The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
The Establishment Strikes Back
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

There are a number of elements in the recent release of an indictment of twelve named alleged Russian military intelligence GRU officers by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein looking into possible ties between Moscow and the Trump Administration that I find either implausible or even incoherent. But before considering that, it is necessary to consider the context of the announcement.

The Department of Justice, which had, based on evidence already revealed, actually interfered in the 2016 election more that Moscow could possibly have done, continued in that proud tradition by releasing the indictment three days before President Donald Trump was due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Helsinki Summit between the two leaders was critically important to anyone interested in preserving the planet Earth as we know it and there was no reason at all to release a non-time sensitive document that was clearly intended to cast a shadow over the proceedings. In fact, the surfacing of the indictment might easily be explained as a deliberate attempt by a politicized Justice Department and Special Counsel Robert Mueller to torpedo President Trump over concerns that he might actually come to some understanding with Putin.

The 30-page long indictment is full of painstaking details about alleged Russian involvement but it makes numerous assertions that the reader is required to accept on faith because there is little or no evidence provided to back up the claims and the claims themselves could be false trails set up by any number of hostile intelligence services to implicate Moscow. From an intelligence officer’s point of view, there are even some significant areas where operational implausibility completely undermines the case being made.

The indictment identifies by name and position the twelve alleged GRU officers who “knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other, and with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury (collectively the ‘Conspirators’), to gain unauthorized access (to ‘hack’) into the computers of US persons and entities involved in the 2016 US presidential election, steal documents from those computers, and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election.”

All twelve alleged GRU officers are described in detail, together with the cover mechanisms they reportedly used and the targets they pursued. But they are all in Russia and there is virtually no chance that they will be extradited to stand trial in Washington, which was certainly understood when the indictment was prepared. That means the “facts” as stated in the document will never be subjected to the normal judicial review process or discovery that takes place whenever someone is accused of a crime, which in turn means that information contained in the indictment will never be challenged.

The document itself also provides no information on how the Russian officers and their positions were identified, which suggests that it could have been a US hack or agent in place, either run by CIA or NSA, that came up with a list of those individuals connected to GRU cyber operations. That would be information involving sources and methods, codeword protected material beyond Top Secret.

If the GRU list is authentic, it would expose US ability to penetrate that organization, leading to Moscow tightening up security to the detriment of American intelligence. But it might alternatively be suggested that the drafters needed a group of plausible Russians and used a generic list provided by either CIA or NSA to come up with the culprits and then used those identities and the detailed information regarding them to provide credibility to their account. What they did not do, however, is provide the actual evidence connecting the individuals to the “hack/interference” or to connect the same to the Russian government. If the information in the indictment is completely accurate, which may not be the case, there is some suggestion that alleged Moscow linked proxies may have deliberately sought to undermine the campaign of Hillary Clinton to favor Bernie Sanders, but absolutely no evidence that they did anything to help Donald Trump.

Beyond what is or is not contained in the document itself, there is a clear misunderstanding regarding how a sophisticated intelligence organization, which certainly includes the GRU, operates. If there had been a large-scale Kremlin sanctioned plan to disrupt the US election, it would not be run by twelve identifiable GRU officers working with what appears to be only limited cover and resources. If the facts are correct, the activity might have been a routine probing, collecting and selective dissemination of information effort that all intelligence agencies engage in. The United States does so routinely in many countries, interfering in elections worldwide, far more than Russia with its limited resources, and even carrying out regime change.

If the Kremlin’s objective were truly to undermine American democracy, a task that is already being undertaken very ably by the GOP and Democrats, hundreds of officers would be involved, all working under deep cover and operating securely out of dispersed sites. And no one involved would be using computers connected to networks that could be penetrated to enable personal identification or discovery of the ultimate source of the activity. Everyone would be working in alias on stand-alone machines and the transmission of information would be done using cut-outs to break any chain of custody. A cut-out might consist of using thumb drives to transmit information from one computer to another, for example. There would be no sending or receiving of information by channels that could be identified by NSA or CIA and compromised.

So the idea that the United States government identified twelve culprits who were responsible for trying to overthrow American democracy is by any measure ludicrous, if indeed there was a major plan to disrupt the election at all. The indictment is little more than a political document seeking to undermine any effort by Donald Trump to establish rapprochement with Vladimir Putin. It will also serve to give fuel to the Democrats, who are still at a loss to understand what happened to Hillary Clinton, and Republican hawks like John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Jeff Flake and Ben Sasse who persist in seeking to refight the Cold War. As Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin said in their Helsinki press conference, the coming together of the leaders of the world’s two most powerful nuclear armed countries is too important an opportunity to let pass. Cold Warriors in Washington should take note.

(Republished from Strategic Culture Foundation by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Deep State, Donald Trump, Neocons, Russia 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Minus my grasp of the specifics concerning operative mechanisms, you are preaching to trhe choir here.

    However, I don’t know how to dismiss the very real move by the president to sign on to the russian conspiracy. As far as he is concerned he has very limited options. I cannot imagine agreeing that the russians attempted or successfully disrupted or overturned the election and proceed forward as if nothing has occurred.

    If last was real, then the president was baited, and he fell for it. I think the title is correct — the establishment has struck back.

  2. Mueller is guilty of sedition, which I’m not sure is a crime according to actual contemporary law, in that he sought through this fraudulent indictment, to prevent Trump coming to any understanding with Russia. He is also guilty of treason to civilization, and our continued existence, since war would be a likely outcome of his intent. In any event, he is totally disloyal to the government theoretically employing him and should be immediately dismissed along with the people responsible for his appointment. The corrupt propaganda press can’t call him anything they are not already calling him. He should take action now, and Mueller and Rosenstein should be investigated for crimes they have committed.

  3. PJ London says:

    PJ London 8 days ago [similar article different forum]
    So the FBI did get access to the DNC server???
    Was that before or after they bleached it and hit it with the hammer?
    Or the whole story is just a load of BS.
    The idea that FBI could identify the individuals in the Cyber units of the GRU that individually spearphished a computer is so laughable that any person with an IQ greater than that of a turnip would just throw it out.
    GCHQ (Cheltenham) has got 6,000 and everyone of them are hidden when using the computer.
    Of course the Russians are so dumb that they login with their real names and unique IP numbers.

    The 12 should come here (as did the Russian company) and sue the FBI for defamation and slander. Discovery process would be hilarious (as it is with the Russian company suing Meuller)

    If you believe that, you will believe that you can make money with your laptop or that ‘Meuller’ is just waiting till October to ‘CRUSH’ Trump.

    My God but people are stupid.

  4. Anonymous [AKA "Alexi Tsipras- Souflis"] says:

    I think the solution to this problem is very simple.
    Notify them and give them enough time to leave the stolen land and go back to their homeland, Poland, Russia, Hungary, Germany, etc.
    If the time expires and still they occupy the stolen land, NATO must bomb them to dust while at the same time arrest those that they steer the strings behind the scenes (about 10.000 of them) around the World.
    Then, once the cancerous tumor is removed, the rest of the world will live in peace.

  5. Anonymous [AKA "Skutch"] says:

    ” truly to undermine American democracy, a task that is already being undertaken very ably by the GOP and Democrats ”

    That’s funny, no mention of the very small crowd of people who have quadrupled their share of wealth, taken over almost every bit of economic growth around the planet, used the MIC/surveillance state to secure their insane standards of living, and completely taken over public policy via regulatory capture in order to legalize bribery and run a world wide protection racket ??

    This doesn’t even begin to cover the war crimes, and general crimes against humanity taking place all over the globe by desperate economic dynasties who are even willing to take the gamble of strapping on the nuclear suicide vest if they don’t get recognition as Gods walking the earth.

    Funny how no one ever seems to get beyond the “we’re being hit over the head with a hammer” and into the quite logical and necessary, “well who exactly is swinging(funding) that hammer ?”

    Every problem around the world today leads right back to the wealthy protecting their entitlements.

  6. No report nor condemnation yet, Putin having harmed financially even one member of the classes.

    And no yet a single report by the classes that condemns Putin for harming masses. Ok, the reports [imaging, imagining, having visions, fantasizing, condemning, accusing, spinning, etc.] that Putin harmed US may have hurt the feelings of one, two, three members of the masses, but probably put the rest to sleep.

    If i am correct or thereabout, Mister Trump and Hospodin [or hospodar=master, owner] Putin have a lot of political power; for masses of both countries are not only larger, but also even angrier than the masses of the classes.

    Classes, of course, would have been much angrier than the are had they been hurt in the pocket book, but so far none of them has, afaik, complained that they are poorer now because Putin allegedly “meddled” [whatever that means, no one will ever know] in the US selection ’16.

  7. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:

    I would like to see a comprehensive list of all the instances where the US govt, or its proxies (including NGOs), interfered in other countries’ elections, tried to remove and/or install a leader, or overthrew a government.

    I know there are many, but perhaps by some writer listing them some of the mainstream media would start mentioning this more.

    Also, which countries interfere in OUR elections? Israel perhaps? Details please.

    • Replies: @Surrealisto
  8. @Anonymous

    from the link: A Carnegie Mellon scholar, Dov H. Levin, has scoured the historical record for both overt and covert election influence operations. He found 81 by the United States and 36 by the Soviet Union or Russia between 1946 and 2000, though the Russian count is undoubtedly incomplete.
    lionk to NYT article 2-17-18

  9. They have obviously not messed with Phil’s precious bodily fluids. The mainstream seems to have ingested a lot of laced Koolaid, on the other hand.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.