The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
The Financial System Is A Larger Threat Than Terrorism
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In the 21st century Americans have been distracted by the hyper-expensive “war on terror.” Trillions of dollars have been added to the taxpayers’ burden and many billions of dollars in profits to the military/security complex in order to combat insignificant foreign “threats,” such as the Taliban, that remain undefeated after 15 years. All this time the financial system, working hand-in-hand with policymakers, has done more damage to Americans than terrorists could possibly inflict.

The purpose of the Federal Reserve and US Treasury’s policy of zero interest rates is to support the prices of the over-leveraged and fraudalent financial instruments that unregulated financial systems always create. If inflation was properly measured, these zero rates would be negative rates, which means not only that retirees have no income from their retirement savings but also that saving is a losing proposition. Instead of earning interest on your savings, you pay interest that shrinks the real value of your saving.

Central banks, neoliberal economists, and the presstitute financial media advocate negative interest rates in order to force people to spend instead of save. The notion is that the economy’s poor economic performance is not due to the failure of economic policy but to people hoarding their money. The Federal Reserve and its coterie of economists and presstitutes maintain the fiction of too much savings despite the publication of the Federal Reserve’s own report that 52% of Americans cannot raise $400 without selling personal possessions or borrowing the money.

Negative interest rates, which have been introduced in some countries such as Switzerland and threatened in other countries, have caused people to avoid the tax on bank deposits by withdrawing their savings from banks in large denomination bills. In Switzerland, for example, demand for the 1,000 franc bill (about $1,000) has increased sharply. These large denomination bills now account for 60% of the Swiss currency in circulation.

The response of depositors to negative interest rates has resulted in neoliberal economists, such as Larry Summers, calling for the elimination of large denomination bank notes in order to make it difficult for people to keep their cash balances outside of banks.

Other neoliberal economists, such as Kenneth Rogoff want to eliminate cash altogether and have only electronic money. Electronic money cannot be removed from bank deposits except by spending it. With electronic money as the only money, financial institutions can use negative interest rates in order to steal the savings of their depositors.

People would attempt to resort to gold, silver, and forms of private money, but other methods of payment and saving would be banned, and government would conduct sting operations in order to suppress evasions of electronic money with stiff penalties.

What this picture shows is that government, economists, and presstitutes are allied against citizens achieving any financial independence from personal saving. Policymakers have a crackpot economic policy and those with control over your life value their scheme more than they value your welfare.


This is the fate of people in the so-called democracies. Any remaining control that they have over their lives is being taken away. Governments serve a few powerful interest groups whose agendas result in the destruction of the host economies. The offshoring of middle class jobs transfers income and wealth from the middle class to the executives and owners of the corporation, but it also kills the domestic consumer market for the offshored goods and services. As Michael Hudson writes, it kills the host. The financialization of the economy also kills the host and the owners of corporations as well. When corporate executives borrow from banks in order to boost share prices and their performance bonuses by buying back the publicly held stock of the corporations, future profits are converted into interest payments to banks. The future income streams of the corporations are financialized. If the future income streams fail, the companies can be foreclosed, like homeowners, and the banks become the owners of the corporations.

Between the offshoring of jobs and the conversion of more and more income streams into payments to banks, less and less is available to be spent on goods and services. Thus, the economy fails to grow and falls into long-term decline. Today many Americans can only pay the minimum payment on their credit card balance. The result is massive growth in a balance that can never be paid off. It is these people who are the least able to service debt who are hit with draconian charges. The way the credit card companies have it now, if you make one late payment or your payment is returned by your bank, you are hit for the next six months with a Penalty Annual Percentage Rate of 29.49%.

In Europe entire countries are being foreclosed. Greece and Portugal have been forced into liquidation of national assets and the social security systems. So many women have been forced into poverty and prostitution that the hourly price of a prostitute has been driven down to $4.12.

Throughout the Western world the financial system has become an exploiter of the people and a deadweight loss on economies. There are only two possible solutions. One is to break the large banks up into smaller and local entities such as existed prior to the concentration that deregulation fostered. The other is to nationalize them and operate them solely in the interest of the general welfare of the population.

The banks are too powerful currently for either solution to occur. But the greed, fraud, and self-serving behavior of Western financial systems, aided and abeted by governments, could be leading to such a breakdown of economic life that the idea of a private financial system will become as abhorent in the future as Nazism is today.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Economics • Tags: Unemployment, Wall Street 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. When corporate executives borrow from banks in order to boost share prices and their performance bonuses by buying back the publicly held stock of the corporations, future profits are converted into interest payments to banks. ,The future income streams of the corporations are financialized.

    I probably would not have connected this last dot. Which is why it is always good to read PCR.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  2. MarkinLA says:

    Yes but the screwy tax laws make the interest deductible so they are also lowering their tax liability. The big problem is that many of these buybacks are simply a cover for the stock options granted to the executives. Give out 2 million options on stock, buy 2 million shares on the open market.

    No dilution as far as the existing shareholders see, but they get the shaft.

  3. Investors dismayed by the low rates offered on bank deposits can purchase dividend aristocrats instead. Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, or Exxon Mobil are better than any bank account.

    Those who are unwilling or unable to purchase individual stocks can buy SPY.

    Those planning on being dead soon (retirees–aka losers) should purchase tax-free municipal and state bonds to enjoy a tax-equivalent yield of 4-5%. This is equivalent to what one could get on a bank deposit in the not too distant past. The risk factor is higher since bond prices can decline and entities can default, but hey it’s income.

    Your description of the impact of debt-financed stock repurchases (and many are financed out of earnings) is rather silly. With interest rates as low as they’ve ever been, the interest payments going to banks (most public corporations issue bonds, more realistically we’re talking bond funds, pension funds, and insurers) are small in relation to cashflow. And interest can be deducted from corporate income taxes. By retiring the number of shares outstanding, earnings per share goes up.

    So the downsides have nothing at all to do with interest payments to banks or “financialization”, whatever that means (everything is owned by somebody…). The downsides are rather:

    1) Repurchasing shares rather than investing future production will limit future earnings growth (not to mention America’s future GDP growth)
    2) Corporations tend to do a poor job timing stock repurchases and act more or less like retail investor suckers who buy at the top and sell at the bottom
    3) Some corporations will over-leverage their balance sheets and expose themselves to severe downside risk; if enough companies do so it creates systemic risk

    Nothing to do with interest payments.

    Even if we accept John Williams’ shadow inflation rate, inflation remains considerably lower than when you worked in the Reagan Administration. And this rate can be outpaced easily with a portfolio of blue chip stocks.

    The real losers of today’s monetary policy isn’t savers (the vast majority of Americans who don’t live paycheck to paycheck invest in the secondary securities markets) but pension funds and insurers.

    Current monetary policy is a failure because new reserves are only created with new borrowers. Low rates by themselves cannot induce people to borrow or invest. Efforts to create inflation fail because QE is merely an asset swap and if anything is mildly deflationary since cash doesn’t pay a return. As most bond holders are institutional investors, the cash simply goes into risk assets which is why stocks are so high right now.

    I am with you 100% on trade, privatization, and austerity.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS