The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Lee Archive
Saudi Arabia Goes All In on Syria Regime Collapse with a Quiet Assist from the US
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A year ago there was a certain amount of back and forth as to what it meant that Saudi Arabia had pushed Qatar out of the leadership position on Syria and whether the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was going to go along with the Syria peace process.

I was of the opinion that the Kingdom would go all in on regime collapse.  A shattered Syria was preferable to a Syria that was tottering along with foreign forbearance under Assad or some government of national reconciliation that included Ba’athists and had the Muslim Brotherhood (beloved by the Qataris and detested by the Saudis, as subsequent events in Egypt demonstrated to even the most casual observer) nose in the tent.

After all,chaos in Syria would deny that country to the MB and also have spillover effects into Iraq, which has already become a charnel house.  If anything, the budding US rapprochement with Iran would strengthen this tendency.  With direct US action off the table, the best way for Saudi Arabia to stick it to Iran was by deposing its vulnerable allies in Syria and Iraq, and by taking another swing at Hezbollah.

Well, according to Patrick Cockburn’s recent piece in the Independent (which, for some reason, is in the comment section), Saudi support for regime collapse in Syria–and by that, I mean explicit government support, and not just a nod and a wink encouragement to well-heeled private Saudi citizens with an enthusiasm for foreign jihad–is pretty much a done deal:

The directors of Saudi policy in Syria – the Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, the head of the Saudi intelligence agency Prince Bandar bin Sultan and the Deputy Defence Minister Prince Salman bin Sultan – plan to spend billions raising a militant Sunni army some 40,000 to 50,000 strong.

Now we know why Saudi Arabia made the otherwise inexplicable decision to purchase over 15,000 TOW missiles from Raytheon.  TOW missiles are surface to surface wire guided missiles used by ground forces at short range over line of sight to take out tanks.  The most plausible place to use them is Syria.

Mr. Cockburn is of the opinion that the Saudis will screw it up.  Indeed, a certain contempt for Saudi Arabia’s aspirations to Israel-like levels of skullduggery in manipulating events and advancing its interests in the Middle East through covert applications of violence seems to permeate the expert commentariat.

But I don’t think victory is Saudi Arabia’s priority.  Chaos is.  Chaos that bleeds the Syrian regime, bleeds Iran and, ironically, bleeds the violent jihadis who otherwise might find the corrupt and sclerotic Saudi kingdom a suitable focus for their militancy.

Over the next few months it will be interesting to see if a side product of US-Iran rapprochement (and conciliation with an offended and threatened Saudi Arabia) is a willingness by the US (and perhaps accepted as a matter of realpolitik) by Iran to keep the meatgrinder of insurrection churning in Syria as long and as fiercely as Riyadh wants it–with the US providing TOW missiles (if not the helicopter-killing surface to air missiles the insurgents crave) to keep things going.

(Republished from China Matters by permission of author or representative)
 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Lee Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.