The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Lee Archive
Four Corners/Fairfax Levels Up to US-Class National Security Steno Work on China
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

There’s a big to-do about an investigative thing by Australia’s Four Corners/Fairfax Media concerning Chinese influence in Australia.

ASIO investigation targets Communist Party links to Australian political system

ASIO is the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, which curated the dossiers that Four Corners/Fairfax assiduously summarized and spun.

I think the series is highly significant, perhaps not in the way the journos hoped and intended, and the June 21 episode of China Watch will pick apart the details.

That’s a teaser, folks. China Watch is behind the paywall, so you gotta open your wallets. I’m proud of what I’m doing there, it’s unavailable elsewhere, and its worth more than what you’re paying to watch Orange is the New Black on Netflix.

So pony up.

A couple notes that didn’t make it into the broadcast.

I found this nugget rather interesting:

Special Minister of State Scott Ryan has defended former trade minister Andrew Robb, who took an $880,000 part-time job as a consultant to a Chinese billionaire days after the 2016 federal election.

Robb was handled rather gently, even though the billionaire in question was the guy who took the 99-year lease on Darwin port, the one that gave conniptions to the US natsec community.

Wonder why.

The second thing that struck me was the emphasis on “the Chinese Communist Party” instead of “the People’s Republic of China” as the evil agency behind the Chinese billionaires.

The CCP doesn’t do overseas espionage, as far as I can tell. So that would seem to hinder the attempt to inflate the Chinese espionage menace. And the other big deal was Chinese billionaires Huang Xiangmo & Chau Chak Wing were big bucks contributors to Australian political parties which is legal even for foreigners down there and Chau’s even an Australian citizen.

I got no problem with allegations that China is buyin’ and spyin’ and oppressin’ and surveillin’ inside Australia. But the report was more along the lines of choreographed threat inflation.

The bulk of the report was, to be unkind, third-rate national security journo-ing.

On China Watch, I was going to cite the instances of crude, dog-whistling assertions trotted out instead of hard facts but the list got too darn long. So I’m doing it here.

At the end of this post, I document the atrocities from just one of the articles, which obligingly passes along a report from the ASIO about a break-in it conducted on Sheri Yan’s apartment in 2015.

Sheri Yan probably deserves a post for herself. She ran what looked like a Clinton Foundation clone, the Global Sustainability Foundation, that got funds from Chinese moneybags and delivered access to and if possible allegedly favors from UN bureaucrats. According to the U.S. government, in the person of NeverTrump celebrity Preet Bahara, Yan passed on some of that money as bribes to UN officials, including John Ashe, who became president of the UN General Assembly.

One billionaire she allegedly did errands for was Chau Chak Wing. If that was the case, Yan took the fall–she’s doing 20 months in federal prison–instead of rolling over on him. Another was Ng Lap Seng, who was named and nailed in the indictment.

This Ng Lap Seng.

Ng’s first brush with bribery in the US (but no conviction!) was in the 1990s. He won fame in the United States in 1997 for funneling a few hundred thousand dollars to Bill Clinton through Little Rock restauranteur Charlie Trie, visiting the White House a few times, and helping lose Al Gore the White House with the “Chinagate” scandal.

An interesting data point is the allegation that the Clinton-related influence buying in the US was reputedly ordered by Jiang Zemin when Jiang was running the show and felt China needed a little more post-Tiananmen international political oomph.

According to the indefatigably anti-Jiang Zemin Epoch Times, Chau Chak Wing is also a member of Jiang’s Shanghai clique. In my China Watch video I speculate that Australia has become a haven for Shanghai clique members seeking to escape the attentions of Xi Jinping and Wang Qishan, and their credentials as trusted PRC state actors are open to question.

Anyway, ASIO, the FBI, and whoever obviously has a hardon for these people, maybe along the lines of, Hey, they bribed Clintons so we’ll get ’em for this! and believe they deserve to be nailed no matter what. Four Corners/Fairfax obliged by cranking up the innuendo machine.

Here I am documenting the dishonest dossier hustling in the Sheri Yan piece, with my disapproving sniffing in boldface:

“The raid…reflects deep concern inside ASIO”

“it is the Chinese Communist party causing the greatest concern…”

“ASIO suspected…that Ms Yan’s activities extended well beyond bribery. Classifed material shared between FBI counter-espionage officials and ASIO…suggested Ms Yan may have been working with Chinese intelligence.”

It is understood the investigation into Ms Yan involves suspicions she infiltrated or sought clandestine influence in Australia and the US on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.”

Professor Rory Medcalf…says the ASIO raid would not have occurred without…input from many parts of the Australian national security community”…”the targeting reflects a small part of a ‘deep and real concern’…Eight serving government officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, broadly confirmed Mr. Medcalf’s assessment…also confirmed …the agency had been collating intelligence suggesting…ASIO feared the campaign was succeeding…

[ASIO] prepared an extraordinary document…at the top was a diagram representing the Chinese Communist Party with lines connected this diagram to photos of two Chinese born billionaires [Huang and Chau].

Donors could be channels to advance Beijing’s interests: AISO.

“[Lewis] said ‘be careful’…he was saying the connections between these guys and the Communist Party is strong”…

In the oh, for f*ck’s sake column, here’s the takeaway the head of ASIO offered the political parties while wielding his “extraordinary” picture-and-line filled document:

In his briefing, Mr. Lewis was careful to stress that neither Dr. Chau nor Huang Xianmo was accused of any crime and that Mr. Lewis wasn’t instructing the parties to stop taking their donations.”

Back to the smear stuff:

“We have to assume that individuals like that have really deep, serious connections to the Chinese Communist Party”.

“Mr. Medcalf said ASIO’s decision to come out of the shadows and identify Dr Chua in its briefings is “certainly unusual”…”it would reflect very real concern

If Dr Chau has taken a position on any policy issue in Australia he’s not done so publicly…But for parts of the Chinese Communist Party, access to the right networks may be worthwhile in and of itself.

This may be why Sheri Yan sought to compromise UN chief John Ashe, according to former CIA officer turned China watcher Peter Mattis.

The magnificent coda to this effort is provided by a Ford Foundation guy:

“John Fitzgerald, a former Ford Foundation director…told Four Corners and Fairfax Media of a warning he received from an “old friend in Australia’s security establishment” to “stay away from Yan”.

“Once you know that, you don’t need to know much more.”

Well, Fitzgerald’s sharing that corner with…Four Corners/Fairfax.

Watch my June 21 episode to learn why this circus is going global.

(Republished from China Matters by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Australia, China 
Hide 14 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I would humbly point out that there is nexus between the CCP and the government of the PRC. It’s called the “Standing Committee of the Central Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China” aka “Politboro Standing Committee” or “PSC”. But I do respect Peter Lee’s judgment that there is real and important difference between the PRC and the CCP.

  2. anon • Disclaimer says:

    China is trying to influence a number of regions and countries. It is naturally facing resistances. China recently has to leave the position it was holding on to in Bhutan. Worst that it was forced to do despite the media barrage and venomous outpourings from Chinese media .

    • Agree: Endgame Napoleon
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  3. Anonymous [AKA "pinoy hunter"] says:

    2 lazy pinoy china bashing above

  4. If Russia is helping a neoliberal, Russia is good. If China is helping a neoliberal, China a good. Follow the neoliberalism.

  5. Smith says:

    China doesn’t really do oversea espionage, as far as you could tell?

    Mate, please say that in the beginning so I know to avoid wasting time on this crap. What is this? The China Defense blog?

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
  6. Jews and Chinese freemasons one and all, but you’ll never ever hear that mentioned in their MSM.

    Like the Chinese who love their lucky number “8”, the Jewish freemasons love their “3s”, “6s”, and “9s” the so-called Telsa numbers, and, of course, they especially love their “7/11s”.

    To wit:

    Special Minister of State Scott Ryan has defended former trade minister Andrew Robb, who took an $880,000 part-time job as a consultant to a Chinese billionaire days after the 2016 federal election.


    Robb was handled rather gently, even though the billionaire in question was the guy who took the 99-year lease on Darwin port, the one that gave conniptions to the US natsec community.

    99 is 66 upside down: As above, so below.

    Last but not least, we have the Jewish freemason handshake between Ng and Clinton hiding in plain sight.

  7. @Maowasayali

    They love to joke and flaunt their kosher black magic numerology right in front of our faces because they know the goyim are too stupid to know or care.

    The latest POTUS Trump ‘jokingly’ admits he’s a MASON live on (((CNN))).


    Further to my above post, note that the Skull and Bones freemasons love their Eights (8s) as much as the Chinese do. Note the time on the clock is at EIGHT. Nuff said.

  8. @Maowasayali

    I think it’s Indians and Pakistanis who own the 7/11s, actually, but proceed.

    • LOL: acementhead
    • Replies: @Loren
  9. Loren says:

    because USA gov gives special minority loans or free money??

  10. “Hey, they bribed Clintons so we’ll get ’em for this! ” Oh, is that fair ? — nearly everyone has bribed the Clintons haven’t they ?

  11. RMM says:

    “According to the indefatigably anti-Jiang Zemin Epoch Times…”
    Epoch Times is a Falungong outlet.

  12. @Smith

    USA only does spying on allies and enemies—this is quite a difference. Now Denmark is a good mark for getting things done but planting Detrick Covid in Danish mink now causing quite a stink–enough to mess a person’s ham in the omelette —-as Stoltenberg stated “yingle yangle–” .

  13. Anonymous[970] • Disclaimer says:

    Like many Unz articles, far too long and never came to a point. CCP doesn’t spy? Pull the other one.

    • Replies: @迪路
  14. 迪路 says:

    As far as I know, quite a few rich Chinese are Freemasons. Most of the famous billionaires are freemasons. You can find their names on the Rockefeller Foundation’s Charitable list of Rich Chinese. Basically, they joined a Jewish financial consortium.
    With CCP, you don’t have to think of CCP as a whole, there are factions within CCP.
    Also, don’t try to confuse the CCP with China’s plutocrats. The very idea of a plutocrat runs counter to what CCP was set up to do.
    CCP doesn’t care if it’s freemasonry, it can cooperate in some places, but it can even be hostile in others, especially when it comes to interfering in foreign affairs.
    The simplest logic is that the CCP can’t even bribe politicians in Taiwan, so why bribe Australia?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Lee Comments via RSS
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement