The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
How the Islamic State's Brutal Project Was Finally Overthrown
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Up to its dying days the self-declared Islamic State has retained the ability to top the news agenda, even as its fighters were losing their last battle for bomb-shattered villages in the deserts of eastern Syria. When their spokesman promised retaliation for the massacre of Muslims in the Christchurch mosques his threat was taken seriously.

Given the record of Isis atrocities it is not surprising that nobody can discount its ability to exact revenge through existing adherents, new converts or those using its name to spread terror. This is not just western paranoia: in Syria and Iraq people speak continually of Isis sleeper cells waiting to emerge and exact revenge.

There is a largely sterile debate about whether or not Isis – whose territory once stretched from the outskirts of Baghdad to the hills overlooking the Mediterranean – is dead and buried, as Donald Trump claims. Could it be reborn if the pressure against it is relaxed? The answer is simple enough: Isis is defeated as a state apparatus that once ruled eight million people, but it can persist as a terrorist and guerrilla organisation.

I was in Baghdad in June 2014 when Isis was advancing south towards the capital, capturing cities and towns like Tikrit and Baiji with scarcely a shot being fired. The rout of the Iraqi army seemed total and for several days there was no defensive lines between us and Isis advance patrols. As many as 1,700 Shia air force cadets were massacred amid the ruins of Saddam Hussein’s old palaces on the banks of the Tigris river near Tikrit.

Isis had 100 days of stunning victories in Iraq and Syria but its emirs were never to reach the same level of success again. Instead of focusing all their forces on seizing Baghdad, they moved north and attacked the autonomous and near independent Iraqi Kurdish enclave. The US and its allies started using their devastating air power. If Isis ever had a chance of complete victory, it came and went very quickly.

The success of its blitzkrieg tactics in 2014 depended in part on Isis’s ability to spread terror through the internet by broadcasting its atrocities. Iraqi families would watch them and tell their soldier sons to desert the army and keep out of the fighting. The unexpected capture of Mosul in 2014 gave the impression to many Sunni Arabs in Iraq and Syria that the forces of the newly declared caliphate were divinely inspired. Isis commanders certainly believed this.


But now with obliteration on the battlefield Isis can no longer make any convincing claim for divine inspiration or support. One of the great attractions of Isis – that it had almost magical powers guaranteeing victory – has gone. For the eight million Iraqi and Syrians whom Isis once controlled, its rule brought nothing but death and destruction. Almost all of Raqqa, its Syrian de facto capital, and much of Mosul, its Iraqi counterpart, are in ruins. Tens of thousands of Sunni Arabs in both countries have died in the relentless US-led bomb and artillery bombardments that finally overwhelmed Isis defences.

But could the thousands of dispersed Isis fighters that the Pentagon says are hiding out in the vast deserts and semi-deserts between Syria and Iraq reorganise and stage a convincing counter-attack? After all, the US “Surge” in Iraq in between 2007 and 2009 was trumpeted at the time as marking the final defeat of al-Qaeda in there, which was Isis under another name. Isis commanders are reported to draw inspiration from that period, arguing that they have come back before and they will do so again.

It is not very likely that favourable circumstances will once more combine in such a way that Isis could relaunch itself. It has lost the advantage of surprise and has too many enemies who may not like each other but know what Isis can do given half a chance. In 2014 it enjoyed a certain tolerance and even support from Sunni states like Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar which is no longer there.

But this not quite the same as saying that Isis is finished. The deserts of Syria and Iraq are vast and impossible to police in their entirety. Occupation forces, be they Kurds in Raqqa or Iraqi Shia troops in Sunni parts of Iraq, are resented and often hated by Sunni Arabs and Isis could benefit from their disaffection. And even if Isis does not regain such popularity as it once enjoyed in these places, its reputation for homicidal fury means that it does not have to do very much to spread terror.

Isis as Isis has probably had its day. But could it transmute into something else? The defeat of Isis does not mean the defeat of al-Qaeda of which Isis was only a single clone. In north-west Syria Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), despite several changes of name, has been for over a year the largest jihadi or al-Qaeda type movement in the country. In western Idlib, northern Hama and western Aleppo provinces it has displaced other armed opposition groups. It now may have as many as 50,000 fighters and control three million people. HTS might also establish itself as an ally of Turkey in northern Syria which would allow the al-Qaeda brand to live on.

But one should not let such possibilities to run riot and pretend that the old al-Qaeda formula of making war – with suicide attacks as acts of faith – has the destructive power it once did. President Trump is largely right in his claims that Islamic State is destroyed – even if he is grossly, even ludicrously, inflating his own role in its demise.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anon1 says:

    Islam is bad news.

    • Agree: Roderick Spode
  2. Does it not occur to Patrick Cockburn HOW ISIS took so much territory in the first place?
    They came in streams of often brand-new Toyota trucks, made in America, mounted with heavy modern weaponry from across the Turkish border.
    Many had been trained and armed by the US in their Turkish base, and others by Turkey.
    US helicopters and 2 British planes were shot down by Iraqis whilst they air-supplied arms to ISIS.
    ISIS/Daesh were the West’s mercenary proxies, and instead of attacking them, the US and it’s Coalition cronies were in reality supporting them, and destroying Syrian and Iraqi infrastructure.
    Not until the Russians started hitting ISIS with air power did they start to lose ground.
    The US airlifts ISIS leaders out of tight spots, and transports them to safer areas.

    • Replies: @Sean
  3. Sean says:

    If you are trying to take a country it is always a mistake to do anything rather than go straight at the capital. Firstest with the mostest.

  4. Sean says:
    @Paul Barbara

    That is why US backed IS attacked the US backed Kurds is it, eh?

    • Replies: @Paul Barbara
    , @Ace
  5. @Sean

    There is many a slip twixt cup and lip. Things don’t always work out exactly as planned, especially when one is dealing with murderous thugs (and when the ‘dealers’ are also murderous thugs).
    Do you honestly believe that ISIS swarmed into Syria and Iraq without the US blessing?
    Are you unaware of 4* General (Retd.) Wesley Clark’s testimony: ‘General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years’ (‘…Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran’):

    Or Roland Dumas: ‘France’s Roland Dumas tells how Syria’s Destruction was planned in advance’:

    ‘UK Government Prepared War in Syria Two Years Before 2011 Protests. France’s Former Foreign Minister Roland Dumas’:
    The British formed ‘White Helmets’ have been outed as Jihadis and a PR outfit for the West’s cut-throat mercenaries; check out Venessa Beeley’s and Eva Bartlett’s videos and articles on Syria.

  6. bunga says:

    Putin , former president of Afghanistan and people from Pakistan have noted the ongoing shipment ( actually by cargo plane and helicopter ) of ISIS from Syria and from Saudi and from Golan area to Afghanhistan with the idea of sabotaging recalcitrant Pakistan, and attacking Russia through its south.

    These ISIS will and are teaming up with Baluchistan rebels paid and employed by India

  7. anonymous[204] • Disclaimer says:

    [There is a largely sterile debate about whether or not Isis – whose territory once stretched from the outskirts of Baghdad to the hills overlooking the Mediterranean – is dead and buried, as Donald Trump claims.]

    HOW COULD ISIS CAPTURED and hold so much land in a short time?

    Why don’t you answer this simple question where even 10 year old can answer it easily? Unless you are an embedded ‘journalist’ in the service of the criminal western countries.
    For your information read the following, and then stop writing about the ME, please. The zionist mass murderers have enough army to mislead the public:

    [Since 2014 the US has been engaged in a phony war against ISIS, pretending to fight this brutal takfiri group while in fact allowing it to expand and killing Syrian Army soldiers who actually fought the group. Throughout this time the US has used ISIS as a pretext for the US military presence in Syria. The US did bomb ISIS occupied Raqqah and destroyed it; it then made a deal to deport many thousands of ISIS partisans. But the ongoing Battle of Baghuz marks the first time the US has really fought ISIS. To his credit, Trump is now doing what the US has only pretended to do for five years: actually fighting ISIS. This spectacular and drawn out campaign allows Trump to take credit for defeating ISIS, although for half a decade the forces actually fighting ISIS have been the Syrian Army, Russia, the Iraqi PMU/Hashed al-Shaabi, the Iraqi Army, Lebanese Hezbollah, and Iran.]

    US NEVER FOUGHT ISIS, in fact the axis of evil US-Israel-Britian created ISIS funded by the Saudi Arabia where is nothing but a COLONY.
    MBS is a faggot where his behind is in the service of zionism by stealing billion of dollars from the people of Saudi Arabia and transferred it to zionist Jewish mafia thieves and Trump, a member.

    Those who have not gotten it should shut up and fuck off. Enough people in the world know and YOU cannot mislead the people, only dummies and the embedded journalists.

  8. Ace says:

    Mr. Barbara accurately describes the initial US plan, to bring down Assad and balkanize Syria as per the Israeli strategy of creating chaos in its immediate and distant neighborhood. Switching horses and backing the Kurds achieves the same purpose to roil the Syrian waters and deny the SAG the oil revenues from the eastern areas. Thus you witness the Kurds racing south to do the bidding of the US benefactors in acquiring control over the oil fields. The Kurds are now well out of their historic lands.

    Americans are wising up to the waste of \$32M an hour for our wars and the US backing for the Kurds will evaporate soon enough. The Syrians and Russians will do to the Kurds what they did to the jihadi scum if they persist in their notion of an autonomous Kurdistan.

  9. And somehow, no mention of the fact that ISIS in Syria was entirely a project of Barry the Kenyan and the murderous bitch Clinton.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr