RSS
On the basis of secret evidence, a UK inquiry under orders from Washington decided that the death ten years ago of a low level spy was “probably” ordered by President Putin of Russia. There is no motive whatsoever for Putin to have been concerned with the dead spy, Litvinenko. He was of no consequence or threat to Russia.
Probably, Litvinenko’s death was due to the fact that he was engaged in the smuggling of nuclear materials and accidently poisoned himself.
What these unsubstantiated attacks on the President of Russia are doing is elevating Russia. The non Anglo-Zionist world, which is the largest part of humanity, has lost confidence in the veracity of the West. The Western media, a collection of prostitutes, is in such lock-step mindless compliance with the anti-Russian agenda that the most implausible accusations against President Putin are reported as if they were proven fact.
Western news organizations, such as the BBC and the New York Times, once respected news organizations, are now widely regarded as government propaganda organizations that lie for their living.
Here is the report of a person who used to believe the lie until he looked into the case.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/today-assumed-putins-russia-killed-litvinenko-looked.html
As I wrote recently, all they do is to lie to us. Lies are the West’s principle weapon. As the lies wear out, the West is exposed as a liar that never can be believed about anything.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
The UK is not a serious country anymore. Who cares what they say?
The puzzling happenstance is that the ordinariness of blatant lying has become redolent of late Soviet mendacity, which had also reached extraordinary levels.
Conspiracy theorizing has become official propaganda.
The puzzling happenstance is that the ordinariness of blatant lying has become redolent of late Soviet mendacity, which had also reached extraordinary levels.
“On the basis of secret evidence, a UK inquiry under orders from Washington decided that the death ten years ago of a low level spy was “probably” ordered by President Putin of Russia.”
This is outrageous. Normally, formal inquiries in Commonwealth countries will only say if someone is or isn’t responsible for something. They don’t go around making probabilistic statements like so and so “probably did it.” Especially if the evidence for this claim isn’t released to the public.
Imagine if the media went around saying so and so “probably did it” everytime they reported on a court case where the accused was let off because of lack of clear evidence. Dodgy stuff.
Litvinenko publicised a claim that Putin is a child molester along with a video showing him behaving rather peculiarly with a little boy. So someone in the Russia secret services got a their poison of choice (Polonium) out of the secure state repository and used about 13 million quids worth to kill Litvinenko. They left a trail like an elephant in six feet of snow. Putin probably did not order it, but he is the leader and he should keep his dogs on a tighter reign.
“Probably” we should be more careful how we throw around this word around – particularly if you are a distinguished judge or respected economist – in either case where is the evidence?
Dear Mr Roberts,
So true.
But for arguments sake, perhaps we can reconsider using the designation of “The West”, to ascribe this foul and disingenuous behavior emanating from it ?
Maybe we should consider calling it “what the West once was” or can be again…. once the Neocons are safely remaindered to Guantanamo Bay ?
Nothing these people are doing stand for the West that I grew up in. Nothing they are doing represents me, and I am nothing if not a man of the “West”.
It would make millions of us “Westerners” feel a heck of a lot better, if those who have hijacked our good name, and used it for the” evil” they wish to commit, were held to account for their fraudulent behavior without denigrating us.
Good to get a confirmation of the Hasbara involvement in this stupid propaganda story as well. The old quip: “do not believe anything until it is officially denied”, has been transformed into: “understand everything when Hasbara, such as Shaun, repeats it”. Putin is the biggest bone in the throats of just your Ziocon Nazis of the Anglo-Zionist establishment, so it would have been expected that your guys would have produced another “probabilistic” story of Putin’s guilt. Through tons of mud (bull manure) the Putin’s way and hope that some of it sticks. In reality, you are just making more and more people wake up to your Israeli propaganda.
Here is a nice summary comment from a US guy on another zine:
From popular culture to finance, “Western” appears largely synonymous with “sham” or “fraud”.
My addition: most of sham and fraud in the West comes from the Anglo-Zionists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3411766/Litvinenko-claimed-Putin-caught-film-having-sex-boys.html
There is an undisputed incident of Putin behaving oddly with a little boy as anyone can see for themselves How did Israel fake that?
Anyway, there are as many Palestinians fighting against Assad Junior and Putin as for him.
Let’s rather talk about how your liver-chomping pets are taking a beating in Syria, idiot.
Are you suggesting that Putin kissing the boy’s stomach at some public function was sexual? I didn’t think it was sexual at all. It just seemed like a cultural thing.
The essential point is Litvinenko used it to allege Putin is a known child molester and Litvinenko’s former FSB comrades used that law authorising assassinations to do what they have longed to to do and poisoned him. I very much doubt Putin is a paedo or the British know enough about the inside workings of the Kremlin to draw the conclusion Putin ordered the assassination. But he should keep his brainless goon squad on a shorter leash, because this has damaged Russia.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7cadf3f6-c403-11e5-808f-8231cd71622e.html#ixzz3ySwiE9SG
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Front_of_the_Free_Syrian_Army
The Southern Front are US backed and controlled from Jordan. With Russia’s bombardments, Assad is eliminating the Southern front of the FSA in Daraa
closer and closer to the borders of Jordan and creating a vacuum that ISIS can fill. Destabilisation of the region will offer a golden opportunity
Robert Locke in 2003
Things are shaping up nicely.
I don’t see the connection between van Creveld’s and Locke’s articles.
What van Creveld describes is expulsion in the fog of war and destabilization in the Mideast, while Locke proposes overt ethnic cleansing in an organized fashion under normal conditions and circumstances. The latter would not go unnoticed and fail to attract attention from the outside world, especially with civil disobedience and violence most certainly to be involved. It’s also highly unlikely that the US would simply be able to stand idly by with mere token displays of disapproval, especially when the Arabs and others start appealing to other countries:
https://www.rt.com/news/329765-sovereign-palestine-jerusalem-china/
The option of the 1967 borders no longer exists, and by the way there is no such thing as a limited liability war meaning the Arabs are not going to get back that land. The Jewish diaspora exists for Israel and no one who goes against Israel will be listened to in the organised Jewish community in the US,. American Jews will go along with what Israel deems necessary and unless Israel wants to try being an Apartheid state it will have to either expel the Palestinians or give them their own state (which it shows no sign of wanting to do). The Israel lobby will have to defend expulsions by Israel. The attitude to expulsions done by Western countries to defend their national future would alter greatly with Western Jews accepting Israel wasjustified to defend the Jewishness of Israel by the very same method.
The argument presumes that the US would simply be able to stand idly by with mere token displays of disapproval. That seems hard to believe, unless you also presume that the Arabs tacitly approve. Otherwise, the Arabs and others will start appealing to other powers, and the US will be inevitably dragged in and required to either explicitly approve of Israel’s actions or push back against Israel. Either way, the US will not be able to keep its hands clean of the matter. It would have to get down and dirty and possibly even go to war.
During the Iraq war the Arab states asked Israel to promise they would not use the conflict to expel the Palestinians and they refused to give any such assurances. The Arabs couldn’t and the US wouldn’t take any meaningful action against Israel is there was general chaos and fighting and Palestinians ended up in the existing Palestinian state (ie Jordan). Something similar is already openly talked about by a major Israeli politician.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieberman_Plan
Assad and Putin are going to do it for Israel, which will certainly act if Hizballah moves in too close and Jordan descends into chaos. Any expulsions will happen during a wider war, and the US is not going to fight Israel and occupy the Middle East for the benefit of Palestinians.