The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
All the Lies Fit to Print
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

The New York Times strikes again. In an article basically discussing the possible timing for attacking Iran Mark Landler and David Sanger state that Washington wants to “give the latest sanctions a chance to inflict enough pain on the Iranian leadership to force it back to the negotiating table.” In reality, it is the US that has been absent from the negotiating table, not Iran. They then go on to give the Israeli position, i.e. to attack soon, some credibility due to that nation’s proximity to Iran, describing the Jewish state as “a neighbor whose very existence the leaders in Tehran have pledged to eradicate.” One might well question Israel’s neighborliness given its nearly daily propensity to threaten to attack Iran, but one thing that actual speakers of Farsi agree on is that Iran has never actually pledged to “eradicate” or attack Israel. In fact, Iran has attacked no one since the seventeenth century.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Media, Iran 
Hide 8 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. You’re a voice in the wilderness, Mr. Giraldi. Everybody knows that the inhuman Iranians are dedicated to the eradication of Israel. That’s why our bestest-bestest friend Israel collaborates with terrorist organizations to assassinate Iranian scientists.

    http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/08/10354553-israel-teams-with-terror-group-to-kill-irans-nuclear-scientists-us-officials-tell-nbc-news

    Anyone who ever doubted the wisdom of George Washington need look no further than our byzantine involvement with Israel for proof that our greatest President knew what the hell he was talking about when he warned:

    “Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens,) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. ”

  2. tbraton says:

    PG, a couple of months ago, someone posted in response to one of Larison’s blogs a link to an article that had appeared in antiwar.com back in 2007 which completely eviscerates the false claim that Ahmahdinejad had threatened to “wipe Israel off the map.”
    http://antiwar.com/orig/norouzi.php?articleid=11025

    I was aware of the disputed translation, but I missed the article when it appeared. I highly recommend the article to anyone who has any doubts.

    Old Saw,

    do you wonder why no neocon cites George Washington as his favorite Founding Father? You find a lot of neocon fans of Alexander Hamilton but none of GW that I know of.

  3. “do you wonder why no neocon cites George Washington as his favorite Founding Father?”

    He’s too American?

  4. Mike W says:

    Apparently David Sanger has a son in the Israeli Defense Force. How can he be objective? How can it be all the news that fit to print? How have we let this small group of dual interest elites dictate our foreign policy?

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “Disputes between the United States and Israel are inevitable, according to experts, given the radically different stakes of a nuclear Iran for a distant superpower and for a neighbor whose very existence the leaders in Tehran have pledged to eradicate.”

    Would anyone like to comment on what evidence exists to support the contention that the leaders of Iran are pledged to eradicate the existence of Israel?

    Come join a discussion on this article here (an Iranian friend will be on hand to add his viewpoint):

    http://www.wedialog.org/conversations/1036?selected=1419#post_1419

  6. “In fact, Iran has attacked no one since the seventeenth century.”

    Well, they’re obviously trying to lure us into a false sense of security!

  7. tbraton says:

    “In fact, Iran has attacked no one since the seventeenth century.”

    Well, they’re obviously trying to lure us into a false sense of security!”””

    LOL. Well, if that was their intention, they obviously failed since they have lured us into a false sense of insecurity. No, wait, it is not the Iranians who were doing that but the Israelis and their supporters in the U.S., specifically the neocons.

    I don’t know how accurate that claim is about Iran not attacking anyone since the 17th century. I was recently reading an account about Georgia in Wikipedia and came across the following:
    “In 1783, Russia and the eastern Georgian Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti signed the Treaty of Georgievsk, which recognized the bond of Orthodox Christianity between Russian and Georgian people and promised eastern Georgia protection.[23] However, despite this commitment to defend Georgia, Russia rendered no assistance when the Turks and Persians invaded in 1785 and in 1795, completely devastating Tbilisi and massacring its inhabitants. ”

    That is the latter part of the 18th century but still 20-30 years before the British invaded Washington, D.C. and burned the White House..

  8. tbraton says:

    “Would anyone like to comment on what evidence exists to support the contention that the leaders of Iran are pledged to eradicate the existence of Israel?”

    tcolgan, see my earlier post re the faulty translation of Ahmadinejad’s speech given in Farsi back in 2006. The article that appeared in antiwar.com back in 2007 was written by someone fluent in Farsi, and he completely eviscerates the fraudulent claim about Iran’s intention “to wipe Israel off the map,” which has gained widespread acceptance in the U.S. despite the lack of evidence to back it up.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.