The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
US On Road to Third World
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

On January 6, 2004, Senator Charles Schumer and I challenged the erroneous idea that jobs offshoring was free trade in a New York Times op-ed. Our article so astounded economists that within a few days Schumer and I were summoned to a Brookings Institution conference in Washington, DC, to explain our heresy. In the nationally televised conference, I declared that the consequence of jobs offshoring would be that the US would be a Third World country in 20 years.

That was 11 years ago, and the US is on course to descend to Third World status before the remaining 9 years of my prediction have expired.

The evidence is everywhere. In September the US Bureau of the Census released its report on US household income by quintile. Every quintile, as well as the top 5%, has experienced a decline in real household income since their peaks. The bottom quintile (lower 20 percent) has had a 17.1% decline in real income from the 1999 peak (from $14,092 to $11,676). The 4th quintine has had a 10.8% fall in real income since 2000 (from $34,863 to $31,087). The middle quintile has had a 6.9% decline in real income since 2000 (from $58,058 to $54,041). The 2nd quintile has had a 2.8% fall in real income since 2007 (from $90,331 to $87,834). The top quintile has had a decline in real income since 2006 of 1.7% (from $197,466 to $194,053). The top 5% has experienced a 4.8% reduction in real income since 2006 (from $349,215 to $332,347). Only the top One Percent or less (mainly the 0.1%) has experienced growth in income and wealth.

The Census Bureau uses official measures of inflation to arrive at real income. These measures are understated. If more accurate measures of inflation are used (such as those available from, the declines in real household income are larger and have been decling for a longer period. Some measures show real median annual household income below levels of the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Note that these declines have occurred during an alleged six-year economic recovery from 2009 to the current time, and during a period when the labor force was shrinking due to a sustained decline in the labor force participation rate. On April 3, 2015 the US Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that 93,175,000 Americans of working age are not in the work force, a historical record. Normally, an economic recovery is marked by a rise in the labor force participation rate. John Williams reports that when discouraged workers are included among the measure of the unemployed, the US unemployment rate is currently 23%, not the 5.2% reported figure.

In a recently released report, the Social Security Administration provides annual income data on an individual basis. Are you ready for this?

In 2014 38% of all American workers made less than $20,000; 51% made less than $30,000; 63% made less than $40,000; and 72% made less than $50,000.

The scarcity of jobs and the low pay are direct consequences of jobs offshoring. Under pressure from “shareholder advocates” (Wall Street) and large retailers, US manufacturing companies moved their manufacturing abroad to countries where the rock bottom price of labor results in a rise in corporate profits, executive “performance bonuses,” and stock prices.

The departure of well-paid US manufacturing jobs was soon followed by the departure of software engineering, IT, and other professional service jobs.

Incompetent economic studies by careless economists, such as Michael Porter at Harvard and Matthew Slaughter at Dartmouth, concluded that the gift of vast numbers of US high productivity, high value-added jobs to foreign countries was a great benefit to the US economy.

In articles and books I challenged this absurd conclusion, and all of the economic evidence proves that I am correct. The promised better jobs that the “New Economy” would create to replace the jobs gifted to foreigners have never appeared. Instead, the economy creates lowly-paid part-time jobs, such as waitresses, bartenders, retail clerks, and ambulatory health care services, while full-time jobs with benefits continue to shrink as a percentage of total jobs.

These part-time jobs do not provide enough income to form a household. Consequently, as a Federal Reserve study reports, “Nationally, nearly half of 25-year-olds lived with their parents in 2012-2013, up from just over 25% in 1999.”

When half of 25-year olds cannot form households, the market for houses and home furnishings collapses.

Finance is the only sector of the US economy that is growing. The financial industry’s share of GDP has risen from less than 4% in 1960 to about 8% today. As Michael Hudson has shown, finance is not a productive activity. It is a looting activity (Killing The Host).

Moreover, extraordinary financial concentration and reckless risk and debt leverage have made the financial sector a grave threat to the economy.

The absence of growth in real consumer income means that there is no growth in aggregate demand to drive the economy. Consumer indebtedness limits the ability of consumers to expand their spending with credit. These spending limits on consumers mean that new investment has limited appeal to businesses. The economy simply cannot go anywhere, except down as businesses continue to lower their costs by substituting part-time jobs for full-time jobs and by substituting foreign for domestic workers. Government at every level is over-indebted, and quantitative easing has over-supplied the US currency.

This is not the end of the story. When manufacturing jobs depart, research, development, design, and innovation follow. An economy that doesn’t make things does not innovate. The entire economy is lost, not merely the supply chains.

The economic and social infrastructure is collapsing, including the family itself, the rule of law, and the accountability of government.

When college graduates can’t find employment because their jobs have been offshored or given to foreigners on work visas, the demand for college education declines. To become indebted only to find employment that cannot service student loans becomes a bad economic decision.


We already have the situation where college and university administrations spend 75% of the university’s budget on themselves, hiring adjuncts to teach the classes for a few thousand dollars. The demand for full time faculty with a career before them has collapsed. When the consequences of putting short-term corporate profits before jobs for Americans fully hit, the demand for university education will collapse and with it American science and technology.

The collapse of the Soviet Union was the worst thing that ever happened to the United States. The two main consequences of the Soviet collapse have been devastating. One consequence was the rise of the neoconservative hubris of US world hegemony, which has resulted in 14 years of wars that have cost $6 trillion. The other consequence was a change of mind in socialist India and communist China, large countries that responded to “the end of history” by opening their vast under-utilized labor forces to Western capital, which resulted in the American economic decline that this article describes, leaving a struggling economy to bear the enormous war debt.

It is a reasonable conclusion that a social-political-economic system so incompetently run already is a Third World country.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Economics • Tags: Free Trade 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. MarkinLA says:

    Too bad you weren’t saying this in 1992. I do remember people saying NAFTA was all about Canadian resources, Mexican labor, and American capital then. I don’t give credit for being 12 years too late.

  2. Guy says:

    Isn’t that asshole the one who is further popularizing attacks on our gun rights?

    Gun control weakens the white native born population of the US against invaders, and you support him?

    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
  3. Macilrae says:

    Loss of manufacturing jobs is an immediate and lamentable consequence which could, in theory, be remedied in the relatively short-term if those jobs were repatriated. However each factory reopened requires an army of specialists to establish and to run it – and the problem is now that the necessary people no longer exist. Universities are meanwhile turning out graduates in “Gender Studies”, “Media Studies”, Economics, Political Science and Psychology – all of which we need about as much as a hole in the head; and, in any event, few professors have the background required to train the needed people. “Manufacturing” is not considered to be a “strategic” discipline among academics.

    It would take ten years for a competitive US manufacturing sector to become re-established and the desperately needed jobs to open up.

    • Replies: @Jim
  4. Eustace Tilley (not) [AKA "Schiller/Nietzsche"] says:

    Dear Traitor:

    Too bad you never learned how to think.

    Just because Roberts agrees with Schumer on trade issues doesn’t mean he agrees with him on Second Amendment issues. In fact, Roberts disagrees with Schumer on these issues.

    If you have been paying attention, it stands to reason that the People would need to protect themselves from a bankrupt, dictatorial, dysfunctional federal government — exactly as the Founding Fathers had feared. And this is also Roberts’ position.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  5. Jim says:

    The declining population percentage of white Americans with an average IQ of 102 and the rising percetage of mestizos with an average IQ about two-thirds of a standard deviation less is also contributing to the economic deline of the US.

    • Replies: @Macilrae
  6. David says:

    …were summoned to… Washington… to explain our heresy… nationally televised… I declared…

    Mehitabel, is that you?

    Dylan declared something similar ten years earlier:

    Well, you know, lots of people complainin’ that there is no work
    I say, “Why you say that for
    When nothin’ you got is U.S.–made?”
    They don’t make nothin’ here no more
    You know, capitalism is above the law
    It say, “It don’t count ’less it sells”
    When it costs too much to build it at home
    You just build it cheaper someplace else

    Well, it’s sundown on the union
    And what’s made in the U.S.A.
    Sure was a good idea
    ’Til greed got in the way

  7. @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Schumer is also a notorious Israel-Firster, and I’m sure Roberts disagrees with him on that.

  8. Macilrae says:

    Although we would be correct to state that low offshore wages has been an important consideration in propelling the flight of manufacturing offshore, it is likely not to be the main one. Unstated for the most part but undeniable is the fact that factory workers in Western countries have become increasingly difficult to handle: bad attitude, laziness, tardiness, absenteeism, constant demands for better working conditions and enormous benefit packages (all hugely encouraged by the unions) have made the plant manager’s job a misery. The recent article by Fred Reed (published here) “Wimp Nation: Poised to Fall” accurately depicts what has happened, not only in the USA but in many other formerly prosperous countries.

    All of these problems pretty well vanish when dealing with Chinese workers but, of course, there we are seeing the pendulum which regulates individual prosperity at the opposite end of its swing.

  9. Jason says:

    Trade policies won’t make or break a country. And it sure won’t move a country from first world status to third world.

    White countries have gotten rich with free trade and with protectionism.

    ONLY racial changes will move a White country to the bottom. And it will do so permanently.

    PCR should know that.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  10. Corvinus says:

    I always thoroughly enjoy these Chicken Little pronouncements. Indeed, several economic indicators demonstrate that the United States is financially in a tailspin. However, this metric that I provide is irrefutable evidence that America is NOT even remotely close to Third World status.

    “ONLY racial changes will move a White country to the bottom. And it will do so permanently.”

    Please define “white country”.

  11. I am amazed that there are so few comments in regard to this column. Does anyone understand what Dr. Roberts is saying? Is everybody in denial?

  12. MarkinLA says:

    Trade policies won’t make or break a country.

    No but it will sure create a lot of unemployment which creates a lot of social problems.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS