The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
A Government Against the People
Loyalty to the president is the chief qualification
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The 24/7 intensified media coverage of the coronavirus story has meant that other news has either been ignored or relegated to the back pages, never to be seen again. The Middle East has been on a boil but coverage of the Trump administration’s latest moves against Iran has been so insignificant as to be invisible. Meanwhile closer to home, the declaration by the ubiquitous Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that current president of Venezuela Nicolas Maduro is a drug trafficker did generate somewhat of a ripple, as did dispatch of warships to the Caribbean to intercept the alleged drugs, but that story also died.

Of more interest perhaps is the tale of the continued purge of government officials, referred to as “draining the swamp,” by President Donald Trump as it could conceivably have long-term impact on how policy is shaped in Washington. Prior to the virus partial lockdown, some of the impending shakeup within the intelligence community (IC) and Pentagon were commented on in the media, but developments since that time have been less reported, even when several inspectors-general were removed.

To be sure, Trump has good reason to hate the intelligence and national security community, which utterly rejected his candidacy and plotted to destroy both his campaign and, even after he was elected, his presidency. Whether one argues that what took place was due to a “Deep state” or Establishment conspiracy or rather just based on personal ambition by key players, the reality was that a number of top officials seem to have forgotten the oaths they swore to the constitution when it came to Donald Trump.

Be that as it may, beyond the musical chairs that have characterized the senior level appointments in the first three years of the Trump administration, there has been a concerted effort to remove “disloyal” members of the intelligence community, with disloyal generally being the label applied to holdovers from the Bush and Obama administrations. The February appointment of U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard “Ric” Grenell as interim Director of National Intelligence (DNI), a position that he will hold simultaneously with his ambassadorship, has been criticized from all sides due to his inexperience, history of bad judgement and partisanship. The White House is now claiming that he will be replaced by Texas Congressman John Ratcliffe after the interim appointment is completed.

Criticism of Grenell for his clearly evident deficiencies misses the point, however, as he is not in place to do anything constructive. He has already initiated a purge of federal employees in the White House and national security apparatus considered to be insufficiently loyal, an effort which has been supported by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Many career officers have been sent back to their home agencies while the new appointees are being drawn from the pool of neoconservatives that proliferated in the George W. Bush administration. Admittedly some prominent neocons like Bill Kristol have disqualified themselves for service with the new regime due to their vitriolic criticism of Trump the candidate, but many others have managed to remain politically viable by keeping their mouths shut during the 2016 campaign. To no one’s surprise, many of the new employees being brought in are being carefully vetted to make sure that they are passionate supporters of Israel.

While it is not unusual for presidents to surround themselves with devoted yes-men, as Trump does with his spectacularly unqualified son-in-law Jared Kushner, his administration is nevertheless unusual in its tendency to apply an absolute loyalty litmus test to nearly everyone surrounding the president, even several layers down into the administration where employees are frequently apolitical. As the Trump White House has not been renowned for its adroit policies and forward thinking, the loss of expertise will be hardly noticeable, but there will certainly be a reduction in challenges to group think while replacing officials in the law enforcement and inspector general communities will mean that there will be no one in a high enough position to impede or check presidential misbehavior. Instead, high officials will be principally tasked with coming up with rationalizations to excuse what the White House does.

Trump’s recent claim that he has the sole authority to shut down or open up the country is clearly unconstitutional based on the 10th Amendment and his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable. His exhortation last Friday to his followers to “liberate” three states from the control of their governors is insurrection, a dangerous provocation that undeniably meets the requirement to qualify as a “high crime” as defined by the constitution.

Trump’s latest firings of top level officials are notable because they have involved two inspectors general. The first one to go was the inspector general of the intelligence community Michael Atkinson. Atkinson, who admittedly was not well liked because of his job responsibilities, was reportedly fired because he had been the official who had forwarded to Congress the initial whistleblower report on the notorious Ukrainian telephone call. Trump explained his decision in a letter to the two congressional intelligence committees: “As is the case with regard to other positions where I, as President, have the power of appointment … it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general. That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.”

It should be noted that Atkinson had a statutory obligation to forward the report to initiate congressional oversight of an alleged executive criminal action. After the firing, Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz rejected Trump’s criticism of Atkinson, saying he had handled the whistleblower matter correctly. It was, of course, a phone call that led to Donald Trump’s impeachment, so Atkinson had to go and Horowitz might just be next.

Subsequent to the defenestration of Atkinson, Trump went after another inspector general Glenn Fine, who was principal deputy IG at the Pentagon and had been charged with heading the panel of inspectors that would have oversight responsibility to certify the proper implementation of the $2.2 trillion dollar coronavirus relief package. As has been noted in the media, there was particular concern regarding the lack of transparency regarding the $500 billion Exchange Stabilizing Fund (ESF) that had been set aside to make loans to corporations and other large companies while the really urgently needed Small Business Loan allocation has been failing to work at all except for Israeli companies that have lined up for the loans. The risk that the ESF would become a slush fund for companies favored by the White House was real, and several investigative reports observed that Trump business interests might also directly benefit from the way it was drafted.

Four days after the firing of Atkinson, Fine also was let go to be replaced by the EPA inspector general Sean O’Donnell, who is considered a Trump loyalist. On the previous day the tweeter-in-chief came down on yet another IG, the woman responsible for Health and Human Services Christi Grimm, who had issued a report stating that the her department had found “severe” shortages of virus testing material at hospitals and “widespread” shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers. Trump quipped to reporters “Where did he come from, the inspector general. What’s his name?”

On the following day, Trump unleashed the tweet machine, asking “Why didn’t the I.G., who spent 8 years with the Obama Administration (Did she Report on the failed H1N1 Swine Flu debacle where 17,000 people died?), want to talk to the Admirals, Generals, V.P. & others in charge, before doing her report. Another Fake Dossier!”

A comment about foxes taking over the hen house would not be amiss and one might also note that the swamp is far from drained. A concerted effort is clearly underway to purge anyone from the upper echelons of the U.S. government who in any way contradicts what is coming out of the White House. Inspectors general who are tasked with looking into malfeasance are receiving the message that if they want to stay employed, they have to toe the presidential line, even as it seemingly whimsically changes day by day. And then there is the irony of the heads at major agencies like Environmental Protection now being committed to not enforcing existing environmental regulations at all.

Most damaging to consumer interests, the rot has also affected the so-called regulatory agencies that are supposed to monitor the potentially illegal activities of corporations and industries to protect the public. As University of Chicago economist George Stigler several times predicted, under both Obama and Trump advocates of ostensibly “regulated” corporations have taken over every U.S. federal regulatory agency. The captured U.S. government regulators now represent the interests of the corporations, not the public. This is more like government by a criminal oligarchy rather than of, by and for The People.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is [email protected].

 
Hide 184 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[361] • Disclaimer says:

    How would have Hillary handled Covid19/the last three years?

    Anybody care to postulate?

  2. onebornfree says: • Website

    “This is more like government by a criminal oligarchy rather than of, by and for The People.”

    This “just” in:

    “Because they are all ultimately funded via both direct and indirect theft [taxes], and counterfeiting [central bank monopolies], all governments are essentially, at their very cores, 100% corrupt  criminal scams which cannot be “reformed”or “improved”,simply because of their innate criminal nature.”   onebornfree

    “Taking the State wherever found, striking into its history at any point, one sees no way to differentiate the activities of its founders, administrators and beneficiaries from those of a professional-criminal class.”      Albert J. Nock

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @chris
    , @Moi
  3. @Anon

    ‘How would have Hillary handled Covid19/the last three years?

    ‘Anybody care to postulate?’

    I hate to say it, but there’s a distinct possibility that, with the cooperation of the media, it would all have been sensibly minimized.

    There would have been noises about making sure there were enough respirators, and the rest of it would have been left out in National Enquirer-land.

    Well, that’s one hypothesis, anyway. For one thing, it might have been seen as unpatriotic to fuss — what with our troops having such problems bringing secular democracy to the ungrateful Iranians and all. After all, three years in…not the time to slack off.

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • LOL: Daniel Rich
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @anon
    , @Fluesterwitz
  4. Anonymous[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    The word is speculate.

  5. nickels says:

    ‘Oh know, we wouldn’t want the federal government to get control of the states!!!!!’
    So stupid.
    What do people think the supreme court has being doing for 150 years?

    • Agree: Realist, Ace
  6. Exile says:

    I yield to no one in my contempt for the fraud-failure of God Emperor Bush III but the author has to be aware that talk of “impeachable” offenses is meaningless in American politics.

    There has never been and never will be an impeachment effort that’s not primarily political rather than process-motivated. It’s an up-or-down vote based on a partisan head-counting and opportunism and public dissatisfaction. All the Article-this-and-that is Magic Paper Talmudry.

    Trump is a somewhat rogueish, somewhat rival Don and faction-head in the same criminal (((Commission))) that’s been running America for well over a century. He’s Jon Gotti to their Carlo Gambino, and his gauche nouveaux-elite style offends the sensibilities of the more snobbish Davoise, but he’s just angling for a seat at the table and a cut of the spoils, not a return of power to the people.

    Impeachment would serve no purpose but what we’ve seen so far with Russiagate, etc.. – a sideshow distraction from the real backroom, long-knife action going down, ala the “settling scores” montage in Godfather III.

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
    • Disagree: Manfred Arcane
  7. Anon[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Just like Obooma. Ignore it till he wanted a piece of legislation passed and them declared an emergency that affected no one. Then declare victory. Amazing what having the press on one’s side does.

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  8. If our media were not controlled by greedy corporations, a reporter would ask this question at Trump’s next news conference:

    “The United States faces mass unemployment with some suggesting rates past 20%. Will you order an immediate halt to all work visas for foreigners?”

    The President would be angry at the question and digress into some other topic.

  9. A concerted effort is clearly underway to purge anyone from the upper echelons of the U.S. government who in any way contradicts what is coming out of the White House.

    So, the same as every other administration, ever. Except that when this administration does it, it somehow is deemed “insurrection.”

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  10. Lot says:
    @Anon

    Quarantine in a secure location with a single trusted “advisor”

    • Replies: @druid55
  11. luke2236 says:

    Telling people to demand and exercise their God given and constitutionally guaranteed rights is impeachable?!?!?
    Suggest the author leave this country and relocate to one more his liking…like red china or similar. sheesh

  12. “As has been noted in the media, there was particular concern regarding the lack of transparency regarding the $500 billion Exchange Stabilizing Fund (ESF) that had been set aside to make loans to corporations and other large companies while the really urgently needed Small Business Loan allocation has been failing to work at all except for Israeli companies that have lined up for the loans.”

    Israeli companies getting the loans intended to benefit America’s small businesses?

    Well, I’m sure this is just another instance where ‘jewish genius’ was responsible for them being first in line to get the money, while the ‘stupid goyim’ were simply too slow to react.

    I’m sure that there is absolutely NO WAY that the Israeli companies got any ‘unfair’ advantage in obtaining loans.

    Jews would never, ever play ‘keep it in the Tribe’ with American taxpayer’s bailout money intended to save America’s small and medium businesses. They love America and always play fair and above board and would never favor Israeli-owned companies over American. And Israelis would never hoard monies intended to help America’s middle class business owners, either .

    Any suggestion to the contrary is just another one of those evil antisemitic tropes…….

    • Replies: @kikz
    , @Cyndy
  13. Getaclue says:

    “To be sure, Trump has good reason to hate the intelligence and national security community, which utterly rejected his candidacy and plotted to destroy both his campaign and, even after he was elected, his presidency.” — Yes to this. This is OBVIOUS to all but the dullest rubes or those who are in on it and trying to escape what they tried to do in attempting to over throw the US Government. The rest?

    Once you have this stated– that an actual Coup which was certainly plotted/sprung by the last occupant of the Presidency along with Clinton, Brennan, Comey, and many other NWO Globalists throughout the Government (FBI, CIA, DOJ…) and outside of it (the Globalist NWO MEDIA) the rest is drivel — they tried to take him out–JFK they used a bullet, here not yet– so to say he shouldn’t put in people he absolutely trusts at this time into any position he can? Are you kidding or what? You can’t be serious– I’ve actually had someone try and kill me they were quite serious about it– my reaction after was not anything like what I see you suggesting or mirrored in your “analysis”. This is how the CIA “counsels” in response to a murderous Coup — an attempt to overthrow the duly elected Government?

    How do you overreact to a group of the most powerful people in the World getting together to try to murder you? That’s your argument basically– he’s over reacting to that? He shouldn’t have “Loyalists”. He needs to work with these other people — the ones who want to murder him — keep some of those “non-Loyalists” on board who time after time have plotted against him in every way possible during the last nearly 4 years?

    You seem to be one strange dude from my life’s vantage point any way, what a perspective….Maybe you would actually deal with people of this magnitude trying to destroy you in the way you state but no sane/fairly intelligent person would — I can’t get past you have that sentence in there and then follow it with all the rest — you seem to live in some alternate reality where when someone tries to murder you the right reaction is to blow it off and work with them– give them another few shots at you– say what? You learned this from your years at the CIA– this is how they train/advise things like this should be dealt with up at Langley? Or is it just wishful thinking on your part that they get another shot at him?

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @BL
  14. anon[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    You’ve burned the bridge to where you might have been considered a decent human being.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  15. So, any aspiring political poodle now has to swear allegiance to the president and Occupied Palestine?

  16. Getaclue says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    I think he just did it–no? No more immigration–zero by Executive Order — “The President would be angry at the question and digress into some other topic.”– I won’t be asking your advice when buying lottery tickets– a little off in the ESP Department– also as to judgement as to the President and his actual agenda as to helping USA Citizens? Hopefully you’re not too TDS to admit you were a bit off in your “analysis”/judgement?

  17. While it is not unusual for presidents to surround themselves with devoted yes-men, as Trump does with his spectacularly unqualified son-in-law Jared Kushner, his administration is nevertheless unusual in its tendency to apply an absolute loyalty litmus test to nearly everyone surrounding the president

    True enough. Trump has also injected into Washington his own nest of swamp creatures and Wall St. bigwigs. However it is also true that Trump has been under unrelenting attack since the day he announced his candidacy. This is not fair. With the possible exception of Nixon, I’ve never seen a more ruthless campaign by political insiders to demean a public figure.

    But to whom must Trump show ceaseless and attentive loyalty to?–no matter what?

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-days-remembrance-victims-holocaust-2020/

    • Agree: Richard B
    • Replies: @Richard B
  18. chris says:
    @onebornfree

    Absolutely!

    I can’t get too worked up about the firing of the prison guards; I rather enjoy the charade.

    The real problem is that: ‘It’s the system, stupid!’ and no amount of tinkering or puting the ‘right’ people in these positions will ever do anything more than just changing the illusion that something is being done.

    It reminds me a little of that late Soviet Union film “Burned by the Sun” about Stalin’s purges of the criminals that had ridden his coat tails to power. Try as the movie makers did, I could not and would not feel an ounce of sorrow for those (these) scumbags who had wielded immoral, arbitrary, and disproportionate power over their subjects.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  19. Anonymous[287] • Disclaimer says:

    The president has the right to hire and fire anyone he pleases. White House officials, cabinet level secretaries/undersecretaries, agency directors, deputy directors, inspector generals, and other high profile people serve at the pleasure of the president not their own whims, desires, agendas, and goals. Some of these idiots even think they’re more royal than the king just because they work in the wealthy areas of the capital and serve the palace. Basically the top one thousand people of an administration need to be staffed properly from the get go. Since the Dubya and later Obango administrations oversaw the ruin of America the sooner their appointees are gone the better. It should be nationalists/populists and Trump loyalists who dominate the White House, federal government agencies, and top positions across DC. It’s why the president was elected.

    None of this is new or unqiue to Trump. These sorts of things have occurred across time and borders.

    https://eradica.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/old-and-new-gods/

  20. @Carlton Meyer

    Totally agree.”work visas for foreigners”?
    Sorry to be a covid-despot, but surely NO foreigners should be entering the US at the moment — short of some necessary business & a 14 day quarantine…. There should be no work visas for many, many months, not merely on medical grounds but as a response to possibly Great Depression levels of unemployment.

  21. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    With the full support of America’s Israeli media cartel, she would have blamed Covid-19 on Iran and started massive bombing raids followed by a land invasion.

    Trump is no prize, but I think he’s still the lesser evil.

  22. Dr. Giraldi, then which one of those 16 other republican candidates would fit your bill? Romney? that loser; Ted Cruz? that one that was never a natural born citizen; or the most qualified, JEB? that one who was even a worse one that you present in your article, that one who IS an internationalist, globalist.

    President Trump—has been THE ONLY president to visit a Pro-Life march. Trump IS building a wall on the Southern border. Tons of Federal employess, FBI, CIA, DNI, State Department are busily sabotaging his administration and agenda—and you are complaining about what? Are you this word busy about the Coup-de-etat we just had done by our Federal Bureaucracy? WHAT about “”””their””” agenda of being “””against the people””””?

    Are you privy to the inner workings of these IGs? For a lot of reasons, President Trump shows very good judgement and yet in this matter, you question? When IGs were hiding that “””whistleblower””” who wasn’t whistle blowing whatsoever but complaining about the President’s agenda. An Ukranian born officer—is attacking President Trump? Really?

    Looking at the Democrat Party and the rest of the Loooooosers in the Repuke party—-Trump is hell of a lot better than any of them by a factor of 10.

    • Agree: kikz, Manfred Arcane
  23. … his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable.

    You need to re-read the US Constitution. From Article 2, Section 3, clause 3:

    … he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;

    Get both Houses to concur, and his threat is moot. Only actions beyond that to shut down Congress against its will would be impeachable.

  24. gotmituns says:

    The government has been against the people for my entire lifetime (I’m an old man now). One of the only glimmers of light in that time, JFK was snuffed out. After all, who did he think he was, trying to stop the elites from having their war in Vietnam?

  25. Z-man says:

    He (Trump) should have purged all of the Obama appointees on day one.
    The Vindman twins are a perfect example of the Deep State.
    While I can understand your loathing of Trump’s middle East policies, I do also, what he has blatantley done vis a vis the Zionist Entity is very little different than what slick Obama did under the table, outside of the Iran deal.
    And to tell you the truth, as much as I loathe Israel the Iran deal was definitely flawed and should have been more advantageous to America and the West. Iran should have seen the advantages of totally relinquishing nuclear weapons even with mad Zionists in their neighborhood. They could have still kept their ballistic missiles, sans nuclear tips.

  26. Anonymous[417] • Disclaimer says:

    There was nothing illegal in the Ukraine call, therefore no need for the IG to report it. And until someone got a bee under their bonnet, 2nd hand information did not legally qualify as “whistle-blowing” but someone changed the reporting form (a piece of paper not a law of Congress) to hide that little problem.

    • Replies: @RationalRabbit
  27. Moi says:
    @onebornfree

    Were we ever the government “of, by and for The People?”

  28. You are okay with Fine and Horowitz but have qualms about Israeli companies … berry, berry interesting Signor Giraldi!

  29. Realist says:
    @Anon

    How would have Hillary handled Covid19/the last three years?

    In regards to the Deep State interest…no different. The Deep State coin has the left on one side and the right on the other. Heads the Deep State wins, tails the Deep State wins…you lose.

  30. @Z-man

    You are deranged. Iran has no nuclear weapons to relinquish.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  31. Truth3 says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    If our media were not controlled by greedy corporations…

    Excuse me… correction…

    If our media were not controlled by evil & greedy Jews

    • Agree: anarchyst
  32. Realist says:
    @Getaclue

    The idea that Trump is fighting the Deep State is ludacris…this is a charade…if the Deep State didn’t want Trump to be President…he wouldn’t be. Trump is a Deep State minion. No matter the existential threat to the US…the 1% get richer and the 99% get poorer.

  33. Realist says:
    @Z-man

    He (Trump) should have purged all of the Obama appointees on day one.

    That supposes that Trump is not a Deep Stater as was Obama…this is a poor supposition.

    Iran should have seen the advantages of totally relinquishing nuclear weapons even with mad Zionists in their neighborhood. They could have still kept their ballistic missiles, sans nuclear tips.

    Ballistic missiles, sans nuclear tips are useless. Did anybody care when North Korea had ballistic missiles…before they had something worthwhile to put on the tip? Hell no.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  34. onebornfree says: • Website
    @chris

    You get it, I get it, but Giraldi doesn’t, and neither do most [ie 99%] here and elsewhere.

    Since the reality about the true nature of governments is too horrifying for them to ever even consider, let alone acknowledge, they continue on, ignoring that “in your face” reality, day in, day out.

    And so it goes….

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @chris
    , @Saggy
  35. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Moi

    That was just the line used to gain your trust. We were sold “a bill of goods”, as they say. And to give credit where credits due, it was a pretty good lie in that it achieved the result desired [i.e. enslavement of the population]. And, by and large, the lie still works on most, despite even the “in your face” aspect of the latest scam [CV-19], let alone preceding major scams, such 9/11.

    Regards, onebornfree

  36. Anonymous[102] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Why bother? Go Troll somewhere else.

  37. Trump has had two open coup attempts in three years, and a constant barrage of leaks etc. His purges are clearly at least three years too late.

    Also, to an outsider, it’s strange how some right-wing American journalists write in a way which indicates that they have faith in the due process, checks-and-balances etc afforded by the American system. I don’t understand how any American right-winger could maintain their faith in the U.S. political system, it seems corrupt approaching the point that it is beyond-repair.

  38. Anonymous[102] • Disclaimer says:

    Why are you offended by the views of others. It is their right and your own.

  39. MGM says: • Website

    What we have today is a Country so deeply corrupt and self-deluded that it will not repair itself for generations to come, if ever.

  40. A123 says:

    Barack Hussein was Against The People

    Trump’s MAGA For The People efforts, must take steps to undo the damage done by the prior criminal admistration.

    Here is an detailed explanation of how Barack Hussein intentionally undermined the rule of law:(1)

    Aside from the date the important part of the first page is the motive for sending it. The DOJ is telling the court in July 2018: based on what they know the FISA application still contains “sufficient predication for the Court to have found probable cause” to approve the application. The DOJ is defending the Carter Page FISA application as still valid.

    However, it is within the justification of the application that alarm bells are found. On page six the letter identifies the primary participants behind the FISA redactions:

    … DOJ needed to protect evidence Mueller had already extracted from the fraudulent FISA authority. That’s the motive.

    In July 2018 if the DOJ-NSD had admitted the FISA application and all renewals were fatally flawed Robert Mueller would have needed to withdraw any evidence gathered as a result of its exploitation. The DOJ in 2018 was protecting Mueller’s poisoned fruit.

    If the DOJ had been honest with the court, there’s a strong possibility some, perhaps much, of Mueller evidence gathering would have been invalidated… and cases were pending. The solution: mislead the court and claim the predication was still valid.

    I am not sure why Giraldi is defending Barack Hussein and Hillary Clinton’s behaviour & staff choices. All rational human beings see the damage that Hillary created at the State Department.

    PEACE 😷
    _______

    (1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/17/declassified-doj-letter-to-fisa-court-highlights-severe-institutional-corruption-doj-blames-fbi-for-spygate/

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @druid55
  41. Iva says:

    Why can’t USA’s gov have Pro -America oficial , why it has to be Israeli “Yes” man.
    How many American Yes -man in Israeli government???? This is sick.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  42. Z-man says:
    @Realist

    That supposes that Trump is not a Deep Stater as was Obama…this is a poor supposition.

    Wrong as Trump wasn’t a full time politician until Obama became POTUS. Obama was groomed from an early age by ‘The Powers That Be’ for the ultimate prize.

    Ballistic missiles, sans nuclear tips are useless.

    Not in the eyes of the Zionists. Any damage to the Zionist Entity is unacceptable to ‘Hymie’. A lot of damage can be done with ‘conventional’ weapons on those missiles whether accurate or not. It would still be a deterrent to attacks from Izruel.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @anarchyst
  43. BL says:
    @Getaclue

    I’ve long felt sorry for PG. As a former member of what they (and he) playfully refer to as a community who publishes his thoughts weekly, his silence on these treasonous activities for years now has been deafening.

    To be sure, Trump has good reason to hate the intelligence and national security community, which utterly rejected his candidacy and plotted to destroy both his campaign and, even after he was elected, his presidency.

    Those of us who read you continue to wonder why you’re stuck on the duly elected president’s motivations for exercising and protecting his legitimate constitutional authority. Worse, at this late date all you can come up with is he “hates” this “community.”

    Whether one argues that what took place was due to a “Deep state” or Establishment conspiracy or rather just based on personal ambition by key players, the reality was that a number of top officials seem to have forgotten the oaths they swore to the constitution when it came to Donald Trump.

    Any thoughts, or will you go to your grave with this ‘On the one hand, on the other hand’ cravenness?

    Be that as it may . . .

    Yes, Mission Accomplished once again.

    • Replies: @A123
  44. A123 says:
    @BL

    I’ve long felt sorry for PG. As a former member of what they (and he) playfully refer to as a community who publishes his thoughts weekly, his silence on these treasonous activities for years now has been deafening.

    Yes that about sums it up.

    I have this vivid mental image of PG getting out of his Prius complete with [I 💗 HILLARY] bumper sticker. He then falls to his knees and begins worshiping the ultimate symbol of SJW Globalist theology. A 300′ foot tall windmill producing the world’s most expensive and least reliable electricity.

    Very Sad!

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @BL
  45. chris says:
    @onebornfree

    Once again, I completely agree, OBF.

    I always think of the Chinese people who, long after the death of Mao, and after the end of the initial criminal regime there, still pine for the grotesque old criminal (true of course also in Russia wrt Stalin, not to mention our criminal leaders). I always ask myself, how many people would Mao (or Stalin) have had to kill before even these people would say to themselves: ‘ok, I was wrong, he really was a criminal!’ The sad truth is that that number would have to reach all the way to their own door almost before they would change their minds.

    In what concerns our friend Phil, it’s true that he’ll never question the structure of the monstrous government which rules us and the planet no matter how many proofs we all receive of its incorrigible nature.

  46. Saggy says: • Website
    @onebornfree

    You get it, I get it, but Giraldi doesn’t, and neither do most [ie 99%] here and elsewhere.

    Count me in the 99.9%.

    But, consider, the founding principles of the US govt. are stated in the Declaration of Independence … which begins …

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    And yet the government makes a complete mockery of these principles when it claims total power over out lives when it drafts men to fight in foreign wars, and no one seems to notice.

    I mean, it’s really absurd that we continue to profess these principles while at the same time turning them upside down.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  47. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Imagine Joe ‘I’m running for the US Senate’ Biden running the CV19 affair.

    Imagine Joe ‘What the hell is a ventilator?‘Biden’s daily press briefings. LOL

    • Replies: @Realist
  48. Realist says:
    @Z-man

    Wrong as Trump wasn’t a full time politician until Obama became POTUS. Obama was groomed from an early age by ‘The Powers That Be’ for the ultimate prize.

    How do you know Trump wasn’t groomed? One doesn’t have to be a politician to be groomed.

    Trump is a member or minion of the Deep State…or he wouldn’t be President.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  49. Wally says:
    @A123

    Giraldi, is one step behind on this like he was when he ignorantly claimed Trump called CV19 “a hoax”.

    – Giraldi is wrong again when he says:

    “Trump’s recent claim that he has the sole authority to shut down or open up the country is clearly unconstitutional based on Article 10 and his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable. ”

    – When in fact Trump has delegated the shut down – opening up to the various states at a time of their choosing,

    – Giraldi also weakly dodges saying who he would prefer in the White House and why.

    Trump over the alternatives any day. Trump landslide 2020.

    • Agree: A123
    • Replies: @Old Jew
  50. anarchyst says:
    @Z-man

    Let’s not forget that Trump has been dealing with jews all his life.

    From real estate to banking, I am sure that Trump has seen every shenanigan, illegal dealings and behavior that the jews have pulled off.

    Just maybe Trump believes in and is acting on the old axiom, to wit: “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”

    Trump is no pushover, knowing when to hold ’em and when to fold ’em.

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @Z-man
  51. Rurik says:

    His exhortation last Friday to his followers to “liberate” three states from the control of their governors is insurrection, a dangerous provocation that undeniably meets the requirement to qualify as a “high crime” as defined by the constitution.

    Michigan’s governor clearly is not fit to serve. Ditto Florida’s and many other governors. Are the residents of Michigan supposed to bow their heads in eternal fealty to a criminal tyrant? Or applaud Trump and anyone else who demands an insurrection from tyranny. We need more insurrection in this nation, not less. God bless the insurrectionists! To hell with that imperious sow in Lansing, MI. If anyone, she should be impeached. And Trump is right to encourage the free citizens of its respective states to liberate themselves from all forms of tyranny, especially from its arrogant, unaccountable governor’s mansions.

    It should be noted that Atkinson had a statutory obligation to forward the report to initiate congressional oversight of an alleged executive criminal action.

    Except that there was no criminal action in the slightest. If the man who wants to run on the Democrat ticket for potus is corrupt, (understatement of the century), then it’s the duty of the president to investigate his corruption. It’s not a crime, it’s Trump’s job as enforcer of America’s laws. Biden is corrupt. Duh. Encouraging an investigation into his (and his son’s) uber-corruption is not illegal. It’s the right thing to do (for God’s sake!)

    *If* Trump really was a Putin agent, then it not only would have been legal to investigate, but Obama’s duty to do so. When it turns illegal, is when they cynically and knowingly use bullshit dossiers from partisan hacks to enlist the power of federal law enforcement to spy on your political opponents, and leak classified documents, and generally engage in a concerted effort to subvert the duly elected president of the United States because you personally hate him, and especially his ‘irredeemable’ Deplorable, Red State white Christians – as so many ‘racists’ and ‘homophobes’ who don’t deserve to have any voice in America’s democracy, because Bill Maher and Adam Schiff doesn’t like them.

    that led to Donald Trump’s impeachment, so Atkinson had to go and Horowitz might just be next.

    Say what you want about Trump, (and I mostly agree), but the impeachment was a grotesque farce and low point (which is saying a lot!), of American sewer politics. Atkinson and Horowitz need to be tossed out on his arses. There’s no dearth of things Trump should be impeached for. Bombing Syria for one. But asking for an investigation into the den of snakes in the Deepstate, including Biden and his POS son, was a patriotic and honorable thing to do. The more the rats in the ‘Russia-gate’ treasonous idiocy are exposed as criminal scum, the better.

    The captured U.S. government regulators now represent the interests of the corporations, not the public. This is more like government by a criminal oligarchy rather than of, by and for The People.

    Wasn’t it Obama who appointed a Monsanto lobbyist to head up the FDA?

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/youre-appointing-who-plea_b_243810

    The reason, I suspect- that Trump is so popular with the Deplorables, is because the hatred for Trump is so invariably irrational, personal, and so often not based on anything Trump actually did wrong, but rather for what he’s doing right.

    When they were screeching the loudest over Trump’s ‘treason’, was when Trump was at his best, conducting diplomacy with the Russia’s Putin.

    Red State America wants a rapprochement with Russia, not a second cold (or hot) war. Red State America likes Vlad Putin. Even with his ‘homophobia’ and blitzkrieg into Crimea to enslave the denizens there.

    So as the Deplorables see the media in their seething, drooling Trump Derangement syndrome hysteria, blubbering about Trump the ‘racist monster’ for shutting down travel from China on one day, and on the next day blaming him for not closing it all down sooner, we all see that it simply doesn’t matter in the slightest what Trump does or does not do. It’s the same as being a straight, American white male (or female),

    Michelle Obama (and the left) don’t hate us for anything we do, she (they) hate us for what we are.

    And the Deplorables understand that leftists and progressives and Democrats and media’s startling hatred for Trump, is just a thinly veiled hatred for traditional America. Not for anything they did or are doing, but for being what they are. Just like with Trump. They don’t hate him for conspiring with Putin to destroy our democracy, or anything else he’s “done”. They hate him for what he represents. That America from their nightmares

    Trump has simply leveraged the last remnants of heritage America into a political alliance with uber-Zionists and evangelicals and financial swindlers extraordinaire, and others in order to prevail in current modern American politics. Where his biggest strength is the unhinged lunacy of his opponents, seeming as they do to resemble the very worst elements of America’s putrescent rot most foul.

    • Replies: @Alden
  52. BL says:
    @A123

    If you were in his position who would you have bet on these last four years?

    The Obama administration was engaged in widespread surveillance of its political enemies long before Trump came down the escalator. You don’t have to believe me, read between the lines and redactions of the declassified FISC opinion:

    https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

    This followed Brennan engineering his rise to a position he never should have been allowed anywhere near, CIA Director, by using these surveillance tools to compromise and cow everyone, including president Obama.

    So I understand why PG is keeping his head down and mouth shut, except for an occasional mumble about how Trump “hates” the intelligence community.

    Maybe he or someone else will explain or look into this:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-usa-cia/cia-boss-brennan-visited-moscow-in-early-march-interfax-idUSKCN0WU0S5

  53. @Z-man

    the Iran deal was definitely flawed and should have been more advantageous to America and the West.

    It would be helpful if you had been paying attention.
    – Iran is a Non Proliferation Treaty signatory, as is the US;
    – The Treaty allows signatories to pursue nuclear development for peaceful purposes;
    – The Treaty requires other signatories to assist in the peaceful development;
    – Two Ayatollahs, over 40 years, have placed a fatwa on nuclear weapons;
    – Iran voluntarily allowed the most rigorous go anywhere, anytime IAEA inspection regime of any NPT signatory, prior to the “deal”;
    – The IAEA has never found any evidence of nuclear weapons, and neither has the CIA;
    – Only NPT non signatory Israel finds any evidence of nuclear weapons;
    – Obama’s “deal” restricted Iran to 5% enrichment, which means they couldn’t produce radio-pharmaceuticals which require 20% enrichment;
    – As far back as 2004, when Canada, which produced about one third of the world’s radio-pharmaceuticals, announced they were decommissioning their reactors, the US nuclear lobby saw an opportunity for that multi billion dollar market; https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/radio-pharmaceutical-market-1650
    – Iran’s new reactor has the capacity to capture an sizeable chunk of that market, at a lower cost challenging the US and taking Isreal’s market share;

    How much more advantageous do you want?

    • Replies: @Z-man
  54. Agent76 says:

    Apr 7, 2020 Bankrupting America

    America’s politicians passed more than $2 trillion in spending to keep the economy afloat during the virus pandemic.

    April 20, 2020 First Negative Interest Rates, Now Negative Oil Prices.

  55. @Carlton Meyer

    “The United States faces mass unemployment with some suggesting rates past 20%….”

    The real unemployment rate has been more than 20% for more than a decade. The globalists keep redefining what “unemployed” means. Working a day a week means you are employed. Running out of benefits means you aren’t unemployed. Try feeding your family on that, even if you didn’t have to pay rent.

  56. @Ozymandias

    I couldn’t understand how Horowitz was still around after his bullshit report on Russiagate. Heads should have rolled in the DOJ, the FBI, and likely the CIA.

    • Replies: @Ozymandias
  57. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Saggy

    “We are born with rights and we die with rights, whether any piece of paper exists or not. If rights are claimed to exist because of a constitution , no rights exist at all. The tyranny we face today is because of the Constitution, not in spite of it.”

    From: “There Are No Such Things as Constitutional Rights”
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/gary-d-barnett/there-are-no-such-things-as-constitutional-rights/

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @J. Farmer
  58. Alden says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Trump just suspended all immigration due to the China virus. Liberals and employers are furious and filing lawsuits and asking for emergency preliminary injunctions to overturn Trumps order. Same old same old that’s happened since Trump took office.

    Reporters for all media are totally, absolutely anti American born worker and absolutely totally in favor of a non White foreigner for every possible job from dishwasher to Doctor.

    Except for the evil White Nationalist racist websites frequented by ignorant prole deplorables like me, I’ve never seen an anti immigration pro American worker word published in any mainstream media.

    So it’s extremely unlikely that a reporter would ask such a question. More likely, a reporter would ask why the government isn’t facilitating more non White immigrants to do the “ jobs Americans just won’t do” such as coding engineering, research and medicine.

  59. @Curmudgeon

    Christopher Wray clearly believes that the best way to restore the FBI’s reputation is by covering up their crimes. As long as he remains, the place will remain a cesspool of corruption.

    And Brennan should be executed along with his coconspirators.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  60. Alden says:
    @Rurik

    Great post. The Jews liberals and media feel the same unreasonable, seething hatred for Trump that they feel for us deplorable proles.

    So why should we believe anything the media says about him or us??

    As for article 10 and the rest of the constitution, both the original wording and interpretations and federal court decisions for the last 250 years have made it abundantly clear that the federal power is supreme over the states.

    Giraldi needs to look at what :

    1Washington and Hamilton did to the Whiskey rebels,

    2Marbury vs Madison 1804,

    3what Lincoln did during the civil war,

    4what Wilson did before and during WW1,

    5 what FDR did for 12 years

    6 that Eisenhower sent the military to enforce school desegregation in Arkansas and Tennessee

    7 Nixon’s creating the Hispanic race by executive order in 1970

    8 Nixon’s opening to China without consulting congress or any governors.

    9 the fact that the last war America actually declared war according to the constitution by congress voting was in December 1941.

    10 The fact that America’s been at war continually for the last 70 years but we’ve never followed the constitution and officially declared war but the presidents have just started wars all on their own.

    The federally authority has been supreme since the whiskey rebellion was put down by Washington. Whether it’s a federal court order, an executive order by the president or any action by the president the constitution and 250 years of precedents makes it very clear the national government rules the state governments.

    Most of what these governors and mayors have done will be held unconstitutional as soon as the lawsuits are filed and injunctions issued.

    Giraldi seems to suffer from the same Trump derangement syndrome as MSNBC and the NYSLIMES

    Maybe he should consult some on line constitutional law lessons.

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @Rob (London)
    , @Curmudgeon
  61. Svevlad says:

    He might be preparing to pull a Sulla. Intriguing times upon us! Not so intriguing for the Americans, though. It might be a little ouchy

  62. @Anonymous

    There was nothing illegal in the Ukraine call, therefore no need for the IG to report it. And until someone got a bee under their bonnet, 2nd hand information did not legally qualify as “whistle-blowing” but someone changed the reporting form (a piece of paper not a law of Congress) to hide that little problem.

    Exactly. Yes, Trump put people in in charge who wouldn’t try to sabotage his agenda – how awful. Trump also put people in charge to stop the corruption and money laundering of the Obama appointees. For example, EPA funneling money to environmental groups by settling instead of fighting lawsuits and then these environmental groups taking that settlement money and funneling it back to Obama and the Democrats.

    The people elected Trump not any of these technocrats. Philip Giraldi seems to be applauding their subversion of the Republic.

  63. I don’t see all of this as Trump’s fault. He is doing what all presidents have done just far more blatently.

    The real problem is Congress, and specifically Mitch McConnell and all his Republican cronies. Trump does whatever he wants and the Republican led Senate simply ignores it instead of holding him accountable.

    If we had a less partisan Congress with better intentions towards oversight, there would be far more impediments placed in Trump’s way for doing what he is doing. Instead it is often left to the lower courts to put the brakes on Trump’s deprivations…

  64. Ko says:
    @Anon

    The question that came to mind was, would there have been an outbreak is the evil bitch was President.

  65. Z-man says:
    @Curmudgeon

    I have ADD.
    The deal was flawed because it gave the Iranians the option to develop nukes down the line. It would have been ‘advantageous’ to both. America to claim victory and Iran to be nuclear free forever and thus ‘trump’ Israeli propaganda.

    • Replies: @A123
  66. Old Jew says:
    @Wally

    Her Walter,

    Etwas Interesantes fuer Ihnen:

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-figure-of-6-million-holocaust-victims-first-cited-by-polish-survivor-not-eichmann-1.8781961

    [MORE]

    On January 21, 1944, about a year and a half before the end of World War II, a dramatic item was published on the front page of Haaretz. Under the headline “Six million Jewish victims,” it brought unusual testimony for the time about the number of Jews murdered in the Holocaust. “Six million – that’s the calculation made by two young men in a meeting with members of their party organizations in Palestine,” the report said.

    “With pencil in hand they counted the number of victims in each country and reached an astonishing number – 6 million Jews were murdered and killed and died in Nazi-occupied countries in death camps, concentration camps, labor camps and the various ghettos,” the article said.

    Despite its importance, the piece was published in a marginal spot on the page, between other items and adjacent to congratulatory messages and an ad for a hotel that offered “direct bus service to the Tiberias Hot Springs.” There was no byline nor was the identity of the two young men mentioned.

    The item was discovered last year by historian Joel Rappel of Bar-Ilan University’s Institute of Holocaust Research. Rappel embarked on a pioneering archival journey in an attempt to discover the first time that someone used the number 6 million in regard to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, “the horrifying and familiar number that has long since become an icon,” he said. His discovery proves that even 75 years after the end of the Holocaust, it is still possible to reveal new details about a subject that has seemingly been researched from every possible angle.

    “Like every Israeli who grew up in this country, I knew from a young age that the number 6 million is always mentioned in connection to the extermination of Jews in the Holocaust,” says Rappel, 73, who lives in Yavne. He is the son of Rabbi Prof. Dov Rappel, a Jewish educational philosophy researcher. After reading hundreds of books and articles about the Holocaust, and even perusing many documents that have never been published as part of his work as the director of the Elie Wiesel Archive at Boston University, Rappel realized that despite the research controversy regarding the precise number of victims, “in our consciousness the number remains 6 million.”

    The website of the Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center states that “all the serious research confirms that the number of victims ranges between five and six million.” Various studies cited by Yad Vashem indicate different numbers based on population censuses from before and after the war, and on Nazi documents containing data about expulsions and extermination.

    In the Yad Vashem database there are about 6.5 million listings of victims, but they include double entries – people who appear on more than one list. According to Yad Vashem’s estimates, once the double listings are removed, the database contains about 4.8 million names. The rest of the names have yet to be discovered, and may never be known.
    Related Articles

    Virus sends Holocaust survivors behind doors, back in time
    The real story of how hundreds of young Holocaust survivors were rehabilitated in postwar Britain
    Remembering Holocaust survivors and Jewish community leaders claimed by the coronavirus

    Breaking news and analyses in your inbox
    Email*

    Yet the question remained: Who was the first to mention the number 6 million, even before the historical studies were conducted and before the Pages of Testimony were collected by Yad Vashem. According to the remembrance center, the number was etched in people’s consciousness due to a statement by Adolf Eichmann, who served as an “expert” on Jewish affairs in the Nazi regime. In August 1944 he boasted about it to his colleagues, estimating the number of Jews murdered in the camps at 4 million, with 2 million others murdered by other methods. This testimony was revealed at the Nuremberg Trials, held in Germany immediately after the war.

    Rappel, who refuses to accept facts without checking their source, looked into it and found a different answer. It turns out that Eichmann was preceded by a Jewish Holocaust survivor, who early in 1944 reported the number 6 million. The man’s name, Eliezer Unger, is not familiar to the general public. Unger was a prominent activist in the Hashomer Hadati religious Zionist youth movement in Poland. At the height of the war, after the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, he crossed the border to Slovakia and then through Hungary on his way to Palestine. When he left Europe he vowed “to shock the entire world, all of humanity and our brothers the Children of Israel in particular.”
    Eliezer Unger in an undated photograph.
    Eliezer Unger in an undated photograph.Unger family

    A few months ago, Rappel found a formative document connected to Unger in the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem. As he puts it, it was “a single document that brought about a major change in direction in the research.” It is the minutes of a meeting, under the headline “A statement by Eliezer Unger at a meeting of all the pioneering organizations, on January 19, 1944.” It turns out that two days after arriving in Palestine, when the Holocaust was still raging on European soil, Unger had difficult and painful things to say in the presence of the country’s Zionist leadership.

    “Polish Jewry is extinct and no longer exists. Polish soil is a sacred grave of Polish and European Jewry. I could have brought you a sacred gift: a clod of earth from Polish soil suffused with the blood of a nation, which has died a martyr’s death,” was how Unger began. Later he mentioned the specific number, noting that other reports say that the number of murdered Jews was “only” 2 million.

    “In early April 1943, on the clandestine radio, we heard about the outcry of Rabbi Stephen Wise [one of the leaders of U.S. Jewry] about 2 million Jews who were exterminated in Poland. We heard and were surprised: Didn’t the world know as yet that the number of the nation’s dead has already reached 6 million?” he said.
    The front page of Haaretz from January 21, 1944. The “Six million” article is in the left column, above the announcements in outlined boxes.
    The front page of Haaretz from January 21, 1944. The “Six million” article is in the left column, above the announcements in outlined boxes.Haaretz archive

    Several hours after his first speech, Unger also spoke at the convention of Hakibbutz Hameuhad kibbutz movement, which convened at Kibbutz Givat Brenner. There he cried out that “Six million martyrs are gone.” Two days later, his words made it to the front page of Haaretz.

    Yes, a year and a half before the end of World War II – and before hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were murdered – it was a Jewish Zionist and not a Nazi officer who mentioned the number of Jews murdered in the Holocaust, which later became a symbol.

    But his words did not make much of an impression. Rappel’s father, who knew Unger personally, told his son how Unger “went from one synagogue to another, mounted the dais, with and without permission, and cried out on behalf of the Jews who still remained alive in Europe.” In most of them, unfortunately, they didn’t want to hear his words and “threw him out of the synagogue – literally and physically,” says Rappel.

    How did Unger know about the outcome of the Holocaust in real time, before the killing had ended? “At the time the number 6 million was the accepted number of European Jews,” says Rappel. He found reinforcement for his claim in other newspapers, where they warned of the fate of “6 million Jews,” even after Unger had spoken.

    About 15 years later, during Eichmann’s trial, chief prosecutor Gideon Hausner said that “In the consciousness of the nation the number 6 million has become sanctified.” But he added: “It’s not so simple to prove that. We did not use this number in any official document, but it became sanctified.” Now, thanks to Rappel, historical research had added another layer for understanding the context for the number.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Wally
    , @Dube
  67. A123 says:
    @Z-man

    The deal was flawed because it gave the Iranians the option to develop nukes down the line.

    That was not a “flaw”, it was an intentional feature.

    The MIC investor class was deliberately trying to start a new nuclear arms race among Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Greece, and probably others. JCOPA would have ended NPT and enriched Elite DNC Globalist families like Obama, Biden, Clinton, and Kerry.

    PEACE 😷

  68. Skeptikal says:

    Agreed. Trump is awful.

    But I can’t help thinking that it’s payback time for those who wasted Americans’ time and mental energy on the impeachment circus. Anyone who advanced the “get rid of Trump” agenda should have expected to get canned down the road if the game plan didn’t work out.

    the idea of Israeli companies feeding at the trough is stomach-churning. Again, those who do not like this picture maybe should have considered that trying to cut trump off at the knees and breaking a whole bunch of rules to do so might have blowback in the future. And, there doesn’t seem to be anyone in congress with the stomach or cojones or even conviction to end the Zionist chumming.

    Who in Congress is standing up for the interests of Americans as against those of rich Israeli entrepreneurs who are taking this country for a ride?

    I don’t give a flying eff about anyone who participated in the “Get Trump” theatrics. Or about anyone who gave Obama a pass of the same s— that Trump does.

    The show is all ending very badly for the American people, and the world.

  69. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Trump went after another inspector general Glenn Fine, who was principal deputy IG at the Pentagon and had been charged with heading the panel of inspectors that would have oversight responsibility to certify the proper implementation of the $2.2 trillion dollar coronavirus relief

    Speaking of the Pentagon, did anyone ever find that missing 2.3 TRILLION that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld talked about on 9/10/2001?

    What should of been the lead story the next day was buried in the WTC rubble.

    It’s said that the easiest way to rob a bank is to own one. Guess the easiest way to destroy a govt is to be in control of one.

  70. @Anonymous

    True enough, but neocons — or neo-Trots, which is more accurate — are not loyal to Trump, or anyone else except each other and Israel. And they are certainly not populists, patriots, or nationalists.

    Trump has hired a bunch of fifth columnists, who will stab him in the back at every opportunity.

  71. TG says:

    Well, yes and no.

    If anything, the greatest failing of Trump was that, after he took office, he surrounded himself with advisors who were opposed to his agenda – and the agenda that the American people elected him to enact.

    It is true, government officials should not be personally loyal to the president. But they should dutifully try to enact his policies, or else resign in protest. To do less is to subvert democracy (or at least, whatever is left of it). Although it must be admitted Trump is increasingly doing the worst of both worlds: surrounding himself with hostile officials for things the people want (like no more pointless foreign wars), and surrounding himself with sycophants when its for crony capitalism…

    As far as stopping immigration being unconstitutional, with respect, unconstitutional is whatever 500 billionaires don’t want. So you see, separating the alleged children of people illegally crossing the border from their parents is clearly unconstitutional, but separating people convicted of any other crime from their children is perfectly OK. Because the rich want cheap labor.

    But if the rich no longer need massive immigration to lower wages – which may be the case for the near future – then the rich will no longer care about ‘immigrants.’ Indeed, if illegal immigration hurt the profits of the rich, it would be legal to machine gun migrants at the border – in fact, it would then be unconstitutional not to!

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  72. Dutch Boy says:

    For most Trump supporters, ceding American foreign policy to Israel is a desired feature of the Trump administration rather than a bug. Nevertheless, Trump remains, as he was in 2016, the best of a very bad lot of candidates. Oremus!

  73. druid55 says:
    @Lot

    or amentor: Kissinger!
    You’re a zio shill!

  74. So what if Trump is replacing bureaucrats? The federal government cannot be fixed. It Nor should we bother to try anymore. Decommission the nukes and biologicals. Execute the deep state careerists for crimes against humanity, and then turn off all federal lights. Finally restore the natural swamp which DC was built upon.

  75. Agent76 says:

    Apr 21, 2020 The Characteristics of an Initiation Ritual

    • Replies: @anon
  76. Beb says:

    It appears to me that Trump has kept his head, while most of those around him have lost theirs.

  77. Robjil says:
    @Old Jew

    Whatever happened, the Zionists wanted it and wanted to look like it happenned. It is the shield to hide the crimes of Zionism since 1945. Here a Jewish Rabbi talks about the numbers game.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ny-rabbi-not-even-1-million-jews-killed-in-holocaust/

    In a video posted online, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi can be seen saying that high assimilation rates in pre-war Europe and broad Nazi definitions have exaggerated the numbers of Jews recorded as killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust. At least five million of the six million were “total goyim,” Mizrachi told the crowd,
    “The truth, I am telling you, is that not even one million Jews were murdered,” Mizrachi said, trashing accepted historical accounts. “A lot of non-Jews were meshed into the count, but in truth, how many Jews really were killed?”

  78. Herald says:
    @Anon

    It matters not one jot or iota what Hillary would have done, she wasn’t there. This fiasco is all down to Trump and his bunch of incomparable incompetents.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  79. @anon

    ‘You’ve burned the bridge to where you might have been considered a decent human being.’

    I’ll have to be sure and let people know that.

  80. The Obama-Trump continuities you cite are very relevant here. Both heads of state behave as figureheads, knuckling under to permit continued CIA impunity (Obama w.r.t. widespread and systematic torture and murder and aggression, Trump w.r.t. ARCA.) They behave identically in terms of abuse of function and trading in influence, subjecting all regulators to industry control.

    The only difference between Obama and Trump is their inside v. outside strategy. Obama was third-generation dynastic CIA nomenklatura, and after his early misstep of promising to obey the supreme law of the land on torture, Obama took CIA direction without demur, up to and including the crime of aggression of TIMBER SYCAMORE. Trump, by contrast, follows the Nixon template, attempting to replace CIA focal points surrounding him with “loyalists.” When Nixon did it, CIA cadres leveled the same charge. But Nixon put Schlesinger in as DCI to extract the crown jewels and shitcan a bunch of the worst criminals. Carter took the outsider’s path too.

    Nixon was purged in the CIA’s bloodless Watergate coup; Carter was ousted by CIA’s October Surprise. We should consider whether COVID-19 collateral damage will be used to discredit Trump, who evidently has less workplace discretion than a McDonald’s fry cook. At a key juncture of the outbreak CIA frogmarched Trump through the synthetic crisis of the Soleimani assassination.

    So of course the government is criminal. It was chartered as a criminal enterprise at inception in Sction 202, 73 years ago. In the resulting kleptocracy, IGs perform a superfluous function. And every CIA inspector general is paid specifically to be a criminal scumbag. The IG reviewing CIA’s most open-and-shut crime against humanity, its torture gulag, criticized it because it didn’t work, intently ignoring the supreme law of the land that says nothing justifies torture.

    So let’s not get all verklempt about some IGs. IGs are nothing but a Gehlen-type apparat generating legal pretexts for manifestly illegal acts. Fuck em if they can’t take a joke.

  81. Anonymous[331] • Disclaimer says:

    Exactly what didn’t Trump do that he should have done?

    What would you have done differently? When would you have done it and exactly would you do what Trump hasn’t done.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Rurik
  82. mcohen says:

    The name is tump,Donald tump,000.

  83. Saggy says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    As Pops replied to a reporter who asked “What is jazz?”, “If you still have to ask, shame on you.”

  84. @Alden

    Is any and every criticism of Trump due to Trump Derangement Syndrome?

  85. MarkinLA says:
    @TG

    So you see, separating the alleged children of people illegally crossing the border from their parents is clearly unconstitutional,

    Maybe you could find exactly where in the Constitution it says that and post it.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
  86. Rurik says:
    @Herald

    It matters not one jot or iota what Hillary would have done,

    So long as we all agree that voting for Trump saved us all from doing to Syria what she did to Libya, and most likely a hot war with Russia, open borders here at home with free everything for the immigrants.. SCOTUS Justices that would have ended the First and Second Amendments, and imposed draconian punishments upon the basket of Deplorables, while lavishing unprecedented power on the Deepstate apparatchiks like Brennan, Comey, Stzrok, McCabe, Clapper and all the other treasonous scum in our federal law enforcement and ‘intelligence’ agencies.

    That and perhaps worst of all, having to stomach that vicious slag on the electronic screens in airports and elsewhere, hectoring us all in between cackling over the latest tortured-to-death former head of state.

    Otherwise, you’re right, and Hillary doesn’t matter anymore, except as a fount of unlimited joy over her meltdown, having been denied the power she coveted more than anything any super-bitch has ever coveted in her murderous, treacherous, execrable little life.

    So the thing that matters now, is who would be preferable to Donald Trump going forward?

    Joe Biden?

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    , @Herald
  87. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous

    What would you have done differently?

    Install all my own agents at the Secret Service and CIA and FBI and anywhere else people would likely try to kill me for exposing the corruption of the last few decades.

    closed Gitmo on the first day with Executive Order

    Ended the wars on day two.

    Ended all aid to Israel on day three.

    Fired all the treasonous scum in the State Dept., and every other sector of the federal government where the employees serve at the pleasure of the president.

    Began an investigation into wars based on lies, and trillions of dollars extorted and looted from the Pentagon and other government agencies.

    Began an investigation into 9/11

    Investigated the assassination of JFK

    Investigate the Obama administration for using the power of federal law enforcement to spy on my campaign, and then attempt to subvert the will of the American voter with the Russia-gate hoax. Investigate the treasonous scum and liars like Schiff for the Ukraine-gate hoax.

    Close the borders to all immigrants. America is full. Fuck off.

    Bring all the troops home from overseas.

    Build the Wall.

    Tell Israel every single person responsible for the USS Liberty still alive is to be extradited for trial, right now. Failure to comply will result in immediate sanctions, leading ultimately to very, very harsh measures, with nothing taken off the table.

    Tell Israel every single person with forehand knowledge of 9/11 is to be extradited for interrogation and trial, right now. Failure to comply will result in immediate sanctions, leading ultimately to very, very harsh measures, with nothing taken off the table.

    Institute E-verify and send all the criminal invaders packing.

    Just for starters..

    Then I’d really get busy.

    Rurik in 2020

  88. Loup-Bouc says:

    Mostly, Mr. Giraldi’s article tracks well the ghastly reality of the current government of the U.S., though it fails to account that reality’s five-decades-long recent history of monstrous evolution. Perhaps the history-disregard enjoys justification of a hot focus pressed by the weight of the health-and-economy crisis engendered by West’s seemingly incompetent pandemic-response. But see https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

    Still, Mr. Giraldi utters one assertion that demands sharp criticism, because it could serve the Democrat elites’ rabid pursuit of impeaching Trump:

    Trump’s recent claim that he has the sole authority to shut down or open up the country is clearly unconstitutional based on Article 10 and his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable.

    Mr. Giraldi is neither lawyer nor law-school-educated. Apparently he did not READ the pertinent federal constitution provisions or the federal judicial decisions that have construed and interpreted those provisions. I cannot divine, securely, the meaning of Mr. Giraldi’s language referring to an “Article 10,” since the federal constitution does not bear an “Article 10.” But a fair supposition is that Mr. Giraldi means the federal constitution’s 10th Amendment, often dubbed the “States’ Rights” amendment.

    Can the President adjourn Congress? U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 3 provides, inter alia, this:

    [The President] may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper….

    Clearly, Trump cannot adjourn Congress merely because he desires. But, if he moved Senate and House “friends” to seek an adjournment that other (“enemy”) Senators and House-Members opposed, he would have Article II, § 3 pretext for adjourning Congress against protest of his opponents. Per a more-than-two-centuries-old rule of law, near-certainly, his motive would be irrelevant. The sole question would be whether his action fit terms of Article II, § 3.

    Nor would law law deem relevant the “motive” of Trump’s Congressional “friends,” partly (but not only) because of the Separation of Powers Doctrine and the “Speech and Debate Clause” [U.S. Constitution Article I, § 6, Clause 1]. For, the legislative maneuver would not be ” Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace,” and Congress-members’ legislative conduct is immune from judicial review.

    [Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/395/486 , has no bearing on this matter, partly, but not only, because the “culprits” were not House-Members or Senators, but a House of Representatives’ Clerk, a House Sergeant at Arms, and a Doorkeeper of the House.]

    The matter is one of details. The practical question is whether Trump has enough of the right “friends” in Congress and whether he and they can negotiate competently the pertinent terms of Article II, § 3.

    Respecting the 10th Amendment matter, the answer inheres partly in the U.S. Supreme Court’s rather consistently (though not always) treating the 10th Amendment as if it were a mere redundancy that only begs the question of whether a challenged Executive or Congressional action can claim some support in the federal constitution’s Article I, II, or III or some other federal constitution provision (like the 14th amendment).

    The 10th Amendment is a reminder that the federal government’s prerogatives form a domain limited partly by the federalism aspect of the federal constitution. The 10th Amendment observes the federal government may not assume a prerogative the federal constitution left residing in the States — left in the States by not providing the federal government such prerogative. One can only wonder how Trump would assume, or invade, a STATE‘s prerogative by affecting the commencement or duration of a regular or special session of the FEDERAL legislature.

    I do not support the prospect of Trump’s adjourning Congress to render interim appointments, just as I do not expect that Trump or his advisors (except, perhaps, Attorney General Bar) would be able to negotiate Article II, § 3 successfully. I concur with Mr. Giraldi’s apprehension that the Trump administration is near-wholly incompetent and that its actions are, predominantly, either designedly or accidentally evil.

    But to oppose successfully the U.S. politico-economic elites’ — and the dangerous idiot progressives’ — one must attend punctiliously to legal, practical, economic, and factual details.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  89. Wally says:
    @Old Jew

    – That would be the same Eichmann who said at his 1961 trial said that he “saw geysers of blood coming up from a mass grave” … which he copied from Elie Wiesel. LOL

    fact:
    – Jews have been lying about ‘6,000,000, dead Jews since at least 1823, see;

    Jews have been pushing their ‘6,000,000’ lie since at least 1823:
    Scroll this down

    6 MILLION?

    – For more on the complete demolition of the desperately claimed Eichmann nonsense:

    EICHMANN INTERROGATED: Transcripts from the Archives of the Israeli Police, Reviewed by Ted O’Keefe: http://vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/6/2/OKeefe237-240.html
    Eichmann tapes: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6479
    The Adolf Eichmann Trial, By John Wear: https://codoh.com/library/document/6316/?lang=en
    much more:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=eichmann&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

  90. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    This comment supplements my post of April 21, 2020 at 11:14 pm GMT

    This comment renders treatment of whether Trump would transgress the 10th Amendment if he actually acted, manifestly, per his (Trump’s) claimed “sole authority to shut down or open up the country.” [Mr. Giraldi’s assertion.]

    The matter is not whether the federal constitution provides Trump “sole” authority of controlling a shut down of open up of a portion or activity of a State or part of the territory of the United States. The matter is whether Trump has ANY authority to control movement or commercial, economic, or other activity within or among U.S. States or parts of U.S. territory. The question is novel, since the U.S. has not ever experienced an internal threat enormous or potentially catastrophic as posed by Covid-19.

    The answer must obtain not only from the federal constitution’s text and judicial construction of it, but also, and much more, from a punctilious examination of all federal statutes (perhaps even U.S. Treaties and interstate Compacts) that might provide Trump such power. I have not spare time enough to perform such law-investigation. But I do know that the matter is far from obvious or simple.

    U.S. federal history bears some judicial “recognition” that the Executive possesses certain, not clearly defined, emergency powers. Some such power is implicit in the Article II, § 2 provision that the President is commander of the militia of the “several states.” Beyond such considerations, the answer must obtain from some provision or provisions of the near-astronomically-profuse Congressional Acts and Resolutions and other federal law authorized by but not stated in the federal constitution. The matter’s resolution is hugely NOT apparent.

    I do not mean that I support Trump’s having or using such power. The prospect is near-unbearably frightening, at least because of Trump’s politics and his very spare, narrow competence. I mean only that Mr. Giraldi’s blithe assertion errs dramatically, for want of attending necessary detail.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  91. @Rurik

    Rurik set rules of commenter-engagement, wrote:
    “So long as we all agree that voting for Trump saved us all from doing to Syria what she did to Libya…,”

    (Zigh)

    In the words of Meatloaf’s “Paradise by the Dashboard Light,” Stop right there!

    President Vladimir Putin stopped “us” from doing to Syria what ZUS Obama’s Secretary of State did to Libya.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  92. @Rurik

    Hi Rurik. Excellent ‘to do’ list. Allow me to suggest one additional thing:

    Abolish all government unions. As employees within a monopoly corporation (government) that exists outside and above the competitive, private marketplace, government workers already enjoy privileged job security. Adding a layer of union protection to their less-competitive environment only softens accountability for their job performance.

    Worse still, when their ’employer’ looses money (runs a deficit) all that needs be done is to raise taxes, issue bonds, or print more money. This is the road to ruin.

    Even FDR warned against government unions (which did not exist during his lifetime). Now that government unions are in place, watch pensions continue to rise, performance standards decline, insider perks grow, and government non-accountability expand.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  93. Paul C. says:
    @Rurik

    You can be my VP! 🙂 Because I’m arresting every member of the Fed, seizing their assets and those of the top executives at member banks (Goldman etc.). The Fed is over. Then arrest and shut down the criminal media empires, as well as outlaw Freemasonry. Then I let my VP pursue his agenda, which I fully support.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  94. Trinity says:

    No matter who has been the President, at least in my lifetime, I see the same ole shit every single time. Trumpstein vs. Biden or Trumpstein vs. Hillary or Bernie, in the words of Hillary, “what difference does it make.” They are all going to be Israel Firsters, not a damn one of them will give a shit about the white working class of America, neither did LBJ, neither did JFK, who all of a sudden has become a saint in recent years, and neither did others before and after them. Look at the audience members in those old MAGA and KAG rallies, Trumpstein & Co. always place some token nonwhites in the back right behind him ( right in view of the cameras, smdh) while the rest of the audience is 98.6 % White, and most are blue collar Whites at that. However, truth be known, Trumpstein isn’t concerned about the people in that audience, he and Ivanka probably mock them in private, take it to the bank on that one. Do you really think Trumpstein & spoiled little Ivanka give two shits about some guy stocking shelves at Walmart? And do you think that Hillary gives a shit about anyone other than herself and her Zionist masters? Washington is INFESTED with the same sort of people on both sides of the aisle. All these self serving blowhards sold this country down the tubes decades ago. I thought I would give Trumpstein a chance because of the alternative. What a HUGE disappointment. Unless some credible person shows up, and I don’t see anyone on the horizon, I’m sitting out on the next election. The repukes aren’t taking my vote for granted again.

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
  95. anarchyst says:
    @Rurik

    I would deport EVERY “dual-citizenship” Israeli from the united States of America…NO exceptions…
    Any Israeli in ANY government position would automatically be deported.

    • Agree: Rurik, Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @druid55
  96. Anon[408] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Z-man

    Iran has no nuclear weapons to relinquish. It ha forsworn weapons of mass destruction as violations of the Koran. Iran does have ballistic missiles, with convention warheads.

  97. anon[361] • Disclaimer says:
    @Agent76

    Interesting, and certainly some points are applicable to the present situation.

    But — it’s not that difficult to penetrate Mask Mania.
    Do gooders are pushing them. Bossy types, who crave being in charge but are in fact impotent.
    Bossy people infantilize others: they assume THEY know how to behave maturely but YOU need their guidance.

    Rational people are resisting inhaling their own snot and calling it hygiene.
    Rational people believe they are capable of behaving responsibly without being instructed by a do gooder or coerced.

    God knows American culture has turned Americans into a herd of sheep.
    And Initiation Rituals are not that very obscure: religions run on such rituals.

    Those two reasons are why the Initiation Rituals described in the video will fail:

    Identity politics has turned USA into too many camps and pointed Identity Herds into disparate directions. The initiation ritual tends to one agenda, but identity politics pushes and pulls Americans on their own scattered paths.

    And the fact that Initiation Rituals are the common currency of religions means that many Americans have built in antibodies to an imposed initiation.

    The masking is particularly onerous.
    Time to turn the imposed snot rag into a symbol of resistance.

    Draw a star of David on your mask.
    or a yellow star.
    or a little Hitler mustache

    ABOVE ALL, remind those who would impose their ego on others of the meaning of WE THE PEOPLE.

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
  98. MarylinM says:
    @Anon

    “How would have Hillary handled Covid19/the last three years?

    She would finally create what she always wanted:
    1) build Supreme National Cathedral of Madam President
    2) change her name to Messiah, and make self the national religion
    3) replace United States of America with the Supreme Ministry of the Village
    4) plough over DC to raise free marijuana for the poor
    5) eliminate all taxes, and all earned income, and put all on mandatory Universal Basic Income
    6) vaccinate all with Fukitol
    7) create some mayhem each May 1st to get the Supreme Ministry to save her most favorite charity, herself, with gazillion bucks

  99. Dube says:
    @Old Jew

    This comment appeared and disappeared beneath that article.

    History of the “six million” figure
    Who is not aware that “the horrifying and familiar number that has long since become an icon” was, in fact, a fixture long before the Shoah of WW II, and was presented in public on occasions as far back as the 19th century, calling attention to the persecution of Jews? Any online researcher can easily verify the instances. Did this repetition bear on the iconic number now settled for victims of the Shoah? Those antecedents and their impetus, if any, should not be overlooked.

    • Thanks: Robjil
  100. Jorge Videla [AKA "matzoball bat soup"] says:

    there will be no one in a high enough position to impede or check presidential misbehavior. Instead, high officials will be principally tasked with coming up with rationalizations to excuse what the White House does.

    lost me there phil. the constitution gives the only elected official of the executive branch that power. given trump’s fending off two jew coup attempts maybe he should exercise it.

    just call trump a butt goy already.

    the unelected bureaucracy is just as much against the people as its elected CEO, especially when it’s an unelected (((bureaucracy))).

  101. @Anon

    Clinton would say — to paraphrase her immortalized words after the murder of Ghadhafi: We saw, it came and we died.

    • Replies: @druid55
  102. @Z-man

    Madness in black and white. A closet pro-Trump, shamelessly pro-Zionist, YouTubesque, infantile comment.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  103. J. Farmer says:
    @onebornfree

    There are no such thing as rights, natural or otherwise, only privileges conferred by society. Rockwell’s anarcho-capitalism is a fantasyland. Any attempt to form a stateless society will fail.

  104. @Moi

    I believe it was actually, on the people, in the people and up the people. Somehow it was transcribed incorrectly, possibly by a new migrant for whom English was a second language.

  105. Realist says:
    @Wally

    Imagine Joe ‘I’m running for the US Senate’ Biden running the CV19 affair.

    Imagine Joe ‘What the hell is a ventilator?‘Biden’s daily press briefings. LOL

    Yes, Biden is brain dead…but there are plenty of people that support him…speaking of brain dead.
    That tells you how much this country is screwed up . We are on a shit slide to hell.

  106. kikz says:
    @Mustapha Mond

    don’t forget…. IR will still get US taxpayer funded $3.8BILLION/YR for the 10yrs no matter how many of US starve or die.

  107. kikz says:
    @Moi

    at least until 1865…………………………

  108. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    Is this what you would do as an absolute authority (Ayatollah, King, Emperor)?

    Or, what you would *propose* As a President? If proposed:

    — Which priorities would Congress appropriate?
    — — What would you trade in return for those appropriations?

    — How many would be overturned by the Judicial branch?
    _______

    This is the problem that Trump (and previous Presidents) have been up against. Without cooperation from the other two branches established by the U.S. Constitution, the power of the Executive branch is limited.

    It has taken years, but Trump and McConnell have done significant work replacing judges that actively oppose the Constitution. And, Trump really needs a second term to flip 2 or 3 additional Supreme Court seats from SJW Globalist to American Populist. Eliminating “mythical” birthright citizenship, based on failure to understand the XIV Amendment, requires a solid court majority.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  109. Z-man says:
    @Bill Jones

    Oh, I thought I had answered you. A great man like me shouldn’t have to write this again but here goes.

    Don’t get hysterical. I should have said relinquish any effort to make nukes.
    Now please put me on your ignore list.

  110. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    President Vladimir Putin stopped “us” from doing to Syria what ZUS Obama’s Secretary of State did to Libya.

    actually it was us, who stopped Obama- and then the war hag from doing to Syria what she did to Libya.

    Because when Obama announced his intention to bomb Syria in order to take out Assad, (and deliver Syria over to the head-slicers of ISIS he had armed and funded to wage the civil war in Syria), it was none other than the American people who thundered back through our representatives, a resolute, unequivocal *No*, to bombing Syria.

    Then again, it was the American people who listened to the war hag espousing a confrontational posture towards Putin’s Russia and Assad’s Syria, demanding ‘no-fly zones’ and bombing airstrips and generally wanting to do to Syria what she did to Libya, and again the American people thundered back a resolute *No* to the hawkish war bitch, by electing Donald Trump instead – who wanted no part of Syria.

    Don’t you remember all that Chuck?

    ‘and I advocate today, no-fly zones’ = war with Russia

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-hillary-clinton-idUSKBN179058

    https://thehill.com/policy/defense/464617-hillary-clinton-calls-trumps-syria-pullout-a-sickening-betrayal-of-allies

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    , @geokat62
    , @Derer
  111. @anon

    anon #361 wrote:
    “God knows American culture has turned Americans into a herd of sheep.
    And Initiation Rituals are not that very obscure: religions run on such rituals.”

    Hello # 361.

    Thanks for offering intelligent thought on “Initiation Rituals.”
    You appear to be a serious commenter.

    Fyi, have appreciated & learned from “obscure” work produced by Aaron & Melissa Dykes.

    Linked below is a video which begins by displaying a book by Joseph Campbell, who did brilliant work on comparative mythologies, religions.

    You wrote: “The masking is particularly onerous…
    Draw a star of David on your mask.
    or a yellow star.” 👍👍👍! Try on the video below, and my unmasked respect, #361.

  112. Rurik says:
    @mark green

    Done’ Mark,

    All federal government unions end on day one.

    There is already zero accountability from federal government employees, who’re massively over-paid and can’t be fired for any reason. This all ends on Jan 20, 2021

    We are going to have a miniscule, but accountable federal government.

    Dept. Education = gone

    CIA = gone

    my chopping block will get more use than a Federal Reserve printing press

  113. @Rurik

    Haha, sad, Rurik wrote, “the American people thundered back a resolute *No* to the hawkish war bitch, by electing Donald Trump instead – who wanted no part of Syria.”

    Get serious Rurik, get well?

    Selah, the Benjamins, the thundering triumph of Jewish Lobby & Adelson Benjamins which “want no part of you.”

    • Disagree: Rurik
  114. Rurik says:
    @Paul C.

    The Fed is over.

    OK, I’ll take the VP

    (I’m a little too excitable to have my finger on the button anyways ; )

    And yes, Goldman Sachs and all the other ‘too big to fails’ would fall to the axe. No more subsidies for Hollywood or Goldman executive offices or anything. (a second Holocaust of sorts ; )

    All anti-trust laws would be enforced with gusto. No more media empires. No more media or bank mergers, no more Big Tech tyranny.

    Google and Facebook and Amazon and Microsoft and Apple will find there’s a new sheriff in town who can’t be bribed. No more censorship, no more petty abuse of power…

    No more wars. No more taxes on people making under a 100k. No more surveillance. NSA abused its power and betrayed the public trust. Federal prison for James Clapper and everyone involved.

    We’ll find out who killed Jeffery Epstein, and get to the bottom of that swamp. Ehud Barak is already sweating matzah balls for his role on 9/11, and Jeffery’s ‘Lolita’ (shiksa) island.

    So many things will change. Palestinians will have their dignity restored and then some. Right of return will transform the Holy Land into a bastion of justice, Godliness, love and truth. Zio-terrorists will find the world a terribly lonely and desolate place for their brand of ethno-supremacism. Even Christian Zionist evangelicals will find the tax man making uncomfortable inquiries. America will put sanctions on every nation who’s imprisoning people for questioning the state-enforced lies vis-a-vis the Holocaust. 90 year old grandmothers in Germany will be welcomed out of their dungeons with ticker tape parades, for their indomitable courage and heroism and as an inspiration to us all.

    It’s going to be a new day.

  115. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    … it was none other than the American people who thundered back through our representatives, a resolute, unequivocal *No*, to bombing Syria.

    Sounds like a script to a Hollywood blockbuster! I I wish it were true, but unfortunately, the American people have been disenfranchised from the political process for quite some time… well before Obama came on the scene.

    Case in point… didn’t the American people march in the millions in various cities across the country to protest W’s impending attack on Iraq? The POTUS and West Knesset members didn’t give a rat’s ass for the people’s wishes back then, did they?

    No, the truth of the matter is a little more mundane… Obama had decided he was not going to attack Syria and he used Congress as a human shield to help him save face for making that decision.

    • Thanks: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Rurik
  116. Rurik says:
    @A123

    Without cooperation from the other two branches established by the U.S. Constitution, the power of the Executive branch is limited.

    There’s going to be a massive paradigm shift.

    A revolution-zeitgeist that will wash away the corruption of our age, in an epic tsunami of cleansing populist rage.

    The age of Bush/Clinton/McConnell/Schumer/Pelosi et al.. will come crashing down upon them, like the Masonic columns forced to crumble to the sheer power of America’s and the world’s collective outrage.

    a new day awaits…

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    , @A123
  117. @Rurik

    Oh, haha, no age of Trumpstein?

    🤣.

  118. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    Obama had decided he was not going to attack Syria and he used Congress as a human shield to help him save face for making that decision.

    I disagree Geo, in fact that sounds to me like a nice script.

    Did Obama have a crisis of conscience?

    Here’s a pretty good account.

    [MORE]

    At the same time the polls starting coming in and the results weren’t good for Obama. At first the issue was whether Obama could order the bombing of Syria on his own. A lot of Americans started standing up for the Constitution. Factor in here the Snowden revelations and the growing understanding and disgust with the Obama war on privacy rights. Then there were polls about whether to attack Syria. The first poll I saw on whether to attack was in Newsmax, a conservative website, and the numbers were running strongly against the war. A shocker.

    Conservative opposition to war was noteworthy. The Tea Party Republicans came out against bombing. Opposition to the war started developing among the right wing radio commentators like Limbaugh and Hannity. They criticized the war plans and started quoting Russian sources, RUSSIA SOURCES, rather than U.S. intelligence on Syria. Now of course some of that sentiment was sheer hatred of Obama, but very, very uncharacteristically these commentators were not following the Israeli government line.

    Obama wanted to attack and went through all the usual steps to prepare for it only to see almost all his support fall away.

    It’s true that anti-war rallies over Syria in the U.S. were insignificant compared to the gatherings and marches of hundreds of thousands in the streets in 2003. Yet why did the U.S. public turn against the war? The corporate TV news played the usual ominous warlike music, showed the usual heart wrenching scenes and called on the usual “security” experts. But something has changed. After war upon war with nothing to show for it Americans are finally wising up. They were listening to what dissidents had to say on Syria and honking their horns in support as they passed by their anti-war demonstrations.

    Ten years of rallies have had their effect.

    Finally there were the anti-war demonstrations. True they were small. Even in New York and in DC they were no more than 400 or 500. Yet they made their mark. The bright yellow signs of “ANSWER” were in the news, one being featured on the web edition of the New York Times. The United National Anti-War Coalition put out a call for rallies and there were a goodly number on the East Coast, the West Coast and Chicago. Code Pink had its “bloody hands” in back of Kerry as he testified to Congress.

    On August 31 President Obama announced that while he had decided to attack Syria, he would first take the matter to Congress first. Peace activists took heart.

    If you recall, those in the know said it was just a trick. Obama would attack whatever Congress said. For a while it did look like the move to go to Congress was the usual, merely getting a rubber stamp for war. Ha’aretz revealed that AIPAC was about to send 250 lobbyists into the halls of Congress to twist arms.

    Arch foe of Obama Sheldon Adelson and his friends in the Republican Jewish Coalition came out for bombing. In my state Connecticut there was a “town hall” meeting called by Congressman Larson (September 2). When I arrived there were 60 Syrians and Syrian-Americans in front of the West Hartford town hall holding a rally with graphic pictures of the chemical weapons massacre. They called for loudly for U.S. action and the media was all over it (neglecting the speakers inside the hall who were generally against military action). Again it looked like the familiar path to war. The pictures of Assad’s horrors would be used to excuse another imperial attack. Just one Democratic Congressman, Alan Grayson of Orlando, said he would vote against war.

    But then a strange thing happened. The opposition of the public to the war wasn’t just an airy “opinion”. Americans were prepared to do a bit about it. They started calling Congress and writing letters and overwhelmingly they said, “No war, no way”. Grayson (formerly very sympathetic to AIPAC) started a website, Don’t Attack Syria and after a while other members of Congress starting speaking out against an attack.

    The very scientific Pew research group issued a poll saying that at the start of September half of the Americans polled opposed the war and only 29% favored a strike on Syria.

    Obama wanted to attack and went through all the usual steps to prepare for it only to see almost all his support fall away.

    It’s true that anti-war rallies over Syria in the U.S. were insignificant compared to the gatherings and marches of hundreds of thousands in the streets in 2003. Yet why did the U.S. public turn against the war? The corporate TV news played the usual ominous warlike music, showed the usual heart wrenching scenes and called on the usual “security” experts. But something has changed. After war upon war with nothing to show for it Americans are finally wising up. They were listening to what dissidents had to say on Syria and honking their horns in support as they passed by their anti-war demonstrations.

    Ten years of rallies have had their effect.

    https://stanthestruggle.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/why-didnt-obama-bomb-syria/

    • Replies: @geokat62
  119. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    There’s going to be a massive paradigm shift. … A revolution-zeitgeist

    Relatively few revolutions turn out the way the original rebels planned. It would involve killing the Constitution and replacing it with something new. As a Populist, I would rather save the Constitution.

    We may end up there any way. If the DNC Globalists try to fabricate millions of votes (a.k.a. Vote By Mail) democracy ends. At that point, a revolution is the near certain outcome.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  120. druid55 says:
    @A123

    Lot Shylock Goldthiefstein!

  121. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    Did Obama have a crisis of conscience?

    Hardly. He probably reckoned he already did Libya for his paymasters and decided to leave Syria to his successor.

    Besides, there’s only so many wars a POTUS can wage after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, lol!

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Rurik
  122. druid55 says:
    @anarchyst

    not good enough. Duyal citizenship for Jews is not just on paper, but is a tribal right. So even the jews that don’t have official citizenship in Israel, their mental/psychological citizenship trumps, and therefore their loyalties!!!

    • Thanks: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  123. druid55 says:
    @Justsaying

    We came, we saw, he died!

  124. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    He probably reckoned he already did Libya for his paymasters and decided to leave Syria to his successor.

    Nope. I’m not even sure where you’re getting such a wild theory from.

    I was there. I remember. The war worm was finally turning in the ZUS.

    From the link I sent:

    But then a strange thing happened. The opposition of the public to the war wasn’t just an airy “opinion”. Americans were prepared to do a bit about it. They started calling Congress and writing letters and overwhelmingly they said, “No war, no way”.

    I personally called my congress-critter as well. I told her assistant that I had never called before, but that I was calling to insist that we do not go blundering into another war in the Middle East.

    I made my opinion known, and so did a huge swath of the American electorate.

    Obama is a soulless cretin. Utterly amoral and opportunistic. It was the American people who thwarted Obama’s war on Syria. The same American people that ALWAYS vote for the anti-war/peace candidate for potus, only to get betrayed by the Satanic forces of Zion, and their willing stooges.

    Trump has turned out to be a huge disappointment, but not even in the same league (or universe) as the war hag.

    • Replies: @A123
  125. anarchyst says:
    @druid55

    Good point!

    Looks like we will have to get (be) rid of all of them.

    Close the synagogues and all jewish organizations, confiscate their assets and ship ’em all to israel.

  126. Rurik says:
    @A123

    I would rather save the Constitution.

    I’m tempted to say ‘what Constitution?’, what with demands that we can’t criticize or boycott the ‘shitty little state’ that murders our citizens wholesale and then dances and celebrates and high-fives’ each other at the carnage.

    What kind of Constitution is it that allows for an enemy foreign government to commit war crimes and atrocities against our sailors in uniform (USS Liberty), and then threatens all the survivors with court-martial if they say a word about it?

    This is not a nation of free citizens ruled by a Constitution, but rather a vassal state of an enemy foreign imperial power.

    But, with that said, we do still do have the Second, which is the amendment that protects and guarantees all the rest.

    Which is yet another reason for us all to grateful that the war hag was thwarted.

  127. Derer says:

    Unfortunately there are only two options for the public to choose from in every 4 years. Trump was elected because he has won the campaign of “better” lies. He was different, an outsider. In final analysis, it all does not matter, the WASHINGTON IS RUN BY THE UNELECTED BACKROOM GANG following their uncompromising agenda different from the public aspiration. If the front puppet is not in line he is eliminated – it happened. Did not Trump change his campaign sound agenda 180 degree?

    A system, created long time ago at primitive communication and transportation, of sending regional proxies to Washington does not work anymore. Public is now more educated and informed then the corrupted proxies who mostly represent their interest.

    We have now means for DIRECT VOTING. Reduce the elected politicians to debating the issues but public will decide by Friday’s vote. Do you want move the embassy to Jerusalem…Yes or No? Majority rules, instead of backroom gang. Get rid of this pseudo-democracy.

  128. Trinity says:

    People like Hillary Clinton are soulless. IF Hitler was in power, Hillary would be a member of the Nazi party, IF Stalin were in power, Hillary would be a Bolshevik, IF Hillary lived in Cuba during Castro’s reign, she would be pro-Castro. EVERYONE, without exception MORE THAN LIKELY, in Washington is an opportunist, that is why they can be bought and sold like farm animals by their Jewish leaders. Trump is an opportunist as well, less grotesque as Hillary, but he is far from what we need to turn this country around. Trump’s constant sucking up to Israel is sickening to say the least, but it isn’t as if anyone in Washington has the balls to criticize Israel except that shriveled up little African Omar what’s her name. I guess Omar gets a pass because she is even more anti-White than she is anti-Jew, so the powers that be will use her for stirring up racial animosity and well, she isn’t exactly white like David Duke. I would say that ABSOLUTELY NO WHITE POLITICIAN IN WASHINGTON HAS THE BALLS TO BE EVEN SLIGHTLY CRITICAL OF ISRAEL OR JEWISH POWER AND INFLUENCE. So, this is where we as Americans stand in 2020.

  129. Derer says:
    @Rurik

    “American people who thundered back through our representatives,”

    Remember it never works “through our representatives”. After election they have their own interests and not yours.

  130. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    Obama is a soulless cretin. Utterly amoral and opportunistic. It was the American people who thwarted Obama’s war on Syria.

    It is impossible for Barack Hussein to have a “crisis of conscience” as that would require having one.

    The U.S. Military would have had boots on the ground in Ukraine if Hillary had taken over.
    ______

    Trump inherited problems created by prior administrations. I had hoped for better results, but he has avoided escalation and de-escalated where possible.

    By moving forces south in Syria he got them out the kill sack from the Shia-Sunni-Kurd war. Everyone understands that the implausible excuse of “protecting oil” was a cover story, not the intent.

    He has made several attempts to wrap up the mess in Afghanistan. The most recent one was blocked when the sides started fighting again while the ink on the deal was still wet. Eventually he will pull the “Full Gromov” and get everyone out.

    Barack Hussein’s funding of Iranian terror with pallets of money destabilized the entire region. It is hard to see how the U.S. can leave until Trump fixes the damage created by Obama’s incomprehensibly awful choices. And, even there he has made it clear that there is a 0% chance of putting boots on the ground.
    ______

    The options are pretty clear for the next election.

    Biden will have boots on the ground in Ukraine, Iran, and probably several other fronts. No one wants that.

    Trump may be imperfect, but he is vastly better than the alternative.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  131. Z-man says:
    @Realist

    He’s still the least owned gentile out there. That’s why they HATE him. I’m praying he gets reelected and sends his ditzy daughter and weird son in law packing back to NY City One. But seeing that NYC is ‘Virus Central’ they will probably move to a walled off complex in New Jersey or Florida. (Grin)

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @anarchyst
  132. @Anon

    ” Amazing what having the press on one’s side does”

    Look let’s just finally face the sad truth that the Democrats are simply invulnerable and invincible, as they have all of the opinion makers on their side : Media, edumacation, justitia, hollywood, etc, etc.

    And the cowardly Repubs, consumed with their arkanside paranoia as they are, are simply too fucking week-spined to really go after any of those odious Democrat grifters.

    My golden rule pertaining to politics being : Anything the bonkers Krauts cherish is poison for the US, and they, the lunatic Germans, worship the ground BO/BC/HC and GS travel upon.

    Just mention BO’s name in a German eatery and you can cut the tension in the air with a knife, as all heads turn your way with bated breath, and waiting for a negative comment about their savior.

    Myself, years ago, made a negative comment regarding BO to a lady working in a German library, and she shrieked in horror and pain.

    AJM

  133. Ahoy says:

    @Trinity #130

    Your comment is the portrait of “Reality in Nude”.

    Decades of gobbling up their lies and vile propaganda has transformed yesterday’s great and proud nation to an amorphous mass of soul less people.

    We must extricate this poison from the body of America now, or there won’t be any tomorrow.

  134. Rurik says:
    @A123

    Barack Hussein’s funding of Iranian terror with pallets of money destabilized the entire region.

    That may be the stupidest thing I’ve read in a while now.

    The money they’re pooping their pants over was Iran’s money, when Iranian assets in some countries were frozen, due to Iran not playing zio-ball like a good little vassal state. They simply got back what was theirs.

    As for destabilizing the region, that happened in 1948, when a cabal of murderers and terrorists began butchering villagers in order to steal their land. It’s been destabilized ever since.

    • Replies: @A123
  135. @Alden

    8 Nixon’s opening to China without consulting congress or any governors.

    Did FDR consult before deciding to meet with the Soviets to work toward recognizing the USSR?
    How about Truman over Israel, aside from the 26 Zionists that wrote to him?
    Slovenia? Kosovo?
    Foreign policy is the purview of the President. Nixon was pragmatic. Pretending Taiwan was the official government of 1/4 of the earth’s population, or alternately that 1/4 of the earth’s population did not exist, was delusional.

    By the way, there was no “civil” war. A civil war by definition is opposing factions warring over control of the government. The Confederacy wanted no part of the Union.

  136. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    As for destabilizing the region, that happened in 1948, when a cabal of murderers and terrorists began butchering villagers in order to steal their land. It’s been destabilized ever since.

    This is among the worst rebuttals I have ever read.

    The true cabal of mass murdering jihadists destabilized the region starting ~600 AD. Sorry — You cannot justify rape, land theft, rape, murder, rape, forced conversion, and rape. The calling cards of Muhammad’s Jihad.

    It is very arrogant to complain about the victims getting their land back after 1,400 years of suffering.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  137. Rurik says:
    @A123

    It is very arrogant to complain about the victims getting their land back after 1,400 years of suffering.

    isn’t it quaint the way Jewish supremacists murdering and raping innocent people so they can steal their land, have the nads to call themselves the ‘victims’?

    Was John Wayne Gacy the victim, because those young men failed to give him what he considered was his?

    Even if the Jewish supremacists were real Jews from the Middle East, (and not Polish and Lithuanian and Ukrainian Khazars), they’d still have no right to slaughter and rape and steal other people’s land. It doesn’t work like that. Maybe back in the 18th century it did, but not in the 20th century, when Jewish supremacists have been screeching at full volume that ethno-nationalism is the worst evil the world has ever known! Unless it’s Jewish supremacists that are killing and ethnic cleansing, huh?

    Nope. If it applies to Germany, then it applies to Zionist Jews. And if Jews have a right to kill Gentiles, then the Nazis had every right in the world to kill every Jew in their conquered lands.

    Or do you consider Jews somehow special, and the rules don’t apply to them?

    (that’s a rhetorical question ; )

    • Replies: @A123
    , @ChuckOrloski
  138. Realist says:
    @Z-man

    That’s why they HATE him. I’m praying he gets reelected and sends his ditzy daughter and weird son in law packing back to NY City One.

    I think you are falling for the charade…he is part of the Deep State.

    The Deep State doesn’t care about the unimportant internecine squabbles of the ‘two parties’ as long as their important issues are maintained. As a matter of fact it strengthens the false perception that there is a choice when voting.

    • Agree: Trinity
  139. anarchyst says:
    @Z-man

    I tend to agree with you.
    Trump has been dealing with jews all his life, and KNOWS their machinations, questionable, dirty and illegal practices, and, in general knows what they are like.
    I realize that some of his closest relatives are jews.
    I just hope he is following the wise mantra, to wit: “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”.

    • Agree: Z-man
  140. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    In my posts of April 21, 2020 at 11:14 pm GMT and April 21, 2020 at 11:14 pm GMT, I discussed certain language of Philip Giraldi’s article — this language:

    Trump’s recent claim that he has the sole authority to shut down or open up the country is clearly unconstitutional based on Article 10 and his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable.

    Later in the same paragraph, Mr. Giraldi asserted this:

    His [Trump’s] exhortation last Friday to his followers to “liberate” three states from the control of their governors is insurrection, a dangerous provocation that undeniably meets the requirement to qualify as a “high crime” as defined by the constitution.

    That language, too, demands serious criticism. Like his language quoted first in this comment, that second-quoted language could encourage the Democrat elite to begin a second illegitimate, divisive, hugely wasteful impeachment circus.

    Trump’s “exhortation” was not an exhortation, but a statement of support of protests that had been already underway days or more earlier.

    Trump’s statement was 1st amendment protected free speech supporting a rather large-scale peaceful public exercise of the people’s 1st amendment protected privilege of free speech and right of peaceful assembly seeking redress of grievance opposing government conduct.

    Even a President has a 1st amendment protected privilege of free speech.

    Free speech exercise and rightful assembly is not “insurrection.” The grieving protesters were not seeking to overthrow state government, but to be freed from serious restrain that quite arguably violates several federal constitution provisions that protect liberty against unnecessary socio-political regulation that constitutes oppression.

    Yesterday (21 April 2020), Wisconsin’s legislature petitioned Wisconsin’s supreme court declare illegal and bar the lock down ordered by the state’s Governor Tony Evers. Also yesterday, Attorney General William Barr said the Justice Department may pursue legal action against states whose measures are “too strict.”

    Trump’s statement did not incite rebellion, but merely supported the protestors’ peaceful protests, with the premises of which Trump agreed.

    Trump has a big mouth and often lacks the restraint most may expect a national leader to possess and manifest. And his anti-lockdown position may be mistaken — though quite enough virologists, epidemiologists, and other pertinent-field scientists agree with Trump.

    Some “experts” insist that China’s Covid-19-related massive quarantine regime is the only sound solution. Others suggest that “social distancing” is unnecessary, even harmful, and that the solution is a requirement that all people must wear a mask when they enter any public sphere and that testing must be very widespread, especially of elderly people and those who suffer, of have suffered, certain diseases (like diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, or hyperlipidemia).

    Sound evidence shows that 6-feet social distancing is virtually rather futile. Compare ANDAND examine VERY CAREFULLY the measures of distance and intensity. You will see that a non-mask-wearing cougher’s likely infectious breath travels markedly farther than 6 feet but that a mask-wearer’s breath very likely would not carry viruses father than about 10 inches.

    The matter is very reasonably debatable. But, just as non-physician U.S. Presidents (even very many physicians) are not competent to determine the matter, non-physician state governors are not proper Covid-19-protection decision-makers.

    Whatever may a yet-unknowable “correct” determination, a merely incorrect Executive decision is not an impeachable offense. An Executive act must be treason (according to the definition given in U.S. Constitution Article III, § 3), seriously corrupt (like national-security-threatening or public-welfare-harming bribery), or some other similar and equally egregious illegal conduct or grave abuse of office. Cf. http://www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm

    Not many lawyers — even not many law professors — understand the meaning of “impeachable offense.” Philip Giraldi and other non-lawyers need cease asserting that Trump, or any official, has committed an impeachable offense — especially where, as in our current state of socio-economic and political severe malaise, even panic, the nation needs avoid counterproductive and grievously public-welfare-harming political dissension fueled by ignorance and rabid political hatreds.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  141. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    Or do you consider Jews somehow special, and the rules don’t apply to them?

    WOW!

    I guess you believe that violent Muslims are special and rules don’t apply them.

    That is why you blame the victims of Muslim violence. According to you — They are lesser humans (a.k.a. Infidels) and deserved it.

    I hate to break it to you, but the civilized world does not work that way.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  142. Loup-Bouc says:

    Alas, I failed to block-quote the two Philip Giraldi quotes of my comment posted at April 22, 2020 at 11:06 pm GMT. So I must point out the quotes here.

    The first quote was this:

    Trump’s recent claim that he has the sole authority to shut down or open up the country is clearly unconstitutional based on Article 10 and his warning that he will use his executive authority to adjourn the continuing virtual session of congress to enable him to approve hundreds of pending recess appointments plausibly qualifies as impeachable.

    The second quote was this:

    His [Trump’s] exhortation last Friday to his followers to “liberate” three states from the control of their governors is insurrection, a dangerous provocation that undeniably meets the requirement to qualify as a “high crime” as defined by the constitution.

    The second quote was the main object of my comment of April 22, 2020 at 11:06 pm GMT.

    Please forgive my error.

  143. @Rurik

    Haha. Rurik asked: “Or do you consider Jews somehow special, and the rules don’t apply to them?”

    Get serious, Rurik.

    Doubtless, Trumpstein does, & he’s landslide better than Israel’s ubiquitous alternative. (zzzZigh)

    Let’s listen & see what Brother Nathanael thinks about ‘dat!

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/uhAUKbc6jxJO/

    • Replies: @Rurik
  144. Rurik says:
    @A123

    That is why you blame the victims of Muslim violence.

    never

    few people were or are less sympathetic of the ISIS head-slicer orcs.

    But they too were unleashed upon civilized people by Jewish supremacists and their lapdog lackeys, Obama and co.

    But there’s a big difference between sub-human head slicers, vs. Palestinians being persecuted and murdered to mollify the infinite hate and malevolence of your typical Zionist Jew.

    A civilized world would not work that way, for sure. Let’s work to make the Holy Land a civilized place, by honoring the Right of Return, and prosecuting the murderers and genocidal J-supremacists.

    • Replies: @A123
  145. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    “Or do you consider Jews somehow special, and the rules don’t apply to them?”

    Get serious, Rurik.

    OK Chuck, you’ve ‘known’ me now for quite a while. What part of my query to the troll do you suppose wasn’t serious?

    That is wasn’t filled with sufficient invective for Trumpstein?

    I once criticized Wally for policing this forum for any comment that didn’t sufficiently denounce the Holocaust as a fraud and a hoax. Even on threads that have nothing to do with the Holocaust.

    Must I now chasten you, for policing the comments for any post that isn’t sufficiently filled with frothing bile directed at Trump?

    You know I abhor Trump. You know I consider him a tragic disappointment, but that isn’t enough, is it? I have to be filled to the brim with unhinged, rabid loathing of Trump as the worst president and human being in the history of the universe!!!

    Aarrrrhhghgghgg!

    I HATE Donald J. Trump as a demon in mortal goat skin, painted orange to trick us all!!!

    He has cloven hoofs and eats babies for lunch!!! Rrrgharreithegaaaergarrhhheaaahe!!!

    die Trump DIE!!!!

    ~ something like that?

  146. Rurik asked me: “Must I now chasten you, for policing the comments for any post that isn’t sufficiently filled with frothing bile directed at Trump?”

    Chasten as you please, Rurik!

    There’s no “better alternative” to police than me.

    Haha. Watch Wally don’t own you.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  147. Robjil says:

    Wesley Clark talked about seven nations to be destroyed, as in Israel’s beginnings in the Torah/Old Testament. Iran being the last one not yet attacked. Perhaps this lock down, is the time they might just do that.

    https://www.rt.com/news/486608-iran-gunboats-threat-trump/

  148. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    Chasten as you please,

    I just don’t want you to become the forum scold. (remember RobinG ; )

    Like the Unz hall monitor or crossing guard, scanning for any post with insufficient venom for the man so many people hate on a personal level.

    I wanted to find a smaller version of that photo I posted, because it’s a little too big and obnoxious, but you have to admit, that the expression of the guy is perfect for how so many feel about Trump.

    Brennan, McCabe, Comey, Clinton, the View, CNN, Pelosi and Schumer, Nadler and Schiff and Maxine..

    talk about being ‘owned’, Trump owns those people’s souls. He keeps their ids in a bottle, and shakes it up from time to time for a good laugh.

    It’s fine and laudable and expected to have contempt for Trump, (you’re only returning the favor ; ). But to lose your bladder with rage every time he Tweets something stupid, only gives you more dry cleaning expenses.

    @ Robjil

    Iran being the last one not yet attacked.

    I took a look, it looks like Iran and the ZUS are pointing the finger at each other, claiming that the other one is being provocative.

    There was a time not so long ago, when I automatically assumed Iran was telling the truth about things, especially vis-a-vis the ZUS (who lies with its every breath)

    But ever since the government of Iran lied to everyone about shooting down that plane, now I consider neither one as having a shred of credibility.

    It’s like Trump vs. Biden. Both rotten liars who shill in fealty to Zion every time they open their faces and the lies plop out like so many turds.

  149. I am not sure that there is a working definition for loyalty. Since Sept. 11 loyalty seems to mean whatever the power does must be accepted, supported, condoned or at the very least, one must never hint at disagreement.

    In my view I have been loyal to this executive beyond measure. However, like the previous executives, there appears to be a demand that one not only light a candle of approval at every utterance, but also march lock step in beyond form. Now clearly, no one wants to hire anyone who opposes their agenda. That make perfect sense. But with increasing clarity, those that are demanding absolute loyalty are set about destroying the lives of anyone who does not fall in line. That seems to be the sad and disappointing truth — so that one’s loyalty cannot be distinguished between genuine support or a desire to survive.

    We have some disagreements Dr. Giraldi, most stark among them on matters of faith and practice.
    But make no mistake, I have appreciate the price you have paid for taking position in opposition in this environment. An while I think your comments about Jews are sometimes over the top, I respect the price you have when expressing even mild challenge — I respect that choice.

    I am unsure if the country can ever recover from the current environment of suspicion fear and retribution correct, incorrect or opportunistic valuations of loyalty. In some respects . . . the current admin is the culmination of practice long before they arrived in office – which is why in many respects this all may seem normal.

  150. Ahoy says:

    Given these interwoven relationships, could it be that general Soleimani was more of a threat to the mullahs than to U.S.A.?

    https://twitter.com/Fulll_Nelson/status/1251915308333273088h

  151. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    But there’s a big difference between sub-human head slicers, vs. Palestinians

    Do you mean Non-Muslim Palestinians?
    Or, Muslim Non-Palestinian?

    The phrase “Palestinian Muslim” is an oxymoron. One can be a Palestinian or one can be a Muslim. The two concepts are mutually exclusive, and the proof is simple.

    How many violent Jihadi Muslim occupiers were in Palestine at the following dates:

    — 400 BC?
    — 200 BC?
    — 0 BC/AD?
    — 200 AD?
    — 400 AD?

    The correct answer is ZERO. Islam is not native to Palestine. The violent Muslim colonization and occupation of non-Muslim, Infidel lands began ~600 AD.
    _____

    By Palestinian you must mean Palestinian Jew. On that basis you are correct:

    There’s a big difference between sub-human, Muslim, head slicers, vs. Palestinian Jews.

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  152. Rurik cares💤, announced to me: “I just don’t want you to become the forum scold. (remember RobinG ; )”

    Having a good hearted forum “scold” is a desirable thing for me. Am truly hoping RobinG is well & returns to comment at U.R.

    Did not know RobinG personally, and I became mean when she insisted that I call the Blue & White House, my ZUS Senators, and a Boston Library who planned to host a Bernard Levi forum. (Note: As an esteemed voice, Phil Giraldi importuned me to take note of RobinG’s good heart and noble political goals)

    Haha, you say, “lose my bladder” with hatred for Trumpstein, and subsequently incur “dry cleaning expenses.” Tweet tweet. 🤣

    The “Dry Cleaning” I get is the Sacrament of Confession at St. Joseph’s Melkite Greek Catholic Church, West Scranton. This Saturday, God willing, I shall appear for Confession & Father Chris Manuele shall listen & perhaps “scold” me as necessary, ideally give absolution.

    Fyi, you do not understand this Rurik, but Catholic & Orthodox Christians are called to love even their Enemies.
    Therefore, I don’t hate mere mortals like well heeled Trumpstein. Seriously, I feel very sorry for him, his Israeli creators, & administratiom entourage,👹 who daily descend deep into the Valley of Perdition.

    “Scold” for me here? Okay, “make my day,” and I am ready for corporeal persecution.

    So be it, Rurik, re; Country Joe & The Fish, @ Woodstock 1969, “Whoopee, we all gotta’ die!” 😳

    And as you might recall, Iran martyr, General Soleimani, took Trumpstein’s lethal drone fire “scold,” and consequently, why can’t a laid-off Scranton School bus driver take one “Big Time” hit for The Christ Team? Uh, i.e., me. 😌

    • Replies: @Rurik
  153. Rurik says:
    @A123

    Do you mean Non-Muslim Palestinians?
    Or, Muslim Non-Palestinian?

    Even an imbecile knows that there are Muslim Palestinians and Christian Palestinians and presumably even Jewish Palestinians. (the Jews that were living in Palestine before the Zionist terrorists went on their rampage).

    Palestinians are mostly Arabs whose ancestors have been living in Palestine for centuries. Back to Biblical times in fact, whereas Ashkenazi Jews have *zero* historic ties to the land.

    The phrase “Palestinian Muslim” is an oxymoron.

    most trolls try not to broadcast their idiocy

    How many violent Jihadi Muslim occupiers were in Palestine

    none during those dates.

    The Muslim occupiers came with the Ottomans, and left their (benign) religion when they were tossed out. The Palestinians simply absorbed the Muslim and Christian religions, and lived peacefully with Jews as such, for hundreds of years. (Again, until the murderous, genocidal Jewish supremacist Zionists went on their killing spree, sending the region reeling into strife and horrors writ large, that continue to this day).

    addendum: I don’t think you do your cause any good by pretending that the Palestinian Arabs have no right to exist in their own ancient lands. In fact, such a suggestion is so vile and morally repulsive, that I wonder if you’re a kind of double-agent troll, making Zionists look like such assholes, that normal people would be put off by them.

    • Replies: @A123
  154. “The correct answer is ZERO. Islam is not native to Palestine. ”

    I take it you are locking time to place, otherwise the said could said of Jews in the region. Because as scripture makes clear, they are natives either. And they did not do as instructed and remove the pre-existing populations. And as foretold, would be a prickly thorn, as result.

    I appreciate your advocacy, but the issue of occupying the land is not a one way street – especially if one is going to contend the matter on secular grounds. The reason for Israel is not for the Jew — but for Go’s purpose, it’s a mistake to confuse the God of Israel for Israel as God or even the purpose of God . . .

    • Replies: @A123
  155. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    Am truly hoping RobinG is well & returns to comment at U.R.

    I agree, sans some of that schoolmarm hectoring

    Christians are called to love even their Enemies.

    will you go on the record saying that you love president Trump?

    “make my day,” and I am ready for corporeal persecution.

    I don’t think that’s Robin, but it looks like she could sure do some scolding

  156. Richard B says:
    @mark green

    Thank you for the link Mark.

    Reading it confirmed, yet again, that the two super powers in the world today are

    1. Jewish Supremacy Inc.

    2. The Chinese Communist Party

    The both have a lot in common. Though, the one big difference is that, for now at least, you can mention and even criticize The CCP. Whereas you can’t even mention JSI by name, except maybe here.

    But all of what they have in common can be subsumed by one thing,

    They’re both cultures of Blind Obedience to Authority.

    As opposed to what has been developing in the West for the last 500 years, a culture of Individual Conscience, culminating in the notion of a democratic culture. A culture fast falling apart after being under relentless attack since WWII, at least.

    For all of its many faults it’s responsible for developing a habit of mind based on self-criticism without anxiety.

    But JSI and The CCP as cultures of blind obedience demand to be placed above criticism, loved unconditionally, and, of course, blindly obeyed.

    Worse, they both have the power to effectuate those demands.

    Even if those demands are based on insane lies. And now we’re back to your link.

    The point being, these facts make a mockery of any attempt to pin the tail on a Presidential donkey like Trump, who looks more and more hapless with every passing day.

    More and more of us are sounding a lot like Oedipus just as he was about to find out the truth of himself, “Right now I sway between hope and fear.”

    To the extent I’m hopeful it’s based on our ability to arrest the ascent of JSI and The CCP’s rise to Full Spectrum Dominance.

    But, I fear that, barring a miracle, that’s not going to happen.

    If it doesn’t theirs will be a joint Pyrrnic Victory.

    Because their mutual effort to create a social order free of control and sustained by force, only increases the uncontrolled exercise of naked power.

    And the uncontrolled exercise of naked power destablizes the social-institutions that power controls.

    And destablized social-institutions disrupts and even halts economic activity.

    In short, if the power of JSI and The CCP go unchallenged we shouldn’t laugh at the dinosaurs for getting themselves extinct. After all, they lasted a lot longer than we have so far.

  157. Fairly, Rurik asked me: “will you go on the record saying that you love president Trump?”

    Grudgingly, am called to love my Enemy, and one is Trunpstein. Reckon the sacred obligation is semi-fulfiled when I even pretend to love Trumpstein.

    As for you, Rurik, comtinue to maintain cordial exhanges with Wally, and his adoration for Trump’s “many accomplishments.”

    As you know, haha, Lonesome Wally desperately needs someone here who even pretends to love him. 🙌 Could be you, Rurik!

    Selah, P.G.: “Loyalty to the president is the chief qualification,” and it would require intimate sessions with a “Torture Broad” to make me loyal & hollar “I love my ZUS president.”

    • Replies: @Rurik
  158. Ahoy says:

    @Ahoy #152

    The link to my comment.

  159. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    addendum: I don’t think you do your cause any good by pretending that the Palestinian Arabs have no right to exist in their own ancient lands.

    You are certainly doing your side no good by saying that violent Islam has the right to occupy non-Muslim territory, the ancient Holy Lands of Jews and Christians.

    I tell you what. I would be happy to expand that definition of Palestine and offer a fair compromise.
    .

    .
    — Jews can have the 22% of Palestine West of the Jordan river.
    — Muslims can have the 78% of Palestine East of the Jordan river. Muslims can even have “The Right to East Bank Return”.

    Or, are you going to say that Violent Islam as a superior religion has the right to steal land from religiously inferior Infidels?

    PEACE 😷

    • Replies: @Rurik
  160. A123 says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    I take it you are locking time to place, otherwise the said could said of Jews in the region. Because as scripture makes clear, they are natives either. And they did not do as instructed and remove the pre-existing populations.

    Both Christianity and Judaism are native to Palestine.

    Given the number of times the ancient stories have been translated, I think I see the problem. Judaism is, most likely, derived from the Canaanite faith which is one of the ‘original’ tribes that permanently settled the region. Other contemporary ‘original’ tribes have not survived to the modern day. God’s Wrath against the Amaleks did not cause Jews to arrive from elsewhere. They were already part of Palestine.

    Christianity holds that Jesus was born in Bethlehem and died on the Plains of Golgatha, both of which are in Palestine.

    The Holy Lands of Islam are Mecca and Medina. Jerusalem is not holy to Muslims. Every serious historian understands that Muhammad died before his Jihadi invasion reached Jerusalem. Al’Aqsa is obviously in the wrong place.

    PEACE 😷

  161. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    semi-fulfiled when I even pretend to love Trumpstein.

    you can’t get half way to Heaven

    maintain cordial exhanges with Wally

    I don’t hate Wally, and while I’ve reluctantly criticized him for being too strident with his holohoax campaign (and I think he’s way too harsh on Dr. G.), I still think his heart, like yours, is in the right place.

    Our people (like so many others) are menaced by Zionism. If his strategy is to free the planet from this scourge, then while I may not agree with the methods, I won’t condemn the motivation.

    He thinks more of Trump than I do. Does that make him an evil person? I don’t think so.

    Trump is not John McCain. In fact they hated each other, which was one more reason for liking Trump, because so many of his enemies are my enemies, and the enemies of all human decency. Which is what I considered McCain to be. As bad of a traitorous rat as they come.

    Tom Cotton seems to have slithered into the role vacated when the Bloodstain went to his reward.

    I’ve seen you and Wally have your flame wars, and I have no dog in that hunt. Flame away to your heart’s content both of you, I want no part of that.

    intimate sessions with a “Torture Broad” to make me loyal & hollar “I love my ZUS president.”

    lol

    she looks willing to make you holler and then some.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
  162. Rurik says:
    @A123

    To be honest with you, I really don’t care what religion or ethnicity lives on that land.

    What I care about is the way the Palestinians are treated. As less than human, and relentlessly humiliated and tormented and murdered, with their children treated as target practice while they play on roofs.

    I couldn’t care less if it was Jews shooting Muslims or Muslims shooting Christians or Christians shooting Jews.

    It isn’t the particular religion or ethnicity that concerns me, but rather that no people’s children should have white phosphorous dropped on them for the crime of existing.

    I can’t tell from this picture whether these boys are Christian, Muslim or Jew.

    They could be any of those, or all three.

    But I can tell you that the kind of people who would target and murder these children, are a very, very fucked up people.

    If they were Muslims, I’d condemn them in the harshest terms.

    But it turns out that it is invariably Jewish supremacists that deliberately murder children out of pure, Satanic malice. And I am opposed to such evil with every fiber of my being.

  163. “Given the number of times the ancient stories have been translated, I think I see the problem. Judaism is, most likely, derived from the Canaanite faith which is one of the ‘original’ tribes that permanently settled the region. ‘

    I am going to walk gingerly here. Because it doesn’t take much to be called an antisemite, or some other brand of “jew hater” of which I am neither. But if we are going to discuss Israel as a people originally understood to be God’s lamp and source of salvation. Then the record is pretty clear, they are not native to Palestine. As scripture makes very clear – repeatedly.

    Now as I have stated numerous times; I support Israel’s right to exist, her right to self defense and have some grasp of her place with respect christian tradition — none of which lends me to condone everything and anything Israel does — hat would be irresponsible both from a secular and spiritual perspective.

    Christians may or may not b native to the region, that all depends on ow far back they can trace their ancestry back to the original people’s. Nothing in the New Testament supports Israeli violations of any scripture as to the treatment of others and certainly for a christian — Christ over rides any such suggestion.

    I do not hate jews or seek their ill will anymore than I would for others — others. But anyone claim to represent God and willfully then violates he precepts and does so repeatedly — well, no christian should be supporting that behavior. I understand you stalwart positioning, though it could use some tempering

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  164. Cyndy says:
    @Mustapha Mond

    You need to research the Homeland Security Grants

  165. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    In my comment of April 22, 2020 at 11:06 pm GMT, one paragraph is this:

    Some “experts” insist that China’s Covid-19-related massive quarantine regime is the only sound solution. Others suggest that “social distancing” is unnecessary, even harmful, and that the solution is a requirement that all people must wear a mask when they enter any public sphere and that testing must be very widespread, especially of elderly people and those who suffer, of have suffered, certain diseases (like diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, or hyperlipidemia).

    In my same comment, another paragraph is this:

    The matter is very reasonably debatable. But, just as non-physician U.S. Presidents (even very many physicians) are not competent to determine the matter, non-physician state governors are not proper Covid-19-protection decision-makers.

    Compare those two paragraphs with this: https://russia-insider.com/en/game-over-swedish-belarus-covid-herd-immunity-strategy-has-won/ri29837

  166. @EliteCommInc.

    I do not hate jews or seek their ill will anymore than I would for others. But anyone claiming to represent God and then willfully violates his precepts and does so repeatedly — well, no christian should be supporting that behavior. I understand your stalwart positioning, though it could use some tempering.

    Note: christians could not make a lineage claim by faith, but they could by biology if they could trace heir lines back far enough.

  167. Herald says:
    @Rurik

    It’s not much of argument, forever justifying the clearly half-insane and clueless Trump, by referring to something that never happened, i.e. the third Clinton coming. That’s akin to being happy because your leg is being amputated just above the knee instead of at the bottom of your thigh.

    As for Biden, he is simply a straw man replacement for your straw woman Hillary.

    Time to look at Trump for what he is, not who he isn’t.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  168. Z-man says:
    @anarchyst

    “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”

    Did you see or hear where Donald was speaking to a Jew-ish group and he called them killers, it was classic. And the Cabal was so dumbfounded that they couldn’t scream the Anti- Semite tag on him for this event since he was using it as a backhanded compliment.
    Trump 2020-24… and beyond! Putin-Trump Axis DA!!!

  169. Z-man says:
    @Justsaying

    I see you failed reading comprehension. I am pro Trump, except for his pro Zionist tendencies and again I am for a Palestinian State based on the 1946 borders… so there! As far as infantile, as I progress into my later years I hope I keep or revert to my optimistic childlike qualities instead of being a miserable old coot, like most.

  170. Rurik says:
    @Herald

    Time to look at Trump for what he is, not who he isn’t.

    With Trump, it has always been about who he isn’t.

    We all know what he is.. a sleazy, dishonest narcissist. A vapid celebrity and New York real estate mogul, with ties to extremely unsavory types in NYC and Hollywood.

    So what? Like I said, it has never been about what Trump is. Because what he is, and has always represented, in a word, is the alternative. That’s it.

    Door number Two, when the American electorate has already seen what’s behind Door number One.

    I’ve said a thousand times here on Unz, that I consider Hillary to be the worst human being on the planet, next to John McCain, and now that McCain is rotting in hell, Hillary takes the cake.

    It says a lot about our politics, that the ((PTB)) would like the worst person on the planet to sit in the White House, but there it is.

    If you ran a dog or a pig against Hillary, I (and is suspect millions of other Americans) would vote for the dog or pig or illegal immigrant or anybody! (or nobody, and just left the White House vacant), I know I’d prefer that (or anything or anyone) to Hillary Clinton.

    Trump has proved to be a zio-stooge, (like virtually every member of congress and the media and churches all across America), but he hasn’t started new wars. That was Hillary’s platform. ‘Assad has to go, ‘no-fly zones’, confrontation with Russia, Iran would be toast today. She was a well know, it not thee well known foreign policy hawk. If she had won, she (and the entire DC power structure) would have demanded that her election was a mandate for wars. And that’s exactly what we’d get. On top of domestic policies intended to castrate (spiritually, financially, psychologically and if you allowed her – literally) people like me.

    So with that staring at me from Door number One, I think it’s understandable why so many ‘deplorable and irredeemable’ Americans went for Door number Two.

    As to Biden, he’s not in the same league of spine-numbing evil as Hillary, but he’s an entrenched and thoroughly corrupt tool of the ((deepstate)), and would give them their wars and anti-white social policies and the rest. But as I’ve said, if he picked Rand Paul as his running mate, I’d vote for Joe. If he picks someone like Michelle Obama, then I’d vote for Trump. Warts and all.

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
  171. @Rurik

    Haha. Rurik opined:
    “We all know what he (Trumpstein) is.. a sleazy, dishonest narcissist. A vapid celebrity and New York real estate mogul, with ties to extremely unsavory types in NYC and Hollywood.”

    Rurik forgot “unsavory” types in Tel Aviv, and (below) unsavory Arkansas types.

    Ad nauseam, Rurik pontificated:
    “Trump… hasn’t started new wars. That was Hillary’s platform.”

    How much evidence does it take to make Rurik aware of Trumpstein’s zeal to kill President Basher Assad 😳, back KSA’s bombing of Houthis, murdering General Soleimani, imposition of 2nd best sanction wars, and now 💥edging toward starting ZUS war against Iran, Persian Gulf?

    Haha, (Zigh). Either a flimsy provocation or a approved False Flag will do, and then American hero “troops” will die for trying to culmimate the PNAC’s requirement to take down 7 nations in 5 years. Plan is on hold due to President Putin’s mighty military obstacle.

    Question for Rurik. How was Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary’s Libya, Syria, and Russia war platform hers and not the ZUS presidents? Explain? Uh, PreZident Obama away on business? 🤔

    Given Rurik’s selective “Chain of Blue & White House Command,”

    [MORE]
    I Reckon the fake murder of OBL in Abbotabad was Obama’s scalp and not the “war hag’s.” 🙌/👹.

    Selah, when he possibly votes November 2020, a masked Shabbos goy duo (with warts) is all Rurik gets and there is no “better alternative.”🕎

    • Replies: @Rurik
  172. Rurik says:
    @ChuckOrloski

    How much evidence does it take to make Rurik aware of Trumpstein’s zeal to kill President Basher Assad

    Not much, just Assad’s dead body.

    Question for Rurik. How was Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary’s Libya, Syria, and Russia war platform hers and not the ZUS presidents? Explain?

    OK, will do.

    Unlike Hillary, who destroyed Libya and was busy destroying Syria, and demanding that ‘Assad has to go’, and was obviously frothing to confront Putin and teach that misogynistic white supremacist a lesson in what real power looks and feels like.

    Trump has de-escalated in Syria. Trump has attempted rapprochement with Putin.

    It seems obvious to most people, that Trump seems fond of Putin and respects him. This is the cause of the unhinged hysteria from the deepstate and media. “Treason!” they frothed, because he had an amiable chat with Putin in Helsinki.

    there is no “better alternative.”

    Are you advocating for Biden?

    I mean that’s fair if you are. It doesn’t make you a bad person. I think there are a lot of people who’re preferring Biden for all kinds of reasons, many of them understandable.

    But if they think he’ll be less zio, then they’re either deluded or dishonest, IMHO.

    Biden will give them their wars, and he’s not going to rescind Trump’s sniveling pandering over the Golan Heights or Jerusalem. Biden is not going to end the sanctions on Iran, or Russia or anywhere, except perhaps Zimbabwe, Cuba or the Congo, where the respective governments are just ‘misunderstood’. And the sanctions are racist.

    But if you prefer Biden for whatever reason(s), then I have no quarrel with that. We’re each entitled to our preferences. But there will be a president elected in November, and if you don’t support Biden, then by default, you’re supporting Trump with your non-participation.

    • Troll: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  173. Goverment & Zio Media against the people. 🕎

    A perspective below, from Kleiner Park.

  174. @Rurik

    ” I think there are are alot of people who’re preferring Biden for all kinds of reasons, many of them understandable”

    Yeah sure and each and every one of them is a fucking brain-dead nutcase.

    There is no rational reason ever for someone to vote for a Democrat, for someone to vote for the party of blue-haired crazies, for someone to vote for the party which will usher in the final and irreversible destruction of the US.

    When I contemplate lunatics such as Mad Maxine directing the destiny of the country, and the trillions of tax-slave dollars which they will throw in the direction of reparations and other such lunacy then good-nite America.

    I have an eighteen year old nephew, rather son of my nephew who was killed in a car wreck, and he is a bright kid who rejected admission to UM as it is “too liberal” and I shudder to think of his future with the Democrat madmen in charge.

    AJM “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet and pro jazz performer.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  175. @Rurik

    The Hildebeast and the “war hero” who dumped his first wife for the liquor heiress are both in my top 10 worst pieces of evil excrement of all time. How many of the following would make your list?

    [MORE]

    FDR
    Teddy R.
    Lincoln
    Wilson
    Sherman, the General
    Sherman, the General’s brother
    Sheridan, the General
    Custer
    Truman
    Beria
    Mengele
    Stalin
    Ivan the Terrible
    Molotov
    Churchill
    Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
    Mao
    Bibi
    David Ben-Gurion
    Moshe Dayan
    Golda Meir
    Ariel Sharon
    Jesse Jackson
    Obama
    Michelle Obama
    Valery Jarrett
    Anita Dunn
    Mike Barnacle
    Mika Brezinski
    Zbignev Brezinski
    Yuri Andropov
    Cass Sunstein
    Ted Kennedy
    Diane Feinstein
    Rudy Julie Annie
    Newt Gingrich
    James Comey
    Jay Edgar Hoover
    Eric Holder
    Robert Mugabe
    Margaret Sanger
    Gloria Steinem
    Barbara Boxer
    Tom Cotton
    Lindsey Graham
    Chuckie Schumer
    Zhou Enlai
    Lazar Kaganovich
    Barbara Streisand
    Joyce Behar
    Whoopi Goldberg
    Andrea Mitchell
    Boris Godunov
    Robespierre
    Maxine Waters

    • Replies: @Rurik
  176. Rurik says:
    @Authenticjazzman

    preferring Biden for all kinds of reasons, many of them understandable”

    Yeah sure and each and every one of them is a fucking brain-dead nutcase.

    not necessarily

    If you’re an identity politics Person of Color, advocating for more Affirmative Action or a radical feminist or homosexual pedophile or Big Tech billionaire or transgender activist or a thousand other marginal groups who want to ‘kill whitey’, once and for all, and feast on the carcass of his dead civilization, or for instance if you’re Hunter Biden, there are lots of people with lots of motivations for preferring Biden to Trump.

    It could just even be that for personal reasons, like you’ve known Trump for decades, and always hated him, or for other reason, (I know a guy like that) maybe you’d prefer Biden.

    Like I said, if Biden picked Rand Paul for his running mate, I’d vote for Biden.

  177. Rurik says:
    @Liberty Mike

    Quite a list Mike!

    I’m happy to say I didn’t even know who Mike Barnacle was, but when I checked, I agree he belongs on that list.

    It looks like the only one I’m not sure I’d put on my list is Margaret Sanger, because she opposed abortion in most cases, but promoted birth control, and it’s said eugenics, an idea that I can be sympathetic to. (I think there’s too many stupid people, if we could encourage stupid people (Clevon, from Idiocracy, for instance) to have less offspring, I wonder if life on planet earth might improve some.

    At the top of my list would be Woodrow Wilson, and then FDR.

    Ted Kennedy, along with John McCain, were the only two people for whom I actually cheered their deaths. But I also took some pleasure in mocking Noel Ignatiev’s recent passing, and wistfully musing at pissing on his grave, which I think a lot of people would pay a small fee to do. Which reminds me of Tim Wise, who I’d also put on my list. And many more, I’m sad to say.

    Thank you for the effort to make such a list Mike.

    What about Mengele? I agree *if* he did the things they claim he did, then he certainly belongs on the List. But why would we take their word, when they lied about everything else.

    It could be that he was just a brilliant physician with an interest in genetics, who happened to be assigned to Auschwitz. I doubt he really did sew Jew’s hands to their ankles and feet to their wrists, as a surgical joke and cruel experiment. I suspect that most, if not all the things they said about him, were lies.

    Cheers Mike.

  178. A government for the globo-elites

  179. geokat62 says:

    Damascus under attack – 27th April 2020

    • Thanks: Robjil
    • Replies: @Robjil
  180. Robjil says:
    @geokat62

    Israel is mentally handicapped. It still thinks it is 500 BC.
    The world has to teach Israel that it is not 500 BC. 500 BC will never come back, no matter how much Israel wishes for it. This attack on Syria is an example of Israel’s mental handicap with reality in the present.

    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/961561/jewish/Positive-Commandment-187.htm

    The same applies to this mitzvah of killing all descendants of the seven nations, which is a milchemes mitzvah. In every generation we are required to uproot them and search after them down to the last individual. We did this until King David destroyed them completely, with the survivors being scattered and assimilated among the nations until they disappeared.

  181. geokat62 says:

    • Thanks: ChuckOrloski
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.