been shot himself three years later, I mentioned the strange story to an academic I know. He then told me he’d been a personal friend of Lowenstein, and that neither he nor any of Lowenstein’s other friends had ever believed the official story.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  165. @Anon

    All available evidence indicates Ron will never wake up.

  166. @Olivier1973

    LOL. I wear it as a badge of honour. My response, for years, has been “Conspiracies exist. Identifying them correctly is the problem. Only a fool would think otherwise.”

  167. @Badger Down

    Excellent article here.
    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t664880/

    Some very talented Jews launched the Anne Frank Industry. Hundreds of Millions have been made.

  168. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I dunno. We have covid fascism (i.e. – covid Nazis). That much is true. And it is also true that because of the globalist perversion that that west has morphed into, there is no place to run away to (within the west), to get away from these covid Nazis, because the entire west is globalist converged. That was Kennedy’s point, and it is true and valid as far as I can tell.

    Was he trolling the anti-antisemites (‘anti’ as in ‘against antisemitism real of imagined’)? Cool if so (this Kennedy dude is quite smart). Best to get on with this trolling forthwith, to force this crap out into the light of day, for all to see. Because of this: Jewish anti-antisemitism = Jewish passive aggressive ethno-fascism. The Jews did this, not me (and not Kennedy or anyone else). The Jews did this. They should take responsibility for what they created: Passive-aggressive Jewish ethno-fascism parading as anti-antisemitism, as culturally fixed, within the west, by way of the perverse non-normative (western-wise) holocaust industry, that disrespects their own dead, which to me, is a sign of a hugely disordered psyche.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  169. I found these articles on HIV/AIDS by Mr Unz really interesting reading but I’m yet to be persuaded by this claim on balance.

    Perhaps it’s not that AIDS/HIV is a hoax and the media don’t want to draw attention to this, but rather Fauci’s reckless use of AZT mirrors the overreached experimental vaccine rollout today is the source of embarrassment.

    Within that it’s also possible that a significant number of AZT deaths were misattributed to AIDs, just as there are deaths by the suppression of early treatments, Remdesovir and vaccines misattributed to covid. But I’m not convinced that means AIDS doesn’t exist or similarly covid doesn’t exist.

    I like RFK Jr a lot, and I haven’t read his book and so I don’t know if he has new material in there. But I now consider myself pretty familiar with the case against AIDS and as far as I can see there has been no new science written about this at all for at least two decades and even then the case was getting thin.

    The central thesis against HIV as the cause of AIDs is over 35 years old. It’s pretty dusty. Examples that people bring up as to why HIV is a hoax today are even older and appear strained, “queers were taking poppers in 1982, see AIDS doesn’t exist” or “AZT killed people”, just ignoring far less dangerous drugs in use today.

    My impression is those credible scientists who objected to HIV as the cause of AIDS at the time were forming reasoned and good positions but perhaps based on limited data. And it doesn’t exclude that some health problems of AIDS patients may indeed have been exacerbated by monstrous life styles.

    It seems quite a developed science to me today, unless one takes the position the whole thing is one massive scam. That all testing is a scam, all data is a scam designed to bolster the hoax up. That all HIV research and scientific papers are a scam. Everything is one giant hoax. As utterly corrupt as the system is, that seems far fetched. That’s not to say there are not some unanswered questions about it though or some potential anomalies, but whether those questions or anomalies undermine the whole thing seems doubtful.

    But surely this is easily settled. If HIV+ patients on ART stop taking their drugs, do they go on to develop AIDS ? From the material I’ve read the answer is yes, apart from a handful of people who have genes which keep HIV under control. Presumably these people could still spread it.

    It’s a very interesting theory and I’m sure like everything else AIDS was been highly abused by our overlords, but until I see some contemporary credible scientific opinion about this, not based on stuff 35 years old and that’s prepared to take on all the data and studies of today, I don’t see solid enough case to dismiss it as a scam.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  170. Mulegino1 says:

    The Anne Frank cult is a lucrative Jewish fable. It is a side altar of the Jewish guilt and extortion racket which has become the real novus ordo of what used to be Western Christendom, i.e., the pseudo-religion of the Shoah Business.

    Anne Frank is a secularized version of the prototypical “virgin and martyr” of the early Church. However, instead of being based upon an authentic popular cultus, the veneration of Anne appears to have its foundation in smarmy Jewish profiteering and self-promotion.

    If what is claimed about Anne is true, then what happened was surely a tragedy- but a tragedy within a greater tragedy called the Second World War- during which tens of millions of mostly non-Jews died.

    The elevation of the Shoah is just another exemplar of Jewry’s incapability- no doubt rooted in its chronic mendacity and paranoia- of properly and truly contextualizing its allegedly tragic history.

  171. @PJ London

    Slightly off topic, but the late Frank Plummer, while doing his “spread of AIDS” work in Kenya _ the crossroads of African trucking – “discovered” that some of the prostitutes had immunity to HIV. I have long wondered how such an allegedly deadly “new” disease could have a natural immunity. Hepatitis is endemic in some populations as is tuberculosis, with the death rates may be significantly lower, but immunity?

  172. In case no one here has already mentioned it, there is quite an analogy between RFK Jr. and Ron Unz with respect to how media get quiet whenever either man writes something that is unassailably true and dangerous to the powers that be.

    Good on both of these men.

  173. eah says:

    The hostile media demanded that Kennedy immediately apologize for his heated words regarding fascism and Anne Frank, and to his credit he quickly did so.

    Why is it ‘to his credit’ that he apologized? — he made an analogy/comparison that some found inapt and insensitive — so what? — there was nothing to apologize for; he did nothing wrong and meant no harm — it’s not his fault that people were offended.

    People who readily complied with every COVID restriction strengthened the dictatorial regimes that imposed them — people who kowtow to Jewish sensitivities legitimize Jewish guilt mongering and help perpetuate Jewish victimhood.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  174. @Verymuchalive

    Private Eye best summed all this up.
    They assured us that AIDS stood for Anal Injection and Death Syndrome.

    When I was a lad, the less-sensitive joked that it stood for “Anally-Injected Death Sentence“.

    I also recall that there was a version of GRID that started “God’s Revenge… something something” but I never committed it to memory.

  175. harfang67 says:

    Great thanks for this article.
    It’s clear the battle is huge. Reading “Operation Gladio” from Paul L. Williams – discovered from one of your recent posts – it becomes apparent that we’re dealing with huge Satanic forces.

  176. @Curmudgeon

    Some people have genes that stop them developing AIDS apparently.

    Although I would hesitate to call Kenyan prostitutes people.

    Are you sure he identified immunity though ? It’s possible these dumb blacks just though they were immune.

  177. @Curmudgeon

    Some people have genes that stop them developing AIDS apparently. Although I would hesitate to call Kenyan prostitutes people.

    Are you sure he identified immunity though ? It’s possible these dumb blacks just though they were immune.

  178. @InnerCynic

    Kennedy didn’t say anything wrong. Yes… you could cross the alps like the Von Trapp family or you could hide in an attic. Two different events and not one and the same. Why is this even an issue?

    First of all, on a point of order, the family von Trapp did not cross the alps, as another poster has already pointed out, but took a train to Italy. The story about crossing the Alps was invented for the musical movie The Sound of Music.

    But did Jews often cross the Alps to escape Nazi Germany, as Kennedy says, or not? I don’t know.

    Secondly, Kennedy went on to say that he traveled to East Germany in 1962 (when he was 8 years old, so presumably with his dad) and met a number of people who had escaped from Nazi Germany, but I guess they were now back in East Germany or something. Anyway I don’t expect that an 8-year-old would understand much about that, so let it rest.

    But the most important point is that Kennedy was saying that being an unvaccinated person in the US today is worse than being a Jew in Nazi Germany. Is this really true? If it is mere hyperbole, it seems in bad taste, and why raise the question of Nazi Germany at all?

    While you do need to show vaccination papers to travel to most countries, US citizens and residents who are unvaccinated can still travel to Mexico. Is this equivalent to persecuted Jews making the dangerous journey over the Alps to Switzerland?

    I personally would argue that there is no equivalency, because all an unvaccinated person has to do is to get vaccinated and then they can go pretty much anywhere, and even play tennis or golf in Australia, which was not open to most Jews in Nazi Germany.

    This is a pretty pathetic article by a progressively addled Ron Unz, who overlooks the obvious point that most people including mainstream journalists are willing to overlook the idiocies of RFK Jr, because he is a Kennedy, and lost both his father and uncle in the American gun violence epidemic when he was a small boy. Come to think of it, the press was also pretty kind to Wicked Uncle Teddy Kennedy, all things considered.

    As far as the conspiracy to kill RFK Sr., has anybody ever noticed that whenever anyone famous dies unexpectedly in the US, there is soon a conspiracy theory to follow, whether it be Robert Johnson, Glen Miller, Elvis, JFK, RFK, or MLK. In the case of foreigners, like Paul McCartney, the theories are reversed, so that they are believed to be dead, while obviously only mummified.

    It would therefore have been disrespectful to the memory of RFK if there had not been a conspiracy theory about his death.

  179. @emerging majority

    it continues to surprise me that some half-crazed PTSD vet exuded from “serving his country”, now suffering from a terminal diagnosis of one of those induced fatal conditions has not taken it upon himself to take out one of those pre\$\$titute talking-heads

    Best guess is that anyone who is diagnosed with PTSD after military service, has their every move, call, and keystroke monitored and is blackv& (‘black-vanned’) if they display any signs of intent to take matters into their own hands. Fur Ihre sicherheit.

    Still, it does happen from time to time: the mastermind behind the “D.C. Sniper” was a veteran, as was Timothy McVeigh. I’m reasonably sure that Williams/Muhammad never saw combat, but there was more than enough atrocity going on in Gulf War I for him to have been ‘triggered’ (as fat adolescent females now say).

    That said: the lack of coherent ‘radicalisation outreach’ is one of my key pieces of evidence that the very idea of a ‘global terror network‘ is absolute fucking hogwash.

    Other dot-points:

     • Why has nobody organised to disperse – say – 2-3kg of carfentanyl in a place, and at a time, of their choosing? (That shit is lethal: ~10,000× as potent as morphine; 100× more potent than fentanyl and cheaper.)

     • Why has phylloxera not been deliberately introduced at dozens of locations in the Napa Valley?

     • Why have there been no attacks on key network infrastructure? (water purification and distribution; electricity distribution; gas distribution).

     • Why are Wolfowitz, Perle, Kristol and the other ‘thought leaders’ not the subject of periodic assassination attempts?

    Answer: there is no structured organisation with the relevant reach.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @emerging majority
  180. gsjackson says:

    I have an image in mind of Ron sitting double-masked in his home office as he penned a new pejorative for those of us who have taken ownership of our own health and prefer not to farm it out to the “health care” establishment and government — “fearful individuals.” Well, yes, I guess I am somewhat fearful of government’s purposes (or its incompetence), especially now, but on the flip side I’ve not spent one second — not one — worrying about whether some invisible microbe is going to take me down.

    On another matter, can someone pin down the precise decade of entry into the public discourse of the term conspiracy theorist? My recollection from the book Devil’s Chessboard, another book by David Talbott that I know Ron has read, is that the CIA first delivered the term up to Operation Mockingbird in the ’50s. All I’m reading lately though is that it didn’t get launched until about 1967.

  181. UR2 says:
    @Iris

    Yes, Iris, Go! Upon beholding our 1st newborn 35 years ago, we just somehow could not believe that his physical perfection was deficient and required injections of substances into his skin. We saw with sorrow children of friends and nieces and nephews afflicted with allergies, syndromes, eczema, autism, and even level 3 diabetes in a 5 year old a few days after receiving 8 shots in one day: 2 in each leg, 2 in each arm! And to be labelled an ‘antivaccer’! Ask are kids if they appreciate being raised by extremists (and homeschoolers)!

  182. Realist says:
    @Tomas Allen

    Does anyone else think commenters like HeebHnter are trolls?

    Yes, trolls…or perhaps agent provocateurs.

  183. @Olivier1973

    I read a comment somewhere yesterday:

    Conspiracy Theory now means Spoiler Alert

  184. @Craig Nelsen

    The claim isn’t that “AIDS” per se is a hoax. The hoax is that the HIV virus is what causes “AIDS.”

    AIDS is not really a unique disease. Rather, it is just a catch-all “syndrome” that includes the full spectrum of bad things that can happen when your immune system fails. The “symptoms” of AIDS are thus defined to include pretty much all of the common pre-existing diseases that could be caused by an immune failure. So “AIDS” just refers to immune system failure. And no one has ever actually proven scientifically that the HIV virus is what causes this immune failure.

    The whole HIV theory depends on nothing but a handful of weak correlation studies that show “AIDS” sufferers often have HIV antibodies. No mechanism of action has ever been identified or explained. Indeed, there are many, many reasons why causation by the HIV retrovirus is utterly implausible according to basic principles of biology. And many people with HIV never get “AIDS” while many people with “AIDS” don’t have HIV. (E.g., the extreme latency period of a decade or more and that the existence of HIV antibodies should be evidence of immunity to HIV rather than disease caused by HIV, etc., etc.)

    The molecular biologist, Dr. Peter Duesberg, is the one who originally and persuasively laid out the case against HIV as the cause of AIDS in the 90’s. To date, I don’t believe anyone has ever refuted his points or improved the case for causation by HIV. His book on the subject is a good read.

    https://www.amazon.com/Inventing-the-AIDS-Virus/dp/B00DBAXVMU/ref=sr_1_3?crid=11QI8O6M7QTDM&keywords=Duesberg&qid=1643671865&s=books&sprefix=duesberg%2Cstripbooks%2C129&sr=1-3

    • Agree: PDXLibertarian
    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  185. @Kratoklastes

    The only “structured organizations” that arise are either direct creations of the FEEBEES or are heavily infiltrated by that–and other canine companions–of the various protected ones. Even back in the early 60’s, “Mister Eye” was heavily snooping with such technological equipment as was available to them at that long-ago time.

    So, the possibility of organized resistance, whether passive or otherwise, has been pretty much obviated. Seeing as the PTB’s minions have created a near-perfect panopticon right across the fruited plain, no sane and sensible individuals would ever make such an attempt.

    Thus, it’s back to my question, amplified by the probable influencing of the “crazed-shooter” narrative by psychotronic, hypnotic and drug-induced means is this: Does it make sense that those “gun violence” types have never targeted the perps or their most useful minions and tools? Funny, how they focus on houses of worship and public gatherings.

    It’s almost as if they are a form of Manchurian Candidates, pre-programmed to hear “my master’s voice”. Somehow it seems as if they are devoutly, religiously following a script—one of which their conscious minds are not even aware.

    As per the ancient Chinese curse, we are living in “interesting times”.

  186. Trinity says:

    Remember when Magic Johnson tested positive for HIV? What was that, 30 years or so ago? Off topic, but apparently more horse dookie, remember when talk show host, Montel Williams only had months to survive? Montel was allegedly on his last legs about 20-25 years ago, lmao.

    AIDS was very real in the case o heterosexual Tommy Morrison and homersexual Rock Hudson among others.

    AIDS/HIV = real.
    Holocaust = 10% real 90 % fiction
    (Jew flu)= 10% real 90% lies

  187. Ron Unz says:
    @Vagrant Rightist

    I found these articles on HIV/AIDS by Mr Unz really interesting reading but I’m yet to be persuaded by this claim on balance…But I now consider myself pretty familiar with the case against AIDS and as far as I can see there has been no new science written about this at all for at least two decades and even then the case was getting thin…until I see some contemporary credible scientific opinion about this, not based on stuff 35 years old and that’s prepared to take on all the data and studies of today, I don’t see solid enough case to dismiss it as a scam.

    As I’ve emphasized, until reading Kennedy’s book a couple of months ago, my knowledge of the HIV/AIDS controversy was almost zero, and I hadn’t even paid any attention back in the 1990s when it was sometimes disputed. So you might be right, but I think the evidence is on the other side. I’ve tried to do reasonable due-diligence on the subject as I explained in a previous comment:

    Aside from reading the 200 pages in the Kennedy book and perhaps 500 more pages in Duesberg’s book, I’ve probably read another 100,000 words of articles, including the extended 1990s debates between the Duesberg and orthodox camps, and watched several very long documentaries, including the public statements by a couple of the science Nobel Laureates who endorse Duesberg.

    If you haven’t read my recent articles on the subject, summarizing and linking to much of this underlying material, you really should:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/aids-and-the-revival-of-the-duesberg-hypothesis/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-public-health-problems/#aids-and-the-duesberg-hypothesis

    As far as I can tell, none of the main arguments of the Duesberg camp were ever refuted. They were just ignored and banned from the media. Given that the orthodox side was backed by billions of dollars each year and had tens of thousands of researchers, that left me very suspicious. For example, the editors of both The Lancet and Science publicly called for research studies to determine whether Duesberg might be correct, but they were totally ignored.

    Let’s consider a close analogy. As I explained in this article, there seems absolutely overwhelming hard evidence that the RFK was assassinated in a conspiracy, and nearly all of that evidence has been publicly known for around 45 years. But the media has totally ignored it, so I doubt if more than a sliver of “normies” are aware of those facts. Probably most people who haven’t looked into the issue would vaguely dismiss the notion of an “RFK conspiracy” as a crazy idea that was debunked long ago.

    Obviously, the Duesberg case is far less solid than the RFK case. But I think Duesberg has been “refuted” in exactly the same way the RFK conspiracy theories have been “refuted.”

    • Agree: PDXLibertarian
  188. @Zachary Smith

    Face it Zachary Smith, although Ron Unz is splendidly heterodox and provides a website valuable as a haven for free speech, he weirdly loves to exculpate Nazis and inculpate Jews. That part of him is broken and hurtful.

    That isn’t drive-by rhetoric, see my detailed arguments here:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/how-to-tell-who-is-a-marginalized-community/#comment-5054881

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Petermx
  189. Ron Unz says:
    @New Dealer

    Face it Zachary Smith, although Ron Unz is splendidly heterodox and provides a website valuable as a haven for free speech, he weirdly loves to exculpate Nazis and inculpate Jews. That part of him is broken and hurtful.

    Well, this is obviously off-topic, but I suppose I might as well respond given the fascinating but little-known historical facts. As you may or may not be aware, the Zionists who founded the State of Israel actually spent most of the 1930s as quasi-allies of the Nazis, and to some extent this even continued after World War II broke out, with a future Israeli Prime Minister seeking to enlist in the Axis military alliance. So the relationship between Jews and Nazis has actually been a rather complex one. I discussed all of this in a 2018 article that you probably should read:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-jews-and-nazis/

    This was exactly why my article closed with a reference to my World War II pieces, conveniently collected here:

    https://www.unz.com/page/world-war-ii-articles/

  190. Petermx says:
    @Jonathan Mason

    There was very little “escaping” from Germany because most people did not want to leave Germany. Hitler was a popular leader and he turned Germany around economically. Jews were an exception but they too didn’t “escape”. That’s a typical Jewish lie suggesting they were being held their against their own wishes. “But did Jews often cross the Alps to escape Nazi Germany, as Kennedy says, or not? I don’t know.” No, because Germany wanted them to leave, provided ships for them to take and made economic deals with Zionists/Palestine that would allow Jews to keep their wealth and spend their money on German goods when they got to Palestine so the German economy wasn’t damaged. This was an economic agreement signed between Germany and Zionists. If Jews or anyone else were criminals, that might be a reason to escape and “cross the Alps”.

    If Jews left Germany thru the Alps that was their choice but they could have left any other way but then their lie suggesting they were prevented from leaving wouldn’t make sense. Germany wanted them to leave and helped them to leave. But no one else wanted them either, so they had a hard time finding another European country to take them. The fact of the matter is, even under Hitler some Jews preferred Germany over other countries. Some Jews from Poland wanted to stay in Germany as exemplified by the Jewish murderer Herschel Grynszpan who murdered a German diplomat because his family was being deported back to Poland (this caused Krystalnacht). Germany was an advanced country with a high standard of living when not being deliberately prostrated by enemies like Great Britain, France and the US.

    If Hitler had his way, Jewish power in Europe (and as a result, the world) would have been greatly diminished and they didn’t want this so they lie with their tales of “escaping”. This fits in with their propaganda encouraging war against Germany which they did because Hitler would have reduced their power greatly.

  191. @Ron Unz

    Well your excused for throwing in the tabloid detail😎

    I am glad to know you had hardly heard of him. I hadn’t heard of him at all and its hard not to admire him. Sounds a bit like a Ron Unz with a popular touch….

  192. @Wild Man

    Yo
    Lone Ranger
    Trigger’s got a burr under his saddle and run off in two different directions.

    I don’t recall saying anything about Natzis.

    I thought the DC protect was about mandates, vaccines, passports etc. and how large swathes of the population didn’t like that bundle of government overreach.

    People froze their butts off — and took on some risk & expense — to be there, to drive those points home.

    imho nothing whatsoever to do with Anne Frank.

    How does she fit in the picture? Is RFKjr so devoid of metaphors that he had to step on a rail that he KNEW had high-voltage coursing through it?

    Take a chill pill Wild Man.

    The protest was about the vaxx hoax, not the holohoax.
    Strategic error to mix the two bcz now everyone’s talking about Anne Frank, NOT about the overreach of mandates regarding untested gene-manipulative injections.

  193. @Jonathan Mason

    The point about COMPULSORY injection, with an experimental gene therapy substance, is that it is in TOTAL CONTRADICTION of all the bases of heretofore existing medical bio-ethics. The Nuremberg Laws, the World Medical Association Helsinki Declaration of 1964, the UNESCO Principles of Medical Bio-ethics and various other such principles all state that forced medical intervention is anathema, but you’re happy with it. So you are a totalitarian bully, but that comes with the BigPharma troll job description.
    Moreover, merely months ago, all the political front-men were declaring that mandatory injection would NOT be used, but then they all, in a trice, reversed course. And the comparison with Jews in Germany is complex. The restrictions on Jews began gradually, and were tightened over time, just as the vicious impositions on the unvaxxed are growing and growing, leading to job loss, the loss of custody of children, loss of social life and amenity etc, SO FAR. ALL based on known lies eg that the unvaxxed represent a risk to the vaxxed, that the vaxxed are protected from disease and from transmitting the disease to others, and that the gene therapy injections are safe, when they most certainly are not, and have caused more adverse reactions than al previous, true, vaccines combined.

  194. Petermx says:
    @New Dealer

    I think he only wants to “exculpate NAZIS” if he thinks they deserve exculpating and “inculpate Jews” when they deserve it, unlike liars expressing sentiments like yours. Too many NAZIS have been inculpated and Jews exculpated and that is why Jews run the world and Germans are universally looked down upon. Jews criminality (especially in the USSR) and leading role in starting WW II has been and continues to be lied about even though the facts are clear. The war could have been prevented but Jews wanted it more than anyone else and Europe and the world should know this.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  195. jsinton says:
    @emerging majority

    Then there was the extremely coincidental crash of Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone, his wife and key staff members just days before his likely victory in a re-election campaign just a couple weeks into the future. At the time he was the major leader in the Senate of the group of solons who opposed Bu\$h the Lesser’s impending attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Kevin Barrett was just discussing how Wellstone was the only senator to vote against the notorious original Patriot Act.

  196. @Insouciant

    EDIT

    Trigger was the horse of Roy Rogers, not Lone Ranger.

    My attempt at spicing up rhetoric merely fell flat.

    No need to apologize to anyone, except maybe Silver.

    RFK, otoh, crashed and undermined his message while the whole world was watching.

    Hi Ho Away.

    • LOL: Wild Man
  197. Notsofast says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    agree and both were eyeing the senate seat as a springboard to the whitehouse along with control of the democratic party. jfk jr. had to die to pave the way for hillary’s coronation and to insure that the kennedy’s were permanently removed from political power.

  198. @Ron Unz

    I have been diverted into watching some excellent YouTube documentaries and interviews. I think if you watch The Nazi Officer’s Wife (narrator, unobtrusive, Susan Sarandon) you will accept the indulgence of watching and listening to a moving page turner.

    Otherwise I hope to direct your attention to Himmler as the absolutely key figure in the organised aspect of what we hear of as The Holocaust. You may want to get some bright Stanford students to sieve the YouTube videos looking as much for tell tale error as much as anything else. I have a picture of the politically canny Hitler not putting euthanasia or genocide of untermenschen in writing after the big eugenic debacle but happily knowing that his ambitious young head of the vast SS machine could be trusted with the Jews , gypsies, miscellaneous Slavs etc.

    • Troll: Sepp
  199. JM says:
    @Tomas Allen

    When I read your remark, I think of Athens vs Jerusalem. You’re the latter.

  200. @A little boy in the crowd

    thank you … and don’t forget her requirement that all guests attending their party had to have vaccine proof… either she wears the pants in that family, or he is totally p-whipped or maybe he’s just a pussy… definitely knocked him down a few notches in my opinion and eliminated him as leader for any kind of counter coup against the commies.

  201. @geokat62

    Since you mentioned Spotify, there are three reasons for the current media attack on Spotify

    [1] Obviously to prop up the Covid narrative.

    [2] Corporate media outlets envy Joe Rogan’s audience share, and they want to destroy Rogan as competition. This part is also obvious.

    [3] Blackstone wants to create a monopoly on music rights. This month Neil Young, for example, sold 51% of his music rights (1,180 songs) to the Hipgnosis Songs Management Fund, which is owned by Blackstone. In Oct 2021 the Blackstone Group announced that it would invest \$1 billion in Hipgnosis to acquire song catalogs and music rights, so that Blackstone can have a monopoly on digital music control. Blackstone owns Neil Young songs, and wants its property removed from Spotify for financial reasons.

    I’ll bet it’s the same with everyone who wants his songs removed from Spotify. All are owned by Blackstone. They spout Covid garbage to camouflage Blackstone’s conquests.

    Blackstone wants to rule the planet, and is one of the chief pushers of the Great Reset. Neil Young supports them, since Young already pocketed \$50 million from selling the rights to his music.

    All the liberals who attack Spotify and who support Neil Young support Blackstone, which is widening the gap between the rich and the rest. Blackstone also has a stake in Hidrovias do Brasil (“Brazilian Waterways”), an infrastructure company that is cutting down the Brazilian rain forest. In April 2020 Blackstone invested \$2 billion in Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (a Massachusetts biotech company) to push new vaccines that will be mandated.

    The stupidity of liberals is truly boundless.

  202. Ned Kelly says:
    @Jonathan Mason

    I don’t go in for conspiracy… I’m strictly the facts. Kennedy assassinations was a conspiracy… for sure. RFK murder proved it. The fatal shot was from behind, point blank. Sirhan Sirhan never got close to RFK. There a lot more proof but I’ll save that for others. The Safest conspiracy theory is that it was the Mob. Outraged and fearful over the Bobby Kennedy relentless crusade against organized crime… That doesn’t sound so far fetched does it? No, it sound just like the thing they would do. I’ve always been amazed that Bobby wasn’t more cautious after seeing what happened to his brother. They were alot bigger and badder than United States Steel…

    P.S. Paul still has his flashbacks to keep him alive.
    We all live in a yellow… 💊

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
  203. geokat62 says:
    @A little boy in the crowd

    Blackstone wants to rule the planet, and is one of the chief pushers of the Great Reset.

    Along with Vanguard and BlackRock.

    The stupidity of liberals is truly boundless.

    Factual statement.

  204. Wild Man says:
    @Insouciant

    “bcz now everyone’s talking about Anne Frank,”

    I am hoping maybe that was the point of Kennedy using that metaphor ….. a masterful troll, of which we need much more of, …. like I outlined in comment #172, …. but unfortunately, it is more likely it is just an unintentional error on Kennedy’s part (which to my mind, wasn’t an error, …. but alas, perhaps instead of a masterful troll it is only a happy accident, but more of what is needed all the time now, nevertheless; …. Also, if Kennedy was accidentally troll-worthy but then intentionally pathetic in response, please don’t follow him down that path).

    “I don’t recall saying anything about Natzis.”

    Isn’t the whole Anne Frank narrative one of the major components of the holocaust industry operation? Holocaust industry operation is also the apparatus that has enforced the idea that ‘fascist’ = ‘Nazi’. The Anne Frank reference, by way of its importance to the holocaust industry operation, automatically implicates both the term ‘fascist’ and the term ‘Nazi’. So it is ludicrous that covid Nazis (i.e. – covid fascists) couldn’t be called covid Nazis, yet that is the implication of the media’s attack on Kennedy. Whenever we see this shite we need to turn it down (i.e. – don’t buy the BS), and throw it back.

  205. Mike Tre says:

    Jews are our friends.

  206. @Verymuchalive

    Thanks. From discovering that I could spell infallibly (the one mistake I can remember before spelling tests stopped was “Czechoslovakia” [and I’ve just done it again]) I have gone downhill.

    Yes, Somal and, doubtfully humorous so I added the extra bit.

    I don’t regard the Skripal affair as anything other than a Putinesque message to traitors that they will not be forgotten or forgiven. Just as you can expect the USG to cause Jonathan Pollard to die a slow and painful death😎

  207. @saggy

    Thanks. I guessed that was the face you meant but I don’t agree that they might be the same person.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  208. Wild Man says:
    @Insouciant

    Just a bit more on this. The use of terms and language ‘for thee but not for me’ type thing is one of the oldest tricks in the book that enables and then helps maintain the operation of parasitic-type (or at least subversive) special interest groups. There are other examples of this throughout the culture, involving other groups (black vernacular, Islamists). Compare, ….. see the common thread, and think about it.

    I don’t think we should tolerate parasitic-type (or at least subversive) special interest groups. The idea here is to reform by forcing them to not be subversive or parasitic. A good place to start with that would be to say no to their petty language policing (a slick dominance move on the sly, when in fact there is no real dominance, it’s all a charade).

    • Replies: @Insouciant
  209. JWalters says:
    @Ralph B. Seymour

    My estimate is that Ron, like a lot of relatively public figures, is cautious so as not to trigger an assassination. Thus, we need to have the public discussion inch toward the ringleaders on many fronts at once, like a pack of wolves surrounding them. A point will be reached at which they are being attacked on too many fronts at once to effectively fend them all off. An assassination would be too obvious and risky. Then the information dam will break and it’s game over.

  210. @saggy

    Thank you for that link. Does it not have the ring of truth to you? It fits my picture of many Germans from late 1943 beginning to extract themselves from the criminal mess they had allowed Himmler to get them into.

  211. @babu

    Either religion, a Palestinian is something that Israel doesn’t want in their god given land.

    Palestinians can just cross a border, so no human rights problem.

    How did the Jews in the Nazi Wermacht’s Officer Korps avoid the ovens? They did cross a few borders and took cover whenever necessary.

  212. @Petermx

    Jews are, contrary to their religious delusions, just people, but they try a lot harder and excel in many fields. Science, music, literature have all been graced by their efforts, to everyone’s benefit.
    But all is not so rosy in the Judaic garden. Like all groups, some Jews have been negative influences on human society. One might only note the control of Western politics by Jewish money power, the behaviour and numerous crimes of the Zionazi racist, apartheid, regime, Israel, the leading Jewish role in sex, arms, pornography, human organs, drug, military and surveillance trafficking, financial crime, and the vulgar and dehumanising ‘entertainment’ industry for just a few blots on the record. It’s a mixed record, as one can say of every human collective-but don’t EVER dare say so.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  213. @Tomas Allen

    AB-solutely. I blocked the blighter, with his repellent idiocies, and, yes, I do suspect that some of the more apparently deranged Judeophobes may be plants designed to denigrate the site by association with moronic hate-mongers.

    • Replies: @hillaire
  214. @eah

    Perhaps that could become a new antonym for ‘gentiles’ The ‘hostiles’. It fits.

  215. On the subject of RFK’s assassination, have y’all seen this British show where they use hypnosis on a highly-suggestible member of the audience to get him to recreate Sirhan’s role in killing Bobby Kennedy? I recommend seeing it. You can search for “Derren Brown Assasssin” or here’s a Youtube link:

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  216. Ron Unz says:
    @Musonius Rufus

    On the subject of RFK’s assassination, have y’all seen this British show where they use hypnosis on a highly-suggestible member of the audience to get him to recreate Sirhan’s role in killing Bobby Kennedy?

    With regard to Sirhan, I was apparently the only person to notice something rather striking in his role. From my article published almost exactly two years ago:

    A young Palestinian named Sirhan Sirhan had fired a pistol at the scene and was quickly arrested and convicted for the murder. But Talbot emphasizes that the coroner’s report revealed that the fatal bullet came from a completely different direction, while the acoustical record proves that far more shots were fired than the capacity of the alleged killer’s gun. Such hard evidence seems to demonstrate a conspiracy.

    Sirhan himself seemed dazed and confused, later claiming to have no memory of events, and Talbot mentions that various assassination researchers have long argued that he was merely a convenient patsy in the plot, perhaps acting under some form of hypnosis or conditioning. Nearly all these writers are usually reluctant to note that the selection of a Palestinian as scapegoat in the killing seems to point in a certain obvious direction, but Bergman’s recent book also includes a major new revelation. At exactly the same moment that Sirhan was being wrestled to the floor of the Ambassador Hotel ballroom in Los Angeles, another young Palestinian was undergoing intensive rounds of hypnotic conditioning at the hands of Mossad in Israel, being programmed to assassinate PLO leader Yasir Arafat; and although that effort ultimately failed, such a coincidence seems to stretch the bounds of plausibility.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-mossad-assassinations/#final-judgment-on-the-jfk-assassination

  217. Just a short note of appreciation, Ron, for this website. Yours is truly the only place that I can think of where one can come to read accounts of past events that are unsullied by the poison of corporate and governmental interests. This site – and your Pravda series in particular – has changed my view of the Kennedy assassinations and 911, which are three of the seminal historical events of the last seventy years. Hard to imagine remaining ignorant of the true nature of these catastrophes, all of which I lived through, until I shuffled off this mortal coil, but that surely would have been the case had I not stumbled upon unz.com.

    Once you fully incorporate the import of this information, it cannot help but transform your entire worldview. Thanks again.

    • Thanks: Ron Unz
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  218. @Mustapha Mond

    No mRNA vaccines had been fully approved for human use before Covid. A smattering of trials over the course of a couple of decades, but nothing viable. Same problems they had before are the same ones we’re seeing now: temporary, quickly fading efficacy combined with risk of inflammation/toxicity w/ increased doses. That’s a bad combo right there. Did they suddenly figure out the problems that have been confounding them for decades?

    Paper from Apr. 2019 – A Comparison of Plasmid DNA and mRNA as Vaccine Technologies:

    Self-limited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) seen in a human clinical trial for an mRNA rabies vaccine, although summarized as still indicating the vaccine was generally safe (described below in the clinical trials section), may also reflect the inflammatory nature of the mRNA [55]. These results highlight the potential toxicity downside of the inflammatory activity of mRNA vaccines, adverse effects not seen to this extent with plasmid DNA. Also note that, for providing monoclonal antibodies [61] (whether for preventing or for treating infectious diseases for other therapeutic applications), this would likely require repeat administration of mRNA, which might not only increase the potential for toxicities, but may also have an impact upon potency due to effects of the mRNA upon decreasing translation, etc., via the other inflammatory effects.

    Thus, it may still be a work in progress to find the best balance of inflammation and any deleterious toxicities via harnessing adjuvant activities of mRNA while limiting or suppressing inherent toxicities for vaccines and immunotherapeutics.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631684/

    • Thanks: Mustapha Mond
  219. RestiveUs says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Then why do you advertise yourself so much?

  220. @Gidoutahere

    There’s no such thing as Jewish history. Several books by Shlomo Sand, Gilad Atzmon and others have made that point. I think (from memory) Israel Shahak wrote that Jewish history was suppressed by the rabbinate. Historical Jewish works such as those of Josephus only survived because they were preserved by Christians. Those of special interest to Christians. The rest, from AD 70 right up till now, have been burned by Jews.

    You see, if your entire system is a fraud, the Jewish people an “invention”, and they are determined to use as weapons hugely inflated, totally fake numbers of Jews killed in endless pogroms, real history must be suppressed.

  221. @Iris

    Has it every been proven in a court of law anywhere in the world that someone has committed murder as a result of being hypnotised … and therefore found to be “innocent”? Or because they went through the MK Ultra programme? Theodore John Kaczynski went through the programme and is languishing in jail.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
  222. @Zachary Smith

    The conniving Zachary Smith writes:

    Facilities existed to bake 60,000 loaves of bread daily, but only 10,000 loaves a day were provided for inmates [of Bergen-Belsen], the rest was sent to feed German soldiers.

    Now Zach, I have news for you.

    It takes more than functioning ovens to bake bread. You left out a little something called ‘ingredients’ .

    We know for a fact, that in the last months of the war, the Allies had bombed and strafed the German transport and food logistics system into oblivion – a direct consequence of their complete air superiority.
    German civilians in the cities were themselves starving as only a trickle of food rations reached them.

    So, let’s put things in context.

    The functioning ovens at Bergen-Belsen may only have managed to procure enough FLOUR and YEAST to bake, for example, 20,000 loaves.
    It was then decided to allocate 10,000 loaves to German soldiers and 10,000 to the inmates at Bergen-Belsen (an equitable 50/50 split*).

    (*For all we know, there may have only been enough ingredients for 15,000 loaves and the inmates may have gotten TWO-THIRDS of the allocation, leaving one-third for the soldiers).

    Then Mr Double-Speak himself (Zach Smith) has the audacity to say this:

    ‘Congratulations to Mr. Unz on producing some world-class Newspeak’.

    The hypocrisy of Zachary Smith knows no bounds.
    Zach consistently LIES, MISREPRESENTS and takes every opportunity to be an apologist for Zio malfeasance.

    You’re an eff’n disgrace mate. Zach, why don’t you put yourself out of OUR misery.
    Because putting up with your shit day in and day out can get very taxing.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  223. @Ron Unz

    Here is my attempt to sweep up Himmler videos, most of which I have watched enough of to pick up details which,if correct, make (attempted) extermination by SS hard to deny or details that are carelessly stated, maybe wrong enough to needfollowing up.

    [MORE]

    It shouldn’t cost much, if anything, to run a little competition for the mart young to pick the contradictions, the plain factual errors and whatever a skim through them suggests to you.

    I think I remember the one about keeping secrets being a bit blowhard/handwavy. But some, like the one on the occult and Himmler’s barmy race ideology at least confirm that one’s feeling for the problem is about as tuned in as it would be to the jury’s verdict in a witch trial in 17th century Salem..

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Ron Unz
  224. @Ron Unz

    In the end the Zionazis decided that polonium 210 was more effective in killing Arafat. One wonders what Litvinenko did to upset them, or perhaps he was just an expendable goy.

  225. @Ron Unz

    Nearly all these writers are usually reluctant to note that the selection of a Palestinian as scapegoat in the killing seems to point in a certain obvious direction

    The word “obvious” undermines your argument. The perpetrators would be smart enough to see that it was obvious. Would they then choose Sirhan Sirhan? If CIA or FBI people were involved they might choose to create confusion by such suggestion of the obvious.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  226. Anon[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @babu

    … The whole thing is a hoax.….

    One tell of a hoax is that the originators of a hoax go absolutely batshit crazy when the hoax tale gets revised-adjusted by outsiders.

  227. @Wizard of Oz

    For those wondering about this explosion on the face of UR I note that the context is my earlier statement

    Otherwise I hope to direct your attention to Himmler as the absolutely key figure in the organised aspect of what we hear of as The Holocaust. You may want to get some bright Stanford students to sieve the YouTube videos looking as much for tell tale error as much as anything else. I have a picture of the politically canny Hitler not putting euthanasia or genocide of untermenschen in writing after the big eugenic debacle but happily knowing that his ambitious young head of the vast SS machine could be trusted with the Jews , gypsies, miscellaneous Slavs etc..

  228. @Verymuchalive

    Sorry about the typo in my immediate reply.  I have enough AMD to miss the odd letter (grandmothers on pedestrian crossings I don’t miss).

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  229. @Jonathan Mason

    Jonathan Free-Mason writes:

    most people including mainstream journalists are willing to overlook the idiocies of RFK Jr, because he is a Kennedy, and lost both his father and uncle in the American gun violence epidemic when he was a small boy.

    Now I’ve heard it all.

    RFK Jr is a living treasure and his work in exposing the dangers of children’s vaccines over many years is worthy of international recognition of the highest order, let alone the great work he’s done during Covid Psyop.
    Yet the confirmed troll and minion of Big Pharma Jon Free-Mason claims RFK Jr exhibits ‘idiocies’. (In his Orwellian world where left is right, up is down, it appears that virtue is vice).

    I’ve heard a lot of obfuscation and diversion used by sayanim like Mr Free-Mason in my time to explain away the deaths of JFK and his brother in a manner that deflects attention away from the actual perpetrators (ie: the Zio cabal), but this is the first time I’ve ever heard an explanation as nonsensical as this one.

    We’ve suspected it for a long time but it’s crystal clear who and what you are Jonathan Free-Mason.

    Only a Talmudic Jew and rabid Zionist would blame the JFK/RFK deaths on the ‘American gun violence epidemic’ in light of the preponderance of evidence of Zio orchestration of both crimes.

  230. @Wizard of Oz

    The one on the left looks half the age of the one on the right.

  231. Sepp says:

    He [Kennedy] further suggested that that government requirements for vaccinations and mandates were imposing “fascism” on our society, with families having nowhere to escape: “Even in Hitler’s Germany, you could cross the Alps to Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”

    Anti-vaxxers keep talking about how “smart” Kennedy is since he is a “Lawyer”. Instead with this statement he exposes what an idiot that he is.

    – The first problem here is that you don’t have to cross the Alps to get to Switzerland from Germany.

    [MORE]

    – The second problem is that at no time did Switzerland stop allowing Jews to travel through Switzerland to another country. The reality is that all countries bordering Switzerland (Germany, Austria, Italy and Vichy France) were finally free of Jewish genocidal hate and depravity for the first time since Napoleon, and they did not want communist Jews to come in and cause even bigger Jewish problems. Switzerland, population of about 4 million at that point, also had first hand experience with communists Jews from the attempted Jewish revolution in Zürich in 1918-19. Of course the Jews would have loved the opportunity to turn Switzerland red with Swiss blood, or even to turn it into Judea in the Alps, but the Swiss weren’t having it.

    – The third problem here is that one didn’t have to “cross” the Alps, there were train tunnels that went THROUGH the Alps, and no one except hardy mountaineers and farmers “crossed” the Alps, and that certainly precludes Jews.

    – The fourth problem here is that Kennedy, in typical ignorant boobus Americanus fashion, is supporting the Hebrew fraud about what happened in the lead up to WWII. Switzerland, already becoming flooded with 10’s of thousands of communist Jewish revolutionaries leaving Germany at the invitation of the NSDAP, called the Évian Conference in 1938 to discuss the Jewish refugee problem. Evian was a failure because:

    Zionist leaders Chaim Weizmann and David Ben-Gurion of the Jewish Agency were both firmly opposed to Jews being allowed entry into Western countries, hoping that the pressure of hundreds of thousands of refugees having nowhere to go would force Britain to open Palestine to Jewish immigration. In a similar vein, Abba Hillel Silver of the United Jewish Appeal refused to assist the resettlement of Jews in the United States saying he saw “no particular good” in what the conference was trying to achieve.

    So it was the Jews themselves who slammed the door shut to Jewish emigration to the US and the English empire because they wanted to force England to turn over their Palestine Mandate to the genocidal Zionist land theives. Of course the secret justification was because the genocidal Zionists wanted to punish the inferior Central European Ashkenazi trash, and because they need some atrocity porn to support their Holofraud narrative.

    That Jews, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr, to this day still propagate the lie that Switzerland somehow was guilty “racism” ny not turning Switzerland, who was already starving, into a refugee camp for “6 million” Jewish communists is not only Chutzpah, it is typical Jewish projection in light of the fact that Jews in both America and the UK did not want this trash either.

    – The fifth problem with this statement is Kennedy is associating Fascism with Vaccinations. This is another typical lie being constantly spewed lying Jews and boobus Americanus. The NSDAP came to power to a large degree on an anti-Vaxx platform and one of the first accomplishments of the NSDAP was the elimination of the hated Vaccine Mandates. Here from the Judeo-communist horses mouth itself, which spews numerous lies but does give us the raw truth:

    You Know Who Else Opposed Vaccine Mandates? Hitler

    By the time Hitler and the Nazis took over the country in 1933, disgruntlement with compulsory vaccines had been building for a while, some of the anti-vaccine sentiment mixing with the antisemitic conspiracy theories that were rife in that era. This opposition was especially inflamed by a 1930 incident in which more than seventy children died thanks to an improperly administered tuberculosis vaccine, in what came to be known as the Lübeck disaster. As a result, in the waning years of German democracy, the Weimar government suspended compulsory vaccination in practice, even if it was still officially the law of the land.

    To me it looks a lot like Kennedy here, just like Malone in his thesis that the Nazi’s used “Mass Formation”, is deliberately smearing Germany and German honor. It certainly makes them look stupid, if not like slithering liars, in my eyes. Perhaps they are doing good work exposing the Vaxx fraud, but I certainly don’t trust them as long as they have such a microscopic understanding of History.

    • Replies: @Sepp
  232. @Tyronee Lemont

    I run a website called prepispoison.com. I’ve investigated PrEP for several years.

    In a nutshell: it’s a scam – a very evil one. Gilead Sciences and Fauci and Gates managed to target a vulnerable group (gay men, a traditional target of eugenics) and create a new market for a daily chemotherapy that shortens their lives. Accepting that Duesberg and the Perth Group are right lays out how absurd this is. Of course the government pays for PrEP: they’re trying to put gay mens’ bodies into coffins while dishing out corporate welfare.

    Fauci buried two clinical trials that showed PrEP didn’t work (in terms of creating HIV antibodies, which itself is an invalid surrogate marker). Then in the ones that showed it did work, they manipulated the data and presented a relative risk reduction as an absolute risk reduction, meanwhile ignoring the vast body of evidence HIV is not transmissible through sex in the first place and probably doesn’t even exist other than a bunch of quasi-related biochemical phenomenon that back up a discriminatory and invalid “HIV test” designed to manipulate undesirables into taking toxic daily chemotherapy and turn whatever the “gay community” is into a death cult.

    The level of the PrEP scam is so unbelievably corrupt and bizarre.

    • Thanks: Emil Nikola Richard
  233. @Curmudgeon

    Slightly off topic, but the late Frank Plummer, while doing his “spread of AIDS” work in Kenya _ the crossroads of African trucking – “discovered” that some of the prostitutes had immunity to HIV. I have long wondered how such an allegedly deadly “new” disease could have a natural immunity. Hepatitis is endemic in some populations as is tuberculosis, with the death rates may be significantly lower, but immunity?

    More to that: in 2003/04, Plummer went off-reservation during some drastic Canadian public health measures and questioned the existence and pathogenic of SARS-1. Now, Plummer was Canada’s leading virologist and occupied a prime position in Manitoba. America didn’t pay attention to SARS-1 because there was all the Iraq 2.0 War BS going on at the time. The fact is: SARS 1 was a hoax, and the primers were created by Corman and Drosten, who in 2020 created the bogus SARS 2 PCR test based on their phony SARS 1 primers. Therefore, in retrospect, it seems that SARS-1 was predictive programming to create the lie that a seriously pathogenic coronavirus could become “a thing.”

    And, of course, Plummer died mysteriously right before SARS 2.0 in 2020.

  234. @Wizard of Oz

    I don’t regard the Skripal affair as anything other than a Putinesque message to traitors that they will not be forgotten or forgiven

    You’ve not been looking at the evidence. It is consistent with being a SIS hoax,

    Just as you can expect the USG to cause Jonathan Pollard to die a slow and painful death

    They had 30 years to do it while he was in jail. They didn’t. He was paroled in 2015 and is now living in Israel. So your premise is likely to be false. However, his wife died yesterday.

    Pollard and his wife settled in Jerusalem.[205][18] Esther Pollard died on January 31, 2022. She had been hospitalized for two weeks after contracting COVID-19

    No, I don’t think she was injected with the virus by a CIA hit team.

  235. Sepp says:
    @Sepp

    It would also be appropriate here to mention that Anne Frank was far, far more a victim of Judea than of NSDAP or even Germany.

    Anne Frank died in a German hospital, they were trying to save her life. This happened after the firebombing of Dresden and the destruction of German transport infrastructure. Germans had long been starving in the second world war of starvation against Germany in the span of 30 years.

    Had England allowed Jewish Refugees, had France not invaded Germany in September of 1939, had England and France not declared war on Germany, had Judea not declared war on Germany in 1933, Anne Frank would have been cozy in her house in Amsterdam throughout the war.

    Had the cynical and genocidal elite Jews allowed Jewish emigration to new Jewish homelands that didn’t require genocide and land theft like Madagascar, Crimea, or even Eastern Siberia, Anne Frank and her family could have peacefully joined the quest to create a new Zion just like American settlers did across the west in the 1800’s.

    But that was not possible because of Jewish lust for vengeance and lust for wealth. Those Jews wanted 6 million Anne Frank’s in order to push the holofraud that they had been predictively programming for for 50 years. But it gets even better. The most crass thing about Anne Frank is not that the Jews wanted her dead, not that they murdered her, but that the Jews now use her as a bludgeon against the German people who had performed everything in their power to save her from Jewish blood lust.

  236. @ChesterView

    Agreed that the RFK murder seems particularly open to questioning the main facts and that, in itself, opens up more doubts about the sole gunman version of the JFK murder… but….

    What do you now think about 9/11? Do you doubt that 19 Arabs in hijacked planes hit three targets out of 4? Have you any reasoned belief that the Twin Toewers were demolished with explosives rather than brought down by gravity after weakening of steel by fire? Do you see any way in which WTC7 would have been included in some supposed plot when it could not be explained by the fires in it being started by an aircraft crashing into it? Do you subscribe to the view that no plane hit the Pentagon and the plane’s passengers somehow disappeared? If any yeses, on what reasoning? Can you believe in guilt beyond perhaps Israel not giving adequate warnings of what their intelligence had picked up?

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  237. geokat62 says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    It’s a mixed record, as one can say of every human collective…

    Mixed record, huh?

    Can one say this of other human collectives?

    “But combine them together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.” – Ron Unz

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  238. @Ron Unz

    As no one has ever managed to hypnotise me I am naturally sceptical but the British film featuring the pretended shooting of Stephen Fry by one Chris seemed credible enough (though I still find it difficult to believe so many people were so suggestible). So….. accepting that Sirhan could have been hypnotised when he shot at RFK what about Oswald? It seems strange that no one – if no one – has suggested that Oswald might have been hypnotised.

    He would have had to be confronted with evidence that he physically fired at JFK o did something that made it seem so to explain a perhaps genuine complaint that he was a patsy.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  239. @Wizard of Oz

    Okay, time for the old roach spray.

    “Wizard of Oz” often draws other commenters in with questions and requests that are seldom resolved to his satisfaction, or with cryptic insinuations that distract discussion.

    He also fuzzes up threads by pretending to be more than one commenter, the technique known as “sock puppetry.” See under Mr. Derbyshire’s February 15, 2019, article comment ## 28, 42, 43, 44, 68, 122, where he got sloppy also posting as “Anon[436].” (Trying to elicit an admission in January 2021 yielded only more extended dissembling, including a preposterous assertion that I am no different for having commented anonymously before being “nudged” into adopting a handle by Mr. Unz.)

    Among this website’s oddest, sophisticatedly trollish commenters.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  240. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Here is my attempt to sweep up Himmler videos, most of which I have watched enough of to pick up details which,if correct, make (attempted) extermination by SS hard to deny or details that are carelessly stated, maybe wrong enough to need following up.

    People who get their knowledge of the world from videos are mostly stupid people, and I certainly don’t have time to waste on your nonsense. I sometimes get a sense that you’ve scarcely read a single serious, non-fiction book in the last twenty or thirty years.

    However, since you’re so enamored with Holocaust videos, here’s a long one that someone just sent me, which I also haven’t bothered watching but which perhaps you might find interesting:

    [MORE]
  241. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    It seems unlikely that making up figures killed in pogroms was something the rabbinic would be bothered with until the 19th century. Who was there to appeal to with the sob stories?

    Much more likely if your facts about book destruction are right is that the rabbinic like the church authorities wanted to keep control of the sources of authority. After all translations of the Christian Bible into the vernacular was forbidden for most of two millennia.

  242. Thank you, Ron Unz.
    Excellent subject material and well-presented. An important piece for understanding the contrived madness which beguiles so odiously our society and nation.

  243. JackOH says:
    @emerging majority

    emerging majority, if my memory’s okay, the FDA’s standard for drug approval includes a better than placebo benchmark, while Europe’s benchmark is better than existing pharmacopeia.

    How do we spell cha-ching?

  244. @Commentator Mike

    A couple of Gottleib’s patients collected damages in Canadian courts. So there is evidence that they were trying their best to do so. Also Burgess’ Clockwork Orange was supposedly written on demand per MI6 spec sheet.

    Michael Aquino claimed they never got it close to working.

    1. His Mind War trilogy might be the definitive source.
    2. Michael Aquino is not trustworthy. To work propaganda must contain a large fraction of facts.
    3. The prosecutor of Charles Manson claimed the actual trigger and knife agents were mind-controlled and he had to have some tenuous connection to reality. Nikolas Schreck tears Bugliosi to pieces if you ask me. He gave up one of his ears in the fight so it is not like he is an anonymous internet person in his mother’s basement.

  245. @Ron Unz

    […] and I certainly don’t have time to waste on your nonsense.

    Ah, but you do.

    Please stop feeding weasels and consider the comments of Kratoklastes, ChesterView, and others with substantial information and heterodox arguments about the Establishment’s COVID censorship and tyranny.

    • Agree: Sepp, Marcion
  246. @Wild Man

    We seem to be talking past each other, and perhaps my dogmatism is to blame: I maintain that “the Protest in DC was about the Coronavirus mandates/vaccine, passports” — the general scamdomness of it all.

    RFKJr and all those people had the megaphone and media’s attention, for that moment. imo it would have been smarter to keep the spotlight squarely on that topic, that grievance, and not allow focus to wander to Stage Left.

    Why in the heck did RFK give ADL an opening to steal the show?

    In my black-and-white way of thinking, here was no good reason whatsoever to broach a topic that tickles the ever-prickly ears of a certain (((group.)))

    Simplistic assessment: RFK was just dumb. It was a strategic and tactical blunder.
    But we know he is NOT dumb. So why did he do it?

    Was he coerced — or rather, was RFK given permission to hold the rally BY ADL crime syndicate, so long as certain requirements are fulfilled, namely, that he pays obeisance to the ADLites.

    To the extent I follow your grievance concerning parasites, etc., I agree.

    But cycle back to my first simplistic point: the rally was about Covid, not the parasite problem.

    Conflating the two give the parasite the opportunity to undermine the primary agenda of the rally — the Covid protest — while not only failing to do anything to mitigate the parasite problem but actually making it worse, giving the parasites one more opportunity to demonstrate and enlarge their power.

    I’ve been on the street in the cold to protest AIPAC’s visits to DC. (I no longer find street protest very useful; subtler but more effective ways need to be explored. I think a Mock Trial of ADL, public and filmed, would be interesting.)
    Taking on the parasite should not, cannot be a throw-away one-liner in an event staged for another purpose.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
    , @Anon
  247. @Ron Unz

    Your reply is both petty and foolish. Both apply to the fact that what you call my “nonsense” you have not even examined and, suggesting petulant bad faith, you have neglected the remedy I suggested for your not having time for the key videos on Himmler.

    Your notorious lack of people skills beyond what can be achieved by imperceptive intellect is a core problem. I once suggested you could use an intern in the shape of a young relation of mine – who has, BTW, now graduated with straight As from Columbia. But no, and the sad fact is that you can’t make use of the vast reservoir of young talent on your doorstep. Just advertise for help. You don’t even have to speak to them to give them their briefs.

    As to books, it is true that I am fastidious enough to regard your last 15 years or so’s choice out of the hundreds of thousands available to you as turgid rubbish in large part. I happily lighted on a 2016 email to a friend about my annual holiday reading in Sri Lanka

    I’ve just been reading “Swerve” by Stephen Grreenblatt which explains that curiosity ceased to be a grave fault about 1400.
    Others were A.N. Wilson’s “The Victorians” and Francis Wheen’s “Marx – a Life” which introduced me to the idea of Das Kapital as satire. I think Marx would have been v. good company.

    Have you read them? You should both for pleasure and for erudition. Unfortunately reading unmagnified print has become hard for me recently.

    If you ever turn your mind to getting the best out of the considerable resources of intellect and data that end up on YouTube and similar platforms You might like to add the remarkable series of interviews with “Holocaust survivors” (by whatever more or less accurate description) that seems to be a product of one or more Shoah Foundations or Holocaust Museums. I say that despite not knowing where your handwaving on “the Holocaust” as substantially false is going to settle. Is it numbers? Is it gas chambers? Is it no one who mattered seriously trying to organise extermination of untermenschen? (Have you heard what purports to be a recorded speech by Himmler in which he speaks of die Ausrottung of Jews as something that can never be talked about?). It is your apparent indecision about what you think that makes me think a wide catholic listening to material which impinges on your Holocaust questions tangentially might help because there would be things said that were relevant and credible because they were not directed primarily to the contentious points where tendentioudness might prevail.

    The fact that the Holocaust has been beaten up to excuse Israel of everything and for Hollywood and lawyers’ profits should not get in the way of the truth.

    • Troll: haha
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Lucius Somesuch
  248. Wild Man says:
    @Insouciant

    I see your points. I agree. It’s frustrating though, this constant gas-lighting. If Mr. Unz wants to weigh in on the JQ (but I’m not really sure precisely what his aims around that are), and weigh-in on it in a way that won’t be deemed tone-deaf by his audience, he should not insinuate that apologizes are in order, for those that milk the holocaust industry narrative (like he did, as I outlined in my comment #96 of this thread). Does Mr. Unz not realize that aware goys find this repulsive?

    And this is Mr. Unz’s site. I suppose I used your comment to double down on my sense, that someone should indicate to Mr. Unz that apologizing to the holocaust industry perps for holocaust industry subverso shenanigans, are at this point, just the stupidity of continued groveling. And I suppose that is your point too, with Mr. Kennedy’s original use of the apparently offensive (but really non-offensive) metaphor, being followed by groveling.

    The grovelling needs to stop. Is it wrong to expect that of all places, the UR, with its focus partly on the JQ, that the editorship should be on the forefront, of, in the very least, not grovelling on this front?

    • Agree: Mehen
    • Replies: @Petermx
  249. But “What Did Anne Frank Have against Americans?” https://www.dcdave.com/article5/150811.htm

    • Thanks: BuelahMan
  250. Notsofast says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    the c.i.a. and f.b.i. are mossad, one big happy family.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  251. Blankaerd says:

    I do appreciate your recordings so that I can listen to it while I’m doing my grindset

  252. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Both apply to the fact that what you call my “nonsense” you have not even examined and, suggesting petulant bad faith, you have neglected the remedy I suggested for your not having time for the key videos on Himmler.

    Your notorious lack of people skills beyond what can be achieved by imperceptive intellect is a core problem.

    Look, this is not a Holocaust thread, and your trying to derail it by publishing eight(!) separate Holocaust videos from Youtube is extremely bad behavior.

    As everyone knows, the modern Holocaust debate has overwhelmingly been shaped by Arthur Butz’s seminal book on the subject that was published more than 45 years ago. Yet I have the strong impression that until just a few weeks ago, you’d never even heard of it. I tend to doubt you’ve even bothered reading my own articles on the subject.

    Assuming that’s correct, perhaps you can understand why I have absolutely no interest in watching the Holocaust videos you so highly recommend. Maybe you should now begin spouting off on other subjects about which you clearly know absolutely nothing.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  253. cassandra says:
    @onebornfree

    I second your comments on this:

    Indulging in overly-heated rhetoric, he declared “We have witnessed over the last 20 months a coup d’état against democracy, and the controlled demolition of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.”

    Overly heated? RFK hit the nail on the head. I’ve been personally trying to avoid this conclusion for quite some time, but it’s become impossible. I’m relieved that discussion is finally coming out into the open, and disapppinted that Mr. Unz is still in denial.

    The loss of rights and sovereignty is a necessary part of the COVID disinformation campaaign meant to hide the discrepancies between what primary medical literature indicates on the one hand, compared with the official pronouncements shielded by the hearsay news and censorship on the other. The no-free-speech MSM has become a sophomorically one-sided bullhorn whose main function is been to suppress intellectual dissent and enforce ideological conformity.

    The medical literature is replete with simple treatments for COVID that doctors have have discovered/developed, some since early 2020, which can render COVID no worse than the flu. A pervasive propaganda effort has been devoted to keep the public ignorant if not frightened of these solutions. In a concerted program official malpractice, Fauci et al. can speak any lie with a strainght face, even in Congress, and promote any coercion he pleases, secure in the knowledge that the MSM will have his back. Simple Tony says do this, and no matter how silly, compliance is expected. Consent of the governed enters not at all into this program.

    Intead of asking how you can be so incurious about the censorship, cancelling, and physical oppression, Mr. Unz, I’ll ask instead, what shred of liberty is being preserved in the current operation that wasn’t smashed in the Weimar “emergency” that Hitler used to take power?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  254. Anonymous[289] • Disclaimer says:

    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp
    archive.vn/u8OjU – archive of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg
    Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg – “The Tribunal shall NOT be bound by technical rules of evidence.”
    Article 21 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg – “The Tribunal shall NOT require PROOF OF FACTS of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.”

    [MORE]

    https://archive.org/details/DavidIrvingDebunksHolocaustIn3Min

    https://archive.org/details/PastorStevenAndersonDidTheHolocaustReallyHappen

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1001 – “One Third of the Holocaust” – documentary

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK3AUG87JD0 – “The First Holocaust The Surprising Origin of the Six Million Figure”

    https://codoh.com/ – Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust website

    https://archive.org/details/DavidIrvingTheManipulationOfHistory



    Video Link– “The “Holocaust” testimonies you DIDN’T hear!”

    http://archive.vn/lwbzT – “Florida principal who told parent he ‘can’t say the Holocaust is a factual, historical event’ is fired”

    -History schoolteacher says: “There was lots of proof from the Red Cross, that the number of deceased in the WORK camps, they were not other types of camps, they were work camps, they starved because the allies were starving them”

    https://www.ancreport.com/documentary/spinning-squirrel-how-pysch-warfare-propaganda-became-the-historical-narrative/ – “Spinning Squirrel, How Pysch Warfare Propaganda Became the Historical Narrative”

  255. anarchyst says:
    @cassandra

    Let’s not forget that ALL of the world leaders, not just the united States government have “exempted” themselves from the vaxxes.
    THAT, in itself, speaks VOLUMES about what (((they))) have in store for us…

  256. @geokat62

    “Black-stone“????
    I wrote that at 2:00 am.
    (Was I drunk?)

    Sorry.

    I meant BlackRock.

  257. Petermx says:
    @Wild Man

    I’m not sure I understand your post. I agree that RFK Jr.did not have anything to apologize for but your post appears to be tone deaf to a welcome website that Ron Unz created that was growing by leaps and bounds because of Mr. Unz’s search for the truth, regardless of where it takes the website. This website surpassed others with much bigger names before tech took certain actions against it but it is still growing.

    “If Mr. Unz wants to weigh in on the JQ (but I’m not really sure precisely what his aims around that are), and weigh-in on it in a way that won’t be deemed tone-deaf by his audience” I think one of his aims are to make people aware of it (the JQ) and discuss it in an intelligent way because no one else talks about the JQ. Have you ever heard CNN or any other television network discuss the JQ? Just asserting there is a JQ makes the person doing so a “NAZI” in the eyes of the liars that don’t want it discussed. I think a significant percentage of Americans, Europeans and others are aware of Jewish power in their countries and abroad and know any criticism from Jews exercising that power can destroy the reputation and career of anyone who said something they don’t like and if they perceive you as an enemy, forget about it. They have the power to destroy anyone, including most heads of state. And if they cant’t take down a head of state themselves, they can start a war against that country to take him down (example: Iraq twice and now possibly Russia). That is what owning and controlling most of the media can do. You can propagandize and create a narrative completely at odds with the truth in order to start a war with your enemy.

    I think Ron Unz is searching for the truth and maybe he thinks the situation is dangerous where large segments of countries around the world know of Jewish power and know they can destroy anyone they don’t like and know they can’t say anything about it without being destroyed by that power. Anyone that can think will realize this situation won’t continue forever and when there is a backlash, it will be nasty. And just like the “NAZIS”, these people will feel justified, that they are on the right side, the side of fairness and justice. And if you think they’re wrong, there is no fairness and justice living under Jewish power either.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  258. @geokat62

    Apologies. I thought I meant BlackRock, but I did indeed mean BlackStone.

    They are two separate entities.

    Blackstone is an American alternative investment management company founded in 1985.

    BlackRock was founded in 1988.

    Both are in financial services.

  259. Mehen says:

    Potentially important information for those who have been following the Vax Lot/Batch controversy regarding the varying levels of toxicity. There is evidence to suggest the potency/toxicity has been been deliberately timed to account for the vax-hesitant holdouts and refusers who may have come late to the party as a result of mandates.

    Such a strategy would be effective only with the vaccine hesitant who were poorly informed and/or compelled by economic circumstances to comply. It would not work with the more independent and informed.

    Consequently, in November we see both the introduction of coercive policies, and the reduced severity of 1st doses – which persisted through December

    So a trap was laid, and many fell for it. In January 2022 the trap was sprung. 1.5% of adverse reports in December had been severe – now it rose to 9.5%. The severity was higher than it had ever been at any time in 2021. Hundreds of first timers are recorded as dying or becoming disabled – thousands of fatalities remained un-recorded.

    https://howbad.info/firstsecond.html

  260. @Kurt Knispel

    Anne Frank Authenticity

    The authenticity of the Diary of Anne Frank was first addressed by the Swedish journal Fria Ord in 1959, which noted that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had made a dramatic adaptation of the diary and had to fight Otto Frank for the reward for his work — \$50,000 — in a lawsuit. Otto Frank lost and had to pay.

    The American Economic Council Letter; 15.4. 1959:

    “The Western world has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through a medium that pretends to be her self-written story, Anne Frank’s diary. Any literarily informed examination of this book would have shown that it could not possibly have been the work of a teenager.”

    Unfortunately, nothing further was published about this process.

    Paul Rassinier drew the following conclusion from the consequence that there had been countless trials about the question of the authenticity of this diary, always with victorious verdicts for father Otto Frank:

    “Far be it from me to claim that this piece of evidence is a forgery! There is a teacher in the vicinity of Harnburg who claimed this and was severely punished for it. … I have noticed that if you read this book in different languages, they are also different in content, and if you compare these publications in turn with another book “Trace of a Child” by the German Ernst Schnabel (1959), you find that the handwriting attributed to Anne Frank is different from one time to another. So here are 2 types of Anne Frank’s handwriting: one (picture 2) is, according to Anne Frank’s father, the last page of her manuscript, the other (picture 1), according to Schnabel, is the correct one, with a picture dedicated to her. … I would only like that one could tell me that these 2 manuscripts belong to the same person, because I understand nothing of graphology. From this alone I can then conclude the authenticity of the document.” *

    Even Paul Rassinier could not find out anything politically-historically worth mentioning from the contents, although this diary has the nimbus of a proof document for the Jewish extermination policy of the Reich government. **

    * Paul Rassinier, “Das Drama der Juden Europas”, Hannover 1965, pp. 52 – 53.
    **A comprehensive concentrate of the Anne Frank trial files 1959 – 1992 in:
    Gerd Knabe: “Die Wahrheit über das Tagebuch der Anne Frank”, Knüllwald 1994.

  261. @Ron Unz

    You must be getting desperate if you don’t think it will be noticed that you have again ignored the fact that I have repeatedly recommended ways to avoid wasting time on getting value from Himmler and other videos rather than demand that you listen/watch. I heard of Butz book years ago but didn’t read him till recently and another fact you ignore is that he wrote in 2015 about his book being out of date.

    Understanding Himmler and the vast SS military and industrial state within a state is a key you seem unwilling to risk turning in case it makes you look as ridiculous as when you base your 9/11 contrarianism on such nonsense as no plane hitting the Pentagon (by brilliant plotters’ design!!) and known passengers disappearing into the ether.

    I am much indebted to you for the solid stuff and even occasional gems I have found in your publications but you maybe flatter yourself if you think obvious opponents like ADSL are at all worried about your motley crew of cranks and (mostly) secular tent preachers. You must be seen by them as providing your own antidote to the good stuff.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  262. geokat62 says:

    The great Harry Vox has just put out this video and has asked people to try their very best to get his message to Neil Young.

    JEWS OWN NEIL YOUNG’S SOUL



    Video Link

    • Thanks: SolontoCroesus
  263. @Wizard of Oz

    Oswald was CIA, Wiz. You need to do more research. He was nowhere near any gun on November 22, 1963. No need to hypnotise-‘I’m the patsy!’. He got it! PS Why would anyone want to hypnotise you?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  264. @geokat62

    ‘Jews’, not ‘the Jews’. You can then argue that ‘Germans’ committed the Nazi atrocities, as some Judaic ‘historians’ like Goldhagen do, but I’m not into collective guilt, or collective supremacy. SOME Jews-Evil, some other Jews-excellent people. Most Jews, just brainwashed adherents of the world’s oldest extant Mafia, transmogrified into a ‘religion’, which then spawned Islam and Christianity, the adherents of both of which have included some fecking God-awful bastards, too.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Wild Man
  265. @Wizard of Oz

    A pretty imbecile comment, even for you, dullard. Skripal was locked up in Russia for yonks, so why not off him then? Moreover harming those exchanged in prisoner swaps after the business is a no-no, because it would end the process in future. And, as for the incident, only a real moron and buffoon would believe the English agit-prop story, as full of holes as your cerebral cortex, and one did.

  266. Wild Man says:
    @Petermx

    I think you understand just fine, yet still won’t do the very first thing necessary within any confrontation, and that is to say ‘no’ to any narrative that you disagree with. If no actual disagreement, then nothing will ever happen then, to change the dynamic. As such, the quagmire of the so-intentionally unresolved conflict, will then fix said perverse status quo in place. We can all cry cry cry until the cows come home (among our aware-goy selves), yet when a Jewish person wields this ‘apologizing to the holocaust industry perps is correct and good, and it’s best to provide said apologies just when these holocaust industry perps are upholding the subversive activity (gas-lighting and lying), so as to signal to these perps, that it was you who was wrong, and not them, as such implying that the perps are not in the wrong for their subversive activity, and indeed it is just dandy for them to continue with it’, …. and yet these crying goys (like yourself I suppose) then assess…. ‘oh yes, nothing to see here, and to imply there is, – is tone-deaf’, …. well, go feck yourself then.

    On this passage of your comment:

    “Anyone that can think will realize this situation won’t continue forever and when there is a backlash, it will be nasty.”

    Maybe take a look at my recent posting history on this site and you will see I already covered that concern off, and in a way the will serve Jewish self-interest. I am not against the Jews. I am against Jewish misbehavior. Mr. Unz seems to playing a game of obscuring precisely what this Jewish misbehavior is, and is it not beyond obvious that Jews, any Jew really, should not be given a free pass as arbiters of western morality (in fact no one in the west should possess such free pass. True-west doesn’t work that way. No free passes for anyone).

    To repeat. Mr. Kennedy had nothing to apologize for. Why did Mr. Unz insinuate that he did?

    • Replies: @Petermx
  267. geokat62 says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    You can then argue that ‘Germans’ committed the Nazi atrocities, as some Judaic ‘historians’ like Goldhagen do…

    … or like Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish!

  268. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    No. You vacillate. Does the larger Jewish community-proper have responsibility with respect to reigning in their subversos (whom are practicing subversion upon western culture)? Earlier you agreed that there is some group responsibility there. Now you seem to indicate: ‘no …. every group has bad people’. Now, I would go along with that, if all things being more or less equal (with respect to per-capita rates of Jewish misbehavior in this vein), …. but that is not the case.

    1) The current brand of globalism being shoved down our throats in the west is bad. Do you agree with that claim?

    2) The current brand of globalism is populated by key players within globalist circles, of which one could easily make the case is 25% Jewish. As such, 100x over-weighting, per-capita-wise, in globalist circles. Do you agree with that claim?

    3) If you agree with #1 and #2, then by logic, you must conclude that the larger Jewish community-proper, have an outsized responsibility towards sorting this out – no?

  269. NaToWaLdo says:

    My normal reading app can’t download this article. Is the audio file new? That might be causing the issues.

  270. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:
    @Verymuchalive

    The “Skokal Hoax “? Do you mean The Sokal Affair, which wasn’t humorous or malicious ?

    The Sokal Affair wasn’t humorous? I’d have to agree.

    Lampooning post modern intellectual morons isn’t merely humorous, it’s laugh-out-loud hilarious.

  271. Realist says:
    @Tomas Allen

    In light of the comment, I received from Ron Unz you may want to reevaluate your reason for trolls on this site.

    See Unz’s comment 170, to me, under https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/kamloops-greatest-hate-hoax-ever/ and my reply.

    I think there is a different nefarious reason for the trolls…as I said agent provocateurs.

  272. @emerging majority

    Please do not forget the death of (then) United Auto Workers president Walter Reuther. He was involved in two plane crashes in less than a year’s time – the second being the fatal one.

    Thank you.

    Brad Anbro,
    retired United Auto Workers Journeyman Electrician

  273. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Understanding Himmler and the vast SS military and industrial state within a state is a key you seem unwilling to risk turning

    I think my very irritated response was perfectly justified…

    Videos are mostly used as propaganda or entertainment, and are generally worthless as a source of solid information on anything. Indeed, I’d guess that the average serious book contains 100x as much substantive content as an hour-long video. And you come along with eight stupid videos on Nazi Occultism that you shove at me.

    Over the last few years, I’ve probably read around 100 books on World War II and Nazi Germany, hardly enough to make me a huge expert, but sufficient to give me a solid grounding in the topic. My question to you is what are the five most important books in that subject area you’ve read over the last five years.

    Once you’ve answered that question, I can decide whether to take your video suggestions seriously.

  274. @Wizard of Oz

    You’re not your usual self, Wiz. It’s taken you two replies to answer my one. Is Drongo Dan Andrews making you spend all of your time in your bunker – just like Justin Trudeau ? Is that why you’re sounding so textually dishevelled ? Have you been drinking too much home made wine ? ( I’m not being judgemental about this. Since the Corona business began, relatives up in the Orkneys have been drinking a lot more home made Skullsplitter )

    PS What is AMD ? Is it related to WMD ?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  275. Unlike the pipeline-connected Jews, Wellstone was a free-spirit and a universalist, rather than a “chosenite”. By tirelessly campaigning from a bus, Wellstone, jumping out of the Democrat Former Labor Party control, won his Senate seat, basically unaided by the Kaplan machine and proceeded to raise holy hell in a Senate packed with pro\$titicians. In more noble-minded Jewish circles he would be considered a true Mensch.

    He was hated and feared by the Bu\$h Crime Clan. They feared that he would run against the Chimp in the next presidential election.

  276. @A little boy in the crowd

    Blackstone also is closely involved with their primary competitors in the funds-control rackets. Its quite likely there is an interlocking directorate nexus between them, Vanguard and State Street. Once you get into researching the “pat my back, I’ll pat yours” interface amongst those entities which control TRILLIONS, you will discover many of the same names on their boards of directors.

    Now if only someone were able to research the actual full ownership of those vultures; we would know the identities of the bulk of the enemies of humanity.

  277. @mulga mumblebrain

    I think you may be right about Oswald and the CIA It helps to make one or two erosions of the assassination more plausible. But I was throwing up the question as to why, if Oswald was set up and hypnotism was given so much credit in the 1968 story in wasn’t even speculated for Oswald. After all it is far from generally accepted, as far as I know, that Oswaild wasn’t in the Book Depository and fired no shots. I’m now for the first time beginning to reimagine what I (maybe) know about the JFK assassination. It’s not a task for the short winded. One of my lines of approach would be to question what could plausibly have been in the plot – just as I regard WTC7’s collapse as very bad for those who want to say the 19 Arabs were framed patsies. Clearly enough, if Oswald is to be framed, it has to appear that he was in the Book Depository and had the right kind of gun to match the bullets ….. OK there couldn’t be the risk taken of having only one shooter but.. .

    As to my hypnosis experience I think a few experiments from the age of about 11 to 26 would be all. I think my family are not very suggestible in the relevant way (though a couple of self deluding fantasists give a moment’s pause). There’s been quite a history of standing out against bullying crowds, in which I claim no great starring part, merely some bloody minded confident consistency. More interesting is what I would now be interested in following up, namely the researched connection between the readily hypnotisable and various personality characteristics. Wouldn’t you be worried to find yourself as suggestible as Chris in the film?

  278. @Verymuchalive

    You didn’t put AMD straight into a Google search? Partly vecause of mine I now spend much of my days and nights with a wide (folding) smartphone screen in hand on which I can look up a word or acronym in about 5 seconds and quickly blow up text to eliminate errors in reading (provided I think there might be error because it obviously slows me down a lot to have to read a line which overflows the page).

    Age Related Macular Degeneration in its wet form can be controlled for at least some years by regular injections in the eye. Mine was caught very early and tends to knock out one letter or number in a string of 7 or 8 which means I have to move my head to read car number plates. As it happens I had, when struck with the wet form that had just knocked me off the tennis court , just recovered from three years of quite successful expensive new laser treatment to obliterate a big fat druse in the middle of my right macula that had once been my dominant eye. Drusen are precursors of the more devastating dry form AMD I understand so the result was quite good but residual homage in the middle of the retina is irritating for one who once had outstandingly good eyesight (Cp. Aborigine or test pilot: not 20:20 but about 20:10).

    I hardly drink alcohol these days though my young neighbour helps find good things in my cellar that might need drinking. I am blessed to have within 30 metres of where I write this a large grassy park with 130 year old elms and other big trees in full leaf. So Dan Andrews has not affected my life much.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  279. @Notsofast

    Family. OK. But happy family? You’ve got to be joking. Remember all the attempts to avoid blame over 9/11? Just for one example.

    • Replies: @Iris
  280. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:

    “Even in Hitler’s Germany, you could cross the Alps to Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”

    Too true. So it’s been extra interesting watching the current WCE: Whoopi Cushion Explosion.

    The ironically-named Whoopi GOLDBERG (a sheboon born Caryn Elaine Johnson who “culturally-appropriated a jewish moniker) is now in hot water with the Tribe for saying the Holocaust wasn’t racist.

    She said if she and a jew were talking on the sidewalk and the KKK rolled into town, she’d have to run…while the jew might pass for White.

    I tend to agree.

    Yet beneath her statement I sense the Whoopster fears jews invading the Racism Grift, now mostly a hustle wholly-owned by Niggas, Inc.

    The firestorm that’s ensued seems the opposite: the Tribe not wanting their Shoah Business grift lessened/shared by blacks who claim that nickers suffer(ed) more.

    Of course, jews want to be White when it benefit\$ them to seem so.

    In 1933-35 Germany, jews were self-declaring their tribalism via IBM punch-cards.

    https://ibmandtheholocaust.com/

    They also stood out by their dress, especially unassimilated arrivals from Eastern Europe. Temple attendance, names, etc. also gave them away. Still as the Wannsee Conference noted, it was still no cakewalk to note “who was a jew.”

    2001 trailer (in English):

    1984 full movie here for free (German with English subtitles):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YAjKUdT3JE&t=7s&ab_channel=LionHeartFilmWorks’

    Only one copy (forged?) exists of the minutes of that meeting, the one that supposedly led to the gassing of 6 gorillion. Since there was no sound recording, both movie scripts are pure fiction.

    Yet both are taken as gospel.

    In the films (both worth watching), considerable time is spent figuring out who’s a full, half, quarter, etc. “jew.” So I think Whoopi is right: a lot of jews CAN pass for white when it suits them.

    The horror is that both Trumpers and Bidenettes are full-bore Zionists, damning all who question judaic myths. The fact that many jews hate blacks (calling them “schvartzes” and “porch monkeys:) and vice versa (joggers call jews “yids” and “noses” and “kikes) is ignored in service of worshiping the Holycost.

    The wonder is that so many Christians, once both virile and martial (eg, “onward Christian soldiers”) have devolved into “Kick me!”-sign-wearing cucks and cowards.

    Jesus weeps.

    Shlomo cackles.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Petermx
  281. @Ron Unz

    Well I can’t say that I have read every word of all six volumes of Churchill’s WW2 memoirs attentively but they had been looking at me accusingly after rescue from my parents’ library for so long that I nominate them to meet your rather odd precondition. And I don’t even demand that you spend much of your precious time on what I typed in to try and add neatly to your digital data – which was of course URLs that blew up on the page embarrassingly.

    The trouble is that to help you use that or any video or other material profitably it would be helpful to know what your particular problems with the Holocaust story are apart from having read Butz’s out of date work and, thanks to the scepticism of senior American officers, formed the general impression that prima facie nothing of the narrative which made Jews the principal victims of Nazi persecution was to be taken as true.

    OK, the 6 mllion goes out the window even though it is often stated as the iconic figure in books, films and articles which nonetheless contain many facts that are not suspect a d can be usefully combined for a true picture of times and places and events. (Consider how I am able to get from my father’s condition as a POW at the end of the war enough evidence to be sure that the deaths from disease and starvation in camps liberated by the Americans at the end of the war had nothing to do with the Holocaust but could have explained a lot about the words you quote from senior American officers. By analogy you can see by studying Himmler’s obsessions with the occult and racial mythology – *especially visuals of what he had expensively constructed* – that the normal expectations about governments in wartime ha e to be completely abandoned).

    I could go further in what I would instruct your team of helpers to look for but you do so much hand waing in your contemptuous condemnations of the Holocaust narrative as you conceive it that I might be wasting my time. The recording of Himmler using the word Ausrotten in reference to the Judenfrage that had to be kept quiet could obviously be at the heart of one follow up project to assess its authenticity – and the inference to be drawn if it were proved fake.

    While I am on the subject of evidence generally, when you start with someone known to be as dodgy as Bacque and have Wear accusing Eusenhower of an extermination campaign I would think it elementary to seek the natural corollaries of the story being true. How about the papers (letters, diaries, everything) of Henry Morgenthau Jr for starters. And there would have to be much else in a country that would have been bound to have had original German sympathisers who were in high enough places to hear and read the ugly details and write their views. And let’s not neglect the UK even if you imagine that all German governments for nearly 75 years had been able to stop disclosures by anti American people.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @scuzzaman
  282. @Truth Vigilante

    And if there was plenty of flour and fuel, so 60,000 loaves were baked daily, 10,000 for inmates and 50,000 for German soldiers would be fair, if the soldiers were five times more numerous.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
  283. gay troll says:

    RFK Jr. emphasizes the tactic that Fauci deployed against critics of Gallo’s flaccid HIV/AIDS etiology: shutting down debate by claiming that the opposition does not deserve a response or a platform. Per Fauci, the thoughtcrime of those who question “settled science” is so severe that it should only be ignored and/or silenced, never answered. This of course bears a strong resemblance to reasoning about Holocaust revisionism. Holocaust denial is illegal in many countries for a very simple reason: it is convincing. Perhaps this is also the reason Fauci won’t engage with HIV/AIDS skeptics: because he’s peddling a false narrative that can’t withstand scrutiny. Vaccinology as a whole is also subject to this exemption, also above the Western ethic of falsifiability. Vaccines are the only drug not subject to double blind placebo control in clinical research. Not only are they unavoidably unsafe: they are indisputably beneficial, and therefore to deny vaccines to a control group is unethical. Even Pfizer unblinded their mRNA trial at the first positive interpretation.

    Only lies need to be protected from counterproof.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  284. Petermx says:
    @Wild Man

    I’m aware of his apology. I don’t ascribe as much to that as a website like this that could make a real impact.

  285. @Anonymous

    Thanks for the entertaining yet depressing Whoopi Goldberg nonsense.

    It would be interesting to know where the makers of the 1984 movie got their dialogue from. Do you know if there is an archive?

    But what are you trying to convey with this

    In 1933-35 Germany, jews were self-declaring their tribalism via IBM punch-cards.

    https://ibmandtheholocaust.com/

    I would have to infer that you hadn’t read the link and made up your description of it.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  286. Petermx says:
    @Anonymous

    Stop talking about “cross[ing] the Alps to Switzerland”. It’s a dumb statement. As someone else pointed out, you don’t need to climb any mountains to get to Switzerland from Germany. The border is on flat land. You can cross a lake if that makes you feel better. Lake Constance separates Germany and Switzerland. Also, since Germany wanted Jews to leave Germany there probably would not be a problem from the German border guard (except in a Hollywood movie) but Switzerland might not let someone into their country without a visa.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  287. @Greta Handel

    In case anyone cares I say that, without affirming or denying what Greta Handel writes I haven’t posted an anonymous comment for several years.

    • LOL: Greta Handel, Iris
  288. Petermx says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I always get a kick out of Americans attempts to show how Americans and American companies helped the “NAZIS” do this or that. Germany was far ahead of the US in science and engineering and American companies got involved in German industry because Germany was the most advanced country and it was beneficial to Americans so they could acquire new technology. The US also stole companies as in the case of the pharmaceutical companies Merck and Schering when the US nationalized these companies. The computer was in its infancy in the 1930’s and 40’s and Germany was a leader in the new field. There was little the US could help Germany with but the US wouldn’t have a pharmaceutical industry without the German companies they stole during WW II or the pharmaceutical companies founded by Germans (Pfizer). Besides, there was no Holocaust, so what is this talk about IBM helping Germany.

    Germany could say it should have kept foreign students out of German universities, then J. Robert Oppenheimer would not have received his PHD at Gottingen University and helped build the atomic bomb years later.

    • Replies: @Iris
  289. @mulga mumblebrain

    I have to give it to you Mulga, that calm and measured response of yours to Dunce of Oz, exercising the utmost restraint, is something I’m not capable of when responding to this poster boy for stupidity.

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  290. @Ron Unz

    I’m absolutely with you as far as your tirade on Dunce of Oz is concerned.
    He is a time waster extraordinaire with his never ending cavalcade of inane commentary.

    Meanwhile, you write:

    Videos are mostly used as propaganda or entertainment, and are generally worthless as a source of solid information on anything. Indeed, I’d guess that the average serious book contains 100x as much substantive content as an hour-long video.

    I don’t disagree with that statement of yours, as far maximising the assimilation of research in a given time frame – although the ‘100x’ comment is more a reflection of your speed reading capabilities over us mere mortals.

    That said, there is nothing quite like watching historian David Irving in full flight (esp. at the peak of his oratorical powers – around the late 80’s/early 90’s).

    Utilising no teleprompters, no written notes or cue cards, all coming from his Herculean and unparalleled grasp of real WWII history.
    The conviction in what he says, the sincerity of his words and tone of delivery, can only truly be appreciated through one of his audio/visual oratorical masterclasses.
    (No written transcript of his speeches even remotely does it justice).

    Most of his better stuff has been purged from You Tube but it seems to all be there on BitChute.

    If you have a few moments to spare, it’s something that you’ll be glad you looked into.

    (HINT: Irving may start off a little slow at times, so scroll through to somewhere in the middle of one of his videos, when he’s at his animated best, and observe).

    Here is one that I haven’t watched for a while:



    Video Link

    You might also like:



    Video Link

    • Agree: Biff
  291. @RoatanBill

    It is not a stretch to say, without equivocation, that every war or military “adventure”, “expedition”, “intervention” “police action”*, since the Declaration of Independence was based upon lies, misrepresentation of facts.
    *De jure -That’s what Truman called it because
    Congress never declared War on North Korea.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  292. @Verymuchalive

    Anne Frank was taken across Germany in wartime to be treated in a hospital for typhus.

    Anne Frank wasn’t “taken across Germany in wartime to be treated in a hospital for typhus”. She was typhus-free when she was deported by the Nazis from her home in The Netherlands to Auschwitz-Birkenau in Nazi-occupied Poland; in October of 1944, when the Soviets were within 100 kilometers or so of Auschwitz the Nazis moved her to Bergen-Belsen in Germany, where she appears to have caught typhus and died after enduring months of malnutrition, slave labor, exposure, etc.

    Most of the population, indoctrinated by the public school system and the MSM, probably think she was killed in a gas chamber in some Nazi Death Camp. The real story of Anne Frank undermines claims of Nazi Death Camps.

    The real story is that the Nazis had both concentration camps and death camps. You can see a list of them here. Auschwitz-Birkenau was both a concentration camp and a death camp; Bergen-Belsen was a concentration camp.

    The interesting meta-question to me about Ron Unz’s description of Anne Frank as

    a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war

    is whether he merely intended it as a jumping off point for a comment such as yours, or whether he wrote your comment himself.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  293. @gay troll

    The problem with ‘Holocaust Denial’ is that in many cases it is simply ‘Holocaust Discussion’, in search for the real facts. ‘The Holocaust’ now having become an increasingly demanding religion, discussion of ANY element is sacrilegious and the entire Official Version is inerrant truth.
    So, it must be the Kabbalistic ‘six million’ when it really does appear to be about four million. That in itself is a hideous crime and great tragedy, but being ‘Gods Upon the Earth’ gives you the right to order the untermenschen about in every way. So you MUST follow the narrative, and the sundry other ancillary dogmata eg that the Judeocide is ‘unique’ and NEVER to be compared with any other genocide in history, that the suffering of victims is heritable through epigenetic effects, that ‘Never Again’ only applies to Jews and certainly not the likes of Palestinians etc, without question. The slightest deviation-‘antisemite’.
    It is an almost exact template for the CoViD denial industry. There, too, questioning and debate are VERBOTEN. Those who dare to are reviled as ‘anti-vaxxers’, misinformers etc. No matter what the evidence or how great their medical credentials and clinical experience. And any deviation brings a baying, screeching, witch-pack down upon your head. Scratch a ‘liberal’ and you will find a fascist.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  294. Not just “Americans”, even Americans without quotation marks do not understand the causality of the holofraud for the deadly ruinous pharmafraud.

    Without the violently upheld “Shoa” narrative the murderous pharmafraud could not take place.
    If Robert Kennedy wants to seriously uproot the pharmafraud he has to expose the holofraud foremost, because the pharmafraud is an extension of the same root.
    To think the holofraud is a German problem – let the Germans stand up against the Jew’s big lie about them – is allowing that evil root to meander with you.

    Libbre David 37
    „To communicate anything to a Goy aobut our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.“

    • Replies: @Allan
  295. Anon[554] • Disclaimer says:
    @Insouciant

    The Leo Frank story is the best method for opening normie’s eyes regarding the ADL

  296. @Shafar Nullifidian

    I believe you’re right.

    Anything before Vietnam is before my time, so I limit myself to what I’ve personally experienced. History is just sufficiently aged propaganda, written by the winner, so I don’t trust it.

  297. geokat62 says:

    Whoopi, like so many others before her, performing the Goy Grovel…

    • Replies: @Wild Man
    , @geokat62
  298. Iris says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Similar to all Crime Families, there is a hierarchy and a capo di tutti i capi.

    Mossad brought down the WTC with nuclear weapons, and the CIA took the blame and shut up because it stands much lower in the US Deep State food chain.

  299. @Dave Pinsen

    Mr Unz has written several articles on the matter. His views are quite plain. If you object to them, you should take it up with him.

    The interesting meta-question to me about Ron Unz’s description of Anne Frank as

    a Jewish teenager who died of typhus in a German hospital near the end of the war

    is whether he merely intended it as a jumping off point for a comment such as yours, or whether he wrote your comment himself.

    You really are very paranoid if you think that Mr Unz would use another pseudonym to comment on his own article. I have been commenting on UR almost from the beginning. My commenting history is open and can be viewed by other commenters. I don’t always see eye-to-eye with Mr Unz, especially over COVID. Indeed, he banned one of my comments concerning it.

    I will be avoiding you in future.

  300. @Ned Kelly

    I don’t go in for conspiracy… I’m strictly the facts. Kennedy assassinations was a conspiracy… for sure. RFK murder proved it. The fatal shot was from behind, point blank. Sirhan Sirhan never got close to RFK. There a lot more proof but I’ll save that for others. The Safest conspiracy theory is that it was the Mob. Outraged and fearful over the Bobby Kennedy relentless crusade against organized crime… That doesn’t sound so far fetched does it?

    Kennedy was hit by three bullets. Either he was turning to the side to shake hands, or else after having been hit by one bullet he span around. In such situations with shooting in a very crowded enclosed space there is total panic and eyewitness accounts are not usually very reliable.

    Did the Mafia use invisible gunmen who could disappear into thin air?

    Sirhan Sirhan had read and enjoyed In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, and apparently indentified with one of the killers. He was also mentally disturbed, probably still is, and has all kinds of motives to lie about what really happened. Very likely he also enjoys the celebrity of his place in history, and would lie to get attention.

    Apparently RFK Jr. had a personal conversation with Sirhan Sirhan in prison, but has never revealed what was said. Why not?

  301. Iris says:
    @Petermx

    If I may, I would supplement your excellent and factual comment by this reflection.

    Germany always was the intellectual and technological powerhouse of the Western world.

    During the 250 years before WW1, Germany produced a scientific progress so outstanding and superior that British historian Peter Watson, in his book “The German Genius“, called it “Europe’s Third Renaissance “.
    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8155672-the-german-genius

    The Western World owes most of its modern scientific standing to Germany.

    • Thanks: Petermx
  302. @Wizard of Oz

    I am sorry to hear this news. I did google AMD, but all I got was a semi-conductor manufacturer. I should have been much more aware, as I have yearly testing for macular retinopathy and other diabetic eye problems. So far no problems. I hope it stays that way.

    As my relatives say, if you live in the country, you will have hardly noticed the restrictions. The same goes for many areas outside large city centres.
    Slainte Mhath ( you can Google that, if you like )

  303. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Now you are back to hitting the nail on the head, again, Mulga. The Jewish anti-crime crimes you speak of, are spiritual in nature, it seems, no?

  304. @mulga mumblebrain

    I see simple minded MM 3 has bee set loose to give a blast big enough to cover, the MM masters hope, the stunning naiveté.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  305. Ron Unz says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    That said, there is nothing quite like watching historian David Irving in full flight (esp. at the peak of his oratorical powers – around the late 80’s/early 90’s)…If you have a few moments to spare, it’s something that you’ll be glad you looked into.

    Sure, Irving is an absolutely outstanding lecturer and I’d already watched both of the videos some time ago, along with several others as I discussed in my 2018 Irving article:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-remarkable-historiography-of-david-irving/

    I’m certainly not claiming that videos are always worthless and I’ve occasionally cited and linked them in my writings. However, I think they’re generally useful only under special circumstances. For example, Irving has been banned for decades from the media, so those videos are the only source of much of his unique information. If I could read his long monthly articles in The Atlantic, I probably wouldn’t bother watching them.

    Similarly, since all the HIV/AIDS theories of the Duesberg camp have been banned from the media, I spent many hours watching some of their documentaries, mostly from the 1990s.

    Another very useful role is in interviews or debates, in which a proponent’s position can be challenged or explored, though for those the video component usually isn’t necessary.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  306. Wild Man says:
    @geokat62

    Too hilarious. It’s like I said in comment #96 of this thread:

    What in heaven’s name was there anything to apologize for? We are experiencing covid fascism. Our authorities are behaving like covid nazis. The holocaust industry has made so much hay over a certain strain of ethno-fascism, to the point that ‘fascism’s’ #1 example, by far, is Nazi Germany, within the popular western cultural milieu. But fascism comes in many many flavors and the ethno-variety is only one. Nevertheless, the holocaust industry has worked to make the Nazi example (of ethno-type-fascism) the #1 way, in which it interpret the term ‘fascism’ within the popular culture.

    Now Whoopi is caught up in this fight over whether ‘fascism = Nazis’ (i.e. – are synonyms) in the popular culture (but these in fact are synonyms within the popular culture – Whoopi is correct on that front). Now don’t get me wrong about Whoopi – race-baiter extraordinaire – so I don’t like her one bit because of her constant race-baiting foul schlock. However, we get to see how this plays out (like it always plays out), …. an apology is extracted, for using Jewish-instigated popularized definitions, for which no apology should therefore be necessary (but the apology is extracted by way of coercion, anyways). Such apologies are therefore on the level of groveling.

    Jewish holocaust industry: ‘I’m right, even when I’m wrong, and you are gonna publicly apologize to me, for the wrongs I committed, and make it our like they are your wrongs, or I will f*ck-you up. As well goy, please note this dispute is all about ‘definitions’, and you are not tall enough for that ride, deary, so don’t even try (and socially, we have arranged it so that it is ‘shmuck-you’, if you do decide to try to engage us on definitions, …. don’t you have any sense of self-preservation?’).’

    • Replies: @Wild Man
    , @geokat62
  307. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Well I can’t say that I have read every word of all six volumes of Churchill’s WW2 memoirs attentively but they had been looking at me accusingly after rescue from my parents’ library for so long that I nominate them to meet your rather odd precondition.

    Your insouciant ignorance almost defies belief. It sounds like your primary written knowledge of World War II comes from Churchill’s ridiculous, self-serving memoirs. It also seems very clear that you never bothered reading my own World War II article from 2019, which included this passage:

    Until recently, my familiarity with Churchill had been rather cursory, and Irving’s revelations were absolutely eye-opening. Perhaps the most striking single discovery was the remarkable venality and corruption of the man, with Churchill being a huge spendthrift who lived lavishly and often far beyond his financial means, employing an army of dozens of personal servants at his large country estate despite frequently lacking any regular and assured sources of income to maintain them. This predicament naturally put him at the mercy of those individuals willing to support his sumptuous lifestyle in exchange for determining his political activities. And somewhat similar pecuniary means were used to secure the backing of a network of other political figures from across all the British parties, who became Churchill’s close political allies.

    To put things in plain language, during the years leading up to the Second World War, both Churchill and numerous other fellow British MPs were regularly receiving sizable financial stipends—cash bribes—from Jewish and Czech sources in exchange for promoting a policy of extreme hostility toward the German government and actually advocating war. The sums involved were quite considerable, with the Czech government alone probably making payments that amounted to tens of millions of dollars in present-day money to British elected officials, publishers, and journalists working to overturn the official peace policy of their existing government. A particularly notable instance occurred in early 1938 when Churchill suddenly lost all his accumulated wealth in a foolish gamble on the American stock-market, and was soon forced to put his beloved country estate up for sale to avoid personal bankruptcy, only to quickly be bailed out by a foreign Jewish millionaire intent upon promoting a war against Germany. Indeed, the early stages of Churchill’s involvement in this sordid behavior are recounted in an Irving chapter aptly entitled “The Hired Help.”

    Ironically enough, German Intelligence learned of this massive bribery of British parliamentarians, and passed the information along to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was horrified to discover the corrupt motives of his fierce political opponents, but apparently remained too much of a gentlemen to have them arrested and prosecuted. I’m no expert in the British laws of that era, but for elected officials to do the bidding of foreigners on matters of war and peace in exchange for huge secret payments seems almost a textbook example of treason to me, and I think that Churchill’s timely execution would surely have saved tens of millions of lives.

    My impression is that individuals of low personal character are those most likely to sell out the interests of their own country in exchange for large sums of foreign money, and as such usually constitute the natural targets of nefarious plotters and foreign spies. Churchill certainly seems to fall into this category, with rumors of massive personal corruption swirling around him from early in his political career. Later, he supplemented his income by engaging in widespread art-forgery, a fact that Roosevelt later discovered and probably used as a point of personal leverage against him. Also quite serious was Churchill’s constant state of drunkenness, with his inebriation being so widespread as to constitute clinical alcoholism. Indeed, Irving notes that in his private conversations FDR routinely referred to Churchill as “a drunken bum.”

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/#the-landmark-historiography-of-david-irving

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-remarkable-historiography-of-david-irving/

    Incidentally, in 2020 I read David Lough’s very mainstream 2015 No More Champagne, written with full access to the Churchill archives. This work absolutely confirmed Irving’s astonishing revelations of Churchill’s massive corruption and venality, though any mention of Irving’s name was obviously excluded from the text.

    Since I haven’t read Churchill’s memoirs and you have, I’m curious about how many of these sordid facts were included.

  308. Iris says:
    @Jonathan Mason

    Either he was turning to the side to shake hands, or else after having been hit by one bullet he span around.

    Mr Kennedy was shot at point-blank behind the ear. To manage such a feat, Sirhan Sirhan would have needed a 4 metres-long retractable arm that could be lobbed behind the head of a victim standing 3 metres in front of him.

    Did the Mafia use invisible gunmen who could disappear into thin air?

    RFK’s assassin did not disappear into thin air. He is known, a security guard called Thane Eugene Cesar who died recently in Sept 2019.

    Cesar was well protected by the PTB’s.
    When he collapsed, RFK grabbed and removed Cesar’s clip-on tie, which was later photographed next to him dying on the floor, as was Cesar later photographed hanging around without his tie.

    This totally incriminating detail was removed (“photoshopped“) by Life Magazine from its front page cover about RFK’s assassination.

    No need to mention that it is the same Life Magazine which purchased and concealed the Zapruder film for a decade, when things got out of control at Dealy Plaza and a back-up gunman shot at JFK from the Grassy Knoll’s picket fence, causing his giveaway “back-and-to-the-left” movement.

    Apparently RFK Jr. had a personal conversation with Sirhan Sirhan in prison, but has never revealed what was said. Why not?

    May be because Mr Kennedy, bless him, does not wish to be “offed” by America’s Israeli Overlords, like his uncle, his father, and his cousin before him?

  309. Wild Man says:
    @Wild Man

    Note that many blacks do this sort of thing over the ever-changing definition of ‘n*gga’ in popularized culture (except the part about: ‘please note this dispute is all about ‘definitions’, and you are not tall enough for that ride, deary, so don’t even try’, …. is instead about: ‘this dispute is about dominance, and we will burn you cities to the ground if you do not comply, so don’t even try’).

    Note that many Islamists (but I think not the majority) do this sort of thing over the sanctity of using the name ‘Muhammad’ (except the part about: ‘please note this dispute is all about ‘definitions’, and you are not tall enough for that ride, deary, so don’t even try’, …. is instead about: ‘this dispute is about dominance, and we will jihad your ass if you do not comply, so don’t even try’).

    The black thing and the Islamist thing is alot easier to understand, because they don’t lie about what it is all about: …. it’s a misplaced dominance ploy.

    But with the holocaust industry, there is this other mindf*ck layer, about the supposed intellectual superiority (which is just cover for the truth …..it’s a misplaced dominance ploy, like the others, but now parading as intellectual superiority). There is nothing at all intellectually superior about the holocaust industry shtick though. It therefore is akin to a womanly dominance ploy (instill doubt by passive-aggressive means). It really is terribly terribly disgusting.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  310. geokat62 says:
    @Wild Man

    “I’m right, even when I’m wrong, and you are gonna publicly apologize to me, for the wrongs I committed, and make it our like they are your wrongs, or I will f*ck-you up.

    You must’ve been quoting Jonathan Greenblatt:

    • LOL: Wild Man
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  311. Emslander says:
    @Ron Unz

    The video of a man lying under oath before Congress, as Fauci has done repeatedly without consequence, is also a useful use of video.

  312. Here’s what RFKJr should have said in DC on Jan 23

    The monastery at Valaam in Russia was destroyed numerous times, but the monks and the Russian people took their sacred shrines with them, and preserved their faith in the warm depths of their souls, wherever it was they were forced to find refuge.

    Piss on Anne Frank.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  313. darius says:
    @Ron Unz

    There is a very GOOD article written by Richard Falk, where deserves to receive larger audience to help them understand the reasons behind the complex issues such as Jcpoa.

    Would you please look at the following link to see if you can post it. This is very interesting and thought provoking article. I don’t know the rules for posting an article, of course. This issue still is hot and I have not seen any single article to explain the related issues in such clarity.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/01/28/reaching-a-nuclear-agreement-with-iran-the-problematics-of-diplomacy/

  314. Wild Man says:
    @Wild Man

    I would also say, that another major difference between the black vernacular dominance ploy, the Islamist dominance ploy, and the holocaust industry dominance ploy, is that for the first two, the cudgel used (a word or phrase) is one they use within their own communities, to describe a phenomenon within their own communities, black-on-black, or Islamist-on-Islamist (so the ‘cultural appropriation or misappropriation’ aspect of their claims), whereas for the holocaust industry, the words or phrases chosen as cudgels, are just describing phenomenon outside of their own community, that they may interface with. Can anybody really claim that ‘fascism = Nazis as synonymous terms’, is a description of a phenomenon occurring within their own Jewish community, (Jew-on-Jew) sans goy interface? No you can’t. Jews don’t go around saying, in ironic fashion “Muh Nazis”, to fellow Jews (in keeping with the black example). Also, Jews don’t go around saying, “I’m a gonna holocaust you ass”, to fellow Jews (in keeping with the Islamist example). As far as I can tell, these are not things that Jews do to fellow Jews. Instead, it’s pure unadulterated constant promotion of ‘victimhood at the hands of immoral goys’, within the Jewish community …. as if there were no Jewish agency. Black don’t fall for descriptions of themselves as non-agentic victims (thus the ironic ‘Muh n*gga’). Islamists don’t fall for descriptions of themselves as non-agentic victims (thus ‘jihad starts internally, within Islam’). But when the holocaust industry claims that, on the one hand, ‘fascism = Nazis as synonymous terms’, and on the other hand, to outsiders they say – ‘you can’t say Nazis without our permission’, ….. there is zero self-awareness that said operation, is akin to claiming agenticlessness for themselves. It’s schizophrenic. Because this operation is also akin to claiming that Jews own the definition of ‘fascism’, which is just a joke to claim that (because nobody and no group has got dibs on that). Pick one already: Is it ‘immortal agenticless victimhood at the hands of immoral goys’ or is it ‘we own the definition of fascism and so you must check with us first (kind of the opposite psychological stance now …… akin to ‘my agency trumps all others’). But they won’t pick, because once they pick, everybody will see that, for each of these claims, there is nothing at all there. And when that happens, everybody will see that this holocaust industry shtick is really just the poor little sister of said black vernacular dominance ploys and said Islamist dominance ploys.

    As such, it’s passive aggressive schlock, parading as a dominance ploy, and nobody should listen to it. What is so surprising, is how such a womanly type dominance ploy got any kind of traction. A lot of western goys have cucked to 3rd-wave man-hating type feminism, …. so we already got submission to passive aggressive ploys, occurring aplenty in western white culture, anyways. I think that is big part of what holds this holocaust industry dreck dynamic in place.

  315. @Ron Unz

    Ron: As one who had become enamored with the rhetorical powers of WLSC during my high school years reading his memoirs; it took me more than half a lifetime to disabuse myself of that deer in the headlights sophomoric fascination.

    Thankful for the gradual maturation process; I have come to a fundamentally different assessment of “We shall fight them…” ad nauseam. Most recently, a kindly Jewish friend in Colorado sent me several books, among them “Human Smoke” by Nicholson Baker. In this volume the author employs a myriad of vignettes from newspaper accounts, through diaries, speeches, journals and memoirs from the period 1938 to the end of ’41.

    Upon reading those brief accounts, my perspectives on Churchill transited from rather negative to extremely so. Additional to being a drunken wastrel, not altogether unlike his pater familias, that man was revealed through his own words and actions as an out and out psychopathic sociopath, as well as being possessed of a personal narcissism so advanced that he had no consideration whatever for any other human being, except for “oh my darling Clementine”.

    An excellent read, quite utilitarian as a sporadic, rather than a sustained time-consuming venture.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  316. @Iris

    ‘Life’ magazine: During my years as a traveling antiques dealer, I happened to purchase a full set of that mag, for various resale purposes and an extremely rare set of 1932-33 ‘Fortune’ mags, which along with Life and ‘Time’ constituted Henry Luce’s trifecta of extremely influential publications.

    Years later, perhaps through U.R. posters; I learned that Luce received considerable funding from the Rottenfeller Crime clan for his endeavors. Slick, smooth and sophisticated and capable of commissioning work from some of the most celebrated photographers and writers/authors through much of it’s life-span; Luce’s vanguard publication achieved the status of being the most profoundly powerful communications medium until approximately 1956, when the boobtoob captivated the attention of the Great Overwashed.

    Such status as ‘Life’ had achieved in determining the conscious mindsets as normative perceptions by America’s professional and other upper middle-class quasi elites and opinion makers; was by the end of its reign, replaced by the more Judeophilic “Chew Pork Slymes”, as I choose to label that self-styled national “voice of informed reason”.

    By catering to not only the male audience, but also to the feminine obsessions with celebrities, fashions and suchlike cultural determinants; life was undoubtedly the most powerful propaganda pace-setter for the nation for most of its “lifetime”.

    Recently I’ve been reading, perusing and studying my remaining collection of that publication, paying particular attention to the years spanning the WWII era, beginning with 1938 and concluding at around ’48. Luce’s lustrations were calculated to work hand in glove with the Baruch-Roosevelt administrations in hyping “preparedness” and generalized war-fever right on through the beginning of December of ’41. It was unabashedly Anglophilic and Atlanticist, pushing and pushing the agenda.

    That agenda was secondly aimed at overcoming the majority American “Isolationist” mood and opinions by gradually winning over that aforementioned professional and corporate class. The publication’s build-up was such that it segued perfectly into FDR’s strategy to get at Germany via the backdoor…Japan. By cutting off that nation’s supply of absolutely vital oil and steel/iron, Roosevelt and his British and exiled Dutch confederates were able to essentially force Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.

    That incident, though not precisely an “Inside Job” ala 911, happened to be just what the doctor ordered to spin the American public into a mass-psychosis of vengeance-minded war fever. The three Luce publications were front and center in the mind-control buildup.

    • Replies: @Iris
  317. Peg B says: • Website
    @Nancy

    Well said!
    An even better and direct rather than second-hand source of information than Robert Kennedy is scientist Peter Duesberg’s exhaustive book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, with comments by Nobel Prize winning biochemist Kary Mullis introducing the book.
    Mullis also quickly cuts to the chase with more comments in his own semi-autobiography, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, an entertaining but serious overall look at science, as well as the apparently well-honed craft of generating huge pots of money by side-stepping scientific method. The money-gushing success of the covid con follows the same pattern as HIV-causes–AIDS.
    Also excellent, journalist Jon Rappoport’s book, AIDS, Inc., lays bare the HIV-causes-AIDS fraud. Rappoport has also published more recent articles about the subject and similar “medical” frauds such as ebola.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  318. @Ron Unz

    I was very struck by the revelations about Churchill in your article when it first came out; I’d only ever read the William Manchester biography. But I notice that the Amazon reviews of the David Lough book don’t seem to mention the more scandalous items you cite above — cash bribes from Jewish and Czech sources, art forgery, etc. Are those covered in the Lough book?

  319. @darius

    Thanks for the link.

    Falk wrote:

    That Iran was willing to curtail its nuclear program without demanding compensating moves by Israel was a surprise. Israel had been permitted, indeed helped, to acquire secretly the means to establish and develop a nuclear weapons capability a generation earlier without any adverse international reaction, becoming in 1967 or so the first state in the Middle East to possess nuclear weapons. It would have seemed reasonable for Iran to strike a posture of willingness to commit itself to a nuclear-free Middle East, which would have been a more dramatic move toward denuclearizing the Middle East than was JCPOA. Why did Iran refrain in 2015 and now again, even with a hardline leadership in control of its government? Perhaps, because the Iranian leadership understood there would be no sanctions relief if it depended on Israel’s willingness to give up its status as a nuclear weapons state.

    In about 2015 (?) Flynt Leverett, then as now with Penn State University’s School of International Affairs, moderated a day-long seminar on Iran at which Richard Butler (also then on Penn State’s School of International Affairs faculty) was among the speakers.
    Butler, a former nuclear arms expert, recounted the negotiation conducted at his dining room table in 1995 when states in the Middle East, including Iran but not Israel, agreed to an extension of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) on the promise/condition that a conference would be convened to discuss declaring the entire region — including Israel — a Nuclear Free Zone.

    That meeting has not yet occurred.

    “Why did Iran refrain” . . .from demanding constraints on Israel’s nuclear capabilities?

    Because Lucy-Israel-USA has pulled the football too many times, and Iran is not inclined to be forever cast in the role of hapless Charlie Brown.

  320. @Truth Vigilante

    Dunce of Oz!

    I used to read her comments very slowly thinking I was missing something—– because there’s so much of it.

    Until I realized it’s all garbage.

  321. Ron Unz says:
    @darius

    There is a very GOOD article written by Richard Falk, where deserves to receive larger audience to help them understand the reasons behind the complex issues such as Jcpoa.

    Would you please look at the following link to see if you can post it.

    Sure, it seems like a good article and I’d be glad to republish it. But I’d need the author’s permission, or perhaps you or someone else could figure out how to get in touch with him.

    • Replies: @Darius
  322. Ron Unz says:
    @Peg B

    An even better and direct rather than second-hand source of information than Robert Kennedy is scientist Peter Duesberg’s exhaustive book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, with comments by Nobel Prize winning biochemist Kary Mullis introducing the book.

    Sure, it’s available right here on this website, and I’d highly recommend it:

    https://www.unz.com/book/peter_h_duesberg__inventing-the-aids-virus-2/

  323. Ron Unz says:
    @emerging majority

    Most recently, a kindly Jewish friend in Colorado sent me several books, among them “Human Smoke” by Nicholson Baker. In this volume the author employs a myriad of vignettes from newspaper accounts, through diaries, speeches, journals and memoirs from the period 1938 to the end of ’41.

    Upon reading those brief accounts, my perspectives on Churchill transited from rather negative to extremely so.

    Yes, I’d had Human Smoke sitting on my shelf for years, but finally got around to reading it a month or two ago, and it seemed quite good. However, I’d even much more strongly recommend Irving’s Churchill biography, especially the first volume, which had all those astonishing revelations. It’s freely available in PDF form on his website:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Churchill/1/index.html

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  324. @Wild Man

    If you are going to bandy such racist slurs as “Nazi”, at least put “Ashke” in front of it: Ashkenazi!

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  325. Darius says:
    @Ron Unz

    Thank you Ron,

    I have already discussed the issue with Professor Richard Falk on his weblog in the comment section where you can read at the following link:

    https://richardfalk.org/2022/01/26/will-the-iran-nuclear-agreement-be-restored/#comments

    This link is located in the month of January 2022.

    He just posted an article on Iran in the month of February. I have not read it yet.
    His weblog is called “Global justice in the 21st century” at https://richardfalk.org/

    Thanks again

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  326. @geokat62

    Are you going to reimburse Ron for the cost of his total supply of coloured inks? And provide a sedative for making him almost incoherent with irritation at your frivolity😎

  327. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62

    Whoopi, like so many others before her, performing the Goy Grovel…

    Thinking about this some more, I think there are enormous lessons for blacks to take away from this embarrassing episode at the expense of Ms Goldberg.

    Goldberg sincerely thought what she stated was true:

    “the Holocaust is not about race, but about man’s inhumanity to man.”

    She even had to spell things out for her co-hosts when they pushed back on her claims:

    “These are two White groups of people.”

    Her confusion is easy to explain, however. If you haven’t been red-pilled on the JQ, you’d look at Ashkenazi Jews and think they’re just like the rest of the Caucasians.

    Big mistake! What most blacks don’t understand is that virtually all Jews do not identify as white, despite the fact they have white skin. This means nothing to Jews. To Jews the great divide is not that between “races,” but that between “souls.” That’s because G-d bestowed the Jewish soul with a divine spark, but the soul of a goy is on the same level as other beasts.

    Most blacks (and white normies) don’t have a clue about any of this.

    That’s why Whoopi and other blacks were so confused when Cheka Commissar, Jonathan Greenblatt, corrected her and said:

    “But it is indeed about race because Hitler and the Nazis considered Jews to be an inferior race.

    The Holocaust was about the Nazi’s systematic annihilation of the Jewish people — who they deemed to be an inferior race.”

    So, Greenblatt is clearly acknowledging that Jews are a separate race (really superior souls) from all other races, including the white race.

    Lesson to blacks and other non red-pilled goyim… while Jews look white, they don’t identify as white.

  328. @Ron Unz

    The last time I heard such criticism of Churchill it came in a prepared paper by someone I had, with some reason, regarded as the most reliably learned and conservative of High Court judges (our SCOTUS equivalent and they are compulsorily retired at the ridiculous age of 70 btw) I was intrigued of course and began to follow up without great diligence. And there was another thing you have in common with my learned friend. It turned out that he too was not a people person. Sample. Instead of calling for volunteers as any straight bloke with a decent ego does, he had, it was eve tally reported, fodled ladies inner thighs at formal dinners and touched up secretaries.

    Your case is nothing like that and without hint of impropriety but, there’s the rub, the ADL, AIPAC and 99% of organised US Jewry are lying in wait for you.
    How would you pick the plant amongst eager young Stanford students helping you with your more time consuming research? Maybe we’ll under cover, like an unattractive obese male without a Jewish name but willing and able to accuse. Well, as I suggested, at the extreme of precautions, you needn’t even speak to them or could ensure you wear a body cam for the duration of the project. But let’s start with simple.

    Simply advertise a prize for finding the best anti Holocaust error or element in a range of videos (including the sometimes moving interviews). I’ll chip in \$500 as soon as you advertise. Yes I am egregious. Unlike the tight wads of UR threads who bemoan the fate of the unjustly convicted but never show the slightest inclination to help fund a decent defence or appeal I am willing to put money where my mouth is.

  329. Anon[942] • Disclaimer says:

    Dear Mr. Unz,
    Will you please continue publishing Andrew Anglin?
    http://stormer5v52vjsw66jmds7ndeecudq444woadhzr2plxlaayexnh6eqd.onion/. On tor
    Thank you.

  330. @Petermx

    Have you not wondered why lots of Nazi leaders didn’t escape to Swwotzerland or Sweden in April 1945, especially those who could requisition a plane. Now you mention flat land you suggest a crash landing followed by fire, followed by escape of azi leader (and pilot if necessary) leaving a burned corpse to be identified as the Nazi leader….

    Maybe I’ve just scripted the next Hitler survival outline….

    • Replies: @Petermx
  331. @Truth Vigilante

    Thanks. Never seen these videos.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  332. geokat62 says:

    Canadian truckers travelled all across Canada to have a conversation with the PM about all matters related to the pandemic – mandatory mandates, vax passports, availability of IVM HDQ – and how does the supposed “leader” of the country respond?

  333. Ron Unz says:
    @Darius

    I have already discussed the issue with Professor Richard Falk on his weblog in the comment section where you can read at the following link:

    Thanks, it’s now up and I’ll see about possibly running it as a main feature in the next few days or so:

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-problematics-of-middle-eastern-diplomacy-the-case-of-iran/

    • Thanks: Emil Nikola Richard
    • Replies: @darius
  334. @geokat62

    Well, Shlomo Sand proved that ‘the Jews’ are not a ‘race’. But he was only gathering together evidence that was long known in Israel and elsewhere.
    Most of what the Judeofascist enforcers say about their people is bullshit or half-truths. The insistence on Jews being a ‘race’ not a community of religious believers, is because Judaism is so textually and behaviourally fragmented and so full of internecine hatreds. And even in ‘racial’ terms there is and has been considerable animosity at times between Ashkenazis and Mizrahi, Sephardi and various smaller groups once scattered around the Caucasus, Ethiopia, India, Yemen even China, and now mostly gathered to Israel. The myth of Judaic solidarity is necessary to justify the ongoing theft of Eretz Yisrael, ‘..from the Nile to the Euphrates’ although some fanatics claim the Arabian Peninsula too. THIS is why Whoopsie must be lynched-to teach the goyim what to say and when to shut their mouths.

  335. @Iris

    Is it theoretically possible on the known evidence that Kennedy spun into the guard’s line of fire after being hit by a bullet from Sirhan Sirhan. He would almost certainly have moved sharply backwards which, come to think of it suggests a more plausible explanation of the shot from the guard killing Kennedy. And if that was what happened is there anything about the cover up which is not consistent with it?

  336. @geokat62

    Notice how the groveling little prick puts ‘antisemitism’ first. Next they’ll be accused of being ‘pawns of Putin’. I’ve seen that accusation, sans evidence of course, from one feminazi unspeakable on Canadian TV already. And the ChiComms-never forget the great Race Enemy.

  337. darius says:
    @Ron Unz

    thanks again for your work.

  338. Wokechoke says:
    @geokat62

    The unusual aspect of the Holocaust was the mass extermination of the female Jewish population. It’s not unusual for men to be massacred. The highly unusual thing was killing all the females. It’s a very rare occurrence in the smiting we see throughout history. The Romans never did it outside of the siege of Alesia which was a freak occurrence between siege lines. Mongols never bothered to do the same. Cromwell in Ireland left women and children alive. It almost never happens. Maybe the Americans and the native tribes? The whole point of war is to kill the men to access the benefits of a subjugated female population.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  339. @Ron Unz

    Thanks, Ron. Irving has long been on my radar screen.

  340. @geokat62

    That alleged “unanimity” of Parliament by Justine Trudeau convinces me that in a nation which is still under the Crown via its Governor General has a set of pro\$ticians even more egregious than the ones in the Di\$trict of Corruption, where there does exist a small set of those who favor our original Constitutionally republican form of governance than adhering to the false government, incorporated under Delaware corporate statutes in the 1930’s as “The United States of America Corporation”.

    Don’t even need to get me started as to their primary owners except for that they are the “usual suspects”.

  341. @darius

    But, but, but-Richard Falk is a notorious ‘self-hating Jew’ and ‘antisemite’, who Israel had to lock up, I believe, for a time while he was working as UN Special Rapporteur ‘on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967’. Of course, Falk, being honest and not imbecilic, found that Israel had behaved and continued to behave abominably, for which truth he was roundly vilified by every Zionazi extant and every Western Sabbat Goy stooge regime, the USA leading the way.

  342. @Jonathan Mason

    What an all-round troll you are, Grendel. Sirhan was several feet from Kennedy, and the autopsy showed powder burns on the entry wound at the back of Kennedy’s head ie he was shot point-blank. What pathopsychological rewards do you garner from your disinformation work?

  343. @Wizard of Oz

    Please do try to mount a convincing argument, Wizzy. Where do I err? Please feel free to be inventive-it’s your most charming attribute.

  344. Ned Kelly says:
    @Jonathan Mason

    Did the Mafia use invisible gunmen who could disappear into thin air?

    No he disappeared to the Philippines.

    Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard with extreme right-wing views, who hated the Kennedys was standing next to the senator at the moment of the shooting and had a gun in his hand.
    When I read this years ago, I said If this guy his Cuban, I’m convinced. I can only find one source that says he’s Cuban… But he sounds Cuban…

    On the JFK assassination, what convinces me is the actions of Jack Ruby ( Jacob Leon Rubenstein)

    There was evidence indicating Jack Ruby had been involved in the underworld activities of illegal gambling, narcotics, and prostitution.[11] He belonged to a Mafia, known as the Yiddish Connection.[12] He had moved from Chicago to Dallas in 1947 with other gangsters who had settled there to take over the prostitution business.[13]

    Allan Weberman refers to Ruby and other mobsters around him as arms dealers. [14]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ruby

    I still don’t know who/what Oswald was… other than a screw-up. But I Sure as hell know what Jack Ruby was. How any times in history do you think a pimp transformed himself into the public avenging vigilante?

    P.S. I wrote this with my pinky on phone. It timed me out three times… so I hope you appreciateO it.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @Wizard of Oz
  345. @geokat62

    She didn’t get cancelled. She got suspended for two weeks. The entire brouhaha cost her one paycheck. This is the most trivial of public spats. Saying outrageous crap is her schtick and that one missed pay day was merely a business expense.

    She still has a long ways to go to top her all time greatest hit of saying that Roman Polanski drugging and sodomizing a 13 year old girl didn’t count as “rapey-rape”.

    • Replies: @Ned Kelly
  346. Petermx says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    No, because that would not be a safe place to escape to. The Americans bombed Switzerland during the war and pressure would have been put on those countries to turn Germans over. Spain was safe and several South American countries and that is why that’s where Germans fled to. But not just Germans. Others that fought alongside Germany, such as Belgium’s famous soldier Leon Degrelle also fled to Spain and lived there until his death in the 1980’s or 90’s. Switzerland is a lot closer to Belgium than Spain but he flew an airplane to Spain and crash landed into the sea because Switzerland would not have been safe.

  347. Ned Kelly says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    No mate, she’s in deep water… Defending Roman Polanski is correct. He’s right there with Woody as persecuted Jewish martyrs. That’s the standard Hollywood view

    The Times of Israel:

    ABC staffers and Disney Network execs are saying Whoopi went way too far. And board members are not happy with her apology and want a fuller retraction. The word is that Whoopi is in ‘deep shit,’” the source told Page Six, adding that several of her co-hosts were among those saying Goldberg was “too controversial now for the show.”

  348. @Wokechoke

    You QUESTION the Holocaust!? You find the storyline UNUSUAL?! Tell us more about The whole point of the second world war.

  349. geokat62 says:

    Upon further reflection, I’m starting to think the whole RFK Jr and Whoopi episodes were both staged to revive discussion of a topic that is quickly fading from most goyim’s minds… or as Cheka head, Jonathan Greenblatt, more eloquently put it, “guilt of the Shoah is fading.”

    Jonathan Greenblatt “GUILT of Holocaust Fading, ‘Bad Ideas’ Coming to Center”

    The goyim must never forget that we’re all caught in a Zio Matrix where nothing is what it appears to be. It’s like we’re living in that haunted house with those mirrors that grossly distort the appearance of everything.

    It behooves us to always remain vigilant and ask ourselves this one question after every supposed controversial incident: Did I just witness another zio psy op?

    • Thanks: Sepp
    • Replies: @Sepp
  350. @Ralph B. Seymour

    I’m glad you liked those videos Ralph.

    The one below is an earlier one – when David Irving was younger and had more fire in his belly:



    Video Link

    Meanwhile, if you’re interested in hearing more from this great man, just go to BitChute.com and enter ‘David Irving’, where there’s a ton more.

    What this man doesn’t know about WWII, isn’t worth knowing – he really is that good.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  351. scuzzaman says:

    There’s a great line in the film Spartan (starring Val Kilmer) where he asks a secret service agent:

    But how do you fake the DNA?

    She rolls her eyes at him.

    You don’t fake the DNA – you issue a press release!

    We live in an age of truth by assertion and sadly too few of us have any degree of skepticism or even curiosity. Too many are afraid of what they might discover if they started asking questions.

    Which itself demonstrates that they already know they’re being lied to, they just prefer comforting lies to uncomfortable truths. This insight is littered across our culture, from songs with lyrics like “lie to me, I’ll believe it” and “tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies …” to films like Lawrence of Arabia:

    the man who lies to others hides the truth, but the man who lies to himself has forgotten where he put it.

    We are always responsible for our choice to be ignorant.

    Neither the fearful, nor those who make or love the lie, will enter the kingdom of heaven.

  352. scuzzaman says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    People have been banned for using the phrase “seems a little high” in a joking fashion utterly unrelated to the number of jewish casualties in concentration camps.

    Pardon me, but this seems a little … overly sensitive for people interested in finding the truth.

  353. Wild Man says:
    @Badger Down

    LOL on the word-play.

    But also I would like to indicate, that my main point (but said over many comments I posted within this thread) is that ‘Nazi’ is not a racial slur, first and foremost, it is a fascist slur first and foremost, and the holocaust industry has made this so (within popular western culture), and then when someone bites on this fact, the holocaust industry clobbers them with the ‘muh nazis’ (said unironically, different than let’s say the ‘muh n*gga’ of the black vernacular, that is said ironically), because the holocaust industry, in that critical moment (the moment when they induce another public apology, in a endless barf-worthy series of public apologies that has depressingly occurred for decades now) shows the shell-game being played, if one watches closely enough with respect to this apology-extraction operation. The shell-game being played is this:

    1) ‘Nazi’ stands for ‘fascist’ (by holocaust industry promotion)

    2) Someone notices a fascist ploy (real or imagined) occurring in the culture, and publicly labels this as ‘Nazi’

    3) The holocaust industry operators then say, “no ….. ‘Nazi’ stand for ‘antisemite’”, and that you must apologize for your error of intellect (smarmy ass move right there …. an attempt at ingratiating the target psyche by cryptically contemptuous means)

    4) Practically nobody then, tells them to f*ck-off, and get their definitions straight, and pick one already – is it: ‘Look: Nazi!’ supposed to mean ‘Look: fascist!’, or is it supposed to mean “Look: antisemite!’? Which one (if ‘both’ is forbidden, but only when the holocaust industry operators say so)?

    It’s just so unbelievably idiotic. Goys who fall for this (nearly all goys) look pathetic. And the Jews (the holocaust industry operators) that promote this, look like gas-lighting deceit-monsters (because they are). And the larger Jewish community-proper that go along with this (nearly all Jews) look weak and womanly. Nobody wins in this arrangement (except the gas-lighting deceit-monsters and the masters they serve).

    Don’t ever apologize when none is warranted. EVER! Unless your life (or the life of your loved ones) depends on said apology. Makes you wonder, eh, what precisely goes on behind closed doors, when these apologies are extracted – huh?

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  354. Iris says:
    @emerging majority

    Thanks ever so much for the insightful comment: argument such as yours are invaluable.

    If the West had a shred of democracy, there would be academics producing PhD thesis on the content of “Life Magazine” and other mass media in the lead up to WW2, and on the way their coverage influenced and bought in public opinion.

    But this will never happen. For it would reveal the biggest Conspiracy of all, that one only painfully learn by themselves by nibbling at alternative sources, one that is uttered only by the bravest, such as President Kennedy in his outstanding “Secret Societies” speech, that by no coincidence was delivered to the American Society of Newspapers Editors.

    That world affairs are manipulated by a centuries-old Anglo-Jewish financial power centre, originally based in the City of London, which replicated at a larger scale in Wall Street, and which has been planning, organising and triggering both World Wars as well as almost any contemporary conflict.

    It is happening right under our eyes again, with a further push to the East, Russia forced into the role of 1938 Germany, and the hapless Ukraine in that of senseless Poland.

  355. hillaire says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    In what way is your anti-semitism’ better’ and more ‘acceptable’ than so called ‘heebhunters’ stout and worthy anti-semitism…. is it because you see yourself differently and your anti-semitism more worthy ..perhaps you feel that your facts are better ‘facts’ and delivered more intelligently?… but of course you are a race blind racist and environmental activist who follows central bankings reccomendations..

    Well…I’ll tell you something ‘mr mumble’… heebhunters deranged yet humorous ravings will be deemed no more offensive by those who choose to be offended.. than the diatribes you scrawl…(in fact your carefully calculated ravings more so)..

    You could probably share a cell some time in the future if you weren’t on different continents… they won’t care who the hell they bang up… flippant jokers, along with all the pseuds and hypocrites who complain about them (but post the same shit )…

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  356. @Iris

    Thank you Iris for your kind words and especially for acquainting me with this wonderful speech, where our last truly American president spoke of the republic, of freedom and independence, not as mere rhetoric, but as a system of values for which he was martyred for his courage in reminding us of a heritage in which he believed and lived.

  357. @Hypnotoad666

    The claim isn’t that “AIDS” per se is a hoax. The hoax is that the HIV virus is what causes “AIDS.”

    But the tests for antibodies work. And the meds work. And in the absence of treatment, the viral load increases, eventually killing the victim.

    Isn’t all that true?

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  358. @Iris

    That was simply a Cold War speech by JFK. Nothing about the City of London at all.

  359. Since this article is much more recent and less bogged down by a large number comments, I want to point to a comment I made on an older article, which I will explicate further here.

    Perhaps the single most obvious and undeniable piece of evidence of the bad faith of the government-medical establishment is that in the statistics on vaccine efficacy they present, they count as unvaccinated those people who have received their initial vaccination, but have not yet received their final vaccination and/or passed the a certain period of time after their final vaccination, after which they are considered “fully vaccinated”.

    To repeat the analogy I used in my other comment, it’s like this:

    – According to our statistics, Jews commit much more violent crime per capita than non-Jews.
    – What? I can believe Jews commit much more white-collar financial crime than non-Jews, but I can’t believe they commit more violent crime.
    Well, we count blacks as Jews.

    And the period between the initial vaccination and the “fully vaccinated” point is exactly the period in which people are most likely to get covid. There is a substantial increase in vulnerability during that period. This period could be six weeks or more.

    The way the statistics are calculated, the people who become infected with covid during this period, or are hospitalized or die during or after that period, are not included as vaccinated group in calculation of the statistics. These covid cases, hospitalizations, or deaths among vaccinated people are covered up, swept under the rug in these statistics.

    But it’s even worse, because those same covid cases, hospitalizations, or deaths among vaccinated people are actually attributed to the unvaccinated group in the statistics.

    Let’s look at an example. Let’s say there are 1000 people who have received no vaccination, and 1000 who received at least one vaccination. Say 20 of the unvaccinated people got covid (or, mutatis mutandis, were hospitalized for it, or died from it) during the next year. Say 10 people got covid (or hospitalized, died) between their first vaccination and before they were counted as “fully vaccinated”, and 10 people got covid (or hospitalized, died) after they were counted as “fully vaccinated”. So equal numbers of unvaccinated and vaccinated people were affected.

    Then really, the relative risk ratio (RRR) for getting covid (or being hospitalized or dying) for vaccinated vs unvaccinated, is really 20/20 = 1.0, and vaccine efficacy is 1 – RRR, or 0%. Vaccinated people are just as likely to die as vaccinated, in this example.

    But what do the government statistics say? They say the RRR is 10/(20+10) = 0.33, and vaccine efficacy is 1.0 -0.33 = 67%! They say the unvaccinated are three times as likely to die as the vaccinated! Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  360. Sepp says:
    @geokat62

    we’re all caught in a Zio Matrix

    This classic Pretenders video co-starring Neil Young seems to be apropos concerning the Zio Matrix. The bass line was used as an opening by Rush Limbaugh for decades.

    Where did you go Ohio? It was always a show, from the very beginning. There was never a hippy rebellion, they were always a part of the matrix. Neil Young was ordered to provide his little astro-turf side show about censoring Spotify because of “covid mis-information” just like Whoopie was ordered to make her little dialog about how Jews are a “race” and the Holofraud was the ultimate act of “racism”.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/crosby-stills-nash-neil-young-in-removing-music-from-spotify-1294044/

  361. geokat62 says:

    Oops! According to just released John Hopkins study, looks like those who promoted the implementation and continuation of the devastating lockdowns were dead wrong as they did virtually squat in terms of saving lives.

    Lockdowns only reduced COVID-19 death rate by .2%, study finds: ‘Lockdowns should be rejected out of hand’

    The Johns Hopkins University study also found that shelter-in-place orders reduced COVID-19 mortality by 2.9%

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/lockdowns-reduced-covid-19-mortality-by-2-study-finds-lockdowns-should-be-rejected-out-of-hand

    Looks like Big Pharma/Big Media narrative is collapsing at an accelerating rate.

  362. geokat62 says:

    Even Dr Malone is starting to heed my advice re living in a Zio Matrix and always being on the lookout for zio-orchestrated psy ops.

    Telegram comment posted by Robert W Malone, MD:

    Something fishy going on here

    CNN President Jeff Zucker Resigns

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/cnn-president-jeff-zucker-resigns_4252323.html

    📌Follow and Share👇🏻
    🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

    https://t.me/RWMaloneMD/1574

  363. @Ned Kelly

    Was it physically possible that Eugene Caesar raised his gun to fire at Sirhan Sirhan and that Kennedy was pushed back into his line of fire by Sirhan’s bullets hitting him. If that was what happened all in the space of time taken for Caesar to aim and pull the trigger after raising his gun the description of the long drawn out cover up is about what an ordinarily worldly person might expect.

  364. @Ron Unz

    You had me up to belief in a conspiracy to kill RFK conceived before the murder. Then the thought struck me that I have just encapsulated in a comment as follows:

    Was it physically possible that Eugene Caesar raised his gun to fire at Sirhan Sirhan and that Kennedy was pushed back into his line of fire by Sirhan’s bullets hitting him. If that was what happened all in the space of time taken for Caesar to aim and pull the trigger after raising his gun the description of the long drawn out cover up is about what an ordinarily worldly person might expect.

    Could it be? I wait in suspended animation.

  365. @Truth Vigilante

    Can you provide a YouTube link for that splendid Irving eruption on Churchill?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Truth Vigilante
  366. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Can you provide a YouTube link for that splendid Irving eruption on Churchill?

    As I’m mentioned several times, I think pretty much all of Irving’s videos were purged from Youtube a couple of years ago, not long after I’d linked them in my Irving article:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-remarkable-historiography-of-david-irving/

    That’s why people are forced to make due with the much less convenient Bitchute versions.

  367. @Wizard of Oz

    As Ron Unz correctly points out, You Tube have purged David Irving (other than a handful of videos from sinister entities that demonise and smear him) – as he tells too much truth for their liking.

    As to ‘Irving on Churchill’, you need only scroll up to my comment # 360 above and soak up one of his sublime performances – a masterclass of oratory that would’ve put Cicero to shame.
    See for yourself why FDR referred to Winston Spendthrift Churchill as a drunken poltroon.

    I promise you that you’ll learn more truths about Churchill in any 10 minute subset of that video than you’ll ever get from those six volumes of Churchill’s WWII memoirs (which are more accurately described as six volumes of Churchill dictated self-promotion, exaggeration and outright lying).

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  368. @Wizard of Oz

    Yes it could be.

    Regardless of which particular bullet fired by whose gun actually killed Kennedy, Sirhan Sirhan is guilty of the murder for being there with a gun intending to kill Kennedy, drawing the gun and shooting him. And if there was a conspiracy and Sirhan Sirhan was part of it why hasn’t he come clean and given up his handlers? Some here would like us to considering him innocent just because he happens to be a Palestinian refugee.

  369. lysias says:
    @Ron Unz

    I just finished reading States of Emergency by Kees van der Pijl. There’s a great deal in it that would interest you, in particular, evidence supporting the view that covid was developed as a bioweapon.

    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Ron Unz
  370. Iris says:
    @lysias

    Professr Kees van der Pijl is an outstanding academic (Netherlands and UK), who made his name with “The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class “(1984) and was award the 2008 Deutscher Prize for “Nomads, Empires, State” , the first opus of a trilogy on foreign relations and political economy.

    He also wrote works on a number of burning topics:
    “The Militarization of the European Union” (2021).
    – “Flight MH17, Ukraine and the New Cold War “(2018).

    He was attacked by Israeli vested interests for stating the obvious:

    Sussex University investigates professor who claims Israel was behind 9/11 Twin Towers attacks ‘with help from Zionists in US government’


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6357733/Academic-says-Israel-9-11-Twin-Towers-attacks-help-Zionists-government.html

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  371. @Ron Unz

    Thanks. My eyes eventually managed to see and read some faint letters under the video frame in the comment and that has given me the Bidchute URLs. Irving is/was such a compelling speaker that it may well be that one can learn more or better from listening to him than reading the same words. Still, some scepticism is always desirable and occasionally one is alerted by such slips as his saying that 12,000 French navy personnel were killed when Churchill ordered the French navy sunk. Ah well, it was a very effective political leader that I remember as being bit unreliable with numbers and probe to add a nought for no reason.

    Then there is the doubt about his sound judgement which didn’t start with his sueing Lipstadt for libel and conducting his own case. The libel action which ruined Cassels and could have been settled for peanuts I must follow up.

    His throwing away a great deal of money over his failure to exercise enough ingenuity to have his Hitler biography published under the original auspices also makes me curious.

    But taking virtually all his statements of fact, especially about sources and quotes (e g. Roosevelt referring to WSC as a “drunken bum’) I have learned a lot. And it is, as usual, by inferences that he didn’t himself draw that one can often learn most. For example, when he was enthusiastically giving examples of Hitler protecting Jews he quoted the use of the word “liquidate” when Hitler was giving instructions to Himmler about Jews being deported. They were not to be “liquidated”! The same instruction was given wrt gypsies. Also the Jewish problem was to be settled after the war. Himmler was in command of both the vast SS state within a state and also the Geatapo and the police battalions that formed parts of the Einsatzgruppen. As production by slave labour was high on his agenda, and killing surplus untermenschen of secondary importance it is not surprising that there was no one system applied to anything that had to do with Jews.

    A very long set of interview tapes of one Kurt Messerschmidt’s experience during the first 82 years if his 102 year life from 1915 makes it clear that a talented linguist musician singer (an Orthodox cantor for most of his life including in Portland, Maine from the 1950s) was able to remain employed in Berlin, as was his wife whom he married in Terezin, till deportation to Terezin (Theresienstadt) in 1942 or43 . He was later deported to Auschwicz and was strong enough still when the SS marched them out to survive. Jewish veterans of WW1 were another obvious source of complication, not to mention Mischlingen who were Jews in German law in the Wehrmacht. While Poland had to be cleared of enough Poles who wouldn’t be farm labourers to make room for resettled Germans it seems that most killings of Jews apart from by Einsatzgruppen and local police were those in the Polish ghettoes of the part of Poland occupied by Germany in September 1939. David Irving’s guess at the total number of Jewish deaths from all causes under the Nazis from 1933 to 1945 was 4 million. I don’t know if he ever elaborated on the details, with reasons. The Nazis were guilty of genocidal killing directly and by starvation and disease of Poles, Soviet Slavs, Jews and gypsies. What number of Jews would disqualify the Holocaust claim to be special? Maybe under 2 million. Were Jews special in being marked for extermination in a degree that others weren’t?

    • Replies: @Lysias
    , @Lysias
  372. Ron Unz says:
    @lysias

    I just finished reading States of Emergency by Kees van der Pijl. There’s a great deal in it that would interest you, in particular, evidence supporting the view that covid was developed as a bioweapon.

    Thanks. The publisher had actually sent me a copy of the book a couple of weeks ago, but I’d never heard of the author and it looked too “conspiratorial” so I only glanced at it.

    However, you’d certainly steered me right on the Kennedy book, so I’ll now read this one as well.

    • Replies: @lysias
  373. Lysias says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    The highest estimates of the Bengalis killed in the famine of 1942-3 by Churchill’s policy of malign neglect that I’ve seen are some 4 million.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  374. Ned Kelly says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    That the RFK assassination was a sophisticated hit using a “Manchurian Candidate” isn’t such wild, fringe speculation anymore…

    Check out this story from the Washington Post :
    The assassination of Bobby Kennedy: Was Sirhan Sirhan hypnotized to be the fall guy?

    But the hypnosis angle gained momentum in recent years after Sirhan was examined for more than 60 hours by a Harvard Medical School professor with vast expertise in forensic psychiatry and hypnosis. In a lengthy affidavit filed with Sirhan’s last appeal in 2011, Daniel P. Brown concluded that “Mr. Sirhan did not act under his own volition and knowledge at the time of the assassination and is not responsible for actions coerced and/or carried out by others.” He was, Brown said, a true “Manchurian Candidate,” hypno-programmed into carrying out a violent political act without knowing it.

    Brown remains adamant that Sirhan was a victim of a larger scheme, put in place as a distraction while a second gunman fired the fatal shots to Kennedy. And in his four-hour interviews with Sirhan between 2008 and 2010, Brown said Sirhan would suddenly switch into “a military-like alter personality state,” which he called “range mode,” for recalling times when he was shooting at a firing range.</blockquot

    But Scheflin examined the CIA’s mind experiments in detail in his book “The Mind Manipulators” and found that the agency did have a project designed to create hypnotized subjects “for purposes of assassination.” And, Scheflin said, “the CIA experiments showed that was possible. Hypnotized people were ordered to do things they otherwise would not do, such as rip up a Bible or fire a gun at somebody they otherwise wouldn’t. In every instance, they got the results.”

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  375. Lysias says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    As time passes, it’s becoming clearer that a large proportion of the Jews who died in World War Two, rather than being killed by active actions of Germans and collaborators, were instead killed by conditions of malnutrition and disease that the Germans permitted to exist. That’s how Anne Frank herself died.

    Malnutrition and disease are what killed the Bengalis, in the millions. I was just looking at a recent book that gives the figure of Bengali dead as 3 1/2 million. Can we not call that another Holocaust, a Holocaust committed by the Allies, and by Winston Churchill in particular?

  376. @Ned Kelly

    Indeed the chance of keeping it simple recedes. What would the time frame ha ve had to be? Who will reliably provide evidence of who in or employed by the CIA was available to do it? Where was Sirhan Sirhan at relevant times? Etc. Etc.

  377. lysias says:
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve started reading another book that I also think would interest you, because William Odom makes a prominent appearance in it. It’s Suzanne Massie’s Trust But Verify: Reagan, Russia and Me. I’m only 14% into it on my Kindle, but Odom is treated so favorably that I am sure you would be pleased.

    (I became aware of Odom when he was Director of NSA and I was a humble junior officer in the Naval Reserve Security Group under Odom’s command, thus several levels below him, but after that I was very impressed by his appearances on the PBS News Hour. I’m sorry I never met the man.)

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  378. @Lysias

    I think you should go to Germany and advertise for members and supporters of The 20tth Century Holocausts Memorial Society. On a scale of 1 to 10 the response which scores 10 is that you are arrested and charged. At the least you could be sure you had irritated some of the right people

  379. @Lysias

    All those estimates do not include the dead in Orissa, and hardly include the death-toll in the back-blocks. Four million is a MINIMUM. Killed deliberately, as cold bloodedly as the Jews, Roma, Sinti etc.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  380. @Iris

    They hate the truth as a vampire does Holy Water. Chris Bollyn settled the MOSSAD/US sayanim/elements of the US intelligence services including Cheney and Rumsfeld, responsibility for 9/11 long ago. The Official Version is so stupid that only brainwashed morons believe it, but to disbelieve takes moral courage, in ever shorter supply.

    • Replies: @Iris
  381. @hillaire

    My dear Zionazi interlocutor-I’m no ‘antisemite’ because that label is an invention designed by the worst sort of Jews, like yourself, to slander, silence and intimidate anyone who dares to criticise the gigantic crimes of Israel, and those of the worst Jews in the Diaspora.
    If you mean that I am a Judeophobe, someone who hates all Jews simply because they are Jews, you are wrong. I judge Jews as any other group-as individuals and on the basis of their behaviour as I see it. I treat ALL people in the same manner. Your slimy slander, and your vicious inference that I might be punished for my opinions, is typical of Zionazis, the Jewish equivalent of German Nazis and Judeofascists, the Jewish equivalent of racist and aggressive elements in all communities. Your ravings against environmental awareness and the lunatic references to ‘central banks’ reveals just what a low buffoon you are.

    • Replies: @hillaire
  382. @Ron Unz

    I am somewhat surprised that I cannot find discussion of Israeli film-maker David Fisher’s “The Round Number” – the 6 million of course.

    A trailer can be viewed at

    Trailer.

    Much more substantial is the article and Podcast from Haaretz at

    https://www.haaretz.com/1.10542149

    [MORE]

    I wasn’t able to open three links to other possibly relevant Haaretz articles within the article that I am referring to. But it seems clear that Fisher that Fisher decides to stick to 6 million as a symbol even though he knows and says it can’t be justified as a reliable calculation. He cites Raul Hilberg as estimating 5.2 million, another at 4 million and yet another at 7 million. He asks rhetorically why the radical revision down of numbers killed at Auschwicz didn’t affect the 6 million. So… the 6 million can be regarded as made up and he quotes a Jew lamenting in 1945 the loss of 6 million of their people. It seems to have become established before the word Holocaust became the dominant brand name.

    As to numbers the article concludes:

    “One of the things this film talks about is how history is written, how a number becomes a symbol and becomes permanently set. As anthropologist Dr. Carol Kidron says in the film: Holocaust scholars aren’t interested in finding exact numbers, because as long as the number is round, the research will be alive, and that serves the scholarly establishment.””

    And on that Fisher himself says:

    “In the movie, I ratify the number six million, I don’t question it. Not in the usual sense of numerical accuracy, but in the sense of the magnitude of the crime against humanity that occurred. If I were to go to Holocaust deniers today, I would tell them, for example, that it’s true that in 1945 it was known that four million Jews were murdered in Auschwitz, and 50 years later it was known that ‘only’ a million and a half people were killed there, out of whom one million were Jews. When I heard about this discovery, I asked myself: How is it possible, then, that the six million number was not reduced accordingly? It bothered me. But now that I know the answer is not statistical and that it is not taken into account in the calculation, as is explained in the film – I get it.”

    *** *** ***

    I would most seriously question Fisher’s version when he says

    “The Nazi death machine in World War II was so industrialized and focused and meticulously planned that it still defies comprehension, and maybe only such a vast and incomprehensible number like six million can echo it, can convey the very idea of it to the masses.”.

    On the contrary it mostly seems to have been chaotic and haphazard with German Jews on the whole treated markedly differently from Polish and Soviet Jews in particular, and much casual use of local police.

    David Irving points to an extraordinary switch in Goebbels’ previously positive attitude to Jews when he went to Berlin but it seems to me that the key to whatever organisation there was at the top is to be found in Himmler’s head, a point I have made before

    Although there is little logic in it I suggest that the Holocaust label is needed to distinguish the deliberate killing of Jews as such as the most shocking crime of the century – maybe several centuries – because… my pick would be the moral collapse of Europe’s best educated people in the land of Goethe and Schiller etc. It was that moral horror, with Jews as the victims, that was needed to get Zionism over the line with respectable informed public opinion.

    The greatest danger to Israel’s Holocaust advantage is probably not being caught out with no gas chambers but proof (extremely unlikely) that most Polish Jews survived so the figures for the genocide were under 2 million (counting the shootings in the Soviet Union and Baltic States as part of it). Otherwise, and anyway, it is in Israel’s interest that the Holocaust industry stop its extortions.

    BTW there is an interview of Zündel by a pastor which has Zundel sounding honest and not notably cranky. It is on Bitschute here



    Video Link

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  383. Apologies for not sussessfully removing this when I replaced it with the same content linked as a Reply to you.

  384. Iris says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    The primary role of Israel in the 9/11 attack on America is proven by the pivotal and proactive role played by Silverstein. This attack succeeded in achieving its short-term objectives, but it utterly failed in its execution, because of the incriminating scientific evidence unwillingly left behind. It is called God’s retribution.

    [MORE]

    First, that wasn’t in their plans, but the Israelis were obliged to demolish WTC7 after it unexpectedly sustained glaring signs of explosion collateral damage from the controlled demolition of the nearby Twin Towers, and was turned into a giant smoking gun.
    Since WTC7 was neither hit by a plane, nor potentially planted by Mossad-vetted “art students” and “asbestos contractors”, being able to improvise its undisputable controlled demolition within hours proves that the demolition means were embedded in the building from the start and were always present, at the disposal of Silverstein and his party. Therefore, similar ready-to-use demolition features would have been available for the Twin Towers as well.

    https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

    Second, the gigantic thermal energy released by the WTC during the 3 months after its demolition was calculated by classic heat transfer equations. The figure returned is so stratospheric (10 peta Joules, or 10^15 J) that it proves without further discussion that the energy at play was of nuclear nature.

    9/11 was a nuclear crime against humanity perpetrated by Israel against the American population.
    Unlike the USS Liberty attack however, it has left behind scientific forensic evidence that will n0t be erased, neither by time, nor by the passing of eyewitnesses.

    Israel’s impunity will last only as long as the America Deep State it controls remains at the top, with public opinion and media silenced accordingly about the obvious. After that, Israel will have to answer for her nuclear holocaust of 3000 innocent Americans. It won’t be long until it happens.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  385. @Wizard of Oz

    One point where he is incorrect is that it was never claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz. The number of “4 million dead” was waved around at various times, and even kept on a plaque by the Soviets for some decades, but it was never attributed as “4 million Jews.” Even in the West it was common in the early postwar era to charge that the German government had killed millions in the camps without saying much about Jews either way. Soviet statements almost never brought up Jews for very long. The establishment voices in Western academia such as Raul Hilberg had always maintained that around a million Jews died at Auschwitz. There are good reasons for casting doubt on that claim, including the actual cremation capacity which existed at the camp. But it’s a pointless diversion for someone to get bogged down in arguing that originally 4 million Jews were supposed to have died there.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  386. @Patrick McNally

    If the number murdered at Auschwitz is reduced to one million, where does that leave the magical, Kabbalistic, pseudo-religious ‘six million’? To be sure even six would be a crime, six thousand a horror etc, but when will the PR ‘six million’ be adjusted. Four million is still an abomination, never to be forgotten (unlike the other hundreds of genocides now TOTALLY ignored and down the ‘Memory Hole’)but when will it be treated as an historical horror, not a religious event and excuse for every Zionazi artrocity?

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  387. @lysias

    The funny thing about the Septics demanding ‘verification’ is that Thanatopia has been the most untrustworthy and treacherous entity in history. See the ‘promise’ not to expand NATO eastwards for one of myriad examples.

  388. The two biggest peddlers of ‘viruses don’t exist’, Andrew Kaufman (sounds Hindu?) and Stefan Lanka.



    Video Link

    They give the impression of being a pair of indignant evasive lunatics when asked questions.

    Kaufman thinks rabies is the ‘body cleansing itself of toxins’.

    The evidence for viruses causing disease is not enough for them and they believe they have been stifled by the scientific community who won’t publish their writings in journals on viruses, even though I think Kaufman has no qualifications on the subject at all.

    There is clearly a lot of corruption and missteps in the history of science but I sense convenient delusional belief there.

    It’s tempting to think Kaufman is an injected op to make anti-vaxxers look like cretins. There’s clearly an audience receptive to this stuff as you can see from this site.

    • Replies: @gsjackson
  389. gsjackson says:
    @Vagrant Rightist

    Kaufman is an MD and has a BS in molecular biology from MIT. Exactly what sort of credentials would you consider suitable for holding forth on the subject? He and Lanka have been appearing regularly in UR for going on two years now. I missed the evasiveness and indignation, though the latter certainly would have been understandable in light of Wodarg’s incivility.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante, Towey
    • Replies: @Vagrant Rightist
  390. @mulga mumblebrain

    Again, none of the orthodox authors who maintain the fabled “6 million” ever based that claim on assuming “4 million Jews at Auschwitz.” Instead, it was more commonly assumed to be 1 million at Auschwitz and the remaining alleged 5 million elsewhere. The famous Soviet plaque which said “4 million” died at Auschwitz had said nothing about Jews and was not treated as a source by any orthodox historian. The problem of cremating so many bodies with 52 muffles remains an issue either way, however.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  391. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Was it physically possible that Eugene Caesar raised his gun to fire at Sirhan Sirhan and that Kennedy was pushed back into his line of fire by Sirhan’s bullets hitting him. If that was what happened all in the space of time taken for Caesar to aim and pull the trigger after raising his gun the description of the long drawn out cover up is about what an ordinarily worldly person might expect.

    Okay, so under your scenario RFK was killed because a “lone nut” named Sirhan unsuccessfully tried to shoot him, but his failed attempt caused a guard to accidentally kill RFK by mistake, which the embarrassed police and media then covered up for 50 years.

    As I recall, a year or so ago, you were promoting a video you’d seen arguing that JFK was accidentally shot and killed by a Secret Service agent seeking to protect him after “lone nut” Oswald failed in his assassination attempt.

    So according to you, JFK and his brother RFK were both accidentally shot and killed by their guards after each was attacked by a “lone nut” gunman in a failed assassination attempt.

    Offhand, I can’t think of one case in all of history in which this sort of thing had ever happened. And if it happened to both JFK and RFK, they must be the most unlucky pair of brothers in the history of the world…

    • LOL: Bumpkin
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  392. @Ron Unz

    It is very discreditable, unless your memory is failing as you enter the dread dungeon of the elderly.

    You say

    according to you, JFK and his brother RFK were both accidentally shot and killed by their guards 

    You know that to be untrue. I did note that the JFK killing could have explained a cover up if the quite well worked out theory of a retired Australian policeman, based on someone else’s suggestion, was true. But, as I expressly said when you later misrepresented what I had said and scoffed, I had abandoned any belief that it could be true. And you acknowledged that. (It was of course about finding alternative explanations for cover ups).

    Also, it is worryingly absurd that you should say that I am now asserting that RFK was killed by a shot from the guard. Plainly I have said nothing of the kind. I merely raised the question because it could explain the behaviour of the local police and prosecution. Any dispute over that?
    Already one Commenter but you are the one eyed man in the land of the blind, if not actually expert, having read actual printed books on the subject (no doubt) so I put it to you that,if the big problem is more than 8 shots and where, and from where, the fatal shot hit Kennedy, an explanation is needed which involves the man standing behind Kennedy. As I said at #386 the chance of keeping it simple recedes and a quick Google search has turned up accounts of 13 shots and 12-14. Of course the firer of the fatal shot may have
    pursued his duty to try and shoot a would be assassin with a volley of shots. While that might, at first glance, complicate the unofficial version too much, maybe not. After all, if the guard was in the course of firing as fast as he could at the gunman it is conceivable that Kennedy didn’t fall in to the line of fire until several shots had been fired. Would he then have fired more shots? Who knows?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  393. @Craig Nelsen

    No, none of it is true. Certainly not in the sense you mean. Take the meds, for example. They may be said to work to destroy HIV—actually a harmless passenger virus, not the cause of anything—in an effective but inherently undesirable way: by destroying the links in the DNA chain and thus, at the typical dosages, killing the patient in three to nine months. Ain’t science grand? Three cheers for Fauci!

    Hypnotoad666 laid out the situation for you in terms of the utmost transparency, but you seem to have less interest in seeing what evidence the other side is presenting than in repeating the (((party line))) till its opponents collapse from exhaustion. To be specific, H666 pointed you to what is still, even after some thirty years, the best possible source of truth about the HIV/AIDS hoax: Peter Duesberg’s Inventing the AIDS Virus. Yet as it happens, I can go H666 one better, in that I am here to tell you that you no longer need to invest even a dime in the purchase of a copy.

    Here’s how. Thanks to Ron Unz, Dr. Duesberg’s book can now be read for free, at this link on this site. Please read at least the first half of the book, the part aimed precisely at the interested, educated nonscientist, before you again present demands for answers to questions that you need to understand are unanswerable because they are inquiries that seek truth within a context of deceit and criminal fantasy. In the terminology of the linguistic philosophers of the last century, your questions fall within the realm of category errors.

    Inventing the AIDS Virus is an elegantly written, highly detailed, and eloquently and patiently laid-out exposition of the facts behind one of history’s most outrageous and murderous scientific frauds. The presence at or near the center of the fraud of the profiteer and liar Anthony Fauci should come as no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to the component parts of the ongoing New Judeo-Bolshevik Revolution: the covid hoax, the BLM riots, the wokeness subversion going on throughout the West, the thirty-year-long media campaign to persuade everyone that race mixing is desirable and indeed required, and the stolen election of 2020. Fauci has been at the heart of federal power for longer than J. Edgar Hoover was, and his hunger for power makes Hoover’s comparable to that of a cave-dwelling hermit who dines on weeds and nuts.

    With due respect to Mr. Unz’s own articles, give them a pass in favor of going straight to the horse’s mouth. Read Duesberg’s book. It’s free, and it might well free you in ways that matter more than you can yet possibly know.

  394. @Patrick McNally

    “52 muffles”????????

    If David Irving is to be believed there were never shown on aerial photographs nearly enough coke to have burned the supposed number of dead at Auschwicz-Birkenau

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  395. Leon says:
    @emerging majority

    Don’t forget that one of the leading people from the John Birch Society was also killed in a plane crash.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  396. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    It is very discreditable, unless your memory is failing as you enter the dread dungeon of the elderly…You know that to be untrue.

    My characterization was perfectly reasonable. That are some public positions that are so utterly outrageous that merely to have stated them—even if hedged or eventually retracted—will dominate all future recollection.

    Suppose, for example, I were to venture the possibility that JFK was actually a Martian, and Oswald had been a Venusian, who killed him for reasons of intergalactic conflict. Even if I merely said it was an interesting idea to consider and later backed away, it’s quite fair that others would continue to ridicule it (and me) in the future.

    Furthermore, suppose that I now raised exactly the same idea with regard to RFK, noting that if Sirhan were a Martian, then either his elongated arms or his super-technology would easily explain how he managed to shoot his victim in the back of the head at point-blank range why standing several feet in front of him. Surely any critic would immediately recall my similar past stance with regard to JFK.

    So I think my approach was entirely reasonable.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Alden
  397. @Ron Unz

    Are you going barmy? You calmly defend your 100% misstatement of my previous positions as if you didn’t know that they were not true by suggesting that they were totally ridiculous speculations or questions of the lunatic kind that you now float.

    In case anyone reads our demeaning exchange let me repeat that I was in each case exploring what explanations there might be for the actual or apparent cover up other than the most sinister. I am sure you agree that it is proper to treat any evidence of cover up or incompetence in investigation as evidence justifying inquiry into whether there has been a conspiracy. Indeed you have deployed such arguments frequently.

    On the JFK shooting did you ever watch the documentary of the retired Australian policeman’s theory and his testing of it? Did you immediately see it as flawed? (I say it was certainly not obvious, subject to someone proving that it was).

    You seem embarrassed at your inability to show that my question about shooting by Eugene Cesar was not a reasonable one. And you have a big problem explaining why local police and prosecutors would cover up for him if

    1. They had even a hint that he deliberately killed RFK

    2.They could not, in good conscience, attribute the tragedy to Sirhan Sirhan. (If he had been hypnotised why would they suspect that?). Even if the bullets from SS’s gun that struck Kennedy hadn’t been the proximate cause of death the offences for which they would be able to have him convicted would have put him away for a very long time, so the locals could honestly enough claim that it was in the public interest not to complicate the case.

    3.They we concerned that publicising Eugene Cesar’s fatal error would lead to rich elderly cranks promoting conspiracy theories with a nation shaking impact.

  398. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    On the JFK shooting did you ever watch the documentary of the retired Australian policeman’s theory and his testing of it? Did you immediately see it as flawed? (I say it was certainly not obvious, subject to someone proving that it was).

    Okay, you’ve now gone back to promoting that stupid video arguing that JFK was accidentally shot and killed by a Secret Service agent. I don’t waste my time watching stupid videos, especially those by random nuts advocating such utterly outlandish theories.

    You seem embarrassed at your inability to show that my question about shooting by Eugene Cesar was not a reasonable one. And you have a big problem explaining why local police and prosecutors would cover up for him if

    1. They had even a hint that he deliberately killed RFK

    Well, the theory is that there was a “conspiracy” to kill RFK, and Cesar was merely the hired assassin. After all, someone needed to position Sirhan to be there and start shooting, thereby providing the necessary distraction.

    Obviously, the powerful individuals who organized the successful assassination of the likely next president of the U.S., realized that that they needed to then cover their tracks afterward and orchestrated the necessary cover-up by the local police and prosecutors. All of that is discussed in exhaustive detail in the two books I cited, as well as numerous articles such as the cover story in Saturday Review published 45 years ago.

    Since you’re asking these foolish questions, you obviously haven’t read the books or the article. That’s perfectly fine and you have every right to instead spend your time watching videos, but I don’t have time to waste answered your questions.

  399. @gsjackson

    >Kaufman is an MD

    How would he treat or prevent rabies ? With vitamins and nutraceuticals ?

    It seems extremely doubtful to me Kaufman practices, or has ever successfully practiced general medicine if that’s what you mean based on his own words.

    I had seen Kaufman presented as a psychiatrist previously. He’s not someone I’d bother paying attention to to delve further. But in some ways it makes it worse. You can study something but end up completely rebelling against reality. This rebellion against reality might well be key to where he is coming from.

    >I missed the evasiveness and indignation, though the latter certainly would have been understandable in light of Wodarg’s incivility.

    If you can’t see how poorly this pair came across, how ridiculous they looked, how strained and thin their positions were, how quickly they would anger and talk over other panelists and claim they were not being allowed to speak as their worthless ideas were exposed to light, and then just invert the presentation and say Wodarg was the problem who was extraordinarily patient and kind to these two angry flat-Earthers, then there is clearly an issue your end.

    Some people just want to bury themselves in these ideas a priori, or are so buried in it already they have to assert an inverted reality when these ideas and their proponents are tested. They don’t want to give these ideas up I guess.

    I’m pretty sure it was you who posted a link when I asked about Zelenko getting angry in another thread. Zelenko was asked by Wodard ‘how did he know his patients had covid?’ which angered him, I think understandably. You claimed Zelenko was the problem there and defended Wodard at the time. But now you see Wodard as the problem when he won’t uphold Kaufman’s positions.

    I don’t know, but one might get the impression that any moment in time that casts doubt on covid or viruses in general is the higher priority for some participants here, not what a particular scientist or doctor specifically believes or where they were coming from at that particular moment when they said what they said. As long as some instance advances a potential that covid doesn’t exist or viruses don’t cause disease ‘it’s good’.

    On Kaufman, I assume from his name, profession and so on he’s Jewish. And he uses a kind of specious argumentation that may broadly overlap with typical leftist Jewish arguments we’ve seen a lot of in the sciences as highly corrupting influences. Albeit because of the deficiency of Kaufman’s claims and the nature of the specialized field it is harder to invoke moralizing shaming arguments to obscure this deficiency and advance his position.

    He also mixes in further very weak claims that derive from alternative medicine which is curious.

    So what’s in it for Jews to assert viruses don’t cause disease and capture conservative white minds with this as opposed to leftist ones?

    Perhaps Kaufman is concerned he will be seen as a virion and if he can sow doubt that viruses cause disease in the most susceptible minds, then it will protect Jews from antisemitism who might be likened to viruses in their behavior and strategies. Trying to stop viruses from causing disease is also a kind of oppression, it’s an example of inequality, and bigotry because we are judging and not fully understanding them and accepting their rich diversity.

    Or perhaps he’s just nuts.

    > He and Lanka have been appearing regularly in UR for going on two years now.

    About the time covid appeared right ? A Cohencidence of course.

    Although I’m not here much, I can see their effect on others here. But if that is a source of achievement for Unz readers, ‘look how enlightened we’ve been for 2 years’ then good luck with the rabies.

  400. @Wizard of Oz

    I’m not sure what the question marks are about, but, yes, 52 muffles. A common set-up was to have a crematorium center which might have several ovens, each of which would have a few muffles adjoined to it (for placing bodies in which could then be burned). Auschwitz I had 6 such muffles in what I recall as just one crematorium. Auschwitz-Birkenau had 46, spread over 4 crematoria with 2 of these having 4 ovens and 2 muffles per oven, while the other 2 had and 5 and 3. That would mean that theoretically one could have 52 cremation muffles going at any one time. In practice, if one simply attempted to keep these raging in flame non-stop day in and out, then the masonry holding the ovens together could be expected to crumble within at most 6 months. Supposedly there are some reports of some masonic repairs having been done at Auschwitz I, but not at Birkenau. One has to allow for a few thousand cremations having been done in each muffle, with perhaps a raised capacity at Auschwitz I because of the partial repairs. Even then, it seems unlikely that one could approach the standard numbers which are given for cremations of bodies at Auschwitz.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @utu
  401. @Leon

    True Dat. Congressman McDonald from Georgia, was it not? He must have been found guilty of embarrassing some big and powerful order-takers, obediently obeying orders from their “betters”–whether of the bribing variety, the blackmailing type or both.

  402. @Wizard of Oz

    Wiz, when you’re in a hole, stop digging. To, instead, declare victory is SO you.

  403. @Wizard of Oz

    I don’t know which sounds more fey: publicly pining for Ron to hire some niece or nephew of yours as his intern, or admitting you vacation in Sri Lanka and read Stephen Greenblatt.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  404. @Wizard of Oz

    The only person ‘demeaning’ matters is YOU, with your obdurate and recalcitrant stupidity.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  405. @mulga mumblebrain

    Whichever version of MM is on duty
    today see if you can disprove the case I made – without pretending like Ron that you don’t understand what case I have made..

    Hint for one of the more mentally challenged of the MM team: there really was nothing more involved than my inquiring whether a particular possible prerequisite to cover up might have existed – as a physical possibility. For extra marks you could tackle the question of how Ron could bring himself to publishing his fake version.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  406. @Lucius Somesuch

    Fey: “giving an impression of vague unworldliness or mystery”.

    That sounds like a compliment to most of the nutters on UR. But maybe your post is a subtle way of telling us something about yourself.

    “Pining’ is of course ridiculous but you remind me that I have surely lighted on something that Ron must know he has to be careful about. Would you put it past the ADL or other enemy organisation to try and stitch up Ron with a totally fabricated scandal? On the other hand, don’t you think he could usefully subcontract some fact checking and wider research?

    BTW, have you read Stephen Greenblatt’s “Swerve”? And as you seem to be claiming to know more about him than I do, tell me please what is “fey” about his work or reading it.

    As it happens I have had business interests in Sri Lanka for 20 years. I don’t know if that allows it to be merely sensible to take holidays in Sri Lanka. (Actually the really sensible part is that it allows me to have family members and friends meet and stay equidistantly between London and Melbourne in each of which many live.)

  407. @mulga mumblebrain

    This is a typical result from searching for Churchill and the Bengal famine

    The 1943 Bengal famine, which is estimated to have caused over three million deaths, resulted not from a drought as is widely thought but from the British government’s policy failures, say IIT Gandhinagar scientists who have analysed 150 years of drought data.20 Mar 2019

    Add Amatya Sen and you might get

    On 7 October, Churchill told the war cabinet that one of the new viceroy’s first duties was to see to it “that famine and food difficulties were dealt with.” He wrote to Wavell the next day: “Every effort must be made, even by the diversion of shipping urgently needed for war purposes, to deal with local shortages.” ..

    So…. where do you choose to believe you have evidence of at least 4 million and “deliberately”. I am still mildly interested in how the MM team operates.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  408. lysias says:

    For the truth about the Bengal famine, read Churchill’s Secret War by Madhusree Mukerjee. An Amazon review says she gives the 4 million figure.

    • Replies: @Lysias
  409. Lysias says:
    @lysias

    I read Mukerjee’s book some 10 years ago, right after it appeared, but I found it hard, looking again through my copy, to find where she states how many died. But Gideon Polya’s review of her book, published in Countercurrents June 13, 2011, says she gives the 4 million figure for Bengal, and adds another 2-3 million for adjoining provinces. How’s that for a Holocaust?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Ron Unz
  410. Alden says:
    @BuelahMan

    Otto Frank didn’t write the diary that was published as Anne Frank’s diary. Anne did keep a diary for years. As did many girls and teens of that era. Pretty pastel diaries were common Christmas and birthday presents for girls.

    Otto Frank found Anne’s diary after the war. He brought to New York. He was one of the thousands of Jews who were sponsored by AJC ADL all the Jewish organizations to come to America as refugees.

    Otto Frank first contacted Meyer Levin a very prolific popular American author. Levin agreed to re write the diary making it more political for \$50,000. Levin did so and the diary was published and became a best seller making millions over the decades. I’m sure it will still be required reading in American schools 100 years from now.

    Levin sued Frank for non payment and breach of contract. Levin won the case. Levin was awarded the \$50,000 contractual payment and court and attorney costs.

    Frank managed to weasel out of paying Levin.

  411. Alden says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Exactly. Why was the ferociously* anti Israel and anti RFK’s groveling to Israel and AIPAC Sirhan Sirhan doing in the hotel kitchen 4 feet away from Robert Kennedy?

    Sirhan’s didn’t work in the hotel wasn’t temporary hired help for hotel events lived about 30 miles away. He hadn’t been involved in democrat politics in any way. It’s possible he went to the event because it was something to do free food maybe meet some women. Or why many people go to political events.

    But why did he follow RFK to the kitchen? . How was it RFK’s friends grabbed him with a just fired gun in his hand 4 feet away from the dying RFK? I know I know some magical mystery person Thane Cesear fired the gun that really killed RFK. The same magical mystery entity hypnotized totally innocent Sirhan to fire his gun into the ceiling 4 feet from RFK to enable the real murderer to get away.

    * ferociously anti Israel. You would be too if you experienced what the Sirhan family did at the hands of the Israelis.

    Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy was the leader of the radical anti White wing of the Democrat party. He was an MLK worshipper. He wanted affirmative action for Hispanics as well as blacks.

    How any White person can favor or care who or what killed a major enemy of American Whites is beyond me. Nixon was devastating for Whites with school bussing, affirmative action, black on White crime aided abetted and encouraged by the federal government and federal courts.
    Robert Kennedy was even more anti White than Nixon or any other candidate in the 1968 election.

    I’ll enjoy reading the comments by the gullible naive idiots who believe there were one or more invisible shooters who killed Kennedy in that hotel kitchen. S

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  412. @Lysias

    No other has to be 6 million if you are talking numbers.

  413. lysias says:
    @Alden

    Several of Meyer Levin’s books were clearly Jewish in subject matter.

    How good is the evidence that Levin was hired to revise the manuscript? Presumably good, if he could win a court case. Are the documents available to the public?

    • Replies: @Alden
  414. Ron Unz says:
    @Alden

    Levin sued Frank for non payment and breach of contract. Levin won the case. Levin was awarded the \$50,000 contractual payment and court and attorney costs.

    I’ve seen that claim Meyer Levin heavily wrote the Anne Frank diary floating around for many years on the Internet, but never tried to track it down. So I’d also be very interested in seeing a solid, unambiguous source.

    • Replies: @Alden
  415. Ron Unz says:
    @Lysias

    I read Mukerjee’s book some 10 years ago, right after it appeared, but I found it hard, looking again through my copy, to find where she states how many died. But Gideon Polya’s review of her book, published in Countercurrents June 13, 2011, says she gives the 4 million figure for Bengal, and adds another 2-3 million for adjoining provinces. How’s that for a Holocaust?

    I’d be very cautious in accepting any of Polya’s quantitative claims. A couple of people had referenced his work last year, persuading me to buy and look over his book. But I discovered that his estimates are outlandish and his methodology totally ridiculous. From what I vaguely remember, he claims that America has killed 20 million Muslims since 9/11, and that the West overall had killed something like a billion or two billion people over the last half century.

    • Replies: @Lysias
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  416. @Alden

    To even hint that RFK was minutely as evil as LBJ, with his deliberate sacrifice of the murdered sailors on the USS Liberty to advance the Zionist agenda, plus his role in the execution of JFK, plus the numerous murders in Texas with which he has been said to be involved…such “thought” is very little short of insanity, total ignorance or the presence of a Sayanim or Hasbarfa.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Replies: @Alden
  417. Never knew William Wallace was an anti-vaxxer. Hate to think of what that will do to Ron Unz’ opinion of him.

    • LOL: Mehen
  418. Alden says:
    @lysias

    Just google Meyer Levin vs Otto Frank et al New York State Supreme Court and it comes up. The et al was the publisher I think.

    Supreme Court isn’t a higher court. It’s just the NY state term for what other states call the regular State County Courts right above small claims court.

  419. Alden says:
    @emerging majority

    RFK was very very anti White. If you want to glorify one of the major anti White politicians of the mid 20th century go right ahead. You might remember that Sirhan’s alleged reason for killing RFK* was the fact that only a few days before RFK’s appearance at the Ambassador Hotel he, RFK made a groveling speech to AIPAC that if elected he would do everything AIPAC and Israel asked.

    RFK was the senator from New York State, already spoken of as the next president and the darling Golden Boy of the democrat party worshipped by millions of idiots like you And he didn’t do a or say thing about the sailors on the USS Liberty. Completely ignored it. Because RFK like all the other democrats and republicans was controlled by AIPAC.

    And the democrats led by RFK were extremely anti White at the time. As soon as JFK was elected his brother RFK became the most prominent member of the slobbering over MLK civil rights movement.

    If you love affirmative action discrimination against Whites and black on White crime you must love RFK as he favored every anti White law and imitative that occurred in his life time.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  420. Alden says:
    @Ron Unz

    Just google Meyer Levin vs Otto Frank et al NY State Supreme Court.

    The 1956 case No. was 2241.

    The 1957 case Meyer Levin vs Otto Frank NY State Supreme Court | 5 Misc. 2d 564 | 1957
    SC 2d 564

    The et al s were the publisher of the very profitable book and Kermit Bloomgarten. I think he was the producer of the play.

    One point I want to make about the death of Anne Frank. She would not have died of Typhus had the Germans not sent her to a crowded camp with typhus infected water and other filthy unhealthy conditions. Like many Dutch she might have died of malnutrition and other war time diseases had they left her alone. Living isolated as her family was, she wasn’t exposed to diseases. Whatever whatever the Germans killed her by exposing her to typhus a deadly disease incurable at the time.

    A new Anne Frank show just arrived on YouTube. According to the local Jewish Journal the jews have discovered many new pages of her diary over the years. About 10 years ago they discovered she had a boyfriend. I notice the latest pictures have been altered. In the old pictures she looks 11 or 12. In the latest pictures she looks about 15 and prettier.

    At one time I read on the internet the judge’s actual written findings that Levin, not 11 12 year old Anne wrote the diary that was published and the play. And of course the judge ordered Frank and the publisher to pay Levin the \$50,000 the signed the contract for. Judge findings are probably still on the internet.

    Levin proved his case by submitting as evidence the copy of the real diary Otto gave him to base the published book on. Ha ha, physical evidence.

    I don’t think Levin was able to ever collect his payment.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  421. Alden says:
    @Ron Unz

    I saw the beginning of the documentary by the retired Aussie detective who decided to solve the mystery of Who Killed Kennedy. Absolute very superficial garbage.

    Here’s a theory I just made up. My mother killed him because he “ seduced and abandoned “ her. They hooked up when Kennedy was at the United Nations founding meeting in San Francisco in 1948?49?. Or maybe it was another woman he hooked up with. Or maybe one of the women’s husbands resenting supporting and raising Kennedy’s bastard child all those years. Maybe the baby was a boy and looked just like a teen John Kennedy.

    Make up any theory about Who Killed Kennedy and the brainwashed naive gullible idiots will believe it.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  422. Alden says:
    @Ron Unz

    Some of the obsessives claim that yes, Sirhan was more or less in front of RFK . But that RFK turned his head just as the shot was fired.

    Which makes sense to anyone who’s ever seen a politician trying to include as many people as possible in his greetings.

    The victim turning just as the shooter fires happens a lot in police shootings. Then the liberals and activists go after the cop because he she shot the victim in the back.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  423. @Alden

    The \$50,000 lawsuit was over the stage play version of the story.

    “Levin alleged in his suit that after he adapted the diary into a play, a change of produced and writers resulted in his being defrauded of his rights. Among Levin’s contentions were that some lines which he wrote and which did not appear in the diary were used by the writers whose version opened on Broadway in 1955 and ran for 86 weeks.”
    — “‘Anne Frank’ Author Wins \$50,000 Suit,” Sarasota Journal, January 9, 1958.

    This was an issue of intellectual property since the play (understood to be a fictional dramatization of the diary) had allegedly included lines which came from Levin and not from the diary. Hence Levin was claiming IP-rights over this.

    • Replies: @Alden
  424. utu says:
    @Patrick McNally

    ” Auschwitz I had 6 such muffles ” – The ones that are on display there were brought after war from somewhere else. The chimney was built after war and it is not attached to anything.

    Many inmates at Auschwitz I were serving prison term sentences and upon finishing them were released. They were mostly from Upper Silesia that was part of Germany. Also there were cases of Polish prisoners from General Government who were released. German administration in Poland was bribable and some interventions by Italian diplomats also worked. There were hundreds if not thousands of former Auschwitz I inmates living among general population during war. Yet there were no rumors in Silesia or Poland during war about gassing people in Auschwitz I.

    Polish underground supposedly did not know what was happening in Auschwitz I, so they sent their intelligence officer to infiltrate it as a prisoner. Witold Pilecki wrote two reports. First, very brief one he wrote in Warsaw in 1943 right after his escape from Auschwitz and the second one right after war in Italy from where he returned back to Poland to organize anti-Soviet resistance. The second report was not published until recently. The manuscript was kept in UK in archives of Polish government in exile. He mentions gassing only in passing as if it was not worthy further elaboration. You can learn from the report more about what packages and how often inmates could receive them form outside than about gassings. Is it possible that the utterances about gassings were inserted many years later so Pilecki’s report could be published after Communism collapse?

    Pilecki was arrested after war by communist authorities for spying and anti-state activities. He was tortured, sentenced to death and executed in 1948. During a visit by his wife in Warsaw prison before his execution he told her: “They finished me off here. Auschwitz was a plaything/game/trifle.” (Mnie tutaj wykończyli. Oświęcim to była igraszka.)

    The case for gassing in Auschwitz I is a very weak one.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  425. @Alden

    Your theorising about the RFK shooting ignores the certificate which stated that the obviously fatal shot was

    “1 inch to the right center of the back of the head”

    As that was found to have been fired from an inch or two behind the head it couldn’t have been the result of turning because Sirhan Sirhan was never close enough. It would have to have been from his staggering back more than turning sideways if one is to follow that line of thinking. Still you do seem to be another who is accepting that killing by the guard cannot be said to be certainly deliberate.

    • Replies: @Alden
  426. @Alden

    >I saw the beginning of the documentary by the retired Aussie detective who decided to solve the mystery of Who Killed Kennedy. Absolute very superficial garbage.

    Is that a joke? Are you baiting Ron with pretended support from a batty old bird from the Bay Area with such bloviating confidence that it would not surprise if she said “I served on that jury but the first five minutes of the defence case was ‘absolute superficial garbage’ so I just put my feet up and made up my sleep deficit until it was time to put the bastard away”.
    Outrageous? Well, when I looked in on the Maxwell brothers trial in London in 1995 I saw a young man in the front row of the jury box with his feet up on the partition in front of him and his eyes closed. You might have fitted in quite well.

    • Replies: @Alden
  427. @Ron Unz

    Surely you can’t deny that a video – consumed as audio – of a prominent figure, most probably an outstanding somewhat controversial academic or author, giving a lecture or a speech cannot be worth spending your time on while driving or doing menial tasks as an very short orientation to a field one is almost completely unaware of or as an interview with a prominent and interesting figure?

    Or in the case of an author giving a speech about a book of his, listening to it with the intention to find out if it’s worth the time and money to get oneäs hands on a hard to find book (I live in northern Europe so it’s much harder finding controversial out of print English language books here and it can be quite costly). For instance, listening to a talk by Irving made me spend a relatively considerable time and money finding a copy of Churchill’s War.

    And when I think about it further, there a quite a lot of controversial people making long form interview videos these days that can be quite rewarding listeing to when one is doing menial tasks or driving or riding the bus.

    However, I absolutely agree that 99+ % of videos, especially so called documentaries, are a complete waste of one’s time.

    Also, I guess, and this is absolutely not intended as an insult but only a light critique, that being a multimillionaire living in a high Gini-coefficient country one probably doesn’t do much menial tasks oneself and perhsps doenät do much long distance driving or riding buses and trains either, so your views on this subject might be somewhat colored by your material circumstances.

    As a younger male student, although upper middle class, in egalitarian northern Europe – where practically no student has enough money to have acess to a car unless they have a working spouse who owns it and pays for fuel, material circumstances are somewhat different.

    And even though I probably enjoy better material circumstances – only because of an inheritance from grandparents who were very well off by this egalitaran country’s standards – than 99 % of students here I still have to do all menial tasks that comes with living alone myself and having a car is out of the question – I am absolutely not complaining though and I am well aware of how much better I have it than most other young people here just being able to live in a native population neighborhood unsullied by third world migrants – and that leaves plenty of time for listening to podcasts, lectures, talks and interviews by/with authors and academics – time that could not be spent better in any other way.

    • Agree: Nancy
  428. Ron Unz says:
    @The Ghost Of Emanuel Swedenborg Revived

    Surely you can’t deny that a video – consumed as audio – of a prominent figure, most probably an outstanding somewhat controversial academic or author, giving a lecture or a speech cannot be worth spending your time on…However, I absolutely agree that 99+ % of videos, especially so called documentaries, are a complete waste of one’s time.

    I absolutely agree with you, and I had made almost exactly the same point in a comment upthread:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-anne-frank-sirhan-sirhan-and-aids/#comment-5154921

    But the problem is that if 99.8% of videos are worthless and they take so much time to consume, I find them only useful under very special circumstances.

  429. @Alden

    Don’t EVER accuse me of being a Democrat. I gave up on them sixty years ago. RFK was a politician and he did have to appeal to his base. Of the possible Democrat choices, he was far preferable to the mass-murderer LBJ.

  430. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Was he the guy who claims the driver of Kennedy’s car stopped the car, turned around and shot Kennedy with his service revolver?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  431. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    What certificate and from which ridiculous book did you find a copy of the certificate?

    Or was it an autopsy report? Original research not selected passages from lunatic authors. The autopsy report is available in the LA County Coroner’s office. File a request for it.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  432. Alden says:
    @Patrick McNally

    Read the entire case which is archived on the internet and read the judge’s findings. Original research not a secondary source a newspaper article.

  433. @utu

    There were a number of reconstructions done at Auschwitz I after the war, but no one has ever disputed the existence of cremation facilities there. Gas chambers are a different matter. But even where one has a silly construction of a fake chimney, it’s not as if any revisionists have ever contested the point about 6 cremation muffles having been in place. That was the same as what existed at Dachau, which is generally acknowledged to have never had an operating gas chamber.

    The claims about gas chambers are weak all around. Of course, one shouldn’t make the error of thinking this means more than it does. In the last half-century, there has been so much Holocaust-propaganda that one might be misled to think that Poles, Russians, East Ukrainians, Serbs and such who fought against the Axis were all desperately worried about Jews. That was not what actually drove people to fight. The aims of treating eastern Europe as a domain of living space for the Aryan Herrenvolk created the conflict with many Slavic populations. The stuff about Jews was more like background noise, rather than a motive for fighting the Axis.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  434. @Patrick McNally

    Never mind debunking Allied propaganda, how about all those Nazis who claimed that there were gassings, some in a court of law? I won’t bother referencing them all but here’s a recent one from the top of a search engine:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/25/former-nazi-camp-guard-admits-seeing-people-being-led-into-gas-chamber

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  435. @The Ghost Of Emanuel Swedenborg Revived

    Past a certain age the eye muscles are unwilling to spend 16 hours per day reading.

    Eye muscles in recovery mode are in a separate universe from brain listening to audio media!

  436. @Alden

    Meyer Levin vs Otto Frank

    I don’t think Levin was able to ever collect his payment.

    Jews Jewing Jews but all Jewing the public.

  437. @Alden

    According to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_Levin

    Levin didn’t write or edit the diary but wrote a play based on the diary and that’s what he was contracted for.

  438. @Commentator Mike

    A 93-year-old man is put on trial, and he offers as a defense the claim that he heard the gassings going on but didn’t have anything to do with carrying them out. That’s not really credible evidence of what was going on, either way. An old man who had worked as a camp guard at Stutthof isn’t going to get very far making a legal defense where he has to argue the matter of whether or not credible evidence exists for the gassings. The simplest default defense to adopt is to simply say that he knew the gassings were going on but had nothing to do with implementing them. “He faces six months to ten years in prison if convicted.” Obviously, he’s trying to aim for the six months by not rocking the boat.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  439. Lysias says:
    @Ron Unz

    Shashi Tharoor gives essentially the same figure of nearly 4 million dead in the 1943 Bengal famine in his 2016 book “An Era of Darkness”. Tharoor is a distinguished former Indian and UN official.

    • Thanks: Ron Unz
  440. @Alden

    You are unbelievable. And shameless. You have purported to comment on a film of which you only saw the beginning ,and now you prove that you don’t even remember which film it was. I have largely put the details out of mu mind but I can say with certainty that the film had nothing to do with JFK being shot by the driver.

    The whole point of interest was that if the incompetence or dishonesty of the Warren Commission shrieked “cover up” you would certainly have found reason for a cover up if a Secret Service man in the car behind had accidentally fired a shot which killed JFK.

  441. @Alden

    I think it was an autopsy report. I was searching as quickly as possible for something consistent with what seems to be common ground on this thread, namely that it was a bullet fired from close up behind RFK’s head that killed him. Do you disagree that Eugene Cesar seems to have fired the fatal shot?

    • Replies: @Alden
  442. @Patrick McNally

    Right, so Reinhold Hanning confessed so he could get a lighter sentence then what about Rudolf Hoss confessing for what? To get the death sentence.

    I commanded Auschwitz until 1 December 1943, and estimate that at least 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease, making a total of about 3,000,000 dead. This figure represents about 70% or 80% of all persons sent to Auschwitz as prisoners, the remainder having been selected and used for slave labor in the concentration camp industries.

    – Rudolf Hoss

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Höss

    Or Wilhelm Pfannenstiel, doctor, Nazi party member and SS officer:

    While the Jews were being taken in, the rooms were lit up with electric light and everything passed off peacefully. But when the lights were turned off, loud cries burst out inside, which then gradually died away. As soon as everything was quiet again, the doors in the outside walls were opened, the corpses were brought out, and, after being searched for gold teeth, they were stacked in a trench.

    – Wilhelm Pfannenstiel

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Pfannenstiel

    Or Kurt Gerstein, SS officer, who on 18 August 1942, along with Rolf Günther and Wilhelm Pfannenstiel, Gerstein witnessed the gassing of some 3,000 Jews in the extermination camp of Belzec

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerstein_Report

    Or SS sergeant Oskar Groening.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Gröning

    Or the Nazi women imprisoned with Nazi sympathiser Savitri Devi after WWII who told her about the gassings and the mass murder of children born to foreign workers in Germany.

    Savitri Devi Defiance (1951)

    https://archive.org/details/DeviSavitriDefianceEN1951582P

    I’m sure there’s a lot more and not just from Jews but from the Nazis themselves.

  443. Allan says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    Please present some evidence which demonstrates that the text “Libbre David” exists, or that it did exist but has been lost.

  444. @Ron Unz

    Polya mostly talks of ‘excess deaths’ to calculate his figures. Given US military aggression, subversion, sanctions, support of brutal stooges and death-squads, and, most importantly, the imposition of a neo-liberal capitalist economic order, through the ‘Washington Consensus’ and the Bretton Woods organisations the IMF, World Bank, WTO etc, particularly through mechanisms like Structural Adjustment Programs, I believe that his calculus may not be far off the mark. After all even today five million children under five die from avoidable causes every year because of the global inequality that the USA is the greatest cause of.

    • Troll: Wizard of Oz
  445. @Wizard of Oz

    Wiz the genocide denier and apologist. I do love the story of Churchill marking a report about the man-made famine in Bengal and Orissa with a scribbled note-‘Why has Gandhi not died yet?’ I bet he’s a BIG hero of yours.

    • Disagree: Wizard of Oz
  446. @Wizard of Oz

    The only case you ever made was a ‘nut-case’. You are my very favourite Dunning-Krugerite.

    • Troll: Wizard of Oz
  447. @Commentator Mike

    Is it plausible that Hoess might have made that confession with those large figures because he thought even the prosecution would work out that they were so patently absurd that the charges might be dropped or a favourable plea bargain negotiated? Against that one would expect him to have managed to communicate that to the wider world.

    I have BTW read in the last few days the claim that the Nazis kept meticulous records of Auschwicz related matters and that included death certificates for those that died there. It would be naive to believe that. Even if it was true for some categories of prisoners over some part of the relevant period it is impossible that it could have covered the cases of thousands of the weak chosen for immediate killing and cremation. It’s a bit like John Wear’s reliance on the Soviet figures for the number of German POWs that died in their custody.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  448. @Wizard of Oz

    It’s hard to say what went through his mind and some would claim that Hoss was forced to give his statement under torture.

    There are inconsistencies between witness statements of the Nazis and survivors but that is to be expected as people witnessing a same event don’t often recollect it in the same way and you just have to read several biographies of living people to find inconsistencies, and even the same person writing his own bio at different times may not quite recollect correctly his own past.

    One could offer an explanation for each of those statements referenced in my comment, and others, being untrue and why the person made them but taken all together there is a consistency and undisputable fact that mas murder and extermination of innocent women, children, elderly and men took place. We can argue about the fine detail of the methodology, the numbers, etc. but to dismiss it all as some kind of made up lie I think is ridiculous.

    I am all for a free debate on those various technicalities and possible revision of some aspects but I don’t agree with people who claim the Holocaust didn’t happen just because they’re able to expose some inconsistency in some claims or dispute some technical details. So are we to say that the Holocaust must have happened exactly and precisely 100% as claimed in some Holocaust museum information broadsheet and if it not exactly so then that it didn’t happen at all?

    Yes Germans kept precise books but maybe there was a also sort of silent, not to be mentioned or recorded but understood, genocidal policy. Also at war’s end perhaps many of the records were destroyed. People tend to shred records when they realise that the jig is up and what they did war wrong and criminal.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  449. Tannim says:

    The forensic facts about RFK Sr.’s assassination always exonerated Sirhan, both from the powder burns and the simple fact that the calibers of the fatal shot and Sirhan’s gun were different.

    RFK Jr. should never have apologized for the Anne Frank reference, because it is valid–the Jews of the Third Reich were just as vilified before the camps as the unjabbed are now. The only difference (except for Australia) is the camps came along later, and the jury is still out on that now.

    For those who continually harp about the unlawful and nonsensical mandates, shrieking, “It’s the law!” I respond thus: “Get in the boxcar, it’s the law.”

    P.S. First-time commenter here. Enjoy the site, and really like this commenting format!

  450. @Commentator Mike

    Thanks. I am sure you are better read on the subject than I am. I wonder if you agree with me that Hitler, though he couldn’t avoid ultimate responsibility, was not the immediate driver or organiser of the extermination but, probably, left it largely to Himmler and the SS.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  451. @Tannim

    I haven’t noticed the unjabbed having their shop fronts smashed or their places of worship burned down. Of course, apart from that dictator Dan knows an Untermensch when he sees one.

  452. @Commentator Mike

    Rudolf Hoess was tortured by the British until he was ready to sign anything they gave him. By the time he was in Polish hands, he didn’t need to be tortured anymore. The threat of his wife and children being sent to Siberia would have been enough. Not surprisingly, the statements which he gave contain absurd claims about camp staff walking chewing on grub as they are allegedly clearing bodies out of a gas chamber where they had just been soaked with cyanide. No indication of how the toxic poison which would have been stuck between all of the dead bodies would have cleared away so fast without killing camp staff who rushed in to take bodies out without wearing protective uniforms.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  453. @Wizard of Oz

    Hitler had his hands full with so much, especially running the war, that he probably couldn’t direct everything that went on, perhaps giving just some vague directions and directives about things he didn’t consider essential to winning the war, leaving much to his underlings. Although some of what he wrote or said could be interpreted as having genocidal potential I am not sure that it was developed into a clear policy and things just evolved as the war progressed. My impression, although I cannot substantiate it, is that the policy, or at least what was being done, changed with time: initially the plan could have been to round up all the Jews for eventual transport to Palestine or wherever once the war was won and conditions for this could be established but they ended up with just so many in the transports and the camps that caring for all of them under the wartime conditions became impossible so disposal of those who couldn’t be exploited as slave labour began to be practiced. Kind of cutting the corners under conditions of wartime hardship with other objectives being prioritised. Who, where and when first decided on this I am not clear, but probably they thought they wouldn’t get in trouble with anybody in the Nazi authorities for eliminating some Jews thus making it easier to handle the others. Imagine that if at the time you had set up a committee to deal with this there could have been different views presented: some would be for the total annihilation of all Jews, some for sticking with the original plan to keep them in camps until war’s end for deportation out of Europe (which would have strained resources needed for the war effort), and some for a kind of compromise solution which probably prevailed; i.e. kill some, exploit the rest.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  454. anarchyst says:
    @Patrick McNally

    It’s one of the oldest torture tactics in the book…
    Agree with everything your torturer says and wants and in most cases he will leave you alone.
    Initially, I am sure that Hoess attempted to tell the real truth, but the British and American officers who tortured him didn’t want the truth.
    They didn’t want to hear it as they had their minds already made up.
    Hoess finally figured out that his tormentors wanted outlandish impossible accounts as they were too stupid to see that what Hoess was doing was attempting to minimize his torture by “giving them what they wanted”.
    Hoess probably thought that if he gave his tormentors outlandish impossible stories, the real truth would eventually get out…
    Sad to say, the outlandish impossible accounts are what have been spewed about as “truth” while the real truth is carefully covered up.
    Cracks are forming in this whole holohoax (oops, I mean “holocaust™) fable. The real truth is finally being noticed by more and more aware people. It cannot happen soon enough.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  455. @Tannim

    RFK the Lesser got the details of the Anne Frank tragedy wrong, so was asking for trouble. And of ALL the instances of persecution he could have used, why one of the ‘icons’ of the Holocaust pseudo-religion and industry? Seems remarkably ill-advised to me. You can prostrate yourself on carpet of glass-shards, wailing and weeping, and they will STILL find some trace of ‘antisemitism’ in your demeanour. Just ask Corbyn.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  456. @Commentator Mike

    Sensible, realistic, thinking if I may say so. A factor you don’t mention is the visit of the Grand Mufti who would have said no more Jews should be sent to Palestine while it had become clear that Madagascar was not on.

    You probably wouldn’t resist my speculation that some bright needy Aspie type would think it a great idea to experiment with gas…..

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  457. @anarchyst

    I have just said

    “You probably wouldn’t resist my speculation that some bright needy Aspie type would think it a great idea to experiment with gas….”

    And you certainly wouldn’t resist my speculation that some otherwise saintly British and American interrogators would have resorted to enhanced methods.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  458. Good survey of many of the former “conspiracy theories” and “misinformation” from Covid policy skeptics that have turned out to be “conspiracy facts”. Sure, a stopped clock is right twice a day, but by now this is clearly way beyond that.

    And this will not be the end of these “astonishing revelations” either, Ron Unz. Your pet US bioweapon theory may or may not turn out to be correct, but when Covid policy skeptics have turned out to be right all along on so many matters, you should probably pay a bit more attention. And if you (reasonably enough) have trouble telling the crackpots from the responsible (if not always correct) analysts, well, again, you should probably pay a bit more attention.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/natural-immunity-and-other-conspiracy-theories-have-magically-become-fact-checked

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  459. @Wizard of Oz

    Initially the Nazis had the alliance with the Zionists and I think they hoped to use the more militant Zionists in an armed struggle against the British in Palestine but they also needed the Arab nationalists on their side against the British so the Zionists were dumped. Germans tend to be highly regarded as professionals but I would expect that lower quality cadres were assigned to the working in the concentration camps while the better ones were devoted to far more important projects, and nobody paid much attention to it during the war, or as Le Pen said the Holocaust was a footnote in the history of WWII.

  460. @Ron Unz

    I am sorry I had not seen that comment of yours that made the same points I made. I agree with you wholeheartedly.

    It would never cross my mind either to watch eight videos somebody on a commentary board on the internet recommended to me, of which several were documentaries, and seemingly of very low quality even by “documentary” standards to boot.

    And your point about debates is a really good one also.

    One can learn very much from a debate that is properly moderated even if one is only superficially knowledgable of the subject matter at hand – unless the subject matter is very technical – just by noticing which side leaves relevant arguments strongly supported by facts – facts which that side does not dispute in the debate – unanswered and which side almost always has relevant contra arguments supported by facts for any pro or contra arguments the other side has.

    The best course I have ever taken at university was a two month full time course on formal argumentative analysis, a course given by the philosopical faculty. I found the subject matter in the course easy to absorb and were one of very few students to get highest marks on the examination at the end of the course, and I find what I learned there very useful even almost a decade later, even if it takes a few hours to do a complete formal analysis of an opinion article.

    But that’s usually not necessary, i have learned though experience that with high analytical ability and a superficial knowledge of the matter at hand one can pretty fast come up with the most central and solid contra arguments against the central thesis being presented in a debate and just check for if the one that is propsing the thesis has responded to any of these contra arguments with his own contra-contra arguments.
    If not, there’s a big chance the thesis does not hold up under formal scrutiny, especially if the one arguing for the thesis takes time to respond to weaker (Ie supported by fewer or less solidly established facts and/or that are less relevant) arguments against his thesis, and even more especially if his interlocutor has never raised those arguments but instead raised the far more solid contra arguments.

    Thanks for your reply.
    You are as always a sensible and truth-seeking man, a type too rare these days.

  461. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Of course newcomer Tannim is completely correct, and yet you mock him? Wtf is wrong with you? The Jews got no special dibs on ‘muh ancestors’. The way the entire larger Jewish community-proper, always close ranks around those in their midst (the holocaust industry) that claim that the Jews do in fact possess dibs over all others, with regards to ‘muh ancestors’ shtick, makes them indirectly culpable for the subversion so-visited upon the western gestalt. Mulga = fence-sitter extraordinaire. For crissakes Mulga – pick one already …. is the larger Jewish community-proper culpable for allowing the fashioning of this stupid ‘muh ancestors’ shtick into a dominance cudgel, to beat everybody else over the head with? Or, by way of your latest insinuation in your comment here, is it always going to be people who are outside of the larger Jewish community-proper, (i.e. – non-Jews) that are in the wrong, when discussing holocaust-industry enforced tropes (like ‘fascist’ = ‘Nazi’)?

    Logic demands you choose the 1st stance. If you don’t go that way …… I don’t think your judgement should be judged worthy on anything, then (i.e. – because of glaring failure to see through, by way of logic, something so simple).

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  462. @Wizard of Oz

    Rupert Butler, Legions of Death, gives the story of Rudolf Hoess being beaten by the British until he began pouring out confessions.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
  463. @Wild Man

    My position is pretty plain. I believe it follows commonsense and simple morality. The murder of one person is a crime. The murder of a million or several is a very great crime, an abomination and a tragedy. That applies to Jews, Roma, Sinti, Soviet citizens etc EQUALLY.
    The exploitation of such a tragedy, that befell Jews, by the Zionazis to exert moral blackmail over the rest of the world is abominable. The turning of this one aspect of Nazi crimes, albeit a huge portion of their atrocities, into a sort of compulsory pseudo-religion in the West, while ALL other genocides, massacres, ethnic cleansings etc, are more or less, and often completely, ignored, is a travesty, but a clear example of that Jewish power in the West that deranged Judeofascists simply deny, which is like refuting the existence of the Sun or Moon.
    Through that money power and the emotional blackmail of the ‘Holocaust’ cult, Jewish elites have accrued vast, indeed dominating, power in the West, while Israel has become a cancer on the world. As a State that is, because, although at least 50% of Israeli society appear to be either religious fundamental xenophobes and nutters, or their secular Zionazi equivalent, there are still good and decent Israelis. Whether their deranged fellows see them as ‘good Jews’ is another question. But, all in all, Israel and the Diaspora nutcases seem, to me, to be bringing about just that concatenation of circumstances that has caused outbursts of reactive hatred over and over again in history. That would not just be a tragedy for Jews, but, with their power and nukes, for everybody on Earth. The only way to avoid it is to neutralise Jewish elite power in the West. One could start by banning political contributions ie bribery, and breaking up the MSM oligopolies.Good luck with that.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Wild Man
  464. @Random Anonymous

    The medical-industrial Mafias, BigPharma, its captured ‘regulatory agencies’ and the ‘liberal’ MSM and Silicon Valley totalitarians, have lied about everything from the beginning. Here in Austfailia, thanks to the total, 100%, Mob Think of the local presstitute vermin, we are still DEMANDING booster shots, even as the evidence from the world is universally that they are near totally ineffective, certainly against omnicon, but also residual delta.
    Yet the medical Mafiosi still appear and spew the MOST outrageous lies. ‘The third shot will give you long-lasting immunity, but you’ll need an annual shot’.’ Children are not safe unless injected’ (a big and Evil lie that must be punished one day).’Natural immunity after infection is inferior to vaccine immunity, and wanes after a few months’.
    And that is but a brief selection, as I cannot stomach much of the whorenalists’ lies anymore. To see the considered opinions of world leading experts regarding the gene therapy injections, dismissed by Guardian feminazis or any other of the various infestations of MSM Thought Police, with NO discernible medical or any other intellectual credentials WHATSOEVER as ‘misinformation’ or even ‘disinformation’ is rage-inducing. If there is not a great Calling To Account among the presstitutes after this fiasco we are surely lost.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  465. nosods says:

    “Fauci then made tremendous efforts to speed it through clinical trials as an appropriate treatment for healthy, HIV-positive individuals, with FDA approval finally coming in 1987,”

    It has been suggested that AIDS is God’s punishment for homosexuality. Strange how Gay, Inc. should not be all over Fauci’s case if he is really to blame for killing so many alleged victims; if it was really the experimental drugs that did them in & not the lack of them. It was the homos who pushed Fauci & NIH to speed up the approval process for the AIDS drugs. 300 of them met in ’87 to form ACT UP (AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power) & in ’88 they staged a protest at FDA headquarters demanding access to experimental drugs & the followed up with a nationwide media tour demanding a shortened drug approval process. So if it wasn’t God’s will, then maybe the homos brought it on themselves; & maybe they helped bring it on the rest of us with the new repeat missteps in the latest vaxx fiasco. The homosexuality pandemic is a bigger threat to society than any other.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  466. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I disagree with all the communist liberal left wing books written that JFK was not killed by a pro Castro activist communist and that a security guard Cesear murdered RFK. Both Kennedy’s were anti White activists. Like the entire democrat party. the propaganda created hero John Kennedy wrote and signed in to law 2 extremely anti White executive orders about 7 weeks, march 6 1961 after he was inaugurated.

    EO 10925 affirmative action for negroes in federal contracting and employment. The very first use of the term affirmative action or NO WHITES NEED APPLY. And the same day, EO 11114 which established the presidential commission on equal employment opportunity. And later John Kennedy amended EO 1114 to create the dreaded EEOC. That’s the federal agency, Gestapo, KGB Lenin and Trotsky’s CHEKA. Witch Finder General federal agency that scrutinizes every employer in America to ensure no one hires Whites, especially White men for any job.

    61 years later, any White American man who still worships President john Kennedy is a brain washed fool. If you’re a White man who has noticed only about 15 percent of medical school students are White American men, if you’re a White man who has noticed every construction worker is a hispanic indian, if you’re a White man who has ever noticed that most of your local government employees are not White and still worship the anti White President John Kennedy you are an ignorant moron. Kennedy was as anti White as Hildabeast Clinton and Obama. And while President Kennedy, like Eisenhower sent federal troops to herd White children into public schools where they were abused beaten and tortured by black savages for 13 years.

    Robert Kennedy was President Kennedy’s emissary to communist trained plagiarist wife and women beater charlatan Martin Luther King from about 1958 on. Although southern blacks often couldn’t vote. But the big northern midwestern city blacks were solid democrat. So it really wasn’t necessary. Just the top elite one of the richest families in America showing their disdain for Whites.

    And Robert Kennedy’s entire campaign in California was sucking up to blacks and Hispanics and marching with Cesear Chavez the catholic church created Hispanic activist.

    The Kennedy’s were as anti White as their hero MLK .

    Google claims 40,000 books about the President Kennedy murder. After 59 years the only viable suspect for the actual Killing is still Lee Harvey Oswald. Al the books about George Bush 1 and Lyndon Johnson and the KKK American Nazis pro segregation activists, anti school bussing parents and activists city dwellers who wanted black crime controlled so they could remain in the cities, the FBI DOJ DOD ATF CIA State Department government of Israel AIPAC ADL AJC oil industry, steel industry, National Association of Manufacturers American Chamber of Commerce Federated Department Stores, any body and every body but the lifelong communist pro Castro activist Lee Harvey Oswald.

    This entire thread is full of LBJ did it. George Bush 1 did it. Mossad did it. President and government of Israel did it. Federal Reserve BOD did it.

    But none of the comments and none of the Who Killed Kennedy books made a connection between the persons and entities that wanted President Kennedy dead and the actual real living human being who pulled the trigger that fired the bullets that killed President Kennedy.

    A thouisand or more viable entities and people who had viable motives to kill Kennedy. But 59 years and thousands of books later no one but Dallas Police one hour after the shooting came up with a suspect. By suspect I don’t mean anyone and everyone and every entity in the world that wanted Kennedy gone. I mean a real actual living human being shooter.

  467. @Alden

    If you simply want an example of an author who names a suspect as a plausible shooter, this author

    https://web.archive.org/web/20080110031700/http://www.jfkmontreal.com/corsicans.htm

    names Lucien Sarti as his preferred suspect. I think it’s hard to sure of a specific shooter in cases where one suspects an undercover assassination. But it’s not as if no one has ever tried naming suspects.

    • Replies: @Alden
  468. Interesting, but I wonder if you are not attributing faults to JFK and RFK which depend on hindsight over many decades. They were both young enough to learn and adjust. I concede you one a priori point, namely that their Irish Catholic heritage added to expensive education and upper class connections would have made them likely candidates for identifying the same people as “deplorables” as Hilary Clinton.

  469. @mulga mumblebrain

    I can understand your concern that a lot of advice to government by medical people has been suboptimal, perhaps flawed, though I tend to doubt your attribution of malign motives. Where I really doubt what you say is when you attribute no value to vaccination. Personal experience of acquaintance plus figures for degree of seriousness of the disease in vaxxed and unvaxxed combine to convince me that vaccines have benefits effects. I suppose that still leaves scope for a dystopian novel about the 2080s world in which a great population replacement has taken place because of differences in vaccination rates with the mRNA vaccines 60 years before.

  470. @mulga mumblebrain

    Maybe the path to sanity is to adopt one of my solutions to the Palestinian problem.

    1. in a one state solution you add a powerful second chamber to the Knesset for which one could only vote if you were an established net taxpayer for say 15 years. That would work for 100 years at least.

    2.A permanent solution would have a vast amount of money committed to establishing Palestinian versions of Hong Kong. My favourite, very much open-to-talent city state would be in Northern Israel bothering on Syria and Jordan with a road and rail link to the Mediterranean along the Lebanese border.

    Do you see problems -apart from the fact that the combined probability of these solutions being tried is 0.1 per cent?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  471. @Ron Unz

    I have now seen the whole Hoover Institute (I.e. Stanford U) YouTube “5 Questions to Stephen Kotkin and been impressed by him, including his modest disclaimers. and that led me to tracking down that biographer of Stalin’s discussions directly or indirectly reflecting on the Suvarov hypothesis which I put at its highest I think by saying that it was Hitler’s knowledge of Stalin’s accelerated preparations for war in August 1941 or thereabouts which precipitated Barbarossa. I think they are worth listening to and don’t give much or any support to that thesis although it is obviously more important to get the evidence on Hitler.

    Just one interesting Kotkin contribution. Stalin’s notorious unwillingness to accept the warnings from the Soviet Union’s outstanding network of spies was fostered by German disinformation fed into that network and Stalin’s certainty that it would be. Apparently he finally got the message which could have saved much of his Air Force and redeployed front line units of the Red Army just at the time that Barbarossa got under way, so it was too late.

    FWIW Barbarossa was expected by Hitler to solve his two front problem by an easy victory in a campaign begun a month earlier, as well as being consistent with his Lebensraum dreams, and all this was underpinned by gross ignorance and underestimation of Soviet strength and resilience AND his hubris resulting from success in the West in 1940.

    PS Kotkin says wrt Putin that he is not like Stalin, Hitler or Mao (not really news) and that, unlike Hitler he is not seeking war. Hitler, he said, was angry that the Munich Agreement deprived him of his war (though it gave him the big prize of the Skoda works). He speculates that Putin may resort to causing Kyiv to be evacuated by poisoning air and water but denying it was Russia

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  472. @Alden

    My reply is #479 (at present ) anyway.

  473. JackOH says:
    @nosods

    nosods, true dat. See my C#39.

    Our rotten medical establishment will cherry-pick democracy’s “squeaking wheel” medical pressure groups, adopt those groups’ issues and goals as their own in complete bad faith, and piggyback their own stealthy money-and-power goals atop the pressure groups’.

    Ohio’s medical establishment pushed hard to promote an anti-smoking ballot initiative after a lazy and inept legislator introduced a ballot initiative to create a statewide universal health authority. That ballot initiative never got sufficient valid signatures. The anti-smoking initiative was supported by a massive media campaign that would have smothered whatever feeble budget the health authority proponents could have mustered.

  474. Alden says:
    @Patrick McNally

    Is that the Corsican mafia professional killer? I read the silly theory that Sarti was the real living actual human being who held a gun pulled the trigger and shit and killed Kennedy. Unfortunately the author of historical fiction who accused Sarti and the Corsican mafia killed Kennedy didn’t provide enough evidence for a detective to pursue Sarai. Let alone get a warrant to arrest Sarti search his home or car. And especially arrange a meeting with a prosecutor.

    Just another fictional story designed to convince ignorant idiots that their hero President Kennedy wasn’t killed by a pro Castro activist communist.

    John Kennedy’s EOs 10925 and 1114 and Robert’s slobbering over MLK and Chavez. Add the fatso adulterer one what’s his name Teddy absolutely applauding the destruction of White neighborhoods and suburbs in and around Boston by school bussing of black savages.

    The Kennedy brothers were as anti White as Obama Clinton and Biden.

    Affirmative action affected American White men and made them hated despised unemployable untouchables. Your father, you, your sons and grandsons will be forever affected. Just like the untouchables of India.

    The White MEN OF UNZ who worship the Kennedys are complete idiots. Especially the ones whose lives have been negatively affected by affirmative action.

  475. @Wild Man

    Agreed, but I do think Mel Gibson handled the pogrom against him very well:

    One night in LA:
    Mel: Jews run Hollywood.

    After Jewish screaming and threats:
    Mel: Of course Jews don’t run Hollywood.

    • LOL: Wild Man
  476. @Alden

    My eyes are sore so I turned to YouTube at siesta time and came across what turned out to be one very sane sounding careful investigator of facts giving at great length (I went to sleep twice and had to replay) an account of evidence he had turned up about a call by Oswald from the jail to what he may have thought was his CIA contact and which was blocked by two plain clothes operatives.. The other contributor is obviously knowledgeable but not as credible in style or manner.

    Dr Grover Proctor is the star of

    Watch “Lee Harvey Oswald’s Final Phone Call Before His Assassination” on YouTube

    Then there is a shorter one I haven’t watched

    I’m now on the side of conspiracy though I’m far from ear who was guilty.

    I do venture the heretical thought that it is interesting that the major biographers of both Churchill and LBJ are Jewish. Justly esteemed no doubt but perhaps less likely than others to think the unthinkable about their faults, errors and crimes.

  477. Alden says:
    @Alden

    And don’t forget the third Kennedy brother, Ted Kennedy who was a major force in the senate in pushing through the 1965 unlimited immigration for non Whites act. And everyone of those non White immigrants entitled to affirmative action.

    And of course Ted Kennedy participated in the big push for school bussing in Boston and metro area. This destroying many safe pleasant White neighborhoods.

    The 3 Kennedy brothers accomplishments.

    Affirmative action unlimited non White immigration MLK worship and school bussing. That’s what the Kennedys wanted and that’s what they imposed on the rest of the White population.

    And the brainwashed retards of UNZ worship the Kennedys. Or maybe the MEN OF UNZ are really highly paid black and Hispanic immigrant women in their government offices posting on UNZ

  478. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    “But, all in all, Israel and the Diaspora nutcases seem, to me, to be bringing about just that concatenation of circumstances that has caused outbursts of reactive hatred over and over again in history. That would not just be a tragedy for Jews, but, with their power and nukes, for everybody on Earth. The only way to avoid it is to neutralise Jewish elite power in the West. One could start by banning political contributions ie bribery, and breaking up the MSM oligopolies.”

    One could also start (i.e. – start to neutralize corrupting Jewish elite power in the west) by calling out the language-use tyranny, that I have been describing, over many comments in this thread. It is not wrong to do so, … because in fact, it is right to do so:

    Jewish person Bret Weinstein seems to understand my position on this issue just fine. Yet, it seems, perhaps, Mr. Unz doesn’t (as such his contention that it was right and proper for Kennedy to apologize when these coerced apologies are a very big part of this language-use tyranny problem).

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  479. Amanda says:

    Another truth-teller on HIV/AIDS:

    Saputo interviewed David Rasnick, PhD on HIV and AIDS

  480. @Wild Man

    As Confucius observed, the great task was ‘ to rectify the language’ ie make words mean what they are meant to represent. My least appreciated example of language perversion is, of course, ‘democracy’, which means dividing society into increasingly mutually hateful factions, while ALL real power is held by the rich owners of the economy.

    • Agree: Jonathan Mason
    • Replies: @Wild Man
  481. @Wizard of Oz

    Kotkin is just the sort of low-level disinformer that a fool like you would lap up. The possibility of Putin poisoning Kiev (do try and spell it properly, you honorary Banderite)is zero. The ‘denying it’ bit is sub-moronic, even for you.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  482. @Wizard of Oz

    There is ONE solution. The Right of Return for the ethnically cleansed Palestinians. If a Jew with no link to Palestine for the last 70,000 years or so, can claim the Right of Return, then a Palestinian who was expelled, or family was expelled, through murder, massacre, rape and terror a mere seventy years ago, MUST have that right, too. Any Jews who don’t like it can feck off back to Brooklyn, Golders Green or Rose Bay/Dover Heights, and occasionally visit any sane friends or relatives who choose to stay.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  483. @Alden

    You write:

    The White MEN OF UNZ who worship the Kennedys are complete idiots. Especially the ones whose lives have been negatively affected by affirmative action.

    I notice that you’ve posted over 22,000 comments on UR over the years, and from what I’ve seen you write so far, you appear to be a troller without equal.
    Fortunately, I’ve been spared from having to cross paths with you and read your nonsense to date.
    It is clear from your foolish remarks, that you’re an imbecile of the first order.

    Certainly, no one agrees with anyone else on absolutely everything, and undoubtedly one could cherry pick and focus on some fringe issues related to the tenure of JFK and brother Bobby.

    But, on the issues that mattered most, JFK achieved more in his 34 months in office than was achieved in the entirety of the post WWII period.
    Take, for example, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Bay of Pigs incident, the order to withdraw U.S troops and advisers from Vietnam that would have resulted in there being no Vietnam War, the de-escalation of tensions with the Soviet Union, JFK’s desire to splinter the CIA into a 1000 pieces and scatter it to the wind (something he may well have implemented had he lived and served a full second term).
    The way JFK presided over all of these events is to be much admired.

    Most importantly, the courage of JFK to not only stand up to the Zio cabal, but to implement measures that would have destabilised it and led to its ultimate dissolution as an entity that could wield immense power, is something that we’ll all be eternally grateful for.

    In the case of the Cuban Missile crisis for example, more than a few commentators have remarked that, had any other President been in charge at the time, there would have been a nuclear exchange with the Soviet Union which had the potential to escalate to a nuclear winter and destruction of much of life on Earth.
    JFK’s tremendous resolve and courage, in the face of unrelenting pressure from the Joint Chiefs of staff and all manner of advisers, to hold his ground and rule against an attack on Cuba, is something that decent people the world over, are thankful for.

    Your other remarks, in keeping with your Zio allegiance by attempting to divert focus away from the actual perpetrators of JFK’s demise, are straight from the Zio playbook.
    Anyone who’s done even the most basic research on the event is aware that JFK’s assassination was a Mossad orchestrated operation, in conjunction with the accountable-to-the-Zio-Cabal CIA.
    (It’s no coincidence that statues were built in Israel to honour the pivotal role played by the CIA’s James Angleton in facilitating the hit on JFK).

    Your feeble attempts to denigrate JFK and make him out to be the enemy of white males is abundantly transparent and will only convince your Talmudic brethren.

    So Alden, take off your yarmulke and pretend, for just a moment, that you’re part of civilised society.
    Feast your eyes on this video of the most loved, most honest (and BY FAR, the least beholden to a malevolent entity), U.S President in living memory:

    For those pressed for time, at least watch the minute and a half from 6:20 to the end – you’ll be glad you did and you’ll know why JFK touched everyone he met.

    He was truly, a man of the people.

  484. @mulga mumblebrain

    What have you read of Kotkin’s work? Who do you say he “disinforms” for and what is the evidence and reasoning behind your answer?

    Do you really claim the standing to be able to pronounce a sneering derogatory verdict on one described as follows?

    He is currently the John P. Birkelund ’52 Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University, where he is also co-director of the program in history and the practice of diplomacy and the director of the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies. He is also a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  485. @mulga mumblebrain

    And that has better than a 0.1% chance of being agreed to? Or are you counting on Iran using nuclear weapons? Or?

  486. @Truth Vigilante

    That was a very enjoyable video. No matter what anyone ultimately thinks of JFK, he sure had style. Add a proper and glamorous wife, they were a peerless personification of a nation that represented youth and hope for a Western world at that time hitting stride for an unprecedented standard of living for the common folk after the ravages of WW2 which had ended less than two decades before.

    Now you will have to wait for Alden, in her calcified brain to point out Lee Harvey Oswald on a trial run peering out from one of the windows in Wexford , and of course a back shot of Jack Ruby, also in training showing up with the tray of salmon sandwiches.

    Cheers-

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  487. Wild Man says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I prescribe to Karl Denninger’s operational definition of democracy:

    https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245135

  488. @Truth Vigilante

    Oh come on, JFK was responsible for most of the crises at the time. He sent the US advisors into Vietnam:

    In May 1961, JFK authorized sending an additional 500 Special Forces troops and military advisors to assist the pro Western government of South Vietnam. By the end of 1962, there were approximately 11,000 military advisors in South Vietnam; that year, 53 military personnel had been killed. The president would soon send additional military advisors to support the South Vietnamese Army. By the end of 1963, the numbers had risen to 16,000.

    https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/education/teachers/curricular-resources/high-school-curricular-resources/military-advisors-in-vietnam-1963

    Bay of Pigs failed invasion of Cuba:

    President Eisenhower authorized the operation and it was subsequently approved by President Kennedy.

    https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/education/teachers/curricular-resources/high-school-curricular-resources/bay-of-pigs-lessons-learned

    Well, OK US nuclear weapons were placed in Turkey in 1959, before his election, so he withdrew them while bargaining over the Cuban missile crisis, so I guess that would be a plus in my books.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  489. @Commentator Mike

    And don’t forget that JFK was the godfather of the Irish mob, inheriting that position from his father, the kingpin of a criminal family, something that is whitewashed in the history books. So the bootlegging and smuggling money sent him to better schools and colleges.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  490. @Commentator Mike

    Surely the chronology is all wrong. Jo Kennedy was still patriarch when JFK was elected. And he probably protected his sons from the old bootlegging criminality which can’t have outlasted Prohibition.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  491. @Ron Unz

    As a result of a journalist family member who got to know RFK Jr slightly after his cousin John died telling me that he was the only sibling who thought his father was shot by Thane Eugene Cesar I went in search of the family opinion.

    Apparently 6 out of 8 didn’t go along with RFK Jr’s theory that there were more shots and another shooter.

    The big surprise is that Wikipedia on the assassination doesn’t even mention Thane Eugene Cesar despite discussing conspiracy theories. When I found the article on the conspiracy theories about the assassination it does appear that RFK Jr is the proponent of the Cesar version based on the supposed proof of 13 or 14 shots having been fired. Apparently Cesar denied firing his gen at all and passed a polygraph test but also lied about the date when he sold his .22 pistol that he denied having with him that evening. There still seems to be open (just) that Cesar shot RFK in the back of the head, probably/possibly accidentally, but the theory that there were CIA men there seems to be blown out of the water.

    A couple of other observations. Kennedy was well behind Humphrey in the polls when murdered and the fact that California changed the probabilities is hardly likely to have led to killing immediately. Also, isn’t it odd if no one else fired a gun while or immediately after Sirhan Sirhan fired his 8 shots? What were the 3 guards that Wikipedia does mention up to?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  492. @Wizard of Oz

    Reliably stupid and keen to swallow the Kool Aid as ever. A ‘Good German’, as they say. Want to know why the Liberals always win in Austfailia? Look no further than this fatuous Dunning-Krugerite.

  493. @Wizard of Oz

    I can sneer at Kotkin PRECISELY because he has those credentials. They might impress a buffoon like you, but for me they spell high level Imperial propaganda apparatchik. Having seen two or three videos of him speaking, my opinion is confirmed. You haven’t got the nous, or the inclination, being a born groveler to power, to understand.

  494. anastasia says:

    To avoid any “over” heated rhetoric , like Kennedy speaking about the thousands of murders committed by Fauci, may I just say about the below that in so brazenly publishing their next level of depravity, they unavoidable take the rest of society with them.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-02-10/meet-drag-queen-biden-just-put-charge-nuclear-waste

  495. Nancy says:
    @The Ghost Of Emanuel Swedenborg Revived

    99+% of print and MSM media is propaganda. Mr. Dutton’s article here reflects generally on how high IQ folks have a unique view of the world…and we all have a hard time seeing it ‘through others’ eyes’. But we are ALL in this world together, and seeking mutual understanding maybe our highest calling.

    I prize videos recommended by trusted sources, as like many, I don’t have the time and attention span (or IQ!) to plow through the complexity and minutae that more intelligent folks eat up like candy …. and I prize the (few) Unz’s of this world who make the ‘tomes’ comprehensible for folks like me; I’m forever indebted to all that he has taught me on his wonderful website.

  496. haha says:
    @utu

    “the anti-vaxxers with the help of Chinese and Russian bots and trolls…”

    Exactly. Most problems, including all this anti-vaccine stuff can be attributed to the vile Rooshians or them Chinese. You should regularly check under your bed at least twice a day: who knows some vile commie may have crept under ready to do you damage while you sleep. Also consider monthly Covid jabs and regular use of AZT – just to be safe, you know.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
  497. haha says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Indeed, you raise a very valid question. However, it does NOT exclude the strong possibility that Robert Kennedy was murdered by other actors, for reasons of “national security”, by a covert team of agents. The evidence as to the number of shots fired and the evidence of close range gun shots at the back of his head are both very “hard” facts (if true and really established). Sirhan carrying a gun may be proof of a mentally disturbed man being set up as a patsy.

    In both the Kennedy murders, hard pathological, ballistic, and forensic evidence was handled in such a covert and suspicious manner as to raise strong doubts that will linger on for ever. But that perhaps suits them (whoever they may be) just as well.

  498. haha says:
    @Ron Unz

    Why for God’s sake are you wasting your time trying to reason with the mulishly stubborn, the wilfully stupid, and trolls? It is spoiling the blog for the rest of your readership.

    • Replies: @Anne Lid
  499. Wild Man says:
    @haha

    Yes…. utu really showing his true colors there, with that idiot drivel. Just another water-carrier for the globalist fascism. Why would anyone listen to utu on anything, if he is so easily duped – eh?

    On the other hand, here, utu is insinuating (further into comment #19) that Mr. Unz is pro-globalist-fascism, but pretending not to be, in order to corral those that are anti-globalist-fascism, into some kind of corner (to then be picked off one by one?):

    “But then the covid struck and the anti-vaxxers with the help of Chinese and Russian bots and trolls and platforms like TUR became a political force that the establishment had to reckon with. Poor RFK, Jr. now he finds himself being pushed by the events to the cen