The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPepe Escobar Archive
Everything Going According to Plan in China
The contours of China's long-term strategy for the new Cold War are quickly coming into view
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Let’s start with the story of an incredibly disappearing summit.

Every August, the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) converges to the town of Beidaihe, a seaside resort some two hours away from Beijing, to discuss serious policies that then coalesce into key planning strategies to be approved at the CCP Central Committee plenary session in October.

The Beidaihe ritual was established by none other than Great Helmsman Mao, who loved the town where, not by accident, Emperor Qin, the unifier of China in the 3rd century B.C., kept a palace.

2020 being, so far, a notorious Year of Living Dangerously, it’s no surprise that in the end Beidaihe was nowhere to be seen. Yet Beidaihe’s invisibility does not mean it did not happen.

Exhibit 1 was the fact that Premier Li Keqiang simply disappeared from public view for nearly two weeks – after President Xi chaired a crucial Politburo gathering in late July where what was laid out was no less than China’s whole development strategy for the next 15 years.

Li Keqiang resurfaced by chairing a special session of the all-powerful State Council, just as the CCP’s top ideologue, Wang Huning – who happens to be number 5 in the Politburo – showed up as the special guest at a meeting of the All China Youth Federation.

What’s even more intriguing is that side by side with Wang, one would find Ding Xuexiang, none other than President Xi’s chief of staff, as well as three other Politburo members.

In this “now you see them, now you don’t” variation, the fact that they all showed up in unison after an absence of nearly two weeks led sharp Chinese observers to conclude that Beidaihe in fact had taken place. Even if no visible signs of political action by the seaside had been detected. The semi-official spin is that no get-together happened at Beidaihe because of Covid-19.

Yet it’s Exhibit 2 that may clinch the deal for good. The by now famous end of July Politburo meeting chaired by Xi in fact sealed the Central Committee plenary session in October. Translation: the contours of the strategic road map ahead had already been approved by consensus. There was no need to retreat to Beidaihe for further discussions.

Trial balloons or official policy?

The plot thickens when one takes into consideration a series of trial balloons that started to float a few days ago in select Chinese media. Here are some of the key points.

1. On the trade war front, Beijing won’t shut down US businesses already operating in China. But companies which want to enter the market in finance, information technology, healthcare and education services will not be approved.

2. Beijing won’t dump all its overwhelming mass of US Treasuries in one go, but – as it already happens – divestment will accelerate. Last year, that amounted to \$100 billion. Up to the end of 2020, that could reach \$300 billion.

3. The internationalization of the yuan, also predictably, will be accelerated. That will include configuring the final parameters for clearing US dollars through the CHIPS Chinese system – foreseeing the incandescent possibility Beijing might be cut off from SWIFT by the Trump administration or whoever will be in power at the White House after January 2021.

4. On what is largely interpreted across China as the “full spectrum war” front, mostly Hybrid War, the PLA has been put into Stage 3 alert – and all leaves are canceled for the rest of 2020. There will be a concerted drive to increase all-round defense spending to 4% of GDP and accelerate the development of nuclear weapons. Details are bound to emerge during the Central Committee meeting in October.

5. The overall emphasis is on a very Chinese spirit of self-reliance, and building what can be defined as a national economic “dual circulation” system: the consolidation of the Eurasian integration project running in parallel to a global yuan settlement mechanism.

Inbuilt in this drive is what has been described as “to firmly abandon all illusions about the United States and conduct war mobilization with our people. We shall vigorously promote the war to resist US aggression (…) We will use a war mindset to steer the national economy (…) Prepare for the complete interruption of relations with the US.”

It’s unclear as it stands if these are only trial balloons disseminated across Chinese public opinion or decisions reached at the “invisible” Beidaihe. So all eyes will be on what kind of language this alarming configuration will be packaged when the Central Committee presents its strategic planning in October. Significantly, that will happen only a few weeks before the US election.

It’s all about continuity

All of the above somewhat mirrors a recent debate in Amsterdam on what constitutes the Chinese “threat” to the West. Here are the key points.

1. China constantly reinforces its hybrid economic model – which is an absolute rarity, globally: neither totally publicly owned nor a market economy.

2. The level of patriotism is staggering: once the Chinese face a foreign enemy, 1.4 billion people act as one.

3. National mechanisms have tremendous force: absolutely nothing blocks the full use of China’s financial, material and manpower resources once a policy is set.

4. China has set up the most comprehensive, back to back industrial system on the planet, without foreign interference if need be (well, there’s always the matter of semiconductors to Huawei to be solved).

China plans not only in years, but in decades. Five year plans are complemented by ten year plans and as the meeting chaired by Xi showed, 15 year plans. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is in fact a nearly 40-year plan, designed in 2013 to be completed in 2049.

And continuity is the name of the game – when one thinks that the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, first developed in 1949 and then expanded by Zhou Enlai at the Bandung conference in 1955 are set in stone as China’s foreign policy guidelines.


The Qiao collective, an independent group that advances the role of qiao (“bridge”) by the strategically important huaqiao (“overseas Chinese”) is on point when they note that Beijing never proclaimed a Chinese model as a solution to global problems. What they extol is Chinese solutions to specific Chinese conditions.

A forceful point is also made that historical materialism is incompatible with capitalist liberal democracy forcing austerity and regime change on national systems, shaping them towards preconceived models.

That always comes back to the core of the CCP foreign policy: each nation must chart a course fit for its national conditions.

And that reveals the full contours of what can be reasonably described as a Centralized Meritocracy with Confucian, Socialist Characteristics: a different civilization paradigm that the “indispensable nation” still refuses to accept, and certainly won’t abolish by practicing Hybrid War.

(Republished from Asia Times by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: China, China/America, New Cold War 
The China/America Series
Hide 44 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Escher says:

    He must be tired after all these meetings and strategy sessions.

    • Disagree: GomezAdddams
    • Troll: Mary Marianne
    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
  2. Chris Moore says: • Website

    China is getting its act together. Meanwhile, in the US, liberal and neocon parasites, pansies and agitators can do nothing but fight over crumbling national spoils and lash out at small fry Mideast nations (for Israel) in a sputtering, senile rage. And shake their fists at Russia.

    Liberals and neocons — is their a more readily-identifiable, pompous-sissy-fat slob of a target anywhere on the planet?

    And yet America can do absolutely nothing about this monkey on the back that is insidiously destroying the nation from within. Like the addict, it is entirely a slave to its own appetites, and has zero desire to change.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  3. Svevlad says:

    What a mess everything is becoming

  4. Wyatt says:

    I never trust anything in which the fuckups or potential fuckups are not listed prominently. Everything pro-China I see on Unz is unabashedly pro-China and obviously propaganda. It’d make for more interesting reading if people who love the bug nation talked about how the Chinese plan to deal with the Uighurs, Hong Kong, the massive spending bubble they’ve inflated, production shifts out of China and into Vietnam and India, the male skew in the population, the pollution, infrastructure failures.

    You know, anything that could make China look like a real nation and not like the first third of Antz.

  5. @Escher

    He must be tired from winning so much, you mean.

  6. Tom Verso says:

    Everything pro-China I see on Unz is unabashedly pro-China and obviously propaganda. It’d make for more interesting reading if people who love the bug nation talked about how the Chinese plan to deal with the Uighurs, Hong Kong, the massive spending bubble they’ve inflated, production shifts out of China and into Vietnam and India, the male skew in the population, the pollution, infrastructure failures.

    Surely you are aware that there is no small amount of reading material on these Chinese problems in the mainstream press.

    The whole purpose of Unz Review so far as I can tell is to give readers alternative facts and points of view.

  7. @Chris Moore

    China is getting its act together.

    Worse than that, they’re “foolishly” going about life at the waterpark while we’re cowering in isolation on the orders of our “wise” leaders.

    • Replies: @d dan
  8. 2) that is understandable – but where will they park that 1 trillion US dollars? Russia was able to sell their US Treasuries and buy gold. But China cant buyt that much can it?? It will be interesting what they invest in.

    4) military spending at 4% of GDP..??? How could that be possible? That would be overkill (no pun intended). I cant imagine how they could spend that much on a regional military. The weapons systems cost nowhere near what US systems cost… Is this a typo??

  9. @Wyatt

    That doesnt make sense since the point of Unz is to rebut the mainstream media. All of what you listed are MSM talking points. The question is what is the truth. Usually it is somewhere in the middle. On some points though the Unz writers are much more correct.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Daemon
  10. Alfa158 says:

    2) I would guess they won’t park it in more government bonds but use it to purchase assets and build infrastructure. Buying real estate, companies, particularly those engaged in technical development, mining rights, and so forth. Also on building things, roads, airports, shipping ports, telecommunications networks, moving factories to lower cost countries etc.
    US Treasury bonds return so little it makes sense to shift that trillion dollars to investments with a better probable rate of return.
    Perhaps to a certain extent they were buying so many US Treasuries to minimize the current account deficit the US has since they wanted us to continue to be a market sink for their products.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  11. Escobar has always been pro China, What is more important here is to define and understand what it means to be “pro China”. Kyle Bass might have an opinion here.

    The question is: Is Club Davos pro-China? Is Gates pro-China? Are the WHO, and the US FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, etc… pro China? Is the BIS pro China? Is the US Democratic Party pro China?

    Needless to say, the answer to some of these questions may be surprising, as future events unfold.

    • Replies: @frankie p
    , @Chesterton
  12. @Wyatt

    Might I suggest Fox News? You’ll get your Yellow Man Bad fix like the good liberal you are. Maybe Cucker will share more of the 1970s CIA photos for you to soyface at.

  13. @Wyatt

    It’d make for more interesting reading if people who love the bug nation talked about how the Chinese plan to deal with the Uighurs, Hong Kong, the massive spending bubble they’ve inflated, production shifts out of China and into Vietnam and India, the male skew in the population, the pollution, infrastructure failures


    It’d make for more interesting reading if we discussed American propaganda talking points?

    Let’s leave that to the professionals who have misled us for so long that now we will never catch China.

  14. @Wyatt

    Uighurs – they re-educate Wahabbi terrorists, 30000 of which are in and around Idlib.

    Hong Kong – China absorbed the Jews, they will absorb the Muslims as well as the much closer Cantonese.

    They spent their bubble on infrastructure, which is taking money from the future to pay for goods that will exist in the future.

    They are shifting low skilled manufacturing to Africa – they with their IQ want the higher hanging fruits.

    Male skew – are there not enough wombs? What does it matter, we are almost at AI, number of humans won’t matter much soon!

    Pollution is improving.

    Infrastructure failures? Cause the dam is a bit full? Sure, 30000km of high speed rail in 20 years is ‘failure’.

    How is HS2 in the UK? Or bridges in the US?

    China’s problem will come when the elites turn on their people, as the people have no direct power to set laws, other than through revolution. But here the west is the same – except our elites have already turned on us!

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  15. d dan says:
    @The Alarmist

    “Worse than that, they’re “foolishly” going about life at the waterpark while we’re cowering in isolation on the orders of our “wise” leaders.”

    You forget to mention the picture is a recent thousand-people party held in, guess where, Wuhan.

    Isn’t this the best way to show the world how China has the confidence that it has decisively defeated the Covid-19? Talking about reality vs propaganda – wonder which sides in living in which ones?

  16. “But companies which want to enter the market in finance, information technology, healthcare and education services will not be approved.”

    This is the key sentence, right here.

    Hold the line, China.

    Once you let in Jewish-owned Wall Street investment banks, you’re terminally screwed. You will lose everything, just as we white citizens have, here in the USA. They will loan themselves the money to buy up everything in your country and pay back the loan through interest they charge you on the money you borrow to buy products produced by the companies they bought with the borrowed money.

    You will be genocided with methamphetamines and opioids and bombarded with gay propaganda which will encourage you to stop having babies while your country will be inundated with African blacks. You will become second-class citizens in your own country.

    Hang tough. You’re one of humanity’s bastions of sanity and hope for a spark of civilization to come through these dark ages unscathed.

  17. frankie p says:

    “The question is: Is Club Davos pro-China? Is Gates pro-China? Are the WHO, and the US FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, etc… pro China? Is the BIS pro China? Is the US Democratic Party pro China?”

    If Pepe’s statement here is accurate, the answer to ALL of the organizations above is NO!:

    “But companies which want to enter the market in finance, information technology, healthcare and education services will not be approved.”

    Face it, the (((parasites))) are employing maximum pressure through Trump as a way to crowbar their financial services control over the Chinese economy and subsequently country.

    Ain’t gonna happen!

  18. GreatAss says:

    3) They can always use it to buy commodities, like oil and keep it in their expanding strategic reserves. There are plenty of other precious metals too. Heck, they could buy a mountain of jade with it and keep it in the vaults, LOL. They could also swap it with Euro, Yen, Won or other currencies. They could also use it to finance their OBOR project. They could use it to buy assets in foreign countries. They could lend it to other countries. How to use it isn’t a question, the question is will they still accept US dollar as reserve?

    4) 4% will bring China close to US military spending, not to mention if purchasing power parity is applied. Why that isn’t possible? China can still afford it and it is still a reasonable ratio. There are others who spend 8% like Saudi. China’s military build up is still at the very early stage, they have just begun. While China aim for regional power, but Asia Pacific is a huge region with many great powers. More importantly, there is a nascent military industrial complex growing in China, they are important employment provider in the future.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  19. @Showmethereal

    I also suspect that the GDP figure is a bit dodgy. My recollection is that China sees GDP (as measured in the west) as a comparatively useless socio-economic measurement.

    The argument is that the western practice of targeting ever higher GDP numbers eventually results in a concentration of wealth rather than a spreading-out of wealth because investments are more profitable if capital is accumulated in the hands of a few people. Obviously that is contrary to Marxist ideology.

  20. To translate this:
    1. China has been cowed by U.S. bullying. Where the Americans use physical force – deployment of military, imposition of sanctions – China…issues disapproving statements.
    2. Against the U.S. dollar dominance, China will do only ceremonial things. “We’re really timid!” So, the dollar remains the most powerful tool of the U.S.
    3. China will not deepen relations with possible allies. There will not be a public military alliance with Russia or Pakistan or Iran. “We’re just friends!” Nothing to really rattle the U.S.
    4. China is fine with being made to look like a stunned duck over Hong Kong. “We’re really weak and hesitant. Let the west beat us ever harder!”
    5. China has a small inventory of nuclear missiles. No intercontinentals. Crapola submarines. “You can hurt us but we can’t hurt you is our stategy”.
    6. The U.S. is welcome to abduct sanctioned Chinese officials, destroy large companies, seize assets ad lib. “Don’t worry, we will just issue statements!”
    7. Subject to a fierce U.S. propaganda storm on all fronts, China will remain on the timid defence. Always only reacting. “We like being beaten up. We have no idea of how to be proactive”.

    An aging leadership that has lost its mojo.

    • Troll: Showmethereal
  21. Daemon says:

    He desperately wants China to fail so the wyatt (heh) man at least has a chance to maintain their status at the rate things are going. Since China obviously isn’t going oblige him, the next best thing he can do is take out his frustration on the messenger.

  22. Renoman says:

    Well then we’re screwed. We can’t tie our shoe laces without protest, endless debate, years of legal challenges and crippling taxes. We will be lunch.

    • Agree: Showmethereal
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Showmethereal
  23. As Pepe Escobar quotes, the Chinese government plans to “abandon all illusions about the United States and conduct war mobilization with our people. We shall vigorously promote the war to resist US aggression (…) We will use a war mindset to steer the national economy (…) Prepare for the complete interruption of relations with the US.”
    Both Washington and Beijing need to realize the other is going into war mode, and not another Cold War. They need to act to resolve this. The end of the Cold War has not made the planet safer. History predicts a hot war, not a cold one.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @mike99588
  24. @Alfa158

    They ramped up buying US Treasuries 1) because the US needed the help after 2008 debacle and 2) tying together financially would mean less likelihood of animosity. We see now that has proven false – which is why they want to divest.

    But it will be interesting to see what they do. Part of US strategy has been to make countries “afraid of the communists buying all your assets”. It worked in Western Europe amd a few other US vassals. No question that the Belt and Road funding loans are backed by the 3 trillion kn total reserves…. But where will that 1 trillion in US reserves sit? Yes it is true US bonds pay little – but China owns so much they still get paid billions in interest in the US every year. So again it will be interesting to see what they do.

  25. @Renoman

    The bad thing isnt the debate… The problem is the debate taking place amongst so many clueless people. That and just the simple spoiled and lazy culture that has set in.

  26. @GreatAss

    My guess would be Euro and some other forms of metals apart from just gold. But we have to wait and see.
    We do know for sure part of the reason they are at the forefront of crypto currency is that they and Russia want to be free of the US dollar constraints.

    As to military spending – I just cant see it. Following the US is a horrible idea. If not for the bloat in US MIC the budget could be probably 1/3 of what it is. China is obsessed with cutting cost of production. Look at high speed rail as an example. I just cant see what they could need to spend 4%. No way should Chinese weapons systems cost as much as an F35 or a Virginia class sub or a Ford carrier. Then China would face the same problem as the US.

    • Agree: Mary Marianne
  27. @John Thurloe

    Your mindset reminds me of something I heard an older Greek telling a minor American consular type about diplomacy, back in the 70s: My ancestors were practising diplomacy when your ancestors were hunter gatherers.
    The Chinese have a recorded history of 5000+ years, and the know what it means to be Chinese. The US are the newbies on the block, and most who knew what it meant to be an American, are long gone.

    • Replies: @TSS
  28. @peter mcloughlin

    True. However, I don’t read or speak Chinese, and there is no source given. What exactly does “promote the war to resist US aggression” mean?
    Does war mean a shooting war or is it a Sun Tzu type of war?
    Is it “promote the war” as in promoting a shooting war, or promoting a war to resist, as in being prepared for whatever means or shape the war takes.
    What is “US aggression”? The sanctions are aggression, as are the naval maneuvers, the Hong Kong “umbrella” revolution, and prosecuting Chinese nationals for everything under the sun.

    The Chinese are more patient. That doesn’t mean they want a shooting war, but if one comes their way, they won’t be caught unprepared. I believe they understand that any type of war is about their success in creating an economic system not beholden to the international banking cartel. Where many other countries have failed, they may succeed.

  29. @Ilya G Poimandres

    Good points but there is no need to absorb the Cantonese. Reality is there has always been more Cantonese in Guangdong than could ever fit in Hong Kong. Cantonese is justmone of many mainland Han sub cultures. Hong Kong just made it famous because of its western links. Canton is/was Guangzhou.

  30. TG says:

    Is China perfect? No. The Chinese face serious problems, and I don’t know if they will be successful in overcoming them. And neither do you.

    But the Chinese also have great strengths – most of which are the strengths that the United States used to have up until around 1965! A mostly unified racially homogenous population, strong patriotism, an economy that respected competition but had very strong industrial policy and regulation (including unashamed in your face protectionism), a population that (mostly) was not forced ever upwards (especially during the immigration time out from 1929 to about 1965), a realistic set of leaders that cared about the nation more than personally cashing in….

    One recalls Henry Kissinger retiring from government service and making millions from China for taking their side in MFN for China… that would have previously been considered treason, now it’s just ‘free enterprise’ to sell out the national interest for cash. And remember the Supreme Court “Citizens United” decision, that not allowing foreign corporations or governments to buy politicians is an infringement on free speech (yes really, de facto).

    And the US has thrown that all away, and is only coasting on the wealth of what was created before. What will the Chinese do with all those US treasuries? I don’t know, maybe burn them. If China has all the industries, it won’t matter.

  31. TSS says:

    I feel he is trying to make a valid point on Chinese inaction and passiveness in the face of American aggression, that is lost on nationalists like showmethereal.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  32. d dan says:
    @John Thurloe

    “An aging leadership that has lost its mojo.”

    Hahaha, this is new. Almost every criticism we hear about China is about China’s “aggressiveness”, “threats”, “bullying”,… Here we have someone complaining that China is too timid, passive, hesitant…

    It just shows how difficult is for people to understand China.

  33. mike99588 says:

    I call it (CCP) Sino-site-itis.

    Some distinguished sinophile authors here go far beyond alternative, truth seeking fare. They do give alternative points of view with important minders. Just heavily laden with rotten CCP fruit, whose leader has arrived at his Maoist purge moment.

    Who knows, just as the US has “Gone with the Wind” for our defunct southern confederation, future China may have, “Gone with the Rain” with its loss of the Mandate of Heaven due to big pieces of Xi-it …

    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
  34. @TSS

    His point is only valid to a warmonger. The US has been trying to destabilize China for 70 years… When China feels truly threatened by the US it will fight – like in the Korean War. But who wants a repeat of that? Only war mongers. Or simply stupid trolls who worship cowboy culture. China is currently running simultaneous naval drills in 4 places from the Yellow Sea to the South China for the US to see. What do you want them to do – fire directly at the US??? That is dumb.
    And in actuality – from currency to nuclear arms – anyone with any clue knows what that person wrote is nonsense. Which country leads in developing crypto currency? China… Who – along with the Russians is leading in developing ballistic and hypersonic missiles? China. The persons comment was simply ignorant. Being active in pursuit of ones own interest doesnt mean acting like a cowboy. The only real valid point is that China is passive when combating US propaganda… But who has the energy for that??? Imagine if Mike Pompeo did REAL diplomacy instead of making up talking points against China. But yes China is too passive. But then when they do speak out they get called “aggressive in diplomacy”. You cant please white supremacists.

  35. mike99588 says:
    @peter mcloughlin

    I think Americans tacitly accept that the 21st century, going west, will be the Asian Century.

    Which asia, how fast, is a big deal.
    I suspect that the borg CCP version of China will see the South/East China Seas, and the Yangtze boiled before US accepts the wave of rape and expansion a la the pre’45 Japanese empire, with infinitely greater CCP-AI tyranny.

    As for true, all out, hot war, US loses its “blue assets” with some % of good real estate and citizens, and China loses 5000 years.

    Holy Xi-it.
    Too bad, when all CCP had to do was play a little nicer, half nice like Deng said, for another 10-20 years…

  36. @Roacheforque

    I think you will find they are pro China, most of the disimulation we see is for the idiot masses, whilst the parasite class prepare for the transition east, having scuttled the yanks like they did the limeys.
    China as it stands was funded and created by them, the latest in a long line of empires curated for that purpose.

  37. @mike99588

    Drink whatever brew helps you sleep at night, Mike. Rest of us have our two sober feet in the real world.

  38. @John Thurloe

    You can punch a ball of cotton all you want, but the ball of cotton will not be the one getting hurt or tired.

  39. @mike99588

    “CCP is so aggressively expansionist!!! 😭” said the country with 800+ military bases around the world and less than 20 years of peace in its entire 200+ years of existence. America really is at the forefront of taking the art of hypocrisy and double standards to the next level.

    • Agree: d dan
    • Replies: @mike99588
  40. @mike99588

    Common misconception about Deng… China took back the Paracel Islands from Vietnam during his tenure. He also told the Soviets he was willing to fight if they helped Vietnam in 79… He was no pushover.

  41. vox4non says:

    I don’t think the US decision makers really think too far ahead, more so given the need to please the jingoistic yahoos who would like to beat their chest at showing how mighty they are.

    As an example, think back 20 odd years when Bill Clinton had the US sail an aircraft carrier between the PRC (China) and the ROC (Taiwan). The boys back home shure luv’ed that, didn’t it? Hey, guess what, dem PLA got new area-denial weapons, and now the aircraft carriers can only play down south in the South China Sea. Well, not sure how long that is going to last with their fighters now have wet legs that can reach down there.

    Really, was it wise to needlessly needle a power that can actually implement five-year plans on time and a long memory? Now, the USA has to spend money it does not have to maintain an ill-configured military, for a purpose not properly spelt out. Or was that the original purpose, anyway?

  42. mike99588 says:
    @Mary Marianne

    The 9 dashed line intruding into EEZs 900 miles away would be embarrassing to most criminals. 9d looks like a thinner tissue than Japanese Manchuko…

    As for US history, it’s mistakes totally pale next to the stakes of a CCP grab at world hegemony fuelled with AI monitoring and ethnocidal/genocidal domination. CCP now, Zioglobal half a step later.

  43. @Wyatt

    Truth hurts you ignorant stupid TV propagandized puppet of Trump or the other buffoon. USA is washed up —too far in DEBT and best yet –did it their Way! Sit back and chill out over 911 –sorry it was an inside job and think about Trump’s Wall and his other Wall in Israel and then blame the JEWS –indeed –USA is going down the drain —— fast.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pepe Escobar Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?