The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Is This How Europe Ends?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Fortress Europe is an illusion.”

So declares the Financial Times in the closing line of its Saturday editorial: “Europe Cannot Ignore Syrian Migrant Crisis.”

The FT undertakes to instruct the Old Continent on what its duty is and what its future holds: “The EU will face flows of migrants and asylum seekers across the Mediterranean for decades to come.”

Can Europe not repel this unwanted home invasion from the Global South?

It is “delusional” to think so, says the FT. Europe must be realistic and set about “providing legal routes for migrants and asylum seekers.”

What occasioned the editorial was Greece’s rough resistance to Turkish President Erdogan’s funneling of thousands of Syrian refugees, who had fled into Turkey, right up to the border with Greece.

Erdogan is threatening to inundate southeastern Europe with Syrian refugees to extract more money from the EU in return for keeping the 3.5 million Syrians already in Turkey away from EU frontiers.

Another Erdogan objective is to coerce Europe into backing his military intervention in Syria to prevent President Bashar Assad from capturing all of Idlib province and emerging victorious in his civil war.

In the human rights hellhole that is Syria today, we may see the dimensions of the disaster wrought when Wilsonian crusaders set out to depose the dictator Assad and make Syria safe for democracy.

A brief history.

When the Arab Spring erupted and protesters arose to oust Assad, the U.S., Turkey and the Gulf Arabs aided and equipped Syrian rebels willing to take up arms. The “good rebels,” however, were routed and elements of al-Qaida soon assumed dominance of the resistance.

Facing defeat, Syria’s president put out a call to his allies — Russia, Iran, Hezbollah — to save his regime. They responded, and Assad, over four years, recaptured all of Syria west of the Euphrates, save Idlib.

There, the latest fighting has pushed 900,000 more refugees to Turkey’s southern border.

The 21st-century interventions and wars of the West in the Islamic world have not gone well.

George W. Bush was goaded into invading Iraq. Barack Obama was persuaded to overthrow Colonel Moammar Gadhafi in Libya and the Assad regime in Damascus. Obama ordered U.S. forces to assist Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in his war to crush Houthi rebels who had ousted Riyadh’s resident puppet in Yemen.

And what has the West reaped from our Mideast wars?

In Syria and Yemen, we have helped to create two of the world’s greatest human rights disasters. In Libya, we have a new civil war. In Iraq, we now battle Iran for influence inside a nation we “liberated” in 2003

In Afghanistan, we have concluded a deal with our enemy of two decades, the Taliban, that will enable us to pull our 12,000 troops out of the country in 14 months and let our Afghan allies work it out, or fight it out, with the Taliban. America is washing its hands of its longest war.

In five wars over 20 years, we lost 7,000 soldiers with some 40,000 wounded. We plunged the wealth of an empire into these wars.

And what did these wars produce for the peoples we went to aid and uplift, besides hundreds of thousands of dead Afghans and Arabs and millions of people uprooted from their homes and driven into exile?

Now, Europe is being admonished by the FT that, having done its duty by plunging into the Mideast, the continent has a new moral duty to take in the refugees the wars created, for decades to come.

But if the EU opens its doors to an endless stream of Africans and Arabs, where is the evidence that European nations will accept and assimilate them?

Will these migrants and asylum seekers become good Europeans? Or will they create in the great cities of Europe enclaves that replicate the conditions in the African and Middle East countries whence they came?

The history of the last half millennium tells the story of the rise and fall of a civilization.

ORDER IT NOW

In the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, Spain, Britain, France and Portugal, and then Belgium, Italy, Germany and America, all believing in the superiority of their civilization, went out into the world to create empires to uplift and rule what Rudyard Kipling derisively called “the lesser breeds without the law.”

After two world wars, the rulers of these empires embraced a liberalism that now proclaimed the equality of all peoples, races, creeds, cultures and civilizations. This egalitarian ideology mandated the dismantling of empires and colonies as the reactionary relics of a benighted time.

Now the peoples of the new nations, dissatisfied with what their liberated lands and rulers have produced, have decided to come to Europe to enjoy in the West what they cannot replicate at home. And liberalism, the ideology of Western suicide, dictates to Europe that it take them in — for decades to come.

The colonizers of yesterday are becoming the colonized of tomorrow. Is this how the West ends?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2020 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: EU, European Right, Immigration, Syria, Turkey 
Hide 133 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. ‘…Rudyard Kipling derisively called “the lesser breeds without the law.”…’

    The reference doesn’t seem to have to the various peoples colonized, but to the powers competing with Britain, such as the Germans and Russians.

    • Replies: @ricpic
    , @Paw
  2. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:

    Most right wing Europeans are pro-Zionist lackeys who support people like Nigel Farage and Geert Wilders. The sorts who cheer on Muslim countries being bombed to smithereens (except Saudi which they like) and then wonder why millions of refugees are flooding into Europe. Europeans are victims of their own stupidity.

  3. Pat’s on the right track — tho his causes are a bit off.
    I think it should be clear to all that Europe can not take another mass refugee invasion as it did a few years ago.
    That group has not assimilated to Europe well.
    So, yes, stop them at the border or better yet pay off Erogden.
    Turkey may not “deserve” the $$ but they have taken in over 3 millions &, more to the point, paying Turkey now is vastly cheaper than taking in millions more.
    However this doesn’t mean the the “West” has no responsibilities.
    Its FIRST responsibility is to STOP invading these countries, whether directly or thru proxies. Stop destabilizing them.
    And start creating a world economy which allows some of these places to crawl out of the muck….Done correctly, it might even help working people in the West also….Here endeth the fantasising….

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @Bill Jones
  4. Anon[396] • Disclaimer says:

    Excuse me, Mr Buchanan, the wars carried out in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan ha precisely nothing to do with “aiding and uplifting” anyone. They had everything to do with America getting their filthy hands on those selfsame peoples resources. A little honesty would not go amiss. Yours faithfully, an African

  5. Smith says:

    The end of the current Western Europe might even be the rebirth of the whole Europe.

    Embrace the end, as it’s the beginning of something new, better or worse.

  6. KenH says:

    Erdogan shares a great deal of responsibility for further destabilizing Syria so he can go f*ck himself and the Islamic high horse he likes to strut around on. Sure, Europe can pay him but he’ll just keep finding pretexts to up the ante so it’s time for Europe to man up and prepare for war with Turkey and the mass expulsion of its hostile and unassimilable Muslims, preferably to Turkey so they can shove them up Erdogan’s behind.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  7. @Anonymous

    Zio-idiocy aside, you are likewise unwittingly promoting a false globalist narrative. Given the uncontrolled population explosion in the Arab world and Africa (which even their own authorities in at least some countries now acknowledge is a problem), it hardly matters whether they get bombed or not. Europe would be inundated with “wretched refuse” anyway. Even today, the vast majority of so-called refugees are economic migrants, not pitiful victims of terrible neo-colonial aggression.

    Of course, the Zio-idiocy certainly doesn’t help, but it’s not the major problem. That would be the promotion of suicidal altruism by politicians and media (who are, of course, deep in the pockets of the usual suspects), and the murderous stomping down on anyone who tries to be a voice of sanity. If Europe was left to itself, it could deal with the invasion very, very easily. Just imagine what Churchill, Hitler, Stalin or Charles de Gaulle would have done if one million rapists suddenly showed up on their borders and demanded to be let in in the name of humanity?

    Furthermore, as I always point out in these posts: If Europeans are idiots, what then are Americans? Europe, for all its troubles, still has a solid majority of Europeans in all age groups, even the worst afflicted parts like Belgium or Sweden. America is already majority non-white in the younger brackets. The US will fall long before Europe does. And the Aztec hordes now gobbling up the lands Cortez and his successors once conquered from them can in no way be blamed on the wars in the Middle East (even if both phenomena have many of their backers in common).

  8. Smith says:

    Also, Europe has more chance of getting this than the USA.

    Despite the rtetorhics, America politics even refuse to believe there’s an American ethnicity (as in WASP). This is increasingly not the case in Central and Eastern Europe.

  9. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Mr. Buchanan’s purported dissidence is a joke, most laughable when it comes to whitewashing the motives of Uncle Sam’s extraterritorial behavior. His criticisms are of Washington’s tactical overreach, not hegemony in principle. “Mr. Paleoconservative” merely advocates a right-sized imperialism.

    • Replies: @ringo
  10. Paul says:

    Who would have thought, not so long ago, that the West would collapse this way? The elites of western countries were, of course, looking out for there own self-interests in their foreign interventions. However, those interventions did help civilize backward regions. We have seen the mayhem in many of those regions since the departure.

  11. Exador says:

    Uncontrolled immigration leads to a ‘positive feedback loop’, and I mean that in the engineering sense. As more immigrants come in, they vote for more immigrants to come in, with greater numbers, the politicians kowtow to them, making policies for more immigrants to come in, who then vote for more immigrants, only now with greater political strength, so the politicians cave even faster…
    As with all ‘positive feedback loops’, it is unstable and will eventually explode.

  12. A123 says:

    Something is clearly wrong in Europe. FT replaced The Guardian as the lead voice for the far-left EU, when it selected George IslamoSoros as their “Person (not man) of the Year”.

    Europe is not dead yet. PiS in Poland, Fidesz in Hungary, and Lega Nord in Italy are all having successes fighting back against the EU, Globalist mass migration theology.

    Do not ask the pessemitic, “Is This How Europe Ends?”

    Ask the optimistic, “Is This How Christian Europe is Reborn?” Once, the Failed EU is terminated with extreme prejudice, there will be new opportunities.

    PEACE 😇

  13. @Anon

    Right that the US government’s invasions and destruction of those countries had nothing to do with helping or uplifting their people.

    Not sure that the wars had to do with natural resources, though. It doesn’t seem that the US has seized any of those resources, and the US has not purported to prohibit the middle eastern or central Asian targets from selling oil, natural gas, minerals / metals to China, for example.

    The wars thus seem more likely motivated by (1) destroying or creating chaos in potential regional rivals to Israel and (2) generating huge multi-decade profits for military manufacturers and their executives, major shareholders, and the congressmen they own.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @Rurik
  14. Rurik says:

    So declares the Financial Times in the closing line of its Saturday editorial: “Europe Cannot Ignore Syrian Migrant Crisis.”

    Have we gotten to the point when the (()) are not even necessary?

    I see the president of the FT was also involved with ((The Economist)) (Rothschild’s rag), so I would be shocked, shocked to find that the PTB behind the FT are also tribal?

    Why are these people so psychotically unhinged in their insane imperative to see whitey blended away?

    Do they really hate us *that* much?

    What occasioned the editorial was Greece’s rough resistance to Turkish President Erdogan’s funneling of thousands of Syrian refugees…

    It was a seminal moment, and reminded me of something an European once told me, ‘that the West is thousands of years old. And they’ve been menaced on all sides, from Carthagians to Mongols to Ottomans and Barbary white-slavers, and yet Europe persists.

    When Erdogon (who laughably wants Europe to accept Turkey as a member), threated to unleash the hoards into Europa, as if there was nothing a castrated Europe could do about it, I was amazed at the impotence of the West. Yet I see they’re not completely ‘Jewed’, as yet.

    Another Erdogan objective is to coerce Europe into backing his military intervention in Syria to prevent President Bashar Assad from capturing all of Idlib province and emerging victorious in his civil war.

    Europe and Russia should back Syria 100%. And demand that Turkey’s occupying forces vacate Syria’s Hatay Province (as well as Idlib) with all due haste. Syria must be returned to it’s full sovereign borders with every inch of its sovereign territory, (including the Hatay Province!).

    The belligerent, aggressive imperial forces of colonization and theft of Syrian territory, must be repudiated. The Golan Heights must also be returned by the regime now illegally occupying and trying to steal it to this day.

    we may see the dimensions of the disaster wrought when Wilsonian crusaders set out to depose the dictator Assad and make Syria safe for democracy.

    Wilsonian crusaders = zion’s eternal whores in the ZUSA

    seven trillion dollars worth of whoredom. Thousands of American lives, millions of innocent citizens. And all of it, squandered in abased service to Jewish supremacist billionaires who buy our politicians like walking into a Wal-Mart, and tossing them into the cart. That’s how easy it is.

    They’re pure, treasonous whores. Dancing on the string$ of sinister men, with ill-gotten shekels clinking in their pockets. When Sheldon Adelson mentions scorpions, I wonder if he appreciates the irony. (with apologies to the inoffensive kind of scorpion, for the comparison ; )

    There, the latest fighting has pushed 900,000 more refugees to Turkey’s southern border.

    It’s not even Turkey’s border. They Hatay Province belongs to Syria. It’s being illegally occupied by Turkey today. Just as the Golan Heights are illegally occupied by Israel.

    The obvious solution to all of this, is simply for Europe and Russia to demand that Turkey end the illegal occupation of Syrian territory, and move their aggressive forces out of the Hatay and back into Turkey proper.

    Once Syria’s borders and sovereignty are intact, order can be restored and the refugee crises averted.

    The 21st-century interventions and wars of the West in the Islamic world have not gone well.

    .. for the West or the Islamic world, but Jewish supremacists are giddy. Seven trillion American dollars squandered, millions of lives destroyed.. suffering and misery and despair as far as the eyes can see!

    And what did these wars produce for the peoples we went to aid and uplift, besides hundreds of thousands of dead Afghans and Arabs and millions of people uprooted from their homes and driven into exile?

    In what way doesn’t that sound straight out of the Old Testament?

    If John Hagee were reading those words, he’d be gloating in full-on rapture mode.

    Now, Europe is being admonished by the FT that, having done its duty by plunging into the Mideast, the continent has a new moral duty to take in the refugees the wars created, for decades to come.

    Such a deal!

    The colonizers of yesterday are becoming the colonized of tomorrow. Is this how the West ends?

    Yes, unless there’s still something of the Western spirit left in the veins of Europa and Russia, that tells Erdogan to get the fuck out of the Hatay Provence, and take his sultanate slinking back across his border into Turkey, where he and the Turks belong.

    Just as Europe needs to tell Israel the same thing about the Golan, (treasonous scum in the White House, notwithstanding ; )

    Yes, it’s true Jewish supremacists are psychotic in their collective imperative to destroy whitey.

    It’s an obsession they’re consumed by, 24/7.

    And yes, if the denizens of Africa and the Middle East, can march on a ((sickened)) West, there won’t be any sympathy from the Asia or Latin America or Africa or the Middle East, for a Europe raped into submission and genocided off the planet. They’ll all be thrilled to no end, (as will many here at the Unz Review ; )

    So if there’s any hope for the West, it’s going to have to be home grown, where liberalism has rotted out the souls of hundreds of millions. So that they embrace their replacement and depraved servitude.

    Which means its up to the rest of us. We have a daunting task, to keep the flame burning.

    • Agree: follyofwar, Parfois1
    • Replies: @The scalpel
  15. @RadicalCenter

    Radical Center, I was about to hit the Agree button until I saw you did the same to Ken H’s comment in which he called for the West to “man up and prepare for war with Turkey” (a NATO partner with the biggest army outside of the US, no less). Your agreement there contradicts your well made point here.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  16. Is this how the West ends?

    Yes.

    With allowance made for acceleration due to nuclear weapons.

  17. Anon[132] • Disclaimer says:

    Financial Times is owned by Pearson Publishing, which also owns a 50% stake in The Economist (the other 50% is owned by the Rothschild family). Both of these Zionist publications are the biggest champions of globalism, open borders, multiculturalism, LGBTQ, legalized drugs, pornography, gambling, prostitution, which they proclaimed are values that represent “Classical Liberalism”.

    Angela Merkel’s disastrous decision to let in 1 million “Syrian” refugees that led to her downfall was in large part pushed by The Economist, which published covers like “Let Them In, Let Them Work”, and “Hit Him. Hit Him Hard” on Assad.

    The message is always the same: you can’t stop migration, globalism, multiculturalism, drugs, LGBTQ, pornography, gambling, all manners of degeneracy…so just learn to live with it, eventually, you’ll love it. Take the drugs, drink the alcohol, have lots of sex, enjoy the mindless and degenerate pop culture and entertainment, let the (((experts))) do all your thinking for you, rage against those who don’t wish to live like you, and let in the third world horde to run over your country.

    Aldous Huxley foresaw this in his book Brave New World in 1932.

    • Agree: follyofwar
    • Thanks: Rurik
  18. Anon[278] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Just like in the US, Jews are playing both sides of the debate to destroy their host. Right wing Jews want to bomb all the Muslim countries, while left wing Jews who own publications like FT and TE hold up their megaphones and try to guilt trip the West into taking in all the refugees that the Ziocon Jews created. The ultimate goal is to destroy the West. This is a revenge 2,000 years in the making.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  19. @animalogic

    “Start creating a World Economy.” Is that not another name for GLOBALISM, the mindset of the greedy oligarchs that has lead us into the mess we find ourselves in today?

    Globalism justifies the offshoring of millions of family-sustaining American jobs into Third World countries, which pay their factory workers a dollar an hour – if they are lucky. Globalism has lead to the hollowing out of small town and rural America – precisely those areas populated by working class whites, whose out-of-work and out-of-luck men struggle with exploding rates of suicide and opioid addiction.

    And, as Tucker Carlson has pointed out, Globalism has led to China controlling over 90% of the medical supplies and drugs this country needs for its survival. Now, with the Coronavirus pandemic, (Tucker blames it all on China, but, there is certainly evidence that the US military/CIA was behind it, as several articles here at the Unz Review have pointed out), China is telling Washington that they need those medical resources for their own people and may have to cut us off.

    This is where a World Economy/Globalism has lead us. Off-shoring means that our huge and resource rich country is now so dependent on other countries for basic necessities that it must go begging for its own survival.

    • Agree: Rurik
  20. Rurik says:
    @RadicalCenter

    Right that the US government’s invasions and destruction of those countries had nothing to do with helping or uplifting their people.

    Exactly.

    Buchanan was being sardonic with his ‘aiding and uplifting’ comment. Just like his ‘Willsonian’ comment.

    The idea that the ZUS intended to ‘aid or uplift’ anyone, as it foments wars and horrors and atrocities all over the planet, is so beyond absurd that it’s taken on face value as preposterous.

    The wars thus seem more likely motivated by (1) destroying or creating chaos in potential regional rivals to Israel and (2) generating huge multi-decade profits for military manufacturers and their executives, major shareholders, and the congressmen they own.

    yep

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @SolontoCroesus
  21. In other words, kharma–what goes around comes around. As if history has ever been any different…and not just Europe. But with Europe and the white nations having been imperialist for so long, what else could be expected? And then you have the folks pushing this, the same folks who refuse to allow aliens in their own nation…but that’s okay, Israel, because your so-called superiority will not save you from the wrath that is eventually coming. Think I’m kidding? Or is Benny boy about to get kicked out of leadership by Gantz mostly because the Palestinian Joint List just made sure you do get kicked out? Nutty, you can’t bribe your way outta this one! Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahah! (nor can Frump Kushner save you either….)

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @Malla
  22. Rurik says:
    @follyofwar

    Ken H’s comment in which he called for the West to “man up and prepare for war with Turkey” (a NATO partner

    a ((NATO)) partner, who stages catastrophic invasions of Europe from Turkey

    I’d prefer to see Russia admitted into NATO, and Turkey tossed out on their sultan’s arse

    Once Russia is ensconced into NATO, then it sort of becomes ‘what’s the point? And the whole farce can be disbanded.

    For what it’s worth, I think it would make sense for Europe to take in the elderly, whenever they can, because it was NATO after all, that helped to destroy nations like Libya and Iraq and Syria and others. So taking in the elderly, would alleviate some of the suffering, (while preserving the ethnic integrity of Europe) and allow the young Syrians to fight alongside Assad, to secure their destiny from the forces of aggression (Erdogan’s Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc..) that threaten it.

    And if you’re a radical Sunni Syrian, who prefers Ergogan’s vision of a dismembered and raped Syria, then get the fuck out, and move to Turkey or Saudi Arabia, where you belong. Problem solved.

    IMHO

  23. Anon[235] • Disclaimer says:

    But the people who decide what people must read in the FT and the people who decide what the EU does are on the same team, so to speak.
    So, naturally, yes. They know what they are talking about: their own decisions.

  24. melpol says:

    Brown and black immigrants can be housed in Europe. But government supplied cash can not be available to the newcomers. They will be forced to live in anarchy style ghettos. European whites can live in their fortified enclaves. High paying Technology Jobs will continually be held by whites. Taxes will be needed for security.

  25. A123 says:
    @Rurik

    I’d prefer to see Russia admitted into NATO, and Turkey tossed out on their sultan’s arse

    Turkey has friends so it would be difficult to toss them. However an new Atlantic Christian Treaty Organization [ACTO] could be formed to accommodate Christian nations including Orthodox Russia. It’s mandate and would include opposing Turkish aggression.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @A123
    , @dfordoom
  26. @John Regan

    Travel makes stupid and Anon proved them americans gave it down the line to their siblings.

  27. Rurik says:
    @Anon

    This is a revenge 2,000 years in the making.

    It has nothing to do with revenge. That’s a ruse, and it’s used to imply that somewhere, somehow ‘the Jews’ were persecuted by the West.

    Like the ubiquitous tropes about the terrible “Crusaders’, about whom there are no end of lies, just like with Saint Isabella, and the heroic Reconquista of Spain.

    What our ((official)) ‘history’ amounts to, is a litany of butt-hurt, for all the times Western man has had to reassert his will to persevere, against those forces whom would subjugate him.

    That there are legions of butt-hurts out there, seething with envy and covetousness, is obvious

    But revenge has nothing to do with it. It’s envy~ burning, bitter, seething envy; of and for a people who’ve created a society that Jewish supremacists see.. (Athens, Rome, modern Europe) as obviously superior to anything they could accomplish in ten thousand years.

    So they dream of burning it all to the ground, just like they had their goons burn Dresden to the ground. Out of a netherworld hatred- born of envy, the likes of which we Gentiles simply wouldn’t be able to comprehend if our lives depended on it. Because they’ve been practicing their envy and hatred for two thousand years, and have perfected it into a religion and a way of life.

    But Dresden has been rebuilt

    because try as they might, the cathedrals and stunning baroque architecture of Europe, can’t be destroyed by burning the buildings down, if the blo0d still flows in its people.

    This is the reason why the FT demands Europe open its gates to millions of non-Westerners.

    Detroit will Never Again!, make Jewish supremacists feel envy for the denizens. Now if they can simply manage to ‘guilt’ Europe into a gigantic, sprawling Detroit..

    London today
    ..well no more envy!

    • Agree: John Regan, Malla
  28. The scalpel says: • Website
    @Rurik

    Bravo! Whoop whoop. Rurik on a roll!!!

    • Replies: @Rurik
  29. Altai says:

    It’s worth noting that most of them at the border with Greece aren’t Syrian. Infact they’re not even Arab, many from various ethnicities of Iran and Afghanistan and even some from Pakistan. Partly this is simply due to the fact that the new wave of Syrians were all the way at the Turkish border when he gave this edict.

    I was shocked when the BBC sent Orla Guerin to the border and she was right up at the fence and immediately spoke about having interviewed ‘Iranians and Afghans’ before even mentioning Syrians. I thought they weren’t supposed to mention these obviously fake refugees, we were only to observe this. My favourite was during the wave in 2015 when I was watching a Danish news report about the people walking through Denmark to get to Sweden. During the clip you could clearly see guys from the Balkans (Presumably Albanians) walking behind her and giving a mischievous grin to the camera.

  30. A123 says:
    @A123

    Turkey has friends so it would be difficult to toss them. However an new Atlantic Christian Treaty Organization [ACTO] could be formed to accommodate Christian nations including Orthodox Russia. It’s mandate and would include opposing Turkish aggression.

    My browser hung and I did not realize this posted.

    The last sentence should read — Its mandate would include opposing Turkish aggression.

    Mexico is a Christian nation. They could be lured into joining the new coalition by calling it the Atlantic Mediterranean Liberation Organization [AMLO].

    PEACE 😇

  31. ricpic says:
    @Colin Wright

    Derisively? Why derisively? Realistically, I’d say.

  32. @Rurik

    Naturally, I’d love to see Turkey kicked out of NATO. Add Russia in its place and the whole rotten to the core ediface falls like a house of cards.

    But, the last thing the West/US needs is another war on an Islamic country run by a Strongman (Erdogan) who dares to go his own way. We should never forget what devastation was done in our names to Iraq, Libya, and Syria – all of whom led by Strongmen with the guts to defy the Great Satan.

    BTW, I thought that the first part of Buchanan’s article, his “brief history,” was way off base with his talk of “good rebels,” and “the human rights hellhole of Syria” run by “dictator” Assad. That came right out of the John McCain/Barack Obama/HRC talking points.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  33. The FT and The Economist aren’t worth the attention.

    Policies they promote have turned parts of the UK into real third world hellholes. People elsewhere in Europe are neither stupid nor docile like beleaguered Brits.

    Savile Town in Yorkshire that has almost no white residents
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3899540/Go-away-shouldn-t-Don-t-come-corner-Yorkshire-no-white-residents.html

    Child sex abuse gangs could have assaulted ONE MILLION youngsters in the UK
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/child-sex-abuse-gangs-could-5114029

    • Replies: @Just Passing Through
  34. @Rurik

    On a societal scale from 1 to 100 jews have proven to rank at minus ten.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  35. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    “Buchanan was being sardonic ..”

    Yes, but his purported dissidence is a joke, most laughable when it comes to whitewashing the motives of Uncle Sam’s extraterritorial behavior. His criticisms are of Washington’s tactical overreach, not hegemony in principle. “Mr. Paleoconservative” merely advocates a right-sized imperialism.

    Just another part of his primary job: to keep you voting Team Red.

  36. @Anon

    I don’t disagree, but I’d add that our society reached peak “Brave New World” some years ago and is now becoming increasingly “1984” as the technology required for that matures. From literally omnipresent surveillance to the Red Guards-like ideological fervor of the Outer Party (“SJWs”) to the utter sociopathy and narcissistic megalomania of the Inner Party (the “One Percent”).

    In Huxley’s dystopia, the elites are to all seeming genuinely well-intentioned, in their own way, and want a nice, clean, stable and sustainable world for their subjects (even if it’s ridden with perversion and enabled through cynical social engineering). And if people disagree with their idea of utopia, they simply let them live in exile, free of the insanity.

    In 1984, the Inner Party men sadistically work to deliberately destroy all human happiness, normality and culture under their domination, for the express purpose of enjoying the humiliation and pain of the peons. And if people disagree, or even express the tiniest bit of “hate speech” against the system (called “thoughtcrime” in the novel), they are sent to their version of Guantanamo to be tortured.

    Our real life Carlos Slim, Morris Dees, B. Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton type people and the system they have built have features of both of these nightmares, but they have been skewing closer to the latter since the 1990s or so.

  37. Rurik says:
    @The scalpel

    Thank you Scalpel,

    Always great to get encouragement from people you respect.

    Cheers.

    • Thanks: The scalpel
  38. Rurik says:
    @follyofwar

    But, the last thing the West/US needs is another war on an Islamic country run by a Strongman (Erdogan) who dares to go his own way. We should never forget what devastation was done in our names to Iraq, Libya, and Syria – all of whom led by Strongmen with the guts to defy the Great Satan.

    True that, (and I suspect Ken was using a bit of hyperbole ; )

    (Erdogan) who dares to go his own way

    Greece has every right to knock him upside his sultan’s head. By what right do you unleash thousands of unwelcome invaders into your neighbor’s lands?

    Buchanan’s article, his “brief history,” was way off base with his talk of “good rebels,” and “the human rights hellhole of Syria” run by “dictator” Assad.

    me too

    I winced when he called the Syrian government a ‘regime’.

    But that’s Buchanan’s shtick, to pepper his articles with paeans to Newspeak. I find you have to read between the lines with Pat. And this:

    In the human rights hellhole that is Syria today, we may see the dimensions of the disaster wrought when Wilsonian crusaders set out to depose the dictator Assad and make Syria safe for democracy.

    ..is pure Buchanan wry, served up cold.

    He knows damn well there was never any intention to ‘make Syria safe for democracy’. I think he’s trying to mock the NYTs types, by parroting their dishonest “journalism’.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  39. Rurik says:
    @Fuerchtegott

    jews have proven to rank at minus ten.

    I like to make a distinction between Jews and Jewish supremacists.

    Jews who agree with us that Europe must turn away the refugees, end the wars, repudiate gay “marriages”, and stop supporting Israel’s genocidal rapine, are honorable.

    It’s only the vile Jewish supremacists, demanding that all white nations commit ethno-suicide, who deserve our contempt and wrath.

    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
  40. Smith says:
    @Anonymous

    Objectively, Sweden does jackshit in the ‘Stan and still get ton of refugees. In fact, Germany does very little also but refugees still want to go to Germany and Sweden the most.

    Saudi Arabia actually bomb and destabilize the ‘Stan countries and they just say whoops we are not taking refugees, human rights be damned.

    This is entirely the work of left wingers/liberals who want to open their anus wide, regardless of what their ancestors do, and of course corporations who want to increase GDP by simply importing more people instead of encouraging people to procreate.

  41. ringo says:
    @anonymous

    What are you people talking about?
    For as long as I can remember, Pat Buchanan has been, and is, the one voice in the MSM who has
    consistently opposed our foreign adventures and defense subsidies to our trade competitors.
    For which he has paid a price. For God’s sake, give the man his due. Let’s hope Tucker C will pick up the baton when Pat retires.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  42. Julia says:

    Many bloggers pretend that the ”COV crisis” has been engineered, and some say certain countries such as Iran have been targeted. Today i learned Italy is virtually ”closed” due to the COV crisis. Could there be a reason behind this, i.e., a pretext for not accepting refugees such as Libyans dying at sea trying to reach Italy?

  43. Thomasina says:
    @Anonymous

    Africa’s population is exploding. That is their biggest problem. They’re moving now only because they can. Some got into the E.U. and they then sent money back home, which allowed the next batch to come. These people are not refugees.

    Putin and Erdogan just negotiated a 6 km buffer zone between Syria and Turkey. The Syrian refugees can now go back home, which I believe most of them want to do.

    The rest of the people are not refugees. They are economic migrants who need to be turned around and told to advance in the direction they came from.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  44. Tomas says:

    With its 12 new military bases in Europe, NATO probably wants to use the EU and the refugees (= young, very young cannon fodder) and its Turk ally to hijack the Syrian government.

    THAT’S pure SADISM and CRUELTY.

    Here, i read: ‘The European Union is obliged to participate in US wars’

    We should remember the total support offered by the European Union to all of the Pentagon’s adventures, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen. In all these cases, without exception, the EU marched along in step with its suzerain, NATO.’

    ‘Whether they like it or not, they are today co-responsible for Washington’s wars, including for example the famine in Yemen, consecutive to the military operations by the Saudi Coalition and to US sanctions. They now have to choose either to assume these crimes and participate in them, or to leave the European treaties.’

    ‘…the construction of the European Union, which was imagined at a time when the world was divided into two irreconcilable blocs, is today completely inadapted. If they want to avoid being dragged by the United States into conflicts which are not their own, its members will have to free themselves from the European treaties and the integrated command of NATO.”

    https://www.voltairenet.org/article206265.html

    Let’s not forget that Halliburton and friends need cheap labor (such as refugees) to build their pipelines linking Iraq to the sea the Balkans and Bondsteel Kosovo.

    They also need cheap labor (such as refugees) to build their pipelines through Ukraine aainst Russia.

    • Replies: @Smith
    , @Rurik
  45. Smith says:
    @Tomas

    lol what? The pipelines are done by contractors and paid workers, not cheap labors.

    It’s hard work, you can’t just simply hire anyone.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  46. anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @ringo

    Check your comment history, and you’ll see that I answered the same question when you put it to me under a December 20, 2018, column by Mr. Sailer:

    ———

    Did you read his current offering here at Unz? I’m far from alone, but here’s what I said:

    ******

    “ … even as we maintain our Cold War commitments to defend scores of countries around the globe?”

    Defend? That’s become such a sick joke that Mr. Buchanan may have needed to set a new record for the pronoun propaganda — “we, us, our” — that marinates Americans in the sense that, because they live in Nebraska, they should root for Uncle Sam.

    And note the equally corny feminine personification — “she” — of China. One can almost see Minister Pat in powdered wig, using his saber to move little tin tanks around on the board there in the War Room.

    Finally, and as always, it’s “Putin’s Russia.”

    If he doesn’t wish to retire, then Mr. Buchanan should stick to his country’s internal problems, where his reputation for foresight and courage has been well earned. In publicly contemplating whether “we” should be at war with Eastasia or Eurasia, he serves to prop up our ruling Establishment, a right-sizing imperialist trapped in Beltway amber.

    ——–

    So now it’s your turn:

    Why do you pop in every year or so, pretending not to understand why people see through “Mr. Paleoconservative”?

  47. Paw says:
    @Colin Wright

    “If they ask you , why they have to die , tell them their fathers lied” …R.Kipling.

  48. @Thomasina

    Africa’s population is exploding. That is their biggest problem.

    It’s a huge problem that is looming over the West.

    Both left and right models haven’t worked in Africa and no one is allowed to talk about this.

    If you point this out to supposed experts of economic development on either side you are given fascinating retorts like “you’re a racist” and “well that’s Africa”.

    • Replies: @Just Passing Through
  49. @Rurik

    I winced when he called the Syrian government a ‘regime’.

    Because it is accurate? Or do tell when the next election is.

    I don’t support wars against Syria but he is calling it like it is.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  50. @Anon

    Good teacher, poor student?

  51. @animalogic

    ” better yet pay off Erogden.”

    What utter bollocks.

    The EU should.
    1. Cut off diplomatic relations with Turkey.
    2.Ban all air travel
    3. Enact a 100 % Refugee tariff on all Turkish goods.
    4. Start repatriating Turks living in Europe. 1,000 a day sounds about right, to start, and just to increase the fun make it a first in first out basis.

    That would fix the problem in a week or so.
    Do not respond to his capitulation quickly or graciously. The goal is to create so much pain that the Turks throw the bum out, he’s damn near close to that now.

    Fuck Erdogan and the camel he rode in on.

    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @animalogic
  52. swamped says:

    “The colonizers of yesterday are becoming the colonized of tomorrow. Is this how the West ends?” Holy Mother Russia will defend Western values even if Europe won’t, or is unable to. Those in Europe who still believe in these values can flock to her sheltering wings for shelter & succor. Those in Europe who are ashamed of their own crumbling culture can stay & be absorbed by the invading hordes of unwashed aliens. Russia has never been conquered; and Russia will never allow itself to be overrun by rude refugees. President Putin has this month formally proposed amending the Russia Constitution to affirm that “The Russian Federation, united by a thousand-year history, preserving the memory of the ancestors who transmitted to us the ideals and faith in God, as well as the continuity in the development of the Russian state, recognizes the historical state unity”. The revised Constitution would also decree that”only a union of a man and a woman is recognized as marriage”. As Putin explained, “As long as I am the president, we will not have one and two parents – we will have dad and mom.”
    Europe may be on the way to self-destruction but Russia still remains an impregnable Fortress.

  53. @Amerimutt Golems

    The Daily Mail is a very peculiar publication, I remember it went on a hate crusade against Nick Griffin and his ethnic nationalist British National Party. But then it also runs these stories destined to scare Whites.

    The publication is another globalist rag, so I wonder what their agenda could be?

  54. Parfois1 says:
    @Rurik

    I’d prefer to see Russia admitted into NATO, and Turkey tossed out on their sultan’s arse

    In its former incarnation (the USSR) when the “allies” were discussing the NATO set up as an “alliance for peace” under the motto of “Peace Through Superior Firepower” (it’s true, no joke) Molotov made representations to the allies-to-be (perhaps in mock irony) that the Soviet Union would be a valuable member of that alliance by dint of its proven firepower prowess and commitment to peace. The allies-to-be were not impressed by the offer! No wonder, their idea was to keep the SU out – that is the reason it was set up and they needed an enemy as the pretext!

    They are still at it 70 years later and no luck this time for Russia either. They are busy now just outside Russian borders doing military exercises to show their peaceful intentions!

    By the way, Turkey got in, not for being a member of the “club” (Atlantic Charter) or an ally – just a convenient bridgehead and missile site (as you surely know of course).

    • Replies: @Rurik
  55. No one in Hellas gives a damn what the FT writes about this issue.

  56. “The colonizers of yesterday are becoming the colonized of tomorrow.”
    The only thing in history that doesn’t change is constant change itself. In the 21st century, the nuclear age, can change avoid total destruction?
    https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/

  57. @Rurik

    U think the non supremacists could exists alone? As a nation somewhere without being a burden to some host?
    Why did they never try?

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @A. Benjamine Moser
  58. Rurik says:
    @Tomas

    ‘The European Union is obliged to participate in US wars’‘

    “We should remember the total support offered by the European Union to all of the Pentagon’s adventures, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen. In all these cases, without exception, the EU marched along in step with its suzerain, NATO.’

    both the Fed and the ECB are Rothschild central banks

    If you asked the American people, ‘was it worth it to spend seven trillion dollars of borrowed money (at interest!) to wage wars all over the planet (Ukraine, Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Yemen, more…), and slaughter and maim and displace millions of innocent men, women and children, while earning the unbridled and justified hatred of over a billion Muslims and Serbs and Russians and Iranians and Iraqis and God knows how many others.. Some of them who watched in horror as weddings! were ‘droned’.

    And all in slavish fealty to a nation that commits overt acts of war against America, when it isn’t committing myriad acts of subversion and treachery against our collective interests.. and ‘dancing and celebrating’ as the fireballs consumed thousands of Americans on 9/11 ?’

    There are very few Americans that would answer to that question, “the price is worth it”.

    Perhaps about 2% or so.

  59. Warman says:

    What the hell is this article saying? The lesser people are coming to Europe because they cannot create in their homelands what the West has? Give me a break. Any country that is NOT invaded by the West does well -> Turkey, India, China, Malaysia, Indonesia for example. Syria never sent hordes of immigrants to the West until they were invaded. Any country that is a lackey of the West like Egypt or Pakistan becomes a failed state and sends millions of its people to the West. Here is the lesson Mr. Buchanan: the West must LEAVE THE REST OF THE WORLD ALONE.

    • Agree: ivan
    • Replies: @Smith
  60. @Anon

    Buchanan is stating what the official line is. Just as the official line about the 2 World Wars is that it was about German/Nazi expansionism. All wars are economic wars, some end up as shooting wars, but they are all driven by economic control.

  61. Smith says:
    @Warman

    Explains all the african and pakistan refugees, because those are by far the biggest bunch in the refugee waves. There are millions of turks in Europe, legally or illegally.

    Strictly on the legal side, indian and chinese legally emigrate themselves by the hundred thousands.

    Blaming the West is getting old when they are all gathering in juicy welfare states.

    • Replies: @Just Passing Through
  62. @Omegabooks

    But with Europe and the white nations having been imperialist for so long, what else could be expected?

    Why is it that only Europe and the white nations have been imperialist? The Ottomans were expanding their Empire, just in different areas. The Mongols expanded their Empire, and were the only ones, early on, able to stop the expansion of the pre-Ottoman Muslim invasions, which was an empire in its own right. The Mughal Empire killed millions. The Bantus invaded most of sub-Saharan Africa killing millions. In the Americas, the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas had Empires. All of the above empires were more brutal and killed many more than the British, French, Spanish, or Portugeuse Empires, yet are given a free ride on criticism.
    The criticism of the European and white nations’ empires, in comparison, would be that they didn’t kill enough.

  63. Rurik says:
    @John Johnson

    Because it is accurate? Or do tell when the next election is.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Syrian_presidential_election

    The only reason someone deliberately writes ‘regime’, (as opposed to government), is to suggest an ‘illegitimacy’ for the “regime”. IOW, ‘regime’ is a pejorative because they don’t approve of the government.

    Now, please consider John Johnson.. whose government is more legitimate; Syria’s, or America’s?

    Whose government is in Syria against all known protocols of International Law?

    Whose government has been meddling in the affairs of the other nation?

    Whose government has been foisting war and strife and instability, specifically for the purpose of staging a putsch against the other’s?

    Whose government has been foisting putsches against legitimately elected governments all over the planet? Ukraine, for instance. Afghanistan, Iraq and so many others.

    Which country is operating under a regime (illegitimate, rogue, rule of the jungle), vs. an elected government trying to restore order and the rule of law, (to a nation that’s been savaged by an unaccountable aggressor)?

    By what right does the US regime occupy Syrian territory? The rule of ‘might = right’ ?

    That’s a very good way to determine if a government should be characterized as a ‘regime’. Does it respect domestic and International Law? If so, then it should be characterized as a government. If not, then we should all call it a regime.

    Which government on the global stage is in violation of just about every known tenet of International Law, codified by the planet’s people following the atrocities of WWII?

    With laws against ‘Waging aggressive or preemptive, unilateral wars’. Respecting the sovereignty of nations. And so forth.

    Is there a nation you can think of, that might be characterized as ignoring other nation’s sovereignty and waging aggressive wars (based on obvious lies) today?

    Hmmm…

    Is that nation Syria, whose popularly elected government has been doing all it can to restore order and sanity and stability, to its people, as a regime has been doing all it can to cause strife and horrors writ large all over the nation and beyond?

    Which nation (regime) recently pretended that it has the power to unilaterally declare that a large swath of valuable land (the Golan Heights ; ) now belongs to another murderous, illegitimate, rogue regime on the word’s stage? Eh?

    Does the government of the ZUS have the legitimate right to decide whose ancient territory belongs to whom, based on fickle political whims?

    Or are such pronouncements, the ravings of a half-baked leader of an out-of-control regime? Menacing the people of the planet with drones and bombs and diplomatic treachery. Doing all it can to ‘destroy seven nations in five years’.

    And the first step to destroying those nations, is to dishonestly begin to call the governments of those erstwhile stable and law-abiding nations ~ regimes.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  64. @Smith

    A friend worked in the Alberta oil patch for close to 30 years. Asian and South American “pipefitters” were being brought in to lower costs. My friend claimed that while they worked hard, most of their work quality was borderline, at best. Contractors want cheap. Finance capitalism is about minimizing costs to maximize profits.
    More than 30 years ago I read an article predicting that the future held no jobs, only work to do. Immigration is the reserve army of capital, and will be the way of achieving that.

    • Replies: @Smith
  65. Rurik says:
    @Parfois1

    Soviet Union would be a valuable member of that alliance by dint of its proven firepower prowess and commitment to peace.

    Yes, and we all know the kind of peace they had in mind.

    The allies-to-be were not impressed by the offer! No wonder, their idea was to keep the SU out – that is the reason it was set up and they needed an enemy as the pretext!

    Pretext?

    I think the idea was to use the SU as a necessary ‘other jaw of the vice’, to crush Germany in.

    Once Germany was ground to ashes, the leaders of the ‘free world’ weren’t too keen to play the role of Germans, in next act on the stage. So at first, I suspect that NATO had some legitimate purpose.

    Now, however- the Bolsheviks are firmly entrenched in power over here in the dying West. I suppose that’s why the Wall came down, because there was no point anymore. The Bolsheviks now control the governments of the West in absolute terms. So ironically, now NATO is being used by the world’s Bolsheviks to menace an inoffensive Russia, in a twist of fates that plays out in this never-ending tragicomedy

    a convenient bridgehead and missile site

    yep

    But Turkey, perhaps more than any other nation, is poised between the two dominant global powers today, as the sultan tries to navigate the tempestuous geopolitical waters between Russia and the ZUS.

    He’d do well to get out of Syria, work to stabilize Syria so the refugees can go home. Make nice with Russia and the ZUS. Send as many Kurds into Iraq as he can. Stop menacing Europe and try trade instead. And basically stop acting like an asshole on the world’s stage.

    But the sultan has an Ottoman sized ego, and so that’s not likely to happen any time soon.

  66. Rurik says:
    @Fuerchtegott

    Why did they never try?

    consider the Jews of Iran, for instance. Loyal, law abiding, respectful of the culture and wider society.

    Or the Jews of Palestine who lived there for centuries in peace and relative harmony with Christians and Muslims, until the zio-scum immigrated in.

    Lots of good and decent Jews out there. (Even if it sometimes seems that too few repudiate the evils some of the others are doing). I give Bernie credit for calling Nutenyahoo a racist. That took courage. (And is suspect he’s paying the price).

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
  67. Smith says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Key word, Asian and South American personnel i.e. trained personnel.

    They just don’t grab the rabble that is accumulating at the border.

  68. @Rurik

    The only reason someone deliberately writes ‘regime’, (as opposed to government), is to suggest an ‘illegitimacy’ for the “regime”. IOW, ‘regime’ is a pejorative because they don’t approve of the government.

    No it’s also used to describe a government that has been in power and cannot be removed democratically.

    Is that nation Syria, whose popularly elected government has been doing all it can to restore order and sanity and stability, to its people, as a regime has been doing all it can to cause strife and horrors writ large all over the nation and beyond?

    Which election would that be?

    People refer to Syria as a regime because the same family based party has been in charge since the 1970s when they took over via coup.

    Again I don’t have a problem with Syria but calling their government a regime is accurate.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  69. @John Johnson

    What exactly can be done about it? I often hear the suggestion that the West stops sending aid but considering that most of this aid ends up in the Swiss bank accounts of the African strongmen instead of the hungry people, it would hardly make a difference.

    Is it not Western medicine that is allowing such a population boom? By now the vaccine manufacturing industry has been transferred to Asia.

    So the West could withhold medical aid, but that doesn’t mean China would. And from the realpolitik sense, it is in China’s interests to see the West flooded with Africans to causes instability and civil strife.

    The only solution is to invade Africa and set up sterilisation camps. One child policy for Africa.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  70. @Smith

    Those ‘Pakistani’ refugees are actually Afghans who took Pakistani citizenship during the Afghan War.

    Africa is just Africa, it was the White Man’s mistake to have given them modern commodities, should have just let them live in their primitive state.

  71. @Rurik

    Your idea about Europe admitting only elderly refugees is intriguing, and I’ve never heard that proposed before.

    The elderly obviously don’t pose the threat of physical violence and intimidation of native Europeans like younger men do (as so many of the younger male “refugees” have amply demonstrated).

    The elderly also won’t be able to reproduce themselves and expand a culturally alien community within the host country.

    Your proposal would be quite compassionate to elderly people escaping the war, poverty, and chaos that the US, Israeli and other governments have done so much to cause or exacerbate — WITHOUT the proven threats to the physical safety of the Europeans and their ability to retain ultimate sociopolitical control over their own territory.

    In other words, your proposal would seem to help a large number of especially vulnerable people without accelerating the demographic takeover and cultural & economic destruction of Europe. Perhaps that is why we haven’t heard it from the people with the power to implement it.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  72. @Rurik

    IsraAID sends team to help refugees in Europe
    ‘After what we suffered in the Holocaust 70 years ago, how can we not help tens of thousands seeking refuge from wars in the Middle East and Africa?’
    Abigail Klein Leichman September 3, 2015

    https://www.israel21c.org/israaid-sending-team-to-help-refugees-in-europe/

    Four points:
    1. If Israel is feeling so compassionate, why not take migrants into Israel?

    2. Read the article: donations are accepted; tax deductible in US and UK. You, American sucker, are subsidizing Jewish-aided de-ethnicization of Europe.

    3. Buchanan mentioned Wilson, who opened the door to the zionist takeover of USA and involved US in WWI. It may not be widely known, but Jewish agencies sent hundreds of Jewish “aid workers” to Poland and Russia to assist Jews to leave those countries for safety in Germany (mainly) and Britain. It was those migrant Jews in Germany that German Ambassador Luther referred to when he was challenged on Germany’s “antisemitism:”

    Nazi Jewish Policies Political, Not Religious, Dr. Luther Asserts

    “He [Dr. Hans Luther, German ambassador to USA] asserted that limitation of Jewish influence in Germany was being conducted with the greatest possible consideration toward the old native Jewish families who, he said; had proven themselves good Germans and indicated that it was directed against the Eastern European Jews who had overflooded the country since the War.”
    https://www.jta.org/1933/05/26/archive/nazi-jewish-policies-political-not-religious-dr-luther-asserts

    4. Yet Jewish schoolchildren are taught that welcoming the stranger is “what it means to be a Jew.” — as long as that stranger is being “welcomed” into someone else’s home.

    “He did his middle school matriculation project on the Jewish value of welcoming the stranger and raised money for immigration issues. He believes it is in his Jewish DNA to show empathy and compassion for the stranger. “If you don’t embrace this value, practicing religion is useless,” he said at the middle school event showcasing the capstone projects.

    The Torah instructs Jews only 36 times to care for the stranger, a precept mentioned more than any other law and central to my own concept of what it means to be a Jew.

    In America welcoming the stranger is not so problematic, as Jews are a minority and generally would like all minorities to be treated justly. [ie it’s to Jews’s advantage] But in Israel (not including West Bank and Gaza) Jews are the majority and this respect for the minority, the stranger, is replaced by the Talmudic concept that one must first rise and kill those who would do harm…”
    https://mondoweiss.net/2020/02/liberal-zionists-teen-son-is-an-anti-zionist/

    (There must be some new bug circulating in the Jewish world; I’d never known authentically welcoming the stranger to be so important to Jews — unless it meant a tax write-off or geopolitical advantage.
    Quite the contrary: Jews make such a fetish of being “separate and apart” that they have separate dishes for milk and for meat; they don’t even share meals with others.
    On the other hand, Hospitality to the Stranger is one of the five pillars of Islam.)

    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @A123
  73. Anon[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    Agree. Jealousy is a feature of the Jews. It’s why they have been attacking Classical Western art, music, literature and architecture with the Frankfurt school and thereafter. Ayn Rand tried hard to tear down neoclassical architecture and promote hideous Brutalism through her stupid book Fountainhead in 1950.

    I’ve read that the Museum of Modern Art in NYC has received billions in donations from rich Jews on Wall Street, while a few blocks away the Metropolitan Museum of Art is starving for funds. IMO the Metropolitan Museum of Art is the best museum in the world, there’s simply no other like it, including the most famous museums in Europe that I have visited – the Louvre, Musee d’Orsay, National Gallery in London, British Museum, Academia and Uffizi in Florence. The Met beats them all hands down. It’s like a combination of British Museum and the National Gallery, but better. It is a true national treasure.

    The Europeans chose wisely to rebuild their bombed out cities in neoclassical style after WWII, it’s why Europe is so popular with tourists the world over today, it’s like a living museum. Unfortunately too many European “starchitects” of today like Rem Koolhaas (who built the ugly CCTV Tower in Beijing) are inflicted in the brain with the stupidity of modernism, and are now busy building ugly modern architecture to reflect Europe’s new “multiculturalism”. The Scandinavians are now the #1 promoters of ugly modern everything.

    Jews love WASPs because they are honest and easy to manipulate. The best race on earth is about to go extinct thanks to the jealousy and greed of an inferior tribe. It’s like Mozart and Salieri.

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    , @Rurik
  74. A123 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    If Israel is feeling so compassionate, why not take migrants into Israel?

    It would be more constructive if you placed the blame on the first cause.

    Mutti Mullah Merkel, acolyte of Muhammad, caused the invasion of Europe. Without Merkel’s IslamoGlobalist betrayal of European Infidels (Christians & Jews), the problem never would of occured.

    Is the Israeli organization guilty of naivety by helping those admitted by 5x a day head-banger Merkel? Probably.

    However, the true crime was committed by a non-Jew, Mutti Mullah Merkel and her Islam, long before Jews or Israel became involved.

    Islam is sabotaging Christian nations by tricking them into choosing Islamic leaders like Mutti Mullah Merkel. This is a Christian problem that must be solved by Christians. Casting tangential blame on Jews only strengthens the hand of violent Jihadis in Europe.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  75. This is the way Europe ends
    This is the way Europe ends
    This is the way Europe ends
    Not with a bang but a whimper.

  76. @A123

    ” Something is clearly wrong in Europe”

    Yeah the elephant in the room being : Germany which is the prime force behind the events, and it’s Greta/BO/BC/HC worshipping pseudo-intellectual ruling class as represented by the Gruenen/Linken/SPD and now the converted to leftism CDU.

    Germany is squirming in DTS and their media is on a 24/7 anti-DT warpath, the basic issue being they call all of the shots and set all policy in western Europe, and these policies being 100% Woke madness.

    The insane Teutons apparently think that they won the war and they are demanding that the US alter it’s gun laws so as to install the restrictive German anti-gun codes, and they; the boots or throat Krauts; are also demanding that the US eliminate it’s electoral college which caused their liebling HC to lose to the most hated man in Germany since 1945.

    AJM

  77. @A123

    Pathetic attempt, a123; muddled by your islamophobia.

    Merkel is not teaching that kid’s Jewish day school that “welcoming the stranger” is the greatest of all Jewish values.

    Merkel is not at the head of the Jewish organization that is helping immigrants insert themselves into Europe.

    Jews did this before — as Hans Luther noted.
    Jewish Barbara Specter Lerner said Jews would do it again “make Europe multicultural.”
    And Jews are doing it again.

    It did not turn out well the first time, it will not turn out well now.

    • Replies: @A123
  78. @Anon

    “Western art and music”

    You are dead wrong on these two subjects as the Hebrew contributions to western architecture and music are monumental and beyond compare.
    Such great Hebrew artists as Albert kahn and his magnificent art-deco creations in Detroit, and the long list of Hebrew song-writers with their wonderful masterpieces : Berlin, Gershwin, Kern, Hammerstein, Arlen (Over the rainbow) , the list is immense, and each and every one of them being unsurpassed.

    AJM

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  79. A123 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Islam has invaded Europe and killed Christians before. Why is it so hard to believe that Muslims still want to conquer Christian lands?
    _____
    _____

    Has Islam found “useful idiots” and even some outright collaborators in both Christian and Jewish communities? Yes. However:
    — The failings of the current Pope does not mean that all Catholics are the enemy.
    — The misdeeds of some Jewish organizations does not mean that all Jews are the enemy.

    Islam wants to “make Europe and the U.S. Multicultural”, as the first step to making it safe for their culture. Islam has no problem with Ilhan Omar marrying her brother. (1)

    Ilhan Omar DID marry her brother and said she would ‘do what she had to do to get him “papers” to keep him in U.S.’, reveals Somali community leader
    — Ilhan Omar told friends years ago that the man who went on to become her second husband was in fact her brother, DailyMail.com can confirm
    — Abdihakim Osman is the first person to go on record to speak of how Omar said she wanted to get her brother papers so he could stay in the United States

    ______

    I do not deny that there are side issues:
    — Are some Jewish organizations doing unhelpful things in Europe? Yes.
    — Is the EU doing unhelpful things in Israel, such as funding construction without permits in restricted areas. Yes.

    However, these side issues are only relevant in the face of failures of national governance. If the Christian governments of Europe and the Jewish government of Israel took a harder line versus the root cause problem, these side issues would be reduced to trivial significance.

    PEACE 😇
    _______

    (1) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8013283/Ilhan-Omar-DID-marry-brother-reveals-Somali-community-leader.html

  80. Saudi arabia has allowed more than half million Syrians and lebanon more than 1.5 Million .

    The estimated number of Syrian refugees in Germany are about 200,000 and many of them are educated and most likely will go back to their country once the Imperialist intervention, cheered by white fascists and Jews , in their homeland has come to an end.
    Buchanan and other right wingers are spreading lies about the “demise” of the west by refugees.
    The sickness of the white racists who constantly demonise and vilify these mostly helpless people is appalling .
    The same shit is now being spread by white supremacists in regard to Puerto Ricans who have flocked to Florida even though they are American citizens .

    You white racists are awful , appalling and weak creatures for you always absolve those who truly mess you up but vent your anger,frustrations and violence upon the weakest and most vulnerable.

    • Troll: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  81. @Anon

    What – the US has been in Afghanistan for 19 years in order to secure their strategic gravel deposits?

    Or for that legendary oil pipeline that some people claim to have seen, snaking along the peaks of the Durand Line from an unknown oilfield to an unknown loading terminal?

    I detest US/UK foreign policy as much as anyone, but it’s nonsense to suggest it was simply a matter of stealing resources. It would be a lot easier, say, to send a carrier group to Lagos and steal the Nigerian oil.

    No, I think RadicalCenter is probably nearer to the truth.

    But you mustn’t forget human stupidity. AFAIK Afghanistan isn’t known to be full of expensive minerals, it’s not in a strategic position – but the Coalition seems to have massively enriched the particular villains in government, while devoting enormous resources to stuff like “women’s empowerment”.

    It’s as if a spaceship from some powerful civilisation landed in 14th century England, showering gold on the King and his barons on condition they provided evidence that they were preaching a strange and alien gospel to their peasants’ womenfolk.

  82. @NegroPantera

    “Saudi arabia has allowed more than half million Syrians”

    No they didn’t, they built a bloody huge fence to keep them out !

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq%E2%80%93Saudi_Arabia_border

    The line consists of a multi-layered fence and ditch barrier wall. The border zone includes five layers of fencing with includes 78 monitoring watch towers, night-vision cameras, and radar cameras, eight command centres, 10 mobile surveillance vehicles, 32 rapid-response centres, and three rapid intervention squads.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
  83. @Authenticjazzman

    I’d swap Berlin, Gershwin, Kern, Hammerstein, Arlen and even Bacharach, David, Goffin and King for Sibelius or Arvo Part. You can throw in Manilow too, and Neil Sedaka!

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
  84. Zana says:

    In the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, Spain, Britain, France and Portugal, and then Belgium, Italy, Germany and America, all believing in the superiority of their civilization, went out into the world to create empires to uplift and rule what Rudyard Kipling derisively called “the lesser breeds without the law.”

    After two world wars, the rulers of these empires embraced a liberalism that now proclaimed the equality of all peoples, races, creeds, cultures and civilizations. This egalitarian ideology mandated the dismantling of empires and colonies as the reactionary relics of a benighted time.

    Germany, Spain, Britain and France in South America:

    South American bloc’s new trade appetite has suitors calling

    “Mercosur is a customs union founded by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. By reaching an agreement with the EU last June, the bloc signaled it is serious about playing a greater role in the global economy. Diversifying trade partners is a growing necessity as Chinese demand is hit by the coronavirus epidemic.”

    […]

    “Mercosur diplomats now have their hands full negotiating with South Korea, Canada and Singapore, while Indonesia and Vietnam are possible candidates. Plus, a deal with the European Free Trade Association — the bloc representing Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein — is in its final stages.”

    […]

    “Talvi attributed Mercosur’s recent eagerness to seek trade agreements to a growing realization among the Brazilian business community that greater access to foreign markets was key to their survival. “It’s my perception that three countries — Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay — have decided on dynamic and swift global insertion.”

    […]

    “Although Talvi said that the Organization of American States is the best forum to address regional crisis, he thinks a new body representing the Americas and Europe might also be needed as a mediator in Venezuela.”

    https://www.bilaterals.org/?south-american-bloc-s-new-trade&lang=en

  85. Juan says:

    Well, the future of Europe is currently being considered in London (Chatham House, aka NATO UK):

    Security and Defence 2020
    A Future European Security Architecture

    Speakers

    Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, House of Lords; NATO Secretary General (1999-2004)
    Lord Peter Ricketts, UK Ambassador to France (2012–16); Strategic Adviser, Lockheed Martin
    Anna Wieslander, Director, Northern Europe, Atlantic Council

    https://www.chathamhouse.org/conferences/security-and-defence-2020

  86. anonymous[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @A123

    Lol! IslamoSoros? Cute.

    You are fooling no one, (crypto-)judenscum. Your modus-operandi has always been so clear. You work towards instigating the base nature of many euRapeans, which is Islamophobia, hoping that they will rally towards the other enemies of true monotheism… who else, but the judenscum. Natural allies and all.

    That is why you hammer away at the “muzzies,” while keeping well away from attacking euRapeans. It reminds me of those “dancing” judenscum, when they claimed… “judenscum are not your problem, the muzzies are…”

    You ultimately hope that this will buy you soulless Decepticons time to destroy “Christian” euRape from within.

    As far as I am concerned, given the unabashed greed and psychopathy of the “Christian” western world, and the consequent untold death and suffering these godless pagans have caused around the world, “destruction” (whatever that means for themselves) in this world will be the least of their worries. They have a hellish Hereafter to look forward to, and for the rabid Islamophobes, is reserved the worst recesses of the Fire.

    A pox on your existence, A123, and everyone like you. Sooner or later, you will be screaming for just a moment of that “PEACE 😇,” which you so generously hand out here.

    • Replies: @Malla
  87. dfordoom says: • Website
    @John Regan

    Of course, the Zio-idiocy certainly doesn’t help, but it’s not the major problem. That would be the promotion of suicidal altruism by politicians and media (who are, of course, deep in the pockets of the usual suspects), and the murderous stomping down on anyone who tries to be a voice of sanity.

    It has nothing to do with suicidal altruism (the idea that whites suffer from suicidal altruism is nonsense). It’s all about cheap labour and expanding markets to keep corporate profits high.

    If Europe was left to itself, it could deal with the invasion very, very easily.

    If Europe was left to itself, it would still welcome the refugees (both political and economic refugees).

    White people are largely motivated by greed.

    • Replies: @Smith
    , @Malla
  88. dfordoom says: • Website
    @A123

    Ask the optimistic, “Is This How Christian Europe is Reborn?”

    Christianity is finished. Maybe civilisation can be saved but Christianity is not going to do it.

    And the eastern European nations are already succumbing to the Poz. They doomed themselves when they joined the EU. Their only chance for survival was by allying with Russia which they were not prepared to do.

  89. dfordoom says: • Website
    @A123

    However an new Atlantic Christian Treaty Organization [ACTO] could be formed to accommodate Christian nations including Orthodox Russia.

    Christian nations? There are no Christian nations in western Europe.

  90. anonymous[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    It’s envy~ burning, bitter, seething envy; of and for a people who’ve created a society that Jewish supremacists see.. (Athens, Rome, modern Europe) as obviously superior to anything they could accomplish in ten thousand years.

    Rurik, I say this as a person who thinks much of what you say is indeed true. Your cities and medical/science/engineering/arts accomplishments are literally breathtaking!

    Living in the dung-hole of a nation I do, there sure is some envy involved. But, I could never think of invading your world, because I possess enough self-respect, and I know where I am unwanted. I will live far away, and look on in some awe.. and some schadenfreude.

    Just to be clear, I am no “economic migrant,” okay. All praise to God.

    That said, for whatever much the Almighty One has blessed the whitey, He, in his infinite wisdom has also willed godlessness on your kind. Pagan polytheist mangods-worship is a spiritual abomination which will lead mankind to an eternity in Hell.

    Your civilisation has so clearly plagiarised your spiritualities from such pagan polytheist faiths as Greek and Hindoo mythology, that it is always hilarious when many of you refer to it as “The Truth.” A “Truth” based on hearsay, how pathetic. So, in this regard, your kind are utter paupers. You can’t be blessed with everything, right?

    I humbly believe that as long as the whitey clings to a sense of racial supremacy, they will also reject the true monotheism of Islam -viewed as a faith of the “racially inferior coloureds”-, which is the only path to salvation. You should know better whether the whitey will ever shed that sense of supremacy. Not much hope there, yeah?

    Even as you revel in your kind’s “greatness” in this world, you do understand that the exhilaration will be short lived… I mean, on your personal level, some decades, on a civilisational level, some millennia… all just a nano-blink in cosmic time.

    Of course, you personally have shown some signs of humanity, Rurik, a certain empathy for those suffering under the barbarism of your kind (hence my wish, Rurik for POTUS2020! 😀 )… so, perhaps there is still some hope for you, if not with full salvation, at least some much begged mercy from the Almighty One, on The Day when mankind will stand trembling before the One and only.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Rurik
  91. jsigur says:

    Remove Jewish money dominance and immigration plus endless wars solved

  92. Smith says:
    @dfordoom

    Aksually, most european nations do not accept refugees except for the western european countries (UK, France, Germany) and some nordic countries (Sweden, Norway), while some european countries that literally want refugees (Spain) but refugees don’t come to them.

    In fact, refugees will stop coming to them once the state stops the welfare.

  93. @Anon

    Sorry, do you not think, that Mr. Huxley, was writer of these clans?

  94. Chinaman says:

    It is no innocent error of omission that Pat have masterfully skirted around an important fact.

    Is the Suffering and death of the millions of non-whites just a historical footnote in these unnecessary wars?

    Refugees are real people too. Who destroyed their homes? It is dehumanising to label the victims of America ‘s wars as mere refugees.

    Pat’s prose reek of hypocrisy and sanctimony.

    • Replies: @anon
  95. Vaterland says:
    @Anonymous

    No, Mister anonymous. Europeans are victims of an Eisenhower crusade in Europe, the blood lust of Churchill who “liberated” Europe at the side of Stalin and Bolshevism, permanently occupied half of it for communism, then brainwashed the other half over seven decades. Lead by a combined effort of the OSS, then CIA, Cultural Marxists like Herbert Marcuse who worked for it before and a treacherous political elite of vassal states.

    And the very people who were instrumental behind the scenes in both world wars are also the ones who infiltrated and subverted the European right and who bomb the world and make sure our borders remain open. And the primary reason why this power cannot be challenged is the American Empire. Increasingly, it seems, the Russian one as well. Nothing has changed. Everything remains the same. The fate of our world was decided in 1945.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @Malla
  96. @YetAnotherAnon

    Well, the honest Arab has yet to be invented.

  97. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    I humbly believe that as long as the whitey clings to a sense of racial supremacy, they will also reject the true monotheism of Islam -viewed as a faith of the “racially inferior coloureds”-, which is the only path to salvation.

    Your Islam has led to the massacre, rape and pillaging of millions of brown Hindus and the enslavement of millions of black Africans.

  98. @A. Benjamine Moser

    It’s a least a stunning high horse from which they preach to us how Nation is done right.

  99. Malla says:
    @Omegabooks

    When will the Islamic world pay back the Hindus for years of brutality and imperialism?
    Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahah!

  100. Malla says:
    @dfordoom

    White people are largely motivated by greed.

    Browns and blacks are a 100 times more motivated by greed than Whites ever can be. And don’t get me started on Jews.

    It’s all about cheap labour and expanding markets to keep corporate profits high.

    Which could be had by squashing feminism and cultural Marxism and thus having a high White birth rate. More White labour force, more high IQ, more productive labour force and much higher corporate profits.
    large scale migration has nothing, let me tell you nothing to do with cheap labour. Most of the browns I saw in Europe (& I am a brown guy myself) live on welfare and contribute nothing running ethnic shops and kebab shops. Europe never needed them, Europe does not need them. It is all about race replacement and White genocide.

    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
    , @dfordoom
  101. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    You work towards instigating the base nature of many euRapeans, which is Islamophobia, hoping that they will rally towards the other enemies of true monotheism

    And they work on the base natures of non Whites in their jealousy and hatred for Whitey. And their easily refutable Marxist theories about how “Whitey looted the darkie” theories, a pet theory of darkies ever since. It is Jews who have allowed non Whites including Muslims in Europe and the West so these non Whites would be their cannon fodder to destroy the greatest enemy of the Satanic Jews, the Romans, the European race. Indeed Islam was a religion initially CREATED BY JEWS for this very purpose. Created for the destruction of Byzantium and Persia and eventually Rome/Europa.

    As far as I am concerned, given the unabashed greed and psychopathy of the “Christian” western world, and the consequent untold death and suffering these godless pagans have caused around the world, “destruction” (whatever that means for themselves) in this world will be the least of their worries. They have a hellish Hereafter to look forward to, and for the rabid Islamophobes, is reserved the worst recesses of the Fire.

    As far as I am concerned, given the unabashed greed and psychopathy of the Islamic world, and the consequent untold death and suffering these barbarians have caused around the world, in the Islamic conquests in Persia, Europa, Asia Minor, North Africa, India (to name a few) they have a hellish Hereafter to look forward to, and for the rabid Kaffirophobes, is reserved the worst recesses of the Fire.

    There, fixed it for you.

  102. @Anonymous

    No, we are the victims of corrupt elites and Jews. People are not more stupid in Europe than anywhere else. On the contrary.

  103. anon[119] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chinaman

    but … but … 6 gazillion! holocaust!
    no one suffered like WE suffered, so we are entitled . . .

  104. @Malla

    to be honest, unlike whites, the road of creation isn’t an option for blacks or jews.
    so what besides greed is their option? =)

    • Agree: Malla
  105. Paul says:

    Can Europe not repel this unwanted home invasion from the Global South? It is “delusional” to think so, says the FT. Europe must be realistic and set about “providing legal routes for migrants and asylum seekers.”

    Elites think they will be okay in their gated communities in the safe parts of town and with their private security guards.

  106. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    Hey BTW, There have been two Rabbis on record who said that their Messiah will not come on earth until the children of Europa and the Children of Arab mix with each other and the European race becomes mixed. Thus they claimed that the coming of large number of Muslims into Europe is good as this will facilitate of the coming of their Moshaich.
    And since their Jewish Moshiach=AntiChrist=Dajjal, muslims going to Europe are facilitating the coming of Dajjal. Congratulations my Muslim friends for bringing Dajjal fast and easy. How will you explain this to Allah on judgement day?
    “I played a part in bringing Dajjal to Planet Earth”
    Nice!!!!

  107. Malla says:
    @Rurik

    One of the best post, getting into the heart of the matter, cutting out all the B.S.
    Except one thing

    Because they’ve been practicing their envy and hatred for two thousand years

    I have a feeling that, this envy is much much older than 2000 years. I have a feeling many if the destroyed civilizations in the Middle East went through a similar fate as Rome and Ancient Greece. It is history repeating itself with Jews as an active agents in all of them.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  108. Rurik says:
    @John Johnson

    No it’s also used to describe a government that has been in power and cannot be removed democratically.

    I just did a quick check, and I see that the NYT refers to the Jordanian government, as the Jordanian government. Just as they also refer to the Syrian government, as the Syrian government.

    The Syrian government, backed by Russian forces, has accelerated its monthslong offensive to seize control of Idlib, the last province held by the opposition.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/18/world/europe/turkey-syria-idlib.html

    using the pejorative ‘regime’, to describe either nation’s governments, would be a breach of protocol, and journalistic decorum. (Something even the NYT understands).

    Which election would that be?

    I provided a link on my earlier reply. If you’re too lazy to even click on it, then I can’t help you.

    People refer to Syria as a regime because the same family based party has been in charge since the 1970s when they took over via coup.

    To test your theory, let’s look at how the ((msm)) characterizes Russia’s government under Vlad Putin, shall we?

    Sep 06, 2019 · Vladimir Putin, whose regime’s legitimacy is derived from his unparalleled popular support..

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/frantisekmarkovic/2019/09/06/vladimir-putins-regime-is-battling-to-survive/

    The Putin Regime Is Forcing Russia’s Best and Brightest …

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-putin-regime-is-forcing-russias-best-and-brightest…

    Dec 26, 2018 · The Putin Regime Is Forcing Russia’s Best and Brightest Into Exile

    The Ideology of Vladimir Putin’s Regime

    http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/The-Ideology-of-Vladimir-Putin-Regime.php

    Here’s a good one.

    Turkey’s President Urges Putin to Restrain Syria Regime in …

    https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/02/22/turkeys-president-urges-putin-restrain…
    Feb 23, 2020 · Turkey’s President Urges Putin to Restrain Syria Regime in Idlib

    That’s the sultan Erdogan calling Syria’s government a ‘regime’.

    How’s that for chutzpah?

    The way it works in modern journalism, is that if you like a government, (or you want to come off as objective), you call it a ‘government’. Just as (even!) the NYT does, even when they obviously don’t approve of that government. It’s called journalism.

    Conversely, if you don’t like a government, and you don’t personally approve, then you dishonestly characterize that government as a “regime”.

    Adam Serwer: The First Days of the Trump Regime – The Atlantic
    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/trump-regime/606682

    The First Days of the Trump Regime

    Trump’s regime is leading America in an insurrection …
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/…

    May 01, 2019 · Trump’s regime is leading America in an insurrection

    Here, John Johnson..

    Just click on this one. It says it all.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/03/donald-trump-administration-regime

    “Then there is Trump. He has no desire or intention to govern. He wants to rule. Where his word is our command. That’s why he admires the regimes in the Philippines, Russia and Turkey – and despises administrations such as Angela Merkel’s and Justin Trudeau’s.”

    Now see, for me, I would call the government of Russia, a government, or an administration. Whereas I would call the treasonous whores masquerading as leaders of Germany or Canada, as regimes beholding to an enemy nation; Israel – from where Merkel and Trudeau take their marching orders. Illegitimate regimes – working towards the destruction of the way of life of their respective peoples. And encouraging a foreign invasion of their nations, at the direct expense (literally) of their citizens.

    Just as, for instance I would call the ZUS puppets in Afghanistan and Iraq and Ukraine, puppets of ‘regimes’. Because I consider them illegitimate and imposed on the people by forces that are at odds with the well-being of the people of those nations.

    It’s all very subjective. But if I was writing an article for publication, and had the stature of a writer like Buchanan, then I’d be far more circumspect in my use of subjective pejoratives like ‘regime’ – to describe the universally accepted legitimate government of Syria.. (under siege today by criminals and aggressors and stone-age, head-slicing orcs. And the pall of zio-evil that is engulfing the world’s stability today ; )

    There’s no reason Buchanan has to add to that evil, when there’s no appreciable advantage in doing so. (unless it’s to mollify the ((PTB))), and get invited onto Talmud Vision).

  109. Rurik says:
    @RadicalCenter

    Your idea about Europe admitting only elderly refugees is intriguing, and I’ve never heard that proposed before.

    The elderly obviously don’t pose the threat of physical violence and intimidation of native Europeans like younger men do ..

    It isn’t even for the violence and intimidation of the Europeans that they demand these young, military age, Muslims and Africans be feted in Europe. The violence and intimidation are just icing on the cake. The point is genocide, as it has always been. That’s why I often write ‘Such a deal’, when all the slaughter and horrors and migrations of the Eternal Wars for Israel are parsed out, because not only do the Jewish supremacists get to see Muslims butchered and displaced and reeling into stone age despair for generations, but they also get to see Europe descend into eternal ethno-strife and hatred and ultimately, genocide, when a sufficient number of non-Westerners flood into those countries, and wipe out for all eternity- those nation’s ethnic identities.

    Like the recent photo of London, I posted, the knife violence and crime and dystopian horrors and racial strife, just add to the misery. But those are not the point. The point is to blend every last strand of DNA out of the British people for all time, so that in a few generations, the “British” people will resemble more and more this charming fellow.

    The offspring of a British woman and Jamaican man. So alienated that he became radicalized, and tried to kill some ‘white devils’.

    Such a deal!

    The elderly also won’t be able to reproduce themselves and expand a culturally alien community within the host country.

    Then what’s the point?

    Your proposal would be quite compassionate to elderly people escaping the war, poverty, and chaos that the US, Israeli and other governments have done so much to cause..

    Yes, I agree RadicalCenter, and I also suspect that like myself, many millions upon millions of Europeans and North Americans and others, would all welcome the opportunity to alleviate some of the suffering our ((respective regimes)) have caused those pitiable peoples.

    I’d have no problem with inviting in as many as we in America could find room to provide those elderly people with succor. Other than a few more tax dollars, and a minor inconvenience, I see hardly no down side. It is the least, the Western world could do for all these people. Yemenise, Afghans, Libyans and Syrians and more. So long as their not criminals or derelicts, I think we’d all be embellished by their participation in our societies. No young women are going t0 be raped, (digitally or otherwise) by seventy year old men, or fifty year old women. There aren’t going to be any ‘no-go’ areas for whites, in their own nations, which are a product of young people imposing their culture on those Western nations foolish enough to invite them in, in significant numbers.

    But that’s all why this simple solution will never get any traction. Because it serves no useful purpose of the (((PTB))).

    In other words, your proposal would seem to help a large number of especially vulnerable people without accelerating the demographic takeover and cultural & economic destruction of Europe. Perhaps that is why we haven’t heard it from the people with the power to implement it.

    Exactly!

    Perfectly stated. Thank you.

  110. @YetAnotherAnon

    ” I’d swap them for Sibelious or Arvo Part”

    Which reveals that you have no clue as to the essense of music per se’.

    Look you clueless neophyte I have been a practicing pro Jazz performer for fifty years, and have completed, in conservatory, classical studies in flute performance, and am light years above you as far as musical insight is concerned, so I really don’t give a shiot as to who you would prefer to swap with these great ( Hebrew) artists, as you really do not know what you are blathering about.

    SJM

  111. Rurik says:
    @Anon

    Ayn Rand tried hard to tear down neoclassical architecture and promote hideous Brutalism through her stupid book Fountainhead in 1950.

    I agree with just about everything you wrote, Anon, and definitely the tenor of your post.

    But I must say that I found the Fountainhead to be a courageous book (so many eons ago ; )

    She really put it to the commies, but good! And I never got out of it, a promotion for the ugly and nihilistic modern architecture, which I find heinous.

    I once heard it said that her Roark was based loosely on Frank Lloyd Wright, some of whose work has a certain merit, no?

    In any case, Ayn Rand notwithstanding, I agree wholeheartedly with the sublime and ineffable beauty of classical art and architecture, and an abhorrence for (the exaltation of the ugly) modernism.

  112. Rurik says:
    @anonymous

    Your civilisation has so clearly plagiarised your spiritualities from such pagan polytheist faiths as Greek and Hindoo mythology, that it is always hilarious when many of you refer to it as “The Truth.”

    Hmm..

    With all due respect, that kind of sounds like gobbledygook to me.

    Who are these ‘whiteys’ that hail ‘polytheist Hindu mythology’, as ‘the Truth’?

    For myself, I tend to honor the spirituality of my ancestors, as their way of communing with the ‘other side’, (so to speak), whether it was ancient paganism, or Byzantine Christianity or whatever, because that’s what seemed to suit them at the time, and I like to honor my ancestors. That’s what suits me.

    as long as the whitey clings to a sense of racial supremacy,

    >>sigh<<

    it's not about 'racial supremacy'. Except perhaps for some inbred KKK losers in a trailer park somewhere, in-between bouts of meth.

    Honoring one's ancestors and traditions and heritage and their struggles and what they've bequeathed to their progeny, is about respect and love, and hoping that you'll be worthy of their struggle, by passing down to our progeny, something that they too, can honor about our lives and struggles. So that we too can be worthy of the struggles of our people, just as our ancestors are worthy of our homage, because 0f what they bequeathed us.

    And none of that has anything to do with racial supremacy over other races. The races are different. The Chinese are a great and noble people. They're not better or worse than Europeans, just as Europeans are no better or worse than Indians, or Arabs, or Zulus, who also have their proud histories, and sagas and heroisms.

    An Eskimo is not better or superior to a Mori, but they are better suited to their lifestyles than a Mori would be, and vice versa.

    Why is that so damn impossible for so many to understand?!

    Just because Norwegians don't want to become blended with Africans, doesn't mean they all think they're so much better, (superior) but they do think they're different, and 'viva la difference.

    Here's a smart fellow..

    I agree 100% with Muhammad Ali. He doesn't want to blend, he loves his black children. Does that mean he thinks they're all superior to everybody else? Of course not.

    But that is the idiotic mantra we're all harangued with 24/7. That any desire to maintain your phenotype, from being blended into a mongrelized mix, means necessarily that you hate all other races!! and consider yours as infinitely superior!!!! Sieg Heil!

    But that's all just ((carefully programmed propaganda)), intended to 'guilt' all white people into blending themselves away. Or someone might call you a 'racist' !

    a certain empathy for those suffering under the barbarism of your kind

    Well, there again, I’m not too tortured by guilt, to understand that there is barbarism to go around. Yes, it is the West today, that is the drooling goon of Zion. Raining down terror and horrors upon hapless victims right and left. And all of it, in slavish fealty to the fiend.

    But it wasn’t whitey who recently used a bone saw to hack pieces off a journalist while he was sill alive, and video taped it all, for the amusement of the powerful heads of state, of a decidedly not-whitey nation.

    It isn’t whitey whose selling slaves on the open market today. It isn’t whitey who’s slicing off people’s heads, and crucifying Christians, and eating the innards of their dead rivals.

    So when we speak of ‘barbarism’ we should be circumspect, no?

    As to your general tone, I feel as tho conversing with Muslims is generally a pleasure, and I respect their (your) piety and devotion to their God.

    Indeed, it is my stated ambition and agenda, that we in the West, make common cause with Islam, to rein in our common enemy, whose counterfeiting machine (the Fed) has given them near absolute power over our common and collective destiny.

    That’s why I’m so disgusted with Erdogan, because he’s trying to destroy a fellow Islamic nation, making common cause with the fiend. Is he that &%#@ stupid?! To think that making nice with Zion and the ZUSA will benefit him in the end? As he attacks a fellow Muslim nation and sabre-rattles at Russia, while staging an invasion of Europe.

    If Turkey can’t be convinced to treat Syria as a sovereign nation, then why on this earth should Russia or Greece or all Western peoples of good will, respect anything that Erdogan says.. ever?

    I used to think the Kurds deserved their own sovereign nation and self-determination. (as I generally agree for all people). But then I heard that the Kurds were some of the worst human and narcotics traffickers all over Europe. And I decided that if that’s how they conduct themselves, then maybe I was wrong about them. But now as I see Turkey acting like a rabid dog, maybe the Kurds do need a homeland, right there in Turkey. If Erdogan thinks it’s OK to carve off a slice of Syria, so he can steal it, then I think there’d be a nice karmic reaction, if the world’s powers, NATO and Russia and China, were to declare that the Kurds are now to have their own sovereign state, right there on the south of Turkey.

    What do you think?

  113. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Malla

    It’s all about cheap labour and expanding markets to keep corporate profits high.

    Which could be had by squashing feminism and cultural Marxism and thus having a high White birth rate.

    Not really. As much as I dislike feminism it’s only one of the many factors depressing fertility.

    The truth is that fertility rates in Europe have been plummeting for more than a century. Declining fertility has been caused by a number of factors. Urbanisation, the growth of mass media (which started with cheap mass-circulation newspapers in the 19th century, mass education, the Industrial Revolution (which destroyed traditional communities), capitalism, democracy, the explosion of higher education, the decline of Christianity. Everything we associate with modernism has one thing in common – a tendency to suppress birth rates. All of these things have their roots in the 19th century (some actually go back to the late 18th century).

    If you want high white birth rates you’d have to undo all of the things I’ve listed above. The proof of all this is that in every country, regardless of race or ethnicity, that has been exposed to those factors birth rates have collapsed. And in western countries birth rates have collapsed among virtually every single racial, ethnic and cultural group.

    It’s not a plot against white people. It’s merely the inevitable result of modernity. If you want high birth rates you have to go back to living in a traditional highly religious pre-modern pre-industrial society.

    Getting rid of feminism and the LGBT madness would be good things but would have very little effect on birth rates.

    The collapse in birth rates is not the result of an anti-white conspiracy.

    • Agree: Talha
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @John Johnson
  114. Malla says:
    @dfordoom

    The truth is that fertility rates in Europe have been plummeting for more than a century. Declining fertility has been caused by a number of factors. Urbanisation, the growth of mass media (which started with cheap mass-circulation newspapers in the 19th century, mass education, the Industrial Revolution (which destroyed traditional communities), capitalism, democracy, the explosion of higher education, the decline of Christianity. Everything we associate with modernism has one thing in common – a tendency to suppress birth rates. All of these things have their roots in the 19th century (some actually go back to the late 18th century).

    Even if birth rates were falling it was still above replacement levels. It would have remained above replacement easily had these poisonous elements not been added into society.

    If you want high white birth rates you’d have to undo all of the things I’ve listed above.

    Not true, even with all that there could have been birth rates above replacement. Low birth rates sure but now low as today. Feminism and Cultural Marxism played a part in tipping it below replacement .
    Besides actions taken in the past to increase White birth rates like in the Third Reich had worked. Anyways if Western governments wanted a larger labour force, there were many actions they could have taken to increase it. But Western governments have worked to encourage those phenomenon which would decrease native birth rates further and now they claim “there is a labour shortage?”.

    It’s not a plot against white people. It’s merely the inevitable result of modernity.

    Cultural Marxism was originally a plot against the West and White people. The thing is many of those concepts of Cultural Marxism has overflowed and spread around the world, it ended up influencing the non White world too including Jews. Jews fell for their own poison.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @dfordoom
  115. Malla says:
    @Vaterland

    The fate of our world was decided in 1945.

    Very true.
    Europe has to kick out all non Whites including Jews out of Europe. Bottom Line. Maybe a small non White population who make up 0.0001 % of the population is acceptable, high IQ individuals of good moral character who can imbibe the ethos and culture of Europe. Failing to do that and Europe has a Third World future. There is no way out of this. You cannot have so many brown blacks in your nations and avoid an eventual Third World future. No way out of this. Period.

  116. @Bill Jones

    Great ideas. Shouldn’t cause a shit load of problems — after all they’re all nato members, so very chummy. And should Ergoden let a million or so refugees out…well that will be inexpensive. But, hey, principles first !

  117. @Just Passing Through

    Is it not Western medicine that is allowing such a population boom?

    That and other Western technologies that improve the efficiency of agriculture.

    There is also less infighting. Their population probably would have still grown with the Bantu migration but they would still have tribal wars every so often.

  118. @dfordoom

    The collapse in birth rates is not the result of an anti-white conspiracy.

    I would say it is not a planned conspiracy but the result of egalitarian deceit which is in fact anti-white even if many of the people that push it are White and have good intentions.

    The result of this deceit is that White people have been convinced that all people are the same. Thus if we import third worlders their children will continue to build the first world if we just educate them. So in the minds of White people they don’t need to have children and in fact become convinced that it is environmentally virtuous to have 2 or fewer.

    It would be ideal if that were true but that simply isn’t the case. It’s in fact easily to disprove this theory by virtue of the fact that both liberal and conservative plans for the third world haven’t worked. According to egalitarian theory there should be modern countries in Africa by now when in fact South Africa is still the most advanced. This completely goes against the theory that White people have held back Africans and just need to be freed from them. Liberia should in fact be Wakanda according to liberal theory.

    Conservatives aren’t any better. Their theories center around minimal government and other libertarian ideals that also deny race. They don’t have a conservative or libertarian Wakanda either.

    Taking out paint theory (everyone is the same but painted differently) is the only solution. I realize it can go against Christian ideals but I don’t see any other path at this point. Paint theory actually works against the third world as it tells White people that they don’t need to provide assistance.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  119. @Malla

    Besides actions taken in the past to increase White birth rates like in the Third Reich had worked.

    That stupid Reich screwed everything up in the first place.

    Sure they increased birth rates but then they sent off their best men to battle. Both sides bombed each others women and children.

    Even when it was clear that they couldn’t win Hitler was still sending off 18 year olds to certain doom.

    Now the left utilizes the war as a source of guilt against White people.

    All thanks to an angry little corporal who wasn’t even German nor did he care about them as seen by his willingness to gamble their lives.

    If he had stayed in his borders or didn’t attack Poland we wouldn’t be in this mess. Racial studies would have continued in the US and leftist blank slate nonsense never would have gotten anywhere.

    • Replies: @Malla
  120. Malla says:
    @John Johnson

    Maybe Britain and France should not have declared war on Germany then and the idiots who divided Europe after WW1 should have done a better job instead of leaving tiny minorities of European ethnics in each other territories.
    Britain and France cared sooooo much about the Poles that they started the most destructive war in human history, a war which led to millions of White (and yellows) killed, lost their empires and White Americans, Brits and French are all raped around by foreign darkies who look at them as weak pussyboys today.
    But when the Soviets rolled into Poland the second time (or third or fourth) in 1945, somehow the Brits and Frenchies somehow lost their soooooo much love for the Poles and they kept quite. Yeah right. People are idiots to buy this b.s.

  121. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Malla

    Even if birth rates were falling it was still above replacement levels. It would have remained above replacement easily had these poisonous elements not been added into society.

    That’s demonstrably untrue. Fertility rates had already begun an inexorable decline. The postwar Baby Boom was a temporary artificial boost to birth rates but the long-term trends were already disastrous.

    Look I dislike feminism and “cultural Marxism” as much as you do but those were factors that made no real contribution until the 70s by which time fertility rates were already plunging.

    The contraceptive pill was the factor that made long-term sub-replacement fertility a certainty.

    Cultural Marxism was originally a plot against the West and White people.

    It’s arguable that “Cultural Marxism” is and always was mostly an agenda of the corporate sector. It was a useful weapon with which to destroy the old Left.

    • Replies: @Malla
  122. dfordoom says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    I would say it is not a planned conspiracy but the result of egalitarian deceit which is in fact anti-white even if many of the people that push it are White and have good intentions.

    It’s largely the result of major social and economic changes in the 19th century. It has been made much worse by the complete dominance of the Economic Right which sees people as interchangeable units of production and consumption. And by the Economic Right’s determination to crush the unions, demoralise the working class and destroy the Economic Left.

    This stuff is not being pushed by people who believe in egalitarianism. Some of the idiot foot soldiers (especially idiot Christians) believe in egalitarianism but the people providing the money that’s funding it most certainly have zero belief in egalitarianism.

    The people with money and power pushing this stuff do not have good intentions. They intend to ensure that the people with power and money will have enough more power and even more money.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  123. Malla says:
    @dfordoom

    It’s arguable that “Cultural Marxism” is and always was mostly an agenda of the corporate sector. It was a useful weapon with which to destroy the old Left.

    Cultural Marxism is an attempt to install communism in the West because the earlier attempt which worked in Russia did not in the West. But read along.
    From
    https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2018/01/21/leninism-and-bioleninism/

    “The point about Leninism is that after absolute power is achieved, the leftist ratchet stops. The country stops moving left. No new ideas. No new catering to low-status people and using them to topple the government. No, none of that. The ever advancing leftist movement was just a means to an end. The end was power. Once power is achieved, leftism dissolves. It doesn’t disappear; it leaves some residue, in that states always try to have ideological consistency with what they said during their founding. Chinese dynasties framed that as filial piety of emperors following the ideas of grandpa the founder; but it’s mostly just inertia.

    This is not how things turned out in Western Europe and North America. No leftist party as such ever achieved absolute power in the West. It just didn’t happen. And not for lack of trying. But it didn’t pan out. As for why, well there’s my theory back then. Countries which developed capitalism slowly tended to produce less resentful losers than agrarian empires who were thrown suddenly into modernity. That’s not quite my original theory, I’ve read it somewhere else, maybe someone can remind me who first said it. At any rate the success of Leninism in Russia and China has plenty of chance in it. Lenin could very easily not have taken power, he could have lost the civil war, he could have not had that precious Wall Street Jewish money to keep him afloat. No Soviet Russia, no Communist China either. But anyway, it did happen, and socialism was very strong in those places with or without actual takeover.
    So what happened in the West, anyway? There’s one guy who thought about it very deeply. For a long, long time. Mostly because he was in jail so he had plenty of time to study the problem. I’m talking about Antonio Gramsci. He was a communist agitator in Italy who got caught by Mussolini, and was sentenced to rot in prison. ”

    …snip….

    “His idea, which was hugely influential, and for good reason, was that the power structure wanted to keep being the power structure and you couldn’t just throw it away and replace it with your boys. You can try your chance in electoral politics, but there’s only so many resentful fucks who are willing to vote for the abolition of the very foundation of social life (property), at least in moderately prosperous Western countries. In these kind of places, if you want to take absolute power, you have to colonize the power structure very slowly. You have to influence their minds. You have to change the culture. This sounds very esoteric and spiritual but it’s not. Basically Gramsci argues that you gotta grab the press and the education system, and slowly but steadily do in every institution with some power what you do in a political party. Political parties work by hiring loyal people by preying on their low-status. Well, find a way into HR of every school, every newspaper, every government department, every judicial board. And to the very same thing. Run a distributed covert Leninist party. Until you run everything.”

    …snip….

    “Because there’s always biology. Some people are tall, some people are short. Some look good, some are pretty ugly. Some are thin and some are fat. Some are pleasant some are annoying. Some are cool and some are awkward. Some are smart and some are dumb. Some make good choices some make bad choices. Some are law-abiding and some are criminally inclined. The latter of each pair is going to be low status anywhere on earth. Even in Soviet Communism under commander Trotsky. Some people just suck. That’s the way genes work.

    And so thankfully for Leftism, even after achieving affluence, even after the working class disappeared as a thing, there was still plenty of material to work with to advance the cause of complete control. And so Leftist groups started agitating status for people of African descent. For Jews. For single women. For drug junkies. For sluts. For fat people. For homos. For lesbians. For aggressive Muslims. For the disabled. For the retarded. For the mentally insane. For the trannies. All people who are were low status in Western society. And who would be low status in any society. Because they suck. They just aren’t very productive. For no fault of their own. Some people are born tall, some short. Some smart, some dumb. Some empathic, some psychopathic. Some content with their lot, some greedy with powerlust. That’s how it is.

    And so the Long March through the Institutions that Gramsci first envisioned as a way of having the Italian Communist Party do what Lenin had done, ended up producing a different kind of Leninist system, one distributed and informal, instead of Lenin’s unified and formal, and one which morphed into promotion of the dregs of society qua dregs of society, instead of promotion of Marx’s idea of the wrongly oppressed proletariat. Marx was not a good man, but at least he tried to dress his ideas in a way that made sense. Das Kapital took some real work to write. But that was just some contingent accident of his time. Leftism doesn’t need to make sense. It just needs to get the job done.”

  124. @dfordoom

    And by the Economic Right’s determination to crush the unions, demoralize the working class and destroy the Economic Left.

    You are completely ignoring the left in this.

    It’s the liberal left that teaches in schools that Whites made the third world and thus we have a moral obligation to any third worlder that wants to come in. Liberals also teach that race doesn’t exist and it’s merely by chance that so many technologies have come from the Anglosphere.

    Sure there is a libertarian right that wants to get rid of borders and drive down wages but they aren’t loading Whites up with guilt and deluded views of reality.

    It’s the liberals that have destroyed the economic left by focusing on race and sex. They are too busy trying to take White men down a notch while arguing about transgendered bathrooms to care about helping the working class. Or debating guns that they don’t understand while trying to censor anyone that points out the truth about “gun crime”.

    That is why we don’t have an economic left. Fuzzy headed liberals would rather just blame Whitey/Christianity/guns for everything and call it a day.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  125. dfordoom says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    It’s the liberals that have destroyed the economic left by focusing on race and sex. They are too busy trying to take White men down a notch while arguing about transgendered bathrooms to care about helping the working class.

    Yes, I agree completely with that. The objective of “cultural marxism” (which in its modern form is just liberalism) was and is to destroy the Economic Left.

    What we erroneously call “cultural marxism” could not exist without massive funding, which is coming from billionaires and the corporate sector. These are not people who want communism. These are people who want to grind the working class into the dirt. These are people who are terrified that the Economic Left might rise again.

  126. What we erroneously call “cultural marxism” could not exist without massive funding, which is coming from billionaires and the corporate sector.

    I would place far more of the blame on liberal professors in the social sciences and humanities. They sell liberalism as not only a science but a path towards fixing every single problem. Even worse is that it is sold with a huge level of censorship while taught as being open minded. So you are taught to not question why tranny bathrooms would even be considered given all our problems.

    The corporate sector is too motivated by profit and doesn’t have the control to churn out the types of trend chasing liberal activists we see today. It’s much easier for them to sell sports or violence than a deceptive ideology that turns would-be activists into emotional twats that rush from one frivolous issue to the next.

    Sure there are a handful of billionaires that promote libertarian and liberal ideals but I really think the schools are the main problem. They aren’t training students to question liberalism or any ism because the profs want liberalism to be completely accepted. Well that leaves those students vulnerable to libertarian and corporate BS as well.

    So we seem to be in agreement of the problem, just not so much on the origin. But it’s refreshing to see someone else distinguish working class left vs liberal left or cultural BS left.

  127. @John Johnson

    This can all be traced back to Germany the main source of many of the woes imposed upon mankind over the last three centuries.

    The German trait of authority worship which Americans have totally adopted, is the main reason why these american commie perfessers can get away with the brainwashing of american youth such as we have witnessed since ww2. without being called out, or questioned.

    In Italy, for example, the greeting of “Bon Giorno Professore”, or “Bon Giorno Dottore” is a common greeting amongst folks not holding such titles, however in Germany unthinkable as this would constitute a desecration of said (BS) titles.

    Germany the source of Communism, ( yeah Marx was Hebrew but he was still German) Heroin, Green madness, antifa, authority worship such as the bizarr Germany addiction to and worship of BO, the list of abberations rooted in Deutschland is amazing, including the current German drive to forbid the ownership of private automobiles.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz artist.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  128. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Authenticjazzman

    Germany the source of Communism, ( yeah Marx was Hebrew but he was still German) Heroin, Green madness, antifa, authority worship such as the bizarr Germany addiction to and worship of BO, the list of abberations rooted in Deutschland is amazing, including the current German drive to forbid the ownership of private automobiles.

    You forgot psychoanalysis.

    But the French have been responsible for a great deal of misery. Take a look at French intellectuals in the 18th century – Voltaire, Rousseau, de Sade (!) etc. And the French were responsible for much 20th century craziness – deconstructionism for example.

    The truth is that European (and British and American) intellectuals have been responsible for producing an endless stream of mad ideas. By the 18th century western intellectuals had gone a long way down the rabbit hole of utter madness. As the West progressively abandoned Christianity it turned to intellectuals as the new priesthood.

    These ideas would probably have done little harm without the profound social and cultural changes that occurred during the 19th century – mass education, the growth of higher education, mass media (by the mid-19th century the press had already become a mortal threat to civilisation), the progress of the Industrial Revolution and its destruction of traditional communities, the growth of capitalism, democracy, urbanisation, the emergence of modernism in art and literature and music, etc. By 1914 the entire destructive apparatus of modernity was already in place and civilisational disaster was all but inevitable. Birth rates had began to plummet.

    The explosive growth in university education during the 20th century made disaster certain.

  129. dfordoom says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    The corporate sector is too motivated by profit and doesn’t have the control to churn out the types of trend chasing liberal activists we see today.

    But the fact remains that the Old Left which in the West was focused on ameliorating the worst features of the modern world still existed in the 1960s but a quarter of a century later it had been destroyed and replaced by the New Left which is focused on maximising the civilisational destruction.

    I witnessed this first-hand in Australia. I saw the Old Left displaced by feminists, homosexual activists and environmentalists. And it exactly coincided with the time that the leaders of of our major left-wing party suddenly became best buddies with billionaires. And that party was transformed from a pro-working class party into a pro-business pro-globalist party.

    So I think it’s safe to say the the corporate sector, and corporate money, played a major and active rôle.

    The corporate sector is focused on power, because power is the key to profits. That’s why the marriage between the Economic Right and the Social Justice Left was a marriage made in heaven. Both sides got what they wanted.

    The Economic Right wanted corporate-friendly economic policies and it wanted the Left to be dominated by social justice concerns so that there would be no chance of the Left suddenly becoming interested in economic issues again.

    The Social Justice Left wanted unlimited opportunities for virtue-signalling and the money to pursue that virtue-signalling.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  130. @dfordoom

    But the fact remains that the Old Left which in the West was focused on ameliorating the worst features of the modern world still existed in the 1960s but a quarter of a century later it had been destroyed and replaced by the New Left which is focused on maximising the civilisational destruction.

    I don’t consider the 60s left to be part of the worker’s left.

    That is when the left became obsessed with fixing racial inequality instead of improving labor standards of all races. Reducing racial inequality is a laudable goal but they started listening to Marxists and bought into the theory that everything is the fault of Whites.

    This is evident in the Great Society programs.

    The GS programs were seeped in race denial and had a bitter and destructive element to them. There was an underlying belief that the left needed to fix the race problem once and for all but the merits of this assumption were never debated. Inequality wasn’t fixed but that didn’t stop them from massively increasing the budget.

    The left didn’t learn from their mistakes and instead doubled down on race denial. How much of it they really believed is up to interpretation but they certainly wanted to increase spending.

    So the corruption happened before they switched their funding from unions to corporations and the wealthy. It was an intellectual corruption by a New left rejection of uncomfortable facts and not financial.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  131. dfordoom says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    I don’t consider the 60s left to be part of the worker’s left.

    The workers’ Left still existed at the beginning of the 60s. But it’s true that the destruction of the workers’ Left was well underway by the late 60s.

    Reducing racial inequality is a laudable goal but they started listening to Marxists and bought into the theory that everything is the fault of Whites.

    The problem is that they stopped listening to Marxists and started listening to liberals. Marxists did not believe that everything is the fault of Whites. Cultural Marxists are not Marxists. The Left abandoned socialism and adopted liberalism.

    The GS programs were seeped in race denial and had a bitter and destructive element to them. There was an underlying belief that the left needed to fix the race problem once and for all but the merits of this assumption were never debated. Inequality wasn’t fixed but that didn’t stop them from massively increasing the budget.

    The Great Society programs failed because they coincided with the rise of the drug culture. The reason that blacks ended up worse off was mostly drugs, plus the destruction of the black family by the Sexual Revolution, abortion and the contraceptive pill. The same things that destroyed the white family. The social revolutions of the 60s meant that any social programs were domed to failure.

    In the 50s it was still possible that the race problem could have been fixed.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS