The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
An Illusion About Illusion
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The indefatigable Kagans, Fred and Kimberly, have again been given a bully pulpit to sell their particular brand of snake oil regarding Afghanistan. Today’s Washington Post op ed page featured a piece called “The Afghan Illusion,” Not surprisingly, the article advocates more US soldiers. I have no time for the Kagans and their nonsense and am astonished that they still pop us as frequently as they do given the fact that they have been wrong almost as many times as Bill Kristol. One might argue that their contention that more American soldiers will serve as a shield for the build-up of Afghan security forces only works if the Afghans really want to fight and can afford such a commitment, both highly unlikely. If it doesn’t work it will only mean more dead Americans (and Afghans). But what really bothers me is their underlying assumption of why we are there at all, that if we leave Afghanistan it will become a “haven for terrorists.” They throw out their assumption without any evidence or explanation as if it is an eternal truth. I wonder who exactly those terrorists would be since al-Qaeda has apparently been reduced to a shadow presence in Pakistan and what kind of threat they would pose against the United States? If we are not directly and seriously threatened we should not be in Afghanistan at all. Or Iraq.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Afghanistan, Kagans 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It’s difficult to believe that these people feel any affinity with the normal Americans who fight their wars. Their’s is a sociopathic disregard for both the realities and the costs to actual humans. Perhaps this is a consequence of the intellectualization of conflict. The toxic environment of the academy and the think-tank makes it possible for fantasist’s such as the Kagans to make a good living playing chess with the lives of others.

  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Ah, yes … the Kagans! They’re like the neocon version of Lucille Ball and Ricky Ricardo for our generation except in place of hijinks with little Ricky, we get endless occupations and no-win wars.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.