The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRaches' Political Proems
America Is a Nation of Hate
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Hate against the Nations of the Free World

According to Time.com, the following photo was published in Life magazine, May 22, 1944.  The caption visible in the image reads, “Arizona war worker writes her Navy boyfriend a thank-you note for the Jap skull he sent her” (click to enlarge).

How must divine retribution repay the Americans?  Perhaps with pyramids of American skulls piled to the heavens, for such a sight as would sate the primaeval bloodlusts of Hulagu, Tamerlane, or even Americans.  Should the Americans be heard to complain?

According to Time.com, that photo was “taken by Ralph Crane (later a staff photographer for LIFE)”, and was featured as “Life’s” (!) “Picture of the Week” (!!) with this accompanying text:

When he said good bye two years ago to Natalie Nickerson, 20, a war worker of Phoenix, Ariz., a big, handsome Navy lieutenant promised her a Jap.  Last week Natalie received a human skull, autographed by her lieutenant and 13 friends, and inscribed:  “This is a good Jap—a dead one picked up on the New Guinea beach.”  Natalie, surprised at the gift, named it Tojo.  The armed forces disapprove strongly of this sort of thing.

The Life editorial staff tried thereby a disclaimer, and made only a worse admission.  If armed forces “disapprove strongly” of their soldiers’ activities, that is why they have something called discipline—including courts martial.  On disciplinary grounds alone, to say nothing of how the too-merciful Führer condemned such savagery as undeutsch, any hypothetical German soldier who sent enemy skulls home as psycho serial-killer trophies would have learned the meaning of “Nazi” discipline.  Whereas the Americans pseudo-judicially murdered top-ranking German and Japanese military commanders for real or imaginary failures to keep discipline amongst their low-level soldiers.  What did American General Douglas MacArthur, who in 1944 was the Americans’ Supreme Commander in the Southwest Pacific Area, deserve for this highly publicized skull-collecting—according to the standards which were imposed under MacArthur’s authority on Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita?[1]See Chapter 8 of F.J.P. Veale’s Advance to Barbarism (Devin-Adair, New York, 1968), and the United States Supreme Court dissents of Mr. Justice Murphy, In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1, 26 (1946), and of Mr. Justice Rutledge, id. at 41.

War is Peace.  Freedom is Slavery.  Death is LIFE.  By American standards, what should I call a “good American”?


America is a nation of hate.  Its culture and its genetics are irreparably, incorrigibly suffused with the hatreds and jealousies of degenerate, low-class religious fanatics, who fled in patricidal hatred from the order and culture of Europe.  Their fratricidal scions then murdered, defiled, and enslaved their better brothers to the South—primarily Americans who journeyed to the New World for better reasons, the Americans who were essentially European in outlook—the brothers who were growing up to be too much like Daddy.  With hate thus a hegemony in America, the Americans then invaded Europe twice, destroyed the European fatherland, and commenced the long-term mass-homicidal spree which has made America the most despised nation on Earth.

Now, let us see the images of a nation of peace, love, and friendship between nations and races.

Here is some Nazi propaganda, in which a Jap—by American standards, not a “good Jap”—teaches her blonde Nazi German Nazi friend how to use those artful little sticks that perennially bemuse and befuddle Westerners:

Framegrab by Raches, from the scene starting around 01:04:44 in Die Tochter des Samurai (Japanese release title: “新しき土”, ‘The New Earth’), a joint production of J.O. Studio (Germany) and Towa Shoji G.K. (Japan), 1937.  Left:  “Mitsuko Yamato”, played by Setsuko Hara (原 節子).  Right:  “Gerda Storm”, played by Ruth Eweler.

According to the IMDB,[2]Beware that at the time of this writing, the IMDB page for this movie states a grossly misleading plot synopsis. this blonde was not so lucky as Death-magazine skull-fetishist Miss “Natalie”:  Fräulein Eweler died October 1, 1947[3]By coincidence or by destiny, 74 years ago today, as I complete and publish this article.  In memoriam—for all Germans who died in the War and its aftermath. at the age of 31, in “at this time notoriously underserved Berlin”, for reasons “not known”.  With a shudder, I do not wish to speculate on the prospects for a beautiful blonde film star in Berlin in 1945–47.  Well, she was a Nazi German Nazi with a brother in the SS; she must have deserved it.  She was evil—so evil that she played a starring rôle in a respectful, affectionate positive portrayal of foreign culture to Europeans.  Instead, she should have turned her movie-friend into a “good Jap”, and collected her skull like Miss Natalie Nickerson.  The racist, fascist Fräulein Eweler was a Nazi, totally against the American way of “LIFE”!

As I have said before, Adolf Hitler was the leader of the free world.  And National-Socialist Germany, the free and independent Germany, was also the great builder of a nondestructive harmony amongst races and nations:  Interracial friendship without deracination, international peace without international Bolshevism, the respectful building of cross-cultural bridges without the countercultural mass-destruction of so-called “multiculturalism”.

Thus, no matter what race I myself may be, no matter whence I hail, I dearly wish that I had been born into a world in which Germany and her friends had won the War—instead of the US-USSR Alliance of Hate.

Ultra-Nazi propaganda presented side-by-side in four languages, bearing the distinctive signature of Reichsminister Dr. Goebbels himself, in which the evil Dr. Goebbels proclaimed that the 1936 Berlin Olympics were “a real Festivity of Peace”, “in world history [] an event full of happiness and peace”, “a new epoch of true peace in all those fields of activity which join nations together.”  (This is just a teaser; I may someday return to this subject in these pages.)

Of course, the Americans, those Great Masters of the Big Lie, will accuse the Germans of having done what the Americans actually did:  Preach “peace” as a falsehood, while rampaging through the world with murderous bloodlust and grand-scale massacres.  America, the Nation of Hate, is also the nation of hypocrisy, chutzpah, and the trick of accusing one’s own victims of the crimes that one commits against them.

Thus the Germans, who foremost dared to love themselves, love their race, and love their traditions, are accused of “hate” by those who preach love while practicing hatred:  Americans, for whom hate is practically a national religion.  And the Germans are frequently accused of having contracted a military alliance of mere convenience—by those who cannot imagine taking an interest in other peoples’ cultures without a two-faced, underhanded, do-gooding meddler’s cultural imperialism.

The Germans’ sincere overtures of friendship to other civilized peoples were reciprocated.  East and West joined in cultural harmony…

Source:  A now-disappeared image in a forum thread.  See below.  My objective hereby is not so much to teach, other than to taunt ignorant Americans:  I seek to learn.

…as they joined politically and military in an Anti-Comintern Pact.  “Comintern” was the Bolsheviks’ own abbreviation for Communist International.  As what were then the most powerful of the free nations, Germany and Japan united militarily in common defense of their own freedoms.

And the Axis of freedom went much farther than that.  Amidst China’s multi-way civil war, both Germany and Japan reached out in friendship to the Chinese leader who had been most successful in fighting off British influence—a free and independent Chinese leader, whom the Maoist and American “history” books insult as a “puppet”.

Far from being a “puppet”, Wang Jingwei was, at the time, the only credible Chinese leader who both (1) was under neither Soviet nor American influence, and (2) governed any significant amount of Chinese territory.

Wang Jingwei (汪精衛; 1883–1944), Republic of China, receives German diplomats in 1941.  Via Wikimedia Commons.

Germany, Japan, and Wang’s China also allied with the great Indian Nationalist leader, whom Indians still revere to this day—he whom, despite deep philosophic differences, Mahatma Ghandi called “the Prince of (Indian) Patriotism”:  Subhas Chandra Bose.  The plan was for the Japanese to train and to arm an Indian National Army in Singapore, so that Bose could invade his own country from the outside, overthrow British rule, and join free India with free China and free Japan in a pan-Asian power bloc.  With this Eastern bulwark aligned with Aryan Europe under German leadership, the free world would have been saved from the tyranny of Soviet-American globalist-internationalist conquest.

L-R: Hideki Tojo (Japan), Wang Jingwei (China), Subhas Chandra Bose (India).  1943.  Via Wikimedia Commons, allegedly from an interesting Indian Nationalist-looking blog that seems to have disappeared.

It was a beautiful world that could and should have been.  That world was destroyed by the Jews’ Janissaries:  The Americans, who can no more pass off the guilt of their own crimes on the Jews they made their masters, than a goy hitman can pass off all blame to his Jewish boss who ordered a murder.

The Future of the Free World

The free world led by Germany is lost.  Corruption and tyranny now rule the world.  We are now in a New Dark Age.

For my part, I do not hate any race except for Jews, Americans, and rhymes with triggers.  I wish to extended my hand in peace and friendship to the decent peoples of this world, in the hope that a new free world may be built in the future.

In no particular order of precedence (and without hereby opining on the tragic tensions between some of these peoples), I respectfully invite to Proems Japanese, Chinese, Hindu traditionalists who have watched their culture destroyed by American-led Western liberal influence even after “Independence”, Arabs who respect Europeans’ right to their homelands as much as I respect Iraq and Palestine, Iranians, Afghans, and of course, Europeans who wish to restore European blood, honor, and territorial sovereignty—Russians who will understand that my War-born wrath is directed primarily at the Soviet government, which was imposed on Russia by Americans and dominated by Jews—and dissident individual Americans who agree with that greatest of American patriots, Professor Revilo P. Oliver:

The German writer correctly describes the aggression against the Southern states as “one of the most dreadful wars in the history of the world,” and he is almost always right about the recent past, when the Americans, mentally rotted with the deadly virus of Christian righteousness, permitted themselves to be made the judges and policemen of the world for their Yiddish masters…

Such was our folly. Our guilt is undeniable.  It cannot be palliated.  We made the Yids our masters, and it was our power that consummated the Suicide of the West.  And it is only natural that Europeans now take satisfaction in the decay and coming dissolution of the contrivers of their ruin.

[Liberty Bell, February 1992, p. 7.]

In this article, I have shamelessly copied Japanese and Chinese names I cannot read—not from pretentiousness, but in the hope of attracting search hits.

I have only a fragmentary knowledge of some important perspectives on this history, which are hidden from me by very difficult language barriers.  It would be my pleasure to discuss these subjects with those who have native knowledge, obscure information, and different perspectives.  And I have somewhere[4]On a misplaced backup disk, unfortunately not accessible at present.  I will search for this. scans of relevant historical texts, seemingly rare, which I downloaded from long-disappeared websites, which I have no realistic hope of even minimally understanding anytime soon; if or when I can find those, I should like to share them with people of the nations whence they came, and ask their opinions.

And culturally and politically, I seek to bring together the good and aristocratic peoples, and urge unity against the American monstrosity of hate, greed, and megalomania that has all but destroyed the whole world.

I come in wrath.  Welcome in peace to my Proems. ®


This article took on a life of its own, after it grew out of a tangent in a forthcoming future article about how the hate-filled Americans waged feminist-democratic Christian jihad against the national goddess of Imperial Japan’s masculine warrior-culture.  Now, consider that to be the second part hereof.


Notes

[1] See Chapter 8 of F.J.P. Veale’s Advance to Barbarism (Devin-Adair, New York, 1968), and the United States Supreme Court dissents of Mr. Justice Murphy, In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1, 26 (1946), and of Mr. Justice Rutledge, id. at 41.

[2] Beware that at the time of this writing, the IMDB page for this movie states a grossly misleading plot synopsis.

[3] By coincidence or by destiny, 74 years ago today, as I complete and publish this article.  In memoriam—for all Germans who died in the War and its aftermath.

[4] On a misplaced backup disk, unfortunately not accessible at present.  I will search for this.

 
Hide 470 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. songbird says:

    As far as I am concerned, one of the greatest tragedies of world history is the fact that Germany did not put all its resources into severing the UK’s connection to India, during WWI.

  2. I doubt the mods allow this. You couldn’t be more correct in your honest assessment(full on takedown out for the 10 count complete knockout) of lil andy anglin but my comments are, i guess, not worthy.
    But I’ll try because, honestly, i think i like you. For the longest i thought you were a hyper-masculine female but, hey, i was wrong.
    I really am being sincere and i don’t mean to be rude but…

    [MORE]

    By American standards, what should I call a “good American”?

    Well, in challenging conventional thinking, klhoe Kardashian would say they’d be dressed in denim. For sure denim.
    Some people think skinny jeans. I don’t unite under textiles myself so i don’t know.
    Kardashian said. “I feel like being a good American is being badass and independent and confident.”
    The reviews i read said those jeans delivered everything promised.
    Raches, sir, i, too, shudder to think that (prolly) no fewer than half of my fellow Americans(not fucking 🇺🇸(fuck yeh) citizens) are actually more stupid than i am.
    Sheez…it really gives me pause. Keeps me up at night sometimes. 😲 it’s true tho. Pretty scary stuff.
    Good thing Mr Unz stays busy with his fine columns and software or his life would be no better than a tweakers what with that HiQ of his. Best to ignore it and go thru the drive thru at burger king.
    My guess is i wouldn’t be here today trolling you(tho i not really but call it what you will) had you been making the call with that total and complete expeditious power you so crave in re eugenics.
    No doubt you would have made the cold and necessary decision to eugenicide the likes of my grandfather who didn’t take tributes from ww2.
    Enlisting in Feb 42 in the Navy brought many adventures with those fine folks from the land of ye o rising sun.
    I guess by the end of 43 he’d been kamikaze once and torpedo another and in hindsight the prolly better than a thousand men he’d seen mutilated and burned alive prolly was tooooo much for his uneducated mind to understand the art of war.
    I know guys like you do.
    Can you believe i forced myself to read clausewitz on war? Geez. Ya see…I’m not smart. But this guy clausewitz turned war into a philosophy so i thought hey this guy did all thinking for me.
    I didn’t get much from it. War is how you solve your politics, right? Isn’t that it? Oh, and logistics is an over ripe goddamn nightmare.
    Good thing we have KBR. If it shoots call browning and root huh. I bet they understand the art of war.
    Those Germans sure were some serious thinkers tho. That Wittgenstein guy really blew my mind. Tried and tried. Listened to every podcast i could find. Found a “philosopher” and he told be to skip to the end, which i did, and i sure did see the wisdom…”Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”
    Now that’s philosophy i can understand.
    So…when i was 11 or 12 my grandfather had me read aloud mein kampf to him. My brother doctored all his logbooks so he could stay on the road like ya know 90-100 hours a week…as long as he could drive ya know.
    He never really bothered to become much more than a beginner at his 3R’s since he had to drop out of school when he was 9 years old and drive a log truck for his father’s sawmill. He actually died just a couple weeks shy of his 59th bday delivering a load of petrol in Waverly Tennessee in 1983 so he nearly made it 50 years in the work world. I think he made up for it because seriously the only month the man ever worked less than 29 days was Feb and every 4 years he got one of those too dude. The man worked for his and he served his country and he was functionally illiterate and what say you mr smart guy about just how fucked up his life truly was.
    And tens of millions of more just like him. If he was cruel in war i can kinda understand how a man might go bugfucked crazy and want to get simple with flesh and bone. Like a butcherer.
    Never saw cruelty or hate in the man in my life. Hell damn near every man i knew growing up got fucked into some grievance, political by extension ya know.
    The ol man may not have matriculated with the master’s of the multiverse but if he could’ve invented a goddamn thermonuclear fucking bomb he wouldn’t have done it.
    Anecdotal?
    He didnt understand why and he believed voting was the most important thing a person could do. Damn near makes me cry to think about that guy. He did his best just like so many gen-xers(and those older of course)grandfather’s did and relatively none were especially cruel and what the fuck pour it own the enemy.
    Just like Sherman did to us. Just like Josh Chamberlain did. Pour it the fuck on them and let the morally courageous figure shit out.
    It’s an art. So a few ears got cut off. What? Ya ain’t never been caught up in the moment before?
    I got caught up in a moment one time on a wild pig hunt so let me tell ya it can happen. Trust me…if an otherwise (mostly) legally responsible guy with shit to lose can go straight goddamn savage on a pig hunt, well, shit prolly gets even dicier when you’re the pig.
    Yeh i agree with you about Hitler.
    Can’t say myself that i have any real hate. Yeh some shit i don’t like with the goddamn 🇺🇸(fuck yeh) gov’t being number one on the enemies list but no…not hate. Not cruel. Not one pair of skinny jeans.
    Hitler made some mistakes.
    And if you really want to play the game that the wermacht didn’t commit atrocities on innocent civilians as well as combatants…okey dokey. 👌
    Who was worse?
    Damn sure wasn’t the ones like ol TC Shook that had to put the philosophers art to the test and keep their supplies delivered.
    The gov’t never really took care of any of those men.
    Oh well…it’s disappointing you say that about the American fighting man. It’s true of course. Of course it is.
    Theirs no such thing as a good 🇺🇸(fuck yeh) anymore. Just U.S. citizens.
    It’s all over anyway. We’re all just standing round the last dieing embers of a campfire.
    Shouldn’t be long now.
    So a guy can hope.

    • Replies: @Raches
  3. JimDandy says:

    I found myself pondering once more the crises of our times. My mentality, uncontrollable and wanton as always, whispered to me a scheme so magnificent and daring that I shrank from the very thought of what I was hearing. “Stop!” I cried imploringly to my godlike mind. “This is madness.” But still I listened to the counsel of my brain. It was offering me the opportunity to Save the World Through Degeneracy.

    Our first step will be to elect one of their number to some very high office — the presidency, if Fortuna spins us kindly. Then they will infiltrate the military. As soldiers, they will all be so continually busy in fraternizing with one another, tailoring their uniforms to fit like sausage skins, inventing new and varied battle dress, giving cocktail parties, etc., that they will never have time for battle. The one whom we finally make Chief of Staff will want only to attend to his fashionable wardrobe, a wardrobe which, alternately, will permit him to be either Chief of Staff or debutante, as the desire strikes him. In seeing the success of their unified fellows here, perverts around the world will also band together to capture the military in their respective countries. In those reactionary countries in which the deviates seem to be having some trouble in gaining control, we will send aid to them as rebels to help them in toppling their governments. When we have at last overthrown all existing governments, the world will enjoy not war but global orgies conducted with the utmost protocol and the most truly international spirit, for these people do transcend simple national differences. Their minds are on one goal; they are truly united; they think as one.

    • Replies: @Raches
  4. Vinnie O says:

    You can’t understand either WW1 or WW2 without knowing that the East Coast Anglophiles HATED Germans (ALL Germans, including American citizens) as a people, in a thoroughly racist kinda way. And so when Hitler offered the USA the hand of friendship, FDR was building The Atom Bomb, whose ONLY purpose was to destroy BERLIN. Whilst in parallel, FDR was PROVOKING a Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Why Pearl Harbor of all places?? Because FDR thought that a war with Japan MIGHT lead to a war with GERMANY…
    But I have taken enough of my medicinal alcohol to get drowsy, so it’s probably time to go back to bed (Your daily priorities change once you retire.).

  5. Max Payne says:

    I’m going to regret this….

    This is a country founded by immigrants. People who’ll beg, steal, and borrow to get ahead. It’s the life blood of the place, people forget that.
    -GTA IV

    Everyone here complains about multiculturalism, about immigration, about black people. About the Jew. Why? Because it’s forcing people to get tougher. To work harder. To be ever vigilant. To be mindful. And thus everyone here hates the object that reminds them of what they never had. True strength, the type that doesn’t compare itself to others but to better itself from what it once was. The last white man who had this strength died many generations ago.

    I am trying to understand the 1930s German thinking of dumping Jews in Palestine (with high quality German weapons, minted currency, and a pretty insulting British declaration from WW1) to fulfill some illiterate dream of ‘Germany for Germans’ (or “the free world” as you call it). Results matter and the end result of that plan is… well… let’s just say America is demonstrating REAL authoritarianism towards Germany (aka Refugee Camp Zero-One). The type in which someone hits you, looks at you and waits for you to say “I injured myself”.

    I wish to extended my hand in peace and friendship to the decent peoples of this world, in the hope that a new free world may be built in the future.

    As long as you still think Palestinians are “worse than niggers” you’ll be fine.

    America is not a nation. It’s a forum. There is no such thing as an American. Those that think they can lock up large portions of the world population away from this forum tend to get a rude awakening time and time again. After all kinetic warfare is the weakest aspect of the United States.

    • Thanks: jim bob beers
  6. @Vinnie O

    “the East Coast Anglophiles HATED Germans”

    So did Hitler. Back to the NYC-DC Anglophiles: You might have a point. Although two very notable and powerful Anglophiles sure did cozy up to the Nazis (after Hitler was submarined to Patagonia): Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles. Many of the OSS-CIA Anglophiles formed networks populated with Paperclip Nazis and Die Spinne operatives. The Spider was the postwar organization founded by the Nazi James Bond: Otto Skorzeny, one of the most interesting Cold War characters.

    • Agree: jim bob beers
    • Troll: Raches
  7. Well, perhaps i was impertinent for not reading the entire proem.
    I did finish it.
    I got hung-up on the wrong trope i suppose.
    That middle part tossed me since i aim for the practical side of life.
    I do agree with what you…allege? Is true.
    Safe to say the UR is synonymous with “THE Joos” did it.
    I don’t disagree with what most people seem to thoroughly substantiate as being true about those pesky joos. I’m sure it’s worse.
    I just missed the boat entirely on the jQuery. My direct exposure to them joos has been very limited to just a few that were basically just normal young people as i knew them anyway and a just starting out young very ptetty no doubt highly intelligent oral surgeon that i went begging for help from.
    I was a full on anti hymie by the time i knew thosefew joos i did but that never came up. They were good friends with people i was good friends with. They were intelligent nice people. Why would i dislike my friends friends? That’s not practical.

    [MORE]

    I was only a burgeoning joo hater when i was struck without mercy by a nasty prob that involved surgery inside my mouth.
    When i found that out i grabbed the nearest yellow pages(25 years ago) and started looking for a joo preferably a joo woman to do the cutting.
    Their she was. I know a fucking joo biz when i see one–they’re efficient and tidy. I called her up. She says come right here. 2 days later she took a fucking knife and fixed me. I didn’t even have the species. Like a 10k deal and she took 2500 and it took me like over a year to pay her off.
    So fuck it. Joos are ok by me. I get the big game. Tears for fears sang it loud, everybody wants to rule the world. Sowing the seeds of love was a better song imo.
    Why not have a winner at the end of history? Methinks the chinee are gonna pee pee in their bed but i don’t count out them joos. Scraggly sneaky little fuckers.
    Gotta tip my cap to them. They just wanted it more and was willing to upcharge you like a “high” dollar prostitute does in the process. Not bad for some religious fanatics. I give religious fanatics much less respect than you my liege because i had to suffer so many of those wretched hollow-men in my youngish life.
    Mostly, it seems to me that most joos are mostly fine people and it’s mostly a smallish nebbish crypto elite that conspire with their counterparts across the aisle and we alllllll fall down.
    But sure. Fuck the joos too.
    I figure in twenty years the only White folk remaining in north America will have by then sued for membership into some indigenous tribe and taken up the ghost dance as a primary source of entertainment.
    All will be folly.
    It’s been known for sometime that some are more robust about the strong doing as they can while the weak suffer as they must.
    I hear rhymes with triggers freed their minds first.
    Maybe the good 🇺🇸(fuck yeh) still remaining can try that?
    So…i meant to say i agreed with you. I just got miffed about the truths you said because i get fucking sentimental about something that was never even true.
    And it looks like I’m the only one gonna say it but you gotta admit those joos come up with some real zingers.
    That whole we’ll forgive you for killing our children but we will never forgive you for making us kill your children bit was some gold shit huh.
    I bet the joo that came up with that did it straight off the cuff. Rolled right off that slimywormtongue like saying shalom.
    That’s good shit. Thumbs ☝.
    Sure beats the hell outta saying, “nuts”.
    I’ll leave you be, sir.
    I’m sure from now on I’ll just agree with you. It’ll be easier i think.
    Careful with the wrath. Blood pressure ya know.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  8. “Here is some Nazi propaganda, in which a Jap—by American standards, not a “good Jap”—teaches her blonde Nazi German Nazi friend how to use those artful little sticks that perennially bemuse and befuddle Westerners:”

    I get it, Ron: you mastered chopsticks with little effort, as did I. Congrats, jewboi.

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  9. Nice propaganda piece…trying to anger people to elicit a response.

    Australian people know of the barbarous behaviour of the Japanese soldier, and many Asians also suffered under their “kindness” as the men we pressed into slave service and their women into “comfort” women.

    But what suprised me was how easy it was for Japan to roll over China?

  10. Daemon says:

    I support your overall stance, but the idea of Wang JingWei being a credible chinese leader is such a laughable fantasy it has to be pointed out. True, he was neither in the American or the Soviet camp. That’s because he was in the Japanese camp, he led a collaborationist government, filled with people in the regions that the Japanese had taken over that didn’t want to risk their lives expelling them.
    From the perspective of 1945 – The hate of the Americans and the Soviets may or may not kill you, that is merely an uncertainty. The Japanese, given the chance will definitely kill you. That is the difference.

    • Disagree: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  11. AKAHorace says:

    Raches,

    when I read your posts I understand that Ron Unz is fully committed to free speech. God help him.

    • Agree: Raches, Mustapha Mond
    • LOL: Fr. John, Iris, Catdog
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Raches
  12. Raches says: • Website
    @Tony massey

    You may have noticed my sympathy for Southerners.  Take all the horrors of being conquered by hate-filled do-gooders, and having forced on you the so-called “Reconstruction”, Second “Reconstruction”, Third “Reconstruction”, and more “Reconstruction”—exponentiate that—and you see what Southerners also participated in, and still do, by and large, with the conquest of someone else’s country, and with what is sometimes called the “German Reconstruction”.  (Do a little search.)

    The upshot is that Germany and her friends lost the War; and this:

    …was and is being forcibly turned into this:


    (See note.¹)

    That is in a country that didn’t have the institution of negro slavery—a country that was almost pure Aryan, excepting the Jewish elements.

    I emphasize, is.  This is ongoing.  It is not a mere historical event.  This is the here and now.  It is a current-events issue.

    Germany still has an American army on its soil.  The Americans have reserved in law and treaty an open possibility that they could start shooting again at any time; see e.g. the “Enemy State Clause” in U.N. Charter Articles 53 and 107.  American propaganda since 1945 has been (and from the beginning, was very explicitly) to the effect that the Americans will force Germans to change.²  Pretenses of “friendship” are for the duplicitous or the incurably gullible—rather like American conquered and occupied Iraq to “liberate” the Iraqi people, but with even more hatred.

    What do you suppose would happen if the Germans were to try taking back their own country again?

    For my part, I react as I would if seeing hooligans smash and defile a piece of fine art—and for my self-interest, I desiderate what the world could and should have been, if Germany and her friends had prevailed. ®

    ——————————

    Editorial note:  I fished your first comment out of the spam filter.  Thanks for your politeness with the cut.  I added a “more” tag in the other one, just because I want to keep up standards, and discourage trash-talk (except, in some degree, from the types who should show themselves as the trash they are).  You seem generally decent, so I think you’ll understand.

    ——————————
    1. Despite hours searching a few years ago, I was unable to find the original source for that graphic.  Does anyone have an original link?  Looks like BRD official stuff.  I have seen well-sourced examples of propaganda that is similar, albeit somewhat less striking visually; and although it’s shocking, it’s not surprising, given what the “German” government’s well-known policies and what is indubitably happening.  Still, I want proper sourcing; and I am using, instead of another image, partly for that reason.  Thanks, Internet.

    2. I am outraged by that, and moreover when Americans who should know better blame Germans for the result of multiple generations of American-enforced American brainwashing—blame completely addled individual Germans for how they behave after the so-called “German Reconstruction”.  I have seen that in many alt-right types of places; it is not only Mr. Anglin.  “Brainwashing” is an excuse that I allow only to those who have had it imposed on them by force; otherwise, it is weak-mindedness.  Whereas the Germans have effectually had brainwashing imposed on them at American gunpoint ince 1945.

    • Agree: Fr. John
  13. Raches says: • Website
    @JimDandy

    Save the World Through Degeneracy.

    Is this what you mean?  America is dissolving itself from the inside out with its hate-cult, drinking deeply of the corrosive poison that it has forced on others:

    Graphic found floating around on the Web.  The juxtaposition made me laugh aloud.  A brief search locates these as the source articles (presented for informational purposes, without endorsing linked sites and articles):
    https://www.marieclaire.com/beauty/a35350683/female-soliders-allowed-lipstick-nail-polish-locs/
    https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/333313-russia-reveals-details-of-sotnik

    I presume that “female soldiers” must equitably-and-inclusively include those with so-called “female penises”.  Overall, given how queer the U.S. Army is becoming, I hope that battle armor has biohazard protection against blood spatter.  If I recall correctly, HIV needs BSL-3 handling in a peaceful laboratory. ®

    • Replies: @p4nc4k3s Pl34s3
    , @JimDandy
  14. Raches says: • Website
    @AKAHorace

    when I read your posts I understand that Ron Unz is fully committed to free speech.  God help him.

    Indeed.  Looking at that from the other direction:

    My comment history reflects a fascination with conspiracy theories about Mr. Unz’s motives—sometimes making them half-jokingly, often shooting them down, sometimes just analyzing the subject.

    When I first started to make significant commentary here, I was a bit pessimistic.  I halfway expected that if I showed myself too smart, tough, and dignified¹ to discard or dissuade with ridicule, I may receive a sort of quiet suppression, viz., to have my comments ignored, demoted, and buried.  It is a usual trick of those who want to be seen as supporting free speech and free thought, but do not want to let anyone argue anything too controversial too persuasively.

    Evidently, the opposite has occurred. ®

    ——————————
    1. This is a part of where Rockwell signally failed.

    • Agree: Treg
    • Replies: @Jefferson Temple
  15. Since everyone else can use the translate function I’ll respond to you auf Deutsch.

    Amidst China’s multi-way civil war, both Germany and Japan reached out in friendship to the Chinese leader who had been most successful in fighting off British influence—a free and independent Chinese leader, whom the Maoist and American “history” books insult as a “puppet”.

    Far from being a “puppet”, Wang Jingwei was, at the time, the only credible Chinese leader who both (1) was under neither Soviet nor American influence, and (2) governed any significant amount of Chinese territory.

    Tatsächlich wird er von drei Seiten beleidigt, PRC, USA und ROC-Taiwan. Es sollte sich ernsthaft bemühen, ihn und den zweiten chinesisch-japanisch Krieg* zu verstehen, weil wir wissen, dass 2. Weltkrieg in der Mandschurei begann (Nomonhan Zwischenfall) und endete (Operation Auguststurm).

    Wang galt in seinen jungen Jahren als heftiger revolutionärer Patriot gegen Manschu Qing. Er wurde einmal verhaftet und zum Tod verurteilt, aber wegen seiner würdevollen Haltung verschont.

    Sie haben recht, er ist nicht ganz eine Puppe. Er hatte meist im Interesse der Chinesen unter seinen Regierung gehandelt (was man mit Vichy Frankreich vergleichen kann).

    Aber es gab auch andere “Quisling” Regime, z.B. East Hebei Autonomous Government, dass er es versäumt hat, sich unter einer Regierung zu vereinen.

    Am Ende war Chiang Kai-shek trotz all seiner Fehler ein viel visionärer Staatsman. Er war offen für Verhandlungen mit den Japanern, weigerte sich aber, sich unter irgendwelchen Bedingungen zu ergeben. In der Verwaltung der Beziehungen zwischen britischen Kolonisten und der indischen Unabhängigkeitsbewegung. 1, 2. So hass heute in der VR China der Ruf von Chiang größtenteils rehabilitiert ist.

    Und obwohl Mao im Krieg zwischen Japan und KMT opportunistisch war, war er am Ende offensichtlich keine sowjetische Marionette.

    *Heutzutage halte ich Rana Mitter für eine maßgebliche und objective Figur in der Anglosphäre.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  16. Raches says: • Website
    @AKAHorace

    Neat.  I didn’t know that I could do that.  I won’t do it often; I do not want to cause inflation. ®

    • Thanks: AKAHorace
  17. Svevlad says:

    Being honest, I don’t think Americans (Yankees to be more accurate) really hate in the proper sense of the word.

    They simply find anything that isn’t exactly like them fundamentally wrong on an existential level. Even not thinking exactly like them qualifies one to be targeted by them.

    Ur-example, personally? The civil war debate. To them it’s all about slavery and only that. They fail to conceive that their southern compatriots have a different culture. The CSA flag to them is exclusively a symbol of enslavement and oppression, not a cultural belonging.

    To put it bluntly, they treat everyone like they’re just a splinter group of themselves. To them, we’re all just a bunch of deluded people who should be taught to be good little Yankees.

    This behavior isn’t very unique: I identified one that is virtually identical on the other side of the pond:

    Najdi Arabs, or more accurately, Wahhabis. Any group that is “Arab” (well, in their case, Muslim) must be identical to them, otherwise, they’re aberrations to be shattered. Just how the Yank hordes tear down confederate statues, so do the Najdis demolish all monuments and sacred places held in high regard by other groups (Hijazis most specifically) – even if those are of absolutely ludicrous historic importance, homes and monuments and grave sites of the most important people in Islam, their own religion! Surely, Wahhabis are uber-conservative, reactionary to be more accurate, but it’s the same M.O: a group is conquered, and must by any means be turned into one of their own by force if necessary.

    In that we find another common thread: disregard to ancestors. You complained about this in a previous post, blaming Christianity, but that would unfairly include Orthodoxy and even Roman Catholicism to an extent (unfortunately, they got degenerated recently as well).

    To put it shortly, America is ran by, and a good chunk of it’s population consists of, people who consider everything that isn’t like themselves “mentally” to be a superthreat. A literal existential hazard.

    And this is like a mental poison, spreading globally: everyone now tries to be as far away as possible from “the great other.” See: ultravaxxers vs antivaxxers.

    I personally blame Puritanism.

    But it is what it is – to dwell too much on history becomes counterproductive to it’s very purpose: to draw conclusions and project into the future for easier decision-making.

  18. I’ve come to think that Germany’s demise was the end of humanity’s last best chance to break free of the curse of international capitalism. Their powerful nationalist socialism rendered both capitalism and communism obsolete, which tends to explain the real reason that mortal adversaries temporarily made common cause of exterminating an existential challenge to both their rackets. War is always “about the Benjamins”. Good versus evil is a fairy tale best left to churchgoers and other naifs. A nation of 75 million souls posed no military threat to global empires which controlled well over a billion people – it only challenged their legitimacy by its success. Here’s a link to the full text of Richard Tedor’s study “Hitler’s Revolution,” the best one-volume account of what National Socialism was actually about and what it accomplished: https://archive.org/details/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor_383 Hard copies of the book were still available on Amazon the last time I checked.

    • Thanks: mark green, Zorost
  19. @Vinnie O

    I was going to say that it was The British who duped the Americans into WWI (which is true), but I believe you’re correct. The Saxon bluebloods would have jumped at most any chance to kill some Krauts, so they were eager to believe English lies about German troops. All too easy

  20. @Raches

    No, you recall incorrectly, HIV does not need a BSL-3 lab to test for or study. We run HIV testing in my lab almost daily and we are not BSL-3.
    Thanks,
    pancakes please

  21. Raches says: • Website

    A German-speaking person said something thoughtful a bit earlier.  Please let me know if you want for me to publish that; I am confused about whether or not you want it published.

    For now, I will simply state from the start how I see a certain angle of this; this was on my mind since a comment earlier, to which I will soon reply:

    Philippe Pétain, the Old Marshal, was undoubtedly a great French patriot, who was persecuted and whose memory has been traduced by internationalists and American stooges who not only care aught for France, but actively destroy their nation.

    Vidkun Quisling was a Norwegian patriot.  Before the War, he had tried to make his country build its military defenses.  If Quisling’s program had been followed, the Norwegians could better have defended their neutrality against the British, whose imminent violation of Norwegian neutrality the Germans only preëmpted by a hair’s breadth.  After his nation proved too weak to defend its neutrality, he committed the sin of coöperating with the Germans—instead of being a stooge for the English, and ultimately, the Americans, as were his enemies.

    The most extreme case in this regard is Léon Degrelle.  After his beloved Belgium suffered the humiliation of a military defeat and occupation, he explicitly declared that he would restore the national honor by fighting for Europe against Bolshevism.  He achieved this ambition so magnificently, he should properly be remembered as one of Belgium’s greatest historic heroes.¹

    Having just named three Europeans whom I admire, who made the best of circumstances they found undesirable, I will say that I see Wang Jingwei no differently.  China was then at one of the lowest points in its proud history.  China and Japan are not natural enemies; historically, they have sometimes enjoyed a fine friendship.  So, Wang aligned himself with Japan—rather than being a puppet of the Jews in Moscow or the Jews in Washington.  The result for China’s national interest and national honor would have been excellent, if Germany and Japan had won the War.

    One of the saddest and also, the most outrageous lessons here:  When a war is won by those who have repudiated the very concept of honour, traitors are honoured, and heroes are betrayed. ®

    ——————————

    1. If anyone wonders about my admiration for Degrelle, perpend this:

    At six o’clock in the morning, a dazzling dawn arose, spreading across the sky: gold, orange, purple, reddish purple with some soft mauves, bordered with clear silver.  As I looked at the sky with rapturous eyes at that breathtaking tableau, Aurora’s violet bounty festooned above the empty steppe, I cast aside my sufferings and felt love!  The most important thing is beauty, at any cost!  I saw, above me, the most beautiful lights in the world.  I had once contemplated the sky in Athens; my emotion, my joy were even greater as I looked upon the sumptuousness and clarity of that Russian sky.  My nose was frozen.  My cheek was frozen.  My machine gun was all ice.  But all of my feelings were on fire.  In that multi-colored dawn at Rosa-Luxemburg, I was happier than Alcibiades looking at the wine dark sea, from the height of the terraces of the Acropolis.

    “The most important thing is beauty, at any cost!”  That, to me, is a commandment of my own religion. ®

  22. Raches says: • Website
    @Daemon

    Americans “liberate” countries like shoplifters “liberate” things they want—except that the American criminals are orders of magnitude more violent.

    I support your overall stance, but the idea of Wang JingWei being a credible chinese leader is such a laughable fantasy it has to be pointed out. True, he was neither in the American or the Soviet camp. That’s because he was in the Japanese camp, he led a collaborationist government, filled with people in the regions that the Japanese had taken over that didn’t want to risk their lives expelling them.

    You are the one so wrapped up in a laughable fantasy that you cannot even see beyond this propaganda trick.

    A collaborationist government comprised of cheap stooges for the Americans (or before them, the English—or in the era of which we speak, the Americans’ Soviet friends) is a “legitimate government”.  The worse its lackeys sell their nation out to the Americans for a pat on the head, the greater the government’s legitimacy.

    The true test of your government’s legitimacy:  When an American official spits on the ground, how fast do you get down on your hands and knees, and lick it up?

    Those who form alliances with powerful enemies of America are “collaborators”—and they are “traitors”, because they did not betray their country to the Americans (or the Americans’ old buddies, the Soviets).  Their allies are undoubtedly evil; they want to murder absolutely everyone in the world, so “given the chance [they] will definitely kill you,” as you said.  (Who has a fantasy here?)

    Those who defend their countries against Americans are “terrorists”.  A country with an anti-American government is, by definition, a “rogue state”; it has no legitimate government, until the Americans helpfully bomb its people into “liberation”, and provide them with a legitimate government, i.e., an American puppet state.

    In their chutzpah, the Americans even have a term for this:  “Régime change”, i.e., forcibly replacing an independent government with collaborationist puppets who dance on American strings.

    ——————————

    Now, since you are so strongly opposed to collaborationist governments and otherwise illegitimate puppets, please advise:  When may I expect for you to denounce the illegitimacy of the current so-called “German” government?

    Iraqis who dare to be ungrateful for the American “liberation” of their country may understand my point. ®

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Thanks: Servant of Gla'aki, W
    • Troll: 36 ulster
    • Replies: @profnasty
  23. @Observator

    This has been pointed out ad nauseum, though maybe not on this site: the “curse of international capitalism” is more of a blessing if it refers to free trade, negotiated peacefully, between sovereign nations. I’m guessing that is not the variety of capitalism you mean.

  24. Vaterland says:

    From the Times article:

    “Allied troops often regarded the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded Russians—as Untermenschen. Boiling the flesh off enemy skulls to make souvenirs was a not uncommon practice. Ears, bones and teeth were also collected.”

    This, among hundreds of other instances, is exactly why I almost never believe anything about WW 2 or most of other topics which comes from the Anglosphere. Especially from their court historians. The pervasiveness and endurance of the systems of lies that these people and their “free and open democracy”, a lie in itself, have built around almost every topic, is outrageous. And unfortunately, even now, almost a century later, all these lies live on.

    Guillaume Durocher had a valuable topic on Unz on the so called Untermensch issue a good while back, including the comment pages and in which I participated a little. And let me say it again: no Wehrmacht officer that I know of ever regarded the Russians as “subhuman”. Germanization of the East, including settlers and just like the Soviet Union did? Yes. A feeling of cultural superiority? Yes, and justified at that time. But it was Ilja Ehrenburg, Stalin and the Anglo war propaganda which turned it into plans of extermination, all the while they were drafting their Morgenthau, Hooton and Kaufman plans, while their preachers called for the mass sterilization of all German men and the isolation and enslavement of all German women.

    As usual it is the most pathetic and disgusting case of projection of those who shall not be named, who do regard the rest of humanity as less human then them. And of their most loyal and servile golem. The Russian people and their civilization and culture are among the old and eminent spheres of Europe which deserve just as much respect as Italy or France. – Current political issues and the Putin government are of course a different matter.

    But the categorical racial hatred of Slavs that is projected onto National Socialism, and especially on the Wehrmacht, many of its officers Prussian aristocrats whose elders fought side by side with Russians against Napoleon – maybe in error -, and among those Slavs whom many fought to the bitter end, Romania’s Iron Guard, who met a terrible fate in Pitești Prison, or the Hungarians, Croatians and Slovaks, who all fought bravely and courageously and who sacrificed much for Europe’s freedom and who were equally betrayed, including by their own government, who held dear in their hearts and loyalty the memory and honor of the Wehrmacht: they all have a very special place in the heart and memory of all German nationalists.

    But today when the enemy controls the mass media, the education system and most of historical records, the lies live on and multiply.

    But indeed: for strange reasons which are a riddle to me, many Anglos do genuinely seem to hate Asians. Including the noble Japanese and elder Chinese. With notable exceptions like Jared Taylor. And during WW 2 indeed many an American seems to have regarded the Japanese as less than human. In a time when we declared them honorary Aryans and even intermarriage was permitted. When there had been an intimate relationship between our cultures, as had been with the Chinese and to some degree the Indians. For the price of peace and liberation of East Asia what sacrifice was too great?

    After becoming fluent in Japanese and Mandarin, I had hoped to continue the legacy of my elders: to negotiate peace and cooperation between Japan and China. To complete our legacy, finally, after a century. But alas, if it wasn’t too ambitious in the first place, it is now too late: the USA is already determined for confrontation and war with China. And my beloved 日本 will be dragged into war with their brothers by the Americans and the British. A tragedy of enslavement which will not bring more freedom and prosperity to Asia…

    One of the most distinguished German Aces, Erich Hartmann, as a child in China:

    https://acesofww2.com/germany/aces/hartmann/

    降る雪や 明治は遠く なりにけり

  25. @Raches

    Rockwell signally failed?

    Are you referring to Lew Rockwell? If so, then I would hardly say he has failed. If not, please disregard this comment.

    • LOL: Jim Christian
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Jim Christian
  26. JimDandy says:
    @Raches

    America is dissolving itself from the inside out with its hate-cult, drinking deeply of the corrosive poison that it has forced on others

    Even when Fortuna spins us downward, the wheel sometimes halts for a moment and we find ourselves in a good, small cycle within the larger bad cycle. The universe, of course, is based upon the principle of the circle within the circle.

    • Agree: Liza
    • Replies: @hillaire
  27. What I find amuzing is who are the Americans to hate?

    After winning the Pacific war America has been invaded by the multicultural sickness that has seen their enemies succeed in peace where they failed in war.

    America….cannot hate the enemy because they are an occupied nation of the enemy dressed up as “fellow” citizens.

    The real enemy of the white western people’s were and are their leaders.

    I pose this question…what would the world look like now if the British ignored their Jewish puppet Churchill and supported Osweld Mosely?

    • Agree: No Tattoos
  28. @Svevlad

    Is the child that carelessly and maliciously steps on an ant driven by ‘hate’, or just by a feeling of existential supremacy, of Exceptional superiority to the lower creatures that he heedlessly destroys? There’s your Yankee Doodle killer. 90% of ‘gunfight’ victims in the Wild West were shot in the back. And Crazy Horse was bayoneted in the back, a veritable Dolchstosse.

    • Replies: @Resartus
    , @GomezAdddams
  29. xxxeliss says:

    americans,british,germans,japanese,soviets commited war crimes , the only aryans are from iran and south asia not Europe

    • Replies: @Alexandros
  30. Raches says: • Website
    @Jefferson Temple

    I referred to George Lincoln Rockwell, the founder of the so-called “American Nazi Party”.


    (A photo of Rockwell with dignity—as he deserved, but often discarded of his own free will.)

    I think that Dr. Griffin gave a fair description of the basics of Rockwell’s story in his book on Dr. Pierce:

    https://www.unz.com/book/robert_s_griffin__the-fame-of-a-dead-mans-deeds/#7-george-lincoln-rockwell

    See the middle of this comment from September 7, 2021 for an abstract of my opinion on Rockwell. ®

  31. Resartus says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    There’s your Yankee Doodle killer. 90% of ‘gunfight’ victims in the Wild West were shot in the back. And Crazy Horse was bayoneted in the back, a veritable Dolchstosse.

    Ironic thing is, the violence in major cities (basically the same ones with it today)….
    Was much worse than the “Wild West”, just as they are multiple times rural/countryside
    is today……

    Think the Yankees were “Covering their asses” even then, since the major issue then is the same as today….
    Immigrants piling into areas already settled by earlier immigrants, who left their home countries decades earlier to get away from the ones currently taking up their space….

  32. @Raches

    Thanks for the reply and the link. Yes, I smacked myself in the forehead after my comment for not realizing that you meant GLR. But he is someone I know almost nothing about and so I didn’t recall right away.

    • LOL: Jim Christian
  33. S says:
    @Raches

    You may have noticed my sympathy for Southerners. Take all the horrors of being conquered by hate-filled do-gooders, and having forced on you the so-called “Reconstruction”..

    As you infer, there are quite a few parallels between the Southern Confederacy and National Socialist Germany, particularly in their respective war experiences.

    Bear with me here as I delve into this.

    I look at history since the proto-Capitalist and proto-Communist American and French Revolutions of 1776 and 1789 as a manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Hegelian Dialectic, a dialectic that was launched by the British Empire of the late 18th century with the original ultimate intention, in part, that when this dialectic had run its full course, ie Capitalism and Communism had ‘synthesized’, the British would (naturally!) inherit the entire globe as it’s empire, which (in theory) was to manifest as a global democratic republic, with a US/UK central axis.

    Historically, the British Empire (and in time the US) would act as this Capitalist vs Communist dialectic’s arbiter (ie referee) during it’s life, making sure neither ideological side ‘won’, per se, or, got too far off course, but, rather, perpetually ‘struggled’, the one against the other.

    During this artificial dialectic’s run, both the then flag ship states of Capitalism (the United States) and of Communism (the Soviet Union) experienced perceived existential threats from quasi nationalist states, their nemesis, in the form of the Southern Confederacy’s 1861-65 war with the United States, and National Socialist Germany’s 1941-45 war with the Soviet Union.

    The high tide of the Confederacy’s power was its invasion of the United States in 1863, culminating in the titanic battle of Gettysburg, the South’s Stalingrad.

    Of course, Germany had it’s paralleling high tide with its invasion of the Soviet Union, culminating in the titanic Battle and defeat at Stalingrad in 1943, Germany’s Gettysberg.

    I say this was a perceived existential threat to both the United States and Soviet Union, as in reality, neither the Southern Confederacy, nor National Socialist Germany, had the industrial capacity to win the war they were fighting. And, against all the odds, had the US (Union) or Soviet lines seriously begun to break under the pressure and defeat appear imminent, one can be sure the British Empire (and US along with it in WWII) would have directly intervened with troops and material to fill in the broken front lines.

    Too much had been invested by the British Empire in this Capitalist vs Communist dialectic’s success to allow it to fail.

    Outwardly, the Capitalist and Communist flagship states had passed with flying colors their respective tests of fitness, but the game was rigged in their favor from the beginning, and it was hardly a fair fight.

    Other parallels abound. Both the Southern Confederacy and NS Germany had a martial aspect in their history. Both the South and Germany had limited surface navies, each relying on commerce raiders. Both had state of the art submarine technology. Both had hoped for ‘redoubts’ at the end in ’65 and ’45, for the South it was the ‘Trans-Mississipi’, and Germany the ‘Alpine’.

    Both were to have their memory damned at the end in ’65 and ’45 with fraudulent accusations of planned systematic mass murder at their ‘camps’, to be followed by the execution by hanging of the entirety of the political and military leadership, the latter plans falling through in the case of the South. Both were to have their identity removed, de-Nazification with Germany, and Reconstruction for the South, again, only partially succesful with the South.

    Anyhow, the parallels are so abundant, one couldn’t be blamed thinking that someone (or something) might be acting historically as a hidden hand in these events.

    • Agree: St-Germain
    • Replies: @Svevlad
  34. Raches: “… that greatest of American patriots, Professor Revilo P. Oliver … I think that Dr. Griffin gave a fair description of the basics of Rockwell’s story in his book on Dr. Pierce:”

    At the link you provide, it’s written that Rockwell was a naval aviator and war hero in the Pacific, so your admiration of him is rather ironic in the context of this article. Rockwell himself perhaps killed the unlucky Jap whose skull adorns your first paragraphs. Interesting too is the fact that Revilo Oliver, according to an autobiographical note in his pamphlet “The Jewish Strategy”, worked in the War Department from 1942-1945. There’s no information about what exactly he did, afaik, but maybe someone could find out via FOIA requests, at least if anyone thinks something obtained from the US gov’t about such matters can be relied upon. It seems very likely though that whatever he did, it was nothing good as far as Germany or Japan was concerned. He appears to have only later acquired his racial activism. About what caused his epiphany, I have no information, but since you say you’ve read just about everything Oliver wrote, perhaps you can enlighten me.

    Your adulation of these two puts me in mind of my pal César Tort. Your tastes seem to parallel his in a remarkable number of ways. He, too, has a worshipful attitude towards Rockwell and Pierce, and especially Hitler, whom you likewise profess to admire greatly. Among top Nazis, your favorite seems to be Goebbels, particularly the Goebbels children, and whereas Tort most highly esteems Himmler instead, he has a soft spot for children and has dedicated his site to furthering not only National Socialism, but also spreading the word about the horrors of child abuse, a topic which you have also recently mentioned and expressed concern about. Also, as a capstone to these parallels, César Tort has even written a book called Day of Wrath, a panegyric to Hate, which he might speculate inspired your very name, Raches. (I’m not suggesting it did. On the contrary, I’m sure it’s all just a coincidence. LOL.) Do you happen to be familiar with his website?

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/

    You might find it interesting.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @C.T.
  35. Raches says: • Website
    @Vaterland

    I have been receiving some high-quality comments here.  It is the purpose for which I turned on comments; I am too proud to care about social media style chatter.  Since I put too much effort into my replies, I don’t always manage to acknowledge each good comment; but I notice them all.

    Yours is exemplary.  Thank you.

    Although I do not agree with you about everything (and I am not sure how significant some of our disagreements may be), you incisively identified, and in some ways better stated one of several deeper purposes of my article.  I spent some time perusing your comment history before replying.

    …the noble Japanese and elder Chinese…

    After becoming fluent in Japanese and Mandarin, I had hoped to continue the legacy of my elders: to negotiate peace and cooperation between Japan and China. To complete our legacy, finally, after a century.

    When I think of world politics, my great dream for the East is to see exactly what I have rendered in bold.

    They should be natural allies, as Germany and England should have been natural allies—and, as I think on the other side, Germany and Russia should be natural allies.

    But this is difficult to approach, even as a respectful suggestion (and not a presumptuous foreign Diktat in the American style).  Although I have had some not insignificant contact with both China and Japan, I lack the depth of cultural understanding, and moreover, the linguistic competence that you seem to have acquired.

    And my beloved 日本…

    Perhaps you may be able to correct any errors that I may make in my soon-forthcoming short article about MacArthur and American Christian jihad against the Japanese national goddess—a sun-goddess, and thus an unusual cultural parallel to Aryan tendencies to heliolatry.  Of course, I see the Japanese Emperor’s claim of divine ancestry no differently than I see the Roman claim that the founder of Rome was descended from both Mars and Venus, or the claim of many ancient kings to have been descended from various gods and goddesses.  Leonidas, perhaps the single most famous king in all of Western history, claimed to descend from Heracles—and thus from Zeus, the Olympian King of the Gods.  When I see American propaganda that grossly misrepresents, insults, and traduces the Japanese Emperor’s claim of divine ancestry, I am outraged and nauseous.

    I had intended to publish that side-by-side with the instant article.  From the American side, I have an indisputable source for evidencing my claims about MacArthur’s outlook and agenda.  But from the other side, I foundered while seeking better sources on the true interpretation of the infamous Imperial Rescript of 1. January 1946.  If you know of any really good English-language sources on this, which are consistent with the archaic Japanese of the Rescript in its cultural context, and are not the usual gaijin nonsense, please advise; I would use that to complete my article, and credit you accordingly. ®

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  36. Svevlad says:
    @S

    If they seriously think they can use the Hegelian dialectic to “perma-win” all of history they are, well, very stupid.

    The dialectic itself is a quirk of mass psychology, where people will often divide themselves into two camps. If there are more divisions, the weaker groups will put their differences aside and become one larger, stronger one, preferably equal to the other.

    It never really ends, because the instant a “synthesis” occurs into a new “thesis,” another “antithesis” appears and the cycle begins anew until something else forces a new synthesis.

    Less of a dialectic, more of a fractal pattern? It never ends, there’s always the next thing to take care of, a new problem to solve.

    • Replies: @S
  37. @Raches

    Hi, it’s fine that you published my comment. I’m not really on board with some of your takes which are a bit too edgy for me. And picture of Goebbels children was making me queasy.

    Ron seems extremely keen on two topics — 1. China, 2. Nazi-Soviet relations. There needs to a scholarly discussion that connects the dots between it all, the Second Sino-Japanese War and rest of World War II. I can contribute based on reliable historical sources in their original languages.

    Wang aligned himself with Japan—rather than being a puppet of the Jews in Moscow or the Jews in Washington.

    Was Stalin’s Moscow post Trotsky and Great Purge that Jewish? In any case the power dynamics of 20th CE East Asia was a triangular relation between Japan, China, Russia-USSR, the latter entity being present in Asia far before Bolshevik takeover. So I don’t want to make this all about Jews.

    In PRC it’s not at all taboo to speak about Jewish power in the West (it is somewhat taboo to question official narrative about the “puppet state” of Manchukuo and PRC’s legitimacy over Manchuria and Innerer Mongolia). But in general there’s some admiration over Jewish business acumen and scientific accomplishments. Of course the Chinese themselves are compared ad nauseam to “Jews of Asia”.

    On the part of the Japanese, which like the Chinese, are philo-Teutonic, are at the same time at least moderately philo-Semitic. Japanese-occupied Shanghai was the safest place in the world for Jewish refugees. There is even a fringe “Japanese-Jewish common ancestry theory” (日ユ同祖論, Nichiyu Dōsoron).

    That said, I want to highlight some historical events,

    1. The Qing dynasty were ruled by a Manchu-Mongol aristocracy, who should be considered in a sense a hostile alien minority. For example, there was such a thing called Literary inquisition 文字獄, that persecuted intellectuals who wrote negatively about Manchus even if in very subtle ways. This all should sound familiar to the current West.

    Culturally, Manchu-Mongols used an Aramaic-based alphabet and originally practiced Nestorian Christianity, so they are indeed alien not only to Chinese but also to Confucian cultures in general i.e. Japan and Korea.

    2. The overthrow of Qing had a large part to do with support from the Japanese, who were reasonably concerned with Russian encroachment in Manchuria and Korea (this would later lead to the Russo-Japanese War). And at the same time support Han Nationalism led by Sun Yat-Sen. The Manchu rulers would be expelled but by this time the Manchus are largely culturally assimilated and existed only nominally as a distinct group.

    3. Sun Yat-Sen’s protege, Chiang in his Northern Expedition (1926-8) would receive support from Soviets, this was perceived as a betrayal by the Japanese.

    4. Chiang would also have a falling out with Stalin that led to Sino-Soviet conflict (1929), again in Manchuria. While Mao continues to be in Stalin’s camp.

    5. After the collapse of the Russian Empire, the Soviets would return to the Far East and after Mongolian Revolution of 1921, form an essentially puppet state in Outer Mongolia. So if you want to discuss Western subversion, when the League of Nations rebuked Japan for setting up Manchukuo, the Japanese indignation there was that they did not do the same to Soviets for doing the same in Mongolia.

    This three-way fight in a succession question of Manchu homeland is what led to escalation of the Sino-Japanese War south of the Great Wall, Soviet victory at Nomonhan, and a ricochet effect that led to Soviet action in Finland and Poland.

    The result for China’s national interest and national honor would have been excellent, if Germany and Japan had won the War.

    I appreciate your thoughts, but even for counterfactuals this is meaningless one. The Japanese never wanted a war with China to begin with. They were like gamblers who got draw in by opportunistic gains, and doubled down compulsively when they started to lose.

    Unfortunately they ran into Chiang, who was a hard nut to crack.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  38. @Cookie Boy

    But what suprised me was how easy it was for Japan to roll over China?

    China’s GDP was 2x larger than Japans but had only a fraction of its industrial capacity. While the Japanese had underestimated the Chinese, the Chinese after years of German training, had overestimated themselves, this led to a dangerous situation.

    On top of that, Chiang, is known as a thoroughly mediocre military commander at the tactical level, whose only main victory in his career, Northern Expedition, was actually led by his Soviet advisor Vasily Blyukher.

    The Battle of Shanghai (1937) was a bloodbath that seriously dented Japanese confidence. Battle of Nanjing was an own-goal by the Chinese a la USSR in early months of Barbarossa. Victories and stalemates at Tai’erzhuang and Wuhan (1938) led to WW1-style static line warfare from 1938-44, until Japanese breakthrough at Operation Ichi-go.

    View post on imgur.com


    But Chiang’s capability is at the strategic level, by provoking the Japanese to a fight at Shanghai, he seized the strategic initiative by picking the place of battle.

    You can see the map below, historically northern invaders can easily overrun the Central Plains through the Beijing-Wuhan and Beijing-Shanghai axis. But by drawing IJA to Shanghai, they would be forced to attack through the Shanghai-Wuhan axis, with a much more hilly and rivery terrain. There Chiang would use terrain and strategic depth to advantage for a long-drawn out war of attrition. This was called Lose but not Surrender 败而不降

    View post on imgur.com

    • Thanks: Grahamsno(G64), W
  39. @Vaterland

    But indeed: for strange reasons which are a riddle to me, many Anglos do genuinely seem to hate Asians. Including the noble Japanese and elder Chinese. With notable exceptions like Jared Taylor. And during WW 2 indeed many an American seems to have regarded the Japanese as less than human.

    Yes, but OTOH the Japanese got significantly more lenient post-war treatment than Germans, no partition, no de-nazification, no equivalent of the expulsion of Volksdeutsche. The pre-war ruling class remained largely intact till today.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-epistemology-of-9-11-narratives/#comment-4901706

    The other way to look at it, instead of through racial lens, is competition of Anglo-Thalassocracy vs. Eurasia, where the latter had much more historical cohesion than usually estimated, e.g. sauerkraut may have originated in China
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choucroute#Histoire

    • Replies: @Joe Paluka
  40. As a Southerner I can relate to Germans as being a conquered and despised people who are occupied and slated for destruction, and whose history has been distorted for propaganda purposes. Germans, so far, have fared much worse at the hands of the U.S. government.

    Most of the men that I grew up around who fought in WWII, Korea, and Vietnam had no love of war, and I was told by my father and others who had no choice but to serve, that the people running the country had no concern for people like me, and that I should stay out of the military. The government had to provoke Pearl Harbor to overcome isolationism, and there was no desire to fight Gulf War I on the part of most Americans. The celebrations came afterwards. It took 9-11 to get Americans on board for a second round. I don’t think Americans have a great love of war, and I surely don’t think the public is willing to sacrifice like the Germans, Brits, Russians, and Japanese did in WWII, and WWI for the Europeans who fought.

    If the people running America force a war with major powers that becomes a bloody death match, I think it may be the end of the elites and the military machine, if not America itself. If technology can’t win, I don’t think that a makeshift fighting force made up of mall rats, benefit seekers, pampered thugs of wildly different backgrounds, immigrant mercenaries, homosexual and trans activists, small town naives and misfits, and delusional women and social justice warriors led by vicious but soft generals and officers would do much against China or Russia, and definitely not against both at the same time.

    • Agree: Schuetze
  41. S says:
    @Svevlad

    If they seriously think they can use the Hegelian dialectic to “perma-win” all of history they are, well, very stupid.

    Could be.

    I just find it a lot easier to believe, despite the often empty rhetoric otherwise, that the Capitalist United States often friendly and supportive actions towards Communist states can best be explained by the manufactured and broadly controlled Capitalist vs Communist dialectic hypothesis, as opposed to the semi-official line that the US establishment is composed in many instances of well meaning bungling idiots.

    No one is that consistently stupid without it being deliberate.

    That doesn’t mean that if there was (and is) such a dialectical plan they’ll be able to carry it out to its full fruition as originally designed centuries ago, ie there’s no question at the present time that the Anglo-Saxon power base in England, unless the process is halted, appears to be being destroyed through mass immigration into the country.

    This dialectical hypothesis also takes into account the historic geo-political context in the late 18th century.

    With French power in North America smashed due to its defeat by Britain in the French and Indian War, Spain in steep decline, and the stone-age Indian tribes unable to offer up any real resistance, the whole of North America lay open for the taking by the British Empire.

    However, if the Brits openly do so, they run the risk of repeating Spain’s experience of the previous century’s, when it openly controlled the whole of continental South America, Central America, and half of North America. Spain was forever having to deal with various European alliances and combinations being formed against it, attempting to block its every move. Spain’s Death Star like empire against the rest of land and colony poor Europe’s x-wing fighters.

    ‘Spain is too powerful!’ Queen Elizabeth is said to have declared in this regard.

    Little England watched and learned, however, from Spain’s experience, and would not make the same mistake by openly conquering the whole of North America.

    In a planned temporary false split, the British Empire would instead ‘throw’ the 1776 Revolution in favor of the colonial hotheads, allowing them the illusion of both victory and a truly independent United States, simultaneously also making happy powerful London based aristocratic Whig party members who desired republican government for the British Empire and supported the North American colonial revolution.

    The ‘former colonists, with their ideology of Manifest Destiny, would unwittingly conquer and consolidate control of North America ‘on the sly’ for the British Empire, while the rest of Europe slept.

    In the future the US and UK would re-unite, something that King George III in his 1782 speech before the British parliament first officially acknowledging the thirteen colonies separation from the Empire, was already even then (seemingly incongruously) speaking about.

    Once the rich heartland of North America was succesfully conquered and occupied by the American pioneers, ie Spain and Mexico being vanquished, the fighting spirit of the last of the Indian tribes crushed at Wounded Knee, and ‘the frontier’ was no more as reported by the US census bureau in 1890, a big push was made by the corporate media in the US and UK to reunite the US with the British Empire. This was effectively accomplished circa 1900 with the formation of the ‘special relationship’ between the US and UK, a relationship that is only just short of an outright political union between the two countries.

    The 1776 Capitalist Revolution, while being a false split between the US and UK, also did double duty getting this manufactured Capitalist vs Communist dialectic ball rolling.

    Below are a couple of geo-political papers from the outstanding Belcher Foundation website, a site dedicated to the preservation of the memory and lifework of Jonathan Belcher (1682-1757), a prominent British royal colonial governor, founder of Princeton University, and the first North American born British freemason.

    One of the linked Belcher papers, though not specifically mentioning the term Hegelian Dialectic, explains that both Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson as the US representatives at the time in France, throughout the 1780’s created and led a network of revolutionary cells in that country which.ultimately resulted in the overthrow and execution of the French crown with the advent of the 1789 French proto-Communist Revolution.

    The other Belcher paper all but openly states the 1776 Revolution was a false split, ie that the British Board of Trade, and powerful London Whig party members, had long had plans in the works prior to the Revolution to make British North America, rather than England, the future center of power of the British Empire,

    The last link below is to the specific page of a little known today US geo-political book published in 1853 which, much like the aforementioned Belcher site paper, but going further, openly claims that the separation of the US and British Empire due to the 1776 Revolution, was a planned false split, was only ever intended to be ‘temporary,’, and that the United States itself is the British Empire’s true center of power, and that in the future the US and UK will openly re-unite.

    A person might, entirely understandably, say that such a claim is crazy and preposterous.

    The same mid-19th century book makes the even crazier claim (for the time) that the first thing this future US/UK united front will do is make a move to conquer and gain control Germany, continental Europe’s center of power, thus unleashing a ‘world’s war’ upon the Earth.

    https://www.belcherfoundation.org/trilateral_center.htm

    https://www.belcherfoundation.org/camerica.htm

    https://archive.org/details/newrome00poes/page/88/mode/2up

    • Thanks: Boomthorkell
    • Replies: @Raches
  42. Raches says: • Website
    @S

    I have been watching this subthread develop with some interest.  A few things were raised which I will set aside to subject to my own refining process.  However, I must note that on its face, the stated theory is implausible for many reasons, some of them quite obvious.

    I cannot now take the time to explore this, save to note:

    In my experience, most “British Empire” conspiracy theories are misdirection to cover for the Jews.  (The extreme example is Lyndon Larouche; many of the conspiracy theories about the British Empire that I see online are merely rehashes of Larouche.)

    I note that some very credibly alleged British Empire conspiracies, such as the Milner Group, turned internationalist, and ultimately destroyed the British Empire.  (See e.g., Professor Oliver’s discussion Carroll Quigley’s writings on this topic at pp. 32ff. of Populism and Élitism; this part is in Liberty Bell, October 1982.)  To posit that élite traitors in the British upper ranks joined with other international elements to destroy all nations, including Britain, would be quite a different conspiracy theory.

    The British Empire is dead—“Great Britain” is already in the dustbin of history, with all current use of the term being a pretentious anachronism.  Little Britain is an American lackey, and still something of a financial hub for international elements that have for Britain no loyalty whatsoever.  Little Britain’s “royal” family is cross-bred with rhymes with triggers.  The population that is actually British (i.e., Aryan) is being replaced; they must be so terribly glad that they defeated Hitler!  The whole thing is a kind of a sick joke.  I say that with considerable sadness for some decent individual Englishmen and Scotsmen whom I have known.

    The American revolution substantially started in 1774–76, with pressure building before that.  Linking it to Hegel is anachronistic; Hegel was born in 1770, did not make any significant publications until the 1790s, and did not become famous and influential until the 1800s.  Moreover, the concept popularly attributed to Hegel was actually from Fichte (slightly earlier).

    In my experience, most talk about the so-called “Hegelian dialectic” is an attempt to misdirect attention from the Marxist dialectic—viz., away from the racial Jew to a German.  Germans are evil, aren’t they?

    Without even checking what speech he allegedly made, I would expect that King George III would probably have tried to save face by declaring the essential unity of the British with the rebellious British subjects who, until only a few years previously, had considered themselves British.  Had I been his speechwriter, I would have woven the whole speech around a kernel of that idea.

    Overall, much though I myself loathe the British Empire, I will not make the mistake of blowing up the corpse of a dead empire that was lousy with Jews, roiled by Christian fanaticism (especially from the time of Cromwell), and overall rotted from the inside out into the conspiracy that makes toast land butter-side down. ®

    • Replies: @S
  43. Raches says: • Website
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Thank you for your extensive commentary.

    Even my abbreviated reply, which mostly addresses ancillary issues, has grown too long and complicated for now.  Thus this brief acknowledgment, to avoid further delay in reply.  I will follow up here. ®

  44. S says:
    @Raches

    In my experience, most “British Empire” conspiracy theories are misdirection to cover for the Jews.

    I think history is often multi-faceted and rather nuanced. One stream of history can be true simultaneously along with other streams, even when involving the same people. It doesn’t have to be either one, or, the other, a false dichotomy as I see it. I allow for agency amongst the Anglo-Saxons. I also think self deception often plays a massive role in history, unfortunately.

    Though I didn’t mention it in the post, deliberately concentrating on the more purely Anglo-Saxonish aspect as I think that needs to be much better understood, the Anglo-Saxons (along with much of the rest of Europe to varying degrees) have long had a dysfunctional relationship with the Jewish people, ie regarding the English, the unfortunate and absurd ideology of British Israelism, much of it in modern times traceable to the time of Cromwell.

    For that reason I advocate, an amicable (if at all possible), separation of the Jewish people from my own particular Euro-tribe, a tribe I’m not going to name here.

    (The extreme example is Lyndon Larouche; many of the conspiracy theories about the British Empire that I see online are merely rehashes of Larouche.)

    Though I’d vaguely heard of him prior, I came up with the ideas in my just previous post from my own personal reading and research. For instance, I can just about guarantee that 1853 book I linked to, The New Rome, has not even once been spoken of on modern main stream radio or television, though it’s provenance and contents are remarkable, and its much more plain spoken and prescient than anything Nostradomus ever came up with. I read about it first only in another 19th century book which commented upon it. Same goes for the Belcher website links, though the site’s geo-political commentaries regarding the events surrounding the 1776 Revolution and its origins, are again, quite remarkable, the site for some reason remains unknown.

    In part I suspect the reason for that is some information is suppressed by simply not speaking about it in the media. However, I think another part of this, perhaps the larger portion, is due to a blindspot people often have regarding their own people, unconsciously perhaps not wanting to know certain things, or mistakenly presuming they know everything already. [I certainly won’t claim perfection in that regard.]

    The population that is actually British (i.e., Aryan) is being replaced

    Yes, that is true, and I readily acknowledge it. I specifically commented in agreement upon that within the post, though it is (for the most part) a post WWII phenomena in the UK.

    The American revolution substantially started in 1774–76, with pressure building before that. Linking it to Hegel is anachronistic; Hegel was born in 1770

    Yes, I’m quite aware. The basic shorthand description of the dialectic, ie ‘problem, reaction, solution’, isn’t that difficult to grasp, or conceive of, and I suspect that others long before Hegel had already thought about it, or observed something like that naturally occurring. I use the term ‘Hegelian Dialectic’ simply so that people will know what I’m talking about.

    Without even checking what speech he allegedly made, I would expect that King George III would probably have tried to save face by declaring the essential unity of the British with the rebellious British subjects who, until only a few years previously, had considered themselves British. Had I been his speechwriter, I would have woven the whole speech around a kernel of that idea.

    Point well taken.

    Overall, much though I myself loathe the British Empire, I will not make the mistake of blowing up the corpse of a dead empire that was lousy with Jews, roiled by Christian fanaticism (especially from the time of Cromwell), and overall rotted from the inside out into the conspiracy that makes toast land butter-side down. ®

    LOL! Regarding ‘the conspiracy that makes toast land butter-side down’. That ‘conspiracy’, as you no doubt know, cuts both ways regarding this subject. The point I suppose I was attempting to get across with my post, is that a people still retains a certain agency, even while within an unhealthy dysfunctional relationship with another people.

    Acknowledge the whole of the situation, certainly, but with more emphasis on the self agency, would be healthier imo.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @S
    , @Oracle
  45. C.T. says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    This webzine does not typically publish articles by Hunter Wallace, editor of Occidental Dissent. This Lutheran has just started a series in which he tries to exonerate Christianity from Aryan decline:

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2021/10/03/the-christian-question/

    Since I am busy translating Savitri Devi’s book, if you want to reply to “Hunter Wallace” (Brad Griffin) here I would post it on my site.

    Greetings,

    C.T.

    • Replies: @Raches
  46. Raches says: • Website
    @C.T.

    Welcome.  Although we probably have some philosophical differences (who doesn’t, with me?), you likely will not hate me—probably not, if you are as wisely wrathful as Dr. Morgan alleges.  I think you may understand why I memorialize the Goebbels children, why I have done so privately for years, and why I will do so publicly, now that I have a blog.  Few will get this:  I am angry, and I demand that they must be remembered with the grace and respect that they, their family, and their nation deserve.  My Weltanschauung demands no less than that they shall be made immortal, forever beloved by the poets for their glory and their tragedy.

    A few years ago, I happened across your site—via something buried deeply in the userpages of the Wikipravda, of all places.  Unfortunately, I only saw it in passing; and I misplaced your name and address in my lamentably disorganized notes.  I remembered my first impression, and had wanted to search for it again.

    My thanks to Dr. Morgan for the pointer is embedded in a longer comment about Professor Oliver’s wartime cryptanalysis, the guilt that he evidently felt for his participation in the destruction of the free world (similarly as for Rockwell), and the Ernie Lazar FOIA files.  With due apologies, Dr. Morgan, I will finish that comment later—perhaps after I finish my forthcoming blog post on why Germans are hated. ®

    • Replies: @C.T.
  47. utu says:
    @S

    “The True History of the American Revolution” (1902), Sydney Fisher

    and also

    “The True Benjamin Franklin” (1899)

  48. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    “e.g. sauerkraut may have originated in China”

    If the rest of the world needed China to help them figure out how to make Sauerkraut, they were really brain dead. People knew that adding salt preserved food and someone put some salt on cabbage and the fermentation process began producing Sauerkraut.

  49. @Cookie Boy

    But what suprised me was how easy it was for Japan to roll over China?

    It wasn’t easy, breaux.

  50. C.T. says: • Website
    @Raches

    “Wikipravda”

    Lol! That’s exactly what Wikipedia is.

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2021/03/29/wikipedias-pov/

    • Agree: lavoisier
  51. S says:
    @S

    To clarify a bit on the Hegelian Dialectic thing, some years back, I’d read Soviet defector Anatoly Golitsyn’s New Lies For Old. And, yes, I’m aware one has to be quite cautious about these things. I tend to believe him, however.

    In his book he claims that the Sino-Soviet split of the 1950’s was a strategic false split, that even during the height of this ‘split’ the Russians and Chinese were still working together in what he called a ‘scissors strategy’, ie each of the scissors two blades, guided by one hand, work together to accomplish a single goal.

    The reason he gave for this strategic split was that the Russian and Chinese Communist had realized that Eurasia as a monolithic Communist bloc during the 1950’s was creating it’s own resistance to the work of spreading Communism, ie the rest of the non-Communist world was simply frightened to death by their bulk and potential for power, and were reacting by becoming resistant to their Red overtures.

    The answer to this, according to Golitsyn, was the planned strategic Sino-Soviet false split of the latter 1950’s, to lull the rest of the non-Communist world into complacency.

    This makes perfect sense.

    If one accepts that the Capitalist vs Communist thing is an Hegelian Dialectic, which myself and many others do, a broadly controlled one at that, doesn’t it also make sense that the Capitalist US and UK may have done exactly the same thing that the Russian and Chinese Communists had done, ie engage in a strategic false split under cover of the 1776 Capitalist American Revolution, for exactly the same reasons, to lull the rest of a frightened non-Capitalist, non Anglo-Saxon US/UK world world, into complacency?

    I submit the Capitalist US and UK did just that, as I elaborated upon in a post upthread, and engaged in their own ‘scissors strategy’ during the 19th century, prior to their open rapprochement circa 1900 with the advent of the ‘special relationship’.

    The Russian and Chinese Communists bloc with their strategic false split were in certain ways (consciously or unconsciously) simply reacting to what the US/UK Capitalists had already done themselves.

    Crimethink, I know. Such things are not supposed to be spoken aloud, let alone even thought.

    Whether one accepts this hypothesis, or not, it’s a matter of open historic record that the United States since 1900 has effectively been back with the Brits due to the ‘special relationship’, about equal the amount of time (officially, at least) America was purportedly away from them, due to the 1776 Revolution.

    Interestingly, according to the Wiki article on Golitsyn and his book, the one thing the British intelligence services decry about Golitsyn is his claim that the Sino-Soviet split was not real, and was an act of strategic deception. They insist it was quite real and that you’d better believe it.

    A case of protesting too much, lest you extrapolate and apply the same strategic false split rational to the Capitalist US/UK, and the entire manufactured Capitalist vs Communist dialectic begin to unravel?

    • Replies: @HVM
  52. C.T. : “[Hunter Wallace] has just started a series in which he tries to exonerate Christianity from Aryan decline:”

    Hello again C.T.! Meet Raches, your Doppelganger in many ways. He (?) loves Hitler and children, and shares your low opinion of Christianity too. I put a question mark after “he” because Raches is being cagey about whether he is a man or a woman, and won’t disclose his race, or even if he’s human at all, so I’ll just use “he” for brevity’s sake. Some have speculated that he’s none other than Ron Unz, amusing himself, using the pen name Raches. Others claim he is an AI. If that’s true, perhaps he was trained using your website! LOL. In any case, he’s a great mind and it’s good to have him on our side.

    As for the HW article, it’s just a standard, boilerplate defense of Christianity. In a past conversation w/Adûnâi, here:

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-were-up-against-white-liberals-rejoice-at-whites-becoming-a-minority/#comment-4880625

    I give my current view. The only really interesting thing HW says is that Christianity is a “shapeshifter”, and he’s right about that. But he doesn’t see that by that admission, he eviscerates the very thing he is trying to defend, since that which can mean anything really means nothing at all. There is no “real” Christianity either to attack or defend. As a religion, it’s as meaningless as the chatter of birds, and trying to pin it down is as fruitless as trying to determine the “real” nature of imaginary objects such as God or the soul. To understand what is going on, another paradigm or two is needed, as I’ve indicated.

  53. Raches says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Hello again C.T.!  Meet Raches, your Doppelganger in many ways.

    Thanks for the commendation.  But I do not want to set expectations awry; Teufelswitz here may surprise you both, and I am not sure whether with admiration or the contrary.

    I will try to explain a bit what I mean by that; but it will require a highly theoretical mini-essay, which will probably bore everybody except for the two of you (and maybe @Ron Unz).  Normal life already has me backed up on moderation queue and replies, not being a very good blogger.  Glancing by, a note now in haste—catch up with y’all soon. ®

  54. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr Morgan,

    You don’t know me, but I used to talk with Cesar Tort on his blog, until he banned me after I challenged him to provide a non-selfish justification for bringing white children into a world where they are guaranteed to suffer and die. I have written a long essay about this issue, but he is not interested in reading it. I think I really put his back up. I haven’t been able to contact you directly, because you don’t have your own website, but please contact me personally if you wish to discuss this further.

    I am also currently writing a book (The Historical Absence of Feminine Facial Morphology in European Art and Culture) in which I make the case that authentic female beauty did not exist, not in the arts and likely not in reality either, until the mid-20th century. It is close to 30,000 words at the moment. As I explain in great detail, even a cursory glance at Greco-Roman statuary reveals an astonishing lack of femininity. Large noses, large chins and small lips are the quintessential features. This morphology does not possess positive valence from a rational perspective, nor is it endocrinologically feminine. People continue to be awed by it, which is inexplicable to me, though perhaps this is feigned. But I am most surprised that white nationalists, of all people, are oblivious to the brutishness of the Greco-Roman canon, which dominated European culture until the early 20th century, despite being so embarrassingly impoverished from an evolutionary perspective. Perhaps you might find my thesis interesting?

    Kind regards,
    S.E. Leggat

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @anon
    , @hillaire
  55. @Jefferson Temple

    He’s talking about George Rockwell. Yer a funny kid. Disclaimer: I’m ok with Lew.

    • Replies: @Jefferson Temple
  56. @Jim Christian

    I’m far from being a kid but it is funny. George Rockwell just isn’t a figure that comes to my mind. Otoh, I’ve spent a lot of time with Lew.

  57. Adûnâi says: • Website

    I’m not sure as to the commenting policy of respected comrade Raches, so excuse me if I sound too harsh – I have no intention to be offensive to the hyper-Christian [and] neo-Nazi alike.

    I have no idea how anyone can consider America cruel. For sure, Americans can appear cruel, but their cruelty is of the naïve kind – they will stuff a hand grenade into a Korean vagina, they will [threaten to] tear out a Belarusian journalist’s tongue, but how can you be blind to the fact that wherever the American goes, brown children multiply?
    https://www.mk.ru/politics/2021/07/02/lukashenko-zayavil-o-pokushenii-na-zhurnalista-azarenka-khoteli-otrezat-yazyk.html

    Iraqi population (2000) – 23.5 mil.
    Iraqi population (2010) – 29.7 mil. (+6.2 mil.).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Iraq

    Philippine population (1903) – 7.6 mil.
    Philippine population (1939) – 16 mil. (+8.4 mil.).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Philippines

    Don’t you understand that America could have genocided all of Japan in 1945? Mexico (Generalplan Süd, as per Chechar)? The Philippines had been their colony since 1898, and its population only grew! Wouldn’t you find it hilarious if the population of Poland had increased under the dominion of Adolf Hitler? Conversely, Adolf Hitler als Führer Amerikas would have proved a monstrous sight – a genocide of horrific proportions [that would only be surpassed in our timeline by the slaughter of native American whitebois at the hands of the Chinese (fingers crossed)].

    Polish population (1938) – 34.8 mil.
    Polish population (1946) – 23.7 mil. (-11.1 mil.).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Poland

    Ukrainian population (1940) – 41.3 mil.
    Ukrainian population (1945) – 34.5 mil (-6.8 mil.).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union

    I even wrote a piece of alternate history ruminations on the topic (in foul language). America has been the most suicidally merciful empire in history. The hyper-Christian cucks forbid themselves to kill! This is why they couldn’t subdue Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq – they choose to fight with toy swords. And nobody seems to notice! Now that’s a cultural matrix.
    https://aduunaai.wordpress.com/2021/08/15/if-whitebois-didnt-have-boypussies-alternate-history/

    As to the NatSoc films… Isn’t it obvious that Japan was a far-away and exotic ally of Germany? That Germany did not film anything similar about Poland or Russia? That Japan was to America the same as Poland to Germany – a mortal enemy? Should I really be explaining this most basic of things to you?

    • Replies: @Poco
  58. C.T. says: • Website
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    My site only admits those who think like the SS Germans. If you don’t think like them (or like Savitri if you want to see things from the POV of the eternal feminine), you won’t be able to comment there.

    Re:

    I challenged him to provide a non-selfish justification for bringing white children into a world where they are guaranteed to suffer and die.

    That is more than answered in my distinction between “unnecessary suffering” and “necessary suffering”. I would suggest that you search between three the tags of my site the posts under the heading of “the four words” to understand it.

    I am not going to discuss this here as it is a huge topic.

  59. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @C.T.

    > “My site only admits those who think like the SS Germans.”

    Yes, the Irish Catholic sympathiser gaedhal thinks like an SS, totally. I doubt non-existing reading comprehension is a mark of an SS either (that 6 million Russian Jews had been mentioned prior to 1938 does not mean they were implied dead).
    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2021/10/04/reflections-of-an-aryan-woman-23/

    [MORE]

    If anyone wishes to familiarise oneself with Autisticus Spasticus’ most unique ideas on female beauty in the context of historical masculinity, here’s the archive.
    https://archive.vn/x4T7X
    https://archive.vn/VpiVn
    https://archive.vn/IvKkU

    As to the topic of the current article – as I used to say, all that is sufficient is genocidal hatred. Not necessarily more, but certainly not less. Employing Occam’s razor, if the only truth is racial survival, then animal welfare is irrelevant, and gentle child raring actively harmful.

    Turning to Raches’ comment #42, I never understood the meme of mocking the Hegelian dialectic. Yes, it is mostly empty philosophy, but it may be useful in describing certain phenomena – such as Love vs Hate, individual vs collective, idealist money vs materialist blood & soil, Jesus vs Kim Jong Il… There is nothing Marxist about it – Marxism overall is a purely economist ideology from among the triune Western Eurasian creations of the 20th ct. (the others’ being Fascism and Liberalism), and America has never experienced Marxist in the slightest. I will even posit that a culture can only be substituted by another culture – and as Christianity in American has clearly never faced a competitor, Christianity it remained – [neo-?] hyper-Christianity, the purest of the poisons, the ultimate conclusion of Judaism. A death by Love. (Just as Fascism was a death by Sword (1945), and Marxism was a death by culture neglect (1991).)

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @C.T.
  60. @C.T.

    As I said before, there is no “necessary suffering” for those who do not yet exist. It is “necessary” from your perspective in the here and now for the purpose of racial ego gratification, but not for anything else. The Hellstormed Germans are useful for you in terms of propaganda, but much like Hitler himself, I don’t think you truly care for them, because their welfare is secondary to your ideology of “victory” at all costs.

    • Replies: @Raches
  61. Raches says: • Website
    @C.T.

    My site only admits those who think like the SS Germans.  If you don’t think like them (or like Savitri if you want to see things from the POV of the eternal feminine), you won’t be able to comment there.

    Quick question:  Do you admit those who can think like SS Germans, and who stay in that mode of thought on your site?  I ask because I know how to obey rules—I would scrupulously obey your rules at your site, but I will not obey them at Proems.

    From what I have read thus far from your writings, I am sympathetic to your overall way of thinking; but I drastically depart from you in places.

    I may explain later.  I wrote something else to you and to Dr. Morgan, but decided for now not to publish it.  Nietzsche was right:  “Every one being allowed to learn to read, ruineth in the long run not only writing but also thinking.” ®

    • Replies: @C.T.
  62. Blip Blop says:

    Wow, paging based department. This is a great article. Unz was right to include this madman.

    I appreciate you not lumping us Southrons in with the degenerate Americans. Many of us absolutely hate them. We will have to answer for our sins (my sins as well) of participating in their war of terror.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  63. Raches says: • Website
    @Adûnâi

    Moderation note:  Much of this discussion is going too far off-topic.

    As to the topic of the current article – as I used to say, all that is sufficient is genocidal hatred. Not necessarily more, but certainly not less. Employing Occam’s razor, if the only truth is racial survival, then animal welfare is irrelevant, and gentle child raring actively harmful.

    By similar logic, Jews are the most superior of all races.  (Objectively, Professor Oliver frankly admitted this.)  Read the Bible:  The Jews are the historical grandmasters of genocidal hatred.  Whereas by your overly reductionist logic, which is altogether too commonplace on some sites, rhymes with triggers must be the true Master Race.  And cockroaches are the most superior race of all—except for prokaryotes, which constitute the majority of biomass on Earth, and which would racially survive any catastrophe short of the planet being entirely incinerated by the Sun.

    Also, “Occam’s Razor” is not what you evidently believe it to be. ®

  64. Raches says: • Website
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    The Hellstormed Germans are useful for you in terms of propaganda, but much like Hitler himself, I don’t think you truly care for them, because their welfare is secondary to your ideology of “victory” at all costs.

    From this, I can tell that you learned your “history” from “History Channel” docu-dramas and the public “schools”. ®

    • Replies: @Autisticus Spasticus
  65. Raches says: • Website
    @Blip Blop

    I wrote this yesterday:

    https://www.unz.com/proems/by-american-acts-the-germans-were-superior/

    I withheld it—not from cowardice, but from the thought that maybe I should be just a tiny bit merciful.  Your comment incited me to publish it, with the only substantial changes being an additional footnote on “Jewish soap”, and an emphasis that Professor Oliver was a Southerner.  (He was originally from Texas, and proud of it.)  The remark on the C.S.A. battle flag was already there.

    Now, I have several openly avowed Zionists, plus a U.S. military commentator who was part of the occupation force and despises Germans, trolling me in the thread on why Germans are hated.  I have no time to rebut all of their nonsense line by line, although it is good for them to show who they are.  Some of the comments there reflect the type of thinking that leads to what I showed in this article here. ®

  66. C.T. says: • Website
    @Raches

    As I have explained several times on my site, by “SS men” I mean an axiological transvaluation that enables Aryan men to think like them; let’s say, imitating the SS’s Master Plan East. (After a revolution à la Turner diaries, American Aryans should think about a “Master Plan South”.)

    I don’t admit those who fail to think with transvalued values, as we used to think before Christianity.

    The case of Autisticus Spasticus exemplifies this. He’s not like Himmler’s gang. Above he dares to psychoanalyse me (“racial ego gratification”) without understanding that we must fight like the SS to avoid unnecessary sufferings (he hasn’t even read my book where I explain this concept). The topic is too huge for a discussion thread in The Unz Review. See what I recently quoted from Savitri Devi on my site: the post-1945 philosopher who most closely resembles my thinking.

  67. @Raches

    If that were true, I would have no knowledge of Hellstorm whatsoever, as the mainstream media never mentions it. On the contrary, I have never watched the History Channel, nor did I go to school.

    The millions of dead Germans who suffered indescribably are useful to Cesar in terms of galvanising and bolstering white resistance, but I don’t feel he has any genuine care for them beyond their utility in eliciting such a reaction. If he did, he would acknowledge that such suffering of our people can never, ever be justified, and that this wretched world will never be a suitable place to bring children into, on account of the fact that their suffering and death is guaranteed.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Adûnâi
  68. C.T. says: • Website
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    @ Raches,

    Just for the record, Autisticus Spasticus is an “efilist”. He wants all whites dead to avoid that they suffer (not only unnecessary suffering):

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2020/12/30/between-ice-and-fire/

    • Replies: @Autisticus Spasticus
  69. C.T. says: • Website
    @Adûnâi

    Yes, the Irish Catholic sympathiser gaedhal thinks like an SS, totally.

    You are completely correct. I hadn’t thought of that. I tolerate that Irishman simply because he only comments occasionally. If he was as persistent as, ahem, others, I would tell him to stay away from commenting on my site a bit until he consolidates his apostasy from Christianity (that is, he finishes revaluing all of his values).

  70. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    Unfortunately, I tend to “agree” with Chechar here. Obsessing over the suffering of every little thing, be it a boiled dog or a dying European, leads nowhere. I would even say that both the race and the culture of the Germans were incarnated in the NSDAP, and it was the Party alone whose suffering and defeat were of import.

    I believe my use of Occam’s razor to be correct – I am merely trying to work backwards from a desired future outcome. This way, Rockwell may be even considered “the last American” (and Andropov “the last Russian”) – for every other one is clearly misguided and inconsequential as far as the survival of the North American Aryans is concerned. (Obviously, Rockwell regrettably failed, and that’s an awkward detail, but that’s what one has to face when dealing with “the last living cells” in the dead corpse of a race, as Joseph Walsh once put it.)

  71. @C.T.

    Once again, Cesar, you misrepresent me. I’m not an efilist. I’m an anti-natalist. There is a difference. Efilists are much more extreme. Although I don’t object to them, I personally choose to focus my concern on humans, and more specifically, whites. If nobody is ever born, then nobody ever dies, and that is a crucial distinction which you continue to omit.

  72. @mulga mumblebrain

    1776 to 2021 is 245 years and USA has been at peace —for 17.

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
  73. Ron Unz says:

    For those so interested, the very long article on World War II that I published just over two years ago discussed much of this same sort of material:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/#the-enormous-scale-of-allied-war-crimes

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Raches
  74. In first year of college, Psych 101, I spent at least the first half of the course trying to understand what Gestalt meant.

    I was almost from the start way behind on the rest of the syllabus so the course was wasted time and uncomprehended material.

    I still don’t have a firm handle on Gestalt.

    I’m aware Ron introduced Raches in one of the “Covid-biowarfare-blowback” quadriilogies, and now I see Raches has turned those polished apples into a pie.

    Molto bene.
    Vaya con dios.

    But what does Raches mean?

    Closest I could come was something about a dog that kills the quarried stag.
    But I couldn’t connect that to the image of something like a statue in something like orangey-pink.

    And the best I could find is that Proem is a Preface, an introduction.


    Is this gathering a subchapter in some fraternity somewhere, where you have to know the secret passwords and glossary?

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Raches
    , @Raches
  75. antibeast says:

    USA is a nation of stupid gringos who speak English but don’t like the British and claim to be ‘White’ but don’t know anything about Europe. A Banana Republic of Pathetic Losers.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  76. Raches says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    I must thank Mr. Unz for the opportunity to write this article, upon which you did not comment by even a single word.  Did you read it?

    The Second World War was a catastrophe.  Tens of millions died—many in excruciatingly horrid ways—all over the world.  Many of them were not the worst of people:  They were the best of people, the strong, the beautiful, the noble.  And they are not even remembered.

    I write so many words.  Usually, the words are little read.  I am fine with that; but I realize that when I really want to get a point across, I need to speak with the proverbial thousand words at a time.

    Look to this picture, and tell me if that isn’t the perfect picture of making peace between nations.  Yes, it is propaganda from a propaganda film—and that is the point!  Authoritarian nationalist governments, including specifically one government that was overtly racist, were propagandizing their respective peoples to friendliness and harmony with each other.  Are these not beautiful people?

    In addition to the Japanese, I also paid my respects to the Axis friendship with Chinese and Indians.

    Now, look to this photo, and tell me if that isn’t the perfect picture of hate.  Total hate—hate for hate’s sake—hate cultivated as what propagandists call a war psychosis, and reïnforced with the public in a feedback loop by, in this example, publishing an image of hateful love of Death as Picture of the Week in so-called “LIFE” Magazine (!).  A total inversion of values!

    And all of this presents two important questions both for racial nationalists, and for “anti-racists” who preach against so-called “Nazis”:

    (1) Why is it that the indubitably most-racist government on Earth bound the fate of its people together with the fate of aliens of another race?  German victory implied and required Japanese victory.  Japanese defeat implied and required German defeat.  In practical effect of the way such alliances work, this was a “Nazi” policy.

    (2) Why is it that white Americans, who preached and still preach that they were fighting a war against racism, themselves descend to the nadir of the worst type of racial hatred—and thus inflict a lethal blow on their own race?  Defeating Japan meant perforce defeating Japan’s Aryan ally—it meant dividing Europe as spoils with the America’s Soviet ally—it meant the road to where Europe is today.  Surely, that is the worst possible result for those who care about race as I do.

    I wrote this article to remember the noble dead of the past—of several races—and to encourage thinking about the future in terms of building peace and friendship between East and West.

    Those who may criticize this on the basis of racialism have a problem:  That was part of Hitler’s policy.  His policies cannot and should not be copied by rote; however, they do demonstrate the exquisitely nuanced thinking of the greatest racial-nationalist leader who has ever yet walked the Earth.  He is an example to study, from whom to learn.

    Those who may criticize this on the basis of “anti-racism” have a problem:  That was part of Hitler’s policy.  Literally Hitler.  Whereas the so-called “Good War” was largely fought by the Americans on the basis of racial hatred against the Japanese—upon the slogan that a good Jap means a dead Jap—and also, on the basis of ethnic hatred against the Germans (a topic not here discussed, but covered much in Mr. Unz’s articles).

    This article is not about me.  It is about something much larger than me.  Proems is my blog, I am unapologetically arrogant, and I sometimes blog about me, me, me to the point that I am criticized for it.  This article is not about me.  There is a thread where personal criticisms of me are on-topic.  Mr. “SolontoCroesus”, an elaboration on what you meant about me is fine over there; but it will not be published here.

    I will, however, briefly answer your question:

    But what does Raches mean?

    Closest I could come was something about a dog that kills the quarried stag.
    But I couldn’t connect that to the image of something like a statue in something like orangey-pink.

    And the best I could find is that Proem is a Preface, an introduction.

    You obviously did not read that Preface (actually, entitled a “Prologue”) with full comprehension:  It showed the derivation of my name.

    Direct further off-topic ad hominem attacks on me to the appropriate thread.  My moderation policy is authoritarian, so this is not a request.  Here, please feel free to make cogent remarks, whether positive or negative, on the substance of the article—which is not about me. ®

  77. Raches says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    For a view of that same hatred unleashed on Europeans after the War, I recommend to accompany that article:
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-post-war-france-and-post-war-germany/

    ——————————

    I am embarrassed.  Of course, I have read your article; and I believe that I have probably cited it somewhere in my copious commentary.  But it somehow slipped my mind that you used, referenced, and explained the same photo that I used at the top hereof:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/#p_1_174

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/#p_1_1

    Oh, the lability of human memory.  I had first come across that photo elsewhere; according to my logs, the copy that I used here was downloaded by me from TIME’s website via a different URL, now 404, a few years before I found The Unz Review—a few years before your article was published.  When I pinpoint-cite your articles, I usually search or skim for key words and phrases to find passages that I recall off the top of my head, in articles that I read at least a year or two ago.  Now that my memory is jogged, I recall that seeing that same photo in your September 2019 article increased your credibility in my eyes—it was something that had an impact on me.

    My apologies.  I should edit my article to slip in an appropriate link.  Maybe not immediately—I am cautious about live-editing an article that’s getting some coverage. ®

  78. Raches says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    On second thought, that could be read two ways.  If I misread you, I apologize for having lambasted you quite unfairly, rather than the opposite reaction.  I am usually more careful of such things.  As anyone who appreciates this article will understand, I recognize its subject as being much more important than personal matters; and when I see that subject not mentioned in something that could be read two ways in a culture that is suffused with backhanded insults, there could be a bit of a misunderstanding. ®

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  79. @Raches

    Well sir, thank you for that.

    I just deleted the third try at a response to your comment.

    It started out explaining that I just wanted to know what RACHES means, having looked it up in English dictionary and learned Raches is a hunting dog.
    That made no sense.
    FINALLY occurred to me that Raches is a German word, meaning, of all things, Vengeance, just as you wrote.

    Ta Da!

    The rest of the commentary that I deleted explained ad nauseam that it was encouraging to find someone as appreciative of the quality of German culture as you; and as outraged at its destruction.
    Sometimes it is difficult to contain the outrage. My pressure-valve is research-research-research.


    I didn’t comment much on Ron’s extensive discussions of the origins of Covid as a bioweapon that backfired, in part because I have been reading Cora Sol Goldstein’s Capturing the German Eye, about the relentless and brutal brainwashing — actually, soul-destruction — of the German people for at least five years after the end of hostilities.

    Particulars of the campaign Goldstein describes, especially comparable to the omnipresent propaganda of the Covid scandemic that we are enduring, have strong roots in that shameful era. I believe the end-goal of the scandemic is similar to that of the destruction of the German people by Jewish zionists and their collaborators– completion of the zionist takeover of the European/western soul.

    In ~1958 Dick Cheney’s favorite professor at Yale, Bradford Westerfield, wrote in his text, Foreign Policy and Party Politics, that zionist Jews were making significant inroads in American politics, benefiting from
    –large amounts of money;
    –recognition of the fact that controlling a few states could result in determining national elections; and most significantly, that
    –no group to counter-balance the zionists was similarly funded and zealously organized and committed.


    Looking forward to a fruitful ride.
    Music to energize the trip:

    Die Fahne Hoch y’all.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  80. Dani says:

    “The Americans, who can no more pass off the guilt of their own crimes on the Jews they made their masters, than a goy hitman can pass off all blame to his Jewish boss who ordered a murder.”

    Save it, Raches.

    I guess you are for reparations for slavery for black Americans living today, too? I am a living victim of what jewry has done to the U.S. and will not take the blame for a G damned thing – just as no average, decent, American should, especially the few of us who are aware of the more accurate version of history in the 19th and 20th centuries. I DON’T CARE how many “shabbos goy” aided and abetted the lot of them – this in no way entitles anyone to paint a broad brush of foul hatred across “Americans” as a whole, the MAJORITY of us, the average, decent, LEGAL Americans. I am sick to death of American-bashing – keep the blame where it truly belongs, FFS. Your attitude is one that subscribes to the world staying stuck in the current paradigm. Apparently, you don’t care about such things and have your own personal motives.

    • Replies: @Raches
  81. Raches says: • Website
    @Dani

    I DON’T CARE how many “shabbos goy” aided and abetted the lot of them – this in no way entitles anyone to paint a broad brush of foul hatred across “Americans” as a whole, the MAJORITY of us, the average, decent, LEGAL Americans. I am sick to death of American-bashing – keep the blame where it truly belongs, FFS.

    So, yon’t care “how many”—even if it is most of them, “the MAJORITY”, or even almost all of them.  Your argument is, in essence, that >99% of Americans give the rest a bad name.  You may as well condemn my “antsemitism” on the basis that Ron Unz gave me a blog, and he doesn’t seem so bad, so the Jews must be fine people, right?  “I DON’T CARE how many Jews are horrible people doing horrible things!  Don’t paint with a broad brush!”  Typical liberalism.

    It is the MAJORITY of Americans.  What, do you suppose that LIFE Magazine was a fringe publication, and the MAJORITY of Americans were horrified by it?  Do you suggest that the MAJORITY of Americans have ever opposed American WWII policy at any time from 1942–2021?  Do you suppose that American policies could be what they are, without at least the tacit support of the MAJORITY?  On what planet do you live?

    Thus, your argument is stereotypical American evasiveness and hypocrisy.  Americans are so proud of their “democracy”, they fight aggressive wars to “liberate” other people into “democracy”.  They hate proper forms of government, such as kings and dictators.  Then, they turn around and try to pass of responsibility for an American war that the majority of Americans supported, and still call the “Good War”.

    What Americans do I not condemn?

    • The Americans who were viciously persecuted by “their” government in the Great Sedition Trial of 1944, because they would not shut up about their opposition to the War.  Those were good Americans.

    • Revilo P. Oliver, who later wrote extensively of how in the War and its aftermath, Americans had brought on themselves “an indelible shame”; as I quoted in the above article, he said, Our guilt is undeniable.  It cannot be palliated.  We made the Yids our masters…  Contrast that with your words, quoted above!  Professor Oliver was a good American—a truly righteous American, which is why I troll the Jews by calling him a tzaddik.

    • Those American Southerners who recognize that the U.S. invasion of the C.S.A. was the beginning of America’s behavior as a savage serial-killer amongst the nations.

    • American dissidents, who dare to do such things as exercising their free speech at The Unz Review to condemn American hatreds and American war crimes.  I think that many of the authors and commentators here are pretty good Americans.  If that were “the MAJORITY” of Americans, the world would be a much better place.

    And this is relevant and necessary today, because Americans are still doing it.  Today.  And if it is not stopped fast—if it is not already too late!—American hatefulness will result in the total extinction of the Aryan race.

    Just wait till I relate this to the Iraq War, the destabilization of the Near East, and the catastrophic impact thereof on Europe.  Political cover for importing large numbers of “refugees” (including, somehow, “refugees” from Sub-Saharan Africa) into Europe is the ultimate result of American hate and American warmongering.

    Someday, the Americans will bite off more than they can chew.  They almost did, in the Second World War.  Now, the American Left stirs hatred against Russia as the American Right stirs hatred against China—and the Americans have turned their army into a playground for blacks, queers, trannies, and degenerate women—because American hate is turned inwards against America’s own straight white men, whom America has always used to invade and destroy other people’s countries.  By preaching against American hate, I could accidentally save America from getting itself wrecked.

    I guess you are for reparations for slavery for black Americans living today, too?

    No, I think they should be put back into slavery.  Either that, or shipped back to Africa.  Two points where I agree with Thomas Jefferson:  He owned slaves; and in the same breath as he opined that negro slaves should be free, he said that they cannot live under the same government.  The liars who built the so-called “Jefferson Memorial” in D.C. cherry-picked half of that.

    From your question, and the way that you tried to impose it as a “gotcha”, it is evident that you have a “universalist” egalitarian morality, which derives from Christianity (whether or not you are Christian).  I do not.

    I am definitely in favor of Americans paying reparations to their victims in WWII—including making Americans compensate the Germans for all of the “Holocaust reparations” that have been extracted at the point of an American gun, in a country conquered and occupied by America, which is still under occupation by rude, thoughtless Americans, under the rubric of the American concept of “collective guilt”. ®

  82. Zumbuddi says:
    @Raches

    Suspect you mean “ < [less than] 99% of Americans give the rest a bad name.”

    Pretty sure > is symbol for Greater than.

    • Disagree: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  83. Raches says: • Website
    @Zumbuddi

    I meant exactly what I wrote:  Greater than.

    I do sometimes make typographical errors.  This was not one of them.  Perhaps some people are too eager to find them.

    In the context, the reading that you suggested does not make sense.  The text as written does make sense. ®

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  84. Zumbuddi says:
    @Raches

    I interpreted your thought to be:

    Jews, 99% give the rest a bad name”meaning.

    I would think that if 99% think X, then “the rest” — the remaining 1%, can fairly be assumed to think X.

  85. The Second World War was a catastrophe. Tens of millions died—many in excruciatingly horrid ways—all over the world. Many of them were not the worst of people: They were the best of people, the strong, the beautiful, the noble. And they are not even remembered.

    • Agree: John Johnson
  86. Zorost says:

    If you don’t hate that which threatens what you love, then you do not truly love. When hate and indifference collide, hate wins. I prefer winning.

  87. Bert33 says:

    Hitler was a piece of crap, albeit a successful one, who was out to purify german society and put germany on top for 1,000 years. It took the combined might and effort of the allies to shut the axis down. As it was, estimates were reported saying germany was 90 days short of having the Bomb, the uberwaffe with which to end the conversation forever. The allies flattened and invaded germany and carved the country into 4 pieces that existed under foreign military control for about 60 years. Hitler died in infamy, reportedly by suicide. His reich is no more, his henchmen rounded up and hanged by military tribunal at nuremberg. And, good riddance.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    , @Badger Down
  88. Anonymous[303] • Disclaimer says:

    Southerners are Euro-Trash. Period. I agree with the statements made in this article about the “religious” scum that founded the US. In making a distinction between them and the wretched “Southerners” this article goes too far. There is no difference between the two groups.

  89. anonymous[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @songbird

    That picture at the heading of the article was made UP by the Time Life Publishers…It is NOT a Jap skull…

    • Troll: Raches
  90. @antibeast

    Well at least their antics are finally being limited outside Murkka, thanks to the Russians, Chinese, Iranians and Taliban (three cheers for the noble “towelheads”!)

    Now the hate has no where to go but to ricochet around and around the USA. The question is not if, but when a Civil War 2.0 will happen.

    • Replies: @antibeast
  91. @Observator

    I’ve come to think that Germany’s demise was the end of humanity’s last best chance to break free of the curse of international capitalism.

    Let’s call things by their correct name….NOT international capitalism….the curse is “Finance Capitalism”.

  92. Max Edge says:

    Anglos executed their war against the Germans with a distinct savagery remarkable even by Anglo standards. In their “wars” since, whether against Vietnamese peasants, Arabs, or Pashtuns, Anglos have demonstrate a half-hearted low effort attitude with a noticeable indifference to the outcome. But if Germans so much as started doing imperial salutes again, these same Anglos would sprint to the B-52s and start firebombing every German city, town, village, and hut, then march an Emu parade of bayonets from the Rhine to Poland and back again . The Eternal Anglo meme is real. These people have a visceral and genocidal hatred for Germans.

    I think at this point Germans just need to outlast Anglos, because Anglos do not seem to have a future.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  93. I remember a while ago, when the EU plunged into one of its hysterical, ”We need a powerhouse to fix this problem!” tantrums, and everyone looked at Germany to pick up that baton of barathrum, to which someone mumbled, “Then, we should have let her win the war…”

    How many other car brands does the German auto industry own around the globe?

  94. Really!??
    As a grandson, son and myself an untermenschen, I hope when you meet your maker, he sends you to the place where all the humane arians are.
    In utter disgust!

  95. @Raches

    The ‘German’ flag has 3 colors. From the top down;

    Black
    Red
    Yellow

    These ‘flags’ were ‘accepted/adopted’ both in 1919 (After WWI – original 2:3 ratio) and May 23, 1949 (After WWII).

    I read on a web site, maintained by a German guy, that once that flag flew upside down, but I can’t find the guy’s web site, nor any other reference to that statement. Personally, I don’t like to have the color black flying over me, unless it night and the darkness the sky.

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  96. anonymous[279] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raches

    I can only point you into the general direction of 国家神道 (kokka-shinto) for legal reasons. The same is true of concrete book recommendations I am afraid. But you might want to contact https://www.nipponkaigi.org/inquiry/ (TEL03-3476-5611 FAX03-3476-5612) for your request. I do think they are the most official place where you could find an answer to your question. English should suffice.

    There are several aspects to keep in mind when it comes to Japanese nationalism and its ‘far right’ however: On their own Japanese nationalists are not more effective, intelligent or brave than those in the West, especially Germany of course. Most of the aspects for which they are admired today and looked up to by Western European nationalists and US white nationalists were expressively permitted by the US occupational force, I think, as a long-term tool against China. Including Yasukuni Jinja, the absence of collective guilt, the recognition of their war victims and many others. In a similar fashion in which during the Cold War and post the “Morgenthau years” of 1945 to ca. 1947 Germany was allowed to reclaim some internal dignity – so West and East Germans could slaughter each other, in the case that the Cold War war went hot. Just until German identity and demographics and dignity came under full attack again since the (partial) reunification. I see the war situation between China and Japan today in a similar fashion, and between North and South Korea. Very unfortunate.

    So as an American citizen, if you are, their answer might differ than to a Japanese member of their own organization. And given that the Cold War with China now implicates Japan, that might affect their answer. But this all I can do.

  97. @Svevlad

    “I personally blame Puritanism.”
    Absolutely. I enjoy blaming Puritans for almost everything….

  98. apollonian says: • Website

    “Nation of Hate” is Mere Platitude, Truism

    What?–so Jew S A is a “nation of hate”?–thus a nation of emotion?–okay, but all peoples have emotions, and hate is just the reciprocal of love, repulsion vs. attraction–so what? And now the dictators of our culture want to attach sanctions and incentives to various forms of hatred (and love), right? Thus HONESTY is affected and expression of ideas are manipulated–it’s really nothing new in the history of culture, one must admit.

    Thus for the West, Christianity is celebration of TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), and expresses hatred (or antipathy) to lies, lying, hence to satanism (Gosp. JOHN 8:44), and this Christian expression has prevailed for two thousand yrs, more or less. For truth implies the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) view of reality, criterion for truth; Satanism upholds subjectivism (idea that mind/consciousness creates reality, making the subject to be creator, hence God–Satanism). And we see Satanism/subjectivism is actually quite successful and, in fact, to such great extent rules our present world–evermore since WWII, for sure.

    Thus the problem is CYCLIC (according to Oswald Spengler, “Decline of the West”)–first, the people (at least some of them) practice a strict objectivity and honesty, hence reason, logic, and science, and as more people join this objectivistic civilization, it leads then to prosperity and victory–but which soon enough, afterwards, leads to HUBRIS and that exaggerated self-satisfaction which breeds subjectivism (hatred of objectivity, science, etc.), as we see presently, which then causes the “Tower-of-Babel” syndrome, people talking past one another, not really listening, and evermore strife, founded upon self-righteousness (like “hate-crimes” and “hate-speech” laws, etc.).

    So the economic treatment of the culture then merely requires observation of the CYCLIC hist. process and the place we happen to be within that CYCLIC phase or process. Thus we see we’re in a gross, ever-worsening satanic (subjectivistic) phase/stage, the monetary instrument of the culture being steadily, consistently destroyed and debauched (“inflated” and legally counterfeited–see Mises.org for expo; use their site search engine for specific terms, like “fiat-currency”), portending “end-times” (as of the Biblic Book of Revelations) within the cultural/historic cycle–as so many of the “patriot” sort emphasize and pt. out for people nowadays.

    Observe thus the lies put out, encouraging people to take the suicidal covid “clot”-shots–so many of the poor fools actually going along, waging a kind of political/psychologic war against those who resist this amazing covid hoax and lies, the Big-Pharma corps. making so much money on these lies playing upon the fear of the poor fools who so much populate the society.

    Thus we see the socio-biologic nature, the Big-Pharma corps. profiting as the over-populated surplus of goons and suckers are steadily exterminated–as if struck by a horrific disease, artificial as it may be. And such CYCLIC socio-biologic process is really the nature of course of life and culture, the way populations are regulated, affected, and treated–all rather predicted and verified by Spengler and Book of Revelations, even Plato, in his “Republic.” So “nation of hate” is really an over-simplification, I’d say, even a bit platitudinous, though true enough, far as it goes.

  99. FatR says:

    I have no reasons to love US of A in its present form, but this article is clearly written by either a G*rman, or, worse, a wannabe traitor cosplaying a G*erman. In either case, I have two answers to him: cope and seethe. You’ve lost, and you’re clearly too dumb to understand why you’ve lost, given that you have no better use for your time than writing articles aimed at (a)repelling the only people on the whole globe who might be slightly sympathetic to you and (b)portraying your side as even bigger losers that they already are.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  100. But didn’t the Germans murder Jews and shrink their heads?
    Didn’t Germans murder Jews and skin them to make lampshades, book covers, and wallets?
    Didn’t Germans murder six million Jews, mainly in gas chambers disguised as showers?
    I’ll have to visit one of the many Holocaust Museums to check the story.

  101. lavoisier says: • Website

    Americans penchant for war and celebrating the killing of the other is indeed pretty nauseating behavior.

    Truman bragged that he never lost any sleep after dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This was a war crime and remains so to this day and yet it is difficult to find people who question the morality of this obvious war crime.

    But isn’t it necessary to first dehumanize a people if you plan on justifying killing them?

    • Agree: dogbumbreath, Iris
  102. @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    I bet Jared Taylor can play a set of chop sticks like Jerry Lee Lewis can play Great Balls of Fire.

  103. Thank you Mr Unz, for having this article. Two books of mine covered the very profound cultural-moral-spiritual-physical destruction of Germany in 20th century, viz ‘the Holocaust myth and Reality’ and ‘how Britain initiated both world wars.’
    Its time now for Germany to start asking US troops to leave, then eventually sign a peace treaty for WW2!

    • Replies: @John Wear
  104. onebornfree says: • Website

    [More-tagged because your attempt to slip in Vaccine Holohoaxing is off-topic here; and I am an authoritarian moderator.  This is a warning; the next one will be trashed.  — Raches (who is still not vaccinated, but also not stupid). ®]

    When you boil it all down, ignore all of the fancy verbiage put there to fool you into believing that the writer is intelligent, this piece is nothing more than a transparent, pseudo-intellectual promotion of German national socialism ( ie fascism) under Hitler, compared to the (apparently disliked) modern US style national socialism.(fascism)

    Of course, (and par for the course, of course!), this nonsense has been written by an anti- freedom, foaming at the mouth statist, myopic enough and politically unaware enough to still believe that government can actually solve problems ( as long as it’s a WW2 era German style government, of course! 😆 ).

    His only real complaint is that the US is not enough like Hitlers Germany, when anyone with their eyes wide open can see that it already _is_ – all that’s lacking over here is Biden wearing military garb and the entire population seig- heiling him and the rest of the criminals that make up the USSA power structure:

    “It’s beginning to look a lot like Hitler
    everywhere you go.
    Pfizer’s killing the willfully blind, and Moderna’s not far behind,
    Jabbing brainwashed suckers you may know.

    It’s beginning to look a lot like Hitler
    It’s a Vaccine Holocaust.

    [MORE]

    And if you should refuse the shots which will fill you with micro-clots
    you’ll lose your job and pay a heavy cost! ….”

    https://allnewspipeline.com/Its_Beginning_To_Look_A_Lot_Like_Hitler.php/

    And Unz apparently loves this guy! Figures. 😂

    ( let me guess- I’ll now be labelled a “troll” in this thread)

    “Regards”, onebornfree

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  105. @Max Edge

    But if Germans so much as started doing imperial salutes again, these same Anglos would sprint to the B-52s and start firebombing every German city, town, village, and hut, then march an Emu parade of bayonets from the Rhine to Poland and back again .

    Maybe not. The Ukrainian far right has been doing Nazi salutes complete with torch light parades while denouncing the Russians and the Anglo press doesn’t seem to mind.

    How the Anglos react to German imperial salutes depends on whether the Germans are in league with the Empire or the Rebel Alliance at the time.

    • Replies: @Alexandros
  106. Oracle says:
    @S

    ‘Self agency’ in the face of (((social engineering))) is a delusion.

  107. John Wear says:
    @Nick Kollerstrom

    You might also enjoy reading my book “Germany’s War.” Ron Unz has published it on this website at https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/.

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  108. Truth says:

    [Edited to elide scatological language, which is befitting of Jews and rhymes with triggers.  Multiple flagrant spelling errors are not corrected; I need to ask Mr. Unz to give me a red pen, and a ruler to rap on the knuckles of those who fail their English lessons.  —Raches (your foe, mayhap a doe, assuredly not your “bro”, and in any case “mad, bad, and dangerous to know”). ®]

    Bro,

    No offense, but I just can’t get into your effiminate, ephemeral, naval-grazing sh–t. I tried to read your “guess which race i am” article which you hyperlinked at the beginning, that sh–t read like it was written by one of those British broads who was ptetending to be a dude, 400 years ago.

    This is America, Big Dawg, we like our racists (seemingly at least) hetrosexual, and faux-masculine like Anglinstein and Jared Rich. You’re not even going to get any hasbara money for this Lord Byron drivel.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
  109. Zumbuddi says:
    @Bert33

    This comment is to Raches, inspired by Bert33’s angry rant–

    Got it, Raches, you are “authoritarian” whatever that means.

    Here’s a thought: with your power to Moderate, may I respectfully (or enviously) suggest that you require commenters such as Bert33 to include in the comment the SOURCE for the information on which the opinion- comment is based.

    I know I’d like to know if Bert33 gets his history of WWII from books, TV, or a brain malfunction.

  110. antibeast says:
    @littlereddot

    The Capitalist Owners of the US Fed are now setting up the financial WMD (Weapons of Mass Destitution) which would usher in the coming American Depression 2.0. When the time comes, the Fed will implode the financial WMD which would lead to the destruction of the household net-worth of the US Middle-Class while reducing the US Working Class to penury. The rest is just ‘smoke and mirrors’ intended to dupe the stupid gringos into believing the political circus of cultural freaks consisting of homos, feminists, transgenders, negros, etc.

  111. Anon[173] • Disclaimer says:

    A country of fearful, greedy, hateful, ignorant people. Of course I live elsewhere.

  112. Trinity says:

    This is the problem. The American people get blamed for what the “gubmint” does around the world. The everyday working class White American is not even represented in Washington, hasn’t been in the last 60 years, so spare me the, “I hate America.” Hell, I wish to God Almighty that Germany and the Axis had won WWII and I am sure a great deal of White Americans feel that way in 2021. As for Americans committing heinous acts during times of war? I do recall hearing and reading about Japanese, Koreans, and Vietnamese brutalizing American troops and POW. WWII and Korea were before my time but I worked with an ex POW of Vietnam and actually saw some of the Viet Cong’s work, so that one I saw with my own two eyes and up close and personal in the flesh.

    No doubt that many of the horror stories about how “the good guys” treated the Germans and Japanese are true, but I hardly think the Japanese have a leg to stand on when it comes to treating enemy POW humanely. Now the Germans are another case altogether when it came to the American POW. The Jew and other communist POW? I certainly DO NOT believe the official fairy tale we are told of the holocaust nor do I believe the camps were Holiday Inns where every afternoon at 5 PM, Jews commies and other assorted scoundrels gathered by the swimming pool for a few drinks. Jews were POW and I doubt any POW is treated that well, even the ones that are treated “humanely.”

    • Agree: usNthem
  113. profnasty says:
    @Raches

    The America of Thomas Jefferson is on it’s death bed.
    Next- the America of Bill Gates.
    Praise the lord and pass the
    ammunition. Our bandoleer is for syringes.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  114. HT says:

    America is a nation of self hate now thanks to the Jewocracy that controls our culture and institutions. Whites are taught to hate themselves and Negroes are taught to hate whites.

    • Agree: John Wear
  115. @SolontoCroesus

    Thank you, SolontoCroesus, for your two comments (so far). I have not carefully read the (confusing) text-article yet; just glanced down the comments here and there looking for a trustworthy soul, and finally found you. You’ve not disappointed me … yet.

    I do believe it’s helpful to know a little about the author, his history, motivations, etc. before reading his text. Raches appears to be a little too aggressive. I notice this article has brought out so many of my least-liked commenters: CT, S, Morgan, Adunai– even Vaterland I have problems with — so it’s not surprising I was uncomfortable with my first look at the text. When I have time later this afternoon, I will read it carefully, and may then comment. I don’t enjoy being in the company of these modern-day, wannebe-Nazis who imagine a 1920 to 1940 Germany that didn’t exist, plus a National Socialist party and party members not as they were but as these guys wish they had been. If they had more then fantasies and other people’s books going for them, they might bring about their own movement, but all they can do is project their ideas on the National Socialists of the past — now all dead and gone. These men cannot speak up for themselves, but I bet they would if they could, and put these know-it-alls in their place.

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Vaterland
  116. The meaning of “Nazi-Pagan” discipline vs “Judeo-Zionist” ritual is this: the former makes a declaration and stands by it, whereas, the latter utters something nonsensical and abrogates it with a wink and a nod; i.e. everything thing is negotiable, even honor and duty and there are no fixed parameters to work within.

  117. @Raches

    GLR was a very interesting guy, and he was treated as interesting by mainstream institutions in ways inconceivable today. In the mid-1960s he was a guest speaker at some high level American Universities — Michigan State the one in Ann Arbor, that is he was invited to speak by student groups and was treated for the most part courteously.

    Also he was interviewed in Playboy Magazine by black plagiarist, Alex Haley of “Roots” infamy. GLR’s most memorable quote was what was going to be his campaign slogan when he ran for president in 19782 — “The Jews are through in 72.”

  118. So you ONLY hate 3 small races: Jews, blacks, and, bizarrely, Americans ( that would not be a race, my friend). You sound like a loving kind of guy.
    That said, I do agree with much of what you wrote. But don’t write off all Americans–the country is way too vast and diverse, and it just makes you sound moronic.

  119. America is not a nation of hate….America has been whipped up by its enemy, (the British Empire) to hate and to hate along a particular strategy of categorizing humanity into various boxes, to thus be ruled over….this is just perennial oligarchs of the Venitian methods.

  120. Half-Jap says:

    For my part, I do not hate any race except for Jews, Americans, and rhymes with triggers.

    Not sure what the nigs have to do with all this, but I can attest to the fact that blacks in US also hate the nigs. Nobody does. Maybe semantics to you, but reality to them.

    Also, this line of history isn’t so clear in the far east/asean region, but all but china and korea agree that the axis wanted them to be free and that war was for a just cause. Too bad us japs have been brainwashed by US occupation’s forced education and media control.

  121. What’s wrong with hate? It is the last pure and honest emotion. I’m sorry your Fuhrer loss. He should have read the Poland situation better. I’m not sure the concept of just teaching the Slavs enough to follow orders isn’t a tad based on hate of Slavs. Haven’t Slavs descended from the Scythians, hence making them part of the Aryan club?

    Absolutely we English are just haters. Why not? Our native homeland has been under occupation since the Roman invasion. Also spare me the Anglo Saxon drivel. The Saxons were just another conqueror who never left.

    Finally isn’t this borderless and mix breeding program the brainstorm of the Austrian Japanese aristocratic Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi? The rich for centuries married their own in status, but not in tribe. That is the basis of all current disorders, and we Americans tend to be human mutts.

  122. rgl says:

    I do not hate any race except for Jews, Americans, and rhymes with triggers.

    What is the point of this essay?? Is the author lamenting the hate, or celebrating it?

    • Replies: @anon
  123. The following passage from the article perfectly encapsulates the state of America:

    “That world was destroyed by the Jews’ Janissaries: The Americans, who can no more pass off the guilt of their own crimes on the Jews they made their masters, than a goy hitman can pass off all blame to his Jewish boss who ordered a murder.”

    Amen!

  124. Thanks Raches.
    Hoping your materials may be found and your appeals bear fruit. Just a word of Respect for the Russians that fought against the judeo bolshevik Beast, among so many millions more. Europa!
    am Ende steht der Sieg.

  125. Billy Ash says:

    “For my part, I do not hate any race except for Jews, Americans, and rhymes with triggers. I wish to extended my hand in peace and friendship to the decent peoples of this world, in the hope that a new free world may be built in the future.”

    Americans are not a race, Einstein. Where did this idiot come from?
    Too much lead in Raches’ drinking supply.

    • LOL: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  126. Blacks are taught to hate whites.
    Whites are taught to hate themselves.
    The civil rights movement/BLM isn’t pro-black….it’s anti-white.
    Feminism isn’t pro-women…..it’s anti-men.
    The gay rights movement is anti-hetero.
    Hollywood taught our people to hate the Germans to prep for WWII.

    jewish minds stay up at night thinking of clever ways to screw white people……

    and THAT is where ALL of the hate comes from.

    • Agree: John Wear
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  127. It takes a good long time to come to the still foggy realization that we were brought up to believe many lies. And the lies are covered in many layers, too many. I’d rather live by and in truth and suffer than to be a part of the satanic lying mega monster that has it’s tentacles spread worldwide now. Yes I was brought up by 2 parents who took the newspaper and evening news as gospel, a notch below the Bible (which also has many lies and distortions in it). Add in the schools, “history” books and church and we were theirs.

    Thanks for the article ……… I thought it quite good.

  128. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    …I have not carefully read the (confusing) text-article yet; just glanced down the comments here…

    I do believe it’s helpful to know a little about the author, his history, motivations, etc. before reading his text.

    How do you suppose you may observe the characteristics that you enumerate, if you don’t see what I have to say for myself?  The huntress Yeager is far off the track here.

    these modern-day, wannebe-Nazis [sic]

    Don’t you try to stick me in that pigeonhole.  It is amusing, when I have recently been humorously accused of being Camille Paglia’s sockpuppet (!); but it does me a grievous injustice nevertheless.

    I am not a National Socialist; I have made that clear from early on, and I pointedly linked to that comment in the above article which you did not read.  I am also “not a white nationalist, an alt-righter, a ‘movement’ follower, or whatever else people may imagine me to be.”

    As I said repeatedly in my extensive commentary before I got my blog, I see Adolf Hitler as an historical figure like Caesar or Napoleon—albeit greater, the greatest yet.  Would you call me a “wannabe Caesarian” or “wannabe Bonapartist”?

    I loathe wannabe-Nazis; and I have sometimes spent wasted way too much time shooting them down in other venues, under other identites.  I know them when I see them.  I would not apply that term to C.T., S, or Dr. Morgan, either—not from what I have seen here thus far, and in a brief (thus far) look at C.T.’s website.  I appreciate their presence here.  I have some disagreements with each of them, from different angles; but they are, for my part, respectful disagreements, as (I hope) should be my various disagreements with you.  They have interesting ideas that I should like to discuss (and I must apologize for having fallen behind on replies, to them and to many others).

    I know your website quite well; and I follow it sporadically, from time to time.  You have done some good work, although I have observed that you are sometimes a bit—prickly, as here.  And I would suggest that you stop forcing your readers to do slave-labor for Google’s AI training with a privacy-destroying CAPTCHA, just to comment; I wanted to comment on one of your articles a few months ago, but I categorically refuse to do Google CAPTCHAs for any reason whatsoever.  You may expect that those who have the most pride and self-value will refuse to jump through Google-hoops like trained circus animals.

    Your blog’s coverage is generally thoughtful; thus, I am disappointed that you would pass judgment on someone by saying explicitly that you haven’t bothered to see what that person says—which you obviously have not.  As for your presumptuous air of somehow having the authority to pass judgment on me here, I will let this exchange speak for itself on who should be issuing such critiques.

    If they had more then fantasies and other people’s books going for them, they might bring about their own movement, but all they can do is project their ideas on the National Socialists of the past — now all dead and gone.

    Oh, you have no idea who I am or what I am capable of.  Perhaps you may be unable to recognize original thinking when you see it refuse to read it.

    Raches appears to be a little too aggressive.

    I am extremely aggressive.  That is a feature, not a bug.  But it is a calculated aggression; I do not lash out wildly.  I even often try to reach out to people who very strongly disagree with me; see, for example, my remarks on Kathryn Paige Harden.  I should like to engage her, and those who think like her, in a cordial discussion of our deep-seated and quite vehement disagreements.  (Not to mention… see above.)  I look deep beneath the surface in judging who is and isn’t worth trying to find common ground with.

    I am at The Unz Review because it is a not echo chamber.  It is a great place to break out of simple-minded political pigeonholes, such as the one to which you would consign me—to reach out and bring together people who have real common interests, against all that threatens those interests.  Vide the above article, which is in large part an ode to Japanese, Chinese, and Indians—from the historical perspective of desiderating the Axis that could have, should have saved Aryan Europe from being cracked like a nut and split between the US-USSR frenemies.  All of this is very relevant today—when Europe is under a de facto invasion that was actuated by America’s destabilization of the Middle East, in the Iraq War and subsequent events—and when American aggressiveness against China is quite possibly an existential threat to everybody, everywhere.

    ——————————

    I intend some replies to other commentators.  I hope.  I should be spending the time on new blog posts, which are forthcoming. ®

  129. Sparkon says:
    @Raches

    It is the MAJORITY of Americans. What, do you suppose that LIFE Magazine was a fringe publication, and the MAJORITY of Americans were horrified by it? Do you suggest that the MAJORITY of Americans have ever opposed American WWII policy at any time from 1942–2021? Do you suppose that American policies could be what they are, without at least the tacit support of the MAJORITY? On what planet do you live?

    I think you’re all mixed up and going way overboard if you believe “the MAJORITY of Americans” had anything at all to do with the production or publication of LIFE magazine in 1944, or any other wartime propaganda.

    Most Americans were targets and victims of WWII propaganda, and not its source. I would not deny, however, that propaganda is very effective.

    I would add that my father and uncle both served in the Pacific during WWII, and they did not send or bring home any Japanese skulls or any Japanese trophies. The same was true for most of my pals, whose fathers also had served during WWII, although not all of them in the Pacific theater, and of course we’ve never heard of any Nazi skulls being sent back to the USA.

    However, two shrunken heads did turn up at Nuremberg:

    Thomas Dodd with USA exhibit #254 at Nuremberg

    However, to be sure, in my youth, a kid down the street like to brag that his dad had brought back from the Pacific a “diamond-studded Jap machine gun,” so by your logic, all of us kids lived in a neighborhood of hate.

    Adolf Hitler’s tragic mistake was he sought solutions to perceived problems through direct military action, thus aligning most of the so-called “free world” against him and Germany in WWII, thereby realizing Heine’s prophecies from the mid 19th century.

    Hitler made so many strategic blunders in WWII that it’s not at all illogical to think he was somebody’s tool or fool.

    • Replies: @Raches
  130. Raches says: • Website
    @Billy Ash

    For my part, I do not hate any race except for Jews, Americans, and rhymes with triggers.  I wish to extended my hand in peace and friendship to the decent peoples of this world, in the hope that a new free world may be built in the future.

    Americans are not a race, Einstein.  Where did this idiot come from?
    Too much lead in Raches’ drinking supply.

    You and a few others need recalibrated irony-meters, and perhaps some remedial lessons in reading comprehension.  (Or better:  Never being taught to read.)

    I am a subtle author:  A joy for the discriminating reader.  I write “in blood and proverbs”. ®

    • Replies: @Truth
  131. Raches says: • Website
    @Sparkon

    However, two shrunken heads did turn up at Nuremberg:

    Thomas Dodd with USA exhibit #254 at Nuremberg

    Oooh, what a classic!

    Attention, Proems readers:  I seek to cultivate the readership who will take great pleasure in dissecting this type of thing, with a classy attitude (take the high road!) and scholarly references.  That way, I can focus without distraction on writing the types of articles that will, no doubt, bring much more of this in reaction.

    Who wants to be the first here? ®

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  132. Raches says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    I know that you weren’t hinting at this; but you assuredly deserve it as the least I can do, and I anyway always want to encourage people to read your American Pravda articles on this topic.  Thus on my own initiative, I belatedly slipped in a link near the top, on a phrase where it seemed best to fit the context of the anchor text.  I didn’t want to change the substantive text. ®

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/#p_1_4

  133. Trinity says:
    @Raches

    So if this shrunken head in Germany is propaganda/comedy which we all know by now it was, what makes you think the “Japanese skull” wasn’t pure bullshit as well?

    I can almost guarantee that countless Japanese civilians suffered like the Germans and that countless Japanese females were raped by the “good guys” as well. I have heard American POW were treated RELATIVELY well by the Germans but I doubt they had it made.

    More than likely the Japanese skull is horseshit. Americans raping Japanese women or treating Japanese POW badly? GOOD CHANCE OF THAT BEING TRUE. HOWEVER, it isn’t as if American POW were treated well by the Japanese and how much of the horrific stories about Japanese brutalizing the Chinese is true? Japan criticizing America for inhumane treatment is akin to some Jew claiming that all Scots are cheap.

    SADLY A GREAT DEAL OF ALL HUMANS CANNOT HANDLE POWER OVER OTHER HUMANS, it isn’t just Americans and generally the weaker the person the worst they handle power. Japan or the Japanese people are not in any shape or form that humane in times of war. Far from it.

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @bike-anarkist
  134. In the early days of the internet there was a German Nazi Forum called Grossdeutsches Vaterland; the only evidence of its existence that I can now find is: https://forums.skadi.net/threads/104223-Hello-from-the-Gro%C3%9Fdeutsches-Vaterland
    The German government had it taken down. I posted there under the name of a certain German Nazi general to whom I may have been distantly related. The main language used there was English, but there were also German, French, Italian, Spanish and other language sections. It was by very far my greatest experience on line. I would love to see it revived. The forum was dominated by one Dr. Brandt (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Brandt). He was a German who could also write in English. He knew all about WWI & II and did not particularly like Americans.
    I know what you’re thinking: Oh! Bad Man! . . . Really? Have you been to Europe recently? Nice place? It was a lot nicer 80 years. What happened to it? Simply put: the good guys lost the wars. The bad guys with malice aforethought have ruined it. Can anyone think that, if the Nazis had won WWII, Europe would be in such terrible shape today?

  135. USA is a business entity, not a country or nation. Even the flag is a copy of the East India Company flag. EIC is the first ever corporation doing trade and annexing territories for the Queen.

    The red and white stripes were common on flags of the Majapahit empire in the east Indies. EIC first traded in the region and adopted the flag but put the Union Jack on the top left. The British controlled Americas later used the same flag with a vertical Union Jack. I guess to signify business as usual like in India and east India. The Grand Union flag.

    The American flag is just a continuation of the Grand Union flag and in essence a continuation of the business of plantation, slave labor and land annexation.

    Today, it seems the trend continues with the overlords reaping it all while the peasants are pitted against each other.

    • Agree: Biff
    • Thanks: antibeast
    • Replies: @Carlton Meyer
    , @antibeast
  136. padre says:
    @Cookie Boy

    And aborigines also know the Christian behavior of “Australian people” (whatever that means)!

  137. They hate white Americans and our founding fathers so much that today, a day we once celebrate a white explorer named Christopher Columbus who discovered the Americas in 1492 and opened the door for exploration of the New World.
    Yet now, because Columbus was white, they’ve changed the holiday from Columbus Day to Indigenous Peoples Day.
    Soon there will be no holidays where statues, monuments or cemetery crypts where whites were once honored or where they were once laid to rest.
    Here’s to old St. Christopher, thanks for all your courageous explorations on the seven seas, and to the four corners of the earth at a time when savage tribes were still Hunter gatherers, killing each other over tribalism.
    They don’t make men like Columbus anymore. What we have now are evil GlobalHomoZioBIGsMIC wankers playing God on humanity.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  138. Truth says:
    @Raches

    [In my book, “fag” is a word to apply to the butthurt flu hoaxer who tosses bitchy, zero-substance insults when he has no argument, and who is just trolling to try to derail an intelligent discussion.  Take it up in Hate Speech, and be sure to whine about how I am an authoritarian.  Further comments from you will not be published in this thread—and probably not in any others at Proems, besides the one to which I have directed you, unless I feel an urge to let you show everyone again how ugly and stupid you are.  —Raches. ®]

    I am a subtle author: A joy for the discriminating reader. I write “in blood and proverbs”. ®

    …Not to mention the light, subtle almost imperceptible patina* of fag…

    (*That’s the type of word you guys use).

  139. gotmituns says:

    It’s not hate to know that certain foul groups must be eliminated.

  140. How does the fact that the most powerful USA figures in the 50’s, Allen and Foster Dulles, Akken, head of the CIA and Foster Secretary of State, spent much of the 30’s helping Council of Foreign Relations masters aid and profit off the rise of Nazi Germany, and in the 40’s during WWII continued helping them and selected Nazis and German money makers and money movers and after WWII brought top Nazis into the CIA, NASA, NATO, USA medical establishment and put them back in power in Germany itself.

    That’s really what happened. It’s documented history. Ask yourself why the zealous Nazi hunters found so few when they were hiding in plain site in so many USA directed institutions?

    What about that Raches? The Nazis didn’t lose, they changed flags and became cold warriors who overthrew governments and assassinated leaders all over the world for Rockefeller inc.

  141. Trinity says:

    That is a Caucasian skull. Look at the eyes? teehee.

    • Troll: Raches
  142. Trinity says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    I have heard rumors that Columbus might have been a heeb. lolol. If that is the case, I wonder if the woke crowd would give him a pass.

    • Troll: Raches
  143. Mefobills says:

    I’m sure by now everybody knows that I am sympathetic to NSDAP. My handle of MEFOBILLS is a bill of credit issued by Nazi Germany.

    So, I should be sympathetic also to Rache’s editorial?

    Let’s start with this one:

    America is a nation of hate. Its culture and its genetics are irreparably, incorrigibly suffused with the hatreds and jealousies of degenerate, low-class religious fanatics, who fled in patricidal hatred from the order and culture of Europe.

    Judeo-Christianity was invented, created in the 200 year period between 1492 and 1694, what I call the big bang. Our (((friends))) were making speculative gains out of Amsterdam’s stock market, and used those gains to fund Bible printing in English, especially the Athias Bibles.

    The creation of stock market capital by 700 unlicensed Sephardic Jews in Amsterdam + Printing Press + Onselling of Stock into free markets + Private money creation (private bank credit) + Freedom of Religion (Judeo Christianity) = Big Bang.

    Big Bang is the invention of Finance Capitalism, which included the invention of Jude0-Christianity. This subversive funding also funded Cromwell, and the attack on England, which culminated in the first debt spreading bank, the BOE. This is non trivial as the former heirarchy of a King looking out for his people was usurped. Hearth and Kin was usurped.

    The first case of Hearth and Kin being destroyed was actually in the low-lands of Holland, where the (((international))) could attach debts to municipalities, rather than the King. A King can always tell the finance international to F-Off, but a debt hook thrust into a large democratic population is another matter.

    Its important to understand that the Revolutionary war was AGAINST the big bang, in the same way as was National Socialism. The BOE was whispering into King George’s ear, and was de-monetizing colonial scrip, which caused a 10 year long depression in the Colonies. This was the real cause of war.

    The line of causality for NSDAP economy is tied to the American Colonies, and ultimately to the resurrection of Industrial Capitalism, invented in said colonies.

    Frederick List transmitted the American System (Industrial Capitalism) to Germany; Hitler resurrected the system after he came into power, especially with Bills of Credit, like MEFOBILLS.

    All wars are economic, with special interests and in-groups vying for control. In the case of America, it was a new head that was in control. The new head was Sociopathic, with money sickness. There is no loss of wants with these sort of Sociopaths, so they maneuver countries into downward cycles, especially debt cycles.

    This new head was that of Finance Capital, which had taken over especially by the Spanish American War, and for sure by the election of 1912. This election was rigged by Finance Capitalists out of London, including Rothschild and Morgan interests.

    Here is the important point. If you have an elect that is a finance oligarchy, who does not look like the people, who are sociopaths intent on taking sordid gain, who have money sickness, then your country will go off the rails. It is a foregone conclusion.

    It isn’t proper to blame an entire people group for the actions of their elect. The elect can brainwash normies easy enough, especially by owning the press. The first case of this propaganda effort was by the Jewish community in Amsterdam using the owned press to create false narrative. This false narrative protected their debts attached to the municipalities, and their sordid gains with stock market capital.

    As can be seen by today’s Covid example, the average normie is not capable of critical reasoning. Mostly normies want a download from the powers that be, and to do the right thing. They want to do what they are told, and then virtue signal about how they are righteous. They have a brain that works on emotion, not logic.

    This is true of EVERY POPULATION! During the EC-130 Hainan Island incident under Bush Junior (2001), almost the entire Chinese population was whipped into a frenzy. It is easy to maneuver populations. The about turn of the population only took a couple of weeks.

    The people that fled Europe in many cases were being made into debt slaves, especially in England. Even small infractions were criminalized. The practice of Kidnapping came to the fore, as Children were grabbed and monetized with debt, debt to be paid off later, especially by working in the colonies.

    http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/theywereslaves.pdf

    America’s problem is indeed one of religion, but even more importantly is that it is Finance Capitalism, which emerged from the Big Bang. The usurpation of Christianity came in stages, with Judeo Christianity being funded into existence to support Finance Capital. Concepts like usury were erased from existence.

    Hitler and Mussolini were fighting against “international capital i.e. finance capitalism.” Even Imperial Japan took up the American System (Industrial Capitalism). Japan took up the system after the American Civil war. Peshine Smith (1814-1882) was one of the architects, transmitting the system as he had learned it from Henry Clay (1777-1852) and Henry Carey (1793-1879). Henry Carey in turn was Mathew Carey’s son. Mathew learned the system from Benjamin Franklin, and wrote about it.

    https://michael-hudson.com/2012/12/e-peshine-smith-a-study-in-protectionist-growth-theory-and-american-sectionalism/

    Hitler, out of instinct, fought against Finance Capital, and correctly diagnosed it as Jewish.

    The Bills of Credit channeled into industry and the commons. The “American Credit” from the first bank, also channeled into industry and the commons. Anybody who doubts this can read Hamilton’s report on Manufacturers, and take note of how American credit (not gold or silver) channeled.

    Mussolini also grappled with Industrialization and the attempts of Finance Capital trying to take over. Mussolini nationalized Italy’s banks in 1926
    .

    The final thought is not not blame the people, but to blame the hidden “elect.” Universal suffrage democracy doesn’t work. Hidden finance Oligarchs and special interests string pulling a population from behind the scenes, is not a proper hierarchy – it is not hearth and kin.

    The average normie cannot discern reality, they become subsumed by clown world. It is important to diagnose the problem correctly, like Hitler did out of instinct, and perhaps also reasoning, because he read widely.

  144. Raches says: • Website
    @Trinity

    So if this shrunken head in Germany is propaganda/comedy which we all know by now it was, what makes you think the “Japanese skull” wasn’t pure bullshit as well?

    You (and an anonymous commentator whom I marked as a troll) are evidently incapable of simple logic.

    The “Jap skull” was published in a fully mainstream American magazine.  By analogy to customary courtroom rules of evidence, that is called an “admission against interest”.  Do you suggest that the ironically-named “LIFE” magazine was fabricating anti-American atrocity propaganda in 1944?

    If a German magazine under Dr. Goebbels’ authority had published photos of these alleged “shrunken heads”, then I would presume that to be genuine.  Of course, no such thing ever happened!

    On the other hand, in the Soviet-American kangaroo-court show trials where lots of stuff was just plain made up

    ——————————

    So…  Any scholarly historians here?  This is your moment to shine.  Points for style. ®

    • Replies: @Trinity
  145. As I have said before, Adolf Hitler was the leader of the free world. And National-Socialist Germany, the free and independent Germany, was also the great builder of a nondestructive harmony amongst races and nations

    Totally ridiculous and would probably draw a laugh even at stormfront.

    The free world includes free elections and free speech which the Nazis eliminated.

    Great builder of nondestructive harmony?

    It [the Sudetenland] is the last territorial claim that I have to make in Europe.

    – Adolf Hitler 1938

    Then he takes the rest of Czechoslovakia and invades Poland knowing that it could provoke another world war. Completely ruined any remaining credibility and made British conservatives look like fools which opened the door for Churchill. Those same conservatives wanted him to invade the USSR but Hitler was reckless and wanted revenge over WW1.

    I’m no fan of clown world or globalism but this take on Hitler being a peace lover is absurd.

    His alliance with the Japanese is what drew the US into war. They foolishly attacked Pearl Harbor which was a dream come true for the Brits and US war mongers.

    • Replies: @sunhunter61
  146. @Brian Damage

    USA is a business entity, not a country or nation. Even the flag is a copy of the East India Company flag. EIC is the first ever corporation doing trade and annexing territories for the Queen.

    Correct, the first flag of the United States was identical to the British East India Company. This nation is a spinoff from the British empire. George Washington referred to New York city as the seat of the empire, hence the state became known as the “Empire State.” Most historians declare that the American empire began with the Spanish-American war in 1898. It really began decades earlier when the US Navy formed the East India Squadron in 1835 that grew into of the Asiatic Squadron in 1868. American warships deployed to Asia to intimidate and attack whoever interfered with American business interests. This force also established American colonies in China, Hawaii, and Samoa before the Spanish-American war.

  147. Jiminy says:

    Most Americans are contented watching “days of our lives, “and not knowing what the rest of the world really thinks about them. If they did then maybe things would be happening differently. Look at tiktok if you don’t agree. It would come as an enormous shock and travesty if the majority were to read this on Facebook or something similar. Their heads would explode. But they won’t , so you’re preaching here mainly to the converted.
    We can’t really sit back and just blame the governments for all that has happened in the past. Certainly one has to feel for those who are conscripted to fight, but those that eagerly volunteered to go to war, and in some cases fought relations of their own , can’t really be forgiven. Unfortunately we see it happening all over again today. Building up to a conflict with any one of at least three adversaries. Here we go again.
    Repeatedly on this website I have read of people proudly boasting how they have never voted or that they will never vote. They have been led to believe that its a right not to vote, to trust the politician to do what’s best for them. And then act surprised when we wake up one morning, turn on the squawk-box only to find that the whole worlds gone to hell.

  148. antibeast says:
    @Brian Damage

    The USA is a nation of debt slaves to the Capitalist Owners of the US Federal Reserve System, a privately-owned Central Bank which issues the privately-owned money called ‘US\$’.

    The picture shown above which appears in the dollar bill issued by the US Federal Reserve System depicts an unfinished pyramid consisting of 13 layers signifying the incomplete task of building the original ‘United States’ of Thirteen Colonies into a new world Empire (‘novus ordo seclorum’), an undertaking approved (‘annuit coeipts’) by divine providence (‘eye of providence’).

    That is why tens of millions of European immigrants were imported as White debt slaves to build up the USA into an Empire which needed White sepoys to fight and die in Overseas Wars as well. As the White debt slaves have turned into useless White Trash behaving just like Ghetto Blacks, the Capitalists now want to import tens of millions of Asian and Latino immigrants who are willing to work as Brown debt slaves in the USA as well as fight and die as Brown sepoys in Overseas Wars.

    Quo Vadis?

    • Thanks: CelestiaQuesta
  149. @John Wear

    You might also enjoy reading my book “Germany’s War.” Ron Unz has published it on this website at https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/.

    David Irving, historian and author, should be included in every discussion regarding “truth” of WW2, Hitler and Germany. A man so dedicated to his craft he learns German to read the official Nazi archives. You know he’s doing something right when he’s prohibited from speaking in “free speech” Nations such as Australia and Canada:

    Links to his books:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  150. While debating which empire was/is the greatest, which allies were/are the better match, which war the better heroes, civilization as we know it, today is on the verge of extinction. This present enemy is not of one or ten nation states fighting for the right to invade, conquer and destroy a helpless state for its natural resources, what’s now assembled against humanity is a power the likes have never before been united since the dawn of mankind.

    The enemy today that seeks to genocide most and enslave the select few are not nation states, they’re a rich elite class of billionaires under a GlobalHomoZioBIGsMIC rainbow flag now forcing Frankenshots, censorship, unjust arrest and judicial justice, forced indoctrination and relentless manipulation of global markets for the benefit of the few and themselves.

    When every man woman and child is now subject to tyrannical mandates, what’s left for any free thinking soul is total surrender or the greatest global rebellion the world has ever experienced.

    I’d like to think there are still spirited warriors out there willing to fight for freedom. But I’m not holding my breath.

  151. @Robert Dolan

    I was in Germany late 2016 with my wife a ret German teacher just after the election, and in a coffee shop became involved in conversation with an affluent German couple who informed me that :
    “Ein guter Deutscher muss Donald Trump hassen” : A good German must hate DT-

    In the following few week of our stay there I was simply amazed and appalled by the incredible amount of crude venom spewed towards DT by all of the media, politicians including the so-called conservatives, and the general public.

    To this day the nutty Germans still worship BO, BC, and the whole cabal of woke charlatans, and they are now singing the praises of JB regarding his “integrity, statesmanship and honesty”

    Germany the homeland of a plethora of world shattering abberations both Goy and Hebrew, such as communism, antifa, shrinkism, Frankfurter Schule, manic authority worship, the list could go on and on, Germany most certainly could be classified as a country with it’s share of hate evident.

    AJM

  152. I’m glad that that Life magazine photographer just happened to be present when that woman was writing that letter of thanks to her Navy fella, with the skull positioned perfectly for the camera, no less.

  153. Well goodness “Raches” don’t come here. Why so many do want to come here must puzzle your noodle to no end.

    • Replies: @Raches
  154. @onebornfree

    His only real complaint is that the US is not enough like Hitlers Germany, when anyone with their eyes wide open can see that it already _is_ – all that’s lacking over here is Biden wearing military garb and the entire population seig- heiling him and the rest of the criminals that make up the USSA power structure:

    umm, wrong.

    USA under Dear Leader Biden is nothing like the Germany that Hitler and National Socialists led:

    — BEFORE Biden took power, US was prosperous; unemployment was lowest it’s been in many, many years; the social climate was relatively calm — no riots in the streets, no widespread hunger or children prostituting themselves in order to find shelter.
    Although in the pre-Biden era (as now) inroads were made on customary moral values by means of Drag Queen Story hours and the normalization of trannies, homos, and gay marriage, similar to depravities that existed in pre-NSDAP Germany.

    – BEFORE Hitler took power, Germany experienced staggering unemployment; hyperinflation the likes of which had never been seen in modern times. As noted above, sexual depravity — prostitution including child prostitution; debasement of the arts — performing and plastic; hunger, homelessness, WWI veterans living on the streets or organized into Freikorp to defend against frequent incursions of Bolshevik Communist-agitated riots; political chaos, with the German people called upon to cast vote after futile vote after nonsensical vote in a system crafted by and largely administered by Jews (one more similarity to US pre- and post-Biden).**

    SIDEBAR: ** So-called Holocaust scholars aver that Hitler came to power by “semi-legitimate means.”
    Heh.
    Check out Molly Ball, TIME,
    The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
    https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

    excerpt:

    “it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally. The system didn’t work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.
    That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.”

    (read the rest of Ball’s essay. Would it surprise you to learn that most of the Cast of Characters in this “Shadow campaign” are Jewish?) CLOSE

    Back to Comparison of Pre-and Post-Biden with Pre-and Post-NSDAP:

    USA Post-Biden: (You tell me. Are you luvin it?)
    Unemployment is at an all-time high; gas prices are higher than they’ve been in the past decade; the US National Debt is stratospheric and growing; murders on the streets of major cities are breaking previous records; immigrants of untold number and source are flooding into the country unchecked (similar thing happened in Germany pre-NASDAP; the ‘immigrants’ were Eastern European Jews with no skills, many illiterate and impoverished); inflation is rampant, affecting most critically food and housing.
    In short, USA under Biden eroded all the gains of the previous administration but took the nation into and ever-deeper economic and financial quagmire.
    If MAD Magazine were still publishing, Joe Biden could have been Alfred E Neuman’s doppelgänger.

    OTOH

    Germany Post-Hitler: Herbert Hoover wrote in Freedom Betrayed that in 1938 he spoke with Hitler and Goring for over an hour. He congratulated Hitler on the tremendous effort NSDAP had accomplished in building sound housing for so many people.
    Unemployment was almost negligible.
    Hjalmar Schacht used MEFOBILLS and other strategies to get the German economy on a sound, labor-based rather than debt-based foundation.
    According to Breitman & Lichtman in FDR and the Jews, “NSDAP quelled physical violence against Jews . . . no Jew was sent to concentration camp until late in 1938.”
    German workers were encouraged to take vacations out of country.
    German children were heavily regimented: they were encouraged to exercise, hike, learn practical crafts and skills (not forced to wear masks and study CRT).
    Hitler was on the cover of TIME magazine as Man of the Year in 1939.

    In short, NO, Biden’s USA today could only wish it were like Hitler’s Germany 1933-1939.

  155. @dogbumbreath

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/1Lzjr2KqXLxg/

    Irving explains how the drunk Churchill engineered the war for his jewish masters.

    • Replies: @Raches
  156. Raches says: • Website
    @Gidoutahere

    Well goodness “Raches” don’t come here.  Why so many do want to come here must puzzle your noodle to no end.

    The point of the article is more about how Americans just love to go to other people’s countries—with hate-driven aggressive warfare, followed by military occupation.  Why they feel an obsessive urge to shoot, bomb, and burn other people into “liberation” must puzzle your noodle to no end. ®

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Gidoutahere
  157. @littlereddot

    He is talking about Germans and you start on with Tartars? Anglos don’t care about Nazis, they care about potential threats to their power. Germans are, Slavs are not.

  158. Raches says: • Website
    @Robert Dolan

    I had to try three IP addresses in different countries before I could see your video.  Region-restricted, for “Holocaust denial” and “hate speech”.

    (I don’t know why Bitchute turns out not to embed, but that is another matter—and not relevant to the below, either.)

    ——————————

    General moderation note (not directed at Mr. Dolan, and not a topic for further discussion here):  I do spot-check videos, just to make sure that they are not misrepresented trolling.  I consider that to be my duty to The Unz Review.  My browser blocks video embeds, for privacy and security reasons; thus, it is very inconvenient.

    I immediately took a glance through Mr. Dolan’s video, because he identified it as Irving.  Sometimes, videos languish in the moderation queue just because I can’t be bothered to deal with the hassle, as a practical matter.  To avoid that, please (1) provide a line of identifying text saying what it’s supposed to be (as Mr. Dolan did), and (2) don’t use videos as low-value/no-value memes, which are not worth the time to check. ®

  159. @Raches

    I do not believe the ordinary American citizen wanted any of the wars.

    Hollywood and the jew media lied us into World Wars I and II.

    The neocons lied us into the Iraq War and all of the ME proxy wars for Israel.

    The ordinary American just wants to be left alone.

    My buddy just recently drank himself to death after three tours in the ME where he finally got blown up and came home a basket case with PTSD. And I think that he didn’t want to live anymore when he discovered the truth about the wars for Israel.

    You are blaming the victims here, calling us “hate driven and aggressive,” when everyone on this site KNOWS that Wolfowitz and Perle and organized jewry are the culprits…..not the ordinary Joe that has no agency whatsoever.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Thanks: Trinity
  160. Anonymous[189] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raches

    …the noble Japanese and elder Chinese…

    After becoming fluent in Japanese and Mandarin, I had hoped to continue the legacy of my elders: to negotiate peace and cooperation between Japan and China. To complete our legacy, finally, after a century.

    When I think of world politics, my great dream for the East is to see exactly what I have rendered in bold.

    Like other European imperial nations, Japan just wanted peace? It was a champion of Chinese sovereignty?

    Fears of communism?

    But the Russo-Japanese war was 1904. The annexation of Korea in 1910. Japan was an ally of Britain/US in WWI. Japan declared war on Germany in 1914. Japan was Washington’s pal before WWII. The 2 were in cahoots.

    Notwithstanding Germany’s situation, who in Asia threatened Japan to give it the pretext to invade and colonize its neighbors?

    • Replies: @Carlton Meyer
  161. @xxxeliss

    So explain why you find Swastikas in Northern Europe during the Viking Age. Why was there a Persian tribe named Germani with the exact same drinking custom as the pre Christian Germans? Why was the Indo European language group originally named the Indo Germanic language group?

    There’s clearly a connection.

  162. Raches says: • Website
    @Robert Dolan

    Do you suggest that the majority of Americans (not the majority of Unz Review readers!) do not have the basic attitude that America is the world-police, an exceptional nation, a nation on a mission to spread “democracy” and “liberation”?

    Do you suggest that the majority of Americans do not to this day consider WWII to be the “Good War”, Roosevelt to be one of the greatest-ever presidents, and Churchill to be a hero?

    I sympathize with your buddy.  I guess that after the government he trusted, which he served with patriotic loyalty, used him as a tool to wreck someone else’s country, he probably felt more or less like an American patriot whom I quoted in the article:  Revilo P. Oliver, who did cryptanalysis for the U.S. War Department during WWII—who spent the last years of his life in the 1980s–90s condemning America’s actions.  So, his government used him, used him up, and left him with horror and regrets.  I know of more than a few stories like that.

    Although you didn’t specify the Iraq War, most American actions in the Middle East in the past thirty years have related to that in one way or another; I am guessing that your buddy wouldn’t have wound up as he did, if the majority of Americans hadn’t been waving flags and screaming that Saddam Hussein must be stopped (like Hitler must be stopped, and the Kaiser before him must be stopped—and like the Japs must be stopped, etc., etc.).  It is what my article seeks to change.

    In my book, “brainwashed” is only an excuse for those who have it forced on them at gunpoint (as the Germans have since 1945—at an American gunpoint, in what is still an occupied country).  Otherwise, it is just an excuse for being gullible.  I say that as an ex-Zionist who has been on the very wrong side before.  Yes, I bitterly blame the Jews who got me into that—but I also need to take responsibility for it, and not just sit and point fingers as if I were a totally a helpless victim.  Am I so passive?  Have I no agency, no free will?  Am I so stupid, like a trained animal?  If not, then I cannot evade all responsibility by saying, “But the Jews brainwashed me!”  If I had ever killed anyone for the Jews (as I willingly would have, had circumstances been different), then I would now consider myself a murderer.  —So as for “blaming the victim”.

    I add, as always I must, that Germany is still an occupied country—as is Japan—and as I stated in some of my prior comments on this thread, my accusations against America in the article are widely applicable, from Iraq to China, to this day. ®

  163. @Raches

    Wow! Calling yourself “arrogant is not the half of it! You are also extremely impatient and angry. Let me READ your damn text AND MAKE A COMMENT ON IT if I choose to, before you accuse me so vigorously of so many sins. In addition I was addressing SolontoCroesus, not you. And in that comment, I was calling the recognized and named commenters in this thread “wanna-be Nazis“, not you. I said nothing about you, except that I don’t know you. You have read my site but I have not previously read anything by you or about you. You’re not exactly a household name. So thanks for telling me so much about yourself–what you are and what you’re not. That helps.

    Maybe slow down and read more carefully? As I intend to do with your article right now. This morning I had to leave for some appointments; now I’m enjoying lunch.

    In defense of my captcha use, my administrator puts that on because I complain of incredible amounts of spam; that is his solution. Since I don’t have any other solution, I accept it. I don’t have a moderator, I do everything on my site and approve the comments myself — after they get through the captcha, lol. It works pretty good; I’m not well-versed in ‘digital science’, and I get less good at it all the time. But I can still do old-fashioned writing and I can post it on my sites and reply to comments.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Raches
  164. Trinity says:
    @Raches

    (((American mainstream magazine?))) You mean the same type of magazines and newspapers that told us the Germans killed 6 million Jews and 5 million others in the holohoax camps? lolol.

    You mean the same type of magazines and newspapers that told us about WMD?

    You mean the same type of magazines and newspapers that reported how terrible apartheid South Africa was in the 1980s but yet won’t mention what is going on in S. Africa today?

    Oh yea, those (((mainstream American newspapers like Life, Time and Newsweek were the bomb back in the day.))) Too bad no one reads them today.

    • Replies: @Raches
  165. Vaterland says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Well, not only am I not a “wannabe-Nazi”, but fist and foremost a German monarchist, more closely aligned with the HRE than the Second Reich and I never claimed otherwise, but neither you nor I can speak for the dead. And also most likely unlike you I actually had relatives in the Wehrmacht, SS, BDM and HJ. I speak for their memories and myself. And you neither live in Germany nor do you speak German. Which is a million times easier than learning Japanese and Mandarin for an English native-speaker, I can assure you.

    The arrogance of Americans, (for now) shielded by a first amendment, towards European dissidents still under military, legal and especially cultural occupation who have the greatest anti-right Billion Euro regime-industry in the world against them, with Orwellian laws like NetzDG and technological means which go far beyond those of the Stasi is totally absurd. Especially given their track record of total failure over three quarters of a century and the state of their own country which is Germany’s true and lasting misfortune. And still: even Germany under these circumstances is to the right of the USA on all major issues. Even though more than one East German who had been a dissident then, has clearly said that it is worse now than in the DDR.

    Most importantly, every German who comments on this site, plays with his direct and personal freedom. Despite the fact that I self-censor a lot and not even enough maybe. And in the end he has to ask himself: For what…? To be used maybe?

    I don’t glorify the Chinese or Russians, far from it. Which might go against the purpose of this site actually. — But the fact that now the Japanese right is trained like a dog as a tool against China, a country with which it historically has a million times more in common with than with the USA especially as it is now, and not in the interests of its own sovereignty, but merely to prop up the criminal US empire on life support and to receive a few crumbs from the table of its master, is disgusting. They let them fly the 旭日旗, Kyokujitsu-ki, which for Korea and China is like the Swastika in “the West”, all the while America keeps exporting BLM, gay marches, war refugees, holocaust/white guilt and psy-warfare into Europe. It’s total late empire cynicism! And Japanese and Chinese shouldn’t have to kill each other, just to maintain a few more years of global US supremacy. Even Europe, weak and old as it is, has done more to acquire a small veneer of independence.

    Because is it the ‘communism’ which the USA is afraid of? In fact China was more orthodox in the time under Mao when he met with Kissinger and Nixon. Their position on Taiwan was also the same as it is today. The mainstream social values of the USA today are to the left of the Soviet Union! Which I also had a lot of relatives in, from its beginning to its end. No, it is the Chinese nationalism which the USA cannot stand and cannot tolerate just like the British could not stomach Germany’s success. Not then and not today as Brexit and especially Nigel Farrage have shown. Which is exactly why I think that a new world war is not entirely excluded from the US agenda. If there were no nuclear weapons, we’d already have one.

    We cannot and will not ever be truly free, so long as the US Empire has a stranglehold over my country: controls its politicians, controls its laws, often controls its foreign policy, dominates its culture, subverts and controls its national media and molded its education system and public life to a point where it is hard to even speak of an existing Germany today. – And if you remember Amalek…

    To prevent a Third World War, which is intended to maintain a world order which is slowly killing us, which has turned our ancestral homelands into hell on earth, is now the most pressing matter. No matter where you stand politically. That is all.

  166. @Anonymous

    Notwithstanding Germany’s situation, who in Asia threatened Japan to give it the pretext to invade and colonize its neighbors?

    The nation of hate:

    • Thanks: dogbumbreath
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Anonymous
  167. Trinity says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    This guy does more harm than good when it comes to gaining a sympathetic ear at how Germans were screwed. I would almost assume he might be kosher. Just another muh I hate America gonzo writers that infested America for the last century. Only this gonzo muh I hate America type is a “Notsee.” Gawd, you cannot make this shit up. lololol.

    • Replies: @Raches
  168. anon[220] • Disclaimer says:
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    The Venus on a Half Shell, has a feminine 20th century woman’s face.

  169. Anonymous[220] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Amerikans were clamoring to turn the place into a parking lot after 9-11. Savage wrote a book countdown to Mecca. The Merikans came back with ptsd, cause their fantasy of genociding Arabs did not materialize. They felt duped. Their hatred got the best of them when they signed up after 9-11[ a day they got a taste of their own medicine] with visions of genocide dancing in their heads implied but never stat outright by the media and the politicians.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  170. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    And in that comment, I was calling the recognized and named commenters in this thread “wanna-be Nazis“, not you.  I said nothing about you, except that I don’t know you. You have read my site but I have not previously read anything by you or about you.  You’re not exactly a household name. So thanks for telling me so much about yourself–what you are and what you’re not.  That helps.

    That is all fair enough.  And in fairness, I would not have reacted as I did (or replied at all) if I did not know who you are.  “Why is Carolyn Yeager coming off so negatively in her first comment on my blog?”  Anyway, that’s how I saw it.

    In defense of my captcha use, my administrator puts that on because I complain of incredible amounts of spam; that is his solution.  Since I don’t have any other solution, I accept it.  I don’t have a moderator, I do everything on my site and approve the comments myself — after they get through the captcha, lol.

    I am still gaining experience with moderation.  And I am realizing that if I try too hard to stay on top of it, to avoid letting good comments languish unpublished, I wind up distracted from other activities, sleep-deprived, and yes—just a little bit cranky.  Since I never did social media (or anything else that keeps me 24/7 connected), I have no prior experience with anything where I can’t just unplug and walk away for a day, or a week, or…  I will find a good balance here; but I do understand why you want to reduce the moderation load, if you don’t want to get behind from being buried by spam.  Mr. Unz has a spam filter that seems to prevent that particular problem.

    Just to give you an idea of what I meant:  Among other things, I had thought to remark on this article that I had extremely negative opinions of Trump (a Zionist with Jewish grandchildren), but a German effectually persuaded me to moderate my negativity towards him.  Long story short—much though I distrust him, his presence in the White House boosted morale for some people who really needed that.  (When I can write it up, I have been intending to speak of that in another thread here, where it is relevant.)

    I do look forward to your commentary on my article.  Despite some political differences between us, I think that you’ll see whence I come, if you set it side by side with the chronologically subsequent three articles—all of which somehow pertain to the Germans ([1], [2], [3]). ®

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  171. Raches says: • Website
    @Carlton Meyer

    Japan can’t win.  If they isolate themselves, they get “opened” by American cannons.  (Something that has long bothered me…)  If they make of themselves a Great Power by means approximately similar to America’s wartime allies, the British—but to a much lesser degree—then they are evil.  The only way is to submit and be an American slave. ®

    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @Anonymous
  172. Raches says: • Website
    @Trinity

    (((American mainstream magazine?))) You mean the same type of magazines and newspapers that told us the Germans killed 6 million Jews and 5 million others in the holohoax camps? lolol.

    So, you claim that an American mainstream magazine was publishing fake atrocity propaganda against America in 1944, in a way favorable to the Axis?  “Lolol” yourself.

    What’s next?  Will you allege that Kaufman’s book calling for the extermination of all Germans was faked by the Jews to make “Nazis” look good? ®

    • Replies: @Trinity
  173. Anonymous[189] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Hey, what do you know. I was already a subscriber to your channel. Thanks for the history lessons.

  174. Raches says: • Website
    @Trinity

    Ah, I see.  America can be blamed for nothing (even when they violently wreck and ruin the world); and if I say something too honest and forthright, which violates your own sense of political correctness, then maybe I’m “kosher”.  Not surprising, since you allege that a mainstream American magazine was faking anti-American propaganda at the height of WWII; and you dodge any challenge to your claim, by throwing around (((parentheses))).

    I am sorry (to myself) that I wasted even three seconds replying to you.  Well, I learn from my mistakes. ®

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  175. Mefobills says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I do not believe the ordinary American citizen wanted any of the wars.

    Hollywood and the jew media lied us into World Wars I and II.

    The neocons lied us into the Iraq War and all of the ME proxy wars for Israel.

    The ordinary American just wants to be left alone.

    I believe you are correct. The average American was brainwashed and befuddled by the owned press, especially after the elections of 1912.

    [MORE]

    The Pujo commission had certain (((people))) who discussed how easy it was to maneuver for the Federal Reserve. All they had to do was buy off the Editors at large Newspaper operations. So, it is on the record, for how propaganda and usurping a population works.

    https://publicintelligence.net/pujo-committee-money-trust-wall-street-banking-cartel-investigation-1912-1913/

    The string pullers behind America’s turn toward war, and usurping the Republic, did so in accord with Hudson’s analysis here:

    https://www.unz.com/mhudson/beyond-the-dollar/

    This was a very important article by Hudson, which was derailed by the Lolbertarian Truth Vigilante.

    Radihka and Hudson put their finger on the animating impulse of Imperialism, and of course the American public had no idea – they are mushrooms.

    Dominant states and their capitalists seek to externalise onto other states or territories the consequences of their capitalism’s contradictions, such as excess commodities and capital, or the need for cheap labour and raw materials. These efforts victimize subordinated economies, but make rivals of states that are able to contest this domination. When the latter happens, there are confrontations – diplomatic, economic or even military – like those between Britain and her nineteenth century rivals, such as Germany. The result then was a Thirty Years’ Crisis (1914-45), including two world wars and a Great Depression. Today, we are witnessing rising tensions between the US and countries like China and Russia. The struggles resulting from international victimization, rivalries and resistance prevent any world state from being formed, also preventing stable world money.

    A world creditocracy is a Nation-State extending its “credit” across national boundaries. Since money = Law, then extending your money beyond your law is an abrogation of the iron laws of economics.

    The revolutionary war was about the Colonies not being allowed to use their script, and also having the Colonial money supply being drained of gold/silver toward London.

    The Creditocracy of London and the Atlantacist system was predicted on City of London’s debts being backed up the power of the English Navy. The Sterling system was a nation state extending its Creditocracy to become “international money.”

    WW2 had four combatants.

    Roosevelt was trying to usurp the English Creditocracy at the behest of Finance Capital String Pullers out of Wall Street and various special interests who wanted to extend credit to then purchase American goods. American special interests wanted to own the world.

    Bolshevism was a creation of Finance Capital, to then create a Pyramid System, where the Russians were to become “white slaves.” Stalin morphed the system to become National Communism, especially by 1944, at which point Finance Capitalists turned against the Soviet Union.

    Hitler was trying to break Germany free from the “international” finance capital system, especially as Germany had been victimized by the Hyperinflation and war.

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/winston-churchill-germanys-unforgivable-crime/

    Germany’s most unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.

    Churchill was trying to preserve the Sterling System and hence London’s creditocracy. The private credit issuers out of London were the string pullers controlling England’s civilization.

    If your civilization has a psychopathic head, then the body follows.

    Ordinary American’s did not want the wars. Even WW1, was a hoax visited on the American people, as the election of 1912 was a finance capital operation designed to push America into war, to then serve special interests.

    In the run up to WW1, the election promises of Woodrow Wilson explicitly stated there would be no American entry into war.

    • Thanks: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Raches
  176. Trinity says:
    @Raches

    Do you realize that most people commenting on this thread are probably sympathetic to the plight of Germans and Germany. As for Japan, I really don’t have a dog in that one and honestly I don’t have a helluva lot of sympathy for a nation that treated White American soldier POW so cruelly. My guess is with your attitude, arrogance and lack of a personality ( which is a German trait btw) you will lose more supporters than you will gain. Believe me, I am just trying to help. I honestly cannot believe you can’t see that you are dividing people up, sounds like Jew 101. lolol. Your over the top arrogance and lack of a decent personality is losing support for Nationalist Socialist Germany if anything. Hmm, come to think of it, maybe that is (((the goal here.)))

    • Replies: @Derer
  177. Derer says:

    Raches: “Those who defend their countries against Americans are “terrorists”. A country with an anti-American government is, by definition, a “rogue state”; it has no legitimate government, until the Americans helpfully bomb its people into “liberation”, and provide them with a legitimate government, i.e., an American puppet state.”

    Never mind the many morons that try to refute this truth.

    • Thanks: Raches
  178. apollonian says: • Website
    @Raches

    Non-Existent “Good-Evil”–Very Worst Enemy Of TRUTH (= Christ)

    “…—then they are evil.”

    Now u say “evil,” and I would only note that “good-evil” doesn’t exist, there being no definition/criterion that works, never has been in entire hist. of ethics or philosophy–it’s totally subjectivistic, also just more hubristic self-righteousness, unfortunately.

    For objectivity demands strict determinism (absolute cause-effect), as objective means it’s one thing and no other–following for cause and effect. For all humans are “sinners” in the sense of self-interestedness, creatures of will, though not a perfectly “free” will, who can only operate according to such self-interest. Thus at worst, humans are subject to hubris which is a kind of madness, not “evil.”

    And the Satanists are merely a kind of disease, like typhus or leprosy, which works as a mechanism for sweeping away the over-populated fools, goons, and suckers, the weaklings and inferiors who were bred-up in the previous CYCLIC rise of the culture for success and prosperity–as we note fm the Roman and present American instances in history.

    For note dear unc’ Adolf (Hitler) failed as thoroughgoing philosopher, though he certainly did emphasize that deterministic racialism–which the Satanists hate so much. Unc’ Adolf was great artist, especially for rhetoric, so successful in Germany, but far less so in UK and Jew S A.

    Hitler was too eclectic and pragmatic for fullest philosophy (though it was quite understandable, being far more a practical-oriented political figure and speaker), and he never should have declared war on Jew S A, though he was indeed justified for the attacks the US Navy made upon the Germans during 1941, etc.

    Don’t forget the Americans of the South in 1865, how they suffered for their “lost cause,” even as they were perfectly justified, and indeed, that very “lost cause” is precisely the solution for the present problems and sufferings here in Jew S A. (see TenthAmendmentCenter.com) by which we can so easily sweep away the present “woke” and satanic excrescences. Non-existent “good-evil” is the very worst enemy of truth (= Christ), and it’s surely the very pretext for that dread Satanism and subjectivism which afflicts so many who fall victim.

    • Replies: @Raches
  179. Raches says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    Although I could quibble over a few details, you make a good overall point about the drastic contrast between Hitler’s Germany and America today.  I am glad that I have moderation powers to save it from where it was misfiled in the system. ®

  180. Raches says: • Website
    @Mefobills

    I dislike cutting you off there; but Renegade Tribune is literally a Flat Earther site.  They do publish some good material there, including republication of old essays by some of my favorite authors; it is a way to draw smart people in.

    I have not looked into whatever you specifically cited.  Maybe it’s good; maybe not.  But if that’s a resource that you are linking, I strongly urge you to double-check your work. ®

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  181. Raches says: • Website
    @apollonian

    Non-Existent “Good-Evil”–Very Worst Enemy Of TRUTH (= Christ)

    […]

    Non-existent “good-evil” is the very worst enemy of truth (= Christ), and it’s surely the very pretext for that dread Satanism and subjectivism which afflicts so many who fall victim.

    Arguing based on premises that I entirely disbelieve will not get you far.  This article is entirely about things that can be rationally observed and analyzed. ®

  182. @Raches

    Strange. I wrote a reply to this comment by Raches about 3 hours ago, reminding him that what I wrote to SolontoCroesus (not to him) was preliminary to my carefully reading his text above. I made it clear I had had appointments in town, would read it now and possibly comment on it.
    I also reminded him that my remarks about “wanna-be Nazis” were directed to the commenters I had named, not to him. And I explained the reason for my captcha requirement for comments at carolynyeager.net. I opined that his reaction to me was way over the top in impatience and aggressiveness. (And he calls me ‘prickly?’)

    So I did read it and went again through the comments and am now ready to speak on the article. But I’m shocked that the comment I wrote 3 hrs ago, which I know went through the system, has disappeared and this is the first time such has happened to me at UR, in over 1500 comments. It does appear that Raches is running the comment thread, since he put a gold border around Vaterland’s comment; it wouldn’t have been Ron or a Mod. So I suspect strongly that Raches deep-sixed my comment because he realized he had been wrong, and he also would prefer not to hear from me. There was nothing I had written that was out of line … but the truth hurts.

    I can say honestly I’m unimpressed, and even bored, with both the article and the comments. So really I’m happiest staying out of it and letting you men do your rather “junior high school” thing … without any negative reaction from me.

    Will this comment be published? I’m copying it this time, in case it’s not. “Speech is free for some people, not for others.”

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  183. Dr. Doom says:

    The Jew cannot build or create anything. Only undermine and tear down.
    America used to be a place of ethnic cohesion and prosperity.
    100 years of Jewish perfidy has turned it into a growing ghetto.

    There is now no cohesion, no real patriotism, only animosity.
    When you throw together disparate elements you cannot get cohesion.
    The very “diversity” prevents harmony or peaceful coexistence.

    Its Anti-Life, Anti-White, Anti-Western, Anti-Christian.
    Its pro nothing. Just an amalgam of petty envy and hatred.
    The White Man built America, and Jews want to tear it down.

    The Jews are a Cancer, a Virus, a Disease of Waste and Abuse.
    They must be stopped and destroyed, before they destroy the Whole World.
    Their mad dreams of living like Effendi on the back of armies of slaves is Toxic.

  184. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    But I’m shocked that the comment I wrote 3 hrs ago, which I know went through the system, has disappeared and this is the first time such has happened to me at UR, in over 1500 comments. It does appear that Raches is running the comment thread, since he put a gold border around Vaterland’s comment; it wouldn’t have been Ron or a Mod. So I suspect strongly that Raches deep-sixed my comment because he realized he had been wrong, and he also would prefer not to hear from me. There was nothing I had written that was out of line … but the truth hurts.

    I can say honestly I’m unimpressed, and even bored, with both the article and the comments. So really I’m happiest staying out of it and letting you men do your rather “junior high school” thing … without any negative reaction from me.

    Will this comment be published? I’m copying it this time, in case it’s not. “Speech is free for some people, not for others.”

    Your comment is right here.  I promptly published it—and I replied to it hours ago:

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/?showcomments#comment-4948842

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/?showcomments#comment-4948903

    You are hasty with serious accusations—serious false accusations.

    P.S.,

    Strange. I wrote a reply to this comment by Raches about 3 hours ago, reminding him that what I wrote to SolontoCroesus (not to him)

    I ignored that the first time, because I thought that quibbling on such a point would be a “rather ‘junior high school’ thing”, indeed.  But since you wish to push the point, I must remind you that when you write a public comment, anyone is entitled to reply to it—most of all, the blog author. ®

  185. What Are The Basic Anti-Theses Of Satanists Against Humanity, Reason?

    [MORE]

    Well, the basis of reason and analysis is precisely what I also want to use and defend. Thus I pt. out the obvious problem for “good-evil”–it’s entirely subjective. There’s never been a criterion given for such “good-evil” that stands up to analysis; if there is, can u say what it is?

    Immanuel Kant himself was only able to pose “duty” as his “imperative,” though he never could say why–he merely wanted to preserve the idea of self-sacrifice as an ethical ideal.

    The virtue of my analysis is demonstrating the Hegelian anti-theses of the Satanists–which are all provable and easily demonstrated: (a) the conflict of objective vs. subjective–which is fundamental–(b) then the presumption of determinism (racialism) vs. a perfectly “free,” God-like will, the Pharisees and rabbis pontificating as to what is kosher and consistent w. Torah, and then anything else about reality. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for expo on Talmud.

    After all, unc’ Adolf defended racialism (hence by implication, determinism)–and this basic truth is obvious factor in his great and everlasting appeal for advocates of truth, justice, etc.–always has been and surely always will be.

    And think of it: what actually is a lie and lying?–isn’t it asserting something is true, hence verifiable in the objective reality, but always turning out to be NOT–objective, not verifiable? But the Satanists don’t consider they exist within an objective reality that they’d acknowledge, for Satanists, anything they want to be is “true.” Thus Satanists are “honest” so far as they think; they’re just psycho as far as objectivity goes.

    Thus Satanists, “liberals,” and leftists deplore racialism (hence determinism) because they insist so obsessively that it’s “evil”–isn’t this right? Thus the Satanists, et al., insist their subjectivism takes precedence for reality and truth over what is objective and verifiable. So the transgenders say they can be females if only they (subjectivistically) want to be so–such is their reality.

    Satanists lie to themselves, which then justifies their lying to anyone else–because they believe, so strongly, in their subjectivistic little universes. Thus Jews always dominate Satanism, because Jews are COLLECTIVIST subjectivists, far better organized and united, whereas the gentiles tend to be more “individualistic,” more dis-united.

    So I hope u’d credit this analysis I present as it’s based on verifiable observations.

  186. Here is another Time magazine article cover:
    What Raches didn’t mention is that it was the Japanese the drew the war weary US into WW2 by attacking Pearl Harbor.

    What you don’t see in that picture are 18 and 19 year old Whites burning alive and drowning because Japan thought they could take out the Pacific fleet in a single attack. Hitler actually did not have to declare war on the US because the attack was outside the terms of his pact with Japan but chose to anyways in his now famous speech.

    Raches calls the US the “nation of hate” but has nothing analogous to the Nanking massacre or Bataan death march. But he has a picture of a White woman with a Japanese skull. How convincing.

    In WW1 it was the Germans that chose to unleash unrestricted submarine warfare knowing full well that they had to take out the British before the US could intervene. They knew the risk and lost. How would you like it if a German submarine sunk your dad who was merely on a neutral merchant vessel? That went against the rules of maritime warfare and yet the American people still did not want to join. There were anti-war and German-American protests up until US entry. It was Germany that made the foolish decision to gamble it all on unrestricted warfare instead of taking every action to keep the US out. All that did was give Wilson and congress the excuse to go against the people and enter the war.

    Let’s also not forget that it was Germany that escorted Lenin to Moscow in order to foster the revolution. This was of course done to get Russia out of the war and yet it helped create the USSR. If the Germans had simply put a bullet into Lenin the cold war would never have happened.

    In both world wars the American people did not want to enter into the European theater. In both world wars the Germans knew this and yet through poor strategy drew them in.

    So this argument that America is a nation of hate or instigator of world wars is totally ridiculous. Japan and Germany both gambled on beating or keeping the Americans out and lost. Whose fault is that?

  187. @Bert33

    Yes, yes, the Jews started and won the second world war. They cast Hitler as the benchmark for evil. They destroyed Germany, already controlled Russia, the UK and France, and took the US; all five countries lost the war.

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  188. Thim says:

    Hitler’s Neo Pagan experiment failed. He was a military ignoramus. If he had let the Generals run things they might have won. But the Generals were pure Germans of the Prussian kind mostly, and Hitler hated Eastern Germans, and Prussians most of all.

    He should be known as the destroyer of Prussia. And he only had one ball. Just right for a filthy pagan.

    The Third Reich died forever 76 years ago. Anyone still pining over that Reich has serious mental issues.

    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @apollonian
  189. Raches says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    What Raches didn’t mention is that it was the Japanese the drew the war weary US into WW2 by attacking Pearl Harbor.

    Because the way that you characterize it the repetition of a lie.

    You should read the American Pravda series.  I will quote Mr. Unz at length:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/#p_1_115

    Given these facts, there were natural suspicions that Roosevelt had deliberately provoked the attack by his executive decisions to freeze Japanese assets, embargo all shipments of vital fuel oil supplies, and rebuff the repeated requests by Tokyo leaders for negotiations.  In the 1953 volume edited by Barnes, noted diplomatic historian Charles Tansill summarized his very strong case that FDR sought to use a Japanese attack as his best “back door to war” against Germany, an argument he had made the previous year in a book of that same name.  Over the decades, the information contained in private diaries and government documents seems to have almost conclusively established this interpretation, with Secretary of War Henry Stimson indicating that the plan was to “maneuver [Japan] into firing the first shot.”  In his later memoirs, Prof. Oliver drew upon the intimate knowledge he had acquired during his wartime role in Military Intelligence to even claim that FDR had deliberately tricked the Japanese into believing he planned to launch a surprise attack against their forces, thereby persuading them to strike first in self-defense.

    By 1941 the U.S. had broken all the Japanese diplomatic codes and was freely reading their secret communications.  Therefore, there has also long existed the widespread if disputed belief that the president was well aware of the planned Japanese attack on our fleet and deliberately failed to warn his local commanders, thereby ensuring that the resulting heavy American losses would produce a vengeful nation united for war.  Tansill and a former chief researcher for the Congressional investigating committee made this case in the same 1953 Barnes volume, and the following year a former US admiral published The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor, providing similar arguments at greater length.  This book also included an introduction by one of America’s highest-ranking World War II naval commanders, who fully endorsed the controversial theory.

    In 2000, journalist Robert M. Stinnett published a wealth of additional supporting evidence, based upon his eight years of archival research, which was discussed in a recent article.  A telling point made by Stinnett is that if Washington had warned the Pearl Harbor commanders, their resulting defensive preparations would have been noticed by the local Japanese spies and relayed to the approaching task force; and with the element of surprise lost, the attack probably would have been aborted, thus frustrating all of FDR’s long-standing plans for war.  Although various details may be disputed, I find the evidence for Roosevelt’s foreknowledge quite compelling.

    See also the books thereby cited, and the Unz Review article thereby linked:

    https://www.unz.com/article/pearl-harbor-unmasked/

    I know of further theories for this; but I have not examined the evidence for them.  The foregoing is the best case for America.

    In both world wars the American people did not want to enter into the European theater.  In both world wars the Germans knew this and yet through poor strategy drew them in.

    You should really read the above article from start to finish—to begin with.  Your theory about Germany is nonsense—unfortunately, popular nonsense as the result of widespread lie-propaganda.

    See also, to round things out on the other front:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-how-hitler-saved-the-allies/

    So this argument that America is a nation of hate or instigator of world wars is totally ridiculous.  Japan and Germany both gambled on beating or keeping the Americans out and lost.  Whose fault is that?

    You made one true statement:  Both Germany and Japan wanted to keep American out of the War. ®

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  190. @Raches

    Okay, I guess we’re now on even ground, since now I’ve embarrassed myself with my just posted comment complaining that the comment you’re referring to here was NOT PUBLISHED, and you were the culprit. Obviously I needed to refresh the page b/c that comment had not shown up — I often forget to do that. I’ve been having trouble with UR not fully loading the features. Rather than trying to fix it, I just put up with it.

    So having said that, and now you sound so much more reasonable, I will comment on your article after all. LOL. I was surprised it was so short; I didn’t think there was much to it. You like to promise “more to come”, future attractions, and encourage reading lots of your prior writing. I think you’re trying to establish yourself, but who has time for all that reading? Only if that is your specialty. I have certain specialties and can’t keep up with everything.

    You admit “I have only a fragmentary knowledge of some important perspectives.” Why listen to you then? For example, you blame America and Americans for too much–as though it’s the only country to give control to Jews. All of Europe did the same, and the Jews flooded America from Europe. You’re ignoring history, maybe because you don’t know it or don’t like it. It was Britain that worked so hard to bring the US in to the European sphere to help them in their devious undertakings; they paid greatly for that later. I’ll bet you know very little about WWI, but it was the same war as WW2.

    Your great love for the Japanese & Chinese is questionable. Actually Japan was not a very good Axis member – they didn’t support Germany like the Brits & Americans supported each other. Hitler was looking for whatever allies he could find, and Japan was there, plus Italy, an even worse ally. OTOH, Hitler & Germany were always there in aid of Japan and Italy. That’s just the way it’s been forever with Germany … always doing the most, the heavy-lifting.

    And Nietzsche was not a Nazi, of course He was not an inspiration for NS. Hitler especially was not a fan, as he very seldom spoke of him. He once said (TT) “there is ONE thing I agree with Nietzsche on, ….” Schopenhauer was his philosopher. So these guys I named are way off base most of the time. They’re doing their own thing. There is no way to overcome differences–not for me. The differences are not minor.

    But thanks for mentioning your change of heart on Donald Trump. That is exactly right–we have to take the best available and he’s still it. His family doesn’t matter, or other silly white-nationalist nonsense, but our basic freedoms need to be protected. He is trustworthy, at least. Biden et al are clearly trying to remove what freedom we still have in record time — before the next election! America, for all it’s faults, must be saved. Our constitution is all the world has, and the rest of the world knows it. So don’t be consumed with vengence – it will only backfire.

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Truth Vigilante
  191. Mefobills says:
    @Raches

    But if that’s a resource that you are linking, I strongly urge you to double-check your work. ®

    Fair enough.

    The question is, Did Finance Capital, i.e. the (((international))) attack Germany?

    My position is that they did, and I can go on at length to support that thesis. Churchill’s quote is convenient to make the point, is all.

    Schacht’s trading banks, MefoBills, Oeffabills, and creating a parallel trading system are available evidence. Schacht’s own memoirs discuss how finance capital operated, especially the bear raiding shorts which caused the hyperinflation.

    The analog to today is China’s belt and road, which is a parallel system to western Atlantacism/Finance Capital. The shorting mechanism was recently operated against Russia, but Putin thwarted it by stuffing Gold into the Russian central bank, to then shore up FX.

    We can see how the string pullers are going bezerk today, as they did in the run up to WW1/2. They are losing their cat-bird seat.

    Fascism and authoritarianism arose to thwart Finance Capital, but Fascism and National Socialism were strangled in the crib. In fascism, private corporate power was ejected from the citadel.

    America fought on the wrong side. I’m American.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Thanks: Raches, Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  192. Anonymous[189] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raches

    To be sure, Japan was in a tough spot, befriended by Washington, encouraged to mimic Western imperialism, then made an enemy and swatted down.

    Japan’s dealing with the West is comprehensible. However, its decision to oppress its neighbors I cannot understand. Is there any moral justification for Japan’s colonization of Korea, China and elsewhere in your view of history?

    How does one justify defense against an aggressive West by becoming aggressive like the West and swallowing up one’s neighbors and attempting to destroy 2000 years of native cultural history under the pretense of a “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere”?

  193. @Vaterland

    @Vaterland One minor quibble with your post. I’m almost 99% sure I’ve heard @Carolyn Yeager speaking fluent German.

  194. Mefobills says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Be advised, ONEBORNFREE-DUMB is a lolbertarian.

    For the most part, these types of people are Cultists, and have a world view that is out-of-this world, and cannot be convinced by facts.

    Lol’s are honorary Jews, doing the bidding of Liberalism, by passing hypnosis such as Free Markets, and Free Movement of Labor, Free movement of “international capital” is shilled for especially if it is Gold.

    Any replies to a Lol must be in third person, so the average UNZ reader can be informed.

    Lol’s cannot be converted, unless in a concentration camp. Removing a person from familiar surrounds and then subjecting them to stress is the only way to rewire well myelinated neuron pathways.

    Concentration camps were midway between civilian life and jail, and were a kind way to overcome the damage done to the German psyche. German’s had been dispossessed of their history, borders, and culture. Up to 1/3 of Germany’s lands had been bought out from beneath their feet, as there was a generational theft and transfer to the new (((owners))). The new owners simply borrowed dollars or pounds from their finance cousins overseas, to then buy up Germany when there was blood in the streets (during the Hyperinflation).

    As is evident, China’s concentration camps are working well on the Uighurs, as their Wahabi Takfiri demoralization status is being driven from their minds.

    It’s no accident that the Atlantacist doctrine, evolved further by Zbigniew Brzezinski, was to recycle petrodollars from Saudi into Madrassas, to then brainwash and destabilize the “stans” including the Uighur regions. The grand chessboard considered Islam as the soft underbelly, and further Wahabbi foot soldiers could become a Takfiri mercenary army paid for with recycled petrodollars.

    China’s concentration camps are a kindness, in the same way as were Hitler’s. China has a Patriarchy and a Hierarchy that is out in the open, and does not operate with hidden string pullers.

    Finance string pullers have to Hoax populations with FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Disease) to then maneuver said populations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  195. @John Johnson

    In WW1 it was the Germans that chose to unleash unrestricted submarine warfare knowing full well that they had to take out the British before the US could intervene.

    A common falsehood. The Germans resumed unrestricted submarine warfare only in British waters to stop arms shipments, and did this long before the Americans declared war. The Lusitania was carrying weapons and ammo. The Germans knew this and so did Churchill, who directed British warships to stay clear in hopes the Germans would attack. Meanwhile, the British illegally blockaded German ports to prevent neutral nations from delivering food. This was a violation of international law the Americans never challenged.

    Moreover, the Germans resumed unrestricted submarine warfare to force the British to the peace table. The Germans wanted peace! But the British and French owed Wall Street far more than they could ever repay, so JP Morgan manipulated the American public and president to join the war so Germany would be forced to pay massive reparations that were paid directly to JP Morgan. Finally, after the Germans agreed to Wilson’s peace offer, the Allies starved a couple million more Germans until they agreed to harsher terms to give up huge regions of traditional German lands. This led to the rise of Hitler and World War II.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  196. HVM says:
    @S

    Wouldn’t you just say that our elites simply bought into convergence theory?

    Goltisyn may be right about the Sino-Soviet split and that USA hubristically believed that it won the Cold War when all the while it was being given a enough rope to hang itself. maybe we were duped into letting our guard down by seeing socialism as benign. Yet the seeds of destruction were shaped by internal events as much as they were shaped by external events.

    Culturally, liberal democracy had already planted the seeds by which the communists could create revolutionary conditions at the end of World War II. In the 1920s, when they knew revolution would not come, the communists in the US (who were they? I think you know their ethnicity) took up cultural issues to advance their agenda.

    As Adolf Hitler pointed out communism and capitalism have internationalism at their core. So our leaders willing allied with Communism to defeat ethnic nationalism of the volk. Investigate who dominated the Roosevelt administration and you will also know why we did what we did against Germany. An ethnically homogeneous nationalist state was a threat to the internationalists and the Jews. If it could happen in Germany it could happen elsewhere…

    The end result has been convergence towards a form of global communism as the capitalist stage has materialistically opened the door towards globalism. This is why we have open borders, multiculturalism, and internationalism now. Indeed why do you think the Biden administration is doing what it is doing? Just look at what ethnic group dominates the administration… Covid and the vax are simply accelerating their global agenda.

    It is likely this plan has been set out for some time by our institutions led by the CFR and Trilateralists among others.

    Golistyn made the case that the failure to protect ourselves came coming from a high level mole within the CIA . Maybe this is true We will never know. When Angleton was ousted, the matter was simply wimped clean with no answer. But the change has come from within as well. Our liberal democrats leaders have been willingly accomplices with millions of fellow travelers among its citizens. So it could have been a little bit of both.

    Maybe it was Kissinger.

    It’s a slippery slope indeed.

  197. Poco says:
    @Adûnâi

    I had the same thoughts.A properly cruel America would have built mountains of japanese skulls.
    These chickenshits have the christian american disease eating their brains out too.

    • Agree: Gidoutahere
    • Troll: Raches
  198. John Wear says:
    @John Johnson

    If you want to understand why Germany declared war against the United States, please read my article at https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/9/3/4882.

    If you want to understand why Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor, you might want to read Chapter Two of my book “Germany’s War” published on this website at https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  199. anon[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @rgl

    Exactly! I am Black man, a nig so he isn’t talking to me at all!

    Raches seems just another intellectual asshole popped up, interrupting the direct mental process of those who let him in. America as a hate-filled nation-nation of hate pissing on the world is obvious, no great intellectual feat.

    The underlying equation of America-the world, is also no great feat: the elites vs ordinary folk – one side must go!

    The rich must depopulate. They know that and they are doing that. nothing disrupts their direct intellectual process relatively.

    Ordinary people are faced with the same option: Depopulate the rich or be depopulated! all else is the doing of it by both sides. But here is Raches popped in my pathway.

    I knew America before he did. I knew the Jews too! Someone can tell me how the Jews will avoid the consequences of cause and effect no matter how many, or all of the victims of their exploitation they kill?

    I read Raches but I don’t have to purge what I read. It is not that hard…just move on that’s all. Nothing much to see in this cage folks, but an intellect on the make!

  200. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Thanks for the reply.

    FYI, The Unz Review does have a WordPress caching bug that sometimes makes older comments fail to appear.  I doubt this was your problem here; I have never seen it happen from a browser that has “save my information” cookies as a regular commentator (only from a totally anonymous browser with no cookies).  It also usually only becomes a real problem on very long threads, >1000 comments.

    Using the URL with ?showcomments at the end may help, but I’m not sure.  Although I have significant technical acumen, and much experience troubleshooting and debugging, I can only observe about this what any member of the public can see; my only access here is a limited blogging and moderation interface for Proems.

    Now, you can see a good reason why I loudly and frequently disclaim being a National Socialist.  I depart from Hitler on many points—sometimes, rather drastically.  If I were a German living in Hitler’s Germany, I would snap into line, and obey for the greater good—but I’m not, so I can’t and don’t.

    I avoid exactly the trap as to which you seem to have alluded:  That of “wannabe-Nazis” who march around in knockoff SA uniforms, and who mechanistically apply Hitler’s program as if it were a religious gospel.  I sometimes quote to them the relevant passages in Mein Kampf (have they read it?) about German nationalists who dressed in bearskins, pranced about with historical reproductions of ancient Teutonic weapons, etc.  Hitler gave an excellent warning against this; and I do learn from him.  So, don’t be surprised if I do not follow Hitler on every point.

    Ultimately, a significant proportion of my thinking is wholly original to me.  No one starts from scratch; and on the other side, most people have no capacity whatsoever for original thought.  I do think for myself—but I must learn from someone; and I will learn from the best.

    To avoid a very long reply, I will leave it for now at this:

    I’ll bet you know very little about WWI, but it was the same war as WW2.

    A few days ago, on October 6, I mentioned offhand “my historical interpretation of the 1914–45 events as a Thirty Years’ War—I arrived at that independently, although I have since become aware that others have the similar conclusions.”

    I think it exemplifies the danger of opining without adequate (or frankly, even slight) understanding of my position.  I would not expect for you to know me—but when you made a variety of critiques that missed me by a mile, perhaps it is an indication.  Instead of writing a book-length comment explaining, I should just keep blogging, and more fully develop my position in public—for those who care to read it, beyond the approximately 200,000 words of comments that I posted at The Unz Review in about six weeks (including many short essays on various subjects). ®

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  201. Derer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    when everyone on this site KNOWS that Wolfowitz and Perle and organized jewry are the culprits…..not the ordinary Joe that has no agency whatsoever.

    But they are only two percent and you voted 85 mil for the party of Schumer and Nadler that threaten Supreme Court justices. You are worse weaklings than 1918 Russians impoverished masses.

  202. This article: False binary choices from the dialectically confused. Attacking false constructs we see today as if they were the original product is absurd. For example, today’s Christianity is not traditional, instead it’s a heresy of niceness, nonconfrontation, and equality, held together by worship of a fictitious Judeo-Christ.

    While agreeing with much of what she has to say about the current globohomo-corporatist-leftoid war on the rest of us, it still doesn’t make up for the fact that Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were both aggressors well before the US went to war. Thus it would have been far better if there were no Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere created by invasion. It would have been far better if Germany had negotiated Gdansk instead of invaded it, and then fully prepared Europe for total war against the Bolsheviks. Today, it would be far better if Mainland China did not invade other nation’s islands and proclaim an entire sea as their property based on nothing but historical slights and subsequent revisionism. And it would have been far better if the US Deep State military-industrial complex had not forcibly exported ‘democracy’ to every corner of the world. These are all power politics disguised by a patina of moral imperative.

    So what is truly moral? Separation of tribes and races into nations based on mutual respect is moral; forced integration that destroys freedom of association is immoral. Time and again we see that only extra-national ideologies such as naziism, communism, islam, zionism, colonialism, corporatism, and now leftism produce massive conflict, because they refuse to respect nationhood. History proves that mutual respect for national boundaries provides an optimal (not perfect) balance between personal liberty and top-down control. That is true nationalism… be on guard against the hyperbolic caricatures that are peddled in its stead.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Yevardian
  203. @Vaterland

    I’m glad to hear from you directly, Vaterland. Yes, I was correct to say that I “had trouble with you;” it is not easy to follow you; same as with Raches. I remember now that you said you were a German monarchist, and preferred the Holy Roman Empire. So where does that leave you! It’s rather bizarre, no? Where to go from there?

    I’m always the first to say I don’t live in Germany or speak German. Likewise, you don’t live in the USA, though you want to comment on it. All Germans are taught English in school, unlike German here. I am German DNA and my forebears have all been German for long time – I don’t know how long. I was born in 1941, during Hitler’s lifetime. When were you born? Adolf Hitler certainly dominated the news in America during my early years. My German-American grandfather spoke highly of him. My other one was quieter, but probably felt the same way. They died when I was 7 and 10 years old, though. I was always proud of being German, and knew they were a great people. I wasn’t told that, but I knew. But no one wanted to teach me any German. My mother said it wasn’t good German when I asked, and my parents didn’t know it themselves. No one wanted to advertise their German-ness, although there were plenty of us around. Well, that’s the American experience … one of them, anyway.

    But your thing is how the USA is responsible for all the problems Germany has, and even all the troubles in Europe … well, hell, in the entire world actually. I can’t respect such an attitude. I hate how the US Army and Air Force fought their war in Europe. I hate the Allied Control Council headed by Eisenhower, the “Swedish Jew”. I have spent 20 years writing and speaking against all that. But Europeans have been no better, so I rail against them too. Even Germans turned against themselves and their own countrymen. Too disgusting to even think about!

    But you know who’s most to blame? The publishing and film industry, now called the Media and Entertainment Industry. These people, for some reason, have no sense of responsibility except sensationalism and ‘being first’ with the story, getting the most readers. Now viewers. Selling the most soap, now high tech products. They are patsies for propaganda. Seems to be their stock in trade. And we do know the race that dominates in that–not only in the US but all over Europe too. It wasn’t Americans that let the Jews take over. It happened FIRST in Europe. And American money came to the aid of Europe. But Jews have always been the poison in whatever good plans were trying to be brought into being.

    Plus, Europeans didn’t HAVE to agree to “hate speech” laws, but they did long before Americans did. They didn’t have to agree to Holocaust reparations, but they did. It was not the US that forced them. It was their own media and politicians, who were not forced on them by the US. Europeans also had free elections, and yet they voted for Jews (in France), for gay men, for liberals and socialists. Why? I know that in the US these scoundrels got elected via controlling the information and also the primary elections. When it came time to vote, it was a selection between bad and bad. Freedom was only a slogan, but we still felt free in comparison to the rest of the world. That’s how it’s done. Frustrating.

    I don’t think so-called Democracy works. But I’m beginning to think we’re just in a declining age – corruption and decay is rampant everywhere. There doesn’t seem any way to stop it. There’s NO WILL. Adolf Hitler stirred up the Will of the German people, but it was overwhelmed by the corruption and weakness everywhere else. The Communist idea was the poison I mentioned earlier. Deciding that one country is at fault is just not realistic.

    In order to get the US out of Germany, all the Germans need to do is to unite and demand it. They don’t because they WANT the USA there! Most Germans do. Donald Trump wanted to leave but the Germans and all Europe objected! You are kidding yourself, you and Raches both.

    I would like to say to you: Why are you focused on Japan and China? You’re German so you should mind Germany’s business. We all want to solve other problems than our own at-home ones. Let China and Japan do whatever they decide. The only power we have is amongst our own, and in our own neighborhood, so to speak. Monarchy would be better than what we have now, but that is never going to come back because life only moves in one direction — forward into the new. The past is gone.

    Gotta get something to eat.

    • Replies: @Vaterland
  204. Mulegino1 says:
    @Mefobills

    What an outstanding summary!

    The analog to today is China’s belt and road, which is a parallel system to western Atlantacism/Finance Capital. The shorting mechanism was recently operated against Russia, but Putin thwarted it by stuffing Gold into the Russian central bank, to then shore up FX.

    We can see how the string pullers are going bezerk today, as they did in the run up to WW1/2. They are losing their cat-bird seat.

    They are going crazy with rage that their neoliberal and globohomo paradigm did not take hold and is not Fukuyama’s “End of History” but a mere pause before Eurasianism becomes the dominant economic, political and cultural philosophy of the world. Europe will soon have the opportunity to regain its independence and recover its cultural and spiritual autonomy. Cultural and spiritual rebirth is both painful and glorious.

    A new order based upon physical production and cooperation between nations who exercise sovereign control over their internal affairs and their money and credit will ultimately replace the (((carrion birds of high finance, interest slavery, and economic ruin))).

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @hillaire
  205. Derer says:
    @Trinity

    I honestly cannot believe you can’t see that you are dividing people up, sounds like Jew 101. lolol.

    A small group dividing masses can succeed only if surrounded by an ocean of illiteracy and mental mediocrity, worse than impoverished 1918 Russian serfs.

    • Agree: Gidoutahere
    • Replies: @Trinity
  206. @Carlton Meyer

    A common falsehood. The Germans resumed unrestricted submarine warfare only in British waters to stop arms shipments, and did this long before the Americans declared war.

    Unrestricted warfare means unrestricted warfare. That includes vessels carrying food or medicine. What exactly did I say is a falsehood?

    It wasn’t just the Lusitania and they weren’t merely trying to stop arms shipments. The plan was to starve Britain into surrendering. I can dig up a long list of merchant ships that were sunk if you would like.

    It’s pretty basic history.
    In 1914, Germany had just 20 U-boats. By 1917, it had 140 and the U-boats had destroyed about 30 percent of the world’s merchant ships.
    https://www.theworldwar.org/learn/wwi/unrestricted-u-boat-warfare

    30% of the world’ s merchant ships. Do you realize how much work goes into building a single merchant ship? All kinds of men that wanted nothing to do with the war are now on the bottom of the Atlantic.

    Don’t try to depict Germany as a fair player in WW1. They gambled on immoral tactics and lost. I don’t think the US should have entered but Germany was no saint.

    The Lusitania was carrying weapons and ammo.

    It was carrying small arms rounds along with American women and children. Yes the British lied about the cargo contents but that didn’t justify killing the passengers. It was not only cruel but completely stupid on the part of the Germans. Sinking a small shipment of ammo in exchange for angering an entire nation. Stupid.

    Moreover, the Germans resumed unrestricted submarine warfare to force the British to the peace table. The Germans wanted peace!

    Hilarious. We love peace so much that we are going to drown innocent people to prove it.

    Germany in both wars took on too many nations and overstretched their hand. Yes I’m sure in 1916 they would have drawn back the borders in a peace deal but they had already pissed off the British. The British weren’t required to do a friendly re-drawing of the borders and just forget about all the men they had lost. In both wars the Germans underestimated the British and seemed to think they were tea sipping ninnies that wouldn’t put up much of a fight.

    I’m not a fan of the British but it was Germany in both wars that gambled and lost. It doesn’t really matter what peace deal A or B could have been. Germany could have played a much longer game with overseas territories but went with the high risk Schlieffen plan to conquer continental Europe. What are you going to do? Build a time machine and tell them it is too risky? That is how they played it and lost.

    You should take a cruise ship and look at the dark ocean once you are out a few miles. Imagine being tossed into it with your family.

    • Troll: Raches
  207. Trinity says:
    @Derer

    And you are the old Trump fan. What a piece of work that guy is. German, is he? Scottish? Why on earth would someone of German ancestry be such philo-Semite?

    • Replies: @Derer
  208. @Anonymous

    Dumbass…..Michael Alan Weiner is JEWISH.

    9/11 was engineered by Israel……you know nothing dipshit.

    The American people were lied into the Iraq War by the neocons and the jewish press.

    The jewish media even lied that Saddam had something to do with the attack when there was no evidence whatsoever.

    Well….unless you count the lies that came out of “The Office of Special Plans.”

    “Clean Break” detailed the need for regime changes all over the ME, and most of what Perle asked for has been done, thanks to PNAC, Wolfowitz, Feith, Wurmser, Kristol, etc.

    Are you really that stupid? Or is it that you’re just a hate filled anti-white bigot?

    White Christian Americans have been used as a golem by the jews, the same way that blacks are used by the jews as a golem against whites.

    I’m guessing that you are a low IQ buckwheat….rocking about 80.

    Begone.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @anon
  209. Trinity says:

    Since we are into blaming Americans. How many German Americans fought against their own kind in both World Wars? How many Italian Americans fought with the Allies in WWII? IF I remember the stats right, German Americans made up a large segment of America’s population back in the day. Now who would you have more disdain for IF you were a German soldier, a Texas farm boy with a Irish last name like Murphy or some German American fighting his own people? Would have to be a tough decision to make. Try not to laugh here. But imagine if America went to war against Israel? I know I have a better shot at becoming a billionaire but work with me? How many Jewish Americans would fight for America?

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  210. Mefobills says:
    @Mulegino1

    Thanks!

    Physical production and cooperation between nations was the animating ideology of the American Revolution.

    Industrial Capitalism was invented in Massachusetts Bay, and the effects of the system were written down, especially by Cotton Mather. This idea of using Bills of Credit instead of paying usury to borrow scarce gold (from guess (((who)))), was how Mass Bay was able to build out the iron works, and then outfit ships for protection and fisheries.

    The Carrion Birds were present in the Colonies, and were intent on enclosing the lands for their own self aggrandizement. But, there was so much land, they could never grab it all, to then enclose, as was happening in Europe.

    The general welfare clause of the constitution was probably transmitted by Benjamin Franklin, and was a function of his experience in Philadelphia Colony.

    Most Americans don’t know their own history, and have (((implanted))) memories.

    Fukuyama was an apologist for Atlantacism, the taking of usury, finance capitalism/ international private bank credit, rim theory…..Mahan’s blue water power projection, and free market corporatism. All of the previous constructs work together like gears in a machine.

    It was not the end of history, but the end of the big bang event of 1694. It was only a pause before the change, because history is on-going.

    It was a diversion of history when Industrial Capitalism was strangled in the crib during WW2, and now it is resurrecting itself, especially in China. Labor works in industry to then make goods and services. A nations’ labor then trades their goods and services within their law, using their national money. China even slams heads, when they get froggy, such as Jack Ma’s ant group.

    In the west, prices and money channel toward speculation and the taking of sordid gain, not in honest production. Over 70 percent of bank credit is hypothecated against land and the FIRE sector, not industry. Lately, western industry has been speculating with their profits by buying back stock, to then boost stock prices. Or, they are borrowing bank credit (really creation of credit) to boost their stock price, rather than invest in new plant and equipment. This is a “I got mine” and screw you mentality.

    As an American, I can’t wait for the parasite to be ejected from our brain. Most Americans are zombies, as they have been propagandized from birth. They identify with their captors.

    I for one welcome the rise of Eurasia and national sovereignty, using production instead of speculation and war.

    1492, when Ferdinand and Isabella kicked out their Jews, was a seminal moment in history. There was a number of events in rapid succession, which created the finance capitalist world we known and love today, and all of the machinery was in place by 1694.

    It is amazing that the founding fathers saw as much as they did given the short amount of time they had to figure it out.

    Fukuyama is looking pretty foolish.

    • Thanks: dogbumbreath
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  211. @Raches

    Well, modesty is not one of your traits, lol.

    You’re brilliant on WW1 and 2, but it would take you a book-length comment to explain. I bet it would, although it would not if you were actually that well-informed.

    When I referred to wannabe-Nazis I was not meaning to wear uniforms, but just those men who speak about the “Nazis”, anonymously of course, in a familiar way but in a wrong way because their idea of who these “Nazis” were is more dream or wishful thinking than reality.

    I don’t care whether you’re a National Socialist or not. It’s not important to me. Though some people call themselves that, I don’t think anyone really is. I think they really mean they admire the National Socialists of history; maybe wish they were still around so they could join them.

  212. @Raches

    Are you incapable of responding with your own words? Nothing you have quoted from Unz contradicts anything that I said.

    Japan declared war on the US and tried knocking them out with a single attack. That is basic history.

    The whole thing was a gamble on the assumption that the Germans would beat the Soviets and the UK would accept the new world order. Thus their oil shortages would only be temporary.

    It doesn’t matter if FDR knew it was coming. There is no proof and in either scenario it did that doesn’t change the fact that Japan was the aggressor and was willing to kill White 18 year olds for a new Asian empire.

    Hitler was never pro-White. When he heard about the attack on Pearl Harbor he was delighted.

    This is really one of the worst articles I have read on Unz. You didn’t make a coherent argument to support your thesis and seem in denial of basic history. I don’t care if you want to write pro-German articles but trying to depict America as a nation of hate because of WW2 is totally ridiculous. Go look at pictures of the rape of Nanking and get back to us. Some are too graphic for the internet. The Japanese not only raped and killed women but would mutilate them sexually.

  213. @Monotonous Languor

    It would have been far better if Germany had negotiated Gdansk instead of invaded it, and then fully prepared Europe for total war against the Bolsheviks.

    Well, you really don’t know a thing about it, do you? Or maybe you’re Polish? Germany WAS negotiating on Danzig (what you call Gdansk), but the Poles broke off negotiations, claiming there was nothing to negotiate. That is clear to everyone.

    extra-national ideologies such as naziism, communism, islam, zionism, colonialism, corporatism, and now leftism produce massive conflict, because they refuse to respect nationhood. History proves that mutual respect for national boundaries provides an optimal (not perfect) balance between personal liberty and top-down control.

    But it’s deciding where those boundaries are that proves to be the devisive part. Parties often don’t agree, isn’t that so?

    • Agree: Raches
  214. Chinaman says:

    Its culture and its genetics are irreparably, incorrigibly suffused with the hatreds and jealousies of degenerate, low-class religious fanatic

    Bravo. You have identified the quintessential qualities of Americans. The incorrigibility of their character and their penchant for the visceral suggests a genetic origin. There is no people more evil and vile than Americans on earth.

    Everywhere there is Americans, there is death, destruction and depravity.

    I am not a Chinese nationalist ( most of the one on Unz are pussies), I am a Chinese supremacist that might put me at odds with the Untouchables and the uncivilised Japs who still have to write their name in Chinese. I don’t hate or envy them per se.

    In any case, That difference shouldn’t stop us from uniting in our effort to purge the American scourge from the face of the earth. A world in which China rules will be one in which all races will learn to live in peace.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Mefobills
  215. Of course “America” is a “Nation of Hate”…

    It’s run by the absolute authorites on the concept of hate (and they’ve run it, largely, since its inception). They are the premier purveyors of it, too, entirely without peer. In fact, no one else even comes close to approcahing the immeasurable volumes of hate which they have dispensed throughout their long (and decidedly unflattering} history… Hate, which these “authorities” have applied, seemingly without ANY restraint, towards literally EVERYONE ELSE around them whom they deem not one of “their own”… And they have done this — in perpetuity — for multiple millennia now. This hatred they possess is a uniquely vile and vitriolic brew, too, exponentially unequalled by any other people on Earth, and is universally recognized as one of their “trademarks”; most certainly a defining trait. (Perhaps this is, in part, attibutable to the fact that their most “sacred” texts actually — and absolutely — sanction and encourage the liberal applications of such [very irrational] hatred towards others?)

    Alas, those I’m referring to, of course, consitute the Hate Tribe, itself… That international pharisaical organized crime syndicate generally referred to as “judaism”.

    It’s THAT simple.

    They run the entire “America” show (yes, it’s MOST DEFINITELY A SHOW!), from top to bottom, and largely have done so from its very inception… and, although, whereas in the past this was done primarily from “behind the curtain”, it is VERY out in the open now (a quite unhealthy brazenness, it should be noted,). Most folks also now see that this very same “show” is obseravable in almost every other nation on Earth, as well, particularly within so-called “governments” and “news” media organs. This is not coincidence. (Perhaps “cohencidence” is more fitting, in this context?)

    In closing, I’ll state that if some of you so-called “jews” out there perhaps don’t like this message, I say, “Tough luck.” Time to look in a mirror. What do you see? Perhaps, if you look long enough, and shelve all that infantile chutzpah and spite for a moment, you’ll see you’re DESTROYING yourselves… and even a reason for simply even existing. It would appear at this juncture that SHAME and DISGRACE will ultimately be your sole anti-legacy. What a waste.

    What an absolute, unmitigated, WASTE.

    • Thanks: Arthur MacBride
  216. Yevardian says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Time and again we see that only extra-national ideologies such as naziism, communism, islam, zionism..

    Honey, you may not like it, but Zionism is literally Jewish nationalism. Consult a dictionary.

    • Agree: Raches
  217. @Thim

    [This crackpot has nothing to do with Adolf Hitler.  —Raches. ®]

    Satanist Filth Squirms And Squeals In Face Of Reality, Truth–As Always

    “Third Reich died forever”? U wish, sucker, but fact remains, (a) unc’ Adolf is glorious, magnificent HERO and thus EXAMPLE for all humanity against u cursed Satanists, filled w. wishful thinking as u are, and (b) dear unc’ Adolf copped case of Jews, the very leaders of Satanism/subjectivism, (c) brilliantly upholding the racialist determinist principle against u satanic filth.

    [MORE]

    (d) Further, unc’ Adolf demonstrated just how to rhetorically handle u satanic puke as described by historian, John Lukacs, integrating racialism, nationalism, and thus uniting the workers, the conservatives and all the human beings of Germany w. only exception of satanic monsters like urselves, hated by all humanity, throughout history.

    “[P]ining over the reich?–all humans regret tragedies, like the immediate outcome of the war in question–we naturally wish it could have been different. But things happen only in the course of the fullness of time, and Judaism is surely fated to be totally, completely exterminated for the anti-human filth it really is, though since Satanism is just extreme subjectivism, and subjectivism is a common error for anyone, it, in contrast to the hated Judaism, will probably survive.

    And soon enough humanity throughout the world will be celebrating the great holiday of the final extermination of such Judaic Satanism like July 4th is celebrated as great occasion of commemoration, like Christmas is celebration of Christ and Christianity.

    And what?–“serious mental issues”?–ho hoo ho for the Satanist filth is all any human would say about satanic puke like urself, sucker, for whom wishes and wishful thinking is so and always confused w. actual objective reality which u hate so much, eh? Ho ho ho.

    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  218. Raches says: • Website
    @apollonian

    I obviously (and very vehemently) disagree with, detest, and despise “Thim”—but two wrongs don’t make a right.  I must do here some of what, in the anti-vaxxer threads, I called “housecleaning”.

    So-called “apollonian”, whose handle badly misappropriates the name of a god and/or distorts Spengler, is, besides being a raving Christian nutcase, also a Moon Landing Denier.  He evidently knows so little history that he fails to realize that Hitler’s own rocket scientists put Man on the Moon, in a postwar triumph of the German mind that surely horrified the Jews.

    That topic is off-topic here; and replies about it will be met with heavy censorship.  I am simply explaining, quite ad hominem, that “apollonian” has nothing to do with me, and he also has absolutely nothing to do with Hitler (whom he even disrespectfully calls “dear unc’ Adolf”), and his kind are not welcome around here. ®

  219. onebornfree says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    Yourself, Raches , Mofo Bill etc. etc. really are a bunch of losers,clowns,busybody windbags.

    You all seem to think: ” the more words I put in my comment, the truer what I say is”.

    Your overlong, pseudo- intellectual, obfuscating reply to my comment is typical of both the pro Nazi and pro Commie comments so often found here. (And I get “MORE”ed because the author of the piece believes that mandatory vaccinations are somehow not related to his own idiotic,totalitarian mindset. 😂).

    If any of you actually live in the US, I suggest you leave. You are all in complete opposition to underlying principles that founded this country.

    Fair enough.

    Much of the rest of the World is already even further along the road to total tyranny than the US; for example: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK, China, N.Korea, France, Germany, Italy, Spain.

    Assuming that you all live in the US, I ask: why don’t you all piss of and live in one of those countries that are already mostly in line with your totalitarian idiocy, instead of staying in the US and forever moaning that it’s still not enough like the rest of the world for your own infantile, purile tastes?

    “Regards” onebornfree

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante, Truth
    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Poco
  220. @Raches

    “… a raving Christian nutcase, also a Moon Landing Denier.”

    I was glad to see that Ron Unz had given you a blog, Raches, from previous perusal of your comments.
    However, this (as well as some other) responses inclines me to think my gladness was perhaps premature …
    Your conversation with the rather immature would-be Apollo is a neurotic mirror image of his ramblings, a gratuitous religious insult and a defence of a Hollywood production.

    IMHO, a somewhat unfortunate start.
    Hoping you will be able to exercise your obvious knowledge and skills base more effectively as time passes.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  221. @Carolyn Yeager

    You wrote:

    But thanks for mentioning your change of heart on Donald Trump. That is exactly right–we have to take the best available and he’s still it.

    and ….

    He [Donald J. Chump] is trustworthy, at least.

    You’re being sarcastic ….. right ?

    I mean, Donald Chump has been a Zionist’s wet dream. No POTUS has prostrated himself to the Zionist puppet masters this much since LBJ was on the scene.

    As for Trump being ‘the best available’, are you forgetting that in 2015, prior to Trump announcing he was entering the race, Senator Rand Paul was the front runner in the polling to be nominated as the GOP candidate.

    And you’re telling me that Trump is better than the SON of Ron Paul ?

    What planet are you living on, to be making such an asinine claim ?

    As for Trump being trustworthy, don’t get me started.

    Candidate Trump said a lot of good things in the run up to the 2016 election.

    He said he’s sit down with Putin and negotiate better relations. He said he’s wind down the wars, build a wall on the southern border that Mexico would pay for, and lots more.

    Actual Outcome: He broke all the promises of substance and was the most profligate POTUS in the history of the republic – check out what he did to the M1 money supply in ONE YEAR (a policy he borrowed from 1923 Weimar Germany):

    Yes readers, Trump out Democratted the Democrats by printing/digitally creating USD like there was no tomorrow, to finance his mountainous budget deficits.

    Not surprising really. Trump always was an economically illiterate Dem who just happened to run on the Republican ticket.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  222. Trinity says:
    @Chinaman

    (((Chinaman?))) Where you been, Shlomo? I thought you said you were leaving Unz awhile back. Why are you back? Another Oriental, Lin Dinh, pulled the same caper a couple of weeks ago. Be a man of your word and do something if you say you are going to do it, son.

    Cue: Should I Stay Or Should I Go by The Clash

  223. Jon Chance says: • Website

    Adolf Hitler:

    Evil Genius or Useful Idiot?

    Thirteen Strategic “Blunders”

    1 – Hitler admired and emulated the British Empire.

    2 – Hitler obstructed German development of nuclear technology.

    3 – Hitler declared war on the US rather than recruiting America as an ally with Germany, Spain, Italy, Romania, Greece, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, and other anti-Communist nations.

    [MORE]

    4 – Hitler failed to recruit Japan in the war against the USSR.

    5 – Hitler obstructed German capture of the British Army at Dunkirk.

    6 – Hitler obstructed German production of jet fighters essential for effective defense against the UK’s bombings of Europe.

    7 – Hitler obstructed German targeting of the UK’s military targets during the Battle of Britain.

    8 – Hitler obstructed Germany’s liberation of Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England from the UK.

    9 – Hitler obstructed Axis supply of fuel to General Rommel’s panzers in North Africa.

    10 – Hitler diverted Germany’s Eastern divisions to Leningrad and Stalingrad, thus obstructing Germany from capturing Moscow and liberating Eastern Europe from the Communists.

    11 – Hitler obstructed the continued deportation of Jews to Palestine (after 1941).

    12 – Hitler nationalized Germany’s central bank, but he neglected to prohibit fractional-reserve banking.

    13 – Hitler obstructed competent alternatives from leading Germany in its defense against Communism and the Franco-British Empires.

    As a result of Hitler’s incompetence, over sixty million (60,000,000) Gentiles were brutally slaughtered by Khazarian-ruled puppet regimes.

    At a minimum, Adolf Hitler and the German National Socialists (Nazis) were useful idiots for Germany’s strategic opponents (Royal Dutch Shell, the French Empire, the Rothschild Dynasty & the Bank of England).

    But it’s entirely possible that Adolf Hitler and other National Socialists were willing and intentional puppets and agents for the defeat of Germany by the UK, the USSR, and the World Zionist Organization (WZO), is it not?

    The Greatest Story Never Told (2013) – Dennis Wise

    https://TheGreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

    Inside the Third Reich (1970) – Albert Speer

    • Replies: @apollonian
  224. @Mefobills

    Mofo-Bill writes:

    Lol’s are honorary Jews, doing the bidding of Liberalism, by passing hypnosis such as Free Markets, and Free Movement of Labor, Free movement of “international capital” is shilled for especially if it is Gold.

    FYI, the Mofo calls Libertarians ‘Lols’ – seeing as he’s dyslexic and spells it as Lolertarian, or some such.

    A bit of background for those who aren’t familiar with the exchanges I’ve had with the Mofo in other threads in UR.

    I’ve repeatedly embarrassed him and his mentor, the pseudo economist and non entity Michael Hudson.
    Time and again his voodoo economics is refuted by the Libertarians and that’s why the Mofo never wastes any opportunity to go off on a tangent and try to demonise Free Market Capitalism – he really is feeling the pain of these numerous shellackings he’s been on the end of.

    Hudson and the Mofo subscribe to what they refer to as Industrial Capitalism (a conjured up term that no one’s ever heard of), but is more accurately described as Socialised Fascism, since they’ve admitted that the bloated Big Government in the U.S is not big enough, nor centralised enough, for them.
    They seek an ever greater concentration of power in the nation’s capital.

    The Mofo wants to appoint even more busy-body regulators and bureaucrats to squeeze the life out of the private sector until such time as his dream of a Judeo-Bolshevik Marxist utopia is realised.

    And, taken straight from the Zionist playbook, the Mofo tries to turn the tables on Libertarians by claiming they’re honourary Jews who are doing the bidding of said Jews.

    Well, let’s look at the facts.

    Who is the most high profile Libertarian [past or present] politician in the world, even though he ran for President as a Republican in his last two attempts ?

    None other than Dr Ron Paul.

    And, as obscenely rich as the Zio-cabal is (multiples of U.S GDP at a very minimum), what instrument do this cartel of usury bankers possess that enables them to print/digitally create trillions more with a key stroke (that they can dole out to their Zio cronies whenever they run into financial distress from their reckless speculation)?

    Of course, that instrument is the U.S Federal Reserve.

    And which politician has campaigned tirelessly for five decades that the Fed should be audited, with the intention that said auditing would reveal fraud and chicanery – leading to an outcry from the public that it be abolished ?

    No prizes for guessing Ron Paul once again.

    Coupled to Ron Paul’s fiscally responsible policies and a massive curtailment of the ‘Wars-for-Israel’ murderous foreign policy, concurrent with a colossal reduction in funding for the Zio-owned Military-Industrial-Security complex, this would have massively crimped the power of the malevolent Jewish oligarchs.

    This could not be allowed to stand.

    That’s why Ron Paul was cheated [by the Zio powers that be] out of being nominated as the GOP candidate in the 2012 Presidential election (it has now been officially admitted that primaries in states that were declared as wins for other candidates were in fact Ron Paul victories).

    Bottom Line: There is NO CANDIDATE for the U.S Presidency post JFK (of any party) that the Zio cabal feared more than Dr Ron Paul.

    He would truly have made American great again.

    That’s why Mofo-Bill (aka the Mofo), acting on behalf of Ronald Lauder (President of the World Jewish Congress), Jacob Rothschild and his others City of London benefactors, take every opportunity to smear Libertarians and instead peddle their Judeo-inspired voodoo economics that is designed to enrich the Zionist Usury Banking Cartel.

    Give it up Mofo – the UR readers know who you are.

    I’ve suggested several times that you (or your mentor Michael Hudson), debate the Libertarians in a public forum and each time you’ve chickened out. (All archived here in the Unz Review).

    You and your ilk are just the worst type of cowards. (ie: Zio-funded, Zio-aligned craven wretches).

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  225. Mefobills says:
    @Chinaman

    Bravo. You have identified the quintessential qualities of Americans. The incorrigibility of their character and their penchant for the visceral suggests a genetic origin. There is no people more evil and vile than Americans on earth.

    Everywhere there is Americans, there is death, destruction and depravity.

    Your wrong. Any population can be maneuvered and led off of a cliff. What matters is the elect, or the elite who are pulling the levers of your civilization.

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/#comment-4948549

    Chinese have been led off the cliff many times. A recent example is the Hainan incident.

    ____________________

    As can be seen by today’s Covid example, the average normie is not capable of critical reasoning. Mostly normies want a download from the powers that be, and to do the right thing. They want to do what they are told, and then virtue signal about how they are righteous. They have a brain that works on emotion, not logic.

    This is true of EVERY POPULATION! During the EC-130 Hainan Island incident under Bush Junior (2001), almost the entire Chinese population was whipped into a frenzy. It is easy to maneuver populations. The about turn of the population only took a couple of weeks.

    _____________

    Don’t be a dumbass, Chinese are supposed to be smart.

    • Agree: dogbumbreath
  226. Mefobills says:
    @onebornfree

    One born free-dumb and Truth Vigilante need a room together in flea bag motel.

    Lolbertarians are not even aware that their very ideology creates the conditions they are against.

    Also, since you Lol’s have no real argument, you always devolve to character assassinations, rather than dealing with actual facts and observable reality.

    Free-dumb has even wrote about he would pay money to see some people harmed. LoL’s virtue signal about their superior morality, but in actuality they are personality defectives and are lacking in empathy.

    There is no contradiction, an authoritarian can have empathy, or an authoritarian can be lacking in empathy and be a sociopath.

    Privateers using usury to rule from behind the scenes, typically are the worst sort of humans – the type Lols promote. Perhaps they recognize sociopathy in each other and find common cause?

  227. Poco says:
    @onebornfree

    I agree, except, mefobills is correct that we must get control of our money. There WILL be some type of government. It seems to me that he advocates a limited government more in line with the constitution and the US early monetary system.
    Humans are too stupid/evil to exist with no government at all.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  228. Mefobills says:
    @John Wear

    Thanks for all of your efforts John.

    Good job, and I’m sure truth seekers in future will find your work. Maintaining narrative hoaxes on entire populations is expensive, typically done with recycled usury flows from finance into “think tanks,” and then said flows go onward to an owned press. Other flows go on to fund politicians, and fill their heads with think-tank-landia type of notions (typically it is Atlantacism in the west).

    Of course, our (((friends))) are world class at narrative hoaxing, which is part of their evolutionary method, to then protect their in-group self-interests at the expense of their host society.

  229. @John Johnson

    “Then he takes the rest of Czechoslovakia and invades Poland knowing that it could provoke another world war. Completely ruined any remaining credibility and made British conservatives look like fools which opened the door for Churchill. Those same conservatives wanted him to invade the USSR but Hitler was reckless and wanted revenge over WW1.”

    This paragraph could have been taken out of my history book in 8th grade.
    Written by the victors.
    And the victors never lie, nor analyse it incorrectly for that matter.

  230. @John Johnson

    It wasn’t just the Lusitania and they weren’t merely trying to stop arms shipments. The plan was to starve Britain into surrendering.

    Surrender what? The Germans and every sane person realized the war was pointless and just wanted it to end so they could go home. But Wall Street wanted to recover their loans from the French and British, plus interest. The Germans ended up paying most of that. I assume you realize the Germans lost lots of lives too. The Germans wanted to starve the Brits like they were doing to the Germans in hopes the British would agree to peace talks. See that video if you want details.

    The British fired upon neutral ships that ignored their blockade of German ports and would sink them if needed. You seem unaware that the US Navy engaged in a massive unrestricted submarine warfare campaign in the Pacific during World War II. Hundreds of American POWs drowned when their ships were hit without warning. The American/British aerial genocide campaign during World War II was truly shocking.

  231. Raches says: • Website
    @Arthur MacBride

    This is slippery propaganda:

    “… a raving Christian nutcase, also a Moon Landing Denier.”

    I was glad to see that Ron Unz had given you a blog, Raches, from previous perusal of your comments.
    However, this (as well as some other) responses inclines me to think my gladness was perhaps premature …
    Your conversation with the rather immature would-be Apollo is a neurotic mirror image of his ramblings, a gratuitous religious insult and a defence of a Hollywood production.

    IMHO, a somewhat unfortunate start.
    Hoping you will be able to exercise your obvious knowledge and skills base more effectively as time passes.

    You obviously did not much “peruse” my comments.  If you had, you would have noticed my habitual and scathing anti-Christian invective, and my total contempt for those who want to deny the later achievements of Hitler’s own rocket scientists.

    Although I saw you in the anti-vaxxer threads, I do not recall ever having interacted with you directly.  (Maybe I did, and forgot; it is too much trouble to check.)  Those same threads contain much material from me which presages what you now find objectionable.

    If I upset you, then I am off to a most fortunate start.  Redouble that since you play the old propaganda trick of pretending to be a sympathizer, even an admirer, offering me friendly advice.  It may fool people who have never seen my work before.  I suppose it’s evidence that the Jews have not cornered the market on dishonesty.

    I will file your humble suggestions in “taken under advisement”. ®

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  232. anon[229] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    9-11 was engineered by professed freedom fighters. That Israel was behind it is ludicrous. That the purpose was to take over US and impose sharia is ludicrous. Though of course Israel cheered as it was the best thing that happened to them. Most alqaeda were NOT fundamentalists. The ignorant Merikans have been hating on Arabs since the founding of Israel. They did not care if Iraq had wmd’s or not. They just wanted to kill as many Arabs as they could. Torture, indefinite detention w/o trial , SCOTUS approved religious [Muslim] ban, everything the US professed to be against, was approved out of genocidal hatred. .

    • Replies: @Derer
  233. @Raches

    Genghis Khan killed more people than anyone else in the history of the world. So it wouldn’t appear this homicidal inclination is an “American” exclusive. Noodle that. Attila the Hun’s ghost is deeply insulted at being omitted in this widening hall of fame. Feel free to add your own inductees – there are a lot of them.

  234. @Mefobills

    Thanks for yet another chapter in the history that “most Americans do not know”
    [“Most Americans don’t know their own history, and have (((implanted))) memories.”]

  235. Mefobills says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    hat’s why Mofo-Bill (aka the Mofo), acting on behalf of Ronald Lauder (President of the World Jewish Congress), Jacob Rothschild and his others City of London benefactors, take every opportunity to smear Libertarians and instead peddle their Judeo-inspired voodoo economics that is designed to enrich the Zionist Usury Banking Cartel.

    Give it up Mofo – the UR readers know who you are.

    You make all kinds of spurious allegations – basically strawmen arguments, and then try to knock it down. And then you declare yourself victor in a fight that you dreamt up in your own mind.

    This is why you are crazy… a nut burger. You should be banned. Crazy people make it harder for rational people to have a conversation.

    Lolberatarians are agents for Zion. There is nothing in Lolbertarian doctrine about the taking of rents and usury, the main method of Jewish power. Lols act as disinfo agents, because they are brainwashed.

    Anybody who is open minded can read historical accounts and then ask themselves what would happen if LOL ideology was in effect:

    Here is one example from Russian history:

    https://russia-insider.com/en/history/vladimir-ii-freed-russia-jewish-oppression-1113-banned-usury-crippling-nation-founded

    It appears that Jewish money being sent from abroad to destabilize Russia has a very long tradition.

    This particular (((international money))) was Gold, which was melted down, and then spirited across the border by the tribe, to then attempt a take over.

    _______________________

    The formerly strong, law-bound economy was gone and the rule of the strongest was the norm. Society was demoralized. This gave rise to the dominance of money lending.

    Given that this prince gave the usurers free rein, a powerful oligarchy developed on the backs of rural communes. Slavery resurfaced as debt-bondage was the only recourse for many. As more and more land became forfeit due to debt, this oligarchy grew fangs.

    Lol’s are so dumb, the shill for that which they are against. Somehow it escapes their notice that privateers emerge from the population, and it takes authoritarianism to smash them.

    It also takes legal authority to erase debts, namely because money’s true nature is law – not metal.

    If Vladimir were a Lolbertarian, he would have ended up in a Jewish run Gulag, and Russia would have lost her people, history, borders, language, and culture.

    LOL’s are a joke, and honorary Jews.

    • Thanks: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @jim bob beers
  236. @Raches

    I have to say I agree with your generalisations about Americans, and it is acceptable to generalise the way you do on UR, and human too. Those complaining about it (Trinity included) have no problems when it comes to generalising about others and I don’t see them writing “Certain, some, specific Jews, Arabs, Muslims, Mexicans, rhymes with triggers, etc. …” but paint them all with a broad brush, yet when it comes to Americans then it’s “No, No, not Americans, it’s the Jews’ fault”. Yeah … well …

    Not surprising, since you allege that a mainstream American magazine was faking anti-American propaganda at the height of WWII

    Here I don’t agree with you and don’t understand why you should see that photo as anti-American propaganda, and why should a leading American mag publish it if it was truly so? (Since you wrote to Trinity “you allege that a mainstream American magazine was faking anti-American propaganda” then I assume that you think that Time was not faking it and that it was truly anti-American propaganda.) It would be like claiming that Ilya Ehrenburg’s “Kill the Germans! Kill!” (“The Germans are not human beings”) was anti-Soviet propaganda and “in a way favorable to the Axis”. That photo is just a photographic version of the same kind of propaganda but directed against the Nips and the same as Kaufman’s book calling for the extermination of all Germans (yet you use the latter to somehow try to counterpose Trinity’s argument). American propaganda had already sufficiently dehumanised the Japs, as had the Jap’s own actions during the war, so all that photo was doing was urging Americans to go out and kill more Nips and send their skulls back home to their girlfriends (not neccessarilly literally skin their skulls and post them back home but just to kill, kill, and kill some more). No American at the time would have seen it as anti-American propaganda, except for the interned Japanese-Americans and some odd bleeding heart humanist/pacifist types. You’re not judging that photo according to the time and place when it was published but with hindsight as a liberal humanist may see it looking back from today. And despite that Ilya Ehrenburg poem trying to fire up the Soviet soldiers, Soviet communists did not really hate, or want to exterminate, Germans, they just wanted the Germans to be good communists.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  237. @Commentator Mike

    Oh, and Trinity could be right that that photo was staged using a prop skull, but the idea was the same as if had been real; i.e. anti-Jap war propaganda and nothing anti-American about it.

  238. @Truth Vigilante

    Who do your recommend who has any chance at all of being elected? I like Rand Paul as a senator but he never would have defeated Hillary Clinton. He is not tough enough, and it’s tough to get elected against the Democrat machine. He also doesn’t have the personality that lights people up. As you say, as soon as Trump entered the race, it was over for the rest of them. He came across as the only truth-teller on the stage.

    When Trump announced his candidacy, he right away went after the immigration from Mexico. That sold me right there! Rand Paul was still supporting the “anti-racist” liberal “gang-of-eight” polices of Big Business and the Chamber of Commerce. Conservative Multiculturalism, and We’re a Nation of Immigrants … all to keep wages down.

    Look what the Dems are doing at the border now, and they would have been doing it from 2016 on under Hillary. Trump was preventing it … and all alone, I might add. He has more balls than Rand Paul and all the Republicans put together. You are doing White Americans a great disservice with your constant Libertarian propaganda.

    I consider you a troll because your specialty is name-calling and cherry-picking of issues that you still LIE about — like saying that Trump didn’t wind down the ‘wars’ and build the wall. All I have to say to you is: Get lost. You’re a completely unserious person in my view.

  239. Mefobills says:
    @Poco

    Humans are too stupid/evil to exist with no government at all.

    There are stupid evil people emerging from the population all the time.

    Psychopaths are born, and Sociopaths are made. There is also money-sickness, which the Greek’s called silver sickness.

    There is no good English word to convey money-sickness. There is no loss of wants with money, you can never have enough. You can have enough bananas, or underwear, etc., your wants are met.

    Psychopaths, Sociopaths, Money-Sickness types have to be countered, and for sure they cannot be allowed near the reigns of power. So far, China is doing a much better job of populating its hierarchy than is the finance capitalist west.

    Benjamin Franklin thought that a natural elite would emerge out of the population, which he noticed in his Juntos. Franklin also was training the population with his Do-Good series, assuming that a normie could become a moral actor. Answer – they can’t, they are too easy to manipulate.

    Franklin also noticed some of the Juntos went bad (the one in Boston especially). They became populated by the worst types of people, those who wanted to enclose the lands, or wanted special gifts from the taxpayer.

    Even so, Franklin never codified a system where an elect could be found and selected, to then be brought up for vote confirmation (by a non-universal suffrage voting base).

    In other words, there is your screw-up for today’s America… no good way of finding an elect. Today’s America makes pretend that people have human action (some sort of nebulous concept of the LoLs), and can make god-like judgements with universal suffrage voting.

    There is another screw-up in Jefferson’s “All men are created equal,” statement, which was probably also influenced by Franklin. All men are not created equal, that is brainwashing of the highest order. There is always hierarchy. (Jews want to be at the top.)

    How you find your elect of non-pathological types is the most important question nobody is asking.

    So, Franklin did a lot of screwing up, along with some good things. The foundation of America had some cracks at the beginning.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  240. @Carlton Meyer

    Just watched an earlier video of yours, Carleton — all are almost equally informative and an antidote to the relentless TV and other media propaganda.

    However, your focus on banker needs for repayment of loans while true enough, does not tell the whole story.

    Zionists were very active in prolonging the war, for their own purposes — most notably, as many on Unz forum may be aware, to fulfill their part of the scheme to obtain the Balfour agreement, British indemnification & protection of Jewish possession of Palestine.

    Chaim Weizmann is, in my estimation, yet another of the odious Jewish characters that has, for good or ill, generalized the perception of Jews as “hateful.” As his friend and biographer, Leonard Stein, discloses in The Balfour Declaration, Weizmann was crucial in extracting that guarantee from the British. – Balfour, and his strategy was to “assess the degree of anti-semitism in each person he considered . . .” and to play on that overt or covert taboo.

    But Weizmann reveals — gloats over — his even more hateful and deliberate scheme to extend the fighting in WWI in this chapter in his autobiography, Trial and Error.
    In ch. 17, “Opera Bouffe Intermezzo” Weizmann narrates how, in close collaboration with Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, he stymied the efforts of then-former ambassador to Turkey Henry Morgenthau (senior) to arrange a “separate peace” which, Weizmann feared, “might leave Jews [and the Jewish project in Palestine] in the lurch.”

    Interested readers should peruse this chapter for themselves. I find too many of Weizmann’s actions too vile to contemplate while maintaining the integrity of my soul. Suffice to say that Weizmann’s machinations were sufficient to distract Morgenthau from his project, and the war continued apace.

    (One of the most hateful elements of Weizmann’s activities is the way he used/abused Sir Mark Sykes. In this time of the Scamdemic, with its reminiscences of the so-called Spanish Flu, Unz readers may not be aware that Mark Sykes, then 39 years old, died alone in his hotel room in Paris-Versailles where he had been participating in the Versailles peace conference. Woodrow Wilson was devastated by Sykes’ death, and indeed, Wilson suffered but survived a bout with the flu, but the combination of his psychological distress over Sykes’s death and the debilitating effects of the flu effectively sidelined the man who had been hailed as the Rock Star, the Savior, the Guarantor of 14 Points, including promises of fair treatment to Germans and to Arabs of the (former) Ottoman Empire.
    While Wilson was distraught over Sykes’s death, Weizmann did not even mention it in his autobiography.)

  241. @Gidoutahere

    Are fellows of Genghis Khan’s tribe presently occupying dozens of the highest positions of influence in US government?

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-the-biden-administration

    • Agree: dogbumbreath
  242. Joe Wong says:
    @songbird

    Before WWII, the American is just one of the Western imperialists ravaged and wreaked havoc of Asia with barbaric wars, illicit drugs like Opium, slavery, stealing, robbing, looting, plundering, murdering, torturing, exploiting, polluting, culture genocide, ‘pious’ fanaticism, unmatchable greed and extreme brutality.

    American became rich and powerful through imperialism, colonialism, selling opium, religious indoctrination of the conquered, ethnic cleansing, genocide, slavery, racial discrimination, regime change, biochem warfare, shock and awe, skilful propaganda, etc.

    In fact it is hard to tell the difference between the American and the unrepentant war criminal Japanese who is more lethal and barbaric to Asians and the rest of the world. Japanese morally defunct evil sadistic psychopathic barbarism make German’s holocaust look like child play.

    Recently bellicose Japanese is threatening to interfere China’s recovering Taiwan. Chinese all over the world see that will be a god sent opportunity to pay back what the Japanese owed to the Chinese by surgically remove them from human population like removing toxic cancer.

  243. @Gidoutahere

    Genghis Khan killed more people than anyone else in the history of the world. So it wouldn’t appear this homicidal inclination is an “American” exclusive.

    And how exactly do you know this? Did you learn it from a Western book or T.V. program. Repeated propaganda is not truth. Simple logic:

    “Those who control the past control the future, and those who control the present control the past”

    Who controls the present?

    • Replies: @Gidoutahere
  244. Raches says: • Website

    Moderation note:  The discussion of money and monetary policy is off-topic here.  I will soon make a thread for it.  I really do not want to shut it down; but I want to keep the thread readable for people who are here to discuss the subject of the article.  Please be patient.

    My own views on this are rather nuanced:  As an admirer of Hitler’s régime (and of Schacht’s work at the Reichsbank), I obviously do not have an absolutist principle against fiat money—and as a Bitcoiner (and a bit of a goldbug), I obviously have no great love for the U.S. Federal Reserve scam.

    I will make a place to let those arguing this hash it out. ®

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Raches
  245. Raches says: • Website
    @Joe Wong

    This reminds me of one of Mr. Unz’s comments about people who damage their own cause.

    Don’t you see that anti-Japanese agitation plays straight into the American agenda?  Anti-Chinese American propaganda can then present Japan as America’s “friend” (whom they nuked twice—whom they still have under military occupation—who is still prohibited from building an effective military), who must be protected from big, evil China.  This also plays as pro-American, anti-Chinese propaganda in Japan, and also for anti-China agitation in America itself.

    Rapprochement between China and Japan would implode the American agenda in the Far East—the same way that rapprochement between England and Germany would have defeated Roosevelt’s warmongering in 1939 (or 1940, or even as late as 1942, if Hitler’s peace overtures had not been rejected).  There is an historical basis for peace and friendship between China and Japan.  (Vaterland, you know the relevant languages; what is your opinion of this?)  At this point in history, I think that China-Japan détente is one of the worst-case scenarios for the global death-grip of the American Empire.

    Think about it.  Why not build terms of mutual respect and friendship between these two great nations, and thereupon agree to kick American influence out of the Pacific Rim? ®

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  246. @Carolyn Yeager

    Dearest Carolyn, excuse me for saying this, but you are absolutely clueless.

    Yes, I am saying Trump didn’t wind down the wars – because it’s patently TRUE.

    If you disagree, name one, just ONE war that he wound down. (And f.f.s, don’t tell me Syria – seeing as the U.S escalated that war and it was only brought to an end by Russian intervention).

    Not only did Trump not wind down the wars, he did this (the article below is titled ‘Trump who vowed to end wars has dropped more bombs than Bush or Obama’ :

    https://www.2lt.com.au/trump-who-vowed-to-end-wars-has-dropped-more-bombs-than-bush-or-obama/

    As for the ‘balls’ you claim Trump possesses, name me ONE courageous thing he’s done in his whole life.

    [MORE]

    He did a Bush 43 and chickened out of military service during Vietnam.
    He’s just shonky property developer who has cheated contractors by not paying them for services rendered.

    Trump is not a fighter. He’s just a showman, a loud mouthed and obnoxious opportunist, a soldier of fortune with no moral compass who’s willing to be sodomised by the highest bidder (as indeed he was when he was the toy boy of mob lawyer Roy Cohn – a known homosexual and paedophile):

    https://villagemagazine.ie/trumps-mentor-and-the-abuse-of-a-teenage-boy-from-kincora-by-joseph-de-burca/

    Yes, that’s Roy Cohn and a young Trump pictured there on one of their numerous dates/public outings.
    It’s no secret that Cohn would have intimate dinners with Trump (yes, just the two of them), and they’d flirt with one another.
    It was public knowledge.

    Meanwhile, on the topic of Trump’s courage, was he brave to prostrate himself at the Wailing Wall when he visited Occupied Palestine and paid homage to his Zionist masters ?
    Is that what makes him tough ?

    Trump is nothing but a cowardly chicken-hawk who sends other peoples sons and daughters to die in foreign conflicts to appease his Zio controllers.

    If you can’t see that then it’s apparent that early onset dementia has been triggered by those clot shots you submitted yourself to.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Derer
  247. @Raches

    It’s a very good idea to ban off-topic posts (like from Mefobills, who intrudes his “money-talk” into every subject, and at great length too). I’m all for banning obvious trolls also. It’s true that they disrupt the thread’s readability … and isn’t that their purpose?!

    Reading this from you gives me a better view of your seriousness. Hope you follow through. If you do, you’ll improve your readership and popularity.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  248. @Mefobills

    There is no good English word to convey money-sickness.

    There is a good Greek word for it: Pleonexia. It is a mental disorder.

    “The pathogenesis of greed: causes and consequences”, Arthur Nikelly

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aps.50

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  249. @Carolyn Yeager

    [Fixed.  My policy is not to let commentators change their comments substantively; but that was an obvious typo, more than reasonable to correct.  —Raches. ®]

    Correction: 2016, not 1916, in paragraph 3. You can see I’ve lived longer in the 20th century than in the 21st! I make this mistake often enough but can usually correct myself in time.

  250. That skull is a fake. The eye sockets aren’t even slanted.

  251. Derer says:
    @Svevlad

    By and large, I agree with you, but you neglected to point out the one crucial factor of the American international behavior and that is while other countries are improving their mental capacity the American is diminishing. Post war European brain is dying out and is replaced by generations raised on misinformation, drugs and violence.

  252. @Raches

    “Thank you” Raches.
    It was an attempt to be courteous while offering valid (imho) criticism. Obviously not something that you are familiar with and attribute it to hypocrisy.

    You bring up Jews. Why do you do that?
    Neuroticism, control-freakism, a Hyena personality … rabid hatred of Christianity, rabid hatred of goyim (like all Americans, a ludicrous proposition).

    My post was also a test, Rachel.
    And you failed. Goodbye.
    You can have the final word. Enjoy.

  253. Derer says:
    @Trinity

    He is philo-Semite because his anti-Muslim sentiment is stronger. Muslims want ME homogeneity and completely cleanse it from other brethren. While flooding Europe and supporting remnants of the Ottoman invasions.

    Trump attempted to run US primarily as a business but vindictive Dems and warmongering morons within his own party and military cockroaches would not let him. For haven sake, they even used sleazy Stormy nonissue. Wake up Trini. How could Biden receive record Dems vote even more than Obama – they stole it from Trump.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  254. Derer says:
    @anon

    Your rational start was ruined by last two sentences. Who is killing whom in the name of camel shepherd.

  255. Derer says:
    @Gidoutahere

    You did not mention Caligula, hahaha. Are you out of your mind, comparing medieval nomadic savages, who did not do anything different from other tribes, to present day Washington “civilized” gang.

  256. Raches says: • Website
    @Raches

    Moderation note:  The discussion of money and monetary policy is off-topic here.  I will soon make a thread for it.

    https://www.unz.com/proems/talk-about-money/

    Much though I dislike Trump myself (and I actually agree with some of the anti-Trump arguments), the general discussion about U.S. electoral politics, Trump, etc. is mostly off-topic here, except insofar as it may relate to American warmongering, etc.; and it is not quite on-topic there, unless you are pointing out that Trump has absolutely nothing against the Federal Reserve system, etc.  Among related issues suitable for that topic, I note that since several banks and financial services deplatformed him and his campaign in January of 2021, Trump should really do Bitcoin.

    Direct your responses to the above-linked topic. ®

  257. Wow talk about beating a dead horse. The global-homo USA is circlin the drain. SJW schl0m0 buzzards, lobotomized leftist l00ns & the corp plutocracy have ensured this. I’m just trying to live out my life w/ my wife & enjoy the end of the empire to the best of my ability. To say the USA is a nation of hate is a bit extreme. How many other empires have done pretty much exactly what we have?? My guess is the majority of them. My only concern is the USA has enough nukes to fry the planet. Will the low IQ mulignan morons & their commie compadres blow the world up in our death throes?? I’m sure I’ll be long dead so I could give a rats ass. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lkibAjbHyg

  258. @Derer

    I thought about replying to the comment from Trinity that you’re replying to, but then let it go as I don’t want to ‘over-comment’ which I can do if I have an open day with not much else going on, LOL. Also the fact that I generally appreciate Trinity’s comments so don’t want to be antagonistic. But this about Trump really bothered me.

    Why would someone of German ancestry be so philo-semite?

    Is he kidding me? It makes no difference to Germans because they don’t know their own right history. I think Trump has at least a clue, but his interest is in saving America, not Germany. He’ll put the USA first every time.

    I like very much what you said about Trump running the US as a business and who opposed that. They want the US to fail. I also agree that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

    • Thanks: Derer
    • Replies: @Raches
  259. @Joe Wong

    Recently bellicose Japanese is threatening to interfere China’s recovering Taiwan. Chinese all over the world see that will be a god sent opportunity to pay back what the Japanese owed to the Chinese by surgically remove them from human population like removing toxic cancer.

    Most Japanese are just as brainwashed as Americans. The regular man/woman is powerless. As Carlton Meyer’s video above shows, Japan was openly under foreign attack since 1854 . At the End of the Edo era, you had samurai like Ryouma Sakamoto selling out his country to Rothschild agents (Glover). In Wikipedia, he is hailed as a visionary but “awake” Japanese know he was a traitor….perhaps one that knew his mistakes before being assassinated.

    Mefobills correctly points out without bias, “Any population can be maneuvered and led off of a cliff. What matters is the elect, or the elite who are pulling the levers of your civilization”.

    Japanese politics is totally corrupt. Nepotism runs strong.

  260. kemerd says:

    OK, a Nazi no less, he had already annoyed me with his verbose comments on covid but this is over the top

  261. @Mefobills

    Of course, our (((friends))) are world class at narrative hoaxing, which is part of their evolutionary method, to then protect their in-group self-interests at the expense of their host society.

    …by projecting their in-group self-interests into the minds of their host society

    • Agree: Mefobills
  262. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Never Forget:  “Germans are broken people.”

    I don’t want to take this thread more off-topic about Trump; but besides a few other things about which I want to reply to you later, this is a datapoint you may appreciate about the Germans:

    It makes no difference to Germans because they don’t know their own right history.

    As I want to explain more in the other thread—where it is relevant, insofar as I see both sides of the Trump question as it relates to Germans—the German who persuaded me to moderate my negativity about Trump had otherwise told me words that I will never forget:  “Germans are broken people.”  She listened quietly to my opinions—very quietly, neither agreeing nor arguing, with palpable fear as an animal who fears punishment.  I suspect that she voted AfD, but she would never admit it.  When I specifically asked her about AfD, she responded with a sarcastic laugh, “Nazis!”—stereotypical dry-ice German sarcasm, not unfriendly, but still technically calling AfD “Nazis”.  The only unambiguous political statement that she told me, for her part, was that she followed Trump on Twitter, and I shouldn’t be so hard on him.

    When we discussed culture, she opened up; and I have never seen anyone else who so despised Americans.  According to her, Americans have no culture except Hollywood, gangsta rap (so I guess that she probably also dislikes jazz), McDonald’s, drugs, and extremely perverse pornography, which they export to the whole world.  Americans are all rude, crude, stupid, and morbidly obese, according to her.  She was very severely anti-American:  Against America, she turned the weapon of cultural critique, while she shut up and said nothing about politics and history.  Almost anything negative that I said about American culture and American people, she promptly doubled.  But then, she defended the American president to me!  I suppose that after a fashion, Trump was Making America Great.

    Her whole demeanor was deeply pessimistic.  It was at that point I realized how much Trump’s mere presence in the White House was boosting morale for some people who really needed it.

    I still distrust Trump, most of all because of his relations with the Jews; but that invokes a longer explanation, which I will not hereby reach since I don’t want to derail this thread.

    I also agree that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

    I also agree.  And at this juncture, I like to point out that Mr. Unz’s argument about that is incisive, it relies only on undisputed and indisputable facts, and it neatly avoids the vexed arguments over complicated, convoluted, heavily disputed evidence of ballot fraud (which I myself reasonably suspect to have occurred).  The blatant, open theft of the election increased my sympathy for Trump, despite my general dislike for him. ®

    • Replies: @jim bob beers
  263. @Raches

    At Least This Christian Nutcase Is Honest, Consistent Too

    Raches: thanks for ur back-hand endorsement, though it was rather hysterical, as u tend to be, one notes. I’d just reiterate that the large cultural problem is Satanism (extreme subjectivism), as I’ve striven to exposit–this extreme subjectivism is counter to all human reason based, as it necessarily is, upon the objective view of reality, which is an assumption, of course (as all first premises must be), but necessary for the meaning of truth (= Christ), as I noted.

    Second, note the objective view strongly implies DETERMINISM, absolute cause-effect, which is then foundation of science and racialism, as of Hitler–it opposes the idea of a perfectly “free” (and subjectivistic) human will. Humans are “sinners” who necessarily pursue self-interest.

    Regarding Spengler, I mainly refer to his CYCLIC theory of culture and history, noting that during the “end times,” as the rise and mature phases of the culture are now long past, the society becomes quite hubristic, due to previous success and prosperity, and becoming thence even contrary to the principles which held during the previous cultural rising phase, as we see presently, Satanism and subjectivism now prevailing against the original more objectivistic period.

    Regarding Hitler, I consider my exposition speaks for itself: though he might not have been too terribly supportive of Christianity, he nonetheless opposed, even if only implicitly, the dread Satanism he described so accurately–it was surely great part of his appeal to the German people, aside fm his other rhetorical abilities and insights which were so consistent, the very strength of his great appeal.

    Of course, I can’t be too sure about what would be “welcome,” but I do my best to make my arguments, and I guess I regret u became so hysterically “triggered”–but surely u might grasp that such “triggering” is often useful part of any rhetorical impact–if it makes the right pt. for an audience upon a given topic. I think if u look again, u’ll see I only make a logical and legitimate pt. for the general dialectic which u’ve first generally brought up and which I then sought to develop in a relevant spirit. Try to get a grip.

    • Replies: @Raches
  264. @dogbumbreath

    Well, do your own research Fido. Ddin’t pull this out of my ass.

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  265. Raches says: • Website
    @apollonian

    I think if u look again, u’ll see I only make a logical and legitimate pt. for the general dialectic which u’ve first generally brought up and which I then sought to develop in a relevant spirit. Try to get a grip.

    Got it.

    ——————————

    Does anyone still wonder at my fondness of the Nietzsche aphorism about “every one being allowed to learn to read”? ®

  266. It seems like Hungarians are the only people who care about been white and are willing to fight for their whiteness, all woke “fading” white countries deserve to disappear because of a lack of fight.

  267. @Jon Chance

    [Daily reminder:  This crackpot has nothing to do with Adolf Hitler.  —Raches. ®]

    Don’t Forget: Germany, West Were Always On Defense, Even FM WWI

    Well, I sympathize w. ur criticisms, BUT fm the large historical perspective, u need to remember that the satanic empire was in control, always, fm the very start. Unc’ Adolf surprised the Satanists, nearly crushing the Russkies, who were only saved in the nick of time by US Lend-lease, and who really only barely recovered. Hitler and Germany did all they could under difficult circumstances.

    [MORE]

    It was inevitable that Hitler (and anyone) would make some mistakes, given Germany’s defensive circumstances. Note again, Hitler was NOT a thorough-going philosopher or economist, though he’d read widely, as he noted. Hitler was rather a pragmatic and eclectic man of action, a politician and public speaker, much a street-type leader.

    Thus Western civ. was well in hands of Satanists (esp. the Rothschild bankers) since at least the Napoleonic wars. The subjectivistic philosophers, Immanuel Kant, Jeremy Bentham, and others, following the “romanticist” Rousseau, had pretty well captured and taken over the entire Western culture, and the ethic had now turned to that of socialistic collectivism overshadowing the individual freedom and natural rights of the previous “enlightenment” culture, say of John Locke and the American founders.

    And Hitler wanted much, if not most, to oppose the Marxist internationalists and Jews, though he endorsed and preserved the socialist/collectivist ethic in general. Un-questionably, Hitler’s worst mistake was to declare war against Jew S A–which immediately portended a second front on the west. Note then unc’ Adolf had to cancel “Operation Citadel,” in which Germans were making good progress, in order to take forces fm the east to place in Italy against the western allies. After Hitler declared war against Jew S A, it was only about 18 months till Italy surrendered.

    So unc’ Adolf underestimated the economic power of Jew S A, still powerful, and rather over-estimated the arrival in enough massive numbers of the wonder-weapons of jet aircraft and rockets. Hitler also underestimated the force and impetus of the genocidal and satanic internationalist empire of “United Nations” (UN) which demanded “unconditional surrender,” triggered by the German preventive and defensive war against suicidal Poland.

    And don’t forget these Satanists declared war against Germany which was merely striving to react and on defense fm the very first day. Reality is determined (absolute cause-effect), and there are no “what-ifs”–Germans and Europe were murdered and it was all they could do to defend themselves best they could–and they almost succeeded, don’t forget. Like I say, u need to look at history in the large, broad view, and u see the great meaning and import of Oswald Spengler’s “Decline of the West.”

  268. @Raches

    It is 100% false to characterise Germany as “completely Aryan”, which is a meaningless term. There are many layers and levels of people inhabiting the large swath of Europe called “Germany”, and much less Nordic than many other residents of Europe. It’s just a nonsensical term invented contrast with “The Jews”, which is another delusional fantasy invented in your mind. After thousands of year in human history, any country is going to be composed of many different ancestries and types.

    In particular given the fact that literally half the population emigrated from “Germany” between the 17th-20th centuries, to America and elsewhere. There are races of man, and none of them is “Aryan”.

    • Replies: @hillaire
  269. @Raches

    You have completely misunderstood the 12th Amendment. It is literally IMPOSSIBLE to “steal” the presidential election, only Congress actually seats the President, who is just a minor federal official.

    Congress on the petition of just 1 representative and 1 senator will throw out and admit ANY combination of electoral certificates so as to seat any named candidate for President and any named candidate for Vice President. All the folderol you heard and “storming the Capitol” was middle ‘murican madness and degeneracy as the entire race falls into collapse and senility.

    All of the heathen rage and idolatrise the unfathomed with their ‘cargo cult’ mentality… of COURSE all election campaigns are “stolen”, it’s almost like a sport game when a team steals the ball in play. The whole theory of state or national elections is to replace the jousting of war with civil combat, and channel all that angst into a safety valve.

    It’s very simple when you don’t make a totem out of it.

  270. @Mefobills

    It does not take “legal authority” to erase debts, since most debt enforcement is FOUNDED in legal authority to begin with. Debts are just somebody’s account of the lien itself, the real question is about defining property rights in function of ascertainable boundaries. In reality your only problem is failing to plead an effective defense or prosecution, and the need to distill the judicial process into a workable administrative system. Constantly going to court is a very subjective result and a royal pain.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  271. antibeast says:
    @Joe Wong

    Your facts are wrong.

    Before WWII, America was politically isolationist and economically protectionist. The Yanks had nothing at all to do with Asia, except for their colony in the Philippines. The Yanks arrived much later than the EUROPEANS who had colonized much of Asia by the time the USA established its first and only colony in the Philippines.

    That changed after WWII when the USA turned into an Empire during the Cold War which it fought against the Soviet Union and Communist China. Under US military occupation since WWII, Japan became a US vassal to this day with the ruling LDP installed by the Yanks to make sure Japan remain subservient to US interests in East Asia.

    The Japs don’t like the Yanks at all but can’t do much to change the status quo. All of this talk of Japan somehow ‘defending’ Taiwan against its reunification with China is like a bad joke made up by the Yanks. Everyone knows the Yanks are on their way out in Asia, where nobody takes them seriously anymore.

    As far as Asia is concerned, Yankistan is finished.

    • Replies: @Raches
  272. Derer says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Your anti-Trump verbal diarrhea is like peeing in your pants, it gives you warm feeling but nobody notices. Trump was not able to accomplish implementing his winning agenda because of his own party warmongering gang headed by vindictive McCain in collusion with military industrial complexes who charge American taxpayers \$8000 for ordinary hammer.

    When he said to McCain that he “prefer fighting soldiers to POW”, McCain in pathological rage went to vote for Obama Care!!! visibly sick at 2.00 AM. You might be aware of the fact that McCain was most influential senator in US military escapades on foreign soils. After midterm loss, the Clinton’s sniveling Democrats finished Trump agenda off without their own meaningful proposal for the public well being – completely preoccupied by removing Trump.

  273. @Carolyn Yeager

    [* I will be the judge of that.  —Raches. ®]

    Carolyn (aka ‘No Chuck’ Yeager), writes:

    I’m all for banning obvious trolls also …. like from Mefobills, who intrudes his “money-talk” into every subject, and at great length too.

    Yes agreed, MoFo-Bill does go on monotonously.

    It wouldn’t be so bad if there was some substance to his rants – but not likely to find anything of merit in his voodoo economics.

    As for banning trolls, you should be careful what you wish for, as you’re likely to be first on the chopping block*.

    [MORE]

    (*Seeing as ‘trolling’ is defined as spreading disinfo that cannot be backed up with hard evidence).

    As a rule, I’m not for banning, deplatforming or muzzling anyone.
    That is what the Zio cabal are doing to us in the Covid psyop and Holohoax debate, the Climate Change fraud nonsense and most everywhere else.

    And of course they do this because they are AFRAID to debate the issues in an open forum – knowing they’ll be eviscerated by the facts.

    So Carolyn, you claim I’m not serious because I besmirched your precious Donald J. Chump, but I can assure you I’m deadly serious.
    I make assertions about him and I will back them up with a tsunami of evidence.

    You meanwhile, just assert partisan platitudes because Qanon told you so, and after all, we must ‘Always Trust The Plan’.

    I don’t have a dog in the race. I know, with absolute CERTAINTY that the Repugnant-cans and the Demon-rats are just two factions of the SAME party and accountable to the same Zionist Usury Banking Cartel puppet master.

    No matter which party wins, the same party always takes office. ie: the War Party.

    Appropriations to the Military-Industrial-Security complex go up no matter who wins.
    The murderous U.S foreign policy and other belligerent foreign misadventures in pursuit of Israeli hegemony continue without a misstep.

    Trump appointed the vilest scum imaginable to his cabinet and inner circle, the likes of John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and long time N.M Rothschild employee Wilbur Ross, to name just a few.

    Appointments of these vermin should’ve been a sufficient red flag to alert anyone who was awake of the impending malfeasance that would characterise the Trump tenure.

    To be fair, Donald J. Chump did appoint General Michael Flynn, someone who’s certainly not of the swamp, as his National Security Advisor.

    But, when he was handed the script from his Zio controllers a few weeks after inauguration, and it read ‘Flynn must go’, Trump abandoned Flynn like a two dollar whore..

    Trump is nothing but a fair weather friend, ready to stab you in the back at a moments notice.

    Where I come from, Trump would be called a #@$& (rhymes with ‘stunt’) for what he did to Flynn.

    But the Trump cultists (otherwise known as MAGAts), didn’t even bat an eyelid, such is their entrenched partisanship.

    Is this the same tough, brave Trump you spoke about Carolyn ?
    Indeed, his defence of General Flynn was an abject lesson in courage (at least that’s how you perceived it).

    I’m not done with Trump’s back-stabbing just yet.

    A big factor in Trump 2016 election success was the Wikileaks factor, as a steady stream of evidence came to the fore impugning Hillary and the DNC.

    You would have thought that Trump would owe Julian Assange a lifelong debt of gratitude for all that he’d done. Instead, Trump did something that the Obama regime (as bad as it was), never stooped so low to engage in.
    And that was giving the order to his British vassals to forcibly remove Assange from the Ecuadorian Embassy and torture him (he’s locked up in solitary for 23 hours per day).

    Here’s a reminder of what transpired:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-xeGWcvifw

    And, despite this Presidential treachery, unequalled since LBJ’s traitorous display during the USS Liberty incident, there are people who are still so brain dead as to be in Trump’s corner.

    You people are just fucked up.

    • Disagree: SolontoCroesus
  274. @Derer

    [Final warning that this is off-topic.  It doesn’t matter that I partly agree with the following—especially not when you generally behave like the opposite counterpart of a low-grade, chan-tier Qtard.  —Raches. ®]

    Derelict writes:

    How could Biden receive record Dems vote even more than Obama – they stole it from Trump.

    I was about to click the ‘Disagree’ tab below your comment (esp. the bit about Trump running the U.S as a business – seeing as he bankrupted the U.S and is a business incompetent), until I came across this sentence of yours above – which is evidently true.

    But you have to remember, this is all THEATRE.

    [MORE]

    It’s all scripted in such a way, so as to make it appear as though Trump is against the Deep State, and that he is offering genuine push back to the cabal.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Yes, there are factions within the Zio-cabal. One faction sides with the left. ie: the majority of MSM (except for Murdoch’s NewsCorp/Fox News), the Hollywood movie industry, advocates of big government and career public servants, the Renewable Energy/Climate Change extremists etc.

    The other faction of the Zio cabal (aligned with the GOP) sides with the Military Industrial Complex, most businesses that actually are productive, the bulk of the private sector, the Fossil fuel and extractive industries etc.

    There is just enough red meat thrown to the one-eyed partisans that fanatically support their team to give the appearance that they’re separate parties with differing agendas.

    But they aren’t.

    No matter who wins, the genocidal wars and sanctions,psyops and False Flags continue.
    No matter who wins, the prostration to the Zionist masters and sacrifice of blood and treasure on behalf of Israeli interests continue.

    On that score, there is ABSOLUTE UNANIMITY.

    Bottom Line: Trump is nothing more than Controlled Opposition.
    He’s reading a script issued to him by his Zio cabal controllers and cares not whether you live or die.

  275. @Gidoutahere

    Well, do your own research Fido. Ddin’t pull this out of my ass.

    Not much between your ears if you don’t know your research stinks. Genghis Khan era was 800 years ago. I’m certain you’ve never been to Mongolia or speak/read Mongolian so how thorough was your research? (((They))) have been lying about events that happened 1 year ago (Covid), 20 years ago (9/11), 80 years ago (WW2) etc..

  276. apollonian says: • Website
    @Tony massey

    [MORE]

    No Greater Fool Than The Deliberately Self-Deluded

    So fuck it. Joos are ok by me. I get the big game. Tears for fears sang it loud, everybody wants to rule the world.

    U poor creature–just ANOTHER complacent and willing dupe and victim who doesn’t seem to realize when u say, “Joos are ok by me,” is same as saying psychopaths, or Satanists, or cannibals, or child-molesters “are ok by me.”

    Thus by definition, Jews are descendants (both literal and spiritual) of original Pharisees who wrote and issued the Talmud of Babylon, 500 AD, and according to the Talmud, which is the “midrash” (official interpretation) of the Torah (1st 5 books of Old Test.), according to their “Oral Law Trad.” Thus these Jews conduct war against the rest of humanity whom they call “gentiles” or “goyim.” See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, or TruthTellers.org–there are other sites too–for the best, definitive expo on Talmud, Talmudism.

    Thus Talmud and midrash are all-encompassing–everything is up to the “midrash” interpretation of the Rabbis according to this “Oral Law Trad.” There is literally no reality but what the rabbis say, in accord w. “midrash.” Hence they are foremost SUBJECTIVISTS–nothing is true but what Jews and rabbis say–NOTHING at all whatsoever–reality is what they want it to be. Thus u see, Jews are foremost SATANISTS (extreme subjectivists) who hold reality is created by consciousness/mind–they are literally gods unto themselves–this is their stinking religion, sucker–which u’re dumb enough to say is “ok by u.”

    Thus Christianity was/is the Hegelian anti-thesis and reaction to this Jew Satanism, Christ being truth itself (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) whom the Jews, in their Talmud, gloat over having killed, Christ condemned as heretic and blasphemer, Jews denying there’s any OBJECTIVE REALITY, necessary basis for such truth. And the Christian lesson thus is that truth RESURRECTS, always coming back to bite u u-know-where.

    Such Christianity and worship of truth thus is the very salvation of gentiles against these foremost, utmost Satanists. Thus Christianity is by its essence anti-Semitic–which the Jews hate most of all. And if one isn’t anti-Semitic, that one is NOT Christian.

    And what makes Jews so powerful and formidable is their extremely tight-knit COLLECTIVISM and organization; they generally co-operate with utmost unity and purpose in war-like, gang-like fashion–which then allows them to lead and dominate all other subjectivists (like the “free-masons,” leftists, and “liberals” among the goyim (“cattle”)) and those gentile satanists who are naturally not nearly as collectivistic and well-organized, pretending and actually practicing to far greater degree of “individualism” and independence. Thus u see why Jews are known for “sneakiness” as they take advantage of these gentile dupes, suckers, and “fellow travelers.”

    Note anyone calling himself “Jew” thereby expresses loyalty to Talmud, etc., even if they or he pretends to “atheism” and/or non-observance to religion–they’re still loyal to their race, culture, and people–in fact, they (Jews) are the most racist of all people, yet at same time, typical of these Satanists, expressing and preaching dis-approval of “racism,” etc. Lying and deception are mere tactics for Jews which they learn throughout their lives, never hesitating especially for lying to gentiles–who are mere cattle and slaves for Jews. See Gosp. JOHN 8:44.

    And don’t be confused by “orthodox,” “reformed,” “conservative,” or whatever else kind of Jews–it’s no diff. fm Lutheran, Catholic, Baptist, etc., within Christianity, just mere variations of same basic thing–Talmud and “midrash”–subjectivism.

    How specifically then in practical reality do Jews effect their rulership and absolute domination?–aside fm their congenital lying, eventually and ultimately by means of “central-banking” (like the US Federal Reserve Bank), the issuing of “fiat currency,” legalized counterfeiting–see Mises.org for best expo; use their site search-engine for specific terms, like “fiat-currency.” By means of this legalized counterfeiting these Satanists obtain control and ownership over everyone and everything, buying elections, politicians, and judges–and anyone else. Alternatively, they (Satanists and Jews) can have anyone assassinated by simply bribing crack-heads for chump-change and then have another crack-head kill the original perpetrator to remove any witnesses–ck into the JFK assassination; see Mike Collins Piper’s book, “Final Judgment.”

    So do urself and fellow humans a favor, sucker, and quit being such a fool for Satanism.

  277. Raches says: • Website
    @antibeast

    Your facts are wrong.

    Before WWII, America was politically isolationist and economically protectionist.  The Yanks had nothing at all to do with Asia, except for their colony in the Philippines.

    Who is Matthew C. Perry?  (The so-called “opening of Japan”, 1850s.)

    What was American involvement in, among other things, putting down the Boxer Rebellion in China?

    This list could be extended. ®

    • Replies: @antibeast
  278. antibeast says:
    @Raches

    Well, yes, but the Yanks never ‘colonized’ Meiji Japan which remained a Sovereign State as did Qing China. And no, the Yanks never had a ‘colony’ in China either; that was the British and the Portuguese who acquired their colonies in HK and Macao, respectively, after the Opium Wars.

    The Yanks were latecomers to the colonial game in Asia as the Europeans had already established their colonial Empires starting from the 16th century. The only colony the USA had in Asia was the Philippines which the Yanks abandoned after WWII but returned to establish US military bases during the Cold War.

    The Yanks have this psychic need to outdo their British cousins in building up the USA into an Empire after WWII. That’s why the Yanks spent trillions of dollars to relive Rudyard Kipling’s White Man’s Burden in order to promote their exceptional ‘American values’ to the rest of the world. Trillions of dollars later, the Yanks are now flat-broke, just like their British cousins after WWII.

    In short, Yankistan is finished.

    • Agree: GomezAdddams
    • Replies: @Carlton Meyer
  279. Mefobills says:
    @jim bob beers

    [Please repost this in the thread for “Talk About Money”—which I created because I find this general type of discussion interesting, it is wildly off-topic here, and I do not want to cut it off.  Thanks.  —Raches. ®]

    [MORE]

    Wow, so much confusion on your part. It is easy to see why the West is in such bad shape and is destined to lose the future.

    https://michael-hudson.com/2018/08/and-forgive-them-their-debts/

    It takes legal authority to release debts, and that “legal” authority was given over to privateers by stealth action, especially with Woodrow Wilson’s acts after 1912.

    Debt instruments and other finance paper is on-sold into free markets, where it is distributed, and hence a pain to find and then release with legal action.

    ______________

    In …and forgive them their debts, renowned professor of economics, Michael Hudson – and one of the few who could see the 2008 financial crisis coming – takes us on an epic journey through the economies of ancient civilizations. For the past 40 years in conjunction with the Harvard Peabody Museum, he and his colleagues have documented the archeological record and history of debt, and how societies have dealt with (or failed to deal with) the proliferation of debts that cannot be paid. In the pages of …and forgive them their debts, readers will discover shocking historical truths about how debt played a central role in shaping ancient societies. Perhaps most striking of all is that – in a nearly complete consensus of Assyriologists & biblical scholars – the Bible is preoccupied with debt, not sin.

    In all eras – from antiquity to the present – debts have tended to mount up faster than the ability of most debtors to pay. That is a basic mathematical fact: Economic growth is arithmetic and can’t keep up with the exponential growth of debt growing at compound interest.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  280. @Trinity

    I can almost guarantee that countless Japanese civilians suffered like the Germans and that countless Japanese females were raped by the “good guys” as well.

    Well… the Yanks are STILL IN Okinawa.
    Doesn’t need a war to rape Japanese Females.
    Or South Korea, for that matter.

    And China IS the enemy!!
    LOL!

  281. @Vinnie O

    Vinnie O from elmerfudzie: People, no matter what their genetic or linguistic origins are are subject to the propaganda of their time. The WW I advertisements of “Babies on Bayonets” comes to mind, as a clear example directed against Germans (in general) and this sort of imagery had a ripple effect, amplified again by “staged” military adventures leading up to WW II.

    The citizen Anglo’s namely the UK and their US cousin’s, are not homogeneous in their hatreds or dislikes-on any level, barring of course, the five eyes intelligence community….

    The western Occident, and the USA hailed and continues to applaud hero’s and intellectuals like Eisenhower and Einstein, both of German descent. When observing and commenting on ethnic or religious peccadilloes, prejudices one “tribe” might have against another, it’s important to recall that every generation of humanity points an accusing finger at their neighbor, for example Hitlery Clinton’s “deplorable’s” statement. The average so called deplorable is an ethnic, social, political and religious mix of all sorts of people who have very disparate levels of education and wealth.

    When American’s decided to participate in the Great Wars, we found ourselves sharing foxholes with fellow citizens of mixed heritage and religious persuasions. Soldiers who were a collage of German Jews, Saxons, Catholics, Poles, Italian/Irish, English Anglicans, Mulattoes, Octoroon’s, Puerto Rican’s and Cubans, all in one ditch together…and the Japanese American would have leaped into that battlefield foxhole with the rest of us, but for pathetic and stupid racism-could not. Ditto, full Negroids, who had separate platoons, flyers and duties.

    Again, the deplorable’s refused to be dominated by to-day’s NeoCon craze, an effort instigated and promoted by bankers and industrialists who work in concert. They are hopelessly in love with war and the control it brings over all world affairs. Phrases like “total information awareness” makes them drool with delight and the internet superhighway, it’s inter-connectivity has been perverted towards catalyzing their goals to control all human activity.

    All wars are bankers wars. Propaganda and the hate it generates are the tools of their trade. The citizens of this world will never escape these bankster tricks and influences until each individual takes action by speaking out, by asking everyone you know to stop taking the blue pill and swallow the red one, break out of the maze. Don’t be a mouse, be a man.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  282. @antibeast

    Before the Spanish American war, the Yanks established colonies in Western Samoa and Hawaii (after an invasion by its military). It had rights at “treaty ports” in Japan that served as trading posts/colonies under rules dictated by the Americans. Decades before, the Americans established colonies in China (called settlements) protected by the US Navy and Marines. After the Spanish American war, the Yanks colonized Guam and invaded the Philippines. It did not acquire the Philippines from Spain because the Spanish never owned it and controlled no part after being ousted in a popular uprising.

    • Thanks: niceland
    • Replies: @antibeast
  283. Weaver says:
    @Joe Wong

    The US became rich, because it had space and resources. Like China, it was large and united. Europe was crowded; America had space for everyone. Also, like China, we protected trade.

    The US was the last standing developed economy after WWII. US workers were in high demand. No one else had capital. All things since WWII have developed, for better and for worse, from the US. This has given the US extreme vanity and extreme complacency. Americans, today, assume this free, easy living will always continue, no matter what policies are pursued.

    • Replies: @Joe Wong
  284. @elmerfudzie

    … intellectuals like Eisenhower and Einstein, both of German descent.

    Eisenhower’s family were Pennsylvania Dutch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Dutch : “The continued use of ‘Pennsylvania Dutch’ was strengthened by the Pennsylvania Dutch in the 19th century as a way of distinguishing themselves from later (post 1830) waves of German immigrants to the United States, with the Pennsylvania Dutch referring to themselves as Deitsche and to Germans as Deitschlenner (literally “Germany-ers”, compare Deutschland-er) whom they saw as a related but distinct group”.[7] Eisenhower famously said during the war, “I hate Germans.” He obviously didn’t consider himself a German.

    Einstein had NO German, as he was a full Jew and Jews are Hebrew, so cannot be German. There is no such thing as a German Jew or a Jewish German. There are only Jews who’ve taken up residence in Germany and don’t want to leave. It matters not how long they’ve been there or what they’ve done, they’re not German. No German can become a Jew by being born in Israel. And no Jew becomes a German by being born in the country. You should try to remember that.

    for example Hitlery Clinton’s “deplorable’s” statement. The average so called deplorable is an ethnic, social, political and religious mix of all sorts of people who have very disparate levels of education and wealth.

    Hitlery? Is that your opinion of Hitler? Many of us are not a mix at all, yet people like you, who must be, like to think everyone is. You seem to be well-named as Elmer Fudzie, judging from the dumb things you write. Another example, that the bad guys are “NeoCons, bankers and industrialists.” You don’t try to name anyone or get any more specific than that. Your comment is more unhelpful than helpful.

  285. Joe Wong says:
    @Weaver

    Your view is American manufactured consent through imagination, it does not reconcile with historical facts and the views of the rest of the world.

    Only human can create wealth thru labor, capital can not create wealth. Capital is only a media of exchange, not wealth. Nations like Nazi Germany, China, etc. proved that they can rebuild nation and became on top of the world without US’ capital.

    US’ capital fueled civil war, corruption, destruction and moral decay in China, even in the last few decades the US capital deters China’s development and advancement, on top of creating mechanism to exploit Chinese labor and resources.

    Marshall Plan did not rebuild Europe, it was a plan legitimized extortion imposed on Europe and suppress European sovereignty aspiration.

    US practises Mafia politics, Mafia does not give, it only takes. Even the whole US nationhood was built on killing, burning, ransacking, lying, cheating, stealing, …

    Not all things developed since WWII were from the US, the US just used illegitimate means and propaganda to claim the credibility of those innovations. Human beings has been inventing long before the existence of the US; Americans’ discoveries are just part of contributions they should make to the progress of humanity like all of our ancestors, there is nothing special about it.

    • Replies: @James McLaren
    , @Weaver
  286. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Eisenhower famously said during the war, “I hate Germans.”  He obviously didn’t consider himself a German.

    Oliver said somewhere that Eisenhower was mixed two different ways.  He said more (including an imputation of self-hatred turned outwards); but I don’t want to repeat details as something that could feed the usual far-right gossip, when I don’t have evidence handy.  Apparently, there was some evidence—some of it quite memory-holed; and it is not the only source from whom I have heard similar claims, only the most credible one.  For the purpose of this discussion, I therefore table it as an interesting research question, nothing more. ®

  287. Joe Wong says:
    @Raches

    Japanese was never any significance in Asian history. Japanese becomes somebody after it become comprador for the West by selling Asian down the drain for the West. Japanese knows that the only opportunity they can be on top in Asia is to become a lap dog or lackey of the West, it is their eternal national policy, no matter who rules Japan.

    China gave Japanese civilization and wealth, but Japanese has never reciprocate the friendship; through the history Japanese always cause harm to China.

    Japan and England are the same horde, they are island nations on the fringe of continents, their existence and well beings depend on the chaos in their neighboring continents.

    Building terms of mutual respect and friendship with Japan does not reconcile with historical facts, it is a wishful thinking out of fantasy by totally fantasizing Japanese character and nature.

    • Replies: @Raches
  288. @Joe Wong

    US practises Mafia politics, Mafia does not give, it only takes.

    And yet Chinese organized crime syndicates predate the Mafia by how many hundreds of years?

    Even the whole US nationhood was built on killing, burning, ransacking, lying, cheating, stealing, …

    lol

    One of the most entertaining things about the way Chinese “argue” is their over-the-top bombast nonsense.

  289. apollonian says: • Website

    Editor Raches Ought To Be More Specific For Useful Criticism, Dialectic

    I notice I’m so often prevented (suppressed) fm entering in the comments section–gee whiz, but I wonder why–which I’m sure can easily be explained by Raches, but he’s soooooo busy, we see. But now that comments on this thread have become reduced maybe Raches might spend some time on this entry of mine.

    Raches, u say u’re both “authoritarian” and “libertarian” at same time, and it’s such pompous, narcissistic (and really, nonsensical) statements as this which u’re most interested in–rather than rational discourse, isn’t it? So being “authoritarian” and “libertarian” simultaneously isn’t “crackpot”? U seem to fantacize that u’re the second coming of old Nietzsche, don’t u?

    I just want to pt. out that when u say, “this crackpot has nothing to do w. Adolf Hitler,” it doesn’t entirely make sense–for how could anyone have anything to do w. Hitler?–he’s been dead since 1945, right? Do u urself have anything “to do” w. Hitler?–could u pls explain what that is?

    If I’m “crackpot,” at least I’m honest and try to be consistent. And u’re editor, so u have all the rights and prerogatives (which u push to the fullest, we see), so u don’t have to be sadistic and overbearing, but then u’re power-mad, aren’t u?–and that’s why u indulge urself, we see. Surely u’d agree that at least u could point something out, whatever it is, specifically, that u think is wrong or inaccurate for my expo and then say what the proper or correct idea ought to be–it doesn’t have to be too elaborate or detailed–is this too complicated or difficult for u?–I suspect it is and that u don’t want to tell us about it.

    I’ve actually gone into some detail for my statements, so if u think there’s problem(s), why not be a little more specific?–instead of prejudicing the comment w. ur antipathetic declarations at the beginning–isn’t that the way discourse is best pursued? I’m sure readers would be interested and would appreciate any corrections or clarifications u might present–it would be good for the larger dialectic. But I suspect u don’t really have any clarifications, just more obscure and murky declarations, right?

    Also, I thought u could have at least put the “[more]” under the essay heading for my #279, not at the very top–u don’t seem to have much respect for us, ur adoring fans, who try to contribute observations and analysis, etc. I know I’m mere “crackpot,” aside fm being “nutcase,” but I try my best, and after all, not everyone can be such an artistic genius like u, right?–u could be more compassionate, u know.

  290. Raches says: • Website
    @James McLaren

    Just out of curiosity, what does a Hollywood movie from 1985 prove about centuries of Chinese history? ®

    • Replies: @James McLaren
  291. Raches says: • Website
    @Joe Wong

    Japan and England are the same horde, they are island nations on the fringe of continents, their existence and well beings depend on the chaos in their neighboring continents.

    It is interesting that you would make that comparison.  I noticed the same East-West/Japan-England parallel.  I also noticed that China is the Middle Kingdom of the East, and some people tend to regard Germany as Mitteleuropa, Middle Europe (a term also applying more generally to Central Europe), or the heart of Europe.

    And the timing worked out well, since I was just now writing for another thread a comment that I did not yet publish, including the text (here with boldface added):

    I see the prospect of war between them [China and Japan] as intelligent Europeans, including Hitler, saw the prospect of war between Germany and England in 1939:  A disaster for both, and potentially the cause of much wider catastrophe—just as America’s destabilization of the Middle East has been catastrophic to Europe, in addition to being disastrous for the Arabs.  If China and Japan go to war, then someday, historians will look back and declare it a very bad war that only benefitted America—indeed, that only played to the “neocon” agenda, much to the future horror of many other Americans.

    But of course, I cannot go to Chinese and Japanese people and tell them what to do.  That would be unwise and ineffective, not to mention terribly condescending.  Thus, I prefer first to show that I respect both nations, and slowly, patiently to build the basis for getting to know potential political sympathizers from each here.  That way, I can learn from them the details that I know I must be missing due to barriers of language and culture—and I can establish the rapport to discuss my ideas with them, on both sides.

    By analogy, that war was pushed by pro-war factions in England, America, and other countries—against the wishes of pro-German English and pro-English Germans (including Hitler, who really wanted to avoid war with England).  Thus both nations suffered terribly, and became shadows of their former selves.

    ——————————

    Mr. Wong:

    Building terms of mutual respect and friendship with Japan does not reconcile with historical facts, it is a wishful thinking out of fantasy by totally fantasizing Japanese character and nature.

    From what I understand, animosity between China and Japan as such is a modern phenomenon, without significant antecedents.  In a Western far-right publication some years ago, I also saw some Japanese quoted as saying this (with a friendly attitude towards China).  But I have admittedly limited knowledge of Far Eastern history, so I will put this as a question.  Before the American “opening of Japan” in the 1850s—which occurred in the same time period as British humiliation of China—was there even one really major Japan-China war, detrimental to China as you suggest?

    I know that there was significant cultural interaction in some periods (most obviously, resulting in Japanese adoption of the Han characters), of a seemingly cordial nature, but not any long-term historical animosity, or even a really disastrous conflict.  I am not trying to argue with you—just trying better to understand your position. ®

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @Joe Wong
  292. @Raches

    Watch the video and figure it out.

    You seem like a clever chap.

  293. Raches says: • Website
    @James McLaren

    P.S., as I have not infrequently linked:
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-power-of-organized-crime/

    Americans should be worried about that, too.  Unless they enjoy being ruled by gangsters and extractive elites, whose rule is detrimental to the American people.

    Whereas I think that Mr. Wong meant it metaphorically, when he said that “US practises Mafia politics” towards other countries.  I do agree with that; it is seen all over the world, most of all in WWII; and Mr. Wong is correct to point out that the Marshall Plan was detrimental to Western Europe, oh so helpful—conveniently thus snapping a leash on the Western Europeans whom the Americans had wrecked, after America already gave Eastern Europe to their Soviet friends!

    Both literally and metaphorically, I have heard not a few Europeans call America a “gangster country”.  Instead of objecting to that, I suggest that Americans should get rid of the gangsters, and stop behaving as the world’s gangsters in the guise of “world police”. ®

    • Replies: @James McLaren
  294. @Raches

    I understand that it’s very much in vogue to bash on every blessed thing which is remotely related to traditional White Americans who do not yet hate themselves and their entire history.

    I assume you’re some sort of “European”, or wannabe. And then we have the Angry Asian ( mostly Chinese) and Muslim contingents, as well as good portion of disgruntled expats and a few fringe Negros.

    Tell me sir, if America is a nation of hate filled ugly racists; why have people (for many years now) literally risked everything to come here?

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @littlereddot
  295. JamesinNM says:
    @songbird

    In Bern, Switzerland in 1960, Winston Churchill said: “Germany’s unforgivable crime before WWII was it’s attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and build upon an own exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit anymore.”

  296. Weaver says:
    @Joe Wong

    During WWII, Europe, Japan, everyone lost their economies. I mean to say, the factories, machinery, infrastructure were destroyed or badly damaged. Because that’s what happens in a war.

    There was no fighting in the US. The US was able to produce; others could not. The US did not protect its trade after WWII.

    How did Japan, SK, and China develop? They worked hard, of course, but they protected trade. US capital flowed, meaning US factories flowed, out of the US and into Asia. For profit. Asian workers work for less than American workers do. China, however, has managed to remain outside US control. It’s more profitable to produce in Asia and sell back to the US market than to produce in the US and sell to the US market.

  297. antibeast says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    The Yanks fought the Spanish-American War which allowed the USA to acquire Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines as part of the Treaty of Paris in 1898. But there was popular opposition to the colonial acquisition of the Philippines in the USA, expressed by writers such as Mark Twain.

    The Yanks did get some ‘concessions’ leased from the Qing Dynasty but the USA was marginal to the foreign trade in China as the Yanks were mostly selling oil and providing loans to Meiji Japan. But the British were the biggest exporters of manufactured goods during the 19th century, selling arms and ships to both the Qing Dynasty and Meiji Japan which fought the First Sino-Japanese War as well as the First Russo-Japanese War.

    As a young country, the USA was marginal to world affairs during the whole of the 19th century, struggling to ward off the Europeans in the Americas as well as suffering from an economic depression following the bloody American Civil War. The 20th century saw the rise of the ‘America First’ movement led by Charles Lindbergh who opposed the entry of the USA into WWII.

    Politically, the USA had always been ‘isolationist’ as exemplified by Lindbergh. Economically, the USA had always been ‘protectionist’ as exemplified by the Smooth-Hawley Tariffs. Socially, the USA had always been ‘nativist’ as exemplified by the US Immigration Act of 1924 which restricted immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe while effectively banning immigration from Asia.

    My view is that the USA will revert back to its historical self after the fall of its Empire during this 21st century. Native-born White Americans are sick and tired of sending their children to fight and die in foreign lands while piling up trillions of war debts from the ‘endless wars’ of the Empire. This reversion to the historical norm is akin to Lindbergh’s ‘America First’ movement prior to WWII, which mirrors Trump’s ‘America First’ movement today. The US Deep State which is trying its best to prolong its Empire now wants to sabotage Trump’s ‘America First’ movement by designating his followers as ‘domestic terrorists’.

    The Statue of Liberty with Emma Lazarus’ famous words contradicts the actual history of the USA which had always been hostile to foreigners, including immigrants from Europe throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.

    • Agree: GomezAdddams
  298. @Carlton Meyer

    It wasn’t just the Lusitania and they weren’t merely trying to stop arms shipments. The plan was to starve Britain into surrendering.

    Surrender what? The Germans and every sane person realized the war was pointless and just wanted it to end so they could go home.

    If the German plan to starve Britain via unrestricted warfare was successful then they would have kept their continental possessions which included territories of non-German people. The German empire also contained overseas territories that the British and French would certainly divide amongst themselves if the Germans faced complete surrender.

    The Kaiser correctly feared that the British and French would chop up the German Empire that was relatively new and render them back into a non-threatening group of nation-states. The British undoubtedly would re-draw borders around various ethnic/cultural groups under the guise of autonomy even though of course they had no intent of doing that with their own territories.

    Unrestricted warfare was a last ditch gamble for the German Empire. What they should have done was dug in and fought a defensive war much earlier to bleed the British and stretch their supply lines. But both sides opted for the meat factory strategy where you throw all your men at the other side in massive offensives and hope that they give up or run of out of men. Well Germany ran out of men before the Americans were involved. So they switched to unrestricted warfare in the hope that they could force the British to surrender and keep their empire before the US army landed.

  299. @Carolyn Yeager

    Is it not true that the Germans demanded a Polish plenipotentiary to arrive in Berlin by midnight or else they would invade the next day? That’s what I heard, but I can’t remember where exactly. Apparently the Germans set a deadline for negotiations that they knew the Polish diplomats couldn’t meet without violating the laws of time and space, and this would then allow them to invade under the pretext that the Poles didn’t show up on time.

    • Replies: @John Wear
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  300. @Carolyn Yeager

    To Carolyn Yeager from elmerfudzie. No attacks against my character, educational level or personhood, please! And again, please, don’t use Wikipedia as a reference for anything!. President Eisenhower, did indeed have German ancestry. This fact can be verified at a far more worthy web page than Wikipedia. Visit https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/eisenhowers/eisenhower-ancestry for details, Briefly then, Ike’s great-grandfather Hans Nicholas Eisenhauer and his 2nd great-grandfather Johann Peter were German immigrants of the time, and the family of Eisenhauer made their way from NYC to settle in the state of Pennsylvania.

    According to one of Australia’s most prestigious educational websites, https://Spartacus-educational.com&#8221;, Albert Einstein was born of Jewish parents in the town of Ulm, Germany. In the late 1870’s he was educated in at Munich and Zurich. However, Einstein detested German militarism and rebelled by becoming a Swiss national. Lastly, the majority of Jews are linked to each other by a religious belief system and cannot show a specific genetic lineage such as the Icelanders, native Hawaiians, Eskimos or pygmies can show. Geographically isolated peoples, with minimal intermarriage, tend to have greater uniformity in their collective gene pool. The origins of the Jews have some weak genetic markers and association with the Berbers of Africa, a fact that has been discussed at length by a great historian, Schlomo Sand who is an emeritus Professor from Hebrew University in Israel, however nothing more biologically definitive can be shown.

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  301. Thank you for another highly interesting essay.
    Your grand interest in truth …”will set you free”.

    Without truth everything is nothing.

    The Jew can have and control everything.
    He can totally control the world and he will have nothing.
    He has everything and he has nothing.
    All he has on offer is greed and war.

  302. Vaterland says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    As for myself I am, as many Germans today, politically homeless. But the idea to restore a modern form of the Holy Roman Empire, or simply Mitteleuropa, is not weird at all. It is the only realistic alternative to the EU in fact, to compete with other global superpowers today. And as you should know: even if I wanted to, the attempt to restart any National Socialist Movement, is a crime in both Germany and Austria. Even though a Strasserist party exists (most likely run by the secret service), just like the NPD and die Rechte were and are heavily infiltrated. But even if it came magically to power, it would simply be nuked. Fat Man and Little Boy were inteded for Berlin after all, not for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. All the New Right parties in Europe, which I know from first hand experience, are in reality nothing but a front for Likud. – It’s good that Durocher and Karlin come clean. Honesty demanded it. – With maybe the exception of Fratelli d’Italia, but we have to see.

    On the one hand, if you truly see yourself as a German, you should have returned to Germany. Especially from the USA. But we also know, that, if you stepped onto German soil, you would be arrested and jailed for your publishing activity; nevertheless this is the gravity of the reality in this country of mine and in fact the current world order. And if there is one positive thing to be found in the activities of Garland, it is, to show American dissidents, what Germans and dissidents under communism knew all along.

    And actually: I didn’t want to comment and opine on “American” politics at all. The fact that I do, is not due to the circumstances that I am fluent in English or been to America, but simply put: what choice do I have? I, as all of you, am the entirely unwilling subject of the American Empire. I was born into slavery. A slavery which most don’t even recognize; therefor to quote Goethe: “No one is more hopelessly enslaved than the one who falsely believes to be free.” And that applies to the majority of Americans and Germans today. My Millennial generation is the most mentally crushed, because we vaguely remember a somewhat normal society before the horrific descent into demon world since 9/11.
    And even if Germany had done all these things that the allied atrocity propaganda claims: they had no right to enslave the coming generations. Something which was quite blatantly told to me by a chosenite: “Dieses Mal werdet ihr richtig versklavt!” And wasn’t it a professional holocaust revision debunker who had told me that the Morgenthau Plan had been reasonable and measured? It is quite telling that my mere existence within the bounds in this regime provokes more hatred, more genocidal lust than the soldiers of the Wehrmacht, or even Waffen-SS whom my ancestors belonged to, provoked within the Allied soldiers who only just before had to fight with them over life and death. That tells you really everything you need to know who is really in charge today…

    Or to quote tangentally from Adornos letters from California: ‘finally everything has come true which we had hoped for for so long: the entire race kicked down; the country trashed. Millions of Hans-Jürgens and Uthes dead! May they rove around in their own blood and the survivors handed over to the brothels with tickets of privilege for the Jews’. — The man of the Authoritarian Personality no less and the demon in shapes who was put into the position of reeducating all of Germany by the US IC. And what an educator he was! The inmates of Pitesti Prison were tortured – some to death – for a few years. Forced to eat their own feces, urinated on and beaten by the guards who were former inmates; forced to denounce their holiest, their family and nation. But at some point it was over. For Germany it is never over and it shall never be over: “Germany has nailed itself to the cross and it will keep hanging as long as human memory prevails.”, as Martin van Creveld put it . The prophecy has come true in Gestalt of German antifa: Or is there any other group in human history which would vandalize monuments to their people’s civilian casualties of Allied fire bombings – smear them with “Nazis are no victims”. A people who would justify the torching of their own babies, children, women. And I am only talking about the ethnic Germans here, not those who shalt not be named. There is libraries to be filled.

    My grandmother saw Dresden burning from the Sudetenland – it burned so brightly, it illuminated the entire night sky for hundreds of kilometers – from which she was shortly after ethnicly cleansed together with her entire family and neighbors. That is: those who survived and were not beaten to death and thrown into bomb craters turned into mass graves. Or who were gang raped and then “went into the water”, or simply hanged themselves afterwards. Sixteen million in total, the greatest ethnic cleansing in human history, with somewhere between 1-2 million deaths. And it was the British who fired into the refugee caravans. I saw one of their victims, our neighbor, who had lost her leg; two days after the official end of the war. But the Germans deserved it right? And who cares about my “crocodile tears” as Commenter Mike and Miro23 had so nicely put it here.

    Whenever I try to forget, there is a new Holocaust movie coming out, or some other Hollywood Blockbuster in which Germans are the eternal villain. Monstrous, wicked movies – anti-white Snuff movies produced by ghouls like Weinstein or Bolshevikesque blood lust and revenge fantasies like Hunters, Django Unchained, Inglorious Bastards. Hundreds. Thousands. But Jud Süß! Remember Jud Süß!… Or a new video game is released in which Germans are shot, tortured, dehumanized, hacked to pieces and their suffering glorified while “The Greatest Generation” is glorified. Or (((Rammstein))) produces a blood libel song against the entire German nation that generates hundreds of millions of clicks. Or Daniel Goldhagen releases an even worse book. – But we “right wing extremists”, we are the haters…

    In fact West-Germany is so hopelessly Americanized that I realized that my experiences growing up were identical to the Americans of my generation down to the small details of the rituals of divorced parents, the dynamics in the house which only we, right in that time of shared US imperial culture, could know and the specific effects of certain propagandia. Essentially we and the baby boomer generation experienced in unisono the deconstruction of every single institution that was healthy and gave life meaning and structure.
    Our internet, once free, is monopolized by American Trillion Dollar corporations, all in the hands of American Zionists, and we have no sovereignty over what we can see, hear and judge. On top of it we have draconian laws: Officially they are by the German government, but we know where the pressure comes from. Ezra Levant was clear enough where they came from in Canada. Ernst Zündel also probably had an effect on their creation; they couldn’t handle him otherwise after all. – Here now The Unz Review is one of the very last places where truth sometimes can shine through. And some pieces of the American Pravda series are certainly among the best things that have ever been written in American journalism. And yet I do remember that it was the Soviet Union which had Mein Kampf printed in the Middle East and that many things here have a clear taste. So what to do? Be silent forever probably.
    What use is it to know anyway that the alternative to B’nai Brith darling and Theodor Herzl price recipient Angela Kasner, who was surrounded by Stasi informants like Wolfgang Schnur, was Atlantic-Bridge head and Blackrock lobbyist Friedrich Merz: There are no nations, there are no peoples, there is only a holistic system of systems of Dollars, Yen, Euros and Shekels! – Sometimes there is so much honesty here! Chutzpah, Sidney Lumet. But I did find it tasteless that the president of the German parliament at that time, Norbert Lammert, had to congratulate the Freemasons to their 300th anniversary and declare that all democracies of the world today share the same foundational values as the Freemasons.

    Everyone is preselected, elections are a sham, much of the German national media was and is OSS and regime media. And it was the USA which had transformed the entire West into one giant surveillance state. -What to even say about those who got away with 9/11, announced their grand design, implemented it and the VAST majority of the masses simply went along with it. Real g**** moments…

    But indeed, we are declared the violent threat by the very regime which started all these wars which, all in all, have now killed millions of people. Over a million Iraqi children alone. And it is the USA which is leading the assault against Europe and the total subversion of its political process. And certainly: Russia and China may be taking advantage of it. But can you imagine: Let’s say it is the year 1986. The Soviet Union had over the course of twenty years invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, meddled in Ukraine, Venezuela, it had persecuted journalists which had exposed its war crimes, including a torture prison like Abu Ghraib, and at some point the supporters of an opposition candidate had stormed the Duma which afterwards had lead to an unprecedented wave of persecution, including denunciation of family members and calls of the state police for more of them, followed by a total ‘Gleichschaltung’ of the mass media while Moscow had been filled with tens of thousands of troops and its regime media openly admitted that it had “fortified” the election to save the glory of socialism. And it was this Soviet Union which still had troops and compounds in Germany, demanded new censorship laws, to arrest members of the opposition and to violently crush their protests. A regime which controlled the media, dominated the political process and was armed with nuclear weapons and spent more on its military than almost the rest of the world combined. Is it then so surprising that I care? That I want this nightmare to end? That I, at least, for the first time in my entire life can simply think, say and write what I want? That I don’t have to live with the hysterical mob of its cultural revolution and the systemic censorship and political persecution? That I, for the first time, may finally know what freedom even is?

    And in the end: there is nowhere to go. Not to New Zealand, Ireland, Australia, Norway or now even Japan which, as I know, was the last hope for many in the German diaspora there. It’s a global empire and needs an international response. Reagan was right to call the Soviet Union an evil empire, but to compare what the USA has become to the Soviet Union would be a grave insult to Gorbatschow and even Brezhnev. In the end the USA has become everything that Thomas Jefferson did not want it to become. And there is neither Cicero nor Cesar to be found. This order has degraded the entire human condition and its last answers are trans-humanism or suicide; or to race mix all nations out of existence out of pure resentment against life itself.

    False ideas deserve to die before humans die for false ideas and yes: I do not want Japan and China to go to war with each other to maintain our own submission. Conditions which were set in motion by colonialism in the first place from Admiral Perry to the handling of Tsingtao at Versaille and the movement of the fifth May. Asia for the Asians, Europe for the Europeans – there is no contradiction. But no more wars for an Empire which hates all nations and cannot live with them, except if it can dissolve or rule over them. This form of globalism is the enemy of all life.

  303. John Wear says:

    American historian Dr. David Hoggan in his book “The Forced War” describes the last few days before Germany invaded Poland as follows:

    Germany made a new offer to Poland on August 29, 1939, for a last diplomatic campaign to settle the German-Polish dispute. The terms of a new German plan for a settlement, the so-called Marienwerder proposals, were less important than the offer to negotiate as such. The terms of the Marienwerder proposals were intended as nothing more than a tentative German plan for a possible settlement. The German government emphasized that these terms were formulated to offer a basis for unimpeded negotiations between equals rather than constituting a series of demands which Poland would be required to accept. There was nothing to prevent the Poles from offering an entirely new set of proposals of their own.

    The Germans, in offering to negotiate with Poland, were indicating that they favored a diplomatic settlement over war with Poland. The willingness of the Poles to negotiate would not in any way have implied a Polish retreat or their readiness to recognize the German annexation of Danzig. The Poles could have justified their acceptance to negotiate with the announcement that Germany, and not Poland, had found it necessary to request new negotiations. In refusing to negotiate, the Poles were announcing that they favored war. The refusal of British Foreign Secretary Halifax to encourage the Poles to negotiate also indicated that he favored war.

    French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain were both privately critical of the Polish government. Daladier in private denounced the “criminal folly” of the Poles. Chamberlain admitted to Ambassador Joseph Kennedy that it was the Poles, and not the Germans, who were unreasonable. Kennedy reported to President Roosevelt, “frankly he [Chamberlain] is more worried about getting the Poles to be reasonable than the Germans.” However, neither Daladier nor Chamberlain made any effort to influence the Poles to negotiate with the Germans.

    On August 29, 1939, the Polish government decided upon the general mobilization of its army. The Polish military plans stipulated that general mobilization would be ordered only in the event of Poland’s decision for war. British Ambassador to Germany Nevile Henderson informed Halifax of some of the verified Polish violations prior to the war. The Poles blew up the Dirschau (Tczew) bridge across the Vistula River even though the eastern approach to the bridge was in German territory. The Poles also occupied a number of Danzig installations and engaged in fighting with the citizens of Danzig on the same day. Henderson reported that Hitler was not insisting on the total military defeat of Poland. Hitler was prepared to terminate hostilities if the Poles indicated that they were willing to negotiate a satisfactory settlement.

    Germany decided to invade Poland on September 1, 1939. All of the British leaders claimed that the entire responsibility for starting the war was Hitler’s. Prime Minister Chamberlain broadcast that evening on British radio that “the responsibility for this terrible catastrophe (war in Poland) lies on the shoulders of one man, the German Chancellor.” Chamberlain claimed that Hitler had ordered Poland to come to Berlin with the unconditional obligation of accepting without discussion the exact German terms. Chamberlain denied that Germany had invited the Poles to engage in normal negotiations. Chamberlain’s statements were unvarnished lies, but the Polish case was so weak that it was impossible to defend it with the truth.

    • Replies: @Autisticus Spasticus
  304. John Wear says:
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    My comment number 306 is meant as a reply to your comment number 302. I failed to properly link it to your comment.

  305. John Wear says:
    @Vaterland

    You made an interesting comment. If you are in to revisionist history, you might enjoy reading articles at https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/. Also, Ron Unz has published my book “Germany’s War” on this website at https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/.

  306. Raches says: • Website
    @elmerfudzie

    One of the reasons that I’m glad to have Carolyn Yeager here is that it’s so much faster and easier to let her handle it.  For you see, I am as wily as a Jew.

    On a serious note, I am pleased that this thread has attracted several serious-minded commentators who are willing to take up this type of discussion.  I don’t always remark on this—in part, because I want to let them stand on their own merits rather than being perceived as, “Oh, Raches likes this one.”  I do notice it—and as a practical matter, it is necessary for me to encourage and to cultivate this type of readership, if my blog is to be a success at The Unz Review. ®

  307. @James McLaren

    He is speaking of the American state functioning like a mafia.
    You then say that Chinese organised crime predates mafia.
    What sort of argument is that?

  308. @James McLaren

    Tell me sir, if America is a nation of hate filled ugly racists; why have people (for many years now) literally risked everything to come here?

    People go where they can make money. Just like hundreds of thousands of Filipinos and Indians flood into Saudi Arabia for a better salary.

    Or Malaysia has an immigration problem because of illegal Indonesians looking for jobs.

    Or South Africa has lots of illegal immigrants from Zambia and Zimbabwe etc.

    Or Thailand has immigration problem because of Burmese coming over the border.

    When there is disparate economic development, so there will be migration.

    The USA is not uniquely attractive you know. Although it will flatter simplistic American minds to think so.

    • Agree: antibeast, Joe Wong
  309. Raches says: • Website
    @Vaterland

    Just FYI, the only reason why I am reluctant to frame this one is that I don’t want for Carolyn Yeager to take it the wrong way, as if taking sides against her.  I do not use that as a “super-agree”, as I once saw someone call that; and indeed, I do not agree with absolutely everything you said in this comment, or the other one that I gold-boxed.  (I have also noticed that Mr. Unz sometimes gives those to cogent comments containing remarks that I’m almost sure he must find debatable.)  Perhaps I may do it later.

    This is the type of unheard voice that I seek.  I don’t know you, and I am somehow unfamiliar with your prior commentary—I am pleased to have you here.  And some of your remarks, I find “quotable”.  Although perhaps we may not agree on some important issues (I’m not sure), I think that you understand on an unusually deep level why I wrote the above article.  And it is not merely an intellectual discussion for you:  It is a life experience.

    I returned and gave this a second reading, slowly, before replying. ®

  310. @Raches

    I know that there was significant cultural interaction in some periods (most obviously, resulting in Japanese adoption of the Han characters), of a seemingly cordial nature, but not any long-term historical animosity, or even a really disastrous conflict.

    Raches, if I may, I would like to offer you some of my input on this.

    The cultural input was more or less one way. When the Chinese describe themselves as the Middle Kingdom, it was not merely a geographical description. There was much pride, and indeed hubris in the Chinese attitude towards all that was outside her borders. Just like the Romans regarded anything beyond the Greco Roman world as barbarians, so did the Chinese. The big down side to such an attitude was that in some periods China refused to learn from the outside as they were all “beneath” her. This culminated with the Qing dynasty falling far behind the West and paying the heavy price of the defeats of the Opium Wars for it. Sure, the Western powers were predatory, but the weak, corrupt and backward Qing had to bear a large portion of the blame too.

    As to the Japanese interaction with the Chinese that you note, you are probably referring to the period about 800AD. The circumstances were these. The Korean peninsula at that time was split into 3 contending kingdoms (if my memory serves me correctly). In order to gain advantage over the other kingdoms, one state sought the support of Japan, and the other Tang China. Things got to a head and Japanese and Chinese forces met on the battlefield with disastrous results for the Japanese. The Japanese having realised that they had met a militarily and technologically far superior force in the subsequent centuries copied everything Chinese. From military to civilian technology, to writing and literature, to religion, even court styles of dress and music.

    It would be interesting to compare it to the period when Japan encountered a militarily superior US in the 1850s and started copying things Western. At the risk of being too simplistic, this may suggest that the Japanese mind reveres a militarily superior foe? This is possibly why a high Chinese official recently reminded the Chinese that they had to be strong enough to comprehensively beat the Japanese as during the Tang dynasty, if they wanted the Japanese to stop fooling around vis a vis Taiwan.

    Back to China Japan relations. China never really bothered about Japan. To China, Japan was some backwater populated by “dwarfs”. China saw itself as the Center of the World where foreign trade missions would come and pay tribute to the Emperor in order to get generous return gifts, as well trading rights. Japan had little to offer the Chinese apart from flattery of the Chinese Emperor.

    Yes, the Chinese were pretty arrogant. It is true. But what I find really interesting is that the late Qing dynasty reminds me of the state the USA is now. Both were filled with hubris, refusing to learn from the outside world. Both ruled by hopelessly corrupt elites only intent of enriching themselves at the expense of the common people.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  311. @Autisticus Spasticus

    John Wear has a bad, and weak, habit of replying immediately to every question directed at me in which he can quote one of his historian-sources. He feels he is in competition and has to assert himself. I would let his answer, quoting Hogan, stand, for myself, but it’s too long and complex for the simplicity of the question, and leaves the reader who doesn’t know the truth of the real history unconvinced.

    My own quick answer to

    the Germans set a deadline for negotiations that they knew the Polish diplomats couldn’t meet without violating the laws of time and space,

    is Absolutely No. It was the Poles who acted in bad faith. They led the Germans on right up until close to the end, then their Ambassador did not show and sent word he could no longer negotiate, while Poland mobilized its armed forces! The Germans turned to the British, the #1 Polish ally, but they lied too. So Hitler, Ribbentrop, etc. made a final ultimatum that a representative with decision-making power show up at Reich headquarters by midnight on that day, or they would be in a state of war.

    Poland had plenty of time to send their ambassador, who had been ordered NOT to negotiate by the Polish government and he even said so; time or space was NOT the reason for the failure of the talks. Poland’s refusal to budge on Danzig, strongly backed (quietly) by the U.S./Roosevelt administration, is the reason for the failure and the invasion. The British ambassador to Germany was quite upset with Poland, and his own govt., over it.

    • Agree: Raches
  312. hillaire says:
    @jim bob beers

    It’s merely a matter of degrees, and your generalization is disingenuous… like most of this type of sophistry an imbecile like yourself would most definitely take notice if you lived in the middle of an australian aboriginal slum… and your daughter was fucking them and birthing new little mischlings…

    because of course this is what the anglo-zionists have planned for you problematic ‘aryans’… if indeed you are one…

    whatever you are…

  313. Joe Wong says:
    @James McLaren

    Let me put it this way, US government and US ruling elite are Mafia in nature and behave like Mafia. There are triads in China as outlaws, but the government is benevolent, morally based, rule in according to Confucianism.

    The remark of “Over-the-top bombast nonsense” cannot white wash how the US nationhood was formed.

  314. hillaire says:
    @JimDandy

    No, No… the universe is a triangle in a square with a centered circle…. and a little eye in the middle of the circle…

    bordered (unlike the the asylum north of mexico) by the infinite sea of divine consciousness… itself divided into kalpas..

    this being so for the benefit of credentialed imbeciles at seats of unlearning… who fiddle with their little ‘particles’ and muse on the depths of a ‘black hole’, and how it might ‘feel’..

  315. @Vaterland

    Thanks for your great post.

    How tragic it is that Germany, the most honourable, the most civilised and cultured amongst the industrialised nations should have suffered so much, as a result of the despicable Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    The good news is that the U.S economy, stock and bond markets are a house of cards and their collapse is imminent.
    When the U.S is in the throes of the coming inflationary depression, concurrent with a collapse in the USD, the jig will be up and it will never extricate itself from the abyss.

    This will usher in a new period of peace and prosperity for the world.

    Germany’s future is obvious. It must establish closer ties with the Super hegemon – none other than the Sino-Russian alliance.
    The Chinese and Russians have leadership that one can actually deal with and negotiate win-win outcomes that benefit both parties, as opposed to the always exploitative Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  316. @elmerfudzie

    Dear Fudzie, The two websites you link to do NOT refute what I wrote at all, and are even worse than Wikipedia. You can’t refute me, so you put up a front that you are doing so, without doing so. How sad.

    What I wrote about Ike is that his family considered themselves Pennsylvania Dutch; it doesn’t matter what Ancestry.com says. The Pennsylvania Dutch wanted to distinguish themselves from other Germans by not calling themselves German. I didn’t deny that they are German; I’ve written quite a bit about the breadth of the German race, and denial of such in America. It was Ike’s GREAT-Grandfathers who came from Germany, but what about his grandmothers? I said “He obviously didn’t consider himself a German,” which is true. And that is more important in understanding Eisenhower, is it not? What he thought about himself?

    As to Einstein, who cares if he was born in Ulm. Or that he continued to live in Germany. His parents were both Jews, and he married a Jew. He was 100% loyal to Jewry and its goals.

    You obviously don’t know what a German is, or what it means. As an anti-racist would, you disregard such things. You seem to even favor Jews. What Schlomo Sand has said has nothing to do with Jews not being German. There’s nothing more I need to add.

  317. @John Wear

    On a Wikipedia page, I can’t recall which one exactly, it said that a British diplomat “almost came to blows” with a German diplomat (possibly Ribbentrop) after learning that the Germans intended to issue an “impossible ultimatum” for a Polish plenipotentiary to arrive by midnight. What do you know about that? I realise that Wikipedia is more like Wikipravda at this point, of course. Also, what about that Gleiwitz incident? Is that the one supposedly codenamed Operation Himmler? Did that really happen or not?

    • Replies: @John Wear
  318. Bookish1 says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Something else to think about. How many people in Auschwitz and other camps longed for the good old days in the camps with their swimming pools, dance halls, wedding chapels, comeraderie of other inmates, food to eat, secure from war until the Allies bombed the camps and starved the inmates causing diseases and death. We might be surprised if we knew how many people missed those good old days.

  319. @Vaterland

    Pathetic. Sophomoric. Embarrassing. Egoistic. Not productive.
    Interesting that none of the names who are praising it are German.

    • Disagree: Raches, SolontoCroesus
    • Troll: L.K
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Authenticjazzman
  320. onebornfree says: • Website

    “America Is a Nation of Hate- Hate against the Nations of the Free World”

    Hah! “Nations of the Free World” ?😂😆😆

    What “Nations”, of what “Free World”, pray tell?

    You mean nations such as China, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the UK, Germany, France, Spain, right now ? 😆

    Do you have any idea as to WTF is going on, right now, in all the countries I just listed ( and many others too)?

    What planet are you on, my little totalitarian “friend”?

    “Regards” onebornfree

  321. apollonian says: • Website
    @Vaterland

    True Victory Merely Requires Strong Stomach, Patience

    Vaterland, u need to get a grip, buddy, even though so much of what u say is true, obviously true, mostly true, whatever; don’t forget there was and is a great lesson taught by our lord and savior 2 thousand yrs ago–TRUTH (= Christ) crucified. How do u think the original Christians had it, so many of them eaten by lions, before the coming of St. Constantine the Great?–how do u think our heroic people in American south had it in 1865 and after?–u just “protesteth too much.”

    [MORE]

    What do u think and even see is happening now?–the people ordered to suicide (as in Jonestown in Guyana, in 1978, to taking the poison clot-shots, as in Australia and everywhere else), satanic “Big Pharma” immune fm lawsuit and making that big money due to the terror campaign whipped up by satanic Jews-media. If Germans weren’t mass-murdered it would have just been someone else. Lots of Russkies, Ukrainians, and Chinese died too, don’t forget.

    It’s just socio-biology, absolutely determined, according to cause-effect, in action, the excess, surplus population being liquidated, unfortunately–it’s a CYCLIC phenomenon predicted and described by Oswald Spengler in “Decline of the West.” And guess what?–observe the Satanists themselves will have to suffer soon enough as they themselves become steadily more over-populated as also happens in the inexorable CYCLIC process. People suffer due to ignorance, HOSEA 4:6.

    See TenthAmendmentCenter.com: soon, the states here in Jew S A will re-assert sovereignty in effort to wriggle out of rulership of satanic globalists formally headed by a brain-dead, senile, old pervert and the baboons he has for buddies and enforcers–I mean, how dumb and pathetic can some people get before the obvious solution is enacted?

    Nat. socialism just wasn’t appropriate for everyone of the time, it takes the REAL Christianity, worship of TRUTH, above all–Satanists hate that most of all things. And don’t forget the full lesson: TRUTH RESURRECTS, never doubt.

    Worst enemy of truth is non-existent “good-evil” which always serves, ironic as it seems, as original pretext for the very worst of false, satanic gods for the over-populated inferiors, weaklings, fools, goons, and morons–non-existent “good-evil” with concomitant “inferiority-complex,” guilt-complex, etc.–they voluntarily take the poison clot-shots first, eagerly, frantically shoving and elbowing aside the other suckers.

    The other pillar of present-day Satanism is the central-bank/fiat-currency system which is also tottering–the primary weapon of mass-murder and genocide behind Big Pharma and Jews-media, etc. Victory only requires patience and a strong stomach to endure all the travail and stench on way to defeat of latest wave of satanic hubris and perversion–it’s simply a CYCLIC phenomenon.

  322. @Truth Vigilante

    Had a conversation yesterday with a young banker who had a (vaguely) German-sounding name.

    Among other things, we discussed Kamal Harris’s statement that “there will be no Christmas because supply chains are broken” (er sumthin’).

    We agreed on the fruitfulness of a campaign, “Make It A Homemade Christmas!”
    Banker said she spent several years in Germany where “homemade Christmas gifts” are the norm. She said, “We spent every spare minute knitting scarves.”

    When you recall that the American celebration of Christmas has roots in German culture and folk ways (A visit to shops in Lancaster, PA at Christmas time puts all of those traditions delightfully on display), and you realize that Kamala Harris represents that wing (all-encompassing wing) of the ZioDemocrat party that takes its marching orders from AIPAC and ADL, and that simply seethes with hatred and envy of all things German, European, non-Jewish, then you start to understand the blackness at the heart of the “I am a Zionist” Biden administration.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  323. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Of course, you are entitled to argue your opinion on the merits; but this is quite unfair, for reasons you may not realize if you didn’t see some prior discussions in very long threads:

    [To Vaterland, re his essay:]  Interesting that none of the names who are praising it are German.

    “Truth Vigilante” patently hates me (an opinion with which John Wear agrees), and he has very viciously insulted me.  I know that he is slippery; and he is rather transparently trying to assert himself here.  I did not think that any Unz Review regulars would be fooled.

    I have had a very nasty run-in with John Wear before.  Anyone who follows my comment history knows my opinion of him.  In a prior thread, Mr. Unz specifically asked me not to be so hard on him.  I can see that he is treading lightly, where he knows that I have authoritarian mod powers; and if he is just citing Hoggan, an Unz Review book covering some facts, and the homepage of one of Germar Rudolf’s sites, then I have no objection to that.  You have already expressed your own opinion of him, so I need not explain what you said back to you; I will, however, note that your statement about Vaterland is as unfair as if someone would try to make a guilt-by-association attack against you, because John Wear said something quite similar to you right here in this thread.

    As for myself, just yesterday in another thread, I was accused of “bombastic, self-indulgent German worship”.  I am determined to inject an unapologetically pro-German admiration into other discourse—with a combination of finesse, and extreme rhetorical force—rather than preaching to the choir.  As a long-term thinker, I have a long-term plan for that; perhaps you may like to see it develop.

    I can’t speak for Vaterland, but as for myself—I think that his personal remark to you was questionable, but I otherwise much appreciated what he wrote; and I think his mini-essay is as pro-European as praising Hitler would have been in 1941–45, when it most mattered. ®

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  324. John Wear says:
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    I don’t trust Wikipedia, especially in regard to World War II history. I don’t think the Germans issued an “impossible ultimatum” for a Polish plenipotentiary to arrive by midnight.

    In regard to the Gleiwitz incident, you might want to read the article in Inconvenient History by Veronica Clark at https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/10/4/6340. This article is extremely lengthy, but the bottom line is that the Gleiwitz false flag incident was not used by Hitler as an excuse to invade Poland.

  325. @Vaterland

    The German Greens, the SPD, and the German “Linken”are on the road to activate their own “Morgenthau” plan totally without the assistance of Hebrews, or Americans, period.

    The political future for German in the vision of the Greens, who actually run the country now, is a hippy waste-land with no industry, no private automobiles, no commerce in the form of “Einzelhandel”, no banking, and dead cities such as in the DDR.

    Myself I spent time within east Germany long before the fall of the wall and I can still vividly recall the dead eyes of the hopeless inhabitants and the morgue-like atmosphere of East Berlin, and this is what the insane Greens with their Kameraden the SPD loonies and the Stalinist Linken have in mind as a future for the poor, oppressed by Hebrews and American, German brain-dead.

    Something that apparently go over the heads of everyone here is that the German Greens, who are setting the tracks for the future of Germany are not aligned with the Jews in any way shape or form.

    AJM

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  326. @Carolyn Yeager

    Regarding obesity : If you were to spend an afternoon in any Germany city, large of small you would be amazed and perplexed upon viewing a scenery such as in any given US city : Armies of obese Germans waddling around and and upsetting your concept of the healthy, slender German circa 1937.

    And then regarding your statement “There is no such thing as a German Jew” You are totally off the mark here as the thousands of Jews who fought in WW1 as Germans would certify.

    If a German born Jew certifies him/herself as a German this is his/her choice not yours.

    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  327. Raches says: • Website
    @Authenticjazzman

    A self-alleged putative member of America’s military occupation force in Germany writes:

    The German Greens, the SPD, and the German “Linken”are on the road to activate their own “Morgenthau” plan totally without the assistance of Hebrews, or Americans, period.

    Ja, no assistance at all—except for the small fact that your army forcibly overthrew the last legitimate German government, split Germany with your Soviet soulmates, instituted and enforced a mass-scale brainwashing program, occupied Germany with a foreign military force (including yourself) that entered under hostile force of arms, and installed in West Germany the continuing “Bundesrepublik” that quite promptly started to ban effective pro-German political parties.

    How different would Germany look today, if even General Remer’s Socialist Reich Party, endorsed by famous war hero Hans-Ulrich Rudel, had not been banned on 23. October 1952—setting the precedent for many banned parties, and strict political censorship?  Even AfD, which deeply compromises its position, operates under a dark cloud with a questionable future.

    Myself I spent time within east Germany long before the fall of the wall and I can still vividly recall the dead eyes of the hopeless inhabitants and the morgue-like atmosphere of East Berlin,

    What part of “America did it” do you not understand?

    Are you so ignorant that you don’t even know how the DDR came into existence, as a consequence of America’s War to Save the Soviet? ®

  328. Raches says: • Website
    @Authenticjazzman

    Ctrl-F shows that the only person who has previously mentioned obesity on this page is I; thus, I will presume that the trolling about it is directed at me:

    Regarding obesity : Armies of obese Germans waddling around and and upsetting your concept of the healthy, slender German circa 1937.

    Wow—it is almost as if you want to allege that sometime after 1937, someone invaded their country and destroyed their culture.

    And then regarding your statement “There is no such thing as a German Jew” You are totally off the mark here as the thousands of Jews who fought in WW1 as Germans would certify.

    Are you preaching Hitler-era policies that distinguished those Jews from other Jews?

    If a German born Jew certifies him/herself as a German this is his/her choice not yours.

    I find it interesting that when you speak of Jews in the context of minimizing criticism of them, you call them “Hebrews” (as in your other comments), but when you openly defend them, you call them “Jews”.

    Anyway, every Jew knows that being a Jew is not a choice—and that nobody can become a Jew simply by “choosing” to be one.  (Don’t make me argue that from my perspective as an ex-Zionist.)  So, why should Germans not have similar standards about who is German? ®

    • Replies: @hillaire
  329. hillaire says:
    @Autisticus Spasticus

    To be fair to the Greeks and Romans, one would have to appreciate that much of what you term ‘art’ is in fact architectural in nature… the equivalent of mass produced tat…

    No doubt one can find more ahem, feminine representations.. so perhaps you should purchase a shovel and go ‘digging’ in Italy or Crete…

    Of course you could always just cast your beadies over the works of Botticelli, Durer, Caravaggio the peerless Vermeer, even Rosetti and Waterhouse fall within your curious time band…

    I suspect you are a tad ‘frightened’ of the ‘ladies’…. Am I right ?

    • Replies: @Autisticus Spasticus
  330. hillaire says:
    @Raches

    I am curious…

    Anyway, every Jew knows that being a Jew is not a choice—and that nobody can become a Jew simply by “choosing” to be one. (Don’t make me argue that from my perspective as an ex-Zionist.)

    Is this because you believed the best place for ‘jews’ is stacked neatly in one place and kept there? Or did you at some point ascribe to the same insanity as the perfidious anglo’s? ..

    Or are you in fact a ‘jew’ yourself?..

    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @Raches
  331. You have to understand the true Nazi’s, the elite who supported Hitler and his regime from the shadows….well they never went away, they had the means and connection to get them new lives and identities…as victims…not as the architects of hate.

    These “elites” are now, again, exerting their power to wipe out the only people who can stop them, white Europeans.

    You may think this is counter intuitive since they be white Europeans?

    No these people look on themselves as a totally different grouping.

    Their modus operandi now is to attack the male, make them the new Jew, use all the dirty tricks of disinformation money can buy.

    Well its working, because the European has been asleep at the wheel and has accepted poor leadership for to long.

    • Troll: Raches
  332. @Authenticjazzman

    You’re replying to the wrong comment, dude. Wake up and turn on your Mensa-grade IQ, lol.

    Since you’re not a German, it’s not for you to say what goes on in Germany and who’s a German. And I’m sick of hearing about the Jews who fought in WWI, so what? Does that change their bloodline? Most were not full Jews, many only 1/4 and 1/2 Jews. In any case, Hitler gave a reprieve to them all.

    That whole subject is overused and overrated by people like you.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  333. apollonian says: • Website
    @hillaire

    [Fact check:  I did not “defend Jews”, but to the contrary.  This commentator is lying, and inverting the truth.  It is easier for readers to see for themselves if the comment is linked, instead of referenced by a number “#220” that few people will bother to find on this page.  He is also materially misrepresenting “#182”.  —Raches. ®]

    Reality Is Determined; Hence Jews Of Race Are Generally Loyal To Talmudic Religion

    Problem w. “Jews” is the satanic religion, as expounded in #279, above. Raches is, unfortunately, tainted and snake-bitten inasmuch as he shares subjectivistic premise(s) w. Satanists and Jews, pretending to non-existent “good-evil”–see his #182, above.

    Thus Ratches got all triggered and bent-out-of-shape at #220, above, defending Jews. I also “defend” Jews to extent denying they’re “evil,” which doesn’t exist; rather I say they’re simply foremost Satanists, acting effectively as a disease, like typhus or plague, working for the destruction/de-population of the weakling goyim (or any goyim).

    Jews dominate Satanist movement(s) as they’re collectivists, thus most organized, over the far more “individualist,” “independent” gentile subjectivists or Satanists, even though gentiles far out-number Jews.

    Leading Satanists surely KNOW there’s no “good-evil.” And in all human hist., of philosophy and ethics, there’s NEVER been any premise or criterion given, that works in all cases and situations for distinction or definition for “good-evil.”

    People, beginning in childhood, no doubt, simply wish and obsessively insist there is such thing as “good-evil,” which serves as psychologic premise for their own subjectivism, which then in extreme form is Satanism, following the philosophy that consciousness/mind creates reality, making the subject to be God, the creator–Satanism. Note then Satanism is really nothing mystic, actually very rationalistic, even though absurd.

    As reality is determined according to absolute cause-effect, there being no perfectly “free” human will, note anyone born physically as Jew of race will find it nearly, if not absolutely, impossible to shed loyalty to the Jew religion of subjectivism/Satanism–otherwise why does a Jew call himself “Jew”? Reality is determined as it is objective (Aristotle).

    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @hillaire
  334. Raches says: • Website
    @hillaire

    Anyway, every Jew knows that being a Jew is not a choice—and that nobody can become a Jew simply by “choosing” to be one.  (Don’t make me argue that from my perspective as an ex-Zionist.)

    Is this because you believed the best place for ‘jews’ is stacked neatly in one place and kept there?  Or did you at some point ascribe to the same insanity as the perfidious anglo’s? ..

    Or are you in fact a ‘jew’ yourself?..

    None of the above.  I was essentially a lost soul with latent racial nationalist tendencies, without any sense of my own identity.  I thus got lured into Jewish racial nationalism—i.e., Zionism.  I wrote of this in my commentary before I got a blog.  (That thread contains some of my best comments from the few weeks immediately before this blog started; here is another.)

    The implications are rather interesting.  I thus began writing here an essay—better saved for a future blog post. ®

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    , @hillaire
  335. apollonian says: • Website
    @apollonian

    Editorship Requires some compassion, sometimes, at least a little bit, I submit

    Raches: I wouldn’t deliberately, consciously, knowingly do something (like lying–against my ideal of truth and honesty) that would get me sent to the dread lake of fire, buddy, fm which there is no reprieve, I assure u–let’s let the readers decide, letting them give their reasons (if they think it’s worth the time and effort)–it’s virtue of blog and blogging, right?

    But how about u?–observe how I so often have had to languish in “take a break” limbo-land–who do u think u are?–Zuckerberg?–why make ur blog just a mini-version of Jew-book suppression? And take a look at my poor entry at #279, where u put “[more]” before anything at all is visible for my expo. Talk about cold-blooded and ruthless.

    I think it’s legitimate for u to express ur dislike and disapproval, for the sake of ur loyal fans, even if u really think they’re that lazy, for something to appear on ur precious blog, but at least, I say, let the essay heading appear (it’s only one line) so that people see something about what the entry tries to expound–wouldn’t that be the fair and reasonable thing?

    Note the whole Christian philosophy teaches us that life sucks; we’re sinners, and of course we’re all “lost” before we begin to find our way. It isn’t easy going through life as “crackpot” and “nutcase,” I assure u–we can’t all be perfect like u, u know. Try to be more compassionate, pls.

    • Replies: @Raches
  336. Thus, no matter what race I myself may be, no matter whence I hail, I dearly wish that I had been born into a world in which Germany and her friends had won the War—instead of the US-USSR Alliance of Hate.

    Note to self: never again click on a story with an author named RACHES.

    • Replies: @Raches
  337. @Cookie Boy

    China kept the Japanes occupied from 1931-1945 —10 years before USA got involved—without China fighting the Japs –USA would have had it in spades and dimwit Scottie Morrison would be now speaking Japanese out his rectum.

  338. @SolontoCroesus

    [Allowing this because I allowed several pro-Trump comments, including one of my own moderately defending him.  But this is not the topic here, and it is probably boring to many of the readers.  This discussion should wind down here, not heat up. ®]

    You wrote:

    …. you realize that Kamala Harris represents that wing (all-encompassing wing) of the ZioDemocrat party that takes its marching orders from AIPAC and ADL, and that simply seethes with hatred and envy of all things German, European, non-Jewish, then you start to understand the blackness at the heart of the “I am a Zionist” Biden administration.

    Look, as much as I’ve criticised Trump for being a Zionist sock puppet, I recognise that Kamala and Biden are worse still. (Not that much worse – because Trump is still totally subservient to his cabal controllers).

    The only difference is that Trump is better at throwing red meat at his constituency by hinting at malfeasance we all acknowledge. eg: criticising Fauci, mentioning HCQ as an alternative treatment fo Covid, calling out the MSM as fake news.

    No doubt about it, Trump is a better actor and is much more convincing in his displays of controlled opposition.

    But make no mistake, Trump is and always was, CONTROLLED OPPOSITION.

    As for Christmas, in particular that aspect of it that centres on the presents under the Christmas tree, this was introduced into Anglo culture during the 18th century.

    Born and bred in Germany, Queen Charlotte, wife of King George III, introduced the concept of the Christmas tree into the royal household, and from there it caught on in Britain and the rest of the world:

    https://royalcentral.co.uk/features/christmas-trees-a-royal-history-92904/

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  339. @Raches

    Rachel writes:

    “Truth Vigilante” patently hates me (an opinion with which John Wear agrees), and he has very viciously insulted me.
    I know that he is slippery; and he is rather transparently trying to assert himself here. I did not think that any Unz Review regulars would be fooled.

    For the record, I don’t hate you. I don’t hate anyone.

    Mind you, seeing as you’re a core constituent of the ‘Axis of Disinformation’ (as you were a consistent apologist for the pr0-vaxxing tyranny), let’s just say you’re not likely to be on my Christmas card list anytime soon.

    As for your description of me being ‘slippery’, that’s ironic seeing as that’s how I would’ve described you.
    You described yourself as being ‘wily like a Jew’. Why the partial admission. We know you are.
    Just come out and say it.

    What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get as far as a description of me is concerned.

    Like the banner at the LewRockwell.com, I too am Anti-War, Anti-State, Pro-Market.

    And you can’t be anti-war and pro the Anglo-Zionist Empire simultaneously – as they’re mutually exclusive.

    I’m pro-Julian Assange, pro-BDS , pro an independent foreign policy for Australia (where I live) and anti the Covid tyranny (all of which come courtesy of the Zionist Usury Banking Cartel).

    Rachel, to the extent that I’ve said things that you’ve interpreted as ‘viciously insulting’, they are in proportion to the level of advocacy you’ve posted on behalf of the Covid psyop – which is evidently a product of said cabal.

    THERE IS NO OTHER CABAL ON PLANET EARTH THAT HAS THE FINANCIAL, POLITICAL and MEDIA WHEREWITHAL to have pulled off this lockstep worldwide Covid tyranny.

    If you or anyone else, believe otherwise, let’s hear the reasoning for it (with the accompanying hard data to support your assertions).

    I’m all ears.

    • Replies: @Raches
  340. @Raches

    Rachel writes:

    I thus got lured into Jewish racial nationalism—i.e: Zionism.

    What ??

    You’re claiming that you’re not Jewish, yet I know of no Gentile that has ever been ‘lured’ into Jewish racial nationalism.

    Sure, there are gentiles like Joe Biden and televangelist (also Chairman of a Christian-Zionist organisation) John Hagee that proclaim they’re Zionists.

    But they were ‘lured’ into it with wads of cash OR the Zio cabal have dirt on them (like videos of them in the process of kiddie fiddling – this making them amenable to Zio overtures), OR …. perhaps both.

    So Rachel, are we to believe this was how you were ‘lured’ ?

    Does the cabal have videos of you engaging in satanic ritual abuse of minors ?

    • Troll: Raches
  341. Anonymous[326] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Liebe Carolyn,
    dieser “Authenticjazzman” = “John Johnson” ist ein übler Psycho,
    ein Saujud oder Shabad Goy der gewalttätigen Sorte.
    Seine Aufgabe ist Lügen-Propaganda und Störung und Zersetzung der Aufrechten,
    vermutlich aus der Amadeu Antonio Stiftung, selbstgenannte “AAS” aka ADL gekrochen;
    Eine Bitte:
    Ignoriere diesen Mistkerl komplett, egal welchen Müll er verstreut.
    Fass die Scheiße nicht an. Er will, dass man ihn anfasst.
    (Sobald man Scheiße anfasst stinkt man selbst nach Scheiße…selbst mit Handschuhen…)
    Er will die Scheiße seines Teufelsgemüts mutwillig auf alle Gutmütigen übertragen.
    Lass seine Lügen und Provokationen einfach stehen. Nicht anrühren!
    Mit den besten Wünschen und Grüßen für Dich
    und alle Kameraden und Kameradinnen im Deutschen Freiheitskampf.
    (Unsere Körper schon, aber unsere Seelen sind unzerstörbar und ewig).

    “Für die Töchter, für die Söhne, für das Wahre, Gute, Schöne”

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  342. Raches says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Please see prior history (elsewhere mentioned).  The usual problem is that if lies are not opposed in public, they may be believed, as the majority of Americans believe.  That is why I don’t censor them:  The same narrative is already in the mainstream media, the “schools”, Hollywood, etc., without any opposition there. ®

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  343. Raches says: • Website
    @apollonian

    When moderating, I read comments from the perspective of a reader—most of all, a lurker.  I suspect that the majority of those who read these comments never write a comment themselves.  I myself sporadically browsed comments at The Unz Review for a long time, before ever commenting.

    I know what always annoyed me—what I wished the moderator would stop, because it is time-wasting clutter and distraction.  This is what I tend to censor most of all:  Off-topic comments, total stupidity, and also, drivel that is not only illiterate, but nigh illegible.  They provide no value to readers, and they make the thread ugly and difficult to navigate.

    Readers may expect for me to be ruthless with you, indeed.  And the intelligent ones, the types of readers I want here, will tend to thank me for it.  I allow just enough of your comments so that they can see what type of material I am censoring.  As a moderator, among other things, I spend time and effort to save the reader’s time and effort.

    On another note, I do not have a Christian worldview; thus, calling me “cold-blooded and ruthless” and pleading for “compassion” will tend to make me shrug. ®

    • Replies: @Anon
  344. Raches says: • Website
    @Truth Vigilante

    Moderation note:  Covid is completely off-topic in this thread.  I allowed this comment, without modification, because I am most reluctant to censor someone’s defense against my criticism of him, whereby he also propounds criticism of myself.  Further discussion of Covid here will be more-tagged or trashed.

    Mind you, seeing as you’re a core constituent of the ‘Axis of Disinformation’ (as you were a consistent apologist for the pr0-vaxxing tyranny), let’s just say you’re not likely to be on my Christmas card list anytime soon.

    […]

    Rachel, to the extent that I’ve said things that you’ve interpreted as ‘viciously insulting’, they are in proportion to the level of advocacy you’ve posted on behalf of the Covid psyop – which is evidently a product of said cabal.

    You are a core constituent of the cabal that makes “conspiracy theorists” look like raving nutcases.  Cui bono?  I could make a pretty good conspiracy theory about you—but I realize that on the balance of probabilities, most likely, you are just a monomaniac with way too much time on his hands.  The Internet is infected with an epidemic of those.

    As I stated in those threads, to defend my choice to remain unvaccinated for Covid (as I still am), I need to show normal human beings that I am not like you.

    More generally, I recognize that Ron Unz needs to fight an uphill battle to establish his credibility in his rational, meticulous, oft nigh unimpeachable research of what most people call “conspiracy theories”.  You and those of your ilk are actively damaging that work, with your sweeping pronouncements of implausible scenarios as if apodeictic fact, followed up by your vicious personal attacks against anyone who dares even to question your narrative—and you don’t care!

    As for your description of me being ‘slippery’, that’s ironic seeing as that’s how I would’ve described you.
    You described yourself as being ‘wily like a Jew’. Why the partial admission. We know you are.
    Just come out and say it.

    You know, this is a very Jewish style of argumentation:  “We know you’re guilty.  Just admit it”—with the unstated implication that denial is also proof.  The latter is commonly called a “Kafkatrap”, after the vivid literary nightmares of Franz Kafka, a Jew.

    Are you a Jew?  Just come out and say it…  I am not seriously saying so, “Truth Vigilante”—just pointing out that your type of argument cuts both ways, especially given your propensity to these types of Jewish-style smear attacks against people.  In your subsequent comment, you even insinuated with absolutely zero evidence that I engaged in “satanic ritual abuse of minors”.  That type of lurid smear is very Jewish.  Et tu, “Truth Vigilante”?

    No, I am not a Jew.  I have already said as much.  But wouldn’t a crypto-Jew deny being a Jew?  Kafkatrap!

    Of course, I will be accused of being one; spurious “Jew!” accusations constitute one of the most common modes of Internet Argument, and are commonplace in some of the stupider quarters of the far-right generally.  Intelligent people don’t fall for it, but weigh the available evidence, and evaluate the balance of probabilities; and I don’t care about the rest.

    ——————————

    Now, I have taken great pains to answer you.  I did it primarily for readers to understand what is going on here; I don’t have much hope for you.  I will not be dragged into a back-and-forth Internet Argument. ®

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Truth Vigilante
  345. geokat62 says:
    @Raches

    TV – As for your description of me being ‘slippery’, that’s ironic seeing as that’s how I would’ve described you.
    You described yourself as being ‘wily like a Jew’. Why the partial admission. We know you are.
    Just come out and say it.

    TV – You’re claiming that you’re not Jewish, yet I know of no Gentile that has ever been ‘lured’ into Jewish racial nationalism.

    Of TV’s two most recent comments he posted, the first you chose to respond to, the second you chose to click the Troll button to.

    Why not furnish a forthright explanation as to why a supposed goy would be “lured” to Zionism, an unprecedented phenomenon in human history, except for a limited subset of evangelicals? And given your a self avowed atheist, this exclusion certainly does not apply to you.

    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  346. Raches says: • Website
    @Zachary Smith

    Comment quoted in its entirety:

    Thus, no matter what race I myself may be, no matter whence I hail, I dearly wish that I had been born into a world in which Germany and her friends had won the War—instead of the US-USSR Alliance of Hate.

    Note to self: never again click on a story with an author named RACHES.

    If the best argument you have is to cover your eyes, plug your ears, and run away, then I have done well.

    Comfortable groupthink and the avoidance of cognitive dissonance have you explicitly defending the “US-USSR Alliance of Hate”.  Americans rarely perpend that their ally was Stalin, and that under the Roosevelt régime, a ridiculously corrupt presidency which annihilated traditional American freedoms at home, the Americans saved the Soviet monster from which Hitler incidentally saved them.

    The only way your worldview can survive is that America tossed many of its own intellectuals down the memory hole.

    And now, as America decays to oblivion, Americans still celebrate their great “victory” in 1945.  It is not the first time I have observed that the worst loser of the Second World War was—America, which now condignly suffers the cultural and political dissolution that it chose for itself by aggressively attacking the free world, and by empowering the political and cultural forces that now eat America alive.  Although I am greatly sympathetic to those individual Americans who are sufficiently decent to recognize this, actions have consequences. ®

  347. Anonymous[326] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raches

    In strong appreciation of your efforts, even for knowledgeable and especially for ignorant there is so much insight on offer here. Next to these amazing mountains of truth this provocateurs are smellable like stinking slurry pits.
    Are they not recognisable for everyone who reads here more often?
    Maybe not. Amazing how you can stand it.
    Your efforts are appreciated in any which way.
    I for one want to use the pitchfork for Jewish swine manure only when
    I can give a direct and very personal, very very personal punch to a Jewish pig.
    To me it is very personal.
    I do apologize to all pig bodied souls. I like pigs on four legs. Pig is not the right word for satanics.
    I apologize for the rude language.
    There shall not be another comment like this.

    “Für die Töchter, für die Söhne, für das Wahre, Gute, Schöne”

    • Thanks: Raches
  348. Raches says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    I like the video.  You show that at least somewhere, the German spirit is still alive.  I recommend that everyone should watch that video.

    Here and in the other thread, I see some comments expressing what I think few people understand.  I strive to put myself in the shoes of a German today.

    I once spoke online to a German who was very angry.  He understood what was done to his country and his people; and he alluded to what was done to his grandmother in 1945.  He spoke, like you, in the types of hyperbole that come across to an Anglophone audience as especially strident across the barriers of language and culture; this also tended to characterize the National-Socialist speeches, and it is frequently misunderstood.  I have a cultural sensitivity to that.  I think you realize it, and you are Germanly polite about it—thanks.

    Given my experience with Jewish “Holocaust” stories, I see that all truths have been inverted.  When Jews wail about the “Six Million”, it is frequently accompanied by Jewish rage.  The Jewish anger evokes sympathy, even if it is largely based on historical hoaxes.  But who understands how a German must feel, based on real events that he is forbidden even to speak about?  I try, as best I can.

    I have some further thoughts on this subject, which I may later post here or in the other thread.

    I understand—as best I can.  I do appreciate your apology for the rude language.  Amidst incalculable loss and inconsolable suffering, for what it’s worth, I hope that you can please at least have a small touch of the personal peace of knowing that somewhere out there, someone wants to make a difference.  And I love that video. ®

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  349. Raches says: • Website
    @geokat62

    Of TV’s two most recent comments he posted, the first you chose to respond to, the second you chose to click the Troll button to.

    Why not furnish a forthright explanation as to why a supposed goy would be “lured” to Zionism, an unprecedented phenomenon in human history, except for a limited subset of evangelicals?  And given your [sic] a self avowed atheist, this exclusion certainly does not apply to you.

    Your ridiculous minimization of “a limited subset of evangelicals” is a rather underhanded defense of the oldest and greatest Jewish controlled-opposition movement, Christianity.  The whole AIPAC gang would lose its power, if not for Christianity in America.  “Neoconservatism” is Judaeo-Christian as such, and quite Zionist.  And the left has considerable support from liberal churches, which frequently advocate for Israel as needed.

    Just for the record, I never said anything that could be described as making me a “self avowed atheist”, myself.

    I properly ignored that comment beyond a “Troll” Reaction, because it is an off-topic attempt to divert and derail the discussion—as is yours.  (Take this as a warning.)  Furthermore, you falsely accuse me through lying by omission about what was said.

    In my reply to Hillaire, to which “Truth Vigilante” replied, I had already linked, as I will hereby link again, to a comment where I forthrightly explained this entirely of my own initiative—not in answer to you, by whom I am not called to answer.  Why would I repeat myself?  My reply to Hillaire was delayed because I had begun to write an essay elaborating on that linked comment; then, I realized that I was derailing my own thread, and I decided to save it for a future blog post.

    Whereupon if you can’t understand why someone from a liberal-intellectual background, who was never allowed to express a natural dislike for Congoids—for their ugliness in both body and behavior, their stench, their mess, their “culture”, their manner of speech, their awful noise in lieu of “music”—would be thrilled to have a tough, smart Jewish friend chat about that in candid terms loaded with deliciously forbidden racial slurs, then you are rather simpleminded.

    From there, it is only a few short steps to having militant Zionism fulfill my latent craving for a group identity—to be no longer an individual atom floating in an anthropoid sea, to be a part of something bigger than myself, to have “my people”.  Of course, I knew that I was not a Jew; I was always almost-but-not-quite accepted.  As is typical in such situations with Jews, the door was sort of implicitly left open that I may someday marry into quasi-Jewishness.  (I briefly mentioned this, too.)  Observe how many high-grade shabbos goyim are married to Jews, or have close family members married to Jews.  Jews are a racial amalgam as it is; and their rules about this, albeit always invoking or bearing on heredity, have some flexibility in practice.

    Yes, you also get a “Troll”—ad hominem:  You are personally a troll, and you won’t get away with it here. ®

    • Replies: @geokat62
  350. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vaterland

    Vaterland,

    I have been following your exchange with Ms. Yeager with some interest. I am an American of Japanese descent, two generations removed (my grandparents were educated and raised in Pre-WW2 Imperial Japan). Having lived in Japan, I was disappointed to find that modern Japanese bear almost no resemblance to what I thought they would be (i.e. similar to my grandparents); in this sense, I am also “politically homeless”. Me and modern Japanese often spar on this topic: they are obviously more Japanese linguistically and fit in better in what is now known as Japan; I, on the other hand, despite having been raised in America, have had much more exposure to and knowledge of the cultural norms that existed prior to the War simply because for a long while, all that I knew was that pre-1945 culture. I can see why Hiroo Onoda moved to Brazil.

    The other plot twist is that I speak Chinese and have lived all over Mainland and Greater China. I am therefore quite sympathetic to what Xi Jinping is attempting to do. This obviously puts me at odds with most modern Japanese, and it is a sentiment I only express in real life in Mandarin amongst Chinese interlocutors via Chinese apps. China pushing out American influence in the Pacific is merely a reversion to the historical norm; the question is how ugly the process will be. Might Japan be the venue for a future proxy war? It is unpleasant thinking of such things.

    I regret to say that in an event, those that I must be most wary of would be other Japanese-Americans whose conception of “Japan” does not stress further back in history than 1945. They will be the wolves in sheep’s clothing, using the veil of Japanese-ness to slowly deconstruct Japanese society and culture while attacking Chinese “Communism” without having any sense of what that word actually means. People like Miki Dezaki. Things will be interesting.

  351. Ron Unz says:
    @littlereddot

    Back to China Japan relations. China never really bothered about Japan. To China, Japan was some backwater populated by “dwarfs”. China saw itself as the Center of the World where foreign trade missions would come and pay tribute to the Emperor in order to get generous return gifts, as well trading rights. Japan had little to offer the Chinese apart from flattery of the Chinese Emperor.

    That’s exactly my own strong impression.

    I think Japan was sometimes described as “the land of the dwarf pirates” because they would sometimes raid portions of the Chinese coast, but the Japanese were generally considered minor tributaries, not worthy of much attention, whether or not they regarded themselves as such.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  352. @Anonymous

    Sehr geschätzt, vor allem, da ich als Kind Akkordeon gespielt habe – von der 2. bis zur 7. Klasse habe ich Unterricht genommen und gelegentlich gespielt, weil meine Eltern, insbesondere mein Vater, es für eine gute Idee hielten. Meine Schwester und ich versuchten unser Bestes (?), aber beide waren musikalisch nicht begabt und stoppten unsere Bereitschaft, als Teenager zu üben … damit war es vorbei. Ich wollte malen und zeichnen, und das habe ich getan.

    Ich bin sehr froh und berührt, dass Sie meine Hingabe an das wahre Deutschland spüren. Ich bin kein Fanatiker, aber es macht mir Spaß, das Land meiner Vorfahren zu verteidigen, da ich mehr über seine Tragödien erfahren habe. Kein Libertarismus für mich (obwohl Libertäre dazu neigen, unsere Wahrheit zu unterstützen). Ich habe jedoch gelernt, dass es falsch ist, die schwere Schuld, die den Deutschen/Deutschland aufgebürdet wurde, auf jemand anderen (sei es in den USA oder anderswo) abzuwälzen. Ich mag deine Worte, wir ‘aufrechten’ Deutschen, unsere Seelen ‘unzerstörbar und ewig’. So sollten wir es als stolze Menschen betrachten, nicht als rachsüchtige oder weinende Opfer. Für mich sind die Nationalsozialisten unter Führer Adolf Hitler (aber alle) das beste Gesicht Deutschlands. Das wird sich nicht ändern, weil es keine Fakten, Beweise, Informationen gegen sie gibt, die einer Überprüfung standhalten; es sind alles Lügen und/oder Übertreibungen. Ich denke, das ist Rache, die ich als Motivation nicht mehr billige. Die N-S-Deutschen waren und sind besser als das. Ich wiederhole: Sie waren die Besten.

    Ich bin mir der Natur von Authenticjazzman bewusst, aber ich habe diesmal geantwortet, weil er eines der schlimmsten Verbrechen gegen unser Volk wiederholt hat – dass Juden Deutsche sein können und dass Juden sich das Recht verdient haben, als Deutsche nur wegen der Länge zu gelten Zeit, die sie dort verbracht haben. Sie bestehen jedoch immer darauf, das Wort Jude mit Deutsch zu kombinieren, oder? Und sich Sorgen um ihre Sonderrechte machen. F–k sie. Sie haben ihren eigenen Staat (finanziert von Deutschland) und können alle dorthin gehen. Ich wünsche ihnen alles Gute in ihrer eigenen Heimat.

    Anstatt immer weiter zu machen, sage ich einfach nochmal Danke für das süße Video. Kennen Sie meine Website carolynyeager.net, auf der ich viele, viele tolle Informationen über True Germany habe, zu denen natürlich auch Österreich gehört. Ich denke, vielleicht sind Sie es, aber wenn nicht, hoffe ich, dass Sie uns besuchen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen
    _____________________

    Much appreciated, especially since I played the accordion as a child – from 2nd grade to 7th I took lessons and played on occasion because my parents, especially my father, thought it was a good idea. My sister and I tried our best (?), but neither were gifted musically and stopped our willingness to practice as teens … so that ended. I wanted to paint and draw, and that’s what I did.

    I’m very glad, and touched that you sense my devotion to true Germany. I’m not a fanatic, but I enjoy defending the land of my ancestors, as I’ve learned more about it’s tragedies. No libertarianism for me (even though libertarians do tend to support our truth). I’ve learned, though, that just passing the heavy burden of guilt that’s been put on Germans/Germany onto someone else (be it the USA or other) is wrong-think. I like your words, we ‘upright’ Germans, our souls ‘indestructible and eternal.’ That’s how we should look at it, as proud people, not vindictive or cry-baby victims. For me, the National-Socialists under leader Adolf Hitler (but all of them) are the best face of Germany. That won’t change because there are no facts, evidence, information against them that holds up under scrutiny; it’s all lies and/or exaggerations. I guess that’s vengeance, which I no longer approve of as a motivation. The N-S Germans were and are better than that. I’ll repeat: They were the best.

    I’m aware of the nature of Authenticjazzman, but I replied this time b/c he repeated one of the worst crimes against our people- that Jews can be Germans and that Jews have earned the right to be considered German just because of the length of time they’ve spent there. However, they always insist on combining the word Jew with German, right? And worrying about their special rights. F–k them. They got their own state (financed by Germany) and they can all go there. I wish them well in their own homeland.

    Rather than go on and on, I’ll just say thanks again for the sweet video. Are you familiar with my website carolynyeager.net where I have lots and lots of great information about True Germany, which includes Austria of course. I think perhaps you are, but if not, hope you will visit. Mit freundlichen Grüßen

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  353. @Raches

    [Moderation note:  I am letting this through as a textbook example of a smear-attack.  I want for my readers to see openly, on the record, what I have to deal with.

    This manufacturing of a scandalous, totally unevidenced accusation in the form of a “question” is stereotypically Jewish, although it is also often used by cheap Gentile hucksters.  Obviously, the best way to handle it is not to dignify it with a response.  For my part, I myself still wonder, “Why haven’t we had an official response to the rumor that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990?”  Mr. Beck?  Why have you not denied that you raped and murdered a girl in 1990?

    “Truth Vigilante”, go join your soulmate “Triteleia Laxa” in the very short list of commentators who are unwelcome on Proems.  You have never denied the rumor that you sodomize hamsters, which I just made up on the spot; and I hate hamster-sodomizers.  Although I am mildly curious about what type of police-state you must wish, if you believe that everyone should be forced to answer random heinous accusations without even a scintilla of evidence, the subject is off-topic here; and off-topic replies may be censored.

    —Raches. ®]

    Rachel writes:

    In your subsequent comment, you even insinuated with absolutely zero evidence that I engaged in “satanic ritual abuse of minors”.
    That type of lurid smear is very Jewish.

    Of course, the reason Rachel is a core constituent of the Axis of Disinformation, is her propensity for misrepresentation.

    Let’s scroll up to my comment # 344 and see what I actually said:

    Does the cabal have videos of you engaging in satanic ritual abuse of minors ?

    As readers can see, I make no assertions. I merely ASK a question.
    Because I’m curious as to why an ‘alleged’ goy would stoop so low as to even contemplate an association with Jewish Racial Nationalism, let alone actually being lured into it (implying that you were a Card Carrying Member at some point).

    I mean, I’d sooner have my fingernails pulled out with pliers whilst being simultaneously waterboarded than have anything to do with Zionism.

    Rachel, if you haven’t previously engaged in satanic ritual abuse of minors, you need only have answered in the negative.
    This would’ve led immediately to my next question:

    What dirt does the Zio cabal have on you that would make you eschew all standards if morality and instead plumb the depths of depravity through allowing yourself to be lured by Zionism ?

    I can understand how they lured Senator Lindsey Graham, via his propensity to engage in unspeakable acts with little boys.
    They probably have something disturbing in the vault on Sean Hannity too, I would imagine.

    What did/do they have on you ?

    We’re all curious.

    • Troll: Raches
  354. geokat62 says:
    @Raches

    [Off-topic attempt to rehash this is more-tagged.  If you don’t get it, the lawyer’s trick of brushing off what I say, and then asking me ten ways for ten explanations will achieve nothing but to annoy intelligent readers, as you are wont to do.  I am editing in up here such a reply as warranted, so as not to spam all readers of this thread with even more off-topic comments from myself.  —I have defended atheism and atheists; and Professor Oliver, an absolute atheist, is indeed one of my greatest intellectual influences.  This does not necessarily make me a “self avowed atheist” myself.  In a thread in which you participated, I also noted, “I am not against all sincerely believed spiritual or religious ideas per se—although I am absolutely opposed to the pathologically destructive ones, including Christianity.”  —You did lie by omission:  You essentially accused me of dodging, when I had provided a link forthrightly answering Hillaire’s inquiry.  —Raches. ®]

    Your ridiculous minimization of “a limited subset of evangelicals” is a rather underhanded defense of the oldest and greatest Jewish controlled-opposition movement, Christianity.

    You must be a big fan of Christopher Jon Bjerknes, as he too is a big proponent of this hypothesis.

    Just for the record, I never said anything that could be described as making me a “self avowed atheist”, myself.

    Mea culpa! I guess I inferred that because you’re a huge admirer of Prof. Revilo Oliver, who was an “absolute” atheist according to you,

    In turn, Prof. Oliver, an absolute atheist…

    https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/taking-the-fun-out-of-being-progressive/?showcomments#comment-4906461

    … that you were also an atheist.

    Furthermore, you falsely accuse me through lying by omission about what was said.

    Sorry, I don’t lie… either by commission or by omission. So, you’ll have to elaborate a bit on why you’re taking issue with something I said.

    [MORE]

    Whereupon if you can’t understand why someone from a liberal-intellectual background, who was never allowed to express a natural dislike for Congoids—for their ugliness in both body and behavior, their stench, their mess, their “culture”, their manner of speech, their awful noise in lieu of “music”—would be thrilled to have a tough, smart Jewish friend chat him up about that in candid terms loaded with deliciously forbidden racial slurs, then you are rather simpleminded.

    So, let me see if I’ve got this right. The reason you’re giving for being “lured” to Zionism is that you have a profound dislike for “rhymes with triggers”?

    I’m sure if Family Feud had a query of the top 6 reasons for a goy being “lured” to Zionism, your answer would be among them, lol.

    Of course, I knew that I was not a Jew; I was always almost-but-not-quite accepted.

    How dare those naughty jews not accept you when they incessantly lecture the dumb goyim to be tolerant of others!

    Yes, you also get a “Troll”

    Feel free to troll away on this one, too.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  355. apollonian says: • Website

    Raches Can Be Brutally Honest, Indeed

    Yessir Mr. Perfect, and I feel like u’re actually being quite honest, as honest as u’re capable, though I still don’t see how one has or doesn’t have anything “to do” w. Hitler who’s been dead since 1945. But forgive me.

    I meant “compassion” somewhat in wry sense of understanding I wouldn’t deliberately lie, as u alleged, and if u don’t think that’s ruthless thing to do, well, I guess u’re just being honest there too, but with which I’d disagree.

    Yet u published that disagreement which I have to admit is quite fair. Further, I think it all (ur policies) is legitimate thing to bring up at least for brief discussion.

    U say: “I know what always annoyed me—what I wished the moderator would stop, because it is time-wasting clutter and distraction….” It seems there’s simple solution, and that being, u just skip it, and go on to the next item which isn’t “time-wasting and distraction”–but then again, u’re a busy man, as we all see.

    U may disagree, but the “Christian worldview,” I say, ought to be judged to great extent according to philosophy of New Test. which is the basic thing, Christianity the Hegelian anti-thesis to Satanism and Pharisaism (later the Talmud), Christ = TRUTH, as I noted. Thus it’s (Christian) truth vs. satanic lies, and there’s no middle ground; ur lack of “Christian worldview” only places u in a certain camp.

    There are great implications to such philosophy of truth, and u do deserve credit for ur willingness, such as it is, to entertain discussion thereof, thanks. A.

  356. @Carolyn Yeager

    ” dass Juden Deutsche sein koennen”

    Das habe ich nicht gesagt, sondern dass wenn Juden sich selbst als Deutsche betrachten, dann geht es Sie nichts an.
    Sie haben nicht das alleinige Recht zu bestimmen wer Jude ist und wer Deutscher ist.

    “I am aware of the nature of Authenticjazzman”

    Just who tf do you think you are a Hellseher, an Augur, do you think that you cann see inside of my Psyche and then determine my personality traits and “nature”.

    Look I was married married to three German women, my first wife was a so-called “Von”, my second wife was an MD, a surgeon, she moved to California, and I decided not to go with her. My third wife, to whom I am still married is a retired Gymnasium teacher.
    My first wife’s mother had a photo of her uncle, a high ranking officer standing directly next to AH, . Her husband, also a teacher, lost a leg in France and when he had two beers under the belt then came out his worship for AH as if it was yesterday.

    Look I am most certainly better versed and prepared to offer my opinons and observations regarding Deutschland than anyone here and most certainly more qualified than the Dummkopf who labels himself as Raches.

    AJM

    • Troll: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  357. hillaire says:
    @apollonian

    Yes I concur… Satanism is top heavy with’ jews’ (Anton la-vey and his paltry little church etc etc), some ‘jews’ even openly pray to Satan and have a specific prayer or chant or whatever( so I’m told)..

    The talmud itself could be described as a Satanic text, so there really is no surprise vis-a-vis the cross-over…

    The problem with all this Satanism is it’s all a bit confused…(it would have to be though, what with him being the lord of chaos and all) there are some references in the Good Book but Old Nick as the common imbecile understands him, is somewhat of a chimera… I think the original greek refers to the ‘tempter’.. (I’ll have to clarify that).. or the Serpent..

    I think one should look towards this all as Luciferic and Ahrimanic, a far more coherent and cogent approach…

    pant shitters like crowley, bailey and blavatsky intentionally muddied the waters and should have been drowned at birth…

    The Cathars and Albigensians though deemed heretics seemed to worship the Gnostic Christ which on face value appear to be somewhat Satanic … before they were exterminated by the Papa.. somewhat like the real Nazis (sic) (now extinct.. gone but not forgotten)… who sent Rahm off to find the Grail…

    Of course Satanism in it’s basic form is merely self worship (or rather the worship of man in Gods place) and thus dovetails perfectly with corporate/consumer narcissism and transhumanism (Adam Kadmon) and all the other jisms..

    and of course most imbeciles are venal and greedy and love to dress up… So I imagine the Christians will soon be the new Nazis(sic) and have the jew Satanist bankers and their hired goons after their blood ..

    After all we are nearly there are we not?

  358. hillaire says:
    @Raches

    Mmmmm… very arcane mr vengeance, a riddle within a conundrum…

    Excellent… I’ll keep the beady’s peeled.

    Regards.

  359. Raches says: • Website
    @Authenticjazzman

    With my apologies to my anonymous German reader, people need to see this.

    Reichsminister Dr. Goebbels did not always totally censor enemy propaganda, even when he had the power to do so.  Sometimes, he quoted it verbatim to his people to show them why they needed to fight for their own existence.  And even before he had state authority, he liked to meet his adversaries head-on.  I recall having read somewhere that one time before 1933, a politician from another party refused his challenge to a debate; so, he played a phonograph of his opponent’s speech at an NSDAP mass-meeting, and “debated” with the recording.  Of course, the crowd loved it.

    Applying that inspiration in a different context, here, I want for the world to see what Germans have to deal with.

    Anyone who has the ability to step outside himself, to put himself in another’s shoes, should try to imagine having his country occupied by this type of arrogant invader.

    As I noted in the other thread, “Authenticjazzman” has the attitude of a Yankee carpetbagger.  It is no surprise that he lists “slavery, Jim Crow, KKK” as bad things he blames on “Democrats”; undoubtedly, he must be as thrilled by the “Reconstruction” of the American South as he is by so-called “German Reconstruction”.

    This comment was relatively mild.  He has consistently insulted and demeaned the Germans in his comments, even as he boasts of how well he allegedly knows them.  And he is not just a stereotypical crude tourist!  He claims to be or have been a member of the U.S. Army in Germany, i.e. a member of the military occupation that is the root cause so many German problems he derides.

    As a U.S. political partisan obsessed with U.S. partisan politics, he mostly seems to despise Germans because so many of them drool over Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden.  He is too stupid to realize that during WWII, this was the country that supported Adolf Hitler by a supermajority approaching unanimity.  Wow, what changed?

    Intelligent readers:  Please try to imagine someone this hostile, this degrading to your people, toting a gun in your country, while insulting and traducing you. ®

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  360. hillaire says:
    @Mulegino1

    An interesting analogy you draw there with birds… I live on a mountain and quite often I see the jack daws and other assorted carrion mobbing the eagles…

    The most notable detail being the dogged resignation of the much larger birds of prey as these screeching crows circle and dive and try to force them to the ground..

    often with success….

    I have yet to see the eagles rip this vermin to pieces..

    still, we live in hope..

  361. geokat62 says:
    @geokat62

    You did lie by omission: You essentially accused me of dodging, when I had provided a link forthrightly answering Hillaire’s inquiry.

    Again, I do not lie. While you say you provided a link answering an inquiry. I didn’t bother paying that much attention to it.

  362. Raches says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus

    For my sixth hundredth comment at The Unz Review, I should belatedly answer your fine question.  The anonymous German here should also find this interesting.

    But what does Raches mean?

    Closest I could come was something about a dog that kills the quarried stag.
    But I couldn’t connect that to the image of something like a statue in something like orangey-pink.

    And the best I could find is that Proem is a Preface, an introduction.

    The hunting dog is a neat coincidence, as is the anagram for “search”.  Whereas my name is a subtle homage to Adolf Hitler, straight from Mein Kampf.  I have left many clues about this, but never fully explained.

    As I have remarked before, I despise presumptuous homages:

    A competent dictionary will reveal that inter alia, by way of a respectful homage, my Proems are a subtle inversion of Professor Oliver’s Postscripts.

    I avoid homages that misappropriate, presume too much, or try improperly to stand on someone else’s shoulders.

    And I love literary games.  I take to the words as a cat to catnip, constructing subtle puns, double entendres, cryptic allusions to other authors, hidden messages:  Words to the wise, the wise only.  Most of them, I will not explain as hereby.  I cannot do this all the time, at such a prolific rate; but my best comments have much beneath the surface, between the lines.  A professor of literary criticism will someday need to examine my Internet posts, which are not intended to be ephemeral.

    I have always done this.  It is what I am.  Sometimes, there is a political purpose; for example, deep in crypsis, I have sometimes written to venues full of Jews with absolute, undeniable proof of my Hitlerian sympathies.  Even when I must hide, my true agenda is always hidden in plain sight—and yes, I am wily as a Jew!  But mostly, I am motivated by the expenditure of literary energy.  It is art, and I am an artist.

    Naturally, I must have some subtlety in my choice of a name.

    I did some little research into archaic German onomastics, and found cases that seemed comparable to me in which a name could be formed by appending a possessive s.  I hope that I got it right; a scholar of the German language would need to opine.  My implication is not that I am Revenge, but that I am her offspring.  It is intended to be a matronymic for one who is created by the principle of retributive justice:  An avenger born of Nemesis.

    By such means, my name derives from the end of Mein Kampf I.12—from the resounding conclusion of “Erſter Band”:

    Und neben der kommenden Erhebung fühlte ich die Göttin der unerbittlichen Rache schreiten für die Meineidstat des 9. November 1918.

    Scan from a 1936 edition published by Zentralverlag der N.S.D.A.P., München:

    My first blog post concludes with a hint:

    https://www.unz.com/proems/hello-world/#p_1_17

    Also schreiben der Wille der Göttin der unerbittlichen Rache. ®

    The linked paragraph in the English translation here, with an apparent OCR error corrected (this rendering is clumsy, but I will quote it as-is):

    https://www.unz.com/book/adolf_hitler__mein-kampf/#p_13_195

    And side by side with the coming resurrection, I sensed that the goddess of inexorable vengeance for the perjured deed of November 9, 1918, was striding forth.

    My above-quoted literary homage, which is also a nod to Nietzsche’s Also sprach Zarathustra, poetically turns “schreiten” to “schreiben” by the difference of one letter, and dedicates my writing as the exercise of divine will—for I call myself not the Goddess of Vengeance herself, but only her votary and her prophet, her faithful servant, her incarnate agent whom she birthed for this purpose.  My own translation:

    Thus writes the Will of the Goddess of inexorable, pitiless, relentless Revenge. ®

    I am fascinated by how many readers have called the “®” a “registered trademark sign”, and questioned my usage thereof.  It is obviously my initial. ®

  363. Joe Wong says:
    @Raches

    First China and Japan war was at 663 AD, Tang Dynasty, caused by Japanese invasion of Korea.
    894 AD Japan stopped diplomatic relationship with China.
    1592 and 1597 AD, Ming Dynasty, wars erupted between China and Japan caused by Japanese invasion of Korea.
    1363-1624 AD Japanese pirates ravaged Chinese coastal land.
    1931-1945 Japanese invasion of China.

  364. Anon[831] • Disclaimer says:
    @Raches

    Raches, I am not certain if you are aware of this, but followers of WN and WN-adjacent comment boards over the past 15 or more years are familiar with the commenter who calls himself “Apollonian.” He was long ago identified as a troll with apparent mental illness. He was permanently banned by almost every blogger of note on the so-called racialist right, from “paleocon” Steve Sailer to Vanguard News Network’s Alex Linder.

    Seeing his schzoidal gibberish resurface like a bad penny turning up, here in your comparatively new and innocent publishing space, has given me – and, I am sure, many other “old-timers” – a hearty laugh as well as a sad sigh. We await your inevitable realization of what you are dealing with in him.

    This is to “Apollonian”: As I have told you already in 2010, please get help.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @Raches
  365. @hillaire

    [He means that you talk like a queer.  You evidently calibrate your “morphologically accurate” appraisals according to the modern fashion industry, which is largely run by homosexuals with paederastic tendencies; and you seem to have a dysmorphia which makes you see the marks of testosterone everywhere.  Note that this discussion is off-topic; and despite because of my love for art, your theories are uninteresting.  —Raches. ®]

    Mass produced tat? I may strongly criticise their depictions of the human form, but their architecture was exquisite. I would never deny that. Still, even they did mass produce their sculptures and frescoes, I don’t see why they would be so morphologically inaccurate.

    I’m not terribly impressed by any of the artists you mention. Rossetti in particular depict quite brutish looking women, with very strong testosterone-derived jaws, chins and noses. Waterhouse did some nice paintings of women, but I find most of them lacklustre at best and tilted in the masculine direction at worst.

    Frightened of the ladies? I don’t know what you mean by that.

  366. @Ron Unz

    I think Japan was sometimes described as “the land of the dwarf pirates” because they would sometimes raid portions of the Chinese coast, but the Japanese were generally considered minor tributaries, not worthy of much attention, whether or not they regarded themselves as such.

    Yes, thats right. The Chinese name for Japanese was Wo, meaning dwarf.

    One thing about the Japanese was that they had big ambitions. If you look at the difference in size of the two countries, one has to grant their ambition a grudging respect.

    Their attempt to conquer China in the 1930s was not their first. In the 16th century Toyotomi Hideyoshi planned to invade China after the conquest of Korea. 800 years after being beaten by the Tang dynasty China, they were stopped again in Korea this time with the assistance of Ming China.

    It is very ironic that the West now portrays China as the aggressor in all of this. One only has recount how all the island disputes in the East and South China Seas are a legacy of Japanese expansionism/conquest in the 1930s.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  367. apollonian says: • Website
    @Anon

    “Nation of Hate”?–So What?

    Golly gee, but here we go again: a “critic” complaining about someone who was “banned”–ho ho ho. Is there anyone who isn’t banned fm some site somewhere? If someone isn’t banned fm anywhere–what good is he/she likely to be?

    And again, note the typical technique fm the real troll–utter lack of any specific complaint or criticism upon any particular pt. allegedly made upon any given topic–just the usual general smear.

    “Get help”?–well gee, but wouldn’t that properly consist of specific advice or info upon some particular topic or subject-matter? “Help”?–for what?–would u like to send me money?–ho ho ho.

    And the complainer here, “anon[831],” is a bit of a liar as I don’t know Steve Sailer and never had anything to do w. him, so that tells u a little right there.

    But anyway, more to the topic at hand regarding Jew S A being a “nation of hate,” I wanted to ask Raches, now that comments have begun to reduce in quantity, how he would summarize things for the dialectic produced here, coming up on 400 responses. What does Raches consider he’s accomplished?

    I already noted that “nation of hate” is somewhat platitudinous, as any land or nation contains people of various emotions, good old hatred being just one item. Jews-media are presently trying to keep a focus of hatred on white Christians, as usual–not Germans–which tells me there’s something about Christians the Jews fear–gee whiz, but I wonder why.

    Don’t forget there’s lots of non-white Christians too who know white Christians MADE USA in the first place, and made it a tremendous success, at least for a while–not even Raches would deny (I’m pretty sure). I hope to have broadened the discourse by pointing-out the real problem is the more general Satanism of which Jews play vital part–indeed, a leading part. I don’t really see anything of note Raches has accomplished in this blog, aside fm throwing his weight about as editor/moderator; maybe he would clarify.

  368. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Raches

    [A guttersnipe’s trash talk suits the proper cultural level of this commentator, but I have elided it; Proems is a civilized place, and das ist streng verboten.  —Raches. ®]

    “Here and in the other thread, I see some comments expressing what I think few people understand. I strive to put myself in the shoes of a German today.”

    So why don’t you “improve” your life and move over there, instead of trying to make the US more like your own minds eye version of Germany circa 1940?

    Since you claim to understand the mass German psyche so well ( assuming there even is such a thing- which I don’t, by the way), surely your “back to Hitler” conversion task would be a lot easier over there; after all, there are still many in the US who are well aware that the US continent was originally peopled mostly by freedom -seeking individuals risking starvation, poverty and death to escape the oppressions of Europe in general, including those of what was to later become the German state, and who therefore want to reinstate the freedoms now mostly vanished in the US, and who will say, right to your face: “f—k you, and f—k Hitler!”

    “Regards” onebornfree

  369. @Raches

    I have never commented on this site before, and I am not very tech savvy, as I have no friends living around me to show me how. All my neighbours are jews. If the comments above are actually yours, then I agree with them.

    I have been jew wise since about 1972, and as an Aussie, that puts me in an extremely small population. This country has a huge jewish population, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they actually out number we of British/European stock. After WW2 the government had a policy of increasing our White population after the fright of being attacked by the Jap’s. Once I became jew wise and taught myself to be able to partly distinguish them from the rest of us, it came as an education to me that most of these “British” migrants were in fact British jews. It was another Trojan Horse to out number we Whites. Then I also had another unhappy surprise to find that my family had at least six jew in- laws all together.

    Because of physical attacks on me while unconscious in hospital, and then an attempt to shut me up by infecting me with Tetanus, I have had to use my real name. It has caused me a lot more bodily abuse but I could see no other way of surviving, since I was/am totally on my own. This abuse I mentioned started in 2013, that is, when it became more obvious as to who, why and what were responsible.

    As an example of this, I was just released from a Mental Health institution after being set up by my Indian doctor who is in cahoots with the jew health system, when he sent me to a hospital to have my legs examined because of almost no blood circulation in my legs. It was all a lie, it was to have a jew psychiatrist interview me and when I became aware that it was a set up to have me institutionalised, I got up and left.

    The jew bastard then had me cited and a couple of hours later the police were demanding I open my doors and go out side. I refused, so they had the use of special house breaking tools to wreck the security door and front door to then enter and grab me, throw me on the ground and take me to the institution. That was on Tuesday, 28th, Sept., and I was released on Friday 16th of October. I have to face court early next year.

    The reason, or one of many reasons I mention this, is that I have known since about 1982 these kind of laws here in Australia would be used against me. I’m not sure that most Whites in other countries are fully aware of what we Aussies are faced with, and in fact, perhaps 99.99% of Aussie ignoramus’s here in their own country are aware. Apart from sport, fact is, the great majority of them know sweet bugger all about what laws exist in this country, and who instigated them since Federation.

    This is also why I am having very serious thoughts of dropping out of the spot light that the enemy have on me, because most Aussie f…wits wouldn’t even know I exist. The very reason I came onto the Internet and used my correct name in 2014 was to make the dumb bastards aware to some extent at least. You will no doubt understand why I look to N/S and the cost to the rest of us of Germany losing that war. The war that our WW2 generation are falsely called the victors of.

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  370. @John Johnson

    Just which planet are you commenting from.? You need far more than a time machine.
    The Lusitania was stacked with high explosives, Churchill’s cousin Roosevelt( Secretary of the Navy), deliberately leaked the real invoice of the cargo that the Lusitania was carrying armaments, this real invoice was found hidden in his desk after he died, and made available by his son after WW2.

    When the Germans received this invoice of the real cargo, they took out front page warnings in all the main newspapers in the USA, that the ship was a legitimate target and would be sunk if possible.

    Churchill, while drunk, as the First Sea Lord of the Navy, demanded that the Lusitania be redirected into waters that were known to have submarines present. Those innocent passengers including children who were killed were set up by both of those notorious war criminal cousins. All useful practice for the next world war and the slaughter of more innocent people.

    Which ever planet you are upon, please, please stay there.

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Raches
  371. @Raches

    “He claims to (be) or have been a member of the US Army in germany”

    Look you bloody fool I just turned 81 this week and just how the hell could I claim to be : now, a member of the US Army in Germany.
    I was stationed in Germany in 1959/60, as a bandsman, and I wasn’t toting a gun rather I was toting an alto saxophone and performing the Glenn Miller songbook which the Germans absolutely loved, and I was discharged out of the Army in March of 1961, Basta.

    You evidently have a huge flaw in your reading and comprehension abilities, and your apparent double-digit IQ doesn’t improve your miserable lot, so let us just agree to disagree and leave it at that, as you do not exist in reality and your blatherings mean nothing to me.

    AJM, Mensa qualified since 1973.

  372. Raches says: • Website
    @Joe Wong

    Thanks for the reply.  You mentioned a few things I knew about, and a few things I didn’t.  I see that I need to do more research; it is why I ask questions.

    Before I address what you say, I ask that you consider the following from my perspective as a long-term thinker.  I hear it said that Chinese have “thousand-year thinking”, as I respect.

    In that light, to know whence I come, please consider the American problem.

    American culture is based on what you would call the 狗肉和尚 attitude.  And they need first to lie to themselves, before making fake images to others.  Americans who don’t lie to themselves must perforce, ineluctably either become dissidents struggling to change their sick system, or kill themselves from despair at having such a bad country.  But most lie to themselves; thus, in their foreign relations, this is why the Americans can sanctimoniously play the do-gooder “world-police”, ruin other people’s countries while claiming to “liberate” them, commit every sin they preach against, accuse their victims of their own crimes against them, and then brag that they are “the greatest country in the world”.

    Accordingly, American “diplomacy” is based on what I call “smile to your face, stab you in the back”.  Although some individual Americans are decent, honorable people, America as a whole and the American government have no honor and no decency.  From Europe to the Far East, from Cuba to Vietnam to Iraq, it is proved a thousand times that to trust American officials is to sign one’s own death warrant.  Never trust the Americans.

    Any American official with even a shred of honor ends up either blacklisted for dissent, or even “suicided” as James Forrestal.  Either way, they have little to no significant influence on American foreign policy, which you correctly identified as “Mafia politics”.

    From my long-term perspective, I consider all history from 1945 to the present to be a series of footnotes to the Second World War.  I say that, because I think that’s how an historian writing 200 years, 500 years, or 1000 years from now will write the history.  Few people can understand this; perhaps a Chinese political thinker may get it.

    It is why I really do not care about minor issues (such as the U.S. electoral gimmick) except insofar as they may indirectly impact major issues (if America’s New Uncle Joe cuts off our free speech here, we may be unable to respond effectively to much bigger events).  With some gross oversimplification for brevity (and obviously omitting some very important parts of the world), I approximately list some of the major issues hereby relevant as:

    1. Whether or not Europe survives at all, as racially and culturally European.  Prospects look bad, but there is some hope.

    2. The future shape of the Far East.  Only two nations in the Far East have ever had the power to exert regional dominance:  China and Japan.  Their relations to each other, and to Europe, are therefore of great importance.

    3. The resolution of the American question, and whether it will cause even more catastrophes for others.  America is eating itself alive; if my primary agenda were anti-America, purely negative, then I would just watch and laugh.  Just as America fulfills to others the sarcastic aphorism, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”, so too unto itself:  In the long term, no enemy of America can exceed what the Americans do to themselves, their culture, their heritage, their genetics, their families, their posterity (or lack thereof).

    If Ron Unz is correct in deducing, from available evidence, that rogue elements in the U.S. intelligence establishment already did covert biological warfare against China, this illustrates how dangerous the situation is.  As the American Empire decays, it may bring down all others with it.  This is, by the way, why I strongly disagree with so-called “accelerationists”.  A global empire with existing far-flung military bases, with nuclear weapons, with biological weapons, and who knows what else—if this collapses the wrong way, it could kill every creature on Earth that is called “human”.

    Based on his writings, I believe that Mr. Unz is trying to stabilize the overall situation.  He understands, at least, that no nation can long survive that builds its glory on lies, Big Lies and bigger lies.  Although he is a Jew, he seems not to have the underhanded hostility that most Jews have to Gentiles; and although he is obviously not a partisan for Aryan racialist causes, much less their champion, he seems not fundamentally hostile to them, either.  As to China, I think that the accusations against him of a pro-China position are unfair.  He clearly respects China; but I see his position as being more that of an American who realizes that mindless neocon aggression towards China is terrifically foolish, myopic, destructive to all.  This is only my own observation, and a part of why I am here; of course, I cannot speak for him.

    Now, please zoom out and consider China and Japan in the above context.

    Although I have only the most superficial knowledge about the Chinese classics, I obviously know something about the war-related Chinese thinking that every Western scholar should have heard about, such as Master Sun and some things about Stratagems, just as I have heard of the German Clausewitz.  And when I examine the matter carefully, with a long-term historical perspective, I am sure that both Sun and Clausewitz would agree with me:  America’s key to East Asia is the continued American military occupation of Japan, and the provocation of hostility between Chinese and Japanese people.

    How that present situation resolves is a question whose answer will be significant to historians 500 years or 1000 years from now, in my opinion.

    In that view, Mr. Wong, wishing to take an eye to both the future and the past, I look to what you say:

    First China and Japan war was at 663 AD, Tang Dynasty, caused by Japanese invasion of Korea.
    894 AD Japan stopped diplomatic relationship with China.
    1592 and 1597 AD, Ming Dynasty, wars erupted between China and Japan caused by Japanese invasion of Korea.
    1363-1624 AD Japanese pirates ravaged Chinese coastal land.
    1931-1945 Japanese invasion of China.

    The first four items, I admit that I know very little about.  I should accept your hint of something to research, before I venture to speak specifically about those events.  I will not be a fool to argue from ignorance.

    To your list, I will add one item that you omitted:  Japanese were together with Americans and Europeans in the Eight Nation Alliance intervening in China during the Boxer Rebellion.  I myself criticize Japan for this, in the below-noted context.

    That being said, an immediate parallel comes to mind with the relations between France and England—definitely much worse traditional enemies, who became friends—or by the unfortunate inverse example, Germany and England—who were not traditional enemies, but who wound up fighting mutually catastrophic wars despite those on both sides who wished for peace.  (See addendum below.)

    Although the past should not be forgotten, sometimes it’s true that things that happened long ago can be set aside.  At some point, in the course of centuries, every nation had some conflicts with its neighbors.  Taking your first four items at face value, they all seem to be sporadic events between about 400 and 1400 years ago; would this really prove that the Japanese are always such vicious enemies of the Chinese?

    As for events in 1931–1945, I think it’s clear from the above article that I think the situation is much more complex than to paint it simply as Japanese aggression towards China.  Please don’t forget also that there were some Chinese leaders taking a pro-American or pro-Soviet position against Japan.  This is not to be a Japan-partisan, but to suggest that if Japan could have built ties with some Chinese leadership amidst China’s tragic internal turmoil, the whole situation probably needs to be analyzed with more nuance than “Japanese invasion of China”.

    Looking backwards for the root cause of Chinese troubles, you will probably not be surprised that in broad outlines, as a racialist, I see China’s ups and downs as caused by ups and downs of the Han, who are today reasserting themselves.  No people has a perfectly flawless history; a German should be able to examine objectively, for example, how Germans almost destroyed themselves in the (Christian) Wars of Religion.  And I suggest, if you trace back the root cause of what you may call the “Century of Humiliation”, perhaps you may find that Western empires collided by coincidence with an historical ebb in the Han people, from which they now recover similarly (without following the exact historical analogy) as Bismarck and Hitler each worked to rebuild the power of the German people.

    It explains why when, in the same general time period, British intruded on China and Americans intruded on Japan, China was humiliated while Japan developed an effective response:  Chinese as a people were at a low point and unable to resist, as Europeans are at a low point today.  Now, China shocks the world by doing what the Japanese did after the Meiji Restoration:  Adapt, import Western technology, master it, make it your own.  China now terrifies the Americans by advancing to a position of superiority in high technology, and in many of the sciences—because Chinese people recuperated from within themselves the strength they had many times in thousands of years, but just not at that point in the late Qing Dynasty.  If you look fairly, you will see that what you do now is what Japan did first, in what Europeans then called the “Japanese Miracle”.

    Japan could have collapsed then, too.  When faced with an external threat, the choice was, “Adapt or Lose”.  They had to fight a little civil war to determine which way to go.  I think they overshot in copying some things from the West, such as legalizing Christianity, and importing the system of parliamentary constitutional monarchy; compare also my remark above on their involvement in the Eight Nation Alliance intervening in China.  But their results were undoubtedly impressive; and they thus became one of the Great Powers.

    I think that the difference is that by historical misfortune, it was just a bad time for Chinese to respond to this.  But Han people are clearly some of the most vital people on Earth.  I take as evidence of this not only their current renaissance, but a comparison of some things I found while researching Communism and racial destruction.  I have from the 1950s–60s examples, mostly from Chinese sources (and some I managed to get a Chinese to translate for me), of Chinese Communist race-mixing propaganda glorifying blacks, trying to inject what is now called “woke” into China.  But by the 1980s, Chinese showed how little effect this had in the Nanjing Race Riots of December 1988 – January 1989.

    I find the Nanjing Race Riots a handy measure of Chinese instincts.  If Europeans had such healthy instincts today, I would be pleased.  The good example that Chinese at Hohai University set for white people has been buried by Western propaganda about subsequent “democracy protests” at Tienanmen Square in Beijing.

    Those who may suggest that I exaggerate the importance of that race riot would need to explain away the consistent historical evidence that healthy, vital people behave generally in healthy, vital ways.  Given that little index of racial health, I am unsurprised to see Chinese recuperate and rise in dominance.  Just please don’t forget that what you are doing is conceptually similar to what Japan did in the Nineteenth through mid-Twentieth Centuries.

    But now, the tables are turned.  I think we are now in what future Japanese historians will call Japan’s “Century of Humiliation”.  Japan is under America’s thumb, militarily and politically.  They cannot be so badly blamed for that, when they fought so nobly and valiantly against the Americans.  And I do think you will find, the whole basis of American strategy depends on hostility between China and Japan.  I believe that resolving that problem would change the politics of the whole region, including the dynamics of the situation with Taiwan.  And China should have shared interests with uncorrupted Japanese nationalists to get rid of American influence in the whole region.

    Despite the very high tension on both sides, and much harsh and insulting rhetoric that I have seen on both sides, I still think there is hope for rapprochement.  In my interactions with both Chinese and Japanese, I noticed that when two fight and then decide to be friends, they have a way even as individuals to resolve it diplomatically, where both sides admit their own faults while excusing and praising each other; thus, both sides are winners and not losers, and both sides keep honor and dignity.  Let both China and Japan be winners.  Let the Americans have all the humiliation.

    And ultimately, East connects to West.  Any realistic chance for another European renaissance depends on decreasing the influence of the global empire that is the enemy of all civilized nations and peoples, the enemy of the great races.  Another American war flaring up in the Far East would undoubtedly have detrimental blowback to Europe.  I think here as Hitler did, that an East-West alliance is of great benefit to both, in common defense of both against those who would destroy all. ®

    ——————————

    (Discussion of France and England, and of Germany and England, is hereby cut to attempt “brevity”.  Perhaps sometime later…)

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @antibeast
  373. Ron Unz says:
    @littlereddot

    Yes, thats right. The Chinese name for Japanese was Wo, meaning dwarf.

    I remember a Chinese friend of mine (from Taiwan) was visiting some Beijing museum a few years ago, and noticed some old scroll describing how a delegation from “the island of the dwarf pirates” were bringing tribute to the Emperor and pledging their loyalty. He thought it very amusing and mentioned it to me.

    In the 16th century Toyotomi Hideyoshi planned to invade China after the conquest of Korea.

    I hadn’t realized that.

    I’ve been following China pretty closely for over forty years, and since I think you’re pretty new here, you might possibly find a couple of my articles interesting:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/

    As I emphasize, some of the Western books written about China a hundred years ago were far more perceptive than most of the ones produced during much of the Twentieth Century. For example, here’s a book published in 1911 by E.A. Ross, one of our greatest early sociologists:

    https://www.unz.com/book/e_a_ross__the-changing-chinese/

  374. @Raches

    Blessed are the peacemakers.

    I wished more in the West were real followers of Christ.

    • Replies: @Raches
  375. @Ron Unz

    Thanks for the links! And also much more for all your efforts in setting up and maintaining UR. It is truly one of the few websites worth visiting everyday 🙂

  376. antibeast says:
    @Raches

    If I would interject into this discussion, I think Westerners such as yourself tend to view the Japanese too favorably, as if they somehow qualify as ‘honorary Whites’. That was true when Hitler chose Imperial Japan over Republican China as Nazi Germany’s ally during WWII as it is today after the Yanks took in Japan as its ally against ‘Communist China’ during the Cold War.

    To understand China’s relations with Japan, you need to grasp the concept of the Hua-Yi Dichotomy (‘華夷之辨’) which influenced the geopolitics of East Asia for well over two thousand years. That implied the existence of a Middle-Kingdom(‘中国’) shining its light of Civilization (‘华夏’) upon the barbarians outside its realm. That concept permeated the whole of East Asia to include Korea and Vietnam, not just China. Chinese Buddhism spread to Japan since Prince Shōtoku until the Tokugawa Shogunate adapted Neo-Confucianism from the Song Dynasty in the form of Hayashi Razan’s Japanese Neo-Confucianism. While the Japanese took in Chinese Classical Culture since the Tang Dynasty, they were nevertheless looked down upon by both Chinese and Koreans as ‘barbarians’ who were constantly invading Korea which was a Chinese protectorate or otherwise raiding the Southeast coast of China as waco pirates. Imperial Japan then adapted this Hua-Yi Dichotomy to its own Japanese East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere during WWII, viewing themselves as the natural heirs to lead Asia against the West, following the model of the Mongols during their conquest of Asia. The Japanese nationalist philosopher Aizawa Seishisai expressed this Hua-Yi dichotomy as follows:

    “Our Divine Land is where the sun rises and where the primordial energy originates. The heirs of the Great Sun have occupied the Imperial Throne from generation to generation without change from time immemorial. Japan’s position at the vertex of the earth makes it the standard for the nations of the world. Indeed, it casts its light over the world, and the distance which the resplendent imperial influence reaches knows no limit. Today, the alien barbarians of the West, the lowly organs of the legs and feet of the world, are dashing about across the seas, trampling other countries underfoot, and daring, with their squinting eyes and limping feet, to override the noble nations. What manner of arrogance is this!”

    As seen in Seishisai’s writings, Japanese nationalism had always been anti-Western. Hitler’s mistake was to choose Japanese imperialists who wanted to conquer and unite the whole of Asia AGAINST the West over Chinese nationalists who were AGAINST the Japanese imperialists. That’s why Chiang was reluctant to commit Chinese nationalist troops to fight the IJA in Burma because Southeast Asia was none of his business. Contrast that to the Japanese imperialists who promised to ‘liberate’ Southeast Asia from Western colonialism, supporting Asian independence movements from Sukarno of Indonesia to Subhas Chandra Bose of India.

    To this day, the Chinese view the Japanese as nothing more than yellow barbarian dwarfs who live under the yolk of the white barbarians from the USA.

  377. @antibeast

    @Antibeast
    Yes, well said.

    My parents could sing the Kimigayo, the Japanese national anthem. They were forced to learn it as kids during the Japanese occupation of Singapore, just as they were forced to bow to Japanese soldiers or else face brutal punishment.

    Thousands of young men were disappeared for no reason other than to “eliminate a potential threat”.

    https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTsAE2InxUA52GNduPVROhSLcb1FaJpWADInjwUvbsg-j2YLyg%26s&sp=1634470926T3e82b45cffed21a7d1bc1eefa001b80dfddb786a42453c9633b1ea22aff5cac4

    @Raches
    Chinese no doubt feel uneasy when Westerners treat Japanese and Chinese with equivalency. But this almost always born out of ignorance of the history of East Asia. We do not hold this against you. But it would be useful for you to know this when you deal with people of Chinese extraction.

  378. Raches says: • Website
    @littlereddot

    Thanks, but I am not a Christian.  More inspired by Hitler.

    In reply to your other comment, I do not see Chinese and Japanese as “equivalent”—far from it; and I did not intend to come across that way.  I simply see them as having naturally aligned interests, and cultures that could and should accord each other mutual respect.  Similarly, I also think that Europeans should have harmonious diplomatic relations with both China and Japan; you would not take that to mean that I see all these peoples as “equivalent”, or somehow interchangeable.

    I am an admirer of Ron Unz’s “diagonal politics”—indeed, it may be said that diagonality is what brings me to The Unz Review.  As such, in my own application thereof (which may or may not agree with Mr. Unz’s), I urge a diagonal realignment, which will strengthen both nations.

    I should disclose to you upfront, I myself have an historical distrust of the PRC; but I do not let this blind me, and I do not see China today as China 70 years ago.  I think it’s beneficial that China rises above the historical adversity it has suffered in the past two centuries; Europeans may even take from this some inspiration as to their own current troubles, and I frankly wish that Europeans had as much mettle as Chinese students at Hohai University in December 1988!  I am not terribly fond of some of China’s domestic policies, and I may sometimes remark on this in an academic way; but I do not have the conceited American attitude of dictating to other people how to run their own countries.  Just as German domestic policy was none of America’s business in the 1930s, the question of how to govern China is properly to be answered by the Chinese.

    As to the relations between nations, this is what I see when I try to look from the Chinese perspective as much as my own:  Would not Master Sun consider it to be consummate skill at war to win without firing a shot?  I posit that cultivating a sincere, mutually respectful friendship between China and Japan, and a diplomatically negotiated settlement of their disputes, could knock down regional American influence like dominoes, to the benefit of both.  Even the other major problem-points (principally Taiwan and Korea) would have their dynamics unavoidably changed by a free and independent Japan being a Chinese ally on mutually beneficial terms, rather than Occupied Japan being an American satellite forced to serve the interests of the globalist-Internationalist empire that nuked them twice.

    Anti-Chinese Americans also understand this, which is why 狗肉和尚 preach so much about how they love Japan, how they support Japan’s freedom (!).  Or to apply Mr. Wong’s apt description, American “Mafia politics” offer a racketeer’s ‘protection’ to Japan—and do so as ‘an offer that can’t be refused’.  Chinese understand American lies; they should not fall for them, especially not when that gives America its primary base on the Pacific Rim, and gives American warmongers a big excuse for anti-Chinese agitation.  I respectfully suggest that in wisdom and justice, Chinese people should consider turning from criticizing Japan, to criticizing the continuing American conquest and occupation of Japan, which is the real problem.

    If war is the continuation of politics by other means, then the inverse is also true.  Chinese people should understand this better than most Westerners, who can match neither Clausewitz in the one nor Machiavelli in the other. ®

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  379. @Raches

    Thank you for clarifying.

    My own view on the current relations between China and Japan is that it is really secondary to that between China and the US. China understands that Japan is but a vassal, and that any substantive dealings will have to be done with the US first.

    Only when it is clear to Japan that the US relative power has declined so much that it cannot defeat China, is when Japanese attitudes will change. Any warming of relations between China and Japan will come after that.

    However there are hints that this may not be too far off. The Koreans differ from the Japanese in that they are as tenacious as badgers. The Japanese tend to defer to power when confronted. Recently the Koreans have defied the US by refusing to join the Quad anti China alliance. The Koreans know that the balance of power has shifted. I hope it is sooner rather than later that the Japanese are willing to admit the same to themselves.

  380. @Joe Wong

    You are telling a narrative that actually highlights the inferiority complex of many Chinese ethnics.

    First China and Japan war was at 663 AD, Tang Dynasty, caused by Japanese invasion of Korea.

    The Tang was a military powerhouse unmatched in world history; this was a such an insignificant affair that the they barely bothered to record it in their history. It was like a “war” between US and Panama.

    1363-1624 AD Japanese pirates ravaged Chinese coastal land.

    The Wokou 倭寇 Dwarf Pirates were up to 70 percent ethnic Chinese (and also some Koreans)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wokou#Later_wokou

    1931-1945 Japanese invasion of China.

    I can get into length about this. But a few main points–

    1. There is controversy of historical dating should be 1931 or 1937-45. From 31-37, there was a temporary truce (He-Umezu) between ROC and Japan.

    2. The Japanese never planned to invade China, its not me saying this, an American historian did

    In 1937, however, the Japanese found themselves fighting an unplanned war against China, a classic case of the wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time against the wrong enemy

    Nomonhan: Japanese-Soviet Tactical Combat, 1939
    https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a322749.pdf

    3. This is part of the Japanese perception

    While the United States sells oil and supplies to Japan, it continues to provide strong assistance to the Republic of China, and it was difficult from the beginning to continue the war in conflict with the United States in both Japan and China. Since the United States had a decisive influence on Japan and China even before the start of the war, it is believed that the Pacific War was a measure for the United States to weaken both Japan and China.

    https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/太平洋戦争#日本における評価

    • Replies: @Raches
    , @Joe Wong
  381. @antibeast

    That’s why Chiang was reluctant to commit Chinese nationalist troops to fight the IJA in Burma because Southeast Asia was none of his business.

    This is just incorrect. The Japanese invaded Burma partly to cut off the last US supply lines to China.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burma_Road

    Later on in the Chinese Civil War, Burma was for the KMT a strategic rear,
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuomintang_in_Burma

    • Replies: @antibeast
  382. @Ron Unz

    In the 16th century Toyotomi Hideyoshi planned to invade China after the conquest of Korea.

    This is correct. But there’s another side of the story.

    The PRC claims more or less Yuan (Mongol) and Qing (Manchu) borders

    View post on imgur.com

    And uses the term 中华民族 Zhonghua Minzu as a macro-ethnicity to include Han, Mongol, Manchu, Tibetan, etc.

    To an extent I don’t have a problem with this interpretation. But under Yuan, Kublai Khan attempted to invade Japan, twice.

    If PRC claims that Yuan dynasty is a proper Chinese dynasty, then logically by extension, China has attempted to invade Japan, twice during Yuan.
    <!--more-->
    Antiquity
    Xia 夏 dynasty (2070 – 1600 BC)
    Shang 商 dynasty (1600 – 1046 BC)
    Zhou 周 dynasty (1046 – 256 BC)
    Spring and Autumn 春秋 period (722 – 476 BC)
    Warring States 战国 period (476 – 221 BC)
    1st Empire
    Qin 秦 dynasty (221 – 206 BC)
    Han 汉 dynasty (206 BC – AD 220)
    Three Kingdoms 三国 (AD 220 – 280)
    Jin 晋 dynasty (AD 266 – 420)
    Northern and Southern dynasties 南北朝 (AD 420 – 589)
    2nd Empire
    Sui 隋 dynasty (AD 581 – 618)
    Tang 唐 dynasty (AD 618 – 907)
    Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms 五代十国 (AD 907 – 960)
    Song, Liao, Jin, and Western Xia dynasties 宋辽金夏 (AD 960 – 1279)
    3rd Empire
    Yuan 元 dynasty (AD 1271 – 1368)
    Ming 明 dynasty (AD 1368 – 1644)
    Qing 清 dynasty (AD 1644 – 1912)
    Modern
    Republic of China (AD 1912 – present)
    PRC (AD 1949 – present)

    • Replies: @antibeast
  383. Raches says: • Website
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Thanks for the input of differing perspectives on history.  I don’t think it’s productive, however, to accuse Chinese of an “inferiority complex” when they were the dominant regional power for ages, they hit an historical low point that collided with the modern rise of Japan and the implosion of Western civilization in World Wars, and they are in a national recovery that is objectively brilliant.  When I compare what I can see of Chinese discourse today to the propaganda that I mentioned from only about 50–70 years ago, agitprop which even included glorification of “Martin Luther King”, I am especially impressed because the West has been going further in a worse direction as China finds a better direction; and I see that the Chinese themselves have a sense of humor about this, especially about America’s cultural revolution suicide.

    The historical moment may well be ripe for a realignment in the region, as I respectfully suggest to both sides.  To effectuate this would probably require some candid discussions and debates about history, in a scholarly way and without personal animosity or insult to national honor.  Then, the only losers would be those who desperately need an ignition point for a catastrophic Third World War—a hot one.

    There are a few historical points I want to ask you about, or to inquire if you have more information—I need to dig through my notes and find something I saw years ago about Japanese scholars who were pro-China, among other matters.  Note that I undid your more-tag in another comment—thanks for the politeness; but the information is relevant, and albeit probably well-known to educated people from the East, you provided a handy key for Westerners. ®

  384. S says:

    I think there’s a lot of truth in the Japan being the Britain of the Far East hypothesis in it’s relationship with the United States.

    Interestingly, the Japanese East-Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere it attempted to create during the war, was something like the Japanese attempting to create their own independent ‘little’ British Empire in the Pacific, something which could not be tolerated by the US/UK.

    On the other hand, if after their defeat and subjugation due to WWII, the Japanese are open to becoming the Britain of the Far East, albeit under the US/UK thumb, that’s another story.

    Japan to Become Britain of the Far East

    ‘The accord between the United States and Japan calling for strengthened bilateral military and security ties – ties already reinforced by China’s military buildup, North Korea’s nuclear crisis, and the global threat of terrorism – marks the evolution of the US-Japan relationship and signals a critical historic phase in the early 21st century. With possible flashpoints ranging from the Middle East to Northeast Asia, the US global military transformation – under fire from many quarters – is transforming Japan itself into a reliable and unswerving “Britain of the Far East”.’

    https://archive.globalpolicy.org/empire/analysis/2005/0224japan.htm

  385. @littlereddot

    The Japanese tend to defer to power when confronted.

    The Chinese commander at Battle of Nanjing (1937), swore to defend the city to death, then tuck his tail and ran in the last minute, abandoning his soldiers and civilians.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tang_Shengzhi#The_general_retreat_turns_into_a_rout

    Whereas no Japanese Army unit surrendered as a unit in any theatre of WWII.

    The Supreme War Council (SWC) was still deadlocked after Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Soviet entry.

    SWC DOVES:
    Foreign Minister Togo (the leader of the doves)
    Prime Minister Admiral Suzuki (77 and very flaky)
    Navy Minister Admiral Yonai

    SWC HAWKS
    Army Minister General Anami (the leader of the hawks)
    Army Chief of Staff General Umezu
    Navy Chief of Staff Admiral Toyoda

    Until Hirohito intervenes on the part of the Doves.

    Then a coup by young hothead Army officers starts, to kill the Doves and kidnap Hirohito.

    Anami, leader of the Hawks, stops the coup. Then returned home and committed seppuku, leaving the message,

    一死以て大罪を謝し奉る 神州不滅を確信しつつ

    I—with my death—humbly apologize to the Emperor for the great crime. While convinced that Shinshu* is immortal.

    *Shinshu 神州 Deital Prefecture is a poetic term used to refer to Japan. It’s borrowed from Chinese who used it, also poetically, to refer to China.

    https://warbirdforum.com/end.htm

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  386. Raches says: • Website
    @littlereddot

    This is not to belabor the point or be overly defensive of Japan; but I don’t want anyone to misinterpret my “Thanks”.  I don’t use the Reaction as a simpleminded “Like” button.  Sometimes, I give “Thanks” when I am grateful for what I see as good-faith discussion (a rarity on the Internet!), or to comments that I think are otherwise valuable even if I partly disagree with them.

    Only when it is clear to Japan that the US relative power has declined so much that it cannot defeat China, is when Japanese attitudes will change. Any warming of relations between China and Japan will come after that.

    […] The Japanese tend to defer to power when confronted.

    This is a point that I see similarly to the Germans, although the Japanese did not suffer the extreme destruction that the Germans did.

    Please imagine the nightmare if your country were occupied under the authority of such a character as General MacArthur, who expressed a great condescension about how the Japanese must be “tamed”, and expressed what I could fairly call Christian missionary motivations.  I base this statement on U.S. official sources, which I will cite and quote in the unfinished blog post to be published at the broken link appended to the above article.

    From my discussion with some Japanese some years ago, I heard that the Japanese Teacher’s Association is very leftist, and trains Japanese children with American types of ideas.  I don’t think it can be a total coincidence that the country is still, in fact, under military occupation, similarly to Germany.

    The Japanese confronted the Americans in WWII.  Their loss was tied to their principal European ally’s loss in an overwhelming two-front war between US-USSR.  They were subjected to the only acts of nuclear terrorism that have ever yet occurred in history; and they thereafter had before their eyes the extreme brutality that befell the Germans, which could also have been meted to them.  They did not entirely escape from such measures, some of which I believe were simply an American show to balance out the image of what the whole world could see was done to Germany.

    I said somewhere earlier, I think that this post-1945 era is Japan’s “Century of Humiliation”.  Surely, it is a position that Chinese can understand.  I don’t see it as derogatory to the Japanese character. ®

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  387. @Anonymous

    There is a side of the German mentality for better or worse, that still exists. I can’t remember where or who it originated from but well expressed by the saying, The French control the land, the British control the seas and the Germans control the clouds.

    • Replies: @Raches
  388. @Raches

    Thanks, but I am not a Christian. More inspired by Hitler.

    I cannot let this go by, as it epitomizes the disaster that people like you (those I earlier characterized as “wannabe Nazis’ although not meaning uniform-wearing by that appellation) do to the reputation of Hitler and the National-Socialist period in Germany.

    I’m not wanting to be antagonistic or create enemies from friends, but TRUTH is essential and you’re confusing it. What is it about Hitler that inspires you? Have you just taken up Hitler as a way to give yourself some identity that you felt you did not have. You revealed in this thread (thank you) that you live in Australia, and formerly had identified as a Jew and a Zionist.

    Comment #352 From there, it is only a few short steps to having militant Zionism fulfill my latent craving for a group identity—to be no longer an individual atom floating in an anthropoid sea, to be a part of something bigger than myself, to have “my people”. 

    I strive to put myself in the shoes of a German today.

    But who understands how a German must feel, based on real events that he is forbidden even to speak about?  I try, as best I can.

    Why are you trying? What is your relationship? If you want people to engage with your blog articles, they have a right to answers such as that. I’m more than willing to be sympathetic, but so far I think that what you know about Adolf Hitler & N-S Germany I could put in a teacup. Unless you’re really just about China and the far east, which is Ron Unz’s ultimate interest.

    • Replies: @Raches
  389. @Raches

    See my response to you on AK’s blog
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/last-reaction/#comment-4959253

    I don’t think it’s productive, however, to accuse Chinese of an “inferiority complex” when they were the dominant regional power for ages

    There is an element of this. As many Chinese perceived the Japanese to look down on them, who are both in turn looked down upon by whites. The Chinese themselves in turn then look down on Indians, Vietnamese etc., the same thing that they accuse the Japanese of doing.

    Japanese scholars who were pro-China

    Yes there are exhaustive examples. If you simple search for my comment history for “Japan” you will see that much my efforts here is to highlight this.

    To begin with, there’s this one here,

    Japan and Its East Asian Neighbors: Japan’s Perception of China and Korea and the Making of Foreign Policy From the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century
    By Norihito Mizuno

    I contend, however, that the Ryukyu-Taiwan policy, motivated by their concerns over national prestige and security in the Western-dominated international environment, did not come out of Meiji Japan’s desire to encroach upon and antagonize China.

    Inoue Kiyoshi has for example contrasted Modern Japan’s attitudes toward China as seventy years of aggression with two thousand years of friendship.

    My comment 37 states that the Japanese helped the Han Chinese overthrow the Manchus, further background here
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-black-muslim-capitol-cop-killer/#comment-4572114

    View post on imgur.com


    Chiang Kai-shek with Black Dragon Society members and founder Tōyama Mitsuru (center), 1929

    • Thanks: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  390. Raches says: • Website
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    There is a side of the German mentality for better or worse, that still exists.  I can’t remember where or who it originated from but well expressed by the saying, The French control the land, the British control the seas and the Germans control the clouds.

    Although Nietzsche infamously, lamentably did not get along with his fellow Germans, I really need to point out how exquisitely German he was, despite all his own protestations:

    I want to have goblins about me, for I am courageous.  The courage which scareth away ghosts, createth for itself goblins—it wanteth to laugh.

    I no longer feel in common with you; the very cloud which I see beneath me, the blackness and heaviness at which I laugh—that is your thundercloud.

    Ye look aloft when ye long for exaltation; and I look downward because I am exalted.

    Who among you can at the same time laugh and be exalted?

    He who climbeth on the highest mountains, laugheth at all tragic plays and tragic realities.

    Since there are Germans here, I will quote Nietzsche’s famously poetic German:

    Ich will Kobolde um mich haben, denn ich bin mutig.  Mut, der die Gespenster verscheucht, schafft sich selber Kobolde,—der Mut will lachen.

    Ich empfinde nicht mehr mit euch: diese Wolke, die ich unter mir sehe, diese Schwärze und Schwere, über die ich lache—gerade das ist eure Gewitterwolke.

    Ihr seht nach oben, wenn ihr nach Erhebung verlangt.  Und ich sehe hinab, weil ich erhoben bin.

    Wer von euch kann zugleich lachen und erhoben sein?

    Wer auf den höchsten Bergen steigt, der lacht über alle Trauer-Spiele und Trauer-Ernste.

    Speaking of which, Anonymous German:

    “Für die Töchter, für die Söhne, für das Wahre, Gute, Schöne”

    I must admit, I have watched your video more times than I care to admit.  I also intend to blog about it.  It must drive the German-haters crazy that no matter how badly your nation is wrecked, no matter how you are fired with justified wrath, you still love cute kittens and cute puppies.  Hail the indomitable German spirit. ®

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  391. Raches says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Factual corrections first.  I will write another reply to you later (maybe more than one), more at length when time permits, about how I see the Germans; that is largely topical here, and will place my discussion of that subject in proper context with others that I discuss.

    You revealed in this thread (thank you) that you live in Australia, and formerly had identified as a Jew and a Zionist.

    (1) I did not say where I live.  I don’t know where you get this.  I neither admit nor deny that I live in Australia, which I have not said.

    (2) Contrary to what you allege, in this thread, I explicitly said, “Of course, I knew that I was not a Jew; I was always almost-but-not-quite accepted.”  I have never identified myself as a Jew.  When I was a Zionist, I explicitly saw Jewishness as an ethnic matter; given how many self-identified Jews are atheists or otherwise “nonobservant”, I was never dumb enough (beyond my childhood) to fall for the notion that Jewishness is only a religious belief.  The far-right secular Israelis who got me into Zionism had a thinly-veiled general racism towards all Gentiles—some more, some less; and they encouraged my own racist tendencies.  Thus, it is unsurprising that I would see all of this in terms of heredity.

    To the best of my knowledge (viz., without such extremely detailed, resource-intensive genealogical investigation as Hitler h