The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Paul Archive
Save the Apologies, Just Stop Promoting War!
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Usually when politicians apologize it’s because they have been caught doing something wrong, or they are about to be caught. Such was likely the case with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who recently offered an “apology” for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Blair faces the release of a potentially damning report on his government’s conduct in the run-up to the 2003 US/UK invasion of Iraq.

Similarly, a batch of emails released from the private server of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton show Blair pledging support for US military action against Iraq a full year before the decision to attack had supposedly been made. While Prime Minister Blair was assuring his constituents that he was dedicated to diplomacy in the Iraq crisis, he was communicating through back channels that he was ready for war whenever Bush decided on it.

A careful observer of public opinion, Blair took the surprising step of “apologizing” for the Iraq war during an interview on CNN last month.

However, there are two other characteristics of politicians’ apologies: they rarely take personal blame for a misdeed and rarely do they atone for those misdeeds.

Thus Tony Blair did not apologize for his role in pushing the disastrous Iraq war. He did not apologize for having, as former head UN Iraq inspector Hans Blix claimed, “misrepresented intelligence on weapons of mass destruction to gain approval for the Iraq War.”

No, Tony Blair “apologized” for “the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong,” on Iraq. He apologized for “mistakes in planning” for post-Saddam Iraq. He boldly refused to apologize for removing Saddam from power.

In other words, he apologized that the intelligence manipulated by his cronies to look like Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and posed a threat to the UK turned out to not be the case. For Blair, it was someone else’s fault.

But if we are waiting for any kind of apology from George W. Bush for Iraq we shouldn’t hold our breath. Likewise if we are looking for any kind of apology from President Obama for a similarly disastrous war on false pretext against Libya we shouldn’t bother waiting.

If they ever did apologize, we can be sure that like Blair they would never really confess to their own manipulations nor would they seek to atone for the destruction their manipulations caused.

In fact, far from apologizing for leading the United States into the Libya war based on a false pretext, President Obama is taking US ground troops into Syria on a false pretext. Let’s not forget, this US military action was sold as a limited operation to save a small religious minority stranded on a hilltop in northern Iraq. After one year and thousands of bombing runs against Iraq and Syria, Obama announced last week he is sending US ground troops into Syria after promising no fewer than seven times that he would not do so.

Here’s an idea: instead of apologies and non-apologies from politicians, how about an actual debate on the policies that led to such disasters? Why not discuss why the US keeps being drawn into wars on false pretexts? But that is a discussion we will not have, because both parties are in favor of these wars. They are ready to spend us into Third World status to continue their empire. When we get there, we will never hear their apologies.

(Republished from The Ron Paul Institute by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Iraq War, Tony Blair 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Blair’s “apology” is in fact what is commonly known as sniveling. The very notion of apologies from mass murders is absurd.

  2. As usual, Ron Paul is right. We will never hear any apologies from the culprits that have brought America low. And there will never, ever be any discussion or debate on the reasons for the policies that suck America into all the wars. The GOP debates are a farce.

  3. But if we are waiting for any kind of apology from George W. Bush for Iraq we shouldn’t hold our breath.

    Forget about that; how about we let ICC take him when he leaves the country?

    Regardless of whether Hussein had WMD or not, it was not a war for legitimate US interests.

    The dummies that still claim the war was about stealing petrol need to be incarcerated too.

  4. Rehmat says:

    War criminal Tony Blair made tens of millions of dollars from the ones who wanted to destroy Iraq being threat to Israel. Now, he got a new job – protecting European Jewry from antisemitism.

    Tony Blair has assumed the chairmanship of the ‘European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation’ – the brainchild of Russian millionaire Jew, Moshe Kantor, president of European Jewish Congress and the of World Holocaust Forum.

    In 2012, Tony Blair along with George Bush was declared a War Criminal by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal (KLWCT) in Malaysia.

  5. Macilrae says:

    Tony Blair “apologized” for “the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong,” on Iraq.

    Yes, this well known excuse of Blair’s is typical of our western political class in general. It is analogous to a homeowner conceiving the idea that his neighbor has a house full of firearms and is awaiting a chance to attack him and his family. In order to counter this imagined threat, the fellow carries out a home invasion of his own: kills the neighbor and several of his family – but finds no arms whatever.

    When the police come he assures them that he had every good reason to believe he was about to be attacked and is incredulous when he gets charged with murder.

    When a politician orders a drastic action and that action is later seen to have been necessary, he gets all due credit. If however his action is found to have been in error, with terrible consequences, he must inevitably fall.

    When the findings of the Chilcot enquiry get finally published (next Summer they now say) it would be uplifting to see Blair finally having to account for his crimes. But I doubt he will – just like that other fella …

  6. I would have been interesting to see Ron Paul as president. Someone to trust.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS