The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Surging for Hillary
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

One might recall the remora from high school biology, a highly specialized fish that has a sucker on the top of its head that enables it to attach itself to sharks and feed on the leftovers after the host has dined. I don’t know if anyone has ever compared the neoconservatives to remoras, but their parasitic behavior has frequently been commented on. Unlike the relatively benign remora, however, they work assiduously to take over the host organism. Having destroyed the Republican Party, they are now engaged in becoming good Democrats, so it seems.

The neocon surge towards Hillary as Secretary of State, a position which she reportedly has accepted, has already begun. The current Weekly Standard features two puff pieces on her lauding her “conservative” credentials. One, describing her as a real hawk, is by Michael Goldfarb. Goldfarb is the former McCain campaign staffer who notoriously claimed on national television that there are a number of anti-Semitic associates of Barack Obama, though he declined to name them. Apparently Hillary, though a Democrat, passes the sniff test.

David Brooks, eager to help the cause in his own “I have a conscience and I’m being reasonable” fashion also jumped on the Hillary bandwagon, writing in today’s NYT “She has demonstrated in the Senate, her foreign-policy views are hardheaded and pragmatic… [and] there are many people on this team with practical creativity. Any think tanker can come up with broad doctrines, but it is rare to find people who can give the president a list of concrete steps he can do day by day to advance American interests. Dennis Ross, who advised Obama during the campaign, is the best I’ve ever seen at this, but Rahm Emanuel also has this capacity…”

Brooks understandably regards Hillary’s support of Kyl-Lieberman as well as every other piece of anti-Iran legislation as “pragmatic.” He also shared her enthusiastic support of war against Iraq. Nor is he disturbed that Ross was so pro-Israel in his lean during Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David that he was even criticized by a colleague Aaron Miller. Rahm’s tilt on the Middle East is also well documented, close to AIPAC, and presumably a comfortable fit for Brooks. All of Brooks’ endorsements are of hawks, all of whom are advocates of using a heavy hand when dealing with the Iranians and others. All are being provided cover by the neocon pundits at the Weekly Standard and New York Times.

Bill Kristol, who has praised Hillary in the past, took a slightly different tack in Monday’s NYT op-ed in an attempt to shift the debate away from any criticism of foreign policy. He proposed a Republican resurgence based on “developing an economic agenda moving forward,” though he did admit that he does not know how that will happen or what should be done. Conveniently, “Republicans and conservatives today face a similar challenge to that of 1976. A hawkish foreign policy, social conservatism and middle-American populism aren’t the problems.” Admittedly the economy trumps all currently, but Kristol is trying to shift the playing field to avoid looking at the policies that were crafted by him and his neocon friends.


(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Hillary Clinton 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Jason says: • Website

    As conservatives could we possibly expect to be HAPPY with whoever Obama chooses as Secretary of State? I don’t like Hillary at all, but Obama could have done a lot worse.
    http://rightklik.blogspot.com/

  2. So it looks like there will be no change in US foreign policy under Obama’s administration? Geez, I never saw that one coming…. (by the way, this Republican voted Ralph Nader)…

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.