The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Will Joe Repudiate His Segregationist Friends?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Apologize for what? Cory should apologize. He knows better. There’s not a racist bone in my body.”

Thus did a stung Joe Biden answer rival Cory Booker’s demand he apologize for telling contributors, in a southern drawl, “I was in a caucus with James O. Eastland, He never called me ‘boy.’ He always called me ‘son.”

Joe was recalling fondly a time in the 1970s when he came into the Senate at 30, having lost his wife and child in an accident, and “Jim” Eastland, the arch-segregationist from Mississippi, took him under his wing and became a patron, mentor and friend.

“You don’t joke about calling black men ‘boy’,” Booker had said. “Biden’s relationships with proud segregationists are not the model for how we make America a safer and more inclusive place for black people.”

Kamala Harris piled on: If Biden’s segregationist friends “had their way … I wouldn’t be in the United States Senate.”

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted a photo of his black wife and two children, saying, “Eastland thought my multiracial family should be illegal & that whites were entitled to ‘the pursuit of dead n—–s.'”

Said The Washington Post, “(Biden’s) history of collegiality with racists is being seen by many in his party as a reason to question his judgment — and not, as Biden says, a sign of his civility.”

This portends a coming clash over race inside the Democratic Party in 2019 and perhaps 2020. For Joe is bleeding and his rivals can see in his segregationist friends of yesterday a way to peel off the black support crucial to his nomination.

Biden is about to have his nose rubbed in friendships formed almost half a century ago.

Like reparations for slavery, on which hearings have opened in the House, this issue seems certain to arise in the debates next week, where taking down Biden will be an objective of every other candidate.

And Jim Eastland is not the only segregationist friend Joe had.

Joe called Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who conducted the longest filibuster in history against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, “one of my closest friends,” and delivered a eulogy at Strom’s funeral.

When Joe backed an anti-busing amendment in the 1970s, Sen. Jesse Helms, on the Senate floor, welcomed him to the “ranks of the enlightened.” On leaving the Senate for the vice presidency in 2009, Biden spoke of his “close personal relationships” with “Eastland, Stennis, Thurmond … all these men became my friends.”

Those three Senators all signed the Southern Manifesto pledging “massive resistance” to desegregation of the public schools mandated by the Brown decision of 1954. All three opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, enacted after bloody Sunday at Selma Bridge.

Asked her views on Biden’s remarks, Elizabeth Warren joined the attack: “It’s never OK to celebrate segregationists. Never.”

But if that is the new Warren Rule in Democratic politics, it may be hard to maintain. For the Democratic Party, the oldest party on earth, was from its founding to the final third of the 20th century, the bastion of slavery, secession and segregation.

Jim Crow voted a straight Democratic ticket.

Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, founding fathers of the party, were slave owners, as were James Madison and James Monroe, who succeeded Jefferson in the White House. And so were John Tyler and James K. Polk, who succeeded them.

ORDER IT NOW

Washington, a slave owner, was the Father of our Country and gave us our independence and a new nation from the Atlantic to the Mississippi. Jefferson executed the Louisiana Purchase. Jackson seized Florida. Tyler annexed Texas. Polk got us the Southwest, California and clear title to Washington and Oregon. All were slave owners — and also the Democrats who gave America almost all of her land and frontiers.

The first Democratic president of the 20th century, Woodrow Wilson, restored segregation to the U.S. government. The second, FDR, chose a segregationist vice president, “Cactus Jack” Garner, put a Klansman, Hugo Black, on the Supreme Court, and, with Wilson, carried all 11 segregated states of the Old Confederacy, all six times they ran.

To hold a segregated South against Eisenhower in 1952, liberal Adlai Stevenson continued the Southern strategy by putting on his ticket John Sparkman of Alabama. Returning to the Senate after Adlai’s defeat, Sparkman signed the Dixie Manifesto and opposed the civil rights acts of both 1964 and 1965.

On his second run for the presidency over a decade ago, Joe Biden joked of his home state: “Delaware … was a slave state that fought beside the North. That’s only because we couldn’t figure out how to get to the South. There were a couple of states in the way.”

The Warren Rule notwithstanding, Southern segregationists remain honored today. The Old Senate Office Building was renamed in 1972 for Sen. Richard Russell of Georgia and John C. Stennis of Mississippi.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2019 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2020 Election, Democratic Party, Joe Biden 
Hide 55 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Mr. Buchanan, gleefully p*ss*ng into the Blue tent, probably doesn’t realize that he is also patronizing black people. I’m surprised that, here on Juneteenth+1, he didn’t mention that is was the GOP’s Father Abraham who freed the (Confederate) slaves.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  2. @anonymous

    Sorry if I’m being dumb but I don’t follow you. Why do you think Buchanan is patronizing blacks?
    You’re right that he’s trying to embarrass the Dems though his main motive is to drive Biden out of the race to the benefit of Donald Trump.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @follyofwar
    , @TTSSYF
  3. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @jack daniels

    The patronizing assumption is that black people are of one (simple) mind and will vote for whoever they think is the least “racist.” The same divide & conquer tactics have increasingly been used on voters who politicians appeal to on the basis of, e.g., their sexual preferences, generally known as “identity politics.” My cautious belief is that people increasingly see these cynics — including Mr. Buchanan — for what they are: a corrupt ruling class that thinks of Americans as tax aphids and cannon fodder who need only be engaged when its time for the next Most Important Election Ever.

  4. “It’s never OK to celebrate [white] segregationists. Never.” -Elizabeth Warren.

    It’s always OK to celebrate Jewish segregationists. Always. -all prominent US politicians and all owners of elite American news and entertainment media.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    , @TTSSYF
  5. ” For the Democratic Party, the oldest party on earth, was from its founding to the final third of the 20th century, the bastion of slavery, secession and segregation.”

    Oh, shit. Pat has discovered Dinesh D’Souza. He forgot that he’s a member of the SCV, apparently.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  6. SafeNow says:

    This is more a practical than moral issue. Whichever candidate appears to be able to deliver the most goodies will win the Black vote. If Biden boasts he can work well with anti-Black legislators, that suggests he would curtail the goodies to placate them.

  7. Kamala Harris piled on: If Biden’s segregationist friends “had their way … I wouldn’t be in the United States Senate.”

    I dunno … the segregationists didn’t seem to do a very good job of keeping her Tamil mother and Jamaican descendant of slave-traders father from immigrating to the US in the early ’60s, not to mention tens of millions of other brown people, so Kamala in the Senate seems almost inevitable.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  8. swamped says:

    “Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, founding fathers of the party, were slave owners, as were James Madison and James Monroe, who succeeded Jefferson in the White House. And so were John Tyler and James K. Polk, who succeeded them”…and so was Pat Buchanan’s great-grandfather whose final resting place in Tupelo, MS has been celebrated with flowers from the honoring hand of Mr. Buchanan himself ; who boasted of his Confederate ancestors as being “troublemakers and rabid secessionists”. If only Delaware didn’t have two states in the way, Joe Biden might have followed such an example. And then maybe, instead of being Obama’s VP, Biden could have been Pat’s running mate when he ran for the presidency himself for the third time as the candidate of the Reform Party in 2000, on a platform which included the plank: “Reverse discrimination – by quota, contract set-aside, busing, affirmative action – is un- American. We need to outlaw the federal classification of American citizens by race or ethnicity, and end all discrimination and all preferential treatment.” Something both Mr. Buchanan & Mr. Biden should be able to agree on. So what’s the problem?

  9. anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    “Democrats are the real raycissts.” -Things Cuckservatives Say

  10. RVBlake says:

    I don’t give a shit about Wilson’s and FDR’s segregationist acts…I hold against them their willingness to slaughter thousands of working class Whites in two unnecessary European world wars.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  11. Elizabeth Warren is one of the few candidates to at least attempt to check corporate power. I’d like to like her. But, as with remark above, she can’t resist any chance to play the asinine PC scold. As with Biden himself, who seems willing to overrule himself whenever it seems electorally desirable, her ambition should be made of sterner stuff.

  12. “Democrats are the real racists.”

    Time to retire, Pat.

  13. @jack daniels

    Buchanan has no ability to drive Biden out of the race. The other democrats, led by the pretenders running for the nation’s highest office, are doing quite a good job of that themselves. And I’m lovin’ every minute watching these radicals implode their politically correct party.

  14. Last night Tucker Carlson opined that Biden’s past will eventually force him out of the race. With his aging body and deteriorating mind, as well as his creepy penchant for touching young girls and women in public, Uncle Joe will have to spend all his time trying to justify his long 50 year career in public life, as he is forced to retreat from his former positions, as he endlessly apologizes. But his apologizes will never be accepted by those hell bent on destroying what’s left of the Constitutional Republic. Old Joe does not realize that his radical left party, obsessed with identity politics, has left him, an old white man, behind.

  15. Rich says:

    What ever happened to those great men of the South? Men like Thurmond, Helms and Eastland mentioned here? Where are the greats like Maddox, Wallace and Faubus? These great men saw what was coming, warned us and fought to save us. Everything they predicted has come true, and even worse. These guys, these great segregationists, were prophets, and like that old biblical saying “no prophet is accepted in his own country.”, weren’t heeded. It’s a shame, a real shame people didn’t listen to these guys.

  16. Zionists are segregationists.

    Gentrifiers are soft segregationists.

    They get away with everything.

  17. MarkinLA says:

    Kamala Harris piled on: If Biden’s segregationist friends “had their way … I wouldn’t be in the United States Senate.”

    Given her obvious mediocrity, shouldn’t we be lamenting that they weren’t better segregationists?

  18. MarkinLA says:
    @anonymous

    The patronizing assumption is that black people are of one (simple) mind and will vote for whoever they think is the least “racist.”

    Well, when it works 90% of the time, I think it is safe to assume it in all cases. How many times on TV has some black barked out nonsense about Trump’s “racism” without providing anything of substance? How many times have people with MAGA hats been attacked by blacks for Trump’s supposed racism?

  19. @anonymous

    They are of simple politics, if you wheel. Polls all over the world show that they tend to vote in blocks.
    Which is why the best the GOP can hope for minorities is that nationalist populism works, and yet that it does not bleed into segregation (I know unzers, sorry but it is not a redpill country yet), thus winning enough them over.
    After all, with Trump, the party have had its highest minority vote in a while. does not mean this platform will win them all instantly, or even ever reach a plurality of them. just that when policies work, eventually just enough votes will be won to tip the paradigms.
    And, not only are white votes more important numbers-wise, but national populism drags in both traditionalist and/or wealthy minorities that usually dislike Dems before turning Republican; it does not work the other way around, as pandering to liberalism only signals to them that we are just like Dems but white and rich. In fact, emphasize the nationalist populism a bit more*, and the ridiculous antiwhite divisiveness of the left, and blacks and Hispanics won’t mind if whites keep their property to themselves.

    *(Infrastructure including the wall, some optional public healthcare, some bettering of labor laws, some squashing of high interest for students, some deregulation of zoning so ghettos can be built up easier by their own people, some one time investment in their schools/neighborhoods and call it “reparations”, some taxes on Wall Street and underused/tourism real estate, exercise and low carb diet programs in schools to kill off obesity and diabetes – these affect minorities more, etc. Pretty much stuff we can all agree and benefit from. And oh yeah cut corporate tax or less to like 10% while keeping tariffs up, to fund it all; some of these lessons we could learn from Orban’s Hungary, budgetwise doing terrific and even propping up births.)

  20. @SafeNow

    Yeah, I think commentators here need to brush up on campaign tactics again, and Buchananite ones in particular. He worked with all those segregationists and several more, so he’s not denouncing them. Rather kicking the Dem’s hornet nest. And maybe, just maybe, illuminating some.

  21. @swamped

    The US desperately needs a bunch of elites to lose the fear and put up enough millions and think tanks on a nationalist-populist third party for real.
    All the grassroots does is keep trying to subvert present institutions, and while Trump was a good try, it might not be enough. The Machines keep squashing them.

  22. @Rich

    Bet you will see in the coming years calls for damnatio memoriae of these men, from the AOC following.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  23. @Rich

    They are American equivalents of Enoch Powell, although perhaps less erudite and eloquent. Like him they will be reviled more each time their prophecies prove true.

  24. @Disordered Deacon (forgets fake emails)

    The Old Senate Office Building was renamed in 1972 for Sen. Richard Russell of Georgia and John C. Stennis of Mississippi.

    That will change soon enough–any bets on which “minority” will get their name on the building?

    Future archaeologists will never figure out that whites used to live here. 🙁

    • Replies: @SafeNow
  25. @Tono Bungay

    not to mention she was always corporate anyway, another hypocritical Northeasterner Wasp lady trying to make up for her guilt over her privilege, and who was also aspirationist enough to cheat by claiming native ancestry.
    heck, this latter fact is the reason why she will double down on the PC schoolmarm crap, she has to deny to her following that she was effectively a white supremacist cheater like that evil Becky with the good hair Lori Loughlin [/sarcasm].
    Dems cannot save us… sadly because, the Chamber of Commerce needs a counterbalance.

  26. KenH says:

    Kamala Harris piled on: If Biden’s segregationist friends “had their way … I wouldn’t be in the United States Senate.”

    That’s right!! If not for the 1965 immigration act white Americans wouldn’t be bothered with people like Kamala Harris and we’d be a sane nation instead of the third world flophouse and insane asylum that we’ve become.

    Asked her views on Biden’s remarks, Elizabeth Warren joined the attack: “It’s never OK to celebrate segregationists. Never.”

    Unless they are Jewish, congoid American or Latino. Then it’s ok, necessary, noble and “progress”.

    The opinions of those old and dastardly segregationists were prescient and prophetic. Blacks and whites loathe each other more than ever before because familiarity does breed contempt. Countless white towns, neighborhoods and schools have been destroyed. It’s created a vast number of pitiable mongrels who aren’t accepted be either race and who generally hate whites. Barrack Obama is a great example. We’re constantly teetering on race war and the Constitution and our way of life has been turned on its head to placate the surly and ungrateful negro, but to no avail.

    Trump has proven to be just as clueless and incompetent as all his Republican predecessors who thought that tax cuts, set asides and butt kissing would win the hearts and minds of congoid Americans. It failed then and it’s failing now under president MIGA. It’s time to separate.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  27. KenH says:

    The recent hit pieces on Biden lead me to think that (((they))) have some misgivings about old Joe the nude swimmer since he exhibited common sense on race decades ago. Even though he insists he was wrong and has been reborn as a social justice warrior our yiddish overlords just ain’t buying it.

    I believe they want Kamala and are trying to the clear the two grumpy old white men in her path. We haven’t seen any hit pieces on Kamala and this reminds me of 2007 and 2008 where almost all news stories about Hussein Obama were laudatory and how women were fainting in his otherworldly presence.

    As a brown female Kamala can be trusted to stick it to whitey, his guns and his constitution, much more so than Joe or Bernie.

    About the only way Joe can redeem himself for his past sins is to vow to kill off half of the white population if elected president.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @TTSSYF
  28. El Dato says:
    @RVBlake

    Actually only the Great War was European.

  29. The patronizing assumption is that black people are of one (simple) mind and will vote for whoever they think is the least “racist.”

    That’s right. Black people vigorously analyze the issues and the candidate’s positions, then pull the D lever.

  30. SafeNow says:
    @Justvisiting

    “Future archaeologists will never figure out that whites used to live here”

    LOL. Except that whites will still be around flying the planes (Unless future planes are all grounded because no one in Idiotocracy can figure out how to build them anymore.)

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  31. And when will Trump “repudiate” his Israel-first/America-last friends Pat?

    More importantly, when will you cite these traitors – directly and on-the-record (as you once used to)?

  32. Behold Pat, the wonderful “friends” of your dear leader drumpf.

    Here are the “brave” Saudis (although less brave than when it’s 10-on-1 with bonesaws in hand):

    Saudi intelligence chief lobbies London for strikes against Iran: UK source

    Then of course, there’s every one’s favourite nuclear rogue lecturing “the world community” on what to do with an actual memeber of the NPT who doesn’t have nukes:

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the international community should reinstate sanctions if Iran follows through on its threats to step up uranium enrichment.

    What a bunch of shysters and grifters.

  33. @KenH

    Few things these puny, gutless dumbocrats did disgusted me more than, when speaking before some type of black group, Shyster Sharpton stood right next to them while (in intimidation) he asked each if they supported reparations. I know that at least Bernie, Kamala, Mayor Pete, Warren, and clueless Beto said they would. There were probably more. When the country was 80% white no sane candidate running for POTUS would have answered in the affirmative. Now they do so with abandon, believing that whites will still vote for them, and it won’t hurt them at the polls. Sadly, they are probably right.

  34. @SafeNow

    Those planes will have crashed due to lack of spare parts/maintenance and their remains will be the basis of multiple cargo cults. 🙁

  35. @KenH

    If they think they can win with Kamala then they are dumber than I think they are. I can’t think of a more unlikeable (w)itch. I could be way off base, but I believe the more people get to know her, the more they will dislike her. Will blacks still support her once they find out she’s married to a rich white Jew? Her own university professor Jamaican father struck back at her when she said she smoked dope because that’s what Jamaicans do. Even Queen Hillary is less unlikeable.

  36. @anonymous

    I’m confused by your confusion.

    First you say there is a “patronizing assumption is that black people are of one (simple) mind” but then you say that to make that assumption is to “divide & conquer”.

    So which is it? People of one mind or people divided and conquered?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  37. @mark green

    “It’s never OK to celebrate [white] segregationists. Never.” -Elizabeth Warren.

    Why not?

    And it’s never OK to question Elizabeth Warren. Never.

    • Replies: @mark green
  38. TGD says:

    Joe Biden was born and spent his formative years in Scranton. The Lackawanna and Wyoming Valleys (NEPA) at that time were 99.9% white, a mix of the original WASP settlers from New England and various Slavic and southern European groups plus the Welsh and Irish. In the 1950s, migrating southern Blacks bypassed the area because unemployment was very high. The anthracite mining industry was in a steep decline due to the replacement of coal fired boilers with fuel oil. There was a huge out migration of people seeking work in the booming areas of surrounding states. Among those economic migrants was Joe Biden’s father.

    I wonder if Biden harbors a deep seated longing for those good old NEPA days?

  39. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @ThreeCranes

    I may be confused by your question.

    I believe the assumptions about black people and other identity groups that inform the ruling class strategy of “divide & conquer” to be both patronizing and increasingly incorrect as the tactics (e.g., the currently proposed reparations) become more extreme and absurd. But Mr. Buchanan’s attempt to exploit the foolishness will likewise be seen as patronizing, a variation of the “Democrats are the real racists” theme.

    The truth is that neither the Red or Blue teams cares much at all about black people, white people, brown people, LGBTQ people, or anyone but themselves and those whose interests they are well paid to serve.

  40. @ThreeCranes

    I meant that comment to be a criticism of Eliz Warren’s political double-standards.

    Like all the elite US candidates and media lords, Warren loudly disapproves of any expression of white advocacy or any assertive manifestation of White identity; including the right of Whites to non-violently self-segregate.

    Meanwhile, Warren and our political/media establishment unconditionally support Israel’s right to discriminate and impose supremacist policies upon non-Jews. These devious double-standards undermine the bedrock principle of Equal Treatment Under Law. They are a political cancer.

  41. TTSSYF says:
    @anonymous

    It’s not patronizing to note the fact that about 90% of blacks vote for Democrats. It is merely noting a fact. If black Americans don’t want to have sweeping generalizations made about them by people whose business it is to make sweeping generalizations (i.e., politicians, marketers, polling organizations, etc.), then they will have to exhibit something other than a herd mentality and not vote en masse for Dems. For people in the business of identifying patterns of behavior, it’s a numbers game. It has nothing to do with being patronizing.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  42. TTSSYF says:
    @jack daniels

    I don’t agree that he’s trying to drive Biden out of the race. I think powerful people in the DNC don’t want him to be the nominee and are attempting to drive him out of the race.

  43. TTSSYF says:
    @mark green

    That comment of Warren’s and other Dems is why I despise Dems, especially the ones on the national stage. He wasn’t “celebrating white segregationists”. He was merely stating that he was able to work with them in a cordial manner.

    It’s a shame to me that we can’t have a national dialog about past events with any degree of maturity, perspective, or nuance. Even when they know better, our political leaders — primarily on the political Left — purposely inflame passions by feigning shock and horror and deliberately distorting what is being expressed. Biden himself is no better with his “…they gonna put y’all back in chains” comment.

  44. TTSSYF says:
    @Twodees Partain

    To what purpose do you put forth such crudity and pseudo-intellectual snark?

  45. TTSSYF says:
    @KenH

    Not sure about their having settled on Kamala, but I agree that some powerful individuals in the DNC and their enablers and fellow travelers in the media are trying to take Biden out.

  46. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @TTSSYF

    Anyone who votes to fill a national office in the belief that the candidate cares primarily about ordinary Americans has been successfully patronized. Such would be “public servants” are unicorns who don’t make the November ballot.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  47. J1234 says:

    Will Joe Repudiate His Segregationist Friends?

    An interesting question. A more interesting question would be: “Will Cory Booker or Kamala Harris (or Joe Biden) repudiate the endorsement they will almost certainly receive from the Communist Party USA, should they receive the nomination from the Democratic party?”

    I wonder about this because it’s my understanding that the Communist Party USA is the only political organization outlawed by an act of Congress in the history of the United States. Outlawed, not because McCarthy hated communists, but because the CPUSA facilitated acts of espionage against the US on behalf of it’s greatest enemy ever, the Soviet Union. And an even more interesting question would be: “Will even one journalist from ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN or PBS ask them to repudiate official endorsement from the CPUSA?”

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  48. TTSSYF says:
    @anonymous

    So now we’re all patronized, especially those of us who assign good intentions to those we vote for. Then why do you specifically identify black Americans as being patronized? Are you patronizing them by concluding that they are being especially patronized? And what would you recommend for all of us dupes who naively vote for politicians who appear to have good motives? Stay home and rail against the system?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  49. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @TTSSYF

    {sorry, looks like I hit the general REPLY button}

    My answers to your three questions:

    1, 2. Black people are the politically ID’d group selected by Mr. Buchanan — not by me — for his column. How can I make my comments clearer that, in my opinion, they’re only more obviously patronized than others?

    3. Yes, I urge you to consider joining those of us who believe that voting serves only to insulate the ruling class by channeling and periodically blowing off dissent.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  50. TTSSYF says:
    @anonymous

    There’s no reason to conclude that black people are being any more patronized than any other group, just because they happen to have been mentioned in Buchanan’s column. But it seems to me that you leap to that conclusion because you know they vote like a herd but you don’t like anyone noticing it.

    Why don’t you encourage blacks to drop out and not vote? Oh, but that would be “voter suppression” of the worst kind. I have a better idea: Traditionalist white people should start voting as a herd while we’re still more than 50% of the population.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  51. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @TTSSYF

    So now you want to turn me into, I guess, some cartoon leftist advocate for black people?

    This has become a waste of our time. You’re either arguing in bad faith or unable to consider what I’ve said.

    Go ahead, go tribal, go vote — and change not a thing.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  52. TTSSYF says:
    @anonymous

    I don’t want to turn you into anything. It’s you who seems to talk in circles, saying first that black people are patronized, then saying we’re all being patronized (but that blacks are more patronized than the rest of us, who are casting votes for unicorns), then recommending that I and others sit out voting but, after saying that, taking offense when I inquire as to why you don’t advocate that that most patronized group of all — black people — abstain from voting. You talk in complete circles with no coherent point, other than that you think we’re all being patronized but that black people are singled out for the most patronizing. If you make a coherent point, other than just generalized whining, I might have a better chance of understanding where you’re coming from.

  53. @The Alarmist

    She is in the Senate because Willie Brown “had his way!”😉😉

  54. @J1234

    Scratch the CPUSA and you get the FBI:
    https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/167878

    Once you enter that rabbit hole you can start asking interesting questions about Presidential candidates and their CPUSA affiliations.

    The old John Birchers explained it correctly: “Pressure from above, pressure from below.”

    The Deep State manipulates the left and right–so every primary and election is “win, win”.

  55. California has moved its primary up to March. California is now only six percent Black. They may not realize it yet, but Blacks are no longer selecting the Democratic candidate.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?