The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Internet Freedom Is Relative
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

TAC readers have no doubt heard Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama defending the “freedom” of the internet as they demand that countries like Russia and China not interfere with the rights and privacy of online users. Well, it turns out that the country that most interferes with internet content, perhaps predictably, is the United States.

Google prepares a semiannual transparency report on government demands to remove content from its site. The latest report covered the last half of 2011. The US leads the pack with police, courts, and government agencies submitting 187 requests to remove content. Brazil had slightly more requests at 192, but the US was far ahead in terms of items to be censored with 6,200 separate items in the 187 requests compared to only 554 for Brazil.

Some of the requests were political in nature, seeking to erase complaints about the respective governments. Canada asked Google to remove a video of a man peeing on a Canadian passport before flushing it down a toilet.

Why am I not surprised? The US is, after all, the country that conceived of a Pentagon program called Total Information Awareness, which sought to search every public and private record to compile in a neat data base all the information on everyone and everything in the United States and, it is to be presumed, worldwide. The concern for freedom of the internet is a bit of a charade, with Washington meddling more than any other country and even working with close friend Israel to develop highly sophisticated computer worms. No other country has embraced a massive cyberwarfare effort, possibly clocking in at $100 billion by the time all the chickens and megabytes are counted.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Government Surveillance 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Borodino says:

    While your assessment is understandably pessimistic, there is the hopeful fact that – for the moment at least – the technology is evolving much more quickly than any government’s ability to control it.

    James Bamford’s work on the subject is indispensable.

  2. Depends on who they ask of course. Some sites just tell the government to shove it.

  3. Borodino says:

    Richard Clarke has dabbled in this stuff. A few years ago he advised Obama to give a speech at the UN saying that the US would never be the first to use cyberweapons against another the national infrastructure of another country, but that if we were attacked with such weapons, we would be entitled to respond with conventional weapons.

    But events seem to have left Mr. Clarke behind. Mr. Obama has now authorized first-use of cyber weapons against Iran, which (by the logic of Clarke’s portentously named “Obama Doctrine of No First Use”) gives Iran the moral right to retaliate against Israel and the United States with conventional weapons.

    Idiocracy indeed. The advance of neocon and neolib third raters through the national security establishment has cost us dearly. As far as I can tell, the last time serious, capable men ran the show was under G. H. W. Bush.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.