The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPepe Escobar Archive
A Eurasian Jigsaw: BRI and INSTC Interconnectivity Will Complete the Puzzle
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

SAMARKAND – Interconnecting Inner Eurasia is an exercise in Taoist equilibrium: adding piece by piece, patiently, to a gigantic jigsaw puzzle. It takes time, skill, vision, and of course major breakthroughs.

A key piece was added to the puzzle recently in Uzbekistan, bolstering the links between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the International North South Transportation Corridor (INSTC).

The Mirzoyoyev government in Tashkent is deeply engaged in turbo-driving yet another Central Asian transportation corridor: a China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan-Afghanistan railway.

That was at the center of a meeting between the chairman of the board of Temir Yullari – the Uzbek national railways – and his counterparts in Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan, as well as managers of the Chinese Wakhan Corridor logistics company.

In terms of the complex intersection of Xinjiang with Central and South Asia, this is as groundbreaking as it gets, as part of what I call the War of Economic Corridors.

The Uzbeks have pragmatically spun the new corridor as essential to cargo transport under low tariffs – but that goes way beyond mere trade calculations.

Imagine, in practice, cargo containers coming by train from Kashgar in Xinjiang to Osh in Kyrgyzstan and then to Hairatan in Afghanistan. Annual volume is planned to reach 60,000 containers in the first year alone.

That would be crucial to develop Afghanistan’s productive trade – away from the “aid” obsession of the US occupation. Afghan products will finally be able to be easily exported to Central Asian neighbors and also China, for instance to the bustling Kashgar market.

And that stabilizing factor would bolster the Taliban’s coffers, now that the leadership in Kabul is very much interested in buying Russian oil, gas and wheat under vastly attractive discounts.

How to get Afghanistan back in the game

There’s also the possibility of spinning off a road project from this railway that would cross the ultra-strategic Wakhan corridor – something that Beijing has already been contemplating for a few years.

The Wakhan is shared by northern Afghanistan and the Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region of Tajikistan: a long, barren, spectacular geological strip, advancing all the way to Xinjiang.

By now it’s clear not only to Kabul, but also to members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), that the humiliated Americans will not restitute the billions of dollars ‘confiscated’ from the Afghan Central Bank’s reserves – something that would at least mitigate Afghanistan’s current, dire economic crisis and imminent mass famine.

So Plan B is to bolster the – for the moment devastated – Afghan supply and trade chains. Russia will be in charge of security for the whole Central-South Asian crossroads. China will provide the bulk of the financing. And that’s where the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan-Afghanistan railway fits in.

China sees a road across the Wakhan – a very complicated proposition – as an extra BRI corridor, linking to the China-repaved Pamir highway in Tajikistan and China-rebuilt Kyrgyzstan roads.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has already built an 80 km access road from the Chinese stretch of the Karakoram Highway – before it reaches the Pakistan border – to a mountain pass in the Wakhan, currently only available for cars and jeeps.

The next Chinese move would be to proceed further on down that road by 450 km, all the way to Fayzabad, the provincial capital of Afghan Badakhshan. That would constitute the roadside back-up corridor to the China-Central Asia-Afghanistan railway.

The key point is that the Chinese, as much as the Uzbeks, fully understand the extremely strategic location of Afghanistan: not only as a Central/South Asian crossroads, connecting to key ocean ports in Pakistan and Iran (Karachi, Gwadar, Chabahar) and to the Caspian Sea via Turkmenistan, but also helping landlocked Uzbekistan to connect to markets in South Asia.

That’s all part of the BRI corridor maze; and at the same time interlocks with the INSTC because of the key role of Iran (itself increasingly linked with Russia).

Tehran is already engaged in building a railway to Herat, in western Afghanistan (it already rebuilt the road). Then we will have Afghanistan inbuilt in both BRI (as part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, CPEC) and the INSTC, giving momentum to yet another project: a Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Tajikistan (TAT) railway, to be linked to Iran and thus the INSTC.

From the Karakoram to Pakafuz

The Karakoram highway – the northern part of which was rebuilt by the Chinese – may sooner or later get a railway sister. The Chinese have been thinking about it since 2014.

By 2016, a railway from the China-Pakistan border to Gilgit, in the northern areas and then further down to Peshawar, was enshrined as part of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) blueprint. But then nothing happened: the railway is not included in the 2017-2030 CPEC Long Term Plan.

That may eventually happen in the next decade: the engineering and logistics are an enormous challenge, as they were for the building of the Karakoram highway.

And then there’s the “follow the money” angle. The top two Chinese banks financing BRI – and thus CPEC – projects are the China Development Bank and the Export Import Bank. Even before Covid they were already toning down their loans. And with Covid, they now have to balance foreign projects with domestic loans for the Chinese economy.

The connectivity priority instead shifted to the Pakistan-Afghanistan-Uzbekistan (Pakafuz) railway.

The key stretch of Pakafuz links Peshawar (the capital of the tribal areas) to Kabul. When it’s finished, we’ll see Pakafuz directly interacting with the upcoming China-Central Asia-Afghanistan railway: a new BRI maze directly connected with the INSTC.

All of the above developments reveal their true complexity when we see they are simultaneously inserted into the interaction of BRI and the INSTC and the harmonization between BRI and the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU).

Essentially, in geopolitical and geoeconomic terms, the relation between BRI and EAEU projects allows Russia and China to cooperate across Eurasia while avoiding a race to reach a dominant position in the Heartland.

For instance, both Beijing and Moscow agree on the supreme need to stabilize Afghanistan and help it to run a sustainable economy.

In parallel, some important BRI members – like Uzbekistan – are not members of the EAEU, but that is compensated by their membership in the SCO. At the same time, the BRI-EAEU entente facilitates economic cooperation between EAEU members such as Kyrgyzstan and China.

Beijing de facto got full approval from Moscow to invest in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia, all EAEU members. A future currency or basket of currencies bypassing the US dollar is being jointly discussed between the EAEU – led by Sergei Glazyev – and China.

China focuses on Central/West Asia

There’s no question that the proxy war in Ukraine between the US and Russia has been creating serious problems for BRI expansion. After all, the US war on Russia is also a war against BRI.

The top three BRI corridors from Xinjiang to Europe are the New Eurasian Land Bridge, the China-Central Asia-West Asia Economic Corridor, and the China-Russia-Mongolia Economic Corridor.

ORDER IT NOW

The New Eurasian Land Bridge uses the Trans-Siberian and a second link through Xinjiang-Kazakhstan (via the dry land port of Khorgos) and then Russia. The corridor via Mongolia is in fact two corridors: one from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei to Inner Mongolia and then Russia; and the other from Dalian and Shenyang and then to Chita in Russia, near the Chinese border.

As it stands, the Chinese are not using Land Bridge and the Mongolian corridor as much as before, mainly because of western sanctions on Russia. The current BRI emphasis is via Central Asia and West Asia, with one branch then bisecting toward the Persian Gulf and on the Mediterranean.

And this is where we see another – highly complex – level of intersection quickly developing: how the increasing importance for China of Central Asia and West Asia mixes with the increasing importance of the INSTC for both Russia and Iran in their trade with India.

Call it the friendly vector of the War of Transportation Corridors.

The hardcore vector – real war – is already being deployed by the usual suspects. They are predictably bent on destabilizing and/or smashing any node of BRI/INSTC/EAEU/SCO Eurasia integration, by any means necessary: be it in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Balochistan, the Central Asian “stans” or Xinjiang.

As far as the major Eurasian actors are concerned, that’s bound to be an Anglo-American train to nowhere.

(Republished from The Cradle by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The Wakhan highway is already under construction but it will be tenuous;
    if the Chinese want Koh-e-Baba (in central Afghanistan, the largest iron ore
    deposit in Asia) it will have to be by railroad (which will take time).
    They are probably more interested in a highway and railroad over
    the Taple Pass and on to Calcutta (the mere thought of which gives India
    the strategic willies 😀 ).
    Be that as it may, stealing their foreign reserves was probably not the best way
    to keep the Taliban out of the Russo-Chinese orbit; the Stans are under
    constant attack, the Great Game has been going on for quite some time,
    only the players change (next point of USraeli attack probably the oilfields in
    West Kazakhstan, as Russian as the Donbass).

  2. Notsofast says:

    wouldn’t you know we’re riding on the pakafuz express.
    wouldn’t you know we’re riding on the pakafuz express,
    they’re taking me to old uzbek.
    all aboard the train, all aboard the train.
    all aboard the train for uzbeki beki beki stan stan.

  3. anonymous[326] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s all well and good, but dominion is achieved by force: if Israel was not a powerful nation militarily, the cries of the Palestinians would be heard more often by the world. If the United States was not a gigantic weapons armory, the world would have moved on from it by now. Until such time as China has overwhelming military dominance, it matters not that it has the world’s largest economy and better trade and financing arrangements with most of the globe than the US does. Might makes right: the US and Israel have spent the past seven decades proving it.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @antibeast
  4. SafeNow says:

    but dominion is achieved by force: if Israel was not a powerful nation militarily, the cries of the Palestinians would be heard

    When the ship Exodus approached Palestine, the British warships blocked Exodus, and prepared to board; Captain Aronowitz was ordered to surrender. He refused, and ordered his crew and passengers to hurl the available missiles, tins of kosher corned beef, at the British. This worked. Only for a time, of course; eventually, you run out of corned-beef missiles. But the lesson was loud and clear, and is sobering even today.

  5. antibeast says:
    @anonymous

    Until such time as China has overwhelming military dominance, it matters not that it has the world’s largest economy and better trade and financing arrangements with most of the globe than the US does. Might makes right: the US and Israel have spent the past seven decades proving it.

    For as long as the USA can coerce the whole world into submission, its militaristic Empire will depend upon its forcible imposition of the USD as the world’s reserve currency. But from the moment parts of the world break free from the USD pyramid scheme, the USA will start to decline and its militaristic Empire will begin to crumble. That explains why the USA reacted to the creation of the Euro in 1999 by invading Iraq in 2003 because Saddam had begun using the Euro instead of the USD. Two decades later, the final completion of the NordStream 2 pipeline between Russia and Germany as well as the expected ratification of the China-EU investment treaty would have cemented the role of the Euro as the world’s reserve currency, displacing the USD in this decade of the 2020s. To save its USD hegemony, the USA reacted by destabilizing Eastern Europe in order to destroy the Euro by instigating the Ukraine Crisis.

    The US invasion of Afghanistan and its abrupt withdrawal after two decades of military occupation is eerily similar to the Soviet invasion of and later withdrawal after a decade of military occupation from the same Central Asian country two decades earlier. Of course, we all know what happened to the Soviet Union thereafter which imploded from within its militaristic Empire. The same process is now happening to the USA and its militaristic Empire which needs to devour its own Asian and European allies just to stay alive. Outside of the ‘Collective West’, the so-called ‘Third World’ is simply too poor for the USA to bother, other than using them as testing grounds for its overpriced weapons.

    According to Kishore Mahbubani, the USA today is behaving like the Soviet Union by invading Third World countries left and right while China has emulated the USA by building bridges not dropping bombs. His talk is shown in the video below:

  6. Pakistan and Afghanistan are the two most unstable parts. If Pakistan can shake off it’s former allegiance to the west… Things could work out much better for the region. If Pakistan is secure – Afghanistan can be made secure by the rest of the neighborhood.

  7. Athena says:

    CIA and British friends at it again in Pakistan

    Govt urges for calm amid PTI’s ‘anti-people’ protest call
    https://tribune.com.pk/story/2372498/govt-urges-for-calm-amid-ptis-anti-people-protest-call

    Is The TAPI Pipeline Finally Ready To Go?
    https://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/Middle-East/Is-The-TAPI-Pipeline-Finally-Ready-To-Go.html

  8. Athena says:

    EAEU-Indonesia Talks On Free Trade Zone May Kick Off By End Of Year – Russian Ambassador

    https://www.urdupoint.com/en/world/eaeu-indonesia-talks-on-free-trade-zone-may-k-1538283.html

    China, Indonesia deepen ties, inject stability to region, world in international landscape full of uncertainties

    https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202207/1271502.shtml

    Indonesia reaffirms plan to establish bullion bank

    https://www.thejakartapost.com/business/2022/08/22/indonesia-reaffirms-plan-to-establish-bullion-bank.html.

    “The government has reiterated a plan to create a bullion bank by merging Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) and PT Pegadaian in a bid to end Indonesia’s dependence on parking gold reserves in Singapore. A bullion bank offers all types of gold or silver transactions, including services for exporting and importing as well as storing precious metals. Many global banks provide such services, including JP Morgan, HSBC, UBS and Credit Suisse. Indonesian gold industrialists have long faced obstacles in managing their reserves domestically due to the absence of a bullion bank.

  9. Athena says:

    India Would Welcome Argentina’s Entry Into BRICS – Foreign Ministry
    August 27, 2022

    https://www.urdupoint.com/en/world/india-would-welcome-argentinas-entry-into-br-1553068.html

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pepe Escobar Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
How America was neoconned into World War IV