The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Paul Archive
Will Biden Start Nuclear War with China Over Taiwan?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

President Biden’s “townhall” meeting this past week was a disaster. From his bizarre poses to the incoherent answers, it seemed to confirm America’s worst fears about a president we are told was elected by the most voters ever. Though he didn’t bother campaigning, we are to believe he somehow motivated the most voters in history to pull the lever in his favor. Or mail in a ballot in his favor. Or something.

After the townhall, the Wall Street Journal was early among mainstream media publications to observe that the emperor has no clothes. In an editorial titled “The Confusing Mr. Biden,” the paper wrote, “Even with a friendly audience and softball questions, Mr. Biden’s performance revealed why so many Americans are losing confidence in his Presidency.”

The Journal focused on one of the most shocking and disturbing revelations from the carefully crafted event: asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper if the United States would come to the defense of Taiwan should it come under attack by the Chinese mainland, he replied, “Yes, we have a commitment to do that.”

Anderson threw him another softball in hopes he might correct this dangerous misstatement, but Biden was not nimble enough to see his gaffe. He doubled down.

It was left to the “Chemical Ali” of this Administration, White House Spokesman Jen Psaki, to “clarify” that when the President signaled a major shift in US policy – a shift that could well lead to nuclear war with China – he was just kidding. Or something.

Said Psaki the next day: “Well, there has been no shift. The President was not announcing any change in our policy nor has he made a decision to change our policy. There is no change in our policy.”

In other words: “Pay no attention to the man who pretends to be the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

But this is not George W. Bush, who was elected in 2000 with zero experience in foreign policy. This is not Trump, who was so hapless that he campaigned on a policy of peace while hiring John Bolton to carry out that policy.

No, Biden has twice been Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Foreign policy has always been considered his one area of competence. Surely the Biden of even the Obama Administration would have understood the potentially catastrophic implications of his statement.

Strategic ambiguity has been US policy toward Taiwan/China for decades, but the new Biden China policy could be re-named “strategic incoherence.”

The policy of “strategic ambiguity” is foolish enough – who cares who rules Taiwan? – but advancing the idea that the United States is willing to launch a nuclear war with China over who governs Taiwan is a whole other level of America-last foolishness.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Miley was heralded as a hero for betraying his Commander in Chief Trump by seeking to restrict Trump’s access to the US nuclear arsenal. Milley claimed that Trump was so unsound of mind that he could not be trusted with the nuclear football.

Yet when actual unsoundness is there for everyone to see, Milley and the other “woke” generals are silent as the grave. These are dangerous times.

Hide 21 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Voltarde says:

    Dear Dr. Paul,

    You have far more intelligence and honesty than Biden, Trump, and the entire U.S. Congress put together. OK, maybe that’s not saying all that much, but still, America (and the rest of the world) needs you!

    Please run for president in 2024! If people call you a geezer, well, compared to who, exactly?

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @showmethereal
  2. No. Biden is being kept on a very tight leash by his owners. Just like pets that are unreliable should be. And that’s a good thing.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  3. JeffZ says:

    I think it a mistake to think Miley isn’t or doesn’t already have the control he was looking for. These Presidencies are possibly a PsyOps to push people into calling for the release of civilian control of the military……

  4. Notsofast says:

    biden has always been an empty suit devoid of intellect but in the old days he could at least remember his lines. now that his cognitive decay has advanced to it’s present level, he is so lost and helpless that it’s becoming impossible to disguise it from even the most obtuse prole. no matter how ugly it gets the msm will run cover for his obvious decline, let’s go brandon!

  5. JimDandy says:

    Yeah, but they can’t always keep a leash on his mouth, and his controllers don’t control Chinese decisions about pre-emptive attacks.

  6. Molip says:

    Imagine the US reaction if China were to sail warships around Hawaii (now) in support of it’s hypothetical (future) bid for succession.

  7. SafeNow says:

    It is not just Biden acting alone that poses the risk. Far from it. The mental state of his civilian and military leaders is conducive to an escalation that results in a nuclear ash pile. Specifically: 1. Incompetence creating miscalculation; 2. systems error; and 3. an obsession with dissension and contentiousness as exemplified by Blinken’s default mode at Anchorage.

    A script: First, a warning shot over the bow, or a bumper-boats ramming or shouldering. Then small-arms fire in retaliation. Then sinking a small ship. The reply sinks a similar ship. The US is then the first to use a tactical nuke to sink a ship. The Chinese reply using a tactical nuke to vaporize a carrier, 5000 lives lost. The US then goes strategic, striking a small city. The Chinese reply is proportional, a small US city. And so on.

    You prevent this by creating some expensive, entirely peripheral, no-fighting deployments. Australia. The polar regions.

  8. Nah, he won’t, he barely knows what’s going on.. But the goons who are obviously behind him, would.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  9. Notsofast says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    ever since entering this bizarro universe in 2016, i initially saw what was happening, as a battle of the deep state, fighting for control of the levers of power. after the devolution of the situation through 2019 and 2020 I came to see it all as a cruel joke, completely orchestrated by our masters as a bizarre kubuki theater version of reality, scripting all the insane and inane narratives of the grand ruling elite. with all that said, i still believe these to be the most likely scenarios and if it is a battle of the deep dark states the recent revelation of dr fasci torturing puppies, may be the turning point, as you can kill millions of humans and use them as guinea pigs as well, but if you torture puppies you are a nazi bastard and need to be tried for your crimes. add to this alec baldwin killing his director of cinematography after firing all the union help on his low budget movie (no more snl trump mocking). don’t be surprised to see generalissimo trump ride in on a white horse to set things straight. no war, back to the deal of the century, (although we’d probably be better off with nuclear conflagration).

  10. When US takes out Shanghai, hopefully China will take out NY.

  11. @Notsofast

    Exactly. Your point about the left and its news media being totally for the hero worship of Fauci becomes different when his abuse of animals used for so called medical experiments is suggested. Then the far left and many on the left become hyper-sensitized. Animals are far more important to them than human beings they disagree with..

  12. Milley admitted that he contacted the Chinese twice to assure them he would warn them of a US attack. Yet he is still Chairman of JCS. He is still in uniform. Nobody, but nobody, is doing anything about his plain confession of sedition. What say you, Dr. Paul?

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
  13. I oppose voting rights. We need to disenfranchise gays, straights, men, women, blacks, whites, etc. You can be sure that I oppose convenience voting.

    Abolish ALL forms of absentee voting, starting with that ridiculous, new institution of unsolicited, mail-in ballots. If you want to vote (I wish that I could stop you or else hit you with a $275 poll tax), you have to show up at your designated polling station on Election Day. None of this “early voting”, voting from a US embassy, etc. baloney.

    Biden’s legitimate, popular vote count was probably around seventeen and a half, i.e. < the number of write-ins for Lassie.

    • Replies: @Jokem
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  14. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    Foreign policy has always been considered his one area of competence

    He was a bottom of the barrel student who went straight into politics. He’s never held an actual real life job but has been a hustler and con man in politics. He has no practical real world experience. This is what passes for a foreign policy authority in the US, a dumb clown. It might be funny were it not so potentially dangerous. Him getting that prosecutor fired in Ukraine was an example of his expertise, one might suppose. That he was chairman twice tells you something about the level of people we’ve got as our policy makers.

  15. @gutta percha

    Milley admitted that he contacted the Chinese twice to assure them he would warn them of a US attack.

    Assuming that’s true, what’s wrong with that? What’s wrong with someone warning a potential victim of an attack by an international serial killer, i.e. the jew-controlled U.S. “government”?

    • Replies: @gutta percha
  16. @Harold Smith

    “what’s wrong with that?”

    A) I live in the USA.
    B) If USA sneak-attacks China, without China warned, we might not lose, and I might live.
    C) If USA sneak-attacks China, with Milley warning them first, we’ll probably be immolated, and I’ll probably die. I don’t want to die for your flavor of anti-semitic justice; no matter whether your jew-hatred is right or wrong, I personally don’t want to get nuked to satisfy it.

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
  17. Jokem says:

    …And those people who are too disabled to travel to the polls can just forget about their representation in government?

  18. @Voltarde

    He should have won before – but that is the folly of electoral politics.

  19. @gutta percha

    LOL! So you’re jewish? That would explain your absurd comments.

  20. @Notsofast

    I prefer bunraku, Japanese puppet theatre, as a metaphor to describe US politics.The dummies, politicians etc, are manipulated by puppeteers wearing black, who we are meant to pretend aren’t there. But the Master Puppeteers, the Adelsons, Sabans, Murdochs etc, are dressed in their finery, proudly, blatantly, apparent, and woe betide any prole in the audience who dares to make a fuss about it.

  21. @Abolish_public_education

    If voting changed anything, they’d ban it, as Oscar Twain observed. Voting only divides societies into hostile camps, while the rich owners of society vote with their Benjies, buying politicians by the gross, numerically and descriptively.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS