RSS
The honor of it all aside, Rep. Paul Ryan would do well to decline the speakership of the House. For it is a poisoned chalice that is being offered to him.
The Republican Party is not, as some commentators wail, in “chaos” today. It is in rebellion, in revolt, as it was in the early 1960s when Barry Goldwater’s true believers rejected Eisenhower Republicanism and Nelson Rockefeller to nominate the Arizona Senator for president.
A similar and bristling hostility to today’s establishment has arisen, in the GOP Congress, the country, and the presidential race.
The acrimony attendant to this militants revolt explains why Speaker John Boehner packed it in, singing “Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah,” and why Donald Trump remains far out in front for the nomination.
Ryan’s popularity and pleasant persona are not going to be able to smooth over those divisions. For they are about ideology, and about issues such as free trade and amnesty for people here illegally, where Ryan stands squarely with the establishment and against the revolt.
Many House rebels and Trump supporters look on the hollowing out of America’s industrial base as the direct result of trade treaties negotiated for the benefit of transnational corporations, whose profits are contingent on cutting production costs by moving factories out of the USA.
Ryan voted for all of those trade deals. And Ryan voted for fast-track, the unilateral surrender of Congress’s power even to amend the trade treaties that Barack Obama brings home.
Should he become speaker, Paul Ryan would have to round up Republican votes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal Obama has negotiated. But not only are Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton opposed to TPP, Trump calls it a “disaster” that fails to address the critical issue of “currency manipulation.”
The TPP has already been rechristened by Republican rebels as “Obamatrade.” If Ryan harbors ambitions to be president, he will steer clear of this coming battle between nationalism and globalism.
As former Speaker Newt Gingrich suggests, a Speaker Ryan would be embattled as soon as he took up the gavel:
“It’s easy to get 218 on the first vote, and then you get to keep the government open through a continuing resolution, and then you get to the debt ceiling, and, if you’re not careful, by Christmas you resemble John Boehner.”
On the issues of mass immigration and illegal immigration that have roiled the Republican race, Ryan is regarded as an open-borders man. Says Rosemary Jenks of NumbersUSA, which is fighting to halt the invasion:
“He (Ryan) has been … pro-amnesty, pro-mass immigration, pro-replacing American workers with foreign workers … all of his career.”
In the early 1960s, the Goldwaterites demanded “A Choice, Not an Echo” in the title of Phyllis Schlafly’s best-seller, an updated version of which is now in print. Those conservatives did not want to compromise with their adversaries in the Republican establishment or Democratic Party. They did not want to work together. They wanted to change policy. They wanted to change the direction of the country.
Backing the Freedom Caucus in the House and the “outsiders” in the GOP presidential race are men and women of a similar mindset, who have been recognized and re-identified by the National Journal’s John Judis.
They are the Middle Americans Radicals, the “MARS.”
Their temperament is that of their forebears in the ’60s and ’90s, but their issues are today’s. Patriotic and nationalistic, they cherish the country they grew up in and do not want it changed by mass migration. They want illegal immigrants sent back. On whether a devout Muslim should be president, they are with Dr. Ben Carson.
When Trump says, “We never win anymore,” that resonates to these folks. They see 21st-century America as a nation that cannot win its wars, or secure its borders, or build an infrastructure of roads, bridges, rails and airports to match those rising in other countries.
Moreover, the spirit of revolt in the GOP, indeed, in both parties today, is not confined to the USA. It is roiling Europe. In Britain, France, Spain, Italy and Belgium, nationalism is tearing at the seams of nations. Secession from the EU appears to be an idea whose time is coming.
Popular resistance to the dictates of Brussels and Angela Merkel’s Berlin, and to mass migration from the Middle East and Africa that threatens to swamp the smallest continent, are familiar to the Americans of 2015 as well.
Paul Ryan is not going to be able to unite a House Republican caucus that is splitting on issues like this. As chairman of the House Committee on Ways & Means, he is better off working on supply-side tax cuts.
After the GOP capture of the House in 2010, Ryan, with new Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, wrote a book about what they were going to do, titled, “Young Guns.”
“Young Guns” Cantor and McCarthy are now lying toes up in the OK Corral, and if Paul Ryan becomes speaker, he will end up the same way.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.”
Copyright 2015 Creators.com.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
This is the biggest problem we have, and I am glad to see it identified here so succinctly by Mr. Buchanan.
Let’s hope it gets a lot of attention in the upcoming Republican debate. Mr. Trump has been on the right side of this issue all along. He needs to aim his words at it with increasing depth. If he does this, even more voters will get the point.
Thanks again to Pat Buchanan for summing up reality here.
males in the Ryan family line are prone to early death via heart attack/stroke. A genetic thing. I fear the “well-liked” Paul will be negatively affected by the stress and strain of becoming the HOR’s Chief Liar. This aside, who cares. The fundamental issues now facing the ‘Kwa will not be decided by the political class, Beltway chatterboxes, or “voting” in meaningless “elections”. Invest in lead
Regardless of who becomes the next Speaker, Congress will accomplish nothing as long as Obama is President. McConnell speaks for the Republican Congressional mainstream, and he has unilaterally disarmed. The next Speaker will be a figurehead caretaker.
McConnell thinks a Republican is all but certain to win the presidency next year, so long as the current political situation continues. Don’t rock the boat, kick the can down the road, and be ready to follow the lead of the incoming President, almost certainly a Republican.
Free trade and open borders (and a permanent state of war) have ruined the country. Notice the past tense. Those of us who voted for Ross Perot are wondering where these angry Republicans have been ALL THESE YEARS. By all means lets shut the barn door. But the horses are long gone never to return.
And yes Pat. The Speaker job has become a political suicide mission. Maybe they should just hand the gavel back to Nancy. More and more I come to agree with Hillary. What difference does it make?
Lincoln tried explaining that to the Southerners, and they’re still griping about his tariffs to this day.
Free trade and open borders are or at least can be separate and very different issues.
On the former it would help intelligent discussion to have someone (Steve Sailer is more than capable of doing it) present accurate comparisons of the effects of a high valued dollar as against making trade freer over the last 25 years.
I suspect that the overvaluation of the US dollar compared with where it would be if it wasn’t the world’s main reserve currency and regarded as backed by a solid non-inflating non confiscating polity beyond that of most other countries.
So, not really “overvaluation” but a way of making imported goods cost a lot less to Americans than they do to people earning the median incomes of most other countries.
If, as I suspect, exchange rates count for more than free trade for the loss of American manufacturing jobs, what can and should be done about it?
Agreed. And I hope that Trump also stresses the fact that this TPP trade deal hands our national sovereignty over to International Courts through ISDS tribunals. The highest court in this land will no longer be the Supreme Court. The highest court in this land will be the International ISDS tribunals.
THAT is the real threat of this TPP trade deal. Loss of national sovereignty. I hope that Mr. Trump stresses it and makes more of the public aware of just what this TPP would do to us.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kill-the-dispute-settlement-language-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership/2015/02/25/ec7705a2-bd1e-11e4-b274-e5209a3bc9a9_story.html