The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPepe Escobar Archive
The Day Obama Dreamed of Being Lula
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

SAO PAULO – In his wildest White House dreams, United States President Barack Obama swoops like an angel over the Jon Stewart/Stephen Colbert “Rally to Restore Sanity” that brought at least 200,000 people to the Mall in Washington, DC, this Saturday; he makes sure that “sanity” wins over “fear” – as it did, with a lot of swing and swagger; and then he soundly falls asleep, knowing in his heart that his Democratic party will overcome all shades of fear in mid-term polls and keep his presidency on track.

Ooops. Wrong script. In fact “sanity” was what Brazilian, not American voters chose on Sunday as they elected Dilma Roussef, of the governing Workers’ Party (PT), as the country’s first female president, with 12 million votes over her competitor, the social-democrat turned tropical version of the Tea Party Jose Serra – or “Serra Palin”. Globally, Dilma’s 56 million votes is the biggest victory of any left-leaning coalition (11 parties) anywhere in the world.

This Brazilian presidential campaign was as ugly and nasty as the American mid-terms – complete with interference from millions of powerful evangelicals and even the Roman Catholic Church surreptitiously asking people not to vote for Dilma because she favors legalizing abortion (personally, she said she doesn’t). Not to mention swift-boating techniques such as dubbing her a “terrorist” because she fought against – and was tortured by – the Brazilian military dictatorship in the late 1960s.

Obama’s jaw must have dropped at the sight of the most popular political leader in the world (over 80% approval rate), outgoing Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, whom he calls “the man”, not only winning two elections in a row (2002 and 2006) but managing to see the election of his chosen successor, a hardworking but relatively faceless bureaucrat who until recently no taxi driver could even name. Dream on, Barack. Well, not really, as the alarm in his iPhone rings and he awakes to face the full extension of the debacle awaiting the Democrats this Tuesday in the US.

Was it a vision, or a waking dream?

It’s the economy, stupid. Obama could only dream of surfing the economic indicators of the Lula years; per capita income growing by 23% from 2002 to 2010; unemployment at a record low of 6.2%; the minimum wage, adjusted for inflation, growing by 65% – not to mention more than 20 million people lifted from poverty and becoming middle class (compare to 40 million Americans been plunged into the poverty line). As much as the American Dream is in Emergency Room, the Brazilian Dream feels like Camelot remixed as a telenovela (with a happy Hollywood ending). Who are these new South American dreamers who voted Dilma? Essentially the urban working class, the sub-proletariat of the poor northeast region, the new lower middle class and some substantial, progressive portions of the classic middle class.

The Brazilian financial elite, concentrated in Sao Paulo, and directly linked to Wall Street, obviously did not vote Dilma (nor did the City of London, via the Financial Times; nor did the four families who control Brazilian corporate media; nor did the Washington foreign policy establishment for that matter; the list is endless). The neo-liberal financial elite are the people who actually set Brazil’s economic policy. One of Lula’s touches of genius was not to mess with them – as well as not having them mess with him.

But major trouble lies ahead. As Brazil maintains absurdly high real interest rates, no wonder it’s raining US dollars like there’s no tomorrow. And still Brazil is not growing as fast as the other fellow BRICs – Russia, India and China. As much as millions of Brazilians this Sunday may have caressed the illusion they were electing a project for the country, Brazil still badly lacks a sound development strategy that really reflects the aspirations of the majority of the population.

Time is running fast. In Lula, Dilma will have a certified globally respected wise man with an invaluable baggage of 35 years of hardcore negotiating. For his part, Lula in theory will now be free to conduct delicate political and union reform and try to reorganize the complex Brazilian political chessboard. Meanwhile, it’s crash course time; Lula is taking Dilma with him to introduce her to world leaders at the upcoming Group of 20 meeting in South Korea.

There are three possible ways ahead; Lulism without Lula; Lula running for president again in 2014; or post-Lulism, with himself at the helm of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) or even as secretary general of the United Nations.

Thus a hefty degree of schizophrenia will be in play – but that’s very Brazilian anyway. Dilma will bet heavily on Mercosur (Southern Common Market) and South America’s political integration – via UNASUR – while at the same time aligning with the Western powers at the World Trade Organization.

The influential (and heavily demonized) Brazilian landless peasant movement (MST) – a concept that should materialize in China would send the Communist Party into a tailspin – officially supported Dilma in the run-of against Serra. At the same time, Dilma will continue investing in controversial hydroelectric projects accused of being eco-disasters.

Dilma will bet heavily on macro-stability and control of inflation – but at the same time, as she already said, she won’t cut social spending; won’t cut corners in upgrading the country’s disastrous infrastructure; and won’t waste away the economic bonanza associated with the new offshore oil wealth found by energy giant Petrobras in the pre-salt layers.

The key problem for Brazil is indeed to tweak this so-called “model” of exporting a tsunami of iron ore, crude oil, soybeans and chemical wood pulp to China, Brazil’s biggest trading partner after it overtook the US. And all this while manufacturing exports go down. Lula told Vale – the world’s top iron ore producer – to build steel mills. He told Petrobras to build refineries. But still that’s not enough.

ORDER IT NOW

To talk about Brazilian de-industrialization would be too early – because the country’s manufacturing base is very large. But China already all but killed two very competent Brazilian industries – textiles and footwear (and look what happened to the de-industrialized US). Just exporting commodities is not enough; the game is to go for high added value, South Korean-style.

For this to happen, Dilma would have to do what even Lula would not dare; turn Brazil’s Byzantine tax system upside down. She has to go for hardcore structural reforms – political, fiscal and agrarian. Lula couldn’t do it essentially because he did not have a strong-enough political base. Dilma may have a shot at it.

Fiscal reform is essential because as in the US the wealthy get away with murder while the salaried classes pay the bill. But the most complex issue is arguably agrarian reform.

It depends on how one defines agrarian reform. Essentially, it is a state policy to democratize land ownership. This never happened in Brazil. The local bourgeoisie allied itself with landowners to basically export commodities. In the process they expelled masses of peasants to the big cities. They could always rely on an industrial reserve army; and the salaries they paid were pitiful anyway. This process in a nutshell explains the rise and rise of urban violence in Brazil.

What’s needed now, as the MST argues, is a new type of agrarian reform, dubbed “popular agriculture”; agro-ecology for the internal market, not for export, and part of a new development model, with less foreign capital controlling agro-business. If Dilma pulls it off, God will be known worldwide as a Brazilian woman.

As respected Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff argues, there’s no question Brazil will be an essential player in the new, multipolar global chessboard because the country holds all the key ecological factors which may be able to re-calibrate the dilapidated Earth-system.

But it’s too early to tell whether Dilma will be able to keep her eyes in the Big Picture. With the not irrelevant add-on that the current Brazilian trajectory may be leading to the formation of the first tropical global power. Would it be just sub-imperial? Would it be just cordial? Or would it be a new, mutant, unpredictable species of benign sub-imperialism?

Obama took time out of his ultra-hectic, pre-election schedule this Monday to call Dilma, offer his congratulations and invite her to visit the US. At least for a moment, he could indeed dream he was acting like “my man” Lula.

(Republished from Asia Times by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Barack Obama, Brazil 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pepe Escobar Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?