The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Carter Diplomacy
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The story of Jimmy Carter’s possible breakthrough with Hamas is predictably already disappearing from the media. It should have been good news that Hamas might be willing to consider recognizing the existence of an Israeli state and that Syria, desperate for peace, believes that 85% of outstanding differences with Tel Aviv have already been resolved, but the chattering class did not seem to be impressed. Carter had been engaged in his own shuttle diplomacy over the past ten days, talking to all interested parties, which ominously did not include the Israeli government and the US State Department, both of which have poured cold water on his mission. Speaking in Kuwait this morning, Condi Rice said flatly that “The United States is not going to deal with Hamas.” The New York Times seemed somewhat interested in the Carter talks, featuring its story as a front page item for its late editions yesterday. Today the story had faded to page 12 where Carter’s “upbeat assessment” was dismissed as having a “contrarian quality,” precisely because his trip had been opposed by both Washington and Tel Aviv. The Washington Post reported the story on page 10, extensively quoting criticism by Israeli government sources of the Carter initiative, noting that Hamas had “used” the former president.

But Carter has correctly understood that there has been no progress towards peace in the Middle East without engaging Hamas. Hamas might well be playing a duplicitous game or carefully nuancing verbal understandings that are intended to unravel, but it is still the majority party in the Palestinian territories, controlling both parliament and the post of prime minister. Its control over Gaza is complete. Israel and the United States refuse to talk to “terrorists” not because it is an effective policy but because it avoids challenging the status quo, which is all about rearranging the West Bank to suit Israeli settlers. When that process is over, Tel Aviv and Washington will presumably want “a two state solution” on Israel’s terms, but they will find that Hamas is still a political force that will have to be dealt with.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Hamas, Jimmy Carter 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.