The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Bari We Hardly Knew You
Bari Weiss bids The New York Times farewell
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Something Here
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

This week’s resignation of neoconservative journalist Bari Weiss from the position of staff editor and contributor on the opinion page at The New York Times provoked considerable discussion both for and against her. Her resignation letter, which was quickly made public, depicts her as a brave non-conformist, a “conservative” among liberals (though she describes herself as a “centrist”), and someone who was willing to write stories that others at the Times would not touch. She was particularly critical of the dominant progressive “group think” at the management levels of the newspaper which created a “hostile environment” that did not tolerate any alternative viewpoints on breaking stories.

The resignation came shortly after the “scandal” at the newspaper that had led to the firing of opinion page chief editor James Bennet in June. Bennet was forced to walk the plank after a piece by Senator Tom Cotton appeared that advocated using military force to put down the unrest that is sweeping America’s cities. “Using military force” is apparently equivalent to “shooting demonstrators” in New York Times-speak, so when Bennett admitted that he had not even read the op-ed, he had to go for approving a piece that “did not meet the Times’ standards.”

Admittedly, Weiss makes some shrewd points about the state of journalism in the United States and how it has become a sounding board for what is appearing on Twitter. To her credit, she has been openly critical of the so-called “cancel culture” which seeks to restrict the free exchange of information and ideas, but she is also very selective about her own record. She claims that she was derided as a “Nazi, a bigot and a racist” because she questioned the reporting on issues like BLM and was not “inclusive” enough. But while she rightly decries what she describes as the tribalism of the corporate mainstream media, she does so without recognizing that she too has her own particular tribal allegiance. She makes a point of implying that she was the victim of anti-Semitism, accused of “writing about Jews again,” without any recognition that she herself has been a strident hardline apologist for Israel and for Jews in general in a journalism world that has been over-populated by mostly liberal Jews for many years.

Bari Weiss’s letter included an overwrought description of Pulitzer Prize winning black writer Alice Walker, author of The Color Purple, as “a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati,” suggesting that she does indeed nurture an agenda focused on Jewish-related issues. Glenn Greenwald recalls how she, in 2012, speaking before a conference of the American Zionist Movement, stated that she had dedicated herself to the “connection between advocacy journalism and Zionism.” Greenwald has also documented how she, starting when she was a sophomore at Columbia, was in the forefront of efforts to silence all criticism of Israel, particularly that which was allegedly coming from professors of Arab background. He observes that her objective was no less than “trying to suppress criticisms of Israel from college campuses… Anyone remotely familiar with the wars over the Middle East Studies Department at Columbia University, in which Weiss played a starring role, knows that her claim here — that the campaign was just a benign attempt to protect students’ rights — is utterly false. The campaign was designed to ruin the careers of Arab professors by equating their criticisms of Israel with racism, anti-Semitism, and bullying, and its central demand was that those professors (some of whom lacked tenure) be disciplined for their transgressions… That the campaign against these Arab professors was about suppressing criticisms of Israel and intimidating and punishing professors who voiced such criticisms was barely hidden. The New York Civil Liberties Union — historically reluctant to involve itself in disputes involving Israel — strongly condemned the campaign against these Arab professors at Columbia that Weiss helped to lead.”

Given all the pressure from Weiss and her associates, as well as threats from prominent Jewish donors to the college, the university investigated the charges. It found that “… for several years, after pieces appeared in the tabloid press blasting the department as anti-Israel, many non-students, clearly hostile and with ideological agendas, had been attending classes in the [Middle East Studies] department, interrupting lectures with hostile asides and inhibiting classroom debate.” All the professors were cleared of the charges leveled against them and the report concluded that they had been the victims and not the perpetrators of an organized harassment campaign.

Weiss, the epicenter of the campaign of vilification and academic censorship, was furious at the exoneration of the instructors and both held a press conference to denounce the findings while also organizing demonstrations by Jewish students. She complained that the issue of “large scale intimidation of pro-Israel students” had not been addressed.

Weiss was hired by The Times in 2017 around the same time that the much better-known Jerusalem Post and Wall Street Journal alumnus Bret Stephens was also brought on board. Both she and Stephens are unflinching in their support of Israel and they joined a Times staff that was hardly anti-Israeli. The Times for long has been something like an uncritical sounding board for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but recently, it has indeed allowed some pieces by Tom Friedman and others that are critical of the Israeli plan to annex much of the Palestinian West Bank. But the arguments are always framed around the premise that the move would be “bad for Israel,” leaving the Palestinian victims on the sidelines as hapless observers of the deliberations.

In retrospect, it is difficult to understand what the stink over Bari Weiss is all about, apart from the fact that she is clearly engaging in self-promotion to get another job. A quick perusal of the list of her undistinguished NYT articles does indeed suggest that roughly half of what she wrote was either about Israel or Jews. As an editor, she commissioned interviews and op-eds by people that she may have considered either “centrist” or “conservative,” but, again, she, and they, hardly had much impact. Whatever her “new perspective” was perceived to be by NYT management when she was hired is somewhat elusive.

Sure, the print media in the United States is run largely by progressives and is subject to groupthink on most issues, but that has been the case since before Weiss arrived and will continue to be so long after she is gone. And she won’t have to worry about pleasing her key constituency. Bret Stephens can continue to beat the drum for Israel at The New York Times in her absence.

Philip M. Giraldi is a former CIA counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer who served nineteen years overseas in Turkey, Italy, Germany, and Spain. He was the CIA Chief of Base for the Barcelona Olympics in 1992 and was one of the first Americans to enter Afghanistan in December 2001. Phil is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a Washington-based advocacy group that seeks to encourage and promote a U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East that is consistent with American values and interests.

(Republished from American Herald Tribune by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 44 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    NDAA Amendment 114 Sections 501(a) and (b)(1) turned Operation Mockingbird into an authorized government program by legalizing domestic propaganda. So now, eight years into this official ideological control regime, some interchangeable government apparatchiks rotate in and out of the “New York Times” Glavlit post. I am trying to imagine an alternative multiverse in which I give a shit. A pudgy JAP genocidaire? Some mediocre plagiarists? Synthetic intelligentsia with the imprimatur of the ersatz Breindel Award? Zzzz, zzzzz.

    No, we have no shits to give.

  2. It’s all a bit like reading about Stalin purging Yezhov. I’m supposed to feel sorry for Yezhov?

    • LOL: Talha
  3. Anon[104] • Disclaimer says:

    I can’t be bothered to waste a few minutes reading an article about this perfidious cunt. Sorry, Phil.

    She’s a neoliberal (ie: she’s Jewish) cutout and nothing more. Her specific American mold is over seven decades old at this point and stinks to high heck.

    The basic rhetoric: Israel first, say little about Whites unless they get uppity and then let them know they are being racist and are out of line. It is enough to block the Right and allow the Left to do what they want in the social sphere, but it guards against targeting Israel and Jews as the racial nationalists they are. We’ve got it. Who the fuck cares about this broad? She’s the opposite of special or interesting and deserves no attention.

    • Replies: @artichoke
  4. Chris Moore says: • Website

    This overwrought resignation is about the “liberal” Bolshevik wing of the Jews in nominal conflict with the Zionist wing, nothing more. Weiss is a Zionist hack, and everyone knows it. But she had Jewish billionaire banker money powers (namely floppy haired poseur Eric Weinstein and Thiel Capital) behind her.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyt-chief-threat-democracy-eric-weinstein-takes-flamethrower-paper-record-after-bari

    So it seems the Zionist plan for “chosen” Jews to rule the world from Israel is in slight conflict with the Marxist plan for “vanguard” Jews to rule the world from the everywhere.

    The good news is that it’s all coming apart at the seams, because the “Jews” have completely lost their moral authority and are taking ZOG-USA down with them, hopefully to be resurrected as Constitutional USA (after the war crimes trials).

  5. JimDandy says:

    “To her credit, she has been openly critical of the so-called “cancel culture” which seeks to restrict the free exchange of information and ideas,”

    Yeah, but, as you eloquently illuminate, that was all bullshit. She essentially worked to “cancel” Tulsi Gabbard because she dared to speak out against America meddling in Syria on Israel’s behalf.

    Weiss and Laura Loomer and so many others are hijacking free speech advocacy and using it as a vehicle to promote their pro-censorship Zionist agenda. Classic sneaks.

    Great article.

  6. Sean says:

    Her sister famously wrote a semi tongue in cheek letter about how her rejection by Princeton, Yale, Vanderbilt and the University of Pennsylvania was due to runaway diversity policies and her lacking a volunteership with starving African children, being merely a Senate page with sky high SAT results. Her father is a member of the Wexner Heritage Foundation.

    She was taken on by the NYT in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election in order to get it a bit more dialed into what was happening with Trump’s base, but she was understood as primarily as a pro Israel voice. Bari was always insufficiently convinced of things such as no biological differences between men and women, and by implication not fully compliant with BLM, but now the BLM agitation is part of the strategy against Trump being pro Israel does not protect her.

    The NYT made Bari feel unwelcome for becoming too actively neutral acer Trump once that equated to being not anti Israel. Allow me to elucidate, Trump has delivered on his promise to be the “best friend in Washington that Israel has ever had.Thomas Friedman demanded that Trump having gave Israel recognition of Jerusalem as its capital must asking something in return. He didn’t. A second Trump term could conceivably mean a Trumpian U.S. allowing Israel to settle the West Bank issue with population transfers. In any even only good things flow from he re-election for the Israel Lobby

    Behind the sudden intolerance for Trump is what he would do outside the Middle East in his second term. Namely, divest America from its reliance on China, and after COVID-19 people are starting to agree. But that close China-America relationship is vital to Wall Street reaping vast profits, which they are counting on, so they are going to stop Trump being re-elected. China is paying off Wall Street and its minions in the Democratic Party-media nexus to prevent Trump being re-elected, and the Israel Lobby is helpless to prevent it. Those who do not go along are being purged.

    Mr Giraldi talks of Bari’s tribalism, but those who are without nationalist feeling would be bereft of moral obligation to former victims. For instance, any debt Germany owes to the Jews stems from and depends on people feeling themselves to be German individuals, and part of their forebears’ legacy for good or ill. Presumably, what Giraldi feels for the Palestinians stems from consciousness of his identity as an American and the complicity of the US in what has happened to Palestine. A morally universalistic and perfectly sovereign individual would feel under no obligation whatsoever to right such wrongs. The same applies to Americans and BLM, or Israelis and a Palestinian state.

  7. Anonymous[192] • Disclaimer says:

    A quick perusal of the list of her undistinguished NYT articles does indeed suggest that roughly half of what she wrote was either about Israel or Jews.

    LOL! If the Tribe gets any more special than this, they’ll just spontaneously ascend to a higher plane of existence.

  8. Elenka says:

    Weiss is referring to Alice Walker’s admiration of David Icke, and if she had bothered to do some research she would know that Icke is not an anti-semite. She would also know the reasoning behind his “lizard Illuminati” theory. It is far more interesting (and well researched) than anything she ever wrote, I’d bet.

  9. I didn’t know who she was, but the description ‘neocon’ suggested perverse intelligence, at least. Nope. She’s a stupid millennial twat from Squirrel Hill, perfect example of Jewish nepotism at the Ivies. Look for the clip where she embarrasses herself in front of Rogan in a pathetic attempt to smear Tulsi Gabbard. She’ll land a plum job, I’m sure.

    • Agree: JimDandy
    • Replies: @malkin_fanboy
  10. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    Diseased minds.

    Lobotomies might help.

  11. @Sean

    ‘…A morally universalistic and perfectly sovereign individual would feel under no obligation whatsoever to right such wrongs…’

    Not really. Richard Gere concerns himself with Tibet — I doubt it’s because he feels responsible for China’s oppression of Tibet.

    Lots of people go off and try to address miseries they had no hand in making. You’ve a point — but not as strong a one as you imply.

    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Meena
  12. “Using military force” is apparently equivalent to “shooting demonstrators” in New York Times-speak

    Sure, if rioting, looting, and vandalizing are forms of demonstrating.

    Btw, NYT has no problems with dropping tons of bombs on the patriotic defenders of foreign nations.

    US military is 10,ooox the murderer that the US police is. This murder machine takes orders from Jews, and blacks take part in the destruction of other nations.

    I guess Muslim and Arab Lives Don’t Matter.

    • Agree: Sya Beerens
  13. American Conservatives catered to Jewish ‘conservatives’ like Weiss over the years, and it’s no surprise what happened to Con Inc.

    Weiss is no centrist. She is an extreme tribal supremacist. She smeared Gabbard as Putin’s puppet.
    But Jews take care of their own and she’ll be okay.

  14. Truth3 says:

    As Jews get more in control of the World, the Anti-Christ’s time gets nearer.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  15. @Sean

    I have no patience for your obfuscating verbiage, but this is funny:

    “her rejection by Princeton, Yale, Vanderbilt and the University of Pennsylvania was due to runaway diversity […], being merely a Senate page with sky high SAT results.”

    In the Rogan clip I just mentioned, she: a) uses “toady” without being sure what it means; b) doesn’t know how to spell it; c) generally melts under minimal pushback. Ivy humanities are shit these days, but this broad is dumb…

    • Replies: @Sean
  16. A rhetorical question, ok?
    On a lush but deserted south Pacific island with just you and her, would you shun her or be morally upright? I’m sure you all would be upright.

  17. It’s good that Weiss is gone. We have far too many Jews in prominent media positions. Jews like Weiss use their access and privilege to warp reporting and distort commentary about all things that affect Jews, which is virtually everything. Jewish bias and censorship corrupts the reporting of news and subverts the interests of the non-Jews. That’s us.

    What happened to Weiss is that the young, diverse POC pets at the TIMES started to complain about Jewish privilege. This was inevitable. These unruly pets also likely took notice of Israel’s unacknowledged license to kill and sabotage with full, unconditional US blessing. This is also rather irksome.

    Then these POC ingrates even started talking back to Jews (not just Whites) despite the loud, uninterrupted and ongoing background noise about ‘anti-Semitism’ and The Holocaust. How dare they!

    Ultimately, Weiss couldn’t take the emerging POC heat. Equal Treatment Under Law is for the goyim, after all. Why entangle Israel in all this?

    The heated newsroom arguments about fairness and double standards are surely what caused this fragile Jewess to quit her enviable job.

    Not to worry. Ms. Weiss will surely reappear in another prestigious, well-paid, media position very soon. Aren’t you grateful for Happy Endings?

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
    , @Sean
  18. Sean says:
    @Parsnipitous

    Too funny if her sister was intending to be less than serious, as she said. Joking about those who volunteer in Africa with starving children, write a statement saying that connecting with them was the most important moment in their life, whereby a place denied to someone with 4.5 GPA, a SAT score of 2120 and work experience as a U.S. Senate page is given, is very brave if not foolhardy. Her father is a self made man, so she is not naturally of the post Clinton Democrat- big business nexus.

    Whether the act, or internet jeer from behind a pseudonym, you are proudest of equals that or her sister Bari’s dissent in the editorial meetings of the NYT I could not possibly guess. Bari leading a demonstration at Columbia of pro-Israel activists was not what got her hired at the NYT. The Jews of the NYT are all to the left of Bari on Israel, but could live with her until she refused to go along with their main project. Who is the greatest friend Israel has had or could have; the president that China prays will not be re-elected; a president who the China centric Wall St are aghast at five more years of?

    What got her cancelled on Twitter and a person not appreciated at NYT was not so much what she was wanting to champion as a partisan of Israel, but that she was unwilling to join in the total effort to get rid of Trump, an effort orchestrated and backed by Wall Street and its Chinese paymaster.

  19. @mark green

    The BLM savages are firmly under control, no worries. What’s happening, is that the more junior and naive Jewish cadre, like Weiss, are getting a tiny bit of blowback. This does not worry or concern the people in charge.

    Another good example is Eric Weinstein. When his biologist brother Bret ran into the insane SJWs at Evergreen, Zerohedge – although a financial publication – DID NOT EVEN MENTION the family ties. I only recently pieced together that it’s basically a financial mafia family, so I’m a lot less worried about Bret.

    In other words, fear not: with all the #metoo and #BLM and Weinsteins and Swinesteins and Epsteins and Bari Weisses – it’s all under control.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  20. Sean says:
    @mark green

    We have far too many Jews in prominent media positions. Jews like Weiss use their access and privilege to warp reporting and distort commentary about all things that affect Jews, which is virtually everything.

    It would follow that arguments about how much to prioritise Israel versus domestic concerns within the NYT are between Jews.

    What happened to Weiss is that the young, diverse POC pets at the TIMES started to complain about Jewish privilege.

    No, there is a toughness there, as with her sister. At least in the face of animadversion from outside her community, she is unmoved.

    In any case, gentiles of any description mobilising the overwhelming cohesive force of NYT diversity against her partisan stand for Israel as such seems unlikely. I will bet you anything you like that it was her senior leftist Jewish colleagues at the NYT who were bullying her over her being to busy with Israel for seizing all opportunities to skewer Trump with BLM and the epidemic. In the run up to the presidential election they would want to be hitting him with everything but the kitchen sink, and as luck would have it they were presented with golden opportunities to disparage Trump’s leadership in two emergencies. She was stymying their ability to have a full court press.

  21. Meena says:
    @Sean

    “ Mr Giraldi talks of Bari’s tribalism, but those who are without nationalist feeling would be bereft of moral obligation to former victims. “

    1 her nationalistic feelings are not derived from nation she comes from but from her DNA . Her moral fabrics are woven around the ways and the means of how justice could be denied to the victims of her DNA based policies . Jewish from Russia to Argentina have allowed loyalties to the nation they belong to get superseded , overruled and ignored by the Loyalties to a distant nation . But nation can’t flourish , can’t exist ,or can’t rule within another nation, There is no exception.

    “For instance, any debt Germany owes to the Jews stems from and depends on people feeling themselves to be German individuals, and part of their forebears’ legacy for good or ill. “

    2 Why Bari is not conscious of the American destruction of Iraq Iran Syria and Palestine ? Why she doesn’t she own up and admit her debt to them as Americans ? She doesn’t because she considers the sentence of your is bs or she is not American or she knows how to believe when it applies to Germany and Jews and not believe when she is a Jew and victims include victims of Jews . Bari fails both as American citizen and fails as Israeli nation’s citizen by disavowing the legacy of her forefathers . She would have failed had she been citizen of France Russia Argentina or Canada or UK.

    “A morally universalistic and perfectly sovereign individual would feel under no obligation whatsoever to right such wrongs” .
    3 Then don’t wear morally universalistic hat . Because exclusion leaves holes in universalism and active silence as embodied and imposed by Bari make someone immoral ,local tribal and exclusive .

    • Replies: @Sean
  22. Bari Weiss is a Bibi toady. She is the mother lode of outdated neocon talking points. I’m pretty sure I am correct about that. I’ll get back to you the next time I post here!

    • LOL: Parsnipitous
  23. @Parsnipitous

    Neocons are intelligent? Really? I thought they were all a bunch of hacks recycling the same talking points from 1998.

    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  24. For instance, any debt Germany owes to the Jews stems from and depends on people feeling themselves to be German individuals, and part of their forebears’ legacy for good or ill.

    What if it’s contrived (made up) “history” which the Jews are so adept at (Narrative concoction, tribal myth collectively repeated by a critical mass of adherents until it becomes their “real history” or “reality”)?

    Could the Germans (or Americans or Europeans or any nation) be made to feel collective guilt and a sense of debt based on oft-repeated, concocted Jewish myth that becomes the Global Narrative “reality”?

    Yes, they can, because it’s already been done by the Jews and their “Holocaust” myth. It’s also been done by their “Chosen” and “Persecuted” myths — not objective reality based on Western standards of fact and science, but tribal “reality” based on sheer repetition by adherents… adherents of Jewishness and of Zionism. And for purposes of profit.

    A lot of people all on the same page, engaged in a guilting grift can be very profitable for those instigating the scam.

  25. @malkin_fanboy

    Wolfowitz, Ledeen, Rumsfeld: not brilliant, but smart and deceitful. Original neocons knew enough to run (shoddy) imperial policy. Bari Weiss can’t run her B’nai Brith chapter without a BLM hitch.

  26. Cowboy says:
    @Truth3

    That’s a different eschatological take. Reverse dispensationalism but keep the gore. Take that Darby and Schofield (slap slap).

  27. Iran Is Being Baited Into WAR: Mysterious Explosions and Sabotage

  28. Sean says:
    @Meena

    Groupthink at the NYT turned on Bari for being so dialed into Israel issues she was stymying hit pieces on Trump, and you accuse her of being too clannish. Trump is the tribune of America’s traditional people and culture currently declining into despair and ellipse, courtesy of China-centric global market capitalism. Bari is not as deaf to Trump voters’ plight as other NYT editorial staff, more than a few of the most influential of whom are Jewish, and as a result she got cancelled by her co-workers. Which you seem to think is a win the battle against Jewish tribalism. But the substantially Jewish finance-media nexus has its own interests quite different to those of the Israel Lobby and Trump voters.

    Jewish NYT staff can be in favour of Israel making a somewhat magnanimous final settlement of the Palestinian problem, not because the NYT Jews are universalist, but because it is not a pressing concern for the NYT. Unlike tacking to the prevailing wind from Wall St, which is banking on Trump not being re-elected. “Immoral, local, tribal and exclusive” is what big business opinion as articulated by the NYT holds Trump voters to be. After all, Trump’s people are refusing to accept international comparative advantage and free movement of labor are they not?

    • Replies: @Meena
  29. It’s “ye.”

    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  30. Talha says:

    But the arguments are always framed around the premise that the move would be “bad for Israel,” leaving the Palestinian victims on the sidelines as hapless observers of the deliberations.

    What?! There are such things as Palestinians??!! 🧐

    Peace.

  31. Meena says:

    In an open letter published on the Harper’s website last week, 153 figures, including J. K. Rowling, Fareed Zakaria, and Malcolm Gladwell, condemned the rise of a culture characterized by “an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.”  https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/07/harpers-letter-free-speech/614080/

    We can replace the words “rise” with Prevalent , “culture” with the Policies not granted by voters ,nor approved by constitutions ,nor by economic imperative of the nation , “intolerance “ with Bodily harms, expulsion from academia.think tanks, media ,and Hollywood , “opposing “ with Anti Israeli, “vogue” with Unforgiving mandated minimum demand” , “complex policy issues” with American national interest ,honest understanding of historical factors, exporting the concept of indigenous rights ,and international erosion of American moral powers ” ,and “binding moral certainty “ with Forced nation wide implementation of organic reflexive unexamined monolithic assertions of the Zionism .

  32. Meena says:
    @Sean

    “ Jewish NYT staff can be in favour of Israel making a somewhat magnanimous final settlement of the Palestinian problem, not because the NYT Jews are universalist, but because it is not a pressing concern for the NYT”

    It’s a concern and a preoccupation “ofNYT“ jews .That’s why they join politics , become guests and anchors of TV and get sent from Jerusalem Post or from IDF family to become columnist at NYT .

    Any question ?

    “ Groupthink at the NYT turned on Bari for being so dialed into Israel issues she was stymying hit pieces on Trump, ”
    Yes her boss in Israel possibly to go soft on Trump while her local benefactors told her to keep pressure on Trump. But her morbid DNA based preoccupation with Zionism would have none of these as distractions.

    Makes sense to you ?

  33. @obwandiyag

    For a troll, you’re getting boring, not even trying hard, so I’m putting you on the list, pink socks.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  34. Kali says:
    @Colin Wright

    Does the phrase “morally universalistic” not cover such situations?
    I feel no responsibility for the situation in Palestine, though I be nominally “English”. I concidered myself entirely sovereign, but this state of being increases my compassion toward others, nor my guilt.

    Hello Colin, btw. I hope this day finds you well and happy!

    With love,
    Kali

  35. anon[218] • Disclaimer says:

    I looked at the picture and thought, “Oh no, Bari’s been attacked by anti-Semites, Weh, Weh!!!”

    https://www.wkbw.com/news/national/son-of-judge-killed-husband-shot-at-new-jersey-home-fbi-looking-for-subject

    But whew! It’s not Bari, it’s a lookalike judge who drew the short straw and got stuck with the civil suit against Deutsche Bank, Big-Time successor to Nugan Hand and BCCI. Inquiring minds want to know, how come CIA’s ace money launderers laundered money for CIA’s pedo blackmailer Epstein?

    Well, yeah, Duh, it’s more of a rhetorical question than a suit. But now she’ll know to put the plaintiffs on Double Secret Probation or some other CIA bullshit red tape. See, if they put a CIA-certified pretend judge like Vanessa Baraitser on it, this stuff wouldn’t have to happen.

  36. Meena says:
    @Colin Wright

    Form the same vantage point of Sean, we can easily travel further down and reach decision and refuse to undertake any kind of foreign intervention to rescue people from the wrath of Ghaddafi or Basher Assad or Maduro or Kim Jong ( these are paradoxical and counterproductive from the point of the citizen but perfectly profitable for US and its allies . US simply uses the words .).

    But in real moral legal universal it is still relevant and different from abuses as undertaken by USA recently We have distorted the rules . So lets focus on that-

    Moral resining was the very argument,Jewis people used in creating Balfour, in getting USA enter WW2 , infiltrating American institution for Zionist’s propaganda and in shutting out US State Department and in bribing Truman along with 20 other UN sovereign members to vote for their dreams . It contain red until 1973 covertly but now it is overt . We are still continuing to right the wrongs done to the Jews people by the rest of the world population- anti semitism . We as tax payers still are paying for the survival and nurturance of Israel because of the past pogrom and Holocaust and prevent future one . Germans are doing same .

    Today Jewish person will say that t USA supports Israel for American national interest . In the process they make it necessary and look legit and good . But the same Zionist argued in Truman’s cabinet and in the NY Times that USA should forgo its national interest in the Middle East ( supply of oil, preventing Moscow a foothold,) and support creation of Israel for moral reason.

  37. @Parsnipitous

    You are nothing, not important enough for me to put you on any “lists,” even to flick you off my shoulder like a gnat, you fucking sanctimonious nothing nobody piece of shit motherfucking cocksucking asshole.

  38. anon[231] • Disclaimer says:

    Bari Weiss is a not-very-bright college girl who was neoptistically promoted way beyond her level of competence. The interview on Joe Rogan shows this clearly. Multiple clips exist.

    Item: Weiss refers to Tulsi Gabbard as a “toady” of Assad, but when asked what “toady” means and how Gabbard qualifies Ms. Weiss vapor-locks on camera. The Columbia BA in history can’t define simple words that she uses. Obviously she’s not used to anyone actually asking her a real question.

    Fans of Jimmy Dore no doubt enjoyed his fisking of Weiss along with his usual claque.

    All of it is here or linked here.
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51054.htm

    tl;dr
    Warmonger Weiss should make aliya and get a job in the press of Israel where she can fit in better.

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @artichoke
  39. anon[293] • Disclaimer says:

    Oh, never mind, it was that sinister male chauvinist Roy Den Hollander, SNFPPF, oops, couldn’t get that out with a straight face, coffee came outa my nose in a massive COVID-19 mucus droplet suspension, holy shit, Jared Maples is gonna get his star in the vault at Langley if he makes you swallow that shit.

    Esther Salas, congratulations on winning the Robert Vance award for judicial independence!

  40. anon[743] • Disclaimer says:

    Xamine Your Zippper, Gina! Poor sad patsy Den Hollander worked for CIA’s Moscow Kroll proprietary.

    https://archive.fo/7x0U9

    https://www.roydenhollander.com/main/royresume.htm

    The whitewash is unraveling in record time. You people really suck at illegal domestic covert ops anymore. Russ Baker did some great work investigating Deutsche Bank, but since CIA put the horse head in his bed, that Mockingbird Schecter redid it all to fit the Russiagate circle-jerk and now you can’t find the original work. Now it’s all Trump hand-in-glove with DB. Third-generation spy brat Obama, hand-in-glove with DB, whoosh, down the memory hole!

  41. artichoke says:
    @Anon

    Did Bari Weiss actually do any of those things?

  42. artichoke says:

    Very good. Former anti-semitic CIA asset Giraldi (purged I guess by Trump? If so, good) discovers (using his extraordinary sleuthing skills) that Bari Weiss is Jewish and therefore we didn’t need her at NYT.

    I might agree with the very last part. NYT is so totally antisemitic now that there’s no point in her being there.

  43. artichoke says:
    @anon

    She was essentially right about Gabbard, who is a strong supporter of Assad and made a rather strange trip to visit him one-on-one. I am not sure if Gabbard ever expressed support for conversion therapy, but maybe Weiss remembers correctly. What do you expect her to do, produce the reference off the top of her head?

    That said she’s not Donald Trump. She cannot cite references for 100 facts off the top of her head without consulting notes. Neither can you or I.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.