The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
Iraqi Troops in Mosul Could be Trump's First Crisis
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Iraqi armed forces are becoming bogged down in the battle for Mosul. Its elite special forces and an armoured division are fighting to hold districts in the eastern outskirts of the city against counter-attacks by Isis fighters using networks of tunnels to move about unseen.

“In one day we lost 37 dead and 70 wounded,” said a former senior Iraqi official, adding that the Iraqi forces had been caught by surprise by the extent of the tunnel system built by Isis, said to be 45 miles long.

The Iraqi Counter-Terrorism Service (CTS) and the Ninth Armoured Division have been trying for two weeks to fight their way into that part of Mosul city, east of the Tigris River.

Isis is sending waves of suicide bombers either as individuals who blow themselves up or in vehicles packed with explosives, snipers and mortar teams, to restart the fighting in a dozen districts that the Iraqi Army had said were already captured.

“At first I was optimistic that we might capture Mosul in two or three weeks, but I now believe it will take months,” said Khasro Goran, a senior Kurdish leader familiar with conditions in Mosul, in an exclusive interview with The Independent.

He said he had changed his mind about the likely length of the siege when he witnessed the ferocity of the fighting in the outer defences of Mosul. He added that “if they [Isis] continue fighting like this then a lot of Mosul will be destroyed. I hope it will not be like Aleppo.”

A prolonged siege of Mosul with heavy civilian casualties and the possibility of Turkish military intervention is likely to be the first international crisis to be faced by the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump. The slow and heavily-contested advance of the Iraqi armed forces into the city means that the attack will still be going on when he is inaugurated in Washington on 20 January.

Mr Trump would have to decide if he is willing to sanction an escalation in US-led airstrikes to destroy Isis defences, though this would inevitably lead to heavy loss of life among the estimated 1.5 million civilians in Mosul.

A threatened military intervention by Turkey will also become more likely if the best Iraqi combat units suffer heavy losses and look for reinforcements from the Shia paramilitary Hashd al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilisation) forces and the Kurdish Peshmerga.

Under an American-brokered agreement, these are being kept out of the city of Mosul itself to avoid sectarian and ethnic tensions between them and its Sunni Arab population.

Turkey has sent tanks to the Turkish-Iraqi border and said it may invade if the Hashd or Peshmerga fight inside Mosul.

The problem for the Iraqi armed forces is that they have previously relied heavily on US-led airstrikes to destroy Isis fighters in fixed positions. There have been 10,300 such airstrikes in Iraq since 2014.

In the battle for Ramadi in 2015 some 70 per cent of the city was destroyed, but almost all of the 350,000 population had fled and Isis did not fight to the last man. The same was true of the outer ring of towns around Mosul like Bartella and Qaraqosh a dozen more miles from the city, which were empty of their largely Christian inhabitants, making it easier to target and destroy from the air buildings held by Isis.

The same tactics cannot be used in Mosul because its people are still there and the city is very big. The Baghdad government offensive that began on 17 October went well until it reached Mosul’s outskirts two weeks ago.

Since then the fighting has swung backwards and forwards with districts being captured or recaptured three or four times.

In al-Qadisiyah al-Thaniya district, which the CTS had entered on Friday, the elite soldiers later retreated and Isis fighters returned. A local resident told a news agency that “they came back to us again, and this is what we feared. At night there were fierce clashes and we heard powerful explosions.”

In Intisar, another embattled east Mosul district, the Iraqi army’s Ninth Armoured Division has found that its tanks are vulnerable in street fighting for which its soldiers have neither experience nor training. Last Tuesday it lost two T-72 tanks.

There were some signs of Isis disarray at the start of the siege. Hoshyar Zebari, the former Iraqi Finance and Foreign Minister, says that by far “the biggest surprise for Isis was some months back when the Iraqi government and the leaders of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) agreed on a joint offensive against Isis in Mosul.” Isis did not expect this – Baghdad and the KRG had previously been barely on speaking terms because of economic and territorial disputes.

When Iraqi forces first attacked east Mosul, there were reports of wavering morale among some Isis fighters, but the Isis leadership has mercilessly enforced its control.

The UN says that it has executed some 70 civilians in Mosul accused of collaboration with Iraqi forces over the last week. Last Tuesday alone 40 people were dressed in orange jumpsuits and shot for “treason and collaboration” before being hanged from electricity poles.

Another 20 civilians have been shot for using mobile phones to leak information to the Iraqi army and their bodies were hanged at traffic lights.

The real level of support for Isis in Mosul is unclear. The 54,000 people who have fled the city and sought refuge behind Peshmerga or Iraqi army lands all express their hatred of movement and deplore its atrocities.

But local Christians and Kurds view the displaced civilians from Isis with suspicion as possible covert Isis supporters. “I see that Isis are getting their families to safety,” said one Christian driving past a camp of white tents occupied by Internally Displaced People (IDPs) at Khazar, east of Mosul.


Mr Goran is an expert on the internal politics of Mosul where he was deputy governor between 2003 and 2009, and leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) in the city until 2011. Speaking of the political sympathies of its people, he said that “a third of the population supports Isis, much of the rest is passive and only a small percentage actively resisted them.”

He believes that reports of extensive anti-Isis armed resistance inside the city was largely propaganda designed for the media. He pointed out that there might be a lot of foreign fighters in Mosul, but “the majority of fighters are Iraqis”.

During the almost two-and-a-half years in which Isis has ruled Mosul since it captured it in June 2014 it has concentrated on recruiting young adolescents and teenagers to its cause. These are given extensive ideological and technical training to turn them into fanatical fighters or suicide bombers.

Isis is holding out effectively in east Mosul and may be able to withstand a siege for many months, but it is likely to lose the battle for the city in the long term. Iraqi army units are approaching Mosul from the south and the Hashd are closing off the escape routes to the west. A last stand by Isis in the city, however, could lead to its destruction.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Iraq, ISIS, Kurds 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Rehmat says:

    Just another OR crap dear …… Iraqi forces and its ally Shi’ite Sadrist fighters don’t need US help. They saw US cowardness and porn during US occupation for eight years.

    Iraqi government forces have retaken another region in Mosul as army soldiers, backed by pro-government fighters from Popular Mobilization Units and Kurdish Peshmerga forces, are pushing forward to drive Daesh terrorists out of the strategic northern city….

    • Replies: @anon
  2. Señor Cockburn seems to lap up anything he is told and reurgitate it as news. What is the origin of this wondrous, supposedly new tunnel system in Mosul? Is this system now a creation of ISIS or is it in the main left over from Saddam Hussein?

    And even if it is partly new, where did the machinery to dig it come from?

    My oh my what a surprise this must all be to the US, etc.

    What could it matter you might ask?

    Well, those with memories will recall that ISIS magically got many heavy duty weapons in what seemed like staged battles with the Iraqi army and also that many ex-Hussein army commanders soon became ISIS, all Sunni of course.

    All of this more than likely supervised, or at least observed and probably encouraged, by certain US and allied actors.

    Anyway a little research is in order, don’t you think? At least if one is writing journalistic accounts rather than the latest party line.

  3. Sadr’s Shi’a forces were never allies with the Iraqi military but they do seem to want to fight to keep some level of unity for the nation. US cowardice is a lie made by the propagandists to dissuade US domestic policy and allow for those who do not know the background to get incorrect information thereby making incorrect choices as solution(s).

    There was even a time when Baath members were called back by US forces to stem the flow towards al Qaeda and US authorities even with their forward thinking strategy acknowledged that these people will come back as some type of terrorist force to exact revenge on their Shi’a overlords because they (Sunnis were not given equity representation under the Maliki government.

    The SOFA allowed for US to stay but since the Iraqis refused to sign it when Bush was in power, it mad sense for POTUS (Obama) to exit troops or else face the notion of US as an occupying force.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  4. […] Patrick Cockburn writes that the combined forces invading Mosul are bogged down, and that due to large numbers of civilians trapped there the U.S. air power cannot just flatten the place as they did in Ramadi. […]

  5. If Iraq were Russia’s baby, they would have solved the puzzle long ago. Of course Russia wouldn’t be in it for the money. An often overlooked detail that makes all the difference in the world. The last thing Washington has any intention of doing is winning another war. A mistake they’ve been careful to avoid since taking all the credit for winning WW2.

  6. Rehmat says:
    @jack shindo

    Nyeth darling … It was Sadrist militia that kicked Zionist’s war hero Gen. David Petraeus’ (of Jewish family roots) dirty butts.

    Al-Qadea like ISIS, Al-Nusra, and other terrorist groups destroying Muslims nations but refuse to attack Israel or help Palestinian resistance, were all given birth by the CIA, Mossad, and MI6.

    Gen Petraeus, who lead US occupation forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan, was hailed as hero by the Jew York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal was appointed head of CIA by Barack Obama. But then he made a serious political blunder. He said that main reason for Muslim world’s hatred toward United States is as result of Washington’s blind support for Israel. The Jewish Lobby got Petreaus involved in a sex scandal, which ended with his resignation from CIA in November 2012. The Jewish Lobby got Petraeus replaced by another Israel-First, Zionist Christian John Brenan, the famous liar on American torture around the world.

    Well, Gen. Petreaus is not the only Jew calling for US boots in both Syria and Iraq. On September 23, 2014, Jew Max Boot, a senior advisor at the powerful CFR wrote an Op-Ed at AJC’s Commentary Magazine urging Obama to dispatch American ground forces to both Iraq and Syria as the foreign-funded rebels including ISIL or ISIS have failed to topple anti-Israel governments in Damascus and Baghdad.

  7. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Kurds are like the zionist Jews, committing war crimes against humanity with the support of Israel/US and the criminal West to erect the Second Israel in the region which NO ONE will allows. The Obama regime is a traitor who is helping the zionist agenda in the region. The traitor kurds are not fighting against ISIS, since ISIS is creation US/Israel, rather with the excuse of isis they are trying to steal more territories. The world should be alarmed about the crimes committed by the kurds against Arabs, Turkmen, Christians, Muslims for the interest of the zionists and the west.

    Iraqi Kurdish Forces Destroying Arab Homes in Apparent War Crimes
    Report: Unlawful Demolitions Reported in Kirkuk, Nineveh Provinces

    With the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) using anti-ISIS offensives by the Peshmerga to gain territory, they’ve come to control considerable numbers of Arab towns and villages in Kirkuk and Nineveh Provinces. According to a new report by Human Rights Watch, this is fueling war crimes, with the Kurdish forces destroying Arab homes in at least 21 of those towns and villages.

  8. unit472 says:

    Neither Mosul or ISIS is America’s problem. In fact, having ISIS break the Iraqi Army in Mosul serves American interests very well. The last thing we should want to see is a Shia Empire reaching from Tehran to the Mediterranean Sea.

  9. For the next couple of months at least, wouldn’t this still be, like, ‘Obama’s last crisis’?

  10. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    {The last thing we should want to see is a Shia Empire reaching from Tehran to the Mediterranean Sea.}

    This garbage is spread around by the Zionist criminals and ignorant people copy it.

    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
  11. […] The Unz Review: Iraqi Troops in Mosul Could be Trump’s First Crisis PATRICK COCKBURN […]

  12. virgile says:

    The Turks are waiting for the moment to make a deal with ISIS and take over Aleppo like they did of Jarabulus. They are Sunnis like ISIS after all!

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  13. @virgile

    “The Turks are waiting for the moment to make a deal with ISIS and take over Aleppo like they did of Jarabulus. They are Sunnis like ISIS after all!”

    Wow! The Turks and ISIS are SUNNIS. Who would have guessed? And the Kurds are….

    (1) Shi’a

    (2) Presbyterian

    (3) Buddhists

    (4) Sunnis

    Don’t write on both sides of the paper at the same time.

  14. @Anonymous

    I’m no fan of Islam and its culture, but I have to root for the Shia. Why do the Sunnis get to be boss of the whole Islamic world? At least they support a semblance of democracy, unlike the cucks of the Caliphate.

  15. Walk away, we win! Tell China the oil is all theirs. China knows what to do and they have the manpower to back it up. Trump will do this. He just can’t quite say it yet. In due time.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr