The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
The Price of Papal Popularity
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Normally a synod of Catholic bishops does not provide fireworks rivaling the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where Mayor Richard Daley’s boys in blue ran up the score on the radicals in Grant Park.

But, on Oct. 13, there emanated from the Synod on the Family in Rome a 12-page report from a committee picked by Pope Francis himself — and the secondary explosions have not ceased.
The report recognized the “positive aspects of civil unions and cohabitation” and said “homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community.” As for Catholics who divorce and remarry without an annulment, we must avoid “any language or behavior that might make them feel discriminated against.”

Hailed by gay rights groups, the document stunned traditionalists.

“Undignified. Shameful. Completely Wrong,” said Cardinal Gerhard Muller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and guardian of Catholic orthodoxy.

He was echoed by Cardinal Raymond Burke, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. “The document lacks a solid foundation in the Sacred Scriptures and the Magisterium,” said Cardinal Burke. “It gives the impression of inventing … what one Synod Father called ‘revolutionary’ teaching on marriage and the family.”

Cardinal Burke called on the pope for a restatement of Catholic teaching on marriage and morality, saying, “It is long overdue.” The pope has relieved Cardinal Burke of his post.
Voice of the Family, a coalition of international pro-life groups, calls the document a “betrayal.”

Irish representative Patrick Buckley said it “represents an attack on marriage and the family” by “in effect giving tacit approval of adulterous relationships.” The report, he adds, “fails to recognize that homosexual inclination is objectively disordered.”

Cardinal Walter Kasper has been the prime mover of the liberalization of Catholic teaching on sexual morality. When an African bishop objected to the report, Kasper retorted, “You can’t speak about this with Africans. … It’s not possible. … It’s a taboo.”

Hearing this insult, Burke went upside the head of his brother cardinal:

“It is profoundly sad and scandalous that such remarks were made by a cardinal of the church. They are a further indication of the determination … to advance Cardinal Kasper’s false positions, even by means of racist remarks about a significant and highly respected part of the Synod membership.”

In the report voted on by the full synod and released this weekend, the language most offensive to orthodox Catholics was gone. But the synod meets again next year, and the stakes could scarcely be higher for the church and pope.

In his remarks at the synod’s close, Pope Francis mocked “so-called traditionalists” for their “hostile rigidity.”

That is one way of putting it. Another is that traditionalists believe moral truth does not change, nor can Catholic doctrines be altered.

Even a pope cannot do that.

ORDER IT NOW

Should such be attempted, the pope would be speaking heresy. And as it is Catholic doctrine that the pope is infallible, that he cannot err when speaking ex cathedra on faith and morals, this would imply that Francis was not a valid pope and the chair of Peter is empty.

We would then be reading about schismatics and sedevacantists.

The Catholic Church is not the Democratic Party of Obama, Hillary and Joe, where principled positions on abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage “evolve.” And when did flexibility in matters of moral principle become a virtue for Catholics?

Indeed, it was in defense of the indissolubility of marriage that Pope Clement VII excommunicated Henry VIII who held the title “Defender of the Faith” for refuting the heresies of Luther.

When Henry wished to divorce Catherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boleyn, Pope Clement said this was not possible. His stand for marriage caused the Catholic Church to lose England.

One wonders what this pope thinks of Pope Clement’s “rigidity.”

While Francis I has nether denied not sought to change any doctrine, Cardinal Burke is correct. The pope has “done a lot of harm.” He has created confusion among the faithful and is soon going to have to speak with clarity on the unchanging truths of Catholicism.

In his beatification of Paul VI on Sunday, Pope Francis celebrated change. “God is not afraid of new things,” he said, “we are making every effort to adapt ways and methods … to the changing conditions of society.”

But among the social changes since Vatican II and Paul VI have been the West’s embrace of no-fault divorce, limitless promiscuity, abortion on demand and same-sex marriage.

Should the church “adapt” to these changes in society?

Should the church accommodate itself to a culture as decadent as ours? Or should the church stand against it and speak moral truth to cultural and political power, as the early martyrs did to Rome?

Pope Francis is hugely popular. But his worldly popularity has not come without cost to the church he leads and the truths he is sworn to uphold.

“Who am I to judge?” says the pope. But wasn’t that always part of the job description? And if not thee, Your Holiness, who?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.”

Copyright 2014 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Catholic Church 
Hide 13 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent article. So perfectly points out how whacked out this situation is.

    I’m not sure if the church really deserves the allegiance of rational people at this point.

  2. The 1st lesson in this should have been what has been evident for ages: ‘you cannot legislate morality’

    Furthermore, Christianity consists of two distinct paths that will never resolve; the teachings of Jesus and Saint Paul are diametrically opposed and this is why you’ll find ‘Christians’ on both sides of every issue:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/04/11/celebrating-the-anti-christ/

    If Jesus was libertarian (do not judge, do not throw stones) Paul was totalitarian (women must submit, homosexuality is abomination) in the machinations adopted by the Church at Rome, which, by the way, are incorporated to every faith or sect that uses the Bible (a work pioneered and politically engineered by the Roman minions of Constantine)

  3. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Machiavelli said a prince must decide whether it is better to be respected or loved. This Pope has made the wrong choice.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  4. With too many Catholic priests buggering boys, and the silent assent of the Catholic hierarchy engaged in the coverup, it shouldn’t be surprising that a powerful contingent within Catholicism are for an “anything goes” licentiousness.

  5. Vendetta says:

    I’m more surprised and disappointed with the liberal stance on divorce than on gay marriage. That one is going to be a lot more socially damaging. The deviant sideshow may indeed be embarrassing, but it’s goings-on really don’t matter that much to me. But it’s the 50% divorce rate that’s wrecking families and damaging children and the future of mainstream society, and its a shame to see more pandering to easy and meaningless divorce instead of attempts to reduce it.

  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This whole “gay marriage” thing has nothing to do with equality. It is yet another Jewish cultural Marxist attack on traditional western values and beliefs. The basic idea is to undermine all the traditional views and values that provided the glue for western society and culture for the last 500 years. Next will be incest, polygamy, polyandry, etc. It is all part of the process.

  7. @Anonymous

    Another way to look at it, a Church can be orthodox or respectable. The Episcopalians, for example, chose to be respectable.

  8. Keith Vaz [AKA "norm"] says:

    CC should allow women priests. It’s the only way to stop seminaries attracting gay pedophiles.

  9. matt says:

    “‘Who am I to judge?’ says the pope. But wasn’t that always part of the job description? And if not thee, Your Holiness, who?”

    Gee, I dunno. God, maybe?

  10. dan says:

    “Let not man declare unclean what God hath declared clean.”

  11. HA says:

    “CC should allow women priests. It’s the only way to stop seminaries attracting gay pedophiles.

    There is zero evidence that Catholic clergy abuse children at a higher frequency than clergy of other denominations or that Catholic bishops have been any more derelict than other bureaucrats in “passing the trash” from parish to parish, or district to district. (Granted, to a Catholic, rape by a priest is far more heinous than rape by any other clergy, but that’s a separate matter.) There’s just more money and adulation to be obtained in filing lawsuits against Catholics than by going after some yeshiva or madrassa, assuming those institutions are likely resort to secular authorities to settle such matters in the first place.

    If you favor married or female clergy, you’re free to say so. But don’t pretend that such changes will help with the problem of priests raping children, since there’s no evidence it has done so for those religions that have tried it.

  12. Bliss says:

    Indeed, it was in defense of the indissolubility of marriage that Pope Clement VII excommunicated Henry VIII who held the title “Defender of the Faith” for refuting the heresies of Luther.

    Buchanan needs to be reminded that among the founding principles of America are the complete rejection of the authority of Popes and Kings.

    Besides this willful disregard of the Constitution there is also his religious hypocrisy of placing the Pope above Jesus.

    Also notable is his sectarian/catholic intolerance of the Protestant faith.

  13. TLM says:

    Very well articulated summary of where we are at in the Church. Even though Doctrine can never change, he is correct that the harm done has to do with the Holy Father’s capitulation or maybe outright agreement with error. His signals are clear, and if they are not, they should be to anyone looking. As I have said many times before, this seems like 1962 all over again. ‘Perception is 90 % of the law’ a saying never more true than today in the Church. The Holy Father has an obligation to state clearly the precepts of the Church, which he has not yet done. This is what everyone is waiting for, and until then there will be a chaos and crisis of ‘pastoral leadership’ that may even be greater than we had with ‘the spirit’ of Vat ll.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS