The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
More Paris Puzzles
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Some people who are not inclined to believe the official story of the Paris attack are troubled by the question why Muslim suicide bombers would blow themselves up for a false flag attack. The answer to this question is very simple. But first we should dispose of the question whether suicide bombers did blow themselves up. Is this something that we know, or is it part of the story that we are told? For example, we were told that during 9/11 passengers in hijacked airliners used their cell phones to call relatives, but experts have testified that the technology of the time did not permit cell phone calls from airliners at those altitudes.

To dispose of the question whether we have or do not have any real evidence that suicide bombers blew themselves up, I will assume that they did.

So we have suicide bombers blowing themselves up.

Now turn to the question that troubles some doubters: Why would suicide bombers blow themselves up for the sake of a false flag attack?

As I said, the answer is simple: Why assume that the suicide bombers knew who was organizing the attack? There seems to be abundant evidence that ISIL is a US creation, one that is still dependent on US active or passive support—thus the conflict between Putin and Washington over attacking ISIL. ISIL seems to be what Washington used to overthrow the government in Libya and afterward was sent by Washington to Syria to overthrow Assad. Obviously, Washington has ISIL infiltrated. Washington has long proven is ability to use Islamic extremists. As Washington used them in Afghanistan against the Soviets and in Libya and Syria against independent governments, Washington used them in Paris. By my last count, the FBI on 150 occasions has successfully deceived people into participating into FBI orchestrated “terror plots.”

Now let us move to some bigger questions. Why do terrorists attack ordinary innocent people who have neither awareness of “their” government’s actions or control over them? The victims of 9/11 were not the neocons and members of the Washington establishment, whose policies in the Middle East justified attacks on their persons. Ditto for the Boston Marathon Bombing, and ditto for the Paris attacks. Innocents were the victims, not those who have taken Muslim lives.

Historically, terror attacks are not on the innocent but on the rulers and those who are guilty. For example, it was the Archduke of Austria/Hungary who was assassinated by the Serbian terrorist, not ordinary people blown up or shot down in a street cafe.


It is interesting that terrorists attacks attributed to Muslims only fall upon ordinary people, not upon the political elites who oppress the Muslims. In past years on several occasions I have remarked in my columns on the total vulnerability of the neoconservatives to assassination. Yet there has been not a single attack by terrortists on a neocon life, and the neocons are the source of the violence that Washington has unleashed on the Muslim world. The neocons walk around without threat free as birds.

How believeable is it that Muslim terrorists take their ire out on innocents when the President of France himself, who has sent military forces to murder Muslims, was sitting in the attacked stadium and could easily have been eliminated by a suicide bomber?

Now let us turn to questions of identification of the alleged “Paris terrorists.” Is it realistic to suppose that the millions of refugees from Washington and its European vassals’ wars in the Middle East have passports? Were these millions of refugees expecting to be driven by White Civilization’s Bombs out of their countries and thus had prepared themselves with passports in order to flee?

Did they write on their passport applications that they were going to be visiting Europe?

Was the beleaguered country, their homeland, under full military assault, able to process all these millions of passports?

What sort of dumbshit Western media goes along with the passport story — a media well paid to lie for Washington’s hegemony and crimes?

One final question for skeptics. Where are the photographs of the terrorists during their terrorizing? Surrounding the scenes of violence there were not only abundant security cameras, but also hundreds, even thousands, of people with cell phones that have cameras. With all of these photos, how is it possible that the authorities do not know if some terrorists escaped, and if so, who they are and what they look like? Why are the authorities relying on fake passports for photos of the terrorists?

Terrorism has been unleashed in the Western World, and it is the terrorism of Western governments against Western peoples.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Paris Attacks, Terrorism 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. J Yan says:

    Innocents are targeted for strategic reasons. PCR is forgetting the Battle of Algiers and the ISIS’s own “The Extinction of the Grayzone” article.

    The strategic terrorism in Paris supports PCR’s assertion that at the highest level ISIS is Washington’s tool.

  2. Tom_R says:


    Thanks for the article, Sir. You raise some interesting points.

    Even after this Paris attack, and so many dead, the Jewish controlled media is promoting the alien invasion of more 3rd world aliens. The evil of these Jewish barbarians is beyond belief.

    There are 3 possible ways this Paris terrorist attack could have happened, but all these ways lead to to the Judaists, through one route or the other.

    1. The Judaists (including the Jewish controlled media) promotes the 3rd world alien invasion in white nations, through media propaganda and bribing and blackmailing politicians to force them into “open borders”. For eg: Barbara Lerner Spectre, George Soros, Jew York Times, etc. The Judaist were behind the 1965 immigration act. These aliens come in and kill whites, either in one-on-one crime or terrorists attacks such as this. Thus, the Judaists have blood on their hands.

    2. ISIS: ISIS was created by Jew-S-A to help overthrow Assad to clear space for a Greater Israel. So if ISIS did it, the Judaists are responsible for it.

    3. False Flag: If the French govt. is involved in it and doing this as a false flag, then is must relate to Syria, then the conflict in Syria is for the Judaists (Greater Israel project) and again the Judaists are thus behind it.

    In other words, almost all the violence, wars, terror, alien invasion, crime, corruption etc. that is going on in the world today is due to barbarity and the mental illness of the Judaists, who are brainwashed by the lies and violence in their vile Torah and become mentally deranged criminals after being brainwashed by the lies of the “animals” (–Jewish author Hitchens) who fabricated the Torah of this mentally deranged criminal cult called Judaism.

  3. tom. says:

    Look I’ll make it as simple as possible, and you don’t need a long article at all.

    False flags can let terrorist attacks happen naturally. The end.

  4. bossel says:

    More idiocy from PCR, just as usual, but this one is just too nice:

    There seems to be abundant evidence that ISIL is a US creation

    So, the IS is essentially working for the US? But the US needs to fake an IS attack on Paris (fooling the suicide bombers into believing to bomb for IS) instead of simply telling IS to organize such an attack?

    Good one…

    • Agree: Travis, Wizard of Oz
  5. One of the worst things that can be said about the often blundering US government is that it once employed the author of this c**p even as an acting deputy something in an unscientific area like la-la land economics.

    What utter nonsense to suggest that typical terrorists would have gone for the neo-cons (isn’t it enough for him that 9/11 was an attack on US financial institutions or the Nairobi bombing on a US embassy?). The whole point if terrorism is normally to create indiscriminate terror by apparent randomness because of the asymmetry which even Roberts ought to have incorporated into his simple formulaic thinking.

    As for the statement that experts [sic] have testified [sic] that mobile/cell phone technology wasn’t capable of relaying the numerous calls made from the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania on 9/11 I ask first what experts (recognised as such by the court or commission) gave sworn evidence (for surely it would be almost dishonest of PCR to use the word “testified” of mere assertion under no pressure to tell the truth)?

    But he is just being careless with the truth. Most of the reported calls were from the aircraft’s airphones and, anyway, my personal experience of cell phones in and about 2001 was that they might well work in a a high flying aircraft and I was glad to find my memory confirmed by convincing and detailed accounts on line that my searches turned up easily enough.

  6. Paul Craig Roberts’ Word of the Week: “Dumbshit” (vulg.) 1. noun, singular: A person who holds a view of reality contrary to that of The Right Honourable Paul Craig Roberts. 2. adjective: Characteristic of a “dumbshit”, like a “dumbshit”, akin to a “dumbshit”, representative of a “dumbshit”.

    (Editor’s note: This vulgarism is generally avoided by cultivated persons, such as former Assistant Deputy Undersecretaries of the Treasury or former Assistant Deputy Sub-editors of the Wall Street Journal.)

  7. alexander says:

    Dear Mr Roberts,

    You make some good points and you should be puzzled by the Paris attacks.

    We all are.

    I think there is one thing I have come to understand after 9-11 and now Paris is just how much those responsible for the attacks “despise” Muslims.

    They must.

    Because Muslims seem to suffer the most in the response to the attacks…How many Muslims have been eviscerated since 9-11….two million, three million, four million? how many have lost there homes and been forced to flee their own cities and countries….10 million, 15 million, 20 million,….40 million ?….

    How many hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the “West” have been persecuted, vilified, and singled out.? How many will continued to be, and how much more amplified will that vilification become , after Paris?

    If terrorist are aware that the consequences of there actions elicit ” profound “suffering “on massive Muslim populations…..what is the point of doing it ?…Unless you really hate them ….A lot.

    Wasn’t the essence of the Paris attacks to say to France.( a super power)..declare war on us… .Please come bomb us..bomb Muslims ..bomb Syria ….we want to be bombed ? .

    Whoever the terrorists are… they might not care about Parisians all too much….but they certainly “hate” Muslims …with… every… bone… in ….their… body.

    That is a fact.

  8. PCR is clearly depressed. He sees darkness and horror everywhere, and can’t see anything else. And that’s the problem with him. His thinking is generally crisp and straightforward (even if wrongheaded), but it has the monotonous and perverse undertone of the thinking of the depressed.

    Mike Ruppert was like that. And eventually blew his brains out.

    Hope the same doesn’t happen to PCR. Maybe he needs to stop following the news for a while. Take a break, spend some time with the kids. Try to remember that even Rome fell, and that the Christian world emerged from the ashes. Nations decline all the time, and there are worse things than national decline.

    But even though many of his recent columns are shrill of tone and full of nonsense, there is no doubt that PCR is an honorable man, a patriot, and an intellectual.

  9. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    What about the Eiffel Peace Sign? To me it just seems too perfect and probably too quickly on the scene to be organic.

  10. I’m going to disagree with PCR here. I think what is happening is that America’s Military Industrial complex is metastasizing. We are accustomed to think of the MIC as an American institution, but is it? Foreigners are now fully invested in out defense establishment. They have their own agendas. They don’t need our permission to launch attacks. They have learned their lessons on subversion and intrigue from our CIA and others.

    So, who are the puppet masters? I think we are looking at an international mafia style consortium. The American Mafia didn’t just die. It eventually went corporate, then international. Some of the marionette control lines undoubtedly lead into the neocon camp. Some lead to the House of Saud some lead to the Qatar and so forth. What we are seeing is the devolution of American power. The tail is wagging the dog. America can no longer keep its vassals in check. The lines of economic power and political power have been reversed.

    America is now the puppet.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS