The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Lee Archive
Asian Auto-da-fé: Trump and the Pivot
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I have not one but two! posts up at Asia Times on the Trump shock.

Hillary is Gone; Will the Pivot Live On?

The US Pivot to Asia: Death by Trump

In my opinion, the pivot was always an autoda, an act of faith: a cumbersome, expensive, difficult, and onerous strategy that ran counter to the trend of declining American relative strength and indeed was attempting to reverse it. Sort of like how the Catholic Church used the Inquisition as an elaborate public ritual to command faith in the universal power of the church and its doctrine when things were headed in the opposite direction. An autoda was often but not invariably punctuated by the public execution of some victim, hence its association with getting burned at the stake, but an autodawas really supposed to instill faith in the doctrinal and moral rightness of the church in the onlookers.

You know, like sending two carriers into the South China Sea to declare the US ain’t goin’ nowhere.


Gotta have faith, in other words, with thin lines between affirming faith that’s already strong and reinforcing faith that was wavering and, when things get desperate, pretending faith is there when it isn’t.

One of the most magnificent autodafés was conducted in Madrid in 1680. It serves as subject of one of the masterpieces of Spanish painting in the Prado,Auto-da-fe in the Plaza Mayor of Madrid by (an Italian) Francisco Rizi. If the picture below messes up your browser, here’s a link to a high-resolution version.


This elaborate spectacle was staged to affirm the stature of the young King Charles II as the spiritual as well as political leader of Spain, and impress his new bride. Somewhat borderline-blasphemously, at least in my opinion, the ceremony is a temporal dramatic rendering of the last day of judgment, with Charles II symbolically sitting in judgment of sinners (and burnishing his credentials as a religious leader) in place of You-Know-Who.

The painting itself is a carefully-composed document to confirm the religious and royal authority of Charles II. Fortunately, a detailed analysis of the painting by Dr. Helen Rawlings of Leicester University is available on the Internet. If readers consult her piece instead of viewing Rizi’s painting as an ornate jumble of colorful figures, they will be rewarded. For instance, that crowd of people on the risers to the right aren’t season ticket holders with preferred seating: they’re the accused, 118 of them, mainly Portugese peasants accused of practicing Judaism, waiting to be led to the central platform to hear their sentences. 19 were burned the next day; 68 repented and were subjected to various non-lethal punishments; and 34 were represented only by effigies since they had fled or already died.

Those who repented received clemency and were reconciled to the Church during the autodafé, in a ritual that was meant to form the emotional and religious heart of the ceremony. However, for understandable reasons the grotesque and galvanizing spectacle of the unrepentant getting burned to death the next day is what stuck in peoples’ minds.

Conveniently for the purposes of my analogy, the 1680 auto-da-fe was both the culmination and the inflection point for the decline of the Inquisition and Spain itself. As Dr. Rawlings puts it, Rizi’s magnificent painting is “a defining image of the decline of the Spanish Inquisition rather than a celebration of its triumph.”

So I think the Asian pivot was, at its heart, an autodafé, an elaborate and expensive ritual that affirmed America’s position at the heart and as the heart of the regional security order–and implying its impermanence.

For the Asian countries to resist the urge to integrate economically with China and instead signing on to a military containment structure led by the US, they had to have faith that the United States would be there, if not forever, for the foreseeable future, injecting pressure, inducements, and political and financial capital into the region to sustain the strategy.

Well, the pivot isn’t dead—never say never—but the simple uncertainty introduced by Trump makes it harder for Asian countries to have faith in the US commitment to the strategy of the pivot–by which the US trades considerable current national capital in return for future and rather intangible advantages–and the long term sustainability of the pivot architecture.

The pathetic public demise of the TPP ain’t helping.

Ash Carter had characterized TPP—an everybody-but-China trade club intended to provide Asian nations with a “high standards” alternative to succumbing to the PRC’s economic gravity—as the equivalent of another aircraft carrier. Instead, the US under Trump will go bilateral on its trade policy and instead of two big trade blocs, one US-led and the other PRC-led, Asian nations will go “all of the above” in their trade treaties, something that, as PRC regional clout grows and relative US clout declines, will not please US pivoteers attempting to claim the “Pacific Century” for America.

I think part of the strategy of the pivot was an attempt to embed it—get enough buy-in and make it complex enough that the costs of dismantling it would be regarded as unacceptable.

A collateral advantage was that it was so complicated that only dedicated pivoteers would be able to run it. Job security! as well as policy continuity, in other words.

Ironically, it appears a good number of pivoteers may have inadvertently taken themselves out of the game by coming out so early and so strongly against Trump. Part of this was probably a matter of conviction, and partly in response to a Clinton strategy of stockpiling declarations of support by token solicitations for advice from the FP community.

Anyway, the word from the Trump campaign via Buzzfeed is that everybody who signed a letter denouncing Trump as unfit for the presidency is—not a big surprise here—blacklisted, and it looks like by default the only Republican Asia heavyweights left are a bunch of Bush-era realists.

As I state in my AT pieces, there are some really opportunities to improve the US position in the Philippines and vis a vis North Korea if the U.S. sheds the pivot incubus.

But I don’t think Trump has the inclination or energy to come up with an alternative to the pivot, and the pivoteers embedded in the Pentagon, State Department, and think-tanks will continue to push for implementation of their cherished strategy.

Problem is, the pivot was already tottering in some secondary markets—Thailand, Burma, and the Philippines—in response to intensive Chinese pressure and blandishments.

Now, I think the Asian democracies, including heavy hitters South Korea and Japan, will be less inclined to provide these initiatives with the enthusiastic support they require as Trumpismo reinforces the new reality that America is in Asia when it wants to be; China will never leave.

That’s the new article of faith.

(Republished from China Matters by permission of author or representative)
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Once again, proof that many voters now realize “American Interests” are not the same as Americans’ interests.

  2. One of my greatest hopes for a Trump presidency is a realistic foreign policy which acknowledges that Russia, China, the USA, and various less powerful nations all have spheres of influence which should be mutually recognized and respected. That the Bushies, the Clintonistas, and the neocons all arrayed themselves as bitter and vicious enemies of Trump makes this more likely. At least, Trump seems to be showing some indifference to, if not disdain for, the grandiose and dangerously bellicose delusions of current US foreign policy.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  3. CK says:

    A fine list of 124 old names that will not be in the new administration.
    But there are many left who were not Bush era heavyweights.
    We can find them here, also on, Ron Paul,
    ( where one can find a rather brill National Security Advisor if one wants to look. )
    So many neocons signed that Open Letter. Now that is an auto-de-fé to enjoy.

  4. @Jus' Sayin'...

    If the US had chosen respectful seeming requests for and offers of cooperation rather than arrogant assertiveness it could have been engaging China and Russia in common enterprises. For example China has, apart from not having its prestige on the line, as much interest in Afghanistan’s future as the US. As it is it will probably be the major developer of Afghanistan’s mineral resources.

  5. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    “there are some really opportunities”

    Peter Lee, that no good English.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. Trump! Trump! I am so happy not because Trump won, but because Hell-Lier lost. If she had advocated friendship with Russia, and the ending of our meddling in Syria, ending bad trade deals, and be pro America, then she could by now be our President elect.

  7. 5371 says:

    How could the defendants be “Portuguese peasants accused of practicing Judaism”? I know that some inhabitants of Braganca province were long suspected of backsliding, but in 1680 Spain and Portugal had been separate again for many years.

  8. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This isn’t 4chan dipshit.

    This is the grownups table. Try to leave your mom’s basement sometime and learn about the rest of the world.

  9. utu says:

    All smaller countries that signed TPP should be happy that TPP is dead. TPP was only good for large corporations.

  10. Marcus says:

    China and the Philippines seem relieved by the election, Japan apprehensive.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Lee Comments via RSS
Becker update V1.3.2
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?