The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Israel Cracks the Whip
Netanyahu tells Biden how to deal with Iran
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
OpenAI Text Summary
The current geopolitical tension between the United States and Iran has been exacerbated by Israel's assertive stance, particularly under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. Shortly after President Joe Biden took office, high-ranking Israeli officials, including Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen and IDF Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi, made it clear that any approach by the Biden administration to engage with Iran would face significant Israeli opposition. Kochavi indicated that the IDF was preparing multiple operational plans to counter potential U.S. diplomacy with Iran, suggesting military action might be on the table. This approach reflects a belief in Israel's right to dictate U.S. foreign policy, particularly concerning Iran's nuclear capabilities and regional influence, raising concerns about the implications for U.S. sovereignty in foreign policy decisions.

Israeli leaders express a sense of hubris, believing that as U.S. influence wanes, Israel should assume a greater role in global leadership. The Israeli position on Iran demands that the Islamic Republic cease uranium enrichment, halt military support for groups like Hezbollah, and end its regional military presence. This stance aims to neutralize any Iranian influence in neighboring countries, reinforcing Israel's dominance in the Middle East. The irony lies in Israel's own secretive nuclear arsenal and its historical support for terrorism, positioning it as a significant regional power while accusing Iran of similar transgressions. This hypocritical narrative is complicated by the ongoing Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and its military operations against Iranian allies in the region.

President Biden’s administration appears to be aligning closely with Israeli interests, as evidenced by the composition of his national security team, which includes many individuals with strong ties to Israel. Secretary of State nominee Tony Blinken's commitment to consult with Israel before any negotiations regarding the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) reveals a willingness to prioritize Israeli concerns over American diplomatic interests. Biden's approach seems to leave little room for constructive engagement with Iran, particularly given Iran's resistance to comply with U.S. demands to limit its regional role and military capabilities. This dynamic could lead to further escalation of tensions, with Israel poised to exert its influence over U.S. foreign policy decisions.

The relationship between the U.S. and Israel is often considered a "red line" in American politics, dominating discussions while being largely unaccountable to scrutiny. Historical examples, such as the alleged Israeli involvement in the “Russiagate” scandal, highlight the complexities and underlying tensions in U.S.-Israel relations. The collaboration between Israeli officials and American political figures has often blurred the lines of national interest, raising questions about the extent of Israel's influence in shaping American policy. The ongoing dynamic suggests that as Biden continues his presidency, he may increasingly find himself beholden to Israeli demands, potentially leading the U.S. into a conflict with Iran that aligns with Israel's strategic aspirations rather than its own national interests. The broader implications for U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East remain uncertain, but the relationship with Israel seems poised to dictate the course of action in the region.
OpenAI Outline Summary
# Outline of the Article on U.S.-Israel Relations and Policy Towards Iran

## I. Introduction
A. The perception of the U.S. as Israel's subordinate
B. Recent actions of the Israeli government post-Biden's inauguration

## II. Israeli Government's Assertive Stance
A. Visit from Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen
1. Purpose: To dictate U.S. policy regarding Iran
B. Statements from Israeli military leadership
1. Aviv Kochavi's warning to Biden
2. Preparation of military options against Iran
3. Potential for an Israeli attack if U.S. policies are not favorable

## III. Israeli Hubris and Regional Dominance
A. Israeli Rabbi's claim of Israel's rising global role
B. The Zionist approach to Iran
1. Disarming Iran’s influence in neighboring countries
2. Conceding Israeli dominance in the region
C. Tactics to provoke U.S. intervention against Iran
1. Possible false flag operations

## IV. The Official Israeli Position on Iran
A. Demands on Iran from Israeli officials
1. Halt uranium enrichment and advanced centrifuge production
2. Cease support for terrorist groups, notably Hezbollah
3. End military presence in Iraq, Syria, Yemen
4. Stop terror attacks against Israeli targets
5. Allow full access to IAEA regarding its nuclear program
6. Abandon ballistic missile program

## V. Irony in Israeli Actions
A. Israel's secret nuclear arsenal
1. Accusations against Iran while maintaining its own stockpile
B. Support for terrorist groups by Israel
C. Iranian actions in Syria as resistance to foreign insurgencies
D. Comparison of attacks on Iranian officials versus Israeli aggression

## VI. Biden Administration's Approach
A. Biden's perceived weakness in negotiating with Israel
B. Composition of Biden's national security team
1. Predominantly Jewish and Zionist
2. Emphasis on consulting Israel regarding Iran policies
C. Challenges posed by Iran's unwillingness to yield its defenses

## VII. Speculation on Israeli Intelligence Operations
A. Allegations of Israeli infiltration of U.S. government systems
B. Historical context of Israeli influence in U.S. politics
1. The Russiagate controversy and its connections to Israel
2. Netanyahu's involvement in lobbying U.S. officials

## VIII. The Complexity of U.S.-Israel Relations
A. The “red line” of U.S. support for Israel
B. The shift in the political landscape post-Trump
C. Biden’s alignment with Israeli interests
D. Concerns about potential conflict with Iran

## IX. Conclusion
A. The ongoing influence of Israel on U.S. foreign policy
B. The likelihood of conflict driven by Israeli demands
C. Call for a more interests-based U.S. approach in the Middle East

## X. Author Information
A. Philip M. Giraldi's background
B. Overview of the Council for the National Interest
C. Contact information for further inquiries

This outline provides a structured summary of the article, highlighting key points regarding the U.S.-Israel relationship, Israeli policy regarding Iran, and the implications for American foreign policy. The focus is on the dynamics of power, influence, and potential conflict in the region.
List of Bookmarks

Anyone who persists in believing that the United States is not Israel’s poodle should pay attention to the comedy that is playing out right now. Joe Biden was president for less than a week when the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu government announced that he would soon be receiving a possibly unwelcome visitor in the form of the Israeli foreign intelligence service Mossad’s chief Yossi Cohen, who will be flying to Washington in February to explain the correct policy when dealing with Iran. And lest there be any confusion on the issue, the Israel Defense Force chief of staff Lieutenant General Aviv Kochavi also announced that any Biden attempt to mend fences with the Islamic Republic will have to meet certain conditions or Israel will exercise other options. He said “In light of this fundamental analysis, I have instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare a number of operational plans, in addition to those already in place. It will be up to the political leadership, of course, to decide on implementation but these plans need to be on the table.” Another government minister clarified that the options would include “an attack” on Iran, though there has been no indication whether or not Israel would possibly contemplate deploying its tactical nuclear weapons to prevent retaliation by Iranian forces.

There is no limit to Israeli hubris. A leading Rabbi in Israel is predicting that as the United States is in decline it is up to the Jewish state to take over the role of “guiding civilization forward.” And that kind of thinking shapes how Israel treats the United States with condescension, acting as if it is the knowledgeable elder statesman whose guidance must be respected. In this case the Zionist solution to the Iran problem will by design be unpalatable for the government in Tehran if it intends to remain sovereign. For Israel the correct policy for dealing with Iran is to effectively disarm it and make it impossible to establish any sphere of influence in the countries adjacent to it, to include Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. That would be to concede Israeli dominance over the entire region and if the Iranians do not play ball the next step would be to convince the United States to attack it on some pretext, possibly to include an Israeli “false flag” to start the process going.

The Times of Israel sums up the Israeli official position as “…Iran must halt the enriching of uranium; stop producing advanced centrifuges; cease supporting terror groups, foremost Lebanon’s Hezbollah; end its military presence in Iraq, Syria and Yemen; stop terror activity against Israeli targets overseas; and grant full access to the IAEA on all aspects of its nuclear program.” Completing the disarming of Iran would also include requiring Tehran to abandon its ballistic missile program.

The irony is, of course, that it is Israel that has a secret nuclear arsenal that it created by stealing uranium and triggers from the United States and it is also the leading regional supporter of terrorist groups, to include al-Qaeda and ISIS. Iran’s presence in Syria is due to its lending assistance to the Damascus government’s resistance to the insurgencies supported by Israel and the United States. And Iran has not targeted Israeli citizens and groups overseas, but Israel and the U.S. have assassinated Iranian officials while also bombing both government and civilian targets in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. And all of the kinetics occur in a context where Israel continues its illegal occupation of Palestine and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people replete with both war crimes and crimes against humanity. Iran is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Israel is not, so who is the rogue state?

Biden will likely fold like a cheap suit when confronted by the force majeure of Cohen. The new American president has assembled a national security team for dealing with the Middle East that is nearly all Jewish and all Zionist, an affliction that he himself claims to suffer from. The Biden nominee for secretary of state Tony Blinken said at a confirmation hearing last week that the new administration would “consult with Israel” before any possible return to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal and he also made clear that there would be additional conditions for Iran. It was an odd comment for a government official who is supposed to support American interests, but it was predictably what Congress wanted to hear. As Iran has already indicated that it is unwilling to abandon its defenses and its role in the region, the Biden proposal will be a non-starter in any case, though Israel will be prepared to apply its own veto if anything undertaken by the State Department moves beyond the talking stage.

Currently there is credible speculation that Israeli intelligence has been able to compromise most if not all of the U.S. government’s information systems as well as those of major corporations. As the Jewish state is the most active in spying against the United States, that should surprise no one. For Israel to interfere in U.S. politics or government blatantly is not exactly new, though it is rare to have anyone in the mainstream media or in government say anything about. That is because Israel’s ability to wage war against critics is second to none, having at its back nearly unlimited financial resources and easy access to the media as well as active supporters from among the nearly six hundred Jewish organizations that exist in the United States.

Indeed, Israel has been involved in American politics frequently, one might even argue incessantly, even if it is predictably never held accountable. To cite only one well known example, it has been suggested that Russiagate was really Israelgate based on what actually took place shortly after the 2016 election. The contact with Russia was set up by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was at the time seeking to kill an anti-Israeli vote in the United Nations. He sought to do so by lobbying Donald Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner on the matter shortly after the 2016 election. Netanyahu was particularly close to the Kushner family, having on at least one occasion slept overnight at their mansion in Manhattan.

Prompted by Netanyahu, Kushner dutifully contacted Trump National Security Advisor-designate Michael Flynn and asked him to privately call Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak to lobby Moscow to vote against the bill. There were two phone calls but Kislyak refused to cooperate. It should be noted that while all of this was taking place Barack Obama was still president and his intention to abstain on a vote on Israel’s illegal settlements is what provoked Netanyahu to act, so Netanyahu-Kushner-Flynn were subverting their own elected government and were definitely in the wrong. Flynn was subsequently thrown under the bus by his Jewish friends without any mention in the media of the Israeli role, thereby becoming the first casualty of “Russiagate.” He was subsequently forced to resign from his post in disgrace in February 2017.

The whole issue of the U.S.-Israel relationship constitutes one of the most formidable “red lines” in American politics as part of its power comes from the fact that the media and political classes pretend that it does not even exist. Israel’s power was poisonous enough prior to the election of Donald Trump, but Trump, “advised” by a gaggle of orthodox Jews, dramatically shifted the playing field to favor Israel in ways that will define the relationship for years to come. Biden’s team is little better and the president will be taking his orders from Jerusalem and saluting as long as he stays in the White House. Will it lead to a totally unnecessary and unwinnable war with Iran? That is what Israel demands above all, and Israel always gets what it wants.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is https://councilforthenationalinterest.org address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is [email protected]

 
All Comments Hidden • Show  217 Comments • Reply
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.