The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPepe Escobar Archive
How to Think Post-Planet Lockdown
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
The Triumph of Death, fresco, Palermo, Italy (artist unknown).

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Between unaccountability of elites and total fragmentation of civil society, Covid-19 as a circuit breaker is showing how the king – systemic design – is naked.

We are being sucked into a danse macabre of multiple complex systems “colliding into one another,” producing all kinds of mostly negative feedback loops.

What we already know for sure, as Shoshana Zuboff detailed in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, is that “industrial capitalism followed its own logic of shock and awe” to conquer nature. But now surveillance capitalism “has human nature in its sights.”

In The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene, analyzing the explosion in population growth, increasing energy consumption and a tsunami of information “driven by the positive feedback loops of reinvestment and profit,” Simon Lewis and Mark Maslin of University College, London, suggest that our current mode of living is the “least probable” among several options. “A collapse or a switch to a new mode of living is more likely.”

With dystopia and mass paranoia seemingly the law of the (bewildered) land, Michel Foucault’s analyses of biopolitics have never been so timely, as states across the world take over biopower – the control of people’s life and bodies.

David Harvey, once again, shows how prophetic was Marx, not only in his analyses of industrial capitalism but somehow – in Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy – even forecasting the mechanics of digital capitalism:

Marx, Harvey writes, “talks about the way that new technologies and knowledge become embedded in the machine: they’re no longer in the laborer’s brain, and the laborer is pushed to one side to become an appendage of the machine, a mere machine-minder. All of the intelligence and all of the knowledge, which used to belong to the laborers, and which conferred upon them a certain monopoly power vis-à-vis capital, disappear.”

Thus, adds Harvey, “the capitalist who once needed the skills of the laborer is now freed from that constraint, and the skill is embodied in the machine. The knowledge produced through science and technology flows into the machine, and the machine becomes ‘the soul’ of capitalist dynamism.”

Living in ‘psycho-deflation

An immediate – economic – effect of the collision of complex systems is the approaching New Great Depression. Meanwhile, very few are attempting to understand Planet Lockdown in depth – and that goes, most of all, for post-Planet Lockdown. Yet a few concepts already stand out. State of exception. Necropolitics. A new brutalism. And, as we will see, the new viral paradigm.

So let’s review some the best and the brightest at the forefront of Covid-19 thinking. An excellent road map is provided by Sopa de Wuhan (“Wuhan Soup’), an independent collection assembled in Spanish, featuring essays by, among others, Giorgio Agamben, Slavoj Zizek, Judith Butler, David Harvey, South Korean Byung-Chul Han and Spaniard Paul Preciado.

The last two, along with Agamben, were referenced in previous essays in this running series, on the Stoics, Heraclitus, Confucius, Buddha and Lao Tzu, and contemporary philosophy examining The City under The Plague.

Franco Berardi, a 1968 student icon now professor of philosophy in Bologna, offers the concept of “psycho-deflation” to explain our current predicament. We are living a “psychic epidemic … generated by a virus as the Earth has reached a stage of extreme irritation, and society’s collective body suffers for quite a while a state of intolerable stress: the illness manifests itself at this stage, devastating in the social and psychic spheres, as a self-defense reaction of the planetary body.”

Thus, as Berardi argues, a “semiotic virus in the psycho-sphere blocks the abstract functioning of the economy, subtracting bodies from it.” Only a virus would be able to stop accumulation of capital dead in its tracks: “Capitalism is axiomatic, works on a non-verified premise (the necessity of unlimited growth which makes possible capital accumulation).

Every logical and economic concatenation is coherent with this axiom, and nothing can be tried outside of this axiom. There is no political way out of axiomatic Capital, there’s no possibility of destroying the system,” because even language is a hostage of this axiom and does not allow the possibility of anything “efficiently extra-systemic.”

So what’s left? “The only way out is death, as we learned from Baudrillard”. The late, great grandmaster of simulacrum was already forecasting a systemic stall back in the post-modernist 1980s.

Croatian philosopher Srecko Horvat , in contrast, offers a less conceptual and more realist hypothesis about the immediate future: “The fear of a pandemic is more dangerous than the virus itself. The apocalyptic images of the mass media hide a deep nexus between the extreme right and the capitalist economy. Like a virus that needs a living cell to reproduce itself, capitalism will adapt itself to the new 21st century biopolitics.”

For the Catalan chemist and philosopher Santiago Lopez Petit, coronavirus can be seen as a declaration of war: “Neoliberalism unabashedly dresses up as a war state. Capital is scared,” even as “uncertainty and insecurity invalidate the necessity of the same state.” Yet there may be creative possibilities when “obscure and paroxistic life, incalculable in its ambivalence, escapes algorithm.”

Our normalized exception

Giorgio Agamben caused immense controversy in Italy and across Europe when he published a column in late February on “the invention of an epidemic.” He later had to explain what he meant. But his main insight remains valid: The state of exception has been completely normalized.

And it gets worse: “A new despotism, which in terms of pervasive controls and cessation of every political activity, will be worse that the totalitarianisms we have known so far.”

ORDER IT NOW

Agamben redoubles his analyses of science as the religion of our time: “The analogy with religion is taken literally; theologians declared that they could not clearly define what is God, but in his name they dictated rules of conduct to men and did not hesitate to burn heretics. Virologists admit they don’t know exactly what is a virus, but in its name they pretend to decide how human beings shall live.”

Cameroonian philosopher and historian Achille Mbembe, author of two indispensable books, Necropolitics and Brutalisme, has identified the paradox of our time: “The abyss between the increasing globalization of problems of human existence and the retreat of states inside their own, old-fashioned borders.”

Mbembe delves into the end of a certain world, “dominated by giant calculation devices,” a “mobile world in the most polymorphous, viral and near cinematic sense,” referring to the ubiquity of screens (Baudrillard again, already in the 1980s) and the lexicography, “which reveals not only a change of language but the end of the word.”

Here we have Mbembe dialoguing with Berardi – but Membe takes it much farther: “This end of the word, this definitive triumph of the gesture and artificial organs over the word, the fact that the history of the word ends under our eyes, that for me is the historical development par excellence, the one that Covid-19 unveils.”

The political consequences are, inevitably, dire: “Part of the power politics of great nations does not lie in the dream of an automated organization of the world thanks to the manufacturing of a New Man that would be the product of physiological assemblage, a synthetic and electronic assemblage and a biological assemblage? Let’s call it techno-libertarianism.”

This is not exclusive to the West: “China is also on it, vertiginously.”

This new paradigm of a plethora of automated systems and algorithmic decisions “where history and the word don’t exist anymore is in frontal shock with the reality of bodies in flesh and bones, microbes, bacteria and liquids of all sorts, blood included.”

The West, argues Mbembe, chose a long time ago to “imprint a Dionysiac course to its history and take the rest of the world with it, even if it doesn’t understand it. The West does not know anymore the difference between beginning and ending. China is also on it. The world has been plunged into a vast process of dilaceration where no one can predict the consequences.”

Mbembe is terrified by the proliferation of “live manifestations of the bestial and viral part of humanity,” including racism and tribalism.

This, he adds, conforms our new viral paradigm.

His analysis certainly dovetails with Agamben’s: “I have a feeling that brutalism is going to intensify under the techno-libertarianism drive, be it under China or hidden under the accoutrements of liberal democracy. Just like 9/11 opened the way to a generalized state of exception, and its normalization, the fight against Covid-19 will be used as a pretext to move the political even more towards the domain of security.”

“But this time”, Mbembe adds, “it will be a security almost biological, bearing with new forms of segregation between the ‘immunity bodies’ and ‘viral bodies’. Viralism will become the new theatre for fractioning populations, now identified as distinct species.”

It does feel like neo-medievalism, a digital re-enacting of the fabulous Triumph of Death fresco in Palermo.

Poets, not politicians

It’s useful to contrast such doom and gloom with the perspective of a geographer. Christian Grataloup, who excels in geo-history, insists on the common destiny of humanity (here he’s echoing Xi Jinping and the Chinese concept of “community of shared destiny”): “There’s an unprecedented feeling of identity. The world is not simply an economic and demographic spatial system, it becomes a territory. Since the Great Discoveries, what was global was shrinking, solving a lot of contradictions; now we must learn to build it up again, give it more consistence as we run the risk of letting it rot under international tensions.”

It’s not the Covid-19 crisis that will lead to another world – but society’s reaction to the crisis. There won’t be a magical night – complete with performances by “international community” pop stars – when “victory “will be announced to the former Planet Lockdown.

What really matters is a long, arduous political combat to take us to the next level. Extreme conservatives and techno-libertarians have already taken the initiative – from refusal of any taxes on the wealthy to support the victims of the New Great Depression to the debt obsession that prevents more, necessary public spending.

In this framework, I propose to go one step beyond Foucault’s biopolitics. Gilles Deleuze can be the conceptualizer of a new, radical freedom. Here is a delightful British series that can be enjoyed as if it were a serious Monty Python-ish approach to Deleuze.

Foucault excelled in the description of how meaning and frames of social truth change over time, constituting new realities conditioned by power and knowledge.

Deleuze, on the other hand, focused on how things change. Movement. Nothing is stable. Nothing is eternal. He conceptualized flux – in a very Heraclitean way.

New species (even the new, AI-created Ubermensch) evolve in relation with their environment. It’s by using Deleuze that we can investigate how spaces between things create possibilities for The Shock of the New.

More than ever, we now know how everything is connected (thank you, Spinoza). The (digital) world is so complicated, connected and mysterious that this opens an infinite number of possibilities.

Already in the 1970s, Deleuze was saying the new map – the innate potentially of newness – should be called “the virtual.” The more living matter gets more complex, the more it transforms this virtual into spontaneous action and unforeseen movements.

Deleuze posed a dilemma that now confronts us all in even starker terms. The choice is between “the poet, who speaks in the name of a creative power, capable of overturning all orders and representations in order to affirm difference in the state of permanent revolution which characterizes eternal return: and that of the politician, who is above all concerned to deny that which “differs,” so as to conserve or prolong an established historical order, or to establish a historical order which already calls forth in the world the forms of its representation.”

The time calls for acting as poets instead of politicians.

ORDER IT NOW

The methodology may be offered by Deleuze and Guattari’s formidable A Thousand Plateaus – significantly subtitled “Capitalism and Schizophrenia,” where the drive is non-linear. We’re talking about philosophy, psychology, politics connected by ideas running at different speeds, a dizzying non-stop movement mingling lines of articulation, in different strata, directed into lines of flight, movements of deterritorialization.

The concept of “lines of flight” is essential for this new virtual landscape, because the virtual is conformed by lines of flight between differences, in a continual process of change and freedom.

All this frenzy, though, must have roots – as in the roots of a tree (of knowledge). And that brings us to Deleuze’s central metaphor; the rhizome, which is not just a root, but a mass of roots springing up in new directions.

Deleuze showed how the rhizome connects assemblies of linguistic codes, power relations, the arts – and, crucially, biology. The hyperlink is a rhizome. It used to represent a symbol of the delightful absence of order in the internet, until it became debased as Google started imposing its algorithms. Links, by definition, always should lead us to unexpected destinations.

Rhizomes are the antitheses of those Western liberal “democracy” standard traits – the parliament and the senate. By contrast, trails – as in the Ho Chi Minh trail – are rhizomes. There’s no masterplan. Multiple entryways and multiple possibilities. No beginning and no end. As Deleuze described it, “the rhizome operates by variation, expansion, conquest, capture, offshoot.”

This can work out as the blueprint for a new form of political engagement –as the systemic design collapses. It does embody a methodology, an ideology, an epistemology and it’s also a metaphor. The rhizome is inherently progressive, while traditions are static. As a metaphor, the rhizome can replace our conception of history as linear and singular, offering different histories moving at different speeds. TINA (“ There is no alternative”) is dead: there are multiple alternatives.

And that brings us back to David Harvey inspired by Marx. In order to embark onto a new, emancipatory path, we first have to emancipate ourselves to see that a new imaginary is possible, alongside a new complex systems reality.

So let‘s chill – and deterritorialize. If we learn how to do it, the advent of the New Techno Man in voluntary servitude, remote-controlled by an all-powerful, all-seeing security state, won’t be a given.

Deleuze: a great writer is always like a foreigner in the language through which he expresses himself, even if it’s his native tongue. He does not mix another language with his own language; he carves out a non pre-existent foreign language within his own language. “He makes the language itself scream, stammer, murmur. A thought should shoot off rhizomatically – in many directions.

I have a cold. The virus is a rhizome.

Remember when Trump said this was a “foreign virus”?

All viruses are foreign – by definition.

But Trump, of course, never read Naked Lunch Grandmaster William Burroughs.

Burroughs: “The word is a virus.”

(Republished from Asia Times by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Coronavirus, Neoliberalism, Philosophy 
Hide 14 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. SteveK9 says:

    Before you get hung up on the ‘extreme right’, support for the LOCKDOWN!!! among Democrats is at 95%, much lower for Republicans. And one thing I’ve learned is that I really don’t want the Chinese ‘model’ to take over the World. This whole Orwellian nightmare is partly due to the West deciding to copy China. Next will be contact tracing apps, codes on your phone determining whether you can drive a car, CCTV everywhere, finger-printing to leave your apartment … it’s a long list and I don’t want any part of it. Apparently we are going to have to fight for freedom again, or lose it.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  2. OH BWOY! I began to read this but could not get past 2 paragraphs. I will come back to it later only because it is Pepe. maybe he has something to say after all that does rile me me end

    Pepe tales as if the capitalist is permanent, general arbiter..GOD itself..immovable. all it would take is revolution..the people getting fed up and putting a permeanet end to the capitalist all his appendages.

    let the capitalist appendages for eg., capture this..that society has no need for parasites only the capitalist does. and if the people move I will make sure that the message to the people is read..that the political parties, higher level bureaucrats, NGOs and all forms of organization that depend on the people’s labor to thrive, are indeed the counter revolutionwaiting to happen, and must not be spared.

    that its..a popular revolution would make all Pepe discusses here absolutely moot! simply as that and the capitlist is no more. discussions that establishes the capitalist as adsoulte starting pint of everything makes no sense to me. they make the capitlist impregnable and are in fact propaganda that supports capitalism

    is that a capitalist spot on Pepe’s jacket I am seeing there?

    where in fact does Pepe Escoba stand on the ideological question..slipping in such as this artilce here that starts likeit is going to do no favors for ordinary people. it just about time for the revolution to explode out of nowhere on the world. the capitalist has run out of all options. lets see if he has a bunch of viruses poised around the planet to let go on the people of the world should they rise.

    that is what his impregnability is all about..mass murder, lockdown, slavery, war and all of that. there is nothing natural about it

    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  3. Usually I like to offer a cheerful or constructive comment. Not this time. This is the higher nonsense – pull anything out of your ass literary theory – not social science. I know many Unzians think all academia is a wasteland. Much of what you don’t see in woke clickbait though is disciplined and evidence-based.

    That it doesn’t make sense is on them, not you.

  4. Cyrano says:

    I still think that Bill Gates could be the man of the hour. I mean the guy is an expert on computer viruses and how they affect the operating system. OK, Corona is a biological virus, but how different can they be? Maybe what the whole world really needs right now is just another operating system. The old one was just too susceptible to infections by viruses and prone to crashes.

  5. anon[367] • Disclaimer says:

    I like satires of this sort, where the vocabularic hyperflutenation of inferior poetics is used to cover-up for mediocre oxymonotonic thinking* – thereby obscuring the fact that nothing actually has been said.

    *Translation: Don’t forget to feed the cat!

  6. Jim says:

    “As a metaphor, the rhizome can replace our conception of history as linear and singular, offering different histories moving at different speeds. TINA (“ There is no alternative”) is dead: there are multiple alternatives.”

    The past history I see always gives the same answer to the question, “What comes next?” What comes next is what has always come next, an empire of some kind or another with a small group of rulers, another small group of technocrats and the great mass of others.

    Maybe the second most powerful human instinct is for certainty, or security if you prefer. This because it takes around fifteen years or so for a female to reach child bearing age. She must therefore be protected for that time at least.

    Various empires offer security to the masses and the masses accept the offer as long as it continues to actually deliver. Industrial welfare states offer security and citizens accept the offer and stop having children, bringing about the failure of the offer. Here we come to the imperial cycle, which however you count it shows that all systems eventually fail to make good on the offer and collapse. What comes next? Another of the same. What always was, always will be I heard somewhere.

    Maybe the, “New Man,” can step off of this cycle?

  7. @SteveK9

    I think that most people will readily embrace it. Here in Australia the government has released a tracking app, the details of which are still largely secret. Around 10% of the nation downloaded it voluntarily in the first couple of days. Younger American people are not that different, they just want convenience and have already largely dispensed with using cash preferring to just tap their phones or cards or even use a ring. They want everything to be at the touch of a finger like an app on their phone or simply by calling out to Alexa or Siri and they willingly offer up their wrists to be chained.

  8. Technology works like a Douglas Adams novel. I can’t wait to see a robot try to fix my gas furnace. It will depress it.

    Or Brazil. Technology is Central Services. Information Retrieval Charges is the key.

  9. Sasha says:

    This appears to have been written by an intelligent person on acid. In that sense – coded and almost unintelligible. I may need to upload the key in order to decipher it and appreciate its panoramic beauty.

  10. Exile says:

    It’s impossible to see the post-Corona landscape clearly until we’re post-Corona. We’re far too close to events which are still unfolding for the kind of perspective necessary for anything but speculation. Too much of our information is unreliable or third-hand.

    With that in mind, I’d like to see how the “rhizome” concept flowers a bit before I sign on. At this point it sounds forced.

  11. Rahan says:

    Good lord, the second half of this articles was like reading Pierre Bourdieu.

    Which is actually…pretty awesome. Shakes things up a little. A bit of French critical theory waffling is a nice change from time to time. It should be like this, IMO: 60% Anglospherical style, 10% French, 10% German, 10% Russian/Eastern european, and 10% Asian. That’s probably the best mix to deal with the current world and filter it in an adequate manner.

    Of course, we accept intellectual honesty as a given, so it can only work here…

  12. I’ve read Junky and The Naked Lunch by Burroughs. Junky is …. wonderful. And it’s not that it’s about junkies, he could have been writing about bus drivers and it would be as good. The writing is just very pure.

    Naked Lunch is meh, kind of disgusting, messy. Not a fan.

    Both books were \$1.50 Goodwill specials, at child-eye level wither their other children’s classics like 50 Shades Of Grey and The Road.

  13. @obwandiyag

    What you’re looking for is “The Futurological Congress” by Stanislaw Lem. Should be in expensive paperback form or may be online for free.

  14. @ben sampson

    I like the way you start your comment, then you carry on and I got to paragr…..zzzzzzz

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pepe Escobar Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV