The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Bipartisan War
A new study urges more U.S. interventions
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Establishment and Realist foreign policy communities in the United States often seem separated by language which leads them to talk past each other. When a realist or Libertarian talks about non-intervention or restraint in foreign policy, as Ron Paul did in 2008 and 2012, the Establishment response is to denounce isolationism. As Dr. Paul noted during his campaigns, non-interventionism and isolationism have nothing to do with each other as a country that does not meddle in the affairs of others can nevertheless be accessible and open in dealing with other nations in many other ways. Non-interventionists are fond of quoting George Washington’s Farewell Address, in which he recommended that “The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible… Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest.” Establishment pundits tend to dismiss that “little political connection” bit, preferring instead to warn how detachment from foreign politics might lead to the rise of a new Adolph Hitler.

I was reminded of the language barrier while reading the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Strategy Task Force report, which appeared on November 30th. The report, which promises a new “Compact for the Middle East” while also asserting that “isolationism is a dangerous delusion,” might be regarded as a quintessential document laying out the Establishment position on what should be done in the region. It is ostensibly the product of two co-chairs, Madeleine Albright and Stephen Hadley, but it is also credited to an Executive Team headed by Executive Director Stephen Grand and Deputy Executive Director Jessica Ashooh, who in all probability were responsible for the actual drafting and editing.

The report also appears to have numerous high profile advisers who might or might not have had some hand in the final product. Running through the list of associates in the project which appears at the end of the report, one notes immediately that there is no individual or group identified that would contest the notion that the U.S. must have a leadership role in the Middle East. Indeed, many of those named derive considerable status from being part or supportive of America’s engagement in the region.

I would unambiguously describe Albright and Hadley as interventionists, a label that they might object to. Albright was Bill Clinton’s aggressive Secretary of State who is famous for her endorsement of American exceptionalism, stating that “We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future…” She also is notorious for her approval of sanctions on Iraq that might have killed 500,000 children as “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it” and she also once asked Colin Powell “What’s the point of having this superb military that you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?”

Stephen Hadley was the hawkish National Security Advisor under George W. Bush. He was one of the most outspoken advocates of military action against Iraq. During the essentially phony Syrian chemical weapons crisis in September 2013, he appeared on the media advocating attacking Syria with missiles. At the time, he was on the board at Raytheon and owned 11,477 shares of stock, which some considered to be a conflict of interest.

Albright and Hadley clearly were selected as co-Chairs to make the report bipartisan, an imperative for the Atlantic Council, which prides itself on being non-political, describing itself in its website as “a nonpartisan organization that promotes constructive U.S. leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the central role of the Atlantic community.” That self-definition suggests active engagement by the United States that goes well beyond George Washington’s advice. And if you look at the list of the Council’s executives and review their writings you will be able to confirm that they are pretty much inside the Beltway status quo in terms of supporting an assertive U.S. role in world affairs.

Albright and Hadley brought with them a certain point of view which was certainly recognized by the initiators of the project and one might assume that the Atlantic Council pretty much knew what the report would endorse even before it was written. The report, which runs to 105 pages, explores what it describes as a new strategic vision for the Middle East that will “change the political trajectory of the region.” It goes something like this: the states in the region must work together to create a “positive vision for their societies” to include “unlock[ing] the region’s rich, but largely untapped, human capital – especially the underutilized talents of youth and women.” Meanwhile, outside forces like the United States would have the responsibility of taking the lead to wind down the “violent conflicts” that have rocked the region. That means that the local governments will be responsible for haggling their way to some kind of acceptable modus vivendi while the U.S. must become more deeply involved militarily and using intelligence resources to stabilize Syria, Yemen and Libya.

In the case of Syria, which is the focus of the report, the argument is made that Bashar al-Assad’s reactionary regime is the root cause of the violence that has cost more than 200,000 lives and dislocated at least a third of the country’s population. This assessment is not necessarily universally accepted since 80% of the Syrian population lives in areas controlled by the government, which is about to increase its dominance by taking all of Aleppo, and there are no reports of civilians fleeing en masse to the greater freedom afforded by the rebel held areas, rather the reverse being true.

The report recommends using the U.S. military to establish safe areas in Syria to protect civilian populations, to include no-fly zones, which would bring about direct contact with the air forces of both Damascus and Moscow. It explicitly calls for direct military action against Syrian government forces including the employment of “air power, stand-off weapons, covert measures and enhanced support for opposition forces to break the current siege of Aleppo and frustrate Assad’s attempts to consolidate control over western Syria’s population centers.”

This judgment has been overtaken by events, but the co-authors do not really discuss what such an intervention would mean as it would involve the United States in an actual war based on executive fiat without any declaration from Congress. It also ignores reality on the ground, to include some politico-military reliance on the mythical moderate rebels while choosing not to recognize that the U.S. military is the intruder in Syria which, like it or not, has a legitimate government and a legal ally in Russia. The possibility of a second war with Russia is largely ignored in the report though there is an assumption that military pressure from the U.S. would push Damascus and Moscow towards a “political settlement” of the conflict after Russia becomes convinced through the assertion of American military power that “defeat, or stalemate, not victory, are the only realistic military outcomes.”

The report was initially intended to serve as a bipartisan rebuke to the current Barack Obama policy which limits direct American involvement in the conflict. Written before the presidential election, the co-authors could not have anticipated a Donald Trump victory, but they might be hoping that the report would serve as a guideline for the new administration. Hopefully they will be wrong in that expectation, but it is difficult at this point to see where the next White House will be going with its Middle Eastern policy.

There are a number of things wrong with the report from my perspective. Most significant, it assigns to the United States the responsibility to set and enforce standards of governance in parts of the world where the American people have little in the way of actual interests. The report refers to this oversight role as part of “enabling American global military operations,” an odd objective and also a point at which the language and perceptual problems come in – I am hearing intervention, which has been a failed policy since 2001, where Albright and Hadley construe a humanitarian mission based on American interests. They also have difficulty in conceptualizing that what they describe as the “debilitating cycle of conflict” in the Middle East might actually have been caused in large part by Washington’s involvement in that region, starting with the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Second, the authors assume that the countries in the region, all of which have disparate interests, will act in good faith to support the “unlocking of the region’s human potential,” as the report enthuses, as part of its “positive vision.” It sounds good and probably is pleasing to globalists, but I would be skeptical of any kumbaya moments that require bringing together players like Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey into one harmonic movement to better everyone in the region. Such pie in the sky is not even close to credible.

Third, when the report was issued Stephen Hadley told Reuters that “It may not work. But one of the things we know is that what’s going on now isn’t working.” No, it isn’t, but that might be based on a faulty assessment of the nature of the conflict. And this is thin gruel indeed to use as justification for going to war against Syria and possibly Russia.

One of the report’s obvious weaknesses derives from its Establishment-centric worldview. It calls for building stronger political institutions among the Palestinians in order to achieve a two-state solution without any serious examination of what the Israeli occupation is doing or not doing to impede any real movement in that direction. It treats Iran as an enemy of the “positive vision” that is “interfering” with its neighbors with the U.S. willing to “deter and contain Iran’s hegemonic activity,” making any real progress towards regional rapprochement unlikely. It sees a liberal democratic solution to all ills and judges multifaceted regional conflicts in purely “us against them” terms, favoring its “friends and allies” against the numerous other forces that are not on the same page.

The Atlantic Council’s Middle East Strategy Task Force Final Report argues that a transformation of the entire region, starting with establishment of security by replacing al-Assad and defeating ISIS, is both desirable and attainable. And it is an enterprise that has to be left to local players for the necessary social and political constructs with the U.S. providing leadership and direction, particularly when it comes to repressing “violent conflicts.” It is a utopian vision of what might be but one has to be concerned that the simplistic application of military force as a remedy for the regional cycle of violence ignores the probability that the reliance on such a solution in the first place has been a key element in the evolution of the current instability. That Syria will be fixed by coming in with force majeure on the side of what is being promoted as a progressive and humanitarian alternative to Bashar al-Assad borders on the ridiculous, but it is characteristic of the default position that many in Washington adopt when considering how to solve the problems in the Middle East.

Hide 91 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Allow me to repost news not allowed in the American press:

    President al-Assad receives letter from Pope Francis expressing heartfelt sympathy with Syria (which includes a nice photo of a Catholic Cardinal with Assad)

    Damascus, SANA – President Bashar al-Assad received a letter from Pope Francis delivered by Apostolic Nuncio to Syria, Cardinal Mario Zenari, who was received by the President on Monday.

    Pope Francis expressed his heartfelt sympathy for Syria and its people in light of the difficult circumstances the country is going through, and asserted the Vatican’s condemnation of all forms of extremism and terrorism.

    The Pope called in his letter for uniting all efforts to put an end to the war in Syria and restore peace in it so that it can remain a model for coexistence among cultures and religions as it always has been.

    For his part, President al-Assad congratulated Zenari on being ordained Cardinal, noting that keeping him as the Apostolic Nuncio to Syria after becoming Cardinal – which is the only such case in the world – is apolitical, historic, and humanitarian president that shows Pope Francis’ great care for Syria and its people.

    His Excellency asserted that Syria, as a state and as a people, is determined to restore security and stability and is continuing to achieve reconciliations, as they are the optimal way for achieving that goal.

    For his part, Cardinal Zenari said he is glad to remain as Apostolic Nuncio to Syria after being ordained Cardinal, stressing that Syria, the cradle of Christianity and religions, is a very important state that plays a pivotal role in the region, and it must overcome the ordeal it is going through and become better than it was before.

    R. Milhem / Hazem Sabbagh


    Our Secretary of State Kerry should be pleased that a permanent ceasefire is finally effect in Aleppo, now that the foreign terrorists have been defeated. Refugees can now return home.
    Note this news is not “breaking” or even “headline” news in the USA.

  2. RobinG says:

    This is alarming. Thanks for the heads up, but isn’t this more demonic than utopian? Re-making the Mid-East, indeed. Let’s pray this doesn’t have the hideous effect of the PNAC document.

    How Pro-Israel Neocons Pushed for War in Iraq
    (Alison Weir)

    • Agree: Stan
  3. This once-great nation, which insists on living by the sword, will one day die. Can’t imagine how..

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  4. “Bi-partisan” must mean fully partisan for the duopoly War Party. It is humanitarian insofar as it is “R2P” for the fiduciary interests of Wall Street billionaires whose loyalty is their love for the American buck, not Americans.

  5. Here’s hoping a new and extremely sensible sensible American administration (some hopes) will shortly build another prison on a small island offshore and lock up every war-mongering Neo-Con in Washington (and beyond) in it.

    If you want to be “exceptional” get out of everywhere and shut down the manufacture of all armaments.

    Train the stupid people in your country to fantasise over something other than slaughtering large numbers of their fellow human beings.

    No one is going to attack you, you idiots. You can destroy the entire earth multiple times over and we all know that.

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  6. anon • Disclaimer says:

    “That Syria will be fixed by coming in with force majeure on the side of what is being promoted as a progressive and humanitarian alternative to Bashar al-Assad borders on the ridiculous, but it is characteristic of the default position that many in Washington adopt when considering how to solve the problems in the Middle East.”

    There is something particularly bizarre about the report. I suggest trying to read through the detail, to the extent that it isn’t too painfully longwinded and disturbing.

    It is hard to see anything, in principle, wrong with the desires expressed in the document. Not surprisingly, this is simply a restatement of the same fantasies embraced by the same people for the last 30 years.

    “They smiled at the good, and frowned at the bad, and sometimes they were very sad.”

    I don’t see a single difference between this and the US involvement in Iraq. Iraq is “proof of failure of concept.” What would motivate development of a document like this?

    The report was initially intended to serve as a bipartisan rebuke to the current Barack Obama policy which limits direct American involvement in the conflict.

    It seems odd that the Obama administration is winding up with the collapse of Aleppo and the battle to retake Mosul. Humanitarian disasters, which needs to be recognized as a unpreventable possibility during war.

    It’s hard to find people (except for John Bolton) that seriously defend the US invasion of Iraq. Nobel Peace Price recipient Obama attempted a ‘regime change lite’ continuation of the same set of policies. And felt the need to backfill his attempt to disengage with special forces and bombing.

    The report continually advances this ‘priority’ :

    Prioritize Civilian Protection.
    For both humanitarian and strategic reasons, alleviating the human suffering in the Middle East should be the immediate priority.
    Enforce existing international norms and laws regarding civilian aid and protection in war

    The last war that the United States ‘Won’ — the so called ‘Good War’ … involved rapid disregard for international norms regarding civilian protection. It was rapidly replaced by massive strategic bombing campaigns. And finished by firebombing of German and Japanese cities.

    • Replies: @Frankie P
  7. Randal says:

    The report recommends using the U.S. military to establish safe areas in Syria to protect civilian populations, to include no-fly zones, which would bring about direct contact with the air forces of both Damascus and Moscow. It explicitly calls for direct military action against Syrian government forces including the employment of “air power, stand-off weapons, covert measures and enhanced support for opposition forces to break the current siege of Aleppo and frustrate Assad’s attempts to consolidate control over western Syria’s population centers.”

    Stupidity this profound is a rather implausible prospect.

  8. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Sounds like an updating of a 1982 Israeli plan to make the ME subservient to Israel.

    Is the US Waging Israel’s Wars? by Linda S. Heard

    Read the following strangely prophetic segment from an article published in 1982 by the World Zionist Organisation’s publication Kivunim and penned by Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist with links to the Israeli Foreign Ministry.

    Yinon’s strategy was based on this premise. In order to survive Israel must become an imperial regional power and must also ensure the break-up of all Arab countries so that the region may be carved up into small ineffectual states unequipped to stand up to Israeli military might. Here’s what he had to say on Iraq:

    “The dissolution of Syria and Iraq into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern frontIraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run, it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel.

    “An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and Lebanon.

    “In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul and Shiite areas in the South will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north.”

    Today the US is actively engaged in weakening the Al-Assad government and is supporting opposition parties. If it is successful, experts predict that Syria, like Iraq, will fall victim to sectarianism and internecine conflict.

    Iraq is finished as a nation, Syria heading that way and now we’re told that Iran is the latest Hitler, helped by Putin, so Russia too must go?
    What will happen first, will Israel gets its way in the ME or will the USA, her 24/7 ATM and supplier of cannon fodder, implode from all that war debt?

  9. n230099 says:

    How do they keep getting the kids to sign up for this nonsense?

  10. @n230099

    How do they keep getting the kids to sign up for this nonsense?

    1. Schools

    2. Tellyvision.

    They help detach minds from the external (real) world and…

    Minds detached from an external world must be strange creatures…

    -G. C. Lichtneberg, The Waste Books, 1799 (Notebook A, aphorism 27)

  11. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The foreign policy talent pool in America is really shallow; the same old names keep getting recycled over and over again offering the same old cliches. There’s nothing new here, just the same stale baloney reheated. It appears they thought Clinton would be president and this “study” was to be something she could point to as justification for intervening in Syria with US troops as well as her no-fly zone which would have brought confrontation with the Russians. Glad we dodged that bullet. Oh, and Iran, always Iran. We’re supposed to ratchet up hostilities with Iran, a rather dismal prospect. How many trillions do we have to blow on all these conflicts? This “utopian vision” will just result in more suffering for the beleaguered people of the region; not that these war-dogs care about that.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  12. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete

    How do they keep getting the kids to sign up for this nonsense?

    1. Schools

    2. Tellyvision.


    most of the young people I know who sign up did or do so to escape crushing and hopeless poverty, from the places David French describes in his infamous tirade- to the urban concrete waste lands of America. They have no hope, so they join the military.

    and if you listen to the voices from Washington and Wall Street all the way to Tel Aviv, you can even hear the faint voice of David French and the neocons in the distance… ‘such a deal !’

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  13. Rurik says:

    Oh, and Iran, always Iran. We’re supposed to ratchet up hostilities with Iran, a rather dismal prospect. How many trillions do we have to blow on all these conflicts?

    “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

    Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @Sam Shama
  14. Ben Frank says:


  15. @Rurik


    Poverty of spirit.

    Largely induced by existence in a cesspool of exploitation and manipulation supported by massive amounts of brainwashing through schooling and tellyvision that tells them that they have it “good” and that they’re part of the “greatest.”

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @woodNfish
  16. Durruti says:

    Philpp Giraldi:

    Lovely writing.

    1. Post complaint – (done).

    2. Identify the disease/criminals – (incomplete). Needs links to Zionist American Imperialism – Financial Oligarchs, Rothschilds, etc.

    3. Suggest the cure – Restore Our Republic! (not done). Or… [Turn on; tune out? Dr. Timothy Leary]

    *Who will be our unconstitutional Oligarch controlled President on January 20, 2017? [Congress is already tightly dominated by foreign Zionist Oligarch\$.]

    The phony Electoral Democracy Show is being produced by second rate actors and ever cheaper directors. No more quality Reagans and high level political bosses, such as LB Johnson, and the occasional honest politician who did not know what hit him (Jimmy Carter), are being interviewed for the Theatrical Position. A Casino Owner and a Psychotic mass murderer/war criminal got the nod. And (pay attention here), the Oligarchs are quite nervous about their casting of the Casino Owner. They let him win, and are increasingly nervous, as those who voted for him are not completely controlled/brainwashed.

    The people have hope/s. Hope frightens the Oligarchs. Because Hope leads to Courage.

    Maneuvers against Trump, and intense Red Baiting (Russian Baiting) of Casino Trump – The President Elect, represents a departure from all previous American electoral history. The Zionist Oligarch – Hollywood electoral circus, Our Nation’s Political Culture has declined to the lowest, most corrupt level in its history.

    Merry Christmas.

    Respect All! Bow to None!

    Restore the Republic!

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  17. @Rurik

    “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

    Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002

    Yup. And the “mighty” USA gets to pay yearly tributes (both blood and treasure) to Israel just as the “mighty” Romans paid yearly tributes to Attila the Hun.

    Funny how that works.

  18. Sam Shama says:

    What is the source of this Netanyahu quote?

  19. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete

    Poverty of spirit.

    I’m reminded of Jessica Lynch. She grew up in poor West Virginia and joined the Army because there was nothing else, and it afforded her an opportunity for a college education and a brighter future. Not expecting to go to war, it was nevertheless in the cards, and then when tragedy struck, the Fiend decided that she would be a perfect pawn to sell their war with.

    When they spun their lies about her heroics, all she had to do was go along with it all, and stardom and fame and fortune would have dropped in her lap. But she refused to go along with the lies, regardless of what must have been massive amounts of pressure and glittering bribes, and told the simple truth, and returned to her simple life.

    I don’t know about all the people who join the military, but her story is consistent with the values and integrity of the mostly poor young people I know who join because their local economies have been wiped out due to the ‘in’ and outsourcing of the scumfucks at the top who also contrive these myriad wars for fun and profit and Israel.

    There is no poverty of spirit in that young American girl, and many more like her.

    • Replies: @utu
  20. woodNfish says:

    Many of us amerikans agree with most of your sentiments as do I. But we must provide for our defense so no longer manufacturing arms is not going to happen, even for those of us like me who do not want our country to be the policeman of the world. It is one of the reasons we elected Trump.

  21. woodNfish says:

    They don’t. We elected Trump to put an end to this military adventurism.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  22. woodNfish says:
    @jacques sheete

    Poverty of spirit.

    Nope. And there is no “crushing hopeless poverty” in the US either, but many grubers believe there is because that is what is drilled into their empty heads in school and from the fake news of the lying LSM. It is also why many of the same useful idiots think the planet needs saving and global warming is real.

    As for US poverty, the average poor family in the US owns their own home, two cars, three televisions and every family member has a cell phone. No one is walking around with distended bellies from starvation or lack of medical care which is available for free to anyone who can’t afford it. They just pass the cost onto those of us who can pay.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
    , @NoseytheDuke
  23. woodNfish says:

    Respect All!

    Why? Leftists don’t deserve my respect, nor do they have any for me because I am a white Christian. No, as far as I am concerned the only good Leftist is a dead Leftist so I can piss on their graves.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  24. MMM says:

    “That Syria will be fixed by coming in with force majeure on the side of what is being promoted as a progressive and humanitarian alternative to Bashar al-Assad borders on the ridiculous, but it is characteristic of the default position that many in Washington adopt when considering how to solve the problems in the Middle East.”

    Divide, Conquer & Rule is “Israel’s” agenda to land grab a “greater Israel”. Its co-religionists and accomplices in Washington (such as John McCain) appear to make many “mistakes” in judgement that nevertheless move “Israel” closer to its objectives in the Middle East and beyond.

    The Babylonian Talmud wholly supports “Israel’s” goals and deceptions:

  25. @jacques sheete

    “How do they keep getting the kids to sign up for this nonsense?”

    No jobs and unemployment.

    Vermont is a good example, lair of the pseudo-Socialist Señor Sanders.

    You know what the employment office is for non-college bound males just out of high school: the Army and other military recruiting centers.

    This was, by the way, all planned out some years ago. In fact a Neo-Con under Bush, whose name one does not recall, suggested that the “recession” would solve all recruiting problems.

    Which it has.

    The vast majority of enlistees, when asked why they enlisted, according to many studies, answer: they were no other jobs.

    This is a prelude to the realization of the quotation attributed to Jay Gould, “I will hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.”

    For when they return what is the veterans’ main employment office? You got it federal, state, and local police.

    Having militarized the police and policified the military, the whole of both cultures has changed radically, with US “civilians” being treated very much like “civilians” in, say, Iraq.

    This process started with Vietnam, but in the last twenty years it has gone ballistic with the installation of a “professional” (i.e. semi-mercenary) military.

    There are simple solutions to this–separating the military and police as careers–but they will never be implemented because this is exactly what the Neo-Cons and one percent want.

    The former need endless economically motivated recruits to fight their planned hundred years of war. The latter realize they need extensive and ferocious military and police protection against the possibility that the ninety-nine percent may wake up and revolt.


    • Agree: jacques sheete, Rurik, edNels
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  26. @Kyle McKenna

    Well, some ICBMs compliments of Vlad Putin might answer your question. . . .

  27. Piss on the Atlantic Council’s bullshit “report,” and piss on Madeleine Albright, that degenerate old hag.

  28. @jacques sheete

    The interrelations of all these factors have long been studied by Unitedstatesian Capitalists.

    For example–why is the driving age in most of the United States 16 years of age? This has nothing to do with farm kids operating farm machinery, which they are allowed to do in farming states at even earlier ages, including, with restrictions, on public roads.

    Rather it is because the automobile companies realize that with their enlistment bonus at 17 the enlistees will rush out and buy new automobiles. Which most of them do.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @Carroll Price
  29. @n230099

    I watched a recruiting documentary about 10 years ago. they recruit in poor areas in the south. the incentives for vets are a bigger draw. also easier to lie and sell to uneducated youth.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  30. @Astuteobservor II

    “they recruit in poor areas in the south”

    Not just the South, though the South has always been an important recruiting area.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  31. I am sick to death of these damn Neo-Cons and liberal buttinski’s. Albright was the worst. Her claim to being an American was, to say the least, dubious. Yet she was eager for real American boys to spill their blood for her insane adventures. God damn them all.

  32. @woodNfish

    “As for US poverty, the average poor family in the US owns their own home, two cars, three televisions and every family member has a cell phone. ”

    Pure, unadulterated, mendacious bullshit.

    As a matter of fact, the banks and credit companies own most Unitedstatesians’ “homes”, cars, and the rest, even among the “middle class”.

    Indeed, the myth of US home ownership is one of the oldest and most fraudulent of the claims of US “wealth”.

    The amusing part is that with Bush so much of the US “middle class”, who supported him, simply diasppeared.

    • Replies: @Kyle McKenna
    , @woodNfish
  33. @E. A. Costa

    Indeed, the myth of US home ownership is one of the oldest and most fraudulent of the claims of US “wealth”.

    Says you. The past several years have demonstrated that millions of people can completely stop paying on their mortgages and still retain title to their homes. Often they get their mortgages “written down” or totally erased. Now that’s ownership.


    Over a billion dollars redistributed to minorities in just this one case:

    “Under federal civil rights laws, a lending practice is illegal if it has a disparate impact on minority borrowers, even without evidence of discriminatory intent. ”

    Extra credit question: from where do banks get all this money?
    ^^ First, ‘free’ money was given to undeserving applicants. They refuse to pay it back, so we’re giving them the ‘free’ money all over again. As the bank’s punishment for being cheated out of millions of dollars, they’re forced to pay millions of dollars to the people who cheated them.
    ^^ NYT crowing again in favor of tax breaks for borrowers who received bailouts

    And to the point of mortgage debt, don’t miss Rick Edelman: “The New Rules of Money are clear: A big, 30-year mortgage is the best thing you can have. You should get as big a loan as possible, and never pay it off. Forget about 15-year loans, never make extra payments, and forget about those bi-weekly mortgage payment plans.”

    Many people carry mortgages because govt tax policy has made it wise to do so.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  34. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Tribalism and Worldism is like Oil and Water. Dangerous Mix.

    Tribalism is good for the Tribe or for the nation.

    Worldism is good if all nations agree to common standards on basis of mutuality and respect.

    But when Tribalism and Worldism mix, we have hell on earth.

    It’s like when oil meets water.

    It’s like Japan and Germany in the late 30s and 40s.

    Japanese being tribal in Japan was fine. Germans being nationalist in Germany was fine.

    But both nations decided to go for empire. The problem was that was natural in Japan was not natural in other nations. Japanese naturally dominate in Japan, their homeland. But when Japanese try to rule over others on the basis of Japanese interests, others will hate it, and Japanese will have to crush them.
    And Germans had the same big problem as their empire expanded. It went from National Socialism to Imperial Supremacism.

    This is why the British were more adept at running empires. The British Empire also had the contradiction as it was Brits ruling over non-Brits. But Brits understood this problem and allowed locals to keep much of their autonomy. Much of the rule was indirect and tolerant. And this allowed the British to maintain their empire for a long time, and there are plenty of former subjects who still have fond memories.

    Today, Globalism is crazy because Jewish Oligarchs and Agents around the world are like Oil and Water. It’s a mix of Jewish Tribalism and Jewish Worldism. On the one hand, Jews who rule America would have us believe that they are more like the British Imperialists than the German/Japanese in WWII. Zionist-led America is about Tolerance, Diversity, Respect, Human Rights, Rule of Law, and etc. US doesn’t seek domination but only mutually beneficial relations with other nations.

    But when we see the total destruction of much of the Middle East and the maniacal hate-fest against Russia, it’s undeniable that the main animating factor behind Jewish Worldism is Jewish Tribalism. Jewish elites will sacrifice everything for Jewish Power and Domination, even if it means possible war with Russia and destruction of so many lives.

    This is crazy but also understandable because no World Power has been as mighty and as fragile as that of Jews. The US is by far the only superpower, and Jews run it. And Jews have powerful elites all over, even in Russia where many oligarchs and elites are still Jewish. So, no people have been as powerful as the Jews.
    But except in Israel — and even Israel depends on US support — , Jewish Power is really built on sand because they don’t have demographic power. It’s like the British Empire. No matter how powerful the Brits were around the world, when confronted with the rise of People Power in their imperial domains, they got kicked out in the end. Even in Hong Kong. The Anglos only remained in power in nations where they became the majority, but then, having taken the poison-advice of Jews, they are even giving away this advantage in places like Canada and Australia that are surrendering to Chinese, Hindus, Arabs, and Africans.

    No people have been so powerful as the Jews, but no powerful people have felt as vulnerable as the Jews. This is, of course, why Jews love diversity in gentile nations. Fearing the eventual unity of gentile masses against the Jewish elites, the only bet for Jewish domination is something like the Austro-Hungarian Empire, a diverse empire where Jews felt safer despite widespread anti-Jewish sentiments because the various gentiles distrusted one another as much as they distrusted Jews. When Austrians and Czechs could hardly get along, they had little time to unite against Jews.

    Anyway, the world is in trouble because the oil of Jewish tribalism keeps mixing with the water of Jewish worldism. Even a a-hole like Netanyahu is no big trouble if he sticks to Israel’s business. But the jerk and his operatives in the US deviously translate what are clearly narrow Jewish/Zionist reason for anti-Iran-ism into bogus World Issues when, in fact, Iran has no problem with other nations except with proxy whores like Saudi Arabia.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Hibernian
  35. @Kyle McKenna

    None of what you refer is accurate nor any of your sources. You obviously know little or nothing about retail banking and are feeding on the banks’ own self-interested propaganda, which is to blame everyone but themselves.

    • Replies: @edNels
  36. anon • Disclaimer says:

    The US military is a good job, with some exceptions. As always, the infantry sucks, and especially so in war.

    Current casualties and fatalities are low, and have been since the ‘surge’ in both Iran and Afghanistan.

    Most enlisted service men have technical or logistical types of work assignments.

    The only people fighting now are special forces or elite troops, who are emotionally suited for the work. They don’t just sign a piece of paper — they go through a rigorous selection process. At the moment, I imagine that the current fighting is done by contract special forces, who know exactly what they are doing.

    This has no bearing on the foolishness of the Neo Con agenda. Nor their zombie like persistence.

  37. @woodNfish

    Why? Leftists don’t deserve my respect, nor do they have any for me because I am a white Christian. No, as far as I am concerned the only good Leftist is a dead Leftist so I can piss on their graves.

    What happened to “Love thy Neighbor?”

    Pissing on graves?

    It would appear that there is not only a poverty of spirit, but perversity of spirit as well.

    Pretty amusing stuff there or are you trying to defame Christianity?

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @woodNfish
    , @Hibernian
  38. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    yer becoming predictable Priss, and in some languages predictable rhymes with boring.

  39. @anon

    It was in Vietnam that the present use of the US infantry (Army mainly and occasionally Marines) was developed. In a word, bait.

    Send them or drop them somewhere and wait till the shooting starts, then bring in air.

    This, of course, to make up for absolutely atrocious intelligence capacities.

    That is not what the troops are told, obviously. Already in Vietnam some had figured it out, others not.

    By the way, no war of any consequence has ever been won by Special Operation Troops.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  40. Frankie P says:

    Vlad was not afraid of mice
    He loved winter, snow and ice
    To Obama, in the zoo
    Vladamir just said poo-poo

  41. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    “The only people fighting now are special forces or elite troops, who are emotionally suited for the work.”

    But this means the US can carry out certain missions but cannot win wars.

  42. Talha says:
    @jacques sheete

    You know JS – I was going to say something, but you beat me to it. What is with all these Christians that wouldn’t know the Beatitudes if they hit them in the face – or worse, would write them off as pinko-Leftist nonsense? What are they teaching people in church these days…assuming people go to church and don’t have their headphones on during the sermon.

    poverty of spirit

    Yeah – I don’t think this is what was meant by; “Blessed are the poor in spirit…”

    I’m not talking about the happy-go-lucky liberal church mentality, but this sanguinary mentality reminds one more of Pol Pot or Hulagu Khan than James the Just.

    are you trying to defame Christianity?

    Uh…yeah – are people actually trying to invite to their faith or repel everyone by horrendous demeanor?


  43. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    The mother of all Projections.

    Jewish groups accusing Russia as the Hostile Foreign Power meddling in American affairs and subverting the Will of the American People.

    LOL. Jews love to be ‘antisemitic’ about other groups.

  44. utu says:

    “Three days before the U.S. raid, Lynch had regained enough strength that the team was ready to proceed with orthopaedic surgery on her left leg. The procedure involved cutting through muscle to install a platinum plate to both ends of the compound fracture. “We only had three platinum plates left in our supply and at least 100 Iraqis were in need,” Raazk said. “But we gave one to Jessica.”

    A second surgery, and a second platinum plate, was scheduled for Lynch’s fractured arm. But U.S. forces removed her before it took place, Raazk said.”

    Media were not telling us for whom the Iraq war was waged. But just before it started Columbia with Israeli astronaut exploded over Palestine, TX. And just before the war ended Jessica Lynch who was from Palestine, WV was was manufactured to become American heroine. Somehow the reality conspired to penetrate the media silence on the connection of the war in Iraq to Israel. Perhaps Carl Jung could comment on this.

  45. @woodNfish

    Planet woodNfish would indeed appear to be located in a galaxy far, far away. One lacking in both logic and common sense… Oh, and morals too. I feel very sad for you.

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  46. @anon

    And yet, suicides by US warriors have taken even more lives than the Taliban and this is likely to continue even if the wars were to stop tomorrow.

    • Replies: @Talha
  47. edNels says:
    @E. A. Costa

    What about the story about how the robo signers, that worked overtime, overtime to undo one main things of free enterprise, or at least home ownership in fee simple…
    that is about how counties charge a tax on the transfer of title of real property. The Robo signers, andthat is about the term REMs… The mortgage co.s were going around and subverting old traditional ways of title transfers… and all that stuff…

    THese bastards have done more harm to free enterprise, and America, than any so called Communist ever could.

    Banksters, and you know who they are mainly… are monsters, look at their (shoes).. shnozes!

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  48. woodNfish says:
    @E. A. Costa

    Absolute fact. Even our poor are wealthy compared to most 3rd world countries.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
    , @NoseytheDuke
  49. woodNfish says:

    Keep dreaming while you drink the koolaid, gruber.

  50. @edNels


    And that was down the line of a whole series of organized scams.

  51. woodNfish says:
    @jacques sheete

    You’re welcome to kiss their asses if you like Jaque, I’ll pass. Tolerance is what got us to this point.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  52. Talha says:

    Hey NtD,

    Very good point – people forget about this silent body count steadily ticking. Also, once some of these guys hit middle age, we might see some of them going postal from past trauma. I once spoke to a psychologist who specialized in working with people that have gone through war zones and he said sometimes things seem completely normal until something triggers it decades later.

    Quite possibly, they want to keep this as silent as possible because it will just draw more attention to the fact that the tab on their criminal war is still being paid in American blood.


  53. @woodNfish

    “Absolute fact. Even our poor are wealthy compared to most 3rd world countries.”

    Some are, some are not. But parsing the wiggle words in that sentence, which sounds like it comes from Limbaugh, requires more effort than you or that are worth.

    So only a few questions, to reveal your own ignorance, both of the US and of the world:

    (1) What is the Third World again? China? Costa Rica, jeje?

    (2) Have you ever looked closely at how US sources calculate Standard of Living?

    (3) Why, do you think, many Mexican mansions, spacious and quite impressive, have no central heating (trick question admittedly)

    That will do for starters but you will have to proceed on your own.

  54. @woodNfish

    It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted in a profoundly sick society. Krishnamurti

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  55. @woodNfish

    You’re welcome to kiss their asses if you like Jaque, I’ll pass. Tolerance is what got us to this point.

    It’s not about my kissing anything.

    I’m just wondering how your expressed attitude accords with the teachings of the dude what got tortured and hung up on a stick in full public view.

    Speaking of tolerance and/or the lack thereof, I myself am highly intolerant of people who profess one thing one day and something else the next. or preach one thing and do the opposite. However, even at that, I don’t see what pissing on their graves would accomplish. Please enlighten me, for I know not what to think.

  56. geokat62 says:

    Justin Raimondo has an excellent piece on Trump’s appointment of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson as SoS.

    Here’s an excerpt:

    Contrary to the brainless leftist narrative that characterizes Big Oil as the driving force behind the War Party – remember “No Blood for Oil!”? – the reality is that the oil industry, including Exxon, opposed the Iraq war, just as they opposed the economic sanctions that preceded it. Iran sanctions are equally unpopular with the oil industry, and, as a New Yorker profile of Tillerson put it: “In general, Tillerson and ExxonMobil have argued against economic sanctions as an instrument of American foreign policy.”

  57. Hibernian says:
    @E. A. Costa

    I oppose the militarization of the police and the proliferation of heavy weaponry in police departments. That having been said, it’s helpful to have a reasonable proportion of recruits already knowing the basics of rifle marksmanship before they begin learning pistol marksmanship at the Police Academy.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  58. Hibernian says:
    @E. A. Costa

    “Rather it is because the automobile companies realize that with their enlistment bonus at 17 the enlistees will rush out and buy new automobiles.”

    This wins the tin foil hat award. The percentage of kids who enlist is very low. The auto companies are marketing to all young drivers, not just soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Coasties.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  59. Hibernian says:

    “But Brits understood this problem and allowed locals to keep much of their autonomy.”

    George Washington and Eamon De Valera (and many others) begged to differ.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  60. Hibernian says:

    “The only people fighting now are special forces or elite troops, who are emotionally suited for the work.”

    This is a gross exaggeration. Non-elite infantry fight, also increasingly MPs because more troops are needed. Truck drivers are ambushed on the roads and return fire. Mechanics are reassigned as drivers because (A) More drivers are needed. (B) Mechanics are trained to drive the trucks they fix. (C) Our still Cold War based force structure, when the GWOT started, included large numbers of mechanics to fix battle damaged trucks and tanks in a classic WWII style clash of NATO and Russian arms in Germany.

  61. Hibernian says:
    @jacques sheete

    He who hath not a sword, let him sell his cloak and buy one.

    I agree that if you identify yourself as Christian and then talk about urinating on graves in the same post, you make yourself a target.

  62. Hibernian says:
    @E. A. Costa

    “By the way, no war of any consequence has ever been won by Special Operation Troops.”

    They were very helpful on D-Day. Neither Special Ops, nor air power, nor artillery, nor armor, nor naval gunfire can or are meant to win the war by themselves. They are force multipliers, and force multipliers are invaluable.

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  63. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Only 1/3 of colonials rebelled against the Crown.

    Historians say the British were indulgent with the colonials, and it was reasonable to raise taxes after the Brits did all the fighting in the French-and-Indian War.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  64. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Washington would have been wrong, but De Valera would have had a point.

  65. @geokat62

    Hell, that’s all the more reason to favor Tillerson for Secretary of State!

    Thank God that chickenhawk Israel-Firster John Bolton didn’t get it. . . .

    • Replies: @geokat62
  66. @Hibernian

    Did you read the part that says NEW cars?

    How many seventeen year olds get enlistment bonuses and buy new cars?

    True enough, campus parking lots all over the country are filled with the latest models, most which are usually owned by students.

    But you know who bought them, don’t you?

    Sixteen year olds on their own, with some exceptions, buy used cars.

    “Tinfoil hat” is dated, by the way and a dead giveway both of your conventional and vacuous mindset and the worthlessness of your comment.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  67. @Hibernian

    “Force multipliers”–gee, is that like “Center of gravity”?

    The statement stands– Special Operations Troops have never won any war of consequence.

    D-Day, by the way, was an amphibious (Churchill’s word) landing and a BATTLE and did not win World WAR II.

    Why not discuss the “force multipliers” at Market Garden, jeje?

    Indeed, without the Red Army in the East even D-Day would have been madness.

  68. @Hibernian

    Ah, “police work” with one’s own civilians centered on experience with pistols and rifles.

    That is part of the problem not the solution, and the proper firearms training for police officers does not require military service, period. In fact, it is likely a negative.

    The only “military” training that translates readily into some aspects of domestic police work is service in the Military Police.

    Gee, all those accountants in the FBI just never properly learned to shoot–who would have guessed?

    Once again a vacuous and conventional mindset.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @edNels
  69. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Real-life Jewish power in the US and Israel is experiencing a transformational American President regarding ‘Jewish power’

    Obama’s Transformative Effects on Jewish Power in the US and Israel? – such as stopping Bibi’s in motion attack on Iran in Sept/Oct 2012, stopping Bibi’s Putsch against the US over the Iran Deal, and stopping Israeli Annexation of Palestine?

    Zionism as practiced by it’s Israeli enthusiasts (and they’ve got bells on their toes these days) is Kahanism and Apartheid, and Apartheid is a crime against humanity according to the UN, Geneva, and all international law.

    I want Peter Beinart, Jeffrey Goldberg, David Brooks, Tom Friedman, and the REST of the punditocracy on the record regarding the Palestine Annexation Law passing in the Knesset and the UN Sec Co Resolution against Apartheid Israel – preferably sooner rather than later before they begin extensively coordinating their stories. I want them thinking on their feet, in the midst of the shock and awe

    The Zeitgeist is against Apartheid Israel and the Israel Lobby supporting it.

    The time is ripe for the UN Sec Co Resolution against Israel – the time is ripe for dismantling the Apartheid that will flow from this, as well – these are existential transformational events taking place for Jewish power in the US and Israel.

    Barack Obama is going to be known as a Transformational American President primarily for the Successful 2nd American Revolution of 4-2-16 (The Iran Nuclear Deal Framework) which he has led. And it had everything to do with ‘real Jewish power’ rather than stereotypes

    It’s a Club of 2 – George and Barack, sorry Abe….

    OK that doesn’t sound quite right – let’s call it the big three: ‘George, Barack, and Abe’


    ‘The End of Political Judaism and 1P1V1S’

    WHEN: Saturday Dec 17 2016, 2:00 – 3:15 pm
    WHERE: Otay Branch San Diego Public Library,
    3003 Coronado Ave, San Diego, Ca 92154
    WHO: Dr Lance Dale


    ‘Welcome to Apartheid Israel’ – Tzipi Livni Nov 16, 2016
    Livni’s surrender of 1- retained Settlement Blocs, 2- the Wall, and 3- ending of Palestinian Right of Return

    Obama’s Greenlighting of the UN Sec Co Resolution against Israel triggered by the Palestine Annexation Law/(Amona)

    The 3 Existential Events (seen as such by Israel itself) for the Collapse of Israeli Apartheid:
    The Iran Nuclear Deal, UN Sec Co Resolution against Israel, and the ICC

    ‘The 3rd Israeli Generals Revolt (CIS) vs Bibi and the Settlers’
    -The Commanders for Israeli Security (CIS)

    ‘The Diskin/CIS UN Chapter 7 Plan and the Dismantling of Israeli Apartheid’

    The Israeli Civil War:
    ‘Obama and the CIS vs Bibi, Adelson and the Settlers’

    ‘1P1V1S (-One Person One Vote One State) replacing Apartheid’
    -Marwan Barghouti and 1P1V1S from Shining River to Shining Sea

    Political Judaism and Kahanism in Israel and the US – Settlers, the Kahanist Alt Right, and the Israeli Lobby/Jewish Lobby’s Islamophobia cottage industry

    ‘The Successful 2nd American Revolution of 4-2-15 and the Iran Nuclear Deal’

    ‘How the Israeli/Israeli Lobby ‘Clean Break Dream’ perished in Aleppo’

    Q and A after talk…

    • Replies: @Anon
  70. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    “I want Peter Beinart, Jeffrey Goldberg, David Brooks, Tom Friedman, and the REST of the punditocracy on the record regarding the Palestine Annexation Law passing in the Knesset and the UN Sec Co Resolution against Apartheid Israel”

    But keep in mind that Bung-Ki-Moon is a pro-homo yellow stooge-bitch of the homomaniacal West. So, his UN is pro-homo. Since Israelis have massive homo parades and Palestinians don’t, it means Israel is morally justified and can do whatever it wants.

    Dic*-in-the-ass gives your nation a pass.

    In ancient times, Jews were spared by Pass-Over that only killed Egyptian kibblers.
    Now, Israel is protected by Ass-Over. Its homo-fests gives it moral cover to carry out apartheid against Palestinians in West Bank.
    It’s no wonder that some in the BDS movement are eager to connect Palestinian cause with homos. Since homomania is the reigning faith of Western Progs, it will be more difficult for Israel to ‘pinkwash its crimes’ if Palestinians are into fruit-fest too.

  71. @geokat62

    That said, it would be interesting to know what was discussed in Dick Cheney’s secret energy industry discussions and why was there the need for such secrecy? That was early in the GWB admin and a lot has happened since then.

  72. geokat62 says:
    @Orville H. Larson

    Hell, that’s all the more reason to favor Tillerson for Secretary of State!

    Hey, OHL. The main thrust for this post was to dispel the myth that the oil companies pushed for the invasion of Iraq.

    Thank God that chickenhawk Israel-Firster John Bolton didn’t get it. . . .

    We may not be completely out of the woods yet as Bolton is still in the running to be Tillerson’s deputy.

  73. @Anon

    I am of the opinion that it was actually the issue of colonial script as a replacement for British currency that was the real trigger for the War of Independence. Governments will tolerate a lot but when the banking industry is threatened the real rulers demand it so prompt action results.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  74. Rurik says:

    the real trigger for the War of Independence.

    “The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War.”

    ~ Benjamin Franklin

    they understood that debt-based paper money loaned out at interest = slavery

    they didn’t want their progeny to be permanent, perpetual debt slaves to the Satanic scum at the Bank of England

    End the Fed!

    • Agree: Talha
  75. Hibernian says:
    @E. A. Costa

    I thought you were serious, and not without reason. Credit standards for auto purchases, new and used, are low because there’s something to repossess and you don’t have to enter someone’s home, or go to court, to repossess it. In the service, it’s commonly known that some soldiers use their enlistment bonuses to make down payments on new cars soon after they enter the service. BTW, those bonuses, paid to very young folks, can be quite large, depending on the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) and the demand for that specialty.

    As for non-military high school graduates, many of whom go to college, often when a kid gets a car as a graduation gift, it really means the down payment was made by Dad and Mom. The kid may get some help making the payments, just as they get help with other things. These are usually new cars

    It’s no secret Detroit markets to youth; an example is the Buick “People with blue hair still drive it.” campaign.

  76. Hibernian says:
    @E. A. Costa

    I think it’s widely known that FBI agents get intensive marksmanship training at Marine Corps Base Quantico. What’s perhaps not so widely known is that it’s common for them to have previous law enforcement experience. In the service, the powers that be tell you that previous shooting experience only gives you bad habits. It’s commonly known that this is a legend they peddle to discourage overconfidence in those with this experience.

  77. @geokat62

    Ah, here we go:



    That sounds about right, but one suspects the “sell” could also mean “bribe”.

    It will not work.

  78. RobinG says:


    Which means we must rally behind P.E. Trump’s better tendencies. Two ways to do that:
    1) Support Tulsi Gabbard’s “STOP ARMING TERRORISTS” bill-
    ………a) sign her petition
    ………b) urge your Representative to co-sponsor
    2) Promote honest journalism

    Gabbard’s Law: To End War on Terror, Stop Arming Terrorists
    “Gabbard models her bill on 1980s Boland Amendment that halted U.S. aid to the U.S. Contra terrorists, in Nicaragua. She was joined by two Republican and two Democratic co-sponsors, including Black California congresswoman Barbara Lee.”

    Aleppo: Freed from Obama’s Terrorists, with Sen. Dick Black

    Canadian Journalist on lies about Syria | December 9th 2016

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @SolontoCroesus
  79. geokat62 says:

    Brava, Eva Bartlett… another truth-telling Canadian.

  80. @n230099

    The absence of employment and educational opportunities in most areas of the country, accompanied by “patriotic” government propaganda tailored for the ignorant, has more to do with it than anything else.

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  81. @woodNfish

    ..and if he don’t, will the American people rise up to put a stop to it, or will they, as I suspect, dutifully go along with the deception because a “conservative Republican” is once again in charge of making America great again by kicking everyone’s ass?

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  82. moi says:

    I say let the Jews run the whole shebang.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  83. @E. A. Costa

    A very large number of returning veterans become instant “donor cyclist” after purchasing high powered, Japanese made motorcycles on which they promptly kill themselves.

  84. @E. A. Costa

    Here in the patriotic South, the worship of all things military, share equal honors with God, Grandma and Apple Pie.

  85. Sam Shama says:
    @Carroll Price

    This is at the absolute heart of the issue. In truth, a metropolis with an economic surplus and therefore bent on expansion and adventurism has since the dawn of civilisation provided supplementary employment, resulting in farmer-soldiers. Think Rome; it continues to this day with greater access to consumer goods where that economic surplus is extracted and directed via production in low-wage nations.

    Related: if you haven’t seen Trump advisor Peter Navarro’s documentary “Death By China: How America Lost Its Manufacturing Base” I highly recommend watching the first 30 mins to understand Trump’s “mandate” wrt China

  86. woodNfish says:
    @Carroll Price

    Do you really think any of us who voted for Trump did it thinking he is a “conservative Republican”? Why don’t you put down the lying LSM koolaid you have been drinking and pay a bit of attention to the real issues that we voted for? And if you want to know what Trump is planning on doing you might go and rad his position papers on his campaign website or even his book, “Crippled America” and he will tell you exactly what he wants to do.

  87. @moi

    In case you missed it, they already run the whole shebang. Who else do you think created the current predicament?

  88. @RobinG

    A concise and powerful presentation. Well done, Eva Bartlett, and thanks, RobinG.

  89. denk says:

    The world according to Trump,

    *Countries like Philippines are running towards Russia/China cuz we’r weak !

    *Obama the wimp, his weak and ineffective foreign policy allows
    everybody to run all over us*

    * “I will rebuild our military. It will be so strong, and so powerful, and so great. It will be so powerful and so great that we’ll never have to use it. Nobody’s going to mess with us, folks. Nobody.”,

    In short,
    Here’s the ‘Great White Hoax’ to the Trumpsters…
    *Our military is a joke, Obama is a wimp.
    You need a strong leader, we’ve to arm ourself up to our eyeballs so that those
    damned Grenadians, Panama’s, Chagosians, Iraqis, Chileans….Chinese, Russians would think twice about messing with us again* !!

    If Obomber is weak, wait till you see the Great White Shark


  90. edNels says:
    @E. A. Costa

    Tell it E.A.

    Too many are too ready to go with the crap. some that come back from the holocausts are ready to keep on killing… when they get a chance!

    Just remember that when the officer tells you to do this or that, he/she, may very well have been veteran, and when they told people/ to do this or that… broke in a door, and marched em out…they didn’t better not do it… ! Free fire zones etc. no problem, good way to get your creds, in wet work… now you go take care of ’em… Good pay &bene’s.

    and, so probably you better comply…

    They are ready to give you a shot, they have been schooled, indocrinated, and tested, with real poor f’n peasants, like us… we are not all just on a same playin’ field anymore…

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.