The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Christians Are White Supremacist Extremists
But don’t mention the Palestinians
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
OpenAI Text Summary
The recent approval of California's Ethnic Studies curriculum has sparked controversy, particularly regarding the portrayal of Jewish Americans and their historical narrative. Critics argue that the curriculum emphasizes Jewish victimhood and contributions to society while excluding other "white" ethnic groups that are numerically larger than Jewish Americans. This has raised questions about the motivations and identity of the Jewish advisers involved in creating the curriculum, as it appears to suggest a unique status that is not shared with other ethnicities. This situation reflects broader societal tensions over race, identity, and representation, indicating a potential bias in educational frameworks that prioritize certain narratives over others.

In a separate incident highlighting sensitivity to perceived anti-Semitism, a high school football coach was dismissed over the use of terms during gameplay that some deemed offensive. Words like "rabbi," "dreidel," and "Auschwitz" triggered allegations of insensitivity, leading to the coach's termination. Critics of this decision argue that such actions exemplify an overreaction to language, especially in contexts where words may not have been used in a derogatory manner. The concern is that if similar situations arose involving Christian references, they might not elicit the same level of scrutiny, suggesting a double standard in the handling of religious sensitivities.

The U.S. military's current focus on combating "white supremacy" within its ranks has also come under scrutiny. The Pentagon has established the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI) to promote diversity and report on potential threats posed by soldiers who hold dissenting views on historical narratives, particularly regarding the Holocaust. A booklet produced by DEOMI asserts that Holocaust denial poses a national security risk, effectively discouraging service members from questioning the established historical accounts. This approach has raised concerns about the implications for free speech and the ability of military personnel to engage in critical discussions about history and its interpretations.

Further complicating the discourse is the broader context of perceived Jewish exceptionalism in U.S. policy and military training. A Department of Defense manual categorizes certain religious groups, including Christians, as potential extremists, while simultaneously protecting narratives surrounding Jewish identity and historical suffering. Critics argue that this creates an environment where dissenters from the mainstream Holocaust narrative may face repercussions, ultimately raising questions about loyalty, patriotism, and the influence of particular interests within government institutions. The interplay between national security and historical narratives continues to evoke debate about the implications for American society and its understanding of identity politics.
OpenAI Outline Summary
# Outline of the Article on Ethnic Studies Curriculum and Military Policies

## I. Introduction
A. Overview of the California State Board of Education's Ethnic Studies curriculum
1. Inclusion of Jewish experiences and contributions
2. Exclusion of other white ethnicities
3. Questions regarding Jewish identity and perceived racial uniqueness

## II. Controversial Firing of a High School Football Coach
A. Coach's dismissal due to alleged anti-Semitic expressions
1. Words used: "rabbi," "dreidel," "Auschwitz"
2. Discussion on the context of the words
B. Comparison with potential reactions to Christian expressions
1. Hypothetical Christian-related terms: "priest," "manger," "kulaks"
2. Claims of hypersensitivity towards perceived anti-Semitism

## III. Military's Stance on Diversity and Extremism
A. Focus on eradicating "white supremacy" within the military
1. Encouragement of spying among soldiers
2. Creation of the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI)
B. DEOMI's mission and its implications
1. Assertion against Holocaust denial as a threat to national security
2. Publication of a booklet titled "Holocaust Revisionism"

## IV. The Holocaust Narrative and its Political Implications
A. Critique of the established Holocaust narrative
1. Claims of inconsistencies in victim numbers and death camps
2. Reference to Norman Finkelstein's work on the "Holocaust Industry"
B. Consequences for military personnel questioning the narrative
1. Labeling dissenters as security risks
2. Use of Holocaust narrative to justify treatment of Palestinians

## V. Cultural and Educational Push for Holocaust Awareness
A. Mandates for Holocaust education across several states
1. States with laws: California, New York, New Jersey, etc.
2. Pressure for nationwide Holocaust education
B. Concerns raised by World Jewish Congress (WJC)
1. Statistics on millennials' ignorance of Holocaust history

## VI. Perception of Religious Extremism in Military Training
A. Department of Defense training manual's classification of extremists
1. Labeling of Catholics and evangelical Christians as threats
2. Conflation of Christian extremism with white supremacy
B. Criticism of the military's social engineering role
1. Historical context of military defending the country
2. Lack of evidence for widespread extremism among soldiers

## VII. Questions on Dual Loyalty and Espionage
A. Allegations of Israeli espionage against the U.S.
1. Reports of investigations into Israeli spying halted by political pressure
2. Historical context of espionage cases
B. Statements from ex-Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard
1. Admission of dual loyalty among Jews
2. Encouragement of espionage for Israel

## VIII. Conclusion
A. Reflection on the implications of the current narrative
1. Concerns regarding the protection of Jewish narratives in America
2. Future of American military personnel's beliefs and consequences
B. Call for awareness among the American public
1. Urgency of recognizing the complexities of identity and loyalty
2. Need for a critical evaluation of historical narratives and policies

## IX. Author Information
A. Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D.
1. Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest
2. Aim for a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East
3. Contact details and mission statement of the organization
List of Bookmarks

The California State Board of Education has finally passed its Ethnic Studies curriculum including discussion of Jews, emphasizing their victimhood and contributions to the United States, without including any other “white” ethnicities, several of which are far more numerous than are Jewish Americans. Or perhaps the Jewish “advisers” who collaborated on creating an “acceptable” final draft do not consider themselves to be white, or is it that “chosen” status makes one racially unique?

And then there is the story of the high school football coach who was fired because his team had used expressions in audible calls at the line of scrimmage that are apparently considered by some to be anti-Semitic. The words were reportedly “rabbi,” “dreidel” and “Auschwitz.” Now, if they had been saying “Let’s beat the rabbi with a dreidel in Auschwitz” I would kind of get it, but seriously a man has lost his job and probably his career over this kind of nonsense? If the team had used words with Christian connotations like “priest,” “manger” and “kulaks” would anyone have cared? Someone is being quite a bit too sensitive over nothing, but, of course it is what we have come to expect.

The media has also been reporting how the US military currently sees as one of its principal roles the extirpation of “white supremacy’ within the ranks, to include encouraging the spying of soldiers on each other to determine whether they are resistant to measures to increase “diversity.” Perhaps not surprisingly, this has included the creation of a Pentagon office in Florida appropriately named the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI) which might be described as the affirmative action enabler of America’s armed forces. Equally unsurprising, DEOMI has included in its mission the assertion that those who deny the so-called holocaust are a threat to national security. A 20 page booklet entitled Holocaust Revisionism published by DEOMI’s “Research Directorate” as an education resource was written by one Captain Carlos C. Huerta, an orthodox Jewish rabbi who was at the time a US Army chaplain at Fort Sill in Oklahoma. Brooklyn born and raised, Huerta lived for years in Israel and taught at a Jewish school in Jerusalem.

The booklet is intended to send the message to American military service personnel that skepticism about the standard history taught in schools regarding what happened to Europe’s Jews during World War 2 is not permissible for those in uniform. Any revisionist criticism of the standard Holocaust Museum tale about the killing of Six Million Jews should be regarded as nothing less than a threat to national security. The booklet states that “A successful fighting force is a cohesive one, one where all members have respect for each other’s diversity and dignity. Holocaust revisionism has the potential to destroy that respect.”

Even a cursory look at the holocaust story by anyone who has any interest in World War 2 Europe reveals that the standard account does not make sense on many levels, either in terms of the number of victims or regarding the existence of death camps. The holocaust’s established narrative has pretty much been contrived over the past fifty years for political reasons, see Norman Finkelstein’s brilliant deconstruction of it in his book “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering.” Books including the highly praised “Night” written by Eli Wiesel, whom Finkelstein calls the “high huckster of the holocaust” are largely works of fiction.

So now American soldiers who want to continue to serve their country will be determined to be security risks if they question the imposed holocaust narrative, which exists to perpetuate the belief in Jewish suffering and brings with it a number of practical advantages. It is, for example, regularly deployed to excuse the horrific treatment of the Palestinian people by Israel – Jewish suffering means that the creation of a homeland is a debt that all the world owes to the Jews without regard to what has been done to the area’s other inhabitants.

Holocaust guilt is also promoted extensively in the United States to counter any criticism of what Israel and Jewish groups are up to, as they use their wealth and access to power to corrupt America’s governmental institutions and drive the country to needless wars. Lest we forget, the holocaust industry operates everywhere in America, to include the taxpayer funded holocaust museums that appear to spring up like mushrooms and more particularly in the education system. Eight states already have laws mandating holocaust education (California, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Florida, Illinois, Indiana and Michigan) and there is considerable pressure to make it universal in the United States. An alarmed World Jewish Congress (WJC) is urging required holocaust education for everyone everywhere “citing statistics from a 2018 poll revealing half of millennials can’t name a single Nazi concentration camp.”

The old line about how, if one religion is persecuted or targeted by a government, other religions will soon be treated the same way never seems to include those who are protected under the umbrella of Jewish exceptionalism. A Department of Defense training manual that has been prepared in response to the discovery of “white supremacy” identifies Catholics and evangelical Christians inter alia as “religious extremists,” presumably because they hold traditional religious views that are unacceptable to the implementers of the currently fashionable woke culture. It warns that “Christian extremism is often conflated with white supremacy for a joint ideology focused on racial and religious purity which they believe to be God’s intention” and places them in a broader group together with members of the Ku Klux Klan, al-Qaeda, and Hamas. The manual claims that such organizations “…use or advocate violence to accomplish their objectives and are therefore [are] rightly classified as extremists.”

To be sure, the US military is becoming increasingly a social engineering tool and irrelevant as it has not actually defended the country since the War of 1812. The training manual and whatever other “teaching tools” it spawns are part of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s “stand-down” to identify and discharge extremists in the US armed forces which was issued after the January 6th incident at the US Capitol in Washington. Some of those involved were reported to be military veterans. Austin did not provide any evidence that “extremism” was pervasive among active-duty soldiers, nor did he define what views in particular are unacceptable. Critics counter that the problem is a minor one in the military, with only nine army soldiers discharged for reasons that might be linked to political extremism in 2020.

If one is going to identify conservative Christians as threats, how about kicking people out of government and denying security clearances for being too close to Israel, General Austin? Israel conducts the most aggressive spying operations directed against the US by any “friendly” country, but it rarely pays any price for its behavior. In 2009 FBI counter intelligence officer John Cole reported how many cases of Israeli espionage were dropped under orders from the Justice Department. He provides a “conservative estimate” of 125 viable investigations into Israeli espionage involving both American citizens and Israelis that were stopped due to political pressure.

And if there is any doubt beyond that evidence, now we have it straight from the horse’s mouth: Ex-Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard gave an interview last week in which he said “The bottom line on this charge of dual loyalty is, I’m sorry, we’re Jews, and if we’re Jews, we will always have dual loyalty. If you’re outside Israel, then you live in a society in which you are basically considered unreliable.” He also said that Jews who though of the United States as their home are delusional and when asked if he would encourage other American Jews working for US intelligence to spy for Israel he responded “I’d tell him, not doing anything is unacceptable. So simply going home [to Israel] is not acceptable. Making aliyah is not acceptable. You have to make a decision whether your concern for Israel and loyalty to Israel and loyalty to your fellow Jews is more important than your life.”

So here we are again and one has to wonder how many Jonathan Pollards are out there. Those who run America’s various levels of government seem to believe that Jews and the approved narrative that surrounds them must be protected at all costs, up to and including promoting a false historical story, giving security clearances to dual nationals, and protecting a rogue nation that is preeminent only for its ability to behave genocidally towards its neighbors. Now American soldiers could be removed from the service if it is determined that they believe something that is unacceptable to the same powerful minority. One has to wonder how it will all end or whether the American people will eventually wake up from this nightmare.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is [email protected]

 
All Comments Hidden • Show  303 Comments • Reply
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.