The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
How Politicians Duck the Blame for Terrorism
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The capture of Salah Abdeslam, thought to be the sole surviving planner of the Paris massacre, means that the media is focusing once again on the threat of terrorist attack by Islamic State. Questions are asked about why the most wanted man in Europe was able to elude the police for so long, even though he was living in his home district of Molenbeek in Brussels. Television and newspapers ask nervously about the chances of Isis carrying out another atrocity aimed at dominating the news agenda and showing that it is still in business.

The reporting of the events in Brussels is in keeping with that after the January (Charlie Hebdo) and November Paris attacks and the Tunisian beach killings by Isis last year. For several days there is blanket coverage by the media as it allocates time and space far beyond what is needed to relate developments. But then the focus shifts abruptly elsewhere and Isis becomes yesterday’s story, treated as if the movement has ceased to exist or at least lost its capacity to affect our lives.

It is not as if Isis has stopped killing people in large numbers since the slaughter in Paris on 13 November; it is, rather, that it is not doing so in Europe. I was in Baghdad on 28 February when two Isissuicide bombers on motorcycles blew themselves up in an outdoor mobile phone market in Sadr City, killing 73 people and injuring more than 100. On the same day, dozens ofIsis fighters riding in pick-ups with heavy machine guns mounted in the back attacked army and police outposts in Abu Ghraib, site of the notorious prison on the western outskirts of Baghdad. There was an initial assault by at least four suicide bombers, one driving a vehicle packed with explosives into a barracks, and fighting went on for hours around a burning grain silo.

The outside world scarcely noticed these bloody events because they seem to be part of the natural order in Iraq and Syria. But the total number of Iraqis killed by these two attacks – and another double suicide bombing of a Shia mosque in the Shuala district of Baghdad four days earlier – was about the same as the 130 people who died in Paris at the hands of Isis last November.

There has always been a disconnect in the minds of people in Europe between the wars in Iraq and Syria and terrorist attacks against Europeans. This is in part because Baghdad and Damascus are exotic and frightening places, and pictures of the aftermath of bombings have been the norm since the US invasion of 2003. But there is a more insidious reason why Europeans do not sufficiently take on board the connection between the wars in the Middle East and the threat to their own security. Separating the two is much in the interests of Western political leaders, because it means that the public does not see that their disastrous policies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and beyond created the conditions for the rise of Isis and for terrorist gangs such as that to which Salah Abdeslam belonged.

The outpouring of official grief that commonly follows atrocities, such as the march of 40 world leaders through the streets of Paris after the Charlie Hebdo killings last year, helps neuter any idea that the political failures of these same leaders might be to a degree responsible for the slaughter. After all, such marches are usually held by the powerless to protest and show defiance, but in this case the march simply served as a publicity stunt to divert attention from these leaders’ inability to act effectively and stop the wars in the Middle East which they had done much to provoke.

A strange aspect of these conflicts is that Western leaders have never had to pay any political price for their role in initiating them or pursuing policies that effectively stoke the violence. Isis is a growing power in Libya, something that would not have happened had David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy not helped destroy the Libyan state by overthrowing Gaddafi in 2011. Al-Qaeda is expanding in Yemen, where Western leaders have given a free pass to Saudi Arabia to launch a bombing campaign that has wrecked the country.

After the Paris massacre last year there was a gush of emotional support for France and little criticism of French policies in Syria and Libya, although they have been to the advantage of Isis and other salafi-jihadi movements since 2011.

It is worth quoting at length Fabrice Balanche, the French cartographer and expert on Syria who now works for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, about these misperceptions in France, although they also apply to other countries. He told Aron Lund of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: “The media refused to see the Syrian revolt as anything other than the continuation of revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, at a time of enthusiasm over the Arab Spring. Journalists didn’t understand the sectarian subtleties in Syria, or perhaps they didn’t want to understand; I was censored many times.

“Syrian intellectuals in the opposition, many of whom had been in exile for decades, had a discourse similar to that of the Iraqi opposition during the US invasion of 2003. Some of them honestly confused their own hopes for a non-sectarian society with reality, but others – such as the Muslim Brotherhood – tried to obfuscate reality in order to gain the support of Western countries.

“In 2011–2012, we suffered a type of intellectual McCarthyism on the Syrian question: if you said that Assad was not about to fall within three months, you would be suspected of being paid by the Syrian regime. And with the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs having taken up the cause of the Syrian opposition, it would have been in bad taste to contradict its communiqués.”


By taking up the cause of the Syrian and Libyan opposition and destroying the Syrian and Libyan states, France and Britain opened the door to Isis and should share in the blame for the rise of Isis and terrorism in Europe. By refusing to admit to or learn from past mistakes, the West Europeans did little to lay the basis for the current, surprisingly successful “cessation of hostilities” in Syria which is almost entirely an US and Russian achievement.

Britain and France have stuck close to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies in their policies towards Syria. I asked a former negotiator why this was so and he crisply replied: “Money. They wanted Saudi contracts.” After the capture of Salah Abdeslam there is talk of security lapses that had allowed him to evade arrest for so long, but this is largely irrelevant as terrorist attacks will go on as long as Isis remains a power. Once again, the wall-to-wall media coverage is allowing Western governments to escape responsibility for a far worse security failure, which is their own disastrous policies.

Patrick Cockburn’s Chaos and Caliphate: Jihadis and the West in the Struggle for the Middle East (OR Books) is published this month

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: ISIS, Terrorism 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Parbes says:

    Great article by Patrick Cockburn; agree with it 100%.

  2. Rehmat says:

    Lol….another propaganda BS from Cockburn.

    ISIS was created by the US and Israel. Its so-called “Caliph”, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was born into a French Jewish family and was trained by Israel Mossad. Just make a Google search to find out the truth.

    Rothschild-owned Charlie Hebdo and attack on Paris Kosher store was an “inside Job” carried out by French internal security agency and Israeli Mossad.

    Despite French Zionist-controlled regime and Jewish Lobby Islam bashing, a new survey conducted by US-based PEW Research Center claimed on June 4, 2015 that “ratings of Muslims rise in France after Charlie Hebdo, just as in US after 9/11.”

    It seems a great majority of French like Americans have come to realize that in both cases, it was Israel that benefited the most over the expense of Muslims. Read here and here.

    The new Pew survey found that 76% of people in France say they have a “favorable view” of Muslims living in their country, similar to the 72% registered in 2014.

    • Replies: @biz
    , @No Second Israel
  3. biz says:

    LOL the Caliph of ISIS is a Jew now?? In your consanguineously defective brain the more someone hates Jews the more likely they are to be a Jew.

    But that would make you the king Jew wouldn’t it? Like some kind of super Jew.

    Logic demands it: Rehmat is a Jew!

    (For those who care, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is an Iraqi Arab born and raised with no connection to Jews or France:

    I know Rehmat, I know. Wikipedia is controlled by Talmudic scholars and the Guardian is a subsidiary of Sol’s Menswear Shop in Flatbush. But still.)

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  4. Shafiq says:

    ISIS claims to have thousands of operatives among the refugees already in Europe, and the US is admitting a number of refugees too; I would be very surprised if terrorists were not among them. The impeccable American logic that holds that the best way to fight fires is to douse them with petrol is going to send the chickens to NATO’s homelands to roost because their coops have burnt down.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  5. mtn cur says:

    Beginning when “the sun never set on the British empire,” our negligence in policing our own ruling class caused Abdul to confuse us with the gentry; thus, they are over here because we are over there.

  6. @Rehmat

    Excellent. Don’t trust Cockburn who spread the lies of the intelligence services of the west including Mossad. He is promoting partition of Syria and Iraq to erect ‘kurdistan’, to create a colony for Israel and the criminal west. Down with the criminal west and its agents.

  7. woodNfish says:

    I’ll repeat the question I have been asking for a while. When will the people responsible for this slaughter, and I am not talking about the terrorists, be held responsible?

  8. Rehmat says:

    Calm down Zionist idiot and read some objective news source than your Israeli filth ‘Wikipedia’.

    Yes al-Baghadai is as much a Jew as you’re – except he is smarter than you.

    • Replies: @biz
  9. Rehmat says:

    Netanyahu has pleaded thousands of Jews living in Europe and Latin America. I’m not surprised if many of them are not Mossad’s “sleeping cells”, who are involved in terrorism in various European and Latin American nations in order to spread ‘Islamophobia’ there.

    In January 2015, while Turkey’s prime minister Ahmet Davutoglo, PhD, attended the anti-Muslim PR rally in Paris, the longtime (since 1994) Mayor of Turkey’s capital Ankara Ibrahim Melih Goksek, 66, had accused Israeli Mossad of masterminding terror attacks in Paris which left 17 people dead including a Muslim police officer.

    Goksek claimed that Mossad carried out attacks on the notorious satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo office and Kosher Grocery store in retaliation for French support for Palestinian cause.

  10. Rehmat says:

    On Tuesday, CIA and Mossad agents exploded at least five bombs in Brussels – two at Brussels Airport, and 3 separate bombs at Metro Stations downtown (watch below). This came days after Paris Friday the 13th False Flag patsy Salah Abdeslam, 26, a French Muslim got arrested in Brussels on Friday.

    The western press has reported that 31 people died and 250 injured as result of the bombing. No arrest has been made, but search for some Muslim pasty is in progress.

    Crypto-Jew Murdoch’s CNN has claimed that ISIS took responsibility of the attack. CNN could be right as ISIS is headed by Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi who was born to a French Jewish couple and received military training from Israeli Mossad.

    On April 22, Jewish propaganda website Politico claimed that according to an ‘anonymous Belgium official’ Salah Abdeslam, was “supposed to have taken part in the bomb attacks that hit Belgium capital on Tuesday.” In other words, Belgium security agency failed to stop Tuesday terrorist attacks while it had the “mastermind” in its custody!

    There are nearly 600,000 Muslims among Belgium’s total population of 11.2 million. But that’s to many Muslims for the Organized Jewry that has turned it into a nation of paranoid.

    In 2012, a Belgian lawmaker Filip DeWinter claimed that Belgium soon would turned into an Islamic State.

  11. biz says:

    Shut up Jew. I already proved, by your own admission, that you are a Jew.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr