The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
Truth Is Washington’s Enemy
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

US Representative Ed Royce (R, CA) is busy at work destroying the possibility of truth being spoken in the US. On April 15 at a hearing before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs of which Royce is chairman, Royce made use of two minor presstitutes to help him redefine all who take exception to Washington’s lies as “threats” who belong to a deranged pro-Russian propaganda cult.

Washington’s problem is that whereas Washington controls the print and TV media in the US and its vassal states in Europe, Canada, Australia, Ukraine, and Japan, Washington does not control Internet sites, such as this one, or media, such as RT, of non-vassal states. Consequently, Washington’s lies are subject to challenge, and as people lose confidence in Western print and TV media because of the propaganda content, Washington’s agendas, which depend on lies, are experiencing rougher sledding.

Truth is bubbling up through Washington’s propaganda. Confronted with the possibility of a loss of control over every explanation, Hillary Clinton, Ed Royce, and the rest are suddenly complaining that Washington is “losing the information war.” Huge sums of taxpayers’ hard earned money will now be used to combat the truth with lies.

What to do? How to suppress truth with lies in order to remain in control? The answer says Andrew Lack, Royce, et alia, is to redefine a truth-teller as a terrorist. Thus, the comparison of RT and “dissident” Internet bloggers to the Islamist State and the designated terror group, Boko Haram.

Royce expanded the definition of terrorist to include dissident bloggers, such as Chris Hedges, John Pilger, Glenn Greenwald and the rest of us, who object to the false reality that Washington creates in order to serve undeclared agendas. For example, if Washington wants to pour profits into the military/security complex in exchange for political campaign contributions, the politicians cannot say that. Instead, they claim to protect America from a dangerous enemy or from weapons of mass destruction by starting a war. If politicians want to advance American financial or energy imperialism, they have to do so in the name of “bringing freedom and democracy.” If the politicians want to prevent the rise of other countries, such as Russia, President Obama has to depict Russia as a threat comparable to the Ebola virus and the Islamist State.

Noam Chomsky summed it up when he said that Washington regards any information that does not repeat Washington’s propaganda to be intolerable.

Washington’s assault on truth as a threat helps to make sense of the gigantic National Security Agency spy system exposed by William Binney and Edward Snowden. One of the purposes of the spy network is to identify all “dissidents” who challenge Big Brother’s “Truth.”


There is, or will be, a dossier on every “dissident” with all of the dissident’s emails, Internet searches, websites visited, phone calls, purchases, travels. The vast amount of information on each dissident can be combed for whatever can be taken out of context to make a case against him, if a case is even needed. Washington has already successfully asserted its power over the Constitution to indefinitely detain without charges and to torture and to murder US citizens.

It was a couple of years ago that Janet Napolitano, head of Homeland Security, said that the department’s focus had shifted from terrorists to domestic extremists. Lumped into the category of domestic extremists are environmental activists, animal rights activists, anti-war activists which includes disillusioned war veterans, and people who believe in states’ rights, limited government and accountable government. Consequently, many dissidents, America’s best citizens, will qualify as domestic extremists on several accounts. Chris Hedges, for example, is an advocate for animals (see ) as well as concerned about the environment and Washington’s never-ending wars.

The spying and the coming crackdown on “dissidents” might also explain the \$385 million federal contract awarded to a subsidiary of Dick Cheney’s firm, Halliburton, to build detention camps in the US. Few seem to be concerned with who the camps are to detain. There is no media or congressional investigation. It seems unlikely that the camps are for hurricane or forest fire evacuees. Concentration camps are usually for people regarded as unreliable. And as Lack, Royce, et alia have made clear, unreliable people are those who do not support Washington’s lies.

A perceived need by Washington, and the private power structure that Washington serves, to protect themselves from truth could also be the reason for the very strange military exercises in various of the states to infiltrate, occupy, and round-up “threats” among the civilian population. (see h ttp:// ) Even the presstitute CNN reported that the National Guard troops sent to Ferguson, Missouri, were programmed to view the civilian protesters as “enemy forces” and “adversaries,” and we know that the state and local militarized police are trained to view US citizens as threats.

As far as I can discern, not many Americans, whether Democrat or Republican, liberal, conservative, or super-patriot, educated or not, understand that Washington with the cooperation of its presstitute media has defined truth as a threat. In Washington’s opinion, truth is a greater threat than Ebola, Russia, China, terrorism, and the Islamic State combined.

A government that cannot survive truth and must resort to stamping out truth is not a government that any country wants. But such an undesirable government is the government that Clinton-Bush-Cheney-Obama-Hillary-Lack-Royce have given us.

Does it satisfy you? Are you content that in your name and with taxes on your hard-earned and increasingly scarce earnings, Washington in the 21st century has murdered, maimed, and displaced millions of peoples in eight countries, has set America on the path to war with Russia and China, and has declared truth to be an enemy of the state?

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Media 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The world isn’t deceived by Washington, District of Corruption’s bullshit. Thus, D.C.’s desperate efforts to control the narrative. . . .

  2. Renoman says:

    Time for new masters. There is good money in the truth, building new energy infrastructure, spending money on Families and the Environment. Take two air craft carriers, string a big net between them and clean up all the plastic in the Ocean gyres, sell more medicine and less guns, fix up America and leave the rest of the World alone for a change. The only people hurt by these things are a handful of billionaires and all you need to do is make them heroes and they’ll back down.
    Rape, pillage and burn is the old school way of making money, time for a change. The voters will love it, the politicians will have new chains on them and people will be busy working. People not working is a huge problem, idle minds Devil’s playground etc.
    If America can make itself look like a shining light instead of wicked Uncle Ernie the money will come.
    There, I told ya how to fix it now Git ta work!

  3. Wally [AKA "BobbyBeGood"] says: • Website

    What we’re seeing is some of the underlying reasons for staging the 9/11 “terrorist” attacks.

    Ultimately 9/11 is the foundation from which all this arises, all explanations revert to ‘Remember 9/11’.

    It has provided the convenient and unchallengeable excuse for labeling anything that the US and the Israeli governments (one and the same) do not like as being “terrorist, terrorist inspired”, etc.

    Staged 9/11 provides the rationale for censoring free speech & free inquiry, seizing control of the internet.

    The impossible as claimed 9/11 has set in motion a security industry which knows no limits to it’s contrived “threats”. Very profitable.

    Anything and everything can now be defined as a “threat” or any site can be labeled a potential terrorist target”. Very profitable. Funding & more funding.

    so essentially:

    – The government’s laughable & impossible 9/11 conspiracy theory is what drives US / Israeli policies.

    – ‘9/11’ has been an immensely profitable scam for various players in the US and Israel.

    – ‘9/11’ provides excuses for our disastrous & mass murdering foreign policy of both the US & Israel.

    – ‘9/11’ provides excuses for the theft of our constitutional rights.

    – ‘9/11’ provides excuses for the enormous & continuous increase in government power.

    Yet the US govt. cannot change laws of physics, the government’s bizarre conspiracy theory is impossible.

    And it’s an established scientific fact that military grade nano-thermite was used in the 9/11 attack.

    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
  4. @Wally

    And it’s an established scientific fact that military grade nano-thermite was used in the 9/11 attack.

    Interesting. A single scientific paper published on the topic — published, by the way, in a ninth-rate, non-peer-reviewed journal — makes this claim, and you buy it. Seventy years of historical examination of the Holocaust, but that’s just a load of BS. Good thing you’re consistent.

    • Replies: @Wally
  5. Wally [AKA "BobbyBeGood"] says: • Website
    @Andrew E. Mathis

    As usual, hasbara troll Andrew Mathis blatantly lies.

    The finding of nano-thermite is a proven fact as stated by the US Geological Survey.

    Not only do I buy it, but so do thousands of architects & engineers.
    for much more see:

    Your subject change to the scientifically impossible ‘holocaust’ is noted, yet doesn’t serve your interests well.

    This is a great example:
    ‘laughable alleged “mass graves” according to T. Darwin / Andrew Mathis’

    For those who accept science over religion & propaganda this is for you:
    ‘Cyanide Chemistry at Auschwitz’


    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
  6. @Wally

    As usual, hasbara troll Andrew Mathis blatantly lies.

    And that, my friends, is called projection.

    The finding of nano-thermite is a proven fact as stated by the US Geological Survey.

    You have a source for this USGS report? Of course not.


    Not only do I buy it, but so do thousands of architects & engineers.
    for much more see:

    Sorry, big buy, but how about a coffee alert next time, eh? First, point out the actual civil engineers on that list. Next, tell me their professional associations and their most recent publications. The mere holding of an engineering degree doesn’t make one an expert on controlled demolition, any more than having a history degree makes one an expert on history — just ask Mark Weber.

    Your subject change to the scientifically impossible ‘holocaust’ is noted, yet doesn’t serve your interests well.

    Really? Your stubborn refusal to debate the issues anywhere but at CODOH, where, as is well known, you personally control the “debate,” is noted.

    My posts get sequestered — by you — sometimes for days. I have you by the short hairs on the euthanasia program, and you know it, which is why you duck like a coward and refuse to respond to my Holocaust posts here. It’s downright girlish.

    This is a great example:
    ‘laughable alleged “mass graves” according to T. Darwin / Andrew Mathis’

    Yeah. Amazing how that “Moderator,” and “Hannover” (Jonnie Hargis) and “BobbyBeGood” all have the same posting style.

    For those who accept science over religion & propaganda this is for you:
    ‘Cyanide Chemistry at Auschwitz’

    Absolutely! Just don’t try to oppose the almighty Hannover!

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS