The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information

Topics Filter?
2016 Election 9/11 American Media American Military Blacks Censorship China CIA Civil Liberties Conspiracy Theories Coronavirus Deep State Democratic Party Disease Donald Trump Economics EU Federal Reserve Floyd Riots 2020 Foreign Policy Free Trade Gold Government Surveillance Greece Hillary Clinton History Ideology Immigration Iran Israel Israel Lobby Neocons Neoliberalism Police State Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Russiagate Science Syria Terrorism Trade Ukraine Unemployment Wall Street 2018 Election 2020 Election Abraham Lincoln Academia Adam Schiff ADL Affirmative Action Afghanistan Africa AI Alexei Kudrin Alt Right American Debt American Jews American Left American Prisons Amnesty International Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anti-Semitism Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antiracism Antitrust Armenia Article Artificial Intelligence Assange Assassinations Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack Obama BDS Movement Belgium Benjamin Netanyahu Bill Binney Bill Clinton Bill Gates Bill Of Rights Bioweapons Bitcoin Black Crime Black Lives Matter Bolivia Boston Marathon Bombing Bradley Manning Brazil Brexit BRICs Britain Capitalism Charles De Gaulle Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Child Services China/America Christianity Christine Lagarde Christmas Civil Rights Civil War Classical Music CNN Cold War Confederacy Confederate Flag Conservative Movement Constitutional Theory Corruption Counterpunch Crime Cuba Cultural Marxism Culture/Society Czech Republic Dallas Shooting David Irving David Stockman Debt Debt Jubilee Deficits Democracy Democrats Department Of Justice Deregulation Development Developmental Noise Dissidence Diversity Dollar Dominique Strauss-Kahn Don Siegelman Drugs Duterte Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Ebola Ecuador Edward Snowden Emmanuel Macron Employment Environment Europe European Right European Union Eurozone Fake News False Flag Attack FBI Feminism Ferguson Shooting FIFA Financial Bailout Financial Debt First Amendment Flight From White France Free Speech Freedom Of Speech Freedom Gays/Lesbians Gaza Gaza Flotilla George Floyd George W. Bush Germany Glass-Steagall Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization GMO Google Government Shutdown Gun Control Guns H1-B Visas Hacking Health Care Healthcare Hispanics Hitler Hollywood Holocaust Housing IMF Inequality Inflation Internet IQ Iraq Iraq War ISIS Islam Israel/Palestine James Comey Japan Jeffrey Epstein Jews JFK Assassination Joe Biden John Bolton John F. Kennedy John McCain Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Khashoggi Ku Klux Klan Labor Day Las Vegas Massacre Latin America LGBT Libya Lithuania Macedonia Magna Charta Malaysian Airlines MH17 Marine Le Pen Martin Luther King Mass Shootings Massacre In Nice Meritocracy Merkel MH 17 Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Microsoft Middle East Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Minimum Wage Minneapolis Monopoly Multiculturalism Muslims NATO Nazi Germany Nazis Neoconservatives New Cold War New York New York Times New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicaragua North Korea NSA NSA Surveillance Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Obamacare Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Orlando Shooting Osama Bin Laden Pakistan Paris Attacks Patriotism Paul Krugman Philippines Police Pornography Portugal Poverty Privatization Propaganda Prostitution Public Schools Putin Qassem Soleimani Qatar Race Riots Racism Real Estate Reconstruction Republican Party Republicans Revisionism Richard Nixon Riots Robert Mueller Robots Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Sandy Hook Saudi Arabia Seattle Slavery Slavery Reparations Social Media Social Security Socialism South Africa SPLC Stephen Cohen Story Student Debt Supply-Side Economics Supreme Court Sweden Switzerland Syriza Tax Cuts Taxes Technology The Confederacy The Saker Tony Blair Torture TPP Transgenderism TTIP Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Twitter Unions United Nations USS Liberty Vaccination Vaccines Venezuela Virginia Vladimir Putin War On Christmas War On Terror Watergate White America White Americans White Guilt White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Supremacy Wikileaks Wikipedia Winston Churchill Workers Working Class World War I World War II Yemen Youtube Ban Zbigniew Brzezinski Zionism
Nothing found
 TeasersPaul Craig Roberts Blogview

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
🔊 Listen RSS

Tucker Carlson on Fox News Announces What I and John-Paul Leonard Told You Almost 2 Months ago—George Floyd Fatally Overdosed with Fentanyl

A Lawsuit Is Brought to Force Release of HCQ to the Public

The rest of the media continues to lie to protect the anti-white agenda and Big Pharma’s profit agenda.

Here is Tucker Carlson’s report:

YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and the rest of the censoring Nazi media have been protecting the official lie on Floyd, just as they do on everything else, such as HCQ, Russiagate, 9/11, Iranian nukes, peaceful protests, Russian invasions, so watch Tucker before the “free American media” cancels him. Note that both Tucker and his guest are sufficiently intimidated by the media claim that Floyd was murdered to make it clear that they are not claiming that the police had no responsibility in Floyd’s death, but they don’t identify what the responsibility is. When even Tucker Carlson can be intimidated, you can see the power of the lie.

As Minnesota’s black attorney general, Keith Ellison, clearly admits on Tucker Carlson, he withheld the police video of their encounter with Floyd in order to aid his prosecution of the police officers who he falsely indicted.

In other words the video does not support the indictment or the official story that the despicable lying presstitutes have beat into your heads by endless repetition and misrepresentation.

The video clearly reveals an agitated and uncooperative Floyd complaining of difficulty breathing long before the infamous knee-on-neck, a routine restraint part of police training. The police did not use excessive restraint. They eventually realized that Floyd was in distress. They accommodated Floyd’s request to be taken out of the squad car and allowed to lay on the ground. You might remember that a large number of presstitute scum misrepresented Floyd’s being removed from the squad car and put on the ground as police brutality. A number of Internet idiots screamed: “they had him safely in the car and took him out so they could kill him!”

The police realized Floyd was on drug overdose and called for medics. Floyd was being held still so as not to exhaust his restricted oxygen capability in agitation. Floyd died because the ambulance did not get there in time.

When the top law enforcement official in Minneapolis withholds exculpatory evidence in order to frame and convict innocent police, and the law enforcement official is black and the police are white, it puts a different color on the lies we have been told.

Here is one person’s analysis of the police video:

Here is a link to the video of the police trying to get Floyd into the car: Notice that RT is so intimidated that RT warns “disturbing video.”

Notice that Floyd is very agitated and very confused. He was sitting in a car with the windows up, but refuses to get in the police car because he is claustrophobic. The police assure him that they will roll down the window and stay with him. He is too confused to comply with police instructions to show his hands, put his hands on the steering wheel, put his hands on his head. Instead, he gives non-relevant replies. Note that the police do not taser him or strike him. One officer keeps Floyd covered with a pistol until he shows his hands.

Note that Floyd complains of breathing problems following his resistance to being put in the police car. The breathing problem associated with fentanyl overdose is beginning to set in. Fentanyl’s effects include confusion, problems breathing, and unconsciusness. “An overdose occurs when a drug produces serious adverse effects and life-threatening symptoms. When people overdose on fentanyl, their breathing can slow or stop. This can decrease the amount of oxygen that reaches the brain, a condition called hypoxia. Hypoxia can lead to a coma and permanent brain damage, and even death” — .

The lessons to be learned from the George Floyd tragecy are these: A black state attorney general withheld exculpatory evidence in order to falsely indict police officers. The presstitute media is so totally devoid of integrity that a sustained campaign of disinformation was used for the purpose of convicting the police in the minds of the public. To find an unbiased jury is probably impossible.

When will Americans ever learn to stop listening to the media?

The presstitutes have done the same thing to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which is proven to be the most successful and safe treatment for Covid-19. The media–print, TV, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google–have covered up the safety and effectiveness of HCQ and have stricken from YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Internet searches evidence provided by doctors treating Covid-19, and by virologists, epidemiologists and immunologists attesting to the safety and efficacy of HCQ.

I was, perhaps, the first to give you the true information about HCQ. I also reported that CDC, NIH, WHO, and FDA are in cahoots with Big Pharma which does not want the information out that a cheap cure for Covid exists, because Big Pharma and its shills at the public health agencies want to sell you Big Pharma’s expensive vaccine and “cure.” For them, Covid is a money-making opportunity. In pursuit of this opportunity, they are jointly responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths. There should not only be class action suits against these criminals, but also murder indictments. If officer Chauvin can be indicted for Floyd’s death, Fauci, Redfield, Big Pharma, and the rest can be indicted for murder not merely of one person but hundreds of thousands of people.

Here is an explanation of why and how Anthony Fauci has blocked HCQ as a treatment for Covid:

Here is an account of how the CDC’s Redfield survived fraud in AIDS research to rise to the head of CDC:

🔊 Listen RSS

When white gentile and Jewish liberals imposed diversity and multiculturalism on the rest of us without asking if we agreed, they did not tell us what it was going to cost us and how much it would cause the quality of our lives to decline.

They did not say that the price would be the loss of public safety and law and order in society as, for example, the Minneapolis Police Department said in its recent advice to Minneapolis citizens to “give up your cell phone and purse/wallet” if approached by robbers and “do not argue or fight with the criminal. Do as they say” —

In Democrat controlled cities and states, the impunity the governing officials gave to looters, who burned down portions of the cities and stole everything from looted businesses that they could carry away, has encouraged a big jump in already high black crime. The police are advising that, with the limitations Democrats have placed on them, that the public’s safety depends on doing as the criminals say. If they want your car keys, give them to them. Otherwise, you might be killed.

When white gentile and Jewish liberals imposed diversity and multiculturalism on us without our permission, they did not tell us it would cost us our history. The preferred diverse elements now require that we rewrite our history, raising them up as unjustly harmed by racist white gentiles such as ourselves, and lowering ourselves down as racist oppressors. This was already the fashion for some time in liberal universities, and now it is incorporated into public education via the New York Times 1619 Project.

The white gentile and Jewish liberals did not tell us that another cost would be the loss of our self-respect and pride in our country’s accomplishments in raising up so many diverse people such that non-white gentiles now are abundantly present among corporate executive ranks, university faculty and administrators, news media propagandists, police force captains, and aggressively outspoken members of Congress, while “racist whites” are disappearing from public view.

We were not informed by the liberal white gentiles and Jews that we had to give up our public monuments, because being mainly white, as our country historically was, the monuments are of white supremacists and must be pulled down, not to please the majority of the American population, but to please the minority of diverse and multicultural foreigners brought in by white liberal gentiles and Jews to ruin our life.

And now our life is ruined, and we are too indoctrinated against ourselves, brainwashed, overcome with guilt, and too emotionally and politically weak to do anything about it.

The world will not regret the demise of the American Empire, which was more of a hegemony than an empire. But the white gentile Americans will regret the demise of their public safety, incomes, self-respect, and their displacement in their own country by immigrant-invaders brought in by white liberal gentiles and Jews.

🔊 Listen RSS

To be sympathetic with one’s declared enemies is an act of suicide. White liberals, even those in authority in cities being looted and burned, are certainly sympathetic with the enemies of law and order. The white liberals’ sympathy won’t earn them any brownie points. Identity Politics and Antifa do not differentiate between white people. They have pulled down both Lee’s statue and Grant’s statue. All whites are victimizers and all whites are racist. The condemnations include liberals.

Mike Whitney points to Seattle’s Bolshevik Revolution

He describes the violence and its massive damage that is misrepresented by the media as “peaceful protests.” He reports that the media is lying for the purpose of associating President Trump with opposition to peaceful protests. You should keep this in mind when you subscribe to the newspapers and watch the TV programs of the presstitutes who lie to you.

Whitney also says that the largely white Antifa and Black Lives Matter organizations (funded by white liberal foundations and corporations) are effective Bolshevik-type entities with a goal of revolutionary overthrow. Whether this is so or not, it is the case that power expands in a vacuum. The vacuum is provided by Democrat city and state governments that believe, like their media allies, that the “peaceful protests” will work against Trump’s reelection. To keep the looting and rioting alive, Democrats have maintained police stand-downs, and these stand-downs have humiliated and demoralized the police.

Whitney believes that this can get out of hand. It can, but perhaps only in cities controlled by white liberals.

The question is whether Democrats can actually benefit from going into an election on the heels of looting and rioting in so many cities. It is possible that the white liberals who elected the Democrats who are enabling their own cities to be burned and looted see the violence as “justice.” But the presstitutes are taking no chance and are committed to misrepresenting the violence as peaceful protests. This works with white liberals, but from the reports of exploding firearm and ammunition sales, not many Americans believe the media. They see the extraordinary breakdown in law and order and are arming to protect themselves.

If Trump is reelected, he will have to take dramatic action against the sedition enabled by the Democrats and media, and he is going to have to act against the Republican establishment that has worked with Democrats to undermine him and his agenda. If he doesn’t there will be more of the same.

If Biden is elected, the establishment Democrats are likely to be swept away by the left which now has the bit between its teeth. White citizens in cities will lose police protection. As white people are unorganized, and Antifa is organized, white American citizens including the white liberals, will come off worse.

🔊 Listen RSS

It is a proven undeniable fact that if given early, hydroxychloroqine (HCQ) given with azithromycin and zinc will cure coronavirus. It is a proven undeniable fact that hydroxychloroquine is safe. It is an approved medicine and has been in use for 65 years with an outstanding safety record.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is under attack for two reasons. One is that Trump recommended it based on Dr. Zelenko’s successful cures of his patients in New York. Consequently, Democrats and the presstitutes have allied with Big Pharma and demonized HCQ hoping to use the false claim that it causes heart attacks to discredit Trump and reduce his chance of reelection. The other is that Big Pharma and the public health organizations, such as NIH, CDC, and WHO which have revolving door relationships with Big Pharma and share in the revenues, are desperate to block an effective and inexpensive treatment when they can make billions of dollars on a mandated vaccine and an ineffectual treatment known as Remdesivir. The Covid vaccine that is being developed perhaps also reflects a darker agenda. The vaccine alters the DNA of the person receiving it. The consequences are unknown.

Remdesivir has been allowed as a Covid treatment prior to being tested, but HCQ which has been proven safe for 65 years is prohibited in the US and most of Europe.

Doctors who are actually treating coronavirus patients take great exception to the many steps taken to prevent the use of HCQ and to prevent the public from knowing that it is a safe and effective treatment.

Here is one Frontline Doctor, an organization of doctors who are treating coronavirus patients, who was fired from her job as certified emergency physican because she told the truth that HCQ was effective and safe— .

The medical organization, American Pysicians & Surgeons, has filed suit against the corrupt US Food & Drug Administration and Department of Health & Human Services for blocking the use of HCQ to save American lives — . Notice that President Trump who believes in the effectiveness of HCQ cannot even control his own cabinet department of Health and Human Services or the Big Pharma subsidiary known as FDA.

What you need to understand is that cabinet level departments and federal agencies of the US government, which represent Big Pharma at the expense of your health and life, are murdering Americans in order to protect obscene profits of Big Pharma. How is it possibe that Americans can get so upset over a felon drug addict George Floyd killing himself with an overdose of Fentanyl and quietly accept the intentional murder of Americans by the federal government, public health agencies, governors, and the Democrats for the sake of Big Pharma profit and Democrat electoral victory?

There is now a huge inventory of hard evidence backed by thousands of doctors that HCQ is by far the best answer that currently exists to the coronavirus pandemic. HCQ is effective both as a preventative and as a cure. Yet greed and politics have blocked its use.

A 29-page White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine by Simone Gold, MD, JD, of Americas Frontline Doctors had 13 or 18 million viewers before it was taken down by Facebook and the website was cancelled by Google acting in behalf of Big Pharma’s profits. I have a copy and will provide a summary and a link to the entire paper.

The White Paper provides uneqivocal evidence from rheumatologists, cardiologists, and ophthalmologists that many decades of use on vast numbers of patients prove conclusively beyond all doubt that HCQ is not only safe but probably the safest drug ever put into use. In many countries it is an over-the-counter purchase. In the US pharmacists are prohibited from filling the prescriptions of doctors who prescribe it as a Covid treatment.

The White Paper reports the conclusive results of 20-year and 50-year safety studies, including that of the FDA itself which is blocking the use of HCQ despite the safety clearance given HCQ by FDA!

The White Paper provides the results of 19 efficacy studies of HCQ dating from February 19, 2020 through July 3, 2020. The studies are international in scope and attest to the efficicy of HCQ as a coronavirus treatment.

The White Paper reports the corruption of scientific journals by Big Pharma. The anti-HCQ studies published in The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine turned out to be frauds that had to be withdrawn.

The White Paper reports the corruption of the media which marches in lockstep with Big Pharma and the Democrats.

The White Paper reports censorship of doctors and efforts to withdraw their licenses to practice for prescribing HCQ.

The White Paper concludes that greed and politics are preventing physicians from upholdng their Hippocratic Oath and healing their patients.

Here is a link to the White Paper —

Below is a collection of information about HCQ and the criminally corrupt and murderous efforts to block its use:

Dr. Simone Gold, the doctor censored by big tech over hydroxychloroquine viral video, has been fired and now lost her job (with video interview discussing her job loss)

Information is available on the Hospice Patients Alliance website regarding use of Hydroxychloroquine for early treatment of COVID-19. Dedicated page of articles and videos is, including:

White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine from America’s Frontline Physicians:

This is the culmination of months-long research from all sources. It explains how Americans have come to be in the grip of fear. All the myths and all the misconceptions about a safe, generic drug that has been FDA approved for 65 years, given to pregnant women, breastfeeding women, children, the elderly and the immune-compromised for years and decades without complication, are finally put in the trash heap where they belong. You will have the indisputable proof that you have been massively lied to, often very intentionally. At first you will first be heartbroken. And then you will be furious. Good. Because then you will demand change.

Frontline Physicians Aim to Dispel ‘Massive’ COVID-19 ‘Disinformation Campaign’

🔊 Listen RSS

Today the Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated the death sentence concocted for one of the alleged bombers of the alleged Boston Marathon bombing of April, 2013, seven years ago. Some years ago John Remington Graham and I demonstrated conclusively that the FBI’s own evidence proved conclusively that, even if there really was a bombing for which there is much exposed false evidence, the Tsarnaev brothers were not involved. You can find our analysis in my articles archive on my website.

We succeeded in getting our evidence of their innocence in front of the federal appeals court, and we were stunned when the court accepted it as part of the record. We have been hopeful ever since. Me less than John Remington Graham. As a retired defense attorney and public prosecutor and, undeniably, an expert on the US, Canadian, and unwritten British constitutions, Jack, as he is known, hoped that the judges would not accept our evidence of the Tsarnaev brothers’ innocence unless the judges intended to act on it. I myself did not see how they could possibly have the courage to blow up one of the hoaxes used to sustain the fabricated “terrorist threat.” Have you noticed how this “terrorist threat” went away? Why did it go away if it were real? It wasn’t real, and it served its purpose at the time. Now we have new threats, China, American white supremacy, Trump, and new hoaxes—Russiagate, George Floyd’s death at racist white police hands, etc.

The federal appeals court for the First Circuit has disappointed us by only vacating Dzhokhar’s death sentence and not his false conviction. Dzhokhar’s appointed attorney cooperated with the prosecution in convicting him. The lack of representation is sufficient to overturn his conviction. Dzhokhar’s appointed attorney did not raise the question of the FBI’s own evidence that the brothers were innocent. She entered the trial with a guilty plea on behalf of her client. In other words, a trial was not needed. A plea bargain could have been arranged instead. The unnecessary trial itself was a hoax for public relations purposes. The appointed attorney was part of the setup that convicted an innocent person for reasons of a hidden agenda. She put her career before truth. That is what people do in a society that has lost its way. We see it all around us. Truth is the greatest enemy of the ruling class. The presstitutes, professors, and corporations that serve the ruling class, in exchange, enjoy financially comfortable lives, unlike 80% of Americans. The way to succeed in America is to be a whore for the Establishment.

The First Circuit’s ruling does not free Dzhokhar. The ruling instructs the lower federal district court to hold a new trial to determine Dzhokhar’s punishment. I think that this is all the federal appeal court dared to do.

Nevertheless, the federal appeals court ruling opens a wedge by admitting that something was wrong, and Dzhokhar’s punishment has to be reconsidered in a new trial. If there were attorneys and bar associations that served justice rather than career and money, they could use the opening provided by the First Circuit to blow up the hoax conviction of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev together with the hoax false flag Boston Marathon Bombing. This, I think, is the message from the US Appeals Court of the First Circuit. The Appeals Court opens the opportunity, but if no one cares, the Appeals Court is not going to take the hit for declaring an innocent person innocent.

A country whose lawyers no longer will fight for justice, but only for money, is a lost and destroyed country.

🔊 Listen RSS

Some Americans are so pathetic they don’t even know what gender they are. A female with a vagina thinks she is a male. A male with testicles and a penis thinks he is a female. Those among us who are normal are supposed to be oh-so-concerned about these confused people that we stop using gender pronouns. He/she/him/her have become transphobic. If you persist in using the English language, you are uncaring and, well, evil to boot.

The transgendered are busy at work making themselves into another preferred minority with all the special privileges in law that that designation brings. I wonder what happens when everyone needs the protection of the special privilege designation, and men and women no longer exist.

Somehow I cannot imagine a country absorbed in transgender issues being exceptional and indispensable, as the neocons say we are, much less being a military power. I very much doubt that Russia and China regard a country as a military threat whose population is confused about what gender they are.

Looking at the evidence, I would say that America has had its 15 minutes of fame. What convinces me that America is all washed up is Americans’ acceptance of the horrors inflicted by the American/British police state on Julian Assange. In Assange’s treatment we see the violation of every human right. And the Western public has accepted it.

Instead of protesting against the persecution of a truth-teller, agents of the Establishment, pretending to be “peaceful protesters,” are burning and looting properties belonging to black, Asian, white, and Hispanic business owners and destroying public monuments for no other reason than a felon, misogynist, drug addict, George Floyd, killed himself by overdosing on Fentanyl.

John Paul Leonard writing in the Unz Review first brought my attention to George Floyd being a drug addict. Unlike CNN, MSNBC, BBC, NPR, New York Times, Washington Post, or any of the corrupt presstitute media, Leonard pointed out that the medical examiner’s toxicology report accompanying the autopsy of Floyd’s death clearly indicated a lethal dose of the dangerous opiod, Fentanyl, in Floyd’s blood.

Fentanyl causes breathing problems that lead to death. Prior to Floyd’s restraint, he complained to the police that he could not breathe and asked to be removed from the police car and to lay down on the ground. We know this from the released police recordings. The presstitutes did not report this fact, but the recordings were released.

When an experienced officer, Chauvin, appeared on the scene he recognized a drug overdose problem and had medics called. Floyd was on his stomach so that he would not choke on his own vomit as Fentanyl can produce nausua. The intentionally misinterpreted “knee-on-the-neck” is a restraint technique that is taught to police. It is not deadly. Chauvin used this common practice to keep Floyd, who was having difficulty absorbing oxygen, still in an effort to minimize his oxygen use and thereby prolong his life until medics arrived, hopefully equipped with naloxone. If given promptly, naloxone can treat a Fentanyl overdose by binding to opioid receptors and blocking the effects of the drug. Fentanyl is such a strong opioid that multiple doses of naloxone are usually required.

Some medics are eqipped with naloxone. No doubt this was what Chauvin hoped.

Instead of attending to the facts, the despicable American media intentionally created the impression that Chauvin had intentionally murdered Floyd in an act of white racism. This lie was used to support the New York Times 1619 Project, an insult to America that alleges in the absence of any evidence that the United States originated as a white supremacist society that enslaved blacks in an act of racism.

The result of the intentional lies that the US is based in racism and that black Floyd was murdered by white police have been the destruction of billions of dollars in black, Asian, white, and Hispanic businesses and public monuments, the abandonment of the defense of property and law and order by Democrat-controlled cities and states, and a stand-down of the police, which has left people at the mercy of Antifa and Black Lives Matter. Democrats have tried to arrest and prosecute white Americans who took legal steps to defend their property and have left others to fend for themselves when stopped in traffic and surrounded by thugs demanding money.

The toxicology report accompanying George Floyd’s autopsy shows Fentanyl in his blood at the concentration of 11 ng/ml. This is a fatal dose. Therepeutic concentrations of Fentanyl, that is, those prescribed by doctors, range between 0.63-2.0 ng/mL.

Fentanyl is equipotent to morphine at doses that are 50–100 times lower. In other words, Fentanyl is 50-100 times stronger than morphine. Post mortem serum concentrations of lethal doses of Fentanyl begin at 5 ng/mL. Floyd had more than twice this concentration. The danger of Fentanyl rises when taken in combination with other drugs. The toxicology report shows Floyd with a Methamphetamine concentration of 19 ng/mL and a concentration of Delta-9 Carboxy THC of 42 ng/mL. Like Fentanyl, a meth overdose causes, rapid, slowed, or irregular heart rate, difficulty breathing, heart attack, stroke, agitation. The THC in the cannabis part of the cocktail increases the toxicity of the cannabis. Floyd also had serious heart problems which made his drug cocktail more dangerous to him.

I spent a lot of time researching Fentanyl and published the findings on my website. The URLs for the evidence will be again provided at the end of this article.

Death by Fentanyl overdose is common. Several tens of thousands occur annually, and music stars have been among the casualties.

In contrast to drug addict George Floyd who killed himself, the police state treatment of Julian Assange by Washington and the British government and the mentally sick media of both countries goes unprotested.

It is OK with the American Establishment if you loot and riot and destroy private property and statues of Washington, Jefferson, Lee, and Grant. But you must not tell the truth. That was Julian Assange’s great crime. He told the truth.

If telling the truth doesn’t get you arrested, it gets you cancelled and banned from the print and TV media and from Facebook, Twitter, Google and the rest of the monopolies.

Racism was stronger in the North than in the South
🔊 Listen RSS

This article concludes this seven-part series on Lincoln’s war against the South. The war ended 155 years ago. In the century and a half since, the war’s history has been falsified and misrepresented as a righteous war by the freedom-loving North against the slave-holding South.

The absence of supporting facts has not hampered this false history.

As Lincoln said endlessly, he invaded the Confederate States of America for the sole purpose of conquering the states that seceded and reincorporating them into the United States. Lincoln fought what he declared to be a rebellion.

The South fought because she was invaded.

Slavery was not an issue. The US Constitution assigned the matter of slavery to the individual states. Slavery was not subject to federal legislation. Lincoln acknowledged this over and over. Lincoln offered further inducement to the South to remain in the Union with the Corwin Amendment, a constitutional provision that forbade any federal steps against slavery ever.

Lincoln did not campaign for the presidency on the grounds of ending slavery. His first inaugural address in 1861 states: “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.”

The declaration of war against the South (July 1861) states that the purpose of the war is “to preserve the Union.”

The Emancipation Proclamation (1863) was a war measure declared “upon military necessity.” Unable to defeat the Army of Northern Virginia in battle, Lincoln hoped to stir a slave rebellion that would pull Confederate troops out of the front line and cause them to return home to protect their families and homes. Lincoln’s effort to turn black slaves against white southerners failed.

Uninformed and indoctrinated people claim that secession documents from the states prove the South was fighting for slavery. As I have shown on numerous occasions, southern states wanted a constitutional justification for leaving the Union so that Lincoln could not declare them to be in rebellion and send in the army to quell the rebellion. Lincoln did not accept the argument that the Union was a voluntary act from which states legitimately could withdraw. The South could not make a constitutional case out of the tariff, because the Constitution made tariffs a federal, not state, issue. But slavery was a state issue, and the South concocted an argument that the refusal of some northern states to enforce the federal Fugitive Slave Law meant that the northern states had broken the contract and that the South’s secession was not responsible for the breakup of the union.

This argument was also needed, because just as some in the North opposed the war, some in the South opposed secession.

As Lincoln made it completely clear that he most certainly was not invading the South in order to free slaves, how can it be that the South was fighting to save slavery?

Why is this series important? For a number of reasons. One is that as the war had nothing to do with slavery, neither do the Confederate war memorials.

Another reason is it demonstrates the ease with which history has been falsified in order to serve an agenda. People who can be convinced contrary to all known facts and the documentary record that the war was fought over slavery can be convinced of any lie. Obviously, a free press, free speech, public education, and democratic debate do not succeed in protecting truth. If we are so misinformed about Lincoln’s war, what else are we misinformed about? How much of what we know is real and how much is programmed into us to serve self-interested agendas?

Northerners like to get very self-righteous about their moral superiority over the South. But in fact, many northern states passed Black Codes, laws enacted to discourage free blacks from residing in northern states. Connecticut, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and New York had laws that denied blacks equal political rights, including the right to vote, the right to attend public schools, and the right to equal treatment under the law.

Southerner John Randolph of Roanoke, Virginia, in his will freed his slaves and provided for their survival by establishing a trust to purchase land for them in Ohio. The righteous Ohioans, so intent on giving their lives to free the slaves, drove John Randolph’s freed slaves from the land in Ohio that he had purchased for them.

Lincoln himself said in Illinois on September 18, 1858 that “I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [applause from the Ohio audience]—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people.” Lincoln’s plan for free blacks was to send them out of the country to Africa or South America.

Yet, there actually are Americans dumb enough to think that the North spent white blood and money in copious quantities in order to free black slaves that they considered inferior to whites and did not want anything to do with.

Indeed, the North cared so little about the negroes that nothing was done for them once they were freed by the economic destruction of the South. A fourth or more of the “freed” slaves died of starvation and exposure. Judge William Sharkey, reconstruction governor of Mississippi told Congress:

“I believe that there are now in my State very little over half the number of freedmen that were formerly slaves, certainly not more than two-thirds. They have died off. There is no telling the mortality that has prevailed among them; they have died off in immense numbers. I should say that very little more than half the amount of land that was under cultivation before the war will be under cultivation this year.”

What else was to be expected from Lincoln’s war of extermination against the South? Destruction of the agricultural infrastructure takes away both food and employment, and it disarms an army.

Armies “fight on their stomach,” and it was the absence of food that forced Lee’s surrender to Grant.

The absence of food was due to the war crimes of Lincoln and his Union army. Unable to defeat Robert E. Lee in battle, the Union destroyed the food infrastructure of the South by warring on agriculture, animal husbandry, women and children.

Most people do not understand that Lee won almost all of the battles. But always outnumbered, he never had reserves with which to destroy or force the surrender of the defeated Union army. So his victories were really for nothing. They only prolonged the war.

• Category: History, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Blacks, Civil War, Confederacy, Racism, Slavery 
🔊 Listen RSS

Defense attorney and constitutional scholar John Remington Graham maintains that despite being two separate countries with different cultures and legislative interests, North and South had been held together by statesmen effecting compromises. Before differing interests could break them apart, hatred had to be fomented between North and South. He states his position clearly: “The American Civil War likewise would not have happened if it had not been planned and fomented.”

Graham says that bankers, principally Rothschilds and Morgans, wanted a massive war that would greatly expand US national debt. By acquiring this debt and having legislation passed that would designate the debt as reserves for the issuance of money and credit, the banks would be able to use their power to expand or contract the supply of money and credit to control government and rule the country. As the quote attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild puts it, “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws.” Graham concludes that “the most important consequence of the American civil war was loss of the monetary independence of the United States. And that, as a practical matter, was also loss of political independence behind a facade of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy.’”

To create the hatred necessary for war, the bankers financed John Brown’s Harper’s Ferry raid, the marketing of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, the 11-year long court case of Dred Scott, and a variety of other machinations that served to brew hatred awaiting a catalyst to set off war. Graham does not identify the catalyst. He argues correctly that it was not slavery and incorrectly that it was not the Morrill Tariff.


Most of his monograph, Blood Money: The Civil War and the Federal Reserve ( ), is about the bankers and their money trust. Graham traces step by step the formation of their power over the United States right through the creation of the Federal Reserve. Graham maintains, as did William Blackstone, that the creation of money is properly a sovereign power of the state, not the act of a private interest as it is in the case of the Federal Reserve.

The new system of national banks created on the war debt permitted banks to make loans at interest on the basis of the bonds as reserves while simultaneously collecting interest on the bonds. The currency issued by state chartered banks was driven out of circulation.

Graham draws on the writings, speeches, and warnings of US Representative Charles A. Lindbergh, the father of the famous aviator, and J. B. Jones to make his case.

Himself a northerner, Graham sees the South as the superior civilization, as it was based in religion, morality, and chivalry in contrast to the money-grubbing North with its hidden agendas. The abolitionist movement was far stronger in the South than in the North. Graham reports that in 1832 the Virginia House of Delegates passed a resolution which lamented “the great evils of arising from the condition of the colored population of the commonwealth.”

The problem with freeing the slaves was what would become of them. On the plantations they had food, housing, and medical care. If evicted, there were no welfare programs, Social Security or Medicare. To convert them into a free work force would require care and time. No one knew what to do. Lincoln’s solution was to send the blacks out of the country. After the South was destroyed by war, estimates are that one-fourth of the blacks died of starvation and exposure.

The North was more business-like in its approach. The North wanted the slaves as wage labor that did not have to be taken care of in old age, as the plantation owner had do do. Unlike the plantation, once the northern industrialists used up a person, the person could be discharged.

Being a civilized people, the southern people, Graham writes, had no idea of the barbarity of the North and “were wholly unprepared to resist the juggernaut which had been ruthlessly bought to march against them.”

The war gave the bankers what they wanted. Moving on with his story of the development of their power, Graham explains how the Financial Panic of 1907 was orchestrated in order to set up Congress for the Federal Reserve Act prepared by a handful of bankers and their agents at Jekyll Island.

Graham provides reform measures and a legal basis for getting rid of the Federal Reserve, which has done the United States so much damage, and for restoring the coinage of money to the government of the people.

Seldom in 100 pages counting notes has there been so much information on how we have been deceived and used and how we can retrieve our fate from the hands of bankers. Graham’s monograph, in a real free society in which all explanations were not controlled by the establishment, would become the catalyst for a new investigation of the War of Northern Aggression and its consequences.

• Category: History • Tags: Banks, Civil War, Confederacy, Conspiracy Theories 
🔊 Listen RSS

Never before have I seen the case of Dred Scott as completely and accurately presented as John Remington Graham presents it in his monograph, Blood Money: The Civil War and the Federal Reserve ( ), republished below with permission.

Dred Scott was a slave who belonged to a United States Army officer, an army surgeon, John Emerson. In 1834 Emerson took Scott with him when assigned duty at Fort Snelling, which was located in Wisconsin Territory, a part of the Louisiana Purchase where slavery had been prohibited by the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

Under established law and precedent at the time, law and precedent acknowledged and upheld by southern courts, an owner who took his slave into a non-slave area was regarded as having freed the slave. Dred Scott loved Dr. Emerson and did not press his case until years after Dr. Emerson’s death.

Scott brought his case against Emerson’s widow, Irene, years after Emerson’s death and won. Irene Emerson appealed the court’s ruling. This began an inexplicable legal process that lasted 11 years. Graham raises the obvious question: Who financed it?

Scott was a poor black with no resources. Irene Emerson was not wealthy, neither was John Sandford, her eventual successor in title. Both Irene and John were ordinary folks unable to afford major litigation. The established law was in favor of Dred Scott and against Irene and John. The southern circuit court of Missouri kept to the established law and freed Dred Scott. There was no known legal basis for appealing the court’s decision to free Dred Scott.

Dred Scott would not have brought a price that could come close to paying for Irene Emerson’s appeal of the southern court’s ruling. It is inexplicable why she appealed when it was completely clear that the law was settled against her. She had no money to pay for the appeal and neither did John Sandford who continued the appeal. As Graham points out, “it was the kind of case which would have to aim at reversing judicial trends going back hundreds of years” and “was certain to be expensive and time-consuming.” Moreover, Mrs. Emerson “was too old to weather the experience.”

The Missouri Supreme Court overturned Dred Scott’s freedom in a 2-1 ruling. The dissenting judge provided overwhelming evidence that there was no basis in law for the ruling of his two colleagues.

The suit eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court where Chief Justice Roger B. Taney and a majority of the court in 1857 upheld that Scott was still a slave. Taney avoided all known precedent that supported the southern court’s ruling that Scott was a freed slave by ruling that under the US Constitution negroes were not citizens. Thus Dred Scott had no standing to bring a case.

It was the United States Supreme Court that kept Dred Scott a slave by overturning the southern court’s ruling that had freed him, but the white liberals of the time, as they do today, falsely heaped all the blame on the South. Having re-enslaved Dred Scott, the US Supreme Court used the case to overturn the entire Missouri Compromise, declaring it to be an unconstitutional limitation on slavery that exceeded the legislative power.

This decision is said to be the worst decision in the entire history of the Supreme Court. Dred Scott aside, certainly a terrible decision that flew in the face of established precedent, the ruling against the Missouri Compromise was probably correct legally and constitutionally, but disastrous politically. Under the US Constitution of the time, slavery was a state’s rights issue outside the purview of US legislation. Only states could decide the issue of slavery within their borders. Thus federal legislation, such as the Missouri Compromise, which divided up states between slave and non-slave, was unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the Missouri Compromise was put into place to keep the Union together and prevent separation and any war that might accompany separation. Thus repealing the Missouri Compromise opened a path to war.

Graham asks, who financed the costly 11-year legal fight? He raises the question: were the two judges on the Missouri Supreme Court bribed and if so, by who, and who bribed Taney and by what means?

These are honest and valid questions. The law suit that made no legal sense prevailed, and Taney’s overturning of the Missouri Compromise which made no political sense (except for those who wanted war) was thrown on top.

To drive home the point, after being used for 11 years, Scott and his wife and two daughters were freed by Sandford upon Taney’s ruling that Scott and his family remained Sandford’s slaves. Clearly Sandford was not a party to the legal struggle in order to hold on to Scott. Moreover, Graham points out that Scott’s freedom could have been purchased by those financing both sides of the 11 years of stupendous litigation for a fraction of the cost of the litigation. Obviously, neither side of the case had any interest in Scott’s freedom.

The dark implications of the Dred Scott case are too much for emotionally weak Americans. They simply cannot entertain the thought that banks intent on their power and profit were able to use the justice system and the Supreme Court as agents of Satan to kill three quarters of a million soldiers—more than the US lost in all other of its wars combined—and who knows how many southern civilians, and physically destroying as well the South, by fomenting a war. Hats off to John Remington Graham for placing this question before us, but I am certain that our historians will not dare to investigate it.


The Case of Dred Scott

John Remington Graham

As troubles in the Kansas Territory continued, a fateful case arose before the United States Supreme Court. Some background concerning this litigation will be in order here.

In 1834 an army surgeon, John Emerson, M. D., took his slave Dred Scott on a tour of duty to Fort Snelling, then part of the Wisconsin Territory within the limits of the Louisiana Purchase where slavery had been prohibited by the Missouri Compromise. While at Fort Snelling, Scott married a female slave named Harriet whom Dr. Emerson had purchased from an army officer there stationed. From this union two daughters Eliza and Lizzie were born.

Some years later, after the death of his master whom he loved, Dred Scott sued Dr. Emerson’s heir and widow before the circuit court of Missouri, seeking title to his freedom, and the freedom of his wife and daughters. Scott’s case was open and shut.

For in Rachael v. Walker, 4 Mo. 350 at 351-354 (1836), the Missouri Supreme Court had held that, when even a military officer of the United States took his slave into territory made free by the Missouri Compromise, there to reside during a tour of duty, the slave became forever free, and was entitled to judgment accordingly. That case was based on previous decisions of the Missouri Supreme Court going back to the earliest days of statehood, in which slaves were adjudged forever free after their masters took them to reside where slavery was prohibited by Northwest Ordinance of 1787, or by constitutions of States formed out of the Northwest Territory. These decisions of the Missouri Supreme Court were like countless others handed down by eminent judges and high courts throughout the South. During the antebellum period, more slaves were emancipated in the South than in the North, and freedmen in the South were incomparably better off than freedmen in the North.

• Category: History • Tags: Civil War, Slavery, Supreme Court 
🔊 Listen RSS

Ron Unz argues that multiculturalism is working. I fervently hope he is correct, but I doubt it. His example is his high education/high income area of Palo Alto and Silicon Valley, a unique area where people share a professional interest and are judged professionally. See Unz:

Multiculturalism did not work in Yugoslavia or in the Austro-Hungarian Empire or for native Americans, and it is not working in the rest of the US as the ongoing riots indicate. Multiculturalism cannot work where there are racial and ethnic conflicts.

Multiculturalism might have worked in America if the emphasis had stayed on assimilation and had not been intentionally shifted to diversity. I grew up in the South where interaction between blacks and whites on a mutually respectful basis occurred every day. My mother and her black helper, Carrie, worked together. You do not turn your food, children, and access to your home over to people you hate and who hate you.

Dishonest white liberals, as all of them are, counter that household help was “dependency” and an example of blacks being kept in their place by whites. But it was no more dependency than that of white and black wives who worked in the household instead of outside the home or the dependency of the kids who helped on family farms. Feminists learned to mimic the kept-in-place argument with their claim that housewives who produced what economist Gary Becker called “household income” (prepared meals, clean clothes and home, child-raising) were kept in a position of dependency. Somehow feminists thought that being dependent on a paycheck wasn’t dependency.

If the kind of relationship that existed when I was a child had been kept intact, the same process that allowed poor whites to rise into the middle class would have allowed blacks to do the same. The ladders of upward mobility worked.

It was the white liberals who destroyed the prospects of multiculturalism by teaching blacks to hate whites for oppressing them. And it was the global corporations that dismantled the ladders of upward mobility.

Multiculturalism did not work for native Americans. They were too much at one another’s throat to unite against the white immigrant-invaders. Obviously, at first there were only a few white people, and the Indians, as they were called, did not comprehend the threat until it was too late. If they had, each ship that landed would have had its passengers killed by native Americans.

Multiculturalism can work if there are no strains and no animosities, but when strains and animosities are intentionally created, there is no prospect of successful multiculturalism. Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the white liberal media, and the white liberal Democrats and professors are furiously at work making certain that multiculturalism in America fails.

This means, obviously, that the America that they hate will also fail.

Paul Craig Roberts
About Paul Craig Roberts

Paul Craig Roberts has had careers in scholarship and academia, journalism, public service, and business. He is chairman of The Institute for Political Economy.

Dr. Roberts has held academic appointments at Virginia Tech, Tulane University, University of New Mexico, Stanford University where he was Senior Research Fellow in the Hoover Institution, George Mason University where he had a joint appointment as professor of economics and professor of business administration, and Georgetown University where he held the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy in the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Dr. Roberts was associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He was a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate in Los Angeles. In 1992 he received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993 the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States.

President Reagan appointed Dr. Roberts Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and he was confirmed in office by the U.S. Senate. From 1975 to 1978, Dr. Roberts served on the congressional staff where he drafted the Kemp-Roth bill and played a leading role in developing bipartisan support for a supply-side economic policy. After leaving the Treasury, he served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Commerce.