The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Gottfried Archive
Counting the Dead Equally
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Much to the consternation of Western intellectuals and journalists, Hungary’s government sponsors a House of Terror in Budapest which dares to devote attention to not only Nazi crimes, but also Stalinist ones.

Ever since the ascendance of the “antifascist” (read: neo-Stalinist plus PC) persuasion in our “liberal democracies,” it has become gauche and somehow even anti-Semitic to compare Nazi (or more generally “fascist”) atrocities to the collateral damage of the communist forced march into the globalist future.

But the House of Terror’s director, Gábor Tallai, says it is sometimes hard to distinguish between victims of Nazi and Soviet terror. “Many Hungarian Jews who escaped Auschwitz were then dragged off by the Red Army to perform compulsory labor in Siberia.” Since my cousin was one of these forced laborers, I concede Tallai’s point.

More importantly, Tallai observes that it’s wrong to divide those who were destroyed by Nazi and Soviet tyrannies into “first and second class victims.” Victims of murderous regimes are victims whether or not fashionable intellectuals condemn some mass murders but excuse others. In German newspapers, political speeches, and learned circles, any attempt to bring up Soviet crimes against Germans, or even to mention that Stalin killed people who were not “fascists,” is condemned as Holocaust-Verharmlosung—trivialization of Nazi genocide. The 12-14 million Germans who were expelled from Eastern Europe after World War II deserved what they got because they were allegedly Nazi collaborators. This is imagined to be true even for anti-Nazi Germans in the Sudetenland and regions of Eastern Germany.

“Conservative” German Chancellor Angela Merkel ran to Moscow last May to thank the Russian government for Stalin’s kindness in liberating the Germans from fascism. Such an act is not surprising from someone who had been a loyal communist almost up until the time the Berlin Wall fell and whose father remained a diehard Stalinist until his death last year. It is all too typical of the current double standard toward tyranny in her country and elsewhere in the PC West. Former Stasi agents remain key players in German politics and may even creep into the federal government after the next national election.

Because of this nauseating double standard about Nazi and Soviet or Soviet-inspired crimes, I initially welcomed the release of Yale historian Tim Snyder’s Bloodlands, which was supposed to do justice to the crimes of both of those tyrannies that oppressed and decimated Central and Eastern Europe in the first half of the twentieth century. Snyder’s conclusions were published in the New York Review of Books, and after reading the article, it became apparent why an unmistakably leftist fortnightly went agog over his work.

Although Snyder tells us that Stalin and his henchmen murdered lots of people, his depiction of Germans and Russians is very different. Unlike the victimized Russians under Stalin, the Germans are always at work—as they are in Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners—murdering and torturing Jews and Slavs. Even the German resistance in 1944 is condemned as a crew of Nazi mass murderers who decided to jump ship. This conclusion is reached on the basis of treating two peripheral figures as typical of this ill-fated resistance force, which included at its center such tried and true anti-Nazis as Leipzig Mayor Carl Goerdeler and longtime Prussian aristocratic opponents of Hitler’s regime.

A learned friend, Alfred de Zayas, has published several books on the treatment of ethnic Germans after the war. The most useful is “50 Theses on the Expulsion of the Germans from Central and Eastern Europe 1944-1948,” which is excerpted HERE. Zayas relies on German Federal Archives investigations from 1959 into the 1970s which show that between 1944 and the early 1950s over two million Germans lost their lives during brutal expulsions from Eastern Europe. This figure must be considered in the context of the “population transfer,” which the Western Allies approved at the postwar gathering in Potsdam.

Snyder describes these expulsions as a generally workmanlike removal of populations from one spot to another and pretends that the massacres of German populations in Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe never occurred. After an asterisk, we learn that…

…of the 12 million Germans who fled or were expelled from Eastern Europe at the end of the War, the vast majority came from Czechoslovakia or Poland….[A]bout half of the twelve million fled, and about half were deported—though a neat division is impossible, since some of those who fled later returned and were then deported.

He makes no mention of the multiple murders that accompanied the forced deportations.

These expulsions and organized killings were not, as Snyder suggests, merely justified reactions to German war crimes. Czech, Polish, and other interwar East Central European governments, as Zayas explains, had well-publicized plans to expel their large German minorities. WWII’s aftermath served as a pretext for nationalists and pro-Soviet forces throughout Eastern Europe to carry out ethnic cleansing on a grand scale. As Zayas points out, both the UN and the Catholic Church fully accept his figures for German deaths and expulsions, numbers which are clearly unacceptable to Snyder and the New York Review of Books.

German historians and researchers now routinely lowball the figures for German deaths from wartime firebombing and later expulsions. Since the 1970s the deaths that resulted from the bombing of Hamburg, Dresden, and other then-defenseless German and Austrian cities seem to have fallen steadily. The impression created is that only neo-fascists could believe these supposedly justified bombings had devastating effects. Casualty figures are lowered by insisting that only a precise counting of “geborgenen Leichen (intact corpses)” can be accepted in determining who died where. Noticing the disappearance of people from this planet will not do. Nor will it suffice that someone testified that he saw his family or neighbors killed. Such people were obviously self-pitying Nazi war criminals.


If such fastidious criteria were applied to tallying Jewish victims of Nazi persecution, the researcher would be jailed in Europe or Canada as a Holocaust denier. But since no one at The New York Times, Weekly Standard, or any other establishment-press fixture complains about massacred Germans—and since most Germans don’t give a rap about atrocities against their ancestors—it is unlikely Zayas’s scholarship will attract much attention.

(Republished from Takimag by permission of author or representative)
• Category: History • Tags: Germany, World War II 
Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Gottfried Comments via RSS