The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Is Islamic Terror America's Future?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If the cliches hold — nothing succeeds like success, the past is prologue — this generation will not likely see an end to the jihadist terror that was on display at Pulse in Orlando on Sunday.

For terrorism has proven to be among the most cost-effective and successful strategies of war that the world has ever seen.

Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

They drew the world’s last superpower into wars that have bled and almost bankrupted us, broken a president, and left us mired in half a dozen civil and sectarian conflicts with no exit or end in sight.

As a political terrorist, Osama bin Laden rivals Gavrilo Princip, whose assassination of the Austrian archduke set in train the events that led to the Great War that brought on the downfall of the West.

Consider the success of Islamist terror since 9/11.

As Gerry Seib of The Wall Street Journal notes, in the 15 years since then, just 95 Americans have died in jihadist attacks in the U.S.

Yet, one atrocity in Orlando, where 49 were slaughtered, polarized the nation, brought the presidential candidates to savaging one another, and held a national TV audience spellbound for a week.

The whole world is talking about Orlando.

And what did this victory cost the Islamic State?

Zero. What Omar Mateen did suicide bombers do every day in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, kill dozens of innocent people while shouting “Allahu Akbar!”

Yet compare the returns from this act of Islamist terror in Orlando, to those from similar attacks in Kabul, Baghdad or Damascus.

Any wonder ISIS would implore its followers to strike where they are, inside the U.S., inside Europe, and not come to Syria to die anonymously?

Under siege in Raqqa, Mosul and Fallujah, being bombed and bled as it surrenders the conquered lands of its caliphate, ISIS’ shift in strategy and targeting makes perfect sense.

Consider, now, the triumphs of Islamist terrorism in Europe.

The 2004 Madrid train bombings led to the defeat of a centrist government and rise of a socialist regime that pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq.

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater strengthened the National Front of Marine Le Pen.

The Beslan massacre of school children in North Ossetia in 2004 led to a consolidation of power by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin.

Across Europe, the political impact of Islamist terrorism, though the numbers of dead and wounded have been, measured against the casualties of conventional war, relatively few, has been extraordinary.

Islamist terrorism has helped spawn anti-immigrant parties and “illiberal” regimes. The association of Islamic terror with Muslim immigration and refugees from Syria’s war has helped to drive “Brexit,” the British campaign to secede from the EU.

Islamist attacks have helped propel anti-EU movements and to incite nationalist demands for a recapture of state control of borders and security policy from Brussels.

ORDER IT NOW

Obama explains his reluctance to use the term “radical Islamic terror” on his not wishing to validate ISIS’ claim to be the spear point, the fighting arm of the world’s largest religion in fulfilling the mission given to it by Allah — to make the whole world Islamic.

And this is exactly what ISIS has in mind.

By the frequency and ferocity of its attacks, it seeks to displace al-Qaida and other Islamic resistance movements in the eyes of the 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, and to be seen by the young as the great liberator of the Islamic world and future conqueror of the West.

The crushing of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of victory in this war, for ISIS is not just an organization but a cause, a movement, an idea.

ISIS believes that by repeatedly wounding and provoking the West, it can reignite a war of civilizations. And though the West is vastly superior in nuclear weapons and conventional arms, economic power and technology, ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

Then, ISIS believes, through mass Muslim migration into a West whose native-born are dying out, Muslims can reoccupy these lands they had almost wholly conquered, until stopped by Charles Martel 14 centuries ago.

For some few Muslims, as we saw at Fort Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando, ISIS offers a dream worth dying for. And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.”

Copyright 2016 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: ISIS, Orlando Shooting, Terrorism 
Hide 65 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    US wars in the Middle East aren’t good for most Americans, but they’ve been great for Jews. And as the US is controlled by Jews and follows Judeo-centric foreign policy, we have to see US role in the Middle East as a resounding success.

    Have they bankrupted America? It doesn’t matter to Jews since they got the Fed and can print more money for themselves.
    What affects most American doesn’t affect Jews. Shipping job to China, India, or Mexico might be bad for US workers, but most Jews are not of the working class. They are part of the globalist urban class who gain to profit from US corporations reducing cost with easy access to cheaper labor. Just look at Jews in Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, and Silicon Valley just getting richer.
    Jews are 2% of the population but 43% of the top 1%. It’s like Israel never suffers despite downturns in the US economy. Like Paulie in GOODFELLAS, Israel gets to say, “Fuc* you, pay me.”

    Now, what do Jews fear most in the Middle East? Modern secular Arab and/or Muslim nation-states with capability in science, technology, and economic growth.

    Jews don’t fear ISIS, a bunch of ragtag morons running around with AK-47s and machetes. They do horrible things on the ground, but they pose ZERO threat to Israel and to the US.

    Jews fear men like Saddam Hussein and Assad. Iran is a theocracy, but even the Mullahs have allowed science and engineering. As long as people don’t get too out of line with decadence and sexuality, the Iranian state is live-and-let-live.
    Such nations are capable of developing strong economies and modern weapons systems.

    Since Jews are mostly secular and ‘Liberal’, you would think they would prefer modern secular Arab states to Muslim extremists. Not necessarily.
    After all, it is secular Arab and/or Muslim states that can run a modern economy and even develop missiles and bombs and tanks that might rival the power of Israel.

    It’s like the Cold War. US had more in common with USSR than with Maoist China or Afghan Mujahadeeen or Saudi Arabia.
    USSR after Stalin’s death remained repressive but sort of liberalized into a modern secular state like the US.
    It was committed to modernity and science and technology.

    In contrast, Maoism was into radical lunacy. Saudi Arabia has been run by religious hardliners. And Mujahadeen were extreme religious zealots.

    So, why did US work with them against USSR, a modern secular state?
    Because the modern and secular aspects of USSR allowed it to have tanks, jets, nukes, missiles, and etc.

    Jews don’t care about higher principles. They only think in terms of “Is it good for the Jews?”
    And Jews want the Arab or Muslim nations to be destroyed and fractured beyond repair.

    Long after invasion of Iraq, that nation is still divided. Libya is shattered into various pieces. Syria may never come together again. And in all those nations, the once powerful modern secular regimes have been toppled or crippled, and much of the land is overrun by Road Warrior Muslim anarchists whose violence prevent any kind of order, organization, development. As such, those nations pose zero threat to Israel. Jews love it.

    Jews messed up Ukraine too.
    We have to mention the Jew.
    The Ukraine mess has been bad for Ukrainians and bad for Russians who got hit with all sorts of sanctions. But it has been great for the Jews. Make Slav fight Slav. Make goy fight goy. Cripple resurgent nationalist Russia with all sorts of economic warfare.

    So, before Patkins yammers about Muslims as the aggressors, he needs to mention how they’ve been the main victims.

    How many Americans and Europeans were killed by Muslim terror?
    How many Muslims and Arabs have been killed by Jewish-controlled US imperialism in the Middle East and North Africa?

    Americans killed a lot of Arabs/Muslims with guns and bombs. But worse, US invasion created a power vacuum that was filled by Jihadis, foreign elements, mercenaries, thugs, and opportunists. (I suspect Jewish gangsters looted the Baghdad Archaeology Museum soon after US invasion. It seems to have been coordinated. A lot of that loot are probably in Israel right now as they have Biblical significance.)
    So many Muslims and Arabs have been killed.

    Now, I totally oppose the mass migration of Muslims/Arabs to the EU and US, but why are so many people on the move in the first place? Because of the mayhem and horror unleashed by JEWISH control of foreign policy.

    The media tell us about Muslims killing homos, but why is that happening? When Syria, Iraq, and Libya were ruled by secular rulers, there were no terrorist psychos going around tossing homos from rooftops. And even Christian Arabs lived in peace and harmony with their Muslim neighbors.
    But what happened to all such people as the result of Jewish-controlled foreign policy?

    Muslim terrorism is horrible, but it’s pipsqueak stuff compared to Globalist Terror of the Zionists. Iraq War was an act of terrorism far worse than Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. There was NO justification for US to just destroy a nation that hadn’t attacked the US. It was especially vile after US had killed 100,ooos of women and children through sanctions. Worse, much of Hussein’s power had been aided by the US when Iraq was at war with Iran.

    But we are so amnesiac and only blaming Muslims for all the violence.
    Muslims are stupid, and guys like Omar need their heads examined, but much of Muslim violence is blowback pure and simple.

    When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, it suffered massive blowback. US felt justified in firebombing entire cities and killing over 100,000 in a single night in Tokyo. Just when Japan was about to surrender, US nuked two cities. US calls this the ‘good war’.

    If US was right to act thus in retaliation for Pearl Harbor, then why is it so terrible that Muslims and Arabs are lashing out at the West after what the West has done to Arab/Muslim nations?

    ISIS wouldn’t exist if Obama and Hillary hadn’t taken orders from Jews to mess up Libya and Syria. Gaddafi made peace with West and gave up WMD, but his independent spirit in Africa was too much for the Jewish globalists.
    And Assad had to be fatally weakened or toppled because he was allied with Russia and Iran, two nations Jews hate most.

    Of course, Jews despise the Saudis too(and Saudis hate Jews), but as the saying goes, ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’. As long as Saudi whores are willing to work with Jews to wreck Iran, Syria, and Russia(by pumping excess oil and lowering oil prices), they get along famously with Jews.

    Anyway, US wars on the Middle East and North Africa have to be counted as terror, or State Terror. US attacked and destroyed nations that had done NOTHING to the US. In the case of Libya and Syria, they didn’t even attack an US ally. Gaddafi and Assad were merely putting down domestic opposition. Ugly as such violence was, it was no worse than Israel raining bombs on Gaza, something that received full blessing from the cucked out US-government.

    Jews own the media and they can lie til the cows come home. They lied about what happened in Ukraine. They lied about Putin as New Hitler brutalizing the homos.
    Jews lied about Sochi Olympics. Jews lied about Russia invading Crimea. Because Jews control media and whore politicians, they can lie all they want. After all, Jews in government and media spread lies to win US public support for the invasion of Iraq.

    Also, we mustn’t see homos as innocents. Decent Americans know that homos are now the co-rulers of the US along with Jews. Jews have anointed homos as their main partners-in-crime.

    So, we now live in a nation where careers are ruined if anyone expresses disdain or distaste over homosexuality. Buchanan was booted from MSNBC for ‘unacceptable’ views due to Jewish and Homo machinations.
    Bakeries and flower shops are destroyed if they believe in Marriage Decency and refuse to believe that homo fecal penetration and tranny penis mutilation have equal value with real sexuality between man and woman. And American schools are filled with homo propaganda filth. Students are told that they better praise homos or else they are suffering from a mental issue called ‘homophobia’.
    SJW’s weaned on homomania will even physically attack those who carry out Moral Disobedience to the sicko Homo Agenda.
    TV shows and advertising are filled with decadent homo and tranny nonsense.
    Homos are cultural terrorists, and Gayria is crazier than Sharia.

    Homos are so grateful for having been chosen as co-rulers of America that they eagerly work with Jews to spread globalist neo-imperialism all over the world.

    The Jew-Homo deal goes as follows: Homos work very hard to help Jews in their Zionist supremacism, and in exchange, Jews favor and bless vain homos over all other groups and fund homo agenda all over the globe. So, everywhere US spreads its tentacles, ‘gay pride’ parade is almost mandatory.

    Indeed, Jews and homos now drape even Christian churches with homo flags and symbolism. As such, homomania is the new faith of the West.

    If you go to most young people today and mock God and Jesus, they will laugh and find it funny. But if you say the slightest critical or mocking thing about holy homos or trannies, they will be triggered into delirium and call the police, FBI, and CIA to report ‘hate’.

    So, this pretense that homos are innocent little lambs is bogus.

    Of course, those homos and trannies at Orlando had nothing to do with foreign policy, but Homo Power has been working with Globalist Jews to advance Zio-American neo-imperialism all over the world.

    What we really need to do is to have Bush II, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle, Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Samantha Powers, Victoria Nuland, Hillary, and Obama be tried for Crime Against Humanity.

    After the Cold War, there was such hopes for peace.
    But unfortunately, Jews took total power of US government and have been working with Homos to turn the world upside down, ignite a New Cold War, totally lay Muslim nations to waste, spread the cult of diversity all over(thereby creating more divisions and tensions), uprooting countless Muslims, and then steering those Muslims to invade the West.

    Jews rigged it so that they can never lose no matter what happens.

    If all those Muslims arrive to EU and US and assimilate peacefully, then Jews can promote it as success and push for further non-white immigration that will turn whites minorities in their own homelands.

    But then, even if Muslims turn angry and commit acts of terror in the West, it will help Jews since so many dumb Americans will sympathize with Jews and homos against Muslims. Americans will think, “We sure understand how Israelis feel on a daily basis as they have to deal with these Muslim savages on a daily basis. And we must protect those darling little homos from those nasty Muslims. Gay is the new red, white, and blue.”

    Talking about Muslims, Muslims, and Muslims without taking into account the Jewish and Homo role in the globalist neo-imperialism of the 21st century is most disingenuous. It’s like discussing WWII in Europe without ever mentioning Nazi aggression.

    The Invisible Imperialism of the Jews and Homos must be outed.

    We need to say the Jewish/Homo Emperor wears military uniform and rides a tank.

    We have to stop acting as if Jewish-Homo Power is Invisible Power.

    What is sickening is that Jews and Homos still speak in the context of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘gay rights’ when they are the ones with the Power and Might to oppress and destroy other peoples.

    They are like a bully who punches someone in the face and then complains of his poor little fingers hurt by the punchee’s ‘hateful’ face.

    Homos still bitch about ‘gay rights’ when they have the power to shut down entire cities for homo parades and get people fired for not bending over to the homo agenda.

    Awful people.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @Rurik
  2. sheer Islamophobia. After all, the ragheads are but one of several – see also: Blacks, mestizos, Asiatics – Orc Armies that the Tikkun Olam (((eskimos))) are using to drown the Western European and North American Whites in a rising tide of hostile color. And one minor point. Just a few other individuals were positively involved in the 9/11 Atrocity besides Bin Laden (questionable) and 19 other ragheads: Bush, Cheney, (((Wolfowitz))), (((Wurmser))), (((Feith))), (((Pike))), (((Zelikow))), (((Zackheim))), (((Perl))), not to mention Saudi Intel, Israeli Intel, and the CIA

    • Replies: @NickG
  3. NickG says:

    The threat of mass Muslim immigration is not mainly terrorism. That is fairly minimal, in the UK it’s significantly lower than in the 70s when Irish Republican terrorism was the main terrorist threat.

    No, it’s diminishing social capital. The harsh truth is that not all demographics are the same, or interchangeable (despite this being an almost religious article of faith on the left).

    The viability and quality of a liberal democracy – and all that this implies in terms of tolerance, free expression, free enquiry, and much else besides – is down to who you have in that population.

    We can see clearly, that in aggregate, Muslims are especially problematic. This is the case all over the World and has been for a very long time.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @anon
    , @Berta Arnason
  4. NickG says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    sheer Islamophobia

    Isamophobia is word created by fascists, used by cowards, to manipulate morons.

    Islamophobiaphobia is different – now that’s a quasi-religious article of faith amongst the bien pensantry.

  5. Consider. The 9/11 attacks involved 19 hijackers willing to crash airliners into four buildings: the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol.

    So doing, those 19 altered the foreign policy of the United States.

    9/11 was a false flag attack.

    The U.S. is rapidly sliding into the third world. When She is just another large country in the Americas She will repatriate Her legions. The global war on terror will be over. Imperial Washington started it. Imperial Washington sustains it.

  6. @Priss Factor

    endorse every single word, Anonymny, except this:

    Talking about Muslims, Muslims, and Muslims without taking into account the Jewish and Homo role in the globalist neo-imperialism of the 21st century is most disingenuous. It’s like discussing WWII in Europe without ever mentioning Nazi aggression.

    Nazis were not the aggressors in 1933; Jews were. In 1933 Nazis took control of mass Jewish immigration; Nazis restored order and “quelled physical violence against Jews;” Jews declared war on Germany.
    https://archive.org/stream/JewsDeclareWarOnGermany1933/JewsDeclareWarOnGermany1933_djvu.txt

    Nazis were not the aggressors in 1934; Jews were. They held a mock trial of Adolf Hitler. Close comparison to the obscenity Jews held in New York City in May 2016.

    Nazis were not the aggressors in 1935; Jews were. Germans made laws to reassert German economic and social values; German Jews supported the clarification of laws; Zionists in USA, Palestine & Britain fomented agitation against German attempts to run their own state.

    Jews screwed up Sochi Olympics and in 1936 Jews attempted to disrupt the German Olympics.

    In 1937 Germany’s neighbors had standing-army superiority over Germany of 12:1, and counting ready reserves, the military superiority over Germany was 97:1.

    1938- 1939 the German National Socialist Government used diplomatic means and negotiations, not aggression, to reclaim territory and protect German nationals; Jewish maneuvering and incitement of Poles made the Poles truculent and obstructive.

    What Jews are doing now to shatter the Middle East, reducing state after Muslim state to rubble, is NOT new: as brilliant and comprehensive as your narrative is, there is nothing about it that is innovative, it is a repetition of the same evil scheme that Jews used to “reduce Germany to rubble and sit on their faces for 50 years” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vIuNmKSNTA

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  7. Corvinus says:
    @NickG

    “We can see clearly, that in aggregate, Muslims are especially problematic. This is the case all over the World and has been for a very long time.”

    Replace “Muslims” with “Europeans”, “blacks”, or “Jews”. It would be nice for once if you could actually state an argument rather than be a rhetorical bobble-head.

    “Isamophobia is word created by fascists, used by cowards, to manipulate morons.”

    Ok, so who are these “fascists” and “cowards” and “morons”? Do you fit this description?

  8. Corvinus says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “Nazis were not the aggressors in 1933; Jews were. In 1933 Nazis took control of mass Jewish immigration; Nazis restored order and “quelled physical violence against Jews;” Jews declared war on Germany.”

    It’s hard to be the aggressor when you’re being rounded up like cattle and cordoned off. Remember, Mein Kempf was the precursor to Nazi propaganda and subsequent Jewish purges.

  9. Marcus says:

    Terrorism is a pretty minor issue, they shouldn’t be here in the first place regardless of their propensity for it.

  10. HdC says:
    @Corvinus

    So where did the 150,000 Jewish soldiers* in the Wehrmacht come from? With each soldier having at least 2 relatives (parents) that makes for 450,000 Jews in Germany during the war. Note that there were only about 550,000 Jews in Germany when Hitler was appointed to power in 1933.

    Mein Kampf was written by a disillusioned soldier who fought honorably in WWI. Once Hitler was in power his plans and opinions changed in accordance with the circumstances in which he found himself.

    And practically all of these circumstances were imposed on him by Britain and the USA. HdC

    * from Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers book, a fairly recent publication.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  11. Rurik says:
    @Priss Factor

    The Jew-Homo deal goes as follows: Homos work very hard to help Jews in their Zionist supremacism, and in exchange, Jews favor and bless vain homos over all other groups and fund homo agenda all over the globe

    it isn’t just the Jew-homo deal. There are several Jew-minority deals that are and have been around for quite a long time now. It was the Jews who treacherously worked on the inside of the gates of Spain to allow the Moorish, African rule to dominate those white, Christian lands for centuries. Just as they’re doing today in Europe. It’s deja vu all over again.

    If you ask all these young Muslim men if they’d rather kill some Zionists Jews who’ve destroyed their homelands, or ally with the same Jews so that they can be free to ravage the girls (and boys)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3642396/Iraqi-migrant-raped-boy-Austria-said-sexual-emergency-jailed-six-years.html

    of Europe, then guess what they’d pick?

    or the blacks too. Consider that greatest of all great humanitarians and peaceful heroes of resistance to oppression; MLK – when it came to Zionism and the cruel occupation and genocide of the Palestinians..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgB_Pt0DxKY

    he was perfectly willing to toss those brown people under a white (Jewish) supremacist bus so long as it meant lots and lots of white prostitutes and black hegemony against their common enemy, the white race.

    Even Ukrainian Nazi are willing to lick the Jewish ring if it means they can use Jewish supplied arms with which to kill Russians who they hate more than they hate even the Jews (who’re laughing as goyim kills goyim)

    So all over the spectrum you have the Jews foisting conflict and making alliances with others in their eternal war against the traditional white West. It isn’t just Jews and homos. It’s Jews and blacks, it’s Jews and Muslims, it’s Jews and feminists, it’s Jews and La Raza, and on and on and on…

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  12. Corvinus says:
    @HdC

    “So where did the 150,000 Jewish soldiers* in the Wehrmacht come from? With each soldier having at least 2 relatives (parents) that makes for 450,000 Jews in Germany during the war.”

    It was 60,000 soldiers with one Jewish parent and 90,000 with a Jewish grandparent in the Wehrmacht, the regular army as distinct from the Nazi SS. On returning home from the Polish campaign (1939), they lamented to their higher command about the persecution of their families, which led Hitler to dismiss thousands who with reported complaints a year later.

    But many of these so-called half-Jewish soldiers continued to serve, sometimes due to delays in the discharge order reaching the front, because they concealed their background or because they applied and won clemency for good service.

    Indeed, dozens of senior officers with Jewish ancestry served under Hitler, but they 1) received special consideration and 2) were deemed “useful idiots”. Moreover, these Jews were BORN Jewish, but did not practice Judaism nor observed Jewish customs. HUGE difference.

    “And practically all of these circumstances were imposed on him by Britain and the USA.”

    What circumstances are you alluding to?

  13. Is Islamic Terror America’s Future?

    It is if the FBI has any say in it.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  14. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Rurik

    “It isn’t just Jews and homos. It’s Jews and blacks, it’s Jews and Muslims, it’s Jews and feminists, it’s Jews and La Raza, and on and on and on…”

    True, but there is the alliance of the hand and the alliance of the glove.

    Alliance of the glove doesn’t go very deep. Jews working with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis is an alliance of the glove. Jews have nothing in common with Saudis. That too is an alliance of the glove. Jews don’t feel much in common with such folks and would gladly destroy them if not for political convenience.

    But Jews and homos make a natural pair. Both are minorities or minority-elite-wanna-be’s all over the world. Both have extreme personalities. Jews are super-pushy and burrowy, and homos are super vain and narcissistic.
    Both have special talents. Jews are good with numbers and words. Homos are good with design and organization. Both work in upper echelons of power and are obsessed with privilege and insider knowledge. Many key Jews were also homo.
    Both have a long history of working in the closet or behind the scenes.
    Both are well-represented in arts, culture, and academia.

    Also, Jewish ambitions are global, and homo allies can be found in EVERY nation.
    Ukrainian allies can be found only in Ukraine. Japanese allies can only be found in Japan. Saudi allies can only be found in Saudi Arabia.

    But Jews can find homo allies in every nation, and they can all work to create a vast global network. Whenever there is a homo ‘pride’ parade in a nation, it is a global affair with the arrival of homos from all over the world. Thus, homomania is promoted as the new globalist faith.

    By funding such homos and using them as homo collaborators, Jews infiltrate many nations and gain power for themselves.
    Notice how Jews promote homos in Georgia, Japan, Ukraine, Greece, South Korea, Mexico, Vietnam, Poland, Russia, and etc. Jews are wary about going full-homo in Muslim lands because it will alienate Muslims, but Jews have homo allies even in Iran and fund them.

    So, we cannot discount the special relationship between Jews and homos.

    Jews forged a special alliance with Negroes, esp because Negroes can play ‘white guilt’ card along with Jews. Also, Negroes are good in pop music and sports that are profitable to Jews. But Jews have problems with bad black behavior, low-level of black politics, black crime, and black lunacy all around. So, Jews don’t wanna be too chummy with the Jivers.

    But Jews and homos go so well together in their shared elitism, intellect, global ambition, hostility to majority population(gentile or straight), contemptuous vanity, and etc. Jews and homos are an alliance of the hand.

    Beware of the Jewish-Homo or JOMO CABAL.

  15. KA says:

    1 http://www.pacificfreepress.com/2011/03/12/opinion/the-creative-process-of-inventing-credible-enemies.html–Russian documents will one day reveal solid proof of the American hand in the creation of the Chechen network.

    2 Berezovsky financed Wahabi warlords – MP

    Grozny, February 19, Interfax – Boris Berezovsky financed Shamil Basayev, Movladi Udugov and other members of illegal armed units as well as broadcasting of Wahabi ideas, Chechen Republic MP Magomed Khambiyev said on air of Grozny television channel —
    Later, he went on to say, it turned out that “Basayev had received not one but two million dollars from Berezovsky in Ingushetia, and Basayev publicly confirmed it.”

    3 AP Exclusive: Syria rebels recruit at refugee camp
    By JAMAL HALABY Nov. 11, 2013 7:24 PM EST

    When an AP reporter told him of instances of overt recruitment witnessed by AP in the camp, Harper expressed surprise. “We can’t afford to have anybody in the camp, except civilians. But what I’m hearing is seriously alarming.”

    Zaatari is an exporter of fighters,” said Abu Salim, a former top Syrian army officer. “We see civilians maimed, our homes destroyed and our relatives jailed, tortured or killed, so we react by recruiting and training people to fight the tyrant government back home.” He spoke on condition he only be identified by his nom de guerre for fear of reprisals.

    “You should all join hands in the fight for freedom and democracy,” the preacher, who asked to be identified by his nickname Abu Mustafa for security reasons, said, as the worshippers shouted, “God is great.”

    Afterward, Abu Mustafa passed out a roster for recruits to sign up. He said he gets around 10 recruits a week. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-exclusive-syria-rebels-recruit-refugee-camp

    3a-And of course the US has had a policy of supporting the “moderate” Syrian Islamist “opposition,” which ended in massive defections from the so-called Free Syrian Army to openly jihadist outfits like al-Nusra and ISIS.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11882195/US-trained-Division-30-rebels-betrayed-US-and-hand-weapons-over-to-al-Qaedas-affiliate-in-Syria.html

    4 Meanwhile the United Nations has come under the dominance of the United States. For example the head political authority (Deputy Secretary for Political Affairs) is the former US Ambassador to Lebanon, Jeffrey Feltman.—–In Syrian refugee camps run by the United Nations Syrian youth are recruited to join the rebels while UN officials pretend not to see. http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/09/11/us-violations-of-international-law/

    5
    State Dept Officials Demand US Attack Assad Instead of ISIS in Syria
    Formal Protest Document Slams Ongoing War Against ISIS
    by Jason Ditz, June 16, 2016

    6 Petraeus: Use Al Qaeda Fighters to Beat ISIS
    To take down the so-called Islamic State in Syria, the influential former head of the CIA wants to co-opt jihadists from America’s arch foe. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/31/petraeus-use-al-qaeda-fighters-to-beat-isis.html

    7 Up to 35 CIA operatives were working in the city during the attack last September on the US consulate that resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, according to CNN.

    The circumstances of the attack are a subject of deep division in the US with some Congressional leaders pressing for a wide-ranging investigation into suspicions that the government has withheld details of its activities in the Libyan city.

    The television network said that a CIA team was working in an annex near the consulate on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armouries to Syrian rebels. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/10218288/CIA-running-arms-smuggling-team-in-Benghazi-when-consulate-was-attacked.html

    8 Gen. Michael Flynn, who headed up the DIA when the document was produced and who was forced out by the interventionists in the administration. Here is what Flynn told Al-Jazeera in an extensive interview: Flynn: It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.”

    9 n account of a 2012 intelligence report from the Defense Intelligence Agency predicting the rise of the Islamic State in Syria – and showing how US policy deliberately ignored and even succored it. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11882195/US-trained-Division-30-rebels-betrayed-US-and-hand-weapons-over-to-al-Qaedas-affiliate-in-Syria.html

    10 The Bush Administration has publicly pledged the Siniora government a billion dollars in aid since last summer. A donors’ conference in Paris, in January, which the U.S. helped organize, yielded pledges of almost eight billion more, including a promise of more than a billion from the Saudis. The American pledge includes more than two hundred million dollars in military aid, and forty million dollars for internal security.

    American, European, and Arab officials I spoke to told me that the Siniora government and its allies had allowed some aid to end up in the hands of emerging Sunni radical groups in northern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, and around Palestinian refugee camps in the south. These groups, though small, are seen as a buffer to Hezbollah; at the same time, their ideological ties are with Al Qaeda. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/03/05/the-redirection

    And Israel is never far from the apple tree – It shows up everywhere

    “Patrick Clawson, of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, depicted the Saudis’ coöperation with the White House as a significant breakthrough. “The Saudis understand that if they want the Administration to make a more generous political offer to the Palestinians they have to persuade the Arab states to make a more generous offer to the Israelis,” Clawson told me. The new diplomatic approach, he added, “shows a real degree of effort and sophistication as well as a deftness of touch not always associated with this Administration. Who’s running the greater risk—we or the Saudis? At a time when America’s standing in the Middle East is extremely low, the Saudis are actually embracing us. We should count our blessings.” “http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/03/05/the-redirection

    [ what Has Israel done ? It is planning next terror attack on Gaza and seizing the West Bank – that is the price of Saudi embrace . Is Clawson an useful idiot ? ]

    Why so much focus on dismemberment of Syria by the new “Allied “forces? That was the plan put into effects in 2007 by Bush Cabinet .

    ( http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/03/05/the-redirection)

    It is still a work in progress. Other stake holders came later not to miss the offerings on the dinner table .

  16. @Corvinus

    In 1933 Jews were NOT being “rounded up like cattle” — unless you mean that some impoverished Jews in Ukraine were among those millions of Russians who were rounded up by Bolsheviks.

    As for Jews in Germany, Richard Breitman and Allan Lichtman inform us that

    “Before the war Nazi oppression of German Jews followed a jagged trajectory. Some Nazi activists physically assaulted Jews in the early exuberant days of Hitler’s semi legal revolution.** Once secure in their authority, Nazi officials curbed personal violence, but enacted a series of discriminatory laws and decrees . . . against Jews. Only in late 1938 . . .For the first time, [did] the Gestapo imprison tens of thousands of German Jews in concentration camps.”

    Of those “discriminatory laws,” in a moment of pique, author Jeffrey Herf responded to the questions of an audience member who raised the matters of the chaos that confronted German soldiers as they returned from the WWI battlefield — 800,000 German civilians starved to death; Communists attempting a takeover of Germany; the punitive harshness of the Versailles treaty; the assassination of the German diplomat, etc.

    After thrice attempting to wave away those historic realities, Herf said:

    “Everything you mentioned would be a rationale for persecuting the Jews, for right wing- for the German right wing, for driving them out of the universities, denying them citizenship, driving them out of Germany, passing the Nuremberg race laws, uh treating them horribly in every way.”

    From the horse’s mouth.

    Germans had good reasons to be pissed with Jews, and to enact the “series of discriminatory laws” against Jews that they did. Presumable, “semi-legal” laws to go with the “semi-legal revolution,” whatever the hell that means.

    Regarding Mein Kampf as the foundation for “Nazi propaganda,” in a discussion about their books on Hitler, Ron Rosenbaum said to Martin Amis that Hitler was “nothing but a thug and a guttersnipe,” and the above-mentioned Jeffrey Herf wrote a book on the subject, The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust.” The opening pages of Herf’s book, where the foundation of his thesis are presented, rely heavily on the assessment of an art historian that Hitler was “paranoid . . . a paranoiac . . . ” relying on a “paranoic myth that [held] the various strands of German propaganda together.” The art historian “concluded that what characterized Nazi propaganda was “less the lie than the imposition of a paranoiac pattern on world events.”

    Herf then interprets the art historian’s comments to fit his thesis, and also introduces the key quote upon which Herf rests his argument that the NSDAP intended and determined to exterminate Jews. Herf writes:

    “During World War II, the propaganda of the Nazi regime repeatedly asserted that an actual political subject, an actor called Jewry or international Jewry, was “guilty” of starting and prolonging the war and that a Jewish international conspiracy was intent on exterminating Germany and the Germans. These statements rested on a paranoia inherent in the Nazis’ radical anti-Semitism. “

    Thus, on a very basic level, are you proposing, Corvinus, to hitch your wagon to the ravings of a “thigh and a guttersnipe;” to the jottings of an imprisoned man, gassed and wounded in a war, likely suffering from what is now termed PTSD; and who is labeled “paranoid, paranoiac” by a noted and contemporary art historian?

    But if you insist, then take a closer look at Professor Herf’s claims about Nazi propaganda and its “paranoid pattern” of seeing “international Jews” as “actors” intent on harming Germany. After two or three pages of overheated and repetitious rhetoric and more scatterings of the label “paranoid” to characterize Hitler, Nazis, and Germany in the pre-war period, Herf gets to his main point:

    “On January 30, 1939, a distinct shift occurred, as Hitler depicted the war that he was preparing to launch as the last in a long series of acts of aggression by international Jewry against Germany. According to Hitler’s paranoid logic, the Jews had launched the war so that the Nazis would be compelled to wage a war of retaliation against the Jews of Europe. In his speech to the Reichstag on Jan 30, Hitler made his first unequivocal public threat to exterminate (that is, murder) — not merely to remove, deport, or defeat– “the Jewish race in Europe” in the event that “international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe” brought about a new world war. He publicly repeated the genocidal prophecy on at least six subsequent occasions. “

    Take a chill-pill, Prof. Herf; let’s look at the facts.

    1. What did Hitler say? What was the context?

    2. Was the claim that “international Jewry” was bent on destroying Germany a “paranoid” delusion?
    3. Given that there is a factual basis for Hitler’s claim that “international Jewry” was intent on destroying Germany, what should a reader of Herf’s book conclude about the credibility of the author? Herf is paid by taxpayers to teach students at a public university. Should parents of those students be warned that their children are being taught by a “paranoid” ideologue? Should taxpayers demand accountability of those whose employment they support?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  17. bunga says:

    Pat
    America should stop coddling with terrorist abroad . It shall stop using the recruits to do its dirty works against enemies . The ‘enemies” are defined not by Americans but by Israel that shall wake us up .

    Donald Trump at some level understands it well but the MSM in its most inverted logic,arguments,and guided purposes of bolstering Israel have trounced up on him

    “Donald Trump said the following on Fox: “Something is going on. He doesn’t get it, or he gets it better than anybody understands. It’s one or the other.” Reiterating this trope later on in the same show, he averred that the President “is not tough, not smart – or he’s got something else in mind.”

    The Beltway crowd went ballistic. Lindsey Graham had a hissy fit, and other Republican lawmakers started edging away from the presumptive GOP nominee. The Washington Post ran a story with the headline: “Donald Trump Suggests President Obama Was Involved With Orlando Shooting.” Realizing that this level of bias was a bit too brazen, the editors changed it an hour or so later to: “Donald Trump Seems to Connect President Obama to Orlando Shooting.” Not much better, but then again we’re talking about a newspaper that has a team of thirty or so reporters bent on digging up dirt on Trump.

    In any case, Trump responded as he usually does: by doubling down. And he did it, as he usually does, on Twitter, tweeting the following:

    “Media fell all over themselves criticizing what Donald Trump ‘may have insinuated about @POTUS.’ But he’s right:”

    The tweet included a link to this story that appeared on Breitbart: an account of a 2012 intelligence report from the Defense Intelligence Agency predicting the rise of the Islamic State in Syria http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/06/16/something-going-worse-thought/

  18. Corvinus says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “In 1933 Jews were NOT being “rounded up like cattle”

    I didn’t attach that specific year to Jews being herded by Nazis. The point was it would be hard for Jews to be the aggressors when concerted efforts were made to control them.

    “Once secure in their authority, Nazi officials curbed personal violence, but enacted a series of discriminatory laws and decrees…against Jews”

    Which, definitively, are acts of aggression.

    “800,000 German civilians starved to death…”

    How are Jews to blame for this?

    “Communists attempting a takeover of Germany…”

    How are Jews to blame for this?

    “the punitive harshness of the Versailles treaty”

    How are Jews to blame for this?

    “author Jeffrey Herf responded to the questions of an audience member…”

    Entire source and context, please.

    “Everything you mentioned would be a rationale for persecuting the Jews…”

    Yes, a rationale, but was it LEGITIMATE, considering those things previously mentioned were not directly related to Jewish “machinations”? Now, if they** are joined at the Jewish hip, please, by all means, provide us with the necessary background information.

    “Germans had good reasons to be pissed with Jews, and to enact the “series of discriminatory laws” against Jews that they did.”

    Because Jews were at the forefront for German misery, that **being starvation, communist takeovers, and the Versailles Treaty**?

    “Thus, on a very basic level, are you proposing, Corvinus, to hitch your wagon to the ravings of a “thigh and a guttersnipe;” to the jottings of an imprisoned man, gassed and wounded in a war, likely suffering from what is now termed PTSD; and who is labeled “paranoid, paranoiac” by a noted and contemporary art historian?”

    Tens of millions of Germans at that point in time “hitched their wagon” to that “guttersnipe”.

    “3. Given that there is a factual basis for Hitler’s claim that “international Jewry” was intent on destroying Germany, what should a reader of Herf’s book conclude about the credibility of the author?”

    Again, Jews were at the forefront of German starvation, communist takeovers, and the harshness of the Versailles Treaty?

    “Herf is paid by taxpayers to teach students at a public university. Should parents of those students be warned that their children are being taught by a “paranoid” ideologue? Should taxpayers demand accountability of those whose employment they support?”

    Got it. Public institutions simply cannot be trusted to offer reasoned arguments about Hitler’s intent. Project much about paranoia?

  19. Rehmat says:
    @Bill Jones

    Though many of FBI official had been trained by Israeli security ‘experts’ – FBI in its 2004 report claimed that between 1990 and 2003 – 7% Terrorist activities were carried by Jewish extremists as compared to 6% by the Muslim extremists.

    Maybe, Pat Buchanan has to join the FBI to educate its pro-Muslim analysts.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619

  20. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Patkins, see the bright side.

    So far, most Muslim violence has been against Zionists, Urban Liberals, Homos, and Feminists.

    9/11 killed a bunch of NY globalists spreading PC, toxic derivatives, homo propaganda, and anti-white hatred. NY is the city that wants to ban Chick Fil-A.

    Muslims attack slut feminists who hate, hate, and hate white males.
    Muslims attack homos who hate, hate, and hate white conservatives.
    Muslims attack Zionists who hate, hate, and hate white Gentiles.

    Tsarnaevs attacked Boston that was totally for Obama.
    Omar attacked fruity Orlando.

    Muslim migration isn’t necessarily bad if the Muslims are encouraged to settle in Democratic areas.

    Now, why should white Conservatives care and worry about Zionists, homos, feminists, and urban Libs when they are the very people who are importing Muslims to hurt white conservatives?

    White conservatives should love the spectacle of the Muslim pitbull turning on its own masters.

    Look at all the Muslim targets in Paris, NY, Orlando, Boston, Cologne, and etc.

    They are all on the ‘left’.

    ROTFL.

    • Replies: @Rehmat
  21. @Corvinus

    It’s a beautiful evening that I shall enjoy with friends and a walk along the shore.

    You might consider doing some of your own research, Corvinus, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed the antidote to the brainwashing you have been spoon-fed.
    Three robins hatched and grew in a nest over my porch; I watched them day-by-day as they clamored, open-mouthed, for the mother robin to feed them and to take away their feces. If she was late, they cried and cried, and sat with mouths wide open, and shat on the ground all around them with nary a thought. But then, that’s what bird-brains do.

  22. anon • Disclaimer says:

    The real problem is not the middle east. We should not be there at all. The REAL problem is allowing Muslims into the west. Muslim immigration is a Trojan horse allowing for terrorism and a fifth column, or inner front, against the west.

  23. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @NickG

    Excellent points. In the long run the worth of any state is only the worth of the people who compose that state.

    Said another way, western society requires westerners. To suppose you can build a viable WESTERN society with Pakistanis, Somalis, Arabs, Muslims etc., is breathtakingly naïve.

  24. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    This video by Taylor is pretty good.

    But Taylor is wrong to see Diversity as one big unity against whites.

    In some ways, the rise of Diversity will be more damaging to ‘native’ blacks than to whites.

    While white working class and poor class will sink lower, white upper middle class and rich class will do great under globalism. Just look at the booming downtown areas of big cities.

    But what of blacks? As blacks have lower IQ, they will be squeezed by tons of browns who will take most menial jobs.

    And ‘native’ blacks will be squeezed by Asians and African immigrants who will take more slots in universities.

    Though the Democratic Party seems the ‘anti-white party’, it is really the Jewish-White-Liberal-Homo overclass party. The elites are mostly Jews, white Libs, and Homos and their mulatto allies and Asian servants.

    It is the Liberal White Overclass Party. Diversity means browns, yellows, and blacks serve Jews, white Libs, and Homos who have the Real Power in big cities.

    GOP is the white party in the sense that, from top to bottom, it is more uniform in color.
    And GOP will be hurt by Diversity.

    But Diversity will actually be good for the Jewish/white Liberal overclass in the Democratic Party because they will get to play divide and rule among blacks, browns, yellows, and Muslims.

    In a way, BLM is a rebellion against this arrangement where blacks have been shunted aside by browns and homos. BLM is less a sign of black strength than desperation as they are being pushed aside by Diversity, Homomania, and gentrification.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  25. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    Not long ago, Jared Taylor had a debate with some black guy at some college,
    and the black dude defended ‘Diversity’.

    In doing so, he is defending imperialism and the slave trade.

    The New World came into being by European imperialist conquest of native peoples and destruction of their cultures.
    And the only reason blacks ended up in the New World is because whites bought them from black Africans to work as slaves.

    So, Diversity is the product of conquest, imperialism, genocide, and slavery.

    Defending Diversity is defending imperialism and slavery.

    Also, the black guy says it would be good to see whites disappear through race mixing.
    But blacks will also disappear.

    Look at Venezuela. A lot of people there don’t know what they are. White, indio, black, etc? They are all mixed up.

    Mexico used to be 5% black, but blacks disappeared through race mixing.

    Blacks survived as a distinct race and culture in the US because of the color barrier.
    It helped preserve and define blackness.

    Suppose US had practiced serious race mixing from the beginning.
    There would be no specific black race in the US. There would just be a bunch of mulattos and darker-hued whites. Sense of black identity would be much weaker than it is today.
    Does the black professor wish that had been the case?

    Idiot.

    • Replies: @KenH
  26. @Corvinus

    one at a time —

    “Once secure in their authority, Nazi officials curbed personal violence, but enacted a series of discriminatory laws and decrees…against Jews”

    Which, definitively, are acts of aggression.

    First, it’s important to understand that resentment of Jews in Germany bubbled up from the populace; it was not a top-down phenomenon.

    Second, it is critically important to understand that during the first war and throughout the Weimar era, Russian and Polish Jews fled those countries and flocked to Germany in very large numbers. Read the comments of Hans Luther, German ambassador to the United States, as reported in Jewish Telegraph Agency 26 May 1933: http://www.jta.org/1933/05/26/archive/nazi-jewish-policies-political-not-religious-dr-luther-asserts
    Think of the situations described in Germany in 1933 in tandem with the debate in the USA over immigration, but add to the problems besetting the state
    – having just lost a war, hundreds of thousands of menfolk killed, leaving widows & orphans, many thousands wounded, all returning to a homeland that had been ravaged by starvation;
    – having been assessed significant reparations;
    – unemployment approaching 70%;
    – hyperinflation;
    You will ask, Were Jews responsible for all of this? The response might be, Germans observed that Jewish people (and some German elites) were not suffering the same poverty and misery as large numbers of Germans; that is why resentment of Jews bubbled up from the masses.
    Jews were protected and aided by numerous Jewish aid societies who raised money in USA and distributed it to Polish and Russian Jews; Jews were able to function in the black market while many Germans did not have the wherewithal to do. When you can’t feed your kids and you see the children of immigrant Polish Jews dressed and fed, it tends to make you angry.

    You say the legal solutions crafted by the Third Reich were “aggression.” How would you prefer the problem be resolved? Read the Luther article again: he points out that NSDAP “discriminated against” foreign aliens and those who attempted to disseminate Communist ideas, and not the old-line German Jewish families.

    Your terse statement that passing laws is “aggression” sounds an awful lot like Gilad Erdan’s declaration that BDS is a form of terror. :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1kVfi1ksfM

    If peaceful resistance doesn’t work, and if legal means to resolve a problem are deemed “aggression,” then what options are left — watch your children die? Allow your state to be overtaken by alien ideologies and subversive political systems? Don’t governments have obligations to protect and defend the rights of the people of a nation against such intrusions on their culture and well-being?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  27. juster says:

    Great article by Pat. Long-winded “Jews in my sandwich” comments severely inhibit any intelligent conversation anybody might want to have about it.

  28. @Corvinus

    “It’s hard to be the aggressor when you’re being rounded up like cattle and cordoned off. ”

    Well that’s the idea, isn’t it? What do you think jails are for? What do you think Lenin’s and Stalin’s gulags were all about (besides slave labor)? What can you say about FDR’s internment of Japanese-American CITIZENS? What have you to say about the Brit prison camps in Kenya as late as the 1950’s?

    “You protest, and with justice, each time Hitler jails an opponent; but you forget that Stalin and company have jailed and murdered a thousand times as many. It seems to me, and indeed the evidence is plain, that compared to the Moscow brigands and assassins, Hitler is hardly more than a common Ku Kluxer and Mussolini almost a philanthropist.”

    – H. L. Mencken, in an open letter to Upton Sinclair, printed in The American Mercury, June 1936

    Note: Please refrain from personal attacks on H.L if you choose to respond. Deal with the ideas only.

  29. @juster

    just heard someone (w/ a Jewish-sounding name, btw) who wants to limit gun ownership say, “If you see something say something” —

    If the scary thing that is seen has a Jewish identity, do different rules apply?

  30. KenH says:
    @Priss Factor

    Suppose US had practiced serious race mixing from the beginning. There would be no specific black race in the US. There would just be a bunch of mulattos and darker-hued whites.

    We’d be a combination of Brazil and Mexico. That’s what the Jewish occupation government is striving for with their mass importation of third world racial stocks and demonization of any whites who dare oppose these plans. They wish to preside over a mass of swarthy, androgynous brown people with no past and no future (see the UNESCO brown man).

    I’d like to know how these brown abominations will maintain a first world economy to provide Izzy with billions of dollars in annual tribute, design advanced weapons systems and willingly defend Izzy like their white slaves do today. But I’m sure the Jewish geniuses have it all figured out.

  31. dahoit says:

    Sorry Pat,your reflexive anti Muslim rant is way off.
    The nexus of our crisis has been Zion,and its campaign of destabilization and destruction of Western society into divided helpless rubes blaming ghosts for Israels crimes.
    They hate Trump and daily try to politically assassinate our only hope of getting out from their domination of our nation.
    Enough with this shite.
    Trump for POTUS.

  32. Rehmat says:
    @Priss Factor

    White racists kill, kill ……. Muslims, Christians – but not Zionist Jews.

    Their latest victim was British MP Jo Cox, a mother of two kids. Her crime was she supported democracy, freedom of speech, and Palestinian cause.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/06/18/uk-pro-palestine-lawmaker-murdered/

    • Replies: @anon
  33. Corvinus says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “You might consider doing some of your own research, Corvinus, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed the antidote to the brainwashing you have been spoon-fed.”

    It’s not about conducting research, it’s about how the information is processed after investigating an issue or topic. You do realize that Luther had a particular axe to grind, correct?

    “First, it’s important to understand that resentment of Jews in Germany bubbled up from the populace; it was not a top-down phenomenon.”

    Not necessarily. Some European monarchs during the Age of Exploration, fearing competition with Jewish commercialists, on their own initiative sought to limit their movement, such as Frederick II’s edict in 1744 (Prussia), or sought to outright banish them, such as Maria Theresa (Archduchess Of Austria). Catherine II (Russian Empress) also restricted Jews to western parts of the Empire in an effort to protect Russian merchants. 

One must also take into consideration the powerful impact among the German citizenry who read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1920) with its accusations of Jewish domination in the aftermath of World War I. To what extent were these accusations accurate?

    “Second, it is critically important to understand that during the first war and throughout the Weimar era, Russian and Polish Jews fled those countries and flocked to Germany in very large numbers. Read the comments of Hans Luther, German ambassador to the United States, as reported in Jewish Telegraph Agency 26 May 1933: http://www.jta.org/1933/05/26/archive/nazi-jewish-policies-political-not-religious-dr-luther-asserts”

    Yes, I am aware of this influx of these immigrants and his assertion regarding the reasons why there was a backlash against Jews.

    Certainly, there would be hostility and anger directed by the German citizenry toward this group in the backdrop of a dire financial situation. Jews, like any group, but especially those in the lower social strata, would be the perfect scapegoat to blame for their economic difficulties.

    “You will ask, Were Jews responsible for all of this? The response might be, Germans observed that Jewish people (and some German elites) were not suffering the same poverty and misery as large numbers of Germans; that is why resentment of Jews bubbled up from the masses.”

    Yes, I am aware of the perception. That is NOT what I asked. Were Jews DIRECTLY responsible for starvation? for the war reparations? for leading communist takeovers? 
That is, what specific evidence is there to prove that German perceptions were based in observed reality?

    “Jews were protected and aided by numerous Jewish aid societies who raised money in USA and distributed it to Polish and Russian Jews; Jews were able to function in the black market while many Germans did not have the wherewithal to do. When you can’t feed your kids and you see the children of immigrant Polish Jews dressed and fed, it tends to make you angry.”

    Yes, Germans would be upset. Why would I dispute their feelings?

    “You say the legal solutions crafted by the Third Reich were “aggression.” How would you prefer the problem be resolved?”

    Legislative policies designed to specifically address the economic issues.

    “Read the Luther article again: he points out that NSDAP “discriminated against” foreign aliens and those who attempted to disseminate Communist ideas, and not the old-line German Jewish families.”

    It wasn’t mere “discrimination”. Inevitably, those “old-line” families became a direct threat, as evident by future German legislative and military action.

    “Your terse statement that passing laws is “aggression” sounds an awful lot like Gilad Erdan’s declaration that BDS is a form of terror. :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1kVfi1ksfM”

    Likewise with Luther’s statements. Is it not this “Jewish invasion” a form of “terror”?

    “Allow your state to be overtaken by alien ideologies and subversive political systems?”

    Was not Nazism, a form of totalitarianism, an “alien ideology” and a “subversive political system”?

    “Don’t governments have obligations to protect and defend the rights of the people of a nation against such intrusions on their culture and well-being?”

    

Of course. But were Jews an “intrusion” that warranted actions that amounted to a death sentence?

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
  34. @juster

    I feel your pain. I too would have preferred a discussion of Pat’s article. But moderation (to keep a conversation on topic) costs money and I am here for free. And close moderation usually results in my being banned. So I am happy with letting the Unz Review be the Unz Review.

  35. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says:

    Instead of ‘white nationalism’, how about Euro-Sphere Consciousness?

    Nationalism is too limited for pan-racial consciousness.

  36. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Rehmat

    Actually what the Labourites mainly support is flooding Great Britain with people like you sport, and turning the native English into a powerless minority in their own land.

  37. Greg S. says:

    Islam is a weapon. It’s a movement founded on the principle of conquest by force. If boil Islam down, it’s “assimilate (to Islam) or die.” They even take it one step further: “assimilate (to the RIGHT KIND of Islam) or die,” which is why most Islamic violence is actually Muslim on Muslim (Sunni vs Shia).

    Evil minds in intelligence agencies across the world have recognized the power of this force, and thought how they could exploit it. The most widely accepted of these is how the U.S. fostered and supported Islamic terror in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets in the 1980s. It’s continued ever since.

    That is why, despite everything going on, you never, ever hear anyone going after Saudi Arabia. They are the “good terrorists” terrorizing on our side. The ends justify the means.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    , @Corvinus
  38. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says:

    Worse than Muslim ‘refugees’ is blacks refuse that comes with Section 8.

    With forced Negro integration upon whites, whites are going to need more guns for protection from the stronger, more aggressive Negroes. From Jim Crow to Willie Horton.

    But Obama not only wants to flood white communities with dangerous Negroes but wanna take away white guns necessary for protection.

    Jews want blacks to beat up white guys and take white girls.

    It’s all part of plan.

  39. @NickG

    By body count (in millions of corpses), Occidentals still have the lead.

    Orientals would follow somewhat closely… although, huh(?), they have essentially murdered their own.

    Muslims, as a cross-national group, are way, way behind and unlikely to catch up.

    Just saying…

    • Replies: @anon
  40. KenH says:

    ISIS believes it can gradually drive the West out of the Middle East, as it has already helped to drive the Christians out.

    It’s time to extricate ourself from the Middle East quagmire. Not because of ISIS who we could and should utterly destroy, but because our continued actions and presence have led to instability and violence throughout the region.

    We never should have invaded, deposed and murdered Saddam Hussein to begin with. Then effectively disenfranchised the Sunnis and the Baathist party while trying to impose a form of government (democracy) that was neither indigenous to the region nor was requested by the Iraqi people. Then thinking we could torture and drone strike our way to success. We only created a vacuum that was filled by AQ in Iraq and later ISIS while helping to radicalize a younger generation of Sunni Muslims against the West in general. This is a very shameful episode in American history.

    With that said, Muslims living comfortably in the West have no right to abuse our tolerance and trust by committing acts of terror against our citizens and sexual assaults on our women (Rotherham, Oxford, Cologne) or by imposing an Islamic moral code as the new Muslim mayor of Londonistan appears to be doing. In Europe, Scandinavia and the UK, if Muslims perceive kindness for weakness then the Europeans should remind them of who’s in charge by leaving mosques in smoking ruins and resorting to shocking levels of brutality against Muslims radicals, their imams and suspected radicals and their sympathizers. This should be coupled with a forcible repatriation program for the bulk of the Muslim population living in these regions as it’s clear Muslims living in traditionally white, European lands is a marriage made in hell.

    In America, we should enact a sensible ban on all Muslim immigration and student visas as well as a repatriation program for adherents and proponents of sharia law. Additional measures may also be necessary.

    Multiculturalism has failed and failed utterly. And as we’ve seen in the terror attacks both in Europe and America and with second and third generation Muslims leaving America, Europe and the UK to join the ranks of ISIS that blood is indeed thicker than water and different racial/ethnic and religious groups are predisposed to thought patterns and actions that bring them into direct conflict with the mores of Western civilization. Therefore, some groups are incapable and/or unwilling to assimilate and redoubling assimilation efforts are futile.

    The fable of the scorpion and the frog applies not only to Jews, but also to Muslims and to an equal or lesser extent, other non European groups who’ve entered America post 1965 either legally or illegally.

    • Replies: @anon
  41. @Greg S.

    ” It’s a movement founded on the principle of conquest by force. ”

    So not like Judaism then?

  42. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Berta Arnason

    What you say is the opposite of the truth. In the sub-continent alone perhaps 100 million Hindus were killed since the violent entry of Islam in that region.

    • Replies: @L.K
    , @Berta Arnason
  43. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    We need to get Muslims OUT of the west and we need to stay OUT of the middle east too.

    • Replies: @KenH
  44. Sam Shama says:
    @Corvinus

    Hello Corvinus,
    [Superb parrying on your part.] SolontoCroesus by his own admission, was taught by his parents to respect Jews and shower them with brotherly love. He is simply being the good, dutiful child.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  45. @Sam Shama

    What an insufferable twit you are, Sam the Sham.

    You have yet to respond to a post from several weeks ago — you claimed you needed time to research it.

    Several months ago you pledged that you would try to provide support for RobinG’s and geokat62’s efforts at organizing a mass protest movement; you said you “would be back under a different name that would be recognized.”
    Big talk, no action.

    You were not able to refute several fact patterns in a recent thread, so you walked away claiming the whole thing was “boring.”

    You’re a phony, Sam, and a pathetic one at that, so pathetic that you’re reduced to echoing Sherman’s lamebrained retorts.

    As for Corvinus, to paraphrase something my Mother used to say, “god’s not done with [him/her] yet,” and neither am I.

  46. L.K says:
    @anon

    anon, you are making numbers up.
    Ridiculous.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @anon
  47. L.K says:

    Is Islamic Terror America’s Future?
    Well, Pat Buchanan can be very dishonest when he wants to.

    The rise of the Daesh/ISIS lunatics was completely predictable – through US destabilizing Eastern Syria which borders the Iraq sunni regions – and it was desired by Washington and its allies.
    In a recent interview, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, former head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), stated clearly that the rise of ‘ISIS’ was ‘a willful Washington decision’.

    As a German blogger wrote:

    Another released DIA document written in August 2012 and also highly redacted explains that Al Qaeda was, from the beginning, a big part of the Syrian “revolution”. It foresees and warns of the creation of an Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. Some quotes (emph. added):
    3 B: AQI(al qaeda in iraq) supported the Syrian opposition from the beginning …

    3 C: AQI conducted a number of operations in Syrian cities under the name of Jaish al-Nusra …
    Now, the criminals in Washington are trying to use ISIS as an excuse to, in fact, intervene in Syria and try to bring about the regime change they have been anxiously seeking since 2011.
    These are the moderate rebels and activists the main stream media wrote and is still writing about. More from the report:
    8 C: If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime.
    The “supporting powers” are earlier listed (in 7 B) as:
    Western countries, the Gulf States and Turkey.

    The DIA warns that the creation of such an Salafist principality would have “dire consequences” for Iraq and would possibly lead to the creation of an Islamic State and:
    DIA chief Michael Flynn confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of warnings to the civilian administration between 2012 and 2014 saying that the jihadists were in control of the opposition.


    “If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic,” Flynn said.

    Yet, as Flynn stated previously, it was a “willful decision” for the administration “to do what they’re doing.”

    So, ISIS, was basically created by the US government and allies.

    The same is basically true for the various Al-CIAda outfits.
    Heck, Zusa has done what it can to protect the Nusra(cia-da in Syria) front & exclude it from Russian/Syrian air strikes and attacks.

    Former Army general and CIA director David Petraeus even lobbied for Nusra.

    Recently, as veteran journalist Gareth Porter, stated: “In yet another a dangerous US political-diplomatic move in Syria, the Obama administration is going out of its way to protect the interests of al-Qaeda’s closest and most powerful ally in Syria, Ahrar al-Sham.”
    Ahrar al-Sham is just another salafist extremist group
    .

    ZUSA has been in bed with radical Islam( and promoting it) going back many decades, same is true for some nato countries, particularly England.

    The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

    “Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.’

    He also said:

    “By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.”

    The Washington Post reported in 2010:

    “The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks”

    So, Mr.Buchanan, how about first you guys stop creating the terrorists in the first place?

    Furthermore, 9-11 was not done by Al-Qaeda. The official US government story does not have a leg to stand on and is a cover -up.

    Some of the recent incidents are also pretty suspicious, just don’t pass the smell test.

  48. anon • Disclaimer says:

    Isis itself is a red herring as they were created by the US to attack Assad in Syria and obviously the neocon wars have inflamed the situation

    however the religion guarantees conflict* with the West under some name of other at any point of contact so the only choice is where those points of contact are:

    1) along the border – guaranteed (wherever those borders end up being)
    2) in what used to be our homelands – optional
    3) neocon wars – optional.

    Any optional conflict should have a permanent solution as the end goal.

    *the conflict is not just terrorism, it’s the schools, rape gangs, forced conversion etc

    And as they kill and die for ISIS, they will push America where they are pushing Europe — to the right.

    That’s one effect but the anti-white and anti-Christian media are doing everything they can to shield them until it is too late.

    The biggest problem of all is always the media.

  49. Corvinus says:
    @Greg S.

    “Islam is a weapon. It’s a movement founded on the principle of conquest by force. If boil Islam down, it’s “assimilate (to Islam) or die.” They even take it one step further: “assimilate (to the RIGHT KIND of Islam) or die,” which is why most Islamic violence is actually Muslim on Muslim (Sunni vs Shia).”

    How many violent clashes in the United States between Sunnis and Shias have occurred?

  50. Corvinus says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “As for Corvinus, to paraphrase something my Mother used to say, “god’s not done with [him/her] yet,” and neither am I.”

    Are you just waiting for the right time to respond to my own line of inquiry?

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  51. KenH says:
    @anon

    Agree 100%. We need to end Middle East intervention and get the hell out, but as long as we outsource foreign policy to Israel and their U.S. agents don’t expect anything to change.

  52. Talha says:
    @L.K

    Hey L.K.,

    When I first heard the 80-100 million number a while back I was shocked; it’s more than Stalin, Mao, WW2 and even pre-modern bloodbaths like the Mongols by almost three-fold. So I looked had into it…I suggest anyone do the same.

    You’ll find a boat-load of Hindutva websites throwing out those numbers (and a bunch of anti-Islam websites jumping on the bandwagon); so what’s their source?

    Most mention the numbers as reported by a man named Koenraad Elst: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/43136.Koenraad_Elst (right-wing supporter of Hindu Nationalism)

    And his book is mentioned as the source:

    Published by some publisher called ‘Voice of India’, probably because no self-respecting western publisher would touch it.

    Now, to be honest, he seems to reference an actual Indian historian Prof. K.S Lal and states:
    “According to his [Lal’s] calculations, the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate). More research is needed before we can settle for a quantitatively accurate evaluation of Muslim rule in India, but at least we know for sure that the term crime against humanity is not exaggerated.”

    So Lal mentioned a population decrease in general, but no mention specifically of all of that due to slaughter – could be famine, disease, etc. along with the many wars of conquest. Knowing that this is an estimate of medieval demographics, which will be inaccurate, Lal’s work was criticized by historians like Simon Digby (the foremost British scholar of pre-Mughal India):
    “Yet the unknown variables are so great and the quality of the data yielded by our sources so poor that almost any detailed general estimates of population based upon them must appear wilful, if not fantastic.”
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/614232?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    (Notice that, in the text, Lal himself analyzes how much of this population change was due to free conversion. Which happens even to this day when Muslims are a minority in a Hindu-super majority country; Islam is the only religion posting growth, while all others are in decline (ain’t no Muslims clubbing Hindus on the head to make them convert): http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-india-census-religion-idUKKCN0QV0G520150826)

    So was there a bloody history in India and even instances of forced conversion? Likely. Some of the Muslim invading armies did make a point to be ruthless in order to get the population to submit to political control quickly. Otherwise, Will Durant (a solid historian) would likely not have stated something like this:
    “The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.”

    However, even his conclusions have been criticized by other historians, like Burjor Avari, and others who state that these Muslim sources do not jive with historical accounts from Hindu sources:
    4.3 Negative stereotyping based on uncritical medieval Muslim histories

    So more research is more than welcome on the subject, but when someone simply throws out number that high, you know their angle on things.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @L.K
  53. Sam Shama says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    I am at a loss to understand the source of your phlegmatic reaction: I was merely praising the obvious convergence of your behaviour with the labours of your parents.

  54. Sam Shama says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    [You have yet to respond to a post from several weeks ago — you claimed you needed time to research it.]

    I have in the past responded to your romantic treatises and other fiction on Hitler; its just that the whole thing has a boring, deja vu quality to it, mostly on account of you indefatigable relish for tripe. Besides, Corvinus is doing a far better job at reducing your version for the tripe it is.

    [Several months ago you pledged that you would try to provide support for RobinG’s and geokat62′s efforts at organizing a mass protest movement; you said you “would be back under a different name that would be recognized.”]

    Well old man, this, as some deep philosopher once observed, is hardly any of your concern [and besides how do you know etc….?]

    [You were not able to refute several fact patterns in a recent thread, so you walked away claiming the whole thing was “boring.”]

    It was bloody boring Art. Things that bore me I despise more than your otherwise horrid tales.

    [You’re a phony, Sam, and a pathetic one at that, so pathetic that you’re reduced to echoing Sherman’s lamebrained retorts.]

    see #56

    • Replies: @L.K
  55. L.K says:
    @Sam Shama

    Sam Shama,

    You r a zionist liar with ZERO credibility & nothing but lies and obfuscation as input.

    You know what is actually really boring, zio boy?
    The tired and old propaganda that makes up the holocau$t HOAX, which your tribesmen keep shoving down our throats day in and day out. As in garbage in and garbage out.

    It is such an obvious hoax, that it needs the police and judiciary in many countries to survive.
    In the zio USA, where there is still the appearance of free speech, character assassination and loss of livelihood are used, very effectively, instead.

    This corvinus guy, insofar as National Socialism and the Jews go, is clueless.

    The constrast between u guys and someone who is well researched, such as Solonto, is obvious to any open minded person.

  56. Sam Shama says:
    @L.K

    […..obvious to any open minded person]

    in your case, you sputtering purveyor of hackneyed four-lettereds, the mind has opened wide enough, “where ether swirls triumphant”

  57. anon • Disclaimer says:
    @L.K

    Plenty of info to support it.

    • Replies: @L.K
  58. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @L.K

    keep shoving down our throats day in and day out. As in garbage in and garbage out.

    Dude, it is good to know that you admit what comes out of your throat is garbage.

  59. L.K says:
    @anon

    anon “Plenty of info to support it.”

    No, there is not.

    Instead, there is a ton of info refuting the idiotic holohoax.

  60. L.K says:
    @Talha

    Hey Talha,

    “So more research is more than welcome on the subject, but when someone simply throws out number that high, you know their angle on things.”

    Thanks for your post & sources. I agree.

    Such figures are indeed just ridiculous. As you correctly pointed out, casualty figures from Antiquity and the Middle Ages – even military ones, let alone civilian losses- are totally unreliable and generally nothing but grotesque exagerations.

    Take the battle of Chalons, as an example, between the Romans and allies vs the Huns and allies;
    Ancient historians put just the dead from the battle at 165,000 and even as many as 300,000!

    Modern historians estimate each side armie’s size to have been in the 25-35,000 range!

    Another point is; exagerations apart, there is little doubt that the Turco-Mongol conqueror, Tamerlane, and his armies, were brutal and comitted many atrocities.
    Tamerlane was a Moslem. But the previous Mongol conqueror, Genghis Khan, who was not a Moslem, had used many of the same terror tactics later employed by Tamerlane.

    Irrespective of Religion, the warriors from the Eurasian steppes, built a fearsome reputation over the course of many centuries.

    But even human losses from very recent conflicts(or repressive regimes), say, from the 20th Century until now, are often quite hard to quantify accurately for a variety of reasons.

    How many died in China bc of Mao’s policies? I’ve seen figures in the range of 40 million all the way up to 90 million.

    Needless to say, civilian casualties are viciously manipulated by propagandists. A recent example is the illegal war on Syria, where numbers are not only inflated but context is brutally distorted. One tactic used by msm propagandists is to take the entire casualty count for the war, estimates in fact, which include military and civilian losses on both sides, and attribute them all to Assad “killing his own people”.

    Even modern military casualties are often difficult to ascertain, largely bc of bias and propaganda.

    So many decades after the Normandy campaing, we still find in military ‘histories’, the absurd German casualty count of 200,000 or even as many as more than 250,000 KIA/WIA.
    The real figures are known from detailed German military archives; for the entire Western front, not only Normandy, in the summer of 44, German casualties amounted to some 90,000 kia/wia.
    Besides sheer incompetence, one reason anglo-american ‘historians’ still repeat the ridiculously inflated numbers, is to make their victory in Normandy appear more than it really was, as well as to conceal the fact that the Allies suffered higher kia/wia than did the Germans.

    Best regards

  61. @anon

    Did you hear of WWI and WWII? The Soviet Union, perhaps? Add up and keep counting. The Cold War is a gift that keeps on giving on this gruesome account.

    For Orientals, look into China and neighbors. Tally up.

    It is possible that humanity will surpass the inhumane records that Occidentals and Orientals have set but I see no benefit in fantasizing that such a thing has indeed happened when, clearly, it has not.

    Evidently, these inhumane records do not mean that no one else has committed atrocious crimes. But, in volume, by body count, Occidentals still have the lead.

  62. Corvinus says:
    @L.K

    “The tired and old propaganda that makes up the holocau$t HOAX”

    The only thing tired are those insisting the Holocaust never happened.

    Please also be advised of Niwdog’s Law—As an online discussion continues with multiple posters, the likelihood of a person making assertions that the Jews are behind everything in the world that is “bad” exponentially grows.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS