The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Who Owns the Future? Dems or GOP?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

For Republicans, the returns were mixed on Nov. 3.

Though he carried burdens unrivaled by a president since Herbert Hoover — a plague that has killed 230,000 Americans in eight months and crashed the economy to depths not seen since the ’30s – Donald J. Trump amassed 72 million votes, the largest total in Republican Party history.

And while he lost the popular vote, Trump held off the predicted “blue wave.” He added seats in the House, a feat rivaling that of Richard Nixon, who added 22 GOP House seats while losing to JFK in 1960. And with Trump at the top of the GOP ticket, the Senate remained Republican.

Even Joe Biden’s 5 million vote margin was a tribute to Trump, who brought out friends and foes in astounding numbers, while Biden sheltered in place in his Wilmington basement reading cliches from his teleprompter.

Democrats, however, had great successes as well, reconstructing their “blue wall,” by winning all 18 states they had won in each of the presidential elections from 1992 through 2012.

Of what does the blue wall consist? All six New England states, save New Hampshire; New York, New Jersey and the mid-Atlantic states of Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland; the Middle America quadrant of Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota; and the Pacific Coast states of California, Oregon and Washington.

Not only did Biden rebuild that blue wall, he also added New Hampshire and Virginia, thereby carrying every state that touches the Atlantic from Maine to North Carolina.

Democrats gained ground in the Republican heartland as well.

Where Nixon in 1972 and Reagan in 1984 swept all 11 states of the Old Confederacy — as did Woodrow Wilson and FDR in the days of Dixiecrat segregation — the GOP mega-states of Florida and Texas became visibly competitive. North Carolina and Georgia are becoming toss-ups. And Virginia, capital of the Confederacy, where they now tear down statues of Robert E. Lee, is closer to blue.

The existential GOP problem? The party has lost the popular vote in seven of the last eight presidential elections. Consistent and growing popular vote majorities for Democrats must one day translate into consistent and permanent electoral vote majorities.

Democrats remain today the minorities’ party and Republicans the party of America’s white majority. White folks are roughly 60% of the U.S. population, though closer to 70% of the electorate. Both those figures, however, are slowly and steadily falling.

Demography is still destiny.

Republicans are going to have to grow their share of the white vote and their share of the Hispanic, Black and Asian vote or their future will begin to look like California today, where the Grand Old Party does not hold a single statewide office.

There are other presently insoluble problems for the GOP.

ORDER IT NOW

Democrats are the party of government and Republicans the party of the private sector. But the number of Americans who depend on federal programs — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, student loans, housing subsidies, Earned Income Tax Credits, affirmative action — is growing, while the share of the population that contributes most to the programs is shrinking.

The top 1% of the population in income pays more taxes than the bottom 90%. The top 50% of the population pays 97% of the income taxes, while the bottom 50% pays only 3%.

If people who receive a cornucopia of benefits pay no income taxes, then why would they vote against a party that promises them still more benefits, to be paid for by raising the income taxes of someone else?

As John C. Calhoun declaimed on the roots of democratic class warfare,

“The necessary result… of the unequal fiscal action of the government is, to divide the community into two great classes; one consisting of those who… pay the taxes, and… bear exclusively the burthen of supporting the government; and the other, of those who are the recipients of their proceeds, through disbursements, and who are… supported by the government; or, in fewer words, to divide it into tax-payers and tax-consumers.”

Who owns the future?

If Democrats can kill the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court, if they can add four new senators from Puerto Rico and D.C., and if they can pack the electorate by turning millions of migrants, legal and illegal, into U.S. citizens and regular voters, then you don’t need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.

Yet, as seen in California, conservatism is not dead:

On Nov. 3, Californians came out to crush Proposition 16, an attempt by leftists to cut out of the state constitution a provision that forbids racial or gender discrimination in public employment, education and contracting. The margin of defeat for Prop 16 was 56% to 44%.

The left’s appeal to diversity, and affirmative action to achieve it, was rejected by a majority of voters who put first their belief in the idea of race neutrality.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2020 Creators.com.

 
Hide 59 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The future? Nicky Boy?

    NICK FUENTES GIVES ANOTHER SPEECH AT HIS #STOPTHESTEAL RALLY IN LANSING, MI


  2. Anon[238] • Disclaimer says:

    Yet, as seen in California, conservatism is not dead: On Nov. 3, Californians came out to crush Proposition 16

    That wasn’t a victory for race-blind conservatism. Asians, Hispanics, and some Whites interpreted that proposition as a giveaway to blacks, so they voted against it. Doesn’t mean the GOP is winning an election there anytime soon. The democrat coalition is held together through racist dogwhistling against middle-class and poor Whites. That dynamic isn’t changing at any point in the near future, even if occasionally coalition members look out for their own interests along purely tribal grounds.

    Frankly, the GOP is doomed. It’s not even clear the republicans have retained the Senate. If both republicans lose their runoff elections in Georgia, it’s game over. That state will be solidly blue by 2024, just like Virginia. Texas and North Carolina will go with Georgia and no republican president or federal judge will gain office again. You were warned for decades. So much for “natural conservatives” and “the most legal immigrants in history” and we must “staple a greencard to every immigrant” (Lindsey Graham). Even South Carolina will become a purple state by 2030, and then solidly blue by 2035.

    The writing was already on the wall by 2016. That was the real reason for #NeverTrump. Unscrupulous republican social climbers felt which way the wind was blowing and jumped ship to the other side. On their way out, they loudly advertised their new loyalties to the other side so they could get comfy jobs and social cred with them. Example: both William Krystol and Bush lackey Nicole Wallace left the republican party. The latter has a nice gig on MSNBC where she repeats democrat party talking points. The former has appeared on MSNBC multiple times to denounce Donald Trump. There are rumors neocon Dick Cheney could be up for a job in the Biden Administration. I’m sure Krystol and other neocons will follow suit, rewarded for loudly voicing their new loyalties.

    [MORE]

    I remember back when conservatives were bragging about Georgia “growing.” “Look how much we’re growing.” Reality: filling up with non-republicans. Frankly, that demographic is hopeless. They’re selfish, inconsiderate, low-information, gullible, simpletons who just wanna grill and chill.

    “We’re growing, so now I can grill cheaper. I don’t have to mow my own grass anymore. Yay! …. Hey, why does my neighborhood look like Juarez now? Why is my daughter dating a guy named Trayvelous? I have to speak Spanish to get a job these days? Why are all the churches being replaced with mosques? Why does nothing work around here anymore, even the power grid? And why do all my new section 8 neighbors say I have White privilege and White Fragility and denounce me for the male gaze? Why do they say I should be reeducated and write how my state should be carpetbombed for White supremacy on Twitter? I don’t understand this? Isn’t grilling and boating cheaper than ever? Didn’t Donald Trump win the black vote? Lowest black unemployment, ya’ll. The Constitution. And … uh, liberty!”

    • Replies: @Derer
    , @USA1943
  3. The title

    Who Owns the Future? Dems or GOP?

    confirms Mr. Buchanan’s role: sentry of the Right boundary of the Establishment’s bicolor Beltway politics.

    Consider.

    Why does a Team Red cheerleader write another Trump eulogy, making no mention of the possibility of different outcomes due to ongoing challenges in several “Blue Wall” states? He sounds like an old jock in a tight suit on ESPN, dissecting the last game and talking about the next.

    Because the system he serves needs enough people voting as though it mattered to them, their participatory assent channeling and harmlessly blowing off dissent. And that level of gullibility is threatened by a wider realization that “our” democracy may not be as legitimate as those in Crimea, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and whatever other unExceptional! places need more light from Shining City.

    The sheep need to wait for the next Most Important Election Ever, getting their hopes back up with the guidance of cliche* pundits like Mr. Palaverconservative.

    ———

    *Intern Watch: “you don’t need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing” doesn’t sound like Mr. Buchanan.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @onebornfree
  4. @Priss Factor

    Is that the fellow who bottoms for Catboy Kami? Normiecons and Plan Trusters always get led by homosexuals, it’s like clockwork.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  5. Emslander says:

    No system of taxation can collect the amount of revenue necessary to cover all the payoffs that keeps the Deep State in operation. Reality, in the form of debt service, will soon kick in and destroy the nation.

  6. Sigh, Pat’s at it again. There was no such thing as income tax when slaveholder John C. Calhoun made the remark he quotes (although the term “consumer” is an oddly modern anachronism for a statement that right wing sites claim was made in 1850, or ’49). The federal government supported itself by “imposts”, duties on imported goods and sales of certain commodities. Calhoun was so enamored of Mammon that when Washington enacted a modest protective tariff, he was ready to take his home state of South Carolina out of the Union – in 1832, a generation before the attack on Sumter.

    On the other hand, a few years earlier, in 1811, former President Thomas Jefferson proposed a national, federal tax on excessive private wealth such that “…the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings.”

    Before that, Founder Samuel Adams proposed a cap on individual wealth. In a 1743 newspaper article he wrote, “As Liberty can never subsist without Equality, nor Equality be long preserved without an Agrarian law, or something like it [limiting the amount of property an individual can own], so when Men’s Riches are become immeasurably and surprisingly great, a People who regard their own Security ought to make strict Enquiry how they came by them, and oblige them to take down their own Size, for fear of TERRIFYING THE COMMUNITY, OR MASTERING IT.” (emphasis in the original).

  7. @Observator

    And here you are, triggered by anything that might tarnish Father Abraham and other saviors of The Union.

    Is this

    the attack on Sumter

    replacing your repeated but never substantiated spin that Mr. Lincoln only wanted to recover the mints that were “federal assets”?

  8. h5mind says:

    “Lost the popular vote”? Isn’t that exactly what all the sworn affidavits, and lawsuits are looking to resolve? This sounds strikingly similar to the claims in 2016 when Hillary “won” the popular vote.

  9. Realist says:

    Who Owns the Future? Dems or GOP?

    Neither…as of now the Deep State does.

  10. A123 says:

    Judeo-Christian Populism owns the future. If the GOP stands with Trump, they win.

    The Islamic Globalist DNC will have little chance at opposing Jesus in favor of their Anti-Christ Muhammad.

    PEACE 😇

    • Disagree: GomezAdddams
  11. @Greta Handel

    “The Next Most Important Election Ever.” Hmm? Where have I heard that one before?

    Seems that in just about every prior Buchanan column, at least up until recently, a commenter who went by the handle of “Anonymous 245” had repeatedly used that phrase. I wonder, Greta, have you plagiarized that term for your own, or are you perhaps one and the same person? Inquiring minds want to know.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  12. There is something rotten in Denmark when a lawless Democrat Senate majority, along with a potus of the same party, can, of their own volition, add more states to the Union. I thought there was, but apparently there is nothing in the Constitution which prohibits the District of Columbia (the key word should be district) from becoming its own city-state. If DC can become its own city-state, then why not NYC or LA? Why not just return DC to Maryland? Problem solved.

    To me, this seems so wrong on so many levels. Why do existing states have no say in the matter, as they do in passing an Amendment to the Constitution? Heritage America should not live in fear of an out-of-control democrat government, which can cement its permanent control on power by just adding two new states. Just imagine the enormous power of Queen Kamala if the Senate winds up 50-50? We are doomed if this is allowed to take place.

    • Replies: @Drapetomaniac
  13. @follyofwar

    Maybe Trump and the Repub Senate should turn all red counties in the US into States – then secede from the blew states.

    Is there still time?

  14. The problem for the GOP is that they do not have a statesman type Conservative with charisma to run in 2024, one who will teach the people as to why Conservative principles must prevail if the nation is to survive. Trump came off as the best of the lot in 2016 which is damning. His narcissistic personality disorder was on full display for four years, and still is as I write this. (He is speaking to the nation now on Covid-19.) His foreign policy has been an abomination and will continue unchecked under Biden.

    Stick a fork in the Republic. It’s dead.

  15. Anonymous[330] • Disclaimer says:

    A major key to electoral success for whites is white birthrates, and that will mostly happen via cultural means, not political.

  16. Welcome to the world of one-party rule. Perhaps in future the real battles will be fought in Democratic primaries.

  17. @follyofwar

    Same person. I was “nudged” to pseudonymity by Mr. Unz, who for no apparent reason imposed a daily limit of three anonymous comments. See Greta Handel’s first.

    Why do you care?

  18. @Supply and Demand

    Normiecons and Plan Trusters always get led by homosexuals, it’s like clockwork.

    Sure do:

  19. Not only did Biden rebuild that blue wall

    With pilfered bricks. In a pilfered color.

    Come on, these are Democrats. They’ve been crooks for 200 years.

  20. anon[476] • Disclaimer says:

    Dems own the future. They’ve figured out how to cheat through early voting and mail-in voting. As long as there is no national database like the social security office that verifies citizenship, and detects duplicate voting across state line, more cheating will go on with each election, until there are no Republicans left.

    Just look at WA state, Dems own the Governor’s mansion, the Senate and the House since 2018. The Kindergarten sex ed bill passed by a 58% to 42% margin, even though in the primaries, the Superintendent of Public Instructions was so unpopular because of this bill he only won 40% of the votes, with the remaining split between 5 Republican contenders all opposed to that bill. Somehow in the final election, he won with 55% of the vote to 45% for his (R) challenger. The voter turn out for the primaries is 54%, but over 85% for Nov. 3, does that even sound plausible?

    Five states currently vote entirely by mail only: WA, CO, OR, HI and UT. Four out of five are solidly blue, and getting bluer by the year. Coincidence?

    Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Mail-in voting should be illegal until we have a national database that verifies eligibility and detect duplicates. Kim Strassel of WSJ said today that Nancy Pelosi is going to try to get a new bill passed that mandates early mail-in voting in every state. Also all states should be forced to junk the easily hackable Dominion voting system, with all votes counted by hand, in the presence of poll watchers from both parties.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  21. anon[287] • Disclaimer says:

    The GOP without Trump will be like a chicken without a head, and immediately go back to the bad old ways of kowtowing to big business and monopolies, globalism, Zionism, endless wars and endless immigration, while clinging to abortion and guns to virtue signal their conservatism. Under morons like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, they will be what they’ve always been, THE STUPID PARTY. Wouldn’t surprise me if they even invite Paul Ryan to come back and lead them back to the dark ages.

  22. Me confused

    SIDNEY POWELL WITH LOU DOBBS: RELEASE THE KRAKEN


  23. @Emslander

    Reality, in the form of debt service, will soon kick in and destroy the nation.

    So I’ve been saying, since the 1980s, when I was still in college. Guess what? I was wrong. We’ll pay down the debt, with devalued dollars. The pain will be incremental, not sudden.

    The MMT people have convinced me. Not that their theory is sound, but that we can kick the can further down the road for a good while yet. We’ll monetize more and more debt, and ultimately the nation’s living standards will take a serious hit.

    But what does anyone expect? We’re becoming a third world country, so it’s only natural that we should enjoy third-world living standards too. There will always be a veneer of very wealthy people living high on the hog and totally insulated from the masses.

    Just as in any other third-world country. We’re lucky that we have tremendous institutional and infrastructural strength built up over many generations. By negroes, of course. Funny that they can’t do that in their own countries.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/were-saved-bidens-covid-science-team-will-have-intersectional-pokemon-points-galore/#comment-4271955

    About Patrick:

    Virginia, capital of the Confederacy, where they now tear down statues of Robert E. Lee, is closer to blue.

    … future will begin to look like California today, where the Grand Old Party does not hold a single statewide office.

    It’s weird that he lives in Virginia and doesn’t know that this is already true there, in his own state–and has been for many years now.

  24. @Observator

    Calhoun was so enamored of Mammon that when Washington enacted a modest protective tariff, he was ready to take his home state of South Carolina out of the Union – in 1832, a generation before the attack on Sumter.

    Quite impossible, dear boy, for we are reliably informed everywhere that the Sole and Singular Purpose of Secession was to preserve Slavery Forever and Viciously Violate & Depredate Innocent Black Baby Bodies Unto Eternity.

  25. @Greta Handel

    Why do you care?

    Well, we need to know where to send the royalties whenever we play numbers by your progenitor George Frideric.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  26. @Mike Pierson, Davenport Rector, Midfielder

    Well spelt, all in good fun and the publick domain.

    Now, will follyofwar answer my question? I never understood “get a handle!”, especially since Mr. Unz’s numbering compromise, as anything but a last retort of those losing an argument.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  27. @Greta Handel

    Hey Greta, I’m just curious truth seeker. That’s why I’m here, reading and occasionally commenting. More importantly, why do you care so much that I cared enough to ask you that question?

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  28. The future doex not belong to Democrats or Republicans because both parties are infested with pathological lying psychopaths. The corona virus did not kill 230,000 Americans. It is a lie. People have been falsely diagnosed to perpetuate the lie. Everyone knows tbat it is a lie. If lying changes reality, then I am a multi-billionaire, because all that I would need to do to become one is to lie about it.

    The future belongs to the truth, and the truth is that the Republicans and Democrats are both terrorist netwoks and every shred of evidence proves that they are. They are both guilty of the cover up of the inside job of 9/11 controlled demolition and they are both guilty of the health scare scamdemic based on scientific fraud, and all of the evidence proves it!

    Please stop peddling this rubbish that covid killed 230,000 people. It was not a pandemic. One lie leads to another, and another and another, and now the covid conspirators look every bit as corrupt, insane, and evil as the Russian hacking cost Hillary the election conspirators.

    Andrea Iravani

    Andrea Iravani

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Troll: Corvinus
  29. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    “The voter turn out for the primaries is 54%, but over 85% for Nov. 3, does that even sound plausible?”

    Absolutely.

    “Mail-in voting should be illegal until we have a national database that verifies eligibility and detect duplicates”.

    To the contrary, each state with mail-in voting does exactly what you say. You really need to be educated about this type of voting.

    https://time.com/5892357/voting-by-mail-history/

    As TIME reported in its recent roundup of state laws for voting by mail in 2020, five states were already holding entirely mail-in elections before the pandemic—Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Utah. Twenty-nine states and Washington D.C. allowed “no excuse” mail-in absentee voting, and 16 states allowed voters to cast a ballot by mail if they had an excuse. In the 2016 presidential election, about 1 in 4 voters cast their votes via ballots mailed to them. Despite claims of vote fraud when voting is conducted outside of polling places, only 0.00006% of the 250 million votes by mailed ballots nationwide were fraudulent, according to MIT political scientists who analyzed numbers from the Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database.

    Now, how would you have felt if Trump had received the bulk of mail-in voting instead of Biden? Would you be claiming fraud then? Be honest.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  30. There is no “plague” that killed 200K…..that is bs.

    Only 6% of those deaths are actually FROM Covid.

    In any case it wasn’t Trump’s fault.

    The future belongs to the Dems due to the demographic disaster facing the GOP.

    The idiots in the GOP (I should say the nose donors) have decided the GOP is the “party of diversity.”

    Rather than help the more deserving white people whose ancestors built this nation, the GOP is going to pander to hateful stone age people that hate us.

    The GOP cucks are going to try to outdo the left to suck up to non-whites, and it isn’t going to work.

    The few additional votes the GOP gets from non-whites is more than offset by the loss of white votes caused by ignoring the white Christian base.

    The deeper problem is the tribe donors who are viciously and insanely anti-white, and sadly they control the narrative for both “sides.”

    • Troll: Corvinus
  31. @Corvinus

    Your first mistake, Corvinus, was in using Time Magazine as a reliable source.

    Your second one is in believing that “only 0.00006% of the 250 million votes by mailed ballots nationwide were fraudulent.” They have NO WAY of proving that. That stat was pulled out of their arse. One would have to be very naïve to believe it.

    Also Trump voters voted in person in great numbers because they were for FOR him, which is why he had such a HUGE lead on election night. Democrats cowardly voted by mail, using the Covid hoax as an excuse, not because they were for Biden/Harris (who could be?), but because they hated Trump.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  32. @follyofwar

    On reflection, I don’t. Let’s stick to this latest column of Mr. Buchanan.

    Do you disagree with what I said in #3?

  33. Pat Buchanan still writes as if he’s part of the Establishment when the likes of him have been purged ages ago into irrelevancy(which is unfortunate). Buchanan’s faith, Catholicism, is going globo-homo with the Poop-Pope. Whether Washington D.C. or the Vatican, most of the ‘Western’ World seems to be bending over to Jewish Power, of which Homo-mania is a proxy.

    Though he carried burdens unrivaled by a president since Herbert Hoover — a plague that has killed 230,000 Americans in eight months and crashed the economy to depths not seen since the ’30s – Donald J. Trump amassed 72 million votes, the largest total in Republican Party history.

    When the Establishment was running the bogus Russian Collusion Story, Buchanan entertained the notion that it might be true. It was complete bunk. And now, he’s parroting numbers of a ‘plague’ that killed how many? 230,000! ROTFL. Covid-19 hysteria is nonsense. There would have been no lockdowns if Obama or Hillary were president. This was a calculated move against the Trump economy and the rise of national populism spilling out into the streets. And Jewish Power is demented enough to go to such lengths to get what it wants. (Remember Madeleine Albright who said it’s worth killing 500,000 Arab children to implement Zionist policy in the Middle East.) How many died of Covid-19 alone? Barely 10,000. What is the death rate of Covid-19 among those under 70? Close to zilch. Most Covid deaths are ‘with the disease’ than ‘of the disease’. Anyone who died with Covid in their system was marked as ‘died OF Covid’, which is bogus. It’s all very ironic. These progs say Trump is ‘hitler’, but if any movement used medical ‘science’ to promote its ideology, it was National Socialism. It explains why Greg Johnson was so enthused about the Covid Hysteria. It was about the Alien Other invading the purity of the Human Body.

    All the medical hysteria, from both the ‘right’ and ‘left’, were ludicrous. It was either “Covid is Chicom disease invading the US” or “Covid is Pearl Harbor all over again” OR “Hitler Trump is using Covid to kill millions or he doesn’t care”. In truth, it was a virus that could easily have been handled(even after it escaped from the lab, or was it bat soup?) as most people are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms. The only necessity was better treatment of the old and sick. (By the way, what happened to the flu?)
    As for Trump, he forgot the Jewish Way. If you want to duel with Jewish Power, you must anticipate and preempt their moves. When this Covid thing was breaking out in China, Trump should have realized that the Power could use this against him. He should have seen what was coming and made moves to appear as a true statesman. Announce that, despite tensions with China, he will cooperate with Xi to deal with this problem. He could have seemed like a world leader. Instead, his eyes were off the ball. He thought Wall Street and Zionists were okay with him because of all he did for big finance and Israel, but the Jews(even those close to him) were plotting to take him down. They hardly advised him on Covid, and of course, the Democrats were saying Covid is no problem and not much to worry about even while preparing to ambush him. When Covid finally did become an issue in the US, Trump got bad advice from the likes of Tucker Carlson who urged ‘China Bad’ agenda. But it undermined Trump’s image as a statesman, world leader. It brought out the worst in him as he went into school yard bully mode giving middle finger to the Middle Kingdom. He made the same mistake in 2016. Trump was right to address the Illegal Alien issue, but did he have to speak of Mexicans as ‘rapists’ and the like? He could have carried many more Hispanics without such rhetoric.

    The narratives on Covid are pretty hilarious. On the one hand, it’s generally understood that it came from China. And yet, Jews and Progs hardly blame China or note that it is a foreign disease that ‘ravaged’ America and the West. They play on fears of ‘medical xenophobia’ without blaming the foreign entity and only denounce the national authority that supposedly failed to defend the realm. But this is like blaming only the Byzantines and not the Turks for the fall of Constantine. Sure, the Byzantines failed to defend the Order, but the attackers were still Turks. So, we have a strange case of hysteria about a foreign disease where ALL THE BLAME is dumped on the domestic ruler.
    But the Trump side also has a blind spot, but then it’s understandable given the Jew Taboo. Trump dumped on China but insufficiently addressed the Fifth Column in the US that allowed the germ to spread. Trump did name some Democrats, but he didn’t mention Jewish Power that has control of media, medical community, and whore politicians. There is no doubt that Jewish Power underplayed Covid’s potential impact on the US UNTIL it spread sufficiently and could be used against Trump. (Still, what a funny disease. It’s a real killer… except when people want to protest, riot, loot, and celebrate basketball championships. Don’t attend church but gather at St. Floyd communions.)

    Progs blamed Trump but not the foreign element; Trump blamed the foreign element but not the fifth column, Jewish Power. Covid and BLM were gambit moves by Jews to bring down Trump. It is so obvious.

    Democrats gained ground in the Republican heartland as well… Demography is still destiny.

    ‘Demography is destiny’ is true enough but, to borrow a phrase from John Lukacs, ‘not true enough’. After all, Jews are 2% of the US but control the country. Jews are even smaller in number in Europe but dominant in many nations. How could a demographic minority have so much power? Blacks are 13% of the US population but sacred idols and holy objects. Homos and trannies are a small portion of the population, but they are revered, celebrated, idolized, and adulated. In Latin America, the brown folks have outnumbered white or light-skinned folks for centuries, but the white and light-skinned folks still rule over the Tacoans.

    Also, the fact that so many whites vote for the Democratic Party in the whiter states and white suburbs would indicate that, at least among whites, it’s not just a matter of demography. After all, plenty of whites WELCOME the fact of their future minority-hood. Such people now exist all over Europe as well. Many Irish can’t wait for Ireland to become new India-Africa. German morons hold up signs saying ‘Wilkommen Muslimen und Afrikanen; Wir Sucken und wanten Cucken”. How is it that Europeans, once so solidly white, are welcoming the Great Replacement? And Japan is now going the same way as its elites are globo-homo traitors who promote Jungaru Fibah on the nation.

    [MORE]

    So, we need to go beyond ‘demography is destiny’. We need to look into ‘democology’, or maybe it should be called ‘psychography’. It is about mental colonization or psychological infiltration that paves the way for demographic replacement. After all, the Great Replacement is far easier to realize IF the target population has been psychologically altered to not only welcome it but to perceive opposition to it as evil and wicked.
    How are a people ‘democologically’ altered to favor their own demographic demise? One way is to buy off the elites. In any order, most people don’t want to deal with politics and matters of power. They just want to focus on the personal life, like the characters in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO. They just want to ‘live’. So, it is really up to the elites to decide and implement the policy and agenda of the Order. But the sort of people who rise up the political ladder tend to be vain, craven, and deceitful. Also, those who succeed in business tend to care mostly about profits and status. So, political elites care about themselves than the good of the Order. And the rich will gravitate to whatever happens to be fashionable and ‘acceptable’. As the US has the most money and power, political and business elites around the world seek to be in good graces with American Power, which is now controlled by Jews. So, elites around the world can easily be bought off or browbeaten into serving the Empire than protecting their own order. When Rome was supreme, the subject elites preferred to be in good graces with Roman Might than do anything for their own kind. It’s no wonder so many Jews in the streets were discontent with Jewish elites who collaborated with the Romans. When it came to crushing the Zealots, the Jewish elites usually sided with the Romans. They got ‘theirs’. Still, more than most peoples, the Jews were resistant because of their Covenant Mentality.

    Consider our world. Most white elites have been bought off. They are whores whose careers depend on donations from Jewish groups. Rich Jews can dole out money freely, not least because it’s deemed ‘antisemitic’ to scrutinize how Jewish money and power are used. In contrast, rich whites, even conservative ones, must be exceedingly careful about whom they give their money to. Sheldon Adelson and Michael Bloomberg can freely give tons of money to AIPAC, ADL, or some other Jewish Supremacist Zionist group. Rich Jews can fund anti-white groups like SPLC and Antifa. Many hundreds of millions poured into such organizations are almost never criticized. But suppose a rich white guy gives Jared Taylor a check for $100. He will be denounced by all the media as a ‘white supremacist’ and ‘nazi’. This was why many rich whites who admired Pat Buchanan dared not donate to his campaigns in the 1990s. They were afraid the Jewish-run media would condemn them, and they and their children would be smeared as ‘racists’ and ‘xenophobes’.
    In the current West, you can donate all the money you want to insane BLM, globo-homo degeneracy, and Zionism(as if Jews need more money in that regard), but you better not donate any cause that is for traditional marriage. Even Chick Fil-A that gained the loyalty of so many conservative consumers for its stance on spiritual/moral values finally caved to Jewish Power and became Dic*-Fil-Ass in order to expand into big cities controlled by Jews. This is why politicians are often useless and why business elites turn out to be spineless opportunists. The core of ‘politicism’ is careerism, and the core of ‘commercism’ is profits. So, while some politicians and businessmen may have strong convictions, the very essence of their primary stations in life militates against true conviction in favor of career or profits(or reputation which is related to both). It is why Gail Wynand in THE FOUNTAINHEAD finally wilts under pressure. As a businessman, he can only go so far in defense of his conviction.

    This is why any stable and resilient Order needs another set of people to uphold the conviction that maintains its survival and preservation. A set of people who aren’t primarily motivated by personal careerism or individual profit. The state can play this role, as was the case in Ataturk’s Turkey and is the case in Putin’s Russia, but the state, as a domain of politics, eventually becomes a den of craven careerists. Also, there is only so much a statesman(even a great one) can say and do. Putin has been good for Russia(considering the alternatives), but there’s a lot of things he can’t say because of the nature of politics — it’s like Michael Corleone isn’t someone you go to for the truth. As for businessmen, in Russia or elsewhere, they are always looking over their shoulders to see which way the wind blows. In contrast, Alexander Solzhenitsyn spoke his mind.

    Anyway, we need to address ‘democology’ as well as demography. If ‘demography is destiny’ holds true, then white European nations should have been pro-white. At one time, UK was almost all white-British. Now, 60% of Londoners are non-British. And there are tons of blacks as well. How did this happen? Why did an overwhelmingly white Britain welcome this if ‘demography is destiny’? It’s because psychological colonization of British minds paved the road for the physical colonization of British territory. Politicians proved to be poor defenders of the Order. As whores of the moneyed class, most dared not go the path of Enoch Powell. (Powell himself failed with the hysterical rhetoric about ‘rivers of blood’. A more rational argument would have served him better. It especially failed to gain traction because British tend to allergic to overt emotionalism.) As for Margaret Thatcher’s brand of conservatism, the emphasis on commerce failed just like Reagan’s. While the Right needed to be anti-communist and counter-balance big labor, it failed to realize that Labor is inherently more nationalist compare to Big Business. Workers are more rooted to the nation than businessmen are. While there have been mass migrations of workers around the world, money outpaces labor. Indeed, labor moved around to follow the money.

    By making conservatism synonymous with moneyed success, both Reagan and Thatcher undermined nationalism by favoring class(or plain cash) over identity, roots, and blood. By their logic, the Right should cozy up more to rich Hindus and wealthy Jews than to the white middle class and working class. This would have worked out half-way decently if the newly ascendant yuppies were grateful and became ‘conservative’. But yuppies didn’t merely want to be associated with wealth and privilege. They wanted ‘meaning’ and ‘status’. But in their eyes, conservatism was all about soulless materialist greed(among the nouveau riche), stuffy snobbery(among crusty traditionalists), mindless religious dogma, or, worst of all, ‘racism'(followed by ‘antisemitism’, ‘xenophobia’, and ‘homophobia’).
    Now, if the Right had defended nationalism and spoke the truth about racial differences and the problems of Jewish Power, things might have been different. But, the so-called ‘mainstream right’ was agreed that there’s nothing worse than ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’. And to prove it’s not ‘xenophobic’, it too chanted the nonsense ‘Diversity is our strength’. As the ‘right’ came to agree with the ‘left’ on all the moral issues — ‘racism’ bad!! — , its only advantage in the eyes of the successful was that it was pro-rich. So, when the ‘new left’ became pro-rich too under Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, the eventual collapse of the ‘right’ was inevitable. The ‘right’ used to have the money-advantage, and the ‘left’ used to have the moral-advantage. So, when the ‘left’ became pro-money as well, the ‘right’ had nothing left with which to woo over the rich and successful.
    When class politics was a thing, social morality favored the have-lesses over the have-mores. The left bestowed moral advantage not only to women and minorities but to working class men of the majority. But once class became passe in the new discourse, the ‘left’ focused solely on identity whereby the minority(especially if Jewish or black) became sacrosanct against the majority. This had a huge impact on social moral discourse in both US and Europe. Traditionally, especially since the Great Depression and World War II era(in which so many working class men died), the political and economic elites were morally disadvantaged vis-a-vis the working masses. Radical leftism was premised on dictatorship of the proletariat, and even so-called ‘radical right’ movements such as Fascism and National Socialism gained mass support. FDR won four terms with votes from workers and agrarian folks. So, much of the social discussion in the US and EU revolved around what the elites can and should do for the good of the national working class.
    But class politics was bound to be problematic in the Capitalist West. Under communism, most people had no choice but to be proles. In traditional society, class was almost like caste. Born into a certain class, you were likely to do what your father and grandfather did. But in the capitalist West, especially with booming wealth following WWII, so many children of working class parents became middle class, upper middle class, or even rich. Working class parents wanted their children to rise to higher classes, and as such was possible, working class identity waned even among proles. Indeed, the growing perception was that, if your family remained working class, it must be a bunch of losers because OTHER FAMILIES produced kids who became doctors, computer engineers, and successful businessmen.
    So, unlike race which remains fixed, class became too fluid and unstable for a morally charged identity, especially as the West became free enough so that any individual, whatever his origins, could rise considerably higher through education and effort. The rise of youth and drug culture degraded whatever had been dignified about Prole Culture. Children of working class in the US turned to heavy metal culture. In the UK, many turned to ugly demented punk culture. And their values turned ‘black’. And then, there was the double whammy of mass non-white immigration and ‘free trade’. This meant tons of non-whites could enter the West while many factory jobs could be shipped overseas.
    And as the elites controlled the narrative and discourse, the social moral themes went from the Noble Worker to Magical Diversity. Almost overnight, the sacrosanct theme of ‘diversity’ gave the social-moral advantage to the have-mores over the have-lesses. Wall Street crooks and Silicon Valley sharks could elevate themselves as social-moral superiors on account of their support of Diversity and, of course, Globo-Homo. But such attitudes aren’t found only among the rich and successful but the status-conscious. Even college graduates with low-level jobs pick up signals of what is fashionable or neo-sacred and what isn’t. Even white middle class suburbanites look to whatever’s happening in the hottest parts of New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco as worthy of emulation. Or, they think they’re smarter or ‘more sophisticated’ for listening to NPR, reading the New York Times or the New Yorker.

    While Buchanan is right about demographics, he hasn’t sufficiently addressed the problem of ‘democology’. And when he did address related issues, such as the Culture War, he failed to understand why the Right was bound to lose in the Modern World. Buchanan and Catholic Conservatives are priestly and dogmatic. What is priesthood but unimaginative keepers of dogma? As such, a priesthood-driven order is static. It’s like a museum of ad nauseum, or even a mausoleum. Catholic Church became a museum religion of priests. In contrast, Jews kept alive the prophetic power that inspires the imagination. Would-be Jewish prophetic types could be peddling craziness, but they generated excitement and captured the imagination in arts, academia, and public square. In the Modern World, people want the New, the Visionary. It can be hokum-visionary, like James Cameron’s idiotic AVATAR, but consider its mass success. How could Conservatives win the culture war? Catholic Church became a museum. Its most activist sector was the gaytholics.

    Also, when so many more people are attending college and look to the arts/culture as a substitute for religion, how could ‘Conservatives’ compete when they lack the culture of critique and creativity? Critical Theory, despite a promising start, has become idiotic over the years, BUT its very conceit of critique wins over so many people who think they are smart or sophisticated. Most people aren’t capable of independent thought; they are content merely to feel as part of the club; and that is exactly what Critical Theory offered to ‘educated’/indoctrinated college folks. It makes them feel they are ‘smart’ and ‘edgy’. In contrast, Conservatives didn’t even have a faux-thinking culture with which to entice young and the educated. The Bill Buckley types had an attitude of blind reverence to the past. They were educated but lacked criticality. At most, they counter-critiqued the culture of critique and, as such, was a reactionary than a pro-active force. (They batted but never pitched in a game in which the odds favor the pitcher.) Buckley once said all the great works of art and ideas had already been created, and modern man could only appreciate this largess. Maybe he’s right, maybe he’s wrong, but it’s not the kind of attitude to generate excitement and passion on his side. Even large-ass-ism wins the culture war against largessism.
    Related to criticality is creativity. Though not the same thing, they activate and stimulate each other. Artists invite critics, and critics inspire new generation of people toward arts and creativity. Criticism is more rational whereas creativity is more mysterious, and yet one energizes the other, and in some cases, especially in France, the path to film-making is through film-criticism. Appreciation of literature has been kept alive by critics and teachers(who use critical material in the discussion of works of art). Andrei Tarkovsky is one of the greatest conservative artists of the second half of the 20th century, but I’ll bet most critical appreciation of his works comes from Liberals than Conservatives.

    Buckley and others like him were intelligent and well-educated but not particularly curious or critical. If Buckley engaged with the arts and culture at all, it was out of snobbery or political/ideological reasons. As for Rush Limbaugh and populist America, their interests range from top 40 hits to monster mash trucks. They are more into muscle culture than mind culture. They tend to see arts/culture as ‘faggy’.
    Now, if white folks were the toughest in sports, this might not be so bad. Consider: Jews and liberal dorks dominate arts/culture, but white conservative jocks and toughies dominate sports and manhood. But, White Conservatives can’t even have that because muscle-and-manhood fields are dominated by blacks. So, Jewish Liberals, homos, and white collaberals dominate the arts/culture while black Democrats & supremacists dominate sports, manhood-stud departments. What does that leave for white conservatives? Role of cuckservatives who cheer on Negro athletes who hump white girls. There is WWE and action movies that feature tough white guys, but WWE is fake sports and action movies are now filled with Negroes and Diversity. Original STAR WARS had white heroes. The latest STAR WARS had a batch of Negroes, white ho’s, bunch of homos and diversity dominating the galaxy.

    Now, one reason why Conservatives lack criticality and creativity is due to their aversion to deviancy. While this tendency is generally good(as most deviant types are screwy), it has a way of overlooking, alienating, and suppressing strangeness that is the real source of creativity(and criticality). According to David Mikics, Stanley Kubrick was an avid reader of Franz Kafka, and they were both major weirdos. And yet, that is from where creativity flows.

    The thing is Liberal centers of power are more welcoming and encouraging of the weirdos. Then, no wonder that so many talents in conservative communities end up in Liberal areas. Given that homos are generally more critical and creative than the usual public, they also flock to Liberal areas. And as Jews have been the perennial minority group in the West, they also developed and sharpened a critical and adversarial attitude.
    Of course, this has downsides as well. Liberal areas can attract too many weirdos. While some weirdos are genuinely talented and make a difference, most weirdos are a rather sorry lot and cause more problems. They tend to be anti-social, neurotic, vain, self-indulgent, excessive in certain traits, and/or even sociopathic or pathological. For every Pee Wee Herman and Andy Warhol who gain success, there are many others who are mired in social dysfunction, not least because only a few can succeed in arts/culture. MULHOLLAND DR. is revealing about the losers in Hollywood. When a normal person fails to live up to his dreams, he finds another normal and constructive function in life. But when a weirdo fails in his/her dreams, he/she often turns even nuttier. Who knows, if Kubrick failed as a film-maker, he might have become a pornographer. If Tarantino had failed in film, maybe he might have turned to drug-dealing. Conservatism is more like the 50s, Liberalism is more like the 60s.

    Now, there was the hope of strangeness-acceptance in the Modern Right in the late 19th century and early 20th century with figures like Nietzsche, Carl Jung, Celine, Oswald Spengler, T.S. Eliot, and the like. Also, back then, race-ism was rife among the Left as well, Jack London was a socialist but also a tremendous race-ist. But National Socialism turned rightist culture into a cartoon, and then the demise of Nazi Germany meant anything passionate, visionary, controversial, or ‘pathological’ on the Right would be associated with mass murder. Henceforth, the Right could only be stuffily traditional, dogmatically religious(snipped of Christian ‘antisemitism’), obsess over money, or emphasize ‘my individualism’. There was hardly any room left for strangeness that could serve as fertile soil for creativity. It is no wonder so many artists became ‘liberals’ and ‘leftists’ even though crypto-rightist tendencies are still found in works.

    There is also the factor of black domination in sports and music. White youths growing up with total reverence of the black soul(as usually related to music) and black body(as the vessels of heroes). No wonder so many in UK and Ireland can’t say NO to more African immigration. You can’t say NO to magical black soul and heroic black body — why, it’s be sacrilege against the memory of MLK, Mandela, and Muhammad Ali. The role of youth in American Culture is both rebellious and subservient. Pop Culture encourages the cult of rebellion, but because young people are so ignorant, naive, and shallow, they can easily be manipulated into swallowing whatever is shoved down their throats. So, even as the youth are predictably conformist and servile to the Power, they think they are being rebellious because the New Normal is presented as ‘edgy’, ‘cool’, and ‘more evolved’.

    Mainstream Conservative Culture is non-existent. What of the ‘Alt-Right’? All too often, the ‘radical right’ approach to culture isn’t much different from the PC kind. It’s essentially PC dogmatism in reverse. If PC tends to praise or condemn works for their political content, so do those on the ‘radical right’. This is why David Duke is utterly useless as a culture critic. If it’s Jewish, it must be bad or worthless. Others will praise a work because it has pro-white content, which is about as dumb as the National Review extolling some movie for its ‘conservative’ message. Now, it’s perfectly understandable to hate any work for its politics, but true cultural appreciation must give credit where it’s due, e.g. Sergei Eisenstein was a commie propagandist but one of the greatest film-makers. Or, one may cheer Mel Gibson’s PASSION for pissing off the Jews, but let’s not pretend it’s a great work of art. There is aesthetics beyond ideology though the two are not entirely separable.

    One would think that with all the PC, censorship, immaturity, retardation, and ‘woke’ mania laying waste to the best of Liberal Culture, the Conservative side would take the opportunity to offer an alternative in ideas and expression. But nope. How could the Right take advantage of such crisis when it lacks the culture of critique and creativity? Even when Liberals aren’t thinking, they at least pretend to ‘think’, which fools a lot of people, themselves included. But Conservatives seem allergic to the very idea of Thought. ‘Highbrow’ National Review failed to present a new school of ideas. Lowbrow Rush Limbaugh encouraged ditto-head-ism among millions. At best, Mark Levin came up with witticisms such as Al-Not-So-Sharpton and Washington-Compost.
    How can you win the Culture War when you got no culture of critique? Buchanan hoped that Catholicism would be enough, but any institution is only as good as the people in it. And over the years, Catholic Church ended up with more homos, more cucks, more gimps, and more ‘social justice’ types. Also, is Christianity really ‘conservative’? It’s ‘conservative’ in the way that communism became ‘conservative’ in the Soviet Union: the New Orthodoxy. But Jesus and St. Paul, the founders of the Faith, were Jewish heretics who rebelled against Jewish Conservatism. Likewise, how can Americanism ever be truly ‘conservative’ when its founding myth is rebellion against the Mother Country and giving the middle finger to the King in the name of creating a new order?

    Anyway, the reason why so many whites are ‘woke’ even after BLM lunacy — and why Trump pandered to blacks and white ‘wokesters’ — is because of ‘democological’ mental-colonization that has taken place all across the West. How else do we explain massive BLM lunacies in Europe as well? These people don’t mass-protest the Great Replacement but come out in huge numbers in support of some worthless Negro trash who got hisself killed in Minneapolis. Granted, many used the Floyd issue as an excuse to protest Trump as the poster-boy of nationalism, but still, such white passion for a Negro. Back in 1968 when blacks rioted, even sympathetic white liberals were appalled. Mayor Richard Daley ordered his men to ‘shoot to maim, shoot to kill’. LBJ sent the US military into cities to suppress the violence. While Democrats were more sympathetic of black rage and anti-war protesters, they weren’t encouraging people to loot and burn down cities. Fast Forward to 2020, and the Jewish Power and Collaberals urged people to protest and riot and use violence. The city governments released Antifa thugs who attacked the police. The ‘left’ and blacks threaten white suburbs. And yet, so many white people voted for Biden against Trump on account that the latter is a ‘racist’ even though Trump pandered to blacks. Since then and now, so many whites have been mentally colonized by the media and academia, both of which are entirely controlled by Jews and their anti-white allies. Through much of the 70s and 80s, big cities and black areas were reliably Democratic while the rest, including the suburbs, were Republican. This was why Nixon and Reagan won such huge landslides. But since then, the changes haven’t been merely demographic but ‘psycho-graphic’. Jungle fever has spread to the suburbs. Women with purple hair and tattoos now serve as librarians. Also, there used to be a separation between ideology and institutions/entertainment. But now, globo-homo idolatry is even featured in comic books that kids read for fun. And library websites and displays push globo-homo and BLM. There are no more neutral spaces. It’s as if every nook and cranny of life must be Shlomo-Afro-homo-ized. Campbell soup commercial push ‘gay dads’, and mantras of diversity-inclusion-equity crop up everywhere. (But, of course, nothing about Palestinians.)
    And just when this mental-colonization was being reversed with the growth of the online square, the Jews and collaberals pulled all the stops to shut down free speech on the internet(and cuckservatives have done NOTHING to counter this). Why are so many young whites in the South cheering on the destruction of Confederate statues and their own heritage? They’ve been mentally colonized to hate their own kind. Of course, even as they denounce the legacy of Jim Crow in the South, they are fully supportive of Jim Crowitz in the West Bank. In a way, Southern cuckery is easy to understand. Southern Culture was always more deferential to power, and so, when the New Power is globalist and anti-white, Southern Cucks cluck-cluck to the New Dogma.

    No one did anything about the rising Cult of Identity, namely that of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. The Cult of Personality around Stalin, Hitler, and Mao said the Great Man could never do wrong. He was always right, even when wrong. So, if Stalin said A, he was right. If he reversed himself and said B, he was still right. Why? Because what mattered was not what he said but that HE said it. He was like god, he was always right, and so whatever he said must be right. No wonder Mao was right when he said US is an eternal enemy, and he was right again when he met with Nixon. That’s how cult of personality works.
    What we have in the West is worse than the Cult of Personality, which dies along with the person in question. Stalin’s cult of personality died with him. In contrast, the Cult of Identity is meant to last forever. The Tri-Supremacist Cults of Identity in the West revolve around the special holiness of Jews, blacks, and homos. So, it doesn’t matter that certain Jews die. As long as there are Jews around, we must all kneel down and praise/serve the holy Jew. Same with Negroes. Even after so many years after the Civil Rights Movement, we are supposed to believe George Floyd is some kind of saint-angel even though he was a worthless scumbag. The Cult of Identity advantages or ‘privileges’ virtually all members of one group over all members of another group. So, a black guy can be a thug and looter, but he glows with the aura of BLM while his non-black victims mean nothing. As for whites, their passion matters ONLY IN service to the Tri-Supremacist Other of blacks, homos, and Jews. No wonder then so many whites join the BLM movement as such is the ONLY way they can express anything like passion. Happy passion in praise of homos, Tragic passion in service to Negroes.
    But then, White Conservatives aren’t much different from Antifa in their adherence to the current Cult of Identity. While more critical of BLM and less enthused of homos, White Conservatives can’t conceive of a Bad Jew. They are totally invested in Cult of Identity of Zionism. No matter what Jews do to Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians, and etc., the holy Jews are always right and their victims don’t amount to a plate of beans. White Conservatives who despair of the globalist use of BLM violence in the US should look in the mirror and ask why they themselves supported Zionist use of Quasi-Nazis to smash Ukraine and Isis-Alqaeda types to smash Syria. Unless something is done to rid the West of the Cult of Identity(of Jews, blacks, and homos), there can be no real progress.

    Republicans are going to have to grow their share of the white vote and their share of the Hispanic, Black and Asian vote or their future will begin to look like California today, where the Grand Old Party does not hold a single statewide office.

    There is a simple way to do this. It takes only three words: Palestinian Lives Matter or PLM. Spread the truth that Jews are the ruling elites of America. Acknowledge America’s ‘guilt’ in the Zionist ‘genocide’ of Palestinians. Call for a memorial to the victims of Nakba Pogroms. Denounce Apartheid in the West Bank. There is little reason why browns and yellows should be anti-white. Most browns and yellows get along just fine with whites. So, why did they turn so anti-white? Economically, browns tend to be in the lower half while yellows are in the upper half. And yet, both are overwhelmingly Democratic when the ‘progressive’ rhetoric has become viciously anti-white. (In some ways, they could be taking cues from whites, i.e. if whites hate themselves and equate virtue with anti-whiteness, why shouldn’t yellows and browns join whites in hating whiteness?) One reason for brown/yellow support of the Democratic Party is surely immigration, but even that is now tied to anti-white-ism, i.e. it is ‘moral progress’ to destroy white majority wherever it exists because whites dominating any nation is ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’. Who came up with such a nutty idea? Jews.
    Now, with browns and white Hispanics, there is the factor of resentment. White Hispanics are envious of Anglo achievement, and so, they want Gringo America to be brought down. Also, Mexicans have this revanchist notion of ‘Reconquista’. As Mexicans can’t beat gringos on the individual level in any endeavor, they’ve chose to rely on sheer numbers to gain power. And most people in Latin America share such resentments, and Jews exploit this fact against white America. As for Asians, they are a pathetic bunch of yellow dogs so anxious to fit in among the elites. As the elites are dominated by Jews and white cucks, yellows just go along like a bunch of teacher’s pets. So, if globo-homo and BLM are the new holies among Jews and white cucks, yellows just bark along.

    Still, on the personal level, most browns don’t hate whites and would prefer to work with whites than deal with blacks. And yellows just go with the power. So, there is no reason for browns and yellows to hate whites UNLESS they are encouraged to. And what’s doing that? Jewish Power. Now, whites can turn Jewish Logic against the Jews. If Jews say the peoples of color should resent and hate whites because of ‘white privilege’, whites should educate all Americans on which group has the most wealth, privilege, and power. Indeed, whites don’t even have to do this in any ‘antisemitic’ way. Even if whites just objectively and dryly spell out who has the most power and most wealth, they will put into motion the natural tendency of the masses to grow most critical of whoever’s on top. So, even if whites don’t say, “Jews got the most power and they are a bunch of a**holes” but merely say, “Jews got the most power”, it will naturally set into motion a new kind of discourse that will increasingly fixate on Jewish power, Jewish privilege, and then eventually the abuses of Jewish Supremacism.

    Now, blacks are more problematic. Most blacks gained power in the Democratic Machine. As black elites are invested in the Democratic Machine as the source of their personal gain, they care more about the Party than about the race. So, even though black elites know that more mass immigration will squeeze out blacks in many areas, they don’t care AS LONG AS it advantages the Democratic Party in which their personal power and wealth are invested. Black pride and identity function mainly as an idea. In truth, most blacks regard other blacks as ‘dat no good nasty-ass mothafuc*in ni**a’. In other words, they don’t trust each other and don’t bother to help one another due to this lack of trust. That is why black politics is always ragging about ‘white racism’ so that white people will be burdened with fixing all the problems that blacks theyselves not be willing to fix.
    That said, as long as Jews are inflaming black anti-white hatred, why not return the favor and air all the dirty laundry about Jewish exploitation of blackness, as well as giant Jewish role in slavery in Brazil? And to make things worse for Jews, point out how Jewish merchants sold guns and ammos to cowboys who killed the Indians. Yes, Jews took part in the ‘American Holocaust’.

    What Jewish Power did in 2020 is so vile, inexcusable, and disgusting that any self-respecting white who still sucks up to Jewish Power needs to hang himself. Such a person is lower than a cuck; he’s a cuckroach. That Buchanan is unwilling to mention Jewish Power in his entire column shows how cowered and craven he is when it comes to the real power.

    There are other presently insoluble problems for the GOP.
    Democrats are the party of government and Republicans the party of the private sector.

    This again? No, many white working class folks who lost their jobs now rely on the government. All those addicted to opioids rely on the government as well. Many rural Americans rely on the military for jobs.
    And the biggest private sectors, Wall Street and Big Tech, are totally with the Democrats. The richest and fanciest parts of the city, the glittering jewels of capitalism, are almost all Democratic.
    Las Vegas still gives to the GOP but ONLY to keep the GOP sucking up to Israel. The ONLY reason why the likes of Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer give to the GOP is for more money for themselves and more power to Israel. GOP is in a bind because it used to be the party of big money. But now that big money has gone with the Democrats, the GOP doesn’t know what to do. It should logically move towards the working class, but old habits die hard. A party that sucked up to Wall Street all these years has no clue as to what to say to the working class. When Buchanan gave his pro-prole speech at the GOP convention in 1992, there was much befuddlement among the crowd. These ‘free trade’ enthusiasts were clueless about workers losing their jobs in small towns.

    Indeed, one of the biggest losing ideas among American Conservatives has been anti-statism. Maybe long ago, the state wasn’t that big and there was more local governance. But in rising Modern America, the state was bound to get bigger and bigger. So, if conservatives became ‘anti-statist’, the effect was not a smaller state but the growing state being taken over by ‘liberals’ and blacks. Washington D.C. is what? 96% Democratic? With Big Money being with the Democrats and with the diminishing of the working class and middle class, American Conservatism should encourage more of its folks to seek jobs and positions in statist institutions. What else is there? But now, Democrats have both Big Business and Big Bureaucracy. They got both Wall Street and the Department of Education. Conservatives were told that business and government were opposites, even enemies. Well, guess what? Wall Street and Big Tech cozy up to the Big State and collude against all of us. Great going, Conservatives.

    State = Power. If you reject statism, other side will take it. It’s like guns. If you refuse to own guns, the other side will have all the guns. Anti-statism was one of the biggest mess-ups of American Conservatism. And the notion that ‘small government = conservatism’ is almost uniquely an American argument. Traditionally, conservative forces always sought to control the state. If Putin and Russian nationalists give up control of the state, the nation will be totally ruled by capitalist oligarchs who can easily go globalist. Statism in China, despite all its corruption, is what holds the nation together and prevents total takeover by the moneyed class who are the same everywhere. Better to have China ruled by a nationalist like Xi than be dominated by globalist-capitalists.

    The top 1% of the population in income pays more taxes than the bottom 90%.

    And the top 1% owns most of the wealth. And when they mess up, they get super-bailouts. Also, the government just prints and prints more money than relying solely on taxes. Much of it goes to fund the government, but much of it also goes to fund Wall Street and corporations into buying back their own stocks. At any rate, most American Conservatives are not in the top 1%. The top 1% are with the Democrats. They push for the Great Replacement. They support BLM. They spread globo-homo degeneracy. So, F*** the top 1%. I say bring back New Deal era taxation rates. I say round up the likes of Jeff Bezos and Jack Dorsey and tar and feather them. Let’s take all their money.

    If Democrats can kill the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court, if they can add four new senators from Puerto Rico and D.C., and if they can pack the electorate by turning millions of migrants, legal and illegal, into U.S. citizens and regular voters, then you don’t need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.

    Again. Just three words: Palestinian Lives Matter. Diversity need not be anti-white. After all, the main attraction of non-whites moving to white-majority nations is to be with white people. Anti-white ideology is pushed by Jews. So, return the favor. Side with Palestinians. Whites should ally with non-white goyim against Zionists who oppress and murder Palestinians. And if Jews scream with rage at whites, whites can say, “But we are only siding with brown Arabs against you rich privileged white Jews.”

    The real question is, do whites have the courage and sense to speak those three words: Palestinian Lives Matter. And how much is a Palestinian Flag on Ebay or Amazon? Wave that flag in support of PLM and then gleefully watch Jewish Power shi* its pants.

    Also, one-party rule may not be a bad thing. In a one-party state, people choose on the basis of issues and topics than on ‘tribal’ party affiliation. Suppose US were to turn one-party and suppose all Republicans became Democrats. The rivalry would no longer be the tiresome mudslinging between ‘Dummicrats’ vs ‘Repuglicans’ and instead become based more on particular issues. Indeed, the existence of the GOP has been a great boon to Jews. Even in California, the very presence of the GOP allows Jews and rich Democrats to keep playing the game. As long as Republicans exist, Jews can manipulate non-whites and white cucks to vote for the Democrats because, oh my, the alternative would be the ‘white supremacist’ and ‘nazi’ Republicans. But without the GOP, people will be more focused on the issues. Also, whites, instead of knee-jerkedly voting for the White Party(that has proven useless) can forge alliances with non-whites against the Elite Power Bloc of Jews and Collaberals.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
  34. Corvinus says:
    @follyofwar

    “Your first mistake, Corvinus, was in using Time Magazine as a reliable source”.

    You have to prove that what was in the article I linked to is other than reliable. Show your work. Now, read carefully the advice of Ron Unz.

    I apply the same historical methods I did in my academic journal articles back in the 1980s. You analyze the likely reliability of the raw information presented, look for confirming or refuting evidence, and then draw your own plausible conclusions…On a more serious note, many of my articles very heavily cite various MSM sources, so why would I do that if I believed they were always lying?”

    “Your second one is in believing that “only 0.00006% of the 250 million votes by mailed ballots nationwide were fraudulent”

    Obviously, they DO have a way of proving it. So why don’t YOU offer counter evidence to the contrary? What specific proof do you have that demonstrates this “stat was pulled out of their arse?”

    “Democrats cowardly voted by mail…”

    You mean American citizens chose to use a legal way to vote in a national election.

    “using the Covid hoax as an excuse”

    That would be Fake News.

    “not because they were for Biden/Harris (who could be?), but because they hated Trump.”

    There is definitive truth to what you are saying here. It is probable that they preferred the lesser of two evils. Also consider this cogent point from commenter on a Paul Craig Roberts post…

    Equally plausible is a rather obvious explanation that Paul Craig Roberts deftly avoids mentioning: Trump is a crude, narcissistic and deeply unattractive plutocrat who may have established a cult-like following but who’s disliked by a majority of Americans (along with his billionaire-friendly economic policies). Among other possible factors are the fact that Trump’s environmental policies are so appalling they’d embarrass Richard Nixon and his America-alone approach to global politics is puerile and seen to be such by a majority of Americans?

    Now, how would you have felt if Trump had received the bulk of mail-in voting instead of Biden? Would you be claiming fraud then? Be honest.

    • Replies: @anon
  35. Anon 2 says:

    Does anyone know how many in-person votes were received by Trump
    vs how many by Biden (i.e., excluding mail-in votes, and absentee votes
    of any kind)? I understand there is a significant difference in percentage
    terms between in-person votes alone and total votes received by each
    candidate but I can’t easily find a reliable source

  36. The Future?

    Democrats?

    Republicans?

    Both parties are just hood ornaments on the Jewmobile driving America and the World towards…

    Antichrist!

  37. geokat62 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Oops! Nick uttered the three words that are deemed to be verboten… “Synagogue of Satan.”

  38. geokat62 says:

    Who Owns the Future? Dems or GOP?

    Neither. Jewish Supremacists do.

  39. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Greta Handel

    “you don’t need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing” doesn’t sound like Mr. Buchanan”

    That’s because, FYI, its quote by Bob Dylan, from his song “Subterranean Homesick Blues:

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  40. onebornfree says: • Website

    “As John C. Calhoun declaimed on the roots of democratic class warfare,“The necessary result… of the unequal fiscal action of the government is, to divide the community into two great classes; one consisting of those who… pay the taxes, and… bear exclusively the burthen of supporting the government; and the other, of those who are the recipients of their proceeds, through disbursements, and who are… supported by the government; or, in fewer words, to divide it into tax-payers and tax-consumers.” ”

    Or, as the great French economist Frederic Bastiat said: “When plunder becomes a way of life, men create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it”.

    “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.” –Carroll Quigley, U.S. President Bill Clinton’s mentor, “Tragedy and Hope,” pg. 1247, 1966 AD

    “In the US, there is basically one party — the business party. It has two factions, called Democrats and Republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations on the same policies.” –Noam Chomsky

    See: “Changing Hood Ornaments”
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/11/l-reichard-white/changing-hood-ornaments/

    regards, onebornfree

  41. Derer says:
    @Anon

    no republican president or federal judge will gain office again.

    Please provide some hints as to why is that good for the American future? Conspicuously absent in your long tirade. Krystol or Will typify their brethren character, no surprise there. All this was achieved by Democrats remarkable ability of waterproof manipulation of the porous ballots mailing. No rational person can believe that senile Biden, a Washington parasite all his life, damaged by corruption could impressed 77 mil American voters.

  42. USA1943 says:
    @Anon

    What I don’t get if the Democrats seem hostile to Whites (And there seems to be a lot of truth to that) Why do so many Whites (40-45% or more) Still Vote Democrat? I know some of the older Democrats who don’t really follow politics think the Democrats are still the party of JFK. Very Pro America and Anti Communism (I have older relatives who think that) but that is a small number. If one follows Politics for a White to vote for Democrats seems borderline Ethno-Masochism, I don’t know why the White vote is not over 95% for the Republicans, Even though most Republicans cave and don’t even try to do what they say (Trump is an EXCEPTION) at least they are not OPENLY and Blatently Hostile and even Hateful towards Whites. I see Whites with signs in these Marches that say things like “kill all Whites” Many of these people are college age some younger, some in their 40’s, but some are older like White Professor Noel Ignataev who on his last day at school, before he retired told his students, if you are White and you want to Improve the World go kill yourself, Chelsea Handler said If you are a White couple and expecting a male baby go to the nearest abortion center, Look up Tim Wise or sara raeo (Unsure of spelling) They are constantly spewing hate towards Whites, MANY other Examples, How did this happen? Or were there always huge numbers of Whites who hate other Whites and I was lucky not to be exposed to it?

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  43. @onebornfree

    His thing for Dylan never crossed my mind.

  44. GoodTwin says:

    The GOP has no future whatsoever if they do not embrace the MAGA movement and carry it beyond Trump (whether or not he gets a second term). They have never had a candidate so beloved as old Trumpy, and they are cynically tossing all that political capital in the trash to protect the “legitimacy” of the electoral process. That legitimacy is gone, deluged in a sea of mail-in fraud, but you know the GOP are suckers for a lost cause. It is the job of White America (and our patriot allies of all colors) to drag the GOP kicking and screaming into the future, which is nationalistic. Conservatism is dead, what is even left to conserve? The Right now becomes radicalized or goes away forever.

  45. It’s OK to point out the lopsidedness of income taxes.

    Unfortunately, the amount of regressive taxes, paid by the weak side, often gets overlooked.

    What’s even more unfair is that those who leech off of government spending programs, such as:

    • parents who work in the private sector (but still have >= 2 kids in public school), and

    • government workers and contractors,

    are improperly labeled as tax payers.

    They properly belong in Calhoun’s category of tax consumers.

  46. anon[156] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Obviously they have evidence…

    So where is it? Where’s the link to that 0.00006% study? How many ballots in how many states were looked at? Until then, you are just making a claim without evidence then tell anyone who disagrees to come up with proof that your claim is false. There is a name for that, it’s called Proof by Lack of Evidence, a well known fallacy. Please go take a class in Rhetoric or Law and stop embarrassing yourself.

    OTOH, Trump actually provided proof that voting fraud occurred, including a 264 page testimony by hundreds of eyewitnesses who swore under oath, under the penalty of perjury that they witnessed fraud taking place including running the same batch of ballots over and over again up to 10 times, counting ballots without signatures, without addresses, with unmatched signatures, kicking out poll watchers, saying they were going to stop counting at midnight then continued “counting” after poll watchers left, backdating ballots received after close of election day, ballots received the same day or even the day before ballots were sent, dead people voting, people voting in one state and found out they’ve already “voted” by mail in another state. The fraud is rampant.

    The DOJ indicted 11 people in WI in October for voting illegally, all were non-citizens, some from Latin America, many from Asia. The Cascade Mall shooter in WA State who was only a green card holder from Turkey voted 3 times just in 2016. There have been many whistle blowers who came forward and said they received ballots in AZ, WA etc. even though they were not citizens and didn’t even register to vote, but were duly ignored by mainstream media, who shut their eyes and ears and continue to tell us, “no evidence of fraud”.

    The DNC should rename themselves the EJM party, the End Justifies Means party, because it is run by a bunch (((end justifies means people))), their media propaganda machines and useful idiots.

    The left wants to steal this election, and they want to force us to accept this result as legit, ignoring at least 50% of the country who believe fraud occurred and demand a clean audit. We will not accept Biden as a legitimately elected POTUS until these fraud allegations are thoroughly investigated and cleared.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  47. Who Owns the Future?

    Who is it to be? The Democraps or the Repuglicans?

  48. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    “So where is it? Where’s the link to that 0.00006% study? How many ballots in how many states were looked at?”

    https://www.mahoningmatters.com/community-columns/your-legal-rights-how-safe-is-voting-by-mail-in-the-valley-and-the-us-2620049

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/25/business/media/voter-fraud-misinformation.html

    “OTOH, Trump actually provided proof that voting fraud occurred, including a 264 page testimony…”

    No, those are affidavits. Affidavit is not treated as “evidence” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act. However, it was held by the Supreme Court that an affidavit can be used as evidence only if the court so orders for sufficient reasons, namely, the right of the opposite party to have the deponent produced for cross-examination.

    “by hundreds of eyewitnesses who swore under oath”

    GREAT! Let them all be cross-examined in a court of law.

    “The left wants to steal this election, and they want to force us to accept this result as legit, ignoring at least 50% of the country who believe fraud occurred and demand a clean audit.”

    That would be Fake News.

    “We will not accept Biden as a legitimately elected POTUS until these fraud allegations are thoroughly investigated and cleared.”

    https://www.startribune.com/plaintiffs-drop-suit-claiming-fraud-in-wisconsin-absentees/573089981/

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/13/trump-law-firm-withdraws-pennsylvania-election-case

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/13/us/politics/trump-election-lawsuits.html

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  49. @Corvinus

    And that

    Affidavit is not treated as “evidence” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act. However, it was held by the Supreme Court that an affidavit can be used as evidence only if the court so orders for sufficient reasons, namely, the right of the opposite party to have the deponent produced for cross-examination.

    would be Fake Law, unless the complaints have been filed in India. Is that why you didn’t provide your Wikipedia source?

    Or maybe you were just in a hurry:

    GREAT! Let them all be cross-examined in a court of law.

    Really?

    Even if Mr. Trump prevails, the allegations will not have been fully and fairly aired. See #3, above.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  50. @USA1943

    ” How did this happen?”

    Very simple : The “Frankfurter Schule” has been absorbed totally into the US edumacation system, and
    9o% of the kids graduating from either high school or college have been hypnotized into believing that socialism/communism is fair and the other “white” system is unfair.

    Germany both Goy and Hebrew being the source of most of mankinds travails and lunacy : antifa, the insane green movement, Bauhaus: the destruction of architecture , Psychology, Heroin, authority worship, politician worship : the brain-dead Krauts worship BO/MO and Greta as saints and they are already in the process of elevating JB to the state of sainthood with their media reporting incessantly on his “Integrity” “Decency”, and “Statesmanship”.

    AJM

  51. Corvinus says:
    @Greta Handel

    “would be Fake Law, unless the complaints have been filed in India. Is that why you didn’t provide your Wikipedia source?”

    It’s from https://blog.ipleaders.in/affidavits/

    And I notice that you didn’t provide a counter assertion here. Why is that?

    “Even if Mr. Trump prevails, the allegations will not have been fully and fairly aired. See #3, above”

    They have been fully aired, by way of Trump’s tweets and Guiliani’s work. As far as been “fairly aired”, that depends upon the merits of each case.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  52. @Corvinus

    GREAT! Let them all be cross-examined in a court of law.

    But that will never happen, especially in a public proceeding.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  53. Juat like pro wrestling –all this to dupe the sheeple and keep them stirred up. Behind closed doors DC–all is well with the puppet masters. Another 4 years of laughter at the sheeple’s expense. Debt will jump to perhaps 35 Trillion and perhaps negative interest rates will then save the day. And don’f forget Israel –Trump loves Israel —

  54. Corvinus says:
    @Greta Handel

    “GREAT! Let them all be cross-examined in a court of law.”

    Absolutely. I look forward to the Trump legal team trying to prove their cases in several states.

    “But that will never happen, especially in a public proceeding”.

    It actually has happened, as several rulings have been issued by judges.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  55. @Corvinus

    Which of those several rulings was issued after a witness was “cross-examined in a court of law”?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  56. Corvinus says:
    @Greta Handel

    “Which of those several rulings was issued after a witness was “cross-examined in a court of law””

    I imagine the cases were brought by non-Trump lawyers or by Trump lawyers in a wide range of jurisdictions. No cross examinations in preliminary hearings if the judge is solely determining if the contention warrants investigation due to the strength of evidence or if the accusation is meritless.

    • Replies: @Greta Handel
  57. @Corvinus

    Thanks. This has been GREAT!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  58. Corvinus says:
    @Greta Handel

    No it’s been WONDERFUL! I can’t wait when at Giuliani’s next news conference every single person who has made a claim or has an affidavit comes to the podium and tells their story.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?