RSS
Last week Europe saw one of its worst crises in decades. Tens of thousands of migrants entered the European Union via Hungary, demanding passage to their hoped-for final destination, Germany.
While the media focuses on the human tragedy of so many people uprooted and traveling in dangerous circumstances, there is very little attention given to the events that led them to leave their countries. Certainly we all feel for the displaced people, especially the children, but let’s not forget that this is a man-made crisis and it is a government-made crisis.
The reason so many are fleeing places like Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq is that US and European interventionist foreign policy has left these countries destabilized with no hopes of economic recovery. This mass migration from the Middle East and beyond is a direct result of the neocon foreign policy of regime change, invasion, and pushing “democracy” at the barrel of a gun.
Even when they successfully change the regime, as in Iraq, what is left behind is an almost uninhabitable country. It reminds me of the saying attributed to a US major in the Vietnam War, discussing the bombing of Ben Tre: “It became necessary to destroy the town in order to save it.”
The Europeans share a good deal of blame as well. France and the UK were enthusiastic supporters of the attack on Libya and they were early backers of the “Assad must go” policy. Assad may not be a nice guy, but the forces that have been unleashed to overthrow him seem to be much worse and far more dangerous. No wonder people are so desperate to leave Syria.
Most of us have seen the heartbreaking photo of the young Syrian boy lying drowned on a Turkish beach. While the interventionists are exploiting this tragedy to call for direct US attacks on the Syrian government, in fact the little boy was from a Kurdish family fleeing ISIS in Kobane. And as we know there was no ISIS in either Iraq or Syria before the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.
As often happens when there is blowback from bad foreign policy, the same people who created the problem think they have a right to tell us how to fix it – while never admitting their fault in the first place.
Thus we see the disgraced General David Petraeus in the news last week offering his solution to the problem in Syria: make an alliance with al-Qaeda against ISIS! Petraeus was head of the CIA when the US launched its covert regime-change policy in Syria, and he was in charge of the “surge” in Iraq that contributed to the creation of al-Qaeda and ISIS in Iraq and Syria. The idea that the US can salvage its disastrous Syria policy by making an alliance with al-Qaeda is horrific. Does anyone think the refugee problem in Syria will not be worse if either al-Qaeda or ISIS takes over the country?
Here is the real solution to the refugee problem: stop meddling in the affairs of other countries. Embrace the prosperity that comes with a peaceful foreign policy, not the poverty that goes with running an empire. End the Empire!
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
If it serves Jewish/Zionist interests, Jews will make every inch of the ‘Muslim World’ uninhabitable.
And if it leads to a massive refugee crisis that undermines Europe, Jews don’t care.
They just giggle with hideous glee at the fall of the the white race.
Bundesnachrichtendienst or BND (German CIA) has been up to its armpits in assisting the USA and UK overthrowing Assad. The result of this focus on a single man whose crimes are dwarfed by the crimes of those arrayed against him, has been 250,000 Syrians dead, 4 x that many wounded & disabled, and millions of refugees displaced internally and externally. Those Syrians with higher educations and skill level are generally those wealthy enough to get out and migrate to Europe. Meanwhile, Germany’s Merkel has been prioritizing welcoming Syrians above other refugees on ‘humanitarian’ grounds but in actuality Germany is capitalizing on having essentially destroyed Syria, taking the cream of Syria’s educated, bolstering Germany’s demographic where the skilled population had been retiring faster than it can be replaced and keep growing the German economy; while leaving a devastated nation drained of its best talent.
Meanwhile the western democracies has covertly supported al-Qaida in the effort to overthrow Assad, leading to the rise of Islamic State. Criminal is the proper description of this policy. The western democracies are criminal states, of which our own USA is the leading troublemaker.
But I would remind Dr Paul it’s not only neo-conservatives, it is neo-liberals as well:
http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/09/06/fall-message/
^ And little of what happens in our world according to media can be taken at face value, whether reporting from left or right.
THIS ALIEN INVASION IS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE AND CAN BE STOPPED EASILY USING THE NAVY.
Thanks for the interesting article, Sir. Surely, war is one reason these aliens are invading Europe. But the second and real reason is they are being let in, on purpose, by Jewish controlled EU politicians, using the war as a pretext.
The Jewish controlled media such as the Jew York Times has been calling these invaders ‘migrants’ and ‘refugees’, and demanding they be let in, proving that the Judaists are behind the alien invasion and sent people there in Africa to spread the word to invade Europe.
Eg. Jewish hatemonger alienist Barbara Lerner Spectre promotes more invasion by blacks into Sweden (videos on youtube).
European nations must use their navies to patrol their coastal waters and prevent these alien ships and boats from entering. European naval forces can blockade these ships, and order them to return. It is legal to seize the ship and destroy it under the doctrine of instruments of crime (it is called arrest of property) and aliens ID’d transported back on other ships.
If somebody invaded your house, you have a LEGAL AND MORAL right to shoot the invader. European nations similarly have a right to fire on these ships and torpedo them, as this is an act of war and the military has a right to repel the invasion, under the same doctrine. The reason they are not doing that is because the politicians are being bribed or threatened by the Judaists that the fake illegal EU Kangaroo courts (which they have stuffed with their own Jewish friend) will try them for ‘crimes against humanity’ or some other scam for attacking the invaders, though these countries have a legal right to do so.
People need to protest in all these countries, demand a total ban on immigration, deportation of aliens, binding superseding national referenda, get out of the criminal Jewish controlled EU and use their armies to repel these invasions.
I don’t know if RP ever reads the comments here, but he should know I’m reading his 2008 Manifesto and am learning some useful things (and also some things I don’t quite understand and need to learn more about, e.g. the role of the Fed in generating economic crises and fomenting inequality). It’s also morbidly amusing to read about the obsession with stopping Iran’s nuclear program and how nothing seems to have developed on that front in almost a decade; I myself have barely given Iran or Israel any thought for months, though Syria has been higher in my consciousness because of this refugee crisis impacting Europe.
One thing that concerns me is the thorny problem of how to dismantle the welfare-warfare state and restore the open-minded, peaceful and freedom-loving republic of the Founders’ vision. Does it matter in which order we deconstruct the edifice? E.g. in the Founders’ republic, there were no immigration restrictions, though naturalization was another matter. Still, anybody who had the means could come to this country and attempt to make a living for himself and his family. At the same time, there was no welfare state: it was up to the individual, native or immigrant, to make his own way.
Ideally, we would be able to open our borders to anyone who had the means and desire to come here and make his own living, and indeed many libertarians are pushing to open the borders even before the welfare state and its associated entitlements have been abolished. But it seems to me that this would cause even more social harm than if we cracked down on immigration first, while postponing the problem of entitlements to a later date. In particular, as long as it’s possible in our political system to keep voting yourself other people’s money, there seems to be little good that can come of allowing poor people from all over to come here and raise poor children who will be entitled to citizenship and to vote themselves ever more of the wealth belonging to our remaining productive citizens.
For these reasons, I am still intending to vote for Trump. Despite his less than liberal vision of America, he understands current and future demographic realities and then if we are to save anything at all of our republic, we need to secure our demographic destiny first. Only then will we be in a position to correct the other mistakes we have made.
End the Empire! Amen brother. China and Russia are working on taking away the FED’s money machine. When that is done the Empire will be no more. Hallelujah! Play for time (the empire is dying) and pray for peace.
According to Ron Paul the “real” problem is the foreign policies which lead to the creation of refugees. But what about the refugees themselves, Ron, they’re not a “real” problem, so Europe – and every other white country on earth – should just welcome being overrun by them? I don’t want to put words in his mouth, but Ron Paul throughout his long career has been such a disgraceful failure on immigration policy that it would surprise me in the least that he’d think that.
Hahahaha… Hahahahahahaha
So funny
They wouldn’t be refugees if we didn’t make them. It’s not like there is a refugee-farm out there where refugees grow on refugee-trees and from time to time the refugee-season floods the market with more refugees than usual.
Clearly we screwed things up beyond recognition by bombing the living bejeepers out of their country and now we’re all like “ah-yuk where did all dem refugees come from?”
I guess when you liberate people (from their homes and personal possessions through bombing campaigns no less) you have to expect something like this.
Maybe next time you can be a good patriot and punch your elected politicians in the face every time they start talking about how “we” (royal we, of course) need to get more involved in the Middle East.
No one likes refugees, stop creating them.
Don’t ever forget that. Remember that the next time you advocate Palestinian, Arab, Islamic aggression and oppression of the Jews. Remember that the next time you demonize Jews.
“hideous glee”? Any references for that or is that your own Jew-hatred speaking? Here’s some search terms for you: psychology projection. Ye protesteth too much.
Before you advocate oppression of the Jews, remember the part above about “every inch” and “uninhabitable”. That’s the only thing you oppressors will ever understand – Israeli nukes. Don’t ever forget it.
What’s that got to do with anything? Failure? Let’s have some references please. Show me where he’s been worse than anyone else.
Got some references for that? Or is that just irrational Jew-hatred speaking? Remember, Israel has nukes. We won’t go down next time, you will. Let that be a warning to you anti-Jewish aggressors and oppressors. Don’t bring it on. The Jews are right and you’re wrong. That’s absolute fact. Remember, the Jews have NUKES! You don’t listen to reason. Nukes are the only language you’ll understand.
There’s no requirement that he be any worse than anyone else in order to qualify as a failure. The statements he has issued about immigration are every bit as egregious as the worst of the nonsense emitted by congressmen. I’m inclined to treat Ron Paul even more harshly, however, since there is evidence that he has a decent handle on questions of basic racial reality that other politicians apparently lack – in other words, he knows his immigration stance is sowing ruin, but he persists regardless.
Anyway, I don’t expect you to care. Judging your other comments, your abiding concern is evidently Israel’s welfare, not America’s.